Varsitytutors Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve varsitytutors.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 2,537 Tutoring Services In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Varsitytutors Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Varsitytutors Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Varsitytutors Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Varsitytutors Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	39,130	2,537	4	47.9%	154,809,260	7.5	27,379	32,654	1,989	47,792	242	4,421	38,458
California	4,920	591	4	50.1%	19,597,770	7.3	1,166	1,740	259	2,108	4	408	1,584
Texas	3,887	359	3	60.5%	16,857,131	6.0	1,360	1,917	173	2,551	10	544	2,297
New York	3,773	509	3	51.4%	10,083,555	7.6	1,491	1,756	116	2,757	44	192	2,211
Florida	2,642	351	4	48.3%	9,952,560	7.2	446	975	134	1,230	14	179	945
Illinois	3,300	293	4	47.2%	6,048,480	7.9	1,247	1,382	132	1,968	1	62	1,590
Ohio	2,899	223	3	46.7%	5,433,963	7.6	976	1,188	76	1,749	17	189	1,393
Pennsylvania	3,335	360	5	40.2%	5,144,010	8.3	1,604	1,781	71	2,713	10	144	2,123
Georgia	2,047	228	4	48.4%	4,979,838	7.5	574	726	80	919	21	110	722
Arizona	1,530	167	2	69.5%	4,826,372	5.4	247	396	55	536	5	158	495
Virginia	2,088	250	4	52.5%	4,413,667	6.4	723	891	107	1,369	6	125	1,236
Washington	2,016	214	3	60.4%	4,396,261	6.0	451	587	91	892	0	129	828
Michigan	2,431	211	6	36.4%	3,619,849	8.3	833	976	56	1,577	6	63	1,213
Indiana	3,450	374	3	52.6%	3,492,613	6.6	659	770	60	1,152	1	128	1,023
Colorado	1,910	207	2	62.8%	3,474,584	6.5	381	514	49	722	11	120	629
North Carolina	2,364	264	4	34.2%	3,471,528	9.1	683	802	71	1,012	0	26	672
Missouri	2,065	171	3	55.9%	3,405,036	7.0	887	1,017	67	1,505	49	150	1,314
Maryland	1,596	240	3	55.6%	3,338,603	5.9	392	463	54	650	4	91	591
New Jersey	2,072	383	6	37.1%	3,297,104	7.8	537	593	109	908	0	38	707
Tennessee	1,875	190	3	48.2%	3,203,724	7.4	514	622	35	857	0	93	693
Wisconsin	2,084	193	3	52.0%	3,005,115	6.8	694	769	47	1,160	0	92	1,034
Massachusetts	2,203	253	5	41.4%	2,824,895	7.9	461	534	84	741	7	64	558
Minnesota	1,954	180	3	48.9%	2,705,273	7.8	777	878	74	1,400	8	101	1,111
Oklahoma	1,470	161	3	56.6%	2,216,403	6.9	557	646	37	985	4	175	787
Oregon	2,090	228	3	49.6%	2,023,441	7.5	355	414	44	560	0	70	434
Nevada	789	140	2	68.3%	1,995,164	6.0	92	168	21	202	0	70	166
Alabama	1,835	175	5	39.2%	1,907,522	7.9	522	637	21	942	1	100	726
Utah	1,021	141	3	56.3%	1,714,230	5.7	246	284	34	409	3	77	373
Connecticut	1,481	205	3	47.8%	1,712,404	6.6	234	279	58	412	0	48	357
Kentucky	1,758	191	6	36.9%	1,638,985	8.1	698	758	29	1,325	0	77	1,052
Kansas	1,715	179	3	55.4%	1,610,563	7.0	616	692	50	1,100	4	155	938
South Carolina	1,568	180	6	26.7%	1,323,497	9.1	347	422	31	549	2	13	378
Iowa	1,947	183	6	36.5%	1,143,034	8.2	890	933	38	1,551	0	74	1,197
Arkansas	1,670	157	6	36.2%	1,082,514	8.1	553	587	29	904	2	15	716
New Mexico	1,070	126	4	50.6%	1,056,416	7.3	327	361	26	526	1	60	411
Nebraska	1,564	156	3	52.7%	1,003,087	7.3	524	581	31	875	0	65	741
Louisiana	1,579	161	9	18.6%	865,289	9.8	431	510	25	732	1	2	472
Mississippi	1,789	166	7	28.7%	858,218	8.2	384	418	23	686	0	11	525
Idaho	1,148	141	5	36.0%	607,425	8.2	251	273	26	418	0	18	310
Rhode Island	613	100	3	54.6%	576,703	6.1	64	77	24	121	4	11	104
Montana	1,126	133	4	44.8%	466,851	7.2	348	361	17	552	0	20	473
Hawaii	586	95	7	25.8%	366,314	8.3	82	93	11	143	0	0	122
North Dakota	840	113	3	46.1%	345,954	7.5	367	381	18	563	0	38	428
New Hampshire	1,188	168	7	25.6%	343,956	9.3	238	248	14	354	0	3	246
South Dakota	1,010	108	4	38.7%	334,654	8.4	359	370	14	562	0	19	418
West Virginia	1,531	156	7	17.1%	312,465	9.5	684	704	22	1,107	2	2	732
Delaware	577	111	6	32.5%	308,259	8.7	52	66	13	91	0	7	52
Vermont	1,016	130	4	48.3%	301,829	5.1	250	254	5	300	0	77	287
Maine	1,752	234	7	19.7%	262,256	8.8	421	425	12	649	0	0	515
Alaska	823	106	6	31.3%	231,062	8.4	218	235	14	405	0	0	337
Wyoming	844	113	7	30.4%	177,053	9.4	164	171	16	264	0	7	163

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	458	113	2	75.8%	2,417,250	3.3	96	1	106	2	82	106
Los Angeles	California	380	129	3	75.2%	1,847,440	3.6	62	4	64	0	49	62
Chicago	Illinois	343	93	3	65.9%	1,781,127	4.5	56	4	65	0	3	65
Brooklyn	New York	395	162	4	68.0%	1,767,380	4.1	37	2	39	1	2	39
Miami	Florida	439	108	2	75.0%	1,408,736	3.4	55	11	86	9	44	86
San Antonio	Texas	342	71	2	76.5%	1,359,570	3.3	59	2	60	0	53	60
New York City	New York	336	151	2	81.1%	1,315,496	3.0	47	2	51	0	32	51
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	328	87	2	78.0%	1,229,337	3.4	47	2	48	0	37	47
Las Vegas	Nevada	353	84	2	75.3%	1,164,119	3.5	43	1	43	0	36	43
Phoenix	Arizona	335	71	2	78.9%	1,144,396	3.1	42	3	46	1	36	46
San Diego	California	345	100	2	73.8%	994,446	3.5	36	2	36	0	29	36
Denver	Colorado	396	86	2	81.4%	884,618	2.8	38	6	47	4	36	47
Austin	Texas	353	94	2	75.4%	819,834	3.4	44	1	44	0	38	44
Saint Louis	Missouri	335	77	1	87.5%	802,973	2.2	45	8	56	27	31	56
Minneapolis	Minnesota	403	85	2	72.1%	784,963	3.8	51	17	75	4	48	71
Indianapolis	Indiana	312	68	2	79.5%	756,802	3.2	37	4	39	0	34	39
Dallas	Texas	357	92	4	53.1%	740,036	5.8	48	5	57	0	2	57
Seattle	Washington	341	80	2	76.0%	725,547	3.3	35	2	35	0	31	35
Portland	Oregon	308	74	2	78.7%	723,884	3.0	33	3	35	0	29	35
Tucson	Arizona	314	72	2	79.2%	716,415	3.1	32	4	36	0	28	36
Orlando	Florida	301	74	2	70.2%	699,164	3.9	32	3	35	2	14	35
Atlanta	Georgia	368	102	2	70.4%	696,452	4.0	39	9	43	4	21	42
Fort Worth	Texas	285	73	2	72.3%	659,201	3.6	32	1	32	0	22	32
Saint Paul	Minnesota	370	72	2	81.1%	648,228	3.1	30	13	37	4	23	37
San Francisco	California	248	94	2	74.4%	647,440	3.7	28	2	30	1	16	30
Cleveland	Ohio	310	71	2	85.3%	640,203	2.6	29	5	34	2	25	34
Sacramento	California	275	63	2	78.6%	632,800	3.2	28	2	29	0	25	29
Columbus	Ohio	310	70	2	74.7%	632,588	3.5	30	3	34	0	24	34
Jacksonville	Florida	289	67	2	72.3%	627,211	4.0	31	2	36	0	17	35
Louisville	Kentucky	270	69	2	82.4%	626,934	2.8	32	2	45	0	38	45
Charlotte	North Carolina	259	66	3	67.3%	610,210	4.3	24	3	28	0	0	28
Tampa	Florida	315	80	2	74.9%	593,868	3.6	27	2	30	0	21	30
Cincinnati	Ohio	288	60	2	73.2%	588,678	3.5	45	2	47	1	37	47
Bronx	New York	345	133	5	40.7%	586,726	6.9	25	5	39	0	0	38
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	305	65	2	82.8%	565,266	3.0	43	6	59	1	38	59
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	323	60	2	67.2%	545,642	4.3	29	3	30	0	19	30
Baltimore	Maryland	279	62	2	84.4%	532,242	2.6	22	3	26	3	21	26
Albuquerque	New Mexico	257	52	2	80.0%	524,564	3.0	17	2	20	0	17	20
Kansas City	Missouri	290	66	2	89.6%	512,512	2.1	49	3	54	17	45	54
El Paso	Texas	287	58	3	63.2%	498,436	4.5	24	3	44	0	4	44
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	316	80	2	71.1%	485,029	3.9	39	2	40	0	25	40
Detroit	Michigan	230	56	3	74.9%	479,987	3.5	25	2	26	0	8	26
Memphis	Tennessee	275	60	3	67.6%	469,790	4.2	26	4	29	0	1	29
Fresno	California	244	56	2	77.9%	469,525	3.5	18	1	18	0	15	18
Washington DC	District of Columbia	279	84	3	66.0%	451,695	4.9	28	1	28	0	1	28
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	296	97	4	51.9%	431,564	5.6	27	12	35	0	3	32
Omaha	Nebraska	283	59	2	75.8%	418,559	3.4	31	3	35	0	26	35
Mesa	Arizona	205	56	3	72.9%	389,443	3.8	13	3	27	0	4	27
Bakersfield	California	239	52	2	69.4%	388,127	4.1	11	1	11	0	7	11
Colorado Springs	Colorado	300	85	3	64.8%	377,949	4.3	30	2	31	0	0	31
Salt Lake City	Utah	258	72	2	76.6%	372,710	3.1	19	5	35	0	24	35
Virginia Beach	Virginia	215	53	2	80.7%	363,035	2.8	12	2	13	0	9	13
Nashville	Tennessee	269	63	2	77.9%	356,965	3.3	22	4	29	0	20	29
Long Beach	California	215	65	2	74.1%	355,130	3.6	12	1	12	0	10	12
Aurora	Colorado	202	60	2	80.4%	350,031	2.8	11	1	11	0	10	11
Dayton	Ohio	300	64	3	72.9%	348,373	2.9	27	5	34	10	19	32
Birmingham	Alabama	276	66	3	68.1%	340,455	4.1	30	2	33	1	9	33
Tulsa	Oklahoma	244	63	2	79.0%	333,464	3.1	28	1	30	0	27	30
Raleigh	North Carolina	216	61	4	56.1%	306,762	5.3	15	2	16	0	0	16
Wichita	Kansas	244	60	3	71.1%	297,046	3.8	26	1	26	0	13	26
Buffalo	New York	286	60	4	52.4%	294,803	5.9	28	5	31	0	1	29
Oakland	California	243	70	2	70.2%	288,940	3.9	14	1	14	0	10	14
Spring	Texas	216	59	2	75.6%	288,032	3.1	8	3	11	2	9	11
Richmond	Virginia	214	59	3	72.7%	284,225	3.8	15	3	24	0	2	24
Spokane	Washington	235	52	2	78.6%	282,549	3.1	14	3	28	0	14	28
Knoxville	Tennessee	249	55	2	71.7%	277,254	3.7	17	1	17	0	12	17
Santa Ana	California	169	56	2	76.7%	273,930	3.7	6	2	8	0	4	8
Stockton	California	211	44	2	71.1%	265,628	3.8	12	1	12	0	7	12
Anaheim	California	160	55	3	71.6%	264,077	3.7	7	1	7	0	2	7
Madison	Wisconsin	217	46	2	87.6%	258,215	2.6	14	1	14	0	11	14
Arlington	Texas	187	53	2	64.7%	256,975	4.5	12	1	12	0	3	12
Littleton	Colorado	259	74	1	77.8%	253,085	3.3	10	4	12	2	5	12
Jamaica	New York	208	83	1	100.0%	243,845	1.5	6	2	7	5	6	7
Fort Wayne	Indiana	206	54	2	76.5%	243,562	3.4	16	1	16	0	14	16
Riverside	California	164	49	2	65.2%	241,359	4.3	7	2	7	0	3	7
Glendale	Arizona	221	53	2	79.2%	241,304	3.4	9	5	13	2	2	13
Scottsdale	Arizona	254	70	2	79.2%	236,105	3.2	11	3	12	0	9	12
Henderson	Nevada	195	53	2	77.4%	234,403	3.4	8	2	8	0	7	8
Laredo	Texas	159	42	2	85.0%	230,132	2.5	6	1	6	0	6	6
Reno	Nevada	213	54	2	74.7%	221,685	3.7	12	1	12	0	9	12
Lubbock	Texas	224	55	2	78.9%	218,200	3.2	14	1	14	0	13	14
San Bernardino	California	186	52	2	87.2%	217,642	2.1	7	2	10	0	10	10
Flushing	New York	181	80	1	100.0%	215,067	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Katy	Texas	157	59	2	62.3%	214,262	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Corpus Christi	Texas	201	51	3	65.4%	213,203	4.0	18	1	18	0	5	18
Alexandria	Virginia	230	72	3	59.7%	211,705	4.7	14	3	20	0	3	20
Mobile	Alabama	256	51	2	77.6%	210,664	3.4	18	1	18	0	16	18
Chandler	Arizona	181	46	2	77.9%	209,235	3.2	6	1	6	0	5	6
Vancouver	Washington	183	52	3	63.8%	208,074	4.5	11	2	13	0	1	13
Tacoma	Washington	252	56	4	60.9%	203,155	4.9	20	3	33	0	0	33
Fort Myers	Florida	189	53	2	80.2%	201,817	3.1	11	1	11	0	8	11
Grand Rapids	Michigan	177	53	5	54.4%	200,216	5.5	12	1	12	0	0	12
Syracuse	New York	192	54	2	87.7%	198,902	2.3	15	2	25	0	22	25
Chesapeake	Virginia	195	63	2	82.8%	196,948	3.0	6	2	7	0	5	7
Pensacola	Florida	196	52	3	73.1%	196,131	4.0	13	1	13	0	5	13
Jersey City	New Jersey	176	69	3	74.4%	194,678	3.1	7	1	7	0	5	7
Lincoln	Nebraska	231	48	3	66.9%	193,626	4.3	22	2	23	0	8	23
Irving	Texas	161	48	2	80.0%	192,446	3.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Boise	Idaho	175	45	2	75.1%	192,234	3.6	9	2	11	0	7	11
Oxnard	California	154	46	2	86.0%	189,524	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Irvine	California	192	74	3	70.0%	187,287	4.1	9	1	9	0	6	9
Santa Rosa	California	166	51	2	84.6%	182,756	2.5	6	1	6	0	5	6
Bradenton	Florida	197	61	2	71.9%	181,947	4.7	10	1	10	0	7	10
San Jose	California	285	84	8	17.3%	181,217	9.5	28	2	33	0	0	27
Marietta	Georgia	189	64	3	56.1%	180,899	5.3	7	3	10	0	0	10
Toledo	Ohio	173	49	4	58.8%	180,761	4.9	15	1	15	0	4	15
Fremont	California	144	47	2	76.9%	179,229	3.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Lawrenceville	Georgia	161	52	2	69.7%	178,478	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Silver Spring	Maryland	226	76	3	58.6%	177,659	5.1	7	2	9	0	2	9
Sarasota	Florida	204	55	3	70.6%	176,745	3.9	13	2	14	0	1	14
Staten Island	New York	261	117	5	37.1%	175,770	7.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Winston Salem	North Carolina	201	49	3	66.5%	175,752	4.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Norfolk	Virginia	179	53	2	70.9%	174,123	3.8	14	2	24	0	11	24
Grand Prairie	Texas	133	41	2	90.0%	171,491	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Columbia	South Carolina	196	42	4	49.9%	171,235	5.8	14	2	20	0	1	20
North Las Vegas	Nevada	191	52	2	72.6%	169,827	3.9	7	2	7	0	5	7
Chula Vista	California	160	44	3	64.5%	168,153	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gainesville	Florida	188	51	2	80.0%	167,538	3.0	10	1	10	0	10	10
Gilbert	Arizona	167	50	4	69.3%	165,334	4.0	6	2	9	0	1	9
Tallahassee	Florida	205	52	3	56.3%	162,327	4.9	10	1	10	0	0	10
Eugene	Oregon	170	43	2	79.4%	161,089	3.2	6	1	6	0	5	6
Brownsville	Texas	141	37	2	79.9%	160,908	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Hollywood	Florida	197	64	5	33.5%	156,816	7.4	9	3	10	0	0	10
Plano	Texas	167	51	4	51.2%	156,249	5.9	7	2	13	0	0	13
Augusta	Georgia	183	49	2	76.2%	155,809	3.4	8	1	8	0	7	8
Tempe	Arizona	159	48	2	82.0%	155,786	2.5	4	2	6	1	4	6
Savannah	Georgia	180	47	4	64.1%	154,544	4.2	10	1	10	0	3	10
Providence	Rhode Island	181	44	3	75.2%	154,244	3.5	8	4	12	0	2	12
Ann Arbor	Michigan	183	52	1	91.0%	151,754	2.0	5	2	7	1	5	7
Overland Park	Kansas	176	44	2	81.3%	149,189	2.8	9	3	19	1	9	19
Chattanooga	Tennessee	250	60	2	71.1%	147,841	3.8	15	3	16	0	12	16
Boca Raton	Florida	181	67	2	66.1%	146,906	4.0	9	1	9	0	6	9
Mission	Texas	138	34	2	80.0%	144,874	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Reading	Pennsylvania	254	54	3	66.8%	143,827	4.8	10	4	19	0	1	17
Escondido	California	138	45	3	80.0%	143,722	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Huntsville	Alabama	188	48	2	73.2%	143,643	3.8	11	1	11	0	8	11
Van Nuys	California	148	58	3	80.0%	142,250	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Odessa	Texas	174	39	2	88.7%	141,911	2.3	6	1	6	0	6	6
Hialeah	Florida	171	55	4	38.4%	141,035	7.3	7	4	14	0	0	13
Lansing	Michigan	161	48	2	85.0%	139,719	2.7	7	2	12	0	10	12
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	60	1	73.7%	139,422	3.5	4	3	4	1	3	4
Rockford	Illinois	181	48	2	76.1%	138,783	3.4	9	1	9	0	5	9
Waco	Texas	178	47	2	87.1%	137,824	2.3	9	1	9	0	8	9
Amarillo	Texas	205	44	4	60.0%	137,384	5.0	14	1	14	0	0	14
Beaverton	Oregon	145	43	3	67.7%	136,483	4.0	4	2	8	0	2	8
Anchorage	Alaska	211	53	4	55.4%	135,223	5.7	12	2	22	0	0	22
Albany	New York	219	59	2	89.0%	134,588	2.2	11	2	22	0	20	22
Boston	Massachusetts	232	69	2	88.0%	133,647	2.4	14	2	15	0	13	15
Green Bay	Wisconsin	189	47	3	72.7%	133,288	3.7	7	1	7	0	2	7
Ogden	Utah	161	38	3	65.9%	132,709	4.4	5	2	6	0	2	6
Pompano Beach	Florida	226	67	5	35.6%	131,890	7.6	10	8	13	0	1	9
Honolulu	Hawaii	193	52	5	31.7%	131,865	8.0	11	2	11	0	0	11
Mckinney	Texas	145	44	3	69.2%	130,784	4.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Wilmington	Delaware	205	64	3	59.4%	130,450	4.8	10	1	10	0	5	10
Worcester	Massachusetts	201	52	2	69.9%	129,744	3.6	9	1	9	0	6	9
Akron	Ohio	212	56	4	47.9%	129,486	6.4	17	2	33	0	0	32
Round Rock	Texas	172	54	3	77.1%	129,167	3.3	3	2	3	0	2	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	154	36	3	66.1%	128,750	4.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
Kissimmee	Florida	217	50	4	44.5%	128,695	6.4	7	4	11	0	0	11
Whittier	California	208	70	3	65.5%	128,489	4.2	6	3	6	0	3	6
North Hollywood	California	153	65	2	83.7%	128,148	2.5	4	2	5	0	4	5
Astoria	New York	157	75	1	89.6%	127,784	2.0	4	4	7	2	5	7
Clarksville	Tennessee	143	32	3	72.4%	127,260	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Oceanside	California	139	42	3	63.1%	126,413	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Peoria	Arizona	153	41	2	73.1%	125,813	3.8	4	2	5	0	3	5
Topeka	Kansas	194	51	2	76.6%	125,127	3.6	18	1	18	0	14	18
Palmdale	California	156	48	3	71.2%	124,623	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Melbourne	Florida	168	42	2	80.0%	124,548	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Athens	Georgia	158	44	1	99.8%	124,486	1.2	6	2	7	5	6	7
Roanoke	Virginia	203	54	3	73.3%	124,289	3.5	10	2	11	0	5	11
Edmond	Oklahoma	184	49	2	72.2%	123,895	3.8	5	2	5	0	3	5
Midland	Texas	151	34	2	77.4%	123,867	3.2	5	1	5	0	4	5
Sterling Heights	Michigan	137	46	2	92.5%	122,584	1.8	4	1	4	1	4	4
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	176	45	2	87.7%	122,243	2.7	6	1	6	0	5	6
El Cajon	California	172	54	3	70.7%	121,982	4.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Visalia	California	140	39	2	80.0%	121,611	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Beaumont	Texas	177	46	2	83.5%	121,536	2.6	8	1	8	0	7	8
Durham	North Carolina	184	52	4	41.8%	121,385	6.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Sugar Land	Texas	165	53	3	71.6%	120,872	4.0	3	3	4	0	1	4
Henrico	Virginia	213	61	3	62.4%	120,288	4.6	7	4	10	0	1	10
Naperville	Illinois	144	52	2	72.3%	119,892	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Pueblo	Colorado	186	41	2	75.2%	118,976	3.7	7	1	7	0	5	7
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	187	47	3	58.5%	118,870	5.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Macon	Georgia	173	43	2	72.5%	118,639	3.6	9	1	9	0	7	9
Yuma	Arizona	129	37	2	80.0%	118,078	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Youngstown	Ohio	201	51	3	74.8%	117,570	3.3	12	3	22	0	9	22
Lancaster	California	135	37	3	63.6%	117,367	5.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Olympia	Washington	186	45	4	64.2%	117,325	4.7	6	3	6	0	1	6
Humble	Texas	146	47	2	69.6%	115,891	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Simi Valley	California	118	46	2	90.0%	115,841	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	45	2	66.4%	115,534	4.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Olathe	Kansas	121	36	2	80.0%	115,498	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Decatur	Georgia	196	67	2	63.8%	115,339	4.6	5	3	6	0	2	6
Santa Barbara	California	173	52	2	84.5%	114,851	2.6	7	1	7	0	7	7
Saint Petersburg	Florida	179	38	6	32.0%	114,046	8.1	16	4	17	0	0	15
Newark	New Jersey	181	68	4	40.0%	112,238	7.0	9	2	17	0	0	17
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	150	39	3	59.9%	111,716	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Evansville	Indiana	168	42	4	60.4%	111,432	4.9	9	1	9	0	1	9
West Palm Beach	Florida	202	61	5	30.0%	111,120	8.6	12	5	14	0	0	10
Conroe	Texas	185	62	4	68.9%	110,515	4.0	7	3	9	2	4	9
Yakima	Washington	145	36	2	84.7%	109,963	2.5	4	2	7	0	5	7
Santa Clara	California	137	38	2	86.6%	108,652	2.5	4	1	4	0	4	4
Surprise	Arizona	153	40	2	80.0%	108,447	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Salinas	California	149	36	3	57.4%	108,146	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Vista	California	131	41	2	90.0%	107,880	2.0	3	2	6	0	6	6
Kalamazoo	Michigan	170	51	2	65.5%	107,538	4.1	7	1	7	0	4	7
Boulder	Colorado	190	45	2	81.9%	107,472	2.8	6	1	6	0	6	6
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	135	34	2	85.6%	107,240	2.5	4	2	6	0	6	6
Puyallup	Washington	166	45	2	75.0%	107,158	3.4	5	1	5	0	3	5
Arvada	Colorado	154	52	2	80.0%	106,736	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Ridgewood	New York	97	39	1	100.0%	106,717	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Bellevue	Washington	150	45	2	72.8%	106,515	3.6	5	2	8	0	4	8
Shreveport	Louisiana	189	49	5	47.7%	106,391	6.4	12	3	13	0	0	13
Ontario	California	141	44	4	60.0%	105,989	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Modesto	California	162	50	4	39.9%	105,444	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	6
Lakeland	Florida	170	54	4	40.7%	104,986	7.1	9	3	17	0	0	15
Bend	Oregon	151	37	2	85.8%	104,927	4.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	173	42	4	57.2%	104,920	5.5	13	3	26	0	0	26
Newport News	Virginia	171	46	4	59.2%	104,622	5.1	7	2	14	0	0	14
New Port Richey	Florida	143	38	2	86.4%	104,410	2.3	4	1	4	2	3	4
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	144	37	3	80.0%	104,398	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	184	49	5	57.4%	104,293	4.9	9	1	9	0	2	9
Rock Hill	South Carolina	141	41	2	89.5%	104,168	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Pasadena	California	178	58	3	65.9%	103,988	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Frisco	Texas	108	40	3	60.0%	103,469	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	133	39	2	83.7%	102,659	2.8	4	1	4	0	4	4
Homestead	Florida	188	60	4	54.6%	102,483	5.7	7	3	12	0	0	12
Abilene	Texas	156	35	2	78.5%	102,152	3.0	6	2	12	0	8	12
Longmont	Colorado	137	42	3	77.3%	101,133	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Hartford	Connecticut	151	39	2	81.8%	100,961	2.8	6	3	10	0	8	10
Rancho Cucamonga	California	143	49	4	57.1%	100,891	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Carrollton	Texas	133	44	3	74.3%	100,163	3.3	3	2	6	0	2	6
Mcallen	Texas	130	32	2	68.1%	96,470	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Springdale	Arkansas	113	35	1	100.0%	96,405	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Kent	Washington	146	43	4	60.0%	96,301	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Ypsilanti	Michigan	129	45	2	90.0%	96,209	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Santa Maria	California	153	41	4	67.2%	96,102	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	116	41	2	86.3%	96,077	2.5	2	2	3	0	2	3
Pacoima	California	95	37	2	90.0%	95,219	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Elmhurst	New York	96	43	1	100.0%	93,967	1.0	1	2	2	1	2	2
Vallejo	California	141	51	2	75.1%	93,439	3.5	4	2	5	0	3	5
Bothell	Washington	173	56	3	72.6%	93,106	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Frederick	Maryland	148	39	2	70.4%	92,988	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Elgin	Illinois	144	43	3	75.8%	92,677	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Asheville	North Carolina	147	45	3	70.0%	92,467	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Corona	California	159	52	5	35.9%	92,394	7.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
Compton	California	133	55	3	66.2%	91,980	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tracy	California	147	40	2	78.1%	91,518	5.0	4	2	4	0	3	3
Everett	Washington	146	46	4	54.7%	91,158	5.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Fontana	California	128	41	6	38.5%	90,275	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sparks	Nevada	162	40	2	75.7%	90,254	3.5	4	2	4	0	3	4
Federal Way	Washington	117	35	2	90.0%	90,129	2.0	2	2	4	0	4	4
Antioch	California	124	36	2	80.0%	88,577	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Carlsbad	California	144	48	2	77.9%	88,555	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Canton	Ohio	185	48	4	60.0%	88,141	5.1	12	3	13	0	0	13
Charlottesville	Virginia	164	44	2	71.6%	87,998	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Bellingham	Washington	141	37	3	69.5%	87,873	4.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
Lawrence	Kansas	160	35	2	86.9%	87,862	2.4	5	2	10	0	8	10
Mesquite	Texas	130	43	4	60.0%	87,788	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Paterson	New Jersey	177	81	4	60.0%	87,480	5.0	9	2	17	0	0	17
Sylmar	California	99	40	2	90.0%	86,838	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Schenectady	New York	185	51	4	53.4%	86,602	5.8	8	3	16	0	0	16
Tyler	Texas	182	44	4	55.4%	86,559	5.8	9	2	13	0	0	13
Renton	Washington	198	56	4	55.8%	86,424	5.8	5	3	7	0	1	7
Murrieta	California	124	36	3	65.2%	86,159	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saint Charles	Missouri	146	38	3	61.1%	85,518	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Livonia	Michigan	129	41	2	90.0%	85,110	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
New Braunfels	Texas	123	35	2	82.8%	85,096	2.5	2	2	3	0	3	3
Lowell	Massachusetts	146	38	3	75.5%	84,054	3.5	4	2	7	0	1	7
Yonkers	New York	151	63	4	46.4%	83,710	6.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Norman	Oklahoma	155	41	2	67.2%	83,370	4.5	4	2	8	0	2	8
Ballwin	Missouri	111	38	2	87.8%	83,138	2.5	2	3	4	1	2	4
Lees Summit	Missouri	171	49	2	81.3%	83,035	3.5	6	3	9	0	6	9
Champaign	Illinois	138	36	2	87.3%	82,527	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Bell Gardens	California	97	42	2	80.0%	81,946	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Appleton	Wisconsin	135	36	3	67.3%	81,876	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Merced	California	151	36	3	79.4%	81,842	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Manassas	Virginia	161	51	4	53.6%	81,507	6.3	4	4	7	0	0	5
Rockville	Maryland	166	61	4	56.2%	81,327	5.5	4	4	7	0	0	7
San Mateo	California	156	51	4	57.0%	81,216	5.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	165	49	3	55.4%	81,080	5.2	6	2	11	0	1	11
Delray Beach	Florida	162	61	3	68.0%	81,000	5.0	5	2	5	1	2	5
Englewood	Colorado	194	61	2	72.6%	80,958	4.0	4	4	5	0	3	5
Elizabeth	New Jersey	136	56	2	80.0%	80,374	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Parker	Colorado	120	42	2	80.0%	80,226	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Summerville	South Carolina	121	36	4	57.7%	80,159	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Flint	Michigan	194	53	4	51.5%	80,122	6.0	7	3	8	0	0	8
Laurel	Maryland	173	56	2	71.2%	80,115	3.8	4	2	4	0	2	4
Woodstock	Georgia	104	35	2	78.6%	79,984	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Longview	Texas	171	43	3	75.8%	79,804	3.8	5	1	5	0	3	5
Fairfax	Virginia	167	63	5	48.8%	79,796	6.8	4	3	5	0	0	4
Waukegan	Illinois	121	43	2	81.8%	79,772	3.5	2	2	3	0	2	3
Missoula	Montana	155	44	2	82.0%	79,770	2.8	5	1	5	0	5	5
Westerville	Ohio	127	33	2	83.5%	79,530	2.5	2	2	3	0	3	3
Douglasville	Georgia	124	40	2	72.0%	79,376	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Lewisville	Texas	133	41	3	66.9%	79,367	4.3	3	2	5	0	0	5
Kennewick	Washington	142	44	2	80.0%	79,048	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Downey	California	139	53	3	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ocala	Florida	197	49	6	35.0%	78,739	7.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Daly City	California	150	56	2	68.7%	78,544	4.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Fargo	North Dakota	139	40	3	64.0%	78,419	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Killeen	Texas	146	33	5	52.0%	78,138	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Coral Springs	Florida	111	40	2	80.0%	77,790	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	261	56	10	20.5%	77,677	9.3	18	2	18	0	0	14
Palo Alto	California	147	48	3	80.0%	77,345	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Hemet	California	139	42	4	60.0%	77,272	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Valley City	Utah	138	47	3	58.0%	77,035	5.3	3	3	6	0	0	6
Hayward	California	135	39	5	40.0%	76,813	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Little Rock	Arkansas	193	49	7	35.0%	76,249	7.9	12	1	12	0	0	11
New Bedford	Massachusetts	145	41	3	80.0%	75,851	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Rapid City	South Dakota	137	36	4	77.8%	75,240	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	163	52	2	78.9%	75,213	3.1	7	3	12	0	6	12
Hagerstown	Maryland	143	38	3	76.8%	75,191	3.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Ventura	California	138	44	3	64.5%	74,803	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	148	37	2	78.3%	74,744	3.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Wichita Falls	Texas	173	44	2	75.1%	74,194	3.6	7	1	7	0	4	7
West Jordan	Utah	135	42	3	60.0%	74,142	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	144	42	5	53.9%	73,967	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Vacaville	California	114	35	4	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Racine	Wisconsin	163	39	3	57.7%	72,692	5.2	5	2	5	0	3	5
Charleston	South Carolina	214	53	5	36.4%	71,705	8.0	10	3	11	0	0	8
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	167	57	3	72.6%	71,130	4.0	3	2	6	0	2	6
Independence	Missouri	175	43	3	56.3%	69,848	4.8	8	2	9	1	1	9
Waukesha	Wisconsin	141	39	3	72.8%	69,725	3.7	3	2	6	0	1	6
Broomfield	Colorado	137	44	4	66.4%	69,595	4.3	3	3	5	0	1	5
Bowling Green	Kentucky	143	37	4	60.0%	69,309	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Dearborn	Michigan	138	38	3	72.6%	69,052	3.5	4	2	6	1	1	6
Garland	Texas	148	44	5	28.9%	68,845	8.2	5	2	9	0	0	8
Clearwater	Florida	236	56	4	37.5%	68,756	7.2	9	4	10	0	0	9
Santa Monica	California	147	55	2	72.7%	68,682	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Apopka	Florida	124	39	3	70.0%	68,358	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Falls Church	Virginia	216	61	4	56.7%	68,269	5.0	5	4	5	0	1	5
College Station	Texas	120	43	5	55.4%	68,143	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	149	42	3	62.6%	68,042	4.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Springfield	Missouri	172	43	6	29.5%	67,893	8.4	7	2	9	0	0	8
Quincy	Massachusetts	128	39	3	72.1%	67,877	5.0	3	3	5	0	1	5
Lithonia	Georgia	112	38	3	70.0%	67,733	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	145	47	3	63.8%	67,666	4.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Elkhart	Indiana	135	34	3	67.7%	67,342	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	120	36	4	68.8%	66,963	4.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
Inglewood	California	177	72	5	50.0%	66,900	6.0	5	3	9	0	0	9
Miami Beach	Florida	186	59	3	57.8%	66,827	4.8	5	3	7	0	1	7
Terre Haute	Indiana	149	35	3	70.3%	66,792	3.8	6	1	6	0	2	6
Keller	Texas	131	44	4	56.6%	65,817	5.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Deltona	Florida	122	37	3	70.0%	65,722	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Baytown	Texas	122	42	3	55.8%	65,692	5.3	3	3	4	0	0	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	123	37	4	64.6%	65,506	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Chester	Pennsylvania	126	45	4	60.0%	65,218	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Clermont	Florida	151	42	3	64.6%	64,794	5.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Las Cruces	New Mexico	175	44	6	43.3%	64,440	6.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Gastonia	North Carolina	122	38	4	59.9%	64,110	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Rialto	California	127	38	4	60.0%	63,950	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	136	55	4	63.4%	63,938	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Orem	Utah	145	40	3	63.5%	63,720	5.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Norwalk	California	95	45	3	60.0%	63,532	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	105	34	3	64.1%	63,476	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Trenton	New Jersey	209	64	7	30.5%	63,469	9.2	11	7	17	0	0	12
Lynchburg	Virginia	158	39	4	61.9%	63,367	4.8	4	3	7	0	0	7
Livermore	California	125	42	3	65.7%	63,277	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Huntington Beach	California	153	56	6	31.6%	63,195	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hamilton	Ohio	139	38	5	46.0%	63,069	6.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	151	40	4	57.7%	62,938	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	170	45	4	60.9%	62,767	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
O Fallon	Missouri	129	39	3	64.9%	62,560	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roseville	California	138	41	7	44.6%	62,324	6.3	3	3	5	0	0	5
Hyattsville	Maryland	185	56	4	39.4%	62,025	6.8	5	3	7	0	0	7
Costa Mesa	California	122	46	6	54.4%	61,931	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Richardson	Texas	139	48	3	53.5%	61,352	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Bend	Indiana	183	51	5	41.5%	60,886	6.7	10	4	16	0	0	15
Brockton	Massachusetts	118	40	3	63.4%	60,505	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Herndon	Virginia	126	52	4	64.6%	60,386	4.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Winter Haven	Florida	129	39	4	56.1%	59,992	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Belleville	Illinois	135	38	3	64.1%	59,768	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Midlothian	Virginia	144	44	3	61.7%	59,675	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	105	37	4	60.0%	59,478	5.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Lafayette	Louisiana	144	40	5	37.0%	59,433	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Nampa	Idaho	138	38	3	51.2%	59,384	5.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Muncie	Indiana	144	38	3	63.9%	59,246	3.8	5	1	5	0	3	5
Rochester	New York	251	55	11	12.3%	58,177	10.7	24	2	45	0	0	15
Manchester	New Hampshire	154	44	4	50.0%	58,030	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Duluth	Minnesota	191	48	6	49.5%	58,013	6.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Cambridge	Massachusetts	154	55	5	50.1%	57,989	5.8	5	3	8	0	1	8
Covington	Georgia	135	31	2	62.4%	57,877	4.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Gaithersburg	Maryland	150	56	5	40.0%	57,837	7.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Acworth	Georgia	129	42	3	57.5%	57,286	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gulfport	Mississippi	138	38	5	60.0%	56,831	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Mill	South Carolina	142	46	3	59.5%	56,570	5.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Chico	California	143	35	4	50.0%	56,008	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Medford	Oregon	118	31	5	60.0%	55,951	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	147	46	4	43.4%	55,895	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sunnyvale	California	160	58	4	35.6%	54,416	7.8	4	3	7	0	0	7
Denton	Texas	163	47	7	34.0%	53,761	7.2	6	3	12	0	0	11
Annapolis	Maryland	167	51	4	56.4%	53,648	5.2	5	3	6	0	1	6
Newnan	Georgia	131	36	5	56.3%	52,568	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	163	43	5	30.7%	52,196	8.3	7	4	14	0	0	13
Indio	California	122	37	4	54.0%	51,892	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Valdosta	Georgia	165	41	4	53.8%	51,106	5.8	5	2	10	0	0	10
Bryan	Texas	164	44	4	52.9%	50,928	6.0	5	3	10	0	0	10
Cary	North Carolina	148	51	5	32.7%	50,774	7.5	4	2	8	0	0	7
Florissant	Missouri	139	36	4	46.2%	50,024	5.7	3	3	4	0	1	4
Fairfield	California	117	35	5	43.4%	49,476	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverview	Florida	150	47	3	44.0%	49,030	7.7	3	2	4	0	1	2
Palm Bay	Florida	145	39	4	44.0%	48,926	6.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Warren	Michigan	157	49	4	35.9%	48,498	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pearland	Texas	144	45	8	35.2%	48,488	6.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Redwood City	California	134	46	5	41.1%	47,043	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	California	150	59	5	26.7%	46,934	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Napa	California	123	33	6	48.5%	46,923	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hampton	Virginia	159	41	6	34.3%	46,774	7.8	6	2	7	0	0	7
New Haven	Connecticut	156	49	6	35.9%	46,686	6.8	5	3	10	0	0	10
Provo	Utah	143	42	5	40.0%	46,609	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Fullerton	California	162	61	5	33.1%	46,037	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bloomington	Indiana	163	53	6	33.7%	44,966	8.2	6	5	10	0	0	6
San Angelo	Texas	138	36	4	40.4%	44,711	7.0	4	3	5	0	0	3
Torrance	California	180	69	7	25.1%	44,453	8.0	5	2	5	0	0	5
Greensboro	North Carolina	190	47	9	13.6%	44,429	9.9	9	2	16	0	0	7
Davenport	Iowa	173	36	6	41.7%	43,688	6.3	6	2	7	0	0	7
Jupiter	Florida	127	37	5	44.2%	43,516	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	153	44	6	33.3%	42,616	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Grand Junction	Colorado	145	46	5	40.0%	42,186	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Plainfield	Illinois	145	41	4	42.6%	41,969	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Clovis	California	143	40	5	34.2%	41,464	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Menifee	California	146	42	5	37.3%	41,276	9.8	4	3	4	0	0	2
Largo	Florida	133	34	6	38.2%	41,137	7.2	5	3	6	0	0	6
Lynn	Massachusetts	157	46	4	43.7%	40,844	6.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Scranton	Pennsylvania	185	45	5	41.1%	40,824	7.8	8	2	8	0	0	7
High Point	North Carolina	138	38	6	32.5%	39,738	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Milton	Florida	145	37	6	40.0%	37,896	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	153	46	6	28.9%	37,072	8.3	3	3	4	0	0	3
Stamford	Connecticut	168	59	6	28.5%	36,659	7.0	6	2	9	0	0	8
Hillsboro	Oregon	121	36	8	35.3%	36,271	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
La Puente	California	146	55	5	29.3%	34,616	7.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Lynnwood	Washington	173	50	7	31.7%	34,366	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Madera	California	157	40	6	32.5%	33,428	7.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	140	44	5	29.2%	32,927	8.0	4	3	8	0	0	7
New Orleans	Louisiana	246	61	11	7.6%	32,325	12.5	19	1	19	0	0	1
Elk Grove	California	136	41	8	17.2%	30,896	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Worth	Florida	195	64	8	14.9%	30,693	10.6	5	3	5	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	135	45	6	27.7%	30,607	8.3	4	3	5	0	0	5
Auburn	Washington	135	37	7	27.0%	30,432	9.0	3	3	3	0	0	2
Bowie	Maryland	189	55	6	29.2%	29,854	8.0	4	3	5	0	0	4
Burbank	California	164	66	7	23.7%	25,604	8.8	5	3	7	0	0	6
Roswell	Georgia	118	44	5	25.3%	25,287	8.5	2	2	4	0	0	3
Redding	California	177	40	6	20.9%	23,672	9.5	4	3	4	0	0	3
Cypress	Texas	120	45	10	13.8%	23,519	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
San Marcos	California	121	41	7	23.1%	23,215	10.0	2	3	3	0	0	1
San Leandro	California	127	41	8	20.5%	22,777	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Temecula	California	137	45	7	16.3%	21,213	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	California	159	44	11	20.0%	20,794	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Naples	Florida	227	58	11	6.4%	19,933	14.7	14	6	16	0	0	3
Cape Coral	Florida	170	43	11	10.8%	19,605	10.3	6	2	6	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	214	58	9	15.2%	19,380	11.1	9	5	11	0	1	1
Franklin	Tennessee	143	40	7	18.1%	19,271	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	111	36	7	19.5%	18,428	10.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Lehigh Acres	Florida	164	44	8	15.7%	18,375	9.8	6	3	9	0	0	4
Orange	California	159	58	6	12.6%	18,197	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Salem	Oregon	145	43	12	6.7%	17,954	13.3	7	5	7	0	0	0
Lexington	Kentucky	216	49	12	5.5%	17,514	14.7	15	3	15	0	0	0
Jackson	Mississippi	190	48	10	9.7%	16,494	11.1	11	4	16	0	0	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	174	51	13	12.1%	15,808	11.2	5	3	5	0	0	1
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	54	11	8.4%	14,705	11.3	6	4	7	0	0	1
Woodbridge	Virginia	149	49	14	6.9%	14,577	13.0	3	3	5	0	0	0
West Covina	California	135	49	8	12.3%	13,445	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Pomona	California	137	41	11	8.0%	12,639	12.0	3	3	5	0	0	0
Des Moines	Iowa	180	48	13	5.6%	12,573	14.3	11	7	17	0	0	0
Fayetteville	North Carolina	160	42	12	5.0%	12,201	15.0	8	2	8	0	0	0
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	173	44	13	7.1%	12,005	12.9	9	2	9	0	0	0
Greenville	South Carolina	176	46	13	5.4%	11,896	14.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Edinburg	Texas	151	36	9	7.6%	11,784	12.3	3	3	4	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	136	42	9	9.2%	11,316	10.7	3	3	3	0	0	1
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	148	42	9	7.7%	11,281	12.6	5	5	5	0	0	0
Montgomery	Alabama	188	49	12	5.3%	11,209	14.3	13	1	13	0	0	0
Moreno Valley	California	127	40	12	5.4%	11,152	14.5	4	3	5	0	0	0
Cumming	Georgia	139	40	11	6.4%	10,426	13.7	3	3	4	0	0	0
Spartanburg	South Carolina	153	43	12	9.1%	10,185	11.0	5	2	5	0	0	3
Vero Beach	Florida	171	46	9	8.8%	10,182	11.2	6	5	7	0	0	2
Saginaw	Michigan	158	44	12	7.8%	10,181	13.0	7	3	11	0	0	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	96	30	8	10.0%	10,076	10.0	1	2	2	0	0	1
Victorville	California	124	36	11	7.3%	9,895	12.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Concord	California	134	47	9	7.4%	9,601	12.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	California	115	43	8	9.5%	9,360	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Fort Pierce	Florida	188	46	10	9.5%	9,051	12.0	8	6	11	0	0	1
York	Pennsylvania	197	42	14	4.9%	8,817	15.3	7	3	7	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	135	38	11	8.9%	8,523	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	109	33	12	8.0%	7,510	12.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Greeley	Colorado	109	34	12	6.5%	7,402	13.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	119	39	12	7.0%	7,295	13.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	137	32	12	7.2%	7,057	13.0	4	3	5	0	0	1
Perris	California	124	41	11	6.0%	7,043	14.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	124	43	12	7.0%	7,021	13.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	145	41	12	5.4%	6,951	14.4	5	2	6	0	0	0
Hawthorne	California	96	44	11	7.0%	6,779	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	152	46	13	5.4%	6,755	14.2	5	5	5	0	0	0
Pittsburg	California	96	38	10	7.0%	6,726	13.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Hesperia	California	104	32	11	6.4%	6,689	13.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Lake Charles	Louisiana	163	46	14	5.1%	6,650	15.0	5	4	6	0	0	0
El Monte	California	112	45	12	7.0%	6,560	13.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Metairie	Louisiana	149	46	15	4.5%	6,458	15.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Panama City	Florida	162	43	13	4.9%	6,178	15.2	6	4	9	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	128	51	13	4.0%	4,492	16.0	2	2	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	380	129	3	75.2%	1,847,440	3.6	62	4	64	0	49	62
San Diego	345	100	2	73.8%	994,446	3.5	36	2	36	0	29	36
San Francisco	248	94	2	74.4%	647,440	3.7	28	2	30	1	16	30
Sacramento	275	63	2	78.6%	632,800	3.2	28	2	29	0	25	29
Fresno	244	56	2	77.9%	469,525	3.5	18	1	18	0	15	18
Bakersfield	239	52	2	69.4%	388,127	4.1	11	1	11	0	7	11
Long Beach	215	65	2	74.1%	355,130	3.6	12	1	12	0	10	12
Oakland	243	70	2	70.2%	288,940	3.9	14	1	14	0	10	14
Santa Ana	169	56	2	76.7%	273,930	3.7	6	2	8	0	4	8
Stockton	211	44	2	71.1%	265,628	3.8	12	1	12	0	7	12
Anaheim	160	55	3	71.6%	264,077	3.7	7	1	7	0	2	7
Riverside	164	49	2	65.2%	241,359	4.3	7	2	7	0	3	7
San Bernardino	186	52	2	87.2%	217,642	2.1	7	2	10	0	10	10
Oxnard	154	46	2	86.0%	189,524	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Irvine	192	74	3	70.0%	187,287	4.1	9	1	9	0	6	9
Santa Rosa	166	51	2	84.6%	182,756	2.5	6	1	6	0	5	6
San Jose	285	84	8	17.3%	181,217	9.5	28	2	33	0	0	27
Fremont	144	47	2	76.9%	179,229	3.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Chula Vista	160	44	3	64.5%	168,153	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Escondido	138	45	3	80.0%	143,722	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Van Nuys	148	58	3	80.0%	142,250	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Whittier	208	70	3	65.5%	128,489	4.2	6	3	6	0	3	6
North Hollywood	153	65	2	83.7%	128,148	2.5	4	2	5	0	4	5
Oceanside	139	42	3	63.1%	126,413	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palmdale	156	48	3	71.2%	124,623	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
El Cajon	172	54	3	70.7%	121,982	4.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Visalia	140	39	2	80.0%	121,611	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Lancaster	135	37	3	63.6%	117,367	5.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Simi Valley	118	46	2	90.0%	115,841	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Santa Barbara	173	52	2	84.5%	114,851	2.6	7	1	7	0	7	7
Santa Clara	137	38	2	86.6%	108,652	2.5	4	1	4	0	4	4
Salinas	149	36	3	57.4%	108,146	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Vista	131	41	2	90.0%	107,880	2.0	3	2	6	0	6	6
Ontario	141	44	4	60.0%	105,989	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Modesto	162	50	4	39.9%	105,444	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	6
Pasadena	178	58	3	65.9%	103,988	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Rancho Cucamonga	143	49	4	57.1%	100,891	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	153	41	4	67.2%	96,102	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pacoima	95	37	2	90.0%	95,219	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Vallejo	141	51	2	75.1%	93,439	3.5	4	2	5	0	3	5
Corona	159	52	5	35.9%	92,394	7.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
Compton	133	55	3	66.2%	91,980	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tracy	147	40	2	78.1%	91,518	5.0	4	2	4	0	3	3
Fontana	128	41	6	38.5%	90,275	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	124	36	2	80.0%	88,577	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Carlsbad	144	48	2	77.9%	88,555	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Sylmar	99	40	2	90.0%	86,838	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Murrieta	124	36	3	65.2%	86,159	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bell Gardens	97	42	2	80.0%	81,946	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Merced	151	36	3	79.4%	81,842	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
San Mateo	156	51	4	57.0%	81,216	5.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Downey	139	53	3	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Daly City	150	56	2	68.7%	78,544	4.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Palo Alto	147	48	3	80.0%	77,345	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Hemet	139	42	4	60.0%	77,272	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hayward	135	39	5	40.0%	76,813	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Ventura	138	44	3	64.5%	74,803	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vacaville	114	35	4	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	147	55	2	72.7%	68,682	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Inglewood	177	72	5	50.0%	66,900	6.0	5	3	9	0	0	9
Rialto	127	38	4	60.0%	63,950	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norwalk	95	45	3	60.0%	63,532	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Livermore	125	42	3	65.7%	63,277	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Huntington Beach	153	56	6	31.6%	63,195	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roseville	138	41	7	44.6%	62,324	6.3	3	3	5	0	0	5
Costa Mesa	122	46	6	54.4%	61,931	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chico	143	35	4	50.0%	56,008	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Sunnyvale	160	58	4	35.6%	54,416	7.8	4	3	7	0	0	7
Indio	122	37	4	54.0%	51,892	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	117	35	5	43.4%	49,476	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	134	46	5	41.1%	47,043	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	150	59	5	26.7%	46,934	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Napa	123	33	6	48.5%	46,923	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fullerton	162	61	5	33.1%	46,037	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	180	69	7	25.1%	44,453	8.0	5	2	5	0	0	5
Clovis	143	40	5	34.2%	41,464	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Menifee	146	42	5	37.3%	41,276	9.8	4	3	4	0	0	2
La Puente	146	55	5	29.3%	34,616	7.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Madera	157	40	6	32.5%	33,428	7.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Elk Grove	136	41	8	17.2%	30,896	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Burbank	164	66	7	23.7%	25,604	8.8	5	3	7	0	0	6
Redding	177	40	6	20.9%	23,672	9.5	4	3	4	0	0	3
San Marcos	121	41	7	23.1%	23,215	10.0	2	3	3	0	0	1
San Leandro	127	41	8	20.5%	22,777	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Temecula	137	45	7	16.3%	21,213	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	159	44	11	20.0%	20,794	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Berkeley	214	58	9	15.2%	19,380	11.1	9	5	11	0	1	1
Chino	111	36	7	19.5%	18,428	10.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Orange	159	58	6	12.6%	18,197	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
West Covina	135	49	8	12.3%	13,445	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Pomona	137	41	11	8.0%	12,639	12.0	3	3	5	0	0	0
Moreno Valley	127	40	12	5.4%	11,152	14.5	4	3	5	0	0	0
Victorville	124	36	11	7.3%	9,895	12.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Concord	134	47	9	7.4%	9,601	12.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	115	43	8	9.5%	9,360	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Perris	124	41	11	6.0%	7,043	14.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Hawthorne	96	44	11	7.0%	6,779	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Pittsburg	96	38	10	7.0%	6,726	13.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Hesperia	104	32	11	6.4%	6,689	13.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
El Monte	112	45	12	7.0%	6,560	13.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
South Gate	97	44	14	3.0%	2,853	17.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

Houston

ZIP	varsitytutors.com	care.com	wyzant.com	tutors.com	universitytutor.com	suprexlearning.com
77088	3	4	7	8	9	11
77047	3	1	4	5	6	8
77037	3	1	4	5	6	8
77098	3	1	4	6	5	8
77027	3	1	4	5	6	8
77068	3	1	4	5	6	7
77078	3	1	4	5	6	8
77086	3	1	4	5	6	8
77035	3	1	4	5	7	6
77008	3	1	4	5	6	8
77004	3	1	4	5	6	7
77028	2	4	7	9	8	11
77059	3	1	4	5	6	7
77039	2	4	7	8	9	11
77019	3	1	4	5	6	8
77075	2	4	7	8	9	10
77077	3	1	4	5	7	6
77079	3	1	4	5	7	6
77099	3	1	4	5	6	7
77024	3	1	4	5	6	8
77095	3	1	4	5	6	8
77048	3	1	4	5	6	7
77044	3	1	4	5	6	7
77015	3	1	4	5	6	8
77017	3	1	4	5	6	7
77057	6	4	7	9	8	12
77055	6	4	7	8	9	3
77006	3	1	4	5	6	8
77026	1	4	7	8	9	11
77046	3	1	4	5	6	8
77066	3	1	4	5	6	8
77023	3	1	4	5	6	8
77094	3	1	4	5	6	7
77084	3	1	4	5	6	7
77013	3	1	4	5	6	7
77063	3	1	4	5	6	8
77053	3	1	5	4	7	6
77022	2	4	7	8	9	11
77072	3	1	4	5	7	6
77049	3	1	4	5	6	8
77045	3	1	4	5	6	8
77010	3	1	4	5	6	8
77018	3	1	4	5	6	8
77041	3	1	5	4	6	7
77009	3	1	4	5	6	8
77089	3	1	5	4	6	7
77032	3	1	4	5	6	8
77036	3	1	4	5	6	7
77085	3	1	4	5	7	6
77054	1	4	7	9	8	11
77058	3	1	4	5	6	7
77014	3	1	4	5	6	8
77067	3	1	4	5	6	8
77005	3	1	4	6	5	8
77076	2	4	7	8	9	11
77070	6	4	7	8	9	11
77060	6	4	7	8	9	11
77080	6	4	7	8	9	2
77050	3	1	4	5	6	8
77091	2	4	7	8	9	11
77071	3	1	4	5	7	6
77061	3	1	4	5	6	8
77020	3	1	4	5	6	9
77081	3	1	4	5	6	8
77030	3	1	4	5	6	8
77040	6	4	7	8	9	11
77090	3	1	5	4	6	9
77031	3	1	4	5	6	7
77051	3	1	4	5	6	8
77011	3	1	4	5	6	8
77042	6	4	7	8	2	9
77062	6	4	8	7	9	10
77082	3	1	4	5	7	6
77093	3	1	4	5	6	8
77073	6	4	7	8	9	11
77033	3	1	4	5	6	8
77043	3	1	4	5	6	9
77074	3	1	4	5	7	6
77064	6	4	7	8	9	11
77012	3	1	4	5	6	7
77002	3	1	4	5	6	7
77092	6	4	7	8	9	10
77069	3	1	4	5	6	7
77021	3	1	4	6	5	8
77083	3	1	6	4	7	5
77029	2	1	3	4	5	8
77034	3	1	4	5	6	7
77087	3	1	4	5	6	7
77003	6	4	7	9	8	1
77038	6	4	7	8	9	10
77007	3	1	4	6	5	8
77016	6	4	7	8	9	11
77065	3	1	4	5	6	8
77096	2	4	7	8	9	11
77025	3	1	4	6	5	8
77056	3	1	4	6	5	8

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Varsitytutors

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 2,537 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Varsitytutors Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (tutor near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Varsitytutors Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Varsitytutors Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Varsitytutors Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly