Lexingtoninsurance Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve lexingtoninsurance.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Lexingtoninsurance Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Lexingtoninsurance Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Lexingtoninsurance Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Lexingtoninsurance Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	69	0.6%	2,038,380	56.1	26,395	31,439	1	31,439	0	0	0
California	870	609	72	0.6%	239,134	58.3	1,134	1,684	1	1,684	0	0	0
Texas	846	595	72	0.7%	183,338	53.2	1,289	1,822	1	1,822	0	0	0
New York	791	600	68	0.7%	131,628	53.8	1,434	1,685	1	1,685	0	0	0
Florida	768	578	73	0.6%	125,957	58.2	433	944	1	944	0	0	0
Pennsylvania	757	591	86	0.6%	76,971	59.2	1,558	1,728	1	1,728	0	0	0
Illinois	670	490	90	0.6%	75,016	60.7	1,205	1,333	1	1,333	0	0	0
Ohio	670	548	88	0.6%	72,896	56.1	947	1,146	1	1,146	0	0	0
Georgia	409	319	96	0.7%	68,232	53.1	544	689	1	689	0	0	0
North Carolina	506	406	105	0.6%	65,395	53.7	652	758	1	758	0	0	0
Michigan	656	528	99	0.6%	61,439	56.6	805	941	1	941	0	0	0
New Jersey	436	328	89	0.6%	56,991	53.7	515	568	1	568	0	0	0
Virginia	406	322	90	0.6%	53,295	55.3	702	865	1	865	0	0	0
Massachusetts	517	422	95	0.7%	48,464	48.3	446	517	1	517	0	0	0
Tennessee	377	305	101	0.7%	44,271	52.2	490	595	1	595	0	0	0
Indiana	472	373	102	0.7%	43,324	53.7	639	747	1	747	0	0	0
Washington	337	274	111	0.6%	41,856	59.6	433	561	1	561	0	0	0
Arizona	269	218	106	0.6%	40,781	59.9	237	382	1	382	0	0	0
Maryland	338	254	100	0.7%	39,253	53.3	381	448	1	448	0	0	0
Missouri	427	337	110	0.6%	35,975	58.4	864	986	1	986	0	0	0
Colorado	296	242	97	0.6%	35,836	53.7	369	494	1	494	0	0	0
South Carolina	278	223	81	0.7%	35,647	47.3	336	409	1	409	0	0	0
Minnesota	530	418	93	0.6%	34,215	58.0	749	849	1	849	0	0	0
Kentucky	354	287	83	0.8%	33,620	43.9	672	731	1	731	0	0	0
Louisiana	306	237	96	0.7%	33,206	48.4	417	493	1	493	0	0	0
Alabama	320	261	90	0.7%	31,697	53.8	505	614	1	614	0	0	0
Wisconsin	481	384	124	0.5%	30,694	64.5	672	743	1	743	0	0	0
Connecticut	284	228	76	0.7%	25,929	46.4	229	270	1	270	0	0	0
Oregon	271	224	103	0.6%	25,553	57.3	337	391	1	391	0	0	0
Oklahoma	322	248	113	0.6%	23,006	59.7	540	623	1	623	0	0	0
Arkansas	261	209	103	0.7%	19,578	54.1	521	553	1	553	0	0	0
Mississippi	250	193	102	0.7%	19,556	54.9	366	398	1	398	0	0	0
Iowa	486	357	113	0.6%	18,328	58.8	853	893	1	893	0	0	0
Utah	245	207	119	0.6%	18,158	59.2	237	274	1	274	0	0	0
Kansas	341	261	120	0.6%	16,818	60.6	597	673	1	673	0	0	0
Nevada	176	146	103	0.5%	15,128	66.7	89	164	1	164	0	0	0
Nebraska	308	241	106	0.6%	11,695	57.8	507	564	1	564	0	0	0
West Virginia	277	224	93	0.6%	11,077	57.1	659	676	1	676	0	0	0
Idaho	199	170	86	0.6%	10,892	55.4	238	260	1	260	0	0	0
New Mexico	204	159	108	0.5%	10,765	66.3	316	350	1	350	0	0	0
New Hampshire	226	197	103	0.7%	8,802	53.7	226	236	1	236	0	0	0
Hawaii	152	129	77	0.6%	8,789	56.4	81	92	1	92	0	0	0
Maine	240	198	103	0.6%	8,470	56.0	411	415	1	415	0	0	0
Rhode Island	157	139	79	0.7%	7,773	45.8	64	76	1	76	0	0	0
Montana	229	186	90	0.6%	6,214	61.3	336	349	1	349	0	0	0
Delaware	159	137	80	0.6%	5,966	55.8	52	65	1	65	0	0	0
South Dakota	217	174	95	0.6%	5,171	59.6	342	353	1	353	0	0	0
Alaska	155	134	75	0.6%	4,645	56.0	206	221	1	221	0	0	0
North Dakota	206	168	75	0.6%	4,584	55.8	358	371	1	371	0	0	0
Vermont	197	170	95	0.7%	4,064	51.6	241	245	1	245	0	0	0
Wyoming	152	130	77	0.6%	3,545	57.7	159	166	1	166	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	173	138	97	0.7%	22,104	47.3	93	1	93
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	70	0.7%	17,949	49.6	35	1	35
Los Angeles	California	147	126	81	0.7%	16,822	48.4	59	1	59
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	90	0.6%	16,361	58.3	53	1	53
Miami	Florida	160	123	92	0.7%	12,794	51.0	55	1	55
New York City	New York	128	111	62	0.7%	11,701	47.8	46	1	46
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	92	0.6%	10,491	56.4	52	1	52
Bronx	New York	118	103	55	0.7%	9,892	48.4	23	1	23
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	87	0.6%	9,573	59.1	44	1	44
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	85	0.6%	9,022	56.5	41	1	41
Dallas	Texas	149	126	90	0.6%	8,496	56.2	43	1	43
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	84	0.5%	8,242	64.6	42	1	42
Austin	Texas	138	123	63	0.7%	8,100	44.0	43	1	43
San Diego	California	134	116	80	0.6%	7,822	60.1	35	1	35
Denver	Colorado	136	120	72	0.7%	7,401	49.7	36	1	36
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	76	0.6%	6,902	55.1	50	1	50
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	76	0.7%	6,543	51.9	38	1	38
Seattle	Washington	142	127	78	0.6%	6,191	54.9	35	1	35
Orlando	Florida	133	115	75	0.6%	6,150	55.4	31	1	31
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	81	0.6%	6,141	53.5	36	1	36
San Jose	California	129	116	79	0.6%	6,097	62.8	27	1	27
Portland	Oregon	130	112	68	0.7%	6,044	53.8	31	1	31
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	75	0.7%	6,003	52.3	31	1	31
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	64	0.8%	5,791	42.3	32	1	32
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	70	0.6%	5,595	59.4	19	1	19
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	78	0.6%	5,547	54.6	31	1	31
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	80	0.6%	5,518	59.9	41	1	41
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	75	0.7%	5,394	51.0	43	1	43
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	80	0.6%	5,148	56.3	29	1	29
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	79	0.6%	5,062	55.7	30	1	30
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	68	0.7%	4,885	55.4	28	1	28
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	78	0.6%	4,818	55.0	24	1	24
San Francisco	California	121	106	75	0.6%	4,787	64.6	28	1	28
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	80	0.5%	4,785	65.8	32	1	32
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	58	0.7%	4,741	50.5	28	1	28
Sacramento	California	134	115	84	0.6%	4,608	62.1	27	1	27
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	65	0.6%	4,387	56.0	25	1	25
Tampa	Florida	131	110	82	0.5%	4,293	64.4	27	1	27
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	59	0.7%	4,237	51.3	22	1	22
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	76	0.6%	4,067	58.3	38	1	38
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	83	0.5%	4,028	67.9	27	1	27
El Paso	Texas	122	110	78	0.5%	4,009	66.4	23	1	23
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	71	0.6%	4,007	54.6	24	1	24
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	87	0.6%	3,909	61.6	42	1	42
Fresno	California	120	105	64	0.6%	3,863	57.2	17	1	17
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	75	0.6%	3,429	57.1	31	1	31
Long Beach	California	120	109	58	0.7%	3,428	47.7	12	1	12
Staten Island	New York	120	105	53	0.7%	3,427	46.3	12	1	12
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	63	0.7%	3,391	51.3	29	1	29
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	65	0.6%	3,378	55.2	14	1	14
Bakersfield	California	112	102	61	0.6%	3,323	59.0	11	1	11
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	73	0.6%	3,261	61.1	28	1	28
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	57	0.7%	3,260	47.3	22	1	22
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	55	0.7%	3,249	50.0	9	1	9
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	81	0.5%	3,207	68.7	17	1	17
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	89	0.6%	3,150	60.4	47	1	47
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	75	0.6%	3,041	57.5	19	1	19
Buffalo	New York	142	124	84	0.5%	3,002	62.6	26	1	26
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	72	0.6%	2,976	57.2	25	1	25
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	63	0.7%	2,935	50.7	19	1	19
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	74	0.5%	2,883	64.8	13	1	13
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	39	0.9%	2,855	28.5	15	1	15
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	63	0.6%	2,812	55.8	12	1	12
Arlington	Texas	122	107	59	0.7%	2,804	49.1	12	1	12
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	56	0.7%	2,787	44.3	18	1	18
Rochester	New York	125	108	73	0.6%	2,750	60.5	22	1	22
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	52	0.7%	2,738	48.0	15	1	15
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	57	0.7%	2,688	49.5	17	1	17
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	61	0.6%	2,684	55.2	10	1	10
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	45	0.8%	2,679	41.1	14	1	14
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	59	0.7%	2,577	49.8	10	1	10
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	62	0.6%	2,539	58.0	11	1	11
Stockton	California	122	108	57	0.7%	2,538	53.3	12	1	12
Spring	Texas	114	103	55	0.7%	2,492	52.5	7	1	7
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	51	0.7%	2,446	49.8	14	1	14
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	49	0.7%	2,431	44.7	9	1	9
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	62	0.7%	2,421	52.4	12	1	12
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	64	0.7%	2,417	53.2	12	1	12
Spokane	Washington	113	104	55	0.7%	2,390	52.1	14	1	14
Katy	Texas	112	102	51	0.7%	2,383	50.5	4	1	4
Oakland	California	115	102	69	0.6%	2,371	61.6	14	1	14
Santa Ana	California	110	99	58	0.6%	2,305	53.7	6	1	6
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	81	0.5%	2,303	65.5	23	1	23
Anaheim	California	114	102	62	0.6%	2,173	57.9	6	1	6
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	75	0.6%	2,153	56.5	15	1	15
Riverside	California	113	102	66	0.6%	2,145	60.9	7	1	7
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	57	0.7%	2,128	50.5	15	1	15
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	86	0.5%	2,099	68.1	26	1	26
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	69	0.6%	2,075	58.7	6	1	6
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	59	0.7%	2,061	48.5	22	1	22
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	54	0.7%	2,054	52.4	7	1	7
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	64	0.6%	2,037	54.8	16	1	16
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	48	0.7%	2,024	49.8	8	1	8
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	60	0.6%	2,013	57.3	6	1	6
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	62	0.6%	2,002	55.4	9	1	9
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	66	0.6%	1,978	54.3	17	1	17
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	55	0.7%	1,945	48.9	14	1	14
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	48	0.7%	1,886	45.9	7	1	7
Naples	Florida	125	111	74	0.6%	1,883	59.8	14	1	14
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	71	0.6%	1,878	63.1	19	1	19
Jamaica	New York	112	100	42	0.8%	1,862	42.7	6	1	6
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	59	0.7%	1,847	54.8	17	1	17
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	56	0.7%	1,846	53.1	9	1	9
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	46	0.7%	1,828	47.8	4	1	4
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	56	0.6%	1,817	56.6	7	1	7
Plano	Texas	112	103	62	0.6%	1,816	57.6	6	1	6
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	68	0.6%	1,804	57.1	11	1	11
Salem	Oregon	110	101	53	0.7%	1,789	51.3	7	1	7
Irvine	California	112	101	56	0.7%	1,741	54.3	9	1	9
Laredo	Texas	126	110	56	0.6%	1,710	55.3	6	1	6
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	69	0.5%	1,702	61.8	10	1	10
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	69	0.6%	1,686	64.9	13	1	13
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	51	0.7%	1,681	47.0	10	1	10
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	73	0.5%	1,674	65.9	8	1	8
Boise	Idaho	111	100	56	0.7%	1,666	53.3	9	1	9
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	62	0.7%	1,665	52.3	11	1	11
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	66	0.5%	1,654	64.4	8	1	8
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	62	0.6%	1,652	54.7	8	1	8
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	60	0.6%	1,630	58.9	8	1	8
Flushing	New York	107	96	43	0.7%	1,605	45.3	4	1	4
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	54	0.7%	1,593	46.7	12	1	12
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	50	0.7%	1,576	46.7	12	1	12
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	58	0.6%	1,572	61.7	10	1	10
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	55	0.7%	1,548	51.1	14	1	14
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	63	0.6%	1,543	60.8	6	1	6
Irving	Texas	111	102	59	0.6%	1,543	53.8	6	1	6
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	42	0.7%	1,536	43.6	8	1	8
San Bernardino	California	113	103	62	0.6%	1,527	56.7	7	1	7
Corona	California	111	98	62	0.6%	1,516	59.6	5	1	5
Garland	Texas	106	96	56	0.6%	1,516	55.0	5	1	5
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	64	0.6%	1,497	60.1	13	1	13
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	49	0.7%	1,496	50.8	9	1	9
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	50	0.7%	1,496	47.5	13	1	13
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	57	0.6%	1,485	56.3	6	1	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	57	0.6%	1,482	56.2	6	1	6
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	46	0.7%	1,479	44.0	3	1	3
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	61	0.7%	1,449	54.0	9	1	9
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	70	0.5%	1,438	65.8	8	1	8
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	50	0.7%	1,406	51.5	6	1	6
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	50	0.7%	1,402	51.6	5	1	5
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	72	0.5%	1,380	61.6	10	1	10
Akron	Ohio	122	112	77	0.5%	1,373	63.2	14	1	14
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	57	0.6%	1,373	54.0	3	1	3
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	71	0.6%	1,372	59.4	7	1	7
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	57	0.6%	1,369	55.8	10	1	10
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	57	0.7%	1,368	49.9	7	1	7
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	51	0.7%	1,362	51.5	4	1	4
Palmdale	California	106	97	44	0.8%	1,358	40.8	4	1	4
Whittier	California	108	98	50	0.7%	1,353	50.2	6	1	6
Oxnard	California	107	98	57	0.6%	1,347	59.0	4	1	4
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	60	0.7%	1,341	49.8	9	1	9
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	62	0.6%	1,341	57.6	9	1	9
Homestead	Florida	111	99	49	0.7%	1,340	46.9	7	1	7
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	47	0.7%	1,334	50.3	4	1	4
Reno	Nevada	112	100	76	0.4%	1,334	73.9	12	1	12
Fontana	California	109	98	66	0.6%	1,326	62.0	3	1	3
Ocala	Florida	118	107	67	0.6%	1,319	60.9	11	1	11
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	39	0.8%	1,314	41.0	3	1	3
Yonkers	New York	109	99	46	0.7%	1,312	46.4	5	1	5
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	43	0.7%	1,310	44.3	3	1	3
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	73	0.5%	1,308	60.7	13	1	13
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	63	0.6%	1,297	63.3	7	1	7
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	55	0.6%	1,296	52.0	4	1	4
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	54	0.7%	1,279	49.6	9	1	9
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	66	0.6%	1,277	55.9	14	1	14
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	61	0.6%	1,276	59.3	6	1	6
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	58	0.6%	1,274	54.0	11	1	11
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	80	0.5%	1,271	70.5	13	1	13
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	55	0.7%	1,267	50.2	5	1	5
Fremont	California	107	98	64	0.5%	1,264	64.8	4	1	4
Van Nuys	California	105	95	48	0.7%	1,263	48.3	4	1	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	55	0.6%	1,247	54.4	5	1	5
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	45	0.7%	1,240	43.3	3	1	3
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	63	0.6%	1,238	55.7	6	1	6
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	55	0.6%	1,219	56.0	3	1	3
El Cajon	California	109	97	48	0.7%	1,217	48.0	3	1	3
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	72	0.5%	1,214	62.7	10	1	10
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	50	0.7%	1,209	50.2	6	1	6
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	54	0.6%	1,206	56.0	4	1	4
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	46	0.8%	1,206	39.6	14	1	14
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	52	0.7%	1,202	50.3	7	1	7
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	60	0.6%	1,200	55.5	4	1	4
Ontario	California	109	98	52	0.7%	1,197	51.3	3	1	3
Frisco	Texas	105	95	50	0.7%	1,186	50.5	2	1	2
Syracuse	New York	119	107	76	0.5%	1,181	66.5	14	1	14
Cypress	Texas	108	101	49	0.7%	1,178	50.0	2	1	2
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	53	0.7%	1,173	52.5	4	1	4
Torrance	California	113	103	54	0.7%	1,173	56.0	4	1	4
Lancaster	California	105	96	55	0.6%	1,170	53.3	3	1	3
Hayward	California	108	98	58	0.6%	1,168	58.8	4	1	4
Elk Grove	California	109	96	54	0.7%	1,166	54.3	3	1	3
Humble	Texas	108	98	49	0.7%	1,161	49.7	3	1	3
Ogden	Utah	110	101	67	0.6%	1,159	61.2	5	1	5
Olympia	Washington	110	98	58	0.6%	1,157	54.0	6	1	6
Garden Grove	California	110	97	52	0.7%	1,156	52.6	5	1	5
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	66	0.6%	1,154	57.4	9	1	9
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	51	0.7%	1,149	52.3	10	1	10
Mission	Texas	105	95	52	0.6%	1,146	56.3	3	1	3
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	64	0.6%	1,142	56.6	9	1	9
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	58	0.6%	1,139	55.6	5	1	5
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	67	0.5%	1,136	56.5	10	1	10
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	48	0.7%	1,132	45.3	3	1	3
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	45	0.8%	1,124	44.0	8	1	8
Waco	Texas	112	100	49	0.7%	1,118	49.4	9	1	9
Conroe	Texas	111	101	53	0.7%	1,116	49.3	7	1	7
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	51	0.7%	1,115	49.4	5	1	5
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	44	0.8%	1,114	39.2	5	1	5
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	61	0.6%	1,112	54.9	8	1	8
Odessa	Texas	112	103	50	0.7%	1,109	50.7	6	1	6
Oceanside	California	106	96	62	0.6%	1,105	63.8	4	1	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	55	0.7%	1,104	53.2	5	1	5
Pasadena	California	113	103	53	0.7%	1,099	49.3	6	1	6
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	51	0.7%	1,097	52.5	4	1	4
Salinas	California	106	96	62	0.6%	1,094	61.8	5	1	5
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	57	0.6%	1,093	54.2	9	1	9
Modesto	California	111	101	78	0.4%	1,091	71.3	6	1	6
North Hollywood	California	108	98	47	0.7%	1,089	48.3	4	1	4
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	62	0.6%	1,086	60.8	13	1	13
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	59	0.7%	1,086	52.1	7	1	7
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	65	0.6%	1,084	60.3	9	1	9
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	39	0.7%	1,083	45.8	5	1	5
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	57	0.6%	1,082	55.8	10	1	10
Astoria	New York	111	100	45	0.8%	1,078	43.5	4	1	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	46	0.7%	1,076	45.5	6	1	6
Midland	Texas	113	102	54	0.7%	1,070	52.8	5	1	5
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	45	0.7%	1,069	45.7	3	1	3
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	67	0.6%	1,068	59.9	7	1	7
Denton	Texas	110	101	52	0.7%	1,064	51.7	6	1	6
Killeen	Texas	110	101	49	0.7%	1,059	49.3	4	1	4
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	71	0.5%	1,052	58.6	6	1	6
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	75	0.5%	1,049	69.7	9	1	9
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	54	0.6%	1,048	53.7	3	1	3
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	45	0.7%	1,042	47.8	5	1	5
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	67	0.6%	1,042	64.3	9	1	9
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	69	0.5%	1,040	68.0	3	1	3
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	53	0.7%	1,039	52.3	4	1	4
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	62	0.6%	1,034	58.8	4	1	4
Schenectady	New York	113	101	59	0.6%	1,033	55.5	8	1	8
Escondido	California	104	94	60	0.6%	1,024	61.8	4	1	4
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	46	0.7%	1,022	49.0	2	1	2
Macon	Georgia	118	108	61	0.6%	1,017	55.4	9	1	9
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	56	0.6%	1,011	57.3	4	1	4
Tyler	Texas	115	104	54	0.6%	1,010	54.1	9	1	9
Albany	New York	117	102	56	0.7%	1,005	56.0	10	1	10
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	44	0.7%	1,004	46.5	2	1	2
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	55	0.7%	1,003	53.3	4	1	4
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	64	0.6%	1,002	60.4	5	1	5
Pomona	California	107	97	55	0.6%	1,001	54.7	3	1	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	43	0.8%	996	42.2	5	1	5
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	51	0.7%	995	49.3	4	1	4
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	60	0.6%	987	70.3	5	1	5
Everett	Washington	112	100	61	0.6%	987	60.0	5	1	5
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	66	0.6%	986	61.5	4	1	4
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	47	0.8%	981	44.2	6	1	6
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	63	0.6%	978	56.4	5	1	5
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	41	0.8%	978	44.0	5	1	5
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	50	0.7%	975	50.7	3	1	3
Chula Vista	California	109	100	80	0.4%	974	70.6	4	1	4
Compton	California	106	98	49	0.7%	974	49.3	3	1	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	35	0.8%	970	38.3	4	1	4
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	41	0.8%	968	40.3	6	1	6
Renton	Washington	112	100	57	0.6%	964	56.8	5	1	5
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	61	0.6%	961	57.7	7	1	7
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	51	0.7%	960	52.2	6	1	6
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	79	0.4%	955	68.9	6	1	6
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	53	0.6%	949	54.2	5	1	5
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	48	0.7%	946	49.0	4	1	4
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	49	0.7%	944	50.3	4	1	4
Canton	Ohio	117	105	58	0.6%	942	54.3	12	1	12
Victorville	California	105	95	48	0.7%	940	48.3	3	1	3
College Station	Texas	107	98	41	0.8%	938	42.5	2	1	2
Inglewood	California	124	112	53	0.7%	938	49.0	5	1	5
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	50	0.7%	936	50.3	3	1	3
Orange	California	111	100	60	0.6%	930	56.0	5	1	5
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	56	0.6%	929	55.0	9	1	9
Flint	Michigan	117	105	65	0.6%	920	60.7	7	1	7
Pearland	Texas	104	96	51	0.7%	917	52.5	2	1	2
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	50	0.7%	914	50.8	6	1	6
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	64	0.6%	911	59.5	11	1	11
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	51	0.7%	910	51.4	5	1	5
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	58	0.6%	907	56.7	3	1	3
Fullerton	California	106	97	52	0.6%	902	53.0	4	1	4
Billings	Montana	106	98	55	0.7%	901	54.8	4	1	4
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	53	0.7%	894	52.0	3	1	3
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	70	0.5%	887	64.9	18	1	18
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	43	0.8%	886	42.0	5	1	5
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	72	0.5%	881	71.3	7	1	7
Abilene	Texas	111	102	52	0.7%	879	51.5	6	1	6
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	49	0.7%	879	52.0	3	1	3
Santa Maria	California	106	97	59	0.6%	876	57.0	3	1	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	51	0.7%	875	51.3	3	1	3
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	62	0.6%	872	57.8	9	1	9
San Mateo	California	106	97	57	0.6%	868	57.0	4	1	4
Roseville	California	106	95	56	0.6%	867	56.0	3	1	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	55	0.7%	863	52.5	4	1	4
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	49	0.7%	852	47.4	5	1	5
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	57	0.6%	851	58.0	3	1	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	59	0.6%	847	55.0	5	1	5
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	59	0.6%	847	66.5	3	1	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	46	0.7%	846	41.7	3	1	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	73	0.5%	843	62.6	6	1	6
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	52	0.7%	841	54.8	5	1	5
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	61	0.6%	834	55.6	5	1	5
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	42	0.7%	830	46.5	2	1	2
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	50	0.7%	828	51.3	3	1	3
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	62	0.6%	823	55.3	7	1	7
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	49	0.7%	822	48.8	5	1	5
Vallejo	California	107	98	53	0.7%	820	55.3	4	1	4
Clovis	California	106	97	53	0.7%	816	51.3	3	1	3
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	51	0.7%	814	49.0	3	1	3
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	63	0.5%	813	66.0	7	1	7
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	46	0.7%	812	46.8	4	1	4
Burbank	California	109	100	43	0.7%	810	42.4	5	1	5
Temecula	California	109	99	56	0.6%	808	58.7	3	1	3
Hesperia	California	105	94	40	0.8%	807	41.5	2	1	2
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	58	0.7%	806	54.8	5	1	5
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	45	0.8%	806	44.0	3	1	3
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	61	0.6%	806	56.8	5	1	5
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	64	0.6%	805	62.0	5	1	5
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	47	0.7%	805	46.8	4	1	4
Carlsbad	California	109	96	47	0.7%	803	50.0	4	1	4
Simi Valley	California	101	92	56	0.6%	801	57.0	2	1	2
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	41	0.7%	800	44.0	1	1	1
Murrieta	California	106	96	57	0.6%	799	58.5	2	1	2
Concord	California	107	98	57	0.6%	795	57.3	4	1	4
Hemet	California	105	95	55	0.6%	793	58.3	3	1	3
Rialto	California	106	97	41	0.7%	791	49.5	2	1	2
Downey	California	100	91	47	0.7%	789	49.0	3	1	3
Longview	Texas	122	109	43	0.7%	789	44.0	5	1	5
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	54	0.6%	784	54.5	4	1	4
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	42	0.8%	784	46.5	2	1	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	49	0.7%	784	46.8	6	1	6
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	50	0.7%	782	47.6	5	1	5
Keller	Texas	108	99	53	0.7%	779	52.5	2	1	2
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	59	0.6%	779	55.7	3	1	3
Yakima	Washington	109	100	62	0.6%	779	56.0	4	1	4
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	61	0.6%	776	60.3	3	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	56	0.6%	775	55.2	5	1	5
Parker	Colorado	108	100	44	0.8%	775	45.5	2	1	2
El Monte	California	103	94	37	0.8%	774	35.5	2	1	2
Baytown	Texas	108	98	54	0.7%	771	53.7	3	1	3
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	57	0.6%	770	57.5	4	1	4
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	50	0.7%	770	52.7	3	1	3
Berkeley	California	110	99	60	0.6%	766	58.4	9	1	9
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	46	0.7%	766	50.5	4	1	4
Daly City	California	103	94	51	0.7%	764	53.0	2	1	2
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	49	0.7%	764	47.0	2	1	2
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	49	0.7%	754	50.5	2	1	2
Independence	Missouri	112	103	61	0.6%	753	56.6	8	1	8
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	43	0.8%	749	43.5	2	1	2
La Puente	California	105	96	56	0.6%	749	55.0	2	1	2
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	56	0.6%	748	54.5	6	1	6
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	68	0.5%	747	62.7	7	1	7
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	54	0.7%	747	53.5	2	1	2
Kent	Washington	113	102	72	0.5%	747	68.8	3	1	3
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	40	0.8%	746	43.0	3	1	3
Redding	California	110	99	52	0.7%	744	56.5	4	1	4
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	79	0.4%	743	70.5	4	1	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	59	0.6%	742	54.8	5	1	5
Visalia	California	108	99	69	0.5%	739	68.7	2	1	2
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	61	0.6%	736	60.7	3	1	3
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	50	0.7%	735	49.0	3	1	3
Richardson	Texas	109	101	56	0.6%	735	54.3	3	1	3
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	63	0.6%	734	61.7	3	1	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	49	0.7%	733	50.2	6	1	6
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	47	0.7%	730	47.3	4	1	4
Pacoima	California	100	90	48	0.7%	730	50.0	1	1	1
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	52	0.7%	730	53.3	4	1	4
Sandy	Utah	111	103	57	0.7%	726	53.3	4	1	4
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	63	0.6%	726	58.2	5	1	5
Warren	Michigan	115	103	73	0.5%	726	62.8	4	1	4
Bend	Oregon	109	99	61	0.6%	724	59.7	3	1	3
Allen	Texas	102	94	53	0.6%	723	54.0	2	1	2
Riverview	Florida	104	96	56	0.6%	722	54.3	3	1	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	107	97	39	0.8%	720	36.8	4	1	4
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	50	0.7%	719	50.0	3	1	3
Tracy	California	106	96	56	0.6%	719	56.5	4	1	4
Santa Clara	California	107	97	62	0.6%	717	61.5	4	1	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	41	0.8%	714	43.3	3	1	3
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	67	0.5%	713	60.7	5	1	5
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	72	0.5%	713	66.4	4	1	4
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	46	0.7%	712	46.5	2	1	2
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	49	0.7%	712	51.0	2	1	2
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	65	0.6%	709	61.8	4	1	4
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	64	0.6%	709	64.3	3	1	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	108	46	0.7%	708	51.5	2	1	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	49	0.7%	705	49.0	1	1	1
Menifee	California	108	98	52	0.6%	704	58.5	4	1	4
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	53	0.6%	703	56.5	2	1	2
West Covina	California	111	100	59	0.6%	703	55.0	3	1	3
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	48	0.7%	702	48.0	4	1	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	50	0.7%	702	50.0	2	1	2
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	49	0.7%	702	50.0	2	1	2
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	54	0.6%	699	55.0	4	1	4
Panama City	Florida	107	99	64	0.6%	697	61.5	6	1	6
Vista	California	106	97	62	0.6%	697	61.3	3	1	3
Athens	Georgia	115	106	66	0.6%	695	66.0	4	1	4
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	43	0.7%	695	45.0	1	1	1
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	47	0.7%	694	50.0	2	1	2
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	59	0.6%	691	59.3	11	1	11
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	60	0.6%	688	59.3	6	1	6
Norwalk	California	99	91	54	0.6%	688	54.0	1	1	1
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	48	0.7%	686	50.7	3	1	3
Buford	Georgia	102	94	49	0.7%	684	50.0	2	1	2
Fairfield	California	102	93	54	0.6%	684	59.0	2	1	2
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	53	0.6%	684	52.3	3	1	3
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	64	0.6%	682	62.8	4	1	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	47	0.7%	682	47.7	3	1	3
Perris	California	106	96	60	0.6%	681	61.0	2	1	2
Clermont	Florida	108	96	53	0.7%	680	48.3	3	1	3
Deltona	Florida	102	93	46	0.7%	680	46.5	2	1	2
Covington	Georgia	107	98	42	0.7%	679	46.5	2	1	2
Hawthorne	California	101	90	48	0.7%	678	49.0	1	1	1
Ventura	California	104	95	59	0.6%	677	60.7	3	1	3
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	53	0.7%	676	53.0	1	1	1
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	47	0.7%	674	48.5	2	1	2
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	51	0.7%	672	51.5	2	1	2
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	49	0.7%	671	52.7	3	1	3
Redwood City	California	105	95	59	0.6%	670	60.8	4	1	4
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	54	0.6%	668	57.3	3	1	3
South Gate	California	99	90	49	0.7%	666	49.0	1	1	1
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	57	0.6%	664	57.0	3	1	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	55	0.6%	662	53.5	4	1	4
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	52	0.7%	660	50.3	3	1	3
Merced	California	108	100	52	0.6%	660	55.3	3	1	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	53	0.6%	658	55.0	2	1	2
Bryan	Texas	114	105	54	0.7%	657	50.2	5	1	5
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	53	0.7%	655	53.3	3	1	3
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	55	0.6%	652	55.6	5	1	5
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	54	0.7%	652	50.0	4	1	4
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	59	0.6%	648	59.3	3	1	3
Chico	California	105	96	57	0.6%	647	61.0	3	1	3
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	65	0.5%	647	64.0	3	1	3
Madera	California	105	94	55	0.6%	645	52.7	3	1	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	66	0.6%	644	62.0	4	1	4
Santa Monica	California	105	96	49	0.7%	644	51.0	5	1	5
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	58	0.6%	641	58.2	6	1	6
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	53	0.7%	639	53.5	2	1	2
Sylmar	California	100	94	51	0.7%	637	53.0	1	1	1
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	54	0.6%	636	55.0	2	1	2
Pittsburg	California	98	90	50	0.7%	634	53.0	1	1	1
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	68	0.5%	633	67.2	5	1	5
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	53	0.7%	633	51.8	5	1	5
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	69	0.5%	632	67.3	4	1	4
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	56	0.6%	632	57.2	5	1	5
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	53	0.7%	629	53.5	4	1	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	61	0.7%	628	56.4	8	1	8
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	50	0.7%	627	51.5	2	1	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	54	0.6%	625	56.7	3	1	3
Chino	California	105	96	52	0.7%	622	55.5	2	1	2
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	54	0.6%	621	54.5	2	1	2
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	51	0.7%	618	52.4	5	1	5
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	67	0.5%	618	68.5	4	1	4
Vacaville	California	101	92	58	0.6%	615	60.0	2	1	2
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	56	0.6%	615	55.0	2	1	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	54	0.6%	613	54.5	6	1	6
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	57	0.6%	612	54.3	7	1	7
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	60	0.6%	611	54.7	3	1	3
Holland	Michigan	107	98	52	0.6%	610	54.0	2	1	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	54	0.6%	608	55.3	3	1	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	56	0.6%	608	57.7	3	1	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	61	0.6%	607	58.0	3	1	3
Apopka	Florida	105	95	57	0.6%	605	57.0	2	1	2
Medford	Oregon	106	98	53	0.6%	602	54.5	2	1	2
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	56	0.6%	601	59.0	2	1	2
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	56	0.6%	599	55.2	5	1	5
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	58	0.6%	595	58.5	2	1	2
Missoula	Montana	111	102	60	0.6%	587	58.2	5	1	5
Orem	Utah	104	96	60	0.6%	583	60.7	3	1	3
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	57	0.6%	582	57.0	2	1	2
Bothell	Washington	110	98	72	0.5%	579	73.3	2	1	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	66	0.6%	579	60.3	7	1	7
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	65	0.5%	577	59.5	3	1	3
Livermore	California	105	95	58	0.6%	574	59.5	2	1	2
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	64	0.6%	574	64.8	4	1	4
San Leandro	California	108	97	66	0.5%	571	70.0	2	1	2
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	84	0.4%	569	72.4	3	1	3
Ballwin	Missouri	105	95	60	0.6%	568	58.5	2	1	2
Indio	California	103	94	57	0.6%	568	61.0	2	1	2
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	63	0.6%	560	60.0	4	1	4
Waukesha	Wisconsin	117	107	55	0.6%	558	60.3	3	1	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	61	0.6%	553	63.0	2	1	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	64	0.5%	550	61.7	5	1	5
Palo Alto	California	107	96	64	0.6%	543	63.0	4	1	4
Largo	Florida	113	105	71	0.5%	528	69.8	4	1	4
Napa	California	101	92	64	0.5%	525	66.0	2	1	2
Champaign	Illinois	110	98	66	0.6%	523	63.7	3	1	3
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	62	0.5%	510	64.0	4	1	4
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	79	0.4%	498	75.6	4	1	4
Milton	Florida	108	99	70	0.5%	475	69.0	3	1	3
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	79	0.5%	452	67.1	7	1	7
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	80	0.3%	422	72.7	2	1	2
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	77	0.4%	417	68.7	2	1	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	75	0.4%	411	61.8	3	1	3
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	76	0.4%	400	77.5	1	1	1
Antioch	California	107	99	82	0.4%	395	80.5	1	1	1
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	77	0.4%	391	66.3	2	1	2
Auburn	Washington	112	101	84	0.3%	389	74.3	2	1	2
Provo	Utah	108	99	85	0.3%	389	76.0	2	1	2
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	82	0.4%	364	70.3	2	1	2

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	81	0.7%	16,822	48.4	59	1	59
San Diego	134	116	80	0.6%	7,822	60.1	35	1	35
San Jose	129	116	79	0.6%	6,097	62.8	27	1	27
San Francisco	121	106	75	0.6%	4,787	64.6	28	1	28
Sacramento	134	115	84	0.6%	4,608	62.1	27	1	27
Fresno	120	105	64	0.6%	3,863	57.2	17	1	17
Long Beach	120	109	58	0.7%	3,428	47.7	12	1	12
Bakersfield	112	102	61	0.6%	3,323	59.0	11	1	11
Stockton	122	108	57	0.7%	2,538	53.3	12	1	12
Oakland	115	102	69	0.6%	2,371	61.6	14	1	14
Santa Ana	110	99	58	0.6%	2,305	53.7	6	1	6
Anaheim	114	102	62	0.6%	2,173	57.9	6	1	6
Riverside	113	102	66	0.6%	2,145	60.9	7	1	7
Irvine	112	101	56	0.7%	1,741	54.3	9	1	9
San Bernardino	113	103	62	0.6%	1,527	56.7	7	1	7
Corona	111	98	62	0.6%	1,516	59.6	5	1	5
Huntington Beach	111	99	51	0.7%	1,362	51.5	4	1	4
Palmdale	106	97	44	0.8%	1,358	40.8	4	1	4
Whittier	108	98	50	0.7%	1,353	50.2	6	1	6
Oxnard	107	98	57	0.6%	1,347	59.0	4	1	4
Fontana	109	98	66	0.6%	1,326	62.0	3	1	3
Santa Rosa	112	100	61	0.6%	1,276	59.3	6	1	6
Fremont	107	98	64	0.5%	1,264	64.8	4	1	4
Van Nuys	105	95	48	0.7%	1,263	48.3	4	1	4
El Cajon	109	97	48	0.7%	1,217	48.0	3	1	3
Ontario	109	98	52	0.7%	1,197	51.3	3	1	3
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	53	0.7%	1,173	52.5	4	1	4
Torrance	113	103	54	0.7%	1,173	56.0	4	1	4
Lancaster	105	96	55	0.6%	1,170	53.3	3	1	3
Hayward	108	98	58	0.6%	1,168	58.8	4	1	4
Elk Grove	109	96	54	0.7%	1,166	54.3	3	1	3
Garden Grove	110	97	52	0.7%	1,156	52.6	5	1	5
Oceanside	106	96	62	0.6%	1,105	63.8	4	1	4
Pasadena	113	103	53	0.7%	1,099	49.3	6	1	6
Salinas	106	96	62	0.6%	1,094	61.8	5	1	5
Modesto	111	101	78	0.4%	1,091	71.3	6	1	6
North Hollywood	108	98	47	0.7%	1,089	48.3	4	1	4
Moreno Valley	109	99	69	0.5%	1,040	68.0	3	1	3
Escondido	104	94	60	0.6%	1,024	61.8	4	1	4
Pomona	107	97	55	0.6%	1,001	54.7	3	1	3
Chula Vista	109	100	80	0.4%	974	70.6	4	1	4
Compton	106	98	49	0.7%	974	49.3	3	1	3
Victorville	105	95	48	0.7%	940	48.3	3	1	3
Inglewood	124	112	53	0.7%	938	49.0	5	1	5
Orange	111	100	60	0.6%	930	56.0	5	1	5
Fullerton	106	97	52	0.6%	902	53.0	4	1	4
Santa Maria	106	97	59	0.6%	876	57.0	3	1	3
San Mateo	106	97	57	0.6%	868	57.0	4	1	4
Roseville	106	95	56	0.6%	867	56.0	3	1	3
Sunnyvale	107	98	59	0.6%	847	66.5	3	1	3
Costa Mesa	104	95	42	0.7%	830	46.5	2	1	2
Vallejo	107	98	53	0.7%	820	55.3	4	1	4
Clovis	106	97	53	0.7%	816	51.3	3	1	3
Burbank	109	100	43	0.7%	810	42.4	5	1	5
Temecula	109	99	56	0.6%	808	58.7	3	1	3
Hesperia	105	94	40	0.8%	807	41.5	2	1	2
Carlsbad	109	96	47	0.7%	803	50.0	4	1	4
Simi Valley	101	92	56	0.6%	801	57.0	2	1	2
Murrieta	106	96	57	0.6%	799	58.5	2	1	2
Concord	107	98	57	0.6%	795	57.3	4	1	4
Hemet	105	95	55	0.6%	793	58.3	3	1	3
Rialto	106	97	41	0.7%	791	49.5	2	1	2
Downey	100	91	47	0.7%	789	49.0	3	1	3
El Monte	103	94	37	0.8%	774	35.5	2	1	2
Berkeley	110	99	60	0.6%	766	58.4	9	1	9
Daly City	103	94	51	0.7%	764	53.0	2	1	2
La Puente	105	96	56	0.6%	749	55.0	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	111	99	68	0.5%	747	62.7	7	1	7
Redding	110	99	52	0.7%	744	56.5	4	1	4
Visalia	108	99	69	0.5%	739	68.7	2	1	2
Pacoima	100	90	48	0.7%	730	50.0	1	1	1
Tracy	106	96	56	0.6%	719	56.5	4	1	4
Santa Clara	107	97	62	0.6%	717	61.5	4	1	4
Menifee	108	98	52	0.6%	704	58.5	4	1	4
West Covina	111	100	59	0.6%	703	55.0	3	1	3
Vista	106	97	62	0.6%	697	61.3	3	1	3
Norwalk	99	91	54	0.6%	688	54.0	1	1	1
Fairfield	102	93	54	0.6%	684	59.0	2	1	2
Perris	106	96	60	0.6%	681	61.0	2	1	2
Hawthorne	101	90	48	0.7%	678	49.0	1	1	1
Ventura	104	95	59	0.6%	677	60.7	3	1	3
Bell Gardens	99	90	53	0.7%	676	53.0	1	1	1
Redwood City	105	95	59	0.6%	670	60.8	4	1	4
South Gate	99	90	49	0.7%	666	49.0	1	1	1
Merced	108	100	52	0.6%	660	55.3	3	1	3
Chico	105	96	57	0.6%	647	61.0	3	1	3
Madera	105	94	55	0.6%	645	52.7	3	1	3
Santa Monica	105	96	49	0.7%	644	51.0	5	1	5
Sylmar	100	94	51	0.7%	637	53.0	1	1	1
Pittsburg	98	90	50	0.7%	634	53.0	1	1	1
Chino	105	96	52	0.7%	622	55.5	2	1	2
Vacaville	101	92	58	0.6%	615	60.0	2	1	2
Mission Viejo	105	95	58	0.6%	595	58.5	2	1	2
Livermore	105	95	58	0.6%	574	59.5	2	1	2
Santa Cruz	106	95	64	0.6%	574	64.8	4	1	4
San Leandro	108	97	66	0.5%	571	70.0	2	1	2
Indio	103	94	57	0.6%	568	61.0	2	1	2
Palo Alto	107	96	64	0.6%	543	63.0	4	1	4
Napa	101	92	64	0.5%	525	66.0	2	1	2
Antioch	107	99	82	0.4%	395	80.5	1	1	1
San Marcos	107	98	93	0.3%	284	81.0	1	1	1

Houston

ZIP	lexingtoninsurance.com	allstate.com	nationwide.com	farmers.com	geico.com	esurance.com
77088	50	4	5	8	6	7
77047	33	4	5	8	6	7
77037	29	4	5	6	7	8
77098	33	4	5	7	6	8
77027	45	4	5	7	6	8
77068	38	1	5	7	6	8
77078	52	4	5	8	7	6
77086	29	4	5	7	6	8
77035	47	4	5	7	6	8
77008	52	4	5	7	6	8
77004	32	1	5	7	6	8
77028	45	4	5	7	6	8
77059	44	2	5	7	6	8
77039	45	4	5	7	6	8
77019	47	4	5	7	6	8
77075	44	1	2	4	3	5
77077	51	4	5	7	6	8
77079	39	4	5	7	6	8
77099	32	4	5	7	6	8
77024	33	4	5	7	6	8
77095	44	4	5	2	7	8
77048	31	4	5	7	6	8
77044	46	4	5	6	7	8
77015	31	4	5	6	8	7
77017	45	1	2	4	3	5
77057	47	4	5	7	6	8
77055	46	4	5	2	6	8
77006	33	4	5	7	6	8
77026	43	1	2	3	4	5
77046	33	4	5	7	6	8
77066	54	2	5	6	7	8
77023	51	4	5	6	8	7
77094	52	4	5	7	6	8
77084	52	4	5	7	6	8
77013	54	4	5	7	6	8
77063	46	1	2	4	3	5
77053	34	4	5	6	7	8
77022	52	4	5	8	6	7
77072	50	4	5	8	6	7
77049	50	4	5	6	7	8
77045	51	4	5	7	6	8
77010	47	1	5	6	8	7
77018	48	4	5	7	6	8
77041	45	3	5	6	7	8
77009	54	1	2	3	4	5
77089	53	2	5	1	6	8
77032	51	4	5	6	7	8
77036	50	4	5	6	8	7
77085	55	4	5	6	8	7
77054	44	4	5	7	6	8
77058	49	4	5	8	6	7
77014	44	4	5	7	6	8
77067	43	1	2	3	4	5
77005	44	4	5	7	6	8
77076	51	1	2	4	3	5
77070	52	4	5	7	6	8
77060	44	4	5	8	6	7
77080	51	4	5	3	8	6
77050	47	1	2	4	5	3
77091	47	4	5	8	6	7
77071	48	1	2	5	3	4
77061	48	4	5	7	6	8
77020	47	4	5	7	8	6
77081	46	4	5	6	7	8
77030	47	4	5	8	6	7
77040	42	4	5	6	7	8
77090	53	1	5	8	6	7
77031	46	1	2	3	5	4
77051	43	4	5	7	6	8
77011	43	4	5	7	6	8
77042	46	4	5	7	6	8
77062	51	4	5	3	8	6
77082	44	1	2	4	3	5
77093	45	4	5	7	6	8
77073	46	4	5	8	7	6
77033	49	4	5	8	7	6
77043	53	4	5	6	7	8
77074	50	4	5	8	7	6
77064	49	4	5	7	6	8
77012	50	4	5	8	6	7
77002	45	4	5	8	6	7
77092	49	4	5	7	8	6
77069	49	4	5	6	8	7
77021	42	1	2	5	3	4
77083		4	5	7	8	6
77029	47	4	5	7	8	6
77034		1	5	8	6	7
77087	46	1	2	5	4	3
77003	47	2	5	8	7	6
77038	46	4	5	7	8	6
77007	47	1	2	5	4	3
77016	45	4	5	7	8	6
77065		4	5	7	8	6
77096	52	4	5	6	8	7
77025	46	1	2	4	3	5
77056	49	4	5	6	8	7

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Lexingtoninsurance

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Lexingtoninsurance Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Lexingtoninsurance Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Lexingtoninsurance Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Lexingtoninsurance Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly