Lancasterdepewpediatrics Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve lancasterdepewpediatrics.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 4,149 Pediatric Clinics/Pediatricians In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Lancasterdepewpediatrics Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Lancasterdepewpediatrics Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Lancasterdepewpediatrics Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Lancasterdepewpediatrics Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	13,143	4,149	39	0.9%	2,780,103	45.6	21,314	26,515	3	26,516	1	4	94
California	2,011	850	76	0.9%	336,510	43.6	978	1,545	2	1,545	0	0	1
New York	1,724	791	65	1.2%	230,640	33.1	1,490	1,755	2	1,756	1	4	66
Texas	2,049	929	121	0.6%	178,402	46.2	1,314	1,869	1	1,869	0	0	0
Florida	1,382	652	127	0.7%	149,728	43.8	446	970	1	970	0	0	0
Pennsylvania	1,861	928	97	0.8%	101,387	43.3	1,273	1,443	2	1,443	0	0	0
Illinois	1,438	650	105	0.8%	100,057	42.1	1,022	1,154	1	1,154	0	0	0
Ohio	1,351	594	96	0.8%	88,629	42.5	815	1,026	1	1,026	0	0	0
Michigan	1,297	578	97	0.9%	86,735	52.9	522	660	1	660	0	0	0
North Carolina	1,230	545	129	0.8%	80,405	38.7	654	773	1	773	0	0	0
New Jersey	1,115	602	101	0.9%	75,665	32.8	530	585	1	585	0	0	0
Georgia	1,197	585	151	0.7%	74,038	40.4	571	723	1	723	0	0	0
Washington	954	389	89	0.9%	69,131	47.3	322	456	1	456	0	0	0
Virginia	1,152	545	124	0.8%	67,624	41.5	585	753	1	753	0	0	0
Massachusetts	1,030	476	115	0.9%	58,694	37.7	415	488	2	488	0	0	0
Wisconsin	922	404	60	1.0%	57,972	50.0	448	521	1	521	0	0	0
Indiana	1,767	867	90	0.8%	56,337	35.3	614	724	1	724	0	0	0
Missouri	1,191	491	87	0.9%	56,150	59.9	464	594	1	594	0	0	1
Tennessee	1,020	468	121	0.8%	52,060	46.1	420	527	1	527	0	0	0
Arizona	734	349	114	0.7%	50,997	46.9	229	376	1	376	0	0	0
Colorado	998	461	92	0.8%	46,731	47.5	304	434	1	434	0	0	1
Minnesota	962	394	71	0.8%	46,648	57.9	395	493	1	493	0	0	0
Oregon	1,188	603	79	1.1%	45,033	40.5	294	353	1	353	0	0	2
Kentucky	1,027	453	87	1.0%	43,871	53.7	436	495	1	495	0	0	1
Maryland	1,141	627	141	0.7%	41,865	43.7	384	455	1	455	0	0	0
Oklahoma	936	417	80	1.1%	41,802	57.9	327	411	1	411	0	0	0
Louisiana	930	416	81	0.9%	41,333	51.3	293	372	1	372	0	0	0
Mississippi	963	439	63	1.4%	40,898	51.0	235	268	1	268	0	0	1
Alabama	1,125	511	95	0.8%	39,852	49.7	366	477	1	477	0	0	0
South Carolina	859	392	100	0.8%	39,604	35.9	342	417	1	417	0	0	0
Connecticut	765	372	100	1.0%	34,130	31.6	219	264	1	264	0	0	0
Iowa	993	392	62	1.0%	30,945	64.4	413	454	1	454	0	0	1
Arkansas	945	424	78	1.0%	28,530	64.2	254	284	1	284	0	0	3
Kansas	907	382	71	1.0%	28,001	45.6	454	530	1	530	0	0	0
New Mexico	620	287	47	1.3%	27,210	48.5	222	256	1	256	0	0	0
Utah	598	271	56	0.9%	26,961	35.0	217	255	1	255	0	0	0
West Virginia	955	458	51	1.1%	20,497	27.8	645	665	1	665	0	0	1
Nevada	496	236	76	0.7%	19,792	59.2	76	150	1	150	0	0	1
Nebraska	854	378	61	1.0%	19,635	51.4	351	408	1	408	0	0	6
Hawaii	341	159	48	1.3%	19,066	51.4	54	64	1	64	0	0	0
Idaho	736	375	65	1.0%	17,567	51.6	159	179	1	179	0	0	2
Maine	1,422	749	42	1.1%	15,082	24.0	415	419	1	419	0	0	0
Montana	698	313	53	1.3%	13,932	53.3	207	218	1	218	0	0	1
New Hampshire	706	310	60	1.0%	13,551	47.8	159	169	1	169	0	0	3
North Dakota	442	211	29	1.5%	11,079	51.2	224	234	1	234	0	0	1
South Dakota	602	285	42	1.1%	9,450	52.1	223	234	1	234	0	0	1
Wyoming	551	255	54	1.6%	9,042	57.7	85	92	1	92	0	0	1
Alaska	612	262	45	1.2%	8,763	36.7	189	206	1	206	0	0	0
Rhode Island	357	178	57	0.8%	8,603	34.9	64	77	1	77	0	0	0
Delaware	425	232	44	0.9%	8,284	30.4	52	66	1	66	0	0	0
Vermont	623	284	49	1.1%	7,144	55.0	142	145	1	145	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	296	161	96	0.4%	13,751	76.1	96	1	96
Los Angeles	California	245	127	79	0.5%	12,069	68.8	62	1	62
Miami	Florida	261	133	74	0.6%	12,049	54.8	55	1	55
Chicago	Illinois	207	108	86	0.4%	11,149	77.8	56	1	56
Brooklyn	New York	194	117	92	0.4%	9,355	82.7	37	1	37
Minneapolis	Minnesota	240	115	42	0.9%	9,263	36.2	50	1	50
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	218	122	67	0.5%	8,564	63.5	47	1	47
San Diego	California	209	103	56	0.6%	7,919	57.7	36	1	36
Saint Louis	Missouri	235	121	36	0.8%	7,422	38.0	45	1	45
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	233	118	45	0.9%	7,193	32.9	27	1	27
Saint Paul	Minnesota	233	105	44	0.8%	6,737	35.8	29	1	29
Buffalo	New York	212	115	35	1.2%	6,529	47.7	28	2	28
New York City	New York	210	121	89	0.4%	6,422	79.3	47	1	47
Indianapolis	Indiana	234	110	52	0.7%	6,353	51.1	37	1	37
San Antonio	Texas	217	119	85	0.4%	6,291	83.8	59	1	59
San Jose	California	190	101	59	0.6%	6,156	60.6	28	1	28
Bronx	New York	179	106	82	0.4%	6,109	77.2	25	1	25
Las Vegas	Nevada	213	116	77	0.4%	6,096	79.5	42	1	42
Phoenix	Arizona	181	104	80	0.4%	5,987	77.7	42	1	42
Dallas	Texas	255	149	91	0.4%	5,548	79.9	47	1	47
Cleveland	Ohio	220	113	38	0.7%	5,520	45.5	29	1	29
Seattle	Washington	190	92	55	0.6%	5,500	61.1	35	1	35
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	202	95	48	0.7%	5,474	50.7	29	1	29
San Francisco	California	187	99	48	0.6%	5,393	56.1	28	1	28
Denver	Colorado	296	159	79	0.5%	5,353	70.6	38	1	38
Fort Worth	Texas	200	119	54	0.6%	5,327	60.8	32	1	32
Sacramento	California	197	105	48	0.7%	5,264	53.1	28	1	28
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	213	99	51	0.8%	5,151	43.7	43	1	43
Portland	Oregon	178	95	63	0.5%	4,939	65.1	33	1	33
Austin	Texas	195	104	76	0.4%	4,859	74.3	44	1	44
Tucson	Arizona	211	109	65	0.5%	4,823	63.7	32	1	32
Cincinnati	Ohio	206	109	53	0.6%	4,618	61.4	45	1	45
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	214	103	48	0.7%	4,574	52.3	39	1	39
Albuquerque	New Mexico	169	88	41	0.7%	4,542	50.4	17	1	17
Columbus	Ohio	207	109	65	0.5%	4,523	65.4	30	1	30
Atlanta	Georgia	249	141	89	0.4%	4,441	74.4	39	1	39
Charlotte	North Carolina	181	85	62	0.5%	4,337	71.2	24	1	24
Jacksonville	Florida	210	106	66	0.5%	4,226	70.7	31	1	31
Tampa	Florida	207	112	63	0.5%	4,172	64.0	24	1	24
Louisville	Kentucky	182	103	62	0.5%	4,099	65.3	32	1	32
Washington DC	District of Columbia	187	106	52	0.6%	4,038	62.3	28	1	28
Orlando	Florida	211	111	84	0.4%	4,026	79.1	32	1	32
Hollywood	Florida	160	77	37	0.9%	4,020	32.7	9	1	9
Memphis	Tennessee	190	99	55	0.6%	3,982	61.7	26	1	26
Bakersfield	California	158	83	45	0.7%	3,906	50.0	11	1	11
Dayton	Ohio	234	113	38	0.8%	3,650	45.7	26	1	26
Baltimore	Maryland	207	107	61	0.6%	3,539	62.3	22	1	22
Salt Lake City	Utah	175	92	42	0.7%	3,535	46.9	19	1	19
Fresno	California	168	84	55	0.6%	3,521	60.9	18	1	18
El Paso	Texas	213	103	79	0.4%	3,493	71.0	24	1	24
Omaha	Nebraska	188	92	53	0.6%	3,432	56.6	31	1	31
Detroit	Michigan	169	82	67	0.5%	3,418	65.0	25	1	25
Hialeah	Florida	165	86	34	0.9%	3,296	29.6	7	1	7
Virginia Beach	Virginia	150	76	40	0.7%	3,288	46.2	12	1	12
Pompano Beach	Florida	170	89	42	0.9%	3,284	30.9	10	1	10
Colorado Springs	Colorado	200	104	54	0.5%	3,196	62.1	30	1	30
Aurora	Colorado	164	91	38	0.7%	3,147	46.5	11	1	11
Stockton	California	156	82	31	0.8%	3,125	36.2	12	1	12
Santa Ana	California	133	70	27	0.9%	3,105	32.0	6	1	6
Long Beach	California	160	85	45	0.6%	3,097	54.3	12	1	12
Kansas City	Missouri	191	99	71	0.5%	3,007	66.9	49	1	49
Saint Petersburg	Florida	186	106	35	0.8%	2,981	36.1	16	1	16
Anaheim	California	222	108	33	0.8%	2,912	39.3	6	1	6
Birmingham	Alabama	188	102	59	0.6%	2,904	61.7	30	1	30
Mesa	Arizona	157	95	58	0.5%	2,869	64.1	13	1	13
Honolulu	Hawaii	160	82	47	0.7%	2,814	52.1	11	1	11
Wichita	Kansas	176	86	49	0.6%	2,707	54.2	26	1	26
West Palm Beach	Florida	161	89	37	0.7%	2,685	47.0	12	1	12
Vancouver	Washington	155	81	33	0.8%	2,674	36.8	11	1	11
Riverside	California	146	78	42	0.7%	2,652	46.9	7	1	7
Oakland	California	160	87	49	0.6%	2,645	55.0	14	1	14
Spokane	Washington	164	82	41	0.7%	2,550	48.7	14	1	14
New Orleans	Louisiana	158	74	58	0.6%	2,546	58.3	19	1	19
Yakima	Washington	133	60	17	2.0%	2,546	20.3	4	1	4
Santa Maria	California	134	67	19	1.8%	2,535	21.7	3	1	3
Tacoma	Washington	200	105	45	0.8%	2,528	40.1	19	1	19
Knoxville	Tennessee	160	86	51	0.6%	2,456	56.6	17	1	17
Grand Rapids	Michigan	149	81	46	0.7%	2,432	52.8	12	1	12
Rochester	New York	192	109	63	0.5%	2,419	68.3	24	1	24
Laredo	Texas	136	74	26	0.9%	2,407	30.2	6	1	6
Toledo	Ohio	160	84	37	0.8%	2,375	41.0	15	1	15
Mobile	Alabama	206	108	25	0.9%	2,363	39.0	18	1	18
Raleigh	North Carolina	151	84	68	0.4%	2,361	76.0	15	1	15
Alexandria	Virginia	178	109	57	0.7%	2,348	53.3	14	1	14
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	205	103	52	0.6%	2,305	56.1	18	1	18
Naples	Florida	189	93	41	0.7%	2,292	44.4	14	1	14
Chula Vista	California	122	58	29	0.9%	2,252	32.8	5	1	5
Newark	New Jersey	164	101	33	0.8%	2,243	38.9	9	1	9
Corona	California	149	81	31	0.8%	2,186	33.8	5	1	5
San Bernardino	California	148	75	29	0.9%	2,185	31.9	7	1	7
Tallahassee	Florida	159	84	40	0.7%	2,153	44.5	10	1	10
Tulsa	Oklahoma	188	93	66	0.5%	2,152	68.5	28	1	28
Corpus Christi	Texas	157	82	46	0.7%	2,118	55.6	18	1	18
Madison	Wisconsin	159	85	40	0.7%	2,117	46.1	14	1	14
Boise	Idaho	147	66	30	0.8%	2,110	36.0	9	1	9
Pueblo	Colorado	159	77	26	1.3%	2,101	26.3	7	1	7
Winston Salem	North Carolina	142	76	35	0.8%	2,077	40.3	9	1	9
Littleton	Colorado	165	97	52	0.6%	2,064	56.2	10	1	10
Salem	Oregon	129	65	39	0.8%	2,044	42.1	7	1	7
Fontana	California	115	58	29	0.9%	2,022	32.7	3	1	3
Lubbock	Texas	163	84	36	0.7%	2,016	46.1	14	1	14
Jersey City	New Jersey	151	90	38	0.8%	1,987	41.9	7	1	7
Greensboro	North Carolina	136	72	50	0.6%	1,971	58.1	9	1	9
Nashville	Tennessee	172	86	74	0.4%	1,969	74.7	22	1	22
Silver Spring	Maryland	186	116	45	0.6%	1,956	55.7	7	1	7
Reno	Nevada	154	80	44	0.7%	1,942	53.1	12	1	12
Akron	Ohio	171	91	39	0.7%	1,931	47.2	17	1	17
Modesto	California	148	73	43	0.7%	1,928	45.1	7	1	7
Fort Wayne	Indiana	154	78	49	0.6%	1,925	58.6	16	1	16
Kissimmee	Florida	175	106	45	0.7%	1,922	53.6	7	1	7
Richmond	Virginia	150	85	61	0.5%	1,918	69.8	15	1	15
Spring	Texas	175	98	70	0.5%	1,915	65.8	8	1	8
Arlington	Texas	151	81	68	0.5%	1,903	71.2	12	1	12
Trenton	New Jersey	179	107	34	0.9%	1,893	27.3	11	1	11
Lexington	Kentucky	159	85	55	0.6%	1,875	60.7	15	1	15
Columbia	South Carolina	158	80	58	0.5%	1,870	67.1	14	1	14
Oxnard	California	126	67	32	0.8%	1,862	33.8	4	1	4
Staten Island	New York	160	101	80	0.4%	1,840	79.5	12	1	12
Bradenton	Florida	148	71	45	0.7%	1,829	46.4	10	1	10
Scottsdale	Arizona	172	97	50	0.6%	1,825	56.3	11	1	11
Duluth	Minnesota	150	75	19	1.6%	1,816	21.2	11	1	11
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	145	79	26	0.9%	1,811	30.0	6	1	6
Amarillo	Texas	173	95	34	0.8%	1,799	39.7	14	1	14
Chesapeake	Virginia	146	81	37	0.8%	1,796	45.5	6	1	6
Moreno Valley	California	124	62	30	0.9%	1,795	31.5	4	1	4
Marietta	Georgia	146	90	53	0.6%	1,788	63.1	7	1	7
Norfolk	Virginia	175	91	41	0.7%	1,788	46.1	14	1	14
Pensacola	Florida	172	86	45	0.7%	1,781	55.8	12	1	12
Fort Collins	Colorado	129	63	29	0.9%	1,773	28.2	5	1	5
Lakeland	Florida	151	81	45	0.7%	1,740	51.6	9	1	9
Wilmington	Delaware	163	89	33	0.8%	1,738	40.6	10	1	10
Lincoln	Nebraska	147	71	54	0.6%	1,732	56.9	22	1	22
Santa Rosa	California	147	69	34	0.8%	1,726	38.8	6	1	6
Beaverton	Oregon	127	70	31	0.9%	1,723	33.3	4	1	4
Hayward	California	132	72	24	0.9%	1,722	29.5	4	1	4
Brownsville	Texas	123	67	27	0.9%	1,719	33.7	3	1	3
Sarasota	Florida	162	81	45	0.7%	1,718	48.8	13	1	13
Fort Myers	Florida	160	87	47	0.7%	1,704	50.4	11	1	11
Springfield	Missouri	155	75	37	0.7%	1,703	47.3	7	1	7
Salinas	California	129	63	24	0.9%	1,695	28.0	5	1	5
Durham	North Carolina	141	77	52	0.6%	1,694	60.8	8	1	8
Eugene	Oregon	138	66	28	0.8%	1,683	37.0	6	1	6
Huntington Beach	California	133	71	28	0.8%	1,682	34.8	4	1	4
Oceanside	California	124	59	28	0.8%	1,679	35.0	4	1	4
Syracuse	New York	159	91	41	0.7%	1,665	45.5	15	1	15
Ontario	California	126	65	21	0.9%	1,660	25.0	3	1	3
Escondido	California	120	55	24	0.9%	1,641	27.8	4	1	4
Homestead	Florida	151	76	28	0.9%	1,637	30.7	7	1	7
Garden Grove	California	151	80	28	0.9%	1,634	25.2	5	1	5
Lake Worth	Florida	152	86	36	0.8%	1,634	41.4	5	1	5
Erie	Pennsylvania	149	77	28	0.9%	1,634	30.2	13	1	13
Woodbridge	Virginia	142	88	37	0.8%	1,624	42.7	3	1	3
Ogden	Utah	129	62	33	0.8%	1,610	39.4	5	1	5
Little Rock	Arkansas	155	76	40	0.7%	1,608	45.4	12	1	12
Irvine	California	144	79	49	0.6%	1,607	59.0	9	1	9
Green Bay	Wisconsin	148	70	29	0.9%	1,598	30.1	7	1	7
Garland	Texas	136	79	44	0.7%	1,592	51.0	5	1	5
Worcester	Massachusetts	150	83	32	0.9%	1,589	32.9	9	1	9
Fremont	California	124	61	44	0.7%	1,576	51.3	4	1	4
Whittier	California	182	96	39	0.8%	1,570	39.3	6	1	6
Roanoke	Virginia	178	99	23	0.9%	1,563	26.0	10	1	10
Palmdale	California	128	67	31	0.9%	1,558	30.5	4	1	4
Savannah	Georgia	140	77	50	0.6%	1,558	55.8	10	1	10
Evansville	Indiana	153	69	33	0.8%	1,553	35.0	9	1	9
Yonkers	New York	140	80	33	0.8%	1,531	34.2	5	1	5
Reading	Pennsylvania	169	83	41	0.7%	1,529	48.6	10	1	10
Schenectady	New York	154	81	26	0.9%	1,525	25.4	8	1	8
Glendale	Arizona	157	90	61	0.5%	1,519	70.3	9	1	9
Olympia	Washington	157	81	32	0.8%	1,519	36.3	6	1	6
Chandler	Arizona	135	81	55	0.6%	1,516	62.3	6	1	6
Boca Raton	Florida	144	77	43	0.7%	1,510	49.8	9	1	9
Clarksville	Tennessee	119	65	27	0.9%	1,510	32.0	3	1	3
Grand Prairie	Texas	130	81	39	0.8%	1,510	40.0	4	1	4
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	135	66	30	0.8%	1,503	40.2	5	1	5
Katy	Texas	136	87	71	0.4%	1,497	74.3	4	1	4
Cape Coral	Florida	148	74	33	0.8%	1,493	36.7	6	1	6
Tempe	Arizona	118	71	33	0.8%	1,484	41.0	4	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	California	131	68	34	0.8%	1,479	35.0	4	1	4
Shreveport	Louisiana	156	78	46	0.7%	1,477	53.7	12	1	12
Elk Grove	California	116	59	35	0.8%	1,454	38.3	3	1	3
Clearwater	Florida	160	90	41	0.8%	1,453	40.1	9	1	9
Des Moines	Iowa	137	63	47	0.7%	1,452	54.5	11	1	11
Anchorage	Alaska	164	82	54	0.6%	1,448	60.0	12	1	12
Ocala	Florida	151	80	46	0.6%	1,448	54.6	11	1	11
Rockford	Illinois	146	72	33	0.8%	1,448	39.3	9	1	9
Newport News	Virginia	147	70	34	0.8%	1,445	37.9	7	1	7
Fayetteville	North Carolina	135	79	53	0.6%	1,430	60.1	8	1	8
Mission	Texas	137	79	35	0.8%	1,429	41.7	3	1	3
Everett	Washington	133	69	28	0.9%	1,418	34.4	5	1	5
Topeka	Kansas	169	90	28	0.9%	1,410	32.7	18	1	18
Visalia	California	138	66	27	0.9%	1,403	26.3	3	1	3
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	153	80	31	0.8%	1,402	36.0	9	1	9
Kent	Washington	143	75	29	0.9%	1,398	31.8	4	1	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	144	72	35	0.8%	1,384	42.6	9	1	9
Las Cruces	New Mexico	156	74	23	0.9%	1,378	25.7	7	1	7
Youngstown	Ohio	164	89	28	0.9%	1,378	31.0	12	1	12
Boynton Beach	Florida	136	77	32	0.8%	1,373	39.7	6	1	6
Irving	Texas	128	77	57	0.6%	1,373	62.5	6	1	6
Edmond	Oklahoma	139	63	33	0.8%	1,371	39.4	5	1	5
Jackson	Mississippi	160	76	31	0.8%	1,363	40.0	11	1	11
Bend	Oregon	135	65	16	1.1%	1,346	25.3	3	1	3
Gainesville	Florida	141	79	47	0.6%	1,344	54.4	10	1	10
Chattanooga	Tennessee	179	94	48	0.6%	1,342	56.1	15	1	15
Allentown	Pennsylvania	139	73	33	0.8%	1,341	41.0	7	1	7
Paterson	New Jersey	144	88	29	0.9%	1,317	29.0	9	1	9
Edinburg	Texas	131	70	31	0.8%	1,315	35.0	3	1	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	149	78	30	0.8%	1,314	39.3	7	1	7
Odessa	Texas	156	86	31	0.8%	1,313	36.7	6	1	6
Waco	Texas	155	86	32	0.8%	1,312	36.6	9	1	9
Fullerton	California	142	77	26	0.9%	1,307	25.5	4	1	4
Killeen	Texas	130	66	30	0.9%	1,299	33.5	4	1	4
Providence	Rhode Island	158	84	50	0.6%	1,297	57.9	8	1	8
Pomona	California	119	62	31	0.8%	1,296	37.3	3	1	3
Fredericksburg	Virginia	151	81	39	0.7%	1,295	45.2	5	1	5
Augusta	Georgia	149	80	47	0.6%	1,292	57.6	8	1	8
Billings	Montana	132	59	20	0.9%	1,292	24.0	4	1	4
Lawrenceville	Georgia	123	73	59	0.5%	1,292	69.0	4	1	4
Montgomery	Alabama	154	80	51	0.6%	1,284	56.5	13	1	13
Saint Charles	Missouri	134	64	24	0.9%	1,284	27.3	3	1	3
Bridgeport	Connecticut	148	81	27	0.9%	1,277	31.5	6	1	6
Compton	California	130	69	29	0.9%	1,276	28.0	3	1	3
Warren	Michigan	132	68	28	0.9%	1,243	27.2	5	1	5
Henrico	Virginia	165	92	45	0.6%	1,240	53.0	7	1	7
Greenville	South Carolina	143	70	51	0.6%	1,239	62.1	9	1	9
Hemet	California	133	63	20	1.0%	1,238	23.0	3	1	3
Sunnyvale	California	144	78	31	0.8%	1,234	41.0	4	1	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	141	69	20	1.0%	1,227	23.4	5	1	5
El Cajon	California	138	64	43	0.7%	1,226	48.7	3	1	3
Henderson	Nevada	128	75	70	0.4%	1,221	78.8	8	1	8
Bloomington	Indiana	131	62	26	0.9%	1,219	26.2	6	1	6
Olathe	Kansas	114	59	31	0.8%	1,214	35.0	2	1	2
South Bend	Indiana	129	61	29	0.8%	1,213	36.5	10	1	10
Hamilton	Ohio	127	67	27	0.9%	1,204	30.7	3	1	3
Macon	Georgia	154	87	40	0.7%	1,203	44.6	9	1	9
Midland	Texas	148	88	38	0.8%	1,203	43.6	5	1	5
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	143	79	30	0.8%	1,198	36.8	5	1	5
Murrieta	California	114	55	26	0.9%	1,196	28.5	2	1	2
Conroe	Texas	157	86	40	0.7%	1,193	44.3	7	1	7
Charleston	South Carolina	150	81	51	0.6%	1,192	58.0	10	1	10
Plano	Texas	128	89	74	0.4%	1,182	80.1	7	1	7
Yuma	Arizona	126	61	35	0.8%	1,182	37.0	3	1	3
Puyallup	Washington	145	75	32	0.8%	1,180	37.6	5	1	5
Mesquite	Texas	113	68	34	0.8%	1,174	38.3	3	1	3
Renton	Washington	153	77	39	0.8%	1,173	40.8	5	1	5
Longmont	Colorado	129	70	26	0.9%	1,172	30.0	3	1	3
Saginaw	Michigan	139	67	22	0.9%	1,171	29.7	7	1	7
Racine	Wisconsin	146	70	28	0.9%	1,166	26.8	5	1	5
Hampton	Virginia	149	71	33	0.9%	1,162	33.8	6	1	6
Simi Valley	California	109	59	29	0.9%	1,161	29.0	2	1	2
Manassas	Virginia	141	90	47	0.8%	1,160	42.5	4	1	4
Overland Park	Kansas	146	82	46	0.6%	1,157	55.8	9	1	9
York	Pennsylvania	140	83	54	0.6%	1,156	54.9	7	1	7
Canton	Ohio	144	72	35	0.8%	1,148	41.5	12	1	12
Cypress	Texas	114	67	46	0.7%	1,147	51.5	2	1	2
Vallejo	California	127	66	25	0.9%	1,147	27.3	4	1	4
Bellingham	Washington	119	60	21	0.9%	1,146	28.3	3	1	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	152	74	24	0.9%	1,146	30.6	5	1	5
Torrance	California	151	79	54	0.6%	1,140	56.0	5	1	5
West Valley City	Utah	111	61	28	0.9%	1,140	33.3	3	1	3
Concord	California	125	68	31	0.9%	1,130	32.0	4	1	4
Jamaica	New York	147	91	73	0.5%	1,129	73.2	6	1	6
Alpharetta	Georgia	149	94	55	0.6%	1,127	61.0	4	1	4
Boulder	Colorado	148	82	32	0.9%	1,121	33.8	6	1	6
Temecula	California	129	68	29	0.9%	1,117	33.7	3	1	3
Summerville	South Carolina	116	59	34	0.8%	1,117	39.0	2	1	2
Lansing	Michigan	140	75	43	0.7%	1,116	50.6	7	1	7
Huntsville	Alabama	142	80	55	0.6%	1,112	62.4	11	1	11
Inglewood	California	159	89	39	0.8%	1,109	36.8	5	1	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	135	68	22	0.9%	1,109	28.8	4	1	4
Muskegon	Michigan	126	65	26	0.9%	1,106	32.0	5	1	5
Victorville	California	118	59	35	0.8%	1,105	37.7	3	1	3
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	129	57	33	0.8%	1,095	38.8	6	1	6
Abilene	Texas	144	83	28	0.8%	1,091	35.2	6	1	6
San Mateo	California	134	64	42	0.8%	1,089	43.0	4	1	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	135	74	46	0.7%	1,088	53.6	5	1	5
Pasadena	California	157	82	44	0.7%	1,087	50.0	6	1	6
Gilbert	Arizona	117	73	64	0.5%	1,081	73.7	6	1	6
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	122	68	28	0.9%	1,080	33.0	4	1	4
Perris	California	117	62	25	0.9%	1,080	27.0	2	1	2
Greeley	Colorado	110	52	22	0.9%	1,077	24.5	2	1	2
Tracy	California	132	67	24	0.9%	1,077	26.5	4	1	4
Fairfax	Virginia	152	96	44	0.7%	1,068	53.0	4	1	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	128	68	27	0.9%	1,067	32.8	5	1	5
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	123	62	31	0.8%	1,066	37.0	3	1	3
Menifee	California	131	73	22	1.0%	1,063	22.0	4	1	4
New Haven	Connecticut	125	65	31	0.8%	1,060	37.8	5	1	5
Rialto	California	114	61	24	1.0%	1,055	20.0	2	1	2
Redwood City	California	131	65	26	0.9%	1,053	27.0	4	1	4
Nampa	Idaho	114	52	26	0.9%	1,051	28.0	3	1	3
Lafayette	Louisiana	126	62	47	0.7%	1,046	53.8	5	1	5
Cumming	Georgia	125	76	48	0.6%	1,037	57.3	3	1	3
Mckinney	Texas	124	82	59	0.5%	1,033	62.7	3	1	3
Mcallen	Texas	135	70	40	0.7%	1,032	45.7	3	1	3
Antioch	California	117	64	23	0.9%	1,026	27.0	2	1	2
Appleton	Wisconsin	117	57	27	0.8%	1,025	34.5	4	1	4
Santa Clara	California	121	64	31	0.8%	1,025	37.5	4	1	4
Arvada	Colorado	125	73	33	0.8%	1,024	42.4	5	1	5
Redding	California	147	67	25	0.9%	1,024	46.5	3	1	3
Independence	Missouri	136	70	29	0.8%	1,017	36.9	8	1	8
Norman	Oklahoma	134	69	32	0.8%	1,015	35.8	4	1	4
Chico	California	138	67	23	0.9%	1,014	28.3	3	1	3
Joliet	Illinois	112	68	37	0.8%	1,013	40.4	5	1	5
Roseville	California	119	61	43	0.7%	1,005	47.3	3	1	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	134	86	34	0.8%	1,005	41.3	3	1	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	124	61	28	0.9%	1,001	32.5	4	1	4
Delray Beach	Florida	136	73	28	0.8%	999	35.6	5	1	5
Downey	California	132	73	33	0.9%	999	30.7	3	1	3
Missoula	Montana	148	67	20	1.0%	999	22.8	5	1	5
West Jordan	Utah	126	69	32	0.8%	999	38.3	3	1	3
Auburn	Washington	122	59	28	0.9%	996	30.3	3	1	3
Fairfield	California	112	57	27	0.9%	996	32.0	2	1	2
Vacaville	California	113	57	21	0.9%	996	25.0	2	1	2
Albany	New York	161	91	48	0.7%	993	52.4	11	1	11
Berkeley	California	162	85	39	0.8%	991	41.4	9	1	9
San Leandro	California	114	59	25	0.9%	988	29.7	3	1	3
Baytown	Texas	143	80	32	0.8%	984	34.3	3	1	3
Metairie	Louisiana	147	70	40	0.7%	982	50.8	5	1	5
San Angelo	Texas	142	78	23	0.9%	982	30.0	4	1	4
Tyler	Texas	150	79	45	0.6%	981	54.7	9	1	9
Provo	Utah	120	65	29	0.8%	977	35.7	3	1	3
Hyattsville	Maryland	139	83	53	0.6%	974	56.8	5	1	5
Vero Beach	Florida	155	80	25	0.8%	973	34.5	6	1	6
Bellevue	Washington	135	70	48	0.7%	972	52.4	5	1	5
Manchester	New Hampshire	133	65	28	0.8%	972	34.8	5	1	5
Carlsbad	California	123	61	29	0.9%	967	34.8	4	1	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	129	71	44	0.7%	967	46.5	4	1	4
Peoria	Arizona	124	71	58	0.6%	966	63.5	4	1	4
Surprise	Arizona	133	77	39	0.7%	966	46.3	4	1	4
Elgin	Illinois	124	74	30	0.8%	963	40.0	3	1	3
Hesperia	California	115	57	23	0.9%	963	26.5	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	California	135	68	46	0.7%	961	49.3	7	1	7
Melbourne	Florida	131	61	50	0.6%	961	57.4	5	1	5
Kenosha	Wisconsin	114	56	25	0.9%	960	33.8	4	1	4
Fargo	North Dakota	129	66	36	0.8%	959	40.5	4	1	4
West Covina	California	126	66	28	0.9%	959	32.0	3	1	3
Davenport	Iowa	135	69	25	0.9%	956	28.0	6	1	6
Madera	California	137	68	22	0.9%	955	29.3	3	1	3
Waukegan	Illinois	108	62	20	1.0%	954	20.5	2	1	2
Boston	Massachusetts	177	89	51	0.6%	953	56.0	14	1	14
Norwalk	California	99	55	25	0.9%	953	29.0	1	1	1
Santa Cruz	California	129	61	27	0.9%	953	29.5	4	1	4
North Las Vegas	Nevada	135	75	73	0.4%	952	78.3	7	1	7
Grand Junction	Colorado	130	61	22	0.9%	951	28.8	6	1	6
Orange	California	136	72	46	0.7%	950	53.8	5	1	5
High Point	North Carolina	127	73	39	0.8%	949	42.0	4	1	4
Bothell	Washington	133	66	43	0.7%	945	41.0	3	1	3
Sugar Land	Texas	147	86	59	0.6%	944	63.7	3	1	3
O Fallon	Missouri	121	58	18	1.0%	941	21.5	2	1	2
Toms River	New Jersey	117	63	36	0.8%	941	42.3	3	1	3
Costa Mesa	California	113	61	36	0.8%	939	37.0	2	1	2
Clovis	California	125	61	39	0.8%	939	41.7	3	1	3
Panama City	Florida	127	69	39	0.7%	932	43.8	6	1	6
Spring Hill	Florida	136	74	35	0.7%	930	44.0	5	1	5
Carrollton	Texas	123	82	48	0.7%	929	50.0	3	1	3
Vista	California	117	58	38	0.8%	929	41.3	3	1	3
Beaumont	Texas	147	80	50	0.6%	928	56.6	8	1	8
College Station	Texas	120	62	38	0.8%	928	44.0	2	1	2
West Chester	Pennsylvania	114	65	30	0.9%	928	34.7	3	1	3
New Port Richey	Florida	148	84	37	0.8%	927	42.3	4	1	4
Merced	California	138	68	23	0.9%	925	29.0	3	1	3
Denton	Texas	137	84	49	0.6%	922	59.8	6	1	6
Daly City	California	121	67	40	0.8%	921	39.5	2	1	2
Lewisville	Texas	122	74	35	0.8%	921	39.7	3	1	3
Rockville	Maryland	152	104	45	0.6%	921	55.3	4	1	4
Ventura	California	122	63	36	0.8%	921	39.3	3	1	3
Flushing	New York	139	86	72	0.4%	919	76.5	4	1	4
Sandy	Utah	132	74	33	0.8%	916	36.0	4	1	4
Idaho Falls	Idaho	142	72	29	0.8%	914	35.8	4	1	4
Burbank	California	125	67	32	0.8%	913	35.0	5	1	5
Napa	California	119	60	23	0.9%	912	27.5	2	1	2
Falls Church	Virginia	193	119	48	0.8%	910	45.6	5	1	5
Terre Haute	Indiana	128	61	21	1.0%	910	24.5	6	1	6
New Braunfels	Texas	115	68	26	0.9%	909	29.5	2	1	2
Portsmouth	Virginia	140	68	23	1.0%	908	23.7	7	1	7
Cambridge	Massachusetts	138	69	33	0.8%	904	40.4	5	1	5
Indio	California	121	56	22	0.9%	904	25.5	2	1	2
South Gate	California	100	53	21	0.9%	903	24.0	1	1	1
Gaithersburg	Maryland	134	81	46	0.6%	902	57.8	5	1	5
Waterbury	Connecticut	136	75	34	0.8%	902	35.5	6	1	6
Hillsboro	Oregon	116	66	27	0.9%	900	31.5	2	1	2
Lawrence	Kansas	135	63	28	0.9%	898	30.8	5	1	5
Morgantown	West Virginia	118	58	22	0.9%	896	25.0	3	1	3
Champaign	Illinois	123	61	18	0.9%	894	24.3	3	1	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	138	74	30	0.9%	894	31.3	4	1	4
Saint Augustine	Florida	143	75	43	0.7%	890	53.6	5	1	5
San Marcos	California	108	56	23	0.9%	890	30.5	2	1	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	133	81	23	0.9%	889	30.3	3	1	3
Cary	North Carolina	119	66	57	0.6%	888	62.8	4	1	4
Lakewood	New Jersey	99	60	28	0.9%	887	31.0	1	1	1
Naperville	Illinois	122	70	57	0.5%	883	65.8	4	1	4
Gastonia	North Carolina	119	58	32	0.8%	882	36.7	3	1	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	113	58	21	0.9%	881	28.0	3	1	3
La Puente	California	146	79	37	0.7%	880	53.0	2	1	2
Kennewick	Washington	124	60	24	0.9%	877	28.7	3	1	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	133	68	41	0.7%	876	42.8	5	1	5
Pittsburg	California	97	54	22	0.9%	874	28.0	1	1	1
Douglasville	Georgia	117	67	31	0.8%	873	40.0	2	1	2
Elkhart	Indiana	112	51	22	0.9%	872	31.3	3	1	3
Florissant	Missouri	126	65	33	0.8%	872	39.0	3	1	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	129	62	23	0.9%	870	28.0	3	1	3
Milton	Florida	124	66	27	0.9%	865	27.7	3	1	3
Sparks	Nevada	149	67	37	0.7%	865	45.0	4	1	4
Hawthorne	California	100	51	28	0.9%	862	30.0	1	1	1
Mission Viejo	California	112	56	29	0.9%	861	31.5	2	1	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	118	63	24	0.9%	859	33.7	3	1	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	128	61	25	0.9%	858	29.3	3	1	3
Livermore	California	117	58	25	0.9%	858	30.0	2	1	2
Rock Hill	South Carolina	127	71	38	0.7%	858	46.0	3	1	3
Winter Haven	Florida	116	62	34	0.8%	856	38.7	3	1	3
Federal Way	Washington	121	64	26	0.9%	856	33.5	2	1	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	155	80	31	0.8%	855	33.5	6	1	6
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	119	59	25	0.9%	855	32.0	2	1	2
Broomfield	Colorado	131	76	32	0.8%	853	37.7	3	1	3
El Monte	California	107	54	25	0.9%	853	28.5	2	1	2
Lynnwood	Washington	149	75	35	0.8%	853	39.3	3	1	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	134	72	27	0.9%	852	27.8	4	1	4
Round Rock	Texas	146	76	62	0.5%	847	68.3	3	1	3
Scranton	Pennsylvania	154	72	31	0.8%	844	33.5	8	1	8
Wichita Falls	Texas	153	83	27	0.9%	841	33.9	7	1	7
New Bedford	Massachusetts	129	74	26	0.9%	839	30.0	4	1	4
Anderson	South Carolina	132	68	28	0.9%	837	34.3	4	1	4
Springdale	Arkansas	109	51	25	0.9%	837	32.0	2	1	2
Bryan	Texas	145	80	28	0.9%	831	33.8	5	1	5
Livonia	Michigan	118	59	29	0.9%	830	31.3	3	1	3
Parker	Colorado	112	65	30	0.8%	829	36.0	2	1	2
Stamford	Connecticut	127	76	49	0.6%	828	53.7	6	1	6
Lowell	Massachusetts	128	70	41	0.7%	824	45.3	4	1	4
Longview	Texas	151	83	29	0.8%	822	40.8	5	1	5
Quincy	Massachusetts	118	65	30	0.9%	819	33.3	3	1	3
Van Nuys	California	129	74	67	0.5%	819	72.8	4	1	4
Largo	Florida	135	78	37	0.8%	813	43.2	5	1	5
Chino	California	100	50	29	0.9%	812	33.0	2	1	2
Riverview	Florida	141	75	42	0.7%	811	43.3	3	1	3
Belleville	Illinois	122	61	26	0.9%	811	31.8	4	1	4
Deltona	Florida	112	62	28	0.9%	811	32.5	2	1	2
Holland	Michigan	109	53	27	0.9%	808	33.0	2	1	2
Plainfield	Illinois	132	78	31	0.8%	804	36.7	3	1	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	139	75	32	0.8%	798	35.7	3	1	3
Richardson	Texas	122	80	46	0.7%	793	51.7	3	1	3
Woodstock	Georgia	114	70	37	0.8%	791	42.0	2	1	2
Acworth	Georgia	117	74	39	0.8%	790	39.5	2	1	2
Franklin	Tennessee	124	64	40	0.7%	789	45.3	3	1	3
Pearland	Texas	133	81	58	0.6%	789	65.0	2	1	2
Muncie	Indiana	124	54	27	0.8%	786	32.4	5	1	5
Orem	Utah	120	64	35	0.8%	786	41.3	3	1	3
Daytona Beach	Florida	141	77	34	0.8%	784	42.6	5	1	5
Johnson City	Tennessee	129	66	29	0.8%	782	37.3	4	1	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	153	88	34	0.8%	781	36.3	8	1	8
Asheville	North Carolina	116	62	51	0.6%	780	59.8	5	1	5
Palm Bay	Florida	131	65	40	0.7%	780	51.5	4	1	4
Flint	Michigan	201	88	59	0.5%	770	56.7	5	1	5
Valdosta	Georgia	140	81	24	0.8%	769	39.8	5	1	5
Palo Alto	California	126	66	36	0.8%	767	40.3	4	1	4
Hartford	Connecticut	130	70	55	0.6%	766	56.5	6	1	6
Humble	Texas	126	72	67	0.5%	764	73.7	3	1	3
Midlothian	Virginia	123	65	34	0.8%	762	42.3	3	1	3
Buford	Georgia	108	70	36	0.8%	758	42.5	2	1	2
Laurel	Maryland	159	92	43	0.7%	756	51.5	4	1	4
Apopka	Florida	110	68	35	0.8%	753	42.0	2	1	2
Ashburn	Virginia	107	65	48	0.7%	752	52.0	2	1	2
Medford	Oregon	118	61	32	0.8%	751	38.5	2	1	2
Coral Springs	Florida	112	59	38	0.8%	750	42.5	2	1	2
Frisco	Texas	108	69	71	0.4%	745	76.0	2	1	2
Bowie	Maryland	168	92	39	0.7%	739	46.3	4	1	4
Miami Beach	Florida	142	75	47	0.6%	738	51.6	5	1	5
Clermont	Florida	123	69	38	0.7%	736	43.3	3	1	3
Ballwin	Missouri	106	60	35	0.8%	735	41.5	2	1	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	108	60	35	0.8%	732	42.0	2	1	2
Jupiter	Florida	124	63	36	0.7%	729	43.5	4	1	4
Covington	Georgia	120	81	34	0.8%	727	40.0	2	1	2
Englewood	Colorado	157	95	45	0.6%	722	53.8	4	1	4
Spartanburg	South Carolina	127	64	46	0.6%	717	53.2	5	1	5
Frederick	Maryland	124	72	58	0.5%	707	65.5	4	1	4
Keller	Texas	121	74	55	0.6%	706	57.5	2	1	2
North Hollywood	California	126	72	67	0.5%	706	72.8	4	1	4
Athens	Georgia	133	82	52	0.6%	704	62.7	6	1	6
Allen	Texas	116	74	49	0.6%	698	54.5	2	1	2
Herndon	Virginia	118	74	37	0.7%	692	45.5	2	1	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	116	73	41	0.7%	689	51.0	2	1	2
Lithonia	Georgia	109	70	45	0.7%	687	47.0	2	1	2
Decatur	Georgia	158	97	83	0.4%	684	78.6	5	1	5
Annapolis	Maryland	148	82	38	0.7%	682	46.8	5	1	5
Ypsilanti	Michigan	115	65	45	0.6%	674	55.5	2	1	2
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	129	73	44	0.7%	661	53.7	3	1	3
Meridian	Idaho	120	61	45	0.6%	661	55.5	2	1	2
Newnan	Georgia	122	78	46	0.7%	659	50.0	2	1	2
Missouri City	Texas	143	86	51	0.6%	645	51.5	2	1	2
Santa Monica	California	135	70	44	0.7%	645	50.6	5	1	5
Edison	New Jersey	127	75	48	0.6%	642	55.0	3	1	3
Dearborn	Michigan	128	73	48	0.6%	616	53.3	4	1	4
Kennesaw	Georgia	109	71	51	0.6%	616	57.0	2	1	2
Roswell	Georgia	111	69	49	0.6%	615	57.5	2	1	2
Astoria	New York	146	97	71	0.4%	613	76.3	4	1	4
Bell Gardens	California	95	57	62	0.5%	502	70.0	1	1	1
Sylmar	California	98	53	62	0.5%	502	67.0	1	1	1
Westerville	Ohio	112	65	61	0.5%	482	68.5	2	1	2
Pacoima	California	100	58	72	0.4%	466	75.0	1	1	1
Ridgewood	New York	98	64	73	0.4%	448	77.0	1	1	1
Fort Mill	South Carolina	121	60	65	0.5%	446	72.0	3	1	3
Elmhurst	New York	99	60	73	0.4%	404	76.0	1	1	1

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	245	127	79	0.5%	12,069	68.8	62	1	62
San Diego	209	103	56	0.6%	7,919	57.7	36	1	36
San Jose	190	101	59	0.6%	6,156	60.6	28	1	28
San Francisco	187	99	48	0.6%	5,393	56.1	28	1	28
Sacramento	197	105	48	0.7%	5,264	53.1	28	1	28
Bakersfield	158	83	45	0.7%	3,906	50.0	11	1	11
Fresno	168	84	55	0.6%	3,521	60.9	18	1	18
Stockton	156	82	31	0.8%	3,125	36.2	12	1	12
Santa Ana	133	70	27	0.9%	3,105	32.0	6	1	6
Long Beach	160	85	45	0.6%	3,097	54.3	12	1	12
Anaheim	222	108	33	0.8%	2,912	39.3	6	1	6
Riverside	146	78	42	0.7%	2,652	46.9	7	1	7
Oakland	160	87	49	0.6%	2,645	55.0	14	1	14
Santa Maria	134	67	19	1.8%	2,535	21.7	3	1	3
Chula Vista	122	58	29	0.9%	2,252	32.8	5	1	5
Corona	149	81	31	0.8%	2,186	33.8	5	1	5
San Bernardino	148	75	29	0.9%	2,185	31.9	7	1	7
Fontana	115	58	29	0.9%	2,022	32.7	3	1	3
Modesto	148	73	43	0.7%	1,928	45.1	7	1	7
Oxnard	126	67	32	0.8%	1,862	33.8	4	1	4
Moreno Valley	124	62	30	0.9%	1,795	31.5	4	1	4
Santa Rosa	147	69	34	0.8%	1,726	38.8	6	1	6
Hayward	132	72	24	0.9%	1,722	29.5	4	1	4
Salinas	129	63	24	0.9%	1,695	28.0	5	1	5
Huntington Beach	133	71	28	0.8%	1,682	34.8	4	1	4
Oceanside	124	59	28	0.8%	1,679	35.0	4	1	4
Ontario	126	65	21	0.9%	1,660	25.0	3	1	3
Escondido	120	55	24	0.9%	1,641	27.8	4	1	4
Garden Grove	151	80	28	0.9%	1,634	25.2	5	1	5
Irvine	144	79	49	0.6%	1,607	59.0	9	1	9
Fremont	124	61	44	0.7%	1,576	51.3	4	1	4
Whittier	182	96	39	0.8%	1,570	39.3	6	1	6
Palmdale	128	67	31	0.9%	1,558	30.5	4	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	131	68	34	0.8%	1,479	35.0	4	1	4
Elk Grove	116	59	35	0.8%	1,454	38.3	3	1	3
Visalia	138	66	27	0.9%	1,403	26.3	3	1	3
Fullerton	142	77	26	0.9%	1,307	25.5	4	1	4
Pomona	119	62	31	0.8%	1,296	37.3	3	1	3
Compton	130	69	29	0.9%	1,276	28.0	3	1	3
Hemet	133	63	20	1.0%	1,238	23.0	3	1	3
Sunnyvale	144	78	31	0.8%	1,234	41.0	4	1	4
El Cajon	138	64	43	0.7%	1,226	48.7	3	1	3
Murrieta	114	55	26	0.9%	1,196	28.5	2	1	2
Simi Valley	109	59	29	0.9%	1,161	29.0	2	1	2
Vallejo	127	66	25	0.9%	1,147	27.3	4	1	4
Torrance	151	79	54	0.6%	1,140	56.0	5	1	5
Concord	125	68	31	0.9%	1,130	32.0	4	1	4
Temecula	129	68	29	0.9%	1,117	33.7	3	1	3
Inglewood	159	89	39	0.8%	1,109	36.8	5	1	5
Victorville	118	59	35	0.8%	1,105	37.7	3	1	3
San Mateo	134	64	42	0.8%	1,089	43.0	4	1	4
Pasadena	157	82	44	0.7%	1,087	50.0	6	1	6
Perris	117	62	25	0.9%	1,080	27.0	2	1	2
Tracy	132	67	24	0.9%	1,077	26.5	4	1	4
Menifee	131	73	22	1.0%	1,063	22.0	4	1	4
Rialto	114	61	24	1.0%	1,055	20.0	2	1	2
Redwood City	131	65	26	0.9%	1,053	27.0	4	1	4
Antioch	117	64	23	0.9%	1,026	27.0	2	1	2
Santa Clara	121	64	31	0.8%	1,025	37.5	4	1	4
Redding	147	67	25	0.9%	1,024	46.5	3	1	3
Chico	138	67	23	0.9%	1,014	28.3	3	1	3
Roseville	119	61	43	0.7%	1,005	47.3	3	1	3
Downey	132	73	33	0.9%	999	30.7	3	1	3
Fairfield	112	57	27	0.9%	996	32.0	2	1	2
Vacaville	113	57	21	0.9%	996	25.0	2	1	2
Berkeley	162	85	39	0.8%	991	41.4	9	1	9
San Leandro	114	59	25	0.9%	988	29.7	3	1	3
Carlsbad	123	61	29	0.9%	967	34.8	4	1	4
Hesperia	115	57	23	0.9%	963	26.5	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	135	68	46	0.7%	961	49.3	7	1	7
West Covina	126	66	28	0.9%	959	32.0	3	1	3
Madera	137	68	22	0.9%	955	29.3	3	1	3
Norwalk	99	55	25	0.9%	953	29.0	1	1	1
Santa Cruz	129	61	27	0.9%	953	29.5	4	1	4
Orange	136	72	46	0.7%	950	53.8	5	1	5
Costa Mesa	113	61	36	0.8%	939	37.0	2	1	2
Clovis	125	61	39	0.8%	939	41.7	3	1	3
Vista	117	58	38	0.8%	929	41.3	3	1	3
Merced	138	68	23	0.9%	925	29.0	3	1	3
Daly City	121	67	40	0.8%	921	39.5	2	1	2
Ventura	122	63	36	0.8%	921	39.3	3	1	3
Burbank	125	67	32	0.8%	913	35.0	5	1	5
Napa	119	60	23	0.9%	912	27.5	2	1	2
Indio	121	56	22	0.9%	904	25.5	2	1	2
South Gate	100	53	21	0.9%	903	24.0	1	1	1
San Marcos	108	56	23	0.9%	890	30.5	2	1	2
La Puente	146	79	37	0.7%	880	53.0	2	1	2
Pittsburg	97	54	22	0.9%	874	28.0	1	1	1
Hawthorne	100	51	28	0.9%	862	30.0	1	1	1
Mission Viejo	112	56	29	0.9%	861	31.5	2	1	2
Livermore	117	58	25	0.9%	858	30.0	2	1	2
El Monte	107	54	25	0.9%	853	28.5	2	1	2
Van Nuys	129	74	67	0.5%	819	72.8	4	1	4
Chino	100	50	29	0.9%	812	33.0	2	1	2
Palo Alto	126	66	36	0.8%	767	40.3	4	1	4
North Hollywood	126	72	67	0.5%	706	72.8	4	1	4
Santa Monica	135	70	44	0.7%	645	50.6	5	1	5
Bell Gardens	95	57	62	0.5%	502	70.0	1	1	1
Sylmar	98	53	62	0.5%	502	67.0	1	1	1
Pacoima	100	58	72	0.4%	466	75.0	1	1	1
Lancaster	145	69	110	0.2%	292	93.7	1	1	1

Houston

ZIP	lancasterdepewpediatrics.com	yelp.com	zocdoc.com	texaschildrenspediatrics.org	pediatricsofgreaterhouston.com	healthgrades.com
77088	71	1	2	5	3	4
77047	80	4	5	8	7	6
77037	79	4	5	8	6	7
77098	77	4	5	2	6	9
77027	78	4	5	8	6	7
77068	64	4	5	7	6	94
77078	77	1	2	5	3	4
77086	73	1	2	4	3	6
77035	82	4	5	2	6	7
77008	76	4	5	7	6	10
77004	81	4	5	1	6	7
77028	72	4	5	8	6	7
77059	76	4	5	8	7	6
77039	72	4	5	8	6	7
77019	75	4	5	2	6	10
77075	67	4	5	3	2	6
77077	73	4	5	1	8	6
77079	79	4	5	1	7	6
77099	86	4	5	8	6	7
77024	83	4	5	3	6	7
77095	76	1	2	4	3	48
77048	77	4	5	1	6	8
77044	60	4	5	1	7	6
77015	67	4	5	2	7	10
77017	64	4	5	1	2	50
77057	79	4	5	3	6	9
77055	75	4	5	1	6	10
77006	78	4	5	1	6	9
77026	73	4	5	8	6	7
77046	76	4	5	2	6	9
77066	77	4	5	8	6	7
77023	80	4	5	2	7	6
77094	77	4	5	3	6	7
77084	77	4	5	8	7	6
77013	73	1	2	4	3	7
77063	82	4	5	1	6	7
77053	85	16	4	1	5	73
77022	84	4	5	8	6	7
77072	63	1	2	5	4	3
77049	68	4	5	1	6	9
77045	83	4	5	2	1	7
77010	80	4	5	1	6	7
77018	85	4	5	8	7	6
77041	65	4	5	7	6	9
77009	87	4	5	1	6	13
77089	80	4	5	8	10	11
77032	74	4	5	9	7	6
77036	81	4	5	9	7	6
77085	70	4	5	1	8	6
77054	79	1	2	6	4	3
77058	77	4	5	9	10	6
77014	72	4	5	9	7	6
77067	79	4	5	7	6	45
77005	84	4	5	2	6	12
77076	87	4	5	8	6	12
77070	53	4	5	7	8	10
77060	76	1	2	5	6	7
77080	78	4	5	1	6	12
77050	81	4	5	1	11	6
77091	84	4	5	8	6	7
77071	86	4	5	9	6	12
77061	82	4	5	1	6	10
77020	77	4	5	1	7	6
77081	75	4	5	1	6	7
77030	74	4	5	7	6	8
77040	76	4	5	8	6	12
77090	62	4	5	2	8	6
77031	75	4	5	8	7	6
77051	77	4	5	3	1	7
77011	78	4	5	1	6	7
77042	77	4	5	1	7	6
77062	75	1	2	7	6	8
77082	65	4	5	1	8	6
77093	66	1	2	5	3	4
77073	78	4	5	3	7	8
77033	78	4	5	1	2	7
77043	67	4	5	3	7	6
77074	77	4	5	9	6	7
77064	72	4	5	8	6	12
77012	84	4	5	1	7	6
77002	74	4	5	1	6	7
77092	78	4	5	1	6	10
77069	58	4	5	3	8	9
77021	83	4	5	1	3	6
77083	91	4	5	7	6	32
77029	76	4	5	2	6	7
77034	68	4	5	8	7	6
77087	77	4	5	1	6	7
77003	80	4	5	1	6	7
77038	71	4	5	7	6	93
77007	78	1	2	4	3	5
77016	85	4	5	8	6	7
77065	79	4	5	6	7	10
77096	78	1	2	5	3	4
77025	83	4	5	2	3	7
77056	78	1	2	5	3	4

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Lancasterdepewpediatrics

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 4,149 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Lancasterdepewpediatrics Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (pediatrician near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Lancasterdepewpediatrics Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Lancasterdepewpediatrics Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Lancasterdepewpediatrics Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly