Progressive Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve progressive.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Progressive Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Progressive Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Progressive Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Los Angeles
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Progressive Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	7	15.6%	50,255,494	9.7	27,379	32,654	39	32,951	84	293	27,651
California	870	609	7	17.3%	6,775,622	9.4	1,166	1,740	5	1,780	14	40	1,659
Texas	846	595	8	14.6%	4,070,584	9.7	1,360	1,917	4	1,926	4	9	1,658
New York	791	600	7	17.1%	3,347,503	9.5	1,491	1,756	3	1,781	3	25	1,657
Florida	768	578	7	16.0%	3,288,069	9.5	446	975	5	988	8	13	938
Pennsylvania	757	591	7	15.9%	2,028,584	9.6	1,604	1,781	4	1,796	2	15	1,616
Ohio	670	548	7	16.5%	1,920,640	9.5	976	1,188	3	1,195	2	7	1,120
Illinois	670	490	9	13.7%	1,753,620	10.1	1,247	1,382	5	1,392	4	10	683
New Jersey	436	328	7	16.8%	1,493,549	9.4	537	593	6	603	4	10	591
Michigan	656	528	7	14.7%	1,462,453	9.7	833	976	3	985	4	9	806
North Carolina	506	406	7	14.2%	1,443,638	9.6	683	802	3	807	2	5	756
Virginia	406	322	8	17.0%	1,426,231	9.6	723	891	3	907	3	16	815
Georgia	409	319	8	13.5%	1,391,539	9.7	574	726	1	728	0	2	648
Washington	337	274	7	15.4%	1,122,546	9.7	451	587	1	591	1	4	460
Arizona	269	218	7	15.5%	1,078,270	9.6	247	396	2	398	1	2	328
Massachusetts	517	422	7	15.4%	1,052,608	9.5	461	534	1	539	3	5	525
Indiana	472	373	8	14.0%	930,565	9.8	659	770	3	777	2	7	534
Maryland	338	254	8	15.4%	926,222	9.6	392	463	3	469	2	6	413
Tennessee	377	305	7	13.8%	914,319	9.8	514	622	2	625	1	3	511
Wisconsin	481	384	7	15.8%	910,419	9.7	694	769	5	774	1	5	571
Minnesota	530	418	7	15.9%	877,180	9.9	777	878	5	886	0	8	581
Colorado	296	242	7	15.4%	849,228	9.5	381	514	3	521	1	7	499
South Carolina	278	223	7	15.7%	779,594	9.5	347	422	3	425	0	3	403
Louisiana	306	237	8	16.7%	778,330	9.5	431	510	4	519	1	9	509
Alabama	320	261	8	15.5%	756,343	9.6	522	637	3	641	0	4	606
Missouri	427	337	9	12.3%	752,145	9.9	887	1,017	5	1,025	2	8	713
Oregon	271	224	8	16.1%	655,255	9.6	355	414	2	418	1	4	390
Kentucky	354	287	8	14.5%	644,463	9.9	698	758	2	759	0	1	594
Connecticut	284	228	7	16.6%	596,232	9.5	234	279	1	286	3	7	276
Oklahoma	322	248	8	15.2%	594,181	9.7	557	646	2	649	1	3	521
Iowa	486	357	8	16.1%	503,701	9.7	890	933	4	947	6	14	700
Mississippi	250	193	7	15.7%	470,084	9.7	384	418	3	424	1	5	359
Nevada	176	146	8	15.8%	463,252	9.4	92	168	2	170	0	2	162
Arkansas	261	209	7	15.2%	454,362	9.7	553	587	3	590	0	3	501
Utah	245	207	9	13.7%	417,561	9.8	246	284	1	284	0	0	231
Kansas	341	261	7	12.7%	367,956	9.8	616	692	2	696	1	4	546
New Mexico	204	159	9	15.1%	315,001	9.8	327	361	2	363	1	2	302
Nebraska	308	241	8	14.7%	280,710	9.8	524	581	1	581	0	0	476
West Virginia	277	224	7	14.6%	267,343	9.6	684	704	2	707	0	3	636
Idaho	199	170	7	15.0%	253,001	9.8	251	273	2	274	1	1	211
New Hampshire	226	197	7	17.8%	239,065	9.6	238	248	2	250	0	2	202
Delaware	159	137	7	23.2%	220,050	9.2	52	66	2	68	1	2	64
Hawaii	152	129	10	14.8%	210,889	9.5	82	93	1	93	0	0	93
Maine	240	198	8	14.6%	195,045	9.8	421	425	2	427	0	0	349
Montana	229	186	8	16.4%	171,455	9.9	348	361	1	361	0	0	283
South Dakota	217	174	7	14.6%	126,211	10.0	359	370	2	371	1	1	237
North Dakota	206	168	9	16.7%	125,208	9.7	367	381	2	385	2	4	280
Alaska	155	134	9	16.3%	120,162	9.0	218	235	2	236	0	0	170
Rhode Island	157	139	8	11.1%	117,441	9.8	64	77	1	77	0	0	77
Vermont	197	170	7	16.1%	100,721	9.7	250	254	2	256	0	2	216
Wyoming	152	130	10	10.8%	62,600	9.9	164	171	1	171	0	0	149

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	California	147	126	7	20.6%	505,965	9.0	62	1	63	0	1	63
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	7	18.8%	488,692	9.0	37	1	40	0	3	40
Houston	Texas	173	138	7	14.0%	447,500	9.7	96	1	96	0	0	85
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	9	14.8%	398,831	10.0	56	1	56	0	0	36
Miami	Florida	160	123	7	17.2%	324,147	9.5	55	3	57	1	2	51
Bronx	New York	118	103	7	21.4%	308,724	8.7	25	1	26	0	1	26
New York City	New York	128	111	8	18.8%	304,353	9.4	47	1	48	1	1	48
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	8	16.9%	266,333	9.5	47	1	47	0	0	47
San Diego	California	134	116	7	18.9%	255,239	8.9	36	2	39	1	3	38
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	7	16.9%	244,787	9.6	42	1	43	1	1	33
Dallas	Texas	149	126	7	15.7%	218,742	9.3	48	2	49	1	1	47
Denver	Colorado	136	120	7	19.6%	212,670	9.0	38	2	39	0	1	39
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	8	13.6%	209,744	9.7	43	1	43	0	0	42
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	8	11.7%	208,222	9.8	59	1	59	0	0	41
Austin	Texas	138	123	7	18.3%	199,048	9.8	44	2	46	0	2	32
Seattle	Washington	142	127	8	20.5%	196,264	9.5	35	1	37	0	2	21
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	7	17.7%	193,255	9.4	51	1	51	0	0	38
San Jose	California	129	116	7	17.1%	179,911	9.1	28	2	30	0	2	29
San Francisco	California	121	106	8	19.9%	173,266	9.1	28	1	30	0	2	27
El Paso	Texas	122	110	7	21.4%	168,960	9.1	24	2	25	0	1	23
Orlando	Florida	133	115	8	16.5%	164,418	9.4	32	1	32	0	0	32
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	7	23.0%	157,157	8.9	43	2	46	1	3	39
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	8	19.3%	156,955	9.4	29	2	30	0	1	24
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	9	17.1%	155,035	9.2	32	2	33	0	1	30
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	8	22.5%	153,732	9.4	28	1	29	0	1	25
Oxnard	California	107	98	2	65.9%	145,246	5.8	4	1	6	1	2	6
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	8	22.7%	145,239	9.0	25	2	27	1	2	25
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	8	17.9%	143,238	9.6	30	2	31	0	1	22
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	11	16.9%	143,154	9.5	30	1	30	0	0	30
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	7	28.8%	137,933	8.3	27	2	30	2	3	27
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	10	15.1%	136,471	9.3	24	1	24	0	0	24
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	7	15.9%	131,994	9.3	27	1	27	0	0	25
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	9	19.8%	125,002	9.2	22	2	24	1	2	22
Staten Island	New York	120	105	7	26.1%	123,632	9.2	12	2	13	0	1	13
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	8	15.4%	117,031	9.5	32	1	32	0	0	27
Sacramento	California	134	115	7	13.9%	112,181	9.9	28	1	28	0	0	22
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	8	12.7%	110,546	9.6	31	1	31	0	0	24
Daly City	California	103	94	1	95.7%	109,451	1.5	2	1	4	1	2	4
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	8	11.8%	108,007	9.9	32	1	32	0	0	26
Tampa	Florida	131	110	9	13.4%	106,552	9.7	27	1	27	0	0	26
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	8	13.0%	104,175	9.6	45	1	45	0	0	44
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	10	15.3%	100,622	9.7	17	1	17	0	0	16
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	8	17.1%	99,916	9.4	30	1	30	0	0	29
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	10	14.3%	99,264	9.7	26	1	26	0	0	22
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	10	10.4%	98,752	10.4	37	1	37	0	0	22
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	10	14.3%	97,857	9.6	39	1	39	0	0	36
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	10	9.8%	96,946	10.2	39	1	39	0	0	33
Portland	Oregon	130	112	9	10.5%	96,928	9.8	33	1	33	0	0	33
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	12	10.4%	95,481	10.2	45	1	45	0	0	24
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	6	37.0%	95,316	7.9	9	2	11	1	2	11
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	10	12.4%	92,699	9.8	29	1	29	0	0	28
Irvine	California	112	101	6	34.6%	92,467	7.6	9	2	11	1	2	11
Bakersfield	California	112	102	11	16.5%	92,208	9.5	11	1	11	0	0	9
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	8	32.2%	90,264	8.7	9	2	10	1	1	10
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	7	20.4%	87,289	9.2	19	1	19	0	0	19
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	7	24.0%	85,295	9.3	14	1	15	1	1	12
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	7	21.8%	84,158	9.2	17	2	18	0	1	14
Buffalo	New York	142	124	9	14.9%	83,922	9.4	28	1	28	0	0	27
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	7	17.7%	82,838	9.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Modesto	California	111	101	7	31.1%	82,138	8.6	7	1	8	1	1	6
Riverside	California	113	102	9	22.1%	81,795	8.1	7	2	8	0	1	8
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	8	16.5%	80,530	9.6	19	1	19	0	0	17
Spring	Texas	114	103	7	20.8%	79,330	9.1	8	1	8	0	0	6
Reno	Nevada	112	100	8	26.7%	79,136	8.7	12	1	12	0	0	12
Stockton	California	122	108	8	20.4%	76,325	9.5	12	1	13	1	1	10
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	10	14.2%	76,040	9.7	13	1	13	0	0	11
Fresno	California	120	105	9	12.4%	74,695	9.7	18	1	18	0	0	17
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	7	12.9%	71,397	9.7	31	1	31	0	0	28
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	4	57.9%	71,253	5.4	5	2	7	1	2	6
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	8	24.4%	70,852	8.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	8	14.1%	70,725	9.6	30	1	30	0	0	29
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	7	20.4%	70,009	9.1	14	2	15	0	1	15
Santa Ana	California	110	99	9	19.6%	69,845	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Katy	Texas	112	102	10	20.0%	68,871	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	9	16.5%	68,545	9.4	11	1	11	0	0	11
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	8	14.7%	67,236	9.5	22	1	22	0	0	19
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	8	15.4%	67,222	9.3	11	1	11	0	0	11
Bend	Oregon	109	99	3	54.6%	66,789	7.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Boise	Idaho	111	100	7	26.0%	66,692	8.8	9	2	10	1	1	9
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	6	49.2%	64,930	5.5	4	2	6	0	2	6
Rochester	New York	125	108	8	13.5%	63,775	9.6	24	1	24	0	0	22
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	12	14.9%	62,710	9.8	28	1	28	0	0	24
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	8	19.1%	62,189	9.3	11	1	12	1	1	11
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	6	40.6%	62,025	7.5	4	1	5	0	1	5
Arlington	Texas	122	107	8	15.6%	61,786	9.6	12	1	12	0	0	9
Akron	Ohio	122	112	7	22.7%	61,277	8.8	17	1	18	0	1	17
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	7	20.7%	61,043	9.2	14	2	15	0	1	10
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	9	23.2%	60,698	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Ontario	California	109	98	7	34.1%	60,154	7.7	3	1	4	0	1	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	4	45.4%	60,151	6.3	4	2	6	0	2	6
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	11	16.2%	59,399	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	9	16.0%	59,187	9.4	10	1	10	0	0	10
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	9	16.4%	58,590	9.3	16	1	16	0	0	16
Spokane	Washington	113	104	12	16.2%	58,365	9.6	14	1	14	0	0	11
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	11	17.7%	57,519	9.2	10	1	10	0	0	10
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	9	17.2%	57,178	9.7	20	1	21	0	1	17
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	13	10.0%	56,963	10.0	49	1	49	0	0	38
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	8	23.8%	56,691	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	5	48.9%	56,641	7.0	5	1	6	1	1	6
Oakland	California	115	102	10	13.6%	55,856	9.7	14	1	14	0	0	13
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	8	17.4%	55,740	9.9	15	1	15	0	0	9
Salem	Oregon	110	101	8	20.8%	55,334	8.6	7	2	8	0	1	8
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	10	14.1%	55,243	9.4	15	1	15	0	0	15
Carlsbad	California	109	96	5	48.5%	55,175	5.8	4	2	6	1	2	6
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	4	42.4%	55,157	8.4	5	1	6	0	1	6
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	3	45.1%	54,533	7.3	4	2	5	1	1	5
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	13	9.9%	54,233	10.1	15	1	15	0	0	14
Lynn	Massachusetts	107	97	4	57.9%	54,136	7.0	4	1	5	1	1	5
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	9	16.3%	53,415	8.8	9	2	10	0	1	10
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	10	21.8%	52,494	9.0	10	1	11	0	1	7
Whittier	California	108	98	6	26.7%	52,382	8.7	6	2	7	0	1	7
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	10	19.3%	52,276	9.4	18	2	19	0	1	17
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	11	13.6%	51,566	9.5	18	1	18	0	0	18
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	10	15.9%	51,292	9.9	7	1	7	0	0	5
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	9	34.2%	50,985	8.3	7	2	8	0	1	6
Naples	Florida	125	111	7	16.1%	50,547	9.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
Downey	California	100	91	4	43.9%	49,588	7.0	3	1	4	1	1	4
Vallejo	California	107	98	7	39.7%	49,460	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	9	16.2%	49,022	9.4	7	1	7	0	0	6
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	8	16.8%	48,675	9.7	22	1	22	0	0	17
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	9	17.9%	48,033	9.5	13	1	13	0	0	11
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	5	50.6%	47,967	7.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Long Beach	California	120	109	14	10.0%	47,897	10.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Santa Monica	California	105	96	3	50.2%	47,377	7.0	5	1	7	0	2	7
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	8	12.7%	47,223	9.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Plano	Texas	112	103	11	15.3%	46,653	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	9	14.6%	46,455	9.3	16	1	16	0	0	15
Flushing	New York	107	96	10	21.3%	45,763	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	11	14.0%	45,582	9.7	18	1	18	0	0	17
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	12	15.0%	45,567	9.9	9	1	9	0	0	5
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	12	10.9%	45,430	10.0	26	1	26	0	0	22
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	11	14.8%	45,388	9.6	15	1	15	0	0	15
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	8	20.6%	45,263	9.1	10	1	10	0	0	10
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	9	18.0%	44,986	9.5	13	1	13	0	0	11
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	13	10.0%	44,872	9.7	12	2	13	0	1	10
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	9	16.5%	44,314	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	4
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	7	22.9%	44,142	8.9	7	2	8	0	1	8
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	10	17.1%	43,746	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Albany	New York	117	102	8	28.9%	43,684	8.4	11	3	13	0	2	11
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	11	15.8%	43,667	9.5	14	1	14	0	0	12
Santa Clara	California	107	97	6	34.6%	43,478	6.0	4	2	6	1	2	6
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	11	11.7%	43,148	9.9	12	1	12	0	0	11
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	9	27.4%	42,696	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	9	17.5%	42,650	9.2	12	2	13	0	0	8
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	10	19.3%	42,404	9.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Norwalk	California	99	91	7	40.0%	42,354	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Garland	Texas	106	96	10	17.7%	42,225	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	9	18.7%	41,806	9.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	8	26.0%	41,683	7.8	5	2	6	0	1	6
Jamaica	New York	112	100	10	17.0%	41,420	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	7	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	7	40.0%	40,305	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Billings	Montana	106	98	8	29.3%	40,246	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	9	30.5%	39,880	8.0	5	2	6	0	1	6
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	9	13.2%	39,493	9.6	11	1	11	0	0	10
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	7	38.3%	39,491	6.2	5	2	7	1	2	7
Berkeley	California	110	99	7	30.7%	39,019	8.8	9	1	10	0	1	10
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	10	28.2%	38,659	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pasadena	California	113	103	7	24.3%	38,288	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Irving	Texas	111	102	11	15.9%	38,255	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	5
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	7	15.1%	38,159	9.5	10	1	10	0	0	9
South Gate	California	99	90	7	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	9	20.0%	38,038	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
La Puente	California	105	96	7	32.2%	37,967	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Yonkers	New York	109	99	9	20.9%	37,722	8.2	5	2	6	1	1	6
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	10	17.8%	37,680	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	10	20.7%	37,544	9.1	9	2	10	1	1	7
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	8	25.9%	37,453	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	10	15.2%	37,257	9.6	14	1	14	0	0	13
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	13	15.2%	36,985	9.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
Anaheim	California	114	102	11	10.0%	36,863	10.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	8	17.7%	36,652	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	7	18.7%	36,620	9.2	11	1	11	0	0	11
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	9	15.7%	36,591	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Orem	Utah	104	96	7	36.2%	36,266	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	8	17.4%	36,263	8.9	15	1	16	1	1	14
Athens	Georgia	115	106	10	28.7%	35,791	8.5	6	1	7	0	1	7
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	13	11.8%	35,728	9.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	9	20.5%	35,723	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	5	32.0%	35,591	8.3	4	1	5	0	1	5
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	7	37.2%	35,540	6.0	2	1	3	0	1	3
Midland	Texas	113	102	9	22.2%	35,526	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Denton	Texas	110	101	9	22.4%	35,443	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	8	20.8%	35,281	9.6	10	1	11	0	1	7
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	11	12.1%	34,950	9.8	10	1	10	0	0	10
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	8	20.8%	34,922	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bothell	Washington	110	98	8	27.2%	34,897	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	9	16.0%	34,373	9.5	10	1	10	0	0	10
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	8	21.9%	34,373	9.4	12	2	13	0	1	13
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	13	15.4%	34,279	9.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Odessa	Texas	112	103	9	21.4%	34,200	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	7	25.1%	34,158	8.2	6	1	7	0	1	7
San Bernardino	California	113	103	9	13.7%	34,105	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Humble	Texas	108	98	10	20.4%	33,985	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	12	17.5%	33,983	8.8	5	2	6	0	1	5
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	9	22.1%	33,617	8.5	4	1	5	0	1	4
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	7	25.8%	33,264	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	5
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	9	23.0%	32,775	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	7	31.6%	32,531	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Syracuse	New York	119	107	11	14.3%	32,522	9.2	15	2	17	0	2	14
Murrieta	California	106	96	8	24.5%	32,459	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	11	17.6%	31,621	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	6
Santa Maria	California	106	97	9	22.0%	31,520	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	10	18.4%	31,189	9.1	9	1	9	0	0	8
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	7	32.2%	31,188	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Visalia	California	108	99	10	20.5%	31,106	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	11	19.8%	30,730	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ogden	Utah	110	101	12	15.1%	30,487	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	2
Van Nuys	California	105	95	9	17.0%	30,205	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Napa	California	101	92	7	31.2%	30,134	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	5	32.3%	30,104	8.5	4	2	5	0	1	4
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	11	16.1%	29,946	9.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	11	13.1%	29,932	9.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Fullerton	California	106	97	7	21.4%	29,804	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	12	12.9%	29,741	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	6
Ocala	Florida	118	107	10	13.2%	29,660	9.8	11	1	11	0	0	10
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	10	16.8%	29,601	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	10	18.7%	29,420	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	12	13.1%	29,153	9.6	11	1	11	0	0	9
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	12	16.7%	29,085	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	12	10.0%	28,907	10.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	10	21.4%	28,822	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Olympia	Washington	110	98	11	15.7%	28,725	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	10	12.1%	28,692	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	11	20.6%	28,688	8.2	6	2	7	1	1	5
North Hollywood	California	108	98	10	18.7%	28,656	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pearland	Texas	104	96	9	20.8%	28,643	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	13	13.1%	28,570	9.9	12	1	12	0	0	10
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	7	28.7%	28,488	8.9	8	2	9	1	1	9
El Monte	California	103	94	8	30.4%	28,443	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	9	23.8%	28,388	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Orange	California	111	100	8	19.2%	27,888	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	11	19.2%	27,845	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Everett	Washington	112	100	10	16.4%	27,334	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	10	20.1%	27,310	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	9	17.1%	27,037	8.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	9	27.7%	26,944	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	16	10.0%	26,413	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	9	14.3%	26,215	9.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	9	27.2%	26,174	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Laredo	Texas	126	110	13	9.7%	26,169	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	4
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	8	14.2%	26,095	10.1	13	1	13	0	0	9
Chula Vista	California	109	100	10	10.0%	26,083	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	10	21.1%	25,906	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Astoria	New York	111	100	12	18.1%	25,777	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Longview	Texas	122	109	8	24.4%	25,733	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	9	19.8%	25,562	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	2
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	8	25.8%	25,480	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Mateo	California	106	97	9	17.8%	25,310	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	9	18.9%	25,216	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	5
Schenectady	New York	113	101	11	15.5%	25,127	9.5	8	1	8	0	0	7
Hemet	California	105	95	7	19.5%	25,064	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	13	9.9%	24,853	10.1	11	1	11	0	0	10
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	12	17.0%	24,843	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	9	20.6%	24,794	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	10	16.9%	24,729	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Corona	California	111	98	12	9.6%	24,662	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	7	25.7%	24,491	8.3	7	1	8	0	1	7
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	10	14.3%	24,428	9.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	12	14.7%	24,361	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	12	11.5%	24,156	9.8	13	1	13	0	0	12
Killeen	Texas	110	101	11	16.1%	24,133	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	10	25.7%	24,017	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	8	16.4%	23,847	9.2	9	1	10	0	1	10
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	10	21.3%	23,810	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Deltona	Florida	102	93	8	25.3%	23,791	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	10	19.2%	23,684	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	16	15.2%	23,674	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	10	11.5%	23,664	9.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	11	18.1%	23,620	9.0	7	2	8	1	1	6
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	10	20.4%	23,570	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	8	23.0%	23,528	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	5
Fontana	California	109	98	12	10.0%	23,473	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	California	108	97	8	21.1%	23,436	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roseville	California	106	95	8	16.7%	23,378	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Canton	Ohio	117	105	12	15.9%	23,346	9.6	12	1	12	0	0	11
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	10	16.2%	23,173	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	11	12.9%	22,784	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Clovis	California	106	97	11	18.8%	22,774	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fremont	California	107	98	10	9.7%	22,634	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Inglewood	California	124	112	10	16.9%	22,628	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	8	23.1%	22,526	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	12	12.2%	22,167	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	6
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	9	22.5%	22,120	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	9	17.7%	22,102	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	10	19.8%	22,048	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	9	17.9%	21,916	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	9	20.2%	21,914	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	12	17.7%	21,907	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Abilene	Texas	111	102	11	16.7%	21,777	8.2	6	1	7	1	1	6
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	10	18.7%	21,576	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Concord	California	107	98	8	16.5%	21,550	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Conroe	Texas	111	101	13	13.4%	21,410	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	9	22.1%	21,407	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	12	9.9%	21,391	10.2	6	1	6	0	0	5
Waco	Texas	112	100	10	13.5%	21,321	9.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	11	10.4%	21,138	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	5
Auburn	Washington	112	101	11	18.7%	21,075	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	11	10.0%	20,794	10.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	15	9.9%	20,792	10.1	10	1	10	0	0	9
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	11	16.9%	20,727	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	13	10.0%	20,545	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	10	15.6%	20,515	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	15	10.0%	20,313	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	10	18.3%	20,242	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	12	10.0%	20,164	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	11	10.0%	20,132	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	13	11.7%	20,107	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	10	16.5%	20,042	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	12	10.0%	19,991	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tyler	Texas	115	104	12	12.7%	19,830	9.6	9	1	9	0	0	7
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	14	9.6%	19,698	10.3	8	1	8	0	0	6
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	14	10.0%	19,690	10.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Torrance	California	113	103	13	11.0%	19,498	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Oceanside	California	106	96	10	9.7%	19,487	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	13	11.9%	19,413	10.1	18	1	18	0	0	11
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	10	19.7%	19,351	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hayward	California	108	98	9	10.0%	19,203	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	9	10.0%	19,055	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	10	10.0%	18,919	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	9	17.3%	18,774	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	11	12.7%	18,667	10.1	10	1	10	0	0	6
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	13	10.0%	18,635	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Salinas	California	106	96	11	9.9%	18,605	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Homestead	Florida	111	99	12	9.9%	18,535	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Lancaster	California	105	96	9	10.0%	18,442	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	10	10.8%	18,412	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	11	9.7%	18,370	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	8	19.1%	18,176	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission	Texas	105	95	10	10.0%	18,109	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	111	103	12	16.4%	18,092	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	14	10.0%	18,081	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Panama City	Florida	107	99	10	14.3%	18,079	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	10	18.2%	17,966	9.4	7	1	7	0	0	6
Escondido	California	104	94	8	10.0%	17,965	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	14	9.7%	17,934	10.3	9	1	9	0	0	6
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	11	18.0%	17,883	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	11	9.9%	17,856	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	9	18.8%	17,820	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
West Covina	California	111	100	15	16.3%	17,813	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	11	9.7%	17,757	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	5
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	9	18.2%	17,756	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	12	9.6%	17,701	10.3	9	1	9	0	0	6
Garden Grove	California	110	97	11	10.0%	17,576	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Palmdale	California	106	97	11	10.0%	17,494	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	14	13.1%	17,315	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elk Grove	California	109	96	11	9.6%	17,293	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
El Cajon	California	109	97	11	10.0%	17,246	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Frisco	Texas	105	95	11	10.0%	17,245	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	11	16.4%	17,220	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	12	18.2%	17,194	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cypress	Texas	108	101	10	10.0%	17,060	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	11	9.6%	16,798	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	12	9.7%	16,707	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	11	10.0%	16,617	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	10	13.9%	16,279	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	12	9.9%	16,245	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	11	10.0%	16,202	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	9	13.6%	16,101	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Largo	Florida	113	105	13	15.0%	16,092	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	8	16.9%	16,089	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tracy	California	106	96	8	13.7%	16,076	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	11	9.8%	16,052	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Macon	Georgia	118	108	14	9.8%	16,027	10.1	9	1	9	0	0	8
Pomona	California	107	97	9	10.0%	15,799	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	14	9.6%	15,759	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	5
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	12	9.3%	15,719	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Missoula	Montana	111	102	10	15.9%	15,434	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Flint	Michigan	117	105	14	9.9%	15,334	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	5
Kent	Washington	113	102	10	9.5%	15,191	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	13	10.0%	15,180	10.0	14	1	14	0	0	14
Renton	Washington	112	100	14	9.7%	15,050	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	10	10.0%	14,631	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	117	107	9	15.2%	14,583	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	8	10.0%	14,560	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	11	10.0%	14,437	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	107	96	11	14.8%	14,345	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	9	9.5%	14,028	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	12	14.2%	13,988	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	9	14.2%	13,969	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	9	10.0%	13,894	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Compton	California	106	98	11	10.0%	13,888	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	15	9.4%	13,711	10.4	8	1	8	0	0	5
Victorville	California	105	95	9	10.0%	13,631	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	12	9.6%	13,599	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	9	9.7%	13,573	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	10	13.0%	13,495	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	13	9.8%	13,313	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	11	9.9%	13,222	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Warren	Michigan	115	103	17	9.8%	13,219	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	9	12.9%	13,217	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	11	10.0%	13,077	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	10	10.0%	13,050	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	12	9.9%	13,005	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Temecula	California	109	99	9	10.0%	12,991	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Yakima	Washington	109	100	12	10.0%	12,985	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	10	10.0%	12,918	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Simi Valley	California	101	92	8	10.0%	12,871	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	10	10.0%	12,809	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	10	9.6%	12,748	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	10	10.0%	12,649	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	11	10.0%	12,607	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	10	10.0%	12,543	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	10	9.8%	12,531	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	11	10.0%	12,409	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	10	10.0%	12,286	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vista	California	106	97	10	10.0%	11,987	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	11	10.0%	11,906	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Independence	Missouri	112	103	13	9.5%	11,795	10.5	8	1	8	0	0	4
Baytown	Texas	108	98	11	10.0%	11,779	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	California	106	96	10	10.0%	11,739	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	9	9.6%	11,729	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
College Station	Texas	107	98	10	9.5%	11,705	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	12	10.0%	11,658	10.3	11	1	11	0	0	5
Provo	Utah	108	99	10	10.0%	11,652	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	11	10.0%	11,636	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ventura	California	104	95	8	10.0%	11,596	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	10	10.0%	11,591	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	13	10.0%	11,521	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Richardson	Texas	109	101	11	10.0%	11,460	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	9	10.0%	11,375	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	California	105	95	11	9.9%	11,321	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Redding	California	110	99	9	10.0%	11,303	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	10	10.0%	11,247	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	8	10.0%	11,231	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chico	California	105	96	8	10.0%	11,202	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	11	10.0%	11,159	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Riverview	Florida	104	96	12	10.0%	11,133	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	102	94	8	10.0%	11,127	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Antioch	California	107	99	9	10.0%	11,072	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	10	10.0%	11,025	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	14	9.4%	10,904	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	9	10.0%	10,902	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Menifee	California	108	98	9	9.8%	10,878	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	8	10.0%	10,870	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	12	10.0%	10,864	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Keller	Texas	108	99	11	9.3%	10,857	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Burbank	California	109	100	11	10.0%	10,802	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	12	10.0%	10,704	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	108	9	10.0%	10,690	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	11	10.0%	10,688	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	8	10.0%	10,672	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Rialto	California	106	97	9	10.0%	10,658	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	California	102	93	8	9.3%	10,652	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	100	90	8	10.0%	10,580	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	12	10.0%	10,546	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Vacaville	California	101	92	8	10.0%	10,530	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	11	10.0%	10,422	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	California	105	94	9	10.0%	10,381	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	California	108	100	10	10.0%	10,306	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	11	10.0%	10,287	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	11	9.0%	10,266	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	12	9.7%	10,244	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	11	10.0%	10,216	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	11	10.0%	10,172	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	14	9.0%	10,159	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	11	10.0%	10,146	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	9	10.0%	10,083	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	12	9.5%	10,081	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	10	10.3%	10,061	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	107	98	11	10.0%	10,048	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	10	10.0%	10,047	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	12	9.6%	10,040	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	13	10.0%	10,030	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	108	100	12	10.0%	10,028	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	108	96	11	10.0%	10,026	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	11	10.0%	9,977	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	11	10.0%	9,968	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	11	10.0%	9,913	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	102	94	9	10.0%	9,910	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	105	94	10	9.6%	9,903	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	10	10.0%	9,795	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Apopka	Florida	105	95	9	10.0%	9,765	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	11	9.6%	9,690	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	101	90	9	10.0%	9,684	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	10	10.0%	9,677	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sylmar	California	100	94	8	10.0%	9,649	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livermore	California	105	95	8	10.0%	9,625	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	California	103	94	8	10.0%	9,609	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	98	90	7	10.0%	9,608	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	10	10.0%	9,529	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	10	10.0%	9,521	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	13	9.9%	9,521	10.1	8	1	8	0	0	7
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	10	9.5%	9,511	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	8	10.0%	9,501	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	13	10.0%	9,481	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Milton	Florida	108	99	12	10.0%	9,474	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	105	96	8	10.0%	9,447	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	11	10.0%	9,412	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	10	10.0%	9,397	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	12	9.9%	9,394	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Medford	Oregon	106	98	10	10.0%	9,325	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Covington	Georgia	107	98	10	10.0%	9,269	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	11	9.5%	9,048	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	3
Bryan	Texas	114	105	15	9.4%	9,047	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	107	98	10	9.5%	8,903	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	11	9.6%	8,872	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Champaign	Illinois	110	98	11	9.3%	8,769	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	11	9.4%	8,752	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	12	9.0%	8,681	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	7	20.6%	505,965	9.0	62	1	63	0	1	63
San Diego	134	116	7	18.9%	255,239	8.9	36	2	39	1	3	38
San Jose	129	116	7	17.1%	179,911	9.1	28	2	30	0	2	29
San Francisco	121	106	8	19.9%	173,266	9.1	28	1	30	0	2	27
Oxnard	107	98	2	65.9%	145,246	5.8	4	1	6	1	2	6
Sacramento	134	115	7	13.9%	112,181	9.9	28	1	28	0	0	22
Daly City	103	94	1	95.7%	109,451	1.5	2	1	4	1	2	4
Irvine	112	101	6	34.6%	92,467	7.6	9	2	11	1	2	11
Bakersfield	112	102	11	16.5%	92,208	9.5	11	1	11	0	0	9
Modesto	111	101	7	31.1%	82,138	8.6	7	1	8	1	1	6
Riverside	113	102	9	22.1%	81,795	8.1	7	2	8	0	1	8
Stockton	122	108	8	20.4%	76,325	9.5	12	1	13	1	1	10
Fresno	120	105	9	12.4%	74,695	9.7	18	1	18	0	0	17
Santa Ana	110	99	9	19.6%	69,845	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Sunnyvale	107	98	6	40.6%	62,025	7.5	4	1	5	0	1	5
Ontario	109	98	7	34.1%	60,154	7.7	3	1	4	0	1	4
Oakland	115	102	10	13.6%	55,856	9.7	14	1	14	0	0	13
Carlsbad	109	96	5	48.5%	55,175	5.8	4	2	6	1	2	6
Whittier	108	98	6	26.7%	52,382	8.7	6	2	7	0	1	7
Downey	100	91	4	43.9%	49,588	7.0	3	1	4	1	1	4
Vallejo	107	98	7	39.7%	49,460	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Long Beach	120	109	14	10.0%	47,897	10.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Santa Monica	105	96	3	50.2%	47,377	7.0	5	1	7	0	2	7
Santa Clara	107	97	6	34.6%	43,478	6.0	4	2	6	1	2	6
Norwalk	99	91	7	40.0%	42,354	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bell Gardens	99	90	7	40.0%	40,973	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Berkeley	110	99	7	30.7%	39,019	8.8	9	1	10	0	1	10
Pasadena	113	103	7	24.3%	38,288	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
South Gate	99	90	7	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
La Puente	105	96	7	32.2%	37,967	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Anaheim	114	102	11	10.0%	36,863	10.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
San Bernardino	113	103	9	13.7%	34,105	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Murrieta	106	96	8	24.5%	32,459	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Maria	106	97	9	22.0%	31,520	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Visalia	108	99	10	20.5%	31,106	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Van Nuys	105	95	9	17.0%	30,205	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Napa	101	92	7	31.2%	30,134	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Fullerton	106	97	7	21.4%	29,804	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	10	16.8%	29,601	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
North Hollywood	108	98	10	18.7%	28,656	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Monte	103	94	8	30.4%	28,443	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orange	111	100	8	19.2%	27,888	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chula Vista	109	100	10	10.0%	26,083	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
San Mateo	106	97	9	17.8%	25,310	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hemet	105	95	7	19.5%	25,064	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Corona	111	98	12	9.6%	24,662	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Fontana	109	98	12	10.0%	23,473	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	108	97	8	21.1%	23,436	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roseville	106	95	8	16.7%	23,378	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clovis	106	97	11	18.8%	22,774	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fremont	107	98	10	9.7%	22,634	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Inglewood	124	112	10	16.9%	22,628	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Concord	107	98	8	16.5%	21,550	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Rosa	112	100	12	9.9%	21,391	10.2	6	1	6	0	0	5
Moreno Valley	109	99	13	10.0%	20,545	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	111	99	12	10.0%	19,991	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	113	103	13	11.0%	19,498	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Oceanside	106	96	10	9.7%	19,487	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Mission Viejo	105	95	10	19.7%	19,351	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hayward	108	98	9	10.0%	19,203	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salinas	106	96	11	9.9%	18,605	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Lancaster	105	96	9	10.0%	18,442	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	104	94	8	10.0%	17,965	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Covina	111	100	15	16.3%	17,813	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Garden Grove	110	97	11	10.0%	17,576	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Palmdale	106	97	11	10.0%	17,494	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elk Grove	109	96	11	9.6%	17,293	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
El Cajon	109	97	11	10.0%	17,246	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tracy	106	96	8	13.7%	16,076	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pomona	107	97	9	10.0%	15,799	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Palo Alto	107	96	11	14.8%	14,345	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Compton	106	98	11	10.0%	13,888	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Victorville	105	95	9	10.0%	13,631	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	106	95	10	13.0%	13,495	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Barbara	111	99	13	9.8%	13,313	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Temecula	109	99	9	10.0%	12,991	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Simi Valley	101	92	8	10.0%	12,871	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	106	97	10	10.0%	11,987	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	106	96	10	10.0%	11,739	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	104	95	8	10.0%	11,596	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	104	95	9	10.0%	11,375	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	105	95	11	9.9%	11,321	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Redding	110	99	9	10.0%	11,303	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chico	105	96	8	10.0%	11,202	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	107	99	9	10.0%	11,072	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Menifee	108	98	9	9.8%	10,878	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Burbank	109	100	11	10.0%	10,802	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rialto	106	97	9	10.0%	10,658	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	102	93	8	9.3%	10,652	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Pacoima	100	90	8	10.0%	10,580	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vacaville	101	92	8	10.0%	10,530	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	105	94	9	10.0%	10,381	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	108	100	10	10.0%	10,306	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	107	98	11	10.0%	10,048	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	105	94	10	9.6%	9,903	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Hawthorne	101	90	9	10.0%	9,684	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	100	94	8	10.0%	9,649	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livermore	105	95	8	10.0%	9,625	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	103	94	8	10.0%	9,609	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	98	90	7	10.0%	9,608	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chino	105	96	8	10.0%	9,447	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2

Los Angeles

ZIP	progressive.com	allstate.com	nationwide.com	geico.com	esurance.com	farmers.com
90011	7	1	2	4	3	5
90003	10	4	5	6	7	8
90023	10	4	5	6	8	7
90014	7	1	2	3	4	5
90012	10	4	5	6	7	8
90010	10	4	5	6	7	8
90063	10	4	5	6	8	7
90061	7	1	2	3	5	4
90065	10	4	5	6	7	8
90034	10	4	5	6	7	8
90032	10	4	5	6	8	7
90043	10	4	5	6	8	7
90041	7	1	2	3	5	4
90001	10	4	5	6	8	7
90021	7	1	2	3	4	5
90035	10	4	5	6	7	8
90045	10	4	5	6	7	8
90036	10	4	5	6	7	8
90005	10	4	5	6	7	8
90066	7	1	2	3	4	5
90026	7	1	2	3	4	5
90067	7	1	2	3	4	5
90057	7	1	2	3	4	5
90013	10	4	5	6	7	8
90044	10	4	5	6	7	8
90017	10	4	5	7	6	8
90040	10	4	5	7	6	8
90004	10	4	5	6	7	8
90031	10	4	5	6	8	7
90022	7	1	2	3	4	5
90062	7	1	2	3	5	4
90029	7	1	2	3	5	4
90028	10	4	5	6	7	8
90018	10	4	5	6	8	7
90038	10	4	5	6	7	8
90049	10	4	5	6	7	8
90048	10	4	5	7	8	6
90008	10	4	5	7	6	8
90089	7	1	2	3	4	5
90059	10	4	5	6	7	8
90019	10	4	5	6	7	8
90039	7	1	2	4	3	5
90027	10	4	5	6	8	7
90058	10	4	5	7	6	8
90007	10	4	5	6	7	8
90047	7	1	2	3	4	5
90077	10	4	5	8	6	7
90025	10	4	5	6	7	8
90015	10	4	5	6	7	8
90046	10	4	5	6	7	8
90056	10	4	5	6	7	8
90016	10	4	5	6	7	8
90037	8	4	5	6	7	10
90064	2	4	5	6	7	8
90068	10	4	5	6	7	8
90006	5	1	2	4	3	6
90020	10	4	5	6	7	8
90024	10	4	5	6	7	8
90033	10	4	5	7	6	8
90073	10	4	5	6	7	8
90002	7	1	2	3	4	5
90042	9	4	5	6	7	11

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Progressive

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Progressive Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Progressive Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Progressive Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Progressive Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly