Wrong email or password! Try one more time.

Forgot password?

Username should only contain alpha-numeric characters.

An account with this email already exists.

Password should contain at least 6 characters.

An email with a confirmation link has been sent to you.

Did you forget your password? Don't panic. Enter your email address,
and we will email you a link where you may create a new password.

If this address exists, we will send you an email with further instructions.

Back to authentication

Which is better for SEO: content or links?

Which is better for SEO: content or links? - answered by Matt Cutts

Summary:

Usually there is a trade-off where search engines want to return both relevant and trustworthy results. The good news is that in real life great content will naturally attract great links and getting those high quality backlinks whilst having poor content would be an expensive battle. Try to provide fantastic, interesting, useful content and then the Web will reward you with measurable signals that you’re important and helpful.

 

Matt's answer:

As Google’s algorithm evolves, is it better to have exceptional links and mediocre content, or exceptional content and mediocre links?

 

Google always has to trade off the balance between authority and topicality. If somebody types in “Viagra”, which is one of the most spammed terms in the world, you want something that is about Viagra, you do not just want something that has a lot of authority, like Newsweek or Times, that is talking about right in an article and they have one mention of Viagra, where they say: “Oh, this is something like Viagra”, just to throw off a phrase.

 

Content has to be about what the user typed in

 

You do want authority, you want the sites that are trustworthy, that are reputable, but you also want topicality, you do not want something that is off topic. You want it to be about what the user typed in. So we try to find a good balance there. I would try to say: have a well-rounded site. Great content has to be the foundation of any good site, because mediocre content tends not to attract exceptional links by itself, and if you’re trying to get exceptional links on really really crapy content you are going be pushing up hill, it is going to be harder to get those links, you are going to have to do stuff that we consider bad or scuzzy for the web, like paying for them.

 

Search engines want to reflect that the web thinks you are important

 

It is much better to have great content (you get those links naturally) and then you have both. You get great content and you get great links. Then, trying to have something that’s really really not that interesting and trying to just push, push and push and bug people and send out spam emails and ask for links and all those sorts of things… You want to have a well-rounded site and one of the best ways to do that is to have fantastic, interesting, useful content, great resources, great information and then that naturally attracts the links. And then search engines want to reflect the fact that the web thinks that you are interesting or important or helpful.


by Matt Cutts - Google's Head of Search Quality Team

 

Original video: