Yourmechanic Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve yourmechanic.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 30,348 Auto Service Centers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Yourmechanic Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Yourmechanic Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Yourmechanic Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Los Angeles
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Yourmechanic Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	47,289	30,348	6	15.9%	51,392,236	22.9	27,282	32,530	1,272	32,663	8	263	4,505
California	5,924	4,161	3	31.9%	12,500,083	16.2	1,162	1,736	261	1,756	1	29	823
Texas	4,461	3,014	4	22.3%	6,214,166	18.1	1,354	1,909	92	1,914	0	32	476
Florida	3,352	2,312	4	25.8%	5,321,033	15.4	444	972	128	988	2	27	476
New Jersey	2,189	1,607	4	26.2%	2,327,670	16.7	535	591	103	597	0	28	163
North Carolina	2,452	1,771	4	21.7%	2,201,490	21.3	679	798	43	804	0	10	186
Georgia	2,364	1,639	5	21.3%	2,191,808	18.4	572	724	62	727	1	23	150
Virginia	2,540	1,829	4	20.5%	1,725,408	20.7	718	884	53	888	2	7	192
Maryland	1,911	1,425	4	27.2%	1,631,268	18.4	392	463	53	467	0	7	171
Illinois	3,354	2,384	9	11.6%	1,484,476	24.2	1,242	1,370	94	1,373	0	12	146
Washington	2,112	1,526	4	18.5%	1,350,203	21.1	451	587	50	587	0	8	153
Pennsylvania	3,933	2,771	7	10.5%	1,343,322	25.1	1,600	1,777	49	1,784	1	11	139
Arizona	1,626	1,170	5	18.1%	1,260,278	19.8	247	396	27	397	0	3	99
New York	3,940	2,705	12	6.1%	1,197,478	23.6	1,490	1,752	45	1,760	1	7	101
Massachusetts	2,380	1,667	7	14.7%	1,000,893	16.8	459	532	49	532	0	11	107
Indiana	3,794	2,846	8	14.3%	946,655	22.5	657	767	28	769	0	2	118
South Carolina	1,599	1,166	5	16.9%	838,921	17.6	347	422	20	428	0	18	87
Michigan	2,795	1,986	8	8.3%	826,349	28.2	829	971	33	977	0	2	66
Oregon	2,255	1,699	4	18.8%	767,989	22.7	353	411	14	411	0	1	85
Colorado	1,892	1,412	8	12.3%	678,535	19.3	381	513	22	513	0	1	97
Ohio	3,158	2,251	14	5.5%	641,040	25.1	972	1,184	16	1,189	0	0	65
Tennessee	1,814	1,314	13	9.4%	622,245	22.5	512	620	23	621	0	3	77
Oklahoma	1,834	1,330	11	14.9%	583,783	20.8	555	644	20	651	0	3	134
Nevada	912	691	7	17.5%	511,969	22.0	92	167	7	167	0	0	60
Utah	1,429	1,089	5	14.6%	444,111	27.6	244	282	20	282	0	4	41
Wisconsin	2,819	2,023	12	6.9%	400,538	25.7	691	763	16	764	0	1	45
Rhode Island	651	489	3	27.7%	292,982	13.9	64	77	15	77	0	1	31
Missouri	2,214	1,583	15	4.5%	273,053	23.4	884	1,014	20	1,015	0	2	38
Minnesota	2,486	1,735	14	4.2%	231,166	28.3	770	870	10	870	0	1	15
New Mexico	1,355	1,002	10	10.9%	228,311	21.4	327	361	11	365	0	0	50
Mississippi	1,482	1,104	16	5.0%	148,849	21.9	380	414	11	414	0	1	11
Louisiana	1,601	1,183	26	3.1%	145,039	23.9	430	509	12	511	0	0	13
Connecticut	1,618	1,161	17	3.5%	125,442	22.1	234	278	6	278	0	0	9
Kansas	1,831	1,346	30	3.3%	95,952	27.3	612	687	16	689	0	8	20
Delaware	832	644	15	8.8%	83,404	19.1	52	66	4	66	0	0	13
Alabama	1,912	1,401	39	1.7%	81,452	23.2	521	636	7	640	0	0	0
Kentucky	1,878	1,373	47	1.4%	61,061	25.4	698	758	5	758	0	0	0
Arkansas	1,718	1,259	62	1.5%	45,594	23.1	551	585	7	585	0	0	2
Iowa	2,144	1,500	60	1.4%	45,139	25.7	887	929	7	929	0	0	1
Idaho	1,381	1,025	45	2.2%	37,628	23.1	248	270	7	270	0	0	2
West Virginia	1,581	1,154	40	2.0%	36,268	27.1	684	704	9	707	0	0	10
Hawaii	732	568	36	2.3%	33,332	31.8	80	91	3	91	0	0	1
Maine	2,203	1,696	31	2.1%	27,501	37.8	421	425	8	426	0	0	0
New Hampshire	1,332	977	40	1.9%	26,018	27.4	238	248	6	248	0	0	1
Nebraska	1,589	1,150	72	1.0%	19,436	33.1	521	578	6	578	0	0	1
South Dakota	1,170	857	58	1.4%	12,428	26.7	355	366	4	366	0	0	0
North Dakota	1,141	862	43	1.6%	12,315	24.1	366	380	4	380	0	0	0
Montana	1,393	1,018	67	1.1%	11,735	25.4	348	361	3	362	0	0	1
Wyoming	1,138	848	52	1.9%	11,290	23.3	164	171	3	172	0	0	0
Vermont	1,139	837	46	1.6%	10,297	34.6	250	254	4	256	0	0	0
Alaska	1,100	844	55	1.3%	9,959	23.3	217	234	5	235	0	0	1

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	California	441	353	5	38.8%	953,250	7.5	62	3	62	0	0	57
San Antonio	Texas	315	240	6	44.2%	785,865	6.6	59	1	59	0	0	59
Austin	Texas	280	222	4	57.9%	629,696	12.5	44	3	44	0	14	37
Dallas	Texas	331	257	6	37.7%	525,488	7.4	48	2	48	0	0	47
Orlando	Florida	324	240	5	47.5%	473,347	6.1	32	2	32	0	0	32
Fort Worth	Texas	267	204	5	51.2%	467,078	6.1	32	1	32	0	0	30
Charlotte	North Carolina	250	195	5	51.4%	466,016	5.8	24	1	24	0	0	24
Portland	Oregon	276	227	4	48.4%	445,791	6.3	33	1	33	0	0	33
Miami	Florida	481	348	6	23.4%	439,808	11.2	55	3	56	0	0	38
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	384	284	7	25.3%	398,688	9.7	47	2	47	0	0	34
Indianapolis	Indiana	336	263	5	41.5%	394,760	8.5	37	3	37	0	0	36
Las Vegas	Nevada	319	244	7	25.3%	391,210	9.8	43	3	43	0	0	36
San Jose	California	303	235	5	35.9%	377,527	7.5	28	1	28	0	0	28
Seattle	Washington	315	248	6	38.3%	365,476	7.8	35	2	35	0	0	34
Atlanta	Georgia	357	274	5	35.5%	350,979	10.6	39	2	39	0	0	29
San Francisco	California	289	223	6	36.5%	317,308	7.5	28	1	28	0	0	27
Fresno	California	254	194	5	51.3%	308,877	6.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Tampa	Florida	316	250	7	35.2%	278,734	7.4	27	2	28	1	1	27
Washington DC	District of Columbia	339	278	5	40.2%	274,802	7.1	28	1	28	0	0	27
Houston	Texas	399	296	11	8.2%	261,110	12.3	96	1	96	0	0	16
Santa Ana	California	184	150	3	70.0%	249,955	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Diego	California	359	277	9	17.3%	232,907	9.5	36	2	36	0	1	28
Greensboro	North Carolina	172	138	4	67.4%	220,676	4.4	9	1	9	0	3	9
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	367	284	4	26.4%	219,474	15.3	27	3	27	0	2	15
Staten Island	New York	223	169	6	44.9%	213,092	6.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Tucson	Arizona	288	224	7	23.4%	211,539	9.5	32	1	32	0	0	19
Baltimore	Maryland	275	199	6	32.7%	206,606	8.1	22	2	22	0	0	21
Newark	New Jersey	179	143	3	70.0%	196,416	4.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	301	216	7	24.1%	195,394	10.7	29	2	29	0	0	21
Memphis	Tennessee	270	209	6	27.6%	191,702	9.8	26	2	26	0	0	20
Hollywood	Florida	227	172	4	40.6%	190,144	11.7	9	3	9	0	0	6
Raleigh	North Carolina	220	174	6	34.4%	187,931	7.4	15	1	15	0	0	15
Richmond	Virginia	188	147	5	47.5%	185,880	6.5	15	1	15	0	0	14
Jacksonville	Florida	260	196	8	20.3%	176,015	9.6	31	1	31	0	0	22
Plano	Texas	169	139	4	56.3%	171,877	5.4	7	1	7	0	1	7
Riverside	California	185	132	4	43.1%	159,345	6.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fremont	California	148	108	2	66.7%	155,442	4.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Denver	Colorado	357	283	10	14.3%	155,045	12.7	38	4	38	0	0	26
Long Beach	California	249	197	7	31.9%	152,576	8.1	12	1	12	0	0	12
Hialeah	Florida	208	161	5	41.0%	150,468	9.0	7	2	7	0	0	6
Oakland	California	271	207	5	36.4%	149,727	7.4	14	1	14	0	0	13
Albuquerque	New Mexico	219	171	7	21.5%	141,041	9.4	17	1	17	0	0	11
Boca Raton	Florida	165	120	3	60.8%	135,069	5.0	9	1	9	0	4	9
West Palm Beach	Florida	235	185	5	35.2%	130,384	7.8	12	1	12	0	0	9
Corona	California	182	140	4	50.6%	130,231	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Reading	Pennsylvania	223	168	3	60.1%	129,471	7.6	10	2	10	0	3	9
San Bernardino	California	195	149	4	51.4%	128,257	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Scottsdale	Arizona	227	177	4	42.7%	127,379	7.7	11	2	11	0	0	10
Garland	Texas	150	110	4	53.4%	127,037	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cleveland	Ohio	308	247	7	16.4%	123,117	11.2	29	2	29	0	0	17
Arlington	Texas	190	143	8	30.8%	122,390	8.0	12	1	12	0	0	11
Winston Salem	North Carolina	204	169	6	46.0%	121,458	6.9	9	1	9	0	0	8
Irvine	California	198	156	5	43.8%	117,341	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Summerville	South Carolina	127	94	3	84.1%	116,854	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Charleston	South Carolina	208	159	2	59.2%	116,603	5.2	10	2	10	0	1	10
Hayward	California	154	117	4	60.0%	115,220	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chandler	Arizona	165	130	6	42.7%	114,665	6.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Norfolk	Virginia	229	176	5	46.1%	113,286	6.7	14	1	14	0	0	14
Tulsa	Oklahoma	279	225	8	26.3%	110,914	8.9	28	1	28	0	0	20
Virginia Beach	Virginia	205	164	8	24.2%	109,113	8.5	12	1	12	0	0	10
Chesapeake	Virginia	170	138	5	44.6%	106,111	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Elk Grove	California	144	111	4	58.9%	105,650	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	347	266	8	15.3%	104,660	11.9	43	2	43	0	0	27
Newport News	Virginia	175	111	4	59.2%	104,650	5.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mckinney	Texas	131	101	6	54.8%	103,570	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Stockton	California	218	165	8	27.3%	102,070	8.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Columbus	Ohio	257	203	10	12.0%	101,377	11.2	30	2	30	0	0	14
Fort Myers	Florida	203	160	6	40.0%	100,683	7.0	11	2	11	0	0	11
Mesquite	Texas	140	105	2	68.7%	100,557	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Fontana	California	137	94	4	42.3%	99,391	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Yonkers	New York	176	133	5	54.6%	98,652	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Aurora	Colorado	208	154	7	21.9%	95,231	9.5	11	1	11	0	0	7
Whittier	California	214	172	3	47.5%	93,232	10.2	6	4	6	0	0	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	139	118	3	70.0%	92,729	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Irving	Texas	154	120	5	37.9%	91,091	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fullerton	California	158	130	4	64.9%	90,333	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Saint Paul	Minnesota	391	311	9	11.3%	90,222	15.1	30	3	30	0	0	10
Decatur	Georgia	186	154	3	49.5%	89,554	8.4	5	2	5	0	1	4
Hampton	Virginia	182	138	3	65.6%	89,354	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Miami Beach	Florida	155	120	2	76.2%	88,109	3.6	5	2	5	0	4	5
Tacoma	Washington	308	250	6	26.4%	87,919	20.4	20	3	20	0	0	11
Garden Grove	California	160	130	4	49.5%	87,050	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Glendale	Arizona	225	177	7	28.3%	86,263	12.9	9	2	9	0	0	7
Pomona	California	149	126	5	54.6%	86,226	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Peoria	Arizona	153	120	4	50.1%	86,223	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Moreno Valley	California	138	108	7	41.4%	85,075	14.3	4	2	4	0	0	2
Vista	California	146	116	3	70.0%	83,907	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cape Coral	Florida	179	133	6	45.9%	82,986	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	5
Baytown	Texas	138	104	4	70.0%	82,455	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Modesto	California	182	145	7	31.0%	81,967	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	6
Orange	California	144	110	4	55.7%	80,773	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Frisco	Texas	115	89	8	46.2%	79,655	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	California	165	124	3	63.3%	79,479	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palmdale	California	160	123	6	45.4%	79,378	9.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Providence	Rhode Island	222	173	6	38.0%	77,860	7.8	8	2	8	0	0	8
Naples	Florida	230	179	7	24.8%	77,789	8.8	14	1	14	0	0	11
Henderson	Nevada	186	138	7	25.6%	77,619	19.6	7	2	7	0	0	6
Ontario	California	132	103	5	43.4%	76,729	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	184	138	2	65.3%	76,367	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
South Gate	California	95	74	2	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Tempe	Arizona	141	113	6	40.0%	75,998	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	California	204	165	7	42.8%	75,696	6.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Sunnyvale	California	190	150	3	48.9%	74,674	6.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Norwalk	California	99	83	3	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Columbia	South Carolina	210	163	8	21.5%	73,632	9.6	14	1	14	0	0	9
Hemet	California	138	103	3	56.7%	73,047	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clovis	California	145	111	3	60.0%	72,832	5.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hesperia	California	116	93	4	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	California	152	121	3	63.0%	72,128	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madera	California	159	120	3	68.8%	70,807	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	127	104	5	64.0%	70,560	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roseville	California	132	106	5	50.0%	69,897	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	142	111	5	60.0%	69,816	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Grand Prairie	Texas	152	118	7	36.5%	69,608	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Durham	North Carolina	185	149	9	23.9%	69,266	8.6	8	1	8	0	0	6
Anaheim	California	197	163	9	18.6%	68,738	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	4
Jersey City	New Jersey	190	144	6	26.2%	68,639	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	6
Salt Lake City	Utah	260	210	9	14.0%	67,941	10.8	19	2	19	0	0	13
Warren	Michigan	154	120	6	50.0%	67,596	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pittsburg	California	98	72	3	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Cypress	Texas	116	89	5	39.3%	67,023	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daly City	California	144	107	4	58.4%	66,764	5.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	137	109	3	66.6%	66,755	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	173	135	4	69.8%	66,511	4.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Frederick	Maryland	131	101	6	50.0%	65,998	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vancouver	Washington	190	156	9	20.2%	65,983	9.5	11	1	11	0	0	8
Round Rock	Texas	152	127	4	38.9%	65,097	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Spring Hill	Florida	161	130	4	51.7%	64,789	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fairfield	California	121	94	4	56.5%	64,478	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Renton	Washington	199	161	5	41.0%	63,548	6.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Edison	New Jersey	141	112	4	62.8%	63,360	8.3	3	2	3	0	1	2
North Hollywood	California	154	118	5	41.3%	63,222	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Jordan	Utah	137	112	4	50.9%	62,912	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pasadena	California	180	144	4	39.6%	62,400	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Victorville	California	127	95	5	45.7%	62,335	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	139	113	2	63.6%	62,260	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Norman	Oklahoma	146	118	6	49.8%	61,827	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kissimmee	Florida	235	187	6	21.3%	61,604	10.1	7	3	8	0	0	5
Lewisville	Texas	137	101	6	51.6%	61,187	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rialto	California	128	96	4	56.3%	60,039	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Menifee	California	162	133	5	54.3%	59,968	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	California	134	109	4	42.8%	59,395	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Denton	Texas	154	117	8	37.3%	58,917	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Sarasota	Florida	210	167	9	23.4%	58,564	19.0	13	2	13	0	0	8
Hawthorne	California	99	78	4	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Gilbert	Arizona	162	126	9	24.3%	58,024	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	4
Arvada	Colorado	151	123	7	43.4%	57,952	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Livermore	California	122	95	4	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverview	Florida	150	115	3	51.7%	57,557	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Van Nuys	California	146	109	5	32.3%	57,351	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Richardson	Texas	136	105	5	50.0%	57,299	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Alexandria	Virginia	270	211	10	16.0%	56,854	13.4	14	2	14	0	0	11
High Point	North Carolina	153	128	6	46.4%	56,748	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vacaville	California	127	100	4	53.5%	56,371	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
La Puente	California	148	116	4	47.4%	55,903	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Cary	North Carolina	136	109	6	36.0%	55,870	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Wilmington	Delaware	239	183	7	24.9%	54,752	9.0	10	3	10	0	0	9
Inglewood	California	191	148	3	40.9%	54,726	6.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
West Covina	California	143	113	5	50.0%	54,704	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ashburn	Virginia	115	91	6	48.6%	54,545	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	California	150	120	4	47.9%	54,454	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Braunfels	Texas	126	103	6	52.8%	54,258	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	182	137	3	51.8%	53,359	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Pearland	Texas	148	110	6	38.7%	53,288	12.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	99	69	5	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Nashville	Tennessee	241	187	13	11.5%	52,662	10.7	22	2	22	0	0	13
Sugar Land	Texas	159	121	6	30.9%	52,120	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Dayton	Ohio	351	280	11	10.8%	51,850	15.3	27	2	27	0	0	12
Deltona	Florida	121	98	5	54.9%	51,533	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Henrico	Virginia	198	152	6	26.7%	51,388	10.1	7	3	7	1	1	5
Saint Petersburg	Florida	267	206	8	14.3%	51,125	11.4	16	1	16	0	0	7
Chicago	Illinois	306	241	29	1.9%	50,277	69.8	51	3	51	0	0	4
Parker	Colorado	119	96	5	50.0%	50,141	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	113	86	5	50.0%	49,565	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gaithersburg	Maryland	153	118	7	34.2%	49,398	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Winter Haven	Florida	134	99	6	46.1%	49,304	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elizabeth	New Jersey	137	106	4	47.3%	47,545	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hyattsville	Maryland	175	139	6	30.0%	47,207	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Detroit	Michigan	265	196	12	7.3%	46,744	13.0	25	1	25	0	0	8
Largo	Florida	170	136	5	42.8%	46,104	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bradenton	Florida	222	176	9	18.1%	45,875	13.3	10	2	11	0	0	7
New Port Richey	Florida	150	107	6	37.3%	45,112	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Antioch	California	126	98	7	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	133	107	8	33.9%	44,179	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bellevue	Washington	157	123	7	29.5%	43,208	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Auburn	Washington	145	122	7	37.8%	42,714	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
El Cajon	California	163	133	10	24.4%	42,001	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Cambridge	Massachusetts	158	124	5	35.8%	41,412	9.4	5	2	5	0	0	3
Bell Gardens	California	98	75	6	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Laurel	Maryland	174	138	6	35.8%	40,249	9.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Marietta	Georgia	169	136	10	12.5%	40,218	10.7	7	1	7	0	0	5
Surprise	Arizona	139	108	7	29.6%	40,100	24.0	4	3	4	0	0	2
New Orleans	Louisiana	260	199	11	9.4%	40,089	21.3	19	2	19	0	0	7
Hillsboro	Oregon	121	100	8	39.0%	40,082	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Federal Way	Washington	122	102	6	40.0%	40,057	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Concord	California	154	122	6	30.5%	39,703	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	California	139	108	6	35.2%	39,170	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oceanside	California	166	134	8	19.6%	39,159	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	179	142	8	22.5%	39,106	9.5	6	2	8	0	0	4
Buford	Georgia	115	88	7	39.4%	39,014	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	120	94	5	38.2%	38,807	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	123	87	5	39.8%	37,964	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	139	106	5	37.6%	37,659	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Sacramento	California	291	230	14	4.6%	37,103	16.1	28	2	28	0	0	0
Chino	California	113	84	6	38.7%	36,583	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	138	107	7	36.9%	35,914	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Bothell	Washington	173	143	6	27.7%	35,589	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Simi Valley	California	118	89	8	27.6%	35,532	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
New York City	New York	377	292	26	2.2%	35,490	23.6	45	1	45	0	0	0
Keller	Texas	135	105	7	30.3%	35,251	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Rancho Cucamonga	California	150	117	8	19.9%	35,119	10.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Palo Alto	California	159	126	7	36.2%	35,038	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Chula Vista	California	161	122	10	13.3%	34,642	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Lakeland	Florida	187	141	12	13.2%	34,089	13.2	9	3	10	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	California	136	113	10	17.0%	33,912	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Boston	Massachusetts	256	190	6	22.3%	33,854	9.0	14	1	14	0	0	10
Lawrenceville	Georgia	144	117	9	13.2%	33,768	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Edmond	Oklahoma	180	141	14	19.7%	33,760	10.8	5	2	5	0	0	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	156	113	9	34.4%	32,570	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mesa	Arizona	196	145	19	6.1%	32,500	14.5	13	1	13	0	0	0
Cumming	Georgia	132	106	8	20.0%	32,404	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elgin	Illinois	139	103	8	25.8%	31,526	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Allen	Texas	116	89	7	28.3%	31,465	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	157	128	8	24.4%	31,361	13.3	3	2	3	0	0	1
Vallejo	California	153	124	7	25.1%	31,206	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Dearborn	Michigan	148	118	5	32.7%	31,055	8.8	4	2	6	0	0	3
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	143	111	8	24.5%	30,668	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Paterson	New Jersey	201	157	7	20.9%	30,490	9.3	9	1	9	0	0	5
Pompano Beach	Florida	267	187	18	8.2%	30,333	18.9	10	2	10	0	0	3
Carrollton	Texas	143	113	8	22.1%	29,860	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Covington	Georgia	134	107	8	31.7%	29,386	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	166	134	8	30.7%	29,207	9.8	5	2	5	0	0	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	168	136	8	27.4%	28,856	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Downey	California	135	108	7	25.1%	28,367	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	156	122	10	28.7%	28,295	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Silver Spring	Maryland	233	194	19	9.3%	28,257	15.1	7	3	7	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	155	121	7	26.6%	28,188	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Falls Church	Virginia	214	174	8	23.4%	28,117	9.4	5	4	5	0	0	3
El Monte	California	132	100	6	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	144	111	9	21.0%	27,106	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Bowie	Maryland	188	148	8	26.3%	26,853	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Clearwater	Florida	209	166	10	14.4%	26,347	10.3	9	2	9	0	0	4
Franklin	Tennessee	133	106	7	24.7%	26,288	18.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Spring	Texas	232	179	17	6.7%	25,522	13.5	8	2	8	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	California	124	95	8	22.2%	25,273	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Conroe	Texas	209	165	12	15.5%	24,894	10.7	7	2	7	0	0	4
San Mateo	California	180	135	12	17.4%	24,755	10.0	4	2	4	0	0	2
Visalia	California	146	110	10	16.2%	24,573	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	146	115	7	25.7%	24,026	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	339	258	24	3.5%	23,995	28.2	39	2	39	0	0	5
Beaverton	Oregon	143	117	13	11.7%	23,562	26.0	4	3	4	0	0	2
North Las Vegas	Nevada	166	129	11	9.8%	22,961	28.3	7	4	7	0	0	2
Brooklyn	New York	285	202	35	0.9%	22,785	35.0	37	2	37	0	0	0
Lynnwood	Washington	165	130	8	21.0%	22,714	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Quincy	Massachusetts	135	99	9	24.1%	22,698	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Katy	Texas	156	117	14	6.5%	22,407	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	178	131	12	14.6%	22,241	11.3	4	2	4	0	0	2
Tracy	California	165	131	8	18.0%	21,121	12.0	4	2	4	1	1	1
Melbourne	Florida	149	116	11	13.5%	20,954	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Lancaster	California	137	106	12	11.3%	20,892	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bronx	New York	268	204	29	1.4%	19,666	21.0	25	2	25	0	0	0
Napa	California	126	98	9	20.0%	19,333	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Independence	Missouri	178	142	10	15.5%	19,287	10.0	8	1	8	0	0	6
Lake Worth	Florida	210	168	13	9.3%	19,115	17.6	5	3	5	0	0	2
Fort Mill	South Carolina	148	109	9	20.0%	19,034	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Jupiter	Florida	147	111	9	18.4%	18,132	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Puyallup	Washington	174	144	12	12.5%	17,790	13.2	5	2	5	0	0	2
Saint Louis	Missouri	365	302	45	1.9%	17,029	22.7	45	2	45	0	0	0
Homestead	Florida	188	146	13	8.7%	16,255	11.3	7	3	8	0	0	2
Santa Monica	California	167	125	9	17.1%	16,144	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Phoenix	Arizona	268	204	39	1.1%	15,499	28.6	42	1	42	0	0	0
Acworth	Georgia	124	100	10	15.4%	15,356	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Kansas City	Missouri	271	213	20	2.7%	15,340	18.0	49	1	49	0	0	0
Kent	Washington	154	132	9	9.5%	15,193	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Salinas	California	159	120	12	7.8%	14,742	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Trenton	New Jersey	233	180	17	6.8%	14,210	13.0	11	2	11	0	0	1
Broomfield	Colorado	151	123	11	13.4%	14,074	10.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
West Chester	Pennsylvania	133	103	12	12.7%	13,761	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Rockville	Maryland	196	153	11	9.3%	13,440	11.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Apopka	Florida	120	93	10	13.7%	13,412	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Murrieta	California	126	99	9	10.0%	13,224	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Naperville	Illinois	143	116	14	7.8%	12,968	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Woodbridge	Virginia	162	125	13	5.9%	12,583	14.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Tallahassee	Florida	183	134	20	4.3%	12,338	31.1	10	2	10	0	0	2
Delray Beach	Florida	169	130	10	10.4%	12,331	11.6	5	2	5	0	0	2
Minneapolis	Minnesota	466	366	71	1.1%	11,823	34.9	50	2	50	0	0	0
Fayetteville	North Carolina	188	147	15	4.8%	11,731	16.0	8	1	8	0	0	0
Littleton	Colorado	265	210	25	3.5%	11,517	19.0	10	3	10	0	0	0
Olathe	Kansas	128	100	13	7.8%	11,243	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Perris	California	131	107	9	9.5%	11,175	10.5	2	2	4	0	0	1
Fredericksburg	Virginia	164	128	15	6.1%	10,649	31.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Metairie	Louisiana	173	137	17	7.0%	9,932	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Birmingham	Alabama	292	229	33	2.0%	9,899	21.9	30	2	30	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	101	76	8	10.0%	9,649	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Waukesha	Wisconsin	127	102	10	10.0%	9,580	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allentown	Pennsylvania	164	125	15	5.5%	9,426	15.4	7	2	7	0	0	3
Midlothian	Virginia	144	115	11	9.0%	8,723	39.7	2	1	2	0	0	2
Athens	Georgia	168	135	13	6.9%	8,653	14.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Merced	California	138	104	11	8.4%	8,609	11.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	127	100	11	8.0%	8,592	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
El Paso	Texas	320	232	31	1.1%	8,495	23.3	24	2	24	0	0	0
Herndon	Virginia	129	97	11	9.1%	8,483	11.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Livonia	Michigan	122	95	10	8.8%	8,329	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	124	97	12	8.9%	8,299	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Worcester	Massachusetts	200	150	17	4.4%	8,254	19.4	9	2	9	0	0	0
Brownsville	Texas	134	101	14	4.1%	8,185	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hamilton	Ohio	142	104	13	5.9%	8,155	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	1
Mission Viejo	California	115	93	11	7.9%	7,805	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Humble	Texas	131	96	16	4.6%	7,667	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fairfax	Virginia	189	148	19	4.5%	7,438	18.8	4	3	4	0	0	0
Palm Bay	Florida	146	113	14	6.7%	7,411	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Boise	Idaho	176	136	22	2.9%	7,381	17.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Temecula	California	129	103	14	5.6%	7,274	14.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	129	102	13	7.4%	7,165	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Buffalo	New York	329	271	49	1.3%	7,057	37.8	28	1	28	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	246	191	16	5.2%	6,565	28.2	9	2	9	0	0	1
Woodstock	Georgia	107	79	12	6.4%	6,489	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bakersfield	California	229	168	27	1.1%	6,287	24.6	11	3	12	0	0	1
Alpharetta	Georgia	164	132	23	3.3%	6,202	33.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Louisville	Kentucky	280	232	39	0.8%	6,182	37.8	32	1	32	0	0	0
Boulder	Colorado	154	120	14	4.6%	6,046	22.0	6	2	6	0	0	0
Mobile	Alabama	277	220	20	2.2%	6,045	19.1	18	1	18	0	0	0
Lees Summit	Missouri	185	146	11	5.8%	5,871	20.3	6	2	6	0	0	0
Englewood	Colorado	202	163	23	5.2%	5,772	19.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Cincinnati	Ohio	277	207	59	0.7%	5,748	47.7	45	1	45	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	211	161	15	5.8%	5,746	18.8	8	1	8	0	0	0
Colorado Springs	Colorado	297	232	38	1.0%	5,626	28.1	30	2	30	0	0	0
Everett	Washington	157	126	17	3.2%	5,385	26.4	5	3	5	0	0	1
Roswell	Georgia	119	92	13	5.1%	5,087	23.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
West Valley City	Utah	134	107	17	3.8%	5,064	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
New Haven	Connecticut	159	122	15	3.6%	4,682	16.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	143	120	17	2.4%	4,546	17.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	116	89	16	4.6%	4,424	15.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Saint Augustine	Florida	194	151	21	3.2%	4,248	22.4	5	2	5	0	0	0
Olympia	Washington	190	152	25	2.3%	4,231	19.8	6	3	6	0	0	0
Santa Rosa	California	161	117	23	2.0%	4,228	31.3	6	2	6	0	0	0
Rochester	New York	285	225	37	0.9%	4,060	48.0	23	1	23	0	0	0
Edinburg	Texas	147	115	15	2.5%	3,933	18.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	265	213	31	1.0%	3,855	37.4	18	1	18	0	0	0
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	172	140	18	1.8%	3,745	18.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Omaha	Nebraska	243	186	51	0.7%	3,679	51.8	31	1	31	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	176	132	20	2.4%	3,448	18.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	125	102	14	3.3%	3,410	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Erie	Pennsylvania	230	179	17	1.7%	3,150	18.5	13	1	13	0	0	0
Knoxville	Tennessee	215	161	42	0.8%	3,103	39.0	17	1	17	0	0	0
Mcallen	Texas	137	110	17	2.2%	3,057	21.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Mission	Texas	150	116	17	1.7%	3,044	18.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Wichita	Kansas	270	217	40	0.7%	3,036	45.9	25	1	25	0	0	0
Honolulu	Hawaii	225	172	47	0.7%	3,000	48.4	11	1	11	0	0	0
Corpus Christi	Texas	238	179	27	0.9%	2,988	27.3	18	1	18	0	0	0
Youngstown	Ohio	241	192	22	1.8%	2,901	26.7	12	1	12	0	0	0
Chattanooga	Tennessee	244	191	27	1.4%	2,896	31.2	15	1	15	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	98	75	15	3.0%	2,819	17.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Lexington	Kentucky	227	172	28	0.9%	2,775	34.0	15	2	15	0	0	0
Laredo	Texas	164	124	23	0.9%	2,568	23.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Toledo	Ohio	226	171	42	0.8%	2,471	37.6	15	1	15	0	0	0
Madison	Wisconsin	208	162	33	0.8%	2,444	37.0	13	1	13	0	0	0
Albany	New York	237	189	20	1.6%	2,408	20.2	11	1	11	0	0	0
Spokane	Washington	219	165	44	0.7%	2,407	52.6	14	1	14	0	0	0
Jamaica	New York	185	143	19	1.0%	2,397	20.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Ocala	Florida	201	158	26	1.0%	2,338	29.2	11	2	11	0	0	0
Fort Wayne	Indiana	190	136	44	0.7%	2,319	45.6	16	1	16	0	0	0
Pensacola	Florida	231	163	31	0.9%	2,296	34.1	13	1	13	0	0	0
Grand Rapids	Michigan	184	146	51	0.6%	2,253	57.4	12	1	12	0	0	0
Lubbock	Texas	226	158	36	0.8%	2,251	37.9	14	1	14	0	0	0
Akron	Ohio	258	204	43	0.8%	2,208	36.8	17	1	17	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	136	112	18	2.2%	2,192	19.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Flushing	New York	159	122	19	1.0%	2,130	20.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Syracuse	New York	219	162	28	0.9%	2,107	25.9	15	2	16	0	0	0
Lincoln	Nebraska	227	163	48	0.7%	2,085	48.8	22	1	22	0	0	0
Shreveport	Louisiana	232	172	24	0.9%	2,079	25.7	12	1	12	0	0	0
Reno	Nevada	191	151	48	0.7%	2,065	50.2	12	1	12	0	0	0
Savannah	Georgia	204	143	39	0.8%	2,033	35.3	10	1	10	0	0	0
Amarillo	Texas	219	166	30	0.9%	1,995	32.0	14	1	14	0	0	0
Springfield	Missouri	173	127	34	0.8%	1,917	35.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	165	131	18	1.5%	1,905	18.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Oxnard	California	144	109	30	0.9%	1,899	32.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Salem	Oregon	165	123	48	0.7%	1,874	49.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	210	154	38	0.8%	1,864	41.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	208	157	22	1.1%	1,832	22.9	9	2	9	0	0	0
Little Rock	Arkansas	203	160	35	0.8%	1,826	35.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Ogden	Utah	144	110	29	0.9%	1,824	28.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Ventura	California	152	113	19	1.5%	1,791	21.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Des Moines	Iowa	178	138	41	0.8%	1,749	43.9	10	1	10	0	0	0
Augusta	Georgia	182	141	30	0.9%	1,743	34.3	8	1	8	0	0	0
Pueblo	Colorado	194	153	26	1.1%	1,740	30.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Evansville	Indiana	177	138	24	0.9%	1,733	25.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Huntsville	Alabama	179	135	32	0.9%	1,704	31.6	11	1	11	0	0	0
Montgomery	Alabama	229	167	31	0.8%	1,691	39.2	13	1	13	0	0	0
Overland Park	Kansas	191	155	27	0.9%	1,664	28.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Gainesville	Florida	205	152	39	0.8%	1,662	42.8	10	2	10	0	0	0
Greenville	South Carolina	177	134	42	0.8%	1,653	43.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Jackson	Mississippi	202	152	23	0.9%	1,613	24.3	11	1	11	0	0	0
Clarksville	Tennessee	138	106	28	0.9%	1,601	27.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Green Bay	Wisconsin	184	147	31	0.8%	1,543	38.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	156	121	19	1.1%	1,532	23.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Schenectady	New York	193	150	23	0.9%	1,523	25.3	8	1	8	0	0	0
Sandy	Utah	145	118	20	1.4%	1,522	23.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Abilene	Texas	173	135	21	1.2%	1,522	21.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Kalamazoo	Michigan	165	133	26	0.9%	1,503	27.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	172	131	33	0.8%	1,500	37.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Eugene	Oregon	156	122	41	0.7%	1,489	46.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
South Bend	Indiana	194	146	20	1.0%	1,489	21.1	10	1	10	0	0	0
Midland	Texas	165	128	22	0.9%	1,488	26.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	128	23	0.9%	1,479	27.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Las Cruces	New Mexico	198	151	20	1.0%	1,477	20.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Topeka	Kansas	249	185	28	0.9%	1,465	30.6	18	1	18	0	0	0
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	122	28	0.9%	1,461	31.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Roanoke	Virginia	209	153	32	0.8%	1,432	33.3	10	1	10	0	0	0
Bridgeport	Connecticut	187	145	20	1.0%	1,430	22.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Macon	Georgia	186	144	27	0.9%	1,428	32.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Santa Maria	California	156	123	22	1.0%	1,410	20.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Escondido	California	151	122	35	0.8%	1,394	40.5	4	2	5	0	0	0
Killeen	Texas	148	114	24	0.9%	1,392	25.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
York	Pennsylvania	175	136	39	0.8%	1,389	35.9	7	2	7	0	0	0
Fort Collins	Colorado	146	117	46	0.7%	1,381	48.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Canton	Ohio	212	164	23	0.9%	1,379	25.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	140	113	20	1.1%	1,366	27.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	163	128	20	1.2%	1,349	22.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Tyler	Texas	180	144	30	0.9%	1,349	32.4	9	1	9	0	0	0
Lithonia	Georgia	127	103	24	1.4%	1,347	19.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Rockford	Illinois	174	137	42	0.7%	1,305	42.2	8	1	8	0	0	0
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	172	136	27	0.9%	1,298	30.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Beaumont	Texas	186	139	28	0.9%	1,282	29.8	8	1	8	0	0	0
Lake Charles	Louisiana	169	125	21	1.0%	1,275	21.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lansing	Michigan	155	119	37	0.8%	1,266	42.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Billings	Montana	143	108	24	0.9%	1,259	26.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	153	112	31	0.8%	1,250	38.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Santa Fe	New Mexico	158	117	21	1.0%	1,247	22.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Yakima	Washington	141	106	23	0.9%	1,221	24.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Racine	Wisconsin	181	143	27	1.0%	1,210	23.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Saginaw	Michigan	163	128	24	0.9%	1,209	25.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Odessa	Texas	182	137	38	0.8%	1,206	35.7	5	1	5	0	0	0
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	167	133	31	0.9%	1,199	32.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Flint	Michigan	176	135	37	0.8%	1,193	41.4	6	1	6	0	0	0
Stamford	Connecticut	159	126	24	0.9%	1,191	26.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	155	121	30	0.9%	1,172	30.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	203	153	42	0.7%	1,167	44.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	155	121	24	0.9%	1,134	27.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	148	107	26	0.9%	1,130	26.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	134	101	26	0.9%	1,108	29.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Manchester	New Hampshire	162	124	23	1.0%	1,107	23.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	174	130	35	0.8%	1,098	37.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Appleton	Wisconsin	147	115	27	0.9%	1,095	29.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	122	97	29	0.9%	1,083	31.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Panama City	Florida	159	118	28	0.9%	1,081	32.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Greeley	Colorado	121	92	26	0.9%	1,061	26.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	139	112	27	0.9%	1,061	28.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	194	154	27	0.9%	1,059	28.8	11	1	11	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	157	116	29	0.8%	1,045	34.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	167	129	25	0.9%	1,040	28.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Nampa	Idaho	132	106	26	0.9%	1,037	29.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Saint Charles	Missouri	138	113	35	0.7%	1,037	44.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	101	78	20	1.0%	1,035	22.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	171	132	25	0.9%	1,023	24.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	189	142	22	1.0%	1,006	23.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	148	115	28	0.9%	1,004	30.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
San Angelo	Texas	153	122	26	0.9%	1,004	29.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Burbank	California	173	136	30	0.9%	994	26.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Chico	California	149	114	28	0.9%	993	30.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	143	109	31	0.8%	976	39.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	148	117	27	0.9%	961	31.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	191	145	26	0.9%	955	28.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	134	99	23	1.0%	952	23.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	163	112	21	1.0%	949	22.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lynchburg	Virginia	170	120	28	0.9%	948	26.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	156	115	23	0.9%	946	24.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Spartanburg	South Carolina	161	127	35	0.8%	935	35.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	120	98	27	0.9%	931	26.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	172	130	34	0.8%	925	35.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	131	107	42	0.7%	921	46.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	135	105	23	1.0%	915	22.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	161	128	22	1.0%	910	25.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	199	155	27	0.9%	909	23.1	8	1	8	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	95	29	0.8%	907	33.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Indio	California	128	97	21	0.9%	902	24.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	138	102	23	0.9%	891	25.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Redding	California	170	128	37	0.8%	888	33.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	120	97	25	0.9%	886	25.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	135	104	21	0.9%	881	24.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	178	137	25	0.9%	881	27.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	153	122	31	0.9%	868	34.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Kennewick	Washington	130	105	28	0.9%	867	31.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Waukegan	Illinois	120	96	28	0.9%	865	30.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	190	138	25	0.9%	864	31.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	California	144	113	34	0.8%	859	36.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Springdale	Arkansas	112	83	26	0.9%	848	31.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Florissant	Missouri	163	127	38	0.8%	845	47.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Holland	Michigan	110	88	25	0.9%	841	29.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Muncie	Indiana	155	126	29	0.9%	840	39.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sparks	Nevada	159	127	45	0.7%	828	49.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	149	117	28	0.9%	828	32.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	147	111	28	0.9%	825	36.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Coral Springs	Florida	112	85	33	0.8%	817	35.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	132	100	33	0.8%	813	34.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	137	112	47	0.6%	807	57.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	162	122	33	0.8%	790	41.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	120	95	38	0.8%	736	40.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	139	106	40	0.7%	717	43.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	74	54	0.6%	605	59.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	441	353	5	38.8%	953,250	7.5	62	3	62	0	0	57
San Jose	303	235	5	35.9%	377,527	7.5	28	1	28	0	0	28
San Francisco	289	223	6	36.5%	317,308	7.5	28	1	28	0	0	27
Fresno	254	194	5	51.3%	308,877	6.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Santa Ana	184	150	3	70.0%	249,955	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Diego	359	277	9	17.3%	232,907	9.5	36	2	36	0	1	28
Riverside	185	132	4	43.1%	159,345	6.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fremont	148	108	2	66.7%	155,442	4.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Long Beach	249	197	7	31.9%	152,576	8.1	12	1	12	0	0	12
Oakland	271	207	5	36.4%	149,727	7.4	14	1	14	0	0	13
Corona	182	140	4	50.6%	130,231	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
San Bernardino	195	149	4	51.4%	128,257	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Irvine	198	156	5	43.8%	117,341	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Hayward	154	117	4	60.0%	115,220	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elk Grove	144	111	4	58.9%	105,650	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Stockton	218	165	8	27.3%	102,070	8.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Fontana	137	94	4	42.3%	99,391	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Whittier	214	172	3	47.5%	93,232	10.2	6	4	6	0	0	4
Fullerton	158	130	4	64.9%	90,333	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	160	130	4	49.5%	87,050	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pomona	149	126	5	54.6%	86,226	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Moreno Valley	138	108	7	41.4%	85,075	14.3	4	2	4	0	0	2
Vista	146	116	3	70.0%	83,907	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Modesto	182	145	7	31.0%	81,967	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	6
Orange	144	110	4	55.7%	80,773	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Clara	165	124	3	63.3%	79,479	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palmdale	160	123	6	45.4%	79,378	9.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Ontario	132	103	5	43.4%	76,729	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	95	74	2	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Torrance	204	165	7	42.8%	75,696	6.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Sunnyvale	190	150	3	48.9%	74,674	6.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Norwalk	99	83	3	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hemet	138	103	3	56.7%	73,047	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clovis	145	111	3	60.0%	72,832	5.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hesperia	116	93	4	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	152	121	3	63.0%	72,128	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madera	159	120	3	68.8%	70,807	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Roseville	132	106	5	50.0%	69,897	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anaheim	197	163	9	18.6%	68,738	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	4
Pittsburg	98	72	3	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Daly City	144	107	4	58.4%	66,764	5.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Fairfield	121	94	4	56.5%	64,478	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
North Hollywood	154	118	5	41.3%	63,222	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pasadena	180	144	4	39.6%	62,400	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Victorville	127	95	5	45.7%	62,335	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rialto	128	96	4	56.3%	60,039	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Menifee	162	133	5	54.3%	59,968	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	134	109	4	42.8%	59,395	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Hawthorne	99	78	4	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livermore	122	95	4	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Van Nuys	146	109	5	32.3%	57,351	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Vacaville	127	100	4	53.5%	56,371	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
La Puente	148	116	4	47.4%	55,903	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Inglewood	191	148	3	40.9%	54,726	6.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
West Covina	143	113	5	50.0%	54,704	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Carlsbad	150	120	4	47.9%	54,454	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pacoima	99	69	5	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Antioch	126	98	7	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Cajon	163	133	10	24.4%	42,001	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Bell Gardens	98	75	6	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Concord	154	122	6	30.5%	39,703	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	139	108	6	35.2%	39,170	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oceanside	166	134	8	19.6%	39,159	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Sacramento	291	230	14	4.6%	37,103	16.1	28	2	28	0	0	0
Chino	113	84	6	38.7%	36,583	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Simi Valley	118	89	8	27.6%	35,532	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rancho Cucamonga	150	117	8	19.9%	35,119	10.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Palo Alto	159	126	7	36.2%	35,038	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Chula Vista	161	122	10	13.3%	34,642	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Huntington Beach	136	113	10	17.0%	33,912	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Vallejo	153	124	7	25.1%	31,206	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	135	108	7	25.1%	28,367	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
El Monte	132	100	6	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	124	95	8	22.2%	25,273	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
San Mateo	180	135	12	17.4%	24,755	10.0	4	2	4	0	0	2
Visalia	146	110	10	16.2%	24,573	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Tracy	165	131	8	18.0%	21,121	12.0	4	2	4	1	1	1
Lancaster	137	106	12	11.3%	20,892	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Napa	126	98	9	20.0%	19,333	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	167	125	9	17.1%	16,144	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Salinas	159	120	12	7.8%	14,742	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Murrieta	126	99	9	10.0%	13,224	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Perris	131	107	9	9.5%	11,175	10.5	2	2	4	0	0	1
Sylmar	101	76	8	10.0%	9,649	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Merced	138	104	11	8.4%	8,609	11.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	115	93	11	7.9%	7,805	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Temecula	129	103	14	5.6%	7,274	14.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Berkeley	246	191	16	5.2%	6,565	28.2	9	2	9	0	0	1
Bakersfield	229	168	27	1.1%	6,287	24.6	11	3	12	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	161	117	23	2.0%	4,228	31.3	6	2	6	0	0	0
Oxnard	144	109	30	0.9%	1,899	32.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Ventura	152	113	19	1.5%	1,791	21.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Maria	156	123	22	1.0%	1,410	20.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Escondido	151	122	35	0.8%	1,394	40.5	4	2	5	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	174	130	35	0.8%	1,098	37.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Burbank	173	136	30	0.9%	994	26.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Chico	149	114	28	0.9%	993	30.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
San Marcos	120	98	27	0.9%	931	26.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Indio	128	97	21	0.9%	902	24.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Redding	170	128	37	0.8%	888	33.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	144	113	34	0.8%	859	36.5	4	1	4	0	0	0

Los Angeles

ZIP	yourmechanic.com	yelp.com	aaa.com	hectorsautorepairla.com	expertise.com	carotechautomotive.com
90011	7	1	3	4	5	8
90003	6	1	3	4	5	8
90023	7	1	3	4	5	8
90014	6	1	3	4	5	8
90012	9	4	6	7	8	11
90010	6	1	3	4	5	8
90063	6	1	3	4	5	8
90061	7	1	3	4	6	8
90065	9	4	6	7	8	11
90034	6	1	3	4	5	8
90032	6	1	3	4	5	8
90043	7	1	3	4	6	8
90041	6	1	3	4	5	7
90001	7	1	3	4	5	6
90021	6	1	3	4	5	8
90035	9	4	6	7	8	2
90045	6	1	3	4	5	8
90036	6	1	3	4	5	9
90005	6	1	3	4	5	9
90066	6	1	3	4	5	8
90026	6	1	3	4	5	8
90067	6	1	3	4	5	8
90057	9	4	6	7	8	11
90013	6	1	3	4	5	8
90044	9	4	6	7	8	11
90017	6	1	3	4	5	9
90040	12	1	5
90004	6	1	3	4	5	8
90031	6	1	3	4	5	7
90022	7	1	3	4	5	6
90062	6	1	3	4	5	8
90029	16	1	3	5		6
90028	20	4	7	9		11
90018	6	1	3	4	5	8
90038	17	1	4	6		8
90049	6	1	3	4	5	8
90048	9	4	6	7	8	13
90008	7	1	3	4	5	8
90089	6	1	3	4	5	7
90059	9	4	6	7	10	11
90019	6	1	3	4	5	8
90039	6	1	3	4	5	8
90027	6	1	3	4	5	9
90058	9	1	3	4		33
90007	6	1	3	4	5	7
90047	9	4	6	7	8	11
90077	9	4	6	7	8	12
90025	12	1	3	6	5	18
90015	6	1	3	4	5	8
90046	9	4	6	7	8	14
90056	6	1	3	4	5	7
90016	6	1	3	4	5	8
90037	6	1	3	4	5	7
90064	7	1	3	6	5	15
90068	9	4	6	7	8	11
90006	6	1	3	4	5	8
90020	6	1	3	4	5	8
90024	6	1	3	4	5	9
90033	6	1	3	4	5	8
90073	6	1	3	4	5	11
90002	6	1	3	4	5	8
90042	10	4	6	7	8	11

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Yourmechanic

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 30,348 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Yourmechanic Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (auto repair near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Yourmechanic Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Yourmechanic Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Yourmechanic Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly