Quicktransportsolutions Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve quicktransportsolutions.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 6,679 Trucking Companies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Quicktransportsolutions Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Quicktransportsolutions Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Quicktransportsolutions Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Quicktransportsolutions Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	15,001	6,679	2	39.4%	127,243,658	27.5	22,519	27,639	14,476	32,379	675	1,680	22,743
California	2,163	1,214	2	40.7%	15,948,086	24.4	983	1,550	833	1,801	55	102	1,298
Texas	2,135	1,190	2	39.7%	11,073,897	17.7	1,217	1,773	906	2,084	38	119	1,637
Florida	1,581	896	2	41.8%	8,611,236	18.4	394	892	432	1,042	27	66	813
New York	1,512	867	2	33.6%	6,582,451	35.6	1,232	1,493	625	1,662	9	46	773
Illinois	1,660	977	2	42.9%	5,504,866	19.3	1,107	1,240	693	1,505	58	121	1,237
Pennsylvania	1,679	953	4	39.1%	4,995,818	40.2	1,076	1,245	768	1,449	21	65	1,068
Ohio	1,561	916	2	40.9%	4,760,866	24.4	796	1,006	614	1,192	42	79	881
Georgia	1,273	735	2	43.9%	4,516,688	21.6	506	651	380	775	17	63	605
North Carolina	1,329	764	2	42.0%	4,264,048	27.2	546	664	374	762	20	53	561
Virginia	1,229	733	3	45.1%	3,795,414	35.1	504	653	380	766	17	44	642
Washington	1,181	704	1	47.4%	3,447,414	29.2	348	477	258	549	15	29	408
New Jersey	1,079	663	3	37.7%	3,351,403	40.2	356	409	348	519	11	16	388
Michigan	1,403	842	3	32.7%	3,253,844	34.3	630	755	565	916	9	35	670
Indiana	1,529	919	1	47.7%	3,166,652	19.0	607	718	420	866	26	58	649
Wisconsin	1,333	789	2	49.8%	2,878,057	23.1	609	680	509	806	25	49	590
Colorado	1,144	672	1	50.5%	2,794,835	22.2	321	448	206	530	12	31	441
Arizona	953	595	2	38.3%	2,660,732	32.7	184	330	127	375	10	26	228
Tennessee	1,133	675	2	35.3%	2,345,448	24.0	428	533	291	596	9	27	444
Maryland	907	581	3	36.4%	2,186,596	32.0	299	361	243	450	5	27	323
Louisiana	977	599	2	44.8%	2,088,998	24.7	349	428	183	477	10	25	390
Minnesota	1,301	774	3	33.0%	1,826,303	24.2	683	782	478	927	15	52	618
Oregon	1,039	647	1	43.8%	1,788,860	20.1	316	374	185	427	18	27	327
Massachusetts	1,031	623	5	26.2%	1,786,659	33.9	360	432	348	544	5	11	286
Alabama	1,062	641	2	34.3%	1,668,004	20.8	453	567	309	641	6	15	451
Kentucky	1,106	690	2	36.9%	1,641,013	33.6	541	601	311	700	18	35	464
South Carolina	952	565	3	33.1%	1,640,081	25.6	297	372	229	441	8	17	247
Missouri	1,344	807	4	26.0%	1,582,930	29.7	759	888	418	1,060	9	23	634
Kansas	1,103	675	1	52.8%	1,535,289	14.7	584	660	235	741	12	46	600
Arkansas	992	608	3	45.8%	1,371,110	30.8	440	473	212	530	12	24	352
Connecticut	749	471	3	38.2%	1,369,490	21.6	220	264	193	333	9	13	197
Mississippi	985	611	2	44.5%	1,328,646	21.8	339	372	226	434	16	29	297
Iowa	1,297	800	3	39.1%	1,225,741	21.8	823	862	486	1,056	25	54	728
Oklahoma	1,012	620	4	30.4%	1,189,825	23.6	493	582	273	693	9	26	400
Utah	828	537	2	39.1%	1,189,752	29.9	190	228	159	281	4	10	152
New Mexico	850	530	1	37.4%	780,892	32.3	269	303	99	321	4	14	202
West Virginia	898	572	3	40.8%	746,574	39.3	521	541	227	668	6	24	431
Idaho	795	513	1	44.2%	745,714	29.2	210	232	115	269	9	17	190
Nebraska	1,023	630	2	39.0%	743,061	19.2	477	534	191	607	12	48	462
Nevada	730	466	6	18.5%	541,353	23.5	70	146	41	180	3	5	95
Montana	878	579	1	48.1%	500,967	34.5	271	284	120	318	10	23	228
Delaware	529	353	3	49.6%	471,028	27.8	39	52	34	62	3	7	51
Rhode Island	534	348	4	36.7%	387,671	26.5	64	77	43	87	1	2	40
Maine	957	610	5	28.9%	385,686	26.7	364	368	228	457	3	4	226
South Dakota	775	495	1	43.5%	375,947	19.6	319	330	94	377	11	31	295
New Hampshire	750	489	5	27.4%	367,955	51.6	155	164	142	183	1	4	103
Alaska	719	452	2	49.9%	367,948	50.0	143	158	39	163	0	4	91
Wyoming	752	466	1	58.0%	337,442	24.4	135	142	65	153	3	7	137
North Dakota	755	470	2	44.4%	333,445	21.4	327	339	104	380	5	17	280
Hawaii	605	394	9	20.8%	295,621	52.7	44	54	20	60	1	2	43
Vermont	712	465	8	12.7%	79,229	64.8	119	123	98	135	1	2	41

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	310	223	5	38.2%	994,182	12.4	37	3	37	0	4	28
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	345	223	3	48.8%	768,361	8.0	46	1	46	0	6	46
Houston	Texas	426	283	6	21.0%	669,070	18.1	96	25	100	0	2	61
San Jose	California	342	230	2	61.5%	645,885	4.9	28	1	28	0	5	28
Bronx	New York	318	236	4	42.8%	616,864	6.8	25	1	25	0	1	25
Miami	Florida	479	309	3	30.9%	580,986	16.2	53	21	61	0	3	30
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	342	220	1	64.5%	523,926	11.2	27	3	27	4	4	25
Chicago	Illinois	331	218	6	18.4%	498,010	9.3	56	3	58	0	1	51
Denver	Colorado	388	267	3	40.4%	439,438	13.9	36	6	37	1	4	31
San Antonio	Texas	364	227	5	23.6%	418,802	16.3	59	10	60	0	0	30
Washington DC	District of Columbia	332	232	2	60.2%	411,999	5.0	28	1	28	0	6	28
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	411	278	1	48.2%	400,621	6.4	27	14	34	1	1	32
Dallas	Texas	377	254	4	28.7%	399,758	8.5	48	3	49	1	2	44
Colorado Springs	Colorado	330	230	1	68.2%	398,042	10.3	28	1	28	2	3	28
Mesa	Arizona	243	154	1	72.6%	388,176	3.8	13	1	13	2	2	13
Hollywood	Florida	239	161	1	79.6%	372,978	3.2	9	2	9	1	4	9
San Diego	California	394	254	6	27.5%	370,041	10.8	36	3	36	0	0	31
Orlando	Florida	366	228	5	34.9%	347,522	16.4	31	7	32	0	0	27
Austin	Texas	374	256	4	31.9%	347,136	7.5	44	3	48	0	0	47
Staten Island	New York	233	168	1	72.1%	341,984	3.6	12	1	12	1	2	12
Seattle	Washington	338	222	4	35.4%	338,544	7.6	35	4	37	1	2	34
Virginia Beach	Virginia	239	157	1	71.2%	320,507	3.8	12	1	12	2	2	12
Aurora	Colorado	221	154	1	72.7%	316,580	3.7	11	1	11	1	1	11
New York City	New York	317	221	9	18.5%	300,840	9.6	47	2	71	0	0	37
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	343	229	3	42.0%	286,435	13.8	37	1	37	0	1	36
Cincinnati	Ohio	302	211	4	35.4%	284,837	12.5	45	10	47	0	3	35
Rochester	New York	288	199	3	57.6%	271,388	5.3	24	1	24	0	4	23
Fort Worth	Texas	325	212	5	29.2%	266,743	10.2	32	3	32	0	0	29
Long Beach	California	215	143	3	55.3%	264,994	5.3	12	2	12	0	3	12
Wichita	Kansas	283	194	2	62.9%	262,583	4.6	26	1	26	0	4	26
Buffalo	New York	373	249	3	44.8%	252,126	9.4	28	5	28	0	0	26
Fresno	California	264	179	4	39.3%	237,069	7.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Hialeah	Florida	215	152	2	64.4%	236,216	17.3	6	1	6	1	2	6
Minneapolis	Minnesota	418	274	7	21.5%	234,386	27.3	50	25	59	0	2	26
Arlington	Texas	228	157	2	58.2%	230,942	5.2	12	1	12	0	1	12
Pompano Beach	Florida	268	178	2	61.5%	227,991	5.1	10	9	14	0	2	14
Dayton	Ohio	372	254	3	46.5%	222,302	11.4	26	12	34	1	3	24
Spokane	Washington	246	161	3	61.5%	221,020	4.9	14	2	14	1	2	14
New Orleans	Louisiana	293	191	3	51.2%	218,980	6.0	19	1	19	0	3	19
Tampa	Florida	329	220	6	27.5%	218,234	27.7	26	15	30	0	3	12
Santa Ana	California	193	131	1	60.5%	215,975	5.0	6	2	8	0	0	8
El Paso	Texas	331	211	6	26.8%	211,848	14.6	23	3	23	0	0	21
Greensboro	North Carolina	189	129	2	64.2%	210,323	4.3	9	1	9	1	2	9
Anaheim	California	187	136	3	56.5%	208,160	5.1	7	1	7	0	1	7
Richmond	Virginia	283	182	2	51.9%	202,849	6.1	15	4	16	0	2	15
Los Angeles	California	370	257	10	8.2%	200,354	26.3	62	16	65	1	1	10
West Palm Beach	Florida	291	191	1	53.9%	199,826	5.5	12	5	14	1	2	12
Jersey City	New Jersey	201	140	1	76.1%	199,020	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Irvine	California	241	168	1	73.0%	195,322	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Glendale	Arizona	242	162	1	62.2%	189,615	6.8	9	3	15	0	0	13
Las Vegas	Nevada	361	239	9	12.3%	189,399	11.1	43	2	55	0	0	13
Chandler	Arizona	172	117	1	70.0%	188,031	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fort Wayne	Indiana	256	173	2	58.6%	186,545	5.1	16	1	16	0	1	16
Plano	Texas	201	144	3	61.0%	186,197	5.0	7	1	7	0	2	7
Cleveland	Ohio	324	216	7	24.6%	184,424	12.1	28	4	29	0	0	19
Fremont	California	154	101	1	78.8%	183,643	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Lincoln	Nebraska	282	194	2	63.4%	183,390	4.8	22	1	22	0	2	22
Memphis	Tennessee	286	186	5	26.1%	181,523	8.4	26	3	28	0	0	25
Chula Vista	California	184	114	2	68.8%	179,363	4.0	5	1	5	1	1	5
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	308	201	3	47.1%	178,673	9.8	18	2	18	0	2	17
Alexandria	Virginia	292	202	4	50.2%	177,938	25.0	11	3	12	0	3	12
Corpus Christi	Texas	289	199	2	54.6%	177,763	5.5	18	1	18	0	1	18
Durham	North Carolina	200	131	2	60.5%	175,541	5.3	8	1	8	0	1	8
Riverside	California	197	133	4	47.2%	174,776	6.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Vancouver	Washington	196	141	3	52.1%	169,896	6.2	11	1	11	0	1	11
Tempe	Arizona	151	103	1	88.9%	168,977	2.5	4	2	7	2	4	7
Scottsdale	Arizona	226	154	2	56.5%	168,362	10.0	11	2	11	0	2	10
Eugene	Oregon	185	130	1	82.8%	168,096	3.2	6	1	6	2	2	6
Gilbert	Arizona	190	129	1	70.0%	167,020	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Garland	Texas	182	133	2	70.0%	166,628	4.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Marietta	Georgia	206	141	3	51.1%	164,933	6.1	7	1	7	0	1	7
Sarasota	Florida	281	192	1	65.1%	162,997	11.6	12	1	12	0	1	12
Oxnard	California	158	111	3	73.8%	162,708	4.0	4	1	4	1	1	4
Newark	New Jersey	194	139	4	57.1%	160,097	5.0	9	1	9	0	2	9
Santa Rosa	California	171	113	1	73.4%	158,507	3.8	6	1	6	1	1	6
Lexington	Kentucky	263	179	4	49.4%	157,999	6.3	15	1	15	0	0	15
Knoxville	Tennessee	258	179	6	40.4%	156,034	6.9	17	1	17	0	0	17
Boca Raton	Florida	234	152	2	70.0%	155,572	4.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Detroit	Michigan	282	189	6	23.8%	152,588	8.4	25	1	25	0	0	22
Jamaica	New York	186	138	2	62.4%	152,174	4.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
San Bernardino	California	209	136	2	60.8%	151,601	4.7	7	1	7	0	1	7
Oceanside	California	167	124	2	75.6%	151,428	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Salt Lake City	Utah	266	179	6	30.9%	150,518	13.1	19	6	21	0	0	16
Beaverton	Oregon	156	110	1	74.4%	150,043	4.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Yonkers	New York	165	112	1	82.1%	148,259	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Naples	Florida	307	212	3	47.2%	147,698	25.5	11	2	12	1	1	12
Bradenton	Florida	258	177	2	58.1%	147,001	5.8	10	2	10	1	2	10
Oakland	California	253	178	5	35.5%	146,347	10.1	14	2	14	0	0	13
Gainesville	Florida	223	154	3	69.4%	145,279	4.1	10	1	10	0	0	10
Escondido	California	175	113	1	79.5%	142,800	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Anchorage	Alaska	228	152	3	58.4%	142,656	5.7	12	1	12	0	1	12
Tucson	Arizona	326	216	9	15.8%	142,633	34.8	31	13	31	0	1	13
Ogden	Utah	180	118	1	70.4%	141,720	4.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Lancaster	California	145	93	2	76.4%	140,820	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Charlotte	North Carolina	273	185	7	15.3%	138,963	17.5	24	5	24	0	0	17
Portland	Oregon	293	208	5	15.0%	137,945	9.6	33	2	37	0	0	26
Stockton	California	229	164	5	36.8%	137,402	7.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Denton	Texas	176	124	1	86.4%	136,671	2.5	6	2	12	3	6	12
Chesapeake	Virginia	193	135	2	56.8%	135,140	5.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Spring	Texas	224	150	3	35.4%	134,854	7.3	8	2	8	0	0	8
Kissimmee	Florida	221	150	3	46.5%	134,435	6.4	7	3	7	0	0	7
Cape Coral	Florida	199	129	2	74.1%	134,025	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Saint Paul	Minnesota	365	241	9	16.5%	131,709	43.1	30	21	35	0	2	9
Silver Spring	Maryland	233	164	4	43.4%	131,432	31.9	5	2	5	0	1	5
Modesto	California	196	145	3	49.3%	130,401	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Saint Petersburg	Florida	292	197	6	36.2%	129,104	24.3	13	1	13	3	3	11
Madison	Wisconsin	240	166	4	43.8%	129,052	6.5	14	4	14	0	1	12
Akron	Ohio	234	151	3	47.5%	128,266	6.1	17	1	17	0	0	17
Tallahassee	Florida	233	162	3	44.5%	128,168	6.4	10	1	10	0	0	10
Everett	Washington	191	136	1	76.7%	127,770	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Atlanta	Georgia	402	265	9	12.8%	126,702	29.3	38	21	42	0	0	11
Irving	Texas	197	139	2	52.6%	126,478	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Elk Grove	California	140	100	1	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	235	159	2	68.8%	125,483	4.3	9	1	9	1	2	9
Mckinney	Texas	139	95	2	66.0%	124,745	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Pasadena	California	185	133	1	78.9%	124,437	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Fayetteville	North Carolina	197	143	2	50.6%	123,571	5.8	8	1	8	0	1	8
Bridgeport	Connecticut	195	133	1	84.3%	123,457	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Corona	California	195	139	5	47.3%	121,684	6.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Albuquerque	New Mexico	267	191	6	18.4%	120,853	10.1	17	1	17	0	0	7
Frisco	Texas	118	73	1	70.0%	120,714	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Reading	Pennsylvania	247	171	2	55.4%	119,296	5.5	10	3	11	0	2	11
Indianapolis	Indiana	367	240	12	12.5%	119,021	33.8	37	25	43	0	0	12
Fort Myers	Florida	265	180	4	47.3%	118,911	13.1	11	2	11	0	2	10
Fairfax	Virginia	183	122	2	72.6%	118,765	26.8	3	2	3	2	2	3
Omaha	Nebraska	292	199	8	21.3%	117,670	34.5	31	12	32	0	0	16
Grand Prairie	Texas	158	109	3	61.6%	117,317	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	176	125	1	70.0%	116,705	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Overland Park	Kansas	216	143	2	63.5%	116,465	4.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Little Rock	Arkansas	259	182	3	53.4%	116,361	5.9	12	1	12	0	2	12
Wilmington	Delaware	240	175	3	52.7%	115,598	5.4	10	3	11	0	2	9
Louisville	Kentucky	307	208	8	15.2%	115,520	15.9	32	10	33	0	0	16
San Francisco	California	313	218	8	13.2%	114,965	18.0	28	5	29	0	0	11
Topeka	Kansas	232	156	2	70.0%	114,450	4.4	18	1	18	1	3	18
Littleton	Colorado	272	183	5	35.0%	113,905	7.9	10	7	14	0	0	11
Lubbock	Texas	266	177	5	40.9%	113,016	7.0	14	2	18	0	0	18
Salinas	California	173	112	2	60.0%	112,997	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Schenectady	New York	214	145	2	69.5%	112,559	4.3	8	1	8	0	2	8
Tacoma	Washington	300	194	4	33.7%	112,380	23.2	17	2	17	0	0	16
Rancho Cucamonga	California	161	112	3	63.6%	112,260	5.0	4	2	5	0	1	5
Santa Clara	California	166	103	2	89.1%	111,862	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Bakersfield	California	200	141	9	19.9%	111,207	9.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Kansas City	Missouri	341	228	5	19.4%	110,808	10.6	49	8	73	0	0	54
Ventura	California	143	94	1	94.7%	109,859	1.7	3	1	3	2	3	3
Evansville	Indiana	217	147	3	59.1%	109,081	5.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Bellevue	Washington	187	131	1	73.8%	108,026	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Columbus	Ohio	331	231	9	12.8%	108,005	17.0	30	14	33	0	0	12
Flushing	New York	149	108	3	50.0%	107,534	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Syracuse	New York	244	173	4	47.1%	106,933	9.3	15	2	15	0	1	14
Cary	North Carolina	162	112	1	68.7%	106,645	4.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mesquite	Texas	144	104	2	72.8%	106,523	4.0	3	2	6	0	2	6
Jacksonville	Florida	338	218	10	12.3%	106,308	28.6	31	14	35	0	0	18
Santa Barbara	California	222	143	1	78.2%	106,294	3.4	7	1	7	2	2	7
Round Rock	Texas	174	122	1	63.4%	106,198	4.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Baltimore	Maryland	278	191	9	16.8%	106,039	19.7	22	9	23	0	0	16
Providence	Rhode Island	214	142	2	51.7%	105,914	6.4	8	3	9	0	0	7
Sunnyvale	California	199	134	2	69.0%	105,478	5.3	4	4	5	1	1	4
Hyattsville	Maryland	165	116	2	66.8%	105,163	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Kalamazoo	Michigan	197	133	1	63.5%	104,136	4.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Norfolk	Virginia	250	174	3	42.3%	103,820	6.7	14	1	14	0	0	14
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	145	102	1	79.2%	103,379	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Savannah	Georgia	232	162	4	42.8%	103,210	35.4	10	6	10	0	2	4
Torrance	California	200	139	3	58.2%	102,957	20.2	5	2	5	0	2	4
Lakeland	Florida	215	150	5	39.9%	102,915	7.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Lawrenceville	Georgia	159	104	4	40.0%	102,445	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Edinburg	Texas	143	105	2	65.7%	102,278	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Paterson	New Jersey	203	134	1	70.0%	102,060	4.0	9	2	18	0	0	18
Gaithersburg	Maryland	179	130	1	70.0%	101,214	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Macon	Georgia	204	139	3	61.8%	101,167	5.4	9	2	9	1	2	8
Bloomington	Indiana	171	120	1	75.0%	100,159	3.7	6	1	6	1	1	6
Lehigh Acres	Florida	196	134	1	85.6%	100,028	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Toledo	Ohio	236	164	3	32.3%	99,486	30.1	15	9	16	0	0	8
Lansing	Michigan	174	125	2	60.4%	99,302	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Woodbridge	Virginia	153	103	3	46.8%	98,993	36.7	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mission	Texas	139	102	2	54.4%	98,567	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Yuma	Arizona	153	107	1	66.6%	98,250	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Homestead	Florida	227	154	1	52.3%	98,176	31.7	5	1	5	0	0	5
Roseville	California	156	112	1	70.0%	97,856	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waco	Texas	215	146	1	61.8%	97,744	4.9	9	2	10	1	1	10
Fullerton	California	152	104	1	70.0%	97,493	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cumming	Georgia	150	107	3	60.0%	97,211	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Stamford	Connecticut	193	128	1	75.5%	97,204	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Lafayette	Louisiana	178	121	3	60.0%	96,308	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lake Charles	Louisiana	179	115	1	73.5%	96,043	3.6	5	1	5	1	1	5
Beaumont	Texas	217	155	1	66.0%	95,980	4.3	8	1	8	0	1	8
Santa Maria	California	148	105	2	66.8%	95,651	4.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Erie	Pennsylvania	250	178	4	51.9%	95,224	5.8	13	1	13	0	1	13
Clearwater	Florida	230	154	3	51.9%	95,158	6.0	9	4	10	0	1	9
Trenton	New Jersey	256	180	4	45.8%	95,136	14.9	10	1	10	0	0	10
San Mateo	California	184	137	3	66.4%	94,582	4.5	4	3	5	0	2	5
Carrollton	Texas	149	105	1	70.0%	94,368	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	146	93	1	77.2%	94,013	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Inglewood	California	197	138	1	70.0%	93,682	5.0	5	3	6	2	2	5
Melbourne	Florida	168	111	2	60.0%	93,411	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Arvada	Colorado	173	121	1	70.0%	93,394	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ashburn	Virginia	133	96	1	82.9%	93,048	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Olathe	Kansas	126	93	3	64.4%	93,012	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
College Station	Texas	131	93	2	75.4%	92,753	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Katy	Texas	165	117	8	26.9%	92,541	8.5	4	4	6	0	0	5
Conroe	Texas	206	144	2	57.3%	91,923	5.1	7	3	8	0	2	8
Boulder	Colorado	204	142	3	69.8%	91,607	3.7	6	2	12	1	2	12
Santa Fe	New Mexico	179	128	2	71.5%	91,550	3.2	5	1	5	2	2	5
Longmont	Colorado	138	94	1	70.0%	91,536	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Haven	Connecticut	168	110	2	70.0%	91,152	4.0	5	2	7	0	0	7
Temecula	California	160	108	1	70.0%	90,939	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pensacola	Florida	248	173	4	33.8%	90,560	22.5	12	3	12	0	0	10
San Leandro	California	140	90	1	81.1%	90,149	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Norman	Oklahoma	162	116	2	72.5%	89,961	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	155	112	2	77.5%	89,956	3.6	5	1	5	1	1	5
Laredo	Texas	189	130	6	33.1%	89,716	7.2	6	1	6	0	1	6
Charlottesville	Virginia	162	110	3	72.7%	89,428	3.8	5	1	5	1	1	5
Mobile	Alabama	296	197	5	32.6%	88,400	8.2	18	3	19	0	0	18
Lowell	Massachusetts	155	106	1	78.2%	87,111	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Ocala	Florida	232	156	5	38.4%	86,534	7.3	11	1	11	0	0	11
West Jordan	Utah	137	101	1	70.0%	86,499	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Toms River	New Jersey	143	98	1	70.0%	86,002	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jupiter	Florida	159	109	1	87.2%	85,986	3.3	4	2	6	1	1	6
Whittier	California	224	139	4	43.8%	85,982	21.2	5	2	5	0	1	5
Raleigh	North Carolina	253	173	8	15.7%	85,972	24.4	15	7	16	0	0	8
Clarksville	Tennessee	137	89	4	48.7%	85,565	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	125	85	1	85.1%	85,185	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Vero Beach	Florida	208	147	1	73.9%	85,086	3.5	6	2	9	1	2	9
Vacaville	California	131	89	1	80.6%	84,875	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Asheville	North Carolina	163	105	2	64.1%	84,641	4.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Alpharetta	Georgia	185	121	3	44.2%	83,632	6.5	4	5	6	0	0	5
Waterbury	Connecticut	188	134	1	76.9%	83,504	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Summerville	South Carolina	119	85	2	60.0%	83,365	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
York	Pennsylvania	191	137	5	45.7%	82,206	6.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Moreno Valley	California	183	129	5	40.0%	82,182	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Perris	California	134	95	2	70.0%	82,173	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Nampa	Idaho	136	96	3	70.6%	81,871	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Renton	Washington	189	119	1	52.9%	81,847	5.4	5	3	9	0	0	8
Palm Bay	Florida	162	109	1	73.5%	81,804	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Bend	Oregon	162	111	1	66.9%	81,751	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Burbank	California	188	132	1	75.6%	81,701	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Provo	Utah	150	103	1	70.0%	81,566	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mcallen	Texas	150	103	1	57.6%	81,556	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	156	108	3	41.8%	81,463	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Auburn	Washington	150	102	2	72.2%	81,445	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Allentown	Pennsylvania	193	135	4	47.9%	81,419	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lake Worth	Florida	218	147	6	39.0%	80,593	6.8	5	5	7	0	0	6
Rock Hill	South Carolina	161	110	1	69.0%	80,341	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Richardson	Texas	152	112	2	70.0%	80,219	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fairfield	California	126	82	2	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	133	87	1	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	349	231	10	11.7%	79,570	11.6	43	7	46	0	0	17
Sterling Heights	Michigan	156	107	2	60.0%	79,482	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Puyallup	Washington	194	134	1	55.5%	79,233	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Edison	New Jersey	121	86	2	78.5%	79,106	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Winston Salem	North Carolina	219	160	5	29.9%	79,049	26.7	8	2	8	0	0	6
Downey	California	141	98	1	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Naperville	Illinois	165	118	3	47.5%	78,826	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Canton	Ohio	218	146	3	53.4%	78,491	7.3	12	3	13	0	2	12
Chico	California	145	100	1	70.0%	78,411	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	146	92	1	80.8%	78,176	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Kennewick	Washington	139	85	2	78.9%	77,994	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
South Bend	Indiana	255	177	3	53.1%	77,926	6.0	10	2	10	0	0	9
Allen	Texas	131	95	2	70.0%	77,890	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Antioch	California	123	89	1	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Muskegon	Michigan	164	109	2	60.0%	77,505	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Huntington Beach	California	156	113	4	38.7%	77,431	9.3	4	4	5	0	0	2
Brownsville	Texas	139	92	6	38.3%	77,107	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Shreveport	Louisiana	226	159	5	34.5%	77,059	7.5	12	1	12	0	0	12
Orange	California	177	121	2	53.1%	77,001	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Brockton	Massachusetts	126	84	1	80.2%	76,547	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Indio	California	133	99	1	79.6%	76,487	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Pearland	Texas	147	98	1	55.6%	76,474	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Columbia	South Carolina	261	171	5	22.3%	76,385	8.5	14	2	15	0	0	14
Olympia	Washington	209	133	3	41.7%	76,196	7.5	6	2	7	0	1	4
Hartford	Connecticut	170	119	2	61.6%	75,983	4.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Bellingham	Washington	151	100	2	60.0%	75,896	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nashville	Tennessee	282	182	6	16.5%	75,660	14.1	21	1	21	0	0	13
Henrico	Virginia	216	150	2	39.2%	75,563	32.7	5	2	5	0	1	5
Manassas	Virginia	177	117	2	49.6%	75,301	29.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Killeen	Texas	155	103	2	50.0%	75,100	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vallejo	California	164	106	2	60.3%	75,006	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Gastonia	North Carolina	145	101	3	70.0%	74,927	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Athens	Georgia	182	123	3	60.0%	74,829	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Carlsbad	California	191	130	1	65.7%	74,730	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Largo	Florida	166	106	1	69.3%	74,631	3.6	5	3	6	1	3	6
Pueblo	Colorado	204	148	3	47.0%	74,302	6.0	7	3	8	0	0	7
Huntsville	Alabama	217	148	4	37.9%	74,282	7.3	11	3	15	0	0	15
Norwalk	California	100	75	2	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Frederick	Maryland	146	103	3	56.0%	73,919	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Odessa	Texas	187	122	6	46.0%	73,682	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Greeley	Colorado	126	83	3	64.5%	73,555	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Worcester	Massachusetts	219	153	5	39.6%	73,517	7.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Yakima	Washington	163	116	2	56.4%	73,263	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salem	Oregon	201	132	7	27.4%	73,078	8.1	7	2	9	0	0	9
Saginaw	Michigan	196	133	2	56.0%	73,014	5.0	7	1	7	0	1	7
Santa Cruz	California	147	94	1	70.0%	72,834	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	California	135	93	3	52.4%	72,723	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Newport News	Virginia	197	137	2	40.9%	72,192	6.7	7	2	7	0	0	6
New Braunfels	Texas	125	85	1	70.0%	71,954	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Woodstock	Georgia	128	84	1	70.0%	71,205	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Las Cruces	New Mexico	191	129	4	47.6%	70,974	14.6	7	3	9	0	0	8
Ypsilanti	Michigan	132	92	1	66.4%	70,950	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	135	93	2	56.6%	70,862	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Berkeley	California	255	178	2	55.7%	70,842	5.8	9	3	9	0	0	8
Chattanooga	Tennessee	258	162	5	34.1%	70,796	14.6	15	5	16	0	0	13
Visalia	California	143	100	3	46.5%	70,706	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orem	Utah	148	96	1	70.0%	70,223	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redding	California	177	121	3	62.0%	70,095	4.5	4	2	4	0	1	4
Ontario	California	136	97	3	39.7%	70,072	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Racine	Wisconsin	162	119	1	55.5%	70,025	23.4	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roswell	Georgia	132	95	1	70.0%	69,839	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Reno	Nevada	242	175	7	23.4%	69,406	8.2	12	1	12	0	0	12
Abilene	Texas	175	120	4	52.8%	68,690	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Baytown	Texas	139	98	3	58.1%	68,466	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Coral Springs	Florida	124	85	3	70.0%	68,067	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Livonia	Michigan	134	94	2	71.9%	68,015	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Lawrence	Kansas	177	123	1	67.2%	67,867	4.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Surprise	Arizona	164	117	3	50.0%	67,780	6.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Napa	California	123	85	1	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Montgomery	Alabama	261	180	4	32.2%	67,510	7.4	13	2	14	0	0	14
Livermore	California	122	86	3	70.0%	67,377	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	100	69	1	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Waukesha	Wisconsin	147	104	1	70.0%	67,057	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	California	98	68	2	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Angelo	Texas	163	106	3	60.0%	66,460	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Panama City	Florida	198	131	2	52.5%	66,389	5.8	6	2	6	0	0	6
Menifee	California	177	121	1	59.9%	66,232	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boise	Idaho	235	170	9	25.9%	66,219	18.0	9	5	11	0	0	9
Douglasville	Georgia	119	86	2	60.0%	66,149	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	176	120	4	45.4%	66,111	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lewisville	Texas	146	101	4	55.7%	66,088	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rialto	California	129	87	3	61.8%	65,905	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Deltona	Florida	131	93	1	70.0%	65,722	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	126	87	1	70.0%	65,377	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Spring Hill	Florida	177	121	2	52.1%	65,350	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Belleville	Illinois	171	124	1	70.0%	65,258	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Grand Rapids	Michigan	227	155	8	17.7%	64,968	13.2	12	2	12	0	0	11
Buford	Georgia	120	90	1	65.3%	64,731	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bothell	Washington	166	121	2	50.2%	64,375	6.0	3	3	4	0	0	4
Simi Valley	California	130	89	5	50.0%	64,356	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	157	109	2	62.4%	64,213	5.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Florissant	Missouri	154	107	2	59.1%	64,002	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Acworth	Georgia	132	98	1	64.2%	63,974	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	144	104	1	66.5%	63,347	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Annapolis	Maryland	188	125	3	66.5%	63,192	22.8	4	1	4	2	2	4
Meridian	Idaho	121	80	2	60.0%	62,533	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Davenport	Iowa	174	121	3	59.4%	62,245	5.2	6	1	6	0	2	6
Honolulu	Hawaii	225	157	9	14.9%	62,134	9.5	11	1	11	0	0	10
Duluth	Minnesota	221	149	3	53.0%	62,097	5.8	11	1	11	0	2	11
Hillsboro	Oregon	123	87	2	60.0%	61,723	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bryan	Texas	184	124	2	63.7%	61,316	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Boynton Beach	Florida	198	123	8	35.2%	61,253	7.3	6	4	9	0	0	6
Fredericksburg	Virginia	162	113	4	35.2%	61,238	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
High Point	North Carolina	177	123	3	50.0%	61,154	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Idaho Falls	Idaho	160	115	2	56.1%	61,127	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Charleston	South Carolina	222	147	6	30.9%	60,876	14.9	10	2	10	0	0	6
Scranton	Pennsylvania	232	158	1	61.1%	60,780	16.5	7	1	7	0	0	7
Elizabeth	New Jersey	141	91	2	60.0%	60,280	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
El Cajon	California	160	106	6	34.9%	60,212	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Parker	Colorado	125	81	2	60.0%	60,169	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Albany	New York	229	164	4	39.6%	59,933	7.3	11	3	11	0	0	9
Hayward	California	152	101	6	31.2%	59,917	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Laurel	Maryland	162	109	2	53.1%	59,745	5.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Elkhart	Indiana	147	100	2	60.0%	59,660	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Franklin	Tennessee	143	105	3	55.7%	59,308	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Winter Haven	Florida	140	94	4	55.3%	59,065	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sacramento	California	318	208	11	7.2%	58,103	39.2	28	17	30	0	0	6
Hawthorne	California	101	72	4	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Joliet	Illinois	156	108	4	44.9%	57,901	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Johnson City	Tennessee	170	119	2	60.6%	57,844	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Springdale	Arkansas	118	86	2	60.0%	57,843	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	158	109	2	58.7%	57,446	36.7	2	1	2	0	1	2
Muncie	Indiana	183	132	1	61.9%	57,424	4.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
West Valley City	Utah	135	94	2	42.8%	56,895	19.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	150	108	4	54.8%	54,958	36.3	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	California	141	106	4	53.1%	54,775	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Dearborn	Michigan	162	114	2	57.0%	54,164	5.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Missouri City	Texas	156	110	2	50.3%	53,402	5.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Ridgewood	New York	99	79	6	50.0%	53,359	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Clovis	California	155	100	3	43.8%	53,200	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	190	130	3	55.7%	52,864	5.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Longview	Texas	170	114	3	50.1%	52,761	5.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Lynnwood	Washington	160	110	1	48.3%	52,340	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Fargo	North Dakota	160	113	4	42.6%	52,219	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bowling Green	Kentucky	134	93	6	45.2%	52,161	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Edmond	Oklahoma	182	113	6	30.2%	51,864	11.0	5	7	10	0	0	4
Gulfport	Mississippi	138	95	3	54.2%	51,332	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Valdosta	Georgia	154	104	4	54.1%	51,325	5.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Jackson	Mississippi	240	167	3	30.1%	51,323	28.7	11	5	11	0	0	7
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	171	123	7	27.5%	51,278	20.2	5	2	5	0	0	4
Youngstown	Ohio	238	163	4	32.6%	51,251	7.8	12	4	13	0	0	10
Rockville	Maryland	178	115	5	35.4%	51,204	51.8	2	1	2	1	1	2
Tyler	Texas	234	155	6	32.6%	50,973	7.3	9	2	10	0	0	10
Lakewood	New Jersey	100	74	4	50.0%	50,382	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	171	117	3	48.6%	49,730	29.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Apopka	Florida	121	87	3	50.0%	48,827	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	119	92	3	50.0%	48,764	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	California	128	91	2	46.6%	48,425	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Broomfield	Colorado	150	96	4	45.9%	48,101	6.7	3	4	5	0	0	5
Hampton	Virginia	197	132	6	35.2%	48,016	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Chino	California	123	86	3	50.0%	47,237	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	156	117	3	47.9%	47,160	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hamilton	Ohio	157	108	5	34.4%	47,103	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Hemet	California	155	104	5	36.6%	47,085	7.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Champaign	Illinois	143	96	4	49.7%	47,001	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mcdonough	Georgia	121	84	4	45.4%	46,102	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	214	155	6	27.2%	46,040	22.9	9	5	9	0	0	5
Saint Louis	Missouri	373	264	13	5.0%	45,458	30.9	45	10	48	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	162	119	5	47.8%	45,312	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roanoke	Virginia	244	174	6	26.4%	44,667	24.4	9	3	9	0	0	7
Augusta	Georgia	205	145	8	21.3%	43,599	13.5	8	2	8	0	0	7
Quincy	Massachusetts	138	93	3	46.1%	43,427	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Port Richey	Florida	169	112	4	35.6%	43,025	29.5	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cypress	Texas	128	92	7	25.2%	42,955	8.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Pacoima	California	99	71	7	40.0%	42,320	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	133	85	2	43.3%	42,182	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Kent	Washington	154	107	4	25.9%	41,580	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tracy	California	166	102	5	34.3%	40,233	30.5	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mission Viejo	California	123	84	4	40.0%	39,343	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Flint	Michigan	197	138	7	25.3%	39,333	21.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Riverview	Florida	155	99	4	35.1%	39,048	7.7	3	3	4	0	0	4
Billings	Montana	162	116	7	28.3%	38,802	18.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Fort Pierce	Florida	242	165	5	40.2%	38,506	18.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Humble	Texas	137	95	9	23.1%	38,404	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Amarillo	Texas	232	160	11	16.5%	37,682	19.7	14	4	14	0	0	8
Sparks	Nevada	172	126	5	31.6%	37,659	7.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Elmhurst	New York	100	81	4	40.0%	37,587	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
North Las Vegas	Nevada	197	123	7	16.0%	37,323	13.6	7	3	11	0	0	10
Medford	Oregon	122	94	7	39.8%	37,097	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Garden Grove	California	169	110	6	21.1%	37,078	9.0	5	2	10	0	0	8
Kenosha	Wisconsin	150	109	5	32.6%	36,786	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Milton	Florida	149	96	4	38.8%	36,754	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Elgin	Illinois	146	102	8	30.0%	36,664	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Herndon	Virginia	130	86	3	39.2%	36,661	7.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Warren	Michigan	162	105	5	27.0%	36,500	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Missoula	Montana	159	109	4	37.1%	36,140	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Phoenix	Arizona	341	221	29	2.5%	36,016	45.1	42	15	45	0	0	0
Keller	Texas	140	95	7	30.3%	35,251	7.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	160	111	4	27.3%	34,994	69.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	223	153	8	19.1%	34,770	9.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Concord	California	167	121	6	26.7%	34,746	8.8	4	3	5	0	1	1
Tulsa	Oklahoma	313	215	12	8.2%	34,492	40.4	28	14	29	0	0	2
Independence	Missouri	204	147	7	27.7%	34,369	8.8	8	2	8	0	0	7
Birmingham	Alabama	317	206	16	6.6%	33,047	15.4	30	3	31	0	0	1
Falls Church	Virginia	201	143	5	26.6%	32,028	43.6	3	5	5	0	0	5
Covington	Georgia	128	89	3	34.1%	31,651	7.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
Pomona	California	143	107	7	20.0%	31,597	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Monica	California	184	124	7	32.3%	30,500	7.4	5	3	10	0	0	10
Springfield	Missouri	186	124	11	13.2%	30,435	18.3	7	3	8	0	0	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	191	125	7	29.1%	30,027	11.0	5	2	5	0	0	4
La Puente	California	153	102	7	24.5%	28,936	9.5	2	3	3	0	0	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	184	126	8	24.9%	28,838	9.2	5	2	6	0	0	4
Miami Beach	Florida	208	130	9	24.0%	27,784	9.2	5	4	8	0	0	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	224	155	6	28.8%	27,488	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Astoria	New York	161	125	8	19.3%	27,481	10.3	4	2	4	0	0	2
Sugar Land	Texas	174	121	10	15.7%	26,575	10.7	3	5	6	0	0	4
Grand Junction	Colorado	185	125	7	25.2%	26,540	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Bowie	Maryland	173	121	4	25.9%	26,495	9.5	4	6	7	0	0	3
Murrieta	California	128	88	7	20.0%	26,449	9.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
West Covina	California	151	110	6	24.1%	26,402	8.7	3	4	6	0	0	6
Henderson	Nevada	198	134	11	8.6%	25,898	12.3	8	3	12	0	0	2
Delray Beach	Florida	187	121	10	20.5%	24,416	27.6	4	3	7	0	0	1
Victorville	California	144	97	8	16.9%	22,988	9.3	3	2	5	0	0	4
Lees Summit	Missouri	200	141	6	21.9%	22,362	25.0	5	2	6	0	0	3
Englewood	Colorado	194	122	9	19.9%	22,177	31.5	3	3	4	0	0	3
Boston	Massachusetts	229	156	10	13.9%	21,043	27.6	14	5	14	0	0	5
Kennesaw	Georgia	120	86	6	20.0%	19,826	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saint Augustine	Florida	216	145	11	14.3%	18,776	19.4	5	3	5	0	0	2
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	149	99	8	19.2%	18,768	9.0	3	3	6	0	0	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	159	106	6	15.1%	18,530	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palo Alto	California	164	111	9	19.0%	18,342	10.8	4	4	7	0	0	2
Des Moines	Iowa	232	162	13	7.6%	17,072	42.5	11	7	11	0	0	3
Palmdale	California	173	122	10	9.6%	16,724	10.3	4	2	7	0	0	3
Van Nuys	California	152	106	10	9.4%	16,647	27.8	4	3	4	0	0	1
Spartanburg	South Carolina	172	124	9	14.7%	16,462	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Saint Charles	Missouri	149	104	9	11.7%	16,337	11.3	3	4	5	0	0	2
Green Bay	Wisconsin	194	138	13	8.9%	16,331	36.1	6	3	6	0	0	4
Midland	Texas	166	114	10	9.4%	15,043	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Redwood City	California	163	113	9	13.1%	15,023	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	216	146	14	7.1%	14,484	22.5	6	2	6	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	150	109	8	14.4%	14,444	9.7	3	2	4	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	122	85	9	14.8%	13,936	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	170	118	11	8.0%	13,762	12.3	4	2	7	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	151	102	10	14.1%	13,388	27.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Vista	California	154	117	13	11.1%	13,286	16.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
Westerville	Ohio	122	88	10	13.5%	12,884	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	207	142	14	10.7%	10,556	11.6	7	3	8	0	0	3
Metairie	Louisiana	163	114	13	6.7%	9,471	13.6	5	5	9	0	0	0
Lynn	Massachusetts	159	115	8	9.5%	8,910	10.8	4	2	8	0	0	1
El Monte	California	112	78	10	9.0%	8,467	11.5	2	4	4	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	California	98	69	9	8.0%	8,195	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	128	94	10	8.0%	7,745	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	157	108	14	5.1%	7,744	29.0	4	3	4	0	0	0
Midlothian	Virginia	152	105	14	7.1%	6,869	40.0	2	2	4	0	0	3
Daly City	California	134	96	12	5.9%	6,801	33.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Sandy	Utah	159	117	13	5.9%	6,487	14.0	4	3	7	0	0	0
Decatur	Georgia	184	123	16	3.4%	6,096	43.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Greenville	South Carolina	225	162	24	2.4%	5,240	50.9	9	5	9	0	0	2
Ballwin	Missouri	121	93	12	5.4%	5,118	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Fontana	California	133	98	17	1.8%	4,275	21.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	185	128	24	1.1%	1,509	67.7	4	4	4	0	0	1
West Chester	Pennsylvania	142	104	32	0.9%	940	33.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	165	107	24	0.9%	892	27.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	99	72	79	0.4%	376	80.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	129	81	115	0.1%	144	96.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Jose	342	230	2	61.5%	645,885	4.9	28	1	28	0	5	28
San Diego	394	254	6	27.5%	370,041	10.8	36	3	36	0	0	31
Long Beach	215	143	3	55.3%	264,994	5.3	12	2	12	0	3	12
Fresno	264	179	4	39.3%	237,069	7.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Santa Ana	193	131	1	60.5%	215,975	5.0	6	2	8	0	0	8
Anaheim	187	136	3	56.5%	208,160	5.1	7	1	7	0	1	7
Los Angeles	370	257	10	8.2%	200,354	26.3	62	16	65	1	1	10
Irvine	241	168	1	73.0%	195,322	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Fremont	154	101	1	78.8%	183,643	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Chula Vista	184	114	2	68.8%	179,363	4.0	5	1	5	1	1	5
Riverside	197	133	4	47.2%	174,776	6.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Oxnard	158	111	3	73.8%	162,708	4.0	4	1	4	1	1	4
Santa Rosa	171	113	1	73.4%	158,507	3.8	6	1	6	1	1	6
San Bernardino	209	136	2	60.8%	151,601	4.7	7	1	7	0	1	7
Oceanside	167	124	2	75.6%	151,428	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Oakland	253	178	5	35.5%	146,347	10.1	14	2	14	0	0	13
Escondido	175	113	1	79.5%	142,800	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Lancaster	145	93	2	76.4%	140,820	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Stockton	229	164	5	36.8%	137,402	7.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Modesto	196	145	3	49.3%	130,401	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Elk Grove	140	100	1	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pasadena	185	133	1	78.9%	124,437	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Corona	195	139	5	47.3%	121,684	6.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
San Francisco	313	218	8	13.2%	114,965	18.0	28	5	29	0	0	11
Salinas	173	112	2	60.0%	112,997	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rancho Cucamonga	161	112	3	63.6%	112,260	5.0	4	2	5	0	1	5
Santa Clara	166	103	2	89.1%	111,862	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Bakersfield	200	141	9	19.9%	111,207	9.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Ventura	143	94	1	94.7%	109,859	1.7	3	1	3	2	3	3
Santa Barbara	222	143	1	78.2%	106,294	3.4	7	1	7	2	2	7
Sunnyvale	199	134	2	69.0%	105,478	5.3	4	4	5	1	1	4
Torrance	200	139	3	58.2%	102,957	20.2	5	2	5	0	2	4
Roseville	156	112	1	70.0%	97,856	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fullerton	152	104	1	70.0%	97,493	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	148	105	2	66.8%	95,651	4.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
San Mateo	184	137	3	66.4%	94,582	4.5	4	3	5	0	2	5
Inglewood	197	138	1	70.0%	93,682	5.0	5	3	6	2	2	5
Temecula	160	108	1	70.0%	90,939	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	140	90	1	81.1%	90,149	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Whittier	224	139	4	43.8%	85,982	21.2	5	2	5	0	1	5
Vacaville	131	89	1	80.6%	84,875	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Moreno Valley	183	129	5	40.0%	82,182	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Perris	134	95	2	70.0%	82,173	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Burbank	188	132	1	75.6%	81,701	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Fairfield	126	82	2	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	133	87	1	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Downey	141	98	1	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chico	145	100	1	70.0%	78,411	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	123	89	1	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	156	113	4	38.7%	77,431	9.3	4	4	5	0	0	2
Orange	177	121	2	53.1%	77,001	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Indio	133	99	1	79.6%	76,487	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Vallejo	164	106	2	60.3%	75,006	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Carlsbad	191	130	1	65.7%	74,730	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Norwalk	100	75	2	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Cruz	147	94	1	70.0%	72,834	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	135	93	3	52.4%	72,723	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	255	178	2	55.7%	70,842	5.8	9	3	9	0	0	8
Visalia	143	100	3	46.5%	70,706	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redding	177	121	3	62.0%	70,095	4.5	4	2	4	0	1	4
Ontario	136	97	3	39.7%	70,072	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Napa	123	85	1	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Livermore	122	86	3	70.0%	67,377	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	100	69	1	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
South Gate	98	68	2	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Menifee	177	121	1	59.9%	66,232	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rialto	129	87	3	61.8%	65,905	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	130	89	5	50.0%	64,356	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	157	109	2	62.4%	64,213	5.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
El Cajon	160	106	6	34.9%	60,212	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Hayward	152	101	6	31.2%	59,917	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Sacramento	318	208	11	7.2%	58,103	39.2	28	17	30	0	0	6
Hawthorne	101	72	4	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Merced	141	106	4	53.1%	54,775	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clovis	155	100	3	43.8%	53,200	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hesperia	128	91	2	46.6%	48,425	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chino	123	86	3	50.0%	47,237	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hemet	155	104	5	36.6%	47,085	7.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Pacoima	99	71	7	40.0%	42,320	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Tracy	166	102	5	34.3%	40,233	30.5	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mission Viejo	123	84	4	40.0%	39,343	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Garden Grove	169	110	6	21.1%	37,078	9.0	5	2	10	0	0	8
Concord	167	121	6	26.7%	34,746	8.8	4	3	5	0	1	1
Pomona	143	107	7	20.0%	31,597	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Monica	184	124	7	32.3%	30,500	7.4	5	3	10	0	0	10
La Puente	153	102	7	24.5%	28,936	9.5	2	3	3	0	0	2
Murrieta	128	88	7	20.0%	26,449	9.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
West Covina	151	110	6	24.1%	26,402	8.7	3	4	6	0	0	6
Victorville	144	97	8	16.9%	22,988	9.3	3	2	5	0	0	4
Palo Alto	164	111	9	19.0%	18,342	10.8	4	4	7	0	0	2
Palmdale	173	122	10	9.6%	16,724	10.3	4	2	7	0	0	3
Van Nuys	152	106	10	9.4%	16,647	27.8	4	3	4	0	0	1
Redwood City	163	113	9	13.1%	15,023	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Vista	154	117	13	11.1%	13,286	16.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
El Monte	112	78	10	9.0%	8,467	11.5	2	4	4	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	98	69	9	8.0%	8,195	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
North Hollywood	157	108	14	5.1%	7,744	29.0	4	3	4	0	0	0
Daly City	134	96	12	5.9%	6,801	33.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Fontana	133	98	17	1.8%	4,275	21.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Sylmar	99	72	79	0.4%	376	80.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
San Marcos	129	81	115	0.1%	144	96.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

Brooklyn

ZIP	quicktransportsolutions.com	fueloyal.com	yelp.com	dylt.com	atctrucks.com	ironhorsetransportinc.com
11208	5	4	6	81	7	8
11206	6	4	5	2	7	8
11239	6	4	5	3	7	8
11229	7	5	4	74	6	8
11226	7	4	5	1		6
11218	25	4	5	1	6	8
11216	25	4	5	80	6	8
11228	36	4	5	1		6
11238	3	1	2	85	5	6
11237	10	4	5	3	7	8
11217	26	4	5	2	7	8
11207	25	4	5	3	6	8
11236	65	4	6	85	7	8
11205	26	4	5	1	6	8
11219	27	4	5	81		6
11234	39	4	5	2	7	8
11203	6	7	5	3		8
11224	2	1	4	75	5	7
11225	5	4	7	1	8	17
11215	7	4	5	2	6	8
11233	6	4	5	72	7	8
11211	7	4	5	1	6	8
11220	7	4	5	86	6	8
11230	6	4	5	1	7	8
11232	6	4	5	1	7	8
11201	7	4	5	2	6	8
11212	6	4	5	79	7	8
11221	6	5	4	3	7	8
11210	3	1	2	74	4	5
11214	7	4	5	2	6	8
11213	6	4	7	84	8	17
11223	6	4	5	86	7	8
11235	6	4	5	88	8	7
11204	3	4	2	85	5	14
11222	7	4	5	2	6	8
11209	5	1	2	71		3
11231	8	1	3	71	4	5

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Quicktransportsolutions

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 6,679 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Quicktransportsolutions Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (trucking company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Quicktransportsolutions Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Quicktransportsolutions Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Quicktransportsolutions Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly