Nationwide Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve nationwide.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Nationwide Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Nationwide Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Nationwide Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Nationwide Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	2	65.8%	212,408,410	4.4	27,379	32,654	516	34,341	628	6,630	34,341
California	870	609	2	65.1%	25,478,275	4.5	1,166	1,740	18	1,774	10	300	1,774
Texas	846	595	2	64.9%	18,091,574	4.5	1,360	1,917	17	1,940	3	304	1,940
Florida	768	578	2	65.0%	13,392,583	4.5	446	975	2	987	4	155	987
New York	791	600	2	66.4%	13,030,880	4.3	1,491	1,756	42	1,889	46	380	1,889
Pennsylvania	757	591	2	68.4%	8,751,025	4.1	1,604	1,781	81	2,050	90	521	2,050
Illinois	670	490	2	64.2%	8,229,212	4.6	1,247	1,382	9	1,395	4	204	1,395
Ohio	670	548	2	68.1%	7,932,184	4.2	976	1,188	54	1,308	61	286	1,308
North Carolina	506	406	2	67.3%	6,831,821	4.1	683	802	59	932	41	233	932
Georgia	409	319	2	64.9%	6,680,513	4.5	574	726	16	754	12	122	754
Michigan	656	528	2	63.5%	6,327,033	4.6	833	976	5	982	2	128	982
New Jersey	436	328	2	64.7%	5,747,631	4.5	537	593	4	598	1	91	598
Virginia	406	322	2	67.9%	5,711,751	4.3	723	891	37	982	17	211	982
Washington	337	274	2	65.3%	4,752,212	4.4	451	587	6	603	11	112	603
Arizona	269	218	2	66.4%	4,612,865	4.2	247	396	8	414	7	100	414
Indiana	472	373	2	66.5%	4,415,663	4.4	659	770	5	785	10	132	785
Tennessee	377	305	2	66.4%	4,409,949	4.2	514	622	21	691	26	158	691
Massachusetts	517	422	2	63.8%	4,360,204	4.6	461	534	2	538	1	78	538
Maryland	338	254	2	69.8%	4,191,286	4.0	392	463	21	549	51	148	549
Missouri	427	337	2	63.4%	3,863,586	4.6	887	1,017	5	1,025	1	128	1,025
Wisconsin	481	384	2	65.6%	3,789,504	4.5	694	769	3	772	2	136	772
Minnesota	530	418	2	66.0%	3,646,138	4.5	777	878	2	888	9	134	888
Colorado	296	242	2	64.7%	3,578,550	4.4	381	514	2	515	2	95	515
South Carolina	278	223	2	67.2%	3,328,831	4.2	347	422	23	466	13	114	466
Alabama	320	261	2	66.5%	3,237,206	4.4	522	637	11	666	15	122	666
Kentucky	354	287	2	68.9%	3,065,912	4.2	698	758	28	870	38	203	870
Louisiana	306	237	2	64.8%	3,020,584	4.5	431	510	2	516	5	77	516
Oregon	271	224	2	63.5%	2,592,156	4.4	355	414	4	420	2	81	420
Oklahoma	322	248	2	65.3%	2,557,426	4.5	557	646	2	648	1	101	648
Connecticut	284	228	2	66.1%	2,367,163	4.5	234	279	8	287	2	45	287
Iowa	486	357	2	65.0%	2,035,752	4.5	890	933	2	936	3	155	936
Arkansas	261	209	2	67.4%	2,016,203	4.3	553	587	11	622	13	126	622
Utah	245	207	2	64.3%	1,956,348	4.4	246	284	2	286	0	54	286
Nevada	176	146	2	66.3%	1,938,451	4.2	92	168	2	169	1	45	169
Mississippi	250	193	2	64.6%	1,929,273	4.5	384	418	5	426	1	63	426
Kansas	341	261	2	62.8%	1,826,104	4.6	616	692	2	695	0	86	695
New Mexico	204	159	2	64.6%	1,350,359	4.4	327	361	1	361	2	64	361
West Virginia	277	224	2	73.3%	1,340,009	3.5	684	704	45	950	78	355	950
Nebraska	308	241	2	65.6%	1,249,221	4.6	524	581	3	585	3	85	585
Idaho	199	170	2	63.5%	1,071,140	4.5	251	273	1	273	1	46	273
Hawaii	152	129	2	70.0%	995,208	4.3	82	93	1	101	2	24	101
New Hampshire	226	197	2	69.0%	927,287	4.2	238	248	7	258	5	62	258
Maine	240	198	2	64.6%	860,402	4.6	421	425	2	426	4	56	426
Montana	229	186	2	68.0%	708,802	4.4	348	361	2	365	2	67	365
Rhode Island	157	139	2	66.6%	703,225	4.5	64	77	4	83	4	10	83
Delaware	159	137	2	69.7%	662,081	3.7	52	66	9	79	8	26	79
South Dakota	217	174	2	63.5%	549,078	4.5	359	370	1	370	0	60	370
Alaska	155	134	2	69.2%	510,317	2.9	218	235	1	235	1	164	235
North Dakota	206	168	2	67.9%	509,947	4.4	367	381	2	382	0	79	382
Vermont	197	170	2	69.9%	436,731	4.2	250	254	7	290	9	72	290
Wyoming	152	130	2	61.1%	355,454	4.6	164	171	1	171	0	22	171

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	173	138	2	64.5%	2,056,533	4.5	96	1	96	0	15	96
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	2	64.0%	1,730,672	4.7	56	1	56	0	5	56
Los Angeles	California	147	126	2	68.5%	1,682,363	4.2	62	1	62	0	17	62
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	2	64.7%	1,681,554	4.4	37	3	39	1	7	39
Miami	Florida	160	123	2	64.8%	1,217,046	4.6	55	1	55	0	7	55
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	2	71.4%	1,124,825	4.1	47	5	53	5	13	53
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	2	62.1%	1,103,349	4.4	59	1	59	0	11	59
New York City	New York	128	111	2	63.2%	1,025,393	4.6	47	1	47	0	6	47
Bronx	New York	118	103	2	69.7%	1,005,062	3.9	25	2	26	1	9	26
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	2	63.6%	983,065	4.7	43	1	43	0	5	43
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	2	62.7%	910,034	4.7	42	1	42	0	4	42
Dallas	Texas	149	126	2	64.2%	893,895	4.4	48	1	48	0	9	48
San Diego	California	134	116	2	65.6%	884,078	4.4	36	1	38	1	7	38
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	2	69.4%	755,937	4.0	51	1	51	1	16	51
Denver	Colorado	136	120	2	69.2%	752,707	4.1	38	1	38	0	12	38
Austin	Texas	138	123	2	61.8%	672,352	4.7	44	2	45	0	4	45
San Jose	California	129	116	2	63.3%	664,517	4.7	28	1	28	0	3	28
Orlando	Florida	133	115	2	65.9%	656,757	4.4	32	1	32	0	6	32
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	2	70.4%	637,021	4.0	32	2	36	0	11	36
Seattle	Washington	142	127	2	66.2%	631,817	4.4	35	1	35	0	7	35
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	2	71.6%	606,401	4.0	30	3	35	1	9	35
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	2	63.1%	601,138	4.8	37	2	38	1	2	38
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	2	60.0%	593,150	5.0	39	1	39	0	0	39
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	2	65.0%	589,010	4.4	24	1	24	0	5	24
San Francisco	California	121	106	2	67.5%	587,088	4.5	28	2	29	0	5	29
Sacramento	California	134	115	2	70.9%	570,904	4.3	28	4	32	1	8	32
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	2	62.1%	566,283	4.7	32	1	32	0	3	32
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	2	61.2%	561,779	4.7	45	1	45	0	5	45
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	2	64.4%	558,213	4.3	31	1	31	0	7	31
Portland	Oregon	130	112	2	60.5%	557,048	4.8	33	1	33	0	2	33
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	2	66.5%	553,253	4.2	27	1	27	0	7	27
El Paso	Texas	122	110	2	69.3%	547,012	4.3	24	2	25	0	6	25
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	2	66.7%	541,649	4.3	29	2	30	1	6	30
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	2	63.8%	510,204	4.5	30	1	30	0	5	30
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	2	67.0%	509,971	4.2	32	2	33	0	9	33
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	2	62.7%	504,164	4.6	45	2	46	0	7	46
Tampa	Florida	131	110	2	63.5%	503,097	4.7	27	1	27	0	3	27
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	2	64.8%	486,544	4.6	29	2	30	0	3	30
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	2	71.2%	486,353	4.4	43	1	43	0	9	43
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	2	70.6%	483,217	3.9	28	3	33	4	10	33
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	2	66.7%	463,670	4.4	26	2	27	0	5	27
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	2	64.7%	441,383	4.5	39	2	40	0	6	40
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	2	66.5%	435,763	4.6	17	1	17	0	2	17
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	2	64.4%	406,017	4.5	22	3	24	2	3	24
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	2	63.2%	404,809	4.5	25	1	25	0	4	25
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	2	66.2%	386,122	4.4	30	1	30	0	6	30
Fresno	California	120	105	2	63.7%	383,591	4.4	18	3	20	0	4	20
Bakersfield	California	112	102	2	67.2%	375,926	4.2	11	1	11	0	3	11
Buffalo	New York	142	124	2	66.6%	374,853	4.2	28	3	31	0	8	31
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	2	67.0%	357,933	4.4	13	2	14	0	3	14
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	2	63.8%	352,583	4.5	31	2	32	0	5	32
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	2	72.9%	348,697	3.7	27	3	29	2	10	29
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	2	60.2%	344,368	4.8	49	1	49	0	4	49
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	2	60.0%	328,003	5.0	15	1	15	0	0	15
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	2	64.9%	324,585	4.6	30	1	30	0	4	30
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	2	67.7%	317,204	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	2	64.9%	316,101	4.5	19	1	19	0	3	19
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	2	68.9%	315,788	4.0	22	2	24	1	7	24
Rochester	New York	125	108	2	66.7%	314,349	4.3	24	2	25	1	5	25
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	2	70.7%	302,358	4.2	19	1	19	0	5	19
Staten Island	New York	120	105	2	63.7%	301,802	4.6	12	2	13	0	2	13
Arlington	Texas	122	107	2	72.8%	289,058	3.8	12	3	14	0	5	14
Long Beach	California	120	109	2	60.0%	287,381	5.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	2	63.7%	277,356	4.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	2	65.0%	274,315	4.7	28	1	28	0	3	28
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	3	65.7%	273,374	4.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Spring	Texas	114	103	2	71.0%	270,470	3.9	8	1	8	0	3	8
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	2	60.1%	270,283	4.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	2	69.3%	267,825	4.3	17	1	17	0	4	17
Oakland	California	115	102	2	64.0%	263,680	4.6	14	1	14	0	2	14
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	2	72.1%	255,700	3.9	14	4	18	0	6	18
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	2	65.3%	255,289	4.3	15	1	15	0	3	15
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	2	61.0%	254,891	4.9	26	1	26	0	1	26
Riverside	California	113	102	2	68.0%	251,641	4.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	2	67.6%	250,610	4.3	10	1	10	0	2	10
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	2	66.2%	242,896	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	2	63.6%	241,051	4.5	18	1	18	0	3	18
Katy	Texas	112	102	2	70.0%	240,743	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	2	65.1%	239,585	4.5	12	1	13	0	2	13
Spokane	Washington	113	104	2	66.4%	238,765	4.4	14	1	14	0	3	14
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	2	66.4%	236,838	4.3	16	1	16	0	4	16
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	2	62.7%	232,527	4.8	12	1	12	0	1	12
Santa Ana	California	110	99	2	64.5%	230,317	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	2	74.8%	226,585	3.7	7	2	8	0	3	8
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	2	70.4%	225,140	4.3	15	2	16	0	4	16
Stockton	California	122	108	2	60.0%	224,283	5.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Reno	Nevada	112	100	2	75.2%	223,328	3.8	12	1	12	0	5	12
Anaheim	California	114	102	2	60.0%	221,176	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	2	66.7%	217,352	4.4	11	2	13	1	2	13
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	2	66.4%	216,420	4.6	18	2	19	0	3	19
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	2	74.4%	215,909	3.9	8	1	8	0	3	8
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	2	65.7%	213,863	4.4	10	1	10	0	2	10
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	3	66.1%	213,393	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	2	62.2%	213,226	4.6	14	1	14	0	2	14
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	2	64.7%	211,884	4.3	9	2	10	0	2	10
Naples	Florida	125	111	2	67.4%	211,146	4.4	14	1	14	0	2	14
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	2	64.4%	204,990	4.3	16	1	16	0	4	16
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	2	68.7%	204,862	4.2	11	2	12	0	3	12
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	2	68.8%	202,753	4.4	14	1	14	0	3	14
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	2	60.1%	200,315	4.9	20	1	20	0	1	20
Plano	Texas	112	103	2	65.3%	199,388	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	2	68.0%	196,789	4.5	22	1	22	0	4	22
Akron	Ohio	122	112	2	72.7%	196,495	4.0	17	2	20	0	6	20
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	2	63.4%	195,107	4.7	15	1	15	0	1	15
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	2	63.3%	192,860	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	1	78.1%	191,773	3.3	14	3	19	2	7	19
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	2	71.5%	187,087	3.3	7	1	7	0	4	7
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	2	65.5%	183,731	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	2	68.1%	182,825	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Irvine	California	112	101	2	68.3%	182,653	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	2	68.0%	182,399	4.3	13	1	13	0	3	13
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	2	65.9%	182,297	4.4	14	1	14	0	3	14
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	3	60.0%	181,613	5.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	2	70.6%	180,870	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	2	77.3%	180,772	4.0	7	2	8	1	2	8
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	2	75.7%	180,567	3.5	6	1	6	0	3	6
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	2	67.8%	174,918	4.3	9	1	10	0	2	10
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	2	73.1%	173,880	3.8	6	2	7	1	2	7
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	2	60.0%	173,443	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	2	60.0%	172,846	5.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Salem	Oregon	110	101	2	64.3%	171,443	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	2	68.1%	170,453	4.3	13	1	13	0	3	13
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	2	62.5%	169,743	4.7	18	1	18	0	2	18
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	2	78.4%	165,892	3.3	3	2	4	0	2	4
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	2	65.2%	164,909	4.4	10	1	10	0	2	10
Jamaica	New York	112	100	2	67.0%	163,372	3.5	6	1	6	0	3	6
Laredo	Texas	126	110	2	60.0%	162,539	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Modesto	California	111	101	3	61.3%	162,071	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Garland	Texas	106	96	2	67.7%	161,189	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	2	66.2%	159,722	4.4	10	1	10	0	2	10
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	2	65.2%	158,992	4.6	8	1	8	0	1	8
Irving	Texas	111	102	2	66.1%	158,923	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
San Bernardino	California	113	103	2	63.7%	158,863	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Boise	Idaho	111	100	2	62.0%	158,687	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	2	60.0%	158,478	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	3	64.7%	158,021	4.3	12	1	12	0	3	12
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	2	71.9%	157,829	3.7	10	2	11	1	4	11
Chula Vista	California	109	100	2	60.0%	156,499	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Corona	California	111	98	2	60.0%	154,373	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	2	68.7%	153,390	4.3	12	1	12	0	3	12
Flushing	New York	107	96	2	71.3%	153,296	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	2	69.3%	152,166	4.0	9	1	9	0	3	9
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	2	69.3%	151,186	4.0	12	4	16	1	5	16
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	2	60.0%	150,963	5.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	1	72.5%	148,676	3.6	8	2	10	2	3	10
Ocala	Florida	118	107	2	65.9%	148,218	4.5	11	1	12	0	2	12
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	2	66.3%	147,359	4.2	9	1	9	0	2	9
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	3	70.8%	146,107	4.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	2	63.8%	146,027	4.4	14	1	14	0	3	14
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	2	65.3%	145,736	4.1	11	1	12	1	3	12
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	2	67.6%	145,511	4.4	10	1	10	0	2	10
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	2	63.0%	145,048	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	1	75.0%	142,982	4.3	4	1	5	0	1	5
Fontana	California	109	98	2	60.0%	140,836	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	2	67.3%	139,895	4.2	15	1	15	0	4	15
Fremont	California	107	98	2	60.0%	139,894	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	2	70.4%	138,190	3.8	11	2	12	1	4	12
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	2	72.3%	137,372	3.8	4	2	5	0	2	5
Syracuse	New York	119	107	2	60.0%	136,123	5.0	15	1	15	0	0	15
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	2	68.2%	134,251	4.6	10	3	12	1	2	12
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	3	63.5%	133,159	4.5	13	2	14	0	2	14
Ogden	Utah	110	101	2	65.8%	132,451	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Oxnard	California	107	98	3	60.0%	132,230	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	2	60.0%	129,635	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	2	71.0%	129,524	3.9	9	2	11	1	3	11
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	2	65.7%	126,621	4.6	7	2	8	0	1	8
Odessa	Texas	112	103	2	79.0%	126,471	3.0	6	3	9	0	5	9
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	1	87.3%	126,166	2.8	5	2	7	0	4	7
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	2	60.0%	125,653	5.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	2	67.3%	124,865	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	2	60.0%	124,765	5.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	2	60.0%	123,272	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	2	70.5%	122,722	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	3	60.0%	122,658	5.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	2	60.0%	121,875	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	3	60.0%	121,793	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	2	60.0%	120,982	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	1	90.4%	120,794	1.8	6	2	9	2	6	9
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	2	60.0%	120,793	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	2	65.8%	120,707	4.6	13	2	14	0	2	14
Oceanside	California	106	96	2	60.0%	120,155	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Olympia	Washington	110	98	2	65.7%	120,149	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	2	70.9%	120,095	3.8	9	2	10	0	4	10
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	2	60.0%	119,944	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	2	66.6%	119,739	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	2	76.9%	119,448	3.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	2	71.1%	119,157	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Van Nuys	California	105	95	2	67.0%	119,111	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	2	66.8%	117,900	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	2	64.3%	117,867	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Whittier	California	108	98	3	60.0%	117,697	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	3	63.1%	117,616	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Denton	Texas	110	101	2	74.2%	117,317	3.5	6	1	6	0	3	6
Humble	Texas	108	98	2	70.4%	117,250	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	2	84.1%	116,854	2.5	2	2	4	0	2	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	2	60.0%	116,832	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	1	80.3%	116,209	2.8	4	2	5	0	3	5
Midland	Texas	113	102	2	72.6%	116,142	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	2	66.7%	116,129	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	2	74.6%	116,013	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Hayward	California	108	98	2	60.0%	115,220	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	2	61.9%	114,138	4.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	3	60.0%	113,515	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	3	60.0%	113,395	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	California	106	96	2	60.0%	112,997	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pasadena	California	113	103	2	71.6%	112,871	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	2	82.8%	112,751	3.5	6	3	8	0	3	8
Homestead	Florida	111	99	2	60.0%	112,604	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	2	67.4%	111,716	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Vallejo	California	107	98	2	89.7%	111,693	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Everett	Washington	112	100	2	66.4%	110,684	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Lancaster	California	105	96	2	60.0%	110,651	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	2	60.0%	110,071	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	3	60.0%	109,999	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	2	64.3%	109,587	4.7	11	1	11	0	1	11
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	2	60.0%	109,011	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Billings	Montana	106	98	2	79.3%	108,889	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	2	67.8%	108,752	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Mission	Texas	105	95	3	60.0%	108,655	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	2	60.0%	108,495	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	3	60.0%	108,487	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Yonkers	New York	109	99	2	60.0%	108,319	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	2	61.3%	108,314	4.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	2	68.7%	108,182	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	2	66.0%	108,033	4.3	4	2	5	0	1	5
Escondido	California	104	94	3	60.0%	107,792	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elk Grove	California	109	96	2	60.0%	107,591	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	2	78.2%	107,208	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Visalia	California	108	99	2	70.5%	107,113	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Schenectady	New York	113	101	2	66.1%	107,053	4.3	8	1	8	0	2	8
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	3	62.3%	106,929	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Fairfield	California	102	93	2	93.3%	106,390	2.0	2	2	4	1	2	4
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	2	62.7%	106,285	4.8	10	1	10	0	0	10
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	3	67.1%	106,102	3.7	7	1	7	0	3	7
Torrance	California	113	103	2	60.0%	106,076	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ontario	California	109	98	2	60.0%	105,989	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Garden Grove	California	110	97	2	60.0%	105,457	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	3	60.0%	105,418	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Hollywood	California	108	98	2	68.7%	105,220	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Palmdale	California	106	97	3	60.0%	104,962	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	2	70.2%	104,586	4.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	2	71.2%	104,183	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	2	73.0%	103,901	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	2	70.3%	103,766	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
El Cajon	California	109	97	2	60.0%	103,478	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Frisco	Texas	105	95	3	60.0%	103,469	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	3	60.0%	103,260	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Waco	Texas	112	100	3	65.2%	103,206	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	2	66.3%	103,194	4.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Santa Maria	California	106	97	2	72.0%	103,064	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Albany	New York	117	102	2	68.1%	103,029	4.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Cypress	Texas	108	101	2	60.0%	102,361	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	2	63.1%	102,207	4.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	2	65.0%	102,113	4.7	12	1	12	0	0	12
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	3	60.0%	101,961	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	3	62.2%	101,631	4.7	18	1	18	0	2	18
Conroe	Texas	111	101	2	63.4%	101,572	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	3	60.0%	101,357	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orange	California	111	100	2	69.2%	100,384	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	2	60.0%	100,033	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	California	106	97	2	71.4%	99,442	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Killeen	Texas	110	101	2	66.1%	99,233	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	3	60.0%	98,609	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Murrieta	California	106	96	3	74.5%	98,581	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	2	60.0%	98,471	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	3	64.4%	98,358	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Tyler	Texas	115	104	2	63.0%	98,295	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Macon	Georgia	118	108	2	60.0%	98,220	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	3	66.9%	97,937	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	2	76.0%	97,842	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Pearland	Texas	104	96	2	70.8%	97,442	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	2	75.5%	97,274	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Astoria	New York	111	100	2	68.1%	97,120	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
La Puente	California	105	96	2	82.2%	96,941	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
San Mateo	California	106	97	2	67.8%	96,501	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	2	78.4%	96,473	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Kent	Washington	113	102	2	60.0%	96,301	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bothell	Washington	110	98	2	75.1%	96,293	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	2	71.4%	96,227	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	2	79.8%	96,065	3.0	5	2	7	0	4	7
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	2	70.6%	95,673	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Norwalk	California	99	91	2	90.0%	95,297	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	3	62.6%	95,091	4.4	14	2	17	1	3	17
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	1	100.0%	95,049	1.0	5	2	10	5	5	10
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	2	66.5%	94,982	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Canton	Ohio	117	105	2	64.5%	94,871	4.7	12	1	12	0	1	12
Pomona	California	107	97	2	60.0%	94,791	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	2	64.6%	94,780	4.6	10	1	10	0	1	10
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	2	61.8%	93,845	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Flint	Michigan	117	105	3	60.0%	93,280	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Roseville	California	106	95	3	66.7%	93,275	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Renton	Washington	112	100	2	60.0%	92,911	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	2	90.0%	92,190	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	2	66.1%	92,124	4.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	2	90.0%	90,687	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	2	68.5%	90,353	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Orem	Utah	104	96	2	90.0%	90,286	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Hemet	California	105	95	2	69.8%	89,946	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Inglewood	California	124	112	2	66.9%	89,528	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Menifee	California	108	98	1	80.6%	89,107	3.0	4	2	7	0	3	7
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	2	71.0%	88,923	3.8	4	2	5	0	2	5
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	2	72.5%	88,604	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	2	71.6%	88,468	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	2	73.8%	88,021	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	2	60.0%	87,788	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	2	60.0%	87,480	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	2	60.0%	87,357	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	2	60.0%	87,299	5.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	3	71.1%	87,226	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Abilene	Texas	111	102	2	66.8%	86,985	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Concord	California	107	98	2	66.5%	86,660	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	2	60.0%	86,624	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	3	65.6%	86,146	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
South Gate	California	99	90	2	90.0%	85,593	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	2	69.2%	85,373	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	3	60.0%	84,953	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	2	81.6%	83,927	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	3	60.0%	83,915	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clovis	California	106	97	2	68.8%	83,467	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	2	63.1%	83,363	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Compton	California	106	98	2	60.0%	83,325	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	2	67.7%	82,935	3.8	4	2	5	0	2	5
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	2	63.3%	82,692	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	2	65.3%	82,300	4.6	5	2	6	0	1	6
Victorville	California	105	95	2	60.0%	81,786	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	2	60.0%	81,530	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Longview	Texas	122	109	2	77.4%	81,474	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	2	70.4%	81,411	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Berkeley	California	110	99	2	64.0%	81,404	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Panama City	Florida	107	99	3	64.3%	81,261	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Warren	Michigan	115	103	2	60.0%	81,115	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	2	66.6%	81,100	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	2	69.2%	80,092	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	3	60.0%	80,052	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	2	71.3%	79,788	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	3	60.0%	79,721	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	2	82.2%	79,577	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	2	60.0%	79,482	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	3	68.7%	79,334	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Richardson	Texas	109	101	2	69.0%	79,101	4.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
San Leandro	California	108	97	2	71.1%	79,030	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Napa	California	101	92	2	81.5%	78,742	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	3	60.0%	78,631	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	3	60.0%	78,459	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	4	60.0%	78,299	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	3	60.0%	78,182	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	2	60.0%	78,130	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Temecula	California	109	99	4	60.0%	77,948	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Yakima	Washington	109	100	2	60.0%	77,912	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	2	71.9%	77,871	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	2	69.8%	77,693	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Auburn	Washington	112	101	2	68.7%	77,511	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	4	60.0%	77,505	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	2	75.8%	77,428	3.7	6	2	7	0	3	7
Indio	California	103	94	1	80.4%	77,259	3.5	2	1	3	0	1	3
Simi Valley	California	101	92	2	60.0%	77,227	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	4	60.0%	76,986	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	3	60.0%	76,852	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	2	70.9%	76,800	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	3	60.0%	75,896	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Independence	Missouri	112	103	3	61.2%	75,868	4.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	3	68.3%	75,626	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	2	77.7%	75,563	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	2	63.6%	75,440	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Santa Clara	California	107	97	2	60.0%	75,310	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Monte	California	103	94	2	80.4%	75,298	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	4	60.0%	75,260	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	2	75.7%	75,246	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	2	78.6%	74,962	3.6	7	2	8	1	3	8
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	2	75.8%	74,885	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Athens	Georgia	115	106	3	60.0%	74,829	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	2	77.6%	74,777	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	2	63.9%	74,723	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Tracy	California	106	96	2	63.7%	74,648	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	3	60.0%	74,451	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
College Station	Texas	107	98	2	60.0%	73,829	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	3	60.0%	73,716	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	2	72.4%	73,667	4.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	3	60.0%	73,384	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	109	99	2	60.0%	73,354	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	111	103	3	66.4%	73,312	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	2	74.5%	73,288	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	2	69.7%	72,968	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	2	60.0%	72,498	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vista	California	106	97	2	60.0%	71,920	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	1	73.2%	71,690	3.7	3	2	4	1	1	4
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	2	60.0%	71,438	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	2	72.5%	71,324	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	2	73.1%	71,225	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	2	76.2%	71,177	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	2	60.6%	71,000	4.7	11	1	11	0	1	11
Deltona	Florida	102	93	2	75.3%	70,736	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Baytown	Texas	108	98	3	60.0%	70,676	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	California	106	96	4	60.0%	70,434	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	107	98	2	74.5%	69,970	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Provo	Utah	108	99	2	60.0%	69,914	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Largo	Florida	113	105	2	65.0%	69,902	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	4	60.0%	69,816	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	3	72.1%	69,788	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Keller	Texas	108	99	3	60.0%	69,755	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	3	60.0%	69,635	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ventura	California	104	95	2	60.0%	69,575	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	5	60.0%	69,543	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	2	70.2%	69,374	4.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	5	60.0%	69,128	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Redwood City	California	105	95	2	60.0%	68,678	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	California	103	94	4	60.0%	68,641	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	3	66.5%	68,576	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	3	60.0%	68,439	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	2	60.0%	68,252	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	California	109	96	3	60.0%	68,202	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redding	California	110	99	3	60.0%	67,820	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	California	100	91	2	60.0%	67,741	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	2	60.0%	67,728	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	2	60.0%	67,483	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	2	60.0%	67,384	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chico	California	105	96	2	60.0%	67,209	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	2	60.0%	66,951	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	2	60.0%	66,805	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Riverview	Florida	104	96	3	60.0%	66,800	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	102	94	3	60.0%	66,763	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	2	68.2%	66,520	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	3	67.4%	66,445	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Antioch	California	107	99	3	60.0%	66,433	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	5	60.0%	66,149	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	2	69.1%	65,721	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	2	69.1%	65,668	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
West Covina	California	111	100	2	60.0%	65,645	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	1	65.8%	65,614	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	4	63.0%	65,519	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Waukesha	Wisconsin	117	107	2	68.4%	65,483	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	4	60.0%	65,413	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	3	60.0%	65,218	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	3	60.0%	65,182	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Burbank	California	109	100	3	60.0%	64,810	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	2	68.2%	64,478	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	3	62.9%	64,400	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	3	60.0%	64,223	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	108	3	60.0%	64,139	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	3	60.0%	64,127	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Missoula	Montana	111	102	3	65.9%	64,075	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	3	60.0%	64,030	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	2	64.4%	63,992	4.5	8	2	10	0	2	10
Rialto	California	106	97	4	60.0%	63,950	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	4	60.0%	63,884	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	2	66.9%	63,807	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	3	60.0%	63,656	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	California	100	90	3	60.0%	63,479	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	2	60.0%	63,278	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	2	64.2%	63,250	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Vacaville	California	101	92	3	60.0%	63,178	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	107	96	2	65.3%	63,166	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	2	60.0%	62,918	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	3	60.0%	62,533	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ballwin	Missouri	105	95	1	65.9%	62,425	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	California	105	94	4	60.0%	62,287	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	California	108	100	5	60.0%	61,836	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	California	105	94	3	60.0%	61,779	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	2	60.0%	61,723	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	2	60.0%	61,298	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	4	60.0%	60,877	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	4	60.0%	60,632	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	2	60.0%	60,496	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	California	107	98	3	60.0%	60,289	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	4	60.0%	60,280	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	3	60.0%	60,178	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	108	100	3	60.0%	60,169	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	108	96	3	60.0%	60,153	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	3	60.0%	60,086	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	2	60.0%	59,862	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	4	60.9%	59,648	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	4	60.0%	59,478	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	102	94	2	60.0%	59,462	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Apopka	Florida	105	95	3	60.0%	58,592	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	101	90	4	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	5	60.0%	58,059	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sylmar	California	100	94	3	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	3	60.0%	57,876	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bryan	Texas	114	105	2	60.0%	57,769	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Livermore	California	105	95	2	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	98	90	2	60.0%	57,649	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	2	60.0%	57,427	5.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	3	60.0%	57,256	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	4	60.2%	57,190	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	2	60.0%	57,171	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	3	60.0%	57,125	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	3	60.0%	56,984	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	2	60.0%	56,888	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Milton	Florida	108	99	3	60.0%	56,845	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	2	60.0%	56,831	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	110	98	4	60.0%	56,740	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	105	96	3	60.0%	56,684	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	107	97	3	60.6%	56,651	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Santa Monica	California	105	96	2	60.0%	56,646	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	3	60.0%	56,473	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	5	60.0%	56,380	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	3	60.0%	56,037	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Medford	Oregon	106	98	4	60.0%	55,951	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	2	60.0%	55,936	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	3	60.0%	55,656	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	2	68.5%	1,682,363	4.2	62	1	62	0	17	62
San Diego	134	116	2	65.6%	884,078	4.4	36	1	38	1	7	38
San Jose	129	116	2	63.3%	664,517	4.7	28	1	28	0	3	28
San Francisco	121	106	2	67.5%	587,088	4.5	28	2	29	0	5	29
Sacramento	134	115	2	70.9%	570,904	4.3	28	4	32	1	8	32
Fresno	120	105	2	63.7%	383,591	4.4	18	3	20	0	4	20
Bakersfield	112	102	2	67.2%	375,926	4.2	11	1	11	0	3	11
Long Beach	120	109	2	60.0%	287,381	5.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Oakland	115	102	2	64.0%	263,680	4.6	14	1	14	0	2	14
Riverside	113	102	2	68.0%	251,641	4.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Santa Ana	110	99	2	64.5%	230,317	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Stockton	122	108	2	60.0%	224,283	5.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Anaheim	114	102	2	60.0%	221,176	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Irvine	112	101	2	68.3%	182,653	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Modesto	111	101	3	61.3%	162,071	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
San Bernardino	113	103	2	63.7%	158,863	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Chula Vista	109	100	2	60.0%	156,499	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Corona	111	98	2	60.0%	154,373	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fontana	109	98	2	60.0%	140,836	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fremont	107	98	2	60.0%	139,894	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oxnard	107	98	3	60.0%	132,230	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Rosa	112	100	2	60.0%	129,635	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Moreno Valley	109	99	2	60.0%	123,272	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oceanside	106	96	2	60.0%	120,155	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	111	99	2	60.0%	119,944	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Van Nuys	105	95	2	67.0%	119,111	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	2	66.8%	117,900	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Whittier	108	98	3	60.0%	117,697	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Hayward	108	98	2	60.0%	115,220	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salinas	106	96	2	60.0%	112,997	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pasadena	113	103	2	71.6%	112,871	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Vallejo	107	98	2	89.7%	111,693	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Lancaster	105	96	2	60.0%	110,651	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	104	94	3	60.0%	107,792	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elk Grove	109	96	2	60.0%	107,591	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Visalia	108	99	2	70.5%	107,113	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Fairfield	102	93	2	93.3%	106,390	2.0	2	2	4	1	2	4
Torrance	113	103	2	60.0%	106,076	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ontario	109	98	2	60.0%	105,989	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Garden Grove	110	97	2	60.0%	105,457	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
North Hollywood	108	98	2	68.7%	105,220	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Palmdale	106	97	3	60.0%	104,962	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Cajon	109	97	2	60.0%	103,478	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Maria	106	97	2	72.0%	103,064	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Orange	111	100	2	69.2%	100,384	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Fullerton	106	97	2	71.4%	99,442	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Murrieta	106	96	3	74.5%	98,581	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Sunnyvale	107	98	3	64.4%	98,358	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
La Puente	105	96	2	82.2%	96,941	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
San Mateo	106	97	2	67.8%	96,501	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Norwalk	99	91	2	90.0%	95,297	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Pomona	107	97	2	60.0%	94,791	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roseville	106	95	3	66.7%	93,275	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bell Gardens	99	90	2	90.0%	92,190	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Hemet	105	95	2	69.8%	89,946	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Inglewood	124	112	2	66.9%	89,528	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Menifee	108	98	1	80.6%	89,107	3.0	4	2	7	0	3	7
Concord	107	98	2	66.5%	86,660	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
South Gate	99	90	2	90.0%	85,593	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Clovis	106	97	2	68.8%	83,467	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Compton	106	98	2	60.0%	83,325	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Victorville	105	95	2	60.0%	81,786	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	111	99	2	60.0%	81,530	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Berkeley	110	99	2	64.0%	81,404	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
San Leandro	108	97	2	71.1%	79,030	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Napa	101	92	2	81.5%	78,742	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Temecula	109	99	4	60.0%	77,948	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Indio	103	94	1	80.4%	77,259	3.5	2	1	3	0	1	3
Simi Valley	101	92	2	60.0%	77,227	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	107	97	2	60.0%	75,310	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Monte	103	94	2	80.4%	75,298	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Tracy	106	96	2	63.7%	74,648	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Mission Viejo	105	95	2	74.5%	73,288	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Vista	106	97	2	60.0%	71,920	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	106	96	4	60.0%	70,434	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	104	95	2	60.0%	69,575	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redwood City	105	95	2	60.0%	68,678	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	103	94	4	60.0%	68,641	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	104	95	2	60.0%	68,252	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	109	96	3	60.0%	68,202	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redding	110	99	3	60.0%	67,820	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	100	91	2	60.0%	67,741	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chico	105	96	2	60.0%	67,209	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	107	99	3	60.0%	66,433	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	111	100	2	60.0%	65,645	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	106	95	4	63.0%	65,519	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Burbank	109	100	3	60.0%	64,810	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rialto	106	97	4	60.0%	63,950	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	100	90	3	60.0%	63,479	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vacaville	101	92	3	60.0%	63,178	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	107	96	2	65.3%	63,166	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Hesperia	105	94	4	60.0%	62,287	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	108	100	5	60.0%	61,836	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	105	94	3	60.0%	61,779	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	107	98	3	60.0%	60,289	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	101	90	4	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	100	94	3	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livermore	105	95	2	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	98	90	2	60.0%	57,649	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chino	105	96	3	60.0%	56,684	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	105	96	2	60.0%	56,646	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5

Houston

ZIP	nationwide.com	allstate.com	farmers.com	geico.com	esurance.com	libertymutual.com
77088	5	4	8	6	7	9
77047	5	4	8	6	7	9
77037	5	4	6	7	8	9
77098	5	4	7	6	8	9
77027	5	4	7	6	8	9
77068	5	1	7	6	8	9
77078	5	4	8	7	6	9
77086	5	4	7	6	8	9
77035	5	4	7	6	8	9
77008	5	4	7	6	8	9
77004	5	1	7	6	8	9
77028	5	4	7	6	8	9
77059	5	2	7	6	8	9
77039	5	4	7	6	8	9
77019	5	4	7	6	8	9
77075	2	1	4	3	5	6
77077	5	4	7	6	8	9
77079	5	4	7	6	8	9
77099	5	4	7	6	8	9
77024	5	4	7	6	8	9
77095	5	4	2	7	8	9
77048	5	4	7	6	8	9
77044	5	4	6	7	8	9
77015	5	4	6	8	7	9
77017	2	1	4	3	5	6
77057	5	4	7	6	8	9
77055	5	4	2	6	8	9
77006	5	4	7	6	8	9
77026	2	1	3	4	5	6
77046	5	4	7	6	8	9
77066	5	2	6	7	8	9
77023	5	4	6	8	7	9
77094	5	4	7	6	8	9
77084	5	4	7	6	8	9
77013	5	4	7	6	8	9
77063	2	1	4	3	5	6
77053	5	4	6	7	8	9
77022	5	4	8	6	7	9
77072	5	4	8	6	7	9
77049	5	4	6	7	8	9
77045	5	4	7	6	8	9
77010	5	1	6	8	7	9
77018	5	4	7	6	8	9
77041	5	3	6	7	8	9
77009	2	1	3	4	5	6
77089	5	2	1	6	8	9
77032	5	4	6	7	8	9
77036	5	4	6	8	7	9
77085	5	4	6	8	7	9
77054	5	4	7	6	8	9
77058	5	4	8	6	7	9
77014	5	4	7	6	8	9
77067	2	1	3	4	5	6
77005	5	4	7	6	8	9
77076	2	1	4	3	5	6
77070	5	4	7	6	8	9
77060	5	4	8	6	7	9
77080	5	4	3	8	6	9
77050	2	1	4	5	3	6
77091	5	4	8	6	7	9
77071	2	1	5	3	4	6
77061	5	4	7	6	8	9
77020	5	4	7	8	6	9
77081	5	4	6	7	8	9
77030	5	4	8	6	7	9
77040	5	4	6	7	8	9
77090	5	1	8	6	7	9
77031	2	1	3	5	4	6
77051	5	4	7	6	8	9
77011	5	4	7	6	8	9
77042	5	4	7	6	8	9
77062	5	4	3	8	6	9
77082	2	1	4	3	5	6
77093	5	4	7	6	8	9
77073	5	4	8	7	6	9
77033	5	4	8	7	6	9
77043	5	4	6	7	8	9
77074	5	4	8	7	6	9
77064	5	4	7	6	8	9
77012	5	4	8	6	7	9
77002	5	4	8	6	7	9
77092	5	4	7	8	6	9
77069	5	4	6	8	7	9
77021	2	1	5	3	4	6
77083	5	4	7	8	6	9
77029	5	4	7	8	6	9
77034	5	1	8	6	7	9
77087	2	1	5	4	3	6
77003	5	2	8	7	6	9
77038	5	4	7	8	6	9
77007	2	1	5	4	3	6
77016	5	4	7	8	6	9
77065	5	4	7	8	6	9
77096	5	4	6	8	7	9
77025	2	1	4	3	5	7
77056	5	4	6	8	7	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Nationwide

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Nationwide Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Nationwide Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Nationwide Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Nationwide Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly