Thrifty Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve thrifty.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 967 Car Rental Providers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Thrifty Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Thrifty Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Thrifty Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Los Angeles
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Thrifty Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	5,266	967	7	21.2%	68,596,121	8.6	27,379	32,654	231	33,131	107	519	25,744
California	913	287	7	20.2%	7,916,822	9.2	1,166	1,740	29	1,755	2	16	1,189
Texas	733	214	8	18.4%	5,122,936	9.0	1,360	1,917	14	1,921	1	7	1,405
Florida	723	244	7	19.3%	3,984,681	9.5	446	975	28	989	2	14	631
New York	721	214	7	19.0%	3,735,569	8.8	1,491	1,756	5	1,758	0	2	1,329
Pennsylvania	700	211	7	24.3%	3,113,479	8.0	1,604	1,781	8	1,794	4	14	1,566
Michigan	551	170	7	25.8%	2,567,380	8.1	833	976	9	1,027	8	51	870
Illinois	612	182	8	19.9%	2,548,354	8.6	1,247	1,382	5	1,389	1	10	1,072
Ohio	549	166	7	20.9%	2,428,398	8.6	976	1,188	8	1,210	1	20	947
New Jersey	518	181	7	26.2%	2,325,052	8.2	537	593	3	595	0	3	524
Virginia	569	175	6	25.4%	2,136,364	7.8	723	891	2	891	0	0	787
Georgia	548	170	7	20.6%	2,123,140	8.9	574	726	7	737	1	14	529
North Carolina	553	177	7	19.7%	2,001,298	8.8	683	802	6	803	0	2	627
Maryland	505	166	5	31.1%	1,867,579	7.7	392	463	2	463	0	0	417
Tennessee	475	168	7	23.6%	1,567,363	8.1	514	622	6	622	0	0	553
Massachusetts	519	164	8	22.3%	1,520,496	8.7	461	534	12	557	4	24	434
Missouri	597	177	6	24.8%	1,508,325	8.5	887	1,017	7	1,019	0	3	822
Arizona	497	169	8	21.2%	1,471,976	8.9	247	396	4	397	0	3	296
Indiana	755	215	7	18.8%	1,246,509	9.0	659	770	2	770	0	7	556
South Carolina	457	148	7	24.9%	1,233,182	8.5	347	422	11	427	2	5	330
Washington	541	179	8	16.9%	1,231,511	9.3	451	587	9	603	4	16	419
Minnesota	543	174	7	21.3%	1,179,215	8.7	777	878	2	878	0	2	678
Wisconsin	511	159	8	20.2%	1,167,446	8.4	694	769	2	769	0	0	621
Alabama	484	162	7	22.8%	1,111,022	8.8	522	637	7	639	0	2	490
Louisiana	490	173	7	23.4%	1,093,135	8.7	431	510	5	510	0	0	407
Colorado	569	180	8	19.6%	1,082,436	8.8	381	514	9	524	0	10	391
Kentucky	455	152	7	22.1%	982,519	7.9	698	758	2	758	0	0	661
Oklahoma	465	157	7	22.1%	867,312	8.6	557	646	4	649	0	4	510
Arkansas	481	169	7	24.7%	739,168	8.1	553	587	5	588	0	2	480
Connecticut	402	134	8	19.9%	711,525	8.8	234	279	1	279	0	0	205
Iowa	546	175	7	22.4%	702,851	8.6	890	933	4	933	0	1	699
Mississippi	445	152	7	23.4%	698,287	8.5	384	418	2	418	4	4	338
Utah	433	160	7	21.2%	644,840	8.2	246	284	3	284	0	0	240
Oregon	546	178	8	14.6%	594,819	9.5	355	414	3	415	0	2	253
Kansas	506	168	7	19.9%	579,857	9.2	616	692	7	722	6	33	480
Nevada	376	142	7	17.8%	519,813	9.2	92	168	4	171	0	3	133
West Virginia	447	158	6	27.8%	507,507	7.7	684	704	2	710	4	8	648
Nebraska	467	160	7	24.9%	474,273	8.1	524	581	7	712	37	129	502
Maine	503	197	6	28.8%	383,295	7.6	421	425	2	425	0	4	391
New Hampshire	389	146	5	27.8%	374,144	7.5	238	248	2	248	0	0	236
Idaho	451	149	6	21.1%	356,318	8.0	251	273	8	311	21	41	222
New Mexico	424	146	8	15.8%	329,542	9.1	327	361	4	362	0	1	255
Rhode Island	308	115	7	27.8%	293,855	8.2	64	77	3	78	0	1	62
Hawaii	381	159	7	19.2%	272,950	9.0	82	93	7	96	0	3	68
Montana	462	158	7	24.5%	255,499	8.4	348	361	10	372	1	12	313
Delaware	324	133	7	23.5%	223,086	8.7	52	66	1	66	0	0	50
Alaska	436	147	5	25.7%	189,705	7.2	218	235	5	242	1	6	226
Vermont	351	127	6	29.6%	184,900	7.1	250	254	2	254	0	0	244
Wyoming	392	145	6	24.3%	141,330	8.5	164	171	5	196	1	25	136
South Dakota	421	147	10	15.4%	133,313	9.2	359	370	6	384	2	14	267
North Dakota	386	148	9	14.7%	110,199	9.7	367	381	2	381	0	0	234

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	California	288	130	4	42.2%	1,035,708	6.7	62	2	62	0	0	62
Houston	Texas	303	122	7	20.5%	654,357	9.0	96	1	97	1	1	97
Phoenix	Arizona	229	92	4	34.9%	506,967	7.9	42	2	42	0	0	36
Saint Louis	Missouri	269	102	4	41.4%	380,018	6.9	45	5	47	0	2	47
Brooklyn	New York	226	91	8	14.4%	375,329	10.2	37	1	37	0	0	24
Jacksonville	Florida	236	98	4	39.2%	339,565	7.1	31	2	31	0	0	31
Baltimore	Maryland	238	97	4	47.8%	301,852	6.4	22	2	22	0	0	22
Las Vegas	Nevada	251	100	7	19.5%	300,788	9.3	43	3	43	0	0	40
Chicago	Illinois	245	99	9	10.1%	273,956	13.5	56	3	57	1	1	3
Minneapolis	Minnesota	294	111	7	22.0%	240,012	9.0	51	1	51	0	0	42
Miami	Florida	270	129	11	12.1%	227,329	11.6	55	1	55	0	0	16
Tampa	Florida	236	96	7	26.5%	209,780	8.4	27	3	27	0	0	24
Atlanta	Georgia	247	97	7	20.4%	201,795	9.7	39	3	45	0	6	17
New York City	New York	226	96	11	12.0%	194,293	13.5	47	3	49	0	2	2
Long Beach	California	197	89	4	40.1%	192,063	7.0	12	2	12	0	0	11
San Diego	California	272	116	8	14.1%	190,586	11.3	36	3	36	0	0	14
Dallas	Texas	276	112	10	13.4%	187,201	10.9	48	1	48	0	0	15
Orlando	Florida	256	105	8	18.7%	186,722	9.9	32	3	37	0	5	12
Tucson	Arizona	259	104	7	20.5%	185,543	9.0	32	1	32	0	0	28
Colorado Springs	Colorado	264	114	6	31.1%	181,285	7.9	30	1	30	0	0	30
San Antonio	Texas	255	99	9	10.0%	177,600	10.9	59	1	59	0	0	5
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	262	102	9	11.2%	176,791	11.1	47	2	47	0	0	15
New Orleans	Louisiana	203	80	5	39.8%	170,426	7.1	19	2	19	0	0	19
Raleigh	North Carolina	207	78	6	27.1%	147,931	8.6	15	1	15	0	0	14
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	252	111	8	17.7%	147,206	10.1	27	2	27	0	0	14
Saint Paul	Minnesota	286	109	9	17.4%	138,948	9.8	30	1	30	0	0	17
Columbia	South Carolina	205	83	4	40.1%	137,591	6.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Denver	Colorado	266	105	8	12.5%	136,258	11.4	38	2	38	0	0	12
Indianapolis	Indiana	267	104	8	14.3%	136,165	9.9	37	2	37	0	1	21
Flint	Michigan	180	79	2	87.2%	135,577	2.3	7	2	13	3	6	13
Bronx	New York	201	86	13	9.4%	135,090	11.8	25	1	25	0	0	5
Nashville	Tennessee	222	91	5	29.4%	134,883	7.9	22	3	22	0	0	22
Fort Worth	Texas	237	96	8	13.8%	125,423	9.8	32	1	32	0	0	29
San Jose	California	223	95	10	11.8%	124,421	11.1	28	2	28	0	0	6
Moreno Valley	California	144	60	3	59.5%	122,209	6.5	4	2	6	0	2	3
El Paso	Texas	243	87	8	15.3%	120,538	10.4	24	3	25	0	1	8
Richmond	Virginia	233	95	5	30.4%	118,781	8.1	15	1	15	0	0	14
Rochester	New York	227	88	7	25.0%	117,994	8.5	24	1	24	0	0	23
Salt Lake City	Utah	231	97	7	23.6%	115,020	8.6	19	2	19	0	0	19
Cincinnati	Ohio	252	97	8	14.3%	114,726	9.7	45	2	45	0	0	39
Chesapeake	Virginia	164	60	4	45.5%	108,140	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Austin	Texas	244	97	10	9.8%	107,030	12.3	44	3	44	0	0	17
Portland	Oregon	252	96	10	11.6%	106,781	11.6	33	3	34	0	1	7
Chula Vista	California	176	72	5	40.4%	105,495	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cleveland	Ohio	238	92	10	13.9%	104,522	10.6	29	1	29	0	0	10
Louisville	Kentucky	243	97	10	13.4%	102,146	10.0	32	1	32	0	0	25
Aurora	Colorado	193	80	7	23.2%	101,125	8.7	11	1	11	0	0	10
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	255	104	8	14.6%	99,545	9.6	43	2	45	0	2	36
Allentown	Pennsylvania	176	78	4	58.1%	98,795	6.4	7	1	7	0	1	7
West Palm Beach	Florida	186	87	6	26.5%	98,051	8.8	12	2	12	0	0	9
Dayton	Ohio	247	99	6	20.4%	97,681	9.5	27	2	27	0	1	17
Memphis	Tennessee	220	87	8	14.0%	97,401	9.8	26	2	26	0	0	24
Omaha	Nebraska	228	90	8	17.3%	95,335	9.9	31	2	31	0	0	17
Des Moines	Iowa	191	77	4	42.6%	95,049	6.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
Sarasota	Florida	194	81	4	37.8%	94,663	7.4	13	2	13	0	0	12
Corpus Christi	Texas	198	77	7	28.9%	93,992	8.2	18	1	18	0	0	17
Tulsa	Oklahoma	264	113	7	22.2%	93,737	8.6	28	2	28	0	0	28
Hayward	California	154	61	5	48.6%	93,274	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Seattle	Washington	258	98	11	9.8%	93,155	12.6	35	4	35	0	0	8
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	252	91	10	11.4%	92,195	11.5	29	2	29	0	0	7
Toledo	Ohio	228	91	5	29.3%	89,972	8.1	15	1	15	0	0	15
Columbus	Ohio	244	97	9	10.5%	88,513	11.6	30	2	30	0	0	3
Mobile	Alabama	220	88	6	32.5%	88,271	7.9	18	3	19	0	1	19
Van Nuys	California	137	66	4	49.3%	87,740	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kansas City	Missouri	262	103	10	15.1%	86,442	10.8	49	2	49	0	0	20
North Hollywood	California	131	60	4	56.0%	85,720	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kissimmee	Florida	173	78	6	29.6%	85,636	8.6	7	2	7	0	0	6
Spokane	Washington	212	85	8	23.2%	83,361	10.7	14	3	16	0	2	3
Katy	Texas	153	69	6	23.5%	80,881	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Irving	Texas	163	68	6	33.6%	80,814	7.5	6	1	7	0	1	6
Fort Myers	Florida	186	74	5	32.0%	80,444	8.2	11	2	11	0	0	9
Sacramento	California	242	98	10	10.0%	80,111	10.5	28	2	28	0	0	16
Providence	Rhode Island	180	74	6	39.0%	79,889	7.1	8	2	8	0	0	8
Lafayette	Louisiana	150	72	4	49.8%	79,886	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	257	103	9	11.7%	79,765	12.0	39	1	39	0	0	9
Chandler	Arizona	163	69	8	29.6%	79,484	8.5	6	1	7	0	1	4
Savannah	Georgia	195	78	6	32.9%	79,271	7.0	10	2	11	0	1	11
Knoxville	Tennessee	208	81	7	20.2%	78,105	9.1	17	2	17	0	0	14
Decatur	Georgia	167	70	5	42.9%	77,606	6.8	5	1	7	1	2	5
Buffalo	New York	243	98	9	13.5%	76,132	12.1	28	1	28	0	0	7
Worcester	Massachusetts	155	65	5	40.7%	75,463	7.3	9	2	10	1	1	10
Billings	Montana	150	62	4	54.9%	75,303	5.5	4	2	5	0	1	5
Fayetteville	North Carolina	176	70	6	30.4%	74,082	8.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
Pompano Beach	Florida	201	90	9	19.3%	71,428	9.9	10	1	10	0	0	6
Tallahassee	Florida	179	76	7	24.5%	70,593	8.5	10	1	10	0	0	10
Ontario	California	130	59	5	39.9%	70,532	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Birmingham	Alabama	241	100	9	14.0%	70,017	10.5	30	3	31	0	1	23
Marietta	Georgia	175	76	6	21.6%	69,837	8.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Augusta	Georgia	178	78	7	34.0%	69,432	7.9	8	2	8	0	0	7
Henrico	Virginia	182	74	4	35.2%	67,878	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Norfolk	Virginia	189	72	6	27.5%	67,513	8.3	14	2	14	0	0	13
Pasadena	California	163	74	5	42.8%	67,511	6.7	6	2	7	1	1	7
Albuquerque	New Mexico	222	85	9	10.3%	67,430	11.4	17	1	17	0	0	2
Glendale	Arizona	170	72	8	22.0%	67,121	8.6	9	2	9	0	0	9
Charlotte	North Carolina	240	97	13	7.3%	66,182	13.4	24	1	24	0	0	1
Littleton	Colorado	209	89	7	19.2%	62,511	9.4	10	1	10	0	0	8
Detroit	Michigan	227	89	12	9.6%	61,253	12.3	25	2	25	0	0	4
Charleston	South Carolina	216	82	6	31.1%	61,215	9.0	10	3	11	0	1	6
Everett	Washington	155	60	7	35.5%	59,153	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hollywood	Florida	200	93	8	12.5%	58,818	10.8	9	1	9	0	0	4
Mesquite	Texas	143	59	7	40.0%	58,525	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	209	79	8	15.4%	58,497	9.8	18	1	18	0	0	12
Honolulu	Hawaii	185	82	10	14.0%	58,121	11.2	11	2	11	0	0	2
Silver Spring	Maryland	180	79	6	19.1%	57,960	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	4
San Francisco	California	204	77	16	6.6%	57,798	13.4	28	5	28	0	0	2
Saint Petersburg	Florida	211	84	8	15.9%	56,570	10.0	16	1	16	0	0	10
Grand Rapids	Michigan	193	74	8	15.4%	56,464	9.7	12	1	12	0	0	9
Stone Mountain	Georgia	142	64	4	43.8%	56,236	6.0	3	1	4	0	1	3
Anchorage	Alaska	174	76	8	22.6%	55,140	8.3	12	3	13	1	1	10
Mission	Texas	143	63	6	30.3%	54,830	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Spring	Texas	180	80	8	14.2%	54,094	9.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Delray Beach	Florida	148	71	4	45.3%	53,898	5.8	5	3	7	0	2	7
Shreveport	Louisiana	213	86	7	24.0%	53,509	8.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Hialeah	Florida	163	82	10	14.5%	53,319	10.4	7	1	7	0	0	3
Vancouver	Washington	207	83	10	16.1%	52,624	11.2	11	2	12	0	1	3
Staten Island	New York	177	78	9	10.6%	50,429	9.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Jamaica	New York	157	69	8	20.6%	50,151	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fremont	California	152	58	8	21.4%	49,895	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Greensboro	North Carolina	180	74	8	15.2%	49,678	9.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Homestead	Florida	173	82	6	26.2%	49,261	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Huntsville	Alabama	202	81	6	25.0%	49,063	8.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Lithonia	Georgia	120	59	3	50.2%	48,581	5.5	2	1	3	0	1	3
Hamilton	Ohio	136	54	6	35.2%	48,275	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pittsburg	California	99	42	5	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Mesa	Arizona	207	82	13	8.9%	47,684	11.5	13	1	13	0	0	4
North Las Vegas	Nevada	150	58	8	20.4%	47,630	9.4	7	1	7	0	0	5
Elk Grove	California	131	59	6	26.4%	47,406	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
La Puente	California	126	61	5	40.0%	47,179	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverside	California	167	73	10	12.7%	47,138	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	6
Pensacola	Florida	196	80	9	17.4%	46,696	11.0	13	2	13	0	0	5
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	76	7	10.3%	46,280	11.1	12	1	12	0	0	3
Bakersfield	California	193	86	14	8.3%	46,223	11.5	11	1	11	0	0	3
Trenton	New Jersey	196	79	8	22.0%	45,678	9.5	11	1	11	0	0	9
Lubbock	Texas	209	87	8	16.4%	45,269	9.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Naples	Florida	191	74	9	14.4%	45,224	10.2	14	2	14	0	0	9
Albany	New York	210	86	6	29.7%	44,983	7.8	11	2	11	0	0	11
Toms River	New Jersey	133	54	5	36.3%	44,609	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Alexandria	Virginia	208	86	10	12.5%	44,294	10.9	14	1	14	0	0	6
South Bend	Indiana	170	69	7	30.2%	44,282	9.4	10	1	10	0	0	6
Bowie	Maryland	155	65	5	42.5%	43,401	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Olathe	Kansas	122	56	8	30.0%	43,312	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfax	Virginia	165	66	6	26.0%	42,600	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Pacoima	California	99	53	6	40.0%	42,320	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fort Wayne	Indiana	184	75	8	13.2%	42,069	10.4	16	1	16	0	0	9
Washington DC	District of Columbia	200	82	12	6.1%	41,539	13.5	28	2	29	0	1	1
Odessa	Texas	152	59	6	25.9%	41,445	8.7	6	2	6	0	0	5
Hyattsville	Maryland	174	72	6	26.3%	41,440	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Humble	Texas	146	63	7	24.9%	41,401	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bell Gardens	California	96	51	6	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Henderson	Nevada	169	71	7	13.5%	40,755	9.6	8	2	8	0	0	8
Akron	Ohio	213	79	8	14.9%	40,395	9.8	17	1	17	0	0	14
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	46	5	40.0%	40,305	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Cumming	Georgia	136	61	6	24.9%	40,295	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ogden	Utah	158	65	7	19.8%	39,982	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Frederick	Maryland	158	68	7	30.0%	39,599	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cape Coral	Florida	159	71	7	21.9%	39,565	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Wichita	Kansas	236	101	14	9.5%	39,518	12.0	26	1	26	0	0	5
Inglewood	California	166	71	6	29.4%	39,286	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Scottsdale	Arizona	183	76	10	13.1%	39,187	11.4	11	2	11	0	0	3
Lexington	Kentucky	197	76	9	12.2%	39,100	10.9	15	1	15	0	0	4
Stockton	California	199	85	10	10.4%	38,826	11.4	12	1	12	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	101	52	7	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	California	98	51	6	40.0%	38,595	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Corona	California	162	72	8	14.9%	38,265	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Flushing	New York	136	64	8	17.7%	38,067	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tacoma	Washington	240	96	8	11.3%	37,700	11.3	20	1	20	0	0	6
Boynton Beach	Florida	153	66	8	21.3%	37,095	10.2	6	2	6	0	0	2
Whittier	California	140	67	8	18.4%	36,121	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	California	126	54	7	34.4%	35,817	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Hesperia	California	115	50	6	34.4%	35,744	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Panama City	Florida	158	68	6	28.3%	35,709	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	5
Fredericksburg	Virginia	159	68	8	20.3%	35,391	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bradenton	Florida	169	70	9	13.9%	35,231	9.7	10	2	10	0	0	8
Rockford	Illinois	185	73	8	19.3%	35,192	10.6	9	1	9	0	0	5
Indio	California	114	59	6	36.2%	34,826	9.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
West Valley City	Utah	138	67	6	26.1%	34,650	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fresno	California	238	97	12	5.7%	34,531	14.0	18	1	18	0	0	0
Torrance	California	157	78	9	19.5%	34,428	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Falls Church	Virginia	161	68	7	28.6%	34,380	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Midlothian	Virginia	138	55	6	35.5%	34,350	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Port Richey	Florida	140	58	5	28.4%	34,345	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fontana	California	131	59	9	14.5%	34,140	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Durham	North Carolina	186	71	9	11.7%	33,913	9.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Escondido	California	136	61	10	18.8%	33,780	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
York	Pennsylvania	182	81	7	18.4%	33,041	9.4	7	1	7	0	0	6
Kennesaw	Georgia	117	54	7	33.1%	32,819	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Oakland	California	196	77	12	8.0%	32,748	12.2	14	1	14	0	0	4
West Chester	Pennsylvania	141	61	6	30.0%	32,609	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	117	51	8	34.5%	32,421	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Barbara	California	157	68	7	23.7%	32,270	8.9	7	2	8	0	1	5
Ballwin	Missouri	116	52	6	34.1%	32,244	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Round Rock	Texas	134	55	8	19.2%	32,111	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Denton	Texas	166	74	6	20.0%	31,631	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	164	69	7	21.7%	31,559	8.4	5	2	6	0	1	5
Erie	Pennsylvania	206	79	8	17.1%	31,337	9.0	13	1	13	0	0	13
Englewood	Colorado	163	72	7	28.0%	31,223	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roanoke	Virginia	183	77	8	18.3%	30,958	11.6	10	1	10	0	0	4
Jupiter	Florida	132	62	5	31.0%	30,594	8.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Spartanburg	South Carolina	148	59	7	27.3%	30,560	8.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
El Cajon	California	136	64	9	17.7%	30,499	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Franklin	Tennessee	128	58	6	28.3%	30,173	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Newark	New Jersey	177	83	11	10.7%	30,112	11.2	9	1	9	0	0	2
Laurel	Maryland	148	59	8	26.6%	29,901	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Little Rock	Arkansas	183	77	9	13.6%	29,714	9.8	12	1	12	0	0	9
Fort Mill	South Carolina	140	63	6	30.7%	29,144	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockville	Maryland	144	63	8	20.0%	28,986	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	147	62	10	14.9%	28,925	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	143	68	6	28.0%	28,909	8.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Winter Haven	Florida	129	59	6	27.0%	28,836	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Muskegon	Michigan	151	61	6	22.2%	28,697	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Lake Worth	Florida	149	69	11	13.9%	28,606	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Mcallen	Texas	141	61	7	20.0%	28,318	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Manassas	Virginia	154	62	8	18.6%	28,285	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Clearwater	Florida	182	71	11	15.4%	28,255	10.4	9	1	9	0	0	4
Fullerton	California	147	69	6	20.0%	27,855	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Reading	Pennsylvania	186	74	10	12.8%	27,628	10.9	10	1	10	0	0	3
Annapolis	Maryland	160	70	7	29.0%	27,540	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Amarillo	Texas	172	69	9	12.0%	27,414	11.1	14	1	14	0	0	2
Olympia	Washington	158	63	10	15.0%	27,400	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	5
New Haven	Connecticut	140	62	8	20.8%	27,125	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Puyallup	Washington	161	69	8	18.7%	26,728	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Newnan	Georgia	116	54	8	28.5%	26,604	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Springdale	Arkansas	122	54	7	27.6%	26,574	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Beaumont	Texas	184	72	8	18.2%	26,427	9.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
Las Cruces	New Mexico	163	62	7	17.6%	26,219	8.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Charlottesville	Virginia	160	63	6	20.9%	25,689	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Arlington	Texas	167	70	12	6.4%	25,598	13.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Gainesville	Florida	184	79	8	12.2%	25,525	10.6	10	1	10	0	0	3
Chico	California	140	57	8	22.5%	25,233	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Cypress	Texas	122	55	7	14.7%	25,072	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Plano	Texas	170	68	10	8.2%	25,071	12.9	7	1	7	0	0	1
Hemet	California	136	61	9	19.5%	25,064	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Santa Ana	California	159	71	13	7.0%	24,996	13.0	6	2	6	0	0	0
Lawrenceville	Georgia	146	65	9	9.7%	24,867	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Reno	Nevada	195	78	13	8.4%	24,836	11.8	12	1	12	0	0	2
Muncie	Indiana	159	69	7	26.7%	24,729	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	214	89	9	11.7%	24,423	9.7	15	2	15	0	0	14
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	133	55	8	24.9%	24,346	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Wilmington	Delaware	185	81	9	11.1%	24,325	11.8	10	1	10	0	0	2
Murrieta	California	121	57	7	18.2%	24,004	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	California	159	69	11	11.1%	23,954	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	4
Garland	Texas	154	69	7	10.0%	23,793	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Largo	Florida	157	67	7	21.8%	23,492	9.4	5	2	5	0	0	3
Compton	California	131	59	10	16.9%	23,486	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Eugene	Oregon	177	75	10	11.6%	23,446	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	60	7	23.2%	23,271	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anaheim	California	143	65	15	6.3%	23,191	13.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Saint Charles	Missouri	136	61	7	16.5%	23,060	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Concord	California	144	58	7	17.6%	22,915	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Killeen	Texas	158	72	8	15.3%	22,915	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Winston Salem	North Carolina	185	73	9	8.7%	22,891	11.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Carlsbad	California	144	66	9	20.0%	22,724	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Lakeland	Florida	165	76	8	8.8%	22,696	11.4	9	1	9	0	0	5
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	122	56	7	17.3%	22,618	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Florissant	Missouri	141	54	7	20.8%	22,529	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Greenville	South Carolina	186	78	8	10.2%	22,500	12.2	9	1	9	0	0	1
Springfield	Missouri	165	66	9	9.6%	22,074	10.4	7	1	7	0	0	4
Modesto	California	169	70	10	8.2%	21,651	11.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	168	75	10	13.4%	21,458	10.2	5	2	5	0	0	2
Lake Charles	Louisiana	147	64	11	16.3%	21,348	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Ridgewood	New York	100	51	9	20.0%	21,343	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
West Covina	California	118	59	7	19.4%	21,250	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madison	Wisconsin	192	74	10	7.2%	21,219	13.1	14	1	14	0	0	2
Bellevue	Washington	152	70	9	14.5%	21,192	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	152	70	8	16.1%	21,034	9.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Sugar Land	Texas	144	65	9	12.2%	20,616	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Salem	Oregon	174	79	10	7.7%	20,457	12.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Woodbridge	Virginia	139	61	8	9.4%	19,875	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Boise	Idaho	188	78	10	7.7%	19,769	12.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Redding	California	148	68	9	17.3%	19,522	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Evansville	Indiana	182	80	9	10.4%	19,255	12.0	9	1	9	0	0	1
Overland Park	Kansas	187	74	10	10.4%	19,073	11.2	9	1	9	0	0	5
Mission Viejo	California	103	51	7	19.4%	19,041	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Rialto	California	121	59	8	17.8%	18,970	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Gulfport	Mississippi	135	60	8	20.0%	18,944	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	California	150	71	7	8.5%	18,810	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Spring Hill	Florida	157	68	8	14.8%	18,529	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
San Mateo	California	144	61	10	13.0%	18,455	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Anderson	South Carolina	144	62	9	18.5%	18,173	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Sparks	Nevada	146	64	9	15.2%	18,162	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
San Bernardino	California	147	69	12	7.2%	18,078	12.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	California	134	62	9	9.0%	18,060	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Missouri City	Texas	127	56	7	16.9%	17,919	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	95	13	6.2%	17,851	13.9	22	1	22	0	0	0
Simi Valley	California	115	52	8	13.8%	17,816	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Palmdale	California	141	69	7	10.0%	17,494	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	63	8	9.2%	17,476	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Kent	Washington	137	59	9	10.9%	17,450	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Santa Maria	California	143	64	8	12.1%	17,344	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Ocala	Florida	184	86	10	7.7%	17,299	12.5	11	1	11	0	0	2
Frisco	Texas	123	54	7	10.0%	17,245	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Grand Prairie	Texas	119	54	8	9.0%	17,149	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Yonkers	New York	145	64	11	9.5%	17,065	11.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Jackson	Mississippi	203	79	9	10.0%	17,022	10.2	11	1	11	0	0	10
Morgantown	West Virginia	133	61	8	17.7%	16,892	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Pomona	California	135	59	9	10.7%	16,885	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Syracuse	New York	208	83	11	7.4%	16,874	12.5	15	1	15	0	0	0
Lehigh Acres	Florida	161	71	9	14.4%	16,857	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	2
Garden Grove	California	158	70	12	9.5%	16,752	11.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Oceanside	California	132	62	10	8.3%	16,686	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Richardson	Texas	141	59	7	14.5%	16,631	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Asheville	North Carolina	149	60	8	12.5%	16,448	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Melbourne	Florida	147	68	10	10.5%	16,408	12.2	5	2	5	0	0	1
Livonia	Michigan	102	42	8	17.3%	16,403	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Dearborn	Michigan	140	57	7	17.2%	16,395	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Boca Raton	Florida	177	82	14	7.4%	16,367	12.6	9	1	9	0	0	2
Mckinney	Texas	112	49	11	8.5%	16,102	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pearland	Texas	128	57	8	11.7%	16,081	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Edmond	Oklahoma	142	52	11	9.4%	16,070	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	3
Peoria	Arizona	152	66	9	9.3%	16,057	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Elkhart	Indiana	136	56	9	16.1%	16,052	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	191	77	11	8.8%	16,022	11.6	9	1	9	0	0	3
Cary	North Carolina	142	59	10	10.3%	16,018	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Rock Hill	South Carolina	138	61	10	13.8%	16,003	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Bellingham	Washington	139	62	7	12.5%	15,871	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Irvine	California	161	71	14	5.8%	15,650	14.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	123	48	10	12.7%	15,614	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	148	62	8	15.2%	15,527	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	137	59	9	15.9%	15,326	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	115	59	8	15.1%	15,193	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	157	69	11	13.8%	14,998	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	1
Duluth	Minnesota	209	81	9	12.8%	14,969	9.8	11	1	11	0	0	11
Ann Arbor	Michigan	159	68	9	8.9%	14,845	11.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Lancaster	California	135	65	9	8.0%	14,754	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	113	46	8	14.3%	14,722	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
San Leandro	California	123	54	9	13.2%	14,666	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Norman	Oklahoma	147	60	9	11.7%	14,579	11.5	4	2	4	0	0	1
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	153	64	10	7.8%	14,575	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Gaithersburg	Maryland	163	61	7	10.0%	14,454	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Conroe	Texas	166	72	9	8.9%	14,312	11.1	7	1	7	0	0	3
Jersey City	New Jersey	164	73	15	5.5%	14,268	14.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	136	59	11	7.0%	14,219	13.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	134	67	8	14.2%	14,193	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Rancho Cucamonga	California	143	70	10	8.0%	14,128	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Clarksville	Tennessee	130	60	10	8.0%	14,056	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Youngstown	Ohio	189	70	10	8.8%	13,871	13.3	12	1	12	0	0	1
Buford	Georgia	117	51	9	13.9%	13,787	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Edinburg	Texas	137	57	8	8.8%	13,697	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Belleville	Illinois	146	61	8	14.7%	13,693	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Visalia	California	134	63	9	9.0%	13,681	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lynnwood	Washington	141	65	8	12.6%	13,672	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Brownsville	Texas	132	59	11	6.8%	13,624	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Madera	California	138	61	9	13.2%	13,599	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Laredo	Texas	161	69	13	5.0%	13,545	15.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Renton	Washington	160	63	10	8.6%	13,316	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Tempe	Arizona	140	60	12	7.0%	13,300	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Yakima	Washington	146	66	9	10.2%	13,276	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Ventura	California	126	54	8	11.4%	13,259	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Schenectady	New York	173	72	11	8.2%	13,254	12.0	8	1	8	0	0	1
Montgomery	Alabama	210	90	12	6.3%	13,229	14.0	13	2	13	0	0	1
Santa Fe	New Mexico	169	74	9	10.3%	13,199	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	182	74	11	7.2%	13,189	12.4	7	1	7	0	0	1
Salinas	California	144	63	10	7.0%	13,169	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Herndon	Virginia	129	55	8	14.1%	13,154	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Auburn	Washington	122	54	8	11.5%	12,945	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Warren	Michigan	154	62	11	9.6%	12,935	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	164	63	9	13.1%	12,905	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	1
Surprise	Arizona	153	68	7	9.5%	12,821	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
New Bedford	Massachusetts	142	55	10	13.5%	12,818	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Lawrence	Kansas	167	73	8	12.6%	12,755	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Canton	Ohio	187	71	11	8.7%	12,735	11.8	12	2	12	0	0	0
Beaverton	Oregon	146	61	10	6.3%	12,660	13.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	137	57	10	11.8%	12,651	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Missoula	Montana	148	62	10	13.0%	12,638	10.4	5	2	5	0	0	2
Macon	Georgia	177	79	10	7.7%	12,614	12.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	174	69	9	7.9%	12,566	12.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Pueblo	Colorado	170	71	9	7.9%	12,460	12.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	116	49	7	13.1%	12,419	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Lansing	Michigan	148	63	13	7.5%	12,379	12.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Roseville	California	134	56	9	8.8%	12,359	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Sunnyvale	California	135	60	9	8.0%	12,290	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Miami Beach	Florida	142	77	11	10.6%	12,273	11.4	5	2	5	0	0	2
Metairie	Louisiana	159	60	10	8.5%	12,122	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Palm Bay	Florida	152	66	10	10.8%	12,071	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Tracy	California	153	66	8	10.2%	11,944	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Longmont	Colorado	130	56	10	9.1%	11,840	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Grand Junction	Colorado	171	72	10	11.2%	11,833	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	150	60	9	9.2%	11,819	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Yuma	Arizona	125	58	8	8.0%	11,808	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Baytown	Texas	141	63	8	10.0%	11,779	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	195	79	10	6.9%	11,716	13.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	121	56	8	12.2%	11,653	10.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Provo	Utah	142	64	8	10.0%	11,652	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Keller	Texas	130	53	7	10.0%	11,626	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	139	57	8	10.0%	11,606	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Naperville	Illinois	150	59	10	7.0%	11,606	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bothell	Washington	139	57	8	9.0%	11,545	11.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	124	55	7	12.2%	11,527	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Vero Beach	Florida	159	63	8	9.9%	11,373	10.2	6	1	6	0	0	5
Victorville	California	124	56	10	8.2%	11,133	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Sterling Heights	Michigan	139	62	9	8.3%	11,032	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Gilbert	Arizona	149	66	14	4.6%	10,995	15.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Athens	Georgia	141	58	10	8.7%	10,838	11.8	6	1	6	0	0	2
Daly City	California	129	54	9	9.4%	10,791	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Carrollton	Texas	122	56	9	8.0%	10,785	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Kalamazoo	Michigan	169	72	12	6.6%	10,774	13.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	156	70	11	8.8%	10,719	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Lewisville	Texas	137	57	8	9.0%	10,681	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	157	61	9	7.9%	10,610	12.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Norwalk	California	98	46	8	10.0%	10,589	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Perris	California	123	58	7	9.0%	10,565	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	148	69	13	7.3%	10,481	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sandy	Utah	139	57	7	9.5%	10,470	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Racine	Wisconsin	148	68	10	8.3%	10,451	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	110	49	7	9.4%	10,421	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Arvada	Colorado	158	65	13	7.8%	10,419	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Tyler	Texas	170	73	11	6.6%	10,382	13.0	9	1	9	0	0	1
Berkeley	California	187	82	11	8.2%	10,376	12.1	9	1	9	0	0	1
Merced	California	141	65	8	10.0%	10,306	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukegan	Illinois	115	51	8	10.6%	10,295	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	147	62	10	8.2%	10,245	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Vallejo	California	163	67	9	8.2%	10,197	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Riverview	Florida	136	58	9	9.1%	10,174	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Orange	California	135	60	10	7.0%	10,169	13.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Downey	California	127	64	10	9.0%	10,161	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hampton	Virginia	165	65	12	7.4%	10,103	12.5	6	1	6	0	0	1
Nampa	Idaho	121	57	8	8.7%	10,092	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Temecula	California	144	69	10	7.8%	10,070	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Boulder	Colorado	170	67	10	7.6%	10,018	12.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	166	74	9	10.5%	10,005	10.8	8	1	8	0	0	2
Broomfield	Colorado	138	62	9	9.5%	9,924	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Vista	California	127	56	10	8.3%	9,906	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	158	70	9	8.0%	9,859	11.7	6	1	6	0	0	1
Bridgeport	Connecticut	142	64	11	6.7%	9,826	13.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	181	74	10	7.0%	9,802	12.5	6	1	6	0	0	3
Saginaw	Michigan	161	72	12	7.5%	9,733	12.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	145	56	9	9.9%	9,730	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Ashburn	Virginia	122	54	7	8.6%	9,627	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	California	120	56	9	8.4%	9,606	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	116	52	7	9.5%	9,594	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	137	57	12	7.8%	9,583	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	56	8	8.9%	9,526	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
South Gate	California	96	51	8	10.0%	9,510	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Douglasville	Georgia	118	54	8	8.6%	9,481	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Independence	Missouri	175	79	10	7.6%	9,459	12.0	8	1	8	0	0	2
Menifee	California	143	63	9	8.5%	9,409	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Terre Haute	Indiana	148	66	9	9.9%	9,402	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	158	72	9	8.6%	9,382	11.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Newport News	Virginia	153	63	14	5.3%	9,382	14.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	121	54	8	9.0%	9,380	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	150	60	10	8.8%	9,314	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Topeka	Kansas	200	86	10	5.7%	9,262	14.4	18	1	18	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	127	58	7	9.0%	9,251	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	134	59	11	7.3%	9,217	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
San Angelo	Texas	131	54	9	8.3%	9,179	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	118	50	9	9.5%	9,178	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Portsmouth	Virginia	172	73	11	9.6%	9,146	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	4
Elizabeth	New Jersey	139	68	9	9.1%	9,103	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Paterson	New Jersey	133	61	11	6.2%	9,093	13.8	9	1	9	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	149	61	9	7.9%	9,090	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	131	60	10	9.0%	9,074	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	176	71	10	9.3%	8,955	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Summerville	South Carolina	124	52	11	6.4%	8,907	13.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Abilene	Texas	172	73	11	6.8%	8,860	12.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Clovis	California	113	53	9	7.3%	8,852	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Plainfield	Illinois	144	66	9	8.9%	8,817	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Vacaville	California	104	45	9	8.4%	8,796	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	142	59	9	9.2%	8,769	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
El Monte	California	107	56	8	9.4%	8,768	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	109	52	7	9.0%	8,766	11.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	123	54	10	7.7%	8,754	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	148	58	9	7.5%	8,702	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Parker	Colorado	118	49	9	8.7%	8,689	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Livermore	California	124	54	8	9.0%	8,663	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
West Jordan	Utah	129	63	10	7.0%	8,650	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Waukesha	Wisconsin	137	61	9	9.0%	8,622	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	133	58	10	7.6%	8,561	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Champaign	Illinois	140	63	9	9.0%	8,511	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Napa	California	121	56	9	8.7%	8,425	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	112	51	9	9.0%	8,393	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	151	67	10	6.8%	8,304	13.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lynn	Massachusetts	143	65	11	8.9%	8,295	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Brockton	Massachusetts	120	50	9	8.7%	8,263	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Acworth	Georgia	122	57	8	8.3%	8,227	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Valdosta	Georgia	139	55	10	8.6%	8,125	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Covington	Georgia	125	53	9	8.8%	8,115	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Appleton	Wisconsin	140	58	11	6.7%	8,110	13.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	144	61	10	7.7%	8,085	12.5	6	1	6	0	0	1
Federal Way	Washington	121	52	9	8.0%	8,011	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Stamford	Connecticut	133	65	11	6.2%	7,994	13.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Greeley	Colorado	110	52	11	7.0%	7,985	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	126	52	8	8.0%	7,982	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Cambridge	Massachusetts	141	64	11	6.8%	7,896	12.8	5	2	5	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	126	59	11	7.0%	7,794	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Coral Springs	Florida	124	61	10	8.0%	7,779	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Elgin	Illinois	140	55	11	6.4%	7,779	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	186	79	10	7.8%	7,762	12.3	8	1	8	0	0	1
Woodstock	Georgia	116	53	8	7.6%	7,752	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Antioch	California	114	46	10	7.0%	7,750	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Burbank	California	159	71	13	7.1%	7,709	12.4	5	2	5	0	0	1
Orem	Utah	117	54	10	7.5%	7,563	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Elmhurst	New York	97	50	9	8.0%	7,517	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	121	57	9	8.0%	7,511	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	120	51	11	6.1%	7,399	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	154	72	12	7.8%	7,366	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Kennewick	Washington	134	63	9	7.4%	7,281	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	159	67	11	7.0%	7,159	12.0	6	1	6	0	0	1
Apopka	Florida	121	59	10	7.0%	6,836	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chino	California	110	51	9	7.0%	6,652	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Boston	Massachusetts	197	79	16	4.2%	6,429	15.4	14	4	14	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	288	130	4	42.2%	1,035,708	6.7	62	2	62	0	0	62
Long Beach	197	89	4	40.1%	192,063	7.0	12	2	12	0	0	11
San Diego	272	116	8	14.1%	190,586	11.3	36	3	36	0	0	14
San Jose	223	95	10	11.8%	124,421	11.1	28	2	28	0	0	6
Moreno Valley	144	60	3	59.5%	122,209	6.5	4	2	6	0	2	3
Chula Vista	176	72	5	40.4%	105,495	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hayward	154	61	5	48.6%	93,274	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Van Nuys	137	66	4	49.3%	87,740	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
North Hollywood	131	60	4	56.0%	85,720	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sacramento	242	98	10	10.0%	80,111	10.5	28	2	28	0	0	16
Ontario	130	59	5	39.9%	70,532	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Pasadena	163	74	5	42.8%	67,511	6.7	6	2	7	1	1	7
San Francisco	204	77	16	6.6%	57,798	13.4	28	5	28	0	0	2
Fremont	152	58	8	21.4%	49,895	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	99	42	5	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Elk Grove	131	59	6	26.4%	47,406	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
La Puente	126	61	5	40.0%	47,179	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverside	167	73	10	12.7%	47,138	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	6
Bakersfield	193	86	14	8.3%	46,223	11.5	11	1	11	0	0	3
Pacoima	99	53	6	40.0%	42,320	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	96	51	6	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Inglewood	166	71	6	29.4%	39,286	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Stockton	199	85	10	10.4%	38,826	11.4	12	1	12	0	0	2
Hawthorne	101	52	7	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	98	51	6	40.0%	38,595	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Corona	162	72	8	14.9%	38,265	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Whittier	140	67	8	18.4%	36,121	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	126	54	7	34.4%	35,817	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Hesperia	115	50	6	34.4%	35,744	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	114	59	6	36.2%	34,826	9.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Fresno	238	97	12	5.7%	34,531	14.0	18	1	18	0	0	0
Torrance	157	78	9	19.5%	34,428	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fontana	131	59	9	14.5%	34,140	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Escondido	136	61	10	18.8%	33,780	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Oakland	196	77	12	8.0%	32,748	12.2	14	1	14	0	0	4
Santa Barbara	157	68	7	23.7%	32,270	8.9	7	2	8	0	1	5
El Cajon	136	64	9	17.7%	30,499	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Fullerton	147	69	6	20.0%	27,855	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chico	140	57	8	22.5%	25,233	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Hemet	136	61	9	19.5%	25,064	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Santa Ana	159	71	13	7.0%	24,996	13.0	6	2	6	0	0	0
Murrieta	121	57	7	18.2%	24,004	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	159	69	11	11.1%	23,954	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	4
Compton	131	59	10	16.9%	23,486	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Anaheim	143	65	15	6.3%	23,191	13.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Concord	144	58	7	17.6%	22,915	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Carlsbad	144	66	9	20.0%	22,724	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Modesto	169	70	10	8.2%	21,651	11.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
West Covina	118	59	7	19.4%	21,250	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redding	148	68	9	17.3%	19,522	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	103	51	7	19.4%	19,041	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Rialto	121	59	8	17.8%	18,970	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Oxnard	150	71	7	8.5%	18,810	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
San Mateo	144	61	10	13.0%	18,455	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
San Bernardino	147	69	12	7.2%	18,078	12.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	134	62	9	9.0%	18,060	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Simi Valley	115	52	8	13.8%	17,816	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Palmdale	141	69	7	10.0%	17,494	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	143	64	8	12.1%	17,344	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Pomona	135	59	9	10.7%	16,885	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Garden Grove	158	70	12	9.5%	16,752	11.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Oceanside	132	62	10	8.3%	16,686	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Irvine	161	71	14	5.8%	15,650	14.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Palo Alto	137	59	9	15.9%	15,326	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
San Marcos	115	59	8	15.1%	15,193	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lancaster	135	65	9	8.0%	14,754	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
San Leandro	123	54	9	13.2%	14,666	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Rancho Cucamonga	143	70	10	8.0%	14,128	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Visalia	134	63	9	9.0%	13,681	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Madera	138	61	9	13.2%	13,599	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Ventura	126	54	8	11.4%	13,259	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Salinas	144	63	10	7.0%	13,169	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Roseville	134	56	9	8.8%	12,359	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Sunnyvale	135	60	9	8.0%	12,290	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Tracy	153	66	8	10.2%	11,944	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Victorville	124	56	10	8.2%	11,133	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Daly City	129	54	9	9.4%	10,791	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Norwalk	98	46	8	10.0%	10,589	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Perris	123	58	7	9.0%	10,565	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Berkeley	187	82	11	8.2%	10,376	12.1	9	1	9	0	0	1
Merced	141	65	8	10.0%	10,306	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	163	67	9	8.2%	10,197	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Orange	135	60	10	7.0%	10,169	13.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Downey	127	64	10	9.0%	10,161	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Temecula	144	69	10	7.8%	10,070	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Vista	127	56	10	8.3%	9,906	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	120	56	9	8.4%	9,606	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
South Gate	96	51	8	10.0%	9,510	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Menifee	143	63	9	8.5%	9,409	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Santa Clara	134	59	11	7.3%	9,217	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Redwood City	149	61	9	7.9%	9,090	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Clovis	113	53	9	7.3%	8,852	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Vacaville	104	45	9	8.4%	8,796	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
El Monte	107	56	8	9.4%	8,768	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Fairfield	123	54	10	7.7%	8,754	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Livermore	124	54	8	9.0%	8,663	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Napa	121	56	9	8.7%	8,425	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Antioch	114	46	10	7.0%	7,750	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Burbank	159	71	13	7.1%	7,709	12.4	5	2	5	0	0	1
Santa Monica	154	72	12	7.8%	7,366	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Chino	110	51	9	7.0%	6,652	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0

Los Angeles

ZIP	thrifty.com	enterprise.com	budget.com	avis.com	expedia.com	alamo.com
90011	7	1	2	5	10	8
90003	7	1	4	6	8	10
90023	7	5	1	6	8	10
90014	7	6	1	2	8	9
90012	4	2	1	3	5	7
90010	7	5	4	1	8	10
90063	7	5	2	6	8	10
90061	7	3	4	6	8	9
90065	9	1	4	6	7	8
90034	7	2	4	6	8	9
90032	7	2	3	6	8	10
90043	7	5	4	6	8	10
90041	7	1	4	6	8	10
90001	7	1	3	6	8	10
90021	7	6	1	5	8	9
90035	7	1	4	5	8	10
90045	7	6	3	1	8	10
90036	7	3	4	6	8	9
90005	7	3	4	1	8	10
90066	7	1	4	6	8	9
90026	7	3	2	6	8	10
90067	7	5	3	6	8	9
90057	7	2	4	6	8	10
90013	4	2	1	3	5	7
90044	7	5	4	3	8	10
90017	4	2	1	3	5	7
90040	5	1	2	3	4	6
90004	7	1	4	3	8	10
90031	7	3	2	6	8	9
90022	7	1	2	6	8	10
90062	7	3	4	6	8	10
90029	7	2	4	6	8	14
90028	7	1	4	6	8	14
90018	4	2	1	3	5	7
90038	7	5	1	6	8	16
90049	7	5	1	6	8	10
90048	7	1	4	6	8	10
90008	7	2	4	6	8	10
90089	7	1	3	6	8	10
90059	7	2	4	6	8	10
90019	7	1	4	6	8	9
90039	7	1	4	3	8	10
90027	7	1	4	6	8	10
90058	8	1	2	6	7	10
90007	7	1	4	6	8	10
90047	7	6	4	5	8	10
90077	7	3	1	6	12	8
90025	7	1	4	6	12	8
90015	4	3	1	2	7	5
90046	7	2	4	6	13	8
90056	7	3	4	6	12	8
90016	7	1	4	5	10	8
90037	7	1	3	5	10	8
90064	7	1	4	6	13	8
90068	7	1	2	6	13	8
90006	7	5	4	6	11	8
90020	7	2	1	6	12	8
90024	4	2	1	3	9	5
90033	7	3	1	5	11	8
90073	4	2	1	3	9	8
90002	7	1	4	6	11	8
90042	7	2	4	5	10	8

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Thrifty

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 967 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Thrifty Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (car rental near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Thrifty Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Thrifty Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Thrifty Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly