Twomenandatruck Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve twomenandatruck.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 6,962 Movers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Twomenandatruck Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Twomenandatruck Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Twomenandatruck Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
Texas
Chicago
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Twomenandatruck Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	12,478	6,962	4	42.4%	136,740,498	7.1	27,378	32,653	550	38,597	2,701	9,053	27,331
Texas	2,067	1,462	3	46.6%	12,990,886	8.2	1,360	1,917	34	2,125	118	646	1,346
Florida	1,841	1,331	3	58.5%	12,052,820	5.5	446	975	58	1,214	191	396	922
California	2,352	1,661	9	18.2%	7,114,057	11.1	1,166	1,740	16	2,286	36	202	1,115
Illinois	1,546	1,127	3	54.9%	7,034,706	6.0	1,247	1,382	47	1,648	92	486	1,262
Ohio	1,511	1,075	3	56.8%	6,613,825	5.6	976	1,188	40	1,443	98	453	1,126
Michigan	1,387	985	3	57.2%	5,693,747	5.4	833	976	60	1,254	86	272	1,079
North Carolina	1,374	995	3	54.5%	5,537,979	6.1	683	802	30	1,007	73	248	756
Pennsylvania	1,743	1,281	3	43.2%	5,527,668	7.0	1,604	1,781	11	1,987	120	367	1,477
Georgia	1,455	1,061	3	51.2%	5,275,679	6.6	574	726	40	872	91	238	621
Arizona	1,042	759	3	57.7%	4,006,715	6.3	247	396	16	494	63	137	348
New York	1,915	1,414	8	19.7%	3,874,575	9.6	1,491	1,756	12	2,000	1	243	1,274
Indiana	2,141	1,602	3	57.0%	3,785,141	5.1	659	770	35	928	122	328	796
Virginia	1,524	1,111	3	44.5%	3,747,117	6.6	723	891	22	1,030	77	299	774
Tennessee	1,262	906	3	54.9%	3,645,014	6.1	514	622	16	716	52	231	538
Missouri	1,447	1,041	3	56.4%	3,436,336	5.6	887	1,017	18	1,198	141	393	974
Wisconsin	1,319	929	3	53.3%	3,080,920	5.9	694	769	23	903	72	271	723
Colorado	1,317	977	3	54.4%	3,009,302	5.7	381	514	16	578	129	207	448
South Carolina	1,092	812	3	58.0%	2,874,246	6.0	347	422	21	566	76	137	450
Washington	1,322	975	4	38.3%	2,789,826	7.4	451	587	13	670	60	176	442
Alabama	1,237	886	3	56.4%	2,744,087	5.6	522	637	20	734	96	256	589
Louisiana	1,208	874	3	55.2%	2,573,412	6.7	431	510	10	586	87	166	400
Minnesota	1,335	950	4	44.9%	2,483,196	6.1	777	878	25	1,060	43	285	818
Nevada	775	568	1	84.5%	2,470,296	4.1	92	168	8	189	82	106	155
Kentucky	1,256	908	3	52.6%	2,340,326	5.8	698	758	12	891	20	269	706
Oklahoma	1,187	864	3	53.8%	2,106,891	6.2	557	646	10	797	64	251	573
Iowa	1,406	989	3	57.5%	1,801,922	5.7	889	932	17	1,067	125	368	861
Maryland	1,091	823	4	29.3%	1,759,653	8.4	392	463	13	560	12	34	338
Massachusetts	1,007	783	7	24.3%	1,659,284	9.0	461	534	9	610	2	61	335
New Jersey	1,135	871	8	15.5%	1,380,543	10.1	537	593	15	783	4	18	396
Mississippi	1,137	832	4	44.2%	1,320,952	6.8	384	418	12	467	28	91	353
Nebraska	1,202	879	1	68.9%	1,311,637	5.8	524	581	6	659	130	144	498
Oregon	1,456	1,104	5	29.7%	1,212,102	8.5	355	414	7	457	0	83	276
New Mexico	1,054	780	3	56.4%	1,178,508	5.9	327	361	8	464	29	123	368
Kansas	1,225	903	4	40.1%	1,166,769	7.1	616	692	7	814	62	241	506
Connecticut	945	734	6	31.6%	1,130,428	7.3	234	279	11	413	7	50	286
Arkansas	1,182	859	5	37.3%	1,116,339	6.9	553	587	11	701	22	158	509
Utah	981	743	7	25.8%	785,807	7.9	246	284	4	340	20	55	195
Idaho	998	765	4	42.3%	714,137	7.0	251	273	5	315	25	84	209
Delaware	654	511	3	54.8%	520,288	5.7	52	66	7	100	9	18	90
Maine	1,420	1,125	7	31.8%	424,232	7.6	421	425	5	476	9	27	374
South Dakota	937	709	3	48.7%	420,352	7.0	359	370	5	409	39	116	298
Montana	1,054	801	4	39.8%	414,939	7.7	348	361	6	416	35	109	264
West Virginia	1,191	902	8	17.5%	320,343	9.2	684	704	4	752	1	8	483
North Dakota	822	632	5	36.8%	276,462	9.0	367	381	5	439	51	62	238
New Hampshire	785	616	10	19.2%	257,979	9.0	238	248	2	256	0	8	172
Hawaii	621	465	11	13.7%	194,444	10.9	82	93	2	97	0	1	51
Vermont	879	681	8	30.8%	192,217	6.9	250	254	3	275	0	7	221
Wyoming	842	633	7	28.5%	166,138	7.9	164	171	5	199	1	17	124
Alaska	877	650	11	16.4%	120,706	8.5	218	235	2	239	0	107	159
Rhode Island	556	441	15	7.2%	75,920	12.6	64	77	2	84	0	0	15

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Chicago	Illinois	233	190	2	82.2%	2,220,836	2.8	56	1	56	0	41	56
Houston	Texas	326	255	3	67.2%	2,142,960	4.3	96	2	97	2	37	97
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	242	184	1	93.4%	1,471,911	1.7	47	2	47	36	36	47
Las Vegas	Nevada	298	223	1	95.2%	1,471,067	1.3	43	1	43	38	38	43
San Antonio	Texas	260	204	3	73.0%	1,297,959	3.8	59	2	60	1	43	60
Phoenix	Arizona	212	158	1	87.5%	1,269,061	2.3	42	3	46	11	33	46
Miami	Florida	363	293	2	67.4%	1,266,870	4.7	55	4	64	0	31	51
San Diego	California	249	201	1	88.1%	1,187,145	2.8	36	2	36	21	22	34
Austin	Texas	235	179	2	86.4%	940,306	2.5	44	2	45	0	37	45
Denver	Colorado	270	207	1	79.9%	869,020	3.3	38	3	45	26	27	32
Charlotte	North Carolina	213	153	1	92.4%	837,299	1.7	24	2	25	18	19	25
Fort Worth	Texas	223	183	1	88.5%	807,354	2.0	32	2	34	21	22	34
Tucson	Arizona	301	240	1	88.1%	797,102	1.9	32	2	34	21	24	34
Orlando	Florida	261	206	2	78.0%	777,001	3.0	32	3	34	0	22	34
Jacksonville	Florida	250	194	1	89.2%	773,851	1.8	31	2	32	22	23	32
Atlanta	Georgia	327	254	2	77.2%	763,071	3.4	39	7	47	22	26	41
Tampa	Florida	248	202	1	94.1%	746,008	1.7	27	2	28	15	25	28
San Jose	California	200	161	3	70.2%	737,703	4.0	28	1	28	0	19	28
Seattle	Washington	240	189	2	77.2%	737,440	3.2	35	2	36	0	23	35
El Paso	Texas	305	246	1	90.6%	715,258	2.3	24	3	28	13	15	28
Cincinnati	Ohio	311	239	2	86.5%	695,543	2.4	45	2	47	2	39	47
Sacramento	California	265	215	2	79.4%	638,852	2.9	28	2	29	0	20	29
Cleveland	Ohio	290	229	1	84.5%	634,249	2.6	29	3	32	19	19	28
Louisville	Kentucky	298	233	2	83.2%	632,914	2.7	32	1	32	0	25	32
Indianapolis	Indiana	302	245	3	65.8%	626,258	4.4	37	3	38	0	16	38
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	354	278	1	91.5%	624,174	1.7	39	3	43	29	31	43
Saint Louis	Missouri	405	319	3	66.1%	606,055	4.2	45	3	48	3	25	48
Albuquerque	New Mexico	252	200	2	90.0%	590,135	2.0	17	1	17	0	17	17
Columbus	Ohio	297	229	3	68.4%	578,880	4.1	30	3	33	1	22	29
Colorado Springs	Colorado	259	206	1	92.7%	540,802	1.8	30	2	31	23	23	31
Kansas City	Missouri	261	206	1	94.2%	538,421	1.7	49	2	50	38	38	50
Minneapolis	Minnesota	343	268	5	48.4%	527,198	6.7	51	8	68	1	20	38
Detroit	Michigan	236	193	2	82.3%	527,163	2.6	25	2	27	1	20	27
Omaha	Nebraska	297	236	1	94.7%	523,280	1.4	31	2	33	26	27	33
Memphis	Tennessee	301	242	3	74.9%	520,518	3.9	26	2	28	0	19	24
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	282	222	2	63.7%	516,780	4.9	29	3	35	1	14	27
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	363	282	3	74.8%	510,859	3.2	43	2	44	2	31	42
Raleigh	North Carolina	189	145	1	92.5%	505,789	1.8	15	1	15	11	11	15
Portland	Oregon	227	186	5	50.0%	459,997	6.0	33	1	33	0	1	32
Mesa	Arizona	194	154	2	84.9%	454,065	2.8	13	1	13	4	9	13
Birmingham	Alabama	324	252	1	87.5%	437,593	1.9	30	1	30	20	22	30
Salt Lake City	Utah	260	207	1	88.2%	429,286	2.1	19	1	19	13	14	19
Nashville	Tennessee	232	181	1	91.9%	421,468	1.7	22	2	23	17	17	23
Virginia Beach	Virginia	226	189	1	93.2%	419,636	1.8	12	2	14	8	10	14
Baltimore	Maryland	229	186	4	64.1%	404,513	4.8	22	2	23	0	0	22
New Orleans	Louisiana	248	199	1	94.4%	403,888	1.6	19	1	19	14	17	19
Tulsa	Oklahoma	285	227	1	93.3%	393,934	1.9	28	1	28	20	20	28
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	299	248	4	47.3%	393,284	6.4	27	3	32	0	9	19
Wichita	Kansas	254	209	1	93.8%	392,015	1.7	26	2	28	19	21	28
Richmond	Virginia	240	184	1	96.8%	378,475	1.3	15	2	16	13	14	16
Saint Paul	Minnesota	319	252	4	46.3%	370,575	6.5	30	7	43	1	4	28
West Palm Beach	Florida	212	175	1	95.3%	353,160	1.6	12	2	13	9	11	13
Spokane	Washington	253	197	1	96.2%	346,049	1.6	14	1	14	11	11	14
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	301	235	1	87.5%	331,686	2.2	18	1	18	11	11	18
Spring	Texas	188	152	2	86.8%	330,609	2.3	8	3	9	1	7	9
Arlington	Texas	173	141	2	83.2%	330,223	2.6	12	1	12	4	8	12
Knoxville	Tennessee	293	225	2	83.1%	321,193	2.5	17	2	18	0	14	18
Grand Rapids	Michigan	242	195	2	86.8%	319,107	2.3	12	3	15	1	11	15
Corpus Christi	Texas	239	197	1	97.1%	316,239	1.4	18	2	23	13	18	23
Columbia	South Carolina	239	190	1	89.3%	306,335	1.9	14	1	14	10	10	14
Lexington	Kentucky	267	212	1	92.8%	296,754	1.4	15	1	15	13	13	15
Vancouver	Washington	200	169	1	90.6%	295,337	1.9	11	2	13	7	9	13
Marietta	Georgia	178	141	1	91.0%	293,466	2.3	7	2	8	5	5	8
Fort Wayne	Indiana	252	200	1	91.9%	292,670	1.9	16	2	17	11	12	17
Dayton	Ohio	334	261	4	59.8%	285,922	5.0	27	4	30	2	12	28
Reno	Nevada	255	205	1	96.0%	284,780	1.7	12	2	15	9	10	15
Henderson	Nevada	179	132	1	93.9%	284,137	1.6	8	3	11	5	9	11
Naples	Florida	264	215	1	89.6%	280,665	2.0	14	2	15	10	10	15
Santa Ana	California	161	130	2	78.5%	280,328	3.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Lincoln	Nebraska	312	249	1	96.2%	278,215	1.5	22	2	23	17	19	23
Tallahassee	Florida	228	185	1	96.1%	276,721	1.4	10	2	11	8	9	11
Toledo	Ohio	230	188	2	89.4%	275,062	2.2	15	2	16	0	14	16
Madison	Wisconsin	213	167	1	91.8%	270,715	2.0	14	2	15	8	10	15
Durham	North Carolina	181	143	2	89.4%	259,365	2.3	8	2	9	1	7	9
Scottsdale	Arizona	183	148	2	86.3%	257,277	2.4	11	3	12	0	10	12
Mobile	Alabama	289	217	1	92.7%	251,544	2.1	18	2	19	11	13	19
Akron	Ohio	256	207	1	91.4%	246,987	2.1	17	2	23	9	13	23
Lawrenceville	Georgia	157	128	1	95.6%	244,947	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Buffalo	New York	306	241	5	43.1%	242,403	9.5	28	4	32	0	1	18
Pensacola	Florida	254	197	1	87.6%	234,980	2.4	13	2	15	7	9	15
Greensboro	North Carolina	175	137	3	71.3%	233,710	4.1	9	1	9	0	5	9
Boise	Idaho	201	162	1	90.5%	231,793	1.7	9	1	9	7	7	9
Kissimmee	Florida	223	182	1	80.2%	231,767	3.3	7	3	8	3	3	8
Savannah	Georgia	218	174	1	95.9%	231,260	2.0	10	2	11	6	7	11
Plano	Texas	145	115	3	75.1%	229,358	3.4	7	2	8	0	6	8
Lakeland	Florida	221	182	1	88.6%	228,389	2.0	9	1	9	6	6	9
Saint Petersburg	Florida	216	177	5	61.1%	217,825	4.8	16	3	20	0	4	20
Chesapeake	Virginia	181	146	2	90.7%	215,738	1.8	6	2	7	1	6	7
Springfield	Missouri	196	152	1	93.6%	215,728	1.7	7	2	8	5	6	8
North Las Vegas	Nevada	171	130	1	92.3%	215,723	2.1	7	1	7	4	5	7
Ocala	Florida	204	174	1	93.6%	210,730	1.7	11	2	12	8	9	12
Des Moines	Iowa	232	177	1	93.5%	208,722	1.5	11	1	11	9	9	11
Katy	Texas	167	136	3	60.1%	206,757	4.0	4	2	4	1	2	4
Sarasota	Florida	214	174	2	82.1%	205,378	3.1	13	1	13	0	10	13
Fort Myers	Florida	224	189	2	81.0%	203,686	3.2	11	2	13	0	8	13
Little Rock	Arkansas	261	210	1	91.8%	200,192	2.0	12	1	12	8	8	12
Fayetteville	North Carolina	177	141	2	78.5%	191,487	2.8	8	1	8	0	6	8
Garland	Texas	134	108	3	80.0%	190,343	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Gainesville	Florida	210	172	1	90.2%	188,879	1.9	10	1	10	7	7	10
Greenville	South Carolina	200	161	1	85.0%	186,569	3.1	9	1	9	2	4	9
Charleston	South Carolina	220	171	1	92.9%	182,955	2.7	10	1	10	4	6	10
Chattanooga	Tennessee	266	216	2	86.3%	179,516	2.4	15	2	17	2	13	17
Augusta	Georgia	212	169	2	87.5%	178,851	2.3	8	2	10	0	8	10
Wilmington	Delaware	220	184	2	80.2%	175,946	2.4	10	2	11	7	7	11
Green Bay	Wisconsin	196	152	1	95.3%	174,685	1.9	7	1	7	5	5	7
Henrico	Virginia	215	166	1	90.1%	173,715	2.4	7	3	9	3	6	9
Beaverton	Oregon	151	131	2	86.1%	173,541	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Mckinney	Texas	132	111	2	90.8%	171,603	2.0	3	2	4	1	3	4
Pompano Beach	Florida	218	181	5	46.1%	170,845	7.8	10	6	16	1	4	7
Hollywood	Florida	185	153	5	36.4%	170,540	8.3	9	4	15	0	1	7
Jackson	Mississippi	255	206	1	99.9%	170,168	1.3	11	1	11	10	10	11
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	206	167	1	93.5%	169,770	2.0	9	1	9	6	6	9
Evansville	Indiana	188	154	1	91.9%	169,537	1.7	9	2	10	7	7	10
Winston Salem	North Carolina	203	167	3	64.1%	169,418	3.9	9	1	9	0	6	9
Boca Raton	Florida	188	148	2	74.3%	165,179	3.6	9	1	9	0	4	9
Littleton	Colorado	222	175	5	50.4%	164,108	7.1	10	3	13	4	4	5
Los Angeles	California	316	261	13	6.6%	161,006	15.0	62	2	63	0	0	11
Decatur	Georgia	172	136	1	88.3%	159,586	2.6	5	2	6	3	3	6
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	165	135	2	83.8%	156,111	2.4	5	1	5	0	4	5
Kalamazoo	Michigan	185	149	1	93.1%	152,873	1.6	7	2	8	5	6	8
Alpharetta	Georgia	169	140	2	80.6%	152,506	2.8	4	2	5	0	3	5
Huntsville	Alabama	241	190	2	76.8%	150,611	3.5	11	1	11	0	5	11
Rockford	Illinois	188	159	2	82.4%	150,234	2.8	9	1	9	1	7	9
Lafayette	Louisiana	167	128	1	92.2%	148,069	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
South Bend	Indiana	226	191	1	100.0%	146,712	1.0	10	1	10	10	10	10
Pueblo	Colorado	200	154	1	92.7%	146,662	1.6	7	2	9	4	7	9
Newport News	Virginia	172	135	2	82.8%	146,346	2.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Roanoke	Virginia	260	210	2	85.5%	144,924	3.4	10	2	11	0	7	10
Lansing	Michigan	186	151	2	88.0%	144,611	2.6	7	1	7	0	6	7
Fort Collins	Colorado	152	122	3	72.6%	141,462	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Flint	Michigan	203	150	1	90.7%	141,050	1.9	7	2	9	5	5	9
Cary	North Carolina	153	126	2	90.0%	139,799	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Naperville	Illinois	125	108	2	83.2%	138,004	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Lake Worth	Florida	176	145	4	66.8%	137,909	4.0	5	5	10	1	2	10
Glendale	Arizona	178	146	7	44.8%	136,586	6.0	9	2	16	2	2	15
Sugar Land	Texas	139	113	1	80.6%	136,134	2.3	3	2	3	1	2	3
Melbourne	Florida	174	140	2	87.2%	135,806	2.4	5	2	6	1	4	6
Ann Arbor	Michigan	145	111	1	81.4%	135,641	3.0	5	2	6	1	2	6
Carrollton	Texas	121	99	1	100.0%	134,811	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Everett	Washington	163	136	2	80.2%	133,593	2.8	5	1	5	0	4	5
Bloomington	Indiana	168	138	1	100.0%	133,573	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Canton	Ohio	252	198	1	88.8%	130,489	2.0	12	2	13	8	8	13
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	166	128	1	88.7%	129,075	2.2	5	1	5	2	4	5
Youngstown	Ohio	235	192	2	82.1%	128,955	2.2	12	1	12	8	8	12
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	175	135	1	91.1%	127,024	1.5	6	1	6	5	5	6
Pasadena	California	158	134	2	78.7%	124,140	3.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Charlottesville	Virginia	175	142	1	100.0%	122,981	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Spring Hill	Florida	161	131	1	97.9%	122,801	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	135	110	1	100.0%	122,640	1.0	4	2	5	4	4	5
Boston	Massachusetts	176	148	3	80.7%	122,442	3.4	14	1	14	0	12	14
Mission	Texas	143	115	4	67.5%	122,154	5.7	3	2	3	2	2	2
Clearwater	Florida	204	164	3	66.6%	122,096	5.1	9	2	11	0	4	7
Santa Fe	New Mexico	168	144	1	94.2%	120,683	2.0	5	2	6	3	4	6
Pearland	Texas	145	113	2	85.6%	117,753	3.0	2	2	3	1	1	3
Conroe	Texas	163	130	2	72.9%	116,911	3.6	7	1	7	1	3	7
Rock Hill	South Carolina	136	111	1	100.0%	116,360	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Stamford	Connecticut	160	131	2	90.0%	115,872	2.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Saint Charles	Missouri	143	115	2	82.3%	115,074	2.7	3	3	5	1	2	5
Humble	Texas	145	116	3	67.7%	112,754	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Chico	California	141	113	1	100.0%	112,015	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Spartanburg	South Carolina	150	125	1	100.0%	111,957	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Hampton	Virginia	191	155	3	82.0%	111,664	3.2	6	1	6	1	4	6
Edmond	Oklahoma	183	139	3	63.7%	109,353	5.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Athens	Georgia	180	143	1	87.4%	109,055	2.0	6	1	6	4	4	6
Panama City	Florida	213	172	1	85.4%	107,902	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Tempe	Arizona	128	100	4	56.7%	107,729	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Cajon	California	151	122	2	62.4%	107,636	5.0	3	2	4	0	2	2
Appleton	Wisconsin	152	124	1	88.3%	107,414	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Fargo	North Dakota	155	125	1	87.3%	106,955	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Asheville	North Carolina	166	136	2	79.2%	104,655	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
New Haven	Connecticut	174	145	3	79.4%	103,398	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Montgomery	Alabama	234	186	6	48.8%	102,441	6.7	13	1	13	0	0	13
Joliet	Illinois	160	130	2	77.6%	100,060	3.6	5	2	6	0	2	6
Elgin	Illinois	127	106	3	80.0%	97,770	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Boulder	Colorado	160	131	2	74.2%	97,384	3.5	6	1	6	0	3	6
Missoula	Montana	180	145	1	100.0%	97,283	1.0	5	2	7	5	5	7
Saint Augustine	Florida	196	159	3	73.6%	96,490	3.4	5	2	5	2	2	5
Ypsilanti	Michigan	119	93	1	89.1%	95,260	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Champaign	Illinois	140	114	1	100.0%	94,567	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Livonia	Michigan	131	105	1	100.0%	94,567	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Woodstock	Georgia	117	93	2	90.0%	91,549	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
New Port Richey	Florida	163	133	3	73.9%	89,322	3.0	4	1	4	3	3	4
Grand Junction	Colorado	183	142	1	84.6%	89,215	2.3	6	2	7	3	4	7
Lake Charles	Louisiana	186	147	4	68.0%	88,910	6.0	5	3	7	2	2	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	180	140	1	93.5%	88,795	1.5	6	2	7	5	5	7
Metairie	Louisiana	166	138	4	61.6%	87,698	4.6	5	1	5	0	2	5
Waukesha	Wisconsin	138	111	1	89.6%	85,802	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Norfolk	Virginia	214	174	7	34.8%	85,586	7.5	14	1	14	0	0	14
Franklin	Tennessee	121	99	3	80.0%	85,179	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Hamilton	Ohio	148	111	4	62.0%	85,044	5.0	3	4	5	1	1	4
Hialeah	Florida	188	160	8	22.6%	83,043	10.9	7	5	12	0	1	2
Mcallen	Texas	139	114	6	58.2%	82,338	6.3	3	2	3	1	1	2
Gaithersburg	Maryland	146	124	4	56.7%	81,977	4.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mcdonough	Georgia	118	96	3	80.0%	81,170	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Racine	Wisconsin	166	129	2	63.8%	80,421	4.8	5	2	6	0	1	6
Holland	Michigan	129	106	1	85.5%	80,227	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Trenton	New Jersey	179	146	5	38.5%	80,079	8.0	11	3	13	1	2	9
Keller	Texas	137	112	2	68.8%	80,032	6.5	2	1	2	1	1	1
Frederick	Maryland	131	109	5	59.7%	78,830	10.0	4	2	4	2	2	2
Jamaica	New York	134	115	8	31.9%	77,824	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fort Mill	South Carolina	141	106	1	80.3%	76,331	3.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
Round Rock	Texas	149	115	3	45.5%	76,204	6.7	3	2	3	0	1	2
Westerville	Ohio	113	85	3	80.0%	76,166	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Sparks	Nevada	174	134	3	63.4%	75,629	4.8	4	1	4	2	2	3
Plainfield	Illinois	160	133	3	75.5%	74,395	3.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Missouri City	Texas	144	118	3	69.7%	73,911	4.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Englewood	Colorado	176	146	3	66.1%	73,740	4.3	4	2	4	1	2	4
Springdale	Arkansas	125	96	3	74.1%	71,480	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Meridian	Idaho	119	93	3	67.0%	69,868	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	123	103	4	70.0%	69,391	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Delray Beach	Florida	163	137	4	57.2%	68,105	5.4	5	2	6	0	0	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	177	145	4	64.8%	66,797	4.4	5	2	6	0	4	5
Davenport	Iowa	168	134	5	63.0%	66,045	4.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Acworth	Georgia	122	96	4	65.8%	65,614	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	175	145	4	68.4%	64,975	4.2	5	2	6	0	2	6
Miami Beach	Florida	166	137	4	56.0%	64,814	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bradenton	Florida	214	177	8	25.5%	64,425	9.3	10	2	13	0	0	7
Ballwin	Missouri	124	101	3	67.8%	64,204	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	216	173	4	64.7%	61,905	5.1	8	2	9	0	1	9
Flushing	New York	122	102	10	28.7%	61,771	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elkhart	Indiana	148	114	5	62.1%	61,751	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vero Beach	Florida	180	140	6	50.9%	58,661	6.0	6	2	7	1	1	7
Cape Coral	Florida	190	154	8	32.4%	58,555	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	3
Edinburg	Texas	149	112	7	37.0%	57,610	7.0	3	2	3	0	1	2
Riverview	Florida	153	121	4	50.9%	56,681	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Alexandria	Virginia	212	178	11	15.6%	55,388	11.1	14	3	15	0	0	3
Bothell	Washington	152	130	5	42.9%	55,081	10.7	3	4	5	0	1	1
Boynton Beach	Florida	161	131	7	31.2%	54,267	8.5	6	3	13	0	1	10
Nampa	Idaho	129	104	6	45.9%	53,190	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orange	California	137	112	6	36.0%	52,231	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Midlothian	Virginia	139	114	3	53.9%	52,193	6.3	3	4	5	1	1	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	161	120	5	54.8%	51,877	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cypress	Texas	114	95	7	30.0%	51,180	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Milton	Florida	155	123	5	52.5%	49,767	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Renton	Washington	183	152	6	31.8%	49,284	9.6	5	3	7	0	1	3
Elk Grove	California	123	107	8	26.4%	47,406	8.3	3	2	4	0	0	3
O Fallon	Missouri	129	104	6	49.1%	47,395	6.0	2	3	5	0	1	3
Chandler	Arizona	160	128	10	17.1%	45,804	10.8	6	2	10	0	0	3
Dearborn	Michigan	151	124	6	47.7%	45,391	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ridgewood	New York	97	82	7	40.0%	42,687	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	192	150	9	20.9%	42,498	8.3	6	2	7	0	0	6
Sandy	Utah	126	103	7	37.8%	41,763	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Lynnwood	Washington	155	133	6	38.0%	41,234	7.3	3	3	4	0	1	3
Palm Bay	Florida	169	138	8	35.5%	39,547	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elmhurst	New York	97	83	7	40.0%	37,587	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Newnan	Georgia	128	99	7	40.0%	37,358	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Herndon	Virginia	130	114	8	39.6%	37,010	9.0	2	2	3	0	1	1
Clinton Township	Michigan	135	109	7	36.7%	36,771	8.3	3	3	5	0	1	1
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	151	125	7	36.5%	35,729	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Muncie	Indiana	175	141	6	38.0%	35,233	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Astoria	New York	146	121	10	24.4%	34,771	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Broomfield	Colorado	145	115	8	33.1%	34,690	7.7	3	3	4	0	1	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	145	123	9	27.0%	34,664	8.7	3	4	6	0	0	4
Peoria	Arizona	137	119	9	19.6%	33,772	9.0	4	2	5	0	0	4
Longmont	Colorado	137	112	10	24.7%	32,330	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	2
Surprise	Arizona	152	126	8	23.6%	31,937	8.8	4	2	7	0	0	5
Florissant	Missouri	143	111	7	29.1%	31,538	8.0	3	2	5	0	1	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	121	101	8	30.0%	30,861	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rockville	Maryland	157	134	10	20.6%	29,788	10.0	4	2	4	0	0	2
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	135	105	8	30.2%	29,406	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Dallas	Texas	253	200	33	2.1%	28,991	27.3	48	3	50	0	1	1
Silver Spring	Maryland	191	167	15	9.5%	28,829	12.6	7	2	8	0	0	2
Whittier	California	199	170	9	14.6%	28,604	10.5	6	3	11	0	0	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	189	153	7	29.0%	27,650	8.9	7	2	8	0	0	5
Lees Summit	Missouri	181	145	10	26.8%	27,405	7.8	6	2	7	0	0	7
Falls Church	Virginia	186	156	9	22.6%	27,251	9.6	5	2	7	1	1	3
Hartford	Connecticut	181	154	10	21.5%	26,497	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Puyallup	Washington	176	144	10	17.2%	24,588	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Independence	Missouri	178	146	9	19.6%	24,360	8.8	8	2	12	0	0	7
Yonkers	New York	167	142	13	13.2%	23,879	9.8	5	2	6	0	0	4
Norman	Oklahoma	162	124	11	18.6%	23,125	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Sunnyvale	California	152	124	12	14.5%	22,176	13.5	4	2	4	0	1	1
Brooklyn	New York	210	161	57	0.8%	21,339	36.8	37	2	39	0	0	0
Newark	New Jersey	152	126	13	7.0%	19,748	12.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	121	98	10	18.8%	18,866	10.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Corona	California	162	140	14	7.2%	18,584	13.0	5	3	7	0	0	0
Fontana	California	140	116	12	7.8%	18,389	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	147	126	10	18.0%	18,095	9.7	3	3	6	0	0	3
Gilbert	Arizona	146	116	12	7.5%	17,864	12.5	6	2	8	0	0	1
Moreno Valley	California	135	110	12	8.5%	17,484	11.8	4	2	5	0	0	0
Saginaw	Michigan	196	160	12	13.1%	17,120	10.1	7	2	9	0	0	5
Tacoma	Washington	270	228	19	5.1%	16,868	20.3	20	1	20	0	0	2
Sterling Heights	Michigan	156	130	9	12.5%	16,608	9.8	4	2	6	0	0	4
Torrance	California	169	143	13	9.1%	16,095	17.8	5	3	6	0	1	1
San Bernardino	California	182	150	15	6.2%	15,389	13.4	7	2	11	0	0	0
Lancaster	California	161	128	12	8.2%	15,098	12.0	3	2	4	0	0	1
Homestead	Florida	209	176	10	8.0%	15,034	12.0	7	3	9	0	0	3
Brownsville	Texas	145	115	12	7.3%	14,702	13.0	3	2	5	0	0	0
Lithonia	Georgia	126	104	10	15.2%	14,660	10.5	2	3	4	0	0	2
New York City	New York	211	171	39	0.9%	14,615	29.0	47	2	52	0	0	0
Cumming	Georgia	132	104	10	9.0%	14,582	11.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Compton	California	126	111	14	10.5%	14,529	11.3	3	2	5	0	0	2
Lynchburg	Virginia	164	133	12	14.2%	14,486	13.0	4	3	6	0	0	1
La Puente	California	148	124	15	12.2%	14,447	11.0	2	3	3	0	0	1
Bronx	New York	165	137	22	1.0%	14,081	21.9	25	2	25	0	0	0
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	201	165	11	8.1%	13,750	12.1	9	2	10	0	0	0
Oxnard	California	148	121	14	6.2%	13,634	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bakersfield	California	224	185	16	2.4%	13,178	18.0	11	1	11	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	122	99	10	12.2%	13,044	10.7	3	2	5	0	0	1
Tracy	California	161	134	11	11.1%	12,950	10.8	4	3	6	0	0	2
Woodbridge	Virginia	145	123	16	6.1%	12,918	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Fremont	California	136	117	13	5.5%	12,867	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Aurora	Colorado	176	144	18	2.9%	12,703	17.1	11	1	11	0	0	0
Olympia	Washington	202	169	16	6.9%	12,626	13.3	6	2	7	0	0	0
Roseville	California	148	126	11	9.0%	12,581	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Palmdale	California	143	122	11	7.1%	12,505	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ontario	California	126	103	14	7.0%	12,311	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Garden Grove	California	147	120	11	6.7%	11,707	13.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
West Valley City	Utah	145	115	12	8.6%	11,439	11.7	3	2	6	0	0	1
Huntington Beach	California	132	101	16	5.7%	11,366	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Summerville	South Carolina	127	94	14	8.2%	11,365	12.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Kent	Washington	151	129	13	7.1%	11,326	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fairfax	Virginia	159	139	12	6.9%	11,237	12.8	4	4	7	0	0	2
Odessa	Texas	170	136	12	7.0%	11,181	12.8	6	2	7	0	0	0
Perris	California	121	97	9	9.5%	11,175	10.5	2	3	4	0	0	1
Honolulu	Hawaii	206	166	19	2.6%	11,006	17.6	11	1	11	0	0	0
Laredo	Texas	158	129	13	4.0%	10,927	16.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Paterson	New Jersey	161	125	14	7.4%	10,774	13.0	9	4	13	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	157	136	18	7.1%	10,746	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Bridgeport	Connecticut	172	142	13	7.2%	10,516	13.2	6	2	8	0	0	0
Escondido	California	135	114	16	5.8%	10,504	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Reading	Pennsylvania	197	167	14	4.8%	10,436	14.7	10	2	13	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	141	116	13	9.1%	10,420	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Overland Park	Kansas	200	161	19	5.6%	10,208	14.3	9	2	15	0	0	0
Inglewood	California	179	154	15	7.6%	10,158	12.6	5	2	6	0	0	0
Warren	Michigan	160	128	12	7.5%	10,129	12.6	5	2	6	0	0	0
Pomona	California	124	100	13	6.4%	10,069	14.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Irving	Texas	144	116	16	4.2%	10,025	16.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Santa Maria	California	150	119	12	7.0%	9,971	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Erie	Pennsylvania	211	175	13	5.4%	9,934	14.6	13	2	14	0	0	0
Riverside	California	175	140	18	2.7%	9,877	17.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Washington DC	District of Columbia	223	191	28	1.4%	9,629	19.7	28	1	28	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	129	105	12	9.5%	9,566	11.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
Fullerton	California	132	108	12	6.9%	9,554	12.8	4	2	6	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	159	128	12	7.8%	9,541	12.3	4	2	5	0	0	0
Antioch	California	118	98	11	8.6%	9,527	11.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	189	163	15	7.5%	9,513	12.7	9	2	12	0	0	0
Hayward	California	146	122	14	5.0%	9,511	15.3	4	2	5	0	0	0
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	147	120	11	7.5%	9,437	12.5	4	2	5	0	0	0
Vallejo	California	141	117	12	7.5%	9,393	12.5	4	2	6	0	0	0
Largo	Florida	161	129	11	8.7%	9,361	11.4	5	2	10	0	0	0
Baytown	Texas	139	112	15	7.9%	9,358	12.7	3	2	5	0	0	0
San Leandro	California	126	107	11	8.4%	9,306	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	98	84	11	9.0%	9,219	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Las Cruces	New Mexico	197	155	13	6.2%	9,188	13.4	7	2	8	0	0	0
Hemet	California	146	120	14	7.1%	9,174	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Federal Way	Washington	120	99	10	9.0%	9,013	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Visalia	California	137	109	14	5.9%	8,902	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Chula Vista	California	178	149	17	3.4%	8,874	15.8	5	2	8	0	0	1
Long Beach	California	165	134	20	1.8%	8,794	18.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
West Covina	California	112	92	12	8.0%	8,753	12.0	3	2	5	0	0	0
Covington	Georgia	130	102	10	9.4%	8,726	10.5	2	2	4	0	0	1
Hawthorne	California	97	78	10	9.0%	8,715	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Livermore	California	122	105	11	9.0%	8,663	11.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Olathe	Kansas	114	93	14	6.0%	8,662	14.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	198	160	11	7.9%	8,600	12.5	6	2	7	0	0	0
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	142	114	15	6.6%	8,575	13.7	3	2	6	0	0	0
South Gate	California	97	84	9	9.0%	8,559	11.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Beaumont	Texas	186	146	16	5.9%	8,551	14.8	8	2	9	0	0	0
Hesperia	California	122	101	10	8.2%	8,535	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Ogden	Utah	177	144	15	4.2%	8,532	16.6	5	2	9	0	0	0
Menifee	California	165	142	12	7.7%	8,504	12.0	4	2	6	0	0	0
Grand Prairie	Texas	130	111	15	4.4%	8,461	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Salem	Oregon	180	147	16	3.2%	8,402	16.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	103	84	10	8.5%	8,392	11.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Lynn	Massachusetts	132	111	11	8.9%	8,366	11.8	4	2	6	0	0	0
Schenectady	New York	188	152	17	5.1%	8,320	15.0	8	1	8	0	0	0
Mesquite	Texas	119	96	13	5.6%	8,229	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Yakima	Washington	151	126	13	6.3%	8,163	13.8	4	2	5	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	127	107	11	7.4%	8,159	12.5	2	3	4	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	133	113	13	7.0%	8,157	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	152	129	10	8.3%	8,092	12.3	3	2	4	0	0	0
Anaheim	California	137	104	19	2.2%	8,068	17.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Murrieta	California	125	106	14	6.1%	8,015	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Greeley	Colorado	121	101	12	7.0%	7,985	13.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
West Jordan	Utah	153	123	15	6.5%	7,976	13.7	3	2	6	0	0	0
San Mateo	California	162	128	19	5.5%	7,815	14.8	4	2	5	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	172	140	15	6.0%	7,808	13.4	5	2	10	0	0	0
Rancho Cucamonga	California	137	109	16	4.4%	7,776	15.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Rialto	California	133	107	13	7.3%	7,744	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Allentown	Pennsylvania	163	134	15	4.5%	7,731	15.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	100	87	11	8.0%	7,719	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Pittsburg	California	96	79	12	8.0%	7,686	12.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Victorville	California	146	117	16	5.5%	7,552	14.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	152	123	13	7.1%	7,501	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Auburn	Washington	129	108	11	6.6%	7,444	13.3	3	2	6	0	0	0
Jupiter	Florida	143	118	15	7.5%	7,429	12.8	4	2	7	0	0	0
San Francisco	California	212	167	38	0.9%	7,409	33.1	28	2	30	0	0	0
Winter Haven	Florida	131	107	12	6.9%	7,389	13.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	115	94	13	7.0%	7,371	13.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	141	114	15	5.0%	7,335	15.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	163	139	16	4.6%	7,294	15.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Rochester	New York	242	200	24	1.5%	7,249	19.3	24	1	24	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	229	187	14	6.2%	7,208	13.6	11	1	11	0	0	0
Concord	California	141	114	13	5.5%	7,143	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	142	112	14	5.8%	7,114	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Lehigh Acres	Florida	179	145	14	6.1%	7,110	14.2	6	3	8	0	0	0
Shreveport	Louisiana	223	175	19	3.2%	7,090	17.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Salinas	California	158	127	18	3.8%	7,064	16.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	145	113	13	7.4%	7,062	13.0	4	2	5	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	118	100	14	6.3%	7,060	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	95	75	12	7.0%	7,053	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	116	97	12	7.5%	7,052	12.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Palo Alto	California	134	111	11	7.2%	7,004	13.0	4	2	5	0	0	0
Madera	California	144	117	13	6.8%	6,954	15.0	3	3	5	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	151	118	14	5.9%	6,856	14.0	4	2	6	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	123	107	14	6.0%	6,832	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	California	115	88	13	6.0%	6,825	14.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	137	111	12	7.1%	6,800	13.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Oakland	California	213	180	25	1.6%	6,701	19.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	115	95	13	6.0%	6,676	14.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Staten Island	New York	149	123	26	1.4%	6,640	20.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Providence	Rhode Island	193	164	18	3.2%	6,555	17.1	8	1	8	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	123	100	14	6.5%	6,519	13.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
York	Pennsylvania	195	164	18	3.6%	6,514	16.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	California	117	97	14	6.5%	6,441	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bowie	Maryland	168	140	20	6.3%	6,412	13.8	4	2	6	0	0	0
Norwalk	California	100	81	13	6.0%	6,353	14.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Carlsbad	California	138	110	15	5.6%	6,336	14.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Coral Springs	Florida	119	96	13	6.4%	6,233	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	153	132	17	5.5%	6,199	14.3	4	2	5	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	125	103	16	5.2%	6,185	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	118	94	13	6.0%	6,168	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	155	128	13	6.6%	6,148	13.3	4	2	8	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	159	128	14	6.2%	6,137	14.0	4	2	5	0	0	0
Killeen	Texas	163	128	19	4.1%	6,106	15.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	132	104	12	6.3%	6,100	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Stockton	California	244	200	23	1.6%	6,086	19.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Downey	California	122	100	13	5.4%	6,055	14.7	3	2	6	0	0	0
Parker	Colorado	114	93	13	6.0%	6,017	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Fresno	California	262	207	24	1.0%	5,865	21.3	18	1	18	0	0	0
Napa	California	133	111	14	6.0%	5,800	14.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Irvine	California	155	116	19	2.1%	5,749	19.9	9	2	9	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	124	105	15	6.0%	5,726	14.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Waukegan	Illinois	110	93	12	5.8%	5,677	13.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Clovis	California	147	121	17	4.7%	5,667	16.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	142	121	15	5.0%	5,644	15.0	4	2	8	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	131	114	13	5.1%	5,632	14.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Van Nuys	California	150	129	19	3.2%	5,630	17.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	120	97	14	6.0%	5,616	14.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	132	110	16	5.1%	5,531	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	122	102	14	5.6%	5,436	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	142	110	15	5.4%	5,421	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Kennewick	Washington	139	119	13	5.5%	5,405	14.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Amarillo	Texas	202	170	16	2.4%	5,392	17.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Indio	California	124	98	13	5.6%	5,381	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
El Monte	California	113	96	14	5.7%	5,321	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	150	126	15	5.5%	5,314	14.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Topeka	Kansas	271	217	21	3.2%	5,253	16.4	18	1	18	0	0	0
Abilene	Texas	187	154	14	3.8%	4,944	16.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	144	123	17	3.2%	4,861	16.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Albany	New York	221	185	16	3.2%	4,803	16.7	11	1	11	0	0	0
Midland	Texas	168	134	19	3.0%	4,782	17.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	228	179	19	1.9%	4,638	18.6	12	1	12	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	136	105	18	3.6%	4,532	15.8	4	2	8	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	170	139	14	4.5%	4,500	15.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Oceanside	California	148	121	20	2.2%	4,499	17.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	137	108	16	4.4%	4,440	15.3	3	2	4	0	0	0
Daly City	California	146	122	21	3.8%	4,364	19.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	132	103	15	4.3%	4,133	15.3	3	2	4	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	140	118	15	4.3%	4,104	15.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	California	137	114	15	3.9%	4,078	16.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lubbock	Texas	218	173	21	1.5%	4,047	19.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Ventura	California	141	121	16	3.4%	3,975	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Richardson	Texas	122	99	15	3.4%	3,943	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Denton	Texas	152	124	20	2.5%	3,885	18.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	151	123	17	3.5%	3,865	16.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	147	122	15	3.0%	3,818	16.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Chino	California	119	98	14	4.0%	3,779	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Fredericksburg	Virginia	155	127	16	2.1%	3,740	17.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Macon	Georgia	206	165	18	2.3%	3,732	17.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Arvada	Colorado	153	125	20	2.7%	3,621	17.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Tyler	Texas	193	156	17	2.2%	3,466	17.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Redding	California	166	137	17	2.9%	3,319	14.3	4	2	5	0	0	2
Valdosta	Georgia	153	115	15	3.5%	3,295	16.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	130	108	15	3.4%	3,190	15.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	100	85	17	3.0%	3,174	17.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Merced	California	152	123	15	3.0%	3,131	17.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Eugene	Oregon	171	143	19	1.5%	3,015	19.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	189	148	19	3.0%	2,985	17.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	172	142	16	2.2%	2,952	18.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Vista	California	139	114	19	2.4%	2,912	17.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Bellevue	Washington	160	136	19	2.0%	2,876	18.6	5	2	5	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	200	161	16	2.8%	2,818	17.1	8	1	8	0	0	0
Modesto	California	168	137	22	1.0%	2,600	21.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	114	94	17	2.0%	2,492	18.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	172	138	18	1.5%	2,437	19.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
Burbank	California	134	115	18	2.2%	2,394	17.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Manchester	New Hampshire	139	114	17	1.9%	2,260	18.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Clarksville	Tennessee	138	111	16	1.3%	2,259	19.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Billings	Montana	171	136	20	1.6%	2,253	19.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
San Angelo	Texas	152	123	16	2.0%	2,252	18.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Jersey City	New Jersey	144	118	30	0.9%	2,238	32.1	7	3	8	0	0	0
Syracuse	New York	216	180	21	1.0%	2,223	20.9	15	1	15	0	0	0
Santa Rosa	California	172	141	26	1.0%	2,064	23.3	6	2	6	0	0	0
Cambridge	Massachusetts	130	108	19	1.7%	1,926	19.0	5	2	8	0	0	0
Simi Valley	California	117	96	20	1.4%	1,854	18.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Worcester	Massachusetts	161	134	21	1.0%	1,827	20.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Frisco	Texas	115	95	20	1.0%	1,714	19.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	138	112	18	1.2%	1,468	20.0	3	1	3	0	0	0

Texas

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	326	255	3	67.2%	2,142,960	4.3	96	2	97	2	37	97
San Antonio	260	204	3	73.0%	1,297,959	3.8	59	2	60	1	43	60
Austin	235	179	2	86.4%	940,306	2.5	44	2	45	0	37	45
Fort Worth	223	183	1	88.5%	807,354	2.0	32	2	34	21	22	34
El Paso	305	246	1	90.6%	715,258	2.3	24	3	28	13	15	28
Spring	188	152	2	86.8%	330,609	2.3	8	3	9	1	7	9
Arlington	173	141	2	83.2%	330,223	2.6	12	1	12	4	8	12
Corpus Christi	239	197	1	97.1%	316,239	1.4	18	2	23	13	18	23
Plano	145	115	3	75.1%	229,358	3.4	7	2	8	0	6	8
Katy	167	136	3	60.1%	206,757	4.0	4	2	4	1	2	4
Garland	134	108	3	80.0%	190,343	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Mckinney	132	111	2	90.8%	171,603	2.0	3	2	4	1	3	4
Sugar Land	139	113	1	80.6%	136,134	2.3	3	2	3	1	2	3
Carrollton	121	99	1	100.0%	134,811	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Mission	143	115	4	67.5%	122,154	5.7	3	2	3	2	2	2
Pearland	145	113	2	85.6%	117,753	3.0	2	2	3	1	1	3
Conroe	163	130	2	72.9%	116,911	3.6	7	1	7	1	3	7
Humble	145	116	3	67.7%	112,754	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Mcallen	139	114	6	58.2%	82,338	6.3	3	2	3	1	1	2
Keller	137	112	2	68.8%	80,032	6.5	2	1	2	1	1	1
Round Rock	149	115	3	45.5%	76,204	6.7	3	2	3	0	1	2
Missouri City	144	118	3	69.7%	73,911	4.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Edinburg	149	112	7	37.0%	57,610	7.0	3	2	3	0	1	2
Cypress	114	95	7	30.0%	51,180	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Dallas	253	200	33	2.1%	28,991	27.3	48	3	50	0	1	1
Brownsville	145	115	12	7.3%	14,702	13.0	3	2	5	0	0	0
Odessa	170	136	12	7.0%	11,181	12.8	6	2	7	0	0	0
Laredo	158	129	13	4.0%	10,927	16.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Irving	144	116	16	4.2%	10,025	16.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Baytown	139	112	15	7.9%	9,358	12.7	3	2	5	0	0	0
Beaumont	186	146	16	5.9%	8,551	14.8	8	2	9	0	0	0
Grand Prairie	130	111	15	4.4%	8,461	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Mesquite	119	96	13	5.6%	8,229	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Longview	152	123	13	7.1%	7,501	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Allen	115	95	13	6.0%	6,676	14.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Lewisville	125	103	16	5.2%	6,185	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
New Braunfels	118	94	13	6.0%	6,168	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Killeen	163	128	19	4.1%	6,106	15.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Amarillo	202	170	16	2.4%	5,392	17.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Bryan	150	126	15	5.5%	5,314	14.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Abilene	187	154	14	3.8%	4,944	16.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Midland	168	134	19	3.0%	4,782	17.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lubbock	218	173	21	1.5%	4,047	19.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Richardson	122	99	15	3.4%	3,943	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Denton	152	124	20	2.5%	3,885	18.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Tyler	193	156	17	2.2%	3,466	17.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	189	148	19	3.0%	2,985	17.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
College Station	114	94	17	2.0%	2,492	18.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Waco	172	138	18	1.5%	2,437	19.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
San Angelo	152	123	16	2.0%	2,252	18.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Frisco	115	95	20	1.0%	1,714	19.5	2	1	2	0	0	0

Chicago

ZIP	twomenandatruck.com	yelp.com	angieslist.com	newcitymovers.com	getbellhops.com	thumbtack.com
60638	5	4	6	7	8	11
60628	2	1	4	3	5	7
60649	2	1	5	3	4	7
60619	2	1	3	4	5	7
60639	2	1	4	3	5	7
60629	2	1	4	3	5	7
60659	2	1	3	4	5	7
60657	5	4	6	7	8	10
60616	2	1	3	5	4	7
60606	5	4	6	7	3	10
60618	2	1	3	4	5	7
60608	2	1	3	4	5	6
60647	5	4	6	2	8	9
60617	5	4	6	7	8	9
60607	2	1	4	3	5	6
60637	2	1	4	3	5	6
60636	2	1	5	4	3	6
60605	5	4	6	7	3	9
60634	2	1	4	3	5	7
60624	2	1	5	3	4	6
60603	2	1	3	4	5	6
60655	2	1	3	5	4	7
60615	2	1	3	4	5	6
60625	5	4	6	7	8	9
60656	2	1	3	4	5	7
60646	2	1	3	4	5	6
60602	2	1	3	4	5	6
60642	2	1	3	4	5	6
60633	5	4	6	8	7	10
60660	5	4	6	7	8	9
60611	5	4	6	7	8	9
60620	2	1	3	4	5	7
60661	5	4	6	7	8	9
60610	2	1	3	4	5	6
60651	2	1	4	3	5	6
60632	2	1	3	4	5	6
60643	2	1	3	4	5	7
60612	5	4	7	6	8	9
60621	2	1	5	4	3	6
60652	2	1	3	4	5	7
60601	2	1	3	4	5	6
60641	2	1	3	4	5	7
60630	2	1	4	3	5	8
60604	2	1	3	4	5	7
60654	2	1	3	4	5	6
60644	2	1	3	4	5	6
60614	5	4	7	6	8	10
60623	2	1	5	3	4	6
60613	2	1	3	4	5	6
60645	2	1	3	4	5	6
60622	2	1	4	3	5	6
60626	2	1	3	4	5	6
60609	5	4	6	7	8	9
60653	2	1	5	3	4	7
60631	5	4	6	7	8	11
60640	2	1	3	4	5	7

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Twomenandatruck

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 6,962 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Twomenandatruck Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (moving company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Twomenandatruck Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Twomenandatruck Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Twomenandatruck Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly