Psychologytoday Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve psychologytoday.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 28,476 Therapy Clinics In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Psychologytoday Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Psychologytoday Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Psychologytoday Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Psychologytoday Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	84,673	28,476	1	74.5%	240,634,173	3.5	27,379	32,654	10,787	59,479	5,333	9,566	59,479
California	9,879	4,030	1	73.8%	28,902,195	3.6	1,166	1,740	728	3,140	257	460	3,140
Texas	7,032	2,763	1	75.1%	20,953,643	3.4	1,360	1,917	525	3,333	364	619	3,333
Florida	5,828	2,237	1	75.0%	15,455,435	3.5	446	975	415	1,808	158	299	1,808
New York	6,108	2,283	1	75.3%	14,771,993	3.5	1,491	1,756	679	3,213	288	519	3,213
Pennsylvania	5,480	2,007	1	75.0%	9,595,482	3.5	1,604	1,781	558	3,079	277	475	3,079
Illinois	4,922	1,819	1	74.0%	9,491,746	3.6	1,247	1,382	458	2,479	204	362	2,479
Ohio	4,700	1,504	1	74.8%	8,710,033	3.5	976	1,188	406	2,160	192	331	2,160
Georgia	3,906	1,532	1	75.0%	7,727,757	3.5	574	726	320	1,342	112	204	1,342
Michigan	4,091	1,423	1	75.9%	7,558,315	3.4	833	976	408	1,766	179	325	1,766
North Carolina	4,085	1,649	1	74.3%	7,545,007	3.6	683	802	323	1,448	103	190	1,448
New Jersey	3,777	1,561	1	74.6%	6,624,439	3.6	537	593	428	1,155	88	174	1,155
Virginia	3,693	1,440	1	75.3%	6,336,055	3.5	723	891	300	1,687	153	291	1,687
Washington	3,746	1,531	1	74.0%	5,387,388	3.5	451	587	246	1,036	92	161	1,036
Arizona	2,460	964	1	73.7%	5,120,677	3.5	247	396	113	666	59	97	666
Massachusetts	3,871	1,425	1	73.2%	4,998,898	3.7	461	534	457	1,020	61	117	1,020
Indiana	5,061	1,890	1	74.3%	4,928,592	3.6	659	770	245	1,372	107	203	1,372
Tennessee	2,850	1,031	1	74.0%	4,920,186	3.6	514	622	172	1,173	84	162	1,173
Missouri	3,094	1,110	1	74.1%	4,510,430	3.6	887	1,017	235	1,941	151	286	1,941
Maryland	2,807	1,217	1	72.7%	4,362,049	3.7	392	463	206	862	49	95	862
Wisconsin	3,580	1,157	1	75.0%	4,331,957	3.5	694	769	273	1,327	117	188	1,327
Minnesota	3,435	1,242	1	75.2%	4,156,818	3.5	777	878	294	1,533	140	239	1,533
Colorado	3,408	1,477	1	74.1%	4,100,621	3.4	381	514	177	941	107	189	941
South Carolina	2,477	986	1	73.0%	3,619,644	3.6	347	422	150	804	59	112	804
Alabama	2,698	965	1	73.9%	3,597,022	3.6	522	637	199	1,138	90	158	1,138
Louisiana	2,429	921	1	74.9%	3,491,853	3.5	431	510	142	906	85	142	906
Kentucky	2,607	949	1	74.5%	3,312,804	3.6	698	758	181	1,254	110	179	1,254
Oklahoma	2,399	887	1	76.5%	2,998,644	3.5	557	646	143	1,226	102	196	1,226
Oregon	3,217	1,340	1	73.0%	2,977,803	3.5	355	414	152	691	78	124	691
Connecticut	2,535	960	1	74.3%	2,662,535	3.6	234	279	248	553	37	71	553
Iowa	2,915	1,000	1	73.6%	2,304,401	3.6	890	933	194	1,824	127	241	1,824
Mississippi	2,392	933	1	75.4%	2,252,450	3.6	384	418	138	808	64	123	808
Arkansas	2,475	931	1	74.4%	2,223,583	3.5	553	587	131	1,127	100	193	1,127
Utah	1,930	792	1	72.3%	2,200,532	3.6	246	284	117	546	39	78	546
Nevada	1,305	553	1	73.8%	2,157,735	3.4	92	168	38	259	32	50	259
Kansas	2,770	1,030	1	74.1%	2,155,519	3.5	616	692	138	1,330	113	219	1,330
New Mexico	1,702	646	1	76.9%	1,605,870	3.3	327	361	68	669	81	148	669
Nebraska	2,185	853	1	75.8%	1,443,809	3.4	524	581	89	1,028	112	192	1,028
West Virginia	2,140	773	1	73.4%	1,342,713	3.6	684	704	90	1,309	102	190	1,309
Idaho	1,943	801	1	76.9%	1,297,524	3.5	251	273	84	477	43	76	477
New Hampshire	1,835	662	1	77.6%	1,042,910	3.5	238	248	160	480	44	86	480
Hawaii	988	400	1	72.6%	1,032,590	3.6	82	93	43	178	12	23	178
Maine	2,710	1,152	1	74.4%	991,532	3.4	421	425	190	846	83	166	846
Rhode Island	911	393	1	76.4%	807,461	3.6	64	77	60	151	10	20	151
Montana	1,942	788	1	75.2%	784,317	3.3	348	361	85	601	93	133	601
Delaware	849	365	1	74.8%	710,651	3.4	52	66	47	129	14	27	129
South Dakota	1,514	589	1	73.4%	633,776	3.3	359	370	46	694	83	144	694
North Dakota	1,282	496	1	75.1%	564,007	3.4	367	381	26	759	78	151	759
Alaska	1,371	521	1	73.3%	541,122	2.4	218	235	33	389	124	200	389
Vermont	1,507	549	1	74.2%	463,905	3.6	250	254	117	502	36	72	502
Wyoming	1,366	551	1	74.0%	430,884	3.4	164	171	57	291	35	61	291

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	453	251	1	76.4%	2,436,035	3.4	96	3	102	18	20	102
Chicago	Illinois	307	187	1	73.6%	1,987,684	3.5	56	1	56	9	9	56
Brooklyn	New York	297	170	1	74.9%	1,948,181	3.6	37	3	64	5	8	64
Los Angeles	California	477	264	1	73.9%	1,814,731	3.7	62	5	77	6	6	77
Miami	Florida	553	273	1	76.8%	1,442,997	3.2	55	16	110	14	28	110
San Antonio	Texas	332	177	1	75.1%	1,335,741	3.6	59	4	104	8	16	104
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	377	202	1	75.9%	1,195,321	3.6	47	2	47	6	6	47
New York City	New York	329	199	1	72.4%	1,173,459	3.7	47	3	95	5	10	95
Las Vegas	Nevada	362	164	1	72.0%	1,112,773	3.9	43	3	45	2	2	45
Phoenix	Arizona	350	191	1	75.0%	1,087,849	3.4	42	2	43	8	9	43
Dallas	Texas	357	231	1	75.8%	1,055,799	3.4	48	5	81	10	18	81
Bronx	New York	232	125	1	70.9%	1,021,703	3.9	25	2	50	1	2	50
San Diego	California	432	272	1	71.0%	957,002	3.8	36	4	72	2	4	72
Austin	Texas	323	206	1	75.1%	817,218	3.5	44	3	89	7	17	89
Denver	Colorado	489	283	1	74.1%	805,451	3.5	38	8	75	6	12	75
Minneapolis	Minnesota	605	323	1	73.4%	798,699	3.7	51	19	81	5	7	81
San Jose	California	238	132	1	74.9%	786,830	3.6	28	1	28	4	4	28
Atlanta	Georgia	550	287	1	77.8%	769,338	3.2	39	17	57	9	14	57
Orlando	Florida	354	191	1	72.6%	722,664	3.7	32	6	36	3	3	36
Indianapolis	Indiana	410	192	1	75.5%	718,264	3.5	37	5	74	6	12	74
Seattle	Washington	375	228	1	72.8%	694,978	3.7	35	6	43	4	5	43
Jacksonville	Florida	294	155	1	79.1%	686,249	3.2	31	3	46	8	13	46
Tucson	Arizona	413	187	1	75.7%	685,320	3.5	32	5	51	5	8	51
Fort Worth	Texas	262	155	1	74.0%	675,297	3.6	32	3	54	4	7	54
Charlotte	North Carolina	278	173	1	73.6%	667,163	3.6	24	2	28	3	4	28
Saint Louis	Missouri	459	236	1	72.6%	666,043	3.7	45	17	90	5	10	90
Portland	Oregon	374	221	1	71.3%	655,913	3.9	33	1	33	3	4	33
San Francisco	California	306	197	1	74.1%	645,231	3.7	28	2	29	3	3	29
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	524	260	1	76.0%	631,526	3.5	27	14	45	4	7	45
Columbus	Ohio	313	173	1	74.0%	626,523	3.7	30	4	59	3	6	59
Cincinnati	Ohio	274	135	1	77.6%	624,238	3.3	45	4	90	10	20	90
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	342	161	1	75.6%	613,313	3.6	29	7	57	4	8	57
Sacramento	California	297	152	1	76.0%	611,723	3.6	28	3	56	4	8	56
Saint Paul	Minnesota	540	278	1	75.8%	606,112	3.5	30	21	56	5	9	56
Tampa	Florida	285	171	1	75.4%	598,022	3.4	27	4	33	6	8	33
El Paso	Texas	362	151	1	71.3%	562,707	3.8	24	4	47	2	3	47
Louisville	Kentucky	261	127	1	72.9%	555,092	3.6	32	3	64	4	8	64
Cleveland	Ohio	403	184	1	72.4%	542,968	3.8	29	9	58	2	4	58
Memphis	Tennessee	327	144	1	74.3%	516,392	3.7	26	4	50	3	6	50
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	359	187	1	74.3%	506,698	3.6	39	9	77	5	10	77
Fresno	California	240	116	1	83.5%	502,761	3.0	18	3	36	6	12	36
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	388	199	1	73.5%	501,455	3.7	43	9	84	5	10	84
Washington DC	District of Columbia	308	188	1	72.6%	496,766	3.5	28	1	28	5	5	28
Detroit	Michigan	269	140	1	74.4%	476,350	3.6	25	2	50	3	6	50
Albuquerque	New Mexico	238	118	1	72.2%	473,527	3.5	17	3	37	2	5	37
Buffalo	New York	361	162	1	78.7%	442,692	3.2	28	9	57	7	15	57
Baltimore	Maryland	278	137	1	70.0%	441,612	4.0	22	5	42	0	0	42
Colorado Springs	Colorado	323	171	1	75.3%	439,490	3.4	30	5	40	6	8	40
Kansas City	Missouri	279	151	1	74.7%	426,849	3.5	49	4	99	7	15	99
Omaha	Nebraska	246	136	1	77.1%	426,121	3.4	31	2	62	6	12	62
Bakersfield	California	230	112	1	74.5%	416,916	3.7	11	2	17	1	2	17
Mesa	Arizona	212	108	1	72.2%	385,960	3.8	13	2	26	1	2	26
Raleigh	North Carolina	211	122	1	70.0%	382,670	4.0	15	4	20	0	0	20
Birmingham	Alabama	296	157	1	76.4%	382,173	3.4	30	4	60	6	12	60
Hollywood	Florida	258	127	1	80.8%	378,812	2.7	9	4	18	4	8	18
Staten Island	New York	221	116	1	79.1%	375,066	3.0	12	4	27	3	7	27
Long Beach	California	240	123	1	74.9%	358,688	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
Dayton	Ohio	440	204	1	73.1%	349,337	3.8	27	15	49	2	4	49
Aurora	Colorado	217	118	1	79.3%	345,093	2.9	11	2	21	4	8	21
Rochester	New York	275	153	1	73.1%	344,869	3.6	24	4	48	3	6	48
Salt Lake City	Utah	316	167	1	70.0%	340,728	4.0	19	5	31	0	0	31
Tulsa	Oklahoma	233	114	1	79.6%	336,012	3.1	28	4	56	8	16	56
Nashville	Tennessee	296	163	1	73.3%	335,975	3.6	22	4	42	3	5	42
Virginia Beach	Virginia	223	119	1	72.9%	328,275	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
New Orleans	Louisiana	256	130	1	76.1%	325,860	3.5	19	2	36	3	5	36
Arlington	Texas	198	102	1	77.9%	309,235	3.0	12	1	12	4	4	12
Honolulu	Hawaii	212	105	1	74.3%	309,077	3.7	11	4	22	1	2	22
Wichita	Kansas	279	145	1	73.7%	308,095	3.7	26	3	51	3	5	51
Oakland	California	257	145	1	73.7%	303,389	3.6	14	3	16	2	3	16
Knoxville	Tennessee	239	113	1	77.5%	299,634	3.5	17	2	26	3	5	26
Richmond	Virginia	227	109	2	75.9%	296,908	3.6	15	2	17	2	2	17
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	267	119	1	77.5%	293,732	3.2	18	5	36	5	10	36
Spring	Texas	239	136	1	76.7%	292,126	3.3	8	4	10	2	2	10
Hialeah	Florida	249	131	1	79.3%	290,947	3.1	7	4	14	2	4	14
Pompano Beach	Florida	338	162	1	75.0%	277,816	3.7	10	11	20	1	2	20
Anaheim	California	220	111	1	73.4%	270,713	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Greensboro	North Carolina	188	99	1	82.0%	268,468	3.0	9	3	18	3	6	18
West Palm Beach	Florida	302	135	1	72.2%	267,482	3.8	12	6	18	1	1	18
Stockton	California	280	120	1	71.3%	266,396	3.8	12	3	24	1	2	24
Grand Rapids	Michigan	202	109	1	71.0%	261,197	3.9	12	3	14	0	1	14
Riverside	California	185	94	1	70.0%	259,008	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Alexandria	Virginia	286	163	1	72.9%	258,477	3.8	14	8	27	1	2	27
Spokane	Washington	244	125	1	71.7%	257,988	3.8	14	4	28	1	2	28
Saint Petersburg	Florida	327	184	1	72.3%	257,826	3.8	16	2	29	1	2	29
Naples	Florida	241	120	1	80.2%	251,079	2.7	14	4	28	6	12	28
Columbia	South Carolina	217	110	1	72.9%	249,874	3.5	14	4	23	2	3	23
Littleton	Colorado	347	202	1	75.8%	246,759	3.4	10	8	19	2	4	19
Marietta	Georgia	206	115	2	76.3%	246,167	3.3	7	2	8	2	2	8
Santa Ana	California	198	102	1	68.7%	245,308	4.2	6	2	6	0	0	6
Laredo	Texas	195	93	1	90.1%	243,971	2.5	6	2	12	3	6	12
Katy	Texas	146	100	1	70.0%	240,620	4.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Fort Wayne	Indiana	222	107	1	75.3%	239,592	3.4	16	2	32	3	6	32
Tacoma	Washington	345	195	1	71.8%	239,516	3.9	20	5	24	1	1	24
Henderson	Nevada	188	92	1	78.4%	237,224	3.3	8	2	11	2	4	11
Plano	Texas	154	88	1	77.6%	236,946	3.1	7	2	8	2	3	8
Vancouver	Washington	207	116	1	72.4%	236,177	3.7	11	2	14	1	1	14
Lexington	Kentucky	230	113	2	72.6%	232,299	3.8	15	1	15	1	1	15
Corpus Christi	Texas	243	121	1	70.8%	230,575	3.7	18	3	36	2	4	36
Toledo	Ohio	224	110	1	74.9%	230,297	3.4	15	2	30	3	6	30
Glendale	Arizona	244	132	1	72.5%	220,883	3.7	9	3	15	1	2	15
Silver Spring	Maryland	285	158	1	72.6%	219,993	3.6	7	4	13	1	2	13
Durham	North Carolina	202	108	1	74.5%	216,265	3.3	8	2	15	2	4	15
Reno	Nevada	238	129	1	72.7%	215,683	3.8	12	3	24	1	2	24
Madison	Wisconsin	209	117	1	73.0%	215,337	3.6	14	1	14	2	2	14
Lincoln	Nebraska	240	128	1	74.3%	215,021	3.5	22	4	44	4	8	44
Jamaica	New York	158	92	1	87.9%	214,341	2.0	6	2	12	4	8	12
Lubbock	Texas	229	111	1	77.0%	213,044	3.4	14	3	27	3	5	27
Newark	New Jersey	207	108	1	75.5%	211,791	3.7	9	2	18	1	2	18
Scottsdale	Arizona	259	124	1	70.0%	208,734	4.0	11	3	21	0	0	21
Chula Vista	California	144	80	1	79.8%	208,191	3.4	5	3	10	1	2	10
Akron	Ohio	297	157	1	77.0%	208,034	3.5	17	5	34	3	6	34
Boise	Idaho	207	120	1	80.7%	206,667	3.3	9	4	16	2	3	16
Tallahassee	Florida	197	105	1	71.7%	206,412	3.7	10	2	20	1	2	20
Corona	California	196	99	1	79.4%	204,377	2.8	5	2	9	2	3	9
Jersey City	New Jersey	171	94	1	76.5%	200,211	3.1	7	2	14	2	4	14
Springfield	Missouri	175	82	1	86.7%	199,643	2.7	7	3	14	3	6	14
Pensacola	Florida	240	113	1	74.2%	199,064	3.5	13	5	26	2	4	26
Salem	Oregon	182	92	1	74.3%	198,097	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Kissimmee	Florida	267	151	1	68.4%	197,758	4.1	7	6	12	0	0	12
Mobile	Alabama	299	142	1	72.2%	196,066	3.8	18	5	36	1	2	36
North Las Vegas	Nevada	200	90	1	83.8%	195,856	2.7	7	2	11	3	5	11
Garland	Texas	181	89	1	82.0%	195,173	2.8	5	2	10	2	4	10
Modesto	California	198	93	2	73.7%	194,973	3.6	7	3	14	1	2	14
Sarasota	Florida	250	124	1	77.5%	193,946	3.5	13	4	26	2	4	26
Fontana	California	162	69	1	82.3%	193,281	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Chandler	Arizona	161	86	1	70.0%	188,031	4.0	6	3	9	0	0	9
Irvine	California	187	107	1	70.0%	187,319	4.0	9	2	12	0	0	12
Winston Salem	North Carolina	236	111	1	70.0%	184,891	4.0	9	3	18	0	0	18
Fort Myers	Florida	242	118	1	72.8%	183,268	3.7	11	5	22	1	2	22
Fayetteville	North Carolina	185	98	2	74.4%	181,502	3.6	8	2	16	1	2	16
Lakeland	Florida	207	111	1	70.0%	180,499	4.0	9	2	18	0	0	18
Savannah	Georgia	199	88	1	74.4%	179,520	3.7	10	2	20	1	2	20
Lawrenceville	Georgia	181	95	1	70.0%	179,278	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Syracuse	New York	244	120	1	78.9%	179,058	3.3	15	4	32	3	6	32
Bradenton	Florida	239	120	1	70.0%	177,180	4.0	10	5	20	0	0	20
Chesapeake	Virginia	203	107	1	74.5%	177,172	3.5	6	4	10	1	1	10
Anchorage	Alaska	210	107	1	71.7%	174,993	3.5	12	3	22	2	2	22
Flushing	New York	133	70	1	81.3%	174,803	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Fremont	California	155	82	1	74.9%	174,726	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
San Bernardino	California	211	97	2	70.0%	174,661	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Norfolk	Virginia	247	130	1	71.0%	174,444	3.8	14	2	28	1	2	28
Irving	Texas	195	105	1	72.4%	174,179	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Augusta	Georgia	172	75	1	85.0%	173,745	2.9	8	3	11	3	4	11
Gainesville	Florida	194	103	1	81.6%	170,954	3.1	10	4	19	3	5	19
Oxnard	California	159	69	1	76.5%	168,501	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Henrico	Virginia	246	132	1	87.2%	168,109	2.3	7	4	11	4	7	11
Trenton	New Jersey	285	137	1	80.4%	167,149	3.3	11	5	22	2	6	22
Gilbert	Arizona	152	92	1	70.0%	167,020	4.0	6	3	8	0	0	8
Shreveport	Louisiana	251	123	1	74.1%	165,260	3.5	12	2	24	2	4	24
Santa Rosa	California	190	108	1	75.9%	163,986	3.5	6	2	11	1	2	11
Amarillo	Texas	233	121	1	71.4%	163,580	3.8	14	3	28	1	2	28
Providence	Rhode Island	217	104	1	79.7%	163,325	3.3	8	4	16	2	4	16
Ocala	Florida	230	98	1	70.9%	159,533	3.9	11	3	23	0	1	23
Des Moines	Iowa	193	101	1	71.2%	159,062	3.7	11	3	22	1	2	22
Boca Raton	Florida	182	102	1	70.0%	155,572	4.0	9	4	18	0	0	18
Edmond	Oklahoma	181	89	1	90.5%	155,331	2.4	5	5	11	2	5	11
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	207	108	1	76.2%	154,782	3.0	6	2	12	2	4	12
Greenville	South Carolina	184	97	2	70.3%	154,306	3.7	9	3	14	1	1	14
Moreno Valley	California	171	81	1	74.9%	153,891	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Ontario	California	174	82	1	86.6%	152,956	2.3	3	3	7	1	3	7
Little Rock	Arkansas	195	91	1	70.0%	152,646	4.0	12	2	24	0	0	24
Tempe	Arizona	152	76	1	80.3%	152,582	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Wilmington	Delaware	270	129	1	69.4%	152,217	3.9	10	5	20	1	2	20
Chattanooga	Tennessee	242	112	1	73.0%	151,757	3.6	15	4	30	2	4	30
Huntsville	Alabama	186	99	1	77.3%	151,619	3.5	11	3	22	2	4	22
Eugene	Oregon	193	86	2	74.5%	151,227	3.8	6	2	10	1	2	10
Reading	Pennsylvania	223	110	1	70.0%	150,721	4.0	10	4	20	0	0	20
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	158	73	1	79.7%	148,576	2.8	5	2	9	2	3	9
Woodbridge	Virginia	171	95	2	70.0%	148,157	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Green Bay	Wisconsin	222	107	1	80.8%	148,084	3.1	7	3	14	2	4	14
Montgomery	Alabama	227	107	1	70.0%	146,883	4.0	13	4	26	0	0	26
Homestead	Florida	238	116	1	77.6%	145,599	3.1	7	3	14	2	4	14
Whittier	California	263	136	1	74.0%	145,107	3.5	6	5	12	1	2	12
Lake Worth	Florida	256	120	1	70.0%	144,551	4.0	5	9	10	0	0	10
Yonkers	New York	166	89	1	79.9%	144,166	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Rockford	Illinois	170	76	1	79.1%	144,163	3.0	9	2	18	3	6	18
Erie	Pennsylvania	212	107	1	77.2%	141,636	3.3	13	3	26	3	6	26
Beaverton	Oregon	158	86	1	70.0%	141,146	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Ogden	Utah	163	87	1	70.0%	141,001	4.0	5	3	10	0	0	10
Brownsville	Texas	138	69	3	70.0%	140,925	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Decatur	Georgia	216	121	1	77.7%	140,442	3.4	5	4	7	1	1	7
Oceanside	California	154	78	2	70.0%	140,181	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	California	170	85	1	70.0%	139,935	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Denton	Texas	174	95	1	87.9%	138,996	2.5	6	2	12	3	6	12
Charleston	South Carolina	230	116	1	70.0%	137,831	4.0	10	4	20	0	0	20
Clarksville	Tennessee	140	72	1	78.1%	137,261	3.0	3	2	5	1	2	5
Olympia	Washington	231	119	1	74.9%	136,898	3.5	6	5	12	1	2	12
Grand Prairie	Texas	167	91	1	71.7%	136,573	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Tyler	Texas	192	93	1	87.4%	136,438	2.7	9	2	18	4	8	18
Fort Collins	Colorado	172	96	2	70.0%	136,304	4.0	5	2	9	0	0	9
Worcester	Massachusetts	198	91	1	73.4%	136,270	3.7	9	2	18	1	2	18
Salinas	California	176	91	1	71.9%	135,458	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Boynton Beach	Florida	179	90	1	77.6%	135,136	3.5	6	3	12	1	2	12
Jackson	Mississippi	201	105	1	79.3%	134,997	3.5	11	2	22	2	4	22
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	220	108	1	74.3%	134,981	3.7	9	3	18	1	2	18
Hayward	California	169	87	2	70.0%	134,423	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Overland Park	Kansas	192	100	1	73.1%	134,024	3.7	9	2	12	1	1	12
Sugar Land	Texas	186	112	1	79.1%	133,701	3.0	3	4	6	1	2	6
Cumming	Georgia	143	83	1	82.3%	133,373	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Clearwater	Florida	226	101	1	72.3%	132,594	3.7	9	5	18	1	2	18
Alpharetta	Georgia	196	111	1	70.0%	132,434	4.0	4	6	8	0	0	8
Fairfax	Virginia	195	93	1	80.9%	132,389	3.3	4	7	8	1	2	8
Mckinney	Texas	142	83	2	70.0%	132,294	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Round Rock	Texas	184	113	1	78.7%	131,761	3.0	3	4	5	1	2	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	171	85	1	74.3%	131,220	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Fredericksburg	Virginia	186	85	1	74.9%	130,340	3.4	5	3	10	1	2	10
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	192	99	1	76.3%	129,274	3.7	9	3	16	1	2	16
Evansville	Indiana	221	107	1	70.0%	129,165	4.0	9	3	18	0	0	18
Lancaster	California	159	78	1	70.0%	129,093	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Ann Arbor	Michigan	155	86	1	76.5%	127,615	3.4	5	2	8	1	2	8
Roanoke	Virginia	235	117	2	74.9%	126,879	3.4	10	4	14	2	4	14
Mission	Texas	146	72	4	70.0%	126,764	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Cape Coral	Florida	167	85	1	70.0%	126,568	4.0	6	3	12	0	0	12
North Hollywood	California	138	86	1	82.5%	126,341	2.5	4	4	8	2	3	8
York	Pennsylvania	178	86	2	70.0%	125,822	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Escondido	California	145	68	2	70.0%	125,757	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pomona	California	148	71	1	79.5%	125,669	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Elk Grove	California	151	76	2	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Mcallen	Texas	146	69	1	88.1%	124,788	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Van Nuys	California	149	92	1	70.0%	124,468	4.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Hyattsville	Maryland	185	109	1	78.7%	123,934	3.4	5	2	6	1	1	6
Torrance	California	232	129	1	70.0%	123,755	4.0	5	4	10	0	0	10
Midland	Texas	176	86	1	77.3%	123,698	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Newport News	Virginia	211	92	2	70.0%	123,680	4.0	7	2	8	0	0	8
Garden Grove	California	176	86	1	70.0%	123,033	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Flint	Michigan	216	108	1	79.0%	122,807	3.1	7	3	14	2	4	14
Astoria	New York	171	105	1	85.9%	122,603	2.5	4	6	9	2	4	9
Palmdale	California	175	75	2	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Visalia	California	164	82	1	80.5%	122,314	3.0	3	4	6	1	2	6
Lafayette	Louisiana	147	73	1	75.8%	121,646	3.4	5	3	10	1	2	10
Renton	Washington	223	116	1	78.4%	121,453	3.4	5	4	10	1	2	10
Allentown	Pennsylvania	190	91	1	71.3%	121,082	3.6	7	3	11	1	2	11
Beaumont	Texas	208	108	1	83.2%	121,074	2.5	8	2	16	4	8	16
El Cajon	California	190	119	1	70.0%	120,724	4.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Frisco	Texas	112	67	3	70.0%	120,714	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Peoria	Arizona	158	86	1	70.0%	120,470	4.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
Cypress	Texas	124	69	3	70.0%	119,421	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Macon	Georgia	231	112	1	72.7%	118,941	3.7	9	3	17	1	2	17
Manassas	Virginia	190	98	1	78.0%	118,563	3.3	4	6	8	1	2	8
Odessa	Texas	192	96	1	74.1%	118,560	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Bridgeport	Connecticut	192	100	1	80.6%	118,005	3.0	6	2	12	2	4	12
Santa Maria	California	174	77	1	82.0%	117,373	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Everett	Washington	178	95	1	70.0%	116,670	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Humble	Texas	148	88	1	70.0%	116,570	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Temecula	California	139	70	1	89.5%	116,265	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Naperville	Illinois	127	79	1	70.0%	116,065	4.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
Waco	Texas	189	94	2	72.9%	115,419	3.7	9	2	18	1	2	18
Canton	Ohio	245	112	1	78.3%	115,091	3.3	12	2	24	3	6	24
Lansing	Michigan	158	77	1	70.0%	115,044	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Boston	Massachusetts	237	115	1	75.8%	114,995	3.8	14	1	14	1	1	14
Kalamazoo	Michigan	169	78	1	70.0%	114,883	4.0	7	3	14	0	0	14
Topeka	Kansas	245	119	1	70.0%	114,409	4.0	18	2	36	0	0	36
Killeen	Texas	162	76	1	76.1%	114,253	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Pueblo	Colorado	248	112	1	72.2%	114,176	3.6	7	4	14	1	2	14
Athens	Georgia	150	78	1	91.0%	113,538	2.5	6	2	12	3	6	12
Schenectady	New York	237	108	2	70.0%	113,446	4.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Las Cruces	New Mexico	221	114	2	75.8%	113,008	3.6	7	3	14	1	2	14
San Mateo	California	175	97	1	79.3%	112,958	3.3	4	4	8	1	2	8
Victorville	California	148	69	1	82.8%	112,878	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Kent	Washington	157	86	2	70.0%	112,351	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Conroe	Texas	214	116	1	70.0%	112,226	4.0	7	4	12	0	0	12
Murrieta	California	131	50	2	84.5%	111,806	2.5	2	3	5	1	1	5
Warren	Michigan	195	97	1	82.2%	111,110	2.8	5	3	11	2	3	11
Vista	California	136	75	1	92.6%	111,046	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Hampton	Virginia	197	94	1	81.3%	110,795	3.0	6	2	12	2	4	12
Rockville	Maryland	203	101	1	76.5%	110,683	3.3	4	4	6	1	2	6
Lake Charles	Louisiana	208	92	1	84.6%	110,566	2.8	5	2	10	2	4	10
Pasadena	California	189	107	1	70.0%	110,406	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Youngstown	Ohio	247	109	1	70.0%	109,969	4.0	12	6	24	0	0	24
Carrollton	Texas	143	72	1	81.4%	109,709	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Melbourne	Florida	171	80	1	70.0%	108,980	4.0	5	3	10	0	0	10
Edinburg	Texas	157	75	1	70.0%	108,899	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Cary	North Carolina	153	96	2	70.0%	108,732	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Valley City	Utah	158	92	1	81.8%	108,639	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Bellevue	Washington	157	86	1	73.8%	108,026	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Albany	New York	236	107	1	71.2%	107,712	3.7	11	3	22	1	2	22
Puyallup	Washington	210	108	1	75.4%	107,618	3.4	5	5	10	1	2	10
Baytown	Texas	137	68	1	90.8%	107,002	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Norman	Oklahoma	156	82	1	86.2%	106,981	2.5	4	3	8	2	4	8
Sunnyvale	California	194	108	2	70.0%	106,942	4.0	4	3	7	0	0	7
Santa Barbara	California	166	72	1	78.6%	106,845	3.1	7	3	14	2	4	14
Ridgewood	New York	98	56	1	100.0%	106,717	1.0	1	2	2	1	2	2
Bloomington	Indiana	161	80	1	79.7%	106,523	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Panama City	Florida	225	101	1	83.8%	105,857	2.5	6	2	12	3	6	12
Metairie	Louisiana	184	99	1	74.4%	105,801	3.4	5	4	10	1	1	10
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	156	68	1	71.9%	104,735	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Fullerton	California	169	78	1	75.1%	104,653	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Toms River	New Jersey	139	70	1	84.6%	103,952	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Yuma	Arizona	151	58	2	70.0%	103,319	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Sterling Heights	Michigan	151	78	1	77.9%	103,168	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
South Bend	Indiana	216	110	1	70.0%	102,698	4.0	10	2	20	0	0	20
Mesquite	Texas	149	70	1	70.0%	102,419	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Saint Augustine	Florida	237	112	1	78.0%	102,203	3.4	5	4	10	1	2	10
Paterson	New Jersey	211	110	1	70.0%	102,060	4.0	9	3	18	0	0	18
Saginaw	Michigan	199	104	1	78.1%	101,793	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Orange	California	155	82	1	70.0%	101,494	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Billings	Montana	161	75	3	73.8%	101,300	3.3	4	2	7	1	2	7
Fargo	North Dakota	162	77	1	82.7%	101,251	2.5	4	2	8	2	4	8
Gaithersburg	Maryland	173	90	2	70.0%	101,214	4.0	5	4	10	0	0	10
Olathe	Kansas	130	57	3	70.0%	101,061	4.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	148	71	1	82.8%	100,710	2.5	4	3	7	2	3	7
Boulder	Colorado	173	110	1	76.7%	100,615	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Perris	California	131	62	1	85.6%	100,456	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Clinton Township	Michigan	149	74	1	100.0%	100,296	1.0	3	2	6	3	6	6
Lynnwood	Washington	196	111	1	91.9%	99,568	2.0	3	4	6	2	4	6
Hamilton	Ohio	166	77	3	72.6%	99,483	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Rock Hill	South Carolina	146	73	1	85.1%	99,023	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	190	94	1	70.5%	98,263	3.5	6	3	11	1	2	11
Bellingham	Washington	143	73	1	77.6%	98,209	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Surprise	Arizona	185	93	3	72.4%	98,087	3.3	4	4	8	1	2	8
Saint Charles	Missouri	165	74	1	70.0%	97,901	4.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Ashburn	Virginia	118	62	1	87.1%	97,874	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Roseville	California	142	82	1	70.0%	97,856	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	148	71	1	100.0%	97,399	1.0	2	5	5	2	3	5
Summerville	South Carolina	127	59	2	70.0%	97,259	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Compton	California	164	82	1	70.0%	97,213	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
San Leandro	California	143	70	1	87.0%	96,761	2.0	3	2	4	2	3	4
Pearland	Texas	167	87	3	70.0%	96,319	4.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
New Haven	Connecticut	195	96	1	73.7%	95,951	3.4	5	3	10	1	2	10
Joliet	Illinois	158	86	2	74.4%	95,898	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Provo	Utah	140	70	1	82.0%	95,506	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Santa Fe	New Mexico	180	82	2	74.5%	95,480	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Nampa	Idaho	136	71	1	82.3%	95,422	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Santa Clara	California	157	82	1	75.8%	95,141	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Buford	Georgia	125	65	1	95.3%	94,462	1.5	2	3	5	1	3	5
Manchester	New Hampshire	157	71	1	81.2%	94,187	2.8	5	2	6	2	3	6
Elmhurst	New York	98	56	1	100.0%	93,967	1.0	1	2	2	1	2	2
Vero Beach	Florida	191	100	1	81.5%	93,950	3.0	6	2	12	2	4	12
Inglewood	California	231	133	2	70.0%	93,660	4.0	5	5	10	0	0	10
Charlottesville	Virginia	172	84	2	76.0%	93,448	3.4	5	2	7	1	1	7
Arvada	Colorado	174	98	2	70.0%	93,394	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Racine	Wisconsin	175	80	3	73.8%	93,102	3.6	5	2	6	1	1	6
High Point	North Carolina	177	76	1	76.0%	92,929	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Asheville	North Carolina	143	82	1	70.0%	92,467	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Frederick	Maryland	130	67	2	70.0%	92,397	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Longmont	Colorado	149	74	2	70.0%	91,536	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	160	86	1	70.0%	91,349	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Concord	California	154	80	1	70.0%	91,154	4.0	4	3	8	0	0	8
Abilene	Texas	185	91	2	70.0%	91,109	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	160	75	1	74.2%	91,005	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Yakima	Washington	161	79	2	70.0%	90,898	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Muskegon	Michigan	175	82	2	70.2%	90,717	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Hemet	California	162	68	3	70.0%	90,150	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Stamford	Connecticut	176	83	1	70.0%	90,123	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Simi Valley	California	128	67	1	70.0%	90,098	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Jupiter	Florida	155	86	1	91.2%	89,891	2.5	4	2	8	2	4	8
Stone Mountain	Georgia	186	98	1	70.0%	89,817	4.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Bothell	Washington	191	117	1	70.0%	89,795	4.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Chico	California	151	80	1	79.5%	89,044	3.0	3	2	5	1	2	5
Berkeley	California	266	157	1	70.0%	88,989	4.0	9	5	14	0	0	14
Spring Hill	Florida	175	90	2	70.0%	87,804	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	147	76	3	70.0%	87,656	4.0	4	3	8	0	0	8
Palo Alto	California	186	106	1	90.6%	87,598	2.8	4	3	6	1	4	6
Bend	Oregon	165	80	2	71.6%	87,494	3.0	3	3	5	1	1	5
Acworth	Georgia	131	69	1	87.5%	87,190	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Vallejo	California	168	83	2	70.0%	87,126	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Independence	Missouri	221	111	1	70.0%	86,829	4.0	8	2	16	0	0	16
West Jordan	Utah	147	81	1	70.0%	86,499	4.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Hartford	Connecticut	202	111	1	70.0%	86,365	4.0	6	3	12	0	0	12
Tracy	California	170	80	2	73.7%	86,363	3.3	4	4	8	1	2	8
Kennesaw	Georgia	131	69	1	86.9%	86,137	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
College Station	Texas	127	68	1	70.0%	86,134	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Duluth	Minnesota	245	121	1	73.1%	85,581	3.5	11	2	19	2	4	19
Elgin	Illinois	143	74	1	70.0%	85,548	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Lynchburg	Virginia	190	88	1	83.3%	85,277	3.3	4	3	7	1	2	7
Clovis	California	159	79	2	70.0%	84,970	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Burbank	California	157	88	1	78.5%	84,815	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Deltona	Florida	135	63	1	90.2%	84,713	2.0	2	3	5	1	3	5
New Port Richey	Florida	180	94	1	70.0%	84,581	4.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
Falls Church	Virginia	276	156	1	70.0%	84,256	4.0	5	6	9	0	0	9
Spartanburg	South Carolina	159	72	1	74.9%	83,806	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Annapolis	Maryland	199	114	1	88.1%	83,764	2.8	5	3	10	2	4	10
Apopka	Florida	131	62	1	85.7%	83,655	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Sparks	Nevada	180	92	1	70.0%	83,486	4.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
Delray Beach	Florida	184	93	1	70.0%	83,345	4.0	5	3	10	0	0	10
Idaho Falls	Idaho	167	88	2	76.4%	83,261	3.3	4	2	6	1	1	6
Dearborn	Michigan	144	74	1	87.5%	83,197	2.5	4	2	8	2	4	8
Lewisville	Texas	139	79	1	70.0%	83,075	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Elizabeth	New Jersey	163	83	1	82.3%	82,697	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
La Puente	California	173	89	2	70.0%	82,564	4.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	224	119	1	70.0%	81,822	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Grand Junction	Colorado	174	82	1	77.2%	81,410	3.0	6	2	12	2	4	12
Keller	Texas	155	95	1	70.0%	81,381	4.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Ventura	California	138	70	2	70.0%	81,171	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Cambridge	Massachusetts	171	99	2	70.0%	81,054	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Miami Beach	Florida	221	133	1	70.0%	80,978	4.0	5	4	10	0	0	10
Bowling Green	Kentucky	160	67	1	70.0%	80,861	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
New Braunfels	Texas	119	68	3	78.4%	80,540	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	227	117	1	83.9%	80,254	2.9	8	3	16	3	6	16
Richardson	Texas	143	83	3	70.0%	80,219	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Redwood City	California	166	90	1	70.0%	80,124	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	California	164	98	2	70.0%	80,081	4.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Fairfield	California	130	69	2	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Greeley	Colorado	128	61	1	70.0%	79,846	4.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	California	122	63	1	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Carlsbad	California	154	90	1	70.0%	79,569	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	202	103	1	83.1%	79,226	2.6	7	3	15	3	7	15
Redding	California	213	101	2	70.0%	79,124	4.0	4	5	8	0	0	8
Downey	California	157	77	1	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	146	72	2	70.0%	79,016	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Auburn	Washington	156	83	1	70.0%	79,010	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Laurel	Maryland	178	99	1	70.0%	78,730	4.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	172	94	1	79.9%	78,254	3.0	3	2	5	1	2	5
Englewood	Colorado	239	145	1	70.0%	78,110	4.0	4	5	8	0	0	8
Lowell	Massachusetts	159	75	1	70.0%	77,939	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Riverview	Florida	176	95	1	70.0%	77,933	4.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Palm Bay	Florida	170	82	3	70.0%	77,904	4.0	4	3	8	0	0	8
Allen	Texas	124	69	2	70.0%	77,890	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Valdosta	Georgia	176	82	2	81.7%	77,576	2.8	5	3	10	2	4	10
San Angelo	Texas	160	75	3	70.0%	77,537	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Antioch	California	124	63	2	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Livonia	Michigan	123	59	1	81.9%	77,471	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Menifee	California	198	95	1	70.0%	77,371	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Sandy	Utah	160	99	1	70.0%	77,307	4.0	4	3	8	0	0	8
Douglasville	Georgia	134	68	3	70.0%	77,174	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Westerville	Ohio	123	64	1	80.6%	76,736	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
West Covina	California	153	69	1	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	143	88	1	80.1%	76,130	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
West Chester	Pennsylvania	153	81	2	70.0%	76,087	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	182	82	1	70.0%	76,046	4.0	6	2	11	0	0	11
Madera	California	192	94	3	73.7%	75,883	3.0	3	4	6	1	2	6
Florissant	Missouri	158	71	2	70.0%	75,802	4.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Largo	Florida	166	88	1	70.0%	75,334	4.0	5	3	10	0	0	10
Midlothian	Virginia	152	80	1	77.8%	75,267	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Gastonia	North Carolina	143	76	2	70.0%	74,927	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Ypsilanti	Michigan	114	64	1	70.0%	74,829	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Winter Haven	Florida	145	74	3	70.0%	74,815	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
El Monte	California	124	57	1	79.6%	74,639	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Rialto	California	138	64	3	70.0%	74,608	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Franklin	Tennessee	137	76	1	70.0%	74,532	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Missouri City	Texas	164	101	2	70.0%	74,266	4.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	California	98	48	3	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	California	100	56	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	182	93	1	77.9%	73,984	3.0	6	2	12	2	4	12
Scranton	Pennsylvania	220	101	1	74.1%	73,719	3.6	8	4	16	1	2	16
Vacaville	California	120	56	4	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Longview	Texas	169	82	1	70.0%	73,695	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Davenport	Iowa	168	81	2	70.0%	73,404	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Broomfield	Colorado	168	91	1	70.0%	73,325	4.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Meridian	Idaho	126	72	1	70.0%	72,955	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	California	151	73	2	70.0%	72,834	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Hesperia	California	132	60	3	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	188	94	2	70.0%	72,167	4.0	5	4	10	0	0	10
Merced	California	163	77	3	70.0%	72,142	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Hillsboro	Oregon	126	62	2	70.0%	72,010	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Bryan	Texas	172	93	1	74.7%	71,931	3.4	5	3	10	1	2	10
Bell Gardens	California	101	59	3	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Bowie	Maryland	207	107	1	70.0%	71,515	4.0	4	5	7	0	0	7
Lees Summit	Missouri	210	112	1	70.0%	71,460	4.0	6	3	9	0	0	9
Woodstock	Georgia	117	68	3	70.0%	71,205	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	131	67	2	70.0%	71,023	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Lawrence	Kansas	169	77	1	70.0%	70,737	4.0	5	4	10	0	0	10
Edison	New Jersey	131	72	1	70.0%	70,579	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lakewood	New Jersey	99	54	3	70.0%	70,534	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	133	74	2	70.0%	70,337	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Orem	Utah	146	71	1	70.0%	70,223	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Parker	Colorado	127	66	2	70.0%	70,197	4.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Clermont	Florida	166	83	1	70.0%	70,179	4.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Federal Way	Washington	125	59	2	70.0%	70,100	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Roswell	Georgia	121	69	1	70.0%	69,839	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Monica	California	154	90	2	73.8%	69,647	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Elkhart	Indiana	147	66	2	70.0%	69,604	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Wichita Falls	Texas	174	88	1	70.0%	69,189	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Kennewick	Washington	151	79	1	70.0%	69,167	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Plainfield	Illinois	168	97	1	70.0%	68,991	4.0	3	4	5	0	0	5
Anderson	South Carolina	154	70	1	70.0%	68,886	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Mission Viejo	California	120	67	2	70.0%	68,851	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Hagerstown	Maryland	167	79	2	70.0%	68,555	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Waukegan	Illinois	123	62	2	70.0%	68,270	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Missoula	Montana	178	95	3	70.0%	68,098	4.0	5	4	10	0	0	10
Coral Springs	Florida	122	57	1	70.0%	68,067	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Hawthorne	California	97	50	3	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Rapid City	South Dakota	158	71	2	70.0%	67,736	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Lithonia	Georgia	133	77	3	70.0%	67,733	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Napa	California	127	66	4	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	California	100	59	3	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
O Fallon	Missouri	125	62	1	70.0%	67,522	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Springdale	Arkansas	128	68	1	70.0%	67,484	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Livermore	California	123	59	3	70.0%	67,377	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Indio	California	141	64	2	70.0%	67,264	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	California	99	48	3	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	136	69	2	70.0%	67,057	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Johnson City	Tennessee	144	54	2	70.0%	66,805	4.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Brockton	Massachusetts	128	64	1	70.0%	66,798	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Morgantown	West Virginia	137	70	1	70.0%	66,700	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
South Gate	California	100	53	3	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
New Bedford	Massachusetts	178	88	1	70.0%	66,370	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Milton	Florida	151	78	2	70.0%	66,319	4.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Gulfport	Mississippi	148	68	1	70.0%	66,303	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Ballwin	Missouri	117	57	1	70.0%	66,268	4.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Champaign	Illinois	154	74	2	70.0%	66,197	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Chino	California	122	63	4	70.0%	66,132	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	146	75	3	70.0%	65,885	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Holland	Michigan	114	55	2	70.0%	65,711	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Lynn	Massachusetts	158	79	3	70.0%	65,477	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Herndon	Virginia	141	70	1	70.0%	65,421	4.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Newnan	Georgia	132	67	1	70.0%	65,377	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Medford	Oregon	123	63	3	70.0%	65,276	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Belleville	Illinois	171	84	1	70.0%	65,258	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Muncie	Indiana	164	77	2	70.0%	64,932	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	477	264	1	73.9%	1,814,731	3.7	62	5	77	6	6	77
San Diego	432	272	1	71.0%	957,002	3.8	36	4	72	2	4	72
San Jose	238	132	1	74.9%	786,830	3.6	28	1	28	4	4	28
San Francisco	306	197	1	74.1%	645,231	3.7	28	2	29	3	3	29
Sacramento	297	152	1	76.0%	611,723	3.6	28	3	56	4	8	56
Fresno	240	116	1	83.5%	502,761	3.0	18	3	36	6	12	36
Bakersfield	230	112	1	74.5%	416,916	3.7	11	2	17	1	2	17
Long Beach	240	123	1	74.9%	358,688	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
Oakland	257	145	1	73.7%	303,389	3.6	14	3	16	2	3	16
Anaheim	220	111	1	73.4%	270,713	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Stockton	280	120	1	71.3%	266,396	3.8	12	3	24	1	2	24
Riverside	185	94	1	70.0%	259,008	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Santa Ana	198	102	1	68.7%	245,308	4.2	6	2	6	0	0	6
Chula Vista	144	80	1	79.8%	208,191	3.4	5	3	10	1	2	10
Corona	196	99	1	79.4%	204,377	2.8	5	2	9	2	3	9
Modesto	198	93	2	73.7%	194,973	3.6	7	3	14	1	2	14
Fontana	162	69	1	82.3%	193,281	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Irvine	187	107	1	70.0%	187,319	4.0	9	2	12	0	0	12
Fremont	155	82	1	74.9%	174,726	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
San Bernardino	211	97	2	70.0%	174,661	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Oxnard	159	69	1	76.5%	168,501	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Santa Rosa	190	108	1	75.9%	163,986	3.5	6	2	11	1	2	11
Moreno Valley	171	81	1	74.9%	153,891	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Ontario	174	82	1	86.6%	152,956	2.3	3	3	7	1	3	7
Whittier	263	136	1	74.0%	145,107	3.5	6	5	12	1	2	12
Oceanside	154	78	2	70.0%	140,181	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	170	85	1	70.0%	139,935	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salinas	176	91	1	71.9%	135,458	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Hayward	169	87	2	70.0%	134,423	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	171	85	1	74.3%	131,220	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Lancaster	159	78	1	70.0%	129,093	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
North Hollywood	138	86	1	82.5%	126,341	2.5	4	4	8	2	3	8
Escondido	145	68	2	70.0%	125,757	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pomona	148	71	1	79.5%	125,669	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Elk Grove	151	76	2	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Van Nuys	149	92	1	70.0%	124,468	4.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Torrance	232	129	1	70.0%	123,755	4.0	5	4	10	0	0	10
Garden Grove	176	86	1	70.0%	123,033	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Palmdale	175	75	2	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Visalia	164	82	1	80.5%	122,314	3.0	3	4	6	1	2	6
El Cajon	190	119	1	70.0%	120,724	4.0	3	4	6	0	0	6
Santa Maria	174	77	1	82.0%	117,373	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Temecula	139	70	1	89.5%	116,265	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
San Mateo	175	97	1	79.3%	112,958	3.3	4	4	8	1	2	8
Victorville	148	69	1	82.8%	112,878	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Murrieta	131	50	2	84.5%	111,806	2.5	2	3	5	1	1	5
Vista	136	75	1	92.6%	111,046	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Pasadena	189	107	1	70.0%	110,406	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Sunnyvale	194	108	2	70.0%	106,942	4.0	4	3	7	0	0	7
Santa Barbara	166	72	1	78.6%	106,845	3.1	7	3	14	2	4	14
Fullerton	169	78	1	75.1%	104,653	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Orange	155	82	1	70.0%	101,494	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Perris	131	62	1	85.6%	100,456	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Roseville	142	82	1	70.0%	97,856	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Compton	164	82	1	70.0%	97,213	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
San Leandro	143	70	1	87.0%	96,761	2.0	3	2	4	2	3	4
Santa Clara	157	82	1	75.8%	95,141	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Inglewood	231	133	2	70.0%	93,660	4.0	5	5	10	0	0	10
Concord	154	80	1	70.0%	91,154	4.0	4	3	8	0	0	8
Hemet	162	68	3	70.0%	90,150	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Simi Valley	128	67	1	70.0%	90,098	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Chico	151	80	1	79.5%	89,044	3.0	3	2	5	1	2	5
Berkeley	266	157	1	70.0%	88,989	4.0	9	5	14	0	0	14
Palo Alto	186	106	1	90.6%	87,598	2.8	4	3	6	1	4	6
Vallejo	168	83	2	70.0%	87,126	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Tracy	170	80	2	73.7%	86,363	3.3	4	4	8	1	2	8
Clovis	159	79	2	70.0%	84,970	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Burbank	157	88	1	78.5%	84,815	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
La Puente	173	89	2	70.0%	82,564	4.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Ventura	138	70	2	70.0%	81,171	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Redwood City	166	90	1	70.0%	80,124	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	164	98	2	70.0%	80,081	4.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Fairfield	130	69	2	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	122	63	1	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Carlsbad	154	90	1	70.0%	79,569	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redding	213	101	2	70.0%	79,124	4.0	4	5	8	0	0	8
Downey	157	77	1	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Antioch	124	63	2	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Menifee	198	95	1	70.0%	77,371	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
West Covina	153	69	1	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Madera	192	94	3	73.7%	75,883	3.0	3	4	6	1	2	6
El Monte	124	57	1	79.6%	74,639	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Rialto	138	64	3	70.0%	74,608	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Norwalk	98	48	3	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	100	56	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Vacaville	120	56	4	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	151	73	2	70.0%	72,834	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Hesperia	132	60	3	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Merced	163	77	3	70.0%	72,142	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bell Gardens	101	59	3	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
San Marcos	133	74	2	70.0%	70,337	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Santa Monica	154	90	2	73.8%	69,647	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Mission Viejo	120	67	2	70.0%	68,851	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Hawthorne	97	50	3	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Napa	127	66	4	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	100	59	3	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Livermore	123	59	3	70.0%	67,377	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Indio	141	64	2	70.0%	67,264	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	99	48	3	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
South Gate	100	53	3	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chino	122	63	4	70.0%	66,132	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4

Houston

ZIP	psychologytoday.com	goodtherapy.org	mymoderntherapy.com	houstonchronicle.com	houston-therapy.com	yelp.com
77088	4	5	3	7	8	10
77047	4	5	6	7	8	10
77037	1	2	3	4	5	12
77098	4	5	6	7	8	10
77027	4	5	6	8	2	10
77068	4	5	6	7	8	9
77078	4	5	2	8	7	10
77086	4	5	6	7	8	9
77035	4	5	6	7	8	9
77008	4	5	1	7	8	9
77004	4	5	6	7	8	9
77028	4	5	1	7	8	9
77059	1	2	3	4	5	9
77039	4	5	6	8	7	13
77019	4	5	6	7	8	10
77075	1	2	3	4	5	7
77077	4	5	6	7	8	10
77079	4	5	6	7	8	10
77099	1	2	3	4	5	6
77024	4	5	6	8	7	9
77095	4	5	6	7	8	9
77048	1	2	3	5	4	6
77044	4	5	2	8	7	10
77015	4	5	6	8	7	9
77017	4	5	6	8	7	9
77057	4	5	6	7	8	9
77055	4	5	6	7	8	9
77006	4	5	6	7	8	9
77026	1	2	3	4	5	6
77046	4	5	6	7	8	9
77066	4	5	6	7	8	9
77023	4	5	6	7	8	15
77094	4	5	6	7	8	9
77084	4	5	6	7	8	9
77013	4	5	6	7	8	15
77063	4	5	6	7	8	10
77053	4	6	7	9	3	28
77022	4	5	6	7	8	10
77072	4	5	6	7	8	10
77049	1	3	2	5	4	6
77045	4	5	6	7	8	9
77010	4	5	6	7	8	9
77018	4	5	6	7	8	10
77041	4	5	6	8	7	9
77009	4	5	1	7	8	20
77089	4	6	5	8	7	9
77032	4	5	6	8	7	10
77036	1	2	3	4	5	6
77085	4	5	6	8	7	10
77054	4	5	6	8	7	9
77058	4	5	6	8	7	9
77014	4	5	6	7	8	15
77067	4	5	2	7	8	9
77005	1	2	3	5	4	6
77076	4	6	7	8	9	17
77070	1	2	3	4	5	6
77060	1	2	3	5	4	6
77080	4	5	6	7	8	9
77050	4	6	7	8	9	21
77091	4	5	6	7	8	9
77071	4	5	6	7	8	10
77061	4	5	6	7	8	19
77020	4	5	1	7	8	10
77081	4	5	6	7	1	13
77030	4	5	6	7	8	9
77040	4	5	6	7	8	9
77090	1	3	4	5	6	8
77031	4	5	6	7	8	9
77051	4	5	6	7	8	9
77011	4	5	1	7	8	18
77042	4	5	6	7	8	10
77062	4	5	6	7	8	9
77082	4	5	6	7	8	10
77093	4	5	2	7	8	15
77073	4	6	5	7	8	12
77033	4	5	6	7	8	9
77043	4	5	6	7	8	9
77074	4	5	6	7	8	9
77064	4	5	6	7	8	9
77012	4	5	3	7	8	20
77002	4	5	1	7	8	9
77092	1	2	3	4	5	6
77069	1	2	3	4	5	7
77021	4	5	6	7	8	9
77083	1	3	4	6	5	8
77029	1	2	3	4	5	11
77034	4	5	6	8	7	9
77087	1	2	3	4	5	7
77003	4	5	2	7	8	13
77038	4	6	7	8	9	13
77007	1	2	3	4	5	6
77016	4	5	1	7	8	9
77065	4	5	6	7	8	10
77096	4	5	6	7	8	9
77025	4	5	6	7	8	10
77056	4	5	6	7	2	10

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Psychologytoday

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 28,476 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Psychologytoday Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (therapy near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Psychologytoday Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Psychologytoday Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Psychologytoday Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly