Tutors Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve tutors.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 2,537 Tutoring Services In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Tutors Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Tutors Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Tutors Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Tutors Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	39,130	2,537	2	74.4%	240,355,926	2.4	27,379	32,654	485	35,221	18,802	23,562	35,147
California	4,920	591	2	64.3%	25,153,848	3.6	1,166	1,740	111	2,068	578	954	2,054
Texas	3,887	359	2	66.0%	18,392,764	3.2	1,360	1,917	44	2,160	755	1,128	2,157
New York	3,773	509	2	74.7%	14,661,259	2.3	1,491	1,756	13	1,793	1,097	1,285	1,787
Florida	2,642	351	2	70.0%	14,412,588	3.6	446	975	50	1,203	329	562	1,190
Illinois	3,300	293	2	78.8%	10,102,803	2.1	1,247	1,382	29	1,431	871	1,106	1,431
Pennsylvania	3,335	360	2	78.5%	10,035,050	2.1	1,604	1,781	9	1,818	1,183	1,373	1,816
Ohio	2,899	223	2	79.1%	9,208,475	2.3	976	1,188	9	1,276	727	860	1,274
Michigan	2,431	211	2	85.3%	8,498,492	1.9	833	976	16	1,058	643	806	1,057
New Jersey	2,072	383	2	87.2%	7,745,134	1.9	537	593	18	637	402	476	637
Georgia	2,047	228	2	74.8%	7,702,492	2.7	574	726	11	768	348	500	766
North Carolina	2,364	264	2	75.6%	7,677,149	2.5	683	802	12	871	429	568	868
Virginia	2,088	250	2	75.5%	6,353,170	2.3	723	891	13	971	527	662	971
Massachusetts	2,203	253	2	82.4%	5,625,669	2.2	461	534	25	606	304	421	606
Indiana	3,450	374	2	81.0%	5,375,499	2.4	659	770	10	803	419	554	803
Tennessee	1,875	190	2	75.9%	5,044,635	2.6	514	622	11	704	322	439	704
Washington	2,016	214	2	68.5%	4,987,012	3.1	451	587	14	622	253	366	617
Missouri	2,065	171	2	81.2%	4,947,669	2.1	887	1,017	10	1,091	633	773	1,090
Arizona	1,530	167	3	69.3%	4,816,757	3.2	247	396	14	486	146	210	483
Wisconsin	2,084	193	2	80.5%	4,649,241	2.1	694	769	3	806	477	594	806
Minnesota	1,954	180	2	83.0%	4,589,863	2.0	777	878	9	929	576	699	929
Maryland	1,596	240	2	75.9%	4,556,061	2.5	392	463	7	513	251	316	513
Alabama	1,835	175	2	79.5%	3,865,286	2.5	522	637	8	715	366	432	715
South Carolina	1,568	180	2	76.9%	3,808,723	2.6	347	422	7	464	212	296	464
Kentucky	1,758	191	2	79.2%	3,521,173	2.0	698	758	4	805	540	594	805
Colorado	1,910	207	3	62.5%	3,457,849	3.1	381	514	15	575	248	303	572
Louisiana	1,579	161	2	73.2%	3,412,306	2.7	431	510	3	521	263	349	514
Connecticut	1,481	205	2	84.4%	3,023,544	2.1	234	279	10	303	171	221	303
Oklahoma	1,470	161	2	73.3%	2,873,349	2.6	557	646	3	696	368	424	696
Mississippi	1,789	166	2	89.5%	2,673,582	1.8	384	418	3	424	288	364	424
Arkansas	1,670	157	2	86.9%	2,597,750	1.7	553	587	3	599	427	504	599
Iowa	1,947	183	2	82.0%	2,568,505	2.1	890	933	3	960	607	711	960
Oregon	2,090	228	2	62.5%	2,552,780	2.9	355	414	4	419	210	284	416
Utah	1,021	141	2	79.5%	2,421,305	2.2	246	284	10	331	170	206	331
Kansas	1,715	179	2	78.3%	2,278,186	2.2	616	692	8	818	428	520	817
Nevada	789	140	3	61.9%	1,810,762	3.7	92	168	5	194	56	65	193
West Virginia	1,531	156	1	91.6%	1,674,909	1.5	684	704	1	704	584	600	704
New Mexico	1,070	126	2	69.7%	1,455,482	2.4	327	361	4	392	226	253	390
Nebraska	1,564	156	2	69.5%	1,323,901	2.4	524	581	3	630	366	412	629
Idaho	1,148	141	2	75.0%	1,265,060	2.4	251	273	4	284	155	205	283
Maine	1,752	234	1	92.2%	1,228,788	1.6	421	425	1	425	340	357	425
New Hampshire	1,188	168	2	86.9%	1,168,136	1.7	238	248	3	257	182	199	257
Hawaii	586	95	2	71.2%	1,012,352	2.7	82	93	2	106	49	62	106
Rhode Island	613	100	1	88.7%	936,798	1.8	64	77	4	80	53	68	80
Montana	1,126	133	2	81.2%	845,892	2.1	348	361	1	361	219	294	361
Delaware	577	111	2	80.0%	759,261	2.5	52	66	2	75	34	48	75
South Dakota	1,010	108	2	77.7%	670,932	2.1	359	370	1	370	240	294	370
North Dakota	840	113	2	80.5%	604,450	2.2	367	381	1	381	213	290	381
Vermont	1,016	130	1	92.5%	577,951	1.5	250	254	1	254	210	212	254
Wyoming	844	113	1	93.9%	546,487	1.6	164	171	1	171	132	145	171
Alaska	823	106	2	68.0%	501,460	1.9	218	235	1	235	175	198	235

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	395	162	3	75.4%	1,960,408	3.4	37	1	37	0	31	37
Houston	Texas	458	113	4	52.0%	1,656,639	5.8	96	1	96	0	0	96
Chicago	Illinois	343	93	4	56.0%	1,512,575	5.5	56	1	56	0	1	56
New York City	New York	336	151	4	67.1%	1,088,055	4.6	47	1	47	0	14	47
Los Angeles	California	380	129	6	41.1%	1,008,894	6.7	62	4	67	2	4	67
Miami	Florida	439	108	3	53.2%	999,727	5.6	55	5	80	8	13	78
Bronx	New York	345	133	3	64.6%	930,978	4.5	25	1	25	0	4	25
Las Vegas	Nevada	353	84	3	57.5%	889,400	5.3	43	2	46	0	0	45
Phoenix	Arizona	335	71	4	59.2%	859,685	5.0	42	4	71	0	4	70
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	328	87	5	52.7%	830,750	5.6	47	2	51	1	1	50
Minneapolis	Minnesota	403	85	3	71.3%	775,982	3.8	51	5	91	8	22	91
San Antonio	Texas	342	71	5	43.5%	772,790	6.5	59	2	59	0	1	59
Dallas	Texas	357	92	5	50.3%	699,996	6.0	48	2	89	0	4	89
Orlando	Florida	301	74	3	68.6%	683,511	4.3	32	2	42	1	14	42
Saint Louis	Missouri	335	77	3	74.1%	679,961	3.7	45	3	76	8	15	76
Atlanta	Georgia	368	102	3	66.3%	655,276	4.5	39	4	58	4	18	57
Indianapolis	Indiana	312	68	3	67.9%	646,396	4.1	37	4	48	1	3	48
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	296	97	1	76.4%	635,494	3.6	27	7	47	9	20	47
Saint Paul	Minnesota	370	72	3	75.2%	601,640	3.3	30	3	35	5	14	35
Tucson	Arizona	314	72	3	62.6%	566,174	4.8	32	2	43	2	8	41
Memphis	Tennessee	275	60	2	78.3%	544,526	3.1	26	3	28	1	25	28
Detroit	Michigan	230	56	2	85.0%	544,335	2.5	25	2	50	0	39	50
Fort Worth	Texas	285	73	4	59.5%	542,828	4.9	32	2	54	0	0	54
Austin	Texas	353	94	5	46.5%	505,385	6.0	44	2	74	0	1	74
San Diego	California	345	100	5	36.7%	494,003	7.0	36	1	36	0	1	34
Denver	Colorado	396	86	6	45.4%	493,507	6.8	38	5	43	0	3	41
San Jose	California	285	84	5	46.4%	487,462	6.2	28	2	52	0	1	51
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	323	60	4	57.0%	462,990	5.1	29	2	53	0	3	53
Cleveland	Ohio	310	71	4	58.5%	438,771	5.4	29	3	50	2	5	50
Columbus	Ohio	310	70	4	51.7%	437,509	5.9	30	2	49	0	0	49
Mesa	Arizona	205	56	2	80.5%	430,221	3.0	13	1	13	0	12	13
Charlotte	North Carolina	259	66	5	46.2%	418,722	6.5	24	2	44	0	0	42
Cincinnati	Ohio	288	60	4	51.2%	412,053	6.0	45	2	58	0	0	57
Sacramento	California	275	63	5	50.6%	406,855	5.9	28	1	28	0	1	28
Washington DC	District of Columbia	279	84	4	56.0%	383,270	5.9	28	2	56	0	0	56
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	305	65	4	55.3%	377,816	6.0	43	1	43	0	2	43
Hollywood	Florida	197	64	2	80.0%	374,842	3.1	9	3	16	0	11	16
Baltimore	Maryland	279	62	4	59.2%	373,195	5.1	22	2	36	0	1	36
Dayton	Ohio	300	64	2	75.1%	359,203	3.7	27	1	27	9	10	27
Seattle	Washington	341	80	6	36.8%	351,697	7.4	35	1	35	1	1	32
Saint Petersburg	Florida	179	38	1	95.7%	341,141	1.6	16	1	16	13	13	16
Kansas City	Missouri	290	66	4	58.9%	336,552	5.1	49	2	76	0	8	76
Wichita	Kansas	244	60	2	79.0%	330,139	3.3	26	2	47	0	22	47
Salt Lake City	Utah	258	72	3	65.6%	319,165	4.5	19	2	35	0	2	35
Louisville	Kentucky	270	69	5	41.0%	311,986	7.0	32	2	44	0	0	44
El Paso	Texas	287	58	4	39.1%	308,612	6.2	24	2	45	1	3	44
Aurora	Colorado	202	60	3	70.4%	306,487	3.8	11	3	22	0	5	22
Pompano Beach	Florida	226	67	2	81.6%	302,318	3.1	10	6	19	1	13	19
Bakersfield	California	239	52	4	50.5%	282,399	6.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Albuquerque	New Mexico	257	52	4	42.9%	281,186	6.6	17	3	26	0	0	26
Tampa	Florida	315	80	6	34.3%	272,092	7.7	27	2	32	1	2	29
Fresno	California	244	56	5	45.0%	270,905	6.7	18	2	29	0	0	28
Omaha	Nebraska	283	59	4	48.3%	267,060	5.9	31	3	55	0	3	54
Colorado Springs	Colorado	300	85	5	45.7%	266,537	6.1	30	1	30	2	2	29
Buffalo	New York	286	60	7	47.2%	265,480	6.8	28	1	28	3	3	26
Grand Rapids	Michigan	177	53	4	72.0%	264,939	3.7	12	2	15	0	7	15
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	316	80	6	38.7%	264,280	7.4	39	2	40	2	2	39
Santa Ana	California	169	56	3	73.9%	263,827	3.7	6	2	9	0	3	9
Birmingham	Alabama	276	66	5	52.6%	263,284	6.1	30	3	57	0	2	57
Nashville	Tennessee	269	63	4	57.3%	262,772	5.2	22	2	41	0	0	41
West Palm Beach	Florida	202	61	3	68.9%	255,465	4.2	12	3	21	1	2	21
Winston Salem	North Carolina	201	49	1	96.5%	254,991	1.7	9	1	9	7	7	9
Stockton	California	211	44	3	68.0%	254,152	4.3	12	1	12	0	3	12
Arlington	Texas	187	53	3	63.8%	253,404	4.8	12	2	16	0	5	16
Alexandria	Virginia	230	72	2	71.1%	252,159	3.7	14	2	22	1	8	22
Greensboro	North Carolina	190	47	2	75.8%	248,309	3.2	9	2	13	0	9	13
Hialeah	Florida	171	55	2	65.7%	240,943	4.7	7	2	13	1	1	13
Virginia Beach	Virginia	215	53	5	53.5%	240,786	5.5	12	3	24	0	0	24
Kissimmee	Florida	217	50	2	82.8%	239,227	2.7	7	3	11	1	7	11
Raleigh	North Carolina	216	61	6	43.6%	238,298	6.7	15	2	18	0	0	17
Lexington	Kentucky	216	49	2	73.8%	235,986	3.4	15	1	15	0	13	15
Honolulu	Hawaii	193	52	4	56.3%	234,237	5.5	11	2	19	0	0	19
Toledo	Ohio	173	49	2	74.5%	229,028	3.5	15	2	17	0	10	17
Marietta	Georgia	189	64	2	70.8%	228,503	3.9	7	2	10	0	5	10
Newark	New Jersey	181	68	2	80.0%	224,475	3.0	9	2	18	0	9	18
Staten Island	New York	261	117	4	47.1%	223,180	6.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Portland	Oregon	308	74	7	23.7%	217,800	8.7	33	1	33	0	0	30
Naples	Florida	227	58	3	69.2%	216,718	4.1	14	2	15	3	3	15
Laredo	Texas	159	42	3	79.9%	216,330	2.8	6	1	6	0	5	6
Corpus Christi	Texas	201	51	2	66.3%	215,942	4.2	18	1	18	0	11	18
Jacksonville	Florida	289	67	7	24.1%	209,088	8.5	31	2	46	0	0	41
Gilbert	Arizona	167	50	2	86.3%	205,799	2.3	6	1	6	0	6	6
Durham	North Carolina	184	52	3	70.7%	205,191	3.9	8	2	16	0	1	16
Pensacola	Florida	196	52	2	76.1%	204,160	3.7	13	1	13	1	7	13
Tulsa	Oklahoma	244	63	5	48.2%	203,502	6.2	28	2	56	0	0	56
Richmond	Virginia	214	59	4	51.9%	203,031	5.9	15	2	28	0	0	28
Chula Vista	California	160	44	2	76.3%	199,143	3.6	5	2	6	0	4	6
Lakeland	Florida	170	54	2	77.0%	198,572	3.3	9	2	16	0	8	16
Spring	Texas	216	59	4	52.0%	198,231	5.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Columbia	South Carolina	196	42	3	57.5%	197,042	5.6	14	3	23	0	0	23
Littleton	Colorado	259	74	3	60.3%	196,153	4.9	10	4	13	0	2	13
Madison	Wisconsin	217	46	4	66.4%	195,726	4.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Katy	Texas	157	59	3	56.6%	194,625	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Silver Spring	Maryland	226	76	2	64.2%	194,434	4.7	7	1	7	0	2	7
Akron	Ohio	212	56	2	71.8%	193,977	3.9	17	2	18	0	12	17
Lake Worth	Florida	195	64	1	92.9%	191,908	2.4	5	3	7	3	3	7
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	187	47	1	92.8%	188,508	2.0	6	1	6	4	4	6
Anaheim	California	160	55	5	51.1%	188,285	5.9	7	2	14	0	0	14
San Bernardino	California	186	52	3	74.1%	184,933	3.6	7	2	14	0	3	14
Spokane	Washington	235	52	4	51.3%	184,448	5.9	14	1	14	0	1	14
Plano	Texas	167	51	3	59.5%	181,750	5.0	7	2	9	0	1	9
San Francisco	California	248	94	7	20.4%	177,813	9.2	28	1	28	0	0	23
Fort Wayne	Indiana	206	54	4	55.8%	177,711	5.4	16	1	16	0	0	16
Bradenton	Florida	197	61	3	70.0%	177,174	3.7	10	1	10	0	3	10
Mobile	Alabama	256	51	3	65.2%	177,065	4.4	18	1	18	1	1	18
Chesapeake	Virginia	195	63	4	73.4%	174,512	3.8	6	2	9	0	3	9
Trenton	New Jersey	209	64	2	82.3%	171,037	2.9	11	2	14	6	7	14
Henderson	Nevada	195	53	3	56.1%	169,693	5.5	8	3	11	0	0	11
Reading	Pennsylvania	254	54	2	78.8%	169,677	3.0	10	1	10	1	9	10
Long Beach	California	215	65	5	35.3%	168,981	7.7	12	1	12	0	0	11
Homestead	Florida	188	60	2	90.0%	168,952	2.1	7	2	12	2	10	12
Jersey City	New Jersey	176	69	4	64.4%	168,516	4.1	7	2	11	0	3	11
Vancouver	Washington	183	52	4	50.9%	166,013	5.7	11	2	20	0	0	20
Fontana	California	128	41	2	70.0%	164,309	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rochester	New York	251	55	5	34.6%	162,927	7.8	24	1	24	1	1	21
North Las Vegas	Nevada	191	52	3	69.7%	162,865	4.0	7	3	9	0	1	9
Knoxville	Tennessee	249	55	6	42.1%	162,573	6.7	17	1	17	0	0	17
Santa Rosa	California	166	51	3	74.6%	161,151	3.5	6	2	10	0	5	10
Glendale	Arizona	221	53	4	52.8%	161,035	5.1	9	2	15	0	2	15
Amarillo	Texas	205	44	3	70.0%	160,281	4.0	14	1	14	0	0	14
Providence	Rhode Island	181	44	2	78.0%	159,917	3.3	8	1	8	1	7	8
Little Rock	Arkansas	193	49	2	72.9%	158,929	4.0	12	1	12	0	8	12
Modesto	California	162	50	3	60.0%	158,562	5.3	7	2	14	0	0	14
Oakland	California	243	70	5	38.3%	157,663	7.3	14	1	14	0	0	13
Hayward	California	135	39	2	81.7%	156,980	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	8
Tacoma	Washington	252	56	5	46.8%	155,923	6.4	20	2	22	2	3	20
Riverside	California	164	49	4	42.1%	155,676	6.6	7	2	8	0	1	8
Chandler	Arizona	181	46	4	57.9%	155,511	5.2	6	2	12	0	0	12
Reno	Nevada	213	54	4	51.8%	153,777	5.8	12	2	23	0	0	23
Oxnard	California	154	46	3	69.5%	153,132	4.3	4	2	8	0	1	8
Grand Prairie	Texas	133	41	3	80.0%	152,437	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	8
New Orleans	Louisiana	246	61	7	35.6%	152,133	7.5	19	1	19	0	0	18
Corona	California	159	52	4	58.6%	150,824	5.4	5	2	9	0	0	9
Clearwater	Florida	236	56	2	82.0%	150,238	2.8	9	2	14	3	8	14
Scottsdale	Arizona	254	70	5	50.2%	149,566	6.0	11	3	22	0	0	22
Shreveport	Louisiana	189	49	3	66.5%	148,316	4.4	12	1	12	0	2	12
Wilmington	Delaware	205	64	2	67.3%	147,648	4.6	10	2	18	1	3	18
Lancaster	California	135	37	2	80.0%	147,535	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Mckinney	Texas	145	44	2	78.0%	147,410	3.3	3	2	4	0	2	4
Woodbridge	Virginia	149	49	2	69.4%	146,937	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Oceanside	California	139	42	2	73.1%	146,439	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Jamaica	New York	208	83	4	60.0%	146,283	5.5	6	2	7	0	0	7
Whittier	California	208	70	2	74.4%	145,880	3.7	6	2	10	0	5	10
Flint	Michigan	194	53	2	93.2%	144,857	1.7	7	1	7	2	7	7
Fayetteville	North Carolina	160	42	3	59.3%	144,648	5.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Elk Grove	California	136	41	2	80.0%	143,455	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Sarasota	Florida	204	55	4	57.2%	143,216	5.2	13	1	13	0	1	13
Huntington Beach	California	153	56	2	71.6%	143,158	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Salem	Oregon	145	43	3	53.5%	142,555	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Green Bay	Wisconsin	189	47	2	77.4%	141,931	3.0	7	1	7	1	5	7
Newport News	Virginia	171	46	2	80.0%	141,348	3.0	7	2	8	0	7	8
Ontario	California	141	44	2	80.0%	141,318	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Brownsville	Texas	141	37	3	69.9%	140,776	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Norfolk	Virginia	179	53	3	57.0%	139,985	5.2	14	3	25	0	0	25
Ogden	Utah	161	38	2	69.1%	139,173	4.2	5	1	5	0	2	5
Lincoln	Nebraska	231	48	5	47.7%	138,031	5.7	22	1	22	0	0	22
Hamilton	Ohio	139	38	1	100.0%	137,098	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Boise	Idaho	175	45	4	52.9%	135,397	5.7	9	2	15	0	0	15
Fort Myers	Florida	189	53	4	53.8%	135,282	5.3	11	2	21	0	1	21
Jackson	Mississippi	190	48	2	79.3%	135,055	3.3	11	1	11	0	10	11
Rockford	Illinois	181	48	3	73.9%	134,710	3.6	9	1	9	0	4	9
Round Rock	Texas	172	54	2	80.3%	134,526	3.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Irving	Texas	161	48	4	55.7%	133,903	5.5	6	2	12	0	0	12
Henrico	Virginia	213	61	2	69.2%	133,306	4.1	7	2	11	1	2	11
Garland	Texas	148	44	3	55.9%	133,080	5.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Montgomery	Alabama	188	49	3	63.0%	132,299	4.1	13	2	16	0	5	16
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	261	56	5	34.8%	131,978	7.6	18	2	20	0	1	17
Odessa	Texas	174	39	3	81.3%	130,222	2.7	6	1	6	0	6	6
Manassas	Virginia	161	51	2	85.7%	130,213	2.3	4	1	4	2	3	4
Roanoke	Virginia	203	54	2	76.7%	130,031	3.3	10	1	10	1	5	10
Flushing	New York	181	80	4	60.0%	129,040	5.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Moreno Valley	California	127	40	4	62.1%	127,668	4.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	60	3	67.4%	127,605	4.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Lawrenceville	Georgia	161	52	4	49.7%	127,255	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Erie	Pennsylvania	173	42	3	69.2%	126,947	4.2	13	1	13	0	2	13
Conroe	Texas	185	62	2	79.1%	126,892	3.1	7	2	12	0	10	12
Mission	Texas	138	34	3	70.0%	126,764	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	173	44	2	74.7%	126,454	3.4	9	2	17	0	7	17
Escondido	California	138	45	4	70.0%	125,757	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kent	Washington	146	43	3	77.0%	123,608	3.3	4	2	7	0	3	7
Allentown	Pennsylvania	163	43	2	72.0%	122,360	4.7	7	2	12	0	2	12
West Valley City	Utah	138	47	1	91.9%	122,086	1.7	3	2	6	2	5	6
Compton	California	133	55	2	87.6%	121,703	2.3	3	2	5	0	5	5
Tempe	Arizona	159	48	3	63.6%	120,785	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Yonkers	New York	151	63	3	66.4%	119,816	4.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Youngstown	Ohio	201	51	2	76.1%	119,493	4.3	12	1	12	2	3	12
Olympia	Washington	186	45	3	65.2%	119,294	4.5	6	2	8	0	2	8
Eugene	Oregon	170	43	3	58.5%	118,786	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Savannah	Georgia	180	47	6	49.0%	118,227	5.7	10	1	10	0	0	10
Saint Charles	Missouri	146	38	2	84.3%	117,894	2.7	3	1	3	1	2	3
Beaumont	Texas	177	46	3	80.9%	117,731	3.1	8	1	8	0	7	8
Canton	Ohio	185	48	2	80.0%	117,589	3.0	12	1	12	0	12	12
Lubbock	Texas	224	55	5	42.5%	117,513	7.1	14	2	23	0	0	22
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	144	37	2	90.0%	117,448	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Edinburg	Texas	151	36	2	75.5%	117,392	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Mesquite	Texas	130	43	3	80.0%	117,050	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Pueblo	Colorado	186	41	3	73.7%	116,584	4.0	7	1	7	1	1	7
Everett	Washington	146	46	3	69.9%	116,504	4.2	5	2	6	0	1	6
Schenectady	New York	185	51	3	71.7%	116,139	4.1	8	1	8	0	4	8
Midland	Texas	151	34	3	72.6%	116,117	3.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Chattanooga	Tennessee	250	60	5	55.8%	116,003	5.7	15	2	27	1	1	27
Carrollton	Texas	133	44	2	85.7%	115,535	2.7	3	2	6	0	4	6
Sunnyvale	California	160	58	2	75.6%	115,525	3.8	4	3	8	0	3	8
Santa Maria	California	153	41	3	80.0%	114,471	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
York	Pennsylvania	197	42	2	62.9%	113,075	4.9	7	1	7	0	2	7
El Cajon	California	172	54	4	65.3%	112,620	4.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Victorville	California	124	36	2	82.6%	112,585	2.7	3	2	6	0	4	6
Boston	Massachusetts	232	69	4	74.0%	112,333	4.1	14	2	16	0	6	16
Greenville	South Carolina	176	46	4	51.1%	112,250	5.8	9	2	14	0	0	14
Bloomington	Indiana	163	53	2	83.9%	112,030	3.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Augusta	Georgia	183	49	4	54.6%	111,672	5.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Springfield	Missouri	172	43	5	48.3%	111,365	6.4	7	1	7	0	0	6
Ocala	Florida	197	49	5	49.5%	111,300	6.2	11	2	22	0	0	21
Cary	North Carolina	148	51	2	71.3%	110,819	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
South Bend	Indiana	183	51	3	75.4%	110,670	3.8	10	1	10	0	3	10
Cape Coral	Florida	170	43	4	61.2%	110,652	4.8	6	2	8	0	0	8
Pomona	California	137	41	3	70.0%	110,590	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Torrance	California	180	69	4	62.1%	109,713	4.6	5	2	9	0	1	9
Tyler	Texas	182	44	2	70.1%	109,459	4.1	9	1	9	0	6	9
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	54	3	62.4%	108,586	4.5	6	2	12	0	0	12
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	150	39	4	57.9%	107,933	5.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Orange	California	159	58	2	74.3%	107,797	3.8	5	2	10	0	3	10
Bridgeport	Connecticut	165	49	2	73.6%	107,723	3.7	6	2	12	0	4	12
Largo	Florida	133	34	1	100.0%	107,620	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Palmdale	California	156	48	4	61.2%	107,130	4.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Fremont	California	144	47	6	45.9%	106,964	6.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Rialto	California	127	38	1	100.0%	106,583	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Visalia	California	140	39	3	70.0%	106,410	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	137	46	3	80.0%	105,976	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Salinas	California	149	36	4	56.1%	105,708	4.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Garden Grove	California	150	59	3	60.0%	105,457	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Evansville	Indiana	168	42	5	57.1%	105,328	5.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Warren	Michigan	157	49	2	77.9%	105,264	3.2	5	2	10	0	5	10
Killeen	Texas	146	33	3	70.0%	105,140	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Yakima	Washington	145	36	3	80.6%	104,708	3.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
Renton	Washington	198	56	3	67.6%	104,636	4.4	5	2	8	0	0	8
Falls Church	Virginia	216	61	2	86.8%	104,535	2.6	5	2	6	2	3	6
Huntsville	Alabama	188	48	4	53.2%	104,398	5.8	11	2	22	0	0	22
Topeka	Kansas	194	51	3	63.8%	104,351	5.2	18	2	28	0	1	28
Paterson	New Jersey	177	81	3	71.5%	104,207	3.8	9	2	11	0	2	11
Fairfax	Virginia	167	63	2	63.7%	104,181	4.5	4	1	4	1	1	4
Kalamazoo	Michigan	170	51	3	63.1%	103,531	4.7	7	1	7	0	1	7
New Port Richey	Florida	143	38	3	85.5%	103,342	2.5	4	1	4	1	3	4
Yuma	Arizona	129	37	3	70.0%	103,319	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Naperville	Illinois	144	52	4	62.3%	103,311	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lewisville	Texas	133	41	2	86.9%	103,102	2.3	3	2	6	0	5	6
Joliet	Illinois	147	46	2	80.0%	103,102	3.0	5	2	10	0	5	10
Santa Fe	New Mexico	153	44	1	80.4%	102,974	3.2	5	1	5	2	2	5
Fairfield	California	117	35	2	90.0%	102,671	2.0	2	2	4	0	4	4
Rockville	Maryland	166	61	3	70.8%	102,470	4.0	4	2	6	0	2	6
Concord	California	134	47	2	78.5%	102,164	3.3	4	2	8	0	3	8
Puyallup	Washington	166	45	3	71.4%	102,012	4.0	5	2	7	0	2	7
Downey	California	139	53	2	90.0%	101,611	2.0	3	2	6	0	6	6
Metairie	Louisiana	149	46	2	71.3%	101,476	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Inglewood	California	177	72	2	75.7%	101,336	3.4	5	2	9	0	7	9
Lansing	Michigan	161	48	4	61.6%	101,246	5.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Gaithersburg	Maryland	150	56	3	70.0%	101,214	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Olathe	Kansas	121	36	3	70.0%	101,061	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Lakewood	New Jersey	96	30	1	100.0%	100,763	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Macon	Georgia	173	43	3	61.5%	100,648	4.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Charleston	South Carolina	214	53	4	50.8%	100,102	5.7	10	2	12	0	2	12
Berkeley	California	214	58	3	78.2%	99,455	3.2	9	1	9	1	6	9
Bothell	Washington	173	56	2	77.4%	99,312	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Des Moines	Iowa	180	48	5	44.4%	99,082	6.8	11	1	11	0	0	11
Stone Mountain	Georgia	153	46	2	77.1%	98,984	3.0	3	1	3	1	2	3
West Jordan	Utah	135	42	2	80.0%	98,856	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Roseville	California	138	41	2	70.7%	98,768	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Albany	New York	219	59	4	64.8%	97,994	4.5	11	5	15	1	1	15
Cumming	Georgia	139	40	3	60.0%	97,211	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lowell	Massachusetts	146	38	2	87.3%	97,150	2.3	4	2	8	0	7	8
Saginaw	Michigan	158	44	2	74.4%	96,987	3.9	7	1	7	0	5	7
Lake Charles	Louisiana	163	46	3	74.2%	96,947	3.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	45	3	55.7%	96,877	5.2	5	1	5	0	2	5
Lafayette	Louisiana	144	40	3	60.3%	96,825	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Delray Beach	Florida	162	61	2	81.3%	96,788	2.6	5	1	5	2	3	5
Lithonia	Georgia	112	38	1	100.0%	96,762	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Edmond	Oklahoma	184	49	4	56.2%	96,433	5.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
Beaverton	Oregon	145	43	5	47.7%	96,156	6.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Fort Collins	Colorado	154	36	4	49.0%	95,507	6.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Hemet	California	139	42	3	73.8%	95,043	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	174	51	2	72.3%	94,753	3.6	5	1	5	2	3	5
Milton	Florida	145	37	1	100.0%	94,741	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
La Puente	California	146	55	2	80.0%	94,358	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Baytown	Texas	122	42	2	80.0%	94,234	3.0	3	2	5	0	3	5
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	176	45	5	67.5%	94,137	4.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Perris	California	124	41	2	80.0%	93,912	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Orem	Utah	145	40	1	93.5%	93,816	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Irvine	California	192	74	6	35.0%	93,622	7.9	9	1	9	0	0	7
Muskegon	Michigan	145	41	2	72.3%	93,432	3.8	5	1	5	0	3	5
Lehigh Acres	Florida	164	44	2	79.7%	93,133	3.2	6	1	6	1	5	6
Syracuse	New York	192	54	6	40.7%	92,404	6.8	15	1	15	0	1	15
Winter Haven	Florida	129	39	3	86.1%	92,056	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Auburn	Washington	135	37	2	81.3%	91,797	3.0	3	2	6	0	4	6
Independence	Missouri	175	43	2	73.7%	91,374	3.8	8	3	14	0	6	14
Racine	Wisconsin	163	39	2	72.3%	91,093	3.8	5	1	5	1	1	5
Duluth	Minnesota	191	48	3	77.5%	90,828	3.5	11	1	11	0	7	11
Melbourne	Florida	168	42	4	58.3%	90,718	5.2	5	2	9	0	0	9
Anchorage	Alaska	211	53	5	37.1%	90,515	6.9	12	1	12	1	1	12
Waco	Texas	178	47	5	57.1%	90,341	5.3	9	2	10	0	0	10
Redwood City	California	134	46	3	78.9%	90,313	3.3	4	2	8	0	3	8
Vallejo	California	141	51	3	72.5%	90,193	3.8	4	2	8	0	1	8
Waterbury	Connecticut	149	42	2	82.6%	89,770	2.7	6	2	12	0	8	12
Ventura	California	138	44	2	77.4%	89,717	3.3	3	2	4	0	2	4
Peoria	Arizona	153	41	4	52.0%	89,555	5.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Humble	Texas	146	47	4	53.6%	89,182	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Worcester	Massachusetts	201	52	4	47.8%	88,676	5.8	9	2	15	0	0	15
Anderson	South Carolina	137	32	2	90.0%	88,567	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Sandy	Utah	135	45	2	80.0%	88,351	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	8
Apopka	Florida	124	39	2	90.0%	87,889	2.0	2	2	4	0	4	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	148	42	3	60.2%	87,720	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Longview	Texas	171	43	2	83.3%	87,698	3.0	5	1	5	0	4	5
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	135	34	3	70.0%	87,656	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clarksville	Tennessee	143	32	5	49.5%	87,025	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Springdale	Arkansas	113	35	2	90.0%	86,765	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
O Fallon	Missouri	129	39	2	89.7%	86,536	2.0	2	2	3	1	2	3
High Point	North Carolina	138	38	3	70.6%	86,320	4.0	4	1	4	1	1	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	140	44	3	76.3%	86,074	3.3	4	2	8	0	5	8
Murrieta	California	124	36	4	64.8%	85,758	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Bend	Oregon	151	37	4	70.0%	85,580	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	145	41	2	90.0%	85,333	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Keller	Texas	131	44	3	73.4%	85,318	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	138	38	2	90.0%	85,246	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Norwalk	California	95	45	2	80.0%	84,709	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
Deltona	Florida	122	37	2	90.0%	84,500	2.0	2	2	4	0	4	4
Holland	Michigan	109	33	2	90.0%	84,486	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Surprise	Arizona	153	40	4	62.2%	84,276	4.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Vista	California	131	41	3	70.0%	83,907	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Longmont	Colorado	137	42	4	64.1%	83,861	4.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Ballwin	Missouri	111	38	1	88.1%	83,422	2.0	2	1	2	1	2	2
Decatur	Georgia	196	67	4	46.1%	83,357	6.0	5	2	8	0	1	8
Hesperia	California	104	32	2	80.0%	83,049	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Indio	California	122	37	2	86.4%	83,022	2.0	2	1	2	1	2	2
Bowling Green	Kentucky	143	37	3	71.8%	82,922	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Mcallen	Texas	130	32	3	58.1%	82,312	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Arvada	Colorado	154	52	3	61.4%	81,879	4.8	5	2	10	0	0	10
Chico	California	143	35	3	73.0%	81,810	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Belleville	Illinois	135	38	1	87.7%	81,746	2.3	4	1	4	2	3	4
Tracy	California	147	40	4	69.7%	81,615	3.5	4	2	5	1	1	5
Annapolis	Maryland	167	51	2	85.7%	81,491	2.4	5	2	8	2	4	8
Manchester	New Hampshire	154	44	3	70.0%	81,241	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Hampton	Virginia	159	41	4	59.6%	81,167	5.2	6	2	10	0	0	10
Elgin	Illinois	144	43	4	65.8%	80,456	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	137	44	2	76.8%	80,428	3.3	3	3	6	0	2	6
Clinton Township	Michigan	124	43	2	80.0%	80,237	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Spring Hill	Florida	152	46	2	63.9%	80,090	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Costa Mesa	California	122	46	4	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Panama City	Florida	162	43	3	63.0%	79,572	5.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Fort Pierce	Florida	188	46	2	83.1%	79,525	1.9	8	1	8	6	7	8
Kennesaw	Georgia	105	37	2	80.0%	79,304	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Asheville	North Carolina	147	45	4	60.0%	79,258	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Clermont	Florida	151	42	2	79.0%	79,168	3.3	3	1	3	1	2	3
Redding	California	177	40	3	70.0%	79,150	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
New Haven	Connecticut	156	49	4	60.7%	79,086	4.6	5	2	6	0	4	6
Hagerstown	Maryland	143	38	2	80.6%	78,939	2.3	3	1	3	1	3	3
Lees Summit	Missouri	171	49	3	77.0%	78,595	3.5	6	1	6	0	2	6
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	184	49	7	43.3%	78,593	7.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Santa Barbara	California	173	52	4	57.8%	78,500	5.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
San Mateo	California	156	51	5	55.0%	78,347	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Franklin	Tennessee	143	40	3	73.4%	78,172	4.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Provo	Utah	143	42	3	67.1%	78,135	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Palm Bay	Florida	145	39	3	70.0%	77,904	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Hyattsville	Maryland	185	56	3	49.4%	77,777	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Antioch	California	124	36	3	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	96	44	2	80.0%	77,469	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Meridian	Idaho	119	39	3	74.3%	77,458	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	123	37	3	76.3%	77,430	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Elkhart	Indiana	135	34	2	77.7%	77,285	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Simi Valley	California	118	46	5	60.0%	77,227	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Brockton	Massachusetts	118	40	2	80.0%	76,341	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	126	45	3	70.0%	76,087	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	California	157	40	2	73.8%	76,027	4.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Tallahassee	Florida	205	52	7	26.3%	75,904	7.9	10	1	10	0	0	10
Bellingham	Washington	141	37	5	60.0%	75,896	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	137	36	3	78.3%	75,783	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Santa Clara	California	137	38	4	60.3%	75,659	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
San Marcos	California	121	41	2	75.1%	75,481	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Florissant	Missouri	139	36	2	69.6%	75,360	4.0	3	3	6	0	1	6
Sugar Land	Texas	165	53	5	44.6%	75,345	6.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Dearborn	Michigan	138	38	2	78.9%	74,996	3.3	4	3	6	0	3	6
El Monte	California	112	45	2	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Davenport	Iowa	173	36	2	71.5%	74,925	3.7	6	1	6	0	3	6
Rock Hill	South Carolina	141	41	5	64.3%	74,854	5.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Las Cruces	New Mexico	175	44	4	50.2%	74,794	5.1	7	1	7	1	1	7
San Angelo	Texas	138	36	2	67.5%	74,730	4.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
Spartanburg	South Carolina	153	43	3	66.5%	74,460	4.6	5	1	5	0	2	5
Terre Haute	Indiana	149	35	2	78.4%	74,437	3.3	6	1	6	0	4	6
Fullerton	California	162	61	4	53.1%	73,892	6.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Vero Beach	Florida	171	46	3	64.1%	73,871	4.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lawrence	Kansas	160	35	3	73.1%	73,837	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Grand Junction	Colorado	145	46	3	70.0%	73,825	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Allen	Texas	116	41	4	66.3%	73,823	4.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Toms River	New Jersey	136	42	3	60.0%	73,716	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	120	36	2	75.6%	73,657	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Englewood	Colorado	194	61	3	66.0%	73,627	4.5	4	3	6	0	1	6
Lynchburg	Virginia	158	39	3	71.9%	73,604	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	133	39	4	60.0%	73,575	5.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
Appleton	Wisconsin	135	36	4	60.4%	73,552	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Johnson City	Tennessee	148	37	3	76.3%	72,773	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Pasadena	California	178	58	5	45.9%	72,443	6.5	6	2	12	0	0	12
Portsmouth	Virginia	163	52	3	75.6%	72,038	3.3	7	1	7	0	4	7
Merced	California	151	36	4	69.8%	71,963	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bell Gardens	California	97	42	3	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hartford	Connecticut	151	39	4	57.8%	71,306	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Waukesha	Wisconsin	141	39	2	74.4%	71,299	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Newnan	Georgia	131	36	3	76.3%	71,247	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Midlothian	Virginia	144	44	2	73.6%	71,207	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Van Nuys	California	148	58	7	40.0%	71,125	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Waukegan	Illinois	121	43	3	72.7%	70,937	3.5	2	2	4	0	1	4
Fargo	North Dakota	139	40	4	57.9%	70,929	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Abilene	Texas	156	35	3	54.4%	70,839	5.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Menifee	California	146	42	3	63.9%	70,595	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Edison	New Jersey	136	55	3	70.0%	70,579	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sparks	Nevada	162	40	4	58.9%	70,261	5.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
Parker	Colorado	120	42	3	70.0%	70,197	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Federal Way	Washington	117	35	3	70.0%	70,100	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roswell	Georgia	118	44	3	70.0%	69,839	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Medford	Oregon	118	31	4	74.9%	69,837	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	170	45	3	67.7%	69,807	4.4	5	2	6	1	1	6
Overland Park	Kansas	176	44	4	38.0%	69,739	7.3	9	2	17	0	0	16
Burbank	California	164	66	3	64.0%	69,079	4.6	5	2	9	0	0	9
Frisco	Texas	108	40	4	40.0%	68,979	7.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Laurel	Maryland	173	56	3	61.2%	68,868	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Billings	Montana	144	42	6	49.9%	68,526	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	124	40	3	62.0%	68,351	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	California	135	49	2	62.4%	68,266	5.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Gainesville	Florida	188	51	6	32.5%	68,125	7.7	10	1	10	0	0	10
Astoria	New York	157	75	4	47.6%	67,942	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Bryan	Texas	164	44	2	70.4%	67,781	4.0	5	1	5	0	3	5
Quincy	Massachusetts	128	39	4	71.9%	67,702	3.7	3	2	6	0	1	6
Boca Raton	Florida	181	67	6	30.4%	67,602	7.6	9	2	18	0	0	16
Acworth	Georgia	129	42	2	67.5%	67,254	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Cypress	Texas	120	45	7	39.3%	67,023	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daly City	California	150	56	3	58.4%	66,764	5.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
South Gate	California	97	44	4	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Denton	Texas	163	47	4	42.1%	66,524	6.8	6	2	9	0	0	8
Valdosta	Georgia	165	41	3	70.0%	66,466	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Plainfield	Illinois	145	41	2	67.4%	66,449	4.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Summerville	South Carolina	121	36	5	47.7%	66,265	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	136	56	3	65.9%	66,203	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Livonia	Michigan	129	41	4	70.0%	66,197	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Missoula	Montana	155	44	4	66.6%	64,833	4.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lynn	Massachusetts	157	46	2	69.1%	64,644	4.0	4	2	8	1	3	8
Temecula	California	137	45	4	49.5%	64,297	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	129	45	5	60.0%	64,139	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	185	45	4	64.4%	64,048	4.5	8	2	14	0	0	14
Ridgewood	New York	97	39	4	60.0%	64,030	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Stamford	Connecticut	168	59	4	49.3%	63,424	4.7	6	2	9	0	2	9
San Leandro	California	127	41	3	57.0%	63,405	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Miami Beach	Florida	186	59	4	54.8%	63,355	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Riverview	Florida	150	47	2	56.8%	63,205	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Vacaville	California	114	35	5	60.0%	63,178	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Palo Alto	California	147	48	4	64.3%	62,167	4.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bowie	Maryland	189	55	3	60.6%	61,939	4.8	4	2	7	0	2	7
New Braunfels	Texas	123	35	4	60.0%	61,675	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Muncie	Indiana	144	38	2	66.3%	61,459	4.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Pearland	Texas	144	45	6	44.4%	61,124	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Herndon	Virginia	126	52	3	65.4%	61,109	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	173	44	4	61.7%	61,028	4.7	7	1	7	0	2	7
Fort Mill	South Carolina	142	46	2	63.8%	60,618	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Rancho Cucamonga	California	143	49	6	34.3%	60,581	7.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Champaign	Illinois	138	36	5	62.7%	59,323	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kennewick	Washington	142	44	3	60.0%	59,286	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mission Viejo	California	115	43	4	60.0%	59,015	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Clovis	California	143	40	4	48.2%	58,450	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Coral Springs	Florida	111	40	4	60.0%	58,343	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	California	99	40	5	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Ann Arbor	Michigan	183	52	7	34.7%	57,779	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Westerville	Ohio	127	33	4	60.0%	57,125	5.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	111	36	4	60.4%	57,074	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Morgantown	West Virginia	135	38	3	59.4%	56,643	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Covington	Georgia	135	31	3	60.7%	56,297	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Ashburn	Virginia	128	51	4	50.0%	56,154	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	173	50	4	51.8%	56,098	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Boulder	Colorado	190	45	6	42.1%	55,298	7.0	6	2	11	0	0	11
Nampa	Idaho	138	38	4	47.7%	55,255	6.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Livermore	California	125	42	4	55.7%	53,651	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Buford	Georgia	105	34	5	54.1%	53,566	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	122	38	5	49.9%	53,406	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Frederick	Maryland	148	39	5	40.4%	53,390	6.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Pacoima	California	95	37	6	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
North Hollywood	California	153	65	7	34.0%	52,062	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	167	57	4	52.6%	51,541	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Hillsboro	Oregon	121	36	5	50.0%	51,436	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Jupiter	Florida	127	37	4	51.4%	50,630	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Richardson	Texas	139	48	6	43.5%	49,892	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Woodstock	Georgia	104	35	4	48.6%	49,468	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	96	38	4	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Elmhurst	New York	96	43	4	50.0%	46,984	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bellevue	Washington	150	45	4	31.9%	46,712	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Missouri City	Texas	145	47	7	43.8%	46,447	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	154	55	6	39.7%	45,995	6.2	5	2	8	0	0	8
Carlsbad	California	144	48	6	40.1%	45,525	6.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	164	44	7	36.3%	44,600	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Idaho Falls	Idaho	151	40	6	40.7%	44,361	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	California	159	44	7	41.8%	43,483	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Norman	Oklahoma	155	41	7	34.1%	42,267	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Athens	Georgia	158	44	6	32.8%	40,852	6.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Santa Monica	California	147	55	5	42.7%	40,359	6.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
College Station	Texas	120	43	7	30.0%	36,915	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	109	34	7	30.0%	34,220	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	380	129	6	41.1%	1,008,894	6.7	62	4	67	2	4	67
San Diego	345	100	5	36.7%	494,003	7.0	36	1	36	0	1	34
San Jose	285	84	5	46.4%	487,462	6.2	28	2	52	0	1	51
Sacramento	275	63	5	50.6%	406,855	5.9	28	1	28	0	1	28
Bakersfield	239	52	4	50.5%	282,399	6.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Fresno	244	56	5	45.0%	270,905	6.7	18	2	29	0	0	28
Santa Ana	169	56	3	73.9%	263,827	3.7	6	2	9	0	3	9
Stockton	211	44	3	68.0%	254,152	4.3	12	1	12	0	3	12
Chula Vista	160	44	2	76.3%	199,143	3.6	5	2	6	0	4	6
Anaheim	160	55	5	51.1%	188,285	5.9	7	2	14	0	0	14
San Bernardino	186	52	3	74.1%	184,933	3.6	7	2	14	0	3	14
San Francisco	248	94	7	20.4%	177,813	9.2	28	1	28	0	0	23
Long Beach	215	65	5	35.3%	168,981	7.7	12	1	12	0	0	11
Fontana	128	41	2	70.0%	164,309	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Rosa	166	51	3	74.6%	161,151	3.5	6	2	10	0	5	10
Modesto	162	50	3	60.0%	158,562	5.3	7	2	14	0	0	14
Oakland	243	70	5	38.3%	157,663	7.3	14	1	14	0	0	13
Hayward	135	39	2	81.7%	156,980	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	8
Riverside	164	49	4	42.1%	155,676	6.6	7	2	8	0	1	8
Oxnard	154	46	3	69.5%	153,132	4.3	4	2	8	0	1	8
Corona	159	52	4	58.6%	150,824	5.4	5	2	9	0	0	9
Lancaster	135	37	2	80.0%	147,535	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Oceanside	139	42	2	73.1%	146,439	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Whittier	208	70	2	74.4%	145,880	3.7	6	2	10	0	5	10
Elk Grove	136	41	2	80.0%	143,455	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Huntington Beach	153	56	2	71.6%	143,158	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Ontario	141	44	2	80.0%	141,318	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Moreno Valley	127	40	4	62.1%	127,668	4.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Escondido	138	45	4	70.0%	125,757	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	133	55	2	87.6%	121,703	2.3	3	2	5	0	5	5
Sunnyvale	160	58	2	75.6%	115,525	3.8	4	3	8	0	3	8
Santa Maria	153	41	3	80.0%	114,471	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
El Cajon	172	54	4	65.3%	112,620	4.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Victorville	124	36	2	82.6%	112,585	2.7	3	2	6	0	4	6
Pomona	137	41	3	70.0%	110,590	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Torrance	180	69	4	62.1%	109,713	4.6	5	2	9	0	1	9
Orange	159	58	2	74.3%	107,797	3.8	5	2	10	0	3	10
Palmdale	156	48	4	61.2%	107,130	4.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Fremont	144	47	6	45.9%	106,964	6.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Rialto	127	38	1	100.0%	106,583	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Visalia	140	39	3	70.0%	106,410	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	149	36	4	56.1%	105,708	4.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Garden Grove	150	59	3	60.0%	105,457	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Fairfield	117	35	2	90.0%	102,671	2.0	2	2	4	0	4	4
Concord	134	47	2	78.5%	102,164	3.3	4	2	8	0	3	8
Downey	139	53	2	90.0%	101,611	2.0	3	2	6	0	6	6
Inglewood	177	72	2	75.7%	101,336	3.4	5	2	9	0	7	9
Berkeley	214	58	3	78.2%	99,455	3.2	9	1	9	1	6	9
Roseville	138	41	2	70.7%	98,768	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Hemet	139	42	3	73.8%	95,043	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
La Puente	146	55	2	80.0%	94,358	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Perris	124	41	2	80.0%	93,912	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Irvine	192	74	6	35.0%	93,622	7.9	9	1	9	0	0	7
Redwood City	134	46	3	78.9%	90,313	3.3	4	2	8	0	3	8
Vallejo	141	51	3	72.5%	90,193	3.8	4	2	8	0	1	8
Ventura	138	44	2	77.4%	89,717	3.3	3	2	4	0	2	4
Murrieta	124	36	4	64.8%	85,758	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	95	45	2	80.0%	84,709	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
Vista	131	41	3	70.0%	83,907	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Hesperia	104	32	2	80.0%	83,049	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Indio	122	37	2	86.4%	83,022	2.0	2	1	2	1	2	2
Chico	143	35	3	73.0%	81,810	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Tracy	147	40	4	69.7%	81,615	3.5	4	2	5	1	1	5
Costa Mesa	122	46	4	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Redding	177	40	3	70.0%	79,150	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Santa Barbara	173	52	4	57.8%	78,500	5.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
San Mateo	156	51	5	55.0%	78,347	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Antioch	124	36	3	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	96	44	2	80.0%	77,469	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Simi Valley	118	46	5	60.0%	77,227	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Madera	157	40	2	73.8%	76,027	4.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Santa Clara	137	38	4	60.3%	75,659	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
San Marcos	121	41	2	75.1%	75,481	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
El Monte	112	45	2	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Fullerton	162	61	4	53.1%	73,892	6.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Pasadena	178	58	5	45.9%	72,443	6.5	6	2	12	0	0	12
Merced	151	36	4	69.8%	71,963	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bell Gardens	97	42	3	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Van Nuys	148	58	7	40.0%	71,125	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Menifee	146	42	3	63.9%	70,595	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Burbank	164	66	3	64.0%	69,079	4.6	5	2	9	0	0	9
West Covina	135	49	2	62.4%	68,266	5.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Daly City	150	56	3	58.4%	66,764	5.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
South Gate	97	44	4	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Temecula	137	45	4	49.5%	64,297	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	127	41	3	57.0%	63,405	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Vacaville	114	35	5	60.0%	63,178	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Palo Alto	147	48	4	64.3%	62,167	4.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	143	49	6	34.3%	60,581	7.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Mission Viejo	115	43	4	60.0%	59,015	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Clovis	143	40	4	48.2%	58,450	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sylmar	99	40	5	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chino	111	36	4	60.4%	57,074	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Livermore	125	42	4	55.7%	53,651	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Pacoima	95	37	6	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
North Hollywood	153	65	7	34.0%	52,062	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	96	38	4	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Carlsbad	144	48	6	40.1%	45,525	6.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	159	44	7	41.8%	43,483	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Monica	147	55	5	42.7%	40,359	6.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
Napa	123	33	8	24.2%	23,428	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2

Brooklyn

ZIP	tutors.com	care.com	wyzant.com	varsitytutors.com	yelp.com	groupon.com
11208	3	1	2	4	5	6
11206	6	4	5	7	8	9
11239	3	1	2	4	5	7
11229	3	1	2	4	5	6
11226	3	1	2	4	5
11218	3	1	2	4	5	6
11216	3	1	2	4	5	6
11228	3	1	2	4	5	6
11238	6	4	5	2	8	9
11237	3	1	2	4	5	6
11217	3	1	2	4	5	6
11207	3	1	2	4	5	7
11236	3	1	2	4	5	6
11205	3	1	2	4	5	6
11219	3	1	2	4	5	6
11234	3	1	2	4	5	6
11203	6	4	5	7	8	33
11224	3	1	2	4	5	6
11225	3	1	2	4	5	6
11215	3	1	2	4	5	6
11233	3	1	2	4	5	7
11211	4	1	3	5	11	13
11220	3	1	2	4	5	6
11230	3	1	2	4	5	6
11232	3	1	2	4	5	6
11201	3	1	2	4	5	6
11212	3	1	2	4	5	6
11221	3	1	2	4	5	6
11210	3	1	2	4	5	6
11214	3	1	2	4	5
11213	6	4	5	1	8	9
11223	6	4	5	7	8	9
11235	3	1	2	4	5	6
11204	3	1	2	4	5	6
11222	3	1	2	4	5	6
11209	3	1	2	4	5	6
11231	3	1	2	4	5	33

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Tutors

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 2,537 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Tutors Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (tutor near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Tutors Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Tutors Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Tutors Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly