Travelleaders Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve travelleaders.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,890 Travel Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Travelleaders Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Travelleaders Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Travelleaders Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Chicago
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Travelleaders Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	29,774	13,890	5	30.8%	99,432,267	7.8	27,378	32,653	1,998	47,199	805	2,839	38,338
California	4,061	2,193	4	22.9%	8,945,846	9.2	1,166	1,740	132	2,056	5	20	1,483
Texas	2,797	1,443	4	25.6%	7,128,162	8.4	1,360	1,917	138	2,655	6	49	2,236
Florida	3,077	1,916	4	31.9%	6,569,842	8.2	446	975	150	1,333	26	88	1,033
New York	3,026	1,687	5	25.7%	5,034,681	8.3	1,491	1,756	68	2,121	47	159	1,745
Illinois	2,067	1,140	4	30.5%	3,915,088	8.6	1,247	1,382	69	2,096	12	39	1,624
Michigan	1,706	911	3	38.6%	3,841,999	7.5	833	976	85	1,465	28	110	1,237
Georgia	1,719	982	4	34.5%	3,548,821	8.4	574	726	80	873	7	42	626
Pennsylvania	2,375	1,256	5	25.7%	3,283,917	8.9	1,604	1,781	84	2,638	4	19	2,059
North Carolina	1,909	1,041	4	31.4%	3,191,590	7.8	683	802	81	1,118	24	66	892
Ohio	1,831	999	5	27.0%	3,139,533	8.8	976	1,188	82	1,976	18	71	1,408
Indiana	2,444	1,498	2	46.4%	3,082,003	6.5	659	770	62	1,298	74	195	1,125
Arizona	1,309	739	3	40.8%	2,833,613	7.6	247	396	29	582	0	18	500
Tennessee	1,335	764	3	42.6%	2,830,874	7.0	514	622	39	796	10	48	685
Virginia	1,773	967	5	30.5%	2,569,465	8.0	723	891	72	1,595	24	104	1,327
Washington	1,716	939	4	34.4%	2,507,600	7.0	451	587	40	925	81	166	781
Minnesota	1,486	803	3	45.1%	2,493,248	7.1	777	878	121	1,298	49	141	1,098
Colorado	1,764	1,003	3	41.4%	2,291,264	7.3	381	514	56	760	31	99	626
Wisconsin	1,690	879	3	39.4%	2,277,261	6.8	694	769	90	1,319	34	109	1,229
Kentucky	1,230	714	2	48.1%	2,140,010	6.1	698	758	24	958	17	77	893
New Jersey	1,583	985	4	22.4%	1,993,034	8.8	537	593	45	846	8	32	685
Missouri	1,447	808	5	29.1%	1,774,391	8.1	887	1,017	46	1,296	7	48	930
Oregon	1,706	983	4	42.6%	1,738,884	6.8	355	414	26	681	27	89	587
South Carolina	1,387	855	4	34.6%	1,713,568	8.0	347	422	39	671	7	34	526
Massachusetts	1,555	852	4	24.9%	1,699,681	8.7	461	534	47	732	4	16	543
Alabama	1,384	778	4	34.7%	1,687,119	8.1	522	637	33	1,010	4	23	858
Louisiana	1,305	788	4	32.6%	1,520,870	7.9	431	510	38	810	0	13	699
Mississippi	1,046	612	2	48.9%	1,461,605	6.1	384	418	31	599	17	83	509
Maryland	1,347	807	6	23.3%	1,396,934	8.1	392	463	44	585	13	57	476
Iowa	1,320	714	5	36.3%	1,137,331	7.5	890	933	51	1,415	4	53	1,146
Oklahoma	1,180	635	5	29.0%	1,135,216	7.7	557	646	30	1,018	14	40	818
Kansas	1,219	670	3	37.6%	1,092,856	7.0	616	692	31	1,006	52	123	855
Arkansas	1,113	623	5	29.6%	884,636	7.1	553	587	21	856	18	83	617
Connecticut	1,069	590	4	23.3%	833,177	8.3	234	279	20	427	0	7	324
Utah	1,123	679	6	27.1%	823,863	8.4	246	284	18	465	1	5	370
West Virginia	1,031	593	3	43.1%	787,603	6.9	684	704	13	958	9	52	881
Nevada	823	495	5	26.6%	778,657	8.2	92	168	12	213	0	4	153
Maine	1,490	902	2	50.1%	667,460	5.6	421	425	12	480	6	41	461
New Mexico	950	542	6	26.0%	543,495	7.5	327	361	12	538	2	14	437
New Hampshire	838	492	4	39.4%	528,993	6.9	238	248	9	318	4	16	275
Idaho	1,016	588	5	31.1%	524,842	7.7	251	273	17	429	4	19	359
Nebraska	1,055	620	8	22.6%	430,238	8.2	524	581	18	917	5	57	621
North Dakota	714	409	1	55.6%	417,408	6.0	366	380	17	534	9	81	516
Montana	1,028	593	3	38.3%	399,209	7.2	348	361	19	499	0	19	434
South Dakota	818	476	1	45.0%	388,853	5.1	359	370	28	645	89	175	597
Alaska	1,046	640	2	46.4%	342,291	7.2	218	235	13	295	1	10	264
Delaware	616	406	5	28.0%	265,492	8.4	52	66	9	111	3	8	62
Rhode Island	515	320	5	23.5%	248,301	8.9	64	77	9	141	0	3	89
Vermont	823	478	6	31.2%	194,873	7.7	250	254	4	401	0	7	368
Wyoming	757	442	6	27.4%	159,371	8.3	164	171	13	280	0	7	218
Hawaii	754	488	15	6.4%	91,519	12.9	82	93	5	132	0	0	24

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Chicago	Illinois	306	216	4	44.1%	1,191,778	6.4	56	1	58	0	3	58
Houston	Texas	372	247	6	27.2%	867,185	8.1	96	3	104	1	8	104
Los Angeles	California	401	252	4	34.0%	835,331	7.8	62	3	62	0	0	60
Phoenix	Arizona	290	198	2	55.4%	804,361	5.5	42	1	42	0	6	42
Brooklyn	New York	262	187	5	30.7%	797,242	8.1	37	3	50	0	0	26
Minneapolis	Minnesota	379	248	2	56.0%	609,662	5.5	51	18	73	4	7	73
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	296	197	5	35.4%	558,432	7.6	47	3	54	2	6	54
Tucson	Arizona	289	182	3	60.5%	547,740	5.0	32	2	34	0	6	30
Portland	Oregon	258	169	2	58.4%	536,974	5.2	33	1	33	0	6	33
Atlanta	Georgia	400	280	3	53.1%	524,505	5.6	39	3	46	0	3	41
Indianapolis	Indiana	289	196	4	52.1%	495,555	5.8	37	7	46	0	9	44
Memphis	Tennessee	251	170	2	70.8%	492,237	4.0	26	2	37	2	15	35
Miami	Florida	481	310	5	25.9%	486,319	8.7	55	10	66	1	5	53
Louisville	Kentucky	263	181	3	63.4%	482,571	4.7	32	1	32	0	4	32
Jacksonville	Florida	284	182	4	50.8%	440,851	5.7	31	3	34	0	3	34
San Antonio	Texas	308	200	7	24.4%	433,962	8.6	59	2	59	0	0	59
Las Vegas	Nevada	329	219	6	25.0%	386,176	8.7	43	3	44	0	0	29
Orlando	Florida	313	215	4	38.2%	380,585	7.5	32	5	37	0	0	35
Colorado Springs	Colorado	323	206	2	64.8%	377,971	4.4	30	6	43	6	11	41
Detroit	Michigan	247	159	3	53.1%	339,904	5.3	25	1	27	1	5	27
San Diego	California	331	227	5	24.5%	330,648	8.8	36	4	42	0	0	38
Saint Paul	Minnesota	329	226	4	41.0%	327,948	7.0	30	14	53	0	2	49
Fort Worth	Texas	265	173	7	35.0%	318,919	7.5	32	5	58	0	0	58
Spokane	Washington	228	140	1	81.4%	292,752	2.8	14	3	35	7	9	35
Denver	Colorado	355	240	5	26.8%	291,691	8.8	38	5	50	0	0	41
West Palm Beach	Florida	218	147	1	78.5%	290,884	2.4	12	8	33	8	10	32
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	289	184	5	35.6%	289,135	7.5	29	6	52	1	1	50
New York City	New York	318	227	6	17.7%	287,139	9.3	47	3	49	2	2	48
Columbus	Ohio	243	162	6	32.6%	276,091	7.8	30	5	55	0	1	52
Virginia Beach	Virginia	207	138	3	60.5%	272,220	5.0	12	6	25	2	5	25
Raleigh	North Carolina	209	133	6	49.2%	268,945	6.6	15	4	29	1	1	29
Fresno	California	227	148	5	43.9%	264,230	6.4	18	1	18	0	0	18
Buffalo	New York	292	195	3	44.4%	249,973	6.4	28	2	28	0	4	25
Birmingham	Alabama	257	168	4	49.3%	246,481	6.5	30	3	32	0	1	32
Hollywood	Florida	212	146	3	52.5%	246,006	5.8	9	3	11	1	2	11
Fort Wayne	Indiana	207	143	2	77.1%	245,310	3.6	16	3	24	4	10	24
Tallahassee	Florida	181	124	2	81.9%	235,865	2.8	10	2	17	1	8	17
Cincinnati	Ohio	312	198	6	29.2%	235,173	7.9	45	2	46	0	1	46
Tampa	Florida	302	205	6	29.0%	230,020	8.4	27	3	30	2	2	30
Dallas	Texas	334	223	7	16.1%	224,363	9.5	48	3	48	0	0	45
Kansas City	Missouri	264	179	6	38.2%	218,166	7.3	49	5	60	0	0	60
Grand Rapids	Michigan	180	123	5	57.7%	212,375	5.3	12	3	15	0	3	15
Dayton	Ohio	294	186	4	44.4%	212,077	6.8	27	6	32	0	0	32
Corpus Christi	Texas	223	152	3	62.7%	204,320	4.6	18	2	18	0	2	18
Aurora	Colorado	208	149	5	46.8%	203,881	6.2	11	1	11	0	0	11
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	343	235	6	24.4%	202,889	8.5	27	8	44	1	5	34
Bakersfield	California	185	125	5	35.5%	198,402	7.8	11	3	19	0	0	18
Charlotte	North Carolina	269	175	7	21.6%	195,709	8.8	24	3	37	0	0	37
Nashville	Tennessee	258	169	5	41.9%	192,077	6.7	22	2	22	0	0	21
Anaheim	California	172	120	3	50.0%	184,313	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	310	205	6	25.6%	174,814	8.3	39	2	41	0	0	38
Austin	Texas	291	199	9	15.8%	171,695	9.4	44	1	44	0	0	44
Long Beach	California	206	142	4	35.6%	170,623	7.1	12	5	24	0	0	24
Lexington	Kentucky	194	128	4	52.6%	168,105	5.6	15	1	15	0	1	15
Saint Petersburg	Florida	256	181	3	46.8%	166,892	6.6	16	5	19	0	1	17
Reno	Nevada	203	138	4	55.9%	165,938	5.4	12	1	12	0	2	12
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	235	164	6	43.6%	165,042	6.6	18	7	29	0	0	29
Mesa	Arizona	237	152	7	30.0%	160,366	8.0	13	2	26	0	0	26
Kalamazoo	Michigan	209	136	1	97.2%	159,499	1.3	7	3	17	5	7	17
Topeka	Kansas	217	146	1	95.8%	156,644	1.3	18	2	34	12	18	34
Syracuse	New York	212	145	2	66.6%	151,130	4.5	15	2	17	1	7	17
Mobile	Alabama	263	169	5	55.3%	150,056	5.9	18	2	19	0	1	19
Savannah	Georgia	195	135	4	61.8%	149,153	5.2	10	1	10	0	2	10
Tacoma	Washington	278	181	5	44.7%	149,016	7.0	20	3	26	0	0	24
Pueblo	Colorado	208	132	1	94.0%	148,612	1.7	7	3	20	4	6	19
Washington DC	District of Columbia	296	203	6	21.3%	145,652	8.5	28	2	28	0	0	28
Corona	California	159	109	2	56.3%	144,869	5.6	5	2	5	0	1	5
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	301	199	9	21.1%	144,115	8.8	43	4	85	0	0	79
Littleton	Colorado	257	170	3	44.0%	143,172	6.7	10	7	17	1	2	15
Bradenton	Florida	207	139	4	55.2%	139,656	7.5	10	2	10	0	1	7
Baltimore	Maryland	257	162	6	22.0%	138,998	8.9	22	2	22	0	0	21
Glendale	Arizona	212	144	5	45.3%	138,084	6.2	9	2	9	0	0	9
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	158	112	2	73.4%	136,705	4.4	5	1	5	0	2	5
Bloomington	Indiana	169	122	1	100.0%	133,573	1.0	6	2	11	6	6	11
Pensacola	Florida	229	150	5	48.2%	129,388	5.4	13	2	14	0	3	14
El Paso	Texas	281	174	8	16.3%	128,993	10.1	24	3	25	0	0	12
Salt Lake City	Utah	249	165	6	25.9%	126,130	8.7	19	5	36	0	0	33
Rochester	New York	275	188	7	26.7%	126,063	8.5	24	3	48	0	0	46
Durham	North Carolina	168	110	6	43.4%	125,933	6.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Lansing	Michigan	160	105	1	76.0%	124,952	3.3	7	2	9	2	3	9
Columbia	South Carolina	223	149	7	36.4%	124,638	7.5	14	2	27	0	0	27
Springfield	Missouri	159	107	5	51.4%	118,305	5.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Irvine	California	178	129	5	44.1%	118,060	6.3	9	3	11	0	0	11
Shreveport	Louisiana	194	127	3	52.3%	116,614	5.6	12	2	13	0	1	13
Charleston	South Carolina	223	163	3	59.2%	116,567	5.0	10	4	11	0	4	11
Norfolk	Virginia	213	132	5	47.1%	115,781	6.0	14	2	16	0	2	16
Alexandria	Virginia	250	173	6	32.4%	114,971	7.6	14	3	21	0	0	21
Amarillo	Texas	226	158	5	49.6%	113,500	6.1	14	1	14	0	0	14
Marietta	Georgia	186	126	5	35.1%	113,390	7.6	7	3	12	0	0	12
Decatur	Georgia	199	138	2	62.6%	113,280	5.2	5	2	5	0	1	5
Bronx	New York	231	172	15	7.8%	112,710	12.7	25	1	25	0	0	2
Irving	Texas	152	112	5	46.7%	112,271	6.5	6	3	12	0	0	12
Riverside	California	198	116	7	30.0%	111,003	8.0	7	3	11	0	0	11
Evansville	Indiana	183	127	2	60.0%	110,713	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Pompano Beach	Florida	242	158	5	29.8%	110,440	8.4	10	3	10	0	0	7
Rancho Cucamonga	California	162	107	2	62.1%	109,726	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Ypsilanti	Michigan	125	85	1	100.0%	106,899	1.0	2	2	5	2	2	3
Salem	Oregon	161	111	6	40.0%	106,616	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Eugene	Oregon	178	123	4	51.9%	105,415	5.5	6	2	7	0	1	7
Lincoln	Nebraska	202	135	5	36.4%	105,366	6.9	22	2	40	0	0	40
Palmdale	California	152	105	3	60.0%	104,962	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kissimmee	Florida	220	151	6	36.3%	104,961	7.4	7	4	10	0	0	10
Arlington	Texas	223	148	7	26.3%	104,387	8.5	12	2	22	0	0	22
High Point	North Carolina	150	108	1	84.1%	102,860	2.8	4	5	10	0	4	10
Anchorage	Alaska	210	149	6	42.1%	102,850	6.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Saint Louis	Missouri	313	212	11	11.1%	101,831	11.1	45	6	64	0	0	13
Ann Arbor	Michigan	158	102	4	60.8%	101,441	5.8	5	2	7	0	2	6
Jackson	Mississippi	194	123	3	59.3%	101,075	5.1	11	2	21	0	3	21
Albuquerque	New Mexico	223	148	10	15.1%	99,194	9.6	17	4	33	0	0	18
Laredo	Texas	167	108	4	36.6%	99,104	7.5	6	2	11	0	0	11
Chandler	Arizona	169	111	7	36.7%	98,499	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fort Myers	Florida	221	156	5	39.1%	98,313	7.5	11	4	13	0	0	12
Naperville	Illinois	149	102	5	59.0%	97,867	5.0	4	2	5	0	1	5
Modesto	California	187	125	7	36.7%	97,139	7.3	7	2	9	0	0	9
Parker	Colorado	122	88	1	96.6%	96,922	1.5	2	3	6	1	2	6
Panama City	Florida	169	119	2	76.3%	96,424	4.2	6	5	10	2	3	10
Midland	Texas	174	111	4	60.0%	95,993	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Huntington Beach	California	159	109	4	47.0%	94,030	6.3	4	3	5	0	0	5
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	96	1	93.4%	93,718	1.7	3	2	5	1	3	5
Kennewick	Washington	147	91	1	94.7%	93,610	1.3	3	3	10	2	4	10
Abilene	Texas	188	136	2	71.3%	92,746	4.2	6	1	6	1	1	6
Olympia	Washington	172	98	4	50.2%	91,719	6.3	6	3	8	0	1	7
Saint Charles	Missouri	125	90	2	64.4%	90,123	4.3	3	5	7	1	2	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	219	144	6	42.9%	89,134	6.3	15	2	29	0	0	29
Yuma	Arizona	143	93	4	60.0%	88,559	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Wichita	Kansas	197	132	10	21.2%	88,400	8.7	26	2	28	0	0	28
Fairfax	Virginia	168	118	5	52.8%	86,441	5.8	4	4	5	1	1	4
Spring	Texas	228	155	8	22.7%	86,429	9.1	8	2	8	0	0	8
Peoria	Arizona	154	98	4	50.0%	86,050	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madison	Wisconsin	224	149	5	29.1%	85,815	7.7	14	3	27	0	0	27
Knoxville	Tennessee	225	157	7	22.1%	85,470	8.6	17	2	34	0	0	33
Seattle	Washington	306	217	14	8.9%	85,191	12.0	35	5	61	0	0	9
Clarksville	Tennessee	136	88	5	48.1%	84,552	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vancouver	Washington	195	130	6	25.7%	83,922	8.5	11	3	19	0	0	18
Gainesville	Florida	187	131	6	40.0%	83,769	7.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Grand Prairie	Texas	142	98	7	43.9%	83,594	6.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Odessa	Texas	175	116	4	52.1%	83,435	5.8	6	2	7	0	0	7
Plano	Texas	173	119	5	27.2%	83,204	8.1	7	2	14	0	0	14
Erie	Pennsylvania	197	132	4	44.5%	81,668	6.1	13	2	13	0	0	13
Chesapeake	Virginia	172	109	7	34.2%	81,374	9.3	6	3	8	1	2	2
Fredericksburg	Virginia	171	112	6	46.3%	80,638	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cleveland	Ohio	262	175	12	10.7%	80,499	13.2	29	7	39	1	2	4
Montgomery	Alabama	241	164	6	38.3%	80,404	6.7	13	2	14	0	0	14
Salinas	California	174	113	4	42.7%	80,388	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Macon	Georgia	182	122	4	49.0%	80,146	6.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Roswell	Georgia	127	92	3	80.0%	79,816	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Fayetteville	North Carolina	203	128	5	32.4%	78,963	7.6	8	2	10	0	0	10
Woodbridge	Virginia	154	107	6	37.3%	78,871	7.3	3	3	4	0	1	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	153	104	6	40.0%	77,888	7.0	5	2	6	0	0	6
Boston	Massachusetts	220	150	4	51.0%	77,352	6.5	14	1	14	0	0	14
Boise	Idaho	181	117	6	30.0%	76,942	8.1	9	2	15	0	0	15
Overland Park	Kansas	196	133	5	41.9%	76,872	6.8	9	3	10	0	0	10
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	177	115	5	42.3%	76,797	6.8	9	3	10	0	0	10
Hialeah	Florida	191	125	7	20.7%	76,120	10.0	7	2	8	0	1	3
Metairie	Louisiana	158	109	4	53.4%	76,029	5.4	5	2	5	0	1	5
Sarasota	Florida	210	147	5	30.3%	75,930	8.0	13	2	13	0	0	13
Toms River	New Jersey	139	93	2	61.4%	75,483	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Vista	California	144	98	2	62.9%	75,359	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Cape Coral	Florida	181	119	5	41.7%	75,328	6.8	6	2	7	0	0	7
Scottsdale	Arizona	210	148	8	25.2%	75,172	8.6	11	4	21	0	0	20
Medford	Oregon	124	83	1	80.4%	75,009	3.0	2	2	3	1	1	3
Boca Raton	Florida	202	142	6	33.0%	73,386	7.6	9	3	16	2	2	15
San Angelo	Texas	153	99	3	65.8%	72,930	4.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Escondido	California	142	100	4	40.0%	71,861	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Gilbert	Arizona	181	122	7	30.0%	71,580	8.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	187	127	5	42.2%	71,529	6.3	9	2	18	0	0	18
Gulfport	Mississippi	144	94	2	75.2%	71,257	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Fargo	North Dakota	154	106	3	58.1%	71,165	4.3	4	2	6	0	2	6
Bend	Oregon	152	102	4	57.9%	70,802	6.3	3	3	5	0	0	5
Beaverton	Oregon	140	96	7	34.9%	70,395	7.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Denton	Texas	159	105	6	44.2%	69,890	6.5	6	2	6	0	0	6
Cumming	Georgia	131	91	6	43.1%	69,803	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Pasadena	California	165	119	4	44.1%	69,507	6.5	6	3	12	0	0	12
Richmond	Virginia	213	132	9	17.8%	69,463	9.9	15	4	27	0	0	11
Buford	Georgia	119	87	2	70.0%	69,372	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bowling Green	Kentucky	140	89	5	60.0%	69,309	5.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Kent	Washington	152	103	6	43.1%	69,226	6.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
San Francisco	California	270	184	13	7.9%	68,696	12.4	28	3	34	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	150	99	2	53.5%	68,495	5.2	5	2	5	0	1	5
Rockford	Illinois	177	119	5	37.5%	68,359	7.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
San Bernardino	California	175	112	6	27.2%	67,885	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	5
Hagerstown	Maryland	141	96	3	69.2%	67,804	4.7	3	3	5	0	1	5
Woodstock	Georgia	121	86	2	66.2%	67,350	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Spring Hill	Florida	166	120	5	53.5%	67,114	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Lees Summit	Missouri	178	124	3	65.2%	66,578	4.8	6	2	7	0	1	7
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	139	88	4	54.2%	66,477	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Antioch	California	125	84	3	60.0%	66,433	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Green Bay	Wisconsin	162	106	5	36.2%	66,292	8.1	7	3	8	0	0	6
Akron	Ohio	198	134	8	24.3%	65,680	8.7	17	4	34	0	0	33
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	135	84	3	50.0%	65,249	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Davenport	Iowa	162	113	3	60.3%	63,251	4.5	6	2	12	0	2	12
Wichita Falls	Texas	186	129	3	63.7%	62,946	4.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lafayette	Louisiana	157	107	4	39.0%	62,557	7.2	5	2	6	0	0	6
Allentown	Pennsylvania	179	112	5	36.6%	62,244	7.0	7	2	13	0	0	13
Mckinney	Texas	135	96	8	32.8%	61,992	7.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Roseville	California	134	89	5	43.9%	61,411	6.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Tulsa	Oklahoma	241	157	8	14.5%	61,111	9.6	28	2	29	0	0	27
Elgin	Illinois	152	101	5	50.0%	61,106	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Jose	California	282	187	20	5.8%	60,937	14.1	28	2	28	0	0	0
Temecula	California	147	99	5	46.5%	60,407	6.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
South Bend	Indiana	175	121	5	41.1%	60,295	6.6	10	1	10	0	0	10
Greenville	South Carolina	179	116	8	27.4%	60,110	8.2	9	2	15	0	0	15
Waco	Texas	167	110	5	37.8%	59,876	7.3	9	2	14	0	0	14
Baytown	Texas	139	97	5	50.0%	58,897	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pearland	Texas	145	100	6	42.8%	58,877	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Sparks	Nevada	171	116	5	48.9%	58,339	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Naples	Florida	226	162	8	18.3%	57,227	9.3	14	2	14	0	0	13
Mcdonough	Georgia	127	87	4	56.3%	57,138	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Independence	Missouri	170	113	5	46.0%	57,109	6.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
Asheville	North Carolina	145	107	6	42.8%	56,529	6.8	5	2	10	0	0	10
Duluth	Minnesota	188	123	4	48.0%	56,274	6.3	11	2	13	0	1	13
Yakima	Washington	142	87	5	43.3%	56,235	6.3	4	2	6	0	0	6
College Station	Texas	121	81	5	45.4%	55,838	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Manassas	Virginia	170	108	5	36.6%	55,677	7.5	4	3	6	0	0	6
Tracy	California	158	112	4	47.4%	55,568	6.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	174	119	5	47.2%	55,224	6.5	6	3	6	1	1	5
New Orleans	Louisiana	258	187	8	12.6%	53,934	9.8	19	2	19	0	0	17
Elk Grove	California	139	96	5	30.0%	53,796	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Sacramento	California	271	177	15	6.7%	53,735	14.1	28	5	54	0	0	1
Wilmington	Delaware	225	153	7	24.4%	53,540	8.3	10	3	13	0	0	12
Palm Bay	Florida	157	104	5	47.8%	53,246	5.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Humble	Texas	141	98	6	31.9%	53,096	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	California	99	72	4	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vacaville	California	120	80	4	50.0%	52,648	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Summerville	South Carolina	127	84	8	37.7%	52,371	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Katy	Texas	160	113	12	15.2%	52,337	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Meridian	Idaho	121	75	6	50.0%	52,111	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Frisco	Texas	126	89	8	30.0%	51,734	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Morgantown	West Virginia	132	88	6	54.1%	51,523	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Greeley	Colorado	135	99	6	45.1%	51,447	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cypress	Texas	118	82	9	30.0%	51,180	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	151	102	5	53.9%	51,180	5.5	6	2	6	0	1	6
Alpharetta	Georgia	169	126	9	26.8%	50,792	8.3	4	4	6	0	0	6
Tempe	Arizona	150	98	8	26.6%	50,471	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	147	101	6	48.1%	50,424	6.0	3	3	4	0	1	4
Surprise	Arizona	149	104	6	37.0%	50,218	7.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Covington	Georgia	138	99	3	54.1%	50,188	5.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
Acworth	Georgia	128	90	5	50.0%	49,842	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Olathe	Kansas	121	84	8	34.4%	49,700	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lawrence	Kansas	153	107	6	49.1%	49,664	6.4	5	2	10	0	0	10
Norman	Oklahoma	160	105	7	40.0%	49,634	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	170	110	6	35.5%	49,476	7.5	6	4	12	0	0	12
Saginaw	Michigan	171	120	5	37.9%	49,448	6.9	7	3	9	0	0	9
Charlottesville	Virginia	147	96	6	40.0%	49,236	7.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Mission Viejo	California	121	81	5	50.0%	49,179	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Missoula	Montana	169	112	4	50.0%	48,642	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Whittier	California	205	148	5	24.4%	47,935	8.7	6	2	6	0	0	5
Edmond	Oklahoma	182	117	7	27.5%	47,147	8.4	5	4	7	0	0	7
Westerville	Ohio	120	78	5	49.4%	47,034	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	117	81	4	50.0%	46,937	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Van Nuys	California	158	107	7	26.2%	46,622	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Racine	Wisconsin	162	102	6	36.7%	46,253	7.4	5	3	6	0	0	6
Spartanburg	South Carolina	150	105	8	41.1%	46,044	7.0	5	2	8	0	1	8
Puyallup	Washington	170	112	3	32.2%	46,033	7.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
York	Pennsylvania	172	118	7	25.5%	45,881	9.7	7	3	9	0	1	2
Worcester	Massachusetts	168	106	7	24.5%	45,498	8.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Carlsbad	California	145	106	5	40.0%	45,468	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Johnson City	Tennessee	148	100	4	47.5%	45,375	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Billings	Montana	145	96	6	33.0%	45,330	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Plainfield	Illinois	165	110	4	45.9%	45,253	6.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Homestead	Florida	190	129	6	23.6%	44,305	10.0	7	1	7	0	0	4
Vero Beach	Florida	154	115	4	38.4%	44,298	7.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Huntsville	Alabama	200	133	8	22.6%	44,266	8.3	11	3	22	0	0	22
Hemet	California	149	99	5	33.8%	43,528	7.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Arvada	Colorado	153	110	6	32.2%	42,938	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Augusta	Georgia	170	123	7	20.9%	42,797	9.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
Schenectady	New York	188	128	7	26.4%	42,772	8.5	8	1	8	0	0	8
Visalia	California	143	96	6	27.6%	41,962	8.7	3	2	5	0	0	4
Clearwater	Florida	220	149	8	22.7%	41,676	9.2	9	4	14	0	0	12
Chico	California	146	96	6	36.6%	41,050	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bell Gardens	California	100	70	4	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
North Hollywood	California	145	102	8	26.6%	40,718	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Napa	California	118	85	4	41.5%	40,076	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Oceanside	California	143	102	8	20.0%	40,052	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	California	175	129	6	22.6%	39,951	8.8	5	2	5	0	0	4
Elkhart	Indiana	147	98	6	40.0%	39,774	7.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	170	116	6	26.7%	39,147	8.8	6	3	12	0	0	9
Coral Springs	Florida	129	88	7	40.0%	38,895	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Staten Island	New York	219	154	13	8.2%	38,878	12.5	12	2	24	0	0	1
Sylmar	California	98	72	3	40.0%	38,595	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Toledo	Ohio	215	147	9	12.5%	38,587	9.8	15	3	28	0	0	16
Santa Ana	California	155	105	10	10.6%	37,975	10.2	6	1	6	0	0	4
Grand Junction	Colorado	198	137	5	35.6%	37,574	7.3	6	3	11	0	0	11
Ogden	Utah	163	105	8	18.6%	37,550	10.2	5	2	9	0	0	3
Melbourne	Florida	145	103	8	23.6%	36,805	9.2	5	2	5	0	0	4
Appleton	Wisconsin	143	100	7	30.0%	36,511	8.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Longview	Texas	170	113	7	34.4%	36,255	7.8	5	2	6	0	0	6
Henderson	Nevada	188	123	12	11.7%	35,499	10.4	8	4	14	0	0	4
Clermont	Florida	154	111	6	35.3%	35,374	7.7	3	3	4	0	0	3
Valdosta	Georgia	153	105	6	35.9%	34,058	7.6	5	2	9	0	0	8
Roanoke	Virginia	209	136	7	20.0%	33,965	8.8	10	3	20	0	0	19
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	101	6	30.0%	33,864	8.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Daytona Beach	Florida	174	110	5	32.6%	33,642	8.2	5	4	9	0	0	8
Miami Beach	Florida	178	117	5	28.7%	33,226	8.2	5	3	10	0	0	10
Winston Salem	North Carolina	189	129	13	12.6%	33,225	10.1	9	3	17	0	0	6
Tyler	Texas	175	127	8	21.2%	33,146	8.8	9	2	11	0	0	11
Livermore	California	126	90	8	34.3%	32,977	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Des Moines	Iowa	181	123	10	14.8%	32,961	10.5	11	5	14	0	0	7
Greensboro	North Carolina	182	128	11	9.9%	32,582	10.1	9	2	16	0	0	8
Franklin	Tennessee	141	97	8	30.0%	31,942	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Ocala	Florida	191	126	8	14.2%	31,854	10.2	11	1	11	0	0	3
Pacoima	California	99	70	4	30.0%	31,740	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hyattsville	Maryland	177	120	9	20.0%	31,505	9.0	5	2	6	0	0	6
Flint	Michigan	180	125	7	20.2%	31,401	9.4	7	4	10	0	0	8
Oakland	California	230	153	15	7.6%	31,385	12.5	14	1	14	0	0	1
Silver Spring	Maryland	222	140	12	10.1%	30,630	12.3	7	3	8	0	0	3
Vallejo	California	157	106	6	24.3%	30,247	8.8	4	2	8	0	0	6
Rialto	California	127	90	5	28.2%	30,019	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	California	144	100	7	26.0%	29,727	9.0	4	2	6	0	0	3
San Leandro	California	139	98	8	26.7%	29,651	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jersey City	New Jersey	174	122	10	11.3%	29,535	11.3	7	2	8	0	0	2
Saint Augustine	Florida	187	132	11	22.5%	29,456	9.4	5	2	5	0	0	2
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	145	107	8	20.0%	29,119	9.0	5	2	9	0	0	9
Waukesha	Wisconsin	143	98	8	30.0%	28,739	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
West Jordan	Utah	155	105	12	23.1%	28,552	8.7	3	3	6	0	0	6
Henrico	Virginia	201	124	13	14.7%	28,297	10.6	7	5	11	0	0	2
Round Rock	Texas	163	109	9	16.6%	27,805	9.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Newport News	Virginia	176	114	8	15.5%	27,387	9.6	7	2	13	0	0	10
Newark	New Jersey	196	131	13	9.6%	26,873	11.2	9	1	9	0	0	1
Keller	Texas	135	88	10	22.5%	26,215	10.0	2	4	4	0	0	2
Lake Charles	Louisiana	164	108	8	20.0%	26,141	9.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Portsmouth	Virginia	171	110	7	27.3%	25,999	8.1	7	2	9	0	0	9
Englewood	Colorado	195	140	9	23.0%	25,685	8.8	4	4	6	0	0	6
Lithonia	Georgia	124	86	9	26.0%	25,118	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Omaha	Nebraska	242	173	19	4.5%	24,835	15.2	31	3	62	0	0	0
Lake Worth	Florida	193	132	12	11.9%	24,505	10.4	5	2	6	0	0	4
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	145	93	9	19.3%	24,164	9.5	4	2	6	0	0	2
Richardson	Texas	132	95	6	21.0%	24,064	12.0	3	2	4	0	0	1
Costa Mesa	California	119	87	8	21.1%	24,018	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Deltona	Florida	131	92	8	25.3%	23,791	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Boulder	Colorado	162	104	8	17.5%	23,020	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lubbock	Texas	199	135	11	8.2%	22,610	11.8	14	2	15	0	0	1
Auburn	Washington	146	96	10	20.0%	22,574	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Las Vegas	Nevada	191	125	16	9.6%	22,527	10.6	7	2	7	0	0	2
Stockton	California	224	144	14	5.9%	22,240	13.9	12	1	12	0	0	0
Fontana	California	153	98	10	9.4%	22,091	10.7	3	2	6	0	0	1
Midlothian	Virginia	142	91	7	22.4%	21,699	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Providence	Rhode Island	171	109	11	10.6%	21,689	11.0	8	2	15	0	0	2
Rockville	Maryland	162	109	11	14.8%	21,360	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Reading	Pennsylvania	209	141	15	9.8%	21,051	11.5	10	1	10	0	0	3
Trenton	New Jersey	229	156	11	10.1%	20,931	11.0	11	3	13	0	0	3
Santa Rosa	California	165	110	13	9.5%	20,600	12.2	6	2	8	0	0	2
Merced	California	138	90	6	19.9%	20,551	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Moreno Valley	California	144	97	9	10.0%	20,545	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ballwin	Missouri	121	89	9	21.6%	20,435	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Bowie	Maryland	181	126	9	19.9%	20,354	9.3	4	4	6	0	0	5
La Puente	California	154	105	7	17.1%	20,135	9.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Orem	Utah	131	84	8	20.0%	20,064	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Laurel	Maryland	170	118	10	17.7%	19,861	9.3	4	3	5	0	0	4
Conroe	Texas	187	128	12	12.4%	19,824	11.4	7	3	9	0	0	3
Jupiter	Florida	138	95	9	19.9%	19,636	9.0	4	3	9	0	1	3
Little Rock	Arkansas	177	113	11	9.0%	19,626	11.0	12	2	16	0	0	0
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	117	12	9.5%	19,304	10.8	6	3	10	0	0	3
Clovis	California	150	100	11	15.8%	19,181	12.3	3	2	5	0	0	1
Lawrenceville	Georgia	152	99	13	7.5%	19,180	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	146	106	11	20.0%	19,003	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Indio	California	126	89	7	19.6%	18,832	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	129	91	10	20.0%	18,679	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Inglewood	California	184	134	10	13.9%	18,649	9.8	5	2	5	0	0	4
Annapolis	Maryland	171	114	11	19.6%	18,619	9.4	5	2	6	0	0	4
Simi Valley	California	121	84	9	14.4%	18,536	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Garland	Texas	166	113	16	7.7%	18,254	12.2	5	2	8	0	0	1
Sugar Land	Texas	159	111	12	10.7%	18,105	11.3	3	2	5	0	0	1
Elizabeth	New Jersey	142	90	9	18.0%	18,099	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Yonkers	New York	170	123	13	10.0%	18,053	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
San Mateo	California	160	106	14	12.6%	17,929	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Missouri City	Texas	145	109	11	16.9%	17,919	9.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Fullerton	California	146	100	12	12.8%	17,813	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
New Haven	Connecticut	164	111	9	13.7%	17,776	9.2	5	3	10	0	0	7
Burbank	California	161	117	7	16.3%	17,620	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Hayward	California	170	117	9	9.2%	17,608	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
West Valley City	Utah	141	92	8	13.2%	17,598	10.0	3	3	5	0	0	2
Fairfield	California	133	86	9	15.4%	17,584	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Manchester	New Hampshire	161	116	13	15.1%	17,539	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Garden Grove	California	160	116	10	9.9%	17,410	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Santa Maria	California	149	102	9	12.1%	17,267	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Provo	Utah	144	93	8	14.8%	17,228	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Pomona	California	135	83	9	10.7%	16,885	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Albany	New York	226	151	11	10.9%	16,445	10.3	11	2	12	0	0	6
Astoria	New York	161	116	12	11.5%	16,424	14.0	4	2	4	0	0	1
Boynton Beach	Florida	161	112	16	9.4%	16,326	11.7	6	2	6	0	0	2
El Cajon	California	165	121	10	9.0%	15,484	11.0	3	3	5	0	0	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	171	114	12	14.2%	15,390	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	3
Delray Beach	Florida	169	117	13	12.9%	15,378	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Hartford	Connecticut	159	113	11	12.5%	15,368	10.2	6	2	9	0	0	4
Springdale	Arkansas	117	76	11	15.9%	15,285	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Fremont	California	159	108	12	6.5%	15,265	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	133	86	10	15.6%	15,218	9.5	2	3	4	0	0	3
Killeen	Texas	155	102	10	10.1%	15,154	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Chula Vista	California	166	106	15	5.7%	14,961	14.0	5	3	10	0	0	0
Gaithersburg	Maryland	160	106	9	10.3%	14,836	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Lancaster	California	143	97	10	8.0%	14,748	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ontario	California	142	93	9	8.3%	14,739	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Youngstown	Ohio	173	111	15	9.3%	14,642	12.3	12	3	20	0	0	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	159	116	10	11.1%	14,263	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Santa Cruz	California	138	89	9	13.6%	14,175	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Sunnyvale	California	163	108	10	9.2%	13,986	10.8	4	2	5	0	0	1
Compton	California	138	101	8	9.8%	13,559	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Dearborn	Michigan	149	100	10	14.2%	13,520	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Mission	Texas	135	94	11	7.4%	13,479	12.7	3	2	5	0	0	0
Concord	California	142	100	10	10.3%	13,468	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Largo	Florida	168	122	15	12.5%	13,417	10.4	5	2	6	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	193	123	14	13.3%	13,212	10.8	8	3	8	0	0	1
Lakeland	Florida	181	121	16	5.1%	13,197	14.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Carrollton	Texas	135	102	10	9.8%	13,191	10.3	3	2	5	0	0	2
Redding	California	170	122	11	11.6%	13,096	10.5	4	2	5	0	0	3
Renton	Washington	182	117	15	8.2%	12,772	11.8	5	2	5	0	0	0
Cambridge	Massachusetts	142	96	11	11.0%	12,735	10.8	5	3	7	0	0	1
Madera	California	143	96	11	12.2%	12,577	10.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Edinburg	Texas	141	95	10	8.0%	12,401	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Paterson	New Jersey	171	118	12	8.5%	12,336	11.4	9	1	9	0	0	2
Sandy	Utah	146	97	11	11.1%	12,246	10.8	4	3	7	0	0	2
Victorville	California	141	92	8	8.9%	12,113	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Brownsville	Texas	135	87	10	6.0%	12,079	14.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	156	98	12	9.6%	12,066	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Falls Church	Virginia	205	131	16	10.0%	12,042	10.8	5	3	6	0	0	2
Sterling Heights	Michigan	136	95	12	8.8%	11,716	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bellevue	Washington	157	112	14	8.0%	11,702	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Oxnard	California	149	99	14	5.2%	11,484	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
New Port Richey	Florida	153	99	14	9.5%	11,459	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Downey	California	137	100	6	10.0%	11,290	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	135	94	8	9.3%	11,052	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Las Cruces	New Mexico	181	117	11	7.4%	11,033	12.0	7	2	8	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	144	95	12	8.5%	10,971	12.6	5	2	7	0	0	1
Hamilton	Ohio	130	89	8	8.0%	10,968	12.0	3	3	6	0	0	0
Canton	Ohio	181	122	13	7.4%	10,920	12.6	12	2	23	0	0	1
Idaho Falls	Idaho	133	82	9	10.0%	10,902	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Riverview	Florida	168	116	13	9.8%	10,859	10.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Murrieta	California	127	87	10	8.0%	10,580	12.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Bothell	Washington	155	109	11	8.2%	10,570	11.7	3	3	4	0	0	0
Perris	California	130	86	9	9.0%	10,565	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	142	96	11	8.0%	10,461	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Mesquite	Texas	126	86	12	7.1%	10,428	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Warren	Michigan	152	104	11	7.7%	10,379	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Menifee	California	163	111	12	9.4%	10,365	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Hesperia	California	123	82	7	9.8%	10,151	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
West Covina	California	142	101	11	9.3%	10,145	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	164	109	10	9.9%	10,137	10.3	4	3	7	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	131	87	9	10.0%	10,014	10.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Mcallen	Texas	139	95	13	7.0%	9,911	13.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	154	101	14	7.5%	9,907	12.5	4	2	4	0	0	1
Cary	North Carolina	138	93	15	6.4%	9,871	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	136	97	10	9.0%	9,816	11.0	3	2	6	0	0	1
Allen	Texas	109	77	11	8.6%	9,608	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Rock Hill	South Carolina	136	94	12	8.2%	9,531	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Palo Alto	California	161	114	7	9.8%	9,496	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Florissant	Missouri	146	101	11	8.8%	9,495	11.0	3	3	5	0	0	1
Chino	California	125	87	6	10.0%	9,408	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Muskegon	Michigan	147	100	11	7.3%	9,370	12.2	5	2	10	0	0	1
Nampa	Idaho	142	94	11	8.0%	9,272	12.0	3	3	5	0	0	0
Stamford	Connecticut	161	109	11	7.2%	9,247	12.7	6	2	11	0	0	0
Everett	Washington	159	102	17	5.5%	9,215	14.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lynn	Massachusetts	141	100	10	9.8%	9,182	10.3	4	2	6	0	0	3
Milton	Florida	153	103	10	9.7%	9,166	10.3	3	2	6	0	0	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	60	7	9.0%	9,069	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	144	90	9	7.1%	8,922	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	188	135	13	7.0%	8,885	13.1	9	2	11	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	119	81	9	9.0%	8,789	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Champaign	Illinois	142	90	11	9.3%	8,769	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Hillsboro	Oregon	118	80	12	8.4%	8,664	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Pittsburg	California	98	69	8	9.0%	8,647	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	153	108	10	9.0%	8,497	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
El Monte	California	124	79	7	9.0%	8,434	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Herndon	Virginia	126	86	10	9.0%	8,411	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hampton	Virginia	177	104	12	6.1%	8,373	13.5	6	1	6	0	0	1
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	134	91	11	8.5%	8,344	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Ashburn	Virginia	120	79	12	7.4%	8,343	12.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Winter Haven	Florida	139	93	12	7.7%	8,230	12.3	3	2	5	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	136	96	10	8.6%	8,087	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Muncie	Indiana	174	116	10	8.6%	7,943	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	107	80	11	8.0%	7,930	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Honolulu	Hawaii	192	129	20	1.9%	7,901	18.3	11	2	11	0	0	0
Lynnwood	Washington	157	100	13	7.3%	7,881	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Daly City	California	108	75	11	6.8%	7,820	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	131	84	12	8.3%	7,813	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Ventura	California	137	94	11	6.7%	7,812	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	128	93	13	7.0%	7,717	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	127	89	10	8.0%	7,613	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	156	103	11	5.6%	7,569	14.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	122	85	11	7.5%	7,548	12.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	98	76	11	7.0%	7,470	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Athens	Georgia	156	112	11	5.9%	7,375	14.2	6	2	12	0	0	0
Beaumont	Texas	188	129	14	5.1%	7,373	14.5	8	2	16	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	118	86	11	7.2%	7,365	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	142	97	11	7.7%	7,171	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	143	97	14	6.7%	7,149	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	136	95	10	6.9%	6,998	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	149	100	15	7.0%	6,889	13.0	4	2	7	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	160	109	14	7.1%	6,851	12.8	5	2	8	0	0	0
Hawthorne	California	97	68	9	7.0%	6,779	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	144	97	13	6.0%	6,680	14.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
South Gate	California	99	71	10	7.0%	6,657	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	130	90	12	6.5%	6,312	13.5	2	2	4	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	146	92	11	6.6%	6,235	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Waukegan	Illinois	114	80	10	6.3%	6,118	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	197	130	11	5.9%	5,664	13.9	8	1	8	0	0	0
Orange	California	161	108	17	3.8%	5,568	16.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	135	90	12	4.5%	4,327	15.7	3	2	6	0	0	0
Jamaica	New York	175	123	20	1.5%	3,741	19.2	6	2	7	0	0	0
Flushing	New York	154	111	18	1.6%	3,494	19.5	4	1	4	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	401	252	4	34.0%	835,331	7.8	62	3	62	0	60
San Diego	331	227	5	24.5%	330,648	8.8	36	4	42	0	38
Fresno	227	148	5	43.9%	264,230	6.4	18	1	18	0	18
Bakersfield	185	125	5	35.5%	198,402	7.8	11	3	19	0	18
Anaheim	172	120	3	50.0%	184,313	6.0	7	1	7	0	7
Long Beach	206	142	4	35.6%	170,623	7.1	12	5	24	0	24
Corona	159	109	2	56.3%	144,869	5.6	5	2	5	1	5
Irvine	178	129	5	44.1%	118,060	6.3	9	3	11	0	11
Riverside	198	116	7	30.0%	111,003	8.0	7	3	11	0	11
Rancho Cucamonga	162	107	2	62.1%	109,726	5.3	4	1	4	1	4
Palmdale	152	105	3	60.0%	104,962	5.0	4	1	4	0	4
Modesto	187	125	7	36.7%	97,139	7.3	7	2	9	0	9
Huntington Beach	159	109	4	47.0%	94,030	6.3	4	3	5	0	5
Salinas	174	113	4	42.7%	80,388	6.6	5	1	5	0	5
Vista	144	98	2	62.9%	75,359	5.0	3	1	3	1	3
Escondido	142	100	4	40.0%	71,861	7.0	4	1	4	0	4
Pasadena	165	119	4	44.1%	69,507	6.5	6	3	12	0	12
San Francisco	270	184	13	7.9%	68,696	12.4	28	3	34	0	3
San Bernardino	175	112	6	27.2%	67,885	9.0	7	1	7	0	5
Antioch	125	84	3	60.0%	66,433	5.0	2	1	2	0	2
Roseville	134	89	5	43.9%	61,411	6.7	3	2	5	0	5
San Jose	282	187	20	5.8%	60,937	14.1	28	2	28	0	0
Temecula	147	99	5	46.5%	60,407	6.7	3	2	6	0	6
Tracy	158	112	4	47.4%	55,568	6.5	4	2	4	0	4
Elk Grove	139	96	5	30.0%	53,796	8.0	3	2	6	0	6
Sacramento	271	177	15	6.7%	53,735	14.1	28	5	54	0	1
Norwalk	99	72	4	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Vacaville	120	80	4	50.0%	52,648	6.0	2	2	3	0	3
Mission Viejo	121	81	5	50.0%	49,179	6.0	2	1	2	0	2
Whittier	205	148	5	24.4%	47,935	8.7	6	2	6	0	5
Van Nuys	158	107	7	26.2%	46,622	8.5	4	1	4	0	4
Carlsbad	145	106	5	40.0%	45,468	7.0	4	1	4	0	4
Hemet	149	99	5	33.8%	43,528	7.7	3	2	6	0	6
Visalia	143	96	6	27.6%	41,962	8.7	3	2	5	0	4
Chico	146	96	6	36.6%	41,050	7.3	3	1	3	0	3
Bell Gardens	100	70	4	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	1
North Hollywood	145	102	8	26.6%	40,718	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Napa	118	85	4	41.5%	40,076	7.5	2	2	3	0	3
Oceanside	143	102	8	20.0%	40,052	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
Torrance	175	129	6	22.6%	39,951	8.8	5	2	5	0	4
Sylmar	98	72	3	40.0%	38,595	7.0	1	1	1	0	1
Santa Ana	155	105	10	10.6%	37,975	10.2	6	1	6	0	4
Livermore	126	90	8	34.3%	32,977	7.5	2	2	3	0	3
Pacoima	99	70	4	30.0%	31,740	8.0	1	1	1	0	1
Oakland	230	153	15	7.6%	31,385	12.5	14	1	14	0	1
Vallejo	157	106	6	24.3%	30,247	8.8	4	2	8	0	6
Rialto	127	90	5	28.2%	30,019	8.5	2	1	2	0	2
Redwood City	144	100	7	26.0%	29,727	9.0	4	2	6	0	3
San Leandro	139	98	8	26.7%	29,651	8.7	3	1	3	0	3
Costa Mesa	119	87	8	21.1%	24,018	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Stockton	224	144	14	5.9%	22,240	13.9	12	1	12	0	0
Fontana	153	98	10	9.4%	22,091	10.7	3	2	6	0	1
Santa Rosa	165	110	13	9.5%	20,600	12.2	6	2	8	0	2
Merced	138	90	6	19.9%	20,551	9.7	3	1	3	0	1
Moreno Valley	144	97	9	10.0%	20,545	10.0	4	1	4	0	4
La Puente	154	105	7	17.1%	20,135	9.0	2	2	2	0	1
Clovis	150	100	11	15.8%	19,181	12.3	3	2	5	0	1
Indio	126	89	7	19.6%	18,832	8.5	2	1	2	0	2
Inglewood	184	134	10	13.9%	18,649	9.8	5	2	5	0	4
Simi Valley	121	84	9	14.4%	18,536	9.5	2	1	2	0	2
San Mateo	160	106	14	12.6%	17,929	9.8	4	1	4	0	4
Fullerton	146	100	12	12.8%	17,813	10.3	4	1	4	0	1
Burbank	161	117	7	16.3%	17,620	10.6	5	1	5	0	2
Hayward	170	117	9	9.2%	17,608	10.8	4	1	4	0	1
Fairfield	133	86	9	15.4%	17,584	10.0	2	1	2	0	1
Garden Grove	160	116	10	9.9%	17,410	10.2	5	1	5	0	4
Santa Maria	149	102	9	12.1%	17,267	10.7	3	1	3	0	1
Pomona	135	83	9	10.7%	16,885	11.0	3	1	3	0	1
El Cajon	165	121	10	9.0%	15,484	11.0	3	3	5	0	2
Fremont	159	108	12	6.5%	15,265	13.5	4	1	4	0	0
Chula Vista	166	106	15	5.7%	14,961	14.0	5	3	10	0	0
Lancaster	143	97	10	8.0%	14,748	12.0	3	1	3	0	0
Ontario	142	93	9	8.3%	14,739	11.7	3	1	3	0	0
Santa Cruz	138	89	9	13.6%	14,175	10.8	4	1	4	0	2
Sunnyvale	163	108	10	9.2%	13,986	10.8	4	2	5	0	1
Compton	138	101	8	9.8%	13,559	10.3	3	1	3	0	2
Concord	142	100	10	10.3%	13,468	12.3	4	1	4	0	1
Redding	170	122	11	11.6%	13,096	10.5	4	2	5	0	3
Madera	143	96	11	12.2%	12,577	10.0	3	2	3	0	2
Victorville	141	92	8	8.9%	12,113	11.0	3	1	3	0	1
Santa Clara	156	98	12	9.6%	12,066	10.5	4	1	4	0	3
Oxnard	149	99	14	5.2%	11,484	14.5	4	1	4	0	0
Downey	137	100	6	10.0%	11,290	10.0	3	1	3	0	3
Murrieta	127	87	10	8.0%	10,580	12.0	2	2	4	0	0
Perris	130	86	9	9.0%	10,565	11.0	2	1	2	0	0
Menifee	163	111	12	9.4%	10,365	10.5	4	1	4	0	2
Hesperia	123	82	7	9.8%	10,151	10.5	2	1	2	0	1
West Covina	142	101	11	9.3%	10,145	10.7	3	1	3	0	1
Palo Alto	161	114	7	9.8%	9,496	10.3	4	1	4	0	3
Chino	125	87	6	10.0%	9,408	10.5	2	1	2	0	1
Berkeley	188	135	13	7.0%	8,885	13.1	9	2	11	0	0
Pittsburg	98	69	8	9.0%	8,647	11.0	1	1	1	0	0
Santa Monica	153	108	10	9.0%	8,497	11.0	5	1	5	0	0
El Monte	124	79	7	9.0%	8,434	11.0	2	1	2	0	0
Daly City	108	75	11	6.8%	7,820	13.5	2	1	2	0	0
Ventura	137	94	11	6.7%	7,812	13.3	3	1	3	0	0
Santa Barbara	156	103	11	5.6%	7,569	14.4	7	1	7	0	0
San Marcos	122	85	11	7.5%	7,548	12.5	2	2	4	0	0
Hawthorne	97	68	9	7.0%	6,779	13.0	1	1	1	0	0
South Gate	99	71	10	7.0%	6,657	13.0	1	1	1	0	0
Orange	161	108	17	3.8%	5,568	16.0	5	1	5	0	0

Chicago

ZIP	travelleaders.com	yelp.com	kevsbest.com	sunset-travel.com	angieslist.com	windycitytravel.com
60638	7	4	5	6	18	8
60628	6	4	5	7	8	9
60649	7	4	5	6	8	9
60619	6	4	5	7	8	9
60639	8	4	5	6	7	9
60629	7	4	5	6	8	9
60659	7	4	5	6	8	9
60657	4	1	2	3	5	6
60616	7	4	5	6	8	9
60606	7	4	5	6	8	9
60618	7	4	5	6	8	9
60608	7	4	5	6	8	9
60647	7	4	5	6	8	9
60617	9	4	5	6	8	7
60607	4	1	2	3	6	5
60637	7	4	5	6	9	8
60636	7	4	5	6	8	9
60605	2	4	5	6	8	9
60634	8	4	5	6	7	9
60624	7	4	5	1	8	9
60603	7	4	5	6	8	9
60655	6	4	5	8	7	10
60615	7	4	5	6	8	9
60625	7	4	5	6	8	9
60656	7	4	5	6	8	9
60646	7	4	5	6	8	9
60602	7	4	5	6	8	9
60642	7	4	5	1	8	9
60633	6	4	5	8	7	10
60660	7	4	5	6	8	9
60611	7	4	5	6	8	9
60620	3	1	2	5	4	6
60661	7	4	5	6	8	9
60610	7	4	5	6	9	3
60651	6	4	5	7	8	9
60632	8	4	5	6	7	9
60643	6	4	5	7	8	9
60612	4	1	2	3	5	6
60621	7	4	5	6	8	9
60652	7	4	5	6	8	9
60601	7	4	5	6	8	9
60641	7	4	5	6	8	9
60630	4	1	2	3	5	6
60604	2	4	5	6	8	9
60654	7	4	5	6	8	9
60644	8	4	5	6	7	9
60614	7	4	5	1	8	3
60623	7	4	5	6	8	9
60613	4	1	2	3	5	6
60645	7	4	5	6	8	9
60622	4	1	2	3	6	5
60626	7	4	5	6	9	8
60609	7	4	5	6	8	9
60653	7	4	5	6	8	9
60631	7	4	5	6	8	9
60640	7	4	5	6	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Travelleaders

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,890 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Travelleaders Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (travel agency near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Travelleaders Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Travelleaders Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Travelleaders Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly