Pizzahut Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve pizzahut.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,352 Pizzerias In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Pizzahut Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Pizzahut Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Pizzahut Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
Texas
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Pizzahut Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	23,795	13,352	4	23.7%	76,565,281	10.5	27,379	32,654	4,848	36,094	361	1,171	21,344
Texas	1,647	1,034	3	28.7%	8,007,930	8.4	1,360	1,917	434	2,209	28	84	1,562
California	2,747	1,730	5	19.4%	7,608,337	13.0	1,166	1,740	317	1,910	1	16	774
Florida	1,965	1,238	4	22.6%	4,646,988	10.6	446	975	255	1,080	0	11	639
Georgia	1,098	742	3	35.9%	3,695,877	7.6	574	726	192	784	15	39	622
Ohio	1,567	1,033	3	28.8%	3,346,730	9.0	976	1,188	234	1,329	6	48	810
North Carolina	1,373	898	3	32.4%	3,294,036	8.9	683	802	179	899	3	41	619
Virginia	1,356	892	3	26.9%	2,265,305	8.9	723	891	169	1,035	15	30	700
Indiana	1,494	971	3	33.2%	2,202,178	8.1	659	770	154	886	10	39	679
Pennsylvania	2,381	1,598	5	16.7%	2,133,509	11.5	1,604	1,781	176	1,984	2	37	956
Tennessee	980	669	3	30.4%	2,017,041	8.4	514	622	123	708	14	31	512
Illinois	1,656	1,094	5	15.6%	2,005,181	12.1	1,247	1,382	206	1,474	12	38	740
Michigan	1,430	927	4	20.0%	1,991,814	13.1	833	976	127	1,026	3	16	416
Missouri	999	680	4	30.7%	1,867,714	8.4	887	1,017	190	1,192	22	71	781
Louisiana	795	575	3	40.0%	1,865,067	7.2	431	510	116	616	11	31	540
South Carolina	904	618	3	35.5%	1,759,112	7.9	347	422	120	480	5	22	354
Alabama	906	655	3	35.9%	1,744,713	8.0	522	637	118	726	8	31	563
Washington	1,182	787	4	23.2%	1,690,564	11.6	451	587	90	626	0	6	373
Arizona	870	612	3	23.0%	1,600,461	9.3	247	396	95	465	3	10	277
Kentucky	921	682	3	34.8%	1,545,638	7.3	698	758	122	881	30	60	721
Wisconsin	1,325	845	3	26.2%	1,515,931	9.8	694	769	115	829	6	23	466
Oklahoma	826	617	3	36.3%	1,420,685	7.6	557	646	122	736	14	46	608
Mississippi	771	586	3	46.6%	1,392,667	7.2	384	418	96	476	11	28	407
New York	2,976	1,957	9	6.9%	1,351,567	15.7	1,491	1,756	109	1,823	4	20	394
Minnesota	1,137	757	4	24.1%	1,331,734	10.6	777	878	97	920	9	30	493
Arkansas	825	622	3	42.1%	1,257,642	7.3	553	587	101	669	14	36	575
Kansas	832	604	3	39.5%	1,147,871	6.7	616	692	169	811	32	59	721
Utah	719	531	3	35.6%	1,084,602	8.4	246	284	53	307	3	16	211
Colorado	1,068	696	5	18.3%	1,012,873	11.1	381	514	82	554	4	14	262
Iowa	920	643	3	32.1%	1,006,336	8.9	890	933	94	1,007	17	41	654
New Jersey	2,040	1,436	6	10.7%	948,864	16.0	537	593	69	636	0	3	124
Maryland	1,054	739	5	14.7%	885,432	13.1	392	463	81	511	0	3	195
Oregon	1,060	738	4	20.1%	821,145	11.0	355	414	39	440	0	4	201
New Mexico	708	540	4	37.8%	789,283	8.2	327	361	49	386	3	12	307
West Virginia	786	606	3	40.7%	744,195	7.1	684	704	86	820	20	57	661
Nebraska	780	580	3	32.9%	627,258	6.8	524	581	85	690	18	41	616
Idaho	741	564	4	34.5%	582,213	9.2	251	273	29	280	2	6	198
Massachusetts	1,965	1,375	7	6.9%	471,593	21.7	461	534	39	541	0	1	68
Montana	716	552	3	41.2%	429,703	7.8	348	361	36	381	8	19	314
Nevada	623	450	7	14.5%	425,029	10.5	92	168	46	215	1	4	77
Hawaii	531	414	3	20.4%	289,660	10.3	82	93	22	109	0	0	54
Wyoming	610	480	3	47.1%	274,221	7.7	164	171	34	179	3	11	142
New Hampshire	809	598	4	16.3%	218,991	12.8	238	248	19	262	1	6	72
Alaska	606	470	3	28.8%	212,579	10.5	218	235	8	252	0	2	156
Maine	1,077	778	5	15.7%	209,846	13.1	421	425	23	449	1	5	116
South Dakota	643	496	4	22.8%	196,992	9.4	359	370	21	380	2	12	239
North Dakota	614	482	3	26.0%	195,178	9.5	367	381	9	389	0	5	249
Delaware	499	373	6	12.2%	115,367	21.2	52	66	9	68	0	0	16
Connecticut	1,310	894	10	3.0%	108,175	24.1	234	279	16	281	0	0	15
Rhode Island	502	379	5	9.2%	97,718	25.3	64	77	8	77	0	0	11
Vermont	673	509	5	14.4%	89,691	13.4	250	254	12	274	0	6	84

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	273	196	7	13.3%	422,364	10.6	96	17	126	0	0	53
San Antonio	Texas	217	163	8	13.8%	245,141	10.3	59	8	67	0	0	25
Fort Worth	Texas	221	170	6	25.4%	231,953	9.1	32	4	44	0	0	29
San Jose	California	221	183	5	21.9%	230,139	9.4	28	5	28	0	0	20
Fresno	California	198	148	5	33.9%	203,970	8.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Jacksonville	Florida	239	187	6	22.7%	197,003	8.5	31	5	35	0	0	25
El Paso	Texas	254	203	5	23.8%	187,652	8.7	24	6	24	0	0	20
Albuquerque	New Mexico	227	181	5	26.5%	173,734	8.8	17	3	18	0	0	15
Bakersfield	California	189	157	4	30.4%	170,231	8.0	11	2	22	0	0	22
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	240	190	7	24.7%	168,871	9.1	43	10	59	1	1	45
Tampa	Florida	252	193	4	21.0%	166,222	8.8	27	6	29	0	0	27
Phoenix	Arizona	250	191	7	11.4%	164,896	11.4	42	11	49	0	0	16
Mesa	Arizona	183	139	4	29.9%	159,966	7.8	13	2	13	0	0	13
Minneapolis	Minnesota	340	256	7	14.5%	157,405	16.9	51	17	53	0	0	24
Dallas	Texas	295	217	8	10.5%	146,466	11.6	48	17	84	0	0	14
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	301	237	5	17.5%	145,681	13.2	27	11	33	0	0	18
Miami	Florida	360	265	9	7.7%	144,584	14.0	55	20	56	0	0	6
Memphis	Tennessee	245	187	6	20.6%	142,939	9.8	26	3	28	0	0	17
Tulsa	Oklahoma	237	178	5	33.6%	141,897	7.7	28	3	29	0	0	27
Los Angeles	California	324	250	11	5.5%	135,165	14.7	62	19	74	0	0	4
Cleveland	Ohio	256	187	6	17.4%	130,608	10.1	29	9	47	0	0	16
Indianapolis	Indiana	268	198	6	13.7%	130,173	9.8	37	10	41	0	0	28
Las Vegas	Nevada	249	171	8	8.4%	129,598	12.2	43	20	67	0	0	6
Hollywood	Florida	177	137	3	27.0%	126,506	8.2	9	2	9	0	0	9
Dayton	Ohio	263	214	5	26.4%	126,431	8.6	27	9	28	1	1	24
Columbia	South Carolina	179	135	5	36.8%	126,276	7.7	14	3	14	0	0	14
Portland	Oregon	213	148	8	13.7%	125,709	10.4	33	4	38	0	0	7
Virginia Beach	Virginia	185	141	5	27.6%	124,411	8.3	12	2	12	0	0	12
Ogden	Utah	148	120	3	59.4%	119,596	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Saint Petersburg	Florida	209	175	4	33.1%	118,107	7.8	16	6	20	0	0	13
Sacramento	California	218	159	6	14.6%	117,521	10.7	28	3	29	0	0	12
Santa Ana	California	149	119	5	32.8%	117,102	8.0	6	2	11	0	0	10
Corona	California	152	124	3	45.3%	116,579	6.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	162	5	35.6%	115,833	7.4	18	1	18	0	0	18
Louisville	Kentucky	223	172	8	15.2%	115,541	10.4	32	6	42	0	0	15
Atlanta	Georgia	303	222	8	11.0%	109,209	13.3	39	17	44	0	0	13
Laredo	Texas	175	147	4	40.0%	108,359	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Diego	California	252	172	8	8.0%	107,797	13.9	36	10	38	0	0	1
Cincinnati	Ohio	238	184	6	12.9%	103,476	10.3	45	4	46	0	0	22
Tacoma	Washington	251	206	5	30.4%	101,216	8.3	20	5	21	0	0	19
Mobile	Alabama	248	206	3	37.2%	100,961	7.6	18	3	18	0	0	18
Norfolk	Virginia	203	160	5	41.0%	100,769	7.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Shreveport	Louisiana	206	165	3	44.8%	99,883	6.6	12	2	12	0	0	12
Baytown	Texas	138	111	2	84.4%	99,383	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Tucson	Arizona	250	190	8	10.8%	97,809	11.6	32	8	51	0	0	6
Lakeland	Florida	175	144	4	37.1%	95,783	7.7	9	2	9	0	0	9
Akron	Ohio	206	160	4	35.1%	94,953	7.2	17	3	17	0	0	17
Odessa	Texas	174	140	3	58.8%	94,189	5.7	6	4	10	0	1	10
Fontana	California	127	101	3	40.0%	93,891	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hialeah	Florida	176	145	5	25.6%	93,817	8.4	7	2	7	0	0	7
Tyler	Texas	168	133	3	60.0%	93,732	5.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Salinas	California	154	128	3	49.6%	93,454	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cypress	Texas	113	89	3	54.5%	92,918	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Riverside	California	173	131	4	25.0%	92,490	9.0	7	4	9	0	0	4
Chula Vista	California	147	114	4	34.9%	91,109	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Killeen	Texas	134	109	3	60.3%	90,630	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Omaha	Nebraska	201	145	6	16.1%	89,164	9.5	31	5	39	0	0	21
Pompano Beach	Florida	214	167	4	24.1%	89,162	11.0	10	5	13	0	0	4
Midland	Texas	160	128	3	55.7%	89,035	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Boise	Idaho	169	129	4	34.3%	87,709	7.6	9	2	9	0	0	9
Brooklyn	New York	205	140	13	3.4%	87,174	16.8	37	2	37	0	0	2
Montgomery	Alabama	212	172	3	41.2%	86,436	6.8	13	1	13	0	0	13
Winston Salem	North Carolina	191	163	5	32.1%	84,834	7.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Clarksville	Tennessee	137	113	4	48.1%	84,552	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saint Paul	Minnesota	304	239	5	10.5%	84,026	23.7	30	12	31	0	0	8
Reading	Pennsylvania	175	130	4	39.0%	83,931	7.3	10	3	19	0	0	19
Spokane	Washington	209	158	6	23.1%	83,035	9.0	14	2	14	0	0	14
Palmdale	California	151	126	3	47.1%	82,360	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Greensboro	North Carolina	172	133	6	25.1%	82,325	8.8	9	2	9	0	0	7
Woodbridge	Virginia	137	110	3	38.8%	82,221	7.0	3	3	4	0	0	4
West Palm Beach	Florida	203	151	5	22.1%	81,966	9.8	12	4	12	0	0	7
Denver	Colorado	281	201	8	7.5%	81,421	14.4	38	13	46	0	0	8
Independence	Missouri	166	137	3	65.5%	81,192	4.8	8	2	8	0	2	8
Salt Lake City	Utah	235	189	6	16.6%	80,911	10.2	19	6	20	0	0	7
Moreno Valley	California	134	108	4	39.2%	80,501	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Manassas	Virginia	150	125	3	52.5%	79,719	5.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Homestead	Florida	179	151	3	42.4%	79,662	7.6	7	2	7	0	0	6
Toledo	Ohio	198	146	5	25.9%	79,531	8.3	15	1	15	0	0	15
Arlington	Texas	185	138	6	19.8%	78,760	9.1	12	2	13	0	0	13
Olympia	Washington	171	142	3	42.5%	77,712	6.8	6	3	6	0	0	6
Tracy	California	158	131	3	65.8%	77,098	6.5	4	2	4	0	2	3
Lawrenceville	Georgia	148	120	4	30.0%	76,834	8.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Chesapeake	Virginia	157	124	5	32.2%	76,590	8.2	6	2	6	0	0	6
Lake Charles	Louisiana	161	131	3	58.3%	76,245	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Visalia	California	143	112	3	50.0%	76,007	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Macon	Georgia	188	150	3	46.2%	75,563	6.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Newport News	Virginia	159	118	3	42.1%	74,408	6.7	7	2	8	0	0	8
Lancaster	California	133	113	4	40.3%	74,347	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Anchorage	Alaska	184	141	4	30.4%	74,323	7.7	12	2	17	0	0	17
Amarillo	Texas	213	169	4	32.5%	74,307	7.9	14	2	14	0	0	14
Edinburg	Texas	144	118	3	47.7%	74,253	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Modesto	California	170	131	4	28.0%	74,120	8.4	7	2	13	0	0	13
Spring	Texas	184	140	6	19.3%	73,686	9.0	8	3	8	0	0	8
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	222	149	9	8.8%	71,596	12.7	29	10	43	0	0	3
Vallejo	California	136	111	3	57.4%	71,433	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Summerville	South Carolina	120	96	3	50.0%	69,471	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Las Cruces	New Mexico	173	139	3	46.2%	68,906	6.7	7	3	8	0	0	8
Colorado Springs	Colorado	234	183	7	11.7%	68,441	11.0	30	9	38	0	0	11
Saint Louis	Missouri	311	243	8	7.4%	67,964	15.1	45	13	47	0	0	6
Charlotte	North Carolina	199	142	10	7.4%	67,051	13.0	24	11	30	0	0	4
Long Beach	California	184	141	6	14.0%	66,863	9.8	12	3	12	0	0	7
Orlando	Florida	263	191	8	6.7%	66,790	13.5	32	15	48	0	0	2
Brownsville	Texas	129	103	4	33.1%	66,638	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lubbock	Texas	199	158	5	23.8%	65,881	8.9	14	1	14	0	0	10
Winter Haven	Florida	130	110	3	61.0%	65,194	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Jordan	Utah	128	109	3	52.2%	64,497	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	California	120	102	3	58.1%	64,368	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Jackson	Mississippi	202	165	4	37.7%	64,210	7.1	11	3	13	0	0	13
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	242	178	11	4.1%	63,985	16.1	47	2	47	0	0	0
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	211	168	6	16.9%	63,977	9.4	18	5	20	0	0	16
Elk Grove	California	138	109	3	35.6%	63,917	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Everett	Washington	143	116	4	38.3%	63,887	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Norwalk	California	99	81	4	60.0%	63,532	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
New Braunfels	Texas	119	96	4	61.6%	63,368	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	142	112	5	36.8%	63,324	7.5	4	3	4	0	0	4
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	151	119	5	45.3%	63,232	6.5	6	2	6	0	0	6
Appleton	Wisconsin	140	111	3	51.7%	62,969	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bloomington	Indiana	155	119	4	46.9%	62,680	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Longview	Texas	160	130	3	59.5%	62,628	5.4	5	3	6	0	0	6
Oxnard	California	149	116	6	28.4%	62,576	8.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Beaumont	Texas	173	136	3	42.8%	62,327	7.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Aurora	Colorado	191	142	6	14.2%	61,900	10.1	11	2	11	0	0	9
Trenton	New Jersey	206	168	3	29.7%	61,661	8.5	11	3	11	0	0	8
Augusta	Georgia	194	158	4	30.1%	61,526	7.6	8	2	8	0	0	8
Salem	Oregon	168	132	4	23.0%	61,193	8.6	7	2	7	0	0	7
Covington	Georgia	122	101	3	65.9%	61,036	4.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Wichita	Kansas	236	181	7	14.6%	60,916	9.8	26	7	37	0	0	17
College Station	Texas	115	96	3	49.5%	60,903	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chandler	Arizona	151	115	5	22.6%	60,769	8.8	6	3	8	0	0	5
Denton	Texas	155	121	5	38.4%	60,716	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Warren	Michigan	144	109	4	44.9%	60,679	6.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Kent	Washington	146	121	5	36.9%	59,175	7.3	4	3	5	0	0	5
Yuma	Arizona	134	113	3	40.0%	59,039	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Birmingham	Alabama	231	177	7	11.8%	58,921	11.3	30	3	31	0	0	4
Lewisville	Texas	132	103	4	49.0%	58,146	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Roanoke	Virginia	203	168	4	34.3%	58,083	8.0	10	2	15	0	0	15
Nampa	Idaho	140	119	3	50.0%	57,953	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Olathe	Kansas	112	91	3	40.0%	57,749	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Acworth	Georgia	127	107	4	57.5%	57,286	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Garland	Texas	152	117	5	24.1%	57,263	8.4	5	3	7	0	0	7
Santa Maria	California	139	112	3	40.0%	57,236	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kissimmee	Florida	192	147	7	19.7%	57,011	10.4	7	5	12	0	0	5
Saint Charles	Missouri	134	114	3	40.7%	56,883	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Fort Wayne	Indiana	198	152	6	17.6%	56,049	9.4	16	1	16	0	0	11
Columbus	Ohio	242	175	9	6.6%	55,992	13.8	30	12	52	0	0	1
Grand Junction	Colorado	157	128	3	52.9%	55,821	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
West Valley City	Utah	121	100	3	42.0%	55,813	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Simi Valley	California	110	89	4	43.2%	55,609	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Katy	Texas	135	103	6	16.1%	55,329	9.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Belleville	Illinois	145	121	3	59.2%	55,213	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Cary	North Carolina	144	108	6	35.5%	55,199	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	123	101	3	50.0%	55,124	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hamilton	Ohio	146	118	3	40.0%	54,839	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Worth	Florida	171	134	3	26.3%	54,353	10.0	5	4	5	0	0	3
Irving	Texas	154	122	5	22.4%	53,949	8.8	6	2	6	0	0	6
Pearland	Texas	137	105	3	39.2%	53,915	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	141	114	3	50.0%	53,519	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lafayette	Louisiana	150	123	4	33.1%	53,099	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	131	105	3	40.0%	52,199	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Orem	Utah	132	112	3	52.0%	52,137	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lithonia	Georgia	116	99	4	53.8%	52,092	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Abilene	Texas	178	142	3	40.0%	52,062	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Bernardino	California	172	145	5	20.8%	51,925	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hesperia	California	106	85	3	50.0%	51,906	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Terre Haute	Indiana	155	124	3	54.5%	51,725	5.2	6	1	6	0	1	6
Greeley	Colorado	119	95	3	45.1%	51,447	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Metairie	Louisiana	148	116	3	35.9%	51,117	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Grand Rapids	Michigan	170	128	7	13.8%	50,700	9.9	12	2	13	0	0	8
Chattanooga	Tennessee	213	161	5	24.3%	50,583	8.9	15	3	15	0	0	14
Jupiter	Florida	139	108	3	51.2%	50,504	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madison	Wisconsin	183	133	5	17.1%	50,500	9.9	14	2	15	0	0	10
Reno	Nevada	169	125	6	16.8%	49,974	10.1	12	2	12	0	0	6
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	168	127	4	29.4%	49,878	8.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Palm Bay	Florida	138	115	3	44.7%	49,755	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Apopka	Florida	121	104	3	50.9%	49,693	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pueblo	Colorado	181	145	4	31.4%	49,597	7.7	7	3	7	0	0	7
Missoula	Montana	154	121	3	50.8%	49,409	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hayward	California	135	115	5	25.7%	49,277	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Anaheim	California	168	134	6	13.3%	49,093	10.3	7	3	8	0	0	4
Muskegon	Michigan	153	124	5	37.8%	48,816	7.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Topeka	Kansas	219	175	5	29.6%	48,365	8.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Clovis	California	134	102	4	39.8%	48,353	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Mission	Texas	142	109	5	26.6%	48,124	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hemet	California	135	118	4	37.1%	47,753	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Wichita Falls	Texas	176	141	3	48.2%	47,633	6.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
South Gate	California	96	80	2	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Valdosta	Georgia	157	128	3	50.0%	47,476	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Puyallup	Washington	166	139	4	33.2%	47,429	7.8	5	2	5	0	0	4
San Angelo	Texas	143	114	3	42.8%	47,362	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Orleans	Louisiana	199	141	8	11.0%	47,142	11.4	19	4	25	0	0	5
Little Rock	Arkansas	184	147	4	21.5%	46,903	9.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
High Point	North Carolina	144	116	5	38.3%	46,858	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	145	121	3	40.0%	46,756	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Newnan	Georgia	121	97	3	50.0%	46,698	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fredericksburg	Virginia	155	121	4	26.7%	46,506	8.4	5	3	5	0	0	5
Keller	Texas	126	98	3	40.0%	46,503	7.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Murrieta	California	124	101	4	34.8%	46,085	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lincoln	Nebraska	189	149	6	15.8%	45,693	9.0	22	2	24	0	0	16
Escondido	California	136	107	5	25.3%	45,530	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Saint Augustine	Florida	168	129	3	34.7%	45,492	7.4	5	3	5	0	0	5
Redding	California	146	117	3	40.0%	45,181	9.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Downey	California	141	111	3	40.0%	45,160	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Auburn	Washington	123	105	3	40.0%	45,149	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Milton	Florida	138	113	3	47.5%	44,974	6.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Menifee	California	148	125	3	40.2%	44,382	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Raleigh	North Carolina	187	139	8	8.1%	44,373	12.0	15	4	22	0	0	1
Edmond	Oklahoma	153	112	6	25.8%	44,324	8.6	5	3	5	0	0	5
Ocala	Florida	182	140	6	19.5%	43,810	9.2	11	1	11	0	0	11
Fort Pierce	Florida	188	157	3	45.4%	43,419	6.3	8	2	8	0	0	8
Riverview	Florida	147	121	4	38.9%	43,327	7.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Bryan	Texas	162	139	3	44.7%	43,047	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	160	137	6	21.1%	42,904	8.8	6	2	7	0	0	6
Coral Springs	Florida	117	93	3	44.1%	42,879	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Richmond	Virginia	200	152	8	10.9%	42,740	11.3	15	5	30	0	0	5
Conroe	Texas	191	147	4	26.6%	42,610	8.3	7	3	7	0	0	7
Springdale	Arkansas	115	95	3	44.1%	42,558	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Duluth	Minnesota	177	135	4	36.1%	42,265	7.7	11	2	11	0	0	11
Baltimore	Maryland	245	185	8	6.7%	42,076	14.4	22	8	22	0	0	2
Gainesville	Florida	187	132	5	20.0%	41,827	9.2	10	2	10	0	0	7
Stone Mountain	Georgia	147	129	3	32.5%	41,757	8.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Lynchburg	Virginia	154	122	4	40.8%	41,727	7.0	4	3	5	0	0	5
Medford	Oregon	118	98	4	44.7%	41,658	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ontario	California	132	106	5	23.4%	41,400	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Knoxville	Tennessee	202	149	8	10.7%	41,328	11.1	17	5	25	0	0	7
Racine	Wisconsin	152	119	5	32.7%	41,220	7.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Glendale	Arizona	191	149	6	13.5%	41,190	10.2	9	5	11	0	0	5
Hagerstown	Maryland	144	115	3	42.0%	41,092	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Clearwater	Florida	181	139	4	22.4%	41,002	9.0	9	2	9	0	0	6
Tallahassee	Florida	191	145	7	14.2%	40,998	10.2	10	3	14	0	0	5
Victorville	California	117	92	4	30.0%	40,893	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Spring Hill	Florida	145	116	3	32.6%	40,845	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Nashville	Tennessee	214	160	10	8.9%	40,838	13.4	22	5	36	0	0	3
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	156	117	6	21.8%	40,680	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Rialto	California	122	101	4	38.2%	40,678	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Anderson	South Carolina	135	106	3	41.3%	40,620	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	123	100	3	40.0%	40,585	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lawrence	Kansas	150	123	4	40.0%	40,421	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pensacola	Florida	184	145	5	15.0%	40,353	9.7	13	2	13	0	0	13
Melbourne	Florida	138	105	4	25.9%	40,272	8.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	129	108	3	41.2%	40,176	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Overland Park	Kansas	167	131	5	21.9%	40,117	8.8	9	2	10	0	0	8
Federal Way	Washington	117	91	3	40.0%	40,057	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Arvada	Colorado	143	112	4	30.0%	40,026	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Largo	Florida	145	117	3	37.2%	40,013	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rochester	New York	202	147	9	8.5%	39,912	13.5	24	5	28	0	0	3
Surprise	Arizona	144	114	4	29.2%	39,594	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kennewick	Washington	132	111	3	40.0%	39,524	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Littleton	Colorado	223	169	6	12.1%	39,351	14.2	10	5	10	0	0	2
Temecula	California	134	108	4	30.0%	38,974	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Greenville	South Carolina	174	128	6	17.5%	38,374	10.0	9	3	12	0	0	5
Mcallen	Texas	130	104	6	27.1%	38,324	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livonia	Michigan	127	98	3	40.0%	37,827	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mesquite	Texas	131	109	5	25.7%	37,649	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vancouver	Washington	173	134	8	11.5%	37,594	10.5	11	3	12	0	0	4
Merced	California	128	109	3	36.5%	37,587	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kansas City	Missouri	217	160	9	6.6%	37,502	13.2	49	12	64	0	0	0
El Monte	California	115	95	3	40.0%	37,484	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Fe	New Mexico	148	114	4	29.2%	37,458	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	California	129	107	4	26.9%	37,402	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madera	California	151	121	3	36.3%	37,379	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Stockton	California	195	152	7	9.9%	37,114	10.7	12	2	24	0	0	4
Pomona	California	139	116	6	23.4%	36,995	9.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	131	103	3	37.5%	36,986	7.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	138	112	4	31.8%	36,716	7.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Worcester	Massachusetts	162	116	5	19.7%	36,572	9.4	9	1	9	0	0	6
Billings	Montana	155	128	5	26.6%	36,491	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	170	142	4	38.3%	36,475	6.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Humble	Texas	128	97	6	21.9%	36,443	9.0	3	3	4	0	0	4
Florissant	Missouri	148	117	3	33.6%	36,334	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Bellevue	Washington	148	120	5	24.8%	36,263	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gulfport	Mississippi	135	105	4	37.4%	35,379	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	California	124	106	4	30.0%	35,217	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	124	96	6	34.9%	35,168	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Provo	Utah	132	106	4	30.0%	34,957	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	137	113	3	37.3%	34,869	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Marietta	Georgia	177	134	7	10.7%	34,415	10.9	7	2	7	0	0	5
Savannah	Georgia	182	137	8	14.2%	34,359	10.6	10	6	18	0	0	6
Redwood City	California	144	121	4	30.0%	34,339	8.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Fairfield	California	125	103	3	30.0%	34,224	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Garden Grove	California	148	115	5	19.3%	33,947	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chicago	Illinois	233	156	20	1.3%	33,901	28.4	56	9	60	0	0	0
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	269	192	10	4.9%	33,397	15.3	39	7	50	0	0	0
Alexandria	Virginia	215	163	6	9.4%	33,285	11.7	14	5	17	0	0	7
Evansville	Indiana	171	126	6	17.9%	32,983	9.6	9	1	9	0	0	8
Eugene	Oregon	161	124	7	16.2%	32,957	10.2	6	2	6	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	111	92	3	34.8%	32,711	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Yakima	Washington	145	124	4	25.0%	32,412	8.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Cumming	Georgia	140	114	5	20.0%	32,404	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lexington	Kentucky	190	137	10	10.0%	31,993	11.8	15	2	15	0	0	4
Oakland	California	170	125	7	7.8%	31,946	14.6	14	2	14	0	0	1
Joliet	Illinois	141	108	5	24.5%	31,600	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Davenport	Iowa	162	129	4	30.0%	31,459	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Allentown	Pennsylvania	163	130	7	17.9%	30,406	9.3	7	1	7	0	0	6
Scottsdale	Arizona	195	146	7	10.1%	30,196	11.1	11	3	12	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	138	112	4	24.6%	30,059	12.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Huntsville	Alabama	192	148	5	15.1%	29,704	9.7	11	3	12	0	0	8
Mission Viejo	California	114	89	6	30.0%	29,507	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Honolulu	Hawaii	179	135	8	7.0%	29,123	13.0	11	1	11	0	0	0
Gilbert	Arizona	152	109	9	12.2%	29,039	11.0	6	2	11	0	0	3
Henderson	Nevada	173	127	10	9.6%	28,988	12.0	8	7	12	0	0	2
Indio	California	123	98	4	30.0%	28,827	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Whittier	California	195	155	5	14.7%	28,802	10.3	6	4	7	0	0	4
Idaho Falls	Idaho	142	114	5	26.2%	28,589	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
La Puente	California	138	113	4	24.0%	28,322	10.5	2	3	3	0	0	1
Fargo	North Dakota	131	101	4	23.1%	28,271	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Richardson	Texas	135	107	5	24.5%	28,091	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Panama City	Florida	165	125	4	22.2%	28,086	8.5	6	2	6	0	0	6
Athens	Georgia	158	120	5	22.5%	28,060	8.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Austin	Texas	202	125	14	2.6%	28,054	17.6	44	10	60	0	0	0
Muncie	Indiana	164	134	5	30.0%	27,828	8.0	5	2	5	0	0	5
Herndon	Virginia	120	99	7	29.2%	27,315	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Plano	Texas	145	109	8	8.9%	27,302	11.6	7	3	9	0	0	1
Sandy	Utah	134	111	4	24.7%	27,274	8.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Fairfax	Virginia	156	132	6	16.5%	27,026	11.3	4	4	5	0	0	2
Erie	Pennsylvania	179	140	6	14.7%	27,008	9.4	13	1	13	0	0	9
Huntington Beach	California	128	102	6	13.4%	26,872	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Johnson City	Tennessee	132	98	4	28.2%	26,865	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	California	141	112	5	15.1%	26,731	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fayetteville	North Carolina	161	124	7	10.9%	26,493	10.5	8	3	16	0	0	4
New Port Richey	Florida	136	105	3	21.9%	26,403	9.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Silver Spring	Maryland	197	166	7	8.6%	26,008	14.9	7	5	9	0	0	2
Fort Myers	Florida	181	138	6	10.2%	25,672	12.4	11	2	11	0	0	3
Woodstock	Georgia	117	94	5	25.2%	25,592	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sparks	Nevada	145	112	4	21.4%	25,538	9.5	4	2	4	0	0	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	127	103	5	26.5%	25,407	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Falls Church	Virginia	187	149	5	21.1%	25,371	11.0	5	4	5	0	0	3
Norman	Oklahoma	145	116	6	20.3%	25,205	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bronx	New York	207	160	17	1.7%	25,095	19.2	25	2	25	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	141	119	4	25.0%	25,076	9.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	154	119	4	23.1%	25,049	17.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	110	5	20.0%	25,045	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bothell	Washington	158	122	8	19.5%	24,956	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Jersey City	New Jersey	153	104	9	9.5%	24,887	13.6	7	2	11	0	0	2
Kalamazoo	Michigan	157	120	5	15.2%	24,880	9.9	7	3	7	0	0	5
Roswell	Georgia	116	93	4	24.7%	24,598	8.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	143	112	5	20.0%	24,528	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Spartanburg	South Carolina	157	126	7	21.9%	24,522	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Durham	North Carolina	170	127	8	8.4%	24,464	11.4	8	3	10	0	0	2
Oceanside	California	137	100	8	12.2%	24,405	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Compton	California	131	111	5	17.5%	24,352	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Youngstown	Ohio	195	148	5	15.5%	24,340	9.2	12	4	12	0	0	10
Charleston	South Carolina	173	130	6	12.4%	24,334	10.5	10	2	10	0	0	3
O Fallon	Missouri	121	104	5	24.9%	23,976	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Canton	Ohio	167	128	5	16.3%	23,907	9.8	12	1	12	0	0	9
Deltona	Florida	117	94	4	25.3%	23,791	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Paterson	New Jersey	176	143	7	16.2%	23,675	10.3	9	2	18	0	0	4
Naples	Florida	202	145	7	7.5%	23,411	14.1	14	2	14	0	0	0
Orange	California	131	108	5	16.0%	23,233	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Kenosha	Wisconsin	140	108	7	20.4%	22,976	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Midlothian	Virginia	138	108	7	23.6%	22,818	9.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
North Las Vegas	Nevada	169	127	6	9.7%	22,626	12.3	7	8	13	0	0	2
Fort Collins	Colorado	142	109	6	11.6%	22,504	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Laurel	Maryland	152	123	5	20.0%	22,494	9.0	4	3	6	0	0	6
El Cajon	California	145	105	8	13.0%	22,462	17.7	3	3	3	0	0	2
Tempe	Arizona	131	93	6	11.8%	22,461	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Staten Island	New York	161	124	10	4.7%	22,268	15.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Washington DC	District of Columbia	199	144	15	3.2%	22,048	21.3	28	6	31	0	0	0
Sarasota	Florida	189	142	8	8.7%	21,810	13.4	13	4	19	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	158	117	8	12.0%	21,802	10.8	9	2	13	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	129	103	4	20.3%	21,574	8.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Seattle	Washington	234	164	17	2.2%	21,310	29.9	35	5	36	0	0	0
York	Pennsylvania	145	108	7	11.6%	20,894	10.3	7	2	14	0	0	6
Pasadena	California	165	133	7	13.1%	20,667	10.7	6	2	6	0	0	2
Beaverton	Oregon	135	108	8	10.1%	20,430	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Lees Summit	Missouri	169	145	5	20.0%	20,429	8.5	6	2	6	0	0	6
Bradenton	Florida	176	136	8	8.1%	20,399	12.4	10	2	10	0	0	1
Bellingham	Washington	133	106	6	16.1%	20,311	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cape Coral	Florida	149	112	6	11.2%	20,272	10.3	6	2	6	0	0	5
Springfield	Missouri	152	112	10	8.6%	19,848	11.1	7	5	11	0	0	3
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	130	98	5	20.0%	19,589	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hawthorne	California	97	84	4	20.0%	19,367	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Alpharetta	Georgia	152	120	12	10.2%	19,292	12.5	4	2	4	0	0	1
Sugar Land	Texas	137	100	8	11.4%	19,184	10.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Round Rock	Texas	147	99	9	11.4%	19,154	12.0	3	3	4	0	0	1
Carrollton	Texas	126	101	6	14.1%	18,951	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lowell	Massachusetts	124	93	6	17.0%	18,905	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	132	112	5	14.1%	18,669	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Dearborn	Michigan	120	98	5	19.6%	18,659	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Fremont	California	139	116	7	8.0%	18,652	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Gaithersburg	Maryland	148	126	7	12.9%	18,591	9.6	5	2	10	0	0	7
Bowie	Maryland	168	139	6	18.0%	18,358	9.8	4	2	4	0	0	2
Torrance	California	157	124	7	10.3%	18,275	11.6	5	3	6	0	0	1
Allen	Texas	115	92	5	16.3%	18,187	9.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Grand Prairie	Texas	137	107	6	9.5%	18,099	10.3	4	2	8	0	0	3
Mckinney	Texas	126	104	7	9.5%	17,917	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Hampton	Virginia	140	107	6	13.0%	17,675	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	5
Sunnyvale	California	158	133	6	11.5%	17,509	9.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	California	129	108	5	15.7%	17,429	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Boulder	Colorado	152	120	7	13.3%	17,419	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	1
Providence	Rhode Island	176	133	8	8.4%	17,259	17.8	8	1	8	0	0	1
Irvine	California	181	140	9	6.3%	16,896	13.7	9	2	12	0	0	0
Elgin	Illinois	124	100	5	13.8%	16,867	10.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Broomfield	Colorado	142	118	6	16.0%	16,793	10.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Parker	Colorado	126	105	5	16.6%	16,696	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elkhart	Indiana	135	109	6	16.8%	16,691	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Frisco	Texas	116	89	7	9.4%	16,218	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Des Moines	Iowa	177	131	8	7.2%	16,044	12.6	11	2	12	0	0	1
Longmont	Colorado	133	109	8	12.3%	16,036	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	160	128	5	15.5%	15,972	10.0	5	2	5	0	0	4
Rapid City	South Dakota	145	122	6	16.4%	15,873	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	114	88	8	14.8%	15,441	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Green Bay	Wisconsin	160	127	8	8.2%	15,070	11.6	7	4	12	0	0	1
Henrico	Virginia	188	148	9	7.8%	15,056	12.3	7	6	11	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	179	138	7	9.3%	14,661	11.1	9	1	9	0	0	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	171	135	8	8.0%	14,592	12.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	142	108	6	11.9%	14,581	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
San Marcos	California	121	88	7	14.1%	14,212	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
South Bend	Indiana	161	126	8	9.6%	14,076	11.0	10	2	12	0	0	3
New York City	New York	260	170	29	0.9%	14,064	30.6	47	3	47	0	0	0
Burbank	California	134	104	6	12.7%	13,684	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	156	117	6	9.3%	13,506	10.8	5	4	7	0	0	1
Franklin	Tennessee	129	103	6	12.6%	13,405	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Toms River	New Jersey	122	89	7	10.8%	13,269	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
San Francisco	California	184	137	18	1.5%	13,083	30.3	28	3	28	0	0	0
Schenectady	New York	177	136	10	8.1%	13,058	12.3	8	1	8	0	0	2
Roseville	California	133	105	9	9.1%	12,673	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
San Mateo	California	148	121	8	8.7%	12,386	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Englewood	Colorado	172	132	9	11.1%	12,343	11.8	4	4	5	0	0	1
Decatur	Georgia	163	121	9	6.8%	12,223	13.6	5	5	5	0	0	1
Buffalo	New York	215	157	22	2.2%	12,141	27.9	28	2	28	0	0	0
Saginaw	Michigan	168	139	9	9.3%	12,117	12.0	7	1	7	0	0	2
Boynton Beach	Florida	157	127	7	6.9%	11,955	13.2	6	2	9	0	0	0
Van Nuys	California	148	117	10	6.7%	11,911	13.3	4	2	5	0	0	0
Inglewood	California	168	130	8	8.9%	11,903	11.2	5	4	6	0	0	1
Waukegan	Illinois	118	90	7	12.0%	11,712	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Frederick	Maryland	136	108	9	8.8%	11,657	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Vero Beach	Florida	151	114	6	9.7%	11,172	10.3	6	1	6	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	185	141	10	7.2%	11,144	14.6	5	2	5	0	0	1
Rock Hill	South Carolina	125	99	8	9.5%	11,058	10.7	3	3	4	0	0	1
Asheville	North Carolina	140	103	10	8.3%	11,011	12.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
West Covina	California	123	102	5	10.0%	10,941	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vista	California	128	92	7	9.0%	10,788	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	122	96	6	9.6%	10,750	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Jamaica	New York	151	114	9	4.4%	10,712	15.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Boca Raton	Florida	170	132	12	4.7%	10,506	15.3	9	4	16	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	124	86	10	11.0%	10,472	12.3	3	4	6	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	113	87	7	9.0%	10,238	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Ventura	California	126	103	8	8.6%	10,017	11.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
New Bedford	Massachusetts	132	103	8	10.5%	9,993	11.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Kennesaw	Georgia	112	88	6	10.0%	9,913	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	California	141	105	12	4.4%	9,539	15.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Rockville	Maryland	159	127	7	6.4%	9,300	14.0	4	4	5	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	132	100	5	9.6%	9,133	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
North Hollywood	California	146	116	10	5.8%	8,817	14.3	4	5	6	0	0	0
Albany	New York	180	131	11	5.5%	8,335	14.5	11	2	11	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	118	95	7	7.9%	8,176	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Flushing	New York	146	112	12	3.7%	7,904	19.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	147	114	8	8.3%	7,834	11.8	5	2	6	0	0	0
Palo Alto	California	137	112	8	8.0%	7,734	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Chino	California	108	84	6	8.0%	7,519	12.5	2	3	3	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	97	78	8	7.0%	7,470	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	148	118	11	4.7%	7,357	20.2	5	3	6	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	117	85	9	7.6%	7,280	12.5	2	4	4	0	0	0
Annapolis	Maryland	174	143	11	7.6%	7,265	11.6	5	2	7	0	0	2
Champaign	Illinois	131	101	8	7.5%	7,136	12.3	3	2	4	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	153	121	11	6.5%	7,088	13.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	98	75	10	7.0%	6,754	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Pittsburg	California	98	79	8	7.0%	6,726	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	117	105	8	7.0%	6,598	13.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Ann Arbor	Michigan	146	110	15	3.9%	6,435	27.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	97	72	10	6.0%	6,348	14.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	97	75	11	6.0%	6,146	14.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	129	100	10	5.8%	5,796	14.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Detroit	Michigan	165	102	35	0.8%	5,014	41.7	25	2	25	0	0	0
Lansing	Michigan	155	113	13	3.0%	4,956	22.7	7	4	7	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	117	99	10	4.4%	4,366	15.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Syracuse	New York	195	153	19	1.5%	3,422	20.1	15	2	17	0	0	0
Berkeley	California	188	145	16	2.5%	3,192	30.9	9	3	9	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	95	81	11	3.0%	3,023	17.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Livermore	California	123	103	12	3.0%	2,935	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Naperville	Illinois	139	105	15	1.8%	2,908	18.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Delray Beach	Florida	168	135	16	2.3%	2,737	33.8	5	4	6	0	0	0
Newark	New Jersey	180	140	17	0.9%	2,633	24.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	164	121	19	1.7%	2,364	32.8	4	3	4	0	0	0
Wilmington	Delaware	183	142	21	1.0%	2,257	38.8	10	2	10	0	0	0
Flint	Michigan	164	127	19	1.4%	2,123	33.6	7	2	7	0	0	0
Carlsbad	California	132	98	15	1.6%	1,850	24.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Yonkers	New York	154	130	18	0.9%	1,699	24.4	5	2	5	0	0	0
Miami Beach	Florida	147	112	18	1.4%	1,594	18.8	5	3	6	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	150	114	23	0.9%	1,213	30.3	7	2	7	0	0	0
Bridgeport	Connecticut	148	109	33	0.8%	1,207	36.2	6	2	6	0	0	0
Concord	California	135	111	28	0.8%	1,088	35.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	126	101	28	0.9%	1,074	33.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Cambridge	Massachusetts	140	112	24	0.9%	1,038	29.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	169	127	22	1.0%	1,038	23.6	8	2	8	0	0	0
Daly City	California	140	104	24	0.9%	1,019	31.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Stamford	Connecticut	138	105	37	0.8%	986	37.5	6	2	6	0	0	0
Napa	California	116	87	14	1.0%	967	19.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	127	94	28	0.9%	946	35.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Manchester	New Hampshire	151	113	34	0.8%	941	35.8	5	3	5	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	98	72	16	1.0%	930	20.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Chico	California	130	100	29	0.8%	910	37.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	88	33	0.8%	900	34.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
New Haven	Connecticut	143	91	45	0.7%	897	51.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	132	112	22	0.9%	891	29.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	117	96	30	0.8%	887	35.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	135	105	45	0.7%	834	51.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	California	136	106	33	0.8%	833	38.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	115	87	33	0.8%	757	39.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	133	103	33	0.8%	755	38.0	3	2	3	0	0	0

Texas

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	273	196	7	13.3%	422,364	10.6	96	17	126	0	53
San Antonio	217	163	8	13.8%	245,141	10.3	59	8	67	0	25
Fort Worth	221	170	6	25.4%	231,953	9.1	32	4	44	0	29
El Paso	254	203	5	23.8%	187,652	8.7	24	6	24	0	20
Dallas	295	217	8	10.5%	146,466	11.6	48	17	84	0	14
Corpus Christi	208	162	5	35.6%	115,833	7.4	18	1	18	0	18
Laredo	175	147	4	40.0%	108,359	7.0	6	1	6	0	6
Baytown	138	111	2	84.4%	99,383	3.0	3	1	3	2	3
Odessa	174	140	3	58.8%	94,189	5.7	6	4	10	1	10
Tyler	168	133	3	60.0%	93,732	5.3	9	1	9	2	9
Cypress	113	89	3	54.5%	92,918	5.5	2	2	3	0	3
Killeen	134	109	3	60.3%	90,630	5.3	4	1	4	1	4
Midland	160	128	3	55.7%	89,035	5.6	5	1	5	0	5
Arlington	185	138	6	19.8%	78,760	9.1	12	2	13	0	13
Amarillo	213	169	4	32.5%	74,307	7.9	14	2	14	0	14
Edinburg	144	118	3	47.7%	74,253	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Spring	184	140	6	19.3%	73,686	9.0	8	3	8	0	8
Brownsville	129	103	4	33.1%	66,638	7.7	3	1	3	0	3
Lubbock	199	158	5	23.8%	65,881	8.9	14	1	14	0	10
New Braunfels	119	96	4	61.6%	63,368	5.5	2	1	2	0	2
Longview	160	130	3	59.5%	62,628	5.4	5	3	6	0	6
Beaumont	173	136	3	42.8%	62,327	7.1	8	1	8	0	8
College Station	115	96	3	49.5%	60,903	6.0	2	1	2	0	2
Denton	155	121	5	38.4%	60,716	7.5	6	1	6	0	6
Lewisville	132	103	4	49.0%	58,146	7.0	3	2	5	0	5
Garland	152	117	5	24.1%	57,263	8.4	5	3	7	0	7
Katy	135	103	6	16.1%	55,329	9.5	4	2	4	0	3
Irving	154	122	5	22.4%	53,949	8.8	6	2	6	0	6
Pearland	137	105	3	39.2%	53,915	7.5	2	2	2	0	2
Abilene	178	142	3	40.0%	52,062	7.0	6	1	6	0	6
Mission	142	109	5	26.6%	48,124	8.3	3	1	3	0	3
Wichita Falls	176	141	3	48.2%	47,633	6.1	7	1	7	0	7
San Angelo	143	114	3	42.8%	47,362	6.8	4	1	4	0	4
Keller	126	98	3	40.0%	46,503	7.0	2	3	3	0	3
Bryan	162	139	3	44.7%	43,047	6.4	5	1	5	0	5
Conroe	191	147	4	26.6%	42,610	8.3	7	3	7	0	7
Mcallen	130	104	6	27.1%	38,324	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Mesquite	131	109	5	25.7%	37,649	8.3	3	1	3	0	3
Humble	128	97	6	21.9%	36,443	9.0	3	3	4	0	4
Richardson	135	107	5	24.5%	28,091	8.7	3	1	3	0	3
Austin	202	125	14	2.6%	28,054	17.6	44	10	60	0	0
Plano	145	109	8	8.9%	27,302	11.6	7	3	9	0	1
Missouri City	129	103	4	20.3%	21,574	8.5	2	2	2	0	2
Sugar Land	137	100	8	11.4%	19,184	10.3	3	3	4	0	2
Round Rock	147	99	9	11.4%	19,154	12.0	3	3	4	0	1
Carrollton	126	101	6	14.1%	18,951	9.7	3	1	3	0	3
Allen	115	92	5	16.3%	18,187	9.5	2	2	2	0	2
Grand Prairie	137	107	6	9.5%	18,099	10.3	4	2	8	0	3
Mckinney	126	104	7	9.5%	17,917	10.3	3	1	3	0	2
Frisco	116	89	7	9.4%	16,218	10.5	2	1	2	0	1
Waco	179	138	7	9.3%	14,661	11.1	9	1	9	0	2

Houston

ZIP	pizzahut.com	tripadvisor.com	eater.com	yelp.com	houstoniamag.com	grubhub.com
77088	11	4	5	6	8	9
77047	12	4	5	6	8	9
77037	10	4	5	6	8	9
77098	15	4	5	6	8	9
77027	13	4	5	6	8	9
77068	10	4	7	5	8	9
77078	7	1	2	3	4	5
77086	9	4	6	5	7	8
77035	12	4	5	6	8	9
77008	11	1	2	3	5	6
77004	12	4	5	6	8	9
77028	11	4	5	6	7	8
77059	12	4	5	6	8	9
77039	10	4	5	6	8	9
77019	11	4	7	5	8	9
77075	10	4	5	6	8	9
77077	9	1	2	3	5	6
77079	13	4	5	6	8	9
77099	9	1	2	3	5	6
77024	10	4	7	5	8	9
77095	10	4	7	5	8	9
77048	8	1	2	3	5	6
77044	10	4	7	5	8	9
77015	10	4	7	5	8	9
77017	7	1	2	3	5	6
77057	15	4	5	6	8	9
77055	10	1	2	3	5	6
77006	14	4	5	6	8	9
77026	11	4	5	6	8	9
77046	10	1	2	3	5	6
77066	7	1	4	2	5	6
77023	11	4	5	6	8	9
77094	14	4	5	6	8	9
77084	11	4	5	6	8	9
77013	11	4	5	6	7	8
77063	15	4	7	5	8	9
77053	10	4	7	5	8	9
77022	12	4	5	6	8	9
77072	8	1	2	3	5	6
77049	12	4	7	5	8	9
77045	7	1	2	3	5	6
77010	16	4	5	6	8	9
77018	13	1	2	3	5	6
77041	10	4	7	5	8	9
77009	16	4	5	6	8	9
77089	7	1	4	2	5	6
77032	11	4	5	6	8	9
77036	11	4	5	6	8	9
77085	9	4	5	6	7	8
77054	12	4	5	6	8	9
77058	10	4	7	5	8	9
77014	7	1	2	3	5	6
77067	10	4	7	5	8	9
77005	11	4	5	6	8	9
77076	11	4	5	6	8	9
77070	10	4	7	5	8	9
77060	10	4	5	6	8	9
77080	10	4	5	6	8	9
77050	10	4	5	6	8	9
77091	10	4	5	6	8	9
77071	11	4	5	6	8	9
77061	8	1	2	3	5	6
77020	8	1	2	3	5	6
77081	10	4	5	6	8	9
77030	11	1	2	3	5	6
77040	10	4	7	5	8	9
77090	10	4	7	5	8	9
77031	11	4	5	6	8	9
77051	10	4	5	6	8	9
77011	11	4	5	6	8	9
77042	12	4	7	5	8	9
77062	10	4	5	6	8	9
77082	11	4	5	6	8	9
77093	11	4	5	6	8	9
77073	9	4	6	5	7	8
77033	11	4	5	6	8	9
77043	10	4	5	6	8	9
77074	11	4	5	6	8	9
77064	9	1	4	2	5	6
77012	11	4	5	6	8	9
77002	11	4	5	6	8	9
77092	11	4	5	6	8	9
77069	10	4	7	5	8	9
77021	10	1	2	3	5	6
77083	12	4	7	5	8	9
77029	11	4	5	6	8	9
77034	7	1	2	3	5	6
77087	11	4	5	6	8	9
77003	10	1	2	3	5	6
77038	10	4	5	6	8	9
77007	15	4	5	6	8	9
77016	12	4	5	6	8	9
77065	12	4	7	5	8	9
77096	10	4	5	6	8	9
77025	8	1	2	3	5	6
77056	12	4	5	6	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Pizzahut

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,352 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Pizzahut Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (pizza near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Pizzahut Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Pizzahut Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Pizzahut Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly