Libertymutual Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve libertymutual.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Libertymutual Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Libertymutual Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Libertymutual Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Libertymutual Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	6	27.3%	88,254,769	8.2	27,379	32,654	8	32,683	11	181	32,680
California	870	609	6	24.6%	9,623,546	8.5	1,166	1,740	1	1,741	0	1	1,741
Texas	846	595	6	24.5%	6,831,298	8.6	1,360	1,917	1	1,917	0	0	1,917
New York	791	600	6	31.8%	6,230,454	7.7	1,491	1,756	1	1,757	0	15	1,757
Florida	768	578	6	25.1%	5,174,762	8.5	446	975	1	976	0	3	976
Pennsylvania	757	591	6	33.2%	4,245,853	7.6	1,604	1,781	2	1,782	0	19	1,782
Massachusetts	517	422	3	48.3%	3,295,623	6.2	461	534	1	534	0	42	534
Illinois	670	490	6	25.5%	3,271,365	8.4	1,247	1,382	2	1,383	0	1	1,383
Ohio	670	548	6	24.7%	2,876,975	8.6	976	1,188	1	1,188	0	1	1,186
North Carolina	506	406	6	27.9%	2,829,047	8.2	683	802	1	802	0	1	802
Michigan	656	528	6	25.9%	2,579,360	8.4	833	976	1	976	0	1	976
Georgia	409	319	7	24.0%	2,469,698	8.5	574	726	2	730	3	4	729
New Jersey	436	328	6	26.8%	2,384,270	8.3	537	593	1	593	0	0	593
Virginia	406	322	6	24.9%	2,095,379	8.4	723	891	1	891	0	0	891
Missouri	427	337	6	31.6%	1,922,767	7.7	887	1,017	1	1,017	0	11	1,017
Washington	337	274	6	25.4%	1,850,676	8.4	451	587	1	587	0	0	587
Indiana	472	373	6	26.5%	1,756,358	8.3	659	770	1	770	0	1	770
Arizona	269	218	6	24.9%	1,728,992	8.5	247	396	1	396	0	0	396
Maryland	338	254	6	28.6%	1,714,952	8.0	392	463	1	463	0	1	463
Tennessee	377	305	6	25.4%	1,688,939	8.4	514	622	2	627	3	5	627
Wisconsin	481	384	6	27.9%	1,614,270	8.3	694	769	2	770	1	1	770
Minnesota	530	418	6	26.5%	1,464,742	8.4	777	878	1	878	0	0	878
Connecticut	284	228	5	39.1%	1,400,501	7.1	234	279	1	279	0	7	279
South Carolina	278	223	6	28.0%	1,387,932	8.2	347	422	1	422	0	0	422
Colorado	296	242	6	25.1%	1,385,639	8.5	381	514	1	514	0	0	514
Alabama	320	261	6	26.5%	1,287,808	8.3	522	637	1	640	0	3	640
Louisiana	306	237	6	26.3%	1,226,863	8.4	431	510	2	511	1	1	511
Kentucky	354	287	6	26.7%	1,187,201	8.4	698	758	1	758	0	1	758
Oklahoma	322	248	6	26.8%	1,048,202	8.5	557	646	1	646	0	1	646
Oregon	271	224	6	24.4%	996,517	8.5	355	414	1	414	0	0	414
Iowa	486	357	6	29.4%	920,039	8.0	890	933	1	933	0	4	933
Mississippi	250	193	6	26.3%	784,574	8.3	384	418	1	418	0	0	418
Kansas	341	261	6	26.8%	778,556	8.3	616	692	1	692	0	2	692
Arkansas	261	209	6	25.1%	751,251	8.3	553	587	1	587	0	0	587
Nevada	176	146	7	25.5%	746,074	8.4	92	168	1	168	0	0	168
Utah	245	207	6	23.7%	719,916	8.6	246	284	1	284	0	0	284
New Mexico	204	159	6	32.1%	670,832	8.2	327	361	1	361	0	1	361
New Hampshire	226	197	4	46.3%	622,711	6.6	238	248	1	248	0	21	248
Nebraska	308	241	6	31.0%	590,314	8.3	524	581	1	581	0	1	581
Maine	240	198	3	43.7%	581,841	7.0	421	425	2	431	1	12	431
West Virginia	277	224	6	28.6%	522,356	8.0	684	704	1	704	0	6	704
Rhode Island	157	139	4	40.5%	427,587	6.8	64	77	1	77	0	0	77
Idaho	199	170	6	25.1%	424,200	8.4	251	273	1	273	0	0	273
Hawaii	152	129	8	23.7%	336,453	8.5	82	93	1	93	0	0	93
Montana	229	186	6	29.9%	311,625	8.4	348	361	1	361	0	0	361
Vermont	197	170	3	44.0%	275,056	6.9	250	254	1	254	0	9	254
Delaware	159	137	6	26.9%	255,495	8.3	52	66	1	66	0	0	66
North Dakota	206	168	7	30.5%	228,793	8.1	367	381	1	381	0	1	381
South Dakota	217	174	6	25.7%	222,075	8.4	359	370	1	370	0	0	370
Alaska	155	134	7	26.7%	196,915	7.5	218	235	1	235	0	0	235
Wyoming	152	130	7	21.4%	124,667	8.5	164	171	1	175	2	4	175

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	173	138	6	24.4%	778,696	8.5	96	1	96	0	0	96
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	6	28.8%	749,051	8.1	37	1	37	0	0	37
Los Angeles	California	147	126	6	28.5%	699,804	8.2	62	1	62	0	0	62
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	7	25.4%	686,876	8.6	56	1	56	0	0	56
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	5	39.0%	614,025	7.3	47	1	47	0	0	47
Bronx	New York	118	103	5	38.7%	557,199	7.2	25	1	25	0	0	25
New York City	New York	128	111	6	29.4%	477,125	8.0	47	1	47	0	0	47
Miami	Florida	160	123	6	25.1%	472,088	8.6	55	1	55	0	0	55
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	6	21.9%	389,351	8.5	59	1	59	0	0	59
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	7	23.6%	364,717	8.7	43	1	43	0	0	43
San Diego	California	134	116	6	26.8%	360,561	8.3	36	1	37	0	1	37
Dallas	Texas	149	126	6	24.2%	336,726	8.5	48	1	48	0	0	48
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	6	22.0%	319,314	8.8	42	1	42	0	0	42
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	6	29.1%	316,974	8.0	51	1	51	0	0	51
Denver	Colorado	136	120	6	28.0%	303,933	8.2	38	1	38	0	0	38
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	5	32.0%	289,892	7.6	24	1	24	0	0	24
Orlando	Florida	133	115	7	26.9%	267,956	8.3	32	1	33	0	1	33
Seattle	Washington	142	127	6	26.6%	254,298	8.4	35	1	35	0	0	35
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	4	38.6%	253,206	7.5	17	1	17	0	0	17
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	7	31.1%	252,752	7.9	29	2	30	1	1	30
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	6	36.8%	251,514	8.0	43	1	43	0	1	43
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	6	27.2%	249,274	8.0	45	1	45	0	1	45
San Jose	California	129	116	6	22.7%	238,809	8.7	28	1	28	0	0	28
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	5	34.1%	232,851	7.4	39	1	39	0	1	39
El Paso	Texas	122	110	6	29.5%	232,426	8.2	24	1	24	0	0	24
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	7	30.4%	231,528	7.9	32	1	32	0	0	32
San Francisco	California	121	106	7	26.5%	230,257	8.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Austin	Texas	138	123	6	20.9%	227,891	8.8	44	1	44	0	0	44
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	7	25.0%	226,287	8.4	32	1	32	0	0	32
Portland	Oregon	130	112	6	24.2%	222,438	8.5	33	1	33	0	0	33
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	6	26.0%	215,898	8.2	27	1	27	0	0	27
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	6	22.3%	212,373	8.8	37	1	37	0	0	37
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	6	24.4%	206,399	8.6	30	1	30	0	0	30
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	6	23.4%	202,942	8.3	31	1	31	0	0	31
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	6	22.1%	201,502	8.7	32	1	32	0	0	32
Sacramento	California	134	115	6	25.0%	201,040	8.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	7	20.0%	197,717	9.0	39	1	39	0	0	39
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	5	34.5%	197,059	7.5	49	1	49	0	0	49
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	6	28.3%	193,425	8.3	28	1	28	0	0	28
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	6	23.8%	190,323	8.5	30	1	30	0	0	30
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	6	27.2%	189,169	8.0	26	2	28	1	2	28
Tampa	Florida	131	110	6	23.8%	188,632	8.6	27	1	27	0	0	27
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	7	24.4%	183,319	8.6	29	1	29	0	0	29
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	6	32.9%	181,922	7.8	31	1	31	0	0	31
Buffalo	New York	142	124	6	31.8%	178,700	7.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	6	27.2%	174,064	8.0	25	1	25	0	0	25
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	6	29.4%	171,823	8.1	30	1	30	0	0	30
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	6	21.1%	170,066	8.8	45	1	45	0	0	45
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	7	24.3%	153,495	8.5	22	1	22	0	0	22
Bakersfield	California	112	102	8	27.2%	152,227	8.2	11	1	11	0	0	11
Rochester	New York	125	108	6	31.3%	147,402	7.8	24	1	24	0	0	24
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	6	30.4%	145,356	8.1	27	1	27	0	0	27
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	6	32.0%	136,761	8.1	19	1	19	0	0	19
Fresno	California	120	105	7	22.5%	135,383	8.7	18	1	18	0	0	18
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	6	25.1%	133,947	8.5	13	1	13	0	0	13
Staten Island	New York	120	105	6	28.0%	132,631	8.2	12	1	12	0	0	12
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	6	27.7%	129,712	8.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	7	23.6%	129,262	8.7	15	1	15	0	0	15
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	6	25.8%	129,084	8.4	30	1	30	0	0	30
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	6	30.7%	128,204	8.2	26	1	26	0	0	26
Spring	Texas	114	103	6	31.0%	118,084	7.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	6	23.4%	114,092	8.6	19	1	19	0	0	19
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	6	24.8%	113,828	8.3	22	1	22	0	0	22
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	6	29.3%	113,214	8.3	17	1	17	0	0	17
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	7	38.1%	110,471	7.4	8	1	8	0	0	8
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	6	30.2%	107,486	7.9	16	1	16	0	0	16
Arlington	Texas	122	107	6	26.6%	105,740	8.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	6	25.0%	105,472	8.7	28	1	28	0	0	28
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	7	24.0%	104,549	8.2	11	1	11	0	0	11
Reno	Nevada	112	100	6	35.0%	103,872	7.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	8	24.9%	103,761	8.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Riverside	California	113	102	8	28.0%	103,637	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Katy	Texas	112	102	9	30.0%	103,245	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Spokane	Washington	113	104	7	27.8%	99,916	8.2	14	1	14	0	0	14
Long Beach	California	120	109	7	20.8%	99,680	8.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Oakland	California	115	102	7	24.0%	98,983	8.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	6	30.8%	98,618	8.3	15	1	15	0	0	15
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	6	26.0%	96,244	8.4	10	1	10	0	0	10
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	6	26.2%	96,099	8.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	8	24.1%	94,348	8.4	15	1	15	0	0	15
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	3	45.6%	93,447	6.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	7	24.5%	93,010	8.4	18	1	18	0	0	18
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	6	43.0%	92,526	7.0	10	1	10	0	1	10
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	6	31.2%	90,324	8.2	22	1	22	0	0	22
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	8	20.0%	90,012	9.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	6	30.4%	89,631	8.2	14	1	14	0	0	14
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	8	33.9%	88,773	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	7	23.8%	88,085	8.6	12	1	12	0	0	12
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	6	24.4%	86,576	8.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	6	23.3%	85,735	8.7	12	1	12	0	0	12
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	6	26.3%	85,523	8.5	18	1	18	0	0	18
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	6	35.7%	85,127	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	7	26.1%	84,342	8.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	8	27.8%	84,315	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	6	25.7%	83,695	8.4	10	1	10	0	0	10
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	6	24.3%	83,197	8.3	14	1	14	0	0	14
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	8	32.2%	82,443	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Naples	Florida	125	111	6	26.1%	81,854	8.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	7	44.0%	81,692	6.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Flushing	New York	107	96	5	37.6%	80,875	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	6	25.3%	80,650	8.1	16	1	16	0	0	16
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	8	24.5%	80,247	8.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	6	23.9%	79,739	8.4	20	1	20	0	0	20
Santa Ana	California	110	99	7	22.0%	78,451	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	9	27.5%	77,296	8.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Plano	Texas	112	103	9	25.3%	77,200	8.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	7	25.1%	76,517	8.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Irvine	California	112	101	7	28.3%	75,614	8.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	7	28.1%	75,379	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	6	28.0%	75,112	8.3	13	1	13	0	0	13
Stockton	California	122	108	9	20.0%	74,761	9.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	7	26.7%	73,855	8.3	14	1	14	0	0	14
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	6	33.6%	73,732	7.8	10	1	10	0	0	10
Anaheim	California	114	102	9	20.0%	73,725	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	8	32.0%	73,643	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	6	24.5%	73,113	8.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	5	48.1%	73,038	6.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Syracuse	New York	119	107	5	31.6%	71,677	7.9	15	1	15	0	0	15
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	6	28.1%	70,342	8.3	13	1	13	0	0	13
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	9	26.5%	69,943	8.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Jamaica	New York	112	100	7	28.5%	69,479	7.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Akron	Ohio	122	112	6	25.5%	68,986	8.8	17	1	17	0	0	16
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	6	40.5%	68,681	6.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	7	21.0%	68,526	8.9	11	1	11	0	0	11
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	6	37.5%	67,412	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	5	46.0%	67,325	6.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	6	31.7%	67,103	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	7	28.5%	66,683	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	6	29.8%	66,571	8.2	12	1	12	0	0	12
Garland	Texas	106	96	9	27.7%	66,018	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	9	21.5%	65,985	8.9	15	1	15	0	0	15
Salem	Oregon	110	101	7	24.3%	64,827	8.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	8	29.3%	64,356	8.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Modesto	California	111	101	9	24.2%	64,072	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	6	25.3%	64,056	8.3	10	1	10	0	0	10
San Bernardino	California	113	103	6	25.5%	63,621	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Billings	Montana	106	98	6	46.2%	63,365	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	9	26.2%	63,217	8.4	10	1	10	0	0	10
Irving	Texas	111	102	6	26.1%	62,700	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Boise	Idaho	111	100	8	24.4%	62,430	8.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Albany	New York	117	102	5	41.2%	62,343	7.2	11	1	11	0	1	11
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	8	25.3%	62,137	8.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
Vallejo	California	107	98	6	49.7%	61,907	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	7	25.2%	61,386	8.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	9	22.5%	61,172	8.7	18	1	18	0	0	18
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	8	23.5%	60,612	8.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	5	60.0%	60,458	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	7	24.7%	60,372	8.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	6	45.5%	59,456	6.8	5	2	6	1	1	6
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	7	40.7%	58,867	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	7	26.2%	58,570	8.2	11	1	11	0	0	11
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	7	20.0%	57,814	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	7	30.3%	57,584	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	7	27.7%	57,302	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	4	49.4%	57,207	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	6	27.3%	56,822	8.2	15	1	15	0	0	15
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	6	25.4%	56,504	8.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	6	28.7%	56,242	8.2	11	1	11	0	0	11
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	7	32.2%	55,970	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Olympia	Washington	110	98	7	30.5%	55,707	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	3	50.0%	55,671	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	7	24.2%	55,477	8.3	14	1	14	0	0	14
Chula Vista	California	109	100	9	21.2%	55,340	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	10	18.2%	55,079	9.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	6	44.4%	54,792	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	8	26.9%	54,732	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	8	18.9%	54,544	9.1	10	1	10	0	0	10
Laredo	Texas	126	110	9	20.0%	54,180	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Denton	Texas	110	101	8	34.2%	54,055	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	7	34.7%	53,862	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Norwalk	California	99	91	6	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	4	36.3%	52,848	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ocala	Florida	118	107	7	23.3%	52,483	8.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	8	22.1%	52,481	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	7	38.2%	52,369	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	7	28.5%	52,341	8.4	13	1	13	0	0	13
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	6	31.1%	52,156	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Midland	Texas	113	102	7	32.6%	52,146	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	7	31.7%	52,072	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Ogden	Utah	110	101	9	25.8%	51,879	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	8	34.7%	51,655	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Corona	California	111	98	7	20.0%	51,458	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Everett	Washington	112	100	7	30.8%	51,252	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	6	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	6	39.3%	50,710	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	7	29.8%	50,687	8.4	11	1	11	0	0	11
Humble	Texas	108	98	7	30.4%	50,638	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	7	23.2%	50,561	8.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	5	49.4%	50,401	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	9	20.0%	50,321	9.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	4	43.3%	50,231	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Odessa	Texas	112	103	6	31.4%	50,208	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	6	39.0%	50,201	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Orem	Utah	104	96	6	50.0%	50,159	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
La Puente	California	105	96	6	42.2%	49,762	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	6	23.8%	49,538	8.6	11	1	11	0	0	11
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	6	29.8%	49,471	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	7	31.7%	49,317	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	7	33.9%	49,037	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	7	30.7%	48,428	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	8	26.6%	48,355	8.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	7	24.5%	48,160	8.7	10	1	10	0	0	10
Van Nuys	California	105	95	8	27.0%	47,986	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pasadena	California	113	103	6	30.2%	47,642	8.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
South Gate	California	99	90	6	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lynn	Massachusetts	107	97	5	50.6%	47,297	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	7	38.4%	47,281	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	9	26.8%	47,261	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Schenectady	New York	113	101	7	29.0%	47,041	7.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	6	36.1%	47,021	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	8	33.0%	47,000	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fontana	California	109	98	9	20.0%	46,945	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fremont	California	107	98	8	20.0%	46,631	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	6	25.4%	46,520	8.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	8	26.7%	46,494	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Visalia	California	108	99	8	30.5%	46,307	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	8	25.2%	46,010	8.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Oceanside	California	106	96	8	22.9%	45,887	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	California	106	97	7	32.0%	45,829	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Murrieta	California	106	96	7	34.5%	45,684	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	9	21.8%	45,677	8.8	13	1	13	0	0	13
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	7	31.2%	45,670	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	7	28.7%	45,453	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	5	35.8%	44,880	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	6	36.6%	44,589	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	7	27.8%	44,547	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	8	39.8%	44,530	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	8	27.2%	44,405	8.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	7	37.0%	44,174	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Yonkers	New York	109	99	8	24.5%	44,155	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	7	26.5%	44,122	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Oxnard	California	107	98	7	20.0%	44,077	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
North Hollywood	California	108	98	8	28.7%	43,969	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	6	32.2%	43,803	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fullerton	California	106	97	6	31.4%	43,732	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Astoria	New York	111	100	8	30.6%	43,660	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	6	44.4%	43,222	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	6	20.0%	43,212	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	10	21.3%	42,972	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Independence	Missouri	112	103	8	34.6%	42,901	7.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	6	41.6%	42,810	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	11	20.4%	42,645	8.9	10	1	10	0	0	10
Longview	Texas	122	109	7	40.3%	42,464	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pearland	Texas	104	96	8	30.8%	42,403	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orange	California	111	100	7	29.2%	42,387	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	9	31.4%	42,303	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bothell	Washington	110	98	6	32.7%	41,906	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	California	104	94	7	23.2%	41,612	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	9	30.6%	41,449	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	5	43.4%	41,420	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	8	31.0%	41,354	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	10	20.0%	41,091	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	11	20.0%	40,886	9.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	6	42.2%	40,866	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	10	20.0%	40,264	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Napa	California	101	92	6	41.5%	40,076	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	9	20.0%	39,981	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	6	35.9%	39,926	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Waco	Texas	112	100	7	25.2%	39,896	8.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	8	23.4%	39,838	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	6	32.5%	39,719	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Mateo	California	106	97	8	27.8%	39,548	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	8	20.5%	39,480	8.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	9	28.3%	39,460	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	9	19.4%	39,296	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	12	21.1%	39,293	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	8	25.2%	39,243	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Whittier	California	108	98	7	20.0%	39,232	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Killeen	Texas	110	101	10	26.1%	39,153	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	8	31.6%	39,040	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	8	39.2%	39,023	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	10	20.0%	38,944	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	108	6	36.4%	38,880	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	5	40.8%	38,686	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	10	21.0%	38,663	8.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Inglewood	California	124	112	7	28.8%	38,568	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	6	32.0%	38,466	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hemet	California	105	95	6	29.8%	38,432	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hayward	California	108	98	7	20.0%	38,407	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	9	22.3%	38,247	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	6	31.1%	38,170	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	6	35.2%	38,131	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	8	20.0%	38,109	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	7	26.5%	37,855	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	8	20.0%	37,838	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Monte	California	103	94	6	40.4%	37,814	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	10	20.0%	37,798	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	California	106	96	8	20.0%	37,666	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	10	28.5%	37,555	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	9	30.7%	37,551	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Homestead	Florida	111	99	10	20.0%	37,535	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Conroe	Texas	111	101	9	23.4%	37,442	8.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Roseville	California	106	95	7	26.7%	37,357	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	8	24.4%	37,249	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lancaster	California	105	96	8	20.0%	36,884	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	8	30.0%	36,858	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	117	107	6	38.4%	36,744	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	7	20.0%	36,690	9.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	7	37.7%	36,667	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	8	20.0%	36,666	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mission	Texas	105	95	8	20.0%	36,218	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	7	37.6%	36,215	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	8	20.0%	36,165	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	10	20.0%	36,162	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Elk Grove	California	109	96	10	20.0%	35,864	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tyler	Texas	115	104	9	23.0%	35,836	8.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	6	24.6%	35,833	8.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	7	38.0%	35,799	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	9	24.3%	35,616	8.5	10	1	10	0	0	10
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	10	30.5%	35,542	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	7	35.8%	35,361	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	9	20.0%	35,337	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Ontario	California	109	98	12	20.0%	35,330	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	10	24.4%	35,263	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	10	26.6%	35,185	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	California	110	97	9	20.0%	35,152	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	10	20.0%	35,139	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	7	30.4%	35,138	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Palmdale	California	106	97	9	20.0%	34,987	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Abilene	Texas	111	102	9	26.8%	34,923	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Clovis	California	106	97	9	28.8%	34,912	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Concord	California	107	98	6	26.5%	34,572	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	California	108	97	7	31.1%	34,555	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
El Cajon	California	109	97	10	20.0%	34,493	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Frisco	Texas	105	95	10	20.0%	34,490	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	8	26.1%	34,488	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	10	20.0%	34,420	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cypress	Texas	108	101	9	20.0%	34,120	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	8	31.3%	34,010	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	8	34.5%	33,944	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	9	20.0%	33,893	9.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	9	36.2%	33,794	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	10	20.0%	33,786	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	7	25.6%	33,642	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	9	21.4%	33,544	8.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Torrance	California	113	103	11	19.0%	33,540	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	8	30.9%	33,444	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	6	34.0%	33,289	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Deltona	Florida	102	93	7	35.3%	33,180	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	9	28.7%	33,128	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	9	20.0%	32,824	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	8	23.4%	32,762	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Macon	Georgia	118	108	11	20.0%	32,740	9.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	9	20.0%	32,728	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	8	25.3%	32,452	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	10	20.0%	32,404	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	8	23.8%	32,375	8.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Auburn	Washington	112	101	9	28.7%	32,362	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Canton	Ohio	117	105	7	21.9%	32,165	9.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Kent	Washington	113	102	7	20.0%	32,100	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	7	26.9%	32,031	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	6	30.0%	32,015	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	8	32.5%	31,961	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	6	32.1%	31,882	8.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Pomona	California	107	97	7	20.0%	31,597	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Warren	Michigan	115	103	9	23.2%	31,407	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	9	28.3%	31,319	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	9	30.0%	31,266	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Flint	Michigan	117	105	10	20.0%	31,093	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	8	32.1%	31,084	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	7	29.7%	31,068	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Renton	Washington	112	100	12	20.0%	30,970	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Panama City	Florida	107	99	8	24.3%	30,715	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	8	29.7%	30,631	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Yakima	Washington	109	100	10	23.6%	30,620	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	11	20.0%	30,385	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Largo	Florida	113	105	7	28.1%	30,236	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Missoula	Montana	111	102	7	30.9%	30,086	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	7	30.2%	29,837	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	8	28.4%	29,820	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Berkeley	California	110	99	9	23.4%	29,807	8.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	8	31.2%	29,722	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	9	22.2%	29,596	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	7	20.0%	29,520	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	10	23.8%	29,485	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	9	20.0%	29,263	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	111	103	8	26.4%	29,136	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	7	23.8%	29,102	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	11	20.0%	29,100	9.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	9	24.7%	28,963	8.4	11	1	11	0	0	11
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	9	22.7%	28,534	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	9	20.0%	28,318	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	9	23.3%	28,105	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	7	27.3%	27,994	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	8	23.6%	27,969	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	8	23.9%	27,968	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Tracy	California	106	96	6	23.7%	27,791	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	8	20.0%	27,788	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Compton	California	106	98	10	20.0%	27,775	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	7	29.1%	27,685	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	7	29.1%	27,663	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	6	28.9%	27,567	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	9	28.0%	27,552	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	8	28.2%	27,509	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Victorville	California	105	95	8	20.0%	27,262	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	11	28.2%	26,651	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	9	20.0%	26,574	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	11	20.0%	26,210	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	10	20.0%	26,153	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	8	20.0%	26,100	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	9	20.0%	26,061	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	9	20.2%	26,032	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Temecula	California	109	99	8	20.0%	25,983	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	9	22.9%	25,750	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Simi Valley	California	101	92	7	20.0%	25,742	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	9	20.0%	25,662	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	7	26.9%	25,633	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	7	24.8%	25,318	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	9	20.0%	25,299	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	8	20.0%	25,215	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	11	23.5%	25,141	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	10	21.8%	25,139	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Santa Clara	California	107	97	8	20.0%	25,103	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Burbank	California	109	100	7	22.8%	24,671	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
College Station	Texas	107	98	9	20.0%	24,610	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	107	96	10	25.3%	24,494	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	109	99	9	20.0%	24,451	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	7	26.1%	24,378	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	10	24.9%	23,976	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	California	106	97	8	20.0%	23,973	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	9	23.0%	23,900	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	8	24.2%	23,825	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Baytown	Texas	108	98	10	20.0%	23,559	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	11	23.4%	23,511	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	California	106	96	9	20.0%	23,478	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	107	98	9	24.8%	23,323	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	9	21.9%	23,319	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Provo	Utah	108	99	9	20.0%	23,305	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Keller	Texas	108	99	10	20.0%	23,252	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	California	104	95	7	20.0%	23,192	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	9	20.0%	23,181	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Richardson	Texas	109	101	9	20.0%	22,920	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redwood City	California	105	95	9	20.0%	22,893	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	California	103	94	8	20.0%	22,880	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	California	102	93	6	20.0%	22,816	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	9	20.0%	22,813	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ballwin	Missouri	105	95	10	24.1%	22,777	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	8	20.0%	22,751	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	California	109	96	9	20.0%	22,734	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	9	23.4%	22,612	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redding	California	110	99	8	20.0%	22,607	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	California	100	91	7	20.0%	22,580	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	11	20.0%	22,576	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	7	20.0%	22,461	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chico	California	105	96	7	20.0%	22,403	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	9	20.0%	22,317	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Riverview	Florida	104	96	11	20.0%	22,267	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	102	94	7	20.0%	22,254	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	9	22.0%	22,203	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Antioch	California	107	99	8	20.0%	22,144	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Menifee	California	108	98	7	20.0%	22,106	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	9	20.0%	22,050	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	California	111	100	14	20.0%	21,882	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	8	20.0%	21,804	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	7	20.0%	21,739	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	10	20.0%	21,376	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rialto	California	106	97	8	20.0%	21,317	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	10	22.5%	21,265	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	11	20.0%	21,219	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	California	105	96	7	22.4%	21,164	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pacoima	California	100	90	7	20.0%	21,160	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	9	22.8%	21,107	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	10	20.0%	21,093	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Vacaville	California	101	92	7	20.0%	21,059	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	California	105	94	8	20.0%	20,762	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	California	108	100	9	20.0%	20,612	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	California	105	94	8	20.0%	20,593	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	10	20.0%	20,574	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	10	20.0%	20,344	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	10	20.0%	20,292	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	7	20.0%	20,165	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Athens	Georgia	115	106	11	16.1%	20,134	9.3	6	1	6	0	0	5
San Marcos	California	107	98	10	20.0%	20,096	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	9	20.0%	20,093	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	108	100	11	20.0%	20,056	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	108	96	8	20.0%	20,051	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	8	20.0%	20,029	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	10	20.0%	19,954	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	10	20.0%	19,937	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	10	20.0%	19,826	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	102	94	8	20.0%	19,821	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	6	20.7%	19,651	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	8	20.0%	19,589	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Apopka	Florida	105	95	8	20.0%	19,531	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	101	90	8	20.0%	19,367	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	California	100	94	7	20.0%	19,297	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bryan	Texas	114	105	11	20.0%	19,256	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Livermore	California	105	95	7	20.0%	19,251	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	California	103	94	7	20.0%	19,218	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	98	90	6	20.0%	19,216	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	11	20.2%	19,210	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	8	20.0%	19,142	9.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	9	20.0%	19,042	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	9	20.0%	18,995	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Milton	Florida	108	99	11	20.0%	18,948	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	105	96	7	20.0%	18,895	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	9	20.0%	18,793	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	9	20.0%	18,679	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Medford	Oregon	106	98	9	20.0%	18,650	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Covington	Georgia	107	98	9	20.0%	18,537	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	6	28.5%	699,804	8.2	62	1	62	0	62
San Diego	134	116	6	26.8%	360,561	8.3	36	1	37	1	37
San Jose	129	116	6	22.7%	238,809	8.7	28	1	28	0	28
San Francisco	121	106	7	26.5%	230,257	8.6	28	1	28	0	28
Sacramento	134	115	6	25.0%	201,040	8.6	28	1	28	0	28
Bakersfield	112	102	8	27.2%	152,227	8.2	11	1	11	0	11
Fresno	120	105	7	22.5%	135,383	8.7	18	1	18	0	18
Riverside	113	102	8	28.0%	103,637	8.1	7	1	7	0	7
Long Beach	120	109	7	20.8%	99,680	8.9	12	1	12	0	12
Oakland	115	102	7	24.0%	98,983	8.6	14	1	14	0	14
Santa Ana	110	99	7	22.0%	78,451	8.7	6	1	6	0	6
Irvine	112	101	7	28.3%	75,614	8.3	9	1	9	0	9
Stockton	122	108	9	20.0%	74,761	9.0	12	1	12	0	12
Anaheim	114	102	9	20.0%	73,725	9.0	7	1	7	0	7
Modesto	111	101	9	24.2%	64,072	8.3	7	1	7	0	7
San Bernardino	113	103	6	25.5%	63,621	8.4	7	1	7	0	7
Vallejo	107	98	6	49.7%	61,907	6.8	4	1	4	0	4
Chula Vista	109	100	9	21.2%	55,340	8.8	5	1	5	0	5
Norwalk	99	91	6	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Corona	111	98	7	20.0%	51,458	9.0	5	1	5	0	5
Bell Gardens	99	90	6	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
La Puente	105	96	6	42.2%	49,762	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Van Nuys	105	95	8	27.0%	47,986	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Pasadena	113	103	6	30.2%	47,642	8.2	6	1	6	0	6
South Gate	99	90	6	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	9	26.8%	47,261	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Fontana	109	98	9	20.0%	46,945	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Fremont	107	98	8	20.0%	46,631	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
Visalia	108	99	8	30.5%	46,307	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Oceanside	106	96	8	22.9%	45,887	8.8	4	1	4	0	4
Santa Maria	106	97	7	32.0%	45,829	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Murrieta	106	96	7	34.5%	45,684	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Oxnard	107	98	7	20.0%	44,077	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
North Hollywood	108	98	8	28.7%	43,969	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Fullerton	106	97	6	31.4%	43,732	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Santa Rosa	112	100	6	20.0%	43,212	9.0	6	1	6	0	6
Orange	111	100	7	29.2%	42,387	8.4	5	1	5	0	5
Escondido	104	94	7	23.2%	41,612	8.8	4	1	4	0	4
Moreno Valley	109	99	10	20.0%	41,091	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
Napa	101	92	6	41.5%	40,076	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Huntington Beach	111	99	9	20.0%	39,981	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
San Mateo	106	97	8	27.8%	39,548	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Whittier	108	98	7	20.0%	39,232	9.0	6	1	6	0	6
Inglewood	124	112	7	28.8%	38,568	8.2	5	1	5	0	5
Hemet	105	95	6	29.8%	38,432	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Hayward	108	98	7	20.0%	38,407	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
El Monte	103	94	6	40.4%	37,814	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Salinas	106	96	8	20.0%	37,666	9.0	5	1	5	0	5
Roseville	106	95	7	26.7%	37,357	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Sunnyvale	107	98	8	24.4%	37,249	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Lancaster	105	96	8	20.0%	36,884	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Elk Grove	109	96	10	20.0%	35,864	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Ontario	109	98	12	20.0%	35,330	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Garden Grove	110	97	9	20.0%	35,152	9.0	5	1	5	0	5
Palmdale	106	97	9	20.0%	34,987	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
Clovis	106	97	9	28.8%	34,912	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Concord	107	98	6	26.5%	34,572	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
San Leandro	108	97	7	31.1%	34,555	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
El Cajon	109	97	10	20.0%	34,493	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Mission Viejo	105	95	8	34.5%	33,944	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Torrance	113	103	11	19.0%	33,540	9.2	5	1	5	0	5
Santa Barbara	111	99	8	23.8%	32,375	8.7	7	1	7	0	7
Pomona	107	97	7	20.0%	31,597	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Berkeley	110	99	9	23.4%	29,807	8.8	9	1	9	0	9
Tracy	106	96	6	23.7%	27,791	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Compton	106	98	10	20.0%	27,775	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Victorville	105	95	8	20.0%	27,262	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Temecula	109	99	8	20.0%	25,983	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Simi Valley	101	92	7	20.0%	25,742	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Clara	107	97	8	20.0%	25,103	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
Burbank	109	100	7	22.8%	24,671	8.8	5	1	5	0	5
Palo Alto	107	96	10	25.3%	24,494	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Vista	106	97	8	20.0%	23,973	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Santa Cruz	106	95	9	23.0%	23,900	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Perris	106	96	9	20.0%	23,478	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Ventura	104	95	7	20.0%	23,192	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Redwood City	105	95	9	20.0%	22,893	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
Daly City	103	94	8	20.0%	22,880	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Fairfield	102	93	6	20.0%	22,816	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Costa Mesa	104	95	8	20.0%	22,751	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Carlsbad	109	96	9	20.0%	22,734	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
Redding	110	99	8	20.0%	22,607	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
Downey	100	91	7	20.0%	22,580	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Chico	105	96	7	20.0%	22,403	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Antioch	107	99	8	20.0%	22,144	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Menifee	108	98	7	20.0%	22,106	9.0	4	1	4	0	4
West Covina	111	100	14	20.0%	21,882	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Rialto	106	97	8	20.0%	21,317	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Monica	105	96	7	22.4%	21,164	8.8	5	1	5	0	5
Pacoima	100	90	7	20.0%	21,160	9.0	1	1	1	0	1
Vacaville	101	92	7	20.0%	21,059	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Hesperia	105	94	8	20.0%	20,762	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Merced	108	100	9	20.0%	20,612	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Madera	105	94	8	20.0%	20,593	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
San Marcos	107	98	10	20.0%	20,096	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Hawthorne	101	90	8	20.0%	19,367	9.0	1	1	1	0	1
Sylmar	100	94	7	20.0%	19,297	9.0	1	1	1	0	1
Livermore	105	95	7	20.0%	19,251	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Indio	103	94	7	20.0%	19,218	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Pittsburg	98	90	6	20.0%	19,216	9.0	1	1	1	0	1
Chino	105	96	7	20.0%	18,895	9.0	2	1	2	0	2

Houston

ZIP	libertymutual.com	allstate.com	nationwide.com	farmers.com	geico.com	esurance.com
77088	9	4	5	8	6	7
77047	9	4	5	8	6	7
77037	9	4	5	6	7	8
77098	9	4	5	7	6	8
77027	9	4	5	7	6	8
77068	9	1	5	7	6	8
77078	9	4	5	8	7	6
77086	9	4	5	7	6	8
77035	9	4	5	7	6	8
77008	9	4	5	7	6	8
77004	9	1	5	7	6	8
77028	9	4	5	7	6	8
77059	9	2	5	7	6	8
77039	9	4	5	7	6	8
77019	9	4	5	7	6	8
77075	6	1	2	4	3	5
77077	9	4	5	7	6	8
77079	9	4	5	7	6	8
77099	9	4	5	7	6	8
77024	9	4	5	7	6	8
77095	9	4	5	2	7	8
77048	9	4	5	7	6	8
77044	9	4	5	6	7	8
77015	9	4	5	6	8	7
77017	6	1	2	4	3	5
77057	9	4	5	7	6	8
77055	9	4	5	2	6	8
77006	9	4	5	7	6	8
77026	6	1	2	3	4	5
77046	9	4	5	7	6	8
77066	9	2	5	6	7	8
77023	9	4	5	6	8	7
77094	9	4	5	7	6	8
77084	9	4	5	7	6	8
77013	9	4	5	7	6	8
77063	6	1	2	4	3	5
77053	9	4	5	6	7	8
77022	9	4	5	8	6	7
77072	9	4	5	8	6	7
77049	9	4	5	6	7	8
77045	9	4	5	7	6	8
77010	9	1	5	6	8	7
77018	9	4	5	7	6	8
77041	9	3	5	6	7	8
77009	6	1	2	3	4	5
77089	9	2	5	1	6	8
77032	9	4	5	6	7	8
77036	9	4	5	6	8	7
77085	9	4	5	6	8	7
77054	9	4	5	7	6	8
77058	9	4	5	8	6	7
77014	9	4	5	7	6	8
77067	6	1	2	3	4	5
77005	9	4	5	7	6	8
77076	6	1	2	4	3	5
77070	9	4	5	7	6	8
77060	9	4	5	8	6	7
77080	9	4	5	3	8	6
77050	6	1	2	4	5	3
77091	9	4	5	8	6	7
77071	6	1	2	5	3	4
77061	9	4	5	7	6	8
77020	9	4	5	7	8	6
77081	9	4	5	6	7	8
77030	9	4	5	8	6	7
77040	9	4	5	6	7	8
77090	9	1	5	8	6	7
77031	6	1	2	3	5	4
77051	9	4	5	7	6	8
77011	9	4	5	7	6	8
77042	9	4	5	7	6	8
77062	9	4	5	3	8	6
77082	6	1	2	4	3	5
77093	9	4	5	7	6	8
77073	9	4	5	8	7	6
77033	9	4	5	8	7	6
77043	9	4	5	6	7	8
77074	9	4	5	8	7	6
77064	9	4	5	7	6	8
77012	9	4	5	8	6	7
77002	9	4	5	8	6	7
77092	9	4	5	7	8	6
77069	9	4	5	6	8	7
77021	6	1	2	5	3	4
77083	9	4	5	7	8	6
77029	9	4	5	7	8	6
77034	9	1	5	8	6	7
77087	6	1	2	5	4	3
77003	9	2	5	8	7	6
77038	9	4	5	7	8	6
77007	6	1	2	5	4	3
77016	9	4	5	7	8	6
77065	9	4	5	7	8	6
77096	9	4	5	6	8	7
77025	7	1	2	4	3	5
77056	9	4	5	6	8	7

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Libertymutual

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Libertymutual Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Libertymutual Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Libertymutual Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Libertymutual Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly