Mrhandyman Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve mrhandyman.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 4,265 Handymen In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Mrhandyman Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Mrhandyman Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Mrhandyman Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
Texas
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Mrhandyman Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	16,214	4,265	6	46.0%	148,441,161	5.6	27,379	32,654	303	36,244	1,447	8,640	33,992
Texas	2,107	631	5	56.4%	15,719,238	5.3	1,360	1,917	40	2,084	156	800	1,917
California	2,696	795	6	37.8%	14,809,147	6.6	1,166	1,740	17	1,970	16	277	1,777
New York	1,972	629	6	45.9%	9,002,174	5.3	1,491	1,756	9	1,921	80	365	1,859
Florida	1,786	569	6	35.6%	7,325,198	7.2	446	975	22	1,087	18	124	931
Illinois	1,759	551	5	53.3%	6,828,292	5.6	1,247	1,382	17	1,487	17	301	1,406
Pennsylvania	1,847	557	6	50.2%	6,418,897	4.8	1,604	1,781	12	2,151	60	644	2,095
Ohio	1,599	499	6	51.0%	5,933,455	5.2	976	1,188	15	1,315	12	408	1,273
New Jersey	1,309	476	3	60.6%	5,383,865	4.1	537	593	18	729	113	261	714
Georgia	1,481	472	6	51.7%	5,328,626	5.6	574	726	15	819	47	214	786
Michigan	1,412	402	6	50.1%	4,986,082	5.0	833	976	12	1,053	38	362	1,001
Virginia	1,352	429	5	55.5%	4,670,328	4.8	723	891	14	1,016	70	348	977
North Carolina	1,520	484	6	43.7%	4,437,388	6.1	683	802	14	1,007	11	140	966
Massachusetts	1,264	439	5	53.2%	3,635,221	4.5	461	534	14	660	119	250	600
Maryland	1,089	392	3	56.7%	3,406,363	4.4	392	463	21	612	58	214	595
Missouri	1,376	416	6	52.5%	3,199,176	5.2	887	1,017	9	1,080	28	308	1,061
Tennessee	1,275	382	6	47.3%	3,146,115	5.5	514	622	11	673	56	175	639
Indiana	1,987	704	6	47.0%	3,121,482	5.5	659	770	12	856	33	221	815
Washington	1,411	443	6	41.2%	3,000,577	5.9	451	587	13	651	46	119	612
Minnesota	1,379	414	6	52.4%	2,895,596	5.0	777	878	7	897	18	347	871
Colorado	1,389	454	4	48.9%	2,707,120	5.7	381	514	18	550	43	84	505
Alabama	1,231	353	6	53.9%	2,620,724	5.4	522	637	8	684	78	136	625
Wisconsin	1,396	442	6	44.0%	2,543,979	5.9	694	769	8	828	8	110	763
Kentucky	1,206	364	6	56.2%	2,500,542	4.8	698	758	4	787	55	250	758
Connecticut	970	336	5	52.9%	1,895,052	4.4	234	279	10	310	64	134	301
Oklahoma	1,111	335	6	47.3%	1,852,692	5.7	557	646	10	688	3	124	664
South Carolina	1,095	364	6	36.7%	1,821,139	6.5	347	422	6	475	18	73	435
Louisiana	1,075	322	6	36.3%	1,694,322	6.3	431	510	4	582	6	82	531
Kansas	1,185	355	6	53.3%	1,551,629	5.4	616	692	8	878	6	155	843
Arizona	1,044	361	6	22.1%	1,532,444	7.8	247	396	5	460	4	36	353
Mississippi	1,004	309	6	49.6%	1,483,121	5.0	384	418	2	433	0	171	420
Arkansas	1,122	322	6	44.7%	1,337,384	5.3	553	587	6	616	11	208	597
Oregon	1,355	502	6	32.3%	1,317,757	6.8	355	414	4	424	0	21	373
West Virginia	1,142	346	3	65.4%	1,195,376	4.1	684	704	6	823	75	301	815
Iowa	1,360	381	6	35.2%	1,103,360	6.1	890	933	3	951	27	52	902
Nebraska	1,081	316	5	57.1%	1,086,837	6.1	524	581	5	642	22	102	502
Utah	891	300	7	27.3%	831,122	6.7	246	284	2	305	0	20	249
Maine	1,224	453	5	59.4%	791,839	4.4	421	425	5	491	9	170	488
New Hampshire	819	300	6	51.1%	686,710	4.7	238	248	3	273	16	78	268
New Mexico	951	290	6	25.6%	534,401	6.4	327	361	2	366	0	54	343
Idaho	919	302	6	27.5%	464,229	6.7	251	273	3	275	1	8	253
Rhode Island	552	196	6	43.6%	460,583	5.4	64	77	2	85	4	27	82
Montana	943	284	6	37.2%	387,869	5.7	348	361	2	383	0	149	355
Hawaii	572	199	7	27.2%	387,328	6.8	82	93	2	94	0	4	76
Nevada	700	247	11	13.0%	380,226	8.9	92	168	2	173	0	9	106
Delaware	552	226	6	38.6%	366,364	6.9	52	66	2	73	0	4	70
Vermont	789	268	5	54.1%	337,816	4.8	250	254	2	278	0	41	276
North Dakota	799	245	6	41.3%	310,561	5.9	367	381	2	403	0	103	381
South Dakota	838	265	6	29.5%	254,958	6.6	359	370	2	387	0	19	329
Alaska	743	250	6	31.9%	235,472	5.4	218	235	3	255	0	32	235
Wyoming	773	237	6	39.7%	231,245	6.0	164	171	3	175	1	5	170

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	442	166	4	69.0%	2,198,926	4.1	96	5	117	0	27	117
Los Angeles	California	437	163	3	74.2%	1,823,140	3.5	62	5	68	2	45	68
Chicago	Illinois	369	151	4	66.3%	1,790,835	4.5	56	3	86	0	1	86
San Antonio	Texas	403	164	2	86.1%	1,530,358	2.4	59	2	60	0	53	60
Dallas	Texas	355	146	1	94.9%	1,321,100	1.5	48	2	48	40	40	48
Brooklyn	New York	375	154	7	32.8%	852,782	7.5	37	1	37	0	0	36
Austin	Texas	345	151	2	78.0%	849,123	3.1	44	2	52	9	30	52
Charlotte	North Carolina	295	113	2	86.4%	783,188	2.4	24	1	24	3	21	24
Louisville	Kentucky	327	127	1	95.4%	726,262	1.5	32	1	32	27	27	32
Minneapolis	Minnesota	430	168	4	64.4%	700,996	4.8	51	5	54	0	22	53
Bronx	New York	333	135	5	48.3%	696,206	6.3	25	2	32	0	0	32
Cincinnati	Ohio	350	140	2	85.8%	689,678	2.5	45	2	46	0	39	46
San Diego	California	392	154	4	50.5%	680,245	5.8	36	4	64	1	1	64
New York City	New York	359	143	7	41.1%	667,003	7.2	47	2	50	0	0	50
Columbus	Ohio	337	127	3	78.6%	665,170	3.3	30	3	31	0	25	31
Atlanta	Georgia	382	154	4	67.3%	664,979	4.6	39	5	47	2	10	47
Saint Louis	Missouri	407	157	3	71.1%	652,260	3.7	45	4	56	0	25	56
Jacksonville	Florida	350	144	4	70.0%	607,305	4.2	31	1	31	0	3	31
Miami	Florida	431	158	7	31.9%	599,873	8.2	55	5	75	1	3	47
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	401	167	6	33.2%	523,526	7.7	47	3	60	0	1	55
Colorado Springs	Colorado	330	137	1	87.1%	508,261	2.2	30	3	33	20	21	33
Denver	Colorado	377	164	5	46.4%	504,455	6.9	38	5	39	0	0	31
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	355	135	4	61.0%	495,012	5.1	29	3	33	0	6	33
Omaha	Nebraska	273	107	2	86.6%	478,246	2.2	31	1	31	2	28	31
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	349	141	4	57.4%	477,619	5.5	27	3	31	4	8	28
Birmingham	Alabama	304	113	1	94.6%	473,108	1.5	30	3	32	25	26	32
Virginia Beach	Virginia	235	99	1	97.1%	437,229	1.3	12	1	12	11	11	12
Sacramento	California	350	129	5	53.7%	431,786	5.7	28	2	42	0	0	42
Arlington	Texas	232	98	1	98.5%	391,199	1.1	12	2	14	11	12	14
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	397	153	5	57.3%	390,976	5.3	39	4	66	0	0	66
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	396	158	4	55.8%	380,902	5.2	43	6	55	1	2	54
Knoxville	Tennessee	267	112	1	98.1%	379,101	1.4	17	1	17	15	15	17
Richmond	Virginia	254	102	1	96.9%	378,919	1.2	15	2	16	14	15	16
Wichita	Kansas	280	111	2	87.4%	364,998	2.3	26	2	27	1	24	27
Phoenix	Arizona	359	150	8	25.0%	363,240	8.4	42	4	58	0	1	50
Spokane	Washington	259	108	1	100.0%	359,578	1.0	14	2	15	14	14	15
Indianapolis	Indiana	351	138	6	37.2%	354,290	7.3	37	4	45	1	4	40
Kansas City	Missouri	360	148	4	59.9%	342,341	5.2	49	4	65	3	11	64
Grand Rapids	Michigan	253	112	1	91.4%	336,125	1.9	12	2	13	3	11	13
Saint Paul	Minnesota	394	148	6	41.5%	331,553	6.7	30	4	32	2	4	32
Cleveland	Ohio	352	144	6	43.9%	329,286	6.5	29	3	45	0	0	44
Portland	Oregon	326	131	7	35.2%	323,798	8.0	33	2	33	0	0	27
Spring	Texas	258	105	3	84.4%	321,570	2.4	8	3	9	2	8	9
Marietta	Georgia	215	95	1	99.0%	319,367	1.1	7	1	7	6	7	7
Washington DC	District of Columbia	340	139	6	42.3%	289,667	6.5	28	1	28	0	0	28
Katy	Texas	168	76	2	82.1%	282,363	2.8	4	3	6	0	4	6
Tampa	Florida	336	122	7	29.9%	237,148	8.3	27	3	31	1	1	23
Vancouver	Washington	249	109	4	70.1%	228,619	4.2	11	1	11	0	4	11
Savannah	Georgia	235	99	1	94.5%	227,961	1.6	10	1	10	8	8	10
Baltimore	Maryland	278	125	7	35.5%	224,043	7.0	22	3	37	0	1	36
Fort Wayne	Indiana	272	111	4	69.8%	222,152	4.0	16	2	17	1	1	17
Fort Worth	Texas	360	141	8	24.2%	220,827	9.3	32	4	62	0	3	22
Plano	Texas	185	85	4	70.2%	214,506	3.9	7	1	7	1	2	7
Durham	North Carolina	206	86	3	73.8%	214,249	3.8	8	2	9	0	5	9
Montgomery	Alabama	281	108	1	99.8%	209,471	1.2	13	2	15	12	13	15
Nashville	Tennessee	301	124	6	45.1%	206,738	6.2	22	2	22	0	0	22
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	292	112	5	54.0%	204,567	5.5	18	3	33	0	0	33
Alexandria	Virginia	277	126	4	57.4%	203,723	5.4	14	3	19	0	2	19
Silver Spring	Maryland	212	102	3	64.0%	193,834	4.9	7	2	10	0	0	10
Huntsville	Alabama	251	103	1	94.3%	185,005	1.8	11	2	14	7	10	14
Tulsa	Oklahoma	341	130	6	43.6%	184,192	6.5	28	1	28	0	1	28
Chattanooga	Tennessee	298	122	1	86.1%	178,903	2.1	15	3	17	10	11	17
Bradenton	Florida	211	95	4	69.8%	176,713	4.8	10	2	10	0	6	10
Boca Raton	Florida	215	94	3	78.5%	174,461	2.9	9	1	9	0	8	9
Buffalo	New York	329	135	6	30.7%	172,556	8.4	28	2	29	0	0	25
Frisco	Texas	125	57	1	100.0%	172,448	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Staten Island	New York	256	107	7	36.3%	172,052	7.3	12	1	12	0	0	11
Ocala	Florida	255	108	3	76.2%	171,424	3.4	11	1	11	0	8	11
Henrico	Virginia	227	92	1	88.6%	170,778	2.0	7	3	9	3	7	9
Mckinney	Texas	147	77	2	90.0%	170,093	2.0	3	2	4	0	3	4
Charleston	South Carolina	234	103	1	85.0%	167,414	2.2	10	3	14	7	8	14
Fredericksburg	Virginia	194	78	1	94.8%	164,961	1.6	5	2	6	4	4	6
Greensboro	North Carolina	240	98	6	48.9%	160,283	6.2	9	2	14	0	0	14
Everett	Washington	202	91	1	95.7%	159,435	1.4	5	2	6	3	5	6
Naperville	Illinois	179	85	1	93.2%	154,584	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Naples	Florida	249	101	5	49.0%	153,280	6.0	14	4	24	0	0	24
Pompano Beach	Florida	241	113	6	41.2%	152,585	7.0	10	2	11	0	0	11
Waco	Texas	217	92	1	95.3%	150,787	1.6	9	2	11	4	9	11
Boynton Beach	Florida	184	75	2	84.0%	146,151	2.7	6	2	7	0	5	7
Overland Park	Kansas	229	91	3	78.6%	144,215	3.1	9	1	9	0	8	9
Dayton	Ohio	329	137	6	30.1%	144,106	8.4	27	2	28	0	0	22
Alpharetta	Georgia	182	83	2	75.5%	142,863	3.5	4	2	4	0	2	4
Detroit	Michigan	295	109	9	22.2%	142,287	9.6	25	2	40	0	0	19
South Bend	Indiana	233	94	1	96.3%	141,280	1.2	10	2	12	9	10	12
Raleigh	North Carolina	258	95	8	25.6%	139,753	8.4	15	2	25	0	0	25
Newark	New Jersey	209	96	5	49.8%	139,747	6.3	9	3	11	0	0	10
Macon	Georgia	239	91	2	85.1%	139,338	2.3	9	2	10	1	9	10
Allentown	Pennsylvania	212	90	2	81.8%	139,042	2.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Kalamazoo	Michigan	222	94	3	84.2%	138,262	2.7	7	1	7	0	6	7
Orlando	Florida	338	135	8	13.8%	137,194	10.0	32	1	32	1	1	24
Sarasota	Florida	222	96	5	54.3%	135,870	5.4	13	3	16	0	0	16
Fort Collins	Colorado	171	80	4	69.7%	135,782	4.0	5	2	6	0	2	6
Lake Worth	Florida	207	87	4	65.1%	134,470	4.4	5	2	8	0	2	8
Humble	Texas	149	62	3	80.0%	133,223	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
San Jose	California	330	126	10	12.6%	132,119	10.8	28	1	28	0	0	14
Edmond	Oklahoma	183	79	1	75.0%	128,854	4.0	5	3	9	1	3	9
Seattle	Washington	357	144	9	13.3%	127,088	10.2	35	3	44	0	2	27
Van Nuys	California	174	71	3	70.7%	125,668	3.8	4	2	5	0	2	5
Las Vegas	Nevada	358	126	13	8.0%	124,066	12.0	43	1	43	0	0	4
Fairfax	Virginia	191	87	3	73.1%	119,597	3.8	4	2	5	0	2	5
North Hollywood	California	164	72	3	77.1%	118,056	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Littleton	Colorado	248	108	6	36.1%	117,314	8.0	10	5	13	0	1	8
Frederick	Maryland	171	81	2	88.4%	116,730	2.0	4	2	5	1	4	5
Racine	Wisconsin	177	75	1	90.7%	114,313	1.8	5	2	6	2	5	6
West Palm Beach	Florida	241	90	6	30.1%	111,418	8.3	12	2	17	0	1	16
Gaithersburg	Maryland	176	89	1	76.4%	110,421	3.4	5	2	6	0	4	6
Fort Myers	Florida	243	104	6	43.8%	110,285	6.6	11	4	14	0	0	14
Woodbridge	Virginia	147	66	4	50.8%	107,479	6.3	3	2	5	0	1	3
Arvada	Colorado	177	86	3	80.0%	106,736	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Trenton	New Jersey	261	111	5	50.7%	105,441	5.9	11	2	16	0	0	16
Bellevue	Washington	177	79	4	70.3%	102,874	4.2	5	3	7	3	3	6
Woodstock	Georgia	125	62	1	100.0%	101,721	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Round Rock	Texas	174	88	3	60.4%	101,177	5.0	3	2	5	1	1	5
Broomfield	Colorado	147	67	1	93.9%	98,340	2.0	3	2	3	2	2	3
Lees Summit	Missouri	210	89	1	94.8%	96,747	1.7	6	2	7	4	6	7
Cypress	Texas	134	64	5	56.2%	95,961	5.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	158	66	1	100.0%	95,795	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Hyattsville	Maryland	187	86	5	60.4%	95,073	5.0	5	2	9	0	0	9
Boulder	Colorado	196	88	3	72.2%	94,800	4.2	6	1	6	0	4	6
Summerville	South Carolina	129	59	3	67.7%	94,054	4.5	2	2	4	0	1	4
Syracuse	New York	265	106	6	41.4%	93,821	6.7	15	2	16	0	1	16
Hialeah	Florida	200	82	9	25.4%	93,246	9.7	7	1	7	1	1	3
Irvine	California	215	93	5	34.2%	91,461	8.1	9	3	10	0	1	8
Killeen	Texas	155	70	4	60.0%	90,183	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	157	70	3	68.9%	89,942	4.0	3	2	4	1	2	4
Hagerstown	Maryland	164	76	2	90.3%	88,438	1.7	3	2	3	1	3	3
Allen	Texas	124	60	3	79.0%	87,942	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Delray Beach	Florida	194	84	4	73.8%	87,876	3.4	5	2	5	1	3	5
Whittier	California	221	103	4	44.8%	87,869	6.7	6	3	9	0	1	9
Tucson	Arizona	331	134	11	9.6%	87,215	11.4	32	1	32	0	0	4
Stone Mountain	Georgia	160	73	4	67.8%	86,990	4.3	3	1	3	1	1	3
Memphis	Tennessee	319	119	10	12.4%	86,121	11.0	26	2	28	0	0	10
South Gate	California	98	46	2	90.0%	85,593	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Franklin	Tennessee	139	66	3	80.0%	85,179	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Missouri City	Texas	143	64	3	80.0%	84,875	3.0	2	2	2	0	2	2
Pacoima	California	100	44	3	80.0%	84,639	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Bakersfield	California	245	99	9	15.0%	84,086	9.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Hollywood	Florida	239	105	8	17.9%	83,734	9.2	9	2	11	0	0	8
Fresno	California	282	120	9	13.9%	83,617	10.5	18	1	18	0	0	9
Decatur	Georgia	196	86	5	46.2%	83,514	6.8	5	2	7	0	0	6
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	178	79	4	66.6%	83,374	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Cambridge	Massachusetts	167	74	3	71.9%	83,244	3.8	5	2	6	0	2	6
Saint Petersburg	Florida	240	92	8	23.3%	83,189	8.8	16	1	16	0	0	14
Mcdonough	Georgia	129	62	1	81.8%	82,948	3.0	2	1	2	1	1	2
Fort Mill	South Carolina	139	67	2	86.6%	82,306	2.3	3	1	3	0	3	3
Bell Gardens	California	98	45	3	80.0%	81,946	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
San Francisco	California	342	126	10	9.3%	81,299	11.1	28	1	28	0	0	8
Falls Church	Virginia	188	88	3	67.3%	81,014	4.2	5	3	6	0	2	6
Lakewood	New Jersey	99	51	3	80.0%	80,610	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Richardson	Texas	149	69	4	70.0%	80,219	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Aurora	Colorado	244	105	10	18.3%	79,827	10.5	11	3	13	0	1	3
Lawrenceville	Georgia	171	77	8	31.1%	79,556	7.5	4	2	6	0	0	5
Elkhart	Indiana	151	64	2	78.9%	78,442	3.3	3	2	4	0	2	4
Conroe	Texas	214	89	5	48.6%	77,888	6.0	7	2	8	2	2	8
Sylmar	California	98	41	3	80.0%	77,190	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Sugar Land	Texas	174	78	6	45.2%	76,431	6.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
Westerville	Ohio	117	49	3	80.0%	76,166	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Salt Lake City	Utah	271	120	11	15.5%	75,484	10.1	19	2	20	0	0	9
Wilmington	Delaware	235	97	6	34.3%	75,356	8.0	10	1	10	0	0	9
Oakland	California	248	101	8	18.2%	75,082	9.1	14	2	15	0	0	11
Annapolis	Maryland	179	81	3	78.2%	74,314	3.2	5	2	7	0	3	7
Norwalk	California	97	49	4	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
New Orleans	Louisiana	275	105	9	17.3%	74,066	9.8	19	2	29	0	0	15
Kissimmee	Florida	233	100	7	25.6%	74,003	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pomona	California	148	67	5	46.4%	73,247	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Little Rock	Arkansas	252	107	7	33.5%	72,982	8.0	12	1	12	0	0	11
El Paso	Texas	305	117	10	9.2%	72,973	10.6	24	1	24	0	0	9
Paterson	New Jersey	206	96	6	50.0%	72,900	6.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Compton	California	154	65	5	51.4%	71,385	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Albuquerque	New Mexico	298	110	11	10.8%	70,808	10.8	17	1	17	0	0	11
Manassas	Virginia	165	79	5	46.5%	70,641	6.0	4	3	7	0	1	7
Ballwin	Missouri	124	64	4	74.1%	70,112	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	162	71	4	71.5%	70,047	3.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Roswell	Georgia	135	71	4	70.0%	69,839	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Monte	California	124	52	3	73.2%	68,612	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Homestead	Florida	221	90	6	36.3%	68,213	7.6	7	1	7	0	1	6
Madison	Wisconsin	256	113	9	22.9%	67,542	9.4	14	3	28	1	2	10
Gilbert	Arizona	184	85	9	27.9%	66,492	8.7	6	3	10	1	1	6
Orange	California	183	81	5	45.6%	66,141	6.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Lithonia	Georgia	127	65	4	68.1%	65,878	4.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	164	70	4	64.3%	65,811	4.8	4	3	5	0	0	5
Yonkers	New York	184	80	7	36.2%	65,438	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	167	73	5	49.3%	65,278	6.3	4	2	6	0	0	6
Florissant	Missouri	161	73	4	59.6%	64,531	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Flushing	New York	171	71	7	30.0%	64,520	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Astoria	New York	178	78	6	44.8%	63,866	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission Viejo	California	121	58	4	64.8%	63,772	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Inglewood	California	205	91	5	47.7%	63,756	6.2	5	2	5	0	1	5
Rockville	Maryland	195	96	5	44.0%	63,637	6.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Rancho Cucamonga	California	187	84	7	35.7%	63,014	7.8	4	2	5	0	0	4
Salinas	California	186	83	7	33.3%	62,662	7.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Apopka	Florida	129	60	4	63.4%	61,960	4.5	2	1	3	1	1	2
Cumming	Georgia	152	67	7	37.4%	60,652	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baytown	Texas	152	72	6	51.2%	60,283	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Chandler	Arizona	179	89	9	22.2%	59,530	9.3	6	2	7	0	0	4
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	186	79	6	29.1%	59,172	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Jamaica	New York	199	87	7	24.2%	58,928	8.7	6	2	7	0	0	6
Long Beach	California	261	108	10	12.3%	58,901	10.7	12	2	14	0	0	9
Lancaster	California	147	66	8	31.9%	58,768	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Newport News	Virginia	223	98	7	33.1%	58,545	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mesquite	Texas	158	76	6	40.0%	58,525	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tacoma	Washington	305	127	9	17.5%	58,339	9.3	20	2	21	0	0	19
Pittsburg	California	99	47	5	60.0%	57,649	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Glendale	Arizona	236	106	8	18.6%	56,741	8.9	9	2	11	0	0	11
Schenectady	New York	231	97	7	34.8%	56,446	7.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Fullerton	California	166	77	6	39.3%	54,788	6.3	4	2	5	0	1	5
Torrance	California	186	70	5	30.7%	54,227	7.6	5	2	5	0	1	4
Santa Ana	California	191	90	9	15.0%	53,393	9.5	6	2	7	0	0	6
Honolulu	Hawaii	254	104	10	12.8%	53,289	11.0	11	1	11	0	0	5
Oxnard	California	169	84	8	24.0%	52,898	8.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Mesa	Arizona	233	112	11	9.8%	52,256	10.7	13	3	18	0	0	5
Englewood	Colorado	194	89	5	46.7%	52,164	6.5	4	3	4	1	1	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	208	98	6	39.6%	51,947	6.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Hartford	Connecticut	175	81	4	41.7%	51,491	7.0	6	3	11	0	0	9
Hayward	California	170	73	7	26.6%	51,004	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Cajon	California	149	67	6	29.5%	50,948	8.7	3	3	5	0	0	4
Palmdale	California	158	67	7	29.0%	50,741	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roanoke	Virginia	252	109	7	29.7%	50,334	7.7	10	2	11	0	0	11
San Mateo	California	166	74	6	35.2%	50,096	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Scottsdale	Arizona	242	115	9	16.5%	49,072	9.2	11	2	14	0	0	13
Warren	Michigan	178	73	6	36.2%	48,889	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Grand Prairie	Texas	162	79	7	25.6%	48,724	8.5	4	3	5	0	0	5
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	191	84	7	26.1%	48,642	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Auburn	Washington	159	77	5	42.7%	48,223	6.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Herndon	Virginia	124	62	3	51.5%	48,174	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Brockton	Massachusetts	133	59	6	50.0%	47,713	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Winston Salem	North Carolina	246	103	9	18.0%	47,474	9.1	9	1	9	0	0	8
Elizabeth	New Jersey	158	77	6	46.9%	47,089	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elmhurst	New York	100	44	6	50.0%	46,984	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Bernardino	California	204	89	9	18.8%	46,852	9.1	7	2	11	0	0	8
Fremont	California	169	71	7	20.0%	46,631	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lowell	Massachusetts	153	66	6	41.8%	46,505	7.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Burbank	California	185	84	4	42.9%	46,318	6.6	5	2	6	0	0	6
Tempe	Arizona	159	71	8	24.4%	46,264	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Irving	Texas	181	80	9	19.2%	46,182	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Perris	California	143	66	6	39.2%	46,056	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Dearborn	Michigan	157	70	6	48.3%	45,963	6.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Joliet	Illinois	165	71	6	35.5%	45,795	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Reading	Pennsylvania	227	93	8	21.2%	45,566	9.2	10	2	11	0	0	9
Reno	Nevada	235	97	9	15.3%	45,411	9.9	12	1	12	0	0	10
Olympia	Washington	234	104	8	24.8%	45,373	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	5
Puyallup	Washington	190	89	6	31.6%	45,171	8.2	5	2	6	0	0	6
Albany	New York	242	105	6	29.8%	45,005	7.6	11	2	12	0	0	12
Youngstown	Ohio	235	99	8	28.6%	44,970	8.6	12	3	14	0	0	14
Riverside	California	208	94	10	12.1%	44,955	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Rochester	New York	287	125	10	9.5%	44,650	11.0	24	2	32	0	0	5
Corona	California	189	81	10	17.3%	44,630	10.0	5	2	6	0	0	2
Denton	Texas	189	92	9	28.1%	44,511	8.0	6	2	8	0	0	7
Bridgeport	Connecticut	208	90	7	30.4%	44,445	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	5
Daly City	California	141	59	6	38.7%	44,224	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norfolk	Virginia	270	120	8	18.0%	44,130	9.4	14	1	14	0	0	11
Flint	Michigan	219	92	7	28.4%	44,100	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	6
Chula Vista	California	169	77	9	16.7%	43,558	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Columbia	South Carolina	275	108	9	12.7%	43,435	10.1	14	1	14	0	0	9
York	Pennsylvania	206	91	8	24.0%	43,177	9.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Odessa	Texas	206	94	7	27.0%	43,167	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	5
Laurel	Maryland	173	84	6	38.3%	43,042	7.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Keller	Texas	133	55	6	36.8%	42,753	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Midlothian	Virginia	143	57	5	43.9%	42,474	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	232	100	9	23.1%	42,311	8.8	13	1	13	0	0	11
Pearland	Texas	125	57	8	30.4%	41,767	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Elgin	Illinois	148	68	7	34.2%	41,756	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bothell	Washington	170	76	7	32.5%	41,739	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
High Point	North Carolina	186	80	7	34.1%	41,706	7.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
La Puente	California	142	59	6	35.2%	41,526	7.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Ontario	California	158	69	6	23.4%	41,400	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	California	168	70	7	40.0%	41,186	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Ventura	California	143	65	7	35.5%	41,156	7.3	3	2	5	0	0	5
Clinton Township	Michigan	155	73	4	40.9%	40,994	6.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Pasadena	California	190	85	6	25.9%	40,844	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Marcos	California	137	64	5	40.5%	40,675	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	California	182	81	8	18.7%	40,436	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	5
Anaheim	California	222	97	8	10.9%	40,280	10.0	7	2	8	0	0	6
Edison	New Jersey	139	71	5	39.9%	40,253	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cary	North Carolina	144	66	9	25.9%	40,163	9.0	4	3	6	0	0	5
Ashburn	Virginia	125	59	7	35.7%	40,112	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Jackson	Mississippi	241	97	8	23.5%	39,947	8.7	11	1	11	0	0	10
New Bedford	Massachusetts	162	68	6	42.1%	39,936	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Valley City	Utah	145	72	7	29.7%	39,499	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Carrollton	Texas	152	65	8	29.3%	39,472	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
West Covina	California	140	62	5	35.9%	39,243	7.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Akron	Ohio	270	113	9	14.5%	39,130	10.0	17	2	17	0	0	15
Worcester	Massachusetts	208	88	9	21.1%	39,080	9.2	9	1	9	0	0	7
Waukegan	Illinois	125	63	5	40.0%	39,011	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Corpus Christi	Texas	263	109	9	11.9%	38,780	10.0	18	1	18	0	0	16
Hawthorne	California	99	37	6	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Concord	California	176	73	8	29.2%	38,052	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Independence	Missouri	181	77	7	30.6%	37,927	7.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Garden Grove	California	171	82	7	21.5%	37,733	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Stamford	Connecticut	203	91	8	29.0%	37,350	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	4
Fontana	California	153	75	8	15.9%	37,288	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salem	Oregon	197	89	9	14.0%	37,279	10.0	7	1	7	0	0	6
Providence	Rhode Island	222	96	8	18.1%	37,072	10.3	8	2	9	0	0	6
Longmont	Colorado	150	69	8	28.3%	36,958	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Augusta	Georgia	228	98	8	18.0%	36,843	10.1	8	2	9	0	0	7
Stockton	California	262	98	11	9.8%	36,576	10.3	12	2	14	0	0	10
Palo Alto	California	164	70	6	36.9%	35,648	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	182	77	8	21.4%	35,602	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Manchester	New Hampshire	182	76	7	30.0%	34,818	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Port Richey	Florida	180	81	7	28.5%	34,471	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Jersey City	New Jersey	206	85	11	13.1%	34,260	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	5
Mobile	Alabama	311	119	11	12.6%	34,118	10.7	18	1	18	0	0	3
Kent	Washington	177	77	10	21.1%	33,821	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Menifee	California	177	83	8	30.4%	33,618	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Antioch	California	128	61	6	30.0%	33,216	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Maria	California	163	77	8	22.8%	32,678	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fayetteville	North Carolina	218	85	10	13.4%	32,593	10.4	8	1	8	0	0	4
Lynn	Massachusetts	188	83	8	34.2%	32,017	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ridgewood	New York	98	39	7	30.0%	32,015	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Scranton	Pennsylvania	216	95	7	31.9%	31,739	7.6	8	3	10	1	1	9
Pueblo	Colorado	226	93	9	19.8%	31,285	9.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Merced	California	151	65	7	30.0%	30,918	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Morgantown	West Virginia	138	56	8	32.3%	30,802	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Brownsville	Texas	164	70	9	15.3%	30,758	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Oceanside	California	181	84	8	15.3%	30,718	10.3	4	2	5	0	0	2
Escondido	California	151	71	8	17.0%	30,553	9.3	4	2	7	0	0	6
Mission	Texas	147	69	9	16.9%	30,517	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Toledo	Ohio	266	115	11	9.9%	30,412	10.4	15	1	15	0	0	9
Federal Way	Washington	123	58	7	30.0%	30,043	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Las Cruces	New Mexico	216	89	8	20.1%	29,999	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Clovis	California	158	70	7	24.7%	29,983	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bowie	Maryland	173	88	7	29.2%	29,854	8.0	4	3	7	0	0	7
Kennesaw	Georgia	128	54	8	30.0%	29,739	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Duluth	Minnesota	261	100	8	25.3%	29,683	8.5	11	2	12	0	0	10
Kennewick	Washington	156	64	6	30.0%	29,643	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lubbock	Texas	259	104	10	10.7%	29,465	10.4	14	1	14	0	0	7
Jupiter	Florida	148	64	6	29.7%	29,300	9.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Garland	Texas	186	83	9	12.3%	29,292	10.2	5	2	7	0	0	4
O Fallon	Missouri	135	67	7	30.3%	29,216	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Springdale	Arkansas	127	55	7	30.0%	28,922	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Olathe	Kansas	126	60	8	20.0%	28,875	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	115	61	7	25.3%	28,869	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Metairie	Louisiana	200	79	8	20.1%	28,629	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Miami Beach	Florida	186	87	6	24.7%	28,524	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Tyler	Texas	231	93	8	18.2%	28,453	9.7	9	1	9	0	0	8
Pensacola	Florida	265	114	9	10.5%	28,288	10.6	13	1	13	0	0	4
Elk Grove	California	162	64	9	15.7%	28,197	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Portsmouth	Virginia	193	83	7	29.6%	28,180	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	6
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	226	98	11	16.5%	27,986	9.7	9	2	10	0	0	7
Hampton	Virginia	203	84	10	20.5%	27,952	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	5
Costa Mesa	California	134	51	7	24.4%	27,805	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tallahassee	Florida	231	101	10	9.6%	27,609	10.4	10	2	16	0	0	6
Redwood City	California	160	73	6	24.1%	27,601	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chino	California	133	66	6	29.1%	27,525	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Beaverton	Oregon	178	81	9	13.6%	27,447	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Livermore	California	128	65	7	28.5%	27,422	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Fargo	North Dakota	167	73	11	22.3%	27,258	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Lexington	Kentucky	288	108	11	8.5%	27,201	11.3	15	1	15	0	0	1
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	201	77	8	19.3%	26,860	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Gainesville	Florida	223	98	10	12.8%	26,784	10.0	10	2	12	0	0	9
Clermont	Florida	163	74	7	26.5%	26,574	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	143	60	8	22.9%	26,573	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Riverview	Florida	161	70	8	23.8%	26,546	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Plainfield	Illinois	156	66	7	26.8%	26,440	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	158	75	9	15.3%	26,255	9.3	4	2	6	0	0	6
Wichita Falls	Texas	200	83	8	26.5%	26,191	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hamilton	Ohio	147	64	7	19.1%	26,131	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Berkeley	California	201	86	9	20.4%	25,981	9.1	9	2	14	0	0	8
Melbourne	Florida	179	77	10	16.6%	25,825	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Fairfield	California	128	61	7	22.6%	25,766	10.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Athens	Georgia	209	98	8	20.5%	25,584	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	5
New Haven	Connecticut	175	81	8	19.6%	25,576	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Temecula	California	162	71	8	19.7%	25,544	9.3	3	2	4	0	0	3
Milton	Florida	157	66	7	26.9%	25,500	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Beaumont	Texas	206	90	8	17.3%	25,214	9.4	8	1	8	0	0	7
Vallejo	California	174	69	8	20.1%	25,002	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Evansville	Indiana	220	96	11	13.5%	24,855	10.4	9	1	9	0	0	7
Midland	Texas	180	80	8	15.5%	24,804	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lincoln	Nebraska	313	121	10	8.6%	24,799	11.5	22	2	27	0	0	0
Laredo	Texas	190	81	9	9.1%	24,775	10.8	6	2	9	0	0	4
Henderson	Nevada	215	82	15	8.2%	24,672	12.0	8	1	8	0	0	1
College Station	Texas	132	62	8	20.0%	24,610	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clearwater	Florida	228	94	10	13.3%	24,382	9.7	9	2	9	0	0	8
Palm Bay	Florida	160	69	8	21.8%	24,272	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Springfield	Missouri	207	89	10	10.5%	24,208	9.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Yakima	Washington	187	78	8	18.6%	24,182	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	192	89	9	16.6%	24,152	9.4	5	2	9	0	0	5
Vista	California	151	72	9	20.0%	23,973	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cape Coral	Florida	176	75	9	13.3%	23,967	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	2
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	156	71	9	19.4%	23,741	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Simi Valley	California	115	58	8	18.2%	23,481	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Lake Charles	Louisiana	192	85	9	17.7%	23,142	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Saint Charles	Missouri	155	74	9	16.5%	23,060	9.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	155	68	6	21.0%	22,769	9.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
Lakeland	Florida	222	99	11	8.8%	22,739	11.1	9	1	9	0	0	1
Quincy	Massachusetts	145	63	8	24.0%	22,578	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Tracy	California	177	78	7	19.3%	22,570	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	154	70	9	16.4%	22,568	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boise	Idaho	211	88	12	8.8%	22,467	11.1	9	1	9	0	0	3
Norman	Oklahoma	167	71	9	18.0%	22,375	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lafayette	Louisiana	178	73	9	13.9%	22,257	9.6	5	2	8	0	0	5
Modesto	California	208	91	10	8.4%	22,178	11.4	7	2	13	0	0	1
Newnan	Georgia	130	61	9	23.7%	22,148	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bloomington	Indiana	195	94	9	16.0%	21,417	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	207	86	10	9.0%	21,410	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	232	89	10	8.7%	21,274	11.3	12	1	12	0	0	1
Indio	California	136	59	8	22.1%	21,253	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Amarillo	Texas	273	122	11	9.3%	21,190	11.1	14	1	14	0	0	6
West Chester	Pennsylvania	159	77	9	19.5%	21,172	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Meridian	Idaho	132	57	8	20.0%	20,844	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Shreveport	Louisiana	249	101	11	9.3%	20,766	10.6	12	1	12	0	0	9
Des Moines	Iowa	204	88	10	9.2%	20,641	11.2	11	1	11	0	0	2
Hillsboro	Oregon	128	62	9	20.0%	20,574	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ogden	Utah	167	71	13	10.1%	20,433	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	1
Eugene	Oregon	194	83	9	10.0%	20,299	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Santa Monica	California	184	87	8	21.3%	20,069	8.8	5	2	6	0	0	5
Huntington Beach	California	185	90	9	10.0%	19,991	10.0	4	2	5	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	175	75	9	12.8%	19,837	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Buford	Georgia	119	56	7	20.0%	19,821	9.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Bowling Green	Kentucky	142	59	8	17.1%	19,749	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Greenville	South Carolina	201	88	11	9.0%	19,707	10.8	9	2	10	0	0	6
Lansing	Michigan	201	90	10	11.9%	19,610	10.7	7	1	7	0	0	3
Charlottesville	Virginia	167	77	10	15.9%	19,575	10.4	5	2	9	0	0	1
West Jordan	Utah	149	71	8	15.8%	19,556	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Missoula	Montana	190	83	8	20.0%	19,457	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Coral Springs	Florida	131	60	10	20.0%	19,448	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sparks	Nevada	178	74	11	16.2%	19,315	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Sandy	Utah	169	77	9	17.4%	19,268	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Canton	Ohio	232	98	9	13.1%	19,245	10.3	12	1	12	0	0	10
Moreno Valley	California	139	62	13	9.4%	19,227	10.8	4	2	7	0	0	3
Longview	Texas	185	84	8	18.2%	19,119	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Green Bay	Wisconsin	214	92	9	10.4%	18,996	9.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Gulfport	Mississippi	157	72	9	20.0%	18,944	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redding	California	174	77	9	16.4%	18,484	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Winter Haven	Florida	151	65	10	17.1%	18,316	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
New Braunfels	Texas	129	64	8	17.6%	18,123	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Spartanburg	South Carolina	167	77	11	16.2%	18,107	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Hesperia	California	126	58	11	17.3%	18,002	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Vacaville	California	124	59	8	17.1%	17,975	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Leandro	California	155	71	9	15.9%	17,721	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Murrieta	California	120	60	9	13.3%	17,592	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	194	78	8	17.0%	17,577	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rock Hill	South Carolina	157	81	8	14.8%	17,230	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	225	92	10	9.4%	17,083	10.7	9	1	9	0	0	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	147	67	9	9.7%	17,060	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Yuma	Arizona	149	68	8	11.5%	17,034	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Downey	California	158	70	7	14.9%	16,842	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	193	82	9	15.5%	16,806	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Largo	Florida	175	72	10	15.4%	16,531	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Carlsbad	California	170	81	9	14.1%	16,080	9.8	4	2	6	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	California	147	66	8	15.4%	15,977	9.5	4	2	6	0	0	4
San Angelo	Texas	172	70	8	14.4%	15,923	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Saginaw	Michigan	206	91	10	12.0%	15,665	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	5
Rialto	California	135	65	8	14.7%	15,655	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Topeka	Kansas	260	107	9	9.2%	15,113	10.8	18	1	18	0	0	9
Surprise	Arizona	161	71	11	11.1%	15,065	10.5	4	2	6	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	168	67	9	15.7%	15,012	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	151	71	9	12.6%	14,962	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Anderson	South Carolina	159	73	9	15.1%	14,907	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Chico	California	137	56	9	13.2%	14,746	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	134	59	9	13.6%	14,570	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edinburg	Texas	164	70	10	9.3%	14,497	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	208	91	12	7.9%	14,282	12.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	130	63	9	13.3%	14,234	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	130	55	11	14.4%	14,002	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	165	71	10	12.4%	13,975	10.0	4	2	6	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	184	83	9	10.8%	13,777	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Victorville	California	150	71	8	10.0%	13,631	10.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
Visalia	California	150	64	10	8.9%	13,462	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Vero Beach	Florida	199	91	8	11.6%	13,308	9.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lehigh Acres	Florida	212	93	10	11.3%	13,252	10.0	6	2	10	0	0	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	185	66	12	5.6%	13,173	13.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Sunnyvale	California	188	69	11	8.6%	13,115	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Bryan	Texas	189	87	10	13.6%	13,072	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Abilene	Texas	198	87	10	10.0%	13,013	10.3	6	2	7	0	0	5
Bend	Oregon	152	58	11	10.6%	12,981	9.7	3	2	5	0	0	1
Boston	Massachusetts	278	115	11	8.3%	12,650	11.3	14	2	26	0	0	2
Bellingham	Washington	157	74	10	10.0%	12,649	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Panama City	Florida	179	83	9	9.9%	12,545	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	3
Deltona	Florida	124	62	9	13.2%	12,354	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Appleton	Wisconsin	165	75	9	10.0%	12,170	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Idaho Falls	Idaho	169	74	9	11.0%	12,035	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Asheville	North Carolina	161	72	11	8.9%	11,708	10.8	5	2	6	0	0	3
Provo	Utah	156	72	9	10.0%	11,652	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Pierce	Florida	215	78	10	12.0%	11,521	9.9	8	1	8	0	0	6
Valdosta	Georgia	201	83	9	12.0%	11,382	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Roseville	California	148	66	11	8.1%	11,366	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Spring Hill	Florida	172	77	13	9.0%	11,229	11.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Santa Clara	California	152	59	8	8.9%	11,176	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Mcallen	Texas	166	74	12	7.8%	11,063	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	136	63	9	10.0%	11,025	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hemet	California	164	70	12	8.5%	10,922	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Muskegon	Michigan	187	80	11	8.3%	10,779	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	California	199	89	12	7.8%	10,608	11.9	7	2	10	0	0	2
Grand Junction	Colorado	189	82	10	10.0%	10,546	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Belleville	Illinois	174	87	10	11.2%	10,404	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Toms River	New Jersey	147	67	12	8.4%	10,282	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	140	61	9	10.0%	10,032	10.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	130	64	9	10.0%	10,028	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Acworth	Georgia	127	56	9	10.0%	9,968	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	127	60	9	10.0%	9,387	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Covington	Georgia	135	59	8	10.0%	9,269	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Lawrence	Kansas	171	76	11	9.0%	9,077	11.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Napa	California	125	52	8	9.1%	8,841	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Davenport	Iowa	179	74	11	8.4%	8,823	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	4
Champaign	Illinois	143	63	10	9.2%	8,682	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Muncie	Indiana	182	79	10	9.1%	8,472	10.6	5	2	9	0	0	4
Rapid City	South Dakota	139	60	12	8.6%	8,306	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	189	82	11	8.7%	8,264	12.0	6	2	12	0	0	1
Livonia	Michigan	139	62	10	8.5%	8,059	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	1

Texas

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	442	166	4	69.0%	2,198,926	4.1	96	5	117	0	27	117
San Antonio	403	164	2	86.1%	1,530,358	2.4	59	2	60	0	53	60
Dallas	355	146	1	94.9%	1,321,100	1.5	48	2	48	40	40	48
Austin	345	151	2	78.0%	849,123	3.1	44	2	52	9	30	52
Arlington	232	98	1	98.5%	391,199	1.1	12	2	14	11	12	14
Spring	258	105	3	84.4%	321,570	2.4	8	3	9	2	8	9
Katy	168	76	2	82.1%	282,363	2.8	4	3	6	0	4	6
Fort Worth	360	141	8	24.2%	220,827	9.3	32	4	62	0	3	22
Plano	185	85	4	70.2%	214,506	3.9	7	1	7	1	2	7
Frisco	125	57	1	100.0%	172,448	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Mckinney	147	77	2	90.0%	170,093	2.0	3	2	4	0	3	4
Waco	217	92	1	95.3%	150,787	1.6	9	2	11	4	9	11
Humble	149	62	3	80.0%	133,223	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Round Rock	174	88	3	60.4%	101,177	5.0	3	2	5	1	1	5
Cypress	134	64	5	56.2%	95,961	5.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Killeen	155	70	4	60.0%	90,183	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Allen	124	60	3	79.0%	87,942	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Missouri City	143	64	3	80.0%	84,875	3.0	2	2	2	0	2	2
Richardson	149	69	4	70.0%	80,219	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Conroe	214	89	5	48.6%	77,888	6.0	7	2	8	2	2	8
Sugar Land	174	78	6	45.2%	76,431	6.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
El Paso	305	117	10	9.2%	72,973	10.6	24	1	24	0	0	9
Baytown	152	72	6	51.2%	60,283	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Mesquite	158	76	6	40.0%	58,525	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Grand Prairie	162	79	7	25.6%	48,724	8.5	4	3	5	0	0	5
Irving	181	80	9	19.2%	46,182	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Denton	189	92	9	28.1%	44,511	8.0	6	2	8	0	0	7
Odessa	206	94	7	27.0%	43,167	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	5
Keller	133	55	6	36.8%	42,753	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Pearland	125	57	8	30.4%	41,767	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Carrollton	152	65	8	29.3%	39,472	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Corpus Christi	263	109	9	11.9%	38,780	10.0	18	1	18	0	0	16
Brownsville	164	70	9	15.3%	30,758	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Mission	147	69	9	16.9%	30,517	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lubbock	259	104	10	10.7%	29,465	10.4	14	1	14	0	0	7
Garland	186	83	9	12.3%	29,292	10.2	5	2	7	0	0	4
Tyler	231	93	8	18.2%	28,453	9.7	9	1	9	0	0	8
Wichita Falls	200	83	8	26.5%	26,191	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Beaumont	206	90	8	17.3%	25,214	9.4	8	1	8	0	0	7
Midland	180	80	8	15.5%	24,804	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Laredo	190	81	9	9.1%	24,775	10.8	6	2	9	0	0	4
College Station	132	62	8	20.0%	24,610	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Amarillo	273	122	11	9.3%	21,190	11.1	14	1	14	0	0	6
Longview	185	84	8	18.2%	19,119	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
New Braunfels	129	64	8	17.6%	18,123	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
San Angelo	172	70	8	14.4%	15,923	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lewisville	151	71	9	12.6%	14,962	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Edinburg	164	70	10	9.3%	14,497	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bryan	189	87	10	13.6%	13,072	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	3
Abilene	198	87	10	10.0%	13,013	10.3	6	2	7	0	0	5
Mcallen	166	74	12	7.8%	11,063	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0

Houston

ZIP	mrhandyman.com	angieslist.com	yelp.com	thumbtack.com	homeadvisor.com	expertise.com
77088	4	1	2	3	5	6
77047	4	1	2	3	5	7
77037	3	1	2	4	5	7
77098	4	1	2	3	5	6
77027	4	1	2	3	5	7
77068	4	1	2	3	6	7
77078	3	1	2	4	5	6
77086	3	1	2	4	5	7
77035	4	1	2	3	6	7
77008	6	4	5	7	8	10
77004	4	1	2	3	5	6
77028	3	1	2	4	5	6
77059	4	1	2	3	6	7
77039	3	1	2	4	5	7
77019	4	1	2	3	5	6
77075	4	1	2	3	6	8
77077	4	1	2	3	6	7
77079	4	1	2	3	6	7
77099	4	1	2	3	6	8
77024	3	1	2	4	5	7
77095	4	1	2	3	6	8
77048	4	1	2	3	5	6
77044	3	1	2	4	5	8
77015	6	4	5	7	8	9
77017	7	4	5	6	9	10
77057	4	1	2	3	5	6
77055	4	1	2	3	5	6
77006	4	1	2	3	5	6
77026	4	1	2	3	5	6
77046	3	1	2	4	5	6
77066	3	1	2	4	5	7
77023	4	1	2	3	5	6
77094	4	1	2	3	6	7
77084	4	1	2	3	6	7
77013	4	1	2	3	5	6
77063	4	1	2	3	5	6
77053	3	1	2	5	7	9
77022	4	1	2	3	5	6
77072	4	1	2	3	5	6
77049	4	1	2	3	5	7
77045	4	1	2	3	5	6
77010	4	1	2	3	5	6
77018	4	1	2	3	5	6
77041	6	4	5	7	8	11
77009	4	1	2	3	5	6
77089	4	1	2	3	6	8
77032	3	1	2	4	5	7
77036	4	1	2	3	5	6
77085	4	1	2	3	5	7
77054	4	1	2	3	5	6
77058	7	4	5	6	9	11
77014	3	1	2	4	5	7
77067	6	4	5	7	8	10
77005	3	1	2	4	5	7
77076	3	1	2	4	5	6
77070	7	4	5	6	9	11
77060	3	1	2	4	5	7
77080	4	1	2	3	5	6
77050	3	1	2	4	5	7
77091	3	1	2	4	5	6
77071	7	4	5	6	9	10
77061	4	1	2	3	5	7
77020	3	1	2	4	5	7
77081	4	1	2	3	5	6
77030	4	1	2	3	5	6
77040	3	1	2	4	5	7
77090	3	1	2	4	5	8
77031	4	1	2	3	5	7
77051	7	4	5	6	8	10
77011	4	1	2	3	5	6
77042	4	1	2	3	5	6
77062	3	1	2	4	5	7
77082	7	4	5	6	9	10
77093	6	4	5	7	8	9
77073	3	1	2	4	5	7
77033	4	1	2	3	5	6
77043	7	4	5	6	9	10
77074	4	1	2	3	5	6
77064	4	1	2	3	6	8
77012	4	1	2	3	5	6
77002	7	4	5	6	8	9
77092	2	4	5	6	8	9
77069	3	1	2	4	5	7
77021	4	1	2	3	5	6
77083	3	1	2	4	6	8
77029	4	1	2	3	5	6
77034	3	1	2	4	5	7
77087	4	1	2	3	5	6
77003	4	1	2	3	5	6
77038	6	4	5	7	8	10
77007	4	1	2	3	5	6
77016	3	1	2	4	5	7
77065	4	1	2	3	6	8
77096	4	1	2	3	6	8
77025	4	1	2	3	5	6
77056	4	1	2	3	5	6

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Mrhandyman

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 4,265 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Mrhandyman Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (handyman near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Mrhandyman Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Mrhandyman Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Mrhandyman Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly