Safeco Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve safeco.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Safeco Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Safeco Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Safeco Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Safeco Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	11	5.8%	18,606,630	15.3	27,379	32,654	7	32,680	5	26	1,865
California	870	609	12	5.8%	2,252,735	14.9	1,166	1,740	1	1,741	0	1	98
Texas	846	595	13	6.1%	1,713,976	14.4	1,360	1,917	2	1,918	0	1	111
New York	791	600	12	5.8%	1,136,771	14.8	1,491	1,756	1	1,756	0	0	92
Florida	768	578	13	5.4%	1,111,284	16.3	446	975	2	976	0	1	65
Illinois	670	490	11	7.0%	892,049	13.3	1,247	1,382	2	1,386	1	4	85
Pennsylvania	757	591	12	5.9%	751,879	15.3	1,604	1,781	1	1,781	0	0	92
Ohio	670	548	13	5.7%	668,802	16.4	976	1,188	1	1,188	0	0	66
Georgia	409	319	15	5.6%	580,398	14.9	574	726	1	727	0	1	37
New Jersey	436	328	13	5.9%	521,239	14.4	537	593	1	593	0	0	35
Washington	337	274	13	6.1%	447,026	14.6	451	587	2	592	2	5	48
Arizona	269	218	12	6.4%	444,648	14.6	247	396	1	396	0	0	35
North Carolina	506	406	16	4.2%	428,761	20.6	683	802	1	802	0	0	33
Michigan	656	528	15	4.3%	425,830	20.4	833	976	1	976	0	0	38
Wisconsin	481	384	12	7.3%	424,309	13.4	694	769	1	769	0	0	52
Indiana	472	373	11	6.2%	414,666	15.2	659	770	2	773	1	3	49
Missouri	427	337	15	6.7%	405,283	13.8	887	1,017	1	1,017	0	0	49
Virginia	406	322	13	4.7%	398,177	15.7	723	891	1	891	0	0	41
Minnesota	530	418	13	6.3%	348,008	14.6	777	878	2	879	0	1	49
Tennessee	377	305	15	5.2%	344,275	15.1	514	622	1	622	0	0	28
Maryland	338	254	12	5.4%	326,992	15.2	392	463	1	466	1	3	25
Oregon	271	224	11	7.6%	309,784	14.4	355	414	2	416	0	2	29
Colorado	296	242	16	5.5%	305,149	14.6	381	514	1	514	0	0	25
South Carolina	278	223	14	6.1%	303,796	14.3	347	422	1	423	0	1	27
Alabama	320	261	15	5.8%	282,609	15.3	522	637	1	637	0	0	35
Massachusetts	517	422	16	4.1%	279,015	15.8	461	534	1	534	0	0	18
Oklahoma	322	248	12	7.0%	275,822	14.0	557	646	1	646	0	0	38
Louisiana	306	237	15	5.9%	273,682	14.8	431	510	1	510	0	0	23
Kentucky	354	287	13	5.7%	255,591	16.0	698	758	1	758	0	0	32
Kansas	341	261	14	6.6%	191,028	14.6	616	692	2	693	0	1	40
Utah	245	207	14	6.1%	186,898	14.5	246	284	1	284	0	0	17
Arkansas	261	209	14	6.1%	183,002	14.4	553	587	1	587	0	0	48
Mississippi	250	193	16	5.9%	174,939	14.3	384	418	1	418	0	0	19
Connecticut	284	228	13	4.8%	170,754	15.8	234	279	1	279	0	0	13
Nevada	176	146	16	5.6%	162,258	15.2	92	168	1	168	0	0	12
Iowa	486	357	16	4.9%	153,377	16.6	890	933	1	933	0	0	62
New Mexico	204	159	14	6.8%	142,964	14.4	327	361	1	361	0	0	20
West Virginia	277	224	14	5.7%	105,071	15.8	684	704	1	704	0	0	36
Nebraska	308	241	13	5.4%	102,617	17.5	524	581	2	583	0	2	35
Idaho	199	170	18	6.0%	101,666	14.2	251	273	1	273	0	0	13
Maine	240	198	14	6.7%	89,494	15.0	421	425	1	425	0	0	21
New Hampshire	226	197	15	5.7%	75,975	15.2	238	248	1	248	0	0	22
Montana	229	186	13	6.7%	69,397	14.6	348	361	1	361	0	0	25
Hawaii	152	129	23	4.0%	57,329	15.4	82	93	1	93	0	0	3
South Dakota	217	174	18	6.0%	51,747	14.3	359	370	1	370	0	0	18
North Dakota	206	168	14	6.2%	46,661	14.5	367	381	1	381	0	0	28
Delaware	159	137	16	4.9%	46,452	15.5	52	66	1	66	0	0	2
Alaska	155	134	20	5.5%	40,819	14.4	218	235	1	235	0	0	54
Rhode Island	157	139	25	3.4%	35,704	17.2	64	77	1	77	0	0	0
Vermont	197	170	18	4.9%	30,574	15.3	250	254	1	254	0	0	13
Wyoming	152	130	19	4.3%	25,022	16.7	164	171	1	171	0	0	8

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	173	138	15	5.5%	175,555	14.7	96	1	96	0	0	2
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	14	6.4%	173,132	13.9	56	1	56	0	0	1
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	15	5.4%	139,671	14.7	37	1	37	0	0	2
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	13	8.8%	138,141	13.1	47	1	47	0	0	4
Bronx	New York	118	103	13	9.6%	137,894	12.6	25	1	25	0	0	8
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	18	6.4%	113,024	13.1	59	1	59	0	0	3
Portland	Oregon	130	112	8	12.0%	110,429	14.3	33	2	35	0	2	3
Los Angeles	California	147	126	20	4.1%	101,645	16.1	62	1	62	0	0	2
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	18	6.1%	89,216	14.6	42	1	42	0	0	2
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	11	9.2%	87,807	13.2	37	2	40	1	3	3
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	12	7.9%	85,767	13.5	51	1	51	0	0	9
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	16	5.2%	80,608	16.0	43	1	43	0	0	2
Santa Ana	California	110	99	6	22.5%	80,337	25.0	6	1	7	0	1	2
Seattle	Washington	142	127	13	8.3%	79,234	14.0	35	2	39	1	4	7
New York City	New York	128	111	23	4.5%	73,750	15.8	47	1	47	0	0	2
San Diego	California	134	116	17	5.3%	71,721	14.5	36	1	36	0	0	2
Miami	Florida	160	123	22	3.8%	71,249	19.8	55	1	55	0	0	2
Denver	Colorado	136	120	14	6.3%	68,274	15.3	38	1	38	0	0	2
Dallas	Texas	149	126	17	4.9%	68,090	18.0	48	1	48	0	0	1
San Francisco	California	121	106	15	7.1%	61,369	13.8	28	1	28	0	0	3
El Paso	Texas	122	110	17	7.7%	60,924	12.7	24	1	24	0	0	2
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	16	6.6%	60,897	13.4	45	1	45	0	0	1
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	17	7.5%	60,556	13.0	29	1	29	0	0	2
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	11	8.5%	58,198	13.5	43	1	43	0	0	3
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	4	56.7%	57,625	10.0	2	1	3	0	1	1
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	15	6.0%	53,957	14.1	32	1	32	0	0	5
Austin	Texas	138	123	22	4.9%	53,553	15.0	44	1	44	0	0	2
San Jose	California	129	116	19	5.0%	52,381	15.0	28	1	28	0	0	2
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	19	6.0%	52,065	13.9	31	1	31	0	0	4
Sacramento	California	134	115	15	6.4%	51,125	14.0	28	1	28	0	0	1
Orlando	Florida	133	115	16	5.1%	50,813	18.1	32	1	32	0	0	2
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	22	5.3%	48,447	14.5	32	1	32	0	0	0
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	18	6.0%	45,472	15.0	32	1	32	0	0	4
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	20	5.6%	44,870	14.8	30	1	30	0	0	0
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	21	4.7%	42,306	17.3	24	1	24	0	0	1
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	20	4.9%	41,591	21.0	30	1	30	0	0	1
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	20	5.9%	40,841	14.3	26	1	26	0	0	0
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	17	5.9%	40,316	16.9	28	1	28	0	0	1
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	22	5.9%	38,876	14.0	17	1	17	0	0	0
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	22	5.1%	37,977	16.9	29	1	29	0	0	0
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	13	7.6%	36,577	15.8	27	1	27	0	0	5
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	29	3.7%	36,479	15.8	39	1	39	0	0	0
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	20	6.7%	35,626	14.3	13	1	13	0	0	1
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	22	4.2%	34,565	17.3	27	1	27	0	0	3
Tampa	Florida	131	110	29	4.1%	32,781	18.6	27	1	27	0	0	2
Fresno	California	120	105	19	5.4%	32,621	14.1	18	1	18	0	0	0
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	17	9.1%	32,349	12.9	16	1	16	0	0	3
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	19	6.5%	31,731	13.8	19	1	19	0	0	1
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	16	7.2%	31,238	14.5	11	1	11	0	0	1
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	17	5.3%	31,191	15.0	30	1	30	0	0	1
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	25	5.4%	30,684	15.0	49	1	49	0	0	0
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	21	4.9%	30,619	15.2	22	1	22	0	0	0
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	20	7.2%	30,388	13.5	28	1	28	0	0	1
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	17	4.4%	30,287	17.9	39	1	39	0	0	1
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	24	5.5%	30,177	17.0	31	1	31	0	0	2
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	17	6.4%	29,797	16.7	9	1	9	0	0	2
Spring	Texas	114	103	16	7.6%	28,784	12.9	8	1	8	0	0	1
Ocala	Florida	118	107	11	12.0%	26,908	13.5	11	2	12	0	1	2
Rochester	New York	125	108	21	5.6%	26,402	14.6	24	1	24	0	0	1
Bakersfield	California	112	102	17	4.7%	26,124	14.8	11	1	11	0	0	1
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	16	6.6%	25,513	14.3	17	1	17	0	0	1
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	21	5.1%	25,511	16.2	30	1	30	0	0	1
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	27	3.1%	25,254	27.2	45	1	45	0	0	1
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	13	11.5%	25,214	13.3	9	1	10	0	1	2
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	10	10.8%	25,149	12.4	7	1	7	0	0	1
Staten Island	New York	120	105	21	5.3%	24,990	14.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	21	6.7%	24,690	13.6	10	1	10	0	0	2
Buffalo	New York	142	124	26	4.3%	24,396	16.3	28	1	28	0	0	1
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	21	6.6%	24,362	15.9	7	1	7	0	0	1
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	14	7.8%	23,112	13.0	14	1	14	0	0	2
Arlington	Texas	122	107	22	5.8%	22,830	14.8	12	1	12	0	0	1
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	25	5.3%	22,747	15.2	19	1	19	0	0	2
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	16	6.1%	22,703	14.3	12	1	12	0	0	1
Katy	Texas	112	102	16	6.5%	22,437	14.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Long Beach	California	120	109	26	4.7%	22,361	15.9	12	1	12	0	0	0
Oakland	California	115	102	21	5.3%	22,026	15.1	14	1	14	0	0	0
El Monte	California	103	94	9	23.2%	21,784	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	21	5.2%	21,710	15.2	26	1	26	0	0	1
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	24	5.7%	21,518	14.6	18	1	18	0	0	0
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	18	7.0%	21,449	16.9	15	1	15	0	0	1
Vallejo	California	107	98	10	16.8%	20,949	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Jamaica	New York	112	100	13	8.6%	20,867	12.8	6	1	6	0	0	2
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	18	6.8%	20,218	13.7	11	1	11	0	0	1
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	12	9.6%	19,847	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	25	3.6%	19,645	25.3	15	1	15	0	0	0
Modesto	California	111	101	13	7.4%	19,545	13.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Garland	Texas	106	96	14	8.1%	19,243	21.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	14	8.0%	19,108	14.0	6	1	6	0	0	1
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	20	5.6%	19,075	14.0	14	1	14	0	0	1
South Gate	California	99	90	9	20.0%	19,021	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Riverside	California	113	102	19	5.1%	18,949	15.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Anaheim	California	114	102	18	5.1%	18,928	19.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Boise	Idaho	111	100	14	7.4%	18,865	12.9	9	1	9	0	0	1
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	14	7.2%	18,820	14.1	7	1	7	0	0	1
Plano	Texas	112	103	20	6.1%	18,748	15.4	7	1	7	0	0	1
San Bernardino	California	113	103	14	7.5%	18,742	13.1	7	1	7	0	0	1
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	19	5.7%	18,328	14.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	17	6.6%	18,152	14.0	14	1	14	0	0	1
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	17	8.1%	18,095	13.6	12	1	12	0	0	2
Stockton	California	122	108	21	4.8%	18,052	15.2	12	1	12	0	0	0
Ogden	Utah	110	101	15	8.9%	17,845	14.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	10	18.1%	17,610	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	11	13.0%	17,568	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	113	102	13	10.9%	17,452	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	2
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	12	14.2%	17,361	14.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Laredo	Texas	126	110	16	6.4%	17,353	13.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	9	17.6%	17,168	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	18	4.8%	17,067	15.2	14	1	14	0	0	0
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	19	5.2%	16,895	14.4	18	1	18	0	0	0
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	13	8.8%	16,695	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	19	4.0%	16,679	17.5	11	1	11	0	0	0
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	14	11.7%	16,646	13.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	16	6.6%	16,514	14.8	13	1	13	0	0	1
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	26	3.6%	16,504	22.6	22	1	22	0	0	2
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	10	8.5%	16,199	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	14	9.3%	16,186	17.0	6	1	6	0	0	1
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	19	5.0%	16,045	20.7	15	1	15	0	0	0
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	12	10.8%	16,025	14.4	7	1	7	0	0	2
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	19	5.5%	15,916	21.5	8	1	8	0	0	2
Chula Vista	California	109	100	14	6.0%	15,703	14.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Naples	Florida	125	111	22	5.0%	15,658	16.3	14	1	14	0	0	0
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	17	5.0%	15,240	15.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Irving	Texas	111	102	19	6.3%	15,238	16.3	6	1	6	0	0	1
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	19	4.6%	15,141	14.9	11	1	11	0	0	0
Akron	Ohio	122	112	23	5.6%	15,121	14.5	17	1	17	0	0	0
Billings	Montana	106	98	12	11.0%	15,064	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Spokane	Washington	113	104	22	4.1%	14,895	19.9	14	1	14	0	0	0
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	19	7.6%	14,878	14.2	11	1	11	0	0	2
Bothell	Washington	110	98	12	11.6%	14,823	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	11	12.0%	14,685	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Orange	California	111	100	14	10.1%	14,659	18.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	17	7.2%	14,639	13.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Clovis	California	106	97	13	11.9%	14,450	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	16	7.9%	14,405	12.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Corona	California	111	98	16	5.6%	14,341	14.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	29	3.9%	14,231	24.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	21	4.4%	14,176	16.0	10	1	10	0	0	1
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	20	5.0%	13,992	15.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	13	10.3%	13,929	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Palmdale	California	106	97	13	8.0%	13,917	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	17	6.7%	13,903	13.5	11	1	11	0	0	0
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	22	4.5%	13,860	15.8	9	1	9	0	0	0
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	18	4.8%	13,780	18.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	26	4.3%	13,725	21.7	16	1	16	0	0	2
Cypress	Texas	108	101	11	8.0%	13,709	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	17	6.0%	13,689	14.9	14	1	14	0	0	1
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	33	2.1%	13,632	33.1	25	1	25	0	0	1
Killeen	Texas	110	101	15	8.9%	13,408	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Syracuse	New York	119	107	20	5.9%	13,370	13.7	15	1	15	0	0	0
Elk Grove	California	109	96	14	7.4%	13,210	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	18	7.1%	13,178	13.4	9	1	9	0	0	0
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	25	4.5%	13,112	19.3	22	1	22	0	0	2
Flushing	New York	107	96	15	6.1%	13,085	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	16	5.5%	13,072	14.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	24	5.1%	12,900	15.6	11	1	11	0	0	0
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	19	5.8%	12,797	14.4	10	1	10	0	0	1
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	17	5.5%	12,754	14.4	7	1	7	0	0	0
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	22	3.2%	12,462	17.3	15	1	15	0	0	0
Fremont	California	107	98	14	5.3%	12,416	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	12	8.6%	12,355	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	16	5.7%	12,352	15.0	10	1	10	0	0	1
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	18	5.1%	12,339	14.9	10	1	10	0	0	1
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	16	7.5%	12,275	13.8	18	1	18	0	0	2
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	15	7.2%	12,252	13.1	9	1	9	0	0	2
Reno	Nevada	112	100	15	4.1%	12,233	15.5	12	1	12	0	0	1
Fontana	California	109	98	17	5.2%	12,232	15.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	20	4.0%	12,179	16.0	8	1	8	0	0	0
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	15	6.0%	12,124	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	104	96	10	12.0%	12,042	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	14	7.2%	11,979	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	17	5.8%	11,968	14.8	15	1	15	0	0	0
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	16	7.0%	11,962	13.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	14	6.7%	11,920	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	20	3.6%	11,868	17.0	20	1	20	0	0	0
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	16	6.9%	11,789	15.5	11	1	11	0	0	1
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	13	7.2%	11,713	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
San Mateo	California	106	97	13	8.2%	11,706	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Sandy	Utah	111	103	14	10.6%	11,687	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Compton	California	106	98	13	8.4%	11,647	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pasadena	California	113	103	17	7.4%	11,612	14.5	6	1	6	0	0	1
Homestead	Florida	111	99	16	6.2%	11,597	14.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	24	4.2%	11,475	16.2	18	1	18	0	0	0
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	21	5.2%	11,438	15.4	12	1	12	0	0	0
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	22	3.5%	11,408	27.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	19	5.6%	11,407	14.9	8	1	8	0	0	0
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	11	8.1%	11,349	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hemet	California	105	95	10	8.8%	11,309	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	22	6.2%	11,295	14.4	9	1	9	0	0	1
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	18	4.6%	11,268	20.8	14	1	14	0	0	1
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	13	9.2%	11,176	12.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Pearland	Texas	104	96	13	7.9%	10,895	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	22	4.1%	10,805	26.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Ontario	California	109	98	16	6.1%	10,784	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	108	98	14	7.0%	10,763	13.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	15	9.6%	10,757	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	12	9.7%	10,753	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	17	5.3%	10,700	15.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	14	8.0%	10,610	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	12	8.1%	10,561	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	122	109	12	10.0%	10,517	12.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	20	3.7%	10,516	16.0	10	1	10	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	107	98	11	8.5%	10,475	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	17	3.9%	10,440	16.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	15	5.9%	10,419	18.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	19	4.2%	10,363	15.4	12	1	12	0	0	1
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	19	5.6%	10,213	15.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	18	4.7%	10,153	15.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Odessa	Texas	112	103	16	6.3%	10,146	14.2	6	1	6	0	0	1
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	12	7.0%	10,110	14.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	112	100	14	6.3%	10,050	14.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	18	4.8%	9,998	14.8	13	1	13	0	0	0
Salem	Oregon	110	101	18	3.7%	9,981	16.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	23	5.1%	9,966	14.4	10	1	10	0	0	0
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	15	5.4%	9,941	14.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	23	5.1%	9,918	14.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	13	8.6%	9,910	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	17	6.4%	9,903	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	16	5.8%	9,851	14.1	10	1	10	0	0	0
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	23	3.7%	9,810	16.5	13	1	13	0	0	1
Conroe	Texas	111	101	18	6.0%	9,620	13.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Oceanside	California	106	96	15	4.8%	9,591	15.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Tyler	Texas	115	104	16	6.1%	9,511	14.3	9	1	9	0	0	1
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	13	6.5%	9,506	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	18	6.0%	9,506	14.0	7	1	7	0	0	1
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	15	6.9%	9,502	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	23	2.1%	9,446	22.9	12	1	12	0	0	0
Rialto	California	106	97	10	8.8%	9,397	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	19	5.7%	9,368	17.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	14	7.1%	9,344	13.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	18	5.1%	9,238	15.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	17	5.8%	9,233	14.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Missoula	Montana	111	102	12	9.5%	9,222	14.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	17	6.8%	9,185	13.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	14	5.3%	9,084	14.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	12	6.8%	9,066	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Escondido	California	104	94	14	5.0%	9,058	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	17	4.9%	9,050	15.5	13	1	13	0	0	0
Independence	Missouri	112	103	16	7.3%	9,049	13.1	8	1	8	0	0	0
Inglewood	California	124	112	17	6.7%	9,014	15.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Macon	Georgia	118	108	20	5.5%	8,993	15.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	17	6.1%	8,985	15.0	10	1	10	0	0	1
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	23	3.5%	8,981	15.8	10	1	10	0	0	0
Denton	Texas	110	101	16	5.7%	8,978	17.5	6	1	6	0	0	2
Deltona	Florida	102	93	11	9.5%	8,930	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Albany	New York	117	102	14	5.9%	8,885	15.7	11	1	11	0	0	1
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	22	4.2%	8,767	17.3	10	1	10	0	0	0
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	17	6.0%	8,712	14.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	17	5.0%	8,709	14.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	14	5.2%	8,685	15.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	21	3.6%	8,681	16.6	8	1	8	0	0	0
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	18	6.7%	8,639	13.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	15	6.8%	8,624	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Downey	California	100	91	11	7.6%	8,607	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hesperia	California	105	94	11	8.2%	8,535	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	17	6.3%	8,390	14.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	25	4.6%	8,376	15.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Madera	California	105	94	12	8.1%	8,364	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
El Cajon	California	109	97	16	4.8%	8,354	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Indio	California	103	94	9	8.7%	8,341	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	12	8.5%	8,336	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Canton	Ohio	117	105	19	5.6%	8,285	17.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	13	7.6%	8,261	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	14	7.7%	8,239	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	20	3.2%	8,235	21.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	17	4.8%	8,235	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	23	5.3%	8,207	17.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	12	8.0%	8,202	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Yakima	Washington	109	100	15	6.3%	8,177	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	13	8.4%	8,143	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	15	6.3%	8,124	14.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Riverview	Florida	104	96	15	7.2%	8,068	12.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	19	5.5%	7,993	14.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	13	8.0%	7,975	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Everett	Washington	112	100	16	4.8%	7,974	15.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	16	6.1%	7,955	13.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	17	5.4%	7,954	14.8	6	1	6	0	0	2
Redding	California	110	99	12	7.0%	7,942	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	108	12	7.4%	7,871	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	13	7.4%	7,704	13.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	13	5.5%	7,695	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	13	7.3%	7,651	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	16	5.3%	7,649	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	15	8.1%	7,643	20.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	12	8.0%	7,623	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	16	6.2%	7,566	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	110	99	15	5.9%	7,563	14.1	9	1	9	0	0	1
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	19	4.2%	7,509	16.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	16	4.1%	7,479	16.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	15	7.9%	7,477	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	109	99	13	6.1%	7,465	13.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	24	3.4%	7,458	18.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Fullerton	California	106	97	15	5.4%	7,457	25.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Yonkers	New York	109	99	17	4.1%	7,432	17.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Covington	Georgia	107	98	12	8.0%	7,415	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Victorville	California	105	95	13	5.4%	7,413	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	19	3.7%	7,406	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	13	7.5%	7,385	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Torrance	California	113	103	18	4.2%	7,360	16.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Parker	Colorado	108	100	15	7.3%	7,345	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Antioch	California	107	99	12	6.6%	7,338	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Baytown	Texas	108	98	15	6.2%	7,338	14.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	17	6.3%	7,336	18.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Olympia	Washington	110	98	18	4.0%	7,334	15.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Chino	California	105	96	10	7.8%	7,324	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	17	5.6%	7,295	14.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Roseville	California	106	95	13	5.2%	7,290	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Salinas	California	106	96	17	3.9%	7,283	15.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Whittier	California	108	98	17	3.7%	7,250	16.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Mission	Texas	105	95	16	4.0%	7,244	16.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Renton	Washington	112	100	18	4.7%	7,242	19.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	16	3.4%	7,175	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Flint	Michigan	117	105	19	4.6%	7,117	21.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	22	3.8%	7,114	15.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Murrieta	California	106	96	13	5.4%	7,093	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	17	3.5%	7,079	22.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	16	5.7%	7,063	14.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	13	7.0%	7,053	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	15	6.8%	7,026	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	20	3.8%	7,020	15.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	16	4.5%	6,971	26.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Largo	Florida	113	105	17	6.4%	6,924	15.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Frisco	Texas	105	95	17	4.0%	6,898	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	17	6.1%	6,874	13.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	17	4.4%	6,871	15.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	16	5.6%	6,862	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	15	6.6%	6,820	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hawthorne	California	101	90	12	7.0%	6,779	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	18	4.9%	6,766	14.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Kent	Washington	113	102	16	4.2%	6,764	15.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	15	5.3%	6,749	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	15	6.6%	6,728	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	14	7.0%	6,724	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	10	7.2%	6,719	13.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	18	3.3%	6,708	16.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
West Covina	California	111	100	19	6.1%	6,691	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	15	5.0%	6,676	13.5	6	1	6	0	0	3
San Marcos	California	107	98	15	6.6%	6,592	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	12	6.0%	6,553	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Panama City	Florida	107	99	15	5.2%	6,550	14.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	18	4.2%	6,550	16.1	12	1	12	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	15	6.5%	6,519	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Visalia	California	108	99	17	4.3%	6,491	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	17	3.4%	6,475	16.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	15	6.5%	6,454	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Auburn	Washington	112	101	16	5.7%	6,435	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	14	6.4%	6,431	13.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	14	6.5%	6,410	20.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	15	6.2%	6,384	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	18	4.7%	6,381	15.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	23	2.9%	6,373	31.4	11	1	11	0	0	0
Perris	California	106	96	14	5.4%	6,344	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	19	6.4%	6,322	13.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Garden Grove	California	110	97	17	3.6%	6,305	28.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Palo Alto	California	107	96	15	6.5%	6,291	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	111	100	18	4.4%	6,260	15.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Richardson	Texas	109	101	16	5.5%	6,259	15.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Maria	California	106	97	16	4.4%	6,259	16.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	17	5.4%	6,255	17.8	6	1	6	0	0	1
Chico	California	105	96	12	5.6%	6,238	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	21	3.8%	6,238	27.1	7	1	7	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	16	5.7%	6,236	15.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	16	5.0%	6,233	15.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	14	5.2%	6,208	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	16	5.6%	6,204	14.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	19	4.3%	6,123	15.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Abilene	Texas	111	102	17	4.7%	6,115	15.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	16	5.1%	6,101	14.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	16	4.9%	6,016	15.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	15	5.2%	6,010	14.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	22	4.0%	6,002	16.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Simi Valley	California	101	92	13	4.6%	5,973	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	19	4.1%	5,962	15.5	8	1	8	0	0	0
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	16	5.8%	5,959	13.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	13	4.9%	5,946	26.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Daly City	California	103	94	13	5.2%	5,908	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	14	6.1%	5,821	23.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	19	3.8%	5,798	16.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Burbank	California	109	100	16	5.4%	5,790	14.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Temecula	California	109	99	14	4.4%	5,761	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	17	3.3%	5,747	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Vista	California	106	97	15	4.8%	5,746	15.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	15	5.4%	5,734	20.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	108	98	18	3.4%	5,724	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	16	4.5%	5,701	15.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	105	95	15	6.0%	5,680	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	18	3.0%	5,670	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	16	4.6%	5,627	15.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	13	4.3%	5,605	17.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	15	5.7%	5,596	23.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	21	2.9%	5,576	17.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	17	3.3%	5,561	23.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	18	4.8%	5,560	14.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Pomona	California	107	97	15	3.5%	5,536	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	106	98	14	5.9%	5,534	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	16	4.2%	5,533	20.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Waukesha	Wisconsin	117	107	12	5.8%	5,531	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	16	5.3%	5,520	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	22	4.3%	5,506	16.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	107	97	13	4.4%	5,490	16.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Irvine	California	112	101	23	2.0%	5,471	34.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	15	4.9%	5,466	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	14	4.5%	5,416	20.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Napa	California	101	92	13	5.6%	5,390	15.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Athens	Georgia	115	106	17	4.3%	5,366	14.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	16	5.6%	5,340	19.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Oxnard	California	107	98	17	2.4%	5,303	17.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	16	5.3%	5,294	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	17	5.5%	5,217	14.9	7	1	7	0	0	1
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	14	4.6%	5,215	15.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	13	5.5%	5,192	15.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	16	3.6%	5,181	16.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	19	5.4%	5,162	15.5	8	1	8	0	0	0
Hayward	California	108	98	16	2.7%	5,141	17.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	105	95	18	4.5%	5,119	16.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	105	96	13	5.3%	4,988	14.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Carlsbad	California	109	96	17	4.4%	4,976	15.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	13	4.4%	4,975	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	102	94	14	4.5%	4,965	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	16	4.7%	4,940	15.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Merced	California	108	100	15	4.8%	4,910	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	16	4.4%	4,852	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	17	4.2%	4,818	15.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	114	105	19	5.0%	4,799	15.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	16	4.7%	4,706	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Keller	Texas	108	99	17	4.0%	4,688	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	16	4.4%	4,654	15.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	18	4.6%	4,574	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	16	4.8%	4,559	16.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	18	2.7%	4,553	17.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Tracy	California	106	96	14	3.9%	4,548	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	20	3.7%	4,544	21.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	14	4.7%	4,470	14.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Concord	California	107	98	16	3.4%	4,443	16.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Warren	Michigan	115	103	22	3.3%	4,412	20.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
San Leandro	California	108	97	16	4.0%	4,396	21.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	16	4.7%	4,392	15.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Schenectady	New York	113	101	21	2.7%	4,362	16.8	8	1	8	0	0	0
Ventura	California	104	95	15	3.7%	4,333	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	19	4.3%	4,302	16.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	17	3.3%	4,250	30.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	17	3.0%	4,248	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	22	3.6%	4,246	15.5	11	1	11	0	0	1
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	15	2.8%	4,244	16.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Lynn	Massachusetts	107	97	14	4.5%	4,238	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Norwalk	California	99	91	16	4.0%	4,235	16.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	18	3.6%	4,169	15.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Champaign	Illinois	110	98	15	4.4%	4,164	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	17	2.5%	4,138	17.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	14	4.1%	4,137	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	15	3.8%	4,134	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	15	4.0%	4,001	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	18	3.6%	3,974	16.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Van Nuys	California	105	95	18	2.2%	3,970	17.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	19	3.3%	3,946	20.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	17	4.2%	3,883	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	19	1.9%	3,872	18.8	8	1	8	0	0	0
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	24	1.5%	3,870	18.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	18	3.2%	3,802	21.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	16	2.6%	3,797	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	19	3.8%	3,790	16.5	8	1	8	0	0	0
Livermore	California	105	95	14	3.9%	3,708	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	23	2.8%	3,663	33.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	16	3.8%	3,621	16.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	17	3.8%	3,592	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	17	2.8%	3,582	24.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	18	2.7%	3,575	17.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	18	3.3%	3,548	16.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
La Puente	California	105	96	18	3.0%	3,538	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	16	3.6%	3,523	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	102	93	14	2.9%	3,337	27.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lancaster	California	105	96	18	1.8%	3,273	19.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	15	3.0%	3,271	17.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	108	99	17	2.8%	3,260	17.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	108	96	18	3.2%	3,161	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	101	92	15	3.0%	3,159	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	16	3.3%	3,107	16.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	20	3.2%	3,076	16.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	17	3.0%	3,073	17.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	19	2.8%	3,017	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	18	2.7%	3,011	17.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Menifee	California	108	98	16	2.7%	2,980	16.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	100	94	15	3.0%	2,895	17.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	18	2.9%	2,887	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Pittsburg	California	98	90	14	3.0%	2,882	17.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	18	2.8%	2,855	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	21	3.0%	2,854	16.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	20	2.2%	2,513	16.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	102	94	16	2.5%	2,509	17.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	24	1.7%	2,233	24.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	17	2.4%	2,215	17.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	108	99	20	2.3%	2,156	17.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	16	2.0%	2,134	18.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	105	95	17	1.9%	1,894	19.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	19	1.8%	1,744	18.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	18	1.4%	1,630	19.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	18	1.7%	1,584	18.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	21	1.3%	1,266	34.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	100	90	18	1.0%	1,047	20.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	19	1.0%	930	20.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	36	0.8%	869	34.8	5	1	5	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	20	4.1%	101,645	16.1	62	1	62	0	2
Santa Ana	110	99	6	22.5%	80,337	25.0	6	1	7	1	2
San Diego	134	116	17	5.3%	71,721	14.5	36	1	36	0	2
San Francisco	121	106	15	7.1%	61,369	13.8	28	1	28	0	3
San Jose	129	116	19	5.0%	52,381	15.0	28	1	28	0	2
Sacramento	134	115	15	6.4%	51,125	14.0	28	1	28	0	1
Fresno	120	105	19	5.4%	32,621	14.1	18	1	18	0	0
Bakersfield	112	102	17	4.7%	26,124	14.8	11	1	11	0	1
Long Beach	120	109	26	4.7%	22,361	15.9	12	1	12	0	0
Oakland	115	102	21	5.3%	22,026	15.1	14	1	14	0	0
El Monte	103	94	9	23.2%	21,784	9.5	2	1	2	0	1
Vallejo	107	98	10	16.8%	20,949	11.8	4	1	4	0	3
Modesto	111	101	13	7.4%	19,545	13.0	7	1	7	0	0
South Gate	99	90	9	20.0%	19,021	9.0	1	1	1	0	1
Riverside	113	102	19	5.1%	18,949	15.1	7	1	7	0	0
Anaheim	114	102	18	5.1%	18,928	19.7	7	1	7	0	0
San Bernardino	113	103	14	7.5%	18,742	13.1	7	1	7	0	1
Stockton	122	108	21	4.8%	18,052	15.2	12	1	12	0	0
Chula Vista	109	100	14	6.0%	15,703	14.8	5	1	5	0	0
Orange	111	100	14	10.1%	14,659	18.0	5	1	5	0	1
Clovis	106	97	13	11.9%	14,450	10.7	3	1	3	0	1
Corona	111	98	16	5.6%	14,341	14.8	5	1	5	0	0
Palmdale	106	97	13	8.0%	13,917	12.0	4	1	4	0	0
Elk Grove	109	96	14	7.4%	13,210	12.7	3	1	3	0	0
Fremont	107	98	14	5.3%	12,416	15.0	4	1	4	0	0
Fontana	109	98	17	5.2%	12,232	15.0	3	1	3	0	0
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	14	6.7%	11,920	13.8	4	1	4	0	0
San Mateo	106	97	13	8.2%	11,706	14.5	4	1	4	0	1
Compton	106	98	13	8.4%	11,647	11.7	3	1	3	0	0
Pasadena	113	103	17	7.4%	11,612	14.5	6	1	6	0	1
Hemet	105	95	10	8.8%	11,309	14.0	3	1	3	0	1
Ontario	109	98	16	6.1%	10,784	14.0	3	1	3	0	0
North Hollywood	108	98	14	7.0%	10,763	13.0	4	1	4	0	1
Santa Rosa	112	100	18	4.7%	10,153	15.5	6	1	6	0	0
Oceanside	106	96	15	4.8%	9,591	15.3	4	1	4	0	0
Rialto	106	97	10	8.8%	9,397	11.5	2	1	2	0	0
Santa Barbara	111	99	17	6.8%	9,185	13.1	7	1	7	0	0
Escondido	104	94	14	5.0%	9,058	14.5	4	1	4	0	0
Inglewood	124	112	17	6.7%	9,014	15.6	5	1	5	0	1
Downey	100	91	11	7.6%	8,607	12.3	3	1	3	0	0
Hesperia	105	94	11	8.2%	8,535	11.5	2	1	2	0	0
Madera	105	94	12	8.1%	8,364	11.7	3	1	3	0	0
El Cajon	109	97	16	4.8%	8,354	15.7	3	1	3	0	0
Indio	103	94	9	8.7%	8,341	11.5	2	1	2	0	0
Redding	110	99	12	7.0%	7,942	14.3	4	1	4	0	0
Santa Cruz	106	95	13	7.4%	7,704	13.3	4	1	4	0	1
Berkeley	110	99	15	5.9%	7,563	14.1	9	1	9	0	1
Fullerton	106	97	15	5.4%	7,457	25.5	4	1	4	0	1
Victorville	105	95	13	5.4%	7,413	14.0	3	1	3	0	0
Torrance	113	103	18	4.2%	7,360	16.2	5	1	5	0	0
Antioch	107	99	12	6.6%	7,338	14.0	2	1	2	0	0
Chino	105	96	10	7.8%	7,324	15.0	2	1	2	0	0
Roseville	106	95	13	5.2%	7,290	14.3	3	1	3	0	0
Salinas	106	96	17	3.9%	7,283	15.8	5	1	5	0	0
Whittier	108	98	17	3.7%	7,250	16.3	6	1	6	0	0
Murrieta	106	96	13	5.4%	7,093	14.5	2	1	2	0	1
Huntington Beach	111	99	17	3.5%	7,079	22.3	4	1	4	0	0
Hawthorne	101	90	12	7.0%	6,779	13.0	1	1	1	0	0
Moreno Valley	109	99	18	3.3%	6,708	16.5	4	1	4	0	0
West Covina	111	100	19	6.1%	6,691	14.0	3	1	3	0	0
San Marcos	107	98	15	6.6%	6,592	13.5	2	1	2	0	0
Visalia	108	99	17	4.3%	6,491	15.7	3	1	3	0	0
Perris	106	96	14	5.4%	6,344	14.5	2	1	2	0	0
Garden Grove	110	97	17	3.6%	6,305	28.6	5	1	5	0	0
Palo Alto	107	96	15	6.5%	6,291	13.5	4	1	4	0	0
Santa Maria	106	97	16	4.4%	6,259	16.0	3	1	3	0	0
Chico	105	96	12	5.6%	6,238	14.3	3	1	3	0	0
Simi Valley	101	92	13	4.6%	5,973	15.0	2	1	2	0	0
Daly City	103	94	13	5.2%	5,908	14.5	2	1	2	0	0
Burbank	109	100	16	5.4%	5,790	14.4	5	1	5	0	0
Temecula	109	99	14	4.4%	5,761	14.0	3	1	3	0	0
Vista	106	97	15	4.8%	5,746	15.0	3	1	3	0	0
Pomona	107	97	15	3.5%	5,536	17.0	3	1	3	0	0
Santa Clara	107	97	13	4.4%	5,490	16.3	4	1	4	0	0
Irvine	112	101	23	2.0%	5,471	34.1	9	1	9	0	0
Napa	101	92	13	5.6%	5,390	15.5	2	1	2	0	0
Oxnard	107	98	17	2.4%	5,303	17.8	4	1	4	0	0
Hayward	108	98	16	2.7%	5,141	17.5	4	1	4	0	0
Redwood City	105	95	18	4.5%	5,119	16.0	4	1	4	0	0
Santa Monica	105	96	13	5.3%	4,988	14.8	5	1	5	0	0
Carlsbad	109	96	17	4.4%	4,976	15.8	4	1	4	0	0
Merced	108	100	15	4.8%	4,910	15.3	3	1	3	0	0
Tracy	106	96	14	3.9%	4,548	15.0	4	1	4	0	0
Concord	107	98	16	3.4%	4,443	16.5	4	1	4	0	1
San Leandro	108	97	16	4.0%	4,396	21.7	3	1	3	0	0
Ventura	104	95	15	3.7%	4,333	16.3	3	1	3	0	0
Sunnyvale	107	98	15	2.8%	4,244	16.0	4	1	4	0	1
Norwalk	99	91	16	4.0%	4,235	16.0	1	1	1	0	0
Van Nuys	105	95	18	2.2%	3,970	17.8	4	1	4	0	0
Livermore	105	95	14	3.9%	3,708	16.0	2	1	2	0	0
La Puente	105	96	18	3.0%	3,538	17.0	2	1	2	0	0
Fairfield	102	93	14	2.9%	3,337	27.0	2	1	2	0	0
Lancaster	105	96	18	1.8%	3,273	19.7	3	1	3	0	0
Vacaville	101	92	15	3.0%	3,159	17.0	2	1	2	0	0
Bell Gardens	99	90	17	3.0%	3,073	17.0	1	1	1	0	0
Menifee	108	98	16	2.7%	2,980	16.5	4	1	4	0	0
Sylmar	100	94	15	3.0%	2,895	17.0	1	1	1	0	0
Mission Viejo	105	95	18	2.9%	2,887	17.0	2	1	2	0	0
Pittsburg	98	90	14	3.0%	2,882	17.0	1	1	1	0	0
Costa Mesa	104	95	18	1.4%	1,630	19.5	2	1	2	0	0
Pacoima	100	90	18	1.0%	1,047	20.0	1	1	1	0	0

Houston

ZIP	safeco.com	allstate.com	nationwide.com	farmers.com	geico.com	esurance.com
77088	12	4	5	8	6	7
77047	11	4	5	8	6	7
77037	12	4	5	6	7	8
77098	13	4	5	7	6	8
77027	14	4	5	7	6	8
77068	12	1	5	7	6	8
77078	12	4	5	8	7	6
77086	12	4	5	7	6	8
77035	12	4	5	7	6	8
77008	13	4	5	7	6	8
77004	13	1	5	7	6	8
77028	12	4	5	7	6	8
77059	14	2	5	7	6	8
77039	12	4	5	7	6	8
77019	17	4	5	7	6	8
77075	13	1	2	4	3	5
77077	18	4	5	7	6	8
77079	14	4	5	7	6	8
77099	12	4	5	7	6	8
77024	12	4	5	7	6	8
77095	13	4	5	2	7	8
77048	12	4	5	7	6	8
77044	17	4	5	6	7	8
77015	18	4	5	6	8	7
77017	14	1	2	4	3	5
77057	17	4	5	7	6	8
77055	17	4	5	2	6	8
77006	18	4	5	7	6	8
77026	14	1	2	3	4	5
77046	17	4	5	7	6	8
77066	17	2	5	6	7	8
77023	18	4	5	6	8	7
77094	12	4	5	7	6	8
77084	12	4	5	7	6	8
77013	18	4	5	7	6	8
77063	14	1	2	4	3	5
77053	18	4	5	6	7	8
77022	18	4	5	8	6	7
77072	17	4	5	8	6	7
77049	18	4	5	6	7	8
77045	17	4	5	7	6	8
77010	17	1	5	6	8	7
77018	16	4	5	7	6	8
77041	17	3	5	6	7	8
77009	13	1	2	3	4	5
77089	16	2	5	1	6	8
77032	17	4	5	6	7	8
77036	16	4	5	6	8	7
77085	17	4	5	6	8	7
77054	16	4	5	7	6	8
77058	16	4	5	8	6	7
77014	16	4	5	7	6	8
77067	13	1	2	3	4	5
77005	17	4	5	7	6	8
77076	14	1	2	4	3	5
77070	18	4	5	7	6	8
77060	16	4	5	8	6	7
77080	16	4	5	3	8	6
77050	13	1	2	4	5	3
77091	16	4	5	8	6	7
77071	8	1	2	5	3	4
77061	16	4	5	7	6	8
77020	11	4	5	7	8	6
77081	17	4	5	6	7	8
77030	12	4	5	8	6	7
77040	13	4	5	6	7	8
77090	17	1	5	8	6	7
77031	8	1	2	3	5	4
77051	16	4	5	7	6	8
77011	17	4	5	7	6	8
77042	17	4	5	7	6	8
77062	11	4	5	3	8	6
77082	13	1	2	4	3	5
77093	17	4	5	7	6	8
77073	11	4	5	8	7	6
77033	11	4	5	8	7	6
77043	11	4	5	6	7	8
77074	17	4	5	8	7	6
77064	12	4	5	7	6	8
77012	17	4	5	8	6	7
77002	14	4	5	8	6	7
77092	11	4	5	7	8	6
77069	17	4	5	6	8	7
77021	14	1	2	5	3	4
77083	17	4	5	7	8	6
77029	17	4	5	7	8	6
77034	12	1	5	8	6	7
77087	14	1	2	5	4	3
77003	17	2	5	8	7	6
77038	17	4	5	7	8	6
77007	14	1	2	5	4	3
77016	17	4	5	7	8	6
77065	14	4	5	7	8	6
77096	17	4	5	6	8	7
77025	14	1	2	4	3	5
77056	17	4	5	6	8	7

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Safeco

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Safeco Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Safeco Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Safeco Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Safeco Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly