Oktagagent Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve oktagagent.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 513 Tag & Title Agencies (DMV Agents) In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Oktagagent Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Oktagagent Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Oktagagent Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Oklahoma City
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Oktagagent Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	9,809	513	1	26.6%	85,944,041	8.4	27,373	32,642	104	51,369	375	2,178	40,846
California	1,400	185	3	30.3%	11,871,425	7.6	1,166	1,740	21	2,779	0	130	2,364
New York	1,239	159	3	30.6%	5,993,462	7.4	1,491	1,756	17	2,475	26	162	2,198
Texas	1,288	154	5	21.4%	5,971,252	9.2	1,360	1,917	25	3,070	9	83	2,032
New Jersey	706	160	3	42.2%	3,752,518	6.8	537	593	16	934	7	49	856
Ohio	1,047	146	2	31.5%	3,666,295	7.5	976	1,188	16	1,941	0	73	1,670
Illinois	1,127	158	5	27.5%	3,531,580	7.6	1,247	1,382	17	2,429	7	62	2,313
Michigan	1,099	156	7	31.3%	3,112,330	7.4	833	976	11	1,335	0	9	1,290
Oklahoma	771	134	2	74.4%	2,913,616	4.6	554	643	101	1,357	158	427	1,327
Virginia	917	158	3	33.3%	2,802,664	7.7	723	891	13	1,349	4	45	1,184
Pennsylvania	1,046	230	3	20.6%	2,638,061	9.0	1,604	1,781	22	2,787	4	40	1,987
Washington	791	139	2	29.1%	2,119,243	8.3	451	587	15	878	3	17	751
Missouri	928	145	3	33.9%	2,062,754	7.0	887	1,017	19	1,791	36	122	1,595
North Carolina	918	144	4	19.2%	1,945,249	9.7	683	802	17	1,230	1	12	693
Minnesota	974	146	5	34.4%	1,902,019	7.1	777	878	13	1,201	2	22	1,174
Indiana	947	156	6	28.4%	1,884,996	7.6	659	770	14	1,258	2	18	1,216
Wisconsin	999	148	6	32.1%	1,853,492	6.9	694	769	14	1,133	0	49	1,113
Tennessee	865	146	1	27.0%	1,791,334	8.4	514	622	13	975	3	32	749
Massachusetts	1,065	141	7	25.7%	1,753,469	8.3	461	534	9	809	0	4	707
Oregon	733	136	3	40.0%	1,632,262	7.0	355	414	16	622	1	35	589
Kentucky	828	144	3	34.5%	1,532,513	7.5	698	758	10	1,177	0	18	1,144
Arizona	677	130	6	22.0%	1,529,250	9.1	247	396	16	664	0	8	408
Colorado	838	136	3	26.0%	1,437,301	8.0	381	514	15	794	0	38	615
Maryland	716	159	4	21.6%	1,296,016	9.3	392	463	17	753	4	16	464
Utah	681	132	3	37.4%	1,138,989	6.8	246	284	9	450	2	24	431
South Carolina	711	137	5	22.9%	1,134,341	9.4	347	422	17	685	0	8	434
Iowa	948	146	4	33.7%	1,055,819	6.9	890	933	15	1,503	13	78	1,408
Alabama	806	147	5	19.3%	938,112	10.2	522	637	17	1,020	0	4	573
Connecticut	742	129	7	25.0%	894,988	8.5	234	279	10	383	0	3	320
Nevada	587	119	5	30.5%	892,912	7.3	92	168	9	259	0	14	218
Georgia	888	130	15	8.6%	886,146	13.3	574	726	14	1,264	0	0	220
Mississippi	719	127	2	28.7%	857,301	8.4	384	418	13	702	0	9	509
New Mexico	686	127	3	37.4%	781,793	6.7	327	361	15	661	4	42	622
Arkansas	736	131	4	25.7%	769,326	9.0	553	587	20	959	7	31	568
Louisiana	738	136	8	14.3%	666,019	10.3	431	510	14	839	0	1	400
Kansas	823	130	4	22.4%	652,320	7.9	616	692	26	1,349	55	195	831
West Virginia	744	143	2	35.2%	643,729	7.3	684	704	16	1,094	0	61	932
Nebraska	730	138	4	33.2%	632,516	7.2	524	581	15	891	6	41	825
Hawaii	510	110	2	43.4%	616,713	6.6	82	93	9	133	0	3	131
Idaho	628	121	5	36.2%	610,406	7.0	251	273	8	431	0	5	420
New Hampshire	659	127	6	36.7%	493,130	7.6	238	248	8	391	0	2	348
Montana	678	130	1	44.5%	463,342	6.2	348	361	11	528	4	46	520
Maine	778	136	5	31.7%	422,473	7.5	421	425	10	595	2	8	572
South Dakota	630	127	3	43.0%	371,388	6.5	359	370	12	536	2	27	528
Delaware	458	116	5	36.7%	348,730	7.8	52	66	9	104	0	4	88
Rhode Island	486	96	6	29.8%	314,933	8.4	64	77	7	98	0	0	85
Vermont	691	128	2	49.6%	309,786	6.1	250	254	12	416	8	54	389
North Dakota	628	125	2	40.3%	302,721	6.6	367	381	10	518	3	27	485
Wyoming	554	115	2	38.1%	221,548	6.7	164	171	13	274	1	13	267
Florida	1,013	157	59	1.0%	211,511	23.7	443	966	21	1,218	0	0	0
Alaska	562	123	7	28.2%	208,397	7.0	218	235	10	287	1	7	257

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	337	80	1	93.0%	635,008	1.9	43	19	131	17	67	131
Chicago	Illinois	358	78	4	22.2%	600,175	9.6	56	8	82	0	0	52
Houston	Texas	412	85	8	12.9%	411,659	11.0	96	10	135	0	0	49
Los Angeles	California	404	92	7	16.7%	409,629	10.1	62	8	86	0	0	49
Minneapolis	Minnesota	443	88	2	35.8%	389,504	7.7	51	8	77	0	3	68
Portland	Oregon	346	74	3	42.0%	386,083	6.9	33	7	50	0	1	46
Las Vegas	Nevada	427	82	5	24.1%	372,147	9.1	43	6	68	0	0	42
Saint Louis	Missouri	425	91	3	39.7%	363,905	7.1	45	5	65	0	1	62
Brooklyn	New York	323	75	8	12.2%	316,154	10.8	37	6	50	0	0	22
Buffalo	New York	349	77	2	55.3%	311,302	5.2	28	4	46	0	7	45
Bronx	New York	303	63	9	21.1%	304,594	9.2	25	4	33	0	0	28
Tulsa	Oklahoma	298	81	2	65.3%	275,763	4.9	28	5	61	7	16	59
San Antonio	Texas	396	83	7	15.1%	267,932	10.3	59	9	78	0	0	47
San Jose	California	333	74	4	25.2%	264,333	9.2	28	6	45	0	0	26
Louisville	Kentucky	345	72	3	31.4%	238,722	8.3	32	7	54	0	0	42
New York City	New York	398	81	9	14.7%	238,671	10.4	47	8	62	0	0	32
Omaha	Nebraska	368	83	4	41.9%	231,375	7.0	31	10	39	0	3	34
Detroit	Michigan	354	73	4	35.7%	228,635	7.4	25	6	39	0	0	33
San Diego	California	336	71	8	16.6%	223,259	10.3	36	8	45	0	0	24
Columbus	Ohio	359	77	3	25.8%	218,360	8.5	30	8	50	0	0	38
Saint Paul	Minnesota	368	81	6	26.9%	214,959	7.9	30	6	35	0	1	35
Albuquerque	New Mexico	328	70	4	31.9%	209,281	7.6	17	7	30	0	0	29
Reno	Nevada	265	53	1	70.0%	207,851	4.3	12	5	14	0	6	14
Denver	Colorado	387	86	7	18.4%	199,959	10.3	38	9	60	0	0	25
Seattle	Washington	331	69	7	20.7%	197,681	9.8	35	7	61	0	0	40
El Paso	Texas	314	63	5	25.0%	197,339	8.7	24	5	26	0	0	21
Indianapolis	Indiana	370	81	6	19.9%	189,518	9.4	37	8	62	0	0	36
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	369	81	5	23.1%	187,709	8.6	29	9	46	0	0	39
Sacramento	California	348	73	4	23.1%	185,678	8.9	28	5	49	0	1	37
Salt Lake City	Utah	315	72	2	37.9%	184,345	7.3	19	6	31	0	1	30
Memphis	Tennessee	312	67	4	26.0%	180,936	9.2	26	5	43	0	0	27
Tucson	Arizona	309	68	5	19.3%	174,801	9.7	32	9	48	0	0	30
Richmond	Virginia	288	62	3	44.3%	173,261	7.4	15	4	26	0	1	22
Honolulu	Hawaii	254	43	2	40.0%	166,247	7.1	11	5	17	0	0	16
San Francisco	California	337	72	7	19.0%	164,908	9.5	28	5	44	0	0	27
Edmond	Oklahoma	180	39	1	95.6%	164,066	1.4	5	8	17	3	10	17
Fresno	California	341	78	5	26.5%	159,554	9.3	18	4	33	0	0	24
Laredo	Texas	236	42	3	56.9%	154,184	5.0	6	6	11	0	1	11
Kansas City	Missouri	364	80	8	26.6%	152,027	9.1	49	9	68	0	0	42
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	348	80	8	22.2%	151,698	9.6	39	6	55	0	1	29
Cleveland	Ohio	349	76	5	19.5%	145,935	10.0	29	7	46	0	2	20
Virginia Beach	Virginia	239	48	6	32.1%	144,675	8.0	12	4	18	0	0	14
Dayton	Ohio	340	76	3	29.7%	141,976	7.8	27	6	46	0	0	39
Bakersfield	California	246	47	6	24.4%	136,262	8.8	11	4	17	0	0	11
Phoenix	Arizona	359	84	12	9.4%	135,999	12.8	42	9	68	0	0	7
Cincinnati	Ohio	385	86	5	16.9%	135,676	9.9	45	7	77	0	0	39
Long Beach	California	281	65	8	28.1%	134,426	9.0	12	4	15	0	0	11
Stockton	California	284	55	5	35.5%	132,674	7.6	12	5	23	0	1	23
Lexington	Kentucky	323	65	2	40.4%	129,273	7.7	15	4	24	0	1	20
Vancouver	Washington	254	54	4	39.5%	128,880	7.5	11	5	18	0	0	17
Lancaster	California	154	34	2	69.7%	128,514	4.3	3	3	5	0	1	5
Rochester	New York	327	73	8	26.9%	126,699	8.7	24	3	26	0	2	20
Norman	Oklahoma	160	36	1	100.0%	124,085	1.0	4	5	17	4	9	17
Chesapeake	Virginia	204	43	5	51.2%	121,711	6.0	6	3	10	0	1	8
Salem	Oregon	225	48	3	44.9%	119,754	6.4	7	4	10	0	0	10
Henrico	Virginia	213	44	2	59.9%	115,381	4.7	7	3	11	0	2	11
Beaverton	Oregon	184	28	3	56.6%	114,045	6.0	4	4	7	0	0	7
Olympia	Washington	222	48	1	61.6%	112,660	5.0	6	6	11	1	3	11
Washington DC	District of Columbia	320	71	8	16.3%	111,537	9.7	28	6	39	0	0	26
Boise	Idaho	224	44	3	42.4%	108,553	7.6	9	5	15	0	0	12
Raleigh	North Carolina	296	65	5	19.7%	107,521	9.6	15	7	22	0	0	11
San Bernardino	California	241	43	3	42.4%	105,824	6.9	7	5	10	0	0	8
Sugar Land	Texas	171	29	1	60.2%	101,703	6.7	3	4	4	0	1	2
Huntington Beach	California	195	36	2	50.5%	100,854	6.0	4	3	5	0	0	5
Aurora	Colorado	259	54	7	22.9%	99,931	9.5	11	4	15	0	0	9
Oakland	California	240	54	7	23.9%	98,352	9.1	14	4	19	0	0	11
Escondido	California	191	40	2	53.1%	95,363	6.3	4	5	6	0	1	6
Riverside	California	244	47	6	25.2%	93,139	8.7	7	8	12	0	0	7
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	181	39	3	49.9%	92,973	6.4	5	3	9	0	1	9
Mesa	Arizona	251	44	10	17.1%	91,404	9.5	13	4	21	0	0	13
Eugene	Oregon	214	40	2	45.0%	91,318	6.7	6	5	9	0	2	7
Hayward	California	183	34	3	47.4%	90,940	5.3	4	2	8	0	1	8
Dallas	Texas	382	88	9	6.5%	90,222	14.1	48	12	79	0	0	7
Akron	Ohio	332	64	2	33.3%	90,065	7.8	17	6	24	0	0	19
Charlotte	North Carolina	296	66	6	9.9%	89,941	12.1	24	8	39	0	0	3
Fort Worth	Texas	339	72	11	9.8%	89,308	11.9	32	6	44	0	0	7
Oxnard	California	193	33	5	40.3%	88,786	7.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Staten Island	New York	276	65	7	18.6%	88,141	9.8	12	6	17	0	0	11
Moreno Valley	California	166	37	4	42.1%	86,577	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madison	Wisconsin	249	67	8	29.3%	86,531	8.3	14	1	14	0	0	12
Edinburg	Texas	162	27	3	55.0%	85,623	5.7	3	4	6	0	1	5
Green Bay	Wisconsin	235	45	3	45.7%	83,742	6.4	7	5	11	0	1	11
Bowling Green	Kentucky	165	32	1	72.4%	83,601	5.8	4	3	5	0	1	3
Ballwin	Missouri	130	29	2	88.1%	83,422	2.0	2	3	3	1	2	3
Providence	Rhode Island	231	48	4	40.2%	82,399	7.3	8	5	12	0	0	11
Toledo	Ohio	276	54	4	26.7%	82,020	8.9	15	5	24	0	0	18
Yonkers	New York	213	42	5	45.4%	81,910	6.4	5	3	7	0	0	7
Fort Wayne	Indiana	259	64	9	25.7%	81,875	8.4	16	2	24	0	0	24
Syracuse	New York	274	66	5	35.9%	81,439	7.8	15	5	20	0	0	17
Rockford	Illinois	255	49	2	44.6%	81,396	6.3	9	4	15	0	0	15
Flint	Michigan	242	43	1	51.6%	80,162	6.3	7	4	11	0	1	11
Manassas	Virginia	170	42	5	52.4%	79,542	5.8	4	3	5	0	0	5
Plano	Texas	220	40	8	25.9%	79,037	8.7	7	5	13	0	0	10
Knoxville	Tennessee	297	63	5	20.3%	78,378	10.5	17	3	27	0	0	12
Littleton	Colorado	273	57	6	24.0%	78,156	9.8	10	4	14	0	0	7
Santa Rosa	California	201	39	6	35.8%	77,405	7.5	6	5	9	0	0	8
Alexandria	Virginia	276	65	6	21.7%	76,913	9.1	14	4	24	0	0	14
Las Cruces	New Mexico	225	51	3	51.4%	76,568	5.9	7	5	11	0	0	11
Jersey City	New Jersey	217	46	5	29.2%	76,465	7.6	7	3	9	0	0	9
Santa Barbara	California	212	45	2	56.0%	76,135	5.6	7	5	11	0	0	11
Santa Ana	California	197	38	6	21.2%	75,646	8.7	6	4	10	0	0	8
Spokane	Washington	262	51	5	21.0%	75,637	10.1	14	4	22	0	0	12
Tacoma	Washington	320	65	6	22.5%	74,914	9.5	20	6	34	0	0	19
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	263	61	3	41.0%	74,510	7.2	9	4	12	0	0	12
Grand Rapids	Michigan	240	54	8	20.2%	74,420	8.9	12	1	12	0	0	11
Wichita Falls	Texas	230	45	2	74.6%	73,768	3.4	7	2	13	0	6	12
Hesperia	California	126	24	2	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Mckinney	Texas	147	25	7	38.4%	72,546	8.7	3	4	6	0	0	4
Mission	Texas	167	26	4	40.0%	72,437	7.0	3	4	5	0	0	5
Modesto	California	241	51	6	27.3%	72,171	8.3	7	2	12	0	0	9
Tracy	California	140	31	4	61.2%	71,684	5.5	4	3	7	0	1	6
Kalamazoo	Michigan	235	56	4	43.7%	71,670	6.9	7	3	8	0	0	8
Hemet	California	162	28	2	55.2%	71,084	5.7	3	3	5	0	1	5
Lincoln	Nebraska	321	76	5	24.3%	70,148	8.7	22	8	32	0	1	21
Irvine	California	222	44	6	25.9%	69,416	9.0	9	2	13	0	0	7
West Valley City	Utah	153	22	4	52.2%	69,320	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oceanside	California	171	34	4	34.4%	68,963	7.5	4	3	8	0	0	8
Roanoke	Virginia	299	66	2	40.1%	68,026	7.1	10	5	18	0	1	16
Missoula	Montana	197	39	2	69.5%	67,596	4.4	5	4	6	0	1	6
Tempe	Arizona	170	32	5	35.4%	67,278	9.0	4	3	7	0	0	3
Pittsburg	California	97	21	4	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	222	40	4	57.8%	67,120	5.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
Austin	Texas	322	73	11	6.2%	67,101	14.2	44	8	80	0	0	3
Elizabeth	New Jersey	168	35	2	66.3%	66,659	4.0	3	2	5	0	3	5
Erie	Pennsylvania	249	62	4	36.3%	66,592	7.5	13	7	23	0	1	20
Salinas	California	216	39	3	35.0%	65,824	7.6	5	4	8	0	0	8
Murrieta	California	134	26	4	49.7%	65,721	6.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Everett	Washington	199	43	4	39.0%	65,073	7.6	5	3	6	0	0	5
Santa Clara	California	186	31	3	50.9%	63,890	6.5	4	4	6	0	0	6
Clarksville	Tennessee	155	27	3	36.4%	63,871	8.0	3	3	4	0	0	3
Spring	Texas	257	44	9	16.7%	63,545	10.1	8	4	10	0	0	6
Birmingham	Alabama	333	67	7	12.7%	63,398	12.3	30	7	51	0	0	16
Columbia	South Carolina	284	64	7	18.5%	63,309	10.9	14	6	27	0	0	15
Fontana	California	151	26	5	26.9%	63,186	8.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Colorado Springs	Colorado	334	71	9	10.7%	62,713	11.3	30	6	45	0	0	13
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	112	21	3	64.4%	62,701	4.5	2	3	4	0	0	4
Greeley	Colorado	126	20	3	54.9%	62,618	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chandler	Arizona	197	38	7	23.2%	62,357	9.2	6	4	11	0	0	8
Bloomington	Indiana	213	45	5	46.7%	62,323	6.7	6	3	8	0	0	8
New Braunfels	Texas	146	27	3	60.2%	61,913	7.0	2	3	3	0	1	1
Rancho Cucamonga	California	187	32	4	35.0%	61,874	7.3	4	4	7	0	1	7
Trenton	New Jersey	242	62	5	29.7%	61,851	8.5	11	6	19	0	0	15
Round Rock	Texas	169	28	4	36.4%	60,968	7.3	3	3	5	0	0	4
Surprise	Arizona	160	27	6	44.9%	60,841	6.8	4	3	8	0	0	8
Jamaica	New York	190	37	5	24.9%	60,717	9.2	6	5	10	0	0	5
Norfolk	Virginia	297	62	6	24.7%	60,589	8.9	14	5	23	0	0	15
Baytown	Texas	175	35	2	51.0%	60,118	5.7	3	3	5	0	0	5
Allen	Texas	127	31	4	53.7%	59,704	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Nashville	Tennessee	311	62	7	12.8%	58,814	11.1	22	7	37	0	1	12
Evansville	Indiana	225	49	7	31.8%	58,694	7.7	9	2	18	0	0	18
Rapid City	South Dakota	154	36	3	60.6%	58,602	4.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Palmdale	California	134	28	7	33.5%	58,600	7.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Elk Grove	California	182	29	4	32.7%	58,579	7.7	3	5	5	0	0	5
Mcallen	Texas	168	30	7	41.3%	58,521	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bellevue	Washington	196	35	6	39.7%	58,122	8.6	5	3	8	0	0	6
West Jordan	Utah	169	38	6	47.0%	58,042	6.3	3	3	4	0	0	4
Corpus Christi	Texas	271	56	7	17.8%	57,897	9.8	18	6	26	0	0	15
Midlothian	Virginia	135	35	3	59.7%	57,769	6.3	3	3	5	0	1	4
San Leandro	California	168	29	3	51.6%	57,397	5.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
San Mateo	California	188	33	5	40.2%	57,255	7.0	4	4	6	0	0	6
Joliet	Illinois	213	45	4	44.4%	57,161	7.6	5	3	8	0	1	8
Ann Arbor	Michigan	195	39	8	34.3%	57,157	7.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Simi Valley	California	127	29	3	44.4%	57,150	6.5	2	3	4	0	0	4
Fargo	North Dakota	179	32	2	46.6%	57,124	9.0	4	5	6	0	0	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	205	44	1	55.8%	57,121	6.5	4	6	7	0	1	7
Meridian	Idaho	140	25	3	54.3%	56,614	5.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
Ventura	California	162	33	3	48.8%	56,607	6.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Whittier	California	192	41	4	28.6%	56,077	8.5	6	5	10	0	0	9
Henderson	Nevada	235	44	7	18.5%	56,011	9.5	8	3	11	0	0	8
Billings	Montana	147	39	3	40.0%	54,866	6.5	4	3	6	0	0	6
Chico	California	148	33	3	48.9%	54,768	6.7	3	2	6	0	1	4
Rockville	Maryland	178	40	3	37.8%	54,765	7.8	4	3	4	0	0	3
Corona	California	177	38	6	21.2%	54,589	8.8	5	3	7	0	0	5
Lansing	Michigan	229	50	6	33.1%	54,392	8.4	7	4	9	0	0	7
Bothell	Washington	163	34	5	42.4%	54,331	6.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Conroe	Texas	226	48	4	32.6%	52,217	8.4	7	3	12	0	0	8
Youngstown	Ohio	250	51	4	33.2%	52,161	7.7	12	4	24	0	0	20
Atlanta	Georgia	387	86	15	5.3%	52,094	15.3	39	9	68	0	0	1
Sparks	Nevada	168	27	5	43.6%	52,056	6.8	4	4	7	0	1	5
Ogden	Utah	201	39	4	25.8%	52,031	9.0	5	2	9	0	0	7
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	221	39	3	37.3%	51,992	7.0	6	3	8	0	0	7
Sunnyvale	California	188	39	5	34.0%	51,916	8.0	4	4	6	0	0	3
Greenville	South Carolina	215	40	5	23.6%	51,859	9.9	9	5	17	0	0	8
Arvada	Colorado	201	45	5	38.6%	51,553	7.0	5	4	9	0	0	7
Fredericksburg	Virginia	224	49	6	29.6%	51,539	7.6	5	5	9	0	0	7
Appleton	Wisconsin	185	38	6	42.3%	51,538	7.0	4	4	5	0	0	5
Ashburn	Virginia	131	42	6	45.7%	51,343	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	176	35	6	29.8%	51,235	8.0	4	4	7	0	0	5
Santa Maria	California	161	25	3	35.8%	51,221	7.7	3	3	4	0	1	3
Bell Gardens	California	98	21	5	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Compton	California	164	23	4	36.6%	50,789	7.7	3	3	5	0	0	5
Gilbert	Arizona	183	34	9	21.3%	50,747	8.8	6	4	10	0	0	8
Perris	California	145	24	6	43.1%	50,642	7.0	2	3	3	0	1	1
Fullerton	California	199	35	4	36.1%	50,267	7.5	4	4	6	0	1	6
Paterson	New Jersey	233	52	4	34.4%	50,188	7.6	9	5	17	0	0	17
Orem	Utah	152	34	6	50.0%	50,159	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Fayetteville	North Carolina	248	52	5	20.4%	49,872	9.0	8	5	12	0	0	10
Boston	Massachusetts	276	51	6	32.8%	49,839	7.8	14	5	21	0	0	18
Palo Alto	California	172	40	5	51.3%	49,609	6.5	4	3	7	0	0	7
Schenectady	New York	232	44	6	30.3%	49,128	8.3	8	3	12	0	0	10
Racine	Wisconsin	232	50	4	38.9%	49,076	7.0	5	6	9	0	0	9
Orange	California	151	31	4	33.6%	48,726	7.4	5	3	7	0	0	7
Victorville	California	150	30	5	35.7%	48,704	7.3	3	3	5	0	0	5
Mission Viejo	California	141	29	3	49.3%	48,538	6.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Anaheim	California	192	30	12	13.0%	47,842	9.7	7	3	12	0	0	6
Silver Spring	Maryland	223	49	12	15.5%	47,088	9.7	7	6	10	0	0	6
Ontario	California	164	26	4	26.6%	46,925	8.3	3	4	6	0	0	6
Garden Grove	California	194	36	5	26.5%	46,646	8.0	5	4	8	0	0	6
Berkeley	California	236	52	5	36.4%	46,228	8.1	9	3	13	0	0	10
Vallejo	California	185	31	6	37.0%	46,030	6.3	4	3	6	0	1	6
Redwood City	California	183	38	5	40.2%	45,966	7.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
San Angelo	Texas	181	43	4	41.4%	45,859	6.8	4	3	6	0	0	6
Fairfax	Virginia	186	44	7	27.9%	45,645	8.3	4	4	8	0	0	7
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	164	32	3	46.3%	45,378	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	274	60	4	21.6%	44,943	11.3	15	6	22	0	0	9
Bridgeport	Connecticut	211	45	6	30.5%	44,646	8.7	6	4	9	0	0	5
Baltimore	Maryland	285	76	16	7.0%	44,103	14.3	22	6	38	0	0	2
Spartanburg	South Carolina	183	34	3	39.2%	43,934	9.0	5	6	10	0	2	5
Newark	New Jersey	232	47	7	15.6%	43,884	9.9	9	4	15	0	0	8
Wilmington	Delaware	238	61	9	19.8%	43,513	9.8	10	4	16	0	0	8
Parker	Colorado	127	26	4	43.4%	43,473	6.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
New Orleans	Louisiana	288	67	5	10.1%	43,371	11.4	19	5	27	0	0	9
Cary	North Carolina	152	26	5	27.8%	43,246	8.8	4	3	7	0	0	4
Muskegon	Michigan	192	39	7	33.4%	43,200	8.0	5	3	6	0	0	4
Flushing	New York	178	36	7	20.0%	43,105	9.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	California	142	25	8	37.8%	42,981	7.5	2	3	3	0	0	2
Pomona	California	154	28	6	27.2%	42,962	10.3	3	2	5	0	0	3
Saint Charles	Missouri	175	33	6	30.7%	42,897	8.0	3	3	4	0	0	4
Toms River	New Jersey	154	30	5	34.9%	42,841	7.3	3	4	6	0	0	6
Arlington	Texas	286	58	13	10.7%	42,298	11.6	12	5	19	0	0	6
Topeka	Kansas	298	54	7	25.8%	42,151	9.2	18	9	29	0	0	18
South Bend	Indiana	261	58	6	28.6%	41,926	8.2	10	2	10	0	0	10
Fairfield	California	129	29	6	36.6%	41,787	7.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Amarillo	Texas	290	65	6	18.2%	41,663	9.6	14	4	23	0	1	13
Longmont	Colorado	145	22	7	31.8%	41,644	8.0	3	4	5	0	0	4
Independence	Missouri	231	36	6	33.5%	41,542	7.9	8	2	11	0	0	10
Beaumont	Texas	256	50	7	28.3%	41,198	8.4	8	4	14	0	0	14
Daly City	California	151	29	5	35.7%	40,809	7.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
Stamford	Connecticut	209	41	9	31.7%	40,774	7.2	6	5	10	0	0	10
Newport News	Virginia	219	43	10	23.1%	40,728	8.4	7	2	8	0	0	8
Pueblo	Colorado	231	56	4	25.7%	40,642	8.7	7	6	12	0	0	10
Menifee	California	192	33	7	36.8%	40,632	7.5	4	3	7	0	0	6
Odessa	Texas	218	43	7	25.3%	40,425	9.3	6	2	12	0	0	7
Belleville	Illinois	169	41	5	43.3%	40,384	7.0	4	3	7	0	1	5
Brownsville	Texas	170	37	9	20.0%	40,264	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Westerville	Ohio	140	27	3	42.0%	39,970	8.0	2	3	3	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	143	23	4	39.8%	39,951	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Provo	Utah	168	38	9	34.0%	39,675	7.3	3	4	5	0	0	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	188	41	6	29.8%	39,531	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Florissant	Missouri	169	38	8	36.4%	39,459	7.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Roseville	California	157	34	5	28.2%	39,359	9.0	3	3	4	0	0	3
Little Rock	Arkansas	245	46	6	17.9%	39,056	10.2	12	2	21	0	0	12
New Haven	Connecticut	178	35	5	29.9%	38,988	7.0	5	4	7	0	0	7
Hyattsville	Maryland	188	44	6	24.7%	38,979	8.6	5	3	7	0	0	5
South Gate	California	98	17	3	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Jackson	Mississippi	217	42	4	22.3%	37,939	8.7	11	3	18	0	0	10
Napa	California	132	22	7	38.5%	37,256	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Overland Park	Kansas	259	50	6	20.3%	37,182	9.4	9	3	15	0	0	12
Mesquite	Texas	151	27	8	25.4%	37,180	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	5
Augusta	Georgia	214	41	7	18.2%	37,105	11.9	8	5	10	0	0	5
Broomfield	Colorado	163	29	6	35.4%	37,055	8.0	3	3	5	0	0	4
College Station	Texas	146	27	6	30.0%	36,936	8.5	2	3	4	0	0	2
Hampton	Virginia	223	44	10	27.0%	36,801	7.8	6	4	8	0	0	6
Winston Salem	North Carolina	248	54	11	13.9%	36,678	10.0	9	6	17	0	0	9
Chino	California	125	24	6	38.8%	36,622	8.5	2	2	4	0	0	3
Anderson	South Carolina	163	36	5	37.1%	36,527	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	298	88	31	2.3%	36,481	18.0	47	7	62	0	0	1
Anchorage	Alaska	259	57	6	14.9%	36,472	12.1	12	7	21	0	0	4
Chula Vista	California	194	39	8	14.0%	36,467	9.6	5	3	10	0	0	6
Hamilton	Ohio	158	24	6	26.6%	36,454	8.3	3	3	4	0	0	3
Visalia	California	171	31	8	23.9%	36,407	8.7	3	2	5	0	0	4
Cambridge	Massachusetts	220	39	5	31.4%	36,328	7.0	5	4	10	0	1	10
Grand Junction	Colorado	187	36	4	34.2%	36,058	7.3	6	4	8	0	0	7
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	277	62	12	9.5%	36,038	12.3	18	6	29	0	0	7
Garland	Texas	188	37	12	15.1%	35,931	10.4	5	2	10	0	0	4
Lewisville	Texas	162	26	8	30.0%	35,606	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Bellingham	Washington	167	33	7	28.1%	35,509	8.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	238	49	11	15.2%	35,438	9.1	7	4	10	0	0	6
Abilene	Texas	201	39	6	27.1%	35,293	9.0	6	5	9	0	0	7
Woodbridge	Virginia	157	33	8	16.7%	35,267	9.3	3	2	4	0	0	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	167	38	5	18.1%	35,198	9.4	5	3	8	0	0	7
West Covina	California	159	32	6	32.1%	35,174	7.7	3	3	5	0	0	5
Portsmouth	Virginia	208	51	4	36.4%	34,691	7.4	7	5	9	0	0	9
Warren	Michigan	188	48	7	25.5%	34,504	8.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
El Monte	California	134	27	5	36.8%	34,471	7.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
Duluth	Minnesota	264	58	9	29.2%	34,230	8.1	11	5	13	0	0	11
Scottsdale	Arizona	283	60	13	11.4%	34,103	11.5	11	8	17	0	0	4
Puyallup	Washington	207	42	4	23.9%	34,090	10.0	5	4	8	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	159	36	7	34.5%	34,019	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Temecula	California	164	30	7	26.2%	33,986	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	4
Worcester	Massachusetts	239	57	9	18.2%	33,697	9.2	9	2	10	0	0	9
Concord	California	172	30	9	25.5%	33,262	8.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Bend	Oregon	161	34	9	27.1%	33,186	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Grand Prairie	Texas	186	38	11	17.4%	33,132	9.8	4	4	6	0	0	5
Cypress	Texas	131	32	6	19.4%	33,084	10.0	2	3	4	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	153	32	5	33.6%	32,084	7.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	152	22	6	30.0%	31,843	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Norwalk	California	98	19	5	30.0%	31,766	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Tyler	Texas	256	47	8	20.2%	31,465	9.1	9	7	17	0	0	11
Kenosha	Wisconsin	197	54	8	27.8%	31,342	8.3	4	2	6	0	0	6
Morgantown	West Virginia	154	32	7	32.8%	31,274	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Antioch	California	128	17	8	28.1%	31,152	8.5	2	4	4	0	0	3
Hartford	Connecticut	208	52	10	25.1%	30,960	9.3	6	2	6	0	0	5
Sandy	Utah	176	27	6	27.4%	30,284	9.3	4	2	6	0	0	4
Summerville	South Carolina	140	22	11	21.7%	30,175	9.0	2	3	4	0	0	2
Des Moines	Iowa	236	50	9	13.4%	30,035	9.9	11	4	19	0	0	10
Johnson City	Tennessee	180	48	9	31.3%	29,824	7.3	4	3	5	0	0	4
Falls Church	Virginia	207	44	7	24.7%	29,686	9.0	5	3	9	0	0	7
Charleston	South Carolina	243	49	6	15.0%	29,578	11.0	10	3	18	0	0	8
Killeen	Texas	187	32	4	19.6%	29,431	10.0	4	3	6	0	0	3
Yuma	Arizona	156	27	7	19.9%	29,411	9.7	3	4	6	0	0	3
Springfield	Missouri	227	41	11	12.6%	29,062	11.4	7	4	13	0	0	6
Sylmar	California	99	21	6	30.0%	28,946	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
La Puente	California	146	26	6	24.5%	28,936	9.5	2	4	4	0	0	2
Naperville	Illinois	181	47	11	17.4%	28,910	9.3	4	2	6	0	0	5
Elkhart	Indiana	157	30	7	29.1%	28,897	8.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Wichita	Kansas	297	66	10	6.9%	28,698	13.3	26	11	48	0	0	4
O Fallon	Missouri	151	30	10	29.7%	28,660	8.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Dearborn	Michigan	186	39	9	29.9%	28,416	7.5	4	3	5	0	0	5
Irving	Texas	222	44	12	11.8%	28,397	11.8	6	2	11	0	0	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	205	41	8	21.7%	28,315	9.8	5	3	7	0	0	4
Ypsilanti	Michigan	142	31	6	26.4%	28,190	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bowie	Maryland	196	44	4	27.5%	28,090	9.3	4	3	5	0	0	3
Edison	New Jersey	167	33	8	27.9%	28,089	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Nampa	Idaho	164	36	10	24.1%	27,944	8.7	3	3	4	0	0	4
Glendale	Arizona	234	38	11	9.2%	27,891	10.8	9	3	15	0	0	4
Rialto	California	143	21	6	26.1%	27,868	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Franklin	Tennessee	153	32	6	26.0%	27,692	9.0	3	2	6	0	0	4
Kennewick	Washington	151	27	7	27.9%	27,552	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Huntsville	Alabama	252	54	6	14.0%	27,415	10.0	11	3	19	0	0	12
Santa Cruz	California	179	32	6	26.3%	27,325	8.0	4	4	6	0	0	5
Vacaville	California	147	26	8	25.7%	27,101	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Greensboro	North Carolina	225	47	12	8.3%	27,059	13.1	9	4	16	0	0	2
Redding	California	193	30	7	23.9%	27,031	7.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Torrance	California	201	34	9	15.1%	26,741	10.0	5	4	7	0	0	3
Muncie	Indiana	209	48	8	28.7%	26,597	8.4	5	3	7	0	0	7
Waukesha	Wisconsin	167	36	5	27.5%	26,319	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Saginaw	Michigan	225	55	8	20.0%	26,061	9.0	7	2	8	0	0	8
Yakima	Washington	168	39	10	20.0%	25,971	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elgin	Illinois	141	30	8	21.3%	25,970	9.0	3	3	5	0	0	3
Keller	Texas	130	27	10	22.2%	25,839	9.0	2	4	4	0	0	2
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	151	38	9	19.4%	25,256	9.7	3	4	6	0	0	3
Davenport	Iowa	188	36	5	24.0%	25,219	10.7	6	4	10	0	0	4
Vista	California	163	25	7	21.0%	25,211	9.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Albany	New York	249	50	7	16.6%	25,129	10.6	11	4	16	0	0	8
El Cajon	California	171	35	10	14.2%	24,508	10.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Auburn	Washington	165	29	8	21.7%	24,445	9.0	3	3	4	0	0	3
Katy	Texas	177	29	12	7.1%	24,320	13.5	4	3	5	0	0	0
Inglewood	California	208	39	8	18.2%	24,287	9.0	5	4	7	0	0	5
Canton	Ohio	229	44	5	16.3%	23,987	9.7	12	4	22	0	0	15
Englewood	Colorado	193	34	6	21.2%	23,688	10.8	4	5	8	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	179	42	8	24.9%	23,628	8.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Terre Haute	Indiana	209	54	8	24.9%	23,620	8.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Durham	North Carolina	215	40	11	8.1%	23,387	12.0	8	4	14	0	0	0
Mobile	Alabama	290	67	7	8.6%	23,240	12.6	18	8	34	0	0	3
Lees Summit	Missouri	220	49	9	22.6%	23,045	9.5	6	4	8	0	0	4
Herndon	Virginia	136	30	9	24.6%	23,003	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waco	Texas	223	39	9	14.0%	22,129	12.0	9	3	13	0	0	5
Lubbock	Texas	280	57	12	7.9%	21,923	12.7	14	6	23	0	0	2
Reading	Pennsylvania	228	58	9	10.2%	21,903	12.9	10	3	17	0	0	1
Savannah	Georgia	261	63	13	9.0%	21,650	13.0	10	6	18	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	97	21	7	20.0%	21,160	9.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Pearland	Texas	134	27	12	15.3%	21,070	11.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Merced	California	169	34	7	20.2%	20,792	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	162	28	6	21.8%	20,686	9.3	3	3	5	0	0	3
Madera	California	138	26	8	20.0%	20,593	9.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Fremont	California	177	34	14	8.7%	20,312	11.3	4	3	6	0	0	1
Renton	Washington	207	35	12	13.0%	20,166	10.4	5	3	9	0	0	5
Lakewood	New Jersey	101	18	8	20.0%	20,153	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Clinton Township	Michigan	163	35	11	20.0%	20,059	9.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	205	34	14	16.3%	19,996	9.6	5	4	9	0	0	5
Waukegan	Illinois	127	17	7	20.0%	19,506	9.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	185	38	12	17.9%	19,489	9.3	4	3	5	0	0	4
Carlsbad	California	189	41	6	17.1%	19,405	9.5	4	3	5	0	0	3
Elmhurst	New York	98	24	7	20.0%	18,793	9.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	130	33	7	20.0%	18,775	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Burbank	California	203	40	8	17.4%	18,749	9.2	5	3	7	0	0	5
Pasadena	California	193	35	9	11.8%	18,673	10.2	6	2	11	0	0	5
Covington	Georgia	136	24	12	19.6%	18,195	11.5	2	3	3	0	0	1
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	192	34	11	12.5%	18,144	11.6	5	4	9	0	0	4
Rock Hill	South Carolina	151	24	8	15.4%	17,971	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Allentown	Pennsylvania	187	51	12	10.6%	17,962	12.3	7	3	10	0	0	1
York	Pennsylvania	211	56	8	9.9%	17,874	12.9	7	7	12	0	0	2
Carrollton	Texas	160	23	12	13.2%	17,860	10.7	3	2	4	0	0	2
Macon	Georgia	263	55	11	10.9%	17,810	11.7	9	4	15	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	203	45	12	16.1%	17,448	9.5	6	2	11	0	0	9
Richardson	Texas	162	31	13	15.2%	17,416	10.7	3	3	4	0	0	3
Boulder	Colorado	195	32	7	13.1%	17,144	10.8	6	7	10	0	0	4
Humble	Texas	161	25	8	10.3%	17,137	11.7	3	4	6	0	0	2
Miami	Florida	356	91	30	0.9%	17,086	26.7	54	4	55	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	160	32	10	17.3%	16,953	10.3	3	3	4	0	0	3
Laurel	Maryland	180	42	10	15.0%	16,861	9.8	4	3	6	0	0	4
Annapolis	Maryland	198	42	11	17.6%	16,774	10.6	5	2	9	0	0	4
Astoria	New York	187	31	8	11.6%	16,615	10.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Frederick	Maryland	150	39	10	12.4%	16,406	10.0	4	3	6	0	0	4
Livonia	Michigan	158	32	9	17.3%	16,334	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	165	31	12	17.3%	16,331	9.3	3	3	4	0	0	3
Metairie	Louisiana	184	37	7	11.3%	16,083	10.6	5	3	7	0	0	2
Gulfport	Mississippi	150	29	9	16.9%	16,018	10.3	3	3	6	0	0	2
Kent	Washington	178	31	13	9.8%	15,672	10.3	4	4	8	0	0	3
Santa Monica	California	196	38	8	16.6%	15,657	10.0	5	3	6	0	0	4
Van Nuys	California	168	30	11	8.8%	15,566	11.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Clovis	California	155	21	10	12.6%	15,309	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	169	44	11	11.9%	14,936	13.3	4	3	7	0	0	2
Santa Fe	New Mexico	172	42	10	11.6%	14,861	10.4	5	2	10	0	0	2
Downey	California	144	36	10	13.2%	14,853	10.3	3	2	6	0	0	3
Athens	Georgia	221	42	10	11.9%	14,848	12.0	6	6	12	0	0	1
Lithonia	Georgia	123	25	11	15.2%	14,660	10.5	2	3	4	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	169	34	13	13.3%	14,467	10.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Montgomery	Alabama	240	44	8	6.9%	14,434	13.8	13	4	24	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	184	38	10	12.7%	14,090	9.8	4	2	8	0	0	5
Asheville	North Carolina	176	39	7	10.5%	13,912	10.4	5	2	10	0	0	4
Marietta	Georgia	206	38	13	4.2%	13,590	16.0	7	5	13	0	0	0
Shreveport	Louisiana	247	54	15	6.0%	13,435	14.5	12	4	23	0	0	0
Livermore	California	137	30	11	13.7%	13,191	10.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Frisco	Texas	147	24	12	7.6%	13,139	12.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Medford	Oregon	120	14	10	13.9%	12,933	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Lawrenceville	Georgia	163	28	13	5.0%	12,856	15.3	4	4	8	0	0	0
Midland	Texas	186	36	13	7.9%	12,716	12.2	5	2	9	0	0	1
Lafayette	Louisiana	180	35	9	7.7%	12,301	12.2	5	3	8	0	0	0
Alpharetta	Georgia	186	37	17	6.4%	12,085	13.8	4	3	7	0	0	0
Lynn	Massachusetts	169	40	9	12.9%	12,076	9.5	4	2	6	0	0	5
Indio	California	143	28	10	12.5%	12,030	10.0	2	4	4	0	0	2
High Point	North Carolina	187	32	12	9.8%	11,987	10.3	4	4	6	0	0	3
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	213	60	10	7.0%	11,932	12.8	9	4	14	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	191	42	13	12.1%	11,605	11.2	5	2	10	0	0	4
Longview	Texas	209	43	7	10.9%	11,505	11.8	5	3	9	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	223	50	12	11.4%	11,324	10.8	8	5	13	0	0	5
Quincy	Massachusetts	154	41	13	11.9%	11,229	9.7	3	2	5	0	0	3
North Hollywood	California	161	25	11	7.3%	11,167	12.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Gaithersburg	Maryland	183	42	13	7.1%	10,325	12.0	5	3	8	0	0	2
Federal Way	Washington	142	33	12	10.0%	10,014	10.0	2	3	3	0	0	2
Orlando	Florida	297	65	20	1.0%	9,866	23.2	32	7	35	0	0	0
Denton	Texas	191	36	12	6.2%	9,860	13.3	6	3	9	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	100	17	8	9.0%	9,605	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	139	24	13	8.6%	9,251	11.3	3	2	6	0	0	1
Decatur	Georgia	192	41	14	4.9%	8,780	16.0	5	3	9	0	0	0
Olathe	Kansas	140	25	12	5.9%	8,522	14.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	121	24	7	8.4%	8,364	11.5	2	3	3	0	0	0
Jacksonville	Florida	309	78	20	1.0%	8,313	23.1	31	6	36	0	0	0
Cumming	Georgia	161	34	12	5.1%	8,267	15.3	3	3	6	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	137	48	11	7.6%	8,216	12.0	3	3	4	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	136	27	12	7.9%	8,176	12.0	2	3	3	0	0	0
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	297	86	28	1.0%	8,055	27.6	26	3	30	0	0	0
Stone Mountain	Georgia	164	30	15	6.3%	8,049	13.0	3	4	4	0	0	0
Hawthorne	California	99	21	12	8.0%	7,747	12.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Springdale	Arkansas	106	23	10	7.8%	7,548	12.0	2	3	4	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	187	33	8	7.4%	7,446	12.4	5	5	9	0	0	0
Woodstock	Georgia	106	24	12	7.0%	7,120	13.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Tampa	Florida	267	64	25	0.9%	6,961	29.6	26	5	28	0	0	0
Newnan	Georgia	138	21	11	7.4%	6,885	12.5	2	4	4	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	191	38	12	7.1%	6,702	14.4	5	4	8	0	0	0
Acworth	Georgia	139	25	16	5.9%	5,893	14.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Sarasota	Florida	243	51	16	2.3%	5,650	18.5	13	5	22	0	0	0
West Palm Beach	Florida	267	61	20	1.3%	4,980	21.0	12	6	14	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	128	28	15	4.2%	4,630	16.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	159	28	11	3.6%	4,473	16.0	4	3	8	0	0	0
Hollywood	Florida	203	62	25	0.9%	4,146	30.2	9	2	12	0	0	0
Pompano Beach	Florida	238	70	25	1.0%	3,530	23.9	10	5	14	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	112	16	15	3.5%	3,500	16.5	2	4	4	0	0	0
Saint Petersburg	Florida	276	62	20	1.0%	3,449	22.4	16	6	21	0	0	0
Hialeah	Florida	181	53	25	0.9%	3,311	28.4	7	4	8	0	0	0
Bradenton	Florida	247	58	18	1.3%	3,197	20.2	10	6	11	0	0	0
Naples	Florida	258	65	20	1.0%	3,163	21.9	14	5	17	0	0	0
Lakeland	Florida	221	46	21	1.1%	2,916	21.1	9	6	10	0	0	0
Kissimmee	Florida	230	54	23	1.0%	2,828	21.3	7	6	9	0	0	0
Pensacola	Florida	236	57	21	1.0%	2,770	21.0	13	7	15	0	0	0
Tallahassee	Florida	226	53	21	0.9%	2,736	24.0	10	7	13	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	145	25	19	2.6%	2,656	19.0	2	3	4	0	0	0
New Port Richey	Florida	184	36	17	1.9%	2,290	18.5	4	4	5	0	0	0
Ocala	Florida	223	50	21	1.0%	2,183	22.1	11	4	17	0	0	0
Boca Raton	Florida	215	59	20	1.0%	2,149	22.4	9	3	9	0	0	0
Fort Myers	Florida	195	44	20	0.8%	2,057	30.1	10	4	11	0	0	0
Lake Worth	Florida	213	51	21	1.0%	2,016	22.0	5	4	5	0	0	0
Gainesville	Florida	207	50	18	1.0%	2,007	23.1	10	6	12	0	0	0
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	180	39	19	1.0%	1,945	23.2	6	4	6	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	126	17	16	1.9%	1,900	20.5	2	3	3	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	103	23	17	2.0%	1,878	18.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Panama City	Florida	179	42	18	1.5%	1,843	19.8	6	4	9	0	0	0
Homestead	Florida	169	46	20	1.0%	1,830	21.9	7	3	7	0	0	0
Cape Coral	Florida	208	46	18	1.0%	1,756	22.0	6	5	9	0	0	0
Clearwater	Florida	219	60	20	0.9%	1,724	24.9	9	5	11	0	0	0
Boynton Beach	Florida	191	54	20	1.0%	1,686	22.3	6	2	6	0	0	0
Melbourne	Florida	170	41	21	1.0%	1,484	23.2	5	4	9	0	0	0
Saint Augustine	Florida	189	41	21	1.0%	1,263	23.0	5	5	7	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	152	34	21	1.3%	1,213	20.7	3	3	4	0	0	0
Daytona Beach	Florida	190	40	19	1.2%	1,211	23.2	5	3	5	0	0	0
Delray Beach	Florida	169	39	19	1.0%	1,159	21.8	5	4	6	0	0	0
Lehigh Acres	Florida	180	47	21	1.0%	1,125	22.3	6	3	10	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	197	49	19	1.0%	1,102	23.3	6	5	8	0	0	0
Palm Bay	Florida	176	41	17	1.0%	1,072	22.5	4	4	5	0	0	0
Miami Beach	Florida	172	53	22	0.9%	1,065	26.0	5	3	7	0	0	0
Riverview	Florida	144	36	20	0.9%	1,044	24.3	3	4	4	0	0	0
Winter Haven	Florida	156	33	19	1.0%	1,034	22.3	3	3	3	0	0	0
Largo	Florida	167	39	24	0.9%	1,000	26.4	5	4	7	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	156	33	20	1.0%	995	20.3	3	2	5	0	0	0
Jupiter	Florida	159	41	17	1.0%	947	22.8	4	3	4	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	125	32	19	1.0%	947	22.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	213	48	20	1.0%	927	22.0	8	2	10	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	151	32	25	0.7%	924	40.2	4	3	6	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	404	92	7	16.7%	409,629	10.1	62	8	86	0	49
San Jose	333	74	4	25.2%	264,333	9.2	28	6	45	0	26
San Diego	336	71	8	16.6%	223,259	10.3	36	8	45	0	24
Sacramento	348	73	4	23.1%	185,678	8.9	28	5	49	1	37
San Francisco	337	72	7	19.0%	164,908	9.5	28	5	44	0	27
Fresno	341	78	5	26.5%	159,554	9.3	18	4	33	0	24
Bakersfield	246	47	6	24.4%	136,262	8.8	11	4	17	0	11
Long Beach	281	65	8	28.1%	134,426	9.0	12	4	15	0	11
Stockton	284	55	5	35.5%	132,674	7.6	12	5	23	1	23
Lancaster	154	34	2	69.7%	128,514	4.3	3	3	5	1	5
San Bernardino	241	43	3	42.4%	105,824	6.9	7	5	10	0	8
Huntington Beach	195	36	2	50.5%	100,854	6.0	4	3	5	0	5
Oakland	240	54	7	23.9%	98,352	9.1	14	4	19	0	11
Escondido	191	40	2	53.1%	95,363	6.3	4	5	6	1	6
Riverside	244	47	6	25.2%	93,139	8.7	7	8	12	0	7
Hayward	183	34	3	47.4%	90,940	5.3	4	2	8	1	8
Oxnard	193	33	5	40.3%	88,786	7.0	4	2	7	0	7
Moreno Valley	166	37	4	42.1%	86,577	6.8	4	1	4	0	4
Santa Rosa	201	39	6	35.8%	77,405	7.5	6	5	9	0	8
Santa Barbara	212	45	2	56.0%	76,135	5.6	7	5	11	0	11
Santa Ana	197	38	6	21.2%	75,646	8.7	6	4	10	0	8
Hesperia	126	24	2	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	3	3	0	3
Modesto	241	51	6	27.3%	72,171	8.3	7	2	12	0	9
Tracy	140	31	4	61.2%	71,684	5.5	4	3	7	1	6
Hemet	162	28	2	55.2%	71,084	5.7	3	3	5	1	5
Irvine	222	44	6	25.9%	69,416	9.0	9	2	13	0	7
Oceanside	171	34	4	34.4%	68,963	7.5	4	3	8	0	8
Pittsburg	97	21	4	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	2
Salinas	216	39	3	35.0%	65,824	7.6	5	4	8	0	8
Murrieta	134	26	4	49.7%	65,721	6.0	2	3	3	0	3
Santa Clara	186	31	3	50.9%	63,890	6.5	4	4	6	0	6
Fontana	151	26	5	26.9%	63,186	8.7	3	2	4	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	187	32	4	35.0%	61,874	7.3	4	4	7	1	7
Palmdale	134	28	7	33.5%	58,600	7.3	4	2	8	0	8
Elk Grove	182	29	4	32.7%	58,579	7.7	3	5	5	0	5
San Leandro	168	29	3	51.6%	57,397	5.3	3	2	3	1	3
San Mateo	188	33	5	40.2%	57,255	7.0	4	4	6	0	6
Simi Valley	127	29	3	44.4%	57,150	6.5	2	3	4	0	4
Ventura	162	33	3	48.8%	56,607	6.0	3	2	5	1	5
Whittier	192	41	4	28.6%	56,077	8.5	6	5	10	0	9
Chico	148	33	3	48.9%	54,768	6.7	3	2	6	1	4
Corona	177	38	6	21.2%	54,589	8.8	5	3	7	0	5
Sunnyvale	188	39	5	34.0%	51,916	8.0	4	4	6	0	3
Santa Maria	161	25	3	35.8%	51,221	7.7	3	3	4	1	3
Bell Gardens	98	21	5	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Compton	164	23	4	36.6%	50,789	7.7	3	3	5	0	5
Perris	145	24	6	43.1%	50,642	7.0	2	3	3	1	1
Fullerton	199	35	4	36.1%	50,267	7.5	4	4	6	1	6
Palo Alto	172	40	5	51.3%	49,609	6.5	4	3	7	0	7
Orange	151	31	4	33.6%	48,726	7.4	5	3	7	0	7
Victorville	150	30	5	35.7%	48,704	7.3	3	3	5	0	5
Mission Viejo	141	29	3	49.3%	48,538	6.0	2	3	3	0	3
Anaheim	192	30	12	13.0%	47,842	9.7	7	3	12	0	6
Ontario	164	26	4	26.6%	46,925	8.3	3	4	6	0	6
Garden Grove	194	36	5	26.5%	46,646	8.0	5	4	8	0	6
Berkeley	236	52	5	36.4%	46,228	8.1	9	3	13	0	10
Vallejo	185	31	6	37.0%	46,030	6.3	4	3	6	1	6
Redwood City	183	38	5	40.2%	45,966	7.0	4	4	8	0	8
Costa Mesa	142	25	8	37.8%	42,981	7.5	2	3	3	0	2
Pomona	154	28	6	27.2%	42,962	10.3	3	2	5	0	3
Fairfield	129	29	6	36.6%	41,787	7.5	2	2	4	0	4
Daly City	151	29	5	35.7%	40,809	7.5	2	3	3	0	3
Menifee	192	33	7	36.8%	40,632	7.5	4	3	7	0	6
San Marcos	143	23	4	39.8%	39,951	7.0	2	1	2	0	2
Roseville	157	34	5	28.2%	39,359	9.0	3	3	4	0	3
South Gate	98	17	3	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	1
Napa	132	22	7	38.5%	37,256	6.5	2	2	4	0	4
Chino	125	24	6	38.8%	36,622	8.5	2	2	4	0	3
Chula Vista	194	39	8	14.0%	36,467	9.6	5	3	10	0	6
Visalia	171	31	8	23.9%	36,407	8.7	3	2	5	0	4
West Covina	159	32	6	32.1%	35,174	7.7	3	3	5	0	5
El Monte	134	27	5	36.8%	34,471	7.5	2	3	3	0	3
Temecula	164	30	7	26.2%	33,986	9.0	3	2	5	0	4
Concord	172	30	9	25.5%	33,262	8.0	4	2	6	0	6
Norwalk	98	19	5	30.0%	31,766	8.0	1	2	2	0	2
Antioch	128	17	8	28.1%	31,152	8.5	2	4	4	0	3
Sylmar	99	21	6	30.0%	28,946	8.0	1	1	1	0	1
La Puente	146	26	6	24.5%	28,936	9.5	2	4	4	0	2
Rialto	143	21	6	26.1%	27,868	9.5	2	2	3	0	2
Santa Cruz	179	32	6	26.3%	27,325	8.0	4	4	6	0	5
Vacaville	147	26	8	25.7%	27,101	9.0	2	2	3	0	2
Redding	193	30	7	23.9%	27,031	7.5	4	2	6	0	6
Torrance	201	34	9	15.1%	26,741	10.0	5	4	7	0	3
Vista	163	25	7	21.0%	25,211	9.0	3	2	4	0	4
El Cajon	171	35	10	14.2%	24,508	10.7	3	2	3	0	2
Inglewood	208	39	8	18.2%	24,287	9.0	5	4	7	0	5
Pacoima	97	21	7	20.0%	21,160	9.0	1	2	2	0	2
Merced	169	34	7	20.2%	20,792	9.0	3	2	5	0	4
Madera	138	26	8	20.0%	20,593	9.0	3	3	6	0	6
Fremont	177	34	14	8.7%	20,312	11.3	4	3	6	0	1
Carlsbad	189	41	6	17.1%	19,405	9.5	4	3	5	0	3
Burbank	203	40	8	17.4%	18,749	9.2	5	3	7	0	5
Pasadena	193	35	9	11.8%	18,673	10.2	6	2	11	0	5
Santa Monica	196	38	8	16.6%	15,657	10.0	5	3	6	0	4
Van Nuys	168	30	11	8.8%	15,566	11.0	4	2	4	0	3
Clovis	155	21	10	12.6%	15,309	10.0	3	1	3	0	2
Downey	144	36	10	13.2%	14,853	10.3	3	2	6	0	3
Livermore	137	30	11	13.7%	13,191	10.5	2	2	3	0	2
Indio	143	28	10	12.5%	12,030	10.0	2	4	4	0	2
North Hollywood	161	25	11	7.3%	11,167	12.8	4	1	4	0	0
Hawthorne	99	21	12	8.0%	7,747	12.0	1	2	2	0	0

Oklahoma City

ZIP	oktagagent.com	ok.gov	classentag.com	delcitytagagencyoklahoma.com	mapquest.com	downtownokctagagency.com
73115	2	5	13	1	8	12
73135	2	1	9	4	11	5
73145	1	4	9	3	13	10
73105	1	3	2	10	12	7
73104	5	3	2	9	12	1
73116	2	4	8	11	9	7
73106	2	4	1	10	12	7
73117	2	1	3	10	13	7
73122	2	3	10	13	5	11
73102	2	4	7	8	11	1
73173	1	4	7	14	15	12
73139	2	4	8	12	13	7
73108	1	4	8	10	12	7
73129	1	4	8	9	12	7
73179	3	1	9	13	7	11
73169	2	1	10	12	14	7
73103	5	4	1	10	12	3
73107	3	4	2	9	12	8
73134	2	4	10	13	6	11
73165	2	4	9	5	13	11
73112	1	4	2	11	10	7
73170	2	1	7	10	11	8
73130	2	1	12	3	10	11
73121	2	1	3	9	12	7
73120	1	4	8	12	6	11
73160	1	2	11	10	6
73162	1	2	7	14	6	12
73111	2	1	7	8	12	9
73131	1	4	7	8	13	10
73151	2	1	4	6	10	7
73119	2	1	4	5	9	6
73142	1	4	8	14	6	12
73118	2	4	1	9	12	8
73109	1	6	7	9	12	8
73128	3	4	7	13	9	8
73149	2	4	7	8	13	10
73159	1	6	7	9	12	8
73150	1	3	4	6	11	5
73127	5	1	8	11	2	9
73114	1	4	7	8	13	10
73132	2	1	11	14	7	12
73110	1	4	14	6	12	13
73141	1	3	11	7	14	12

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Oktagagent

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 513 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Oktagagent Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (tag agency near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Oktagagent Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Oktagagent Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Oktagagent Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly