Statefarm Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve statefarm.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Statefarm Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Statefarm Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Statefarm Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Los Angeles
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Statefarm Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	8	13.3%	43,019,092	10.5	27,379	32,654	111	33,580	270	894	10,766
California	870	609	8	12.5%	4,892,778	10.9	1,166	1,740	9	1,779	7	37	399
Texas	846	595	9	12.6%	3,513,474	10.6	1,360	1,917	6	1,947	6	29	559
Florida	768	578	8	12.1%	2,502,282	10.8	446	975	2	987	1	12	191
New York	791	600	8	12.4%	2,428,117	10.8	1,491	1,756	5	1,799	14	43	395
Illinois	670	490	8	14.9%	1,910,801	9.8	1,247	1,382	4	1,404	6	22	922
Pennsylvania	757	591	8	14.3%	1,831,058	10.4	1,604	1,781	11	1,852	24	70	498
Ohio	670	548	8	14.9%	1,733,249	10.6	976	1,188	5	1,207	2	19	259
Michigan	656	528	8	14.2%	1,415,902	10.3	833	976	9	1,021	13	45	345
Georgia	409	319	9	13.2%	1,364,057	10.5	574	726	5	753	10	27	201
North Carolina	506	406	8	12.0%	1,220,231	10.9	683	802	3	807	2	5	157
Virginia	406	322	9	13.4%	1,123,760	10.6	723	891	4	917	6	26	231
Washington	337	274	8	15.0%	1,091,999	10.4	451	587	3	608	5	21	243
Maryland	338	254	7	17.0%	1,019,653	10.6	392	463	7	484	7	21	135
New Jersey	436	328	9	11.0%	978,829	11.3	537	593	4	598	0	4	94
Indiana	472	373	7	14.5%	960,582	10.1	659	770	5	786	4	15	375
Arizona	269	218	8	13.3%	924,317	10.5	247	396	2	406	3	9	149
Tennessee	377	305	8	13.7%	912,986	10.4	514	622	4	633	2	11	215
Missouri	427	337	7	14.0%	853,901	10.2	887	1,017	5	1,052	10	34	466
Minnesota	530	418	8	14.9%	826,323	10.1	777	878	4	913	14	35	461
Alabama	320	261	7	16.1%	784,826	10.0	522	637	11	686	22	48	175
Wisconsin	481	384	8	13.6%	784,527	10.3	694	769	5	774	1	4	340
Colorado	296	242	8	12.7%	699,782	10.8	381	514	8	528	0	12	103
Kentucky	354	287	7	15.5%	687,210	10.4	698	758	4	779	2	20	277
Louisiana	306	237	10	14.3%	667,860	10.4	431	510	7	533	9	23	104
Oklahoma	322	248	7	17.0%	664,484	10.0	557	646	7	688	16	42	267
South Carolina	278	223	8	11.8%	585,468	10.7	347	422	1	424	0	2	92
Iowa	486	357	7	17.9%	560,633	10.1	890	933	5	967	15	34	432
Massachusetts	517	422	10	8.1%	550,990	12.5	461	534	1	534	0	0	49
Utah	245	207	8	15.8%	481,661	10.6	246	284	3	289	1	5	94
Oregon	271	224	9	11.1%	453,315	10.7	355	414	1	427	1	7	98
Mississippi	250	193	8	14.6%	435,664	10.4	384	418	5	433	1	15	134
Arkansas	261	209	9	13.5%	403,713	10.3	553	587	6	604	4	17	197
Connecticut	284	228	8	10.5%	377,607	11.3	234	279	1	279	0	0	42
Kansas	341	261	8	12.1%	353,093	10.2	616	692	3	722	10	28	262
Hawaii	152	129	7	24.1%	343,173	10.1	82	93	2	102	4	9	24
Nevada	176	146	10	11.2%	326,665	11.0	92	168	1	168	0	0	36
Nebraska	308	241	7	15.5%	296,122	10.1	524	581	3	617	11	36	218
New Mexico	204	159	10	12.6%	264,088	10.6	327	361	1	368	1	6	108
West Virginia	277	224	8	14.3%	261,070	10.1	684	704	2	752	22	43	228
Idaho	199	170	8	11.3%	189,843	10.5	251	273	2	276	1	2	108
New Hampshire	226	197	8	13.3%	179,022	10.5	238	248	2	251	1	3	97
Montana	229	186	7	16.8%	175,221	10.3	348	361	2	379	2	17	138
Maine	240	198	9	12.4%	164,762	10.7	421	425	2	428	0	2	133
Delaware	159	137	9	15.2%	144,078	10.4	52	66	1	68	2	2	19
North Dakota	206	168	8	18.2%	136,601	9.9	367	381	3	395	4	13	192
Alaska	155	134	10	15.9%	116,994	9.2	218	235	2	237	0	1	179
South Dakota	217	174	10	12.2%	105,046	10.3	359	370	1	373	2	3	191
Rhode Island	157	139	9	8.5%	89,618	12.1	64	77	1	77	0	0	3
Vermont	197	170	8	13.8%	86,042	10.8	250	254	1	257	0	3	74
Wyoming	152	130	9	12.1%	70,269	10.3	164	171	1	183	2	12	48

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	California	147	126	8	15.6%	382,789	10.3	62	2	63	0	1	18
Houston	Texas	173	138	8	12.0%	382,553	10.8	96	1	96	0	0	24
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	10	12.9%	348,392	10.4	56	1	56	0	0	25
Miami	Florida	160	123	8	14.5%	271,876	10.9	55	1	56	0	1	14
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	12	9.6%	248,412	11.4	37	1	37	0	0	4
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	9	10.9%	193,047	10.2	59	1	59	0	0	29
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	8	19.2%	174,125	9.6	32	1	35	2	3	13
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	9	11.0%	173,619	11.2	47	1	47	0	0	7
Bronx	New York	118	103	12	12.0%	172,716	10.9	25	1	25	0	0	7
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	8	15.3%	166,154	10.1	51	1	51	0	0	28
Dallas	Texas	149	126	8	11.9%	165,803	10.6	48	1	48	0	0	11
Denver	Colorado	136	120	8	15.2%	164,992	10.6	38	3	40	0	2	12
San Diego	California	134	116	8	11.6%	156,486	10.8	36	1	36	0	0	6
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	10	10.1%	156,176	11.3	43	1	43	0	0	5
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	10	18.0%	152,248	10.7	30	2	31	1	1	5
New York City	New York	128	111	13	9.4%	151,784	11.6	47	1	47	0	0	5
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	9	10.4%	150,562	11.0	42	1	42	0	0	14
San Jose	California	129	116	8	13.9%	146,300	11.0	28	1	29	0	1	5
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	8	22.9%	144,540	10.0	22	3	26	0	4	7
Seattle	Washington	142	127	9	14.8%	141,770	10.1	35	1	36	0	1	23
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	9	15.1%	137,271	10.4	24	1	25	0	1	6
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	8	18.1%	123,461	10.0	39	2	44	0	5	13
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	8	16.7%	113,817	10.3	43	1	43	0	0	16
Orlando	Florida	133	115	12	11.3%	112,689	10.9	32	1	32	0	0	5
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	9	16.1%	112,068	10.3	26	1	27	0	1	9
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	6	36.9%	111,823	7.3	7	1	9	1	2	5
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	9	14.7%	111,731	10.1	32	1	32	0	0	13
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	9	12.0%	110,162	10.2	45	2	46	0	1	27
El Paso	Texas	122	110	10	13.9%	109,721	10.5	24	1	24	0	0	7
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	10	13.3%	107,999	10.4	29	1	29	0	0	11
Sacramento	California	134	115	8	13.3%	107,013	10.6	28	1	28	0	0	10
Austin	Texas	138	123	11	9.7%	105,085	11.2	44	1	44	0	0	16
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	10	12.5%	104,041	10.6	27	1	27	0	0	8
Garland	Texas	106	96	4	43.5%	103,599	7.8	5	2	7	1	2	2
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	10	11.8%	102,522	10.2	31	1	31	0	0	14
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	9	10.6%	101,153	10.5	37	1	37	0	0	16
San Francisco	California	121	106	10	11.5%	100,188	11.5	28	1	28	0	0	5
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	11	11.9%	95,692	10.6	45	1	46	0	1	7
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	12	10.1%	92,296	11.1	32	1	32	0	0	9
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	10	11.5%	91,593	10.5	30	1	30	0	0	14
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	8	20.4%	87,199	9.9	19	1	20	0	1	6
Tampa	Florida	131	110	10	10.8%	85,976	11.2	27	1	27	0	0	4
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	11	8.6%	84,767	11.5	39	1	39	0	0	6
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	11	12.6%	82,713	10.8	17	1	17	0	0	3
Bakersfield	California	112	102	12	14.6%	81,430	10.1	11	1	11	0	0	5
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	4	59.6%	79,139	4.3	3	2	5	1	2	3
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	12	10.3%	77,273	11.1	29	1	29	0	0	3
Portland	Oregon	130	112	11	8.4%	76,991	11.6	33	1	33	0	0	2
Spokane	Washington	113	104	9	21.2%	76,234	9.2	14	1	16	0	2	8
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	12	11.0%	75,332	11.0	28	1	28	0	0	9
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	9	15.7%	75,121	10.1	27	1	27	0	0	11
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	11	11.7%	74,782	10.5	25	1	25	0	0	6
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	10	12.7%	73,821	10.6	30	1	30	0	0	7
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	9	20.6%	66,946	10.0	10	1	11	0	1	3
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	10	15.8%	66,806	10.4	28	2	29	0	1	8
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	8	17.2%	66,388	10.3	17	1	17	0	0	8
Fresno	California	120	105	10	10.7%	64,237	10.8	18	1	18	0	0	3
Buffalo	New York	142	124	10	11.3%	63,677	10.7	28	1	28	0	0	6
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	9	22.7%	62,850	9.3	14	1	16	1	2	7
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	10	11.4%	62,828	10.7	31	1	31	0	0	7
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	12	11.7%	62,399	10.9	13	1	13	0	0	4
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	11	12.8%	62,225	11.1	19	1	19	0	0	5
Spring	Texas	114	103	8	15.9%	60,687	10.3	8	1	8	0	0	5
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	7	27.8%	59,787	8.5	10	1	12	1	2	4
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	11	11.6%	58,041	10.8	30	1	30	0	0	5
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	9	12.4%	56,845	10.4	22	1	22	0	0	8
Katy	Texas	112	102	12	16.0%	55,085	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Arlington	Texas	122	107	9	13.7%	54,353	10.3	12	1	12	0	0	6
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	14	9.3%	53,063	10.8	49	1	49	0	0	15
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	11	11.2%	52,706	11.1	9	1	9	0	0	2
Riverside	California	113	102	10	14.2%	52,669	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	2
Reno	Nevada	112	100	10	17.7%	52,655	10.1	12	1	12	0	0	5
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	9	17.8%	52,511	9.9	14	2	15	0	0	9
Rochester	New York	125	108	10	11.0%	52,058	10.9	24	1	24	0	0	6
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	9	23.3%	52,011	9.6	11	2	12	0	1	5
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	9	19.8%	50,787	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	11	17.4%	50,488	10.1	8	1	8	0	0	3
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	11	15.1%	50,457	10.6	20	1	21	0	1	6
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	9	15.7%	50,085	10.2	15	1	15	0	0	9
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	13	13.3%	48,919	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	1
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	8	23.7%	48,659	9.5	4	1	5	0	1	1
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	9	16.8%	48,656	10.1	22	1	23	1	1	10
Inglewood	California	124	112	6	36.2%	48,414	9.0	5	1	6	0	1	2
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	7	29.1%	47,577	8.5	4	2	5	0	1	2
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	12	12.8%	47,465	10.8	10	1	10	0	0	2
Staten Island	New York	120	105	12	9.8%	46,669	11.8	12	1	12	0	0	1
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	17	8.5%	46,247	11.7	15	1	15	0	0	1
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	11	11.1%	46,001	11.3	11	1	11	0	0	2
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	12	11.7%	45,796	10.5	15	1	15	0	0	3
Ogden	Utah	110	101	10	22.6%	45,462	9.0	5	1	6	0	1	5
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	9	20.8%	44,062	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Renton	Washington	112	100	8	28.0%	43,333	10.2	5	1	6	0	1	2
Plano	Texas	112	103	12	14.2%	43,251	10.1	7	1	8	0	1	2
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	12	11.7%	43,040	10.8	12	1	12	0	0	2
Oakland	California	115	102	14	10.4%	43,015	11.3	14	1	14	0	0	3
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	10	15.9%	42,837	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	4
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	9	12.0%	42,607	10.6	14	1	14	0	0	5
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	11	17.8%	42,509	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	3
Santa Ana	California	110	99	13	11.9%	42,482	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	1
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	12	13.1%	42,147	10.9	7	1	7	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	107	98	6	43.9%	41,228	6.5	2	1	3	0	1	2
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	14	9.2%	40,050	10.9	11	1	11	0	0	2
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	16	8.8%	39,632	11.1	12	1	12	0	0	3
Naples	Florida	125	111	9	12.6%	39,394	11.4	14	1	14	0	0	2
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	11	14.7%	39,360	10.3	13	1	13	0	0	5
Akron	Ohio	122	112	8	14.5%	39,274	10.6	17	1	17	0	0	5
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	13	9.3%	38,673	11.1	26	1	26	0	0	5
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	13	10.2%	38,624	11.2	18	1	18	0	0	3
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	10	12.9%	38,373	11.0	11	1	11	0	0	3
Long Beach	California	120	109	18	7.9%	37,934	11.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	12	11.9%	37,912	10.4	16	1	16	0	0	5
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	11	13.9%	37,840	9.8	18	1	20	0	2	6
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	13	12.4%	37,674	10.4	9	1	9	0	0	5
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	12	11.5%	37,593	11.1	18	1	18	0	0	3
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	10	10.1%	37,325	11.7	12	1	12	0	0	1
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	5	39.5%	36,642	7.0	5	1	7	1	2	5
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	9	23.4%	36,294	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Irvine	California	112	101	10	13.4%	35,849	10.9	9	1	9	0	0	2
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	13	10.0%	35,656	11.1	16	1	16	0	0	2
Bothell	Washington	110	98	7	27.6%	35,389	8.3	3	2	4	0	1	3
Stockton	California	122	108	13	9.3%	34,580	10.8	12	1	12	0	0	3
Flushing	New York	107	96	11	15.8%	33,965	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Orem	Utah	104	96	8	33.8%	33,956	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	11	15.2%	33,442	10.5	10	1	10	0	0	3
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	13	13.7%	33,168	10.0	10	1	10	0	0	6
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	14	11.8%	33,039	11.6	9	1	9	0	0	1
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	8	25.5%	32,835	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Warren	Michigan	115	103	7	24.1%	32,625	9.0	5	1	6	0	1	2
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	12	9.5%	32,610	11.0	14	1	14	0	0	2
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	9	15.6%	32,410	10.1	15	1	15	0	0	6
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	11	12.6%	31,865	10.6	10	1	10	0	0	3
Norwalk	California	99	91	8	30.0%	31,766	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	9	18.7%	31,730	9.3	9	2	10	1	1	5
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	14	10.2%	31,493	10.9	15	1	15	0	0	1
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	12	14.1%	31,462	10.4	12	1	12	0	0	3
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	11	12.8%	31,335	10.7	14	1	14	0	0	3
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	12	12.8%	31,250	9.9	12	1	12	0	0	8
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	15	9.4%	30,737	11.7	9	1	9	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	8	30.0%	30,730	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	10	21.0%	30,667	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	12	11.7%	30,634	10.9	7	1	7	0	0	3
Denton	Texas	110	101	11	19.3%	30,518	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	3
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	11	12.0%	29,963	10.7	13	1	13	0	0	4
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	12	19.2%	29,871	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	15	12.2%	29,808	11.1	8	1	8	0	0	1
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	11	21.7%	29,803	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Jamaica	New York	112	100	11	12.0%	29,224	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	3
Midland	Texas	113	102	11	18.2%	29,124	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
La Puente	California	105	96	8	24.5%	28,936	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	9	17.1%	28,617	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
South Gate	California	99	90	8	30.0%	28,531	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	10	16.4%	28,486	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	2
San Bernardino	California	113	103	10	11.3%	28,252	10.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Salem	Oregon	110	101	13	10.6%	28,212	10.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Anaheim	California	114	102	16	7.6%	28,175	12.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	12	12.2%	28,034	10.4	14	1	14	0	0	3
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	13	8.6%	27,972	11.5	11	1	11	0	0	1
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	11	16.8%	27,936	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	11	12.7%	27,879	10.6	9	1	9	0	0	2
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	12	10.8%	27,741	11.6	9	1	9	0	0	1
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	8	22.3%	27,274	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Odessa	Texas	112	103	10	17.0%	27,141	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	2
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	9	22.1%	27,125	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Humble	Texas	108	98	11	15.9%	26,461	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	8	20.4%	26,208	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	2
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	9	18.1%	26,115	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Modesto	California	111	101	11	9.8%	25,827	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	3
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	14	11.6%	25,798	10.9	9	1	9	0	0	2
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	11	18.1%	25,787	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	2
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	9	24.5%	25,730	9.2	6	1	7	0	1	4
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	13	11.1%	25,629	10.4	7	1	7	0	0	2
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	11	20.7%	25,541	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Vallejo	California	107	98	9	20.5%	25,491	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	13	8.8%	25,464	11.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	122	109	9	24.1%	25,391	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	17	8.3%	25,180	11.8	8	1	8	0	0	0
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	12	10.4%	24,842	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	1
Visalia	California	108	99	11	16.3%	24,814	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Murrieta	California	106	96	9	18.7%	24,685	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Laredo	Texas	126	110	14	9.1%	24,599	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	2
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	11	12.9%	24,448	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	12	8.4%	24,321	11.5	10	1	10	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	9	23.6%	24,255	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Canton	Ohio	117	105	10	16.4%	24,132	10.2	12	1	13	0	1	3
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	8	21.9%	23,726	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fullerton	California	106	97	8	17.0%	23,648	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	12	13.2%	23,638	10.9	7	1	7	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	9	24.0%	23,601	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	15	10.8%	23,600	10.9	12	1	12	0	0	3
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	13	14.6%	23,001	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	9	16.9%	22,971	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	1
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	13	11.7%	22,932	10.7	11	1	11	0	0	3
Ocala	Florida	118	107	15	10.2%	22,855	11.0	11	1	11	0	0	2
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	13	14.2%	22,847	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Corona	California	111	98	13	8.9%	22,828	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	2
Boise	Idaho	111	100	12	8.9%	22,775	11.2	9	1	9	0	0	2
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	10	12.4%	22,675	10.5	13	1	13	0	0	5
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	15	8.9%	22,341	11.1	11	1	11	0	0	1
Waco	Texas	112	100	9	14.1%	22,297	10.9	9	1	9	0	0	1
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	12	16.5%	22,292	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	10	18.5%	22,289	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Schenectady	New York	113	101	13	13.7%	22,248	10.3	8	1	8	0	0	3
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	17	8.4%	22,246	11.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	108	98	11	14.5%	22,170	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	10	22.2%	22,071	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Everett	Washington	112	100	12	13.2%	22,062	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Irving	Texas	111	102	16	9.2%	22,040	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	1
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	13	10.5%	21,985	10.8	13	1	13	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	11	22.3%	21,935	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	10	18.3%	21,871	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	11	12.3%	21,770	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Olympia	Washington	110	98	13	11.9%	21,691	11.8	6	1	6	0	0	1
Albany	New York	117	102	9	14.3%	21,632	10.5	11	1	11	0	0	4
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	13	13.6%	21,473	10.0	7	1	7	0	0	3
Missoula	Montana	111	102	8	22.1%	21,451	9.4	5	1	6	0	1	1
Chula Vista	California	109	100	12	8.1%	21,189	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	11	15.8%	21,061	9.3	6	1	6	0	0	4
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	10	21.7%	20,930	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Billings	Montana	106	98	10	15.2%	20,896	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	10	14.0%	20,840	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	4
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	11	12.0%	20,506	10.7	11	1	11	0	0	1
Pasadena	California	113	103	13	12.9%	20,274	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	2
Pearland	Texas	104	96	10	14.7%	20,163	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	12	13.9%	20,146	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Syracuse	New York	119	107	14	8.8%	20,043	11.1	15	1	15	0	0	3
Van Nuys	California	105	95	11	11.3%	20,006	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	10	20.1%	19,812	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	12	14.9%	19,688	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	10	20.3%	19,623	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Astoria	New York	111	100	13	13.6%	19,440	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	13	10.7%	19,421	10.8	9	1	9	0	0	4
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	11	20.8%	19,414	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	12	8.2%	19,216	11.9	7	1	7	0	0	1
Fontana	California	109	98	13	8.2%	19,194	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	13	13.4%	19,077	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	2
Fremont	California	107	98	12	8.2%	19,066	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	9	18.0%	18,889	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Oxnard	California	107	98	10	8.6%	18,886	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	11	17.9%	18,843	9.8	6	1	7	0	1	1
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	12	9.2%	18,732	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	1
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	10	17.2%	18,683	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	California	108	97	11	16.8%	18,629	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Oceanside	California	106	96	11	9.3%	18,562	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	11	9.0%	18,492	11.8	8	1	8	0	0	1
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	9	12.1%	18,435	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	13	8.5%	18,426	11.3	6	1	6	0	0	1
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	11	15.9%	18,367	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	13	13.1%	18,211	10.2	6	1	6	0	0	3
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	14	9.0%	18,147	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	102	93	9	19.2%	18,073	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	12	12.3%	18,006	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	12	14.4%	17,976	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	13	8.7%	17,975	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	15	8.7%	17,843	11.1	8	1	8	0	0	2
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	12	14.5%	17,797	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	11	17.9%	17,713	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	3
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	11	15.9%	17,659	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Roseville	California	106	95	9	12.6%	17,644	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	13	9.6%	17,630	11.6	9	1	9	0	0	1
Panama City	Florida	107	99	11	13.9%	17,578	9.2	6	1	7	0	1	2
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	16	8.6%	17,480	11.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	13	8.7%	17,433	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	14	9.0%	17,432	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	11	15.1%	17,414	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	19	11.2%	17,392	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	10	16.9%	17,267	9.8	6	1	6	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	117	107	8	18.0%	17,227	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	11	15.4%	17,210	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	15	9.5%	17,195	10.2	9	1	9	0	0	4
Conroe	Texas	111	101	14	10.7%	17,189	11.3	7	1	7	0	0	1
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	10	17.4%	17,166	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Hayward	California	108	98	10	8.9%	17,141	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	12	9.3%	17,076	10.7	7	1	7	0	0	2
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	11	9.0%	17,027	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Whittier	California	108	98	12	8.7%	17,016	11.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	16	9.2%	16,952	10.8	9	1	9	0	0	3
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	18	8.1%	16,922	11.7	10	1	10	0	0	1
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	10	17.5%	16,920	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Salinas	California	106	96	12	9.0%	16,899	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	12	8.4%	16,871	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	11	13.8%	16,815	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	14	9.1%	16,640	11.0	9	1	9	0	0	3
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	16	8.4%	16,620	11.6	10	1	10	0	0	0
Lancaster	California	105	96	10	9.0%	16,598	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	12	9.4%	16,584	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	12	8.8%	16,556	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	14	9.6%	16,553	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	14	8.0%	16,537	11.8	11	1	11	0	0	0
Homestead	Florida	111	99	13	8.8%	16,467	11.1	7	1	7	0	0	1
Mission	Texas	105	95	11	9.0%	16,298	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Elk Grove	California	109	96	12	9.1%	16,281	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Escondido	California	104	94	9	9.0%	16,169	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ontario	California	109	98	13	9.0%	15,898	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	11	9.4%	15,863	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	11	12.1%	15,825	11.3	6	1	6	0	0	1
Garden Grove	California	110	97	12	9.0%	15,818	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	14	8.5%	15,751	11.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	11	9.3%	15,748	10.1	10	1	11	0	1	5
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	11	14.1%	15,671	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
El Cajon	California	109	97	12	9.0%	15,522	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	13	9.0%	15,483	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	15	9.4%	15,467	10.7	7	1	7	0	0	2
Tyler	Texas	115	104	13	9.7%	15,122	10.7	9	1	9	0	0	3
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	19	7.8%	15,079	12.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Macon	Georgia	118	108	15	9.2%	15,076	10.9	9	1	9	0	0	1
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	10	15.7%	14,954	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Abilene	Texas	111	102	13	11.5%	14,952	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	2
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	13	9.1%	14,938	10.9	7	1	7	0	0	1
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	11	7.8%	14,920	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Palmdale	California	106	97	12	8.5%	14,908	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	12	8.2%	14,853	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	17	8.0%	14,832	12.0	9	1	9	0	0	1
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	16	8.1%	14,671	11.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	12	11.9%	14,646	11.5	6	1	6	0	0	1
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	9	15.4%	14,625	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Yonkers	New York	109	99	14	8.1%	14,622	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Kent	Washington	113	102	11	9.1%	14,559	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	15	8.9%	14,555	10.7	18	1	18	0	0	9
Frisco	Texas	105	95	13	8.4%	14,494	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	12	8.2%	14,464	11.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	12	8.7%	14,435	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Torrance	California	113	103	15	8.0%	14,230	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Pomona	California	107	97	10	9.0%	14,219	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	10	9.5%	14,016	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	14	9.6%	13,934	10.6	8	1	8	0	0	3
Flint	Michigan	117	105	15	9.0%	13,931	10.9	7	1	7	0	0	2
Killeen	Texas	110	101	14	9.2%	13,822	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	10	13.4%	13,809	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	12	11.9%	13,767	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	12	8.1%	13,738	12.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	16	10.3%	13,643	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	11	14.2%	13,563	10.4	7	1	7	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	10	13.8%	13,454	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	12	11.5%	13,435	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	1
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	15	7.7%	13,412	12.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	14	9.1%	13,362	11.0	10	1	10	0	0	5
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	13	9.4%	13,303	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Orange	California	111	100	16	9.2%	13,288	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	9	13.8%	13,171	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	11	9.0%	13,168	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Tracy	California	106	96	9	11.2%	13,106	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	9	9.0%	13,104	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Auburn	Washington	112	101	13	11.6%	13,057	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Champaign	Illinois	110	98	10	13.8%	13,014	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	14	8.6%	13,007	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Santa Maria	California	106	97	12	9.1%	13,001	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	13	8.3%	12,978	11.6	12	1	12	0	0	0
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	13	9.6%	12,968	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Largo	Florida	113	105	14	12.0%	12,903	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Cypress	Texas	108	101	13	7.4%	12,704	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
San Mateo	California	106	97	12	8.9%	12,668	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Sandy	Utah	111	103	13	11.3%	12,524	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	10	9.0%	12,505	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	14	8.5%	12,349	11.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Victorville	California	105	95	10	9.0%	12,268	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	10	10.3%	12,228	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	15	8.0%	12,178	12.1	14	1	14	0	0	0
Hemet	California	105	95	9	9.4%	12,080	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Compton	California	106	98	12	8.6%	11,962	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	13	9.0%	11,922	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	13	9.1%	11,906	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	13	9.1%	11,895	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	15	9.1%	11,868	10.7	7	1	7	0	0	2
Independence	Missouri	112	103	14	9.5%	11,773	10.5	8	1	8	0	0	4
Concord	California	107	98	12	9.0%	11,720	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	11	12.0%	11,712	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Temecula	California	109	99	10	9.0%	11,692	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	11	9.0%	11,626	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	14	8.5%	11,604	11.7	7	1	7	0	0	1
Athens	Georgia	115	106	13	9.3%	11,593	11.3	6	1	6	0	0	1
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	13	9.9%	11,557	10.5	11	1	11	0	0	7
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	10	8.2%	11,535	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	14	9.4%	11,492	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	10	10.0%	11,407	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	13	7.9%	11,384	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	12	8.7%	11,349	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	10	9.2%	11,289	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	13	10.0%	11,288	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	14	6.9%	11,176	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	107	97	10	8.8%	11,054	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	102	93	7	9.7%	11,023	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	13	9.5%	10,988	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	107	96	13	11.3%	10,956	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	11	8.4%	10,943	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	11	8.6%	10,940	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	11	8.3%	10,681	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Perris	California	106	96	11	9.0%	10,565	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	11	8.4%	10,501	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	12	8.5%	10,494	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Vista	California	106	97	11	8.8%	10,494	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	108	99	11	9.0%	10,487	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	12	9.0%	10,472	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Keller	Texas	108	99	12	9.0%	10,445	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	14	7.8%	10,441	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	11	9.0%	10,431	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	107	98	12	8.5%	10,413	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	12	8.7%	10,359	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	12	8.2%	10,326	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Clovis	California	106	97	14	8.5%	10,310	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	10	9.0%	10,238	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	110	99	14	8.0%	10,219	12.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	13	8.4%	10,174	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	12	7.9%	10,161	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	14	8.8%	10,158	11.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Menifee	California	108	98	10	9.2%	10,122	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	10	7.8%	10,114	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	109	99	10	8.2%	10,050	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Riverview	Florida	104	96	13	9.0%	10,020	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	102	94	9	9.0%	10,014	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	11	9.0%	9,922	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	13	9.3%	9,914	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Simi Valley	California	101	92	10	7.7%	9,885	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Richardson	Texas	109	101	12	8.6%	9,842	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Carlsbad	California	109	96	12	8.6%	9,825	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	10	9.0%	9,812	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	12	8.8%	9,811	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	11	8.7%	9,797	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ventura	California	104	95	9	8.4%	9,773	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	11	7.9%	9,747	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Yakima	Washington	109	100	14	7.5%	9,745	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	11	9.9%	9,721	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Napa	California	101	92	10	10.0%	9,667	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	11	10.0%	9,646	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	108	10	9.0%	9,621	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	9	9.0%	9,605	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	13	9.0%	9,557	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	100	90	9	9.0%	9,522	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	9	9.5%	9,516	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
West Covina	California	111	100	16	8.7%	9,503	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	105	95	11	10.0%	9,467	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	10	8.4%	9,466	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	105	95	14	8.1%	9,290	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Madera	California	105	94	11	9.0%	9,280	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Merced	California	108	100	11	9.0%	9,275	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	9	8.5%	9,272	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	114	105	14	9.6%	9,246	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	12	9.0%	9,195	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Baytown	Texas	108	98	13	7.8%	9,186	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Redding	California	110	99	10	8.1%	9,149	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	11	9.0%	9,069	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	11	9.0%	9,042	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	10	9.6%	8,993	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	12	9.0%	8,971	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	12	8.6%	8,930	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	12	9.0%	8,922	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	102	94	10	9.0%	8,919	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	12	8.8%	8,894	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	11	8.7%	8,858	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Burbank	California	109	100	13	8.2%	8,836	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	14	9.3%	8,769	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Downey	California	100	91	10	7.8%	8,754	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	13	9.0%	8,751	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	101	92	10	8.3%	8,732	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hawthorne	California	101	90	10	9.0%	8,715	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	11	9.0%	8,709	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	100	94	9	9.0%	8,684	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	13	8.1%	8,657	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hesperia	California	105	94	10	8.3%	8,653	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Pittsburg	California	98	90	8	9.0%	8,647	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	13	7.8%	8,645	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Chico	California	105	96	10	7.7%	8,628	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	10	8.6%	8,626	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	12	8.7%	8,608	11.3	8	1	8	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	14	8.6%	8,585	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	11	9.0%	8,576	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	9	8.9%	8,494	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	11	9.0%	8,457	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	14	7.7%	8,407	12.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	13	8.8%	8,363	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	2
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	15	8.8%	8,359	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	14	8.7%	8,345	11.1	8	1	8	0	0	1
Covington	Georgia	107	98	11	9.0%	8,342	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	105	95	10	8.5%	8,322	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	12	8.7%	8,295	10.8	6	1	6	0	0	3
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	8	8.9%	8,274	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Milton	Florida	108	99	13	8.7%	8,219	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	108	96	13	8.2%	8,200	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Antioch	California	107	99	11	7.4%	8,188	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	15	7.6%	8,169	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Daly City	California	103	94	10	7.1%	8,162	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Livermore	California	105	95	10	8.5%	8,158	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	12	8.2%	8,077	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	12	8.1%	8,050	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	12	7.7%	8,046	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	13	7.9%	8,028	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	105	96	10	8.3%	7,865	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Parker	Colorado	108	100	14	7.7%	7,687	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	13	7.4%	7,635	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
El Monte	California	103	94	12	8.0%	7,530	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	107	98	13	7.5%	7,500	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	13	7.8%	7,339	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	12	7.7%	7,309	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	13	7.1%	7,260	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	15	7.6%	7,189	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	13	7.3%	7,171	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	106	98	12	7.5%	7,024	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Rialto	California	106	97	13	6.6%	6,982	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chino	California	105	96	11	7.1%	6,691	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Indio	California	103	94	11	6.7%	6,419	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	13	6.7%	6,385	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	8	15.6%	382,789	10.3	62	2	63	1	18
San Diego	134	116	8	11.6%	156,486	10.8	36	1	36	0	6
San Jose	129	116	8	13.9%	146,300	11.0	28	1	29	1	5
Sacramento	134	115	8	13.3%	107,013	10.6	28	1	28	0	10
San Francisco	121	106	10	11.5%	100,188	11.5	28	1	28	0	5
Bakersfield	112	102	12	14.6%	81,430	10.1	11	1	11	0	5
Fresno	120	105	10	10.7%	64,237	10.8	18	1	18	0	3
Riverside	113	102	10	14.2%	52,669	10.6	7	1	7	0	2
Moreno Valley	109	99	8	23.7%	48,659	9.5	4	1	5	1	1
Inglewood	124	112	6	36.2%	48,414	9.0	5	1	6	1	2
Oakland	115	102	14	10.4%	43,015	11.3	14	1	14	0	3
Santa Ana	110	99	13	11.9%	42,482	10.7	6	1	6	0	1
Long Beach	120	109	18	7.9%	37,934	11.8	12	1	12	0	0
Irvine	112	101	10	13.4%	35,849	10.9	9	1	9	0	2
Stockton	122	108	13	9.3%	34,580	10.8	12	1	12	0	3
Norwalk	99	91	8	30.0%	31,766	8.0	1	1	1	0	1
Bell Gardens	99	90	8	30.0%	30,730	8.0	1	1	1	0	1
La Puente	105	96	8	24.5%	28,936	9.5	2	1	2	0	1
South Gate	99	90	8	30.0%	28,531	8.0	1	1	1	0	1
San Bernardino	113	103	10	11.3%	28,252	10.7	7	1	7	0	1
Anaheim	114	102	16	7.6%	28,175	12.4	7	1	7	0	0
Modesto	111	101	11	9.8%	25,827	10.6	7	1	7	0	3
Vallejo	107	98	9	20.5%	25,491	9.5	4	1	4	0	2
Visalia	108	99	11	16.3%	24,814	10.0	3	1	3	0	1
Murrieta	106	96	9	18.7%	24,685	10.0	2	1	2	0	1
Fullerton	106	97	8	17.0%	23,648	10.3	4	1	4	0	1
Mission Viejo	105	95	9	24.0%	23,601	9.0	2	1	2	0	1
Corona	111	98	13	8.9%	22,828	11.0	5	1	5	0	2
North Hollywood	108	98	11	14.5%	22,170	11.3	4	1	4	0	1
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	11	12.3%	21,770	11.5	4	1	4	0	1
Chula Vista	109	100	12	8.1%	21,189	12.0	5	1	5	0	0
Pasadena	113	103	13	12.9%	20,274	10.5	6	1	6	0	2
Van Nuys	105	95	11	11.3%	20,006	10.8	4	1	4	0	1
Fontana	109	98	13	8.2%	19,194	11.7	3	1	3	0	0
Fremont	107	98	12	8.2%	19,066	11.8	4	1	4	0	1
Oxnard	107	98	10	8.6%	18,886	11.5	4	1	4	0	0
San Leandro	108	97	11	16.8%	18,629	10.0	3	1	3	0	1
Oceanside	106	96	11	9.3%	18,562	10.8	4	1	4	0	1
Sunnyvale	107	98	9	12.1%	18,435	10.3	4	1	4	0	1
Santa Rosa	112	100	13	8.5%	18,426	11.3	6	1	6	0	1
Roseville	106	95	9	12.6%	17,644	11.0	3	1	3	0	1
Huntington Beach	111	99	13	8.7%	17,433	11.3	4	1	4	0	0
Hayward	108	98	10	8.9%	17,141	11.3	4	1	4	0	0
Whittier	108	98	12	8.7%	17,016	11.5	6	1	6	0	0
Salinas	106	96	12	9.0%	16,899	11.0	5	1	5	0	1
Lancaster	105	96	10	9.0%	16,598	11.0	3	1	3	0	0
Elk Grove	109	96	12	9.1%	16,281	11.0	3	1	3	0	1
Escondido	104	94	9	9.0%	16,169	11.0	4	1	4	0	0
Ontario	109	98	13	9.0%	15,898	11.0	3	1	3	0	0
Garden Grove	110	97	12	9.0%	15,818	11.0	5	1	5	0	0
El Cajon	109	97	12	9.0%	15,522	11.0	3	1	3	0	0
Palmdale	106	97	12	8.5%	14,908	11.5	4	1	4	0	0
Torrance	113	103	15	8.0%	14,230	12.0	5	1	5	0	0
Pomona	107	97	10	9.0%	14,219	11.0	3	1	3	0	0
Orange	111	100	16	9.2%	13,288	11.0	5	1	5	0	1
Tracy	106	96	9	11.2%	13,106	10.8	4	1	4	0	1
Santa Maria	106	97	12	9.1%	13,001	11.0	3	1	3	0	1
San Mateo	106	97	12	8.9%	12,668	11.3	4	1	4	0	1
Victorville	105	95	10	9.0%	12,268	11.0	3	1	3	0	0
Hemet	105	95	9	9.4%	12,080	10.7	3	1	3	0	1
Compton	106	98	12	8.6%	11,962	11.3	3	1	3	0	0
Concord	107	98	12	9.0%	11,720	11.0	4	1	4	0	0
Temecula	109	99	10	9.0%	11,692	11.0	3	1	3	0	0
Santa Barbara	111	99	14	8.5%	11,604	11.7	7	1	7	0	1
Santa Clara	107	97	10	8.8%	11,054	11.3	4	1	4	0	0
Fairfield	102	93	7	9.7%	11,023	10.5	2	1	2	0	1
Palo Alto	107	96	13	11.3%	10,956	11.0	4	1	4	0	2
Perris	106	96	11	9.0%	10,565	11.0	2	1	2	0	0
Vista	106	97	11	8.8%	10,494	11.3	3	1	3	0	0
Clovis	106	97	14	8.5%	10,310	11.3	3	1	3	0	1
Costa Mesa	104	95	10	9.0%	10,238	11.0	2	1	2	0	0
Berkeley	110	99	14	8.0%	10,219	12.1	9	1	9	0	0
Menifee	108	98	10	9.2%	10,122	10.8	4	1	4	0	1
Simi Valley	101	92	10	7.7%	9,885	12.5	2	1	2	0	0
Carlsbad	109	96	12	8.6%	9,825	11.5	4	1	4	0	0
Ventura	104	95	9	8.4%	9,773	11.7	3	1	3	0	0
Napa	101	92	10	10.0%	9,667	10.0	2	1	2	0	2
Pacoima	100	90	9	9.0%	9,522	11.0	1	1	1	0	0
West Covina	111	100	16	8.7%	9,503	11.3	3	1	3	0	0
Redwood City	105	95	14	8.1%	9,290	11.5	4	1	4	0	1
Madera	105	94	11	9.0%	9,280	11.7	3	1	3	0	1
Merced	108	100	11	9.0%	9,275	11.0	3	1	3	0	0
Redding	110	99	10	8.1%	9,149	11.8	4	1	4	0	0
Burbank	109	100	13	8.2%	8,836	12.0	5	1	5	0	0
Downey	100	91	10	7.8%	8,754	12.3	3	1	3	0	0
Vacaville	101	92	10	8.3%	8,732	12.0	2	1	2	0	0
Hawthorne	101	90	10	9.0%	8,715	11.0	1	1	1	0	0
Sylmar	100	94	9	9.0%	8,684	11.0	1	1	1	0	0
Hesperia	105	94	10	8.3%	8,653	12.5	2	1	2	0	0
Pittsburg	98	90	8	9.0%	8,647	11.0	1	1	1	0	0
Chico	105	96	10	7.7%	8,628	12.3	3	1	3	0	0
Antioch	107	99	11	7.4%	8,188	12.5	2	1	2	0	0
Daly City	103	94	10	7.1%	8,162	13.0	2	1	2	0	0
Livermore	105	95	10	8.5%	8,158	11.5	2	1	2	0	0
Santa Cruz	106	95	12	7.7%	8,046	11.5	4	1	4	0	1
Santa Monica	105	96	10	8.3%	7,865	11.8	5	1	5	0	0
El Monte	103	94	12	8.0%	7,530	12.5	2	1	2	0	0
San Marcos	107	98	13	7.5%	7,500	12.5	2	1	2	0	0
Rialto	106	97	13	6.6%	6,982	12.5	2	1	2	0	0
Chino	105	96	11	7.1%	6,691	12.0	2	1	2	0	0
Indio	103	94	11	6.7%	6,419	13.5	2	1	2	0	0

Los Angeles

ZIP	statefarm.com	allstate.com	nationwide.com	geico.com	esurance.com	farmers.com
90011	8	1	2	4	3	5
90003	13	4	5	6	7	8
90023	11	4	5	6	8	7
90014	8	1	2	3	4	5
90012	12	4	5	6	7	8
90010	11	4	5	6	7	8
90063	11	4	5	6	8	7
90061	8	1	2	3	5	4
90065	11	4	5	6	7	8
90034	11	4	5	6	7	8
90032	11	4	5	6	8	7
90043	11	4	5	6	8	7
90041	8	1	2	3	5	4
90001	11	4	5	6	8	7
90021	8	1	2	3	4	5
90035	11	4	5	6	7	8
90045	2	4	5	6	7	8
90036	11	4	5	6	7	8
90005	11	4	5	6	7	8
90066	8	1	2	3	4	5
90026	8	1	2	3	4	5
90067	8	1	2	3	4	5
90057	8	1	2	3	4	5
90013	11	4	5	6	7	8
90044	12	4	5	6	7	8
90017	11	4	5	7	6	8
90040	12	4	5	7	6	8
90004	12	4	5	6	7	8
90031	11	4	5	6	8	7
90022	8	1	2	3	4	5
90062	8	1	2	3	5	4
90029	8	1	2	3	5	4
90028	11	4	5	6	7	8
90018	11	4	5	6	8	7
90038	11	4	5	6	7	8
90049	11	4	5	6	7	8
90048	11	4	5	7	8	6
90008	11	4	5	7	6	8
90089	8	1	2	3	4	5
90059	11	4	5	6	7	8
90019	11	4	5	6	7	8
90039	11	1	2	4	3	5
90027	11	4	5	6	8	7
90058	11	4	5	7	6	8
90007	11	4	5	6	7	8
90047	8	1	2	3	4	5
90077	11	4	5	8	6	7
90025	11	4	5	6	7	8
90015	11	4	5	6	7	8
90046	11	4	5	6	7	8
90056	11	4	5	6	7	8
90016	11	4	5	6	7	8
90037	12	4	5	6	7	10
90064	13	4	5	6	7	8
90068	11	4	5	6	7	8
90006	9	1	2	4	3	6
90020	11	4	5	6	7	8
90024	12	4	5	6	7	8
90033	12	4	5	7	6	8
90073	11	4	5	6	7	8
90002	8	1	2	3	4	5
90042	10	4	5	6	7	11

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Statefarm

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Statefarm Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Statefarm Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Statefarm Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Statefarm Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly