Kayak Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve kayak.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 967 Car Rental Providers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Kayak Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Kayak Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Kayak Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Chicago
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Kayak Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	5,266	967	4	34.2%	110,396,010	9.3	27,379	32,654	2,803	43,544	40	517	25,286
California	913	287	6	35.0%	13,702,888	8.9	1,166	1,740	301	2,203	6	39	1,346
Texas	733	214	5	34.3%	9,574,202	9.5	1,360	1,917	169	2,271	3	29	1,322
New York	721	214	5	34.7%	6,801,634	9.5	1,491	1,756	152	2,643	6	41	1,240
Florida	723	244	4	32.7%	6,728,841	8.6	446	975	168	1,177	2	12	845
Illinois	612	182	4	35.8%	4,587,488	9.4	1,247	1,382	140	1,781	0	22	952
Pennsylvania	700	211	5	30.4%	3,891,234	10.0	1,604	1,781	111	2,358	0	16	1,215
North Carolina	553	177	4	37.5%	3,807,665	8.5	683	802	96	1,022	1	15	692
Georgia	548	170	4	36.0%	3,711,879	8.8	574	726	105	908	0	5	566
Ohio	549	166	5	30.6%	3,558,257	9.9	976	1,188	113	1,584	0	19	777
Michigan	551	170	5	31.4%	3,130,861	10.4	833	976	90	1,283	0	15	543
Virginia	569	175	4	34.1%	2,867,497	9.7	723	891	88	1,164	1	18	572
Massachusetts	519	164	4	40.6%	2,775,750	9.0	461	534	98	816	5	15	373
Colorado	569	180	3	46.9%	2,594,809	8.7	381	514	47	820	3	15	400
Washington	541	179	5	35.2%	2,563,287	9.7	451	587	55	762	1	9	398
New Jersey	518	181	6	28.4%	2,521,996	10.2	537	593	122	889	1	3	325
Arizona	497	169	4	34.8%	2,418,929	8.9	247	396	39	527	0	12	309
Indiana	755	215	5	34.3%	2,275,399	9.0	659	770	79	1,026	0	15	589
Missouri	597	177	4	34.1%	2,078,748	8.9	887	1,017	68	1,315	0	7	933
Maryland	505	166	4	34.1%	2,049,403	9.0	392	463	60	686	1	5	372
Tennessee	475	168	6	29.4%	1,955,857	9.9	514	622	60	732	0	7	427
Wisconsin	511	159	5	32.7%	1,887,325	10.5	694	769	53	1,002	0	13	442
Minnesota	543	174	4	32.2%	1,779,531	9.7	777	878	54	1,227	0	9	698
South Carolina	457	148	5	35.3%	1,747,474	8.3	347	422	52	593	0	7	438
Louisiana	490	173	5	35.1%	1,636,933	9.0	431	510	44	609	0	6	369
Kentucky	455	152	5	32.3%	1,438,301	8.4	698	758	50	1,127	0	8	946
Connecticut	402	134	4	39.8%	1,424,990	8.8	234	279	53	402	0	6	236
Alabama	484	162	5	29.1%	1,415,209	10.0	522	637	52	887	0	7	376
Oklahoma	465	157	5	32.4%	1,269,840	9.8	557	646	36	728	0	13	429
Oregon	546	178	5	30.9%	1,262,865	10.8	355	414	37	557	0	4	247
Utah	433	160	4	38.1%	1,159,440	9.0	246	284	30	401	0	6	251
Nevada	376	142	5	37.3%	1,088,917	8.7	92	168	16	229	0	3	182
Kansas	506	168	5	36.6%	1,065,279	8.8	616	692	30	806	0	12	571
Arkansas	481	169	5	34.0%	1,016,168	9.0	553	587	35	722	1	13	492
Iowa	546	175	5	32.3%	1,012,568	8.5	890	933	37	1,233	1	7	973
Mississippi	445	152	5	30.2%	901,640	9.2	384	418	35	519	0	2	363
New Mexico	424	146	5	35.1%	733,901	8.9	327	361	20	467	0	1	307
Nebraska	467	160	4	36.4%	694,102	8.9	524	581	19	674	1	7	449
Idaho	451	149	4	38.9%	655,557	8.8	251	273	20	339	0	4	211
West Virginia	447	158	5	32.5%	593,582	8.9	684	704	37	1,245	0	13	767
Hawaii	381	159	5	33.1%	470,530	8.5	82	93	22	124	0	3	80
Montana	462	158	4	39.3%	409,272	8.6	348	361	22	456	1	15	300
Delaware	324	133	4	42.3%	401,698	7.3	52	66	15	84	0	6	67
New Hampshire	389	146	7	27.4%	368,684	10.0	238	248	25	351	0	0	206
Rhode Island	308	115	6	31.1%	328,222	8.8	64	77	15	159	0	0	91
Maine	503	197	7	24.5%	326,536	11.8	421	425	28	739	0	5	161
North Dakota	386	148	4	41.1%	308,499	7.8	367	381	10	477	0	6	374
South Dakota	421	147	5	33.3%	288,051	8.1	359	370	13	457	0	9	370
Wyoming	392	145	4	41.0%	238,927	9.2	164	171	19	232	0	4	133
Vermont	351	127	5	30.4%	190,245	8.4	250	254	14	376	0	0	339
Alaska	436	147	6	25.3%	186,967	9.3	218	235	16	326	0	3	193

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Chicago	Illinois	245	99	4	45.2%	1,222,343	6.4	56	1	56	0	0	56
New York City	New York	226	96	3	60.1%	974,597	4.9	47	1	47	0	7	47
Houston	Texas	303	122	6	28.0%	892,608	8.3	96	1	96	0	0	93
Brooklyn	New York	226	91	5	31.7%	824,350	7.8	37	1	37	0	0	37
Las Vegas	Nevada	251	100	4	44.7%	691,405	6.7	43	3	68	0	2	68
Denver	Colorado	266	105	3	62.6%	680,366	4.8	38	4	38	2	2	38
Dallas	Texas	276	112	4	45.1%	627,886	6.7	48	2	48	0	0	48
Bronx	New York	201	86	6	40.5%	583,150	6.8	25	1	25	0	1	25
Austin	Texas	244	97	4	53.4%	581,113	6.0	44	1	44	0	4	44
San Francisco	California	204	77	2	65.5%	570,023	4.7	28	2	29	1	2	27
Miami	Florida	270	129	5	29.4%	551,851	8.1	55	9	71	0	0	62
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	262	102	6	32.8%	517,418	7.7	47	2	47	0	0	46
Washington DC	District of Columbia	200	82	2	72.8%	498,033	3.4	28	1	28	6	6	28
Minneapolis	Minnesota	294	111	4	41.0%	446,797	7.3	51	9	54	0	0	46
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	252	91	3	48.3%	392,298	6.2	29	3	29	0	2	29
Phoenix	Arizona	229	92	6	24.2%	351,762	8.6	42	2	43	0	0	40
Orlando	Florida	256	105	5	35.0%	348,540	7.4	32	3	33	0	0	33
Saint Paul	Minnesota	286	109	4	43.4%	346,797	6.9	30	11	36	0	1	33
San Diego	California	272	116	5	25.2%	339,605	8.3	36	4	41	0	0	41
Atlanta	Georgia	247	97	4	34.0%	336,437	7.9	39	8	46	0	0	38
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	252	111	4	38.4%	319,659	7.4	27	9	29	0	0	26
Saint Louis	Missouri	269	102	5	34.2%	313,275	7.6	45	7	55	0	0	51
Fort Worth	Texas	237	96	5	33.1%	301,731	7.8	32	1	32	0	0	32
Seattle	Washington	258	98	5	31.2%	297,827	7.9	35	2	35	0	0	35
Tucson	Arizona	259	104	5	32.4%	292,943	7.8	32	3	35	0	0	34
San Antonio	Texas	255	99	8	16.0%	284,589	9.4	59	2	68	0	0	63
Los Angeles	California	288	130	10	11.5%	281,837	10.9	62	7	103	0	0	32
El Paso	Texas	243	87	5	35.6%	281,013	8.3	24	5	30	0	0	21
Columbus	Ohio	244	97	5	31.1%	263,512	8.0	30	3	32	0	0	31
Arlington	Texas	167	70	3	65.6%	260,417	4.3	12	1	12	0	4	12
Indianapolis	Indiana	267	104	6	26.9%	256,173	8.2	37	3	37	0	0	37
Charlotte	North Carolina	240	97	5	27.9%	252,734	8.2	24	1	24	0	0	24
Baltimore	Maryland	238	97	5	38.9%	245,170	7.1	22	3	23	0	0	23
Cincinnati	Ohio	252	97	6	30.4%	244,201	7.9	45	1	45	0	0	45
Omaha	Nebraska	228	90	4	42.1%	232,670	6.8	31	2	33	0	0	33
Anaheim	California	143	65	3	62.9%	231,909	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Sacramento	California	242	98	6	28.8%	231,528	8.1	28	2	28	0	0	28
Raleigh	North Carolina	207	78	4	41.9%	229,317	6.9	15	2	16	0	0	16
Colorado Springs	Colorado	264	114	5	39.0%	227,847	7.3	30	3	32	0	0	28
Louisville	Kentucky	243	97	5	29.5%	224,242	8.0	32	2	33	0	0	33
Albuquerque	New Mexico	222	85	6	33.9%	222,077	7.7	17	2	23	0	0	23
Portland	Oregon	252	96	5	24.1%	221,920	8.6	33	1	33	0	0	32
Irvine	California	161	71	2	78.5%	210,023	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Birmingham	Alabama	241	100	4	40.2%	201,014	7.0	30	2	30	0	0	30
Kansas City	Missouri	262	103	5	35.0%	200,216	8.0	49	2	50	0	0	48
Alexandria	Virginia	208	86	4	55.8%	197,982	5.3	14	1	14	1	1	14
Jersey City	New Jersey	164	73	2	75.0%	196,268	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Jacksonville	Florida	236	98	7	22.5%	195,013	8.7	31	3	37	0	0	35
Aurora	Colorado	193	80	4	44.4%	193,292	6.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	257	103	6	28.3%	193,064	8.2	39	3	40	0	0	38
New Orleans	Louisiana	203	80	4	44.6%	190,723	6.6	19	1	19	0	0	19
Mesa	Arizona	207	82	5	35.4%	189,462	7.5	13	1	13	0	0	13
Hollywood	Florida	200	93	3	40.0%	187,493	7.0	9	2	9	0	0	9
Cleveland	Ohio	238	92	7	24.0%	180,345	8.7	29	5	40	0	0	37
Nashville	Tennessee	222	91	4	38.4%	176,246	7.3	22	5	26	0	0	22
Grand Rapids	Michigan	193	74	4	47.9%	176,084	6.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Scottsdale	Arizona	183	76	4	58.2%	173,534	5.5	11	2	12	0	2	12
Laredo	Texas	161	69	3	63.3%	171,469	4.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Memphis	Tennessee	220	87	6	24.5%	170,458	8.5	26	2	26	0	0	26
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	255	104	6	24.8%	169,569	8.5	43	4	48	0	0	48
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	209	79	4	44.5%	168,589	6.8	18	2	19	0	0	19
Gilbert	Arizona	149	66	2	70.0%	167,020	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Littleton	Colorado	209	89	3	50.5%	164,459	5.9	10	4	11	0	1	11
Tampa	Florida	236	96	8	20.5%	162,380	9.1	27	2	28	0	0	25
Spokane	Washington	212	85	4	45.0%	161,702	6.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Honolulu	Hawaii	185	82	5	38.7%	161,006	7.4	11	1	11	0	0	11
Akron	Ohio	213	79	3	59.2%	160,021	5.2	17	1	17	0	3	17
Pompano Beach	Florida	201	90	5	42.0%	155,515	8.3	10	7	13	0	0	8
Wichita	Kansas	236	101	5	36.8%	153,951	7.4	26	1	26	0	0	26
Modesto	California	169	70	3	58.0%	153,338	5.1	7	1	7	0	1	7
San Jose	California	223	95	8	14.4%	151,082	9.8	28	2	30	0	0	25
Corpus Christi	Texas	198	77	4	45.5%	148,145	6.5	18	1	18	0	0	18
Tulsa	Oklahoma	264	113	5	34.9%	147,490	7.3	28	1	28	0	0	28
Rochester	New York	227	88	5	31.2%	147,322	8.0	24	1	24	0	0	23
Madison	Wisconsin	192	74	4	49.7%	146,450	5.6	14	2	15	0	2	15
Salem	Oregon	174	79	4	54.7%	145,825	5.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Staten Island	New York	177	78	6	30.6%	145,249	7.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Tacoma	Washington	240	96	4	42.3%	141,139	7.1	20	5	23	0	1	20
Oceanside	California	132	62	3	69.9%	140,072	4.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Silver Spring	Maryland	180	79	4	46.2%	139,893	6.3	7	2	7	0	0	7
Wilmington	Delaware	185	81	3	63.3%	138,833	4.3	10	1	10	0	4	10
Vancouver	Washington	207	83	4	42.2%	137,587	6.6	11	1	11	0	0	11
San Bernardino	California	147	69	4	54.2%	135,232	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Oakland	California	196	77	5	32.8%	135,115	7.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Chesapeake	Virginia	164	60	3	56.5%	134,342	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Corona	California	162	72	5	51.8%	133,216	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Richmond	Virginia	233	95	4	34.0%	133,107	7.7	15	2	17	0	0	17
Tempe	Arizona	140	60	2	70.0%	132,997	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salt Lake City	Utah	231	97	5	27.1%	131,908	8.2	19	6	26	0	0	23
Chula Vista	California	176	72	4	50.4%	131,578	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hayward	California	154	61	3	68.5%	131,577	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Lubbock	Texas	209	87	5	47.4%	131,239	6.2	14	1	14	0	0	14
Toledo	Ohio	228	91	4	42.3%	130,079	6.6	15	1	15	0	0	15
Stockton	California	199	85	6	34.3%	128,353	7.5	12	1	12	0	0	12
Dayton	Ohio	247	99	4	26.0%	124,479	8.9	27	5	29	0	0	22
Marietta	Georgia	175	76	4	38.5%	124,143	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hialeah	Florida	163	82	5	33.7%	123,858	7.4	7	3	8	0	0	7
Worcester	Massachusetts	155	65	3	66.1%	122,607	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Knoxville	Tennessee	208	81	5	31.6%	122,209	7.6	17	1	17	0	0	17
Santa Rosa	California	159	69	3	56.0%	121,000	5.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	95	4	41.7%	120,663	6.9	22	1	22	0	0	22
Overland Park	Kansas	187	74	4	65.1%	119,393	4.7	9	1	9	0	2	9
Tallahassee	Florida	179	76	5	41.3%	119,030	6.9	10	1	10	0	0	10
Lexington	Kentucky	197	76	5	36.9%	118,156	7.2	15	1	15	0	0	15
Reading	Pennsylvania	186	74	4	54.8%	117,986	5.5	10	1	10	0	1	10
Long Beach	California	197	89	7	24.6%	117,902	9.1	12	1	12	0	0	8
Chandler	Arizona	163	69	5	43.8%	117,585	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Syracuse	New York	208	83	4	51.6%	117,018	5.9	15	1	15	0	0	15
Fremont	California	152	58	4	49.8%	116,003	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Saint Petersburg	Florida	211	84	6	32.3%	115,271	7.6	16	2	17	0	0	17
Trenton	New Jersey	196	79	4	55.0%	114,392	5.9	11	2	12	0	0	12
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	136	59	3	56.2%	114,179	5.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Riverside	California	167	73	5	30.3%	111,971	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bakersfield	California	193	86	9	20.0%	111,849	9.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Jamaica	New York	157	69	6	44.6%	108,786	6.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	153	64	4	58.3%	108,722	5.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Plano	Texas	170	68	5	35.3%	107,722	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Escondido	California	136	61	3	59.5%	106,870	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Augusta	Georgia	178	78	4	52.2%	106,662	6.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Salinas	California	144	63	3	56.6%	106,613	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Boynton Beach	Florida	153	66	4	61.1%	106,440	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Buffalo	New York	243	98	8	18.8%	105,613	9.3	28	3	30	0	0	24
Durham	North Carolina	186	71	5	36.2%	104,891	7.4	8	1	8	0	0	8
Irving	Texas	163	68	5	43.6%	104,803	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Shreveport	Louisiana	213	86	4	46.7%	104,217	6.2	12	1	12	0	0	12
El Cajon	California	136	64	5	60.4%	104,140	5.3	3	2	5	0	1	5
Rockford	Illinois	185	73	4	57.0%	104,009	5.2	9	1	9	0	1	9
Fayetteville	North Carolina	176	70	4	42.6%	103,967	7.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Erie	Pennsylvania	206	79	3	56.6%	103,805	5.1	13	1	13	0	4	13
Greensboro	North Carolina	180	74	6	31.7%	103,700	7.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Lawrenceville	Georgia	146	65	4	40.0%	102,445	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fontana	California	131	59	5	43.3%	101,664	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bridgeport	Connecticut	142	64	3	69.4%	101,612	4.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Henderson	Nevada	169	71	6	33.5%	101,293	7.6	8	3	13	0	0	13
Olathe	Kansas	122	56	4	70.0%	101,061	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	76	6	22.4%	100,874	8.8	12	1	12	0	0	11
Spring	Texas	180	80	6	26.3%	100,381	8.3	8	2	8	0	0	8
Lakeland	Florida	165	76	4	38.8%	100,129	7.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Naperville	Illinois	150	59	3	60.0%	99,484	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boca Raton	Florida	177	82	3	44.7%	99,334	6.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Moreno Valley	California	144	60	4	47.9%	98,331	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Whittier	California	140	67	5	49.9%	97,902	6.3	6	6	10	0	1	5
Fort Wayne	Indiana	184	75	5	30.5%	97,098	8.0	16	1	16	0	0	16
Lancaster	California	135	65	4	52.1%	96,118	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Boston	Massachusetts	197	79	3	63.2%	95,920	4.3	14	1	14	1	2	14
Waco	Texas	174	69	3	60.5%	95,782	4.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Grand Prairie	Texas	119	54	4	50.0%	95,273	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garland	Texas	154	69	4	40.0%	95,172	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Haven	Connecticut	140	62	3	72.9%	94,871	4.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Ann Arbor	Michigan	159	68	3	56.5%	94,132	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	195	79	3	55.6%	94,116	5.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Katy	Texas	153	69	5	27.2%	93,642	9.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Sunnyvale	California	135	60	3	61.2%	93,554	5.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Naples	Florida	191	74	5	29.7%	92,891	8.1	14	1	14	0	0	14
Columbia	South Carolina	205	83	6	27.1%	92,798	8.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Springfield	Missouri	165	66	4	40.0%	92,150	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Youngstown	Ohio	189	70	3	58.4%	91,697	4.7	12	2	14	0	4	14
Reno	Nevada	195	78	6	30.9%	91,576	7.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Glendale	Arizona	170	72	7	30.0%	91,423	8.0	9	2	9	0	0	9
Bradenton	Florida	169	70	5	36.1%	91,318	8.0	10	2	11	0	0	10
Evansville	Indiana	182	80	4	49.0%	90,411	5.9	9	1	9	0	1	9
San Mateo	California	144	61	3	62.2%	88,597	4.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Cape Coral	Florida	159	71	4	48.8%	88,176	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Little Rock	Arkansas	183	77	5	40.2%	87,683	6.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Paterson	New Jersey	133	61	2	60.0%	87,480	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Norman	Oklahoma	147	60	4	70.3%	87,248	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Homestead	Florida	173	82	4	46.2%	86,666	6.1	7	2	8	0	1	8
Round Rock	Texas	134	55	5	51.3%	85,994	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Olympia	Washington	158	63	4	46.8%	85,492	6.3	6	2	7	0	0	7
Brownsville	Texas	132	59	6	42.3%	85,208	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Odessa	Texas	152	59	3	53.2%	85,178	6.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Fredericksburg	Virginia	159	68	4	48.6%	84,578	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fresno	California	238	97	7	14.0%	84,420	9.6	18	2	20	0	0	15
Chattanooga	Tennessee	214	89	4	40.5%	84,287	6.8	15	1	15	0	0	15
Berkeley	California	187	82	4	66.1%	84,052	4.9	9	2	9	1	1	9
Ogden	Utah	158	65	4	41.7%	83,960	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pasadena	California	163	74	4	53.0%	83,557	5.3	6	1	6	0	2	6
Ocala	Florida	184	86	5	36.9%	82,967	7.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Arvada	Colorado	158	65	3	62.1%	82,827	4.8	5	1	5	1	1	5
Lansing	Michigan	148	63	3	50.0%	82,174	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Flushing	New York	136	64	6	37.7%	81,080	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cambridge	Massachusetts	141	64	3	70.0%	81,054	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hamilton	Ohio	136	54	4	59.1%	80,960	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Carrollton	Texas	122	56	2	60.0%	80,887	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Beaverton	Oregon	146	61	5	40.0%	80,655	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kent	Washington	137	59	4	50.0%	80,251	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Everett	Washington	155	60	4	48.1%	80,248	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Athens	Georgia	141	58	3	63.6%	79,273	5.2	6	1	6	0	1	6
Denton	Texas	166	74	3	50.0%	79,078	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Elgin	Illinois	140	55	2	64.5%	78,847	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	150	62	3	57.2%	78,538	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Topeka	Kansas	200	86	3	48.0%	78,474	6.2	18	1	18	0	0	18
Abilene	Texas	172	73	3	60.0%	78,127	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Longmont	Colorado	130	56	4	59.6%	77,968	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Concord	California	144	58	3	59.8%	77,846	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Yakima	Washington	146	66	4	59.9%	77,806	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Boise	Idaho	188	78	5	30.0%	76,821	8.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Surprise	Arizona	153	68	3	56.4%	76,519	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Warren	Michigan	154	62	3	56.5%	76,442	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Green Bay	Wisconsin	182	74	5	41.5%	76,071	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	6
Palmdale	California	141	69	5	43.3%	75,741	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kalamazoo	Michigan	169	72	6	45.9%	75,298	6.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Saint Charles	Missouri	136	61	4	53.7%	75,106	5.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Gainesville	Florida	184	79	5	35.8%	75,031	7.1	10	1	10	0	0	10
Charleston	South Carolina	216	82	4	38.0%	74,830	7.2	10	4	14	0	0	14
Gastonia	North Carolina	137	57	2	69.8%	74,723	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	147	62	5	38.4%	74,702	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sugar Land	Texas	144	65	3	43.9%	74,163	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
College Station	Texas	123	48	4	60.3%	74,140	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	California	134	59	3	58.8%	73,839	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pomona	California	135	59	4	46.7%	73,811	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	122	56	4	56.4%	73,640	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Frederick	Maryland	158	68	4	55.6%	73,435	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mesquite	Texas	143	59	4	50.0%	73,157	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mission	Texas	143	63	5	40.3%	72,940	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Monica	California	154	72	3	77.3%	72,933	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Charlottesville	Virginia	160	63	3	59.2%	72,775	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Fort Myers	Florida	186	74	6	28.8%	72,442	7.9	11	3	12	0	0	12
Schenectady	New York	173	72	4	44.7%	72,411	6.3	8	1	8	0	1	8
Cumming	Georgia	136	61	4	44.6%	72,301	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	California	150	71	5	32.7%	72,090	7.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Elk Grove	California	131	59	4	40.0%	71,728	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chico	California	140	57	4	64.0%	71,678	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Miami Beach	Florida	142	77	3	61.9%	71,641	4.0	5	3	7	1	1	7
Santa Ana	California	159	71	7	20.0%	71,416	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Waukegan	Illinois	115	51	3	72.7%	70,937	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	143	65	2	75.8%	70,874	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
South Bend	Indiana	170	69	3	48.2%	70,659	6.2	10	1	10	0	0	10
Boulder	Colorado	170	67	4	53.8%	70,589	5.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fargo	North Dakota	156	70	4	57.6%	70,493	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cary	North Carolina	142	59	4	45.3%	70,403	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	California	126	54	4	67.6%	70,328	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	142	55	4	73.8%	69,970	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Redding	California	148	68	3	61.8%	69,818	8.3	4	2	4	0	1	3
Summerville	South Carolina	124	52	4	50.0%	69,471	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pueblo	Colorado	170	71	5	43.9%	69,427	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Rock Hill	South Carolina	138	61	3	59.6%	69,367	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	148	58	4	60.0%	69,309	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Toms River	New Jersey	133	54	3	56.3%	69,181	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Killeen	Texas	158	72	4	46.1%	69,179	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Bend	Oregon	120	51	4	56.1%	68,587	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edmond	Oklahoma	142	52	4	39.8%	68,374	7.2	5	2	6	0	1	6
Temecula	California	144	69	4	52.5%	68,190	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Victorville	California	124	56	4	50.0%	68,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	147	64	4	51.9%	67,812	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Indio	California	114	59	3	70.4%	67,650	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Bloomington	Indiana	157	61	4	50.6%	67,547	5.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Renton	Washington	160	63	5	43.5%	67,426	6.0	5	2	5	1	1	5
Asheville	North Carolina	149	60	4	51.0%	67,416	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pittsburg	California	99	42	4	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Grand Junction	Colorado	171	72	3	63.4%	66,818	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Lowell	Massachusetts	126	59	3	60.0%	66,805	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Jordan	Utah	129	63	4	53.9%	66,560	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mckinney	Texas	112	49	5	35.2%	66,520	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ontario	California	130	59	6	37.6%	66,394	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	139	62	3	50.0%	66,235	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Auburn	Washington	122	54	4	58.7%	66,224	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Vallejo	California	163	67	4	53.1%	66,079	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	124	55	2	70.0%	65,885	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Macon	Georgia	177	79	6	40.2%	65,831	6.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Edinburg	Texas	137	57	4	42.3%	65,760	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Murrieta	California	121	57	5	49.7%	65,721	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Hampton	Virginia	165	65	3	48.1%	65,501	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Fairfax	Virginia	165	66	5	40.0%	65,457	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Orange	California	135	60	5	45.0%	65,229	6.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
West Covina	California	118	59	3	59.4%	65,013	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Newark	New Jersey	177	83	7	23.1%	64,927	8.9	9	1	9	0	0	8
Hemet	California	136	61	4	49.8%	64,189	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ridgewood	New York	100	51	5	60.0%	64,030	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
High Point	North Carolina	151	67	4	52.3%	63,965	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Barbara	California	157	68	5	46.4%	63,023	6.4	7	2	8	0	0	8
Conroe	Texas	166	72	4	39.2%	62,858	7.1	7	2	7	0	0	7
Torrance	California	157	78	6	35.4%	62,511	7.6	5	3	6	0	0	6
Puyallup	Washington	161	69	5	43.7%	62,361	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	181	74	5	44.7%	62,334	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Joliet	Illinois	150	60	5	48.3%	62,221	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Davenport	Iowa	144	61	3	58.8%	61,708	4.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Albany	New York	210	86	5	40.8%	61,696	7.7	11	2	12	0	0	10
Clearwater	Florida	182	71	5	33.5%	61,490	7.7	9	3	11	0	0	11
Lees Summit	Missouri	159	67	3	60.0%	61,239	5.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Anchorage	Alaska	174	76	7	25.0%	61,082	8.0	12	5	20	0	0	12
Visalia	California	134	63	5	40.0%	60,806	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Yonkers	New York	145	64	6	33.6%	60,716	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Holland	Michigan	117	51	3	64.5%	60,583	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Manassas	Virginia	154	62	5	39.8%	60,417	7.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Appleton	Wisconsin	140	58	5	49.6%	60,320	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Amarillo	Texas	172	69	7	26.3%	60,220	8.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Laurel	Maryland	148	59	4	53.5%	60,134	5.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Montgomery	Alabama	210	90	5	28.6%	60,068	7.8	13	1	13	0	0	13
Elkhart	Indiana	136	56	4	60.4%	60,016	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cypress	Texas	122	55	4	35.2%	60,015	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Huntington Beach	California	134	62	6	30.0%	59,972	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	California	158	70	5	34.1%	59,892	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Roanoke	Virginia	183	77	4	35.3%	59,816	7.3	10	1	10	0	0	9
Flint	Michigan	180	79	7	38.5%	59,785	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Stamford	Connecticut	133	65	5	46.2%	59,473	5.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
York	Pennsylvania	182	81	5	33.0%	59,260	7.7	7	2	8	0	0	8
Yuma	Arizona	125	58	4	40.0%	59,039	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pearland	Texas	128	57	4	42.8%	58,877	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	133	58	5	52.1%	58,787	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntsville	Alabama	202	81	5	29.9%	58,671	8.3	11	6	16	0	0	7
Livonia	Michigan	102	42	4	61.9%	58,558	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bellevue	Washington	152	70	5	40.0%	58,512	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
O Fallon	Missouri	118	50	3	60.6%	58,432	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Saginaw	Michigan	161	72	5	44.7%	58,295	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Beaumont	Texas	184	72	6	40.0%	58,200	7.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Midland	Texas	168	75	7	36.3%	58,000	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Nampa	Idaho	121	57	3	50.0%	57,953	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Gaithersburg	Maryland	163	61	5	40.0%	57,837	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	150	58	7	24.6%	57,503	8.9	7	3	11	0	0	10
Detroit	Michigan	227	89	13	8.9%	57,158	11.3	25	4	32	0	0	1
Madera	California	138	61	4	55.2%	56,821	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	118	49	4	56.6%	56,809	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Woodbridge	Virginia	139	61	6	26.7%	56,432	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	124	57	5	58.3%	56,430	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orem	Utah	117	54	4	56.2%	56,330	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Independence	Missouri	175	79	4	45.4%	56,318	6.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
Vista	California	127	56	6	46.9%	56,221	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
San Angelo	Texas	131	54	3	50.5%	55,898	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Las Cruces	New Mexico	163	62	4	37.5%	55,817	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fullerton	California	147	69	4	40.0%	55,710	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Springdale	Arkansas	122	54	4	57.6%	55,496	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Federal Way	Washington	121	52	5	55.0%	55,100	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	116	54	4	58.9%	54,970	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lafayette	Louisiana	150	72	6	34.2%	54,918	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Annapolis	Maryland	160	70	3	57.8%	54,906	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mission Viejo	California	103	51	4	55.5%	54,578	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	158	72	4	50.0%	54,511	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clovis	California	113	53	4	44.6%	54,100	6.7	3	2	4	0	0	3
Humble	Texas	146	63	5	32.5%	54,098	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Eugene	Oregon	177	75	6	26.6%	54,023	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Metairie	Louisiana	159	60	5	37.9%	53,940	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Provo	Utah	142	64	3	46.0%	53,615	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Winter Haven	Florida	129	59	4	50.0%	53,439	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	60	5	53.2%	53,360	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Palm Beach	Florida	186	87	9	14.4%	53,325	11.7	12	7	40	0	0	2
Canton	Ohio	187	71	5	36.3%	53,304	7.2	12	2	19	0	0	19
Providence	Rhode Island	180	74	7	26.0%	53,284	8.4	8	2	16	0	0	15
Fairfield	California	123	54	5	46.6%	53,195	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Valley City	Utah	138	67	4	40.0%	53,147	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Spartanburg	South Carolina	148	59	5	47.4%	53,039	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	143	70	6	30.0%	52,979	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Panama City	Florida	158	68	4	41.9%	52,971	7.3	6	2	10	0	0	10
Norwalk	California	98	46	4	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pensacola	Florida	196	80	7	19.7%	52,926	9.3	13	1	13	0	0	10
Winston Salem	North Carolina	185	73	8	20.0%	52,826	9.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Carlsbad	California	144	66	5	46.4%	52,688	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kennesaw	Georgia	117	54	4	53.1%	52,645	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	California	126	54	5	45.3%	52,484	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Port Richey	Florida	140	58	4	43.3%	52,271	6.8	4	2	6	0	0	6
Terre Haute	Indiana	148	66	4	54.7%	51,997	5.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Frisco	Texas	123	54	5	30.0%	51,734	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Muskegon	Michigan	151	61	4	40.0%	51,670	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Missoula	Montana	148	62	5	53.1%	51,616	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Merced	California	141	65	4	50.0%	51,530	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Belleville	Illinois	146	61	4	55.3%	51,509	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Acworth	Georgia	122	57	4	51.6%	51,481	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	110	52	4	45.1%	51,447	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Menifee	California	143	63	3	46.5%	51,345	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	166	74	3	53.6%	51,285	5.6	8	2	8	0	1	8
Bothell	Washington	139	57	6	40.0%	51,256	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Henrico	Virginia	182	74	6	26.5%	51,124	9.3	7	5	11	0	0	7
Jackson	Mississippi	203	79	7	30.0%	51,095	8.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	147	62	6	40.7%	51,016	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Elizabeth	New Jersey	139	68	5	50.6%	50,848	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Savannah	Georgia	195	78	8	21.0%	50,589	8.5	10	1	10	0	0	10
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	56	4	47.3%	50,519	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	46	4	50.0%	50,382	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Buford	Georgia	117	51	5	50.6%	50,179	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	133	61	5	52.5%	49,994	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
La Puente	California	126	61	4	42.2%	49,762	7.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
Racine	Wisconsin	148	68	5	39.4%	49,616	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Roseville	California	134	56	5	35.3%	49,384	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baytown	Texas	141	63	5	41.9%	49,327	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	137	57	5	40.0%	49,056	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Astoria	New York	148	69	6	34.3%	48,966	7.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Vacaville	California	104	45	4	46.5%	48,925	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Antioch	California	114	46	5	44.0%	48,667	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Maria	California	143	64	6	34.0%	48,664	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Coral Springs	Florida	124	61	4	50.0%	48,619	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rockville	Maryland	144	63	5	33.5%	48,549	7.8	4	3	5	0	0	4
Hesperia	California	115	50	5	46.6%	48,425	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	101	52	6	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Tyler	Texas	170	73	6	31.0%	48,411	7.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Florissant	Missouri	141	54	4	44.4%	48,058	6.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	California	123	54	6	43.0%	47,783	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	142	59	4	50.0%	47,718	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Englewood	Colorado	163	72	5	42.7%	47,683	7.0	4	3	5	0	0	5
Bowie	Maryland	155	65	4	46.6%	47,655	6.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Clarksville	Tennessee	130	60	5	27.1%	47,614	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	137	57	4	40.0%	47,471	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Scranton	Pennsylvania	186	79	4	47.3%	47,009	6.0	8	1	8	0	1	8
Perris	California	123	58	4	40.0%	46,956	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Largo	Florida	157	67	4	43.4%	46,736	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Kissimmee	Florida	173	78	8	16.1%	46,477	9.9	7	3	8	0	0	5
Manchester	New Hampshire	139	57	4	40.0%	46,424	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Decatur	Georgia	167	70	7	25.7%	46,411	8.6	5	3	6	0	0	6
Lawrence	Kansas	167	73	4	45.9%	46,400	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Portsmouth	Virginia	172	73	4	48.6%	46,337	5.7	7	1	7	0	1	7
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	63	7	24.3%	45,979	9.5	4	4	6	0	0	3
Richardson	Texas	141	59	4	40.0%	45,839	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Greenville	South Carolina	186	78	6	20.8%	45,769	8.2	9	1	9	0	1	9
Allentown	Pennsylvania	176	78	7	26.7%	45,390	8.6	7	1	7	0	0	5
Roswell	Georgia	126	52	4	45.3%	45,241	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Jupiter	Florida	132	62	4	45.4%	44,700	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Muncie	Indiana	159	69	5	47.9%	44,386	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sandy	Utah	139	57	4	40.0%	44,176	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Anderson	South Carolina	144	62	7	44.9%	44,176	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	118	54	4	40.0%	44,099	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Des Moines	Iowa	191	77	7	19.7%	44,030	9.4	11	3	14	0	0	9
Apopka	Florida	121	59	5	44.8%	43,728	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Delray Beach	Florida	148	71	5	36.7%	43,727	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Chester	Pennsylvania	141	61	5	40.0%	43,478	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	169	74	6	33.6%	43,008	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Saint Augustine	Florida	152	70	5	32.6%	42,780	7.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Tracy	California	153	66	5	36.3%	42,539	8.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Mcallen	Texas	141	61	6	30.0%	42,476	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Inglewood	California	166	71	5	31.5%	42,174	8.0	5	5	9	0	0	4
Longview	Texas	150	60	5	40.0%	42,112	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Medford	Oregon	112	51	4	45.1%	42,065	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hyattsville	Maryland	174	72	5	26.7%	42,043	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Broomfield	Colorado	138	62	5	40.0%	41,900	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	133	55	5	42.7%	41,849	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	121	54	4	40.0%	41,688	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	120	50	5	43.4%	41,420	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	134	67	5	41.1%	41,213	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
New Braunfels	Texas	127	58	4	40.0%	41,117	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	137	59	4	42.5%	41,075	6.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Falls Church	Virginia	161	68	5	34.1%	41,071	7.2	5	3	5	0	0	5
Covington	Georgia	125	53	5	44.1%	40,919	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Franklin	Tennessee	128	58	5	38.3%	40,821	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Woodstock	Georgia	116	53	4	40.0%	40,688	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	116	52	4	40.0%	40,585	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Burbank	California	159	71	7	37.5%	40,525	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Stone Mountain	Georgia	142	64	7	31.6%	40,497	8.0	3	4	5	0	0	4
Allen	Texas	110	49	4	36.3%	40,441	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	131	60	6	40.0%	40,331	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bryan	Texas	176	71	5	41.1%	39,542	6.8	5	2	7	0	0	7
Plainfield	Illinois	144	66	4	40.0%	39,423	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	148	62	4	38.1%	38,998	7.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Keller	Texas	130	53	5	33.4%	38,815	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Napa	California	121	56	5	40.0%	38,666	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	California	115	52	6	30.0%	38,614	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Livermore	California	124	54	5	40.0%	38,501	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Valdosta	Georgia	139	55	4	40.2%	38,200	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hagerstown	Maryland	145	56	5	38.9%	38,141	9.7	3	3	5	0	0	2
South Gate	California	96	51	6	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Dearborn	Michigan	140	57	4	40.0%	38,036	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bellingham	Washington	139	62	5	30.0%	37,948	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Milton	Florida	116	49	4	40.0%	37,896	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	135	60	5	40.0%	37,887	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	140	63	5	40.0%	37,827	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redwood City	California	149	61	6	33.0%	37,789	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	164	69	6	25.6%	37,315	8.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
Lynnwood	Washington	141	65	7	33.7%	36,493	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	113	46	5	35.3%	36,271	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vero Beach	Florida	159	63	6	31.3%	36,043	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	191	77	9	19.7%	35,758	8.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Missouri City	Texas	127	56	4	33.4%	35,483	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Spring Hill	Florida	157	68	6	28.2%	35,430	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Wichita Falls	Texas	164	63	6	35.8%	35,380	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Newport News	Virginia	153	63	7	20.0%	35,337	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Duluth	Minnesota	209	81	6	30.0%	35,142	8.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Kennewick	Washington	134	63	4	35.3%	34,843	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	161	71	6	29.8%	34,809	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	109	52	5	35.6%	34,698	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	120	56	6	30.0%	34,126	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ballwin	Missouri	116	52	5	35.9%	34,024	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Midlothian	Virginia	138	55	7	34.5%	33,395	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
North Hollywood	California	131	60	9	21.7%	33,163	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Melbourne	Florida	147	68	9	20.9%	32,599	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lake Worth	Florida	149	69	8	15.6%	32,315	10.2	5	7	11	0	0	2
Waterbury	Connecticut	157	69	7	29.6%	32,157	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Sparks	Nevada	146	64	6	26.8%	31,920	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	140	63	5	33.5%	31,829	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Palm Bay	Florida	152	66	5	27.4%	30,512	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Daly City	California	129	54	7	26.6%	30,411	9.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Downey	California	127	64	7	26.2%	29,615	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	137	61	6	30.0%	28,739	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	110	51	5	30.4%	28,731	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Westerville	Ohio	121	56	6	30.0%	28,562	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elmhurst	New York	97	50	5	30.0%	28,190	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Van Nuys	California	137	66	9	14.8%	26,289	11.3	4	4	12	0	0	2
Mobile	Alabama	220	88	10	9.6%	25,970	11.3	18	3	20	0	0	7
Riverview	Florida	136	58	5	23.1%	25,694	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Sarasota	Florida	194	81	13	10.3%	25,661	11.7	13	5	19	0	0	2
Herndon	Virginia	129	55	5	26.8%	25,082	9.5	2	3	4	0	0	1
Hartford	Connecticut	158	70	8	20.3%	25,048	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Norfolk	Virginia	189	72	9	9.3%	22,735	10.9	14	1	14	0	0	6
Lithonia	Georgia	120	59	6	22.1%	21,407	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	143	68	7	19.9%	20,545	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
El Monte	California	107	56	7	20.0%	18,742	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	152	66	10	7.4%	12,691	12.8	4	2	6	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	121	57	7	10.0%	9,389	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	California	99	53	10	8.0%	8,464	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	122	54	9	7.0%	7,861	13.0	2	3	6	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	98	51	10	8.0%	7,719	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	96	51	11	7.0%	7,170	13.0	1	4	4	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	115	59	13	5.4%	5,466	14.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Compton	California	131	59	15	3.1%	4,347	17.0	3	2	6	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Francisco	204	77	2	65.5%	570,023	4.7	28	2	29	1	2	27
San Diego	272	116	5	25.2%	339,605	8.3	36	4	41	0	0	41
Los Angeles	288	130	10	11.5%	281,837	10.9	62	7	103	0	0	32
Anaheim	143	65	3	62.9%	231,909	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Sacramento	242	98	6	28.8%	231,528	8.1	28	2	28	0	0	28
Irvine	161	71	2	78.5%	210,023	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Modesto	169	70	3	58.0%	153,338	5.1	7	1	7	0	1	7
San Jose	223	95	8	14.4%	151,082	9.8	28	2	30	0	0	25
Oceanside	132	62	3	69.9%	140,072	4.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
San Bernardino	147	69	4	54.2%	135,232	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Oakland	196	77	5	32.8%	135,115	7.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Corona	162	72	5	51.8%	133,216	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chula Vista	176	72	4	50.4%	131,578	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hayward	154	61	3	68.5%	131,577	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Stockton	199	85	6	34.3%	128,353	7.5	12	1	12	0	0	12
Santa Rosa	159	69	3	56.0%	121,000	5.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Long Beach	197	89	7	24.6%	117,902	9.1	12	1	12	0	0	8
Fremont	152	58	4	49.8%	116,003	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Riverside	167	73	5	30.3%	111,971	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bakersfield	193	86	9	20.0%	111,849	9.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Escondido	136	61	3	59.5%	106,870	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Salinas	144	63	3	56.6%	106,613	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
El Cajon	136	64	5	60.4%	104,140	5.3	3	2	5	0	1	5
Fontana	131	59	5	43.3%	101,664	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Moreno Valley	144	60	4	47.9%	98,331	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Whittier	140	67	5	49.9%	97,902	6.3	6	6	10	0	1	5
Lancaster	135	65	4	52.1%	96,118	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sunnyvale	135	60	3	61.2%	93,554	5.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
San Mateo	144	61	3	62.2%	88,597	4.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Fresno	238	97	7	14.0%	84,420	9.6	18	2	20	0	0	15
Berkeley	187	82	4	66.1%	84,052	4.9	9	2	9	1	1	9
Pasadena	163	74	4	53.0%	83,557	5.3	6	1	6	0	2	6
Concord	144	58	3	59.8%	77,846	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Palmdale	141	69	5	43.3%	75,741	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Clara	134	59	3	58.8%	73,839	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pomona	135	59	4	46.7%	73,811	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Monica	154	72	3	77.3%	72,933	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Oxnard	150	71	5	32.7%	72,090	7.8	4	2	7	0	0	7
Elk Grove	131	59	4	40.0%	71,728	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chico	140	57	4	64.0%	71,678	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Santa Ana	159	71	7	20.0%	71,416	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Santa Cruz	126	54	4	67.6%	70,328	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redding	148	68	3	61.8%	69,818	8.3	4	2	4	0	1	3
Temecula	144	69	4	52.5%	68,190	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Victorville	124	56	4	50.0%	68,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Indio	114	59	3	70.4%	67,650	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Pittsburg	99	42	4	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Ontario	130	59	6	37.6%	66,394	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	163	67	4	53.1%	66,079	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	121	57	5	49.7%	65,721	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Orange	135	60	5	45.0%	65,229	6.6	5	2	8	0	0	8
West Covina	118	59	3	59.4%	65,013	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Hemet	136	61	4	49.8%	64,189	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	157	68	5	46.4%	63,023	6.4	7	2	8	0	0	8
Torrance	157	78	6	35.4%	62,511	7.6	5	3	6	0	0	6
Visalia	134	63	5	40.0%	60,806	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Huntington Beach	134	62	6	30.0%	59,972	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	158	70	5	34.1%	59,892	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Madera	138	61	4	55.2%	56,821	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Vista	127	56	6	46.9%	56,221	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Fullerton	147	69	4	40.0%	55,710	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission Viejo	103	51	4	55.5%	54,578	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clovis	113	53	4	44.6%	54,100	6.7	3	2	4	0	0	3
Fairfield	123	54	5	46.6%	53,195	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rancho Cucamonga	143	70	6	30.0%	52,979	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Norwalk	98	46	4	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Carlsbad	144	66	5	46.4%	52,688	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ventura	126	54	5	45.3%	52,484	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Merced	141	65	4	50.0%	51,530	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Menifee	143	63	3	46.5%	51,345	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
La Puente	126	61	4	42.2%	49,762	7.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
Roseville	134	56	5	35.3%	49,384	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vacaville	104	45	4	46.5%	48,925	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Antioch	114	46	5	44.0%	48,667	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Maria	143	64	6	34.0%	48,664	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hesperia	115	50	5	46.6%	48,425	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	101	52	6	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Leandro	123	54	6	43.0%	47,783	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	123	58	4	40.0%	46,956	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tracy	153	66	5	36.3%	42,539	8.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Inglewood	166	71	5	31.5%	42,174	8.0	5	5	9	0	0	4
Palo Alto	137	59	4	42.5%	41,075	6.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Burbank	159	71	7	37.5%	40,525	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Napa	121	56	5	40.0%	38,666	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	115	52	6	30.0%	38,614	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Livermore	124	54	5	40.0%	38,501	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
South Gate	96	51	6	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Redwood City	149	61	6	33.0%	37,789	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	120	56	6	30.0%	34,126	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
North Hollywood	131	60	9	21.7%	33,163	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Daly City	129	54	7	26.6%	30,411	9.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Downey	127	64	7	26.2%	29,615	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	110	51	5	30.4%	28,731	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Van Nuys	137	66	9	14.8%	26,289	11.3	4	4	12	0	0	2
El Monte	107	56	7	20.0%	18,742	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	99	53	10	8.0%	8,464	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sylmar	98	51	10	8.0%	7,719	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	96	51	11	7.0%	7,170	13.0	1	4	4	0	0	0
San Marcos	115	59	13	5.4%	5,466	14.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Compton	131	59	15	3.1%	4,347	17.0	3	2	6	0	0	0
Rialto	121	59	15	3.8%	4,068	16.5	2	2	3	0	0	0

Chicago

ZIP	kayak.com	enterprise.com	budget.com	avis.com	hertz.com	carrentals.com
60638	8	2	1	6	3	9
60628	7	1	4	5	2	8
60649	7	1	4	6	11	8
60619	7	1	4	6	2	8
60639	7	1	4	6	3	8
60629	7	3	2	5	12	8
60659	7	3	1	5	2	8
60657	4	2	1	3	8	5
60616	4	2	1	3	9	5
60606	4	2	1	3	9	5
60618	7	1	4	3	12	8
60608	7	1	3	6	11	8
60647	7	2	4	1	11	8
60617	4	2	1	3	8	5
60607	6	1	2	3	11	8
60637	7	1	2	3	11	8
60636	6	1	3	5	12	8
60605	4	3	1	2	8	5
60634	7	1	4	5	12	8
60624	4	3	1	2	8	5
60603	7	1	4	6	3	8
60655	7	1	3	6	11	8
60615	4	3	1	2	9	5
60625	7	2	4	6	1	8
60656	7	1	4	5	12	8
60646	7	1	2	5	12	8
60602	7	1	3	6	2	8
60642	4	2	1	3	9	5
60633	7	1	4	6	3	8
60660	7	1	4	6	2	8
60611	7	3	4	6	1	8
60620	7	1	4	6	12	8
60661	7	1	2	6	12	8
60610	7	1	4	6	2	8
60651	7	1	2	3	11	8
60632	7	1	4	6	3	8
60643	7	1	4	5	2	8
60612	7	1	4	6	12	8
60621	7	1	4	6	12	8
60652	4	3	1	2	9	5
60601	7	2	3	6	1	8
60641	7	1	4	5	3	8
60630	7	1	3	6	11	8
60604	7	2	4	1	12	8
60654	7	2	1	6	11	8
60644	7	1	2	5	3	8
60614	7	2	1	6	3	8
60623	7	1	2	5	11	8
60613	7	2	1	6	3	8
60645	7	1	3	6	11	8
60622	7	1	4	3	11	8
60626	7	5	1	6	11	8
60609	4	3	1	2	8	5
60653	7	1	3	6	11	8
60631	4	2	1	3	8	5
60640	7	1	2	6	3	8

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Kayak

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 967 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Kayak Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (car rental near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Kayak Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Kayak Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Kayak Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly