Supercuts Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve supercuts.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 14,111 Hair Salons In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Supercuts Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Supercuts Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Supercuts Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
San Diego
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Supercuts Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	33,430	14,111	4	26.2%	84,493,280	10.1	27,379	32,654	1,852	52,813	174	2,161	33,047
California	4,460	2,051	2	36.9%	14,432,845	8.4	1,166	1,740	315	2,468	19	196	1,828
Texas	3,030	1,434	5	23.5%	6,543,307	11.2	1,360	1,917	155	2,743	14	141	1,670
Florida	2,864	1,426	3	27.5%	5,659,417	10.5	446	975	137	1,287	6	105	735
Pennsylvania	2,916	1,447	3	28.4%	3,631,941	8.8	1,604	1,781	90	3,050	12	116	2,102
New York	3,332	1,619	6	17.5%	3,436,359	10.4	1,491	1,756	81	2,831	15	131	1,780
Ohio	2,254	1,076	4	29.4%	3,416,566	10.2	976	1,188	85	1,973	8	144	1,234
Michigan	2,047	924	4	33.0%	3,290,574	9.3	833	976	69	1,671	14	98	1,139
Illinois	2,604	1,298	4	23.6%	3,029,707	9.7	1,247	1,382	55	2,346	1	79	1,348
New Jersey	2,162	1,116	4	31.9%	2,835,829	8.7	537	593	88	957	7	66	618
Massachusetts	2,118	1,021	3	33.5%	2,287,704	9.5	461	534	88	847	7	73	532
Georgia	1,936	929	8	19.4%	1,998,170	12.0	574	726	40	1,136	2	32	529
Arizona	1,271	669	5	28.6%	1,985,048	9.0	247	396	39	565	3	24	396
Washington	1,850	877	3	26.2%	1,905,619	10.2	451	587	51	869	1	40	574
Virginia	1,973	974	5	20.3%	1,710,497	11.5	723	891	32	1,489	1	30	950
North Carolina	2,002	955	7	16.8%	1,702,223	11.7	683	802	35	1,360	2	17	692
Louisiana	1,408	711	3	36.5%	1,700,689	8.3	431	510	21	791	0	38	564
Alabama	1,453	713	4	31.8%	1,547,076	8.4	522	637	27	1,014	6	43	715
Colorado	1,756	856	3	27.9%	1,545,438	12.9	381	514	39	823	4	31	456
Tennessee	1,551	773	7	21.9%	1,454,918	11.8	514	622	34	988	3	24	544
Oklahoma	1,293	622	3	36.9%	1,446,774	7.9	557	646	40	1,013	9	95	722
Missouri	1,608	796	6	21.6%	1,313,711	9.8	887	1,017	19	1,708	1	24	979
South Carolina	1,404	686	5	25.0%	1,239,407	9.9	347	422	29	671	0	21	411
Wisconsin	1,981	936	4	20.4%	1,176,563	10.6	694	769	26	1,324	0	20	767
Connecticut	1,405	750	4	32.2%	1,152,073	9.4	234	279	44	442	0	33	259
Indiana	2,848	1,420	7	16.2%	1,072,058	12.4	659	770	30	1,236	2	10	571
Oregon	1,837	918	3	26.0%	1,059,281	10.8	355	414	30	642	0	21	390
Kentucky	1,389	681	6	22.7%	1,007,369	8.9	698	758	20	1,359	3	33	893
Utah	1,219	632	3	32.1%	977,017	8.1	246	284	23	474	0	24	351
Iowa	1,637	797	4	29.3%	918,669	8.9	890	933	19	1,598	1	49	1,036
Arkansas	1,363	658	5	25.3%	756,158	8.9	553	587	15	1,045	0	10	696
Mississippi	1,223	616	7	25.2%	753,240	9.0	384	418	10	726	0	20	456
Nevada	854	427	6	24.8%	723,622	8.9	92	168	20	251	0	12	168
Maryland	1,568	808	10	10.4%	623,623	15.1	392	463	8	739	0	16	389
Nebraska	1,323	681	4	31.6%	602,841	7.6	524	581	17	899	5	75	661
Kansas	1,390	694	7	20.7%	601,625	9.1	616	692	11	1,016	3	19	591
New Hampshire	1,081	572	2	44.1%	592,865	7.5	238	248	25	455	2	18	365
Hawaii	702	363	2	40.5%	575,877	7.2	82	93	22	154	1	13	120
Minnesota	1,839	855	9	9.6%	530,151	13.5	777	878	7	1,548	0	7	725
New Mexico	1,094	584	8	21.6%	451,444	9.8	327	361	17	630	2	10	354
Maine	1,821	1,002	5	33.6%	448,258	8.2	421	425	15	750	0	16	574
West Virginia	1,185	615	6	24.3%	445,207	9.1	684	704	12	1,261	12	54	927
Rhode Island	626	346	4	32.1%	339,479	9.5	64	77	19	111	1	10	74
Delaware	662	373	3	34.8%	330,092	10.2	52	66	14	98	4	9	56
Idaho	1,145	552	6	17.9%	302,753	10.4	251	273	15	447	1	14	282
South Dakota	971	527	4	33.5%	289,201	10.0	359	370	5	627	0	44	344
Vermont	870	465	4	35.7%	223,046	7.7	250	254	9	462	0	12	388
Wyoming	874	465	5	26.6%	154,827	9.2	164	171	4	294	0	8	169
North Dakota	848	436	7	18.1%	135,687	13.0	367	381	3	597	2	36	346
Montana	1,087	548	18	7.0%	73,184	15.8	348	361	2	587	0	0	292
Alaska	918	488	19	7.8%	57,249	11.7	218	235	2	412	0	0	285

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Diego	California	329	185	4	42.2%	568,624	7.4	36	10	45	2	2	37
Chicago	Illinois	271	142	6	18.5%	500,993	11.4	56	7	59	0	2	28
Miami	Florida	434	244	4	25.2%	473,023	11.1	55	19	67	0	8	24
Las Vegas	Nevada	343	196	7	23.6%	364,301	9.3	43	10	51	0	5	29
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	355	205	3	42.9%	356,986	7.9	27	9	30	1	3	20
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	339	200	5	47.7%	325,565	6.0	43	5	47	1	4	47
Phoenix	Arizona	248	147	7	20.2%	292,832	10.4	42	6	44	1	1	26
Bakersfield	California	229	135	5	50.6%	283,203	5.9	11	3	13	1	2	13
San Antonio	Texas	330	162	9	15.4%	274,603	11.4	59	12	68	4	5	22
Los Angeles	California	363	228	8	11.1%	271,523	12.0	62	7	67	0	0	28
Memphis	Tennessee	271	152	5	38.6%	268,075	19.7	26	5	28	0	2	14
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	318	194	5	37.2%	253,585	9.4	39	12	45	1	3	24
Long Beach	California	209	127	4	51.6%	247,352	5.9	12	2	21	0	0	21
Atlanta	Georgia	388	225	7	23.1%	228,408	10.3	39	7	43	0	2	28
Rochester	New York	266	164	4	48.3%	227,485	6.5	24	3	25	1	1	25
Fort Worth	Texas	272	160	7	24.7%	224,948	9.8	32	4	33	0	1	19
Aurora	Colorado	230	131	3	50.8%	221,033	5.9	11	2	20	0	1	20
Mesa	Arizona	234	155	5	41.0%	219,294	7.2	13	2	15	1	2	11
Houston	Texas	324	197	14	6.6%	210,657	24.0	96	8	114	3	4	7
Hollywood	Florida	208	121	4	44.5%	208,660	7.0	9	3	10	0	0	8
San Jose	California	304	165	8	19.8%	207,475	9.6	28	10	52	0	4	18
Oakland	California	232	141	5	48.3%	198,802	6.4	14	2	15	1	1	13
Dayton	Ohio	328	197	4	40.9%	195,362	7.5	27	7	39	0	5	27
Riverside	California	192	115	4	51.9%	192,114	5.9	7	2	14	0	0	14
Glendale	Arizona	222	135	3	61.5%	187,414	6.0	9	3	16	0	0	15
Tucson	Arizona	326	186	8	20.1%	182,184	9.9	32	5	33	0	1	24
Denver	Colorado	362	197	10	16.2%	176,272	36.9	38	9	42	1	2	9
Mobile	Alabama	300	175	4	64.8%	175,917	4.8	18	4	20	0	1	20
Irvine	California	195	124	3	64.2%	171,686	4.4	9	2	11	0	4	11
Fresno	California	280	163	7	28.3%	170,495	8.1	18	2	21	0	0	19
New York City	New York	291	189	9	10.5%	169,884	12.5	47	2	48	1	1	10
Birmingham	Alabama	302	181	6	33.6%	168,102	8.4	30	4	31	0	1	25
Saint Louis	Missouri	331	199	8	18.3%	168,085	10.1	45	5	51	0	1	34
West Palm Beach	Florida	225	140	3	44.8%	166,171	7.3	12	4	13	0	2	10
Jacksonville	Florida	279	161	7	19.1%	165,748	10.3	31	6	34	0	1	15
Corona	California	170	101	3	63.6%	163,704	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Toledo	Ohio	238	138	5	52.9%	162,597	5.5	15	3	15	0	0	15
Wilmington	Delaware	212	122	2	74.1%	162,534	3.7	10	7	14	2	4	13
Saint Petersburg	Florida	224	139	5	45.4%	161,691	6.3	16	3	21	0	3	21
San Bernardino	California	198	113	3	62.9%	156,825	4.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Erie	Pennsylvania	204	124	2	83.5%	153,241	2.5	13	1	13	0	11	13
Anaheim	California	200	123	4	40.9%	150,912	6.4	7	2	8	1	1	6
Irving	Texas	162	97	3	62.7%	150,845	5.0	6	2	7	1	1	7
Fremont	California	145	89	3	63.7%	148,438	4.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Moreno Valley	California	157	88	3	72.1%	148,214	3.8	4	2	8	0	1	8
Salem	Oregon	190	107	4	53.7%	143,059	5.9	7	2	9	0	0	9
Chesapeake	Virginia	188	120	3	59.7%	142,098	5.3	6	3	11	0	1	11
Vancouver	Washington	203	134	5	43.0%	140,281	7.2	11	5	14	1	1	12
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	208	117	2	77.1%	140,110	3.2	9	1	9	0	6	9
Chula Vista	California	151	90	4	52.8%	137,716	6.4	5	2	8	0	0	8
Raleigh	North Carolina	172	100	6	24.8%	135,795	9.1	15	2	16	1	1	11
San Francisco	California	256	120	8	15.6%	135,351	10.0	28	4	30	0	1	20
Pompano Beach	Florida	246	142	3	36.5%	135,144	8.9	10	3	10	0	3	6
Modesto	California	180	107	3	50.8%	134,433	5.3	7	2	8	0	1	8
New Orleans	Louisiana	230	128	6	30.9%	132,387	7.8	19	1	19	0	0	18
Schenectady	New York	201	126	1	81.6%	132,194	3.4	8	2	11	1	6	11
Oxnard	California	171	96	3	59.5%	131,120	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	California	144	86	3	64.8%	129,613	4.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Omaha	Nebraska	226	131	7	23.4%	129,474	9.1	31	1	31	0	0	24
Salt Lake City	Utah	269	152	8	26.6%	129,431	11.2	19	5	22	0	0	7
Allentown	Pennsylvania	177	106	2	75.9%	128,986	3.9	7	1	7	0	3	7
Lansing	Michigan	170	102	2	78.3%	128,643	3.3	7	1	7	0	5	7
Stockton	California	234	141	5	34.1%	127,333	8.1	12	1	13	0	1	11
Chandler	Arizona	167	110	4	47.1%	126,468	6.3	6	2	7	0	0	7
Roanoke	Virginia	224	134	3	74.6%	126,388	4.2	10	5	21	1	1	21
Youngstown	Ohio	229	135	2	80.2%	126,058	3.2	12	3	21	0	14	21
Santa Clara	California	150	85	1	100.0%	125,517	1.0	4	2	5	4	5	5
Odessa	Texas	195	120	2	77.4%	123,914	3.7	6	1	7	1	4	7
Homestead	Florida	201	117	2	65.8%	123,571	4.7	7	3	10	0	3	10
Pueblo	Colorado	210	123	2	78.1%	123,440	3.1	7	2	7	0	5	7
Palmdale	California	153	97	3	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Cumming	Georgia	142	85	3	74.4%	120,464	3.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Grand Prairie	Texas	147	98	4	62.7%	119,539	4.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Gilbert	Arizona	163	97	5	50.0%	119,300	6.0	6	2	7	0	0	6
Bradenton	Florida	215	124	4	46.5%	117,822	8.2	10	3	12	0	2	9
Lafayette	Louisiana	174	100	3	73.2%	117,559	3.8	5	2	6	0	1	6
Akron	Ohio	227	137	4	43.5%	117,518	6.6	17	3	30	0	0	26
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	182	107	3	68.5%	115,941	4.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	293	174	15	7.3%	114,768	17.6	47	6	51	0	0	10
Albuquerque	New Mexico	263	163	9	17.5%	114,698	10.5	17	2	18	0	0	10
Brownsville	Texas	157	89	4	56.9%	114,551	5.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Jackson	Mississippi	226	140	3	66.1%	112,655	4.5	11	1	11	0	5	11
Columbus	Ohio	287	171	9	13.3%	112,550	26.6	30	6	34	0	3	6
Reading	Pennsylvania	221	139	3	51.8%	111,456	5.6	10	5	12	0	1	11
Amarillo	Texas	228	143	4	48.3%	110,655	6.2	14	1	15	0	1	15
Colorado Springs	Colorado	278	164	8	18.9%	110,374	9.3	30	6	59	1	2	26
Hamilton	Ohio	141	87	2	80.0%	109,678	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Tallahassee	Florida	201	119	5	37.9%	109,232	7.1	10	3	15	0	2	12
Hampton	Virginia	178	112	2	80.0%	108,985	3.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Edinburg	Texas	164	96	3	70.0%	108,899	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Austin	Texas	307	170	11	10.0%	108,266	19.0	44	5	47	1	3	6
Peoria	Arizona	147	93	3	62.8%	108,118	5.0	4	3	9	0	1	9
Lancaster	California	153	89	4	58.3%	107,435	5.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Durham	North Carolina	164	96	6	37.0%	107,403	10.4	8	2	10	0	2	2
Everett	Washington	162	97	2	64.4%	107,301	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Murrieta	California	126	76	2	80.0%	105,795	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Summerville	South Carolina	119	74	2	75.9%	105,454	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Littleton	Colorado	257	154	3	32.2%	104,840	21.5	10	6	11	0	1	4
Columbia	South Carolina	219	128	7	30.5%	104,563	8.3	14	2	15	0	0	13
Brooklyn	New York	260	161	17	4.0%	103,002	33.0	37	2	37	0	0	3
Yuma	Arizona	139	82	3	69.7%	102,871	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Montgomery	Alabama	212	127	4	49.0%	102,848	5.9	13	2	15	1	1	15
Lake Worth	Florida	197	114	3	49.8%	102,735	5.2	5	5	7	0	1	6
Honolulu	Hawaii	203	114	9	24.5%	102,026	8.7	11	6	16	0	0	11
Gainesville	Florida	183	106	4	48.6%	101,750	6.2	10	1	10	0	0	10
Topeka	Kansas	243	149	4	61.7%	100,877	5.2	18	1	18	0	0	18
Panama City	Florida	176	109	2	78.6%	99,278	3.2	6	2	6	0	5	6
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	251	143	8	26.1%	99,000	8.5	18	3	19	0	0	16
Hemet	California	160	102	2	76.7%	98,804	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	165	93	2	75.2%	98,354	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Escondido	California	146	83	3	54.7%	98,345	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Grand Rapids	Michigan	176	106	6	26.7%	98,327	8.6	12	3	17	0	1	9
Toms River	New Jersey	125	70	2	80.0%	98,288	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Muskegon	Michigan	177	112	2	76.0%	98,199	4.0	5	1	6	0	2	6
Reno	Nevada	219	120	6	32.8%	97,480	7.6	12	3	22	0	0	20
Virginia Beach	Virginia	201	114	8	21.5%	96,569	8.3	12	1	12	0	0	10
Metairie	Louisiana	168	93	2	67.4%	95,914	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Bowling Green	Kentucky	161	96	2	82.9%	95,720	3.0	4	1	5	0	3	5
Racine	Wisconsin	153	87	2	75.4%	95,006	3.6	5	4	6	0	3	6
Rancho Cucamonga	California	165	106	3	53.3%	94,139	5.3	4	1	5	0	1	5
Louisville	Kentucky	223	122	10	12.3%	93,935	13.3	32	2	38	1	1	11
Mesquite	Texas	138	81	3	64.1%	93,755	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Conroe	Texas	195	120	3	58.1%	93,115	5.1	7	3	7	0	0	7
Sterling Heights	Michigan	151	94	2	70.3%	93,085	4.0	4	1	5	1	1	5
Worcester	Massachusetts	191	116	4	49.7%	92,329	5.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Joliet	Illinois	151	85	2	71.3%	91,837	4.0	5	1	6	1	3	6
Fairfield	California	125	71	2	80.0%	91,263	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Oceanside	California	160	100	5	45.4%	90,951	6.5	4	2	7	0	0	7
Lehigh Acres	Florida	199	117	2	77.7%	90,786	3.2	6	1	6	0	5	6
Clearwater	Florida	222	133	3	49.4%	90,522	5.9	9	2	9	0	1	9
Salinas	California	184	115	4	47.9%	90,174	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	282	160	10	11.1%	90,000	13.4	29	5	31	0	1	6
Canton	Ohio	203	121	4	61.2%	89,899	4.8	12	2	16	0	0	16
Chattanooga	Tennessee	231	147	4	42.7%	88,776	9.0	15	5	18	1	2	12
Baytown	Texas	151	98	2	75.1%	88,427	3.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Visalia	California	155	83	3	58.1%	88,304	5.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hayward	California	163	102	3	45.7%	87,684	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
West Jordan	Utah	146	96	3	70.9%	87,626	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	166	98	3	53.3%	87,555	5.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Acworth	Georgia	131	78	1	87.5%	87,190	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Tulsa	Oklahoma	240	135	8	20.5%	86,612	10.5	28	3	35	0	1	17
Elk Grove	California	155	93	4	48.1%	86,297	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
College Station	Texas	123	76	3	70.0%	86,134	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lincoln	Nebraska	263	164	7	29.7%	85,977	6.8	22	3	25	2	3	22
Denton	Texas	181	110	4	54.3%	85,907	5.5	6	3	12	0	1	12
Warren	Michigan	168	106	4	63.5%	85,854	4.8	5	2	6	1	1	6
Jersey City	New Jersey	168	99	6	32.8%	85,846	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Newport News	Virginia	180	107	4	48.3%	85,334	5.9	7	2	8	0	1	8
Rialto	California	136	81	2	80.0%	85,266	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Waco	Texas	188	113	4	53.7%	84,970	5.1	9	1	9	0	3	9
Saginaw	Michigan	169	107	2	65.1%	84,828	4.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Saint Charles	Missouri	142	88	2	60.3%	84,301	5.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Vacaville	California	120	76	2	80.0%	84,237	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Longmont	Colorado	143	95	2	64.4%	84,210	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Santa Maria	California	162	96	4	58.8%	84,177	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
El Cajon	California	163	96	3	48.6%	83,806	5.7	3	3	3	0	1	3
Midland	Texas	168	98	5	52.3%	83,621	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Roseville	California	139	85	2	59.3%	82,964	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Simi Valley	California	123	73	3	64.4%	82,892	4.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Nampa	Idaho	142	85	2	71.2%	82,547	4.0	3	2	7	0	2	7
Menifee	California	168	98	3	74.6%	82,501	3.8	4	1	5	0	1	5
Merced	California	153	86	2	80.0%	82,448	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Killeen	Texas	157	98	5	54.7%	82,097	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Yonkers	New York	186	119	5	44.6%	80,599	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Orange	California	157	101	3	55.5%	80,507	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Largo	Florida	153	96	2	74.7%	80,364	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Boynton Beach	Florida	155	92	5	46.1%	80,267	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Orem	Utah	134	77	2	80.0%	80,254	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	136	83	2	80.0%	80,237	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Las Cruces	New Mexico	227	134	5	53.7%	80,047	5.9	7	3	8	0	0	8
West Valley City	Utah	147	89	3	60.1%	79,882	4.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Spring	Texas	230	138	7	21.0%	79,853	17.9	8	4	10	1	1	4
Springfield	Missouri	167	100	6	34.7%	79,843	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Grand Junction	Colorado	171	102	2	75.4%	79,489	3.7	6	1	7	1	4	7
Concord	California	162	105	3	60.1%	78,223	4.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Torrance	California	181	117	4	43.9%	77,687	7.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Temecula	California	142	86	4	59.7%	77,507	4.3	3	2	4	1	1	4
Norfolk	Virginia	222	144	5	31.5%	77,405	7.1	14	1	14	0	0	14
Yakima	Washington	141	82	3	59.3%	76,951	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lakeland	Florida	195	115	7	29.6%	76,441	8.2	9	2	10	0	1	8
Corpus Christi	Texas	218	132	7	23.4%	76,359	9.1	18	3	23	0	0	15
Waukegan	Illinois	122	74	2	77.3%	75,355	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	192	120	3	76.1%	75,223	3.4	7	1	7	0	4	7
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	148	85	4	60.0%	75,134	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Edison	New Jersey	144	86	2	74.4%	75,061	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Hesperia	California	127	82	3	72.2%	74,968	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Redding	California	162	92	2	65.1%	73,566	6.0	4	3	5	0	1	3
Costa Mesa	California	120	71	4	64.4%	73,306	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bellingham	Washington	134	79	4	57.9%	73,222	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cleveland	Ohio	295	160	12	9.7%	73,061	23.2	29	5	30	0	2	4
Waterbury	Connecticut	179	114	3	66.9%	72,663	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Longview	Texas	176	112	2	68.3%	71,909	4.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Champaign	Illinois	142	86	2	76.0%	71,838	3.3	3	2	4	0	2	4
Victorville	California	135	79	5	52.6%	71,692	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chico	California	150	88	3	63.8%	71,467	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Tempe	Arizona	142	87	5	37.0%	70,315	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Marcos	California	123	80	3	69.8%	70,095	4.0	2	2	5	0	1	5
Saint Augustine	Florida	209	121	3	53.1%	69,650	5.8	5	2	5	0	1	5
Mckinney	Texas	143	87	6	36.8%	69,558	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Angelo	Texas	166	90	3	62.8%	69,515	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lubbock	Texas	220	131	7	25.1%	69,426	8.7	14	2	14	0	0	11
West Covina	California	150	93	2	63.2%	69,186	5.3	3	1	4	1	1	3
Albany	New York	197	119	4	45.7%	69,169	6.6	11	3	12	0	0	11
Manchester	New Hampshire	152	89	3	59.5%	69,091	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Belleville	Illinois	160	97	2	74.1%	69,090	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	172	97	5	49.4%	68,902	6.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Greeley	Colorado	124	80	5	60.0%	68,439	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Tracy	California	170	103	2	57.7%	67,594	4.5	4	3	6	0	1	4
Des Moines	Iowa	185	110	6	30.0%	67,073	7.8	11	2	11	0	0	11
Lowell	Massachusetts	145	85	4	60.0%	66,805	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Allen	Texas	119	73	4	60.0%	66,763	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	130	81	3	70.0%	66,700	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	157	91	4	53.9%	66,145	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tacoma	Washington	277	175	7	19.8%	66,076	9.2	20	3	23	0	1	17
Elgin	Illinois	156	95	4	53.5%	65,377	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Charleston	South Carolina	212	130	6	33.2%	65,373	8.0	10	2	10	0	1	8
Downey	California	143	92	3	57.8%	65,279	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	127	79	4	65.0%	65,072	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Shreveport	Louisiana	239	138	5	28.9%	64,439	8.2	12	1	12	0	0	12
El Paso	Texas	310	182	11	8.1%	64,164	12.8	24	4	25	0	0	2
Buffalo	New York	309	182	10	11.4%	63,961	11.6	28	6	32	0	0	10
Orlando	Florida	295	177	16	6.4%	63,521	22.5	32	6	34	0	0	8
Melbourne	Florida	157	94	4	40.5%	63,130	7.0	5	3	10	0	0	10
O Fallon	Missouri	127	82	2	65.4%	63,116	4.5	2	1	3	0	1	3
Madera	California	153	80	2	61.2%	63,056	6.7	3	3	4	0	1	2
Vallejo	California	168	105	4	50.5%	62,795	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	189	119	8	30.5%	61,975	8.8	6	2	10	0	0	8
Clovis	California	138	80	2	50.9%	61,753	6.3	3	4	7	0	1	7
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	143	84	5	46.9%	61,239	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Medford	Oregon	130	75	2	65.3%	60,920	4.5	2	1	3	0	1	3
Carlsbad	California	141	88	4	53.6%	60,887	5.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Indianapolis	Indiana	338	180	13	6.4%	60,482	17.1	37	5	39	1	1	4
Beaumont	Texas	217	131	6	41.4%	60,285	6.5	8	1	8	0	0	8
Green Bay	Wisconsin	173	99	6	32.6%	59,848	7.9	7	3	8	0	0	7
Whittier	California	208	133	3	30.5%	59,835	7.8	6	4	7	0	0	7
Sugar Land	Texas	165	94	4	35.4%	59,742	10.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Spartanburg	South Carolina	174	103	4	53.3%	59,665	5.8	5	2	6	0	0	6
Auburn	Washington	141	85	3	52.6%	59,403	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	144	87	8	30.5%	59,385	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	138	79	3	52.6%	59,333	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sparks	Nevada	168	94	3	49.7%	59,287	6.3	4	3	7	0	0	7
Cambridge	Massachusetts	173	102	4	50.9%	58,986	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Kennewick	Washington	143	85	2	59.4%	58,731	5.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Sarasota	Florida	202	110	7	23.5%	58,717	13.5	13	2	13	0	0	6
Appleton	Wisconsin	134	80	3	47.9%	58,291	6.0	4	1	4	0	2	3
Puyallup	Washington	180	111	3	40.3%	57,535	8.0	5	2	6	0	1	4
Waukesha	Wisconsin	137	88	4	60.0%	57,477	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fullerton	California	142	94	3	41.0%	57,129	6.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Newnan	Georgia	130	79	2	61.1%	57,105	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Holland	Michigan	122	70	3	60.6%	56,904	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Tampa	Florida	269	162	13	7.1%	56,679	13.5	27	5	28	0	0	4
Burbank	California	153	100	3	52.1%	56,257	5.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Round Rock	Texas	166	95	5	33.3%	55,797	13.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	171	101	3	51.4%	55,727	8.3	3	2	3	0	2	2
Plainfield	Illinois	144	87	2	56.5%	55,637	6.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Naples	Florida	237	135	8	17.7%	55,351	12.1	14	3	15	0	1	4
Ventura	California	140	78	4	47.5%	55,038	7.3	3	2	6	0	0	4
Cape Coral	Florida	164	100	6	30.4%	55,036	9.2	6	2	7	0	0	6
Humble	Texas	126	82	6	33.0%	54,999	16.3	3	3	4	0	1	1
York	Pennsylvania	177	105	6	30.3%	54,494	7.9	7	2	8	0	0	6
Santa Barbara	California	159	87	5	40.1%	54,481	7.1	7	2	7	0	0	7
Mission Viejo	California	117	68	4	55.2%	54,257	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saint Paul	Minnesota	384	212	22	6.7%	53,869	28.2	30	3	35	0	0	6
Sacramento	California	275	160	14	6.7%	53,561	13.5	28	5	29	0	0	1
Gastonia	North Carolina	148	79	3	49.9%	53,406	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pearland	Texas	149	88	5	38.7%	53,223	18.5	2	3	3	0	0	2
Boca Raton	Florida	148	87	8	23.9%	53,188	9.1	9	2	11	0	2	5
Seattle	Washington	282	159	16	5.6%	53,165	21.3	35	4	35	0	1	5
Quincy	Massachusetts	136	82	4	56.1%	52,839	5.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Coral Springs	Florida	121	65	4	54.1%	52,603	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Abilene	Texas	174	106	5	40.1%	52,172	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Trenton	New Jersey	225	134	7	25.0%	52,024	8.5	11	2	14	0	0	13
Little Rock	Arkansas	205	116	7	23.7%	51,657	8.5	12	1	12	0	0	10
Hialeah	Florida	206	120	11	13.8%	50,749	12.1	7	2	8	0	0	4
Spring Hill	Florida	168	101	5	39.7%	49,822	8.0	5	3	10	0	0	8
Olympia	Washington	197	121	8	27.2%	49,709	21.8	6	2	6	0	2	2
Portland	Oregon	248	144	13	5.4%	49,433	29.8	33	4	36	0	0	2
Chino	California	117	73	2	50.8%	48,015	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	127	75	4	50.0%	47,713	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
South Gate	California	99	58	5	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	California	173	106	7	22.0%	47,493	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	4
Lewisville	Texas	126	78	5	39.8%	47,253	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Greensboro	North Carolina	198	109	11	14.4%	47,112	11.3	9	1	9	0	0	3
Bend	Oregon	152	88	5	38.4%	46,989	8.0	3	4	4	0	0	3
Marietta	Georgia	178	103	9	14.6%	46,986	16.1	7	3	8	0	1	1
Santa Ana	California	193	121	11	13.1%	46,682	15.7	6	2	7	0	1	1
Jupiter	Florida	144	82	5	47.2%	46,539	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Charlotte	North Carolina	243	138	20	5.1%	46,073	18.2	24	5	26	0	1	2
Miami Beach	Florida	178	104	4	39.7%	45,889	9.0	5	2	5	0	0	3
Franklin	Tennessee	138	81	7	42.9%	45,702	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Fairfax	Virginia	174	110	6	27.2%	44,452	9.8	4	3	5	0	0	2
Cincinnati	Ohio	230	132	19	5.4%	43,664	16.8	45	3	61	0	0	6
Livermore	California	128	69	4	45.2%	43,551	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Nashville	Tennessee	249	141	12	9.4%	43,309	16.2	22	4	24	1	1	2
Ocala	Florida	227	141	8	19.2%	43,242	9.2	11	1	11	0	0	9
San Mateo	California	159	97	2	30.2%	42,929	9.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Mission	Texas	148	93	5	23.4%	42,422	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Stamford	Connecticut	145	83	5	32.8%	42,261	7.5	6	1	7	0	1	5
Kansas City	Missouri	235	137	15	7.4%	42,208	14.7	49	1	49	0	0	1
Huntsville	Alabama	213	128	8	20.9%	41,092	10.1	11	1	11	0	0	8
Riverview	Florida	161	93	2	36.9%	41,063	8.3	3	2	3	0	1	2
Henderson	Nevada	201	113	17	13.4%	40,563	10.5	8	3	8	0	0	5
Mcallen	Texas	147	89	5	28.4%	40,273	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	153	91	6	30.8%	39,495	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Compton	California	139	94	6	28.3%	39,330	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Lawrence	Kansas	144	83	4	38.8%	39,259	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bothell	Washington	182	108	5	30.3%	38,910	12.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Woodbridge	Virginia	151	90	11	18.4%	38,882	17.7	3	2	5	0	0	2
Arvada	Colorado	162	103	8	28.5%	38,060	9.0	5	3	6	0	0	2
La Puente	California	149	94	3	32.2%	37,967	8.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Vero Beach	Florida	179	111	7	31.2%	35,965	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Perris	California	136	80	6	30.4%	35,667	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Minneapolis	Minnesota	425	221	26	3.2%	35,331	31.1	51	2	57	0	0	3
Olathe	Kansas	116	74	8	24.4%	35,263	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Tyler	Texas	209	126	7	21.7%	33,940	8.8	9	2	16	0	0	14
Savannah	Georgia	197	113	9	14.0%	33,673	19.6	10	1	10	0	0	3
Athens	Georgia	158	100	6	26.2%	32,720	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	5
Lynchburg	Virginia	174	103	7	31.4%	32,162	7.5	4	3	6	0	1	6
Lithonia	Georgia	125	81	6	33.0%	31,957	9.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Norwalk	California	97	58	6	30.0%	31,766	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lexington	Kentucky	222	135	9	9.8%	31,428	10.5	15	2	15	0	0	12
Delray Beach	Florida	162	97	7	26.3%	31,339	8.4	5	3	6	0	0	6
Silver Spring	Maryland	223	133	14	10.3%	31,294	14.1	7	2	8	0	0	2
North Las Vegas	Nevada	179	99	10	13.2%	30,962	11.1	7	4	7	0	0	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	192	102	7	29.7%	30,615	8.4	5	2	5	0	0	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	164	101	14	16.0%	30,352	10.5	4	4	5	0	0	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	70	7	30.0%	30,229	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Fort Myers	Florida	220	124	11	11.9%	29,901	9.8	11	3	13	0	0	7
Redwood City	California	141	82	3	25.9%	29,702	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	California	149	88	5	25.7%	29,369	8.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Wichita	Kansas	256	141	13	7.0%	29,218	12.8	26	3	29	0	0	4
Hawthorne	California	98	66	6	30.0%	29,051	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Decatur	Georgia	187	115	10	15.8%	28,502	10.6	5	4	6	0	0	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	122	78	5	29.0%	28,242	12.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Boulder	Colorado	174	111	9	20.9%	27,484	9.0	6	2	6	0	0	4
Surprise	Arizona	167	99	13	20.2%	27,366	8.5	4	2	8	0	0	7
Alexandria	Virginia	227	142	16	7.3%	25,973	16.1	14	3	15	0	0	1
Boston	Massachusetts	199	117	11	16.6%	25,238	23.7	14	4	20	0	3	3
Springdale	Arkansas	123	73	7	25.9%	24,926	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Knoxville	Tennessee	227	130	18	6.4%	24,911	33.7	17	2	18	1	1	2
Pasadena	California	153	93	9	15.7%	24,767	11.8	6	2	7	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	144	87	5	25.3%	24,466	22.3	4	3	5	0	0	2
Winston Salem	North Carolina	187	119	13	9.2%	24,351	11.4	9	2	17	0	0	3
Renton	Washington	199	124	10	15.6%	24,222	13.0	5	2	5	0	0	3
Norman	Oklahoma	157	91	9	19.3%	23,911	8.0	4	2	5	0	1	4
Parker	Colorado	122	70	9	23.3%	23,364	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Spokane	Washington	252	131	19	6.5%	23,294	14.1	14	3	14	0	0	1
Napa	California	122	69	6	24.0%	23,220	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Plano	Texas	164	106	14	7.4%	22,523	17.4	7	2	8	0	1	1
Dallas	Texas	331	190	32	1.6%	22,470	27.9	48	4	49	0	0	2
Rockville	Maryland	174	103	9	15.5%	22,449	21.5	4	2	5	0	0	3
Vista	California	140	85	6	18.4%	22,077	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	117	67	8	22.0%	21,790	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Flint	Michigan	210	129	11	13.8%	21,478	10.9	7	2	8	0	0	5
Paterson	New Jersey	207	130	7	14.5%	21,182	10.1	9	2	12	0	0	6
Sunnyvale	California	165	88	7	12.6%	19,222	10.5	4	3	5	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	98	59	7	20.0%	19,216	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Henrico	Virginia	205	129	14	9.9%	19,089	31.7	7	2	8	0	0	3
Bridgeport	Connecticut	165	103	10	12.6%	18,492	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	3
Syracuse	New York	214	128	12	8.0%	18,124	15.5	15	1	16	0	1	1
Santa Monica	California	136	83	7	19.1%	18,059	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Falls Church	Virginia	222	130	9	15.0%	18,045	13.2	5	2	7	0	0	3
Eugene	Oregon	173	99	9	8.8%	17,794	11.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	159	93	12	9.0%	16,693	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Scottsdale	Arizona	214	135	25	5.6%	16,582	14.7	11	4	12	1	1	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	162	97	9	16.7%	15,652	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	California	146	92	8	14.3%	14,857	11.0	4	1	5	1	1	1
Hillsboro	Oregon	124	79	9	14.2%	14,623	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Bronx	New York	311	206	28	1.0%	14,076	21.5	25	2	28	0	0	0
Van Nuys	California	144	95	11	7.7%	13,689	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Edmond	Oklahoma	162	92	12	7.9%	13,548	15.4	5	3	6	0	0	3
Laredo	Texas	188	115	15	4.8%	13,108	15.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Fontana	California	138	79	12	5.4%	12,783	14.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	220	127	10	9.6%	12,209	30.9	9	2	9	0	1	1
Pomona	California	136	88	8	7.5%	11,915	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Newark	New Jersey	200	126	18	4.2%	11,828	15.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Boise	Idaho	184	100	17	4.5%	11,452	15.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Frisco	Texas	116	72	13	6.6%	11,332	14.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	99	67	9	10.0%	10,580	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Broomfield	Colorado	147	93	11	10.0%	10,510	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	California	99	67	9	10.0%	10,243	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Rock Hill	South Carolina	152	86	12	8.5%	9,876	12.0	3	2	5	0	0	0
Inglewood	California	192	127	13	7.2%	9,681	12.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Englewood	Colorado	204	120	21	8.6%	9,621	31.5	4	4	5	0	0	2
Richardson	Texas	129	81	10	8.4%	9,573	12.0	3	2	5	0	0	1
Clermont	Florida	153	94	11	9.4%	9,421	20.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
North Hollywood	California	149	98	15	6.2%	9,419	14.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	153	94	16	5.9%	9,229	14.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Sandy	Utah	155	99	15	8.3%	9,125	11.8	4	2	5	0	0	0
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	154	90	12	6.2%	9,072	19.6	5	2	5	0	0	1
Winter Haven	Florida	147	92	12	8.4%	8,964	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Independence	Missouri	179	121	11	7.2%	8,964	12.8	8	2	11	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	214	139	10	9.1%	8,741	12.8	8	2	10	0	0	4
High Point	North Carolina	153	89	12	7.0%	8,561	13.3	4	2	8	0	0	0
Florissant	Missouri	157	101	12	7.8%	8,412	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	124	81	10	8.5%	8,322	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Indio	California	137	81	9	8.4%	8,109	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Elizabeth	New Jersey	151	92	10	8.0%	8,037	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
El Monte	California	127	77	10	8.4%	7,864	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Pensacola	Florida	242	143	18	2.9%	7,792	19.5	13	4	15	0	0	4
Cary	North Carolina	156	103	16	4.9%	7,620	15.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Kent	Washington	159	95	16	4.6%	7,455	15.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lawrenceville	Georgia	155	96	16	2.9%	7,447	16.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	144	87	14	6.6%	7,129	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Kissimmee	Florida	211	127	21	2.4%	7,009	27.7	7	3	8	0	0	0
Greenville	South Carolina	174	102	19	3.1%	6,740	16.9	9	2	9	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	122	75	11	7.0%	6,594	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	169	104	14	4.3%	6,589	16.0	4	2	6	0	0	0
Bowie	Maryland	188	113	12	6.4%	6,506	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	113	69	12	6.6%	6,271	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Cypress	Texas	120	72	18	3.6%	6,062	16.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Washington DC	District of Columbia	221	122	40	0.9%	6,002	31.3	28	1	28	0	0	0
Portsmouth	Virginia	192	121	11	6.2%	5,929	13.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Ontario	California	150	89	14	3.3%	5,833	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	171	117	21	4.0%	5,765	16.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Midlothian	Virginia	144	89	12	5.9%	5,716	22.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Keller	Texas	135	73	16	4.9%	5,681	28.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Detroit	Michigan	263	157	43	0.8%	5,317	36.8	25	1	25	0	0	0
Garden Grove	California	171	104	13	3.0%	5,202	17.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Flushing	New York	162	113	21	2.4%	5,055	18.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ogden	Utah	158	88	18	2.4%	4,918	17.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	139	79	15	5.1%	4,805	15.0	3	2	5	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	126	74	15	5.0%	4,741	14.7	3	2	6	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	149	85	13	4.7%	4,710	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Providence	Rhode Island	190	114	24	2.3%	4,708	18.6	8	2	8	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	134	76	13	4.8%	4,572	16.0	3	3	5	0	0	0
Baltimore	Maryland	228	127	49	0.7%	4,514	48.6	22	1	22	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	162	97	13	4.4%	4,344	15.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	175	102	16	3.2%	4,267	17.0	6	2	8	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	150	91	12	4.2%	4,016	15.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	99	64	15	4.0%	3,859	16.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Palm Bay	Florida	172	109	17	3.5%	3,840	16.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	174	112	13	3.9%	3,734	16.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Staten Island	New York	198	127	37	0.8%	3,650	42.1	12	2	12	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	169	108	22	3.1%	3,432	21.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Arlington	Texas	191	122	29	0.9%	3,431	32.9	12	2	12	0	0	0
Jamaica	New York	201	133	22	1.4%	3,420	19.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	125	74	14	3.0%	3,307	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Katy	Texas	140	85	25	0.9%	3,238	24.8	4	3	5	0	0	0
Annapolis	Maryland	171	99	15	3.2%	3,068	28.4	5	2	7	0	0	0
Fort Wayne	Indiana	239	141	30	0.9%	2,875	28.3	16	1	16	0	0	0
Missouri City	Texas	149	85	22	2.7%	2,826	21.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Macon	Georgia	201	129	16	1.7%	2,816	22.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
New Port Richey	Florida	156	92	21	2.3%	2,767	19.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Madison	Wisconsin	179	116	30	0.9%	2,748	26.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	129	75	18	2.6%	2,676	17.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Richmond	Virginia	193	128	53	0.7%	2,674	51.4	15	1	15	0	0	0
Covington	Georgia	130	83	18	2.7%	2,459	17.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Garland	Texas	171	105	20	1.0%	2,353	20.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Fayetteville	North Carolina	215	125	29	0.9%	2,180	29.9	8	1	8	0	0	0
Santa Fe	New Mexico	177	109	20	1.7%	2,175	19.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	241	144	38	0.8%	1,934	38.5	12	1	12	0	0	0
Beaverton	Oregon	145	81	29	0.9%	1,771	31.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	173	109	17	1.8%	1,751	19.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Clarksville	Tennessee	138	75	21	1.0%	1,698	22.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Gaithersburg	Maryland	152	92	21	1.2%	1,690	25.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Rockford	Illinois	196	114	27	0.9%	1,666	27.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Evansville	Indiana	204	124	30	0.9%	1,655	29.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Augusta	Georgia	168	102	38	0.8%	1,654	39.1	8	1	8	0	0	0
Lees Summit	Missouri	165	101	17	1.6%	1,651	17.3	6	1	6	0	0	1
Muncie	Indiana	182	109	16	1.8%	1,647	18.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	145	83	19	1.7%	1,620	20.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	186	112	19	1.7%	1,618	24.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Overland Park	Kansas	171	117	33	0.9%	1,603	31.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Fredericksburg	Virginia	162	95	27	0.9%	1,600	26.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	147	88	20	1.4%	1,595	22.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
South Bend	Indiana	214	126	22	1.1%	1,583	21.9	10	1	10	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	188	117	20	1.5%	1,557	21.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	161	98	19	1.5%	1,496	18.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Scranton	Pennsylvania	192	118	20	1.4%	1,396	21.1	8	2	9	0	0	1
Carrollton	Texas	132	87	24	0.9%	1,257	25.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	172	96	18	1.2%	1,254	20.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ann Arbor	Michigan	165	100	41	0.7%	1,237	44.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
New Haven	Connecticut	157	100	25	0.9%	1,215	26.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	160	95	22	1.0%	1,213	20.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Naperville	Illinois	143	80	42	0.7%	1,203	46.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bellevue	Washington	154	86	37	0.8%	1,146	40.8	5	2	5	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	157	95	27	0.9%	1,140	25.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Antioch	California	124	71	15	1.0%	1,092	20.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	140	81	37	0.8%	1,076	39.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	217	133	31	0.9%	1,058	29.7	11	1	11	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	120	68	26	0.9%	1,054	25.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	140	80	36	0.8%	1,053	39.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
San Leandro	California	152	95	21	0.9%	1,032	26.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Billings	Montana	145	79	40	0.7%	1,018	45.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	150	89	35	0.8%	1,012	35.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Dearborn	Michigan	145	92	22	1.0%	996	20.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	130	83	21	1.0%	968	23.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	128	70	25	0.9%	958	26.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	136	79	20	1.0%	947	19.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	142	76	20	1.0%	946	21.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	109	71	24	0.9%	935	24.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	101	70	18	1.0%	930	20.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Herndon	Virginia	128	78	27	1.0%	925	20.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	160	91	24	1.0%	907	25.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	120	72	34	0.8%	885	35.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	78	55	15	0.8%	875	37.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	166	101	26	0.9%	863	30.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	125	73	30	0.8%	845	34.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	117	71	30	0.9%	838	31.0	2	1	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Diego	329	185	4	42.2%	568,624	7.4	36	10	45	2	2	37
Bakersfield	229	135	5	50.6%	283,203	5.9	11	3	13	1	2	13
Los Angeles	363	228	8	11.1%	271,523	12.0	62	7	67	0	0	28
Long Beach	209	127	4	51.6%	247,352	5.9	12	2	21	0	0	21
San Jose	304	165	8	19.8%	207,475	9.6	28	10	52	0	4	18
Oakland	232	141	5	48.3%	198,802	6.4	14	2	15	1	1	13
Riverside	192	115	4	51.9%	192,114	5.9	7	2	14	0	0	14
Irvine	195	124	3	64.2%	171,686	4.4	9	2	11	0	4	11
Fresno	280	163	7	28.3%	170,495	8.1	18	2	21	0	0	19
Corona	170	101	3	63.6%	163,704	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
San Bernardino	198	113	3	62.9%	156,825	4.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Anaheim	200	123	4	40.9%	150,912	6.4	7	2	8	1	1	6
Fremont	145	89	3	63.7%	148,438	4.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Moreno Valley	157	88	3	72.1%	148,214	3.8	4	2	8	0	1	8
Chula Vista	151	90	4	52.8%	137,716	6.4	5	2	8	0	0	8
San Francisco	256	120	8	15.6%	135,351	10.0	28	4	30	0	1	20
Modesto	180	107	3	50.8%	134,433	5.3	7	2	8	0	1	8
Oxnard	171	96	3	59.5%	131,120	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	144	86	3	64.8%	129,613	4.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Stockton	234	141	5	34.1%	127,333	8.1	12	1	13	0	1	11
Santa Clara	150	85	1	100.0%	125,517	1.0	4	2	5	4	5	5
Palmdale	153	97	3	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Lancaster	153	89	4	58.3%	107,435	5.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Murrieta	126	76	2	80.0%	105,795	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hemet	160	102	2	76.7%	98,804	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Escondido	146	83	3	54.7%	98,345	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	165	106	3	53.3%	94,139	5.3	4	1	5	0	1	5
Fairfield	125	71	2	80.0%	91,263	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Oceanside	160	100	5	45.4%	90,951	6.5	4	2	7	0	0	7
Salinas	184	115	4	47.9%	90,174	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Visalia	155	83	3	58.1%	88,304	5.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hayward	163	102	3	45.7%	87,684	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Elk Grove	155	93	4	48.1%	86,297	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rialto	136	81	2	80.0%	85,266	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Vacaville	120	76	2	80.0%	84,237	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Santa Maria	162	96	4	58.8%	84,177	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
El Cajon	163	96	3	48.6%	83,806	5.7	3	3	3	0	1	3
Roseville	139	85	2	59.3%	82,964	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Simi Valley	123	73	3	64.4%	82,892	4.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Menifee	168	98	3	74.6%	82,501	3.8	4	1	5	0	1	5
Merced	153	86	2	80.0%	82,448	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Orange	157	101	3	55.5%	80,507	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Concord	162	105	3	60.1%	78,223	4.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Torrance	181	117	4	43.9%	77,687	7.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Temecula	142	86	4	59.7%	77,507	4.3	3	2	4	1	1	4
Hesperia	127	82	3	72.2%	74,968	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Redding	162	92	2	65.1%	73,566	6.0	4	3	5	0	1	3
Costa Mesa	120	71	4	64.4%	73,306	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Victorville	135	79	5	52.6%	71,692	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chico	150	88	3	63.8%	71,467	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
San Marcos	123	80	3	69.8%	70,095	4.0	2	2	5	0	1	5
West Covina	150	93	2	63.2%	69,186	5.3	3	1	4	1	1	3
Tracy	170	103	2	57.7%	67,594	4.5	4	3	6	0	1	4
Downey	143	92	3	57.8%	65,279	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	153	80	2	61.2%	63,056	6.7	3	3	4	0	1	2
Vallejo	168	105	4	50.5%	62,795	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clovis	138	80	2	50.9%	61,753	6.3	3	4	7	0	1	7
Carlsbad	141	88	4	53.6%	60,887	5.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Whittier	208	133	3	30.5%	59,835	7.8	6	4	7	0	0	7
Fullerton	142	94	3	41.0%	57,129	6.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Burbank	153	100	3	52.1%	56,257	5.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Ventura	140	78	4	47.5%	55,038	7.3	3	2	6	0	0	4
Santa Barbara	159	87	5	40.1%	54,481	7.1	7	2	7	0	0	7
Mission Viejo	117	68	4	55.2%	54,257	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sacramento	275	160	14	6.7%	53,561	13.5	28	5	29	0	0	1
Chino	117	73	2	50.8%	48,015	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
South Gate	99	58	5	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	173	106	7	22.0%	47,493	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	4
Santa Ana	193	121	11	13.1%	46,682	15.7	6	2	7	0	1	1
Livermore	128	69	4	45.2%	43,551	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Mateo	159	97	2	30.2%	42,929	9.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Compton	139	94	6	28.3%	39,330	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
La Puente	149	94	3	32.2%	37,967	8.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Perris	136	80	6	30.4%	35,667	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norwalk	97	58	6	30.0%	31,766	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Redwood City	141	82	3	25.9%	29,702	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	149	88	5	25.7%	29,369	8.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	98	66	6	30.0%	29,051	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pasadena	153	93	9	15.7%	24,767	11.8	6	2	7	0	0	2
Palo Alto	144	87	5	25.3%	24,466	22.3	4	3	5	0	0	2
Napa	122	69	6	24.0%	23,220	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Vista	140	85	6	18.4%	22,077	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Sunnyvale	165	88	7	12.6%	19,222	10.5	4	3	5	0	0	2
Pittsburg	98	59	7	20.0%	19,216	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Monica	136	83	7	19.1%	18,059	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	146	92	8	14.3%	14,857	11.0	4	1	5	1	1	1
Van Nuys	144	95	11	7.7%	13,689	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Fontana	138	79	12	5.4%	12,783	14.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Berkeley	220	127	10	9.6%	12,209	30.9	9	2	9	0	1	1
Pomona	136	88	8	7.5%	11,915	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pacoima	99	67	9	10.0%	10,580	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	99	67	9	10.0%	10,243	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Inglewood	192	127	13	7.2%	9,681	12.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
North Hollywood	149	98	15	6.2%	9,419	14.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Indio	137	81	9	8.4%	8,109	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
El Monte	127	77	10	8.4%	7,864	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Ontario	150	89	14	3.3%	5,833	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Garden Grove	171	104	13	3.0%	5,202	17.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Sylmar	99	64	15	4.0%	3,859	16.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Antioch	124	71	15	1.0%	1,092	20.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
San Leandro	152	95	21	0.9%	1,032	26.3	3	1	3	0	0	0

San Diego

ZIP	supercuts.com	yelp.com	expertise.com	rinsesd.com	fash.com	jetrhys.com
92135	15	4	38		11	26
92114	9	1	3	5	10	14
92104	7	1	3	4	6	9
92145	12	4	6	9	15	11
92155	13	1	39	63	8	23
92115	1	4	6	8	9	12
92147	4	1	3	7	6	10
92127	5	1	3	9	10	7
92116	7	1	3	4	6	10
92134	4	1	3	6	8	9
92105	6	1	3	4	7	8
92101	10	1	3	5	9	12
92154	9	4	6	8	10	11
92103	4	1	3	5	6	10
92123	6	1	3	4	7	8
92128	4	1	3	10	7	12
92110	7	1	3	6	5	8
92107	8	1	3	5	11	10
92119	8	1	3	5	7	10
92129	4	1	3	12	13	7
92106	4	1	3	5	7	8
92120	10	4	6	7	9	11
92111	13	4	6	8	11	14
92124	4	1	3	5	6	9
92102	7	1	3	5	9	8
92130	4	1	3	8	9	6
92121	8	4	6	11	13	12
92139	14	4	6	7	11	16
92131	9	1	3	5	6	7
92108	1	4	7	8	9	13
92109	11	4	6	7	15	14
92126	6	1	3	9	12	11
92117	8	1	3	6	7	9
92140	10	1	3	4	11	9
92113	7	1	3	4	9	8
92122	9	1	3	4	8	7

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Supercuts

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 14,111 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Supercuts Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (hair salon near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Supercuts Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Supercuts Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Supercuts Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly