Planetfitness Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve planetfitness.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,305 Gyms In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Planetfitness Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Planetfitness Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Planetfitness Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Planetfitness Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	34,882	13,305	2	72.8%	235,138,952	2.8	27,362	32,636	2,586	41,388	14,486	25,416	41,106
California	4,415	2,035	2	64.5%	25,249,846	3.9	1,164	1,738	222	2,293	387	958	2,266
Texas	3,524	1,604	3	68.2%	19,004,458	3.2	1,360	1,917	154	2,278	660	1,287	2,250
New York	2,962	1,383	2	74.6%	14,640,985	2.6	1,489	1,754	154	2,259	937	1,492	2,239
Florida	2,755	1,297	2	66.3%	13,661,381	4.1	446	975	148	1,378	192	501	1,349
Pennsylvania	2,688	1,340	2	77.1%	9,865,125	2.3	1,603	1,780	148	2,393	995	1,662	2,378
Illinois	2,798	1,312	2	73.9%	9,470,311	2.6	1,245	1,380	113	1,697	675	1,124	1,695
Ohio	2,338	1,162	2	76.4%	8,897,291	2.7	975	1,187	116	1,631	542	988	1,629
Michigan	2,051	980	1	83.7%	8,331,165	2.2	833	976	100	1,227	525	879	1,227
Georgia	2,016	985	2	75.3%	7,751,229	2.8	574	726	113	1,014	293	610	1,007
North Carolina	2,089	990	2	73.5%	7,464,113	2.8	683	802	105	1,109	363	666	1,101
New Jersey	1,775	883	2	77.8%	6,911,250	2.9	537	593	99	818	190	475	816
Virginia	1,936	921	2	74.9%	6,302,897	2.6	723	891	68	1,121	423	720	1,118
Indiana	2,878	1,368	1	81.5%	5,410,611	2.6	658	769	83	1,032	355	671	1,030
Washington	1,750	891	2	73.0%	5,317,974	2.8	451	587	55	714	252	407	709
Massachusetts	1,836	950	2	76.1%	5,196,709	3.0	461	534	97	738	178	400	734
Tennessee	1,632	818	2	75.6%	5,024,706	2.9	514	622	53	792	269	439	788
Missouri	2,086	1,040	2	76.2%	4,640,405	2.6	887	1,017	41	1,263	468	755	1,261
Maryland	1,303	702	2	75.7%	4,546,281	2.6	392	463	56	666	200	406	664
Wisconsin	1,895	867	3	75.6%	4,370,483	2.6	694	769	49	952	359	554	950
Alabama	1,536	786	1	82.8%	4,029,165	2.4	522	637	54	817	267	517	817
Minnesota	1,926	897	3	72.2%	3,989,081	2.8	777	878	35	1,031	337	621	1,023
Arizona	1,335	675	3	57.3%	3,981,673	4.1	247	396	44	518	109	214	484
South Carolina	1,343	677	2	78.4%	3,883,855	2.6	347	422	43	534	197	360	533
Louisiana	1,308	661	3	78.0%	3,637,343	2.8	429	508	50	652	230	453	648
Kentucky	1,635	819	1	79.9%	3,551,206	2.2	697	757	53	944	468	685	944
Colorado	1,660	805	3	61.4%	3,396,651	3.7	381	514	31	613	154	293	596
Oregon	1,772	895	2	71.7%	2,927,836	3.4	353	412	27	513	148	304	511
Connecticut	1,271	666	2	77.2%	2,763,688	2.9	234	279	49	364	98	194	364
Oklahoma	1,441	721	2	67.7%	2,653,324	3.4	557	645	38	757	242	435	751
Iowa	1,772	802	1	83.6%	2,619,092	2.3	890	933	31	1,114	471	777	1,114
Arkansas	1,465	727	1	85.6%	2,558,736	2.1	553	587	38	719	337	533	719
Mississippi	1,293	676	1	84.6%	2,527,704	2.3	384	418	34	506	223	384	506
Utah	1,087	585	2	75.2%	2,288,949	2.6	246	284	20	320	125	186	318
Kansas	1,515	733	2	77.0%	2,239,748	2.8	615	691	33	843	306	545	832
Nebraska	1,396	751	1	83.2%	1,584,385	2.7	523	580	16	680	239	474	678
West Virginia	1,171	643	1	86.6%	1,584,150	1.9	684	704	29	898	474	671	898
New Mexico	1,079	594	2	68.6%	1,434,376	3.0	327	361	23	419	149	244	411
Nevada	807	447	3	44.7%	1,306,361	5.1	92	168	18	238	32	62	223
Maine	1,614	916	1	86.7%	1,155,261	1.8	421	425	22	488	288	389	484
Idaho	1,114	618	3	68.2%	1,149,969	3.1	251	273	12	322	98	170	320
New Hampshire	1,030	586	1	84.9%	1,140,211	2.0	238	248	36	296	144	223	296
Rhode Island	513	314	2	84.9%	897,086	2.9	64	77	24	120	25	60	120
Montana	1,115	594	2	80.7%	841,139	2.1	348	361	9	411	175	332	411
Hawaii	620	357	3	56.7%	805,588	3.6	82	93	6	120	29	53	119
Delaware	606	376	2	80.2%	761,052	3.2	52	66	16	97	26	48	97
South Dakota	970	532	2	84.1%	726,822	2.3	359	370	10	414	177	280	414
North Dakota	794	445	1	88.7%	666,544	2.0	367	381	10	443	227	340	443
Alaska	942	535	2	77.9%	574,753	2.6	217	234	12	286	152	194	285
Vermont	863	495	1	86.5%	540,348	1.8	250	254	9	274	181	225	274
Wyoming	826	452	1	86.9%	505,579	2.1	164	171	10	204	94	154	204

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	324	199	4	48.8%	1,556,818	6.3	96	6	107	1	12	103
Chicago	Illinois	299	179	4	53.0%	1,432,391	5.7	56	11	77	0	3	77
Bronx	New York	234	156	1	97.9%	1,411,812	1.4	25	2	46	19	43	46
New York City	New York	323	196	2	80.9%	1,311,565	3.6	47	10	72	19	29	70
Dallas	Texas	274	162	2	90.5%	1,260,549	2.2	48	8	54	11	43	54
Los Angeles	California	353	225	4	47.1%	1,156,100	6.4	62	5	103	2	4	103
Miami	Florida	377	222	2	57.3%	1,076,540	5.3	55	11	77	3	12	77
San Antonio	Texas	343	208	4	52.1%	926,578	5.8	59	3	60	0	2	59
Indianapolis	Indiana	316	188	2	81.0%	771,383	2.8	37	8	49	12	26	47
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	260	163	5	47.2%	743,426	6.2	47	8	87	0	3	78
Brooklyn	New York	221	141	7	27.6%	718,684	8.2	37	6	65	0	1	48
San Francisco	California	253	153	2	80.9%	703,863	2.9	28	3	29	0	23	29
Minneapolis	Minnesota	405	256	3	61.0%	663,794	5.1	51	10	84	1	7	83
Memphis	Tennessee	260	169	1	90.2%	626,941	2.1	26	7	35	15	21	35
San Jose	California	240	157	4	59.2%	621,676	5.3	28	5	41	2	6	40
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	309	198	2	69.8%	580,059	4.1	27	8	38	1	12	38
Saint Paul	Minnesota	367	247	3	71.3%	570,357	3.7	30	10	39	5	15	39
Saint Louis	Missouri	320	215	3	61.5%	563,807	4.8	45	6	71	3	15	71
Las Vegas	Nevada	288	157	6	36.3%	561,456	7.7	43	8	72	0	1	64
Columbus	Ohio	226	148	2	65.4%	554,035	4.5	30	7	46	2	9	45
Seattle	Washington	270	173	4	57.3%	547,575	5.3	35	4	58	0	3	57
San Diego	California	291	189	7	39.0%	525,246	7.1	36	7	53	0	2	49
Cleveland	Ohio	264	169	3	69.4%	520,344	4.2	29	4	51	2	10	51
Phoenix	Arizona	304	194	6	35.6%	516,023	7.4	42	3	73	0	0	69
Jacksonville	Florida	282	191	4	59.3%	513,920	4.9	31	5	49	0	4	48
Sacramento	California	254	168	4	63.7%	512,304	4.5	28	4	52	2	4	52
Cincinnati	Ohio	263	174	3	62.5%	502,840	4.8	45	9	78	1	9	78
Atlanta	Georgia	379	246	3	49.9%	493,772	5.8	39	7	67	1	3	64
Omaha	Nebraska	252	175	2	88.0%	486,156	2.3	31	3	33	1	28	33
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	269	170	3	59.6%	483,909	5.0	29	7	59	5	7	59
Bakersfield	California	211	141	2	83.9%	469,113	2.6	11	2	12	1	11	12
Denver	Colorado	335	212	4	42.4%	460,858	6.9	38	9	60	0	5	57
Portland	Oregon	234	152	4	47.3%	435,179	6.2	33	6	54	0	2	52
Detroit	Michigan	204	130	3	67.0%	429,294	4.2	25	3	35	0	9	35
Fort Worth	Texas	234	139	5	46.1%	420,277	6.4	32	7	59	2	5	56
Louisville	Kentucky	239	158	6	54.1%	411,715	5.8	32	7	65	2	3	65
Salt Lake City	Utah	244	153	2	84.0%	409,084	2.5	19	6	21	2	17	21
Fresno	California	235	159	3	67.4%	406,024	4.3	18	4	33	0	4	33
Baltimore	Maryland	225	146	4	64.3%	405,641	4.6	22	7	35	1	3	35
Staten Island	New York	207	133	2	85.2%	403,798	2.8	12	1	12	0	10	12
Charlotte	North Carolina	236	153	4	43.5%	393,953	6.8	24	5	31	0	1	31
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	129	2	86.7%	390,145	2.3	12	1	12	0	11	12
Dayton	Ohio	277	186	2	78.3%	374,253	3.0	27	5	36	3	21	36
Aurora	Colorado	200	142	2	85.9%	373,998	2.3	11	4	14	2	10	14
Washington DC	District of Columbia	240	156	5	52.6%	359,986	5.5	28	3	56	1	2	56
Birmingham	Alabama	246	168	2	71.5%	357,559	3.8	30	7	55	0	19	55
Long Beach	California	193	131	3	74.5%	356,757	3.5	12	1	12	0	8	12
Austin	Texas	276	175	8	32.7%	355,490	7.8	44	5	54	0	2	44
Albuquerque	New Mexico	189	133	5	54.1%	354,528	5.6	17	3	22	0	3	18
Stockton	California	214	153	2	90.9%	339,974	1.9	12	4	22	2	19	22
Alexandria	Virginia	256	180	1	95.0%	336,860	1.4	14	5	18	11	15	18
Mesa	Arizona	232	166	3	62.0%	331,319	4.8	13	3	15	0	3	13
Orlando	Florida	310	194	6	33.2%	331,138	7.5	32	6	43	0	3	39
Oakland	California	191	124	2	80.0%	329,395	3.0	14	3	15	0	14	15
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	243	156	2	85.3%	323,394	2.4	18	4	37	1	29	37
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	278	186	5	47.0%	320,639	6.2	39	3	74	1	4	73
Tucson	Arizona	248	163	6	35.2%	318,524	7.3	32	8	52	0	7	37
Vancouver	Washington	198	140	1	94.9%	309,479	1.6	11	2	12	6	10	12
Saint Petersburg	Florida	226	170	2	86.6%	308,556	2.3	16	2	21	8	14	21
Arlington	Texas	210	146	3	77.4%	307,445	3.3	12	1	12	0	11	12
Buffalo	New York	256	172	4	54.5%	306,938	6.1	28	7	32	1	6	32
Grand Rapids	Michigan	196	131	2	83.3%	306,308	2.7	12	1	12	0	11	12
Hollywood	Florida	210	145	2	63.9%	299,322	4.8	9	3	13	0	4	13
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	313	205	5	43.8%	299,201	9.3	42	5	65	1	5	62
Tulsa	Oklahoma	261	158	3	70.8%	298,935	3.8	28	3	31	2	9	31
West Palm Beach	Florida	214	155	2	80.5%	298,352	3.0	12	5	15	2	10	15
Hialeah	Florida	184	107	2	81.1%	297,478	3.1	7	3	10	1	5	10
El Paso	Texas	263	166	6	37.6%	296,456	6.8	24	3	34	1	1	32
Kansas City	Missouri	240	160	4	51.8%	295,978	6.0	49	5	94	1	2	92
Wichita	Kansas	227	154	4	70.5%	294,427	4.3	26	5	32	1	3	32
Naples	Florida	205	143	1	94.0%	294,273	1.6	14	3	17	11	14	17
Pompano Beach	Florida	243	170	2	77.3%	286,403	3.1	10	7	14	2	6	14
Newark	New Jersey	167	121	1	97.4%	273,284	1.4	9	3	13	6	11	13
Spokane	Washington	205	140	3	75.8%	272,574	3.4	14	3	15	2	4	15
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	132	2	83.3%	271,273	2.6	18	1	19	0	15	19
Colorado Springs	Colorado	244	160	6	46.1%	268,820	6.1	30	5	47	0	11	41
Raleigh	North Carolina	220	153	6	48.8%	266,938	6.5	15	3	25	0	0	24
Tampa	Florida	289	194	6	33.6%	266,370	8.0	27	3	49	0	0	39
Modesto	California	178	129	1	100.0%	264,457	1.0	7	2	8	7	7	8
Rochester	New York	260	165	5	55.4%	261,334	5.5	24	6	40	3	3	40
Laredo	Texas	157	110	1	95.3%	258,286	1.5	6	1	6	5	5	6
Santa Ana	California	147	105	3	72.3%	258,154	3.8	6	2	7	0	2	7
Silver Spring	Maryland	208	147	2	82.6%	250,337	2.7	7	3	10	1	6	10
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	160	2	85.2%	246,541	2.4	22	1	22	0	19	22
Jamaica	New York	181	121	1	100.0%	243,904	1.0	6	3	8	6	7	8
Glendale	Arizona	208	138	2	79.0%	240,731	3.4	9	3	11	0	7	11
Nashville	Tennessee	264	176	4	52.4%	240,326	6.2	22	2	40	1	1	40
Spring	Texas	216	144	4	61.6%	234,603	5.1	8	2	9	0	0	9
Plano	Texas	174	116	2	75.1%	229,358	3.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Lexington	Kentucky	205	141	4	71.5%	228,657	3.7	15	2	16	1	2	16
Norfolk	Virginia	203	135	1	91.9%	225,785	1.6	14	1	14	11	11	14
Lawrenceville	Georgia	150	116	1	86.1%	220,633	2.0	4	1	4	2	3	4
Tacoma	Washington	245	175	4	66.0%	220,115	4.3	20	7	34	0	4	34
Fort Wayne	Indiana	202	125	3	68.2%	217,138	4.3	16	2	19	0	0	19
Savannah	Georgia	184	118	2	90.0%	217,135	2.0	10	1	10	0	10	10
Winston Salem	North Carolina	188	144	2	81.8%	216,067	2.9	9	3	11	1	6	11
Bradenton	Florida	199	137	1	85.3%	215,793	2.9	10	2	10	5	5	10
Little Rock	Arkansas	189	127	1	98.9%	215,653	1.2	12	2	14	10	14	14
Flushing	New York	142	96	1	100.0%	215,067	1.0	4	2	7	4	7	7
Kissimmee	Florida	225	143	4	74.3%	214,841	3.4	7	4	9	1	5	9
Akron	Ohio	176	133	2	79.1%	213,925	3.2	17	1	17	0	16	17
Fontana	California	140	103	2	90.0%	211,254	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Reading	Pennsylvania	204	141	1	95.1%	204,765	1.6	10	5	21	8	17	21
Des Moines	Iowa	196	127	1	91.4%	204,132	2.0	11	1	11	5	9	11
Salem	Oregon	171	121	2	75.4%	201,042	3.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Irving	Texas	164	118	3	82.7%	199,017	2.8	6	1	6	0	5	6
Fayetteville	North Carolina	193	134	3	81.5%	198,983	2.9	8	4	13	3	8	13
Chandler	Arizona	159	113	4	73.5%	197,337	3.7	6	2	6	0	3	6
Greenville	South Carolina	166	118	1	88.6%	194,455	2.1	9	3	10	5	7	10
Beaverton	Oregon	152	108	1	96.1%	193,704	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Katy	Texas	157	106	3	56.3%	193,693	4.3	4	3	7	1	2	7
Mobile	Alabama	242	169	3	71.4%	193,674	3.5	18	5	36	1	9	36
Brownsville	Texas	145	108	1	95.4%	191,961	1.7	3	1	3	2	3	3
Knoxville	Tennessee	219	147	6	49.5%	191,250	6.2	17	3	27	1	1	27
Henderson	Nevada	197	121	3	63.1%	190,940	4.8	8	6	13	0	4	13
Lakeland	Florida	168	116	4	73.4%	189,304	3.6	9	4	17	0	3	17
Durham	North Carolina	173	123	3	64.7%	187,831	4.0	8	3	12	1	5	12
Providence	Rhode Island	185	127	2	91.5%	187,561	1.9	8	4	15	1	13	15
Montgomery	Alabama	199	132	2	87.9%	184,427	2.5	13	1	14	1	11	14
Eugene	Oregon	149	109	1	90.8%	184,367	1.8	6	1	6	3	5	6
Lubbock	Texas	194	130	3	66.3%	183,521	4.4	14	2	15	0	2	15
Erie	Pennsylvania	185	126	1	99.7%	182,940	1.2	13	2	15	12	12	15
Mission	Texas	142	109	1	100.0%	181,092	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Oceanside	California	143	104	2	90.0%	180,233	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Rockford	Illinois	173	125	1	98.3%	179,232	1.2	9	1	9	7	9	9
Ocala	Florida	188	135	2	79.5%	178,944	3.0	11	2	13	0	7	13
Springfield	Missouri	168	123	3	77.4%	178,249	3.3	7	3	9	0	5	9
San Bernardino	California	163	119	3	71.3%	177,973	4.6	7	2	14	0	2	14
Shreveport	Louisiana	197	134	3	79.7%	177,783	2.8	12	3	14	4	7	14
Grand Prairie	Texas	144	112	1	93.2%	177,671	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Chula Vista	California	141	98	4	68.0%	177,275	4.2	5	4	7	0	0	7
Charleston	South Carolina	200	138	2	90.0%	177,212	2.0	10	2	10	0	10	10
Trenton	New Jersey	210	152	1	85.1%	176,894	2.5	11	5	23	1	12	23
Newport News	Virginia	172	124	1	100.0%	176,685	1.0	7	2	14	7	14	14
Littleton	Colorado	254	169	3	54.0%	175,796	5.5	10	2	11	0	1	11
Fremont	California	144	108	2	75.1%	175,008	3.8	4	2	8	0	3	8
Huntsville	Alabama	176	125	1	89.0%	174,601	2.1	11	1	12	7	7	12
Toledo	Ohio	206	144	6	56.3%	173,245	5.6	15	2	27	0	2	27
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	179	121	1	94.0%	170,858	1.3	9	1	9	8	8	9
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	162	113	2	91.1%	169,741	1.6	5	2	7	2	7	7
Chesapeake	Virginia	155	110	4	70.9%	168,762	3.8	6	3	13	0	1	13
Jackson	Mississippi	187	120	1	98.8%	168,222	1.1	11	1	11	10	11	11
Homestead	Florida	200	144	1	89.2%	167,444	2.1	7	2	8	4	5	8
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	126	2	82.4%	167,277	3.3	6	4	11	1	4	11
Salinas	California	164	124	2	88.8%	167,200	2.2	5	1	6	1	5	6
Everett	Washington	159	119	1	99.7%	166,253	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
Boise	Idaho	181	132	4	64.6%	165,538	4.9	9	2	10	0	1	9
Augusta	Georgia	174	120	3	80.1%	163,659	3.4	8	3	15	0	4	15
Oxnard	California	149	105	3	74.0%	163,184	3.5	4	2	5	0	2	5
Peoria	Arizona	145	110	1	94.8%	163,114	1.5	4	1	4	2	4	4
Evansville	Indiana	188	134	1	88.2%	162,726	2.3	9	2	11	2	9	11
Escondido	California	153	110	2	90.0%	161,688	2.0	4	2	5	0	4	5
Anchorage	Alaska	219	157	4	65.6%	160,045	4.8	12	4	14	1	1	14
Huntington Beach	California	141	107	3	80.0%	159,926	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Moreno Valley	California	149	118	3	77.8%	159,743	3.3	4	2	5	0	3	5
Greensboro	North Carolina	179	129	7	48.6%	159,047	6.1	9	4	15	0	2	14
Green Bay	Wisconsin	178	128	2	85.4%	156,583	2.6	7	2	10	0	6	10
Amarillo	Texas	198	142	5	68.4%	156,530	4.1	14	3	21	0	9	21
Lansing	Michigan	162	105	1	95.1%	156,340	1.3	7	2	8	6	7	8
Overland Park	Kansas	179	133	2	84.9%	155,761	2.9	9	2	11	4	6	11
Cape Coral	Florida	169	118	2	85.9%	155,256	2.3	6	1	6	0	5	6
Madison	Wisconsin	197	133	4	52.3%	154,205	5.5	14	5	29	0	1	29
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	120	2	88.1%	153,288	2.5	6	2	9	0	7	9
York	Pennsylvania	164	109	2	84.7%	152,287	2.6	7	2	8	0	6	8
Anaheim	California	183	125	5	41.3%	152,063	6.4	7	3	15	0	1	14
Frisco	Texas	123	94	2	88.1%	151,919	2.0	2	1	2	1	2	2
Yonkers	New York	145	109	2	84.0%	151,721	2.6	5	2	6	0	5	6
Killeen	Texas	162	110	1	100.0%	150,200	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Kent	Washington	145	108	1	93.1%	149,476	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Waco	Texas	177	125	1	93.3%	147,732	1.6	9	1	9	5	9	9
Pueblo	Colorado	182	129	1	93.2%	147,412	1.6	7	3	8	5	6	8
New Orleans	Louisiana	190	125	6	34.3%	146,974	7.7	19	3	35	0	0	31
Honolulu	Hawaii	182	116	5	35.1%	145,864	7.4	11	2	22	0	0	21
Cumming	Georgia	141	113	2	90.0%	145,817	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Woodbridge	Virginia	147	111	2	68.9%	145,771	4.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Roanoke	Virginia	197	139	2	86.0%	145,748	2.4	10	2	11	1	11	11
Edinburg	Texas	145	109	1	93.2%	144,974	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Lake Worth	Florida	195	140	2	69.5%	143,547	4.4	5	4	10	0	1	10
Syracuse	New York	206	141	4	62.9%	142,592	4.7	15	3	25	0	3	25
Olympia	Washington	184	139	2	77.8%	142,255	3.2	6	4	9	0	7	9
Mcallen	Texas	146	109	1	100.0%	141,588	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Torrance	California	185	125	2	80.0%	141,434	3.0	5	3	6	0	5	6
Kalamazoo	Michigan	162	113	2	86.1%	141,385	2.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Beaumont	Texas	185	133	1	97.2%	141,356	1.4	8	3	13	7	9	13
Ontario	California	140	100	2	80.0%	141,318	3.0	3	2	4	0	3	4
Clarksville	Tennessee	131	97	3	80.0%	140,558	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Lancaster	California	143	112	3	76.1%	140,353	3.3	3	3	5	0	2	5
Pensacola	Florida	202	141	5	52.3%	140,229	5.5	13	5	26	0	2	26
Marietta	Georgia	179	127	6	43.3%	139,771	6.6	7	3	13	0	1	13
Denton	Texas	161	117	2	88.1%	139,405	2.0	6	2	7	3	6	7
Renton	Washington	194	137	2	90.0%	139,366	2.0	5	2	5	0	5	5
Summerville	South Carolina	123	90	1	100.0%	138,942	1.0	2	1	3	2	2	3
Macon	Georgia	181	125	2	84.1%	137,664	2.7	9	2	18	0	12	18
Hamilton	Ohio	143	112	1	100.0%	137,098	1.0	3	2	6	3	6	6
Midland	Texas	158	112	2	85.5%	136,738	2.4	5	4	10	1	5	10
Hampton	Virginia	163	116	1	100.0%	136,231	1.0	6	2	7	6	6	7
Worcester	Massachusetts	188	129	3	73.4%	136,228	3.7	9	1	9	0	7	9
Topeka	Kansas	225	156	3	83.3%	136,103	2.8	18	1	18	0	17	18
Conroe	Texas	182	124	2	84.0%	134,716	2.4	7	2	8	4	5	8
Garland	Texas	171	128	3	56.6%	134,601	5.4	5	4	11	0	1	11
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	124	2	77.3%	134,514	3.8	5	3	9	2	2	9
Bloomington	Indiana	155	107	1	100.0%	133,573	1.0	6	2	11	6	11	11
Palmdale	California	157	119	3	75.6%	132,248	3.3	4	3	8	0	3	8
Mesquite	Texas	120	88	2	90.0%	131,682	2.0	3	2	4	0	4	4
Chattanooga	Tennessee	215	147	3	63.1%	131,084	6.1	15	5	32	0	3	31
Saginaw	Michigan	172	127	1	100.0%	130,303	1.0	7	2	8	7	7	8
Warren	Michigan	160	120	1	95.9%	129,700	1.4	5	1	5	3	5	5
Muskegon	Michigan	164	123	1	100.0%	129,175	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Youngstown	Ohio	195	146	2	82.1%	128,998	2.2	12	3	17	6	12	17
Whittier	California	178	130	4	65.6%	128,688	4.5	6	3	11	1	1	11
Tyler	Texas	182	124	2	82.3%	128,473	3.0	9	1	9	2	7	9
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	180	129	3	75.4%	127,673	3.4	9	1	9	0	7	9
Abilene	Texas	172	124	1	98.1%	127,655	1.7	6	2	7	4	5	7
Fort Myers	Florida	199	133	5	50.7%	127,491	5.9	11	2	16	0	1	14
West Valley City	Utah	125	94	1	95.9%	127,477	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Humble	Texas	164	106	2	76.0%	126,627	3.3	3	2	3	0	2	3
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	141	108	1	96.9%	126,488	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Puyallup	Washington	167	120	1	88.5%	126,430	2.0	5	2	6	3	4	6
Pomona	California	127	92	2	80.0%	126,388	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Columbia	South Carolina	196	130	5	36.6%	125,477	7.6	14	4	26	0	0	25
Spring Hill	Florida	177	136	1	100.0%	125,434	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Yuma	Arizona	131	94	1	84.9%	125,283	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Odessa	Texas	177	132	3	77.8%	124,567	3.7	6	3	8	0	5	8
Visalia	California	140	110	2	81.9%	124,503	3.0	3	2	4	0	3	4
Gaithersburg	Maryland	162	125	2	85.8%	123,990	1.8	5	1	5	3	5	5
Irvine	California	194	134	4	46.2%	123,704	6.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Athens	Georgia	158	111	1	99.1%	123,640	1.2	6	1	6	5	6	6
West Jordan	Utah	143	105	1	100.0%	123,570	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Billings	Montana	155	110	2	90.0%	123,557	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Richmond	Virginia	191	124	6	31.6%	123,400	7.9	15	3	28	0	0	28
Garden Grove	California	168	123	4	70.0%	123,033	4.0	5	2	9	0	0	9
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	139	93	2	84.4%	122,839	2.6	5	1	6	1	5	6
Elgin	Illinois	138	101	1	100.0%	122,212	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Paterson	New Jersey	168	125	2	83.8%	122,190	2.7	9	3	18	1	9	18
Lake Charles	Louisiana	155	114	1	93.4%	122,031	1.6	5	2	6	3	5	6
Wilmington	Delaware	186	138	3	55.5%	121,814	5.6	10	4	19	0	2	19
Frederick	Maryland	152	112	1	91.5%	120,841	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Decatur	Georgia	191	124	3	66.1%	119,571	4.4	5	5	10	1	2	10
Alpharetta	Georgia	178	128	3	63.2%	119,487	5.5	4	3	5	1	1	5
Fullerton	California	152	108	2	85.1%	118,499	2.3	4	1	5	1	3	5
Sarasota	Florida	220	137	5	47.3%	118,463	6.5	13	3	24	0	1	22
Cary	North Carolina	158	113	3	76.0%	118,033	3.5	4	2	6	1	2	6
Baytown	Texas	145	106	1	100.0%	117,793	1.0	3	2	6	3	6	6
Corona	California	165	130	5	45.5%	116,954	6.8	5	4	10	0	1	10
Orange	California	160	118	2	80.5%	116,650	2.8	5	2	6	0	4	6
Reno	Nevada	175	123	5	39.2%	116,239	7.3	12	4	22	0	2	17
Allentown	Pennsylvania	173	127	2	67.8%	115,204	3.1	7	3	8	0	4	8
Yakima	Washington	139	101	2	88.6%	115,079	2.0	4	2	6	1	6	6
High Point	North Carolina	148	110	1	94.0%	114,993	1.8	4	3	8	3	5	8
Clearwater	Florida	207	149	4	62.4%	114,335	4.6	9	4	12	0	4	12
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	113	3	68.2%	113,726	4.2	5	1	5	0	2	5
Manassas	Virginia	175	123	2	74.8%	113,580	3.8	4	3	5	0	2	5
Vero Beach	Florida	164	116	1	98.4%	113,426	1.2	6	1	6	5	6	6
Clovis	California	140	103	1	93.1%	112,994	1.7	3	3	6	1	5	6
Murrieta	California	124	94	2	85.2%	112,608	2.5	2	2	3	0	2	3
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	113	3	70.0%	112,359	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ogden	Utah	148	106	6	55.7%	112,224	5.2	5	3	8	0	1	8
Spartanburg	South Carolina	154	106	1	100.0%	111,957	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Panama City	Florida	168	120	2	88.6%	111,914	2.2	6	1	6	0	6	6
South Bend	Indiana	190	131	2	76.1%	111,580	3.8	10	3	15	1	5	15
Inglewood	California	193	129	2	82.8%	110,830	2.8	5	2	6	1	4	6
Hartford	Connecticut	148	107	2	89.7%	110,649	1.8	6	1	6	2	6	6
Toms River	New Jersey	144	110	2	90.0%	110,574	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Victorville	California	125	89	2	80.6%	109,857	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Nampa	Idaho	140	103	2	94.1%	109,077	1.7	3	1	3	1	3	3
Pearland	Texas	147	103	3	79.2%	108,955	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Boca Raton	Florida	197	132	6	48.9%	108,708	6.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Stone Mountain	Georgia	155	114	2	84.5%	108,480	2.7	3	2	4	0	3	4
Van Nuys	California	149	98	3	61.0%	108,446	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Racine	Wisconsin	164	121	1	85.9%	108,248	2.2	5	3	7	2	4	7
Santa Maria	California	155	113	2	75.2%	107,576	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Round Rock	Texas	159	114	3	63.9%	107,058	4.7	3	2	5	0	1	5
Flint	Michigan	177	124	4	68.8%	106,918	4.0	7	4	14	1	3	14
Metairie	Louisiana	149	111	2	74.7%	106,242	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Perris	California	131	104	1	90.4%	106,101	2.0	2	3	5	1	3	5
Scottsdale	Arizona	221	144	5	35.5%	105,771	7.9	11	2	19	0	1	16
Delray Beach	Florida	171	122	1	88.7%	105,630	2.2	5	4	10	1	7	10
Rock Hill	South Carolina	149	110	2	90.0%	104,724	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Longview	Texas	171	129	1	99.4%	104,684	1.2	5	1	5	4	5	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	189	119	4	44.7%	104,496	5.9	7	2	15	0	0	14
Concord	California	144	109	2	80.0%	104,176	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Tracy	California	151	116	2	88.9%	104,159	2.8	4	2	6	1	5	6
Riverside	California	179	125	5	28.1%	104,063	8.7	7	2	8	0	0	5
San Angelo	Texas	150	105	2	93.9%	104,022	1.5	4	2	6	2	6	6
Gastonia	North Carolina	131	97	1	96.7%	103,508	1.3	3	2	4	2	4	4
Fargo	North Dakota	146	103	3	84.2%	103,152	2.5	4	3	6	0	4	6
Grand Junction	Colorado	162	113	1	97.7%	103,069	1.2	6	2	8	5	6	8
Las Cruces	New Mexico	190	137	4	69.0%	102,830	4.3	7	3	9	0	1	9
Redding	California	161	114	2	90.9%	102,730	1.8	4	3	5	2	5	5
Greeley	Colorado	117	84	2	90.0%	102,659	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Joliet	Illinois	141	104	3	79.3%	102,167	3.2	5	2	9	1	2	9
New Port Richey	Florida	159	120	3	84.4%	102,012	2.3	4	2	5	2	3	5
Laurel	Maryland	160	119	1	90.6%	101,945	1.8	4	2	4	3	3	4
Gainesville	Florida	178	127	6	48.6%	101,810	6.0	10	3	20	0	2	18
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	153	106	3	72.5%	101,094	3.3	6	1	6	0	3	6
Saint Charles	Missouri	147	107	3	72.3%	101,089	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Albany	New York	201	138	4	66.8%	101,083	4.3	11	3	13	0	0	13
Ashburn	Virginia	109	80	2	90.0%	101,076	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Olathe	Kansas	117	89	3	70.0%	101,061	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Schenectady	New York	182	134	4	62.3%	100,979	4.9	8	2	13	0	1	13
Edison	New Jersey	131	100	1	100.0%	100,827	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Rialto	California	126	104	1	94.5%	100,716	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	104	2	80.0%	100,178	3.0	4	2	7	0	4	7
Hemet	California	145	111	2	77.8%	100,139	3.3	3	4	6	1	2	6
Astoria	New York	172	111	2	69.9%	99,781	4.0	4	4	8	0	1	8
Elkhart	Indiana	143	105	1	100.0%	99,434	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Lewisville	Texas	150	111	2	83.8%	99,394	2.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	174	130	4	67.6%	98,923	4.3	6	2	12	0	1	12
Florissant	Missouri	140	104	1	91.1%	98,626	2.3	3	3	4	1	3	4
Anderson	South Carolina	143	101	1	100.0%	98,408	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Madera	California	147	104	1	95.1%	97,889	2.3	3	4	6	2	4	6
West Chester	Pennsylvania	124	94	2	90.0%	97,826	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Carlsbad	California	144	105	2	86.0%	97,720	2.3	4	1	4	0	4	4
Waukegan	Illinois	124	90	1	100.0%	97,528	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Hayward	California	141	109	4	50.7%	97,441	5.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
Orem	Utah	140	105	1	96.2%	96,457	1.3	3	3	5	2	3	5
Fairfax	Virginia	179	130	3	58.9%	96,387	5.0	4	3	6	0	1	6
Ridgewood	New York	98	73	1	90.0%	96,045	2.0	1	3	3	0	1	3
Mckinney	Texas	135	95	4	50.8%	96,007	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mcdonough	Georgia	122	94	2	94.6%	95,944	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Franklin	Tennessee	142	111	2	90.0%	95,827	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	131	99	1	100.0%	95,795	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Vallejo	California	141	104	2	76.7%	95,419	2.8	4	2	8	0	6	8
Daly City	California	137	99	2	83.0%	94,936	2.5	2	4	4	1	1	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	146	107	2	77.1%	94,874	3.2	5	2	6	0	4	6
Palm Bay	Florida	156	117	2	85.2%	94,772	2.8	4	1	5	1	3	5
Vacaville	California	124	92	1	90.0%	94,766	2.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	129	93	1	100.0%	94,718	1.0	3	2	4	3	4	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	138	108	3	71.2%	94,358	3.8	4	3	5	0	2	5
Bowling Green	Kentucky	155	112	3	81.2%	93,755	2.0	4	1	4	2	3	4
Lees Summit	Missouri	181	136	1	91.6%	93,477	2.3	6	2	6	3	4	6
Provo	Utah	143	97	2	80.0%	93,218	3.0	3	2	4	0	3	4
Longmont	Colorado	144	104	3	71.2%	93,091	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	141	107	1	99.4%	93,010	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Tallahassee	Florida	184	127	6	32.3%	92,975	7.5	10	4	19	0	1	18
Surprise	Arizona	166	121	4	68.6%	92,970	4.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
Waterbury	Connecticut	154	111	2	85.5%	92,848	2.0	6	1	6	3	5	6
Merced	California	145	104	1	90.0%	92,788	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Muncie	Indiana	152	108	1	100.0%	92,760	1.0	5	3	10	5	10	10
New Braunfels	Texas	119	92	2	90.0%	92,513	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Edmond	Oklahoma	173	122	5	53.8%	92,422	5.0	5	3	6	1	2	5
Bend	Oregon	150	104	3	75.6%	92,400	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	198	135	2	76.4%	91,919	3.2	5	3	8	0	5	8
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	145	101	2	74.7%	91,577	3.5	4	2	5	0	3	5
Lynchburg	Virginia	165	112	1	89.1%	91,174	2.0	4	3	6	1	4	6
New Haven	Connecticut	141	100	3	70.0%	91,152	4.0	5	2	9	0	0	9
Costa Mesa	California	119	83	2	80.0%	91,002	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	139	100	2	83.2%	90,693	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Antioch	California	126	96	1	81.9%	90,641	2.5	2	1	3	1	1	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	107	2	80.0%	90,304	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Parker	Colorado	121	92	2	90.0%	90,254	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Federal Way	Washington	118	90	2	90.0%	90,129	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Independence	Missouri	181	135	3	72.6%	90,047	3.5	8	2	10	0	3	10
Manchester	New Hampshire	144	108	2	77.2%	89,591	3.2	5	1	5	0	4	5
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	87	3	83.6%	89,399	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Bowie	Maryland	177	122	2	87.2%	89,108	2.3	4	4	6	1	4	6
Kennewick	Washington	140	107	2	90.0%	88,929	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Hyattsville	Maryland	171	115	5	56.3%	88,661	5.2	5	2	9	0	0	9
Medford	Oregon	123	88	2	94.9%	88,488	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Downey	California	140	102	2	78.3%	88,368	3.0	3	2	5	0	3	5
Lawrence	Kansas	165	121	2	87.4%	88,341	2.0	5	1	5	2	5	5
Johnson City	Tennessee	143	104	1	92.5%	88,284	1.5	4	2	5	3	4	5
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	96	2	90.0%	88,152	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Apopka	Florida	119	89	2	90.0%	87,889	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hesperia	California	110	82	2	84.4%	87,649	2.0	2	2	3	1	2	3
Coral Springs	Florida	121	90	2	90.0%	87,514	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Sandy	Utah	133	94	2	79.2%	87,472	3.3	4	2	6	2	2	6
Saint Augustine	Florida	196	140	3	66.7%	87,355	4.2	5	3	8	0	2	8
Jupiter	Florida	139	98	2	88.6%	87,335	2.3	4	3	8	0	7	8
Hillsboro	Oregon	125	91	2	84.7%	87,174	2.5	2	1	3	0	2	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	174	123	2	88.1%	87,121	2.1	7	1	9	0	7	9
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	101	2	86.8%	87,054	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Plainfield	Illinois	154	114	2	87.8%	86,583	2.0	3	2	3	1	3	3
Riverview	Florida	163	115	2	77.7%	86,516	2.7	3	2	3	2	2	3
Pittsburg	California	97	76	2	90.0%	86,473	2.0	1	2	2	0	2	2
El Cajon	California	162	110	5	49.9%	86,142	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Elizabeth	New Jersey	133	105	2	85.5%	85,932	2.3	3	2	4	1	3	4
Brockton	Massachusetts	121	88	2	90.0%	85,883	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Canton	Ohio	171	124	3	58.2%	85,603	5.0	12	3	24	0	0	24
Clermont	Florida	150	112	2	84.8%	85,035	3.3	3	2	4	2	2	4
Rockville	Maryland	176	126	2	58.7%	85,023	5.0	4	3	9	0	2	9
Covington	Georgia	144	102	1	91.7%	84,998	2.0	2	3	4	1	2	4
Bryan	Texas	160	116	2	87.7%	84,429	2.4	5	2	6	0	4	6
Portsmouth	Virginia	167	123	2	88.2%	84,064	2.7	7	3	13	0	10	13
Buford	Georgia	120	94	3	84.7%	83,924	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Davenport	Iowa	155	111	2	80.0%	83,890	3.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Appleton	Wisconsin	145	103	4	68.9%	83,873	3.5	4	1	4	1	2	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	154	110	3	65.5%	83,840	4.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Cruz	California	139	103	3	80.4%	83,662	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Valdosta	Georgia	155	110	2	88.1%	83,654	1.8	5	2	6	2	5	6
Henrico	Virginia	202	142	5	43.4%	83,576	6.3	7	4	10	1	1	9
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	132	91	2	85.6%	83,397	2.5	2	2	2	0	2	2
Compton	California	130	101	3	60.0%	83,325	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Ballwin	Missouri	119	93	1	87.8%	83,138	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Melbourne	Florida	142	100	4	53.3%	83,007	6.0	5	3	7	0	1	7
Naperville	Illinois	150	112	5	49.6%	82,198	6.0	4	2	7	0	1	7
Daytona Beach	Florida	174	124	2	79.7%	82,178	3.2	5	2	6	1	2	6
Missoula	Montana	151	107	2	84.1%	81,849	2.6	5	2	10	0	8	10
Boston	Massachusetts	174	108	4	53.8%	81,727	5.6	14	6	27	0	1	26
Woodstock	Georgia	120	90	2	80.0%	81,377	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Keller	Texas	145	101	3	69.8%	81,194	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Stamford	Connecticut	156	108	3	62.7%	80,725	4.5	6	4	8	0	1	8
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	83	2	80.0%	80,610	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Vista	California	132	102	3	67.1%	80,468	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	164	119	3	83.8%	79,546	2.7	6	2	9	2	5	9
Springdale	Arkansas	108	76	2	82.4%	79,472	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	116	83	3	80.0%	79,304	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Asheville	North Carolina	142	100	4	60.0%	79,211	4.4	5	2	8	1	2	8
Chico	California	139	103	3	70.5%	78,979	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	159	117	3	80.6%	78,939	2.3	3	2	4	1	4	4
Hawthorne	California	96	77	3	80.0%	77,469	3.0	1	1	2	0	1	2
Napa	California	113	78	2	80.0%	77,332	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Sylmar	California	98	64	2	80.0%	77,190	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Bothell	Washington	158	114	2	59.9%	76,843	5.7	3	2	5	0	1	5
Rapid City	South Dakota	136	98	3	79.2%	76,648	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Elk Grove	California	138	108	5	42.7%	76,545	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jersey City	New Jersey	167	122	7	29.2%	76,483	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tempe	Arizona	152	108	6	40.2%	76,351	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
South Gate	California	97	77	2	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
Midlothian	Virginia	138	104	3	78.3%	75,814	2.7	3	2	3	1	2	3
Miami Beach	Florida	162	87	3	65.3%	75,527	4.4	5	3	6	0	1	6
Burbank	California	156	117	3	69.7%	75,337	4.0	5	2	7	0	2	7
Elmhurst	New York	98	66	2	80.0%	75,174	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
El Monte	California	122	91	2	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Sunnyvale	California	166	124	6	48.8%	74,627	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Holland	Michigan	113	83	2	79.4%	74,519	3.0	2	2	3	1	1	3
Norwalk	California	99	76	3	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	California	148	101	5	34.2%	73,973	8.0	6	2	12	0	0	10
Fort Pierce	Florida	179	129	3	77.3%	73,967	3.4	8	3	11	0	6	11
Lithonia	Georgia	126	92	2	76.0%	73,499	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
College Station	Texas	120	92	4	59.5%	73,208	5.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Livonia	Michigan	128	98	3	77.3%	73,074	3.3	3	3	5	0	2	5
Westerville	Ohio	113	81	3	76.5%	72,803	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	126	94	3	75.8%	72,268	3.3	3	3	6	0	2	6
Berkeley	California	206	146	4	54.9%	69,833	5.7	9	2	9	0	2	9
Scranton	Pennsylvania	192	139	3	69.9%	69,543	3.6	8	4	17	1	3	17
Cambridge	Massachusetts	143	101	4	59.8%	69,254	5.4	5	2	10	0	1	10
Lynnwood	Washington	160	120	4	63.6%	68,961	5.0	3	2	4	1	1	3
Sugar Land	Texas	161	116	5	40.6%	68,658	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fairfield	California	118	87	3	60.1%	68,573	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
La Puente	California	145	95	4	57.8%	68,186	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Englewood	Colorado	191	132	3	61.0%	68,045	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Auburn	Washington	138	106	5	60.0%	67,723	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Palo Alto	California	145	101	3	70.0%	67,677	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	170	122	5	57.7%	67,427	5.3	6	3	10	0	1	10
Carrollton	Texas	144	105	5	50.0%	67,406	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Fort Mill	South Carolina	135	97	3	70.9%	67,351	4.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
Redwood City	California	156	125	4	57.9%	66,323	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Champaign	Illinois	121	88	4	70.0%	66,197	4.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Chino	California	122	94	3	70.0%	66,132	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Quincy	Massachusetts	136	100	3	70.0%	65,885	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Arvada	Colorado	169	121	4	47.8%	63,747	6.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Dearborn	Michigan	139	103	4	67.0%	63,673	4.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Missouri City	Texas	147	101	2	59.7%	63,301	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	California	112	82	5	48.8%	62,815	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
O Fallon	Missouri	122	96	2	64.9%	62,560	4.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Clara	California	140	104	5	49.7%	62,391	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Belleville	Illinois	144	107	3	66.6%	62,064	4.3	4	2	6	0	1	6
Sparks	Nevada	159	114	5	51.6%	61,517	6.5	4	4	7	1	1	7
Winter Haven	Florida	123	88	5	57.0%	60,920	5.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Milton	Florida	144	110	3	63.2%	59,921	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lowell	Massachusetts	147	109	6	51.7%	57,589	6.0	4	3	9	1	1	8
North Hollywood	California	145	96	5	37.5%	57,380	7.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Annapolis	Maryland	169	121	3	59.9%	56,916	4.8	5	2	9	0	1	9
San Mateo	California	173	123	6	39.8%	56,646	7.5	4	2	5	0	1	3
Deltona	Florida	115	82	4	60.0%	56,333	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	132	98	6	50.0%	55,124	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Broomfield	Colorado	148	104	4	52.2%	54,698	5.3	3	3	4	0	1	4
Roswell	Georgia	118	89	5	54.7%	54,529	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Indio	California	118	87	5	56.4%	54,194	5.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Richardson	Texas	145	105	5	46.6%	53,368	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bellevue	Washington	156	118	7	36.2%	52,883	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Roseville	California	126	89	6	37.8%	52,785	7.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Pasadena	California	173	120	6	32.3%	50,951	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fort Collins	Colorado	143	97	8	26.1%	50,809	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Herndon	Virginia	121	88	3	53.8%	50,318	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	California	125	96	5	49.8%	49,999	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Ventura	California	129	90	5	42.9%	49,702	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Acworth	Georgia	126	91	5	48.4%	48,202	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Menifee	California	160	116	6	43.5%	48,132	6.5	4	2	7	0	0	7
Largo	Florida	147	115	6	43.8%	47,183	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Gilbert	Arizona	186	131	9	19.3%	45,943	9.5	6	3	12	0	0	8
Allen	Texas	116	84	7	40.0%	44,509	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	California	136	102	7	40.6%	44,395	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Pacoima	California	99	65	6	40.0%	42,320	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Boulder	Colorado	180	118	6	30.1%	39,513	8.0	6	2	8	0	0	7
New Bedford	Massachusetts	151	108	6	40.5%	38,381	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Livermore	California	118	87	7	39.5%	38,027	7.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Barbara	California	140	100	5	27.5%	37,322	8.3	7	2	8	0	0	5
Temecula	California	136	103	6	27.2%	35,300	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	5
Bellingham	Washington	137	102	8	27.4%	34,637	8.7	3	2	4	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	California	116	92	5	35.2%	34,586	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norman	Oklahoma	139	101	8	26.5%	32,932	8.5	4	2	7	0	0	6
San Leandro	California	127	94	7	29.4%	32,653	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cypress	Texas	115	87	7	19.1%	32,628	9.5	2	2	4	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	120	94	6	33.7%	31,488	7.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Duluth	Minnesota	185	138	7	26.2%	30,749	8.6	11	2	19	0	0	17
Bell Gardens	California	97	65	5	30.0%	30,730	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Rancho Cucamonga	California	140	105	10	15.5%	27,397	9.3	4	2	7	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	115	91	7	25.7%	26,763	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	353	225	4	47.1%	1,156,100	6.4	62	5	103	2	4	103
San Francisco	253	153	2	80.9%	703,863	2.9	28	3	29	0	23	29
San Jose	240	157	4	59.2%	621,676	5.3	28	5	41	2	6	40
San Diego	291	189	7	39.0%	525,246	7.1	36	7	53	0	2	49
Sacramento	254	168	4	63.7%	512,304	4.5	28	4	52	2	4	52
Bakersfield	211	141	2	83.9%	469,113	2.6	11	2	12	1	11	12
Fresno	235	159	3	67.4%	406,024	4.3	18	4	33	0	4	33
Long Beach	193	131	3	74.5%	356,757	3.5	12	1	12	0	8	12
Stockton	214	153	2	90.9%	339,974	1.9	12	4	22	2	19	22
Oakland	191	124	2	80.0%	329,395	3.0	14	3	15	0	14	15
Modesto	178	129	1	100.0%	264,457	1.0	7	2	8	7	7	8
Santa Ana	147	105	3	72.3%	258,154	3.8	6	2	7	0	2	7
Fontana	140	103	2	90.0%	211,254	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Oceanside	143	104	2	90.0%	180,233	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
San Bernardino	163	119	3	71.3%	177,973	4.6	7	2	14	0	2	14
Chula Vista	141	98	4	68.0%	177,275	4.2	5	4	7	0	0	7
Fremont	144	108	2	75.1%	175,008	3.8	4	2	8	0	3	8
Salinas	164	124	2	88.8%	167,200	2.2	5	1	6	1	5	6
Oxnard	149	105	3	74.0%	163,184	3.5	4	2	5	0	2	5
Escondido	153	110	2	90.0%	161,688	2.0	4	2	5	0	4	5
Huntington Beach	141	107	3	80.0%	159,926	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Moreno Valley	149	118	3	77.8%	159,743	3.3	4	2	5	0	3	5
Anaheim	183	125	5	41.3%	152,063	6.4	7	3	15	0	1	14
Torrance	185	125	2	80.0%	141,434	3.0	5	3	6	0	5	6
Ontario	140	100	2	80.0%	141,318	3.0	3	2	4	0	3	4
Lancaster	143	112	3	76.1%	140,353	3.3	3	3	5	0	2	5
Palmdale	157	119	3	75.6%	132,248	3.3	4	3	8	0	3	8
Whittier	178	130	4	65.6%	128,688	4.5	6	3	11	1	1	11
Pomona	127	92	2	80.0%	126,388	3.0	3	2	6	0	3	6
Visalia	140	110	2	81.9%	124,503	3.0	3	2	4	0	3	4
Irvine	194	134	4	46.2%	123,704	6.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Garden Grove	168	123	4	70.0%	123,033	4.0	5	2	9	0	0	9
Fullerton	152	108	2	85.1%	118,499	2.3	4	1	5	1	3	5
Corona	165	130	5	45.5%	116,954	6.8	5	4	10	0	1	10
Orange	160	118	2	80.5%	116,650	2.8	5	2	6	0	4	6
Clovis	140	103	1	93.1%	112,994	1.7	3	3	6	1	5	6
Murrieta	124	94	2	85.2%	112,608	2.5	2	2	3	0	2	3
Inglewood	193	129	2	82.8%	110,830	2.8	5	2	6	1	4	6
Victorville	125	89	2	80.6%	109,857	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Van Nuys	149	98	3	61.0%	108,446	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	155	113	2	75.2%	107,576	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Perris	131	104	1	90.4%	106,101	2.0	2	3	5	1	3	5
Concord	144	109	2	80.0%	104,176	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Tracy	151	116	2	88.9%	104,159	2.8	4	2	6	1	5	6
Riverside	179	125	5	28.1%	104,063	8.7	7	2	8	0	0	5
Redding	161	114	2	90.9%	102,730	1.8	4	3	5	2	5	5
Rialto	126	104	1	94.5%	100,716	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Hemet	145	111	2	77.8%	100,139	3.3	3	4	6	1	2	6
Madera	147	104	1	95.1%	97,889	2.3	3	4	6	2	4	6
Carlsbad	144	105	2	86.0%	97,720	2.3	4	1	4	0	4	4
Hayward	141	109	4	50.7%	97,441	5.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
Vallejo	141	104	2	76.7%	95,419	2.8	4	2	8	0	6	8
Daly City	137	99	2	83.0%	94,936	2.5	2	4	4	1	1	4
Vacaville	124	92	1	90.0%	94,766	2.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Merced	145	104	1	90.0%	92,788	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Costa Mesa	119	83	2	80.0%	91,002	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Antioch	126	96	1	81.9%	90,641	2.5	2	1	3	1	1	3
Downey	140	102	2	78.3%	88,368	3.0	3	2	5	0	3	5
Hesperia	110	82	2	84.4%	87,649	2.0	2	2	3	1	2	3
Pittsburg	97	76	2	90.0%	86,473	2.0	1	2	2	0	2	2
El Cajon	162	110	5	49.9%	86,142	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	139	103	3	80.4%	83,662	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Compton	130	101	3	60.0%	83,325	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Vista	132	102	3	67.1%	80,468	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Chico	139	103	3	70.5%	78,979	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Hawthorne	96	77	3	80.0%	77,469	3.0	1	1	2	0	1	2
Napa	113	78	2	80.0%	77,332	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Sylmar	98	64	2	80.0%	77,190	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Elk Grove	138	108	5	42.7%	76,545	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	97	77	2	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
Burbank	156	117	3	69.7%	75,337	4.0	5	2	7	0	2	7
El Monte	122	91	2	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Sunnyvale	166	124	6	48.8%	74,627	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Norwalk	99	76	3	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Rosa	148	101	5	34.2%	73,973	8.0	6	2	12	0	0	10
Berkeley	206	146	4	54.9%	69,833	5.7	9	2	9	0	2	9
Fairfield	118	87	3	60.1%	68,573	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
La Puente	145	95	4	57.8%	68,186	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Palo Alto	145	101	3	70.0%	67,677	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redwood City	156	125	4	57.9%	66,323	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Chino	122	94	3	70.0%	66,132	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	112	82	5	48.8%	62,815	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	140	104	5	49.7%	62,391	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
North Hollywood	145	96	5	37.5%	57,380	7.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
San Mateo	173	123	6	39.8%	56,646	7.5	4	2	5	0	1	3
Indio	118	87	5	56.4%	54,194	5.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Roseville	126	89	6	37.8%	52,785	7.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Pasadena	173	120	6	32.3%	50,951	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Marcos	125	96	5	49.8%	49,999	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Ventura	129	90	5	42.9%	49,702	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Menifee	160	116	6	43.5%	48,132	6.5	4	2	7	0	0	7
West Covina	136	102	7	40.6%	44,395	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Pacoima	99	65	6	40.0%	42,320	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livermore	118	87	7	39.5%	38,027	7.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Barbara	140	100	5	27.5%	37,322	8.3	7	2	8	0	0	5
Temecula	136	103	6	27.2%	35,300	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	5
Mission Viejo	116	92	5	35.2%	34,586	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Leandro	127	94	7	29.4%	32,653	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bell Gardens	97	65	5	30.0%	30,730	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Rancho Cucamonga	140	105	10	15.5%	27,397	9.3	4	2	7	0	0	3
Santa Monica	131	85	7	26.9%	25,364	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5

Houston

ZIP	planetfitness.com	yelp.com	houstongym.com	anytimefitness.com	24hourfitness.com	expertise.com
77088	6	1	3	4	8	11
77047	4	1	3	5	7	11
77037	7	1	2	3	5	9
77098	5	1	3	4	6	9
77027	9	1	3	4	6	10
77068	3	1	2	6	9	8
77078	5	1	3	4	6	10
77086	7	1	2	3	5	8
77035	6	1	3	4	5	8
77008	11	4	5	6	8	12
77004	8	1	3	4	6	10
77028	7	1	2	3	5	9
77059	4	1	3	6	9	8
77039	7	1	2	3	5	9
77019	7	1	3	4	5	9
77075	4	1	3	5	7	9
77077	9	1	3	4	5	11
77079	7	1	3	4	5	10
77099	7	1	3	4	5	9
77024	10	4	5	6	8	13
77095	4	1	3	6	11	8
77048	7	1	2	3	5	9
77044	5	1	2	3	6	8
77015	7	1	3	4	5	9
77017	7	1	3	4	6	10
77057	7	1	3	4	5	9
77055	8	2	1	4	5	9
77006	9	1	2	3	5	7
77026	7	1	2	3	5	9
77046	7	1	3	4	5	10
77066	3	1	2	4	7	6
77023	7	1	2	3	5	9
77094	9	4	5	1	14	11
77084	5	2	1	6	9	8
77013	7	1	2	3	5	9
77063	5	1	3	4	6	10
77053	3	2	1	4	9	8
77022	7	1	2	3	5	10
77072	7	1	2	3	5	10
77049	7	1	2	3	5	10
77045	7	1	2	3	5	9
77010	10	1	3	5	7	4
77018	8	1	3	4	6	10
77041	6	1	2	3	5	8
77009	7	1	2	3	5	9
77089	4	1	3	5	10	7
77032	4	1	3	5	10	9
77036	9	2	1	4	5	10
77085	7	1	2	3	5	9
77054	7	1	3	4	5	9
77058	5	1	3	6	11	8
77014	7	4	6	8	13	11
77067	7	1	2	3	5	10
77005	10	5	4	7	8	12
77076	8	2	1	4	5	9
77070	7	4	5	9	12	11
77060	3	1	2	4	6	10
77080	4	1	3	5	7	10
77050	4	1	3	5	7	11
77091	8	2	1	4	5	9
77071	7	1	3	4	5	9
77061	8	2	1	4	5	9
77020	3	1	2	4	5	8
77081	7	1	3	4	5	10
77030	7	1	3	4	5	9
77040	3	1	2	4	7	8
77090	5	1	3	4	9	8
77031	4	1	2	5	7	9
77051	9	2	1	4	6	10
77011	7	1	3	4	6	8
77042	9	1	3	4	5	10
77062	2	4	6	9	17	12
77082	6	1	3	8	11	13
77093	3	1	2	4	5	8
77073	4	1	3	5	8	9
77033	8	1	3	4	6	10
77043	8	1	3	4	6	11
77074	7	1	3	4	5	9
77064	8	4	6	7	10	13
77012	8	1	3	4	6	10
77002	11	4	6	7	9	13
77092	6	1	2	3	4	8
77069	4	1	3	5	9	7
77021	7	1	3	4	5	9
77083	1	4	2	6	12	9
77029	3	1	2	4	6	9
77034	4	1	3	5	7	9
77087	8	1	3	4	6	10
77003	9	1	3	4	6	11
77038	4	1	3	5	7	10
77007	7	1	3	4	5	9
77016	6	1	2	3	4	7
77065	3	1	2	7	9	10
77096	2	4	5	6	8	12
77025	8	1	3	4	6	10
77056	8	1	3	4	6	11

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Planetfitness

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,305 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Planetfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (gym near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Planetfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Planetfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Planetfitness Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly