Selfstorage Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve selfstorage.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 19,302 Storage Facilities In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Selfstorage Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Selfstorage Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Selfstorage Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Selfstorage Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	52,582	19,302	2	65.6%	211,826,756	5.8	27,370	32,642	6,924	36,574	2,174	10,940	32,630
California	5,567	2,633	3	63.6%	24,907,430	5.8	1,165	1,739	484	1,852	21	432	1,662
Texas	5,556	2,671	2	65.0%	18,131,600	5.4	1,360	1,917	370	2,035	151	613	1,838
Florida	3,721	1,757	2	64.3%	13,238,835	4.8	446	975	274	1,035	71	373	974
New York	4,680	2,004	2	62.6%	12,285,776	5.7	1,491	1,756	451	2,057	130	540	1,906
Pennsylvania	4,055	1,997	2	69.2%	8,849,854	5.6	1,604	1,781	358	2,088	131	583	1,909
Ohio	3,332	1,730	2	75.3%	8,760,139	4.3	976	1,188	341	1,365	181	567	1,337
Illinois	4,141	1,909	3	62.1%	7,963,201	5.0	1,247	1,381	400	1,582	111	531	1,510
North Carolina	3,057	1,599	2	76.3%	7,746,361	4.7	683	802	239	910	98	380	833
Georgia	3,168	1,580	2	68.4%	7,048,528	4.8	574	726	217	810	34	305	772
Michigan	3,700	1,642	2	66.0%	6,572,172	5.8	833	975	296	1,088	61	343	994
Virginia	3,324	1,453	2	66.3%	5,580,216	5.4	723	891	200	1,014	30	316	945
New Jersey	2,354	1,165	2	57.6%	5,119,307	6.6	537	593	240	676	19	158	558
Tennessee	2,540	1,401	2	74.6%	4,953,641	4.7	514	622	164	706	59	300	652
Indiana	3,615	2,103	2	72.5%	4,813,303	5.2	657	768	181	831	79	327	759
Arizona	2,152	1,101	2	68.2%	4,739,122	6.1	246	395	64	418	52	120	372
Washington	3,050	1,463	2	61.7%	4,489,884	6.2	451	587	161	641	10	154	552
Massachusetts	2,620	1,200	2	59.5%	4,064,391	5.8	461	533	225	614	23	154	563
Colorado	2,653	1,355	2	69.8%	3,863,179	6.1	381	514	89	541	31	165	470
Wisconsin	3,029	1,559	2	66.0%	3,812,383	6.2	693	768	178	853	43	237	746
Missouri	3,647	1,714	2	62.0%	3,776,241	5.6	886	1,016	188	1,238	61	356	1,119
Alabama	2,912	1,406	2	76.4%	3,714,796	4.5	522	637	162	717	53	327	677
Maryland	2,500	1,118	2	61.5%	3,691,936	5.9	392	463	127	525	33	143	444
South Carolina	2,398	1,177	2	74.1%	3,672,591	4.7	347	422	121	475	24	202	448
Louisiana	2,332	1,083	2	72.2%	3,368,609	5.0	431	510	98	558	25	242	529
Minnesota	3,907	1,471	3	58.1%	3,212,713	6.9	777	878	187	1,003	24	216	865
Kentucky	2,930	1,349	2	71.5%	3,177,187	5.7	698	758	111	892	94	245	799
Oklahoma	2,561	1,233	2	73.1%	2,865,221	5.4	557	646	81	709	38	317	595
Oregon	2,658	1,468	2	65.1%	2,658,395	6.6	355	414	84	442	37	115	355
Connecticut	1,768	917	2	64.5%	2,310,367	5.8	234	279	119	314	16	89	281
Utah	1,800	1,018	2	69.1%	2,103,057	6.2	246	284	66	299	5	79	253
Arkansas	2,411	1,156	2	68.2%	2,040,881	6.0	553	587	100	666	44	182	602
Nevada	1,267	682	3	69.3%	2,026,843	4.7	92	168	26	183	9	40	181
Mississippi	2,642	1,107	2	65.5%	1,958,804	5.6	384	418	91	459	16	152	414
Kansas	3,118	1,277	2	64.6%	1,880,145	5.4	616	692	85	755	31	252	705
Iowa	3,202	1,301	3	46.2%	1,447,968	7.6	889	932	98	1,041	24	167	856
New Mexico	1,999	905	2	67.9%	1,419,449	6.6	326	360	34	392	22	154	328
Nebraska	2,472	1,092	2	62.7%	1,194,985	7.1	524	581	32	667	4	164	513
West Virginia	2,454	1,096	2	62.3%	1,140,099	6.7	684	704	69	854	67	194	680
Idaho	1,684	942	2	56.9%	959,239	8.0	251	273	39	296	30	65	214
New Hampshire	1,696	846	2	61.0%	820,064	6.7	238	248	80	293	11	61	250
Rhode Island	805	481	2	74.9%	791,325	4.5	64	77	29	86	8	34	79
Maine	2,378	1,332	3	52.0%	693,192	7.7	421	425	64	471	21	70	372
Delaware	892	608	2	71.7%	680,869	4.1	52	66	33	75	7	32	71
Hawaii	1,038	482	6	41.1%	584,584	8.6	82	93	11	96	0	1	69
North Dakota	1,861	736	2	71.2%	534,879	5.0	367	381	22	449	102	196	416
Montana	2,086	985	3	48.3%	503,423	7.3	348	361	27	382	10	101	311
Alaska	1,743	673	3	59.4%	438,409	6.7	218	235	16	240	2	48	207
Wyoming	1,476	777	3	48.7%	283,658	8.0	164	171	20	181	7	24	142
South Dakota	1,777	802	5	26.7%	230,473	12.2	358	369	13	385	12	38	235
Vermont	1,560	750	5	29.9%	186,731	8.1	250	254	15	286	2	12	239

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	773	494	5	56.2%	1,792,514	5.3	96	1	96	0	0	96
Los Angeles	California	525	371	4	68.2%	1,674,716	4.3	62	4	65	0	1	64
Brooklyn	New York	337	242	5	57.1%	1,484,352	5.3	37	1	37	0	0	37
Chicago	Illinois	581	358	6	46.5%	1,256,777	6.2	56	1	56	0	0	56
San Antonio	Texas	572	380	5	61.0%	1,085,301	4.9	59	1	59	0	0	59
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	411	304	3	68.6%	1,080,600	4.1	47	3	48	0	29	48
Las Vegas	Nevada	434	296	4	69.3%	1,071,246	4.1	43	1	43	0	3	43
San Diego	California	345	253	4	68.2%	918,309	4.1	36	2	36	1	2	36
New York City	New York	286	217	5	56.2%	911,650	5.4	47	2	90	0	0	90
Phoenix	Arizona	417	302	4	61.4%	890,409	5.1	42	1	42	0	0	42
Miami	Florida	628	381	6	47.2%	887,776	6.3	55	10	56	0	2	55
Tucson	Arizona	346	270	1	95.4%	863,237	1.4	32	2	32	27	29	32
San Jose	California	347	258	3	77.2%	810,582	3.4	28	1	28	0	24	28
Dallas	Texas	511	358	5	57.4%	799,311	5.3	48	2	48	0	1	48
Jacksonville	Florida	408	294	2	87.7%	760,835	2.2	31	1	31	0	29	31
Charlotte	North Carolina	307	225	2	83.9%	760,751	2.5	24	1	24	2	20	24
Louisville	Kentucky	327	246	1	95.8%	729,309	1.3	32	1	32	28	29	32
Minneapolis	Minnesota	596	399	3	65.6%	714,042	4.4	51	13	55	0	27	55
Cleveland	Ohio	311	235	1	95.2%	713,939	1.6	29	3	29	23	26	29
Bronx	New York	336	251	6	47.7%	687,676	6.1	25	1	25	0	0	25
Denver	Colorado	515	388	5	59.9%	651,614	5.1	38	4	38	0	5	38
Seattle	Washington	389	301	4	67.9%	648,954	4.1	35	2	35	0	13	35
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	376	278	3	77.3%	627,180	3.4	29	4	29	0	23	29
Indianapolis	Indiana	392	285	4	63.9%	607,878	4.6	37	5	39	0	1	39
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	479	312	3	72.4%	601,807	3.9	27	7	27	0	8	27
Portland	Oregon	386	287	4	65.0%	598,033	4.4	33	1	33	0	0	33
Cincinnati	Ohio	381	287	3	74.2%	597,045	3.6	45	1	45	0	31	45
Sacramento	California	380	289	3	73.9%	594,340	3.7	28	1	28	0	22	27
Austin	Texas	442	306	5	53.5%	582,418	5.6	44	2	62	0	0	62
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	456	329	2	84.5%	576,564	2.6	39	4	40	0	33	38
Detroit	Michigan	346	254	2	88.7%	568,100	2.2	25	1	25	0	23	25
El Paso	Texas	410	286	3	70.6%	557,096	4.4	24	2	25	0	16	24
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	438	332	2	79.5%	542,891	2.7	43	4	43	0	35	43
Saint Paul	Minnesota	471	345	3	65.7%	525,605	4.3	30	12	32	1	14	32
Orlando	Florida	424	294	5	52.7%	524,499	5.8	32	3	32	0	0	31
Albuquerque	New Mexico	240	185	3	79.8%	522,971	3.0	17	1	17	0	16	17
Saint Louis	Missouri	443	334	4	56.7%	520,202	5.9	45	9	47	1	9	38
Washington DC	District of Columbia	274	210	3	76.0%	520,186	3.5	28	1	28	0	23	28
San Francisco	California	251	201	5	57.6%	501,021	5.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Bakersfield	California	248	190	2	86.3%	482,392	2.4	11	1	11	0	10	11
Columbus	Ohio	297	230	5	56.7%	480,212	5.3	30	3	30	0	0	30
Omaha	Nebraska	333	244	2	86.4%	477,454	2.3	31	1	31	0	28	31
Fort Worth	Texas	407	306	5	51.1%	465,757	6.0	32	2	32	0	0	32
Dayton	Ohio	388	299	1	95.2%	455,398	1.9	27	7	27	19	21	27
Atlanta	Georgia	551	365	6	45.9%	453,676	6.8	39	9	42	0	1	39
Colorado Springs	Colorado	356	267	3	75.8%	442,135	3.5	30	3	31	0	26	29
Kansas City	Missouri	401	291	3	76.8%	439,137	3.3	49	1	49	0	34	49
Memphis	Tennessee	411	298	4	63.0%	438,157	4.7	26	2	26	0	2	26
Birmingham	Alabama	367	269	2	82.3%	411,883	2.6	30	2	30	0	25	30
Fresno	California	286	220	3	68.3%	411,277	4.3	18	1	18	0	1	18
Rochester	New York	260	201	2	85.6%	403,726	2.4	24	2	24	0	22	24
Buffalo	New York	307	223	3	71.3%	401,320	3.6	28	5	30	0	21	30
Salt Lake City	Utah	299	240	2	81.0%	394,465	2.7	19	4	19	0	17	19
Tampa	Florida	390	264	5	49.5%	392,681	6.3	27	1	27	0	0	25
Aurora	Colorado	262	201	2	88.2%	383,955	2.6	11	1	11	2	8	11
Nashville	Tennessee	285	227	3	81.9%	375,211	3.2	22	2	22	4	17	22
Tulsa	Oklahoma	277	221	2	88.7%	374,282	2.3	28	1	28	2	25	28
Baltimore	Maryland	397	273	5	58.6%	369,874	4.9	22	2	22	0	1	22
Staten Island	New York	256	190	3	77.8%	368,689	3.4	12	1	12	0	10	12
Raleigh	North Carolina	274	204	3	67.1%	366,634	4.2	15	1	15	0	8	15
Virginia Beach	Virginia	243	188	3	80.0%	360,050	3.0	12	1	12	0	12	12
New Orleans	Louisiana	339	256	3	79.8%	341,356	2.9	19	1	19	0	18	19
Riverside	California	201	149	2	90.0%	333,010	2.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Wichita	Kansas	298	225	3	77.2%	322,659	3.1	26	1	26	0	22	26
Knoxville	Tennessee	240	184	2	80.8%	312,463	2.7	17	1	17	0	13	17
Grand Rapids	Michigan	239	185	2	84.2%	309,868	2.5	12	1	12	0	10	12
Richmond	Virginia	276	210	3	77.4%	302,485	3.3	15	1	15	0	13	15
Spokane	Washington	261	202	1	84.0%	301,924	2.7	14	2	14	0	11	14
Corpus Christi	Texas	275	207	2	89.9%	292,944	2.2	18	1	18	0	17	18
Mesa	Arizona	289	211	5	53.3%	284,942	5.8	13	1	13	0	0	12
Hollywood	Florida	289	196	4	59.1%	277,097	5.3	9	2	9	0	2	9
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	343	253	3	72.1%	273,372	3.9	18	2	18	0	14	18
Marietta	Georgia	232	170	3	81.6%	263,296	3.6	7	1	7	0	6	6
Durham	North Carolina	246	189	2	89.9%	260,921	2.3	8	1	8	0	7	8
Spring	Texas	261	198	5	66.7%	253,977	4.1	8	2	8	0	3	8
Madison	Wisconsin	196	162	2	86.1%	253,727	2.4	14	1	14	0	12	14
Newark	New Jersey	243	191	2	90.0%	252,535	2.0	9	1	9	0	9	9
Greensboro	North Carolina	207	163	3	77.0%	252,138	3.6	9	1	9	0	7	9
Fort Wayne	Indiana	258	201	2	78.9%	251,227	2.8	16	1	16	0	12	16
Arlington	Texas	232	183	4	62.5%	248,162	4.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Columbia	South Carolina	336	248	3	72.3%	247,937	3.9	14	1	14	0	9	14
Lincoln	Nebraska	263	216	2	84.8%	245,239	2.5	22	1	22	0	18	22
Lexington	Kentucky	296	234	3	76.5%	244,616	3.4	15	1	15	0	13	15
Lakeland	Florida	226	177	2	94.8%	244,360	1.4	9	1	9	5	9	9
Pensacola	Florida	264	202	1	90.8%	243,652	2.6	13	2	14	9	9	12
West Palm Beach	Florida	287	208	4	65.7%	243,642	4.8	12	5	13	0	1	13
Anaheim	California	206	168	4	65.6%	241,786	4.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Salem	Oregon	206	156	2	90.0%	239,886	2.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Alexandria	Virginia	338	244	3	66.4%	235,357	4.4	14	2	14	0	4	14
Scottsdale	Arizona	305	214	2	78.9%	235,195	2.7	11	2	11	0	9	11
Pompano Beach	Florida	302	202	3	63.3%	234,722	4.8	10	5	10	0	4	10
Boise	Idaho	198	154	1	91.1%	233,358	2.1	9	1	9	6	6	9
Mobile	Alabama	325	249	2	85.9%	233,287	2.6	18	1	18	0	16	18
Toledo	Ohio	276	215	3	75.1%	231,026	3.6	15	3	16	0	11	16
Akron	Ohio	312	239	2	84.1%	227,433	2.4	17	2	17	0	16	17
Chandler	Arizona	221	165	3	84.1%	226,017	2.5	6	1	6	0	6	6
Henderson	Nevada	221	165	4	74.1%	224,299	3.6	8	2	8	0	3	8
Kissimmee	Florida	258	198	3	77.0%	222,676	3.4	7	3	7	0	3	7
Fayetteville	North Carolina	225	173	1	90.7%	221,305	1.9	8	1	8	5	6	8
Stockton	California	246	180	5	58.9%	220,344	5.1	12	1	12	0	0	12
Modesto	California	198	159	2	83.3%	220,303	2.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Laredo	Texas	195	153	3	80.9%	219,151	3.2	6	1	6	0	4	6
Littleton	Colorado	314	231	4	67.3%	218,942	4.2	10	4	10	0	4	10
Amarillo	Texas	275	201	1	94.9%	217,292	1.7	14	1	14	9	12	14
Savannah	Georgia	245	191	2	90.0%	217,135	2.0	10	1	10	0	10	10
Tacoma	Washington	335	258	4	64.1%	213,639	4.5	20	3	20	0	0	20
Glendale	Arizona	258	197	3	69.8%	212,590	3.8	9	2	9	0	5	9
Norfolk	Virginia	260	202	2	86.5%	212,526	2.4	14	1	14	0	12	14
Vancouver	Washington	281	209	4	65.1%	212,080	4.6	11	1	11	0	0	11
Naples	Florida	300	226	3	67.0%	209,760	4.2	14	1	14	0	9	14
Plano	Texas	232	162	4	68.6%	209,541	4.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fort Myers	Florida	277	198	2	83.0%	208,863	2.7	11	2	11	0	9	11
Anchorage	Alaska	222	167	2	85.2%	208,089	2.3	12	1	12	0	11	12
Gilbert	Arizona	199	155	2	85.6%	204,155	2.5	6	1	6	0	5	6
Springfield	Missouri	183	141	2	88.5%	203,827	2.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Reno	Nevada	232	185	4	68.6%	203,565	4.1	12	1	12	0	3	12
Bradenton	Florida	294	202	3	79.2%	200,477	2.6	10	2	10	3	8	10
Santa Ana	California	213	171	4	55.5%	198,178	5.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Des Moines	Iowa	226	177	2	87.8%	196,133	2.3	11	1	11	0	10	11
Honolulu	Hawaii	261	183	6	46.4%	192,878	6.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Little Rock	Arkansas	221	172	2	87.4%	190,573	2.3	12	1	12	3	10	12
Corona	California	204	166	3	72.7%	187,074	3.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Hialeah	Florida	251	179	4	50.8%	186,398	5.9	7	2	7	0	0	6
San Bernardino	California	235	168	4	74.5%	185,895	3.6	7	1	7	0	5	7
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	190	153	1	99.6%	185,638	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
Shreveport	Louisiana	252	182	2	82.9%	185,101	2.8	12	1	12	0	10	12
Katy	Texas	191	129	5	53.6%	184,141	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lawrenceville	Georgia	209	137	4	71.6%	183,296	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Brownsville	Texas	169	109	2	90.0%	181,189	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Cape Coral	Florida	198	151	1	100.0%	180,812	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Yonkers	New York	181	139	1	100.0%	180,532	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Silver Spring	Maryland	264	179	4	59.5%	180,426	4.7	7	4	8	0	3	6
Grand Prairie	Texas	164	129	2	92.7%	176,703	1.5	4	1	4	2	4	4
Huntsville	Alabama	237	186	2	90.0%	176,603	2.0	11	1	11	0	11	11
Syracuse	New York	268	202	3	77.8%	176,589	3.2	15	1	15	0	14	15
Long Beach	California	237	187	7	36.3%	173,981	7.7	12	1	12	0	0	12
Erie	Pennsylvania	208	163	1	94.0%	172,487	1.3	13	1	13	12	12	13
Ogden	Utah	173	147	2	85.6%	172,362	2.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Oakland	California	233	191	6	41.8%	172,110	6.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Peoria	Arizona	177	135	1	100.0%	172,100	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Chattanooga	Tennessee	325	232	2	82.4%	171,280	2.9	15	2	15	1	10	15
Augusta	Georgia	199	144	2	83.7%	171,135	3.1	8	1	8	0	5	8
Tempe	Arizona	160	124	2	90.0%	170,996	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Jamaica	New York	203	151	4	70.0%	170,733	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Eugene	Oregon	183	147	1	84.0%	170,534	2.2	6	1	6	3	4	6
Charleston	South Carolina	269	189	2	86.2%	169,725	2.3	10	2	10	0	10	10
Sarasota	Florida	300	219	4	67.5%	169,004	4.4	13	2	13	0	0	13
Gainesville	Florida	217	167	3	80.0%	167,538	3.0	10	1	10	0	10	10
Irving	Texas	203	155	4	68.3%	164,413	4.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Boca Raton	Florida	239	174	3	73.8%	163,955	3.8	9	1	9	0	5	9
Providence	Rhode Island	231	157	2	79.9%	163,841	2.9	8	2	8	0	6	8
Montgomery	Alabama	298	201	3	77.3%	162,280	3.8	13	1	13	0	10	13
Fort Collins	Colorado	145	119	2	82.7%	160,947	2.8	5	1	5	0	4	5
Moreno Valley	California	175	126	2	78.2%	160,715	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Lubbock	Texas	242	190	5	58.1%	160,673	5.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Garden Grove	California	178	134	2	91.4%	160,573	1.8	5	1	5	1	5	5
Mckinney	Texas	154	117	3	84.8%	160,271	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Worcester	Massachusetts	205	158	2	85.7%	159,046	2.7	9	1	9	0	7	9
Olympia	Washington	240	168	2	86.8%	158,631	2.3	6	3	6	0	6	6
Beaverton	Oregon	172	143	3	78.5%	158,332	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Waco	Texas	224	181	1	100.0%	158,277	1.0	9	1	9	9	9	9
Clarksville	Tennessee	152	132	2	90.0%	158,127	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Greenville	South Carolina	191	160	3	71.6%	157,288	3.6	9	1	9	0	6	9
Reading	Pennsylvania	248	185	3	72.6%	156,320	3.8	10	2	10	0	6	10
Melbourne	Florida	180	137	1	100.0%	155,685	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Clearwater	Florida	250	181	3	84.9%	155,534	2.4	9	2	9	0	9	9
Chesapeake	Virginia	183	130	2	65.1%	154,876	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Wilmington	Delaware	278	209	3	69.8%	153,142	3.9	10	2	11	0	4	11
Rockford	Illinois	233	189	2	83.8%	152,751	2.8	9	1	9	0	8	9
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	220	179	2	90.0%	152,441	2.0	9	1	9	0	9	9
Winston Salem	North Carolina	235	184	4	57.2%	150,986	5.3	9	2	9	0	1	9
Green Bay	Wisconsin	186	140	2	82.3%	150,951	4.0	7	2	8	0	5	7
Ocala	Florida	304	217	3	66.8%	150,447	4.5	11	1	11	0	4	11
Ann Arbor	Michigan	168	141	2	90.0%	150,049	2.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Jersey City	New Jersey	197	159	4	57.0%	149,066	5.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Las Cruces	New Mexico	214	150	1	99.9%	148,893	1.3	7	1	7	6	7	7
Evansville	Indiana	208	167	3	80.5%	148,460	2.7	9	1	9	0	7	9
Tallahassee	Florida	245	198	4	51.5%	148,429	5.6	10	1	10	0	0	10
Alpharetta	Georgia	200	147	3	78.1%	147,790	4.0	4	3	4	0	2	4
York	Pennsylvania	196	155	2	81.7%	146,780	2.6	7	1	7	0	6	7
Escondido	California	171	138	2	81.7%	146,711	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Cumming	Georgia	163	122	2	90.0%	145,817	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Sugar Land	Texas	168	121	2	86.3%	145,798	2.7	3	2	3	1	2	3
Lansing	Michigan	194	160	2	88.4%	145,305	2.1	7	1	7	0	7	7
Schenectady	New York	206	161	2	89.1%	144,341	2.4	8	1	8	0	7	8
Topeka	Kansas	323	231	2	88.1%	143,936	2.4	18	1	18	0	16	18
Kalamazoo	Michigan	201	164	2	86.9%	142,691	2.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Irvine	California	243	186	5	53.0%	141,864	5.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Newport News	Virginia	226	157	3	80.0%	141,348	3.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Macon	Georgia	244	185	2	86.2%	141,135	2.4	9	1	9	0	8	9
Mission	Texas	161	113	2	77.9%	140,990	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Saint Petersburg	Florida	336	235	5	39.2%	139,642	8.1	16	3	16	2	4	10
Tyler	Texas	194	154	2	89.0%	139,031	2.3	9	1	9	0	8	9
Edmond	Oklahoma	193	158	2	80.9%	138,859	2.6	5	2	5	0	4	5
Frisco	Texas	134	103	3	80.0%	137,958	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Cary	North Carolina	185	153	2	87.8%	136,375	2.0	4	1	4	1	4	4
North Las Vegas	Nevada	201	150	4	58.2%	136,049	5.0	7	2	13	0	1	13
Fremont	California	157	126	5	57.7%	134,613	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Flushing	New York	166	129	4	62.3%	133,987	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Denton	Texas	209	152	2	84.4%	133,503	2.7	6	1	6	0	5	6
Murrieta	California	130	102	1	100.0%	132,244	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Fontana	California	151	112	4	55.8%	130,908	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Worth	Florida	227	151	4	63.3%	130,648	4.6	5	4	5	0	0	5
Garland	Texas	183	140	4	54.7%	130,127	5.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Maria	California	163	138	2	90.0%	128,780	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Chula Vista	California	175	148	6	49.4%	128,725	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Allentown	Pennsylvania	217	175	3	75.6%	128,530	3.9	7	1	7	0	5	7
Lafayette	Louisiana	168	127	3	80.0%	128,410	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Edinburg	Texas	162	128	2	82.3%	127,988	2.7	3	1	3	0	3	3
Arvada	Colorado	185	151	1	94.5%	126,115	1.8	5	1	5	3	4	5
Trenton	New Jersey	304	212	3	60.1%	125,029	4.7	11	4	13	0	2	13
Roanoke	Virginia	251	168	3	73.5%	124,587	4.3	10	2	10	0	3	10
Huntington Beach	California	158	120	4	62.3%	124,560	4.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Van Nuys	California	161	126	4	70.0%	124,468	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Norman	Oklahoma	161	118	1	100.0%	124,085	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Billings	Montana	151	122	2	90.0%	123,557	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Canton	Ohio	231	179	2	83.6%	122,855	2.7	12	2	23	0	17	23
Paterson	New Jersey	202	161	2	84.0%	122,449	2.7	9	1	9	0	7	9
Metairie	Louisiana	190	140	2	85.8%	122,106	2.2	5	1	5	1	5	5
Visalia	California	142	112	3	80.0%	121,611	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Santa Barbara	California	192	159	2	88.7%	120,569	2.1	7	1	7	0	7	7
Toms River	New Jersey	160	118	1	97.9%	120,277	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Midland	Texas	182	146	3	75.0%	119,912	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Cypress	Texas	126	101	4	70.0%	119,421	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Jackson	Mississippi	286	204	3	70.0%	119,223	4.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Boulder	Colorado	181	142	2	90.0%	118,135	2.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Stamford	Connecticut	198	144	1	91.5%	117,745	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Woodbridge	Virginia	170	119	4	55.6%	117,717	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Longmont	Colorado	148	121	2	90.0%	117,689	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
South Bend	Indiana	240	179	3	80.1%	117,519	2.9	10	1	10	0	9	10
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	156	118	2	90.0%	117,448	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Beaumont	Texas	254	165	2	80.5%	117,166	3.6	8	2	8	1	6	7
Abilene	Texas	193	161	2	90.0%	117,140	2.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Conroe	Texas	217	164	3	72.7%	116,576	3.7	7	2	7	0	2	7
Pasadena	California	199	153	3	73.6%	116,103	4.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	164	116	2	79.6%	115,873	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Bowling Green	Kentucky	155	111	1	100.0%	115,487	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Albany	New York	211	163	3	76.2%	115,301	3.9	11	3	12	0	4	11
Sunnyvale	California	182	143	3	75.4%	115,136	3.8	4	2	4	0	3	4
Odessa	Texas	197	157	4	71.8%	115,013	3.7	6	1	6	0	4	6
Ontario	California	148	118	4	63.2%	111,556	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Compton	California	160	133	3	80.0%	111,100	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	155	126	2	90.0%	110,376	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
El Cajon	California	156	128	4	63.9%	110,234	4.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Hampton	Virginia	190	149	2	80.8%	110,107	2.5	6	1	6	0	5	6
Athens	Georgia	231	170	2	88.3%	110,094	2.3	6	1	6	0	5	6
Muskegon	Michigan	196	152	2	85.1%	109,924	2.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Vallejo	California	174	135	2	88.1%	109,624	2.3	4	1	4	1	3	4
Fargo	North Dakota	157	126	2	89.4%	109,511	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Palmdale	California	189	138	5	62.3%	108,988	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boynton Beach	Florida	216	164	4	62.5%	108,877	4.8	6	2	7	0	0	7
Panama City	Florida	201	152	2	85.7%	108,286	2.5	6	2	6	0	5	6
Vista	California	145	125	2	90.0%	107,880	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Fredericksburg	Virginia	200	150	4	61.9%	107,749	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Naperville	Illinois	180	138	3	64.9%	107,660	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Hyattsville	Maryland	177	145	3	68.2%	107,490	4.4	5	1	5	0	3	5
Puyallup	Washington	204	155	3	75.1%	107,248	3.2	5	2	6	0	3	6
North Hollywood	California	176	132	4	70.0%	107,190	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Yakima	Washington	171	136	3	82.5%	107,104	2.8	4	1	4	0	4	4
Torrance	California	180	149	4	60.5%	107,033	4.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Mcallen	Texas	152	110	3	75.5%	106,915	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Lewisville	Texas	159	122	2	90.0%	106,810	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Kent	Washington	159	125	3	66.3%	106,440	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Grand Junction	Colorado	187	148	1	100.0%	105,464	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Roseville	California	142	110	3	75.3%	105,302	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	143	117	2	86.5%	105,227	2.3	4	1	4	0	4	4
Killeen	Texas	163	119	4	69.7%	104,630	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Inglewood	California	182	143	3	78.1%	104,481	3.2	5	2	5	0	4	5
Hamilton	Ohio	147	111	3	76.1%	104,285	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Charlottesville	Virginia	171	127	2	84.2%	103,590	2.8	5	1	5	0	4	5
Hemet	California	165	118	3	80.0%	103,029	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Flint	Michigan	219	161	3	65.6%	101,999	4.9	7	2	8	0	3	8
Asheville	North Carolina	175	133	3	77.2%	101,987	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Lake Charles	Louisiana	193	158	2	77.7%	101,534	3.0	5	1	5	0	4	5
Orange	California	176	149	4	70.0%	101,529	3.8	5	1	5	0	3	5
Gaithersburg	Maryland	231	157	3	70.1%	101,338	4.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	173	137	2	80.7%	101,095	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Bellevue	Washington	203	146	3	69.0%	100,885	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Manchester	New Hampshire	182	141	2	86.6%	100,478	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Summerville	South Carolina	135	109	2	72.3%	100,465	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Everett	Washington	190	147	4	60.2%	100,396	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Lowell	Massachusetts	157	122	2	90.0%	100,207	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Oceanside	California	175	133	6	50.0%	100,102	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Baytown	Texas	163	130	3	84.9%	100,042	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Warren	Michigan	194	151	3	73.7%	99,612	3.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Henrico	Virginia	238	185	5	50.8%	97,802	5.6	7	2	8	0	3	8
Chico	California	140	110	2	86.6%	97,058	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	187	154	3	75.5%	96,649	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Lancaster	California	166	127	4	52.2%	96,231	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Winter Haven	Florida	160	128	2	90.0%	96,190	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Bloomington	Indiana	184	147	4	71.9%	96,073	3.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Richardson	Texas	159	126	2	83.8%	96,065	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Fairfax	Virginia	198	138	3	58.6%	95,975	4.8	4	3	4	0	1	4
Franklin	Tennessee	150	123	2	90.0%	95,827	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Youngstown	Ohio	262	185	4	60.9%	95,746	3.8	12	4	13	0	9	12
West Valley City	Utah	148	126	3	71.9%	95,532	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	166	132	3	84.5%	95,377	2.5	4	1	4	0	4	4
High Point	North Carolina	163	133	2	77.7%	95,035	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Redding	California	193	148	3	83.9%	94,813	4.8	4	2	4	0	3	3
Vacaville	California	131	97	2	90.0%	94,766	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Elk Grove	California	171	117	6	52.8%	94,628	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	220	156	1	95.2%	94,130	1.4	7	1	7	4	7	7
Renton	Washington	197	158	3	60.7%	94,052	5.0	5	2	5	0	0	5
Perris	California	136	108	3	80.0%	93,912	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Saginaw	Michigan	205	147	3	71.9%	93,661	3.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Costa Mesa	California	128	104	1	82.2%	93,537	3.0	2	1	2	1	1	2
Spartanburg	South Carolina	199	141	2	83.1%	93,049	2.8	5	1	5	0	4	5
Longview	Texas	176	133	2	88.3%	92,965	2.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
New Haven	Connecticut	149	125	3	71.3%	92,841	4.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Hayward	California	166	130	6	48.3%	92,764	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Braunfels	Texas	131	104	2	90.0%	92,513	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Surprise	Arizona	181	140	3	68.1%	92,288	3.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Manassas	Virginia	203	142	4	60.6%	92,101	5.3	4	3	4	0	2	3
College Station	Texas	131	102	2	74.6%	91,821	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	169	131	3	79.1%	91,645	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Davenport	Iowa	174	143	2	87.3%	91,590	2.2	6	1	6	0	6	6
Lakewood	New Jersey	100	83	2	90.0%	90,687	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Roswell	Georgia	137	100	2	90.0%	89,793	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Acworth	Georgia	139	110	2	90.0%	89,715	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Vero Beach	Florida	243	186	2	77.9%	89,710	3.2	6	2	6	3	3	6
Independence	Missouri	212	156	3	72.2%	89,526	3.6	8	1	8	0	6	8
San Mateo	California	173	135	4	62.6%	89,120	4.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Palm Bay	Florida	176	127	3	80.0%	89,033	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Kennewick	Washington	147	117	2	90.0%	88,929	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Round Rock	Texas	168	128	5	52.9%	88,588	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Anderson	South Carolina	163	125	2	90.0%	88,567	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Mission Viejo	California	119	96	2	90.0%	88,522	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Rancho Cucamonga	California	175	138	5	50.0%	88,299	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Spring Hill	Florida	203	129	2	70.3%	88,237	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Yuma	Arizona	150	110	5	59.7%	88,112	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	125	101	3	84.3%	87,880	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hillsboro	Oregon	124	100	2	85.3%	87,707	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Menifee	California	173	138	2	79.0%	87,288	3.5	4	1	4	0	3	4
Clovis	California	159	123	2	71.8%	87,213	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Humble	Texas	160	123	6	52.3%	87,081	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Angelo	Texas	155	121	4	78.3%	86,703	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Boston	Massachusetts	251	186	5	57.1%	86,691	5.7	14	1	14	0	0	14
Idaho Falls	Idaho	153	114	2	79.2%	86,392	3.0	4	1	4	0	3	4
Terre Haute	Indiana	209	152	1	90.7%	86,132	2.0	6	1	6	2	5	6
Overland Park	Kansas	241	187	5	46.9%	85,958	6.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Greeley	Colorado	118	96	2	75.3%	85,901	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	134	103	3	84.6%	85,798	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Largo	Florida	193	139	2	79.7%	85,795	3.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Gastonia	North Carolina	156	122	3	80.0%	85,630	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Bryan	Texas	170	136	2	88.8%	85,541	2.2	5	1	5	0	5	5
San Marcos	California	127	110	2	85.1%	85,530	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	169	129	2	89.2%	85,115	3.0	4	1	4	0	3	4
Champaign	Illinois	143	108	2	90.0%	85,110	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Livonia	Michigan	144	105	2	90.0%	85,110	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	132	104	2	79.1%	84,570	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Holland	Michigan	122	100	2	90.0%	84,486	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Bend	Oregon	161	124	2	68.8%	84,165	3.7	3	2	3	0	2	3
Madera	California	162	130	2	81.4%	83,772	3.3	3	2	3	0	2	3
Parker	Colorado	130	108	3	83.4%	83,586	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Covington	Georgia	144	100	2	90.0%	83,418	2.0	2	2	2	0	2	2
Missoula	Montana	179	137	2	85.3%	82,994	2.6	5	1	5	0	5	5
La Puente	California	143	109	3	70.0%	82,564	4.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Pearland	Texas	151	117	5	60.0%	82,559	5.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Rapid City	South Dakota	155	123	2	85.3%	82,522	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Temecula	California	156	121	5	63.5%	82,497	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Merced	California	147	114	3	80.0%	82,448	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Olathe	Kansas	127	96	4	56.7%	81,896	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Keller	Texas	132	106	2	70.2%	81,568	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Santa Rosa	California	176	139	7	37.7%	81,408	7.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Sparks	Nevada	170	139	3	67.8%	80,909	4.0	4	2	4	0	1	4
Newnan	Georgia	148	101	2	86.3%	80,587	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Santa Clara	California	160	128	4	64.2%	80,583	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Provo	Utah	152	123	2	68.8%	80,207	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Milton	Florida	173	125	2	84.2%	79,794	2.7	3	2	3	1	2	3
Hartford	Connecticut	198	150	4	64.6%	79,714	4.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Salinas	California	182	144	7	42.3%	79,678	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elkhart	Indiana	147	116	3	80.0%	79,547	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Medford	Oregon	131	104	2	85.1%	79,366	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Racine	Wisconsin	183	149	2	62.9%	79,283	5.4	5	3	8	0	3	6
Downey	California	144	118	4	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pomona	California	144	120	4	50.0%	78,993	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elgin	Illinois	144	121	3	64.5%	78,847	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Miami Beach	Florida	192	138	4	67.4%	78,020	4.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Antioch	California	120	89	3	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynchburg	Virginia	184	132	2	75.4%	77,215	3.5	4	2	4	0	2	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	162	120	1	80.8%	76,734	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
West Covina	California	157	125	4	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	California	155	128	8	34.6%	76,236	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pueblo	Colorado	216	159	5	48.1%	76,123	8.9	7	2	7	0	1	6
Lehigh Acres	Florida	214	149	3	65.1%	76,079	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Gulfport	Mississippi	171	123	2	80.2%	75,962	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Frederick	Maryland	188	137	3	57.5%	75,920	12.8	4	1	4	0	3	3
Florissant	Missouri	154	125	4	70.0%	75,802	4.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Morgantown	West Virginia	138	110	3	79.4%	75,700	3.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
Decatur	Georgia	220	159	6	41.3%	74,683	7.6	5	3	6	0	0	5
Nampa	Idaho	152	114	5	64.1%	74,306	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orem	Utah	150	116	4	73.8%	74,084	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Pacoima	California	99	79	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bridgeport	Connecticut	210	150	4	50.4%	73,836	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Homestead	Florida	244	157	4	39.3%	73,803	5.9	7	2	7	0	0	7
Indio	California	131	97	3	76.8%	73,798	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	216	164	3	67.9%	73,740	4.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Lawrence	Kansas	182	152	3	72.8%	73,607	3.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Broomfield	Colorado	160	126	4	69.7%	72,968	4.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	156	121	3	74.0%	72,457	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	136	107	3	74.4%	72,441	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Fairfield	California	132	101	4	63.4%	72,292	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	154	130	3	75.4%	72,210	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Laurel	Maryland	220	145	4	63.9%	71,890	5.0	4	2	4	0	1	4
Bell Gardens	California	99	79	4	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Leandro	California	141	109	4	64.3%	71,521	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	144	126	4	65.6%	71,291	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Midlothian	Virginia	165	111	3	73.5%	71,152	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Concord	California	166	134	6	54.4%	70,796	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Saint Charles	Missouri	159	120	4	50.4%	70,522	8.3	3	1	3	0	1	2
Riverview	Florida	154	115	4	63.3%	70,419	4.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	155	123	4	60.5%	70,372	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Elizabeth	New Jersey	144	116	4	70.0%	70,327	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Scranton	Pennsylvania	252	186	3	70.4%	69,973	5.0	8	2	8	0	5	7
Ashburn	Virginia	132	95	5	61.4%	68,993	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Englewood	Colorado	194	155	5	61.1%	68,163	5.8	4	3	4	1	1	3
Rockville	Maryland	216	136	4	47.1%	68,133	6.3	4	3	4	0	1	3
Coral Springs	Florida	126	99	4	70.0%	68,067	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Belleville	Illinois	165	136	3	72.9%	67,983	3.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Sylmar	California	100	73	4	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pittsburg	California	100	80	4	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Saint Augustine	Florida	224	148	4	51.1%	66,961	5.6	5	3	6	2	2	4
Sandy	Utah	167	141	3	60.4%	66,760	5.0	4	2	5	0	1	5
Astoria	New York	171	133	5	46.8%	66,724	6.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Bowie	Maryland	213	138	2	65.2%	66,650	4.5	4	2	4	0	2	4
South Gate	California	99	88	4	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Valdosta	Georgia	193	148	4	69.7%	66,173	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Monica	California	163	132	4	70.0%	66,087	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elmhurst	New York	97	81	4	70.0%	65,777	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sterling Heights	Michigan	180	126	3	49.7%	65,773	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Joliet	Illinois	169	145	4	50.9%	65,577	6.2	5	2	10	0	0	10
Edison	New Jersey	156	115	4	64.9%	65,417	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	127	103	3	64.9%	65,030	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Buford	Georgia	138	100	3	65.3%	64,731	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carrollton	Texas	157	117	5	47.8%	64,476	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Springdale	Arkansas	122	97	3	66.6%	64,187	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Bothell	Washington	167	129	4	50.0%	64,084	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Ridgewood	New York	98	79	5	60.0%	64,030	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Douglasville	Georgia	135	103	3	58.0%	63,939	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	126	103	5	65.5%	63,852	4.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Missouri City	Texas	147	103	4	60.0%	63,656	5.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	171	132	4	58.2%	63,130	5.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	125	99	6	56.3%	62,696	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Monte	California	126	96	4	66.8%	62,584	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Burbank	California	169	133	4	57.7%	62,305	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hesperia	California	131	89	5	60.0%	62,287	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Fullerton	California	173	144	6	44.6%	62,098	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mesquite	Texas	150	114	5	42.0%	61,435	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	257	180	3	64.1%	61,356	6.1	8	2	8	0	0	7
Herndon	Virginia	130	81	4	64.6%	60,386	4.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	150	119	3	59.8%	60,005	4.3	3	1	3	1	1	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	187	146	4	62.7%	59,781	4.9	7	2	13	0	0	13
Kennesaw	Georgia	128	89	4	60.0%	59,478	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Lees Summit	Missouri	216	158	3	58.1%	59,317	6.0	6	2	6	0	0	6
Bellingham	Washington	141	110	4	46.8%	59,167	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Daytona Beach	Florida	222	156	3	57.3%	59,040	4.8	5	2	5	0	1	5
Santa Cruz	California	160	128	5	56.3%	58,624	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Victorville	California	158	117	6	42.6%	58,061	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Palo Alto	California	181	137	4	59.8%	57,776	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Livermore	California	136	108	5	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	138	102	5	60.0%	57,256	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daly City	California	137	115	5	50.0%	57,201	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Westerville	Ohio	128	105	5	60.0%	57,125	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chino	California	130	111	5	59.6%	56,295	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Jordan	Utah	153	121	5	45.1%	55,789	6.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Redwood City	California	149	113	5	48.7%	55,714	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lynn	Massachusetts	158	116	4	59.4%	55,595	5.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Annapolis	Maryland	219	145	5	58.1%	55,262	5.2	5	1	5	0	3	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	160	122	5	58.1%	55,133	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Port Richey	Florida	179	132	5	45.6%	55,087	6.5	4	3	5	0	0	5
Dearborn	Michigan	170	138	4	57.7%	54,848	5.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Jupiter	Florida	165	118	4	55.4%	54,579	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tracy	California	203	146	5	46.1%	54,050	7.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Rialto	California	144	102	6	50.0%	53,292	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Muncie	Indiana	196	147	5	57.3%	53,137	4.6	5	3	6	0	3	5
Norwalk	California	98	78	5	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Plainfield	Illinois	160	127	3	53.5%	52,777	5.0	3	3	4	0	1	4
Woodstock	Georgia	134	103	3	51.4%	52,253	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Deltona	Florida	132	95	4	55.3%	51,958	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	178	124	5	51.0%	51,163	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	240	177	5	40.8%	49,079	6.8	5	4	5	0	2	3
Hawthorne	California	97	79	4	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hagerstown	Maryland	170	122	5	49.2%	48,154	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	185	137	5	35.8%	45,993	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Ventura	California	140	117	5	39.1%	45,348	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	218	174	6	31.7%	40,339	7.6	9	2	9	0	0	9
Delray Beach	Florida	214	151	5	33.5%	39,861	7.4	5	2	6	0	0	5
Auburn	Washington	155	128	6	35.0%	39,452	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Napa	California	116	92	6	38.5%	37,256	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Quincy	Massachusetts	149	116	4	35.8%	33,687	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ballwin	Missouri	123	99	7	34.4%	32,529	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Whittier	California	216	173	7	15.9%	31,279	10.7	6	2	6	0	0	3
Carlsbad	California	174	137	7	26.6%	30,248	8.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Apopka	Florida	135	101	5	30.0%	29,296	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
O Fallon	Missouri	125	96	7	29.6%	28,558	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	218	139	9	9.5%	19,233	11.3	6	2	6	0	0	2
Simi Valley	California	105	85	9	10.0%	12,871	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lithonia	Georgia	115	82	8	12.8%	12,433	10.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	161	130	19	3.0%	5,490	32.0	9	2	9	0	0	1
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	179	146	20	1.4%	1,922	20.2	6	3	7	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	525	371	4	68.2%	1,674,716	4.3	62	4	65	0	1	64
San Diego	345	253	4	68.2%	918,309	4.1	36	2	36	1	2	36
San Jose	347	258	3	77.2%	810,582	3.4	28	1	28	0	24	28
Sacramento	380	289	3	73.9%	594,340	3.7	28	1	28	0	22	27
San Francisco	251	201	5	57.6%	501,021	5.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Bakersfield	248	190	2	86.3%	482,392	2.4	11	1	11	0	10	11
Fresno	286	220	3	68.3%	411,277	4.3	18	1	18	0	1	18
Riverside	201	149	2	90.0%	333,010	2.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Anaheim	206	168	4	65.6%	241,786	4.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Stockton	246	180	5	58.9%	220,344	5.1	12	1	12	0	0	12
Modesto	198	159	2	83.3%	220,303	2.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Santa Ana	213	171	4	55.5%	198,178	5.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Corona	204	166	3	72.7%	187,074	3.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
San Bernardino	235	168	4	74.5%	185,895	3.6	7	1	7	0	5	7
Long Beach	237	187	7	36.3%	173,981	7.7	12	1	12	0	0	12
Oakland	233	191	6	41.8%	172,110	6.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Moreno Valley	175	126	2	78.2%	160,715	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Garden Grove	178	134	2	91.4%	160,573	1.8	5	1	5	1	5	5
Escondido	171	138	2	81.7%	146,711	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Irvine	243	186	5	53.0%	141,864	5.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Fremont	157	126	5	57.7%	134,613	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	130	102	1	100.0%	132,244	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Fontana	151	112	4	55.8%	130,908	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Maria	163	138	2	90.0%	128,780	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Chula Vista	175	148	6	49.4%	128,725	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Huntington Beach	158	120	4	62.3%	124,560	4.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Van Nuys	161	126	4	70.0%	124,468	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Visalia	142	112	3	80.0%	121,611	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Santa Barbara	192	159	2	88.7%	120,569	2.1	7	1	7	0	7	7
Pasadena	199	153	3	73.6%	116,103	4.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Sunnyvale	182	143	3	75.4%	115,136	3.8	4	2	4	0	3	4
Ontario	148	118	4	63.2%	111,556	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Compton	160	133	3	80.0%	111,100	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
El Cajon	156	128	4	63.9%	110,234	4.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Vallejo	174	135	2	88.1%	109,624	2.3	4	1	4	1	3	4
Palmdale	189	138	5	62.3%	108,988	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vista	145	125	2	90.0%	107,880	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
North Hollywood	176	132	4	70.0%	107,190	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	180	149	4	60.5%	107,033	4.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Roseville	142	110	3	75.3%	105,302	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Inglewood	182	143	3	78.1%	104,481	3.2	5	2	5	0	4	5
Hemet	165	118	3	80.0%	103,029	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Orange	176	149	4	70.0%	101,529	3.8	5	1	5	0	3	5
Oceanside	175	133	6	50.0%	100,102	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chico	140	110	2	86.6%	97,058	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Lancaster	166	127	4	52.2%	96,231	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redding	193	148	3	83.9%	94,813	4.8	4	2	4	0	3	3
Vacaville	131	97	2	90.0%	94,766	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Elk Grove	171	117	6	52.8%	94,628	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	136	108	3	80.0%	93,912	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Costa Mesa	128	104	1	82.2%	93,537	3.0	2	1	2	1	1	2
Hayward	166	130	6	48.3%	92,764	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Mateo	173	135	4	62.6%	89,120	4.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Mission Viejo	119	96	2	90.0%	88,522	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Rancho Cucamonga	175	138	5	50.0%	88,299	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Menifee	173	138	2	79.0%	87,288	3.5	4	1	4	0	3	4
Clovis	159	123	2	71.8%	87,213	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
San Marcos	127	110	2	85.1%	85,530	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Madera	162	130	2	81.4%	83,772	3.3	3	2	3	0	2	3
La Puente	143	109	3	70.0%	82,564	4.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Temecula	156	121	5	63.5%	82,497	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Merced	147	114	3	80.0%	82,448	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Santa Rosa	176	139	7	37.7%	81,408	7.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Santa Clara	160	128	4	64.2%	80,583	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salinas	182	144	7	42.3%	79,678	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Downey	144	118	4	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pomona	144	120	4	50.0%	78,993	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	120	89	3	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	157	125	4	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	155	128	8	34.6%	76,236	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pacoima	99	79	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Indio	131	97	3	76.8%	73,798	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Fairfield	132	101	4	63.4%	72,292	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bell Gardens	99	79	4	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Leandro	141	109	4	64.3%	71,521	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Concord	166	134	6	54.4%	70,796	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	100	73	4	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pittsburg	100	80	4	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
South Gate	99	88	4	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Monica	163	132	4	70.0%	66,087	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
El Monte	126	96	4	66.8%	62,584	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Burbank	169	133	4	57.7%	62,305	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hesperia	131	89	5	60.0%	62,287	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Fullerton	173	144	6	44.6%	62,098	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	160	128	5	56.3%	58,624	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Victorville	158	117	6	42.6%	58,061	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Palo Alto	181	137	4	59.8%	57,776	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Livermore	136	108	5	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daly City	137	115	5	50.0%	57,201	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Chino	130	111	5	59.6%	56,295	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	149	113	5	48.7%	55,714	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tracy	203	146	5	46.1%	54,050	7.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Rialto	144	102	6	50.0%	53,292	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norwalk	98	78	5	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hawthorne	97	79	4	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Ventura	140	117	5	39.1%	45,348	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	218	174	6	31.7%	40,339	7.6	9	2	9	0	0	9
Napa	116	92	6	38.5%	37,256	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Whittier	216	173	7	15.9%	31,279	10.7	6	2	6	0	0	3
Carlsbad	174	137	7	26.6%	30,248	8.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Simi Valley	105	85	9	10.0%	12,871	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2

Houston

ZIP	selfstorage.com	publicstorage.com	sparefoot.com	extraspace.com	cubesmart.com	lifestorage.com
77088	5	1	2	3	4	6
77047	5	1	2	3	4	6
77037	8	1	5	6	7	9
77098	5	1	2	3	4	6
77027	4	1	2	3	5	6
77068	5	1	2	3	4	6
77078	5	1	2	3	4	6
77086	5	1	2	3	4	6
77035	5	1	2	3	4	6
77008	5	1	2	3	4	6
77004	5	1	2	3	4	6
77028	5	1	2	3	4	6
77059	5	1	2	3	4	6
77039	5	1	2	3	4	6
77019	5	1	2	3	4	6
77075	5	1	2	3	4	6
77077	5	1	2	3	4	6
77079	5	1	2	3	4	6
77099	5	1	2	3	4	6
77024	5	1	2	3	4	6
77095	5	1	2	3	4	6
77048	8	4	5	1	7	9
77044	5	1	2	3	4	6
77015	5	1	2	3	4	6
77017	4	1	2	3	5	6
77057	5	1	2	3	4	6
77055	5	1	2	3	4	6
77006	8	4	5	6	7	9
77026	5	1	2	3	4	6
77046	8	4	5	6	7	9
77066	5	1	2	3	4	6
77023	5	1	2	3	4	6
77094	5	1	2	3	4	6
77084	8	4	5	6	7	9
77013	5	1	2	3	4	6
77063	5	1	2	3	4	6
77053	5	1	2	3	4	6
77022	8	4	5	6	7	9
77072	5	1	2	3	4	6
77049	5	1	2	3	4	6
77045	5	1	2	3	4	6
77010	8	4	5	6	7	9
77018	5	1	2	3	4	6
77041	8	4	5	6	7	9
77009	4	1	2	3	5	6
77089	8	4	5	3	2	9
77032	8	4	5	6	7	9
77036	5	1	2	3	4	6
77085	4	1	2	3	5	6
77054	4	1	2	3	5	6
77058	5	1	2	3	4	6
77014	5	1	2	3	4	6
77067	5	1	2	3	4	6
77005	5	1	2	3	4	6
77076	4	1	2	3	5	6
77070	5	1	2	3	4	6
77060	5	1	2	3	4	6
77080	5	1	2	3	4	6
77050	5	1	2	3	4	6
77091	5	1	2	3	4	6
77071	5	1	2	3	4	6
77061	5	1	2	3	4	6
77020	4	1	2	3	5	6
77081	5	1	2	3	4	6
77030	4	1	2	3	5	6
77040	5	1	2	3	4	6
77090	5	1	2	3	4	6
77031	4	1	2	3	5	6
77051	5	1	2	3	4	6
77011	5	1	2	3	4	6
77042	5	1	2	3	4	6
77062	4	1	2	3	5	6
77082	4	1	2	3	5	6
77093	4	1	2	3	5	6
77073	4	1	2	3	5	6
77033	5	1	2	3	4	6
77043	5	1	2	3	4	6
77074	5	1	2	3	4	6
77064	8	2	5	6	7	9
77012	4	1	2	3	5	6
77002	4	1	2	3	5	6
77092	5	1	2	3	4	6
77069	5	1	2	3	4	6
77021	8	4	5	6	7	9
77083	8	4	5	7	6	9
77029	4	1	2	3	5	6
77034	4	1	2	3	5	6
77087	7	4	5	1	8	9
77003	8	3	5	1	7	9
77038	8	2	5	6	7	9
77007	5	1	2	3	4	6
77016	7	4	5	6	8	9
77065	5	1	2	3	4	6
77096	7	4	5	6	8	9
77025	5	1	2	3	4	6
77056	4	1	2	3	5	6

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Selfstorage

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 19,302 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Selfstorage Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (storage near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Selfstorage Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Selfstorage Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Selfstorage Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly