Indeed Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve indeed.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 3,999 Temp/Staffing Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Indeed Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Indeed Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Indeed Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Indeed Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	7,540	3,999	4	25.9%	83,665,035	24.0	26,167	31,101	13,566	35,472	47	1,244	18,946
California	1,360	944	5	20.8%	8,147,078	31.1	1,093	1,631	591	1,761	2	25	723
Florida	966	722	6	24.8%	5,103,865	20.8	426	931	374	1,086	4	34	597
Texas	1,240	931	7	17.8%	4,957,710	31.4	1,229	1,744	639	1,904	3	52	710
New York	1,134	846	4	24.7%	4,848,151	24.5	1,402	1,659	910	1,963	1	69	1,017
Illinois	1,062	805	3	31.4%	4,031,532	22.0	1,195	1,322	726	1,526	1	86	958
Georgia	875	662	3	33.7%	3,471,461	15.6	566	715	364	828	2	28	591
Pennsylvania	1,029	812	5	24.3%	3,106,181	31.4	1,493	1,669	825	1,896	2	54	840
North Carolina	886	673	3	29.0%	2,945,843	23.6	651	760	392	853	1	23	480
Ohio	954	726	3	24.0%	2,790,315	27.9	925	1,120	560	1,280	3	46	578
Massachusetts	727	584	3	39.0%	2,660,627	10.1	456	527	389	676	1	47	548
Virginia	851	651	4	29.3%	2,465,656	22.9	701	855	446	998	2	35	614
Michigan	822	647	4	24.6%	2,445,112	28.7	802	931	530	1,042	0	33	489
New Jersey	755	605	4	27.3%	2,424,797	35.7	448	504	308	566	4	11	310
Washington	732	581	6	26.3%	1,913,446	19.6	435	558	282	605	0	21	311
Wisconsin	762	586	4	31.2%	1,804,987	16.2	682	755	464	854	0	49	494
Indiana	1,061	837	4	27.1%	1,798,344	23.9	648	754	312	883	4	24	462
Missouri	886	653	4	26.1%	1,589,403	24.1	861	964	423	1,085	2	42	618
Minnesota	832	635	3	28.7%	1,584,343	25.1	774	847	431	917	3	30	485
Louisiana	708	573	4	33.5%	1,563,654	20.4	412	490	217	545	2	31	325
Colorado	794	603	4	27.5%	1,518,618	31.1	327	431	226	479	1	18	261
Alabama	717	569	3	31.2%	1,515,682	19.5	508	623	297	727	0	30	419
Arizona	651	501	6	21.0%	1,461,184	18.3	234	381	147	430	1	10	214
Maryland	666	536	5	24.3%	1,459,532	26.6	367	419	242	510	0	12	282
Tennessee	769	604	6	21.8%	1,445,906	19.2	491	597	328	689	0	17	342
South Carolina	651	516	5	26.9%	1,332,643	16.7	343	418	208	495	0	11	217
Connecticut	544	455	3	35.3%	1,264,181	16.0	233	275	198	330	3	17	176
Utah	556	454	5	37.7%	1,147,360	18.1	242	280	134	300	0	15	181
Kentucky	744	581	4	25.7%	1,141,447	29.7	680	733	310	828	0	21	383
Oklahoma	761	589	3	27.5%	1,078,229	19.6	547	636	241	715	0	24	408
Iowa	766	581	3	34.1%	1,067,502	18.8	869	912	402	1,047	2	47	644
Mississippi	619	498	3	34.1%	1,019,422	20.1	377	409	216	479	0	27	261
Oregon	774	623	7	23.9%	976,854	29.4	325	370	177	401	0	12	236
Arkansas	689	555	3	28.8%	861,354	27.2	522	555	240	636	0	17	347
Nebraska	575	445	2	37.9%	721,010	14.2	516	573	164	718	0	26	533
Kansas	768	596	4	24.3%	706,997	19.7	584	660	253	721	0	35	440
Idaho	548	463	4	38.7%	653,430	20.5	239	261	121	294	2	20	161
West Virginia	574	470	3	34.6%	632,562	24.3	671	689	241	785	0	38	380
New Mexico	515	424	8	24.5%	511,738	40.1	278	309	121	340	0	5	149
Montana	528	435	4	40.5%	422,573	24.5	331	344	134	372	0	20	244
New Hampshire	487	418	3	30.4%	408,843	14.0	237	247	199	284	1	9	132
Maine	726	618	7	25.1%	334,031	17.5	420	424	284	485	0	7	219
South Dakota	484	394	4	36.9%	319,248	16.3	356	367	105	408	0	9	293
North Dakota	474	392	3	42.3%	317,479	7.8	367	381	74	431	0	29	385
Nevada	452	371	13	10.3%	301,433	15.6	91	167	53	227	0	4	46
Delaware	365	309	2	31.3%	297,288	9.1	52	66	42	94	0	4	61
Rhode Island	339	293	8	24.8%	262,407	15.9	63	75	40	98	0	1	42
Alaska	529	386	6	30.8%	227,137	46.8	208	225	80	238	0	7	95
Wyoming	459	371	3	36.8%	214,323	16.1	162	169	82	197	0	6	131
Hawaii	336	289	9	15.0%	212,716	34.1	81	92	40	101	0	3	27
Vermont	441	379	7	24.3%	151,711	21.1	246	250	142	301	0	3	87

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	197	175	9	16.7%	435,231	10.9	37	3	48	0	0	23
Staten Island	New York	156	137	1	71.8%	340,183	4.1	12	2	15	0	3	15
Saint Paul	Minnesota	240	211	5	33.0%	264,131	47.8	19	11	19	1	1	15
Aurora	Colorado	146	133	4	51.6%	224,891	6.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Minneapolis	Minnesota	266	232	10	19.0%	206,739	44.7	35	12	39	1	2	18
Anaheim	California	139	127	5	56.1%	206,637	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Hollywood	Florida	173	163	5	43.2%	202,718	6.4	9	2	9	0	0	9
Atlanta	Georgia	267	232	8	19.8%	196,222	13.6	39	11	41	0	0	20
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	240	208	7	26.8%	183,034	10.1	43	5	44	0	0	42
Omaha	Nebraska	189	164	10	32.1%	177,110	7.9	31	2	46	0	0	41
Tucson	Arizona	231	197	10	18.8%	170,519	9.8	32	2	32	0	0	21
Lincoln	Nebraska	192	172	4	58.4%	169,000	5.5	22	2	33	0	1	33
Marietta	Georgia	163	149	5	50.0%	161,267	19.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Toledo	Ohio	186	171	4	49.4%	151,940	6.1	15	1	15	0	2	15
Woodbridge	Virginia	140	128	2	71.1%	150,571	4.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Rochester	New York	197	174	8	30.9%	145,864	8.1	24	1	24	0	0	23
Savannah	Georgia	154	135	4	58.8%	141,860	5.7	10	1	10	0	1	10
Oakland	California	161	146	5	32.7%	134,731	7.8	14	2	15	0	0	13
Chicago	Illinois	235	205	24	4.9%	132,368	19.9	55	7	58	0	0	1
Los Angeles	California	240	207	20	5.4%	131,658	21.0	59	4	62	0	0	2
Fontana	California	118	106	5	54.2%	127,292	5.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Mckinney	Texas	133	120	4	66.0%	124,745	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bakersfield	California	171	151	9	22.2%	124,432	8.8	11	1	11	0	0	11
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	203	177	18	7.9%	123,859	20.6	46	7	61	0	0	8
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	250	222	9	14.5%	120,360	47.0	17	6	17	0	0	12
Ocala	Florida	169	156	4	53.2%	119,693	5.8	11	1	11	0	2	11
Fayetteville	North Carolina	150	136	5	49.0%	119,551	5.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
New York City	New York	202	179	12	7.2%	117,527	12.6	47	2	93	0	0	8
Bronx	New York	194	165	14	8.1%	116,840	12.9	25	4	41	0	0	6
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	228	204	11	17.0%	116,039	9.5	39	5	46	0	0	37
Paterson	New Jersey	154	138	1	78.8%	114,883	3.4	9	1	9	2	2	9
Worcester	Massachusetts	155	140	3	60.0%	111,367	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Bridgeport	Connecticut	149	136	2	75.1%	109,939	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Bradenton	Florida	180	158	4	43.3%	109,521	8.0	10	3	11	0	0	8
Detroit	Michigan	180	160	13	16.7%	107,095	10.1	25	3	35	0	0	25
Salt Lake City	Utah	197	174	11	21.3%	103,798	8.8	19	3	19	0	0	15
Miami	Florida	261	228	19	5.5%	102,494	20.3	54	10	55	0	0	3
Norfolk	Virginia	174	158	6	41.1%	100,918	6.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
San Bernardino	California	148	131	6	40.4%	100,893	6.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Boynton Beach	Florida	146	135	3	57.9%	100,810	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Surprise	Arizona	141	127	2	73.5%	99,679	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Metairie	Louisiana	135	119	1	70.0%	99,576	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	129	117	6	55.3%	97,706	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	151	4	48.0%	97,569	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Grand Prairie	Texas	137	125	5	50.6%	96,469	6.0	4	2	5	0	1	5
Augusta	Georgia	163	145	5	46.9%	95,812	6.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
Schenectady	New York	161	140	4	58.8%	95,265	5.1	8	1	8	0	1	8
Youngstown	Ohio	164	144	2	60.6%	95,237	4.4	12	3	19	1	5	19
Pueblo	Colorado	166	150	4	60.0%	94,879	5.0	7	2	7	0	0	7
Cypress	Texas	118	111	4	55.5%	94,744	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
San Antonio	Texas	240	205	19	5.3%	94,565	17.6	59	5	60	0	0	4
Carrollton	Texas	130	115	1	70.0%	94,368	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kissimmee	Florida	188	167	6	32.6%	94,345	8.7	7	4	8	0	0	7
Green Bay	Wisconsin	154	140	5	50.9%	93,273	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Whittier	California	158	143	4	47.3%	92,821	6.8	6	3	10	0	0	9
Cape Coral	Florida	155	134	3	51.3%	92,754	5.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Durham	North Carolina	155	138	8	31.9%	92,519	8.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Gilbert	Arizona	148	137	7	38.5%	91,964	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Jamaica	New York	144	130	4	37.3%	90,983	7.2	6	2	9	0	0	9
Waukegan	Illinois	116	102	2	91.8%	89,525	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Nampa	Idaho	128	116	1	76.4%	88,594	3.7	3	1	3	1	1	3
Mesquite	Texas	125	115	4	60.0%	87,788	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Jose	California	196	177	17	8.3%	86,689	12.1	28	3	30	0	0	2
West Jordan	Utah	127	116	3	70.0%	86,499	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Flushing	New York	133	119	5	40.0%	86,027	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Denver	Colorado	233	200	18	7.9%	85,464	67.5	18	8	18	1	1	5
Huntsville	Alabama	162	142	4	43.3%	85,021	6.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
Las Vegas	Nevada	229	196	23	5.5%	84,580	14.3	43	4	73	0	0	0
Garden Grove	California	131	118	4	47.9%	84,115	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Allen	Texas	114	107	2	75.4%	83,875	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Hampton	Virginia	152	132	2	61.4%	83,597	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Elizabeth	New Jersey	128	115	1	82.3%	82,697	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
El Paso	Texas	219	194	12	10.4%	82,419	18.9	22	4	31	0	0	7
Trenton	New Jersey	179	162	4	39.4%	82,014	8.7	11	1	11	0	0	9
Newark	New Jersey	174	154	7	29.1%	81,779	7.9	9	2	16	0	0	16
Independence	Missouri	169	147	2	65.9%	81,723	3.6	8	1	8	2	3	8
Modesto	California	153	139	7	30.7%	81,299	8.0	7	2	8	0	0	8
Yakima	Washington	131	116	5	62.5%	81,097	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Toms River	New Jersey	140	127	2	65.5%	80,516	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Garland	Texas	135	124	6	33.5%	79,658	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Palmdale	California	134	120	5	44.8%	78,333	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tyler	Texas	155	143	5	50.0%	78,074	6.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Tallahassee	Florida	156	145	7	27.1%	77,947	8.3	10	2	18	0	0	18
Elk Grove	California	137	122	5	42.9%	76,881	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	148	136	2	78.3%	76,712	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Baltimore	Maryland	199	173	9	12.1%	76,511	10.5	22	3	38	0	0	11
Edinburg	Texas	130	117	4	49.1%	76,406	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Jupiter	Florida	134	124	2	77.3%	76,199	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Fairfield	California	119	106	3	66.5%	75,886	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Fargo	North Dakota	144	129	2	61.3%	75,085	6.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Belleville	Illinois	139	122	1	80.4%	74,908	3.0	4	2	6	0	3	6
Long Beach	California	156	140	14	15.5%	74,431	9.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Ogden	Utah	149	133	6	36.9%	74,278	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Greeley	Colorado	111	101	4	64.9%	74,025	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lancaster	California	131	114	6	40.0%	73,768	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edmond	Oklahoma	168	144	6	42.8%	73,515	6.6	5	2	5	0	1	5
Palm Bay	Florida	137	119	4	65.9%	73,384	4.5	4	1	4	1	1	4
New Haven	Connecticut	145	130	5	56.1%	73,065	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Jersey City	New Jersey	162	143	7	27.9%	73,054	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	6
Olympia	Washington	171	154	5	39.6%	72,459	7.2	6	4	8	0	0	8
Merced	California	123	112	4	70.0%	72,142	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	California	136	123	3	57.5%	71,613	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Phoenix	Arizona	217	197	20	4.9%	71,539	15.0	42	2	44	0	0	0
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	162	144	6	39.3%	71,402	7.0	9	2	14	0	0	14
Salem	Oregon	156	144	9	26.7%	71,241	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pompano Beach	Florida	180	170	9	18.5%	68,480	40.5	10	6	10	0	1	3
Albuquerque	New Mexico	198	181	14	10.4%	68,442	16.5	16	1	16	0	0	6
Seattle	Washington	225	198	15	7.2%	68,315	14.2	35	2	35	0	0	3
Victorville	California	127	114	5	50.0%	68,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	142	129	3	62.2%	67,817	7.5	4	2	4	0	1	3
Corona	California	150	135	8	26.3%	67,542	8.6	5	2	6	0	0	5
Canton	Ohio	175	163	6	45.9%	67,451	14.1	11	2	13	0	0	13
Louisville	Kentucky	205	181	16	8.9%	67,357	11.9	32	2	34	0	0	5
Winter Haven	Florida	134	120	3	63.0%	67,334	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Summerville	South Carolina	120	108	5	48.2%	66,977	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Glendale	Arizona	163	148	10	21.9%	66,887	10.6	9	2	9	0	0	6
Melbourne	Florida	151	129	5	42.9%	66,860	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Parker	Colorado	124	111	3	66.6%	66,837	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	118	106	2	70.0%	66,798	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Wichita	Kansas	187	168	13	15.9%	66,587	9.6	26	1	26	0	0	17
San Angelo	Texas	141	125	4	59.9%	66,341	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fullerton	California	138	126	4	47.3%	65,903	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Federal Way	Washington	119	106	4	64.9%	65,030	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Sunnyvale	California	141	131	3	42.5%	64,950	7.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Boise	Idaho	151	136	7	25.3%	64,910	8.7	9	2	16	0	0	13
Cumming	Georgia	135	121	5	40.0%	64,808	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Joliet	Illinois	138	125	3	50.0%	64,439	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hemet	California	135	121	5	50.0%	64,393	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Simi Valley	California	116	104	7	50.0%	64,356	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverside	California	147	126	11	17.4%	64,203	16.7	7	3	8	0	0	6
New Port Richey	Florida	146	128	7	53.0%	64,086	6.0	4	3	5	0	1	5
Buffalo	New York	213	184	13	11.3%	63,840	10.1	28	5	30	0	0	18
Springfield	Missouri	167	146	7	27.5%	63,418	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pomona	California	127	113	5	40.0%	63,194	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	141	128	2	65.7%	62,598	4.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Cary	North Carolina	133	124	6	40.0%	62,133	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Largo	Florida	139	124	4	57.7%	62,071	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Milton	Florida	131	117	3	65.3%	61,881	4.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	140	126	3	65.0%	61,592	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Silver Spring	Maryland	168	152	7	20.1%	61,008	35.4	5	4	8	0	0	7
Clearwater	Florida	166	146	4	33.0%	60,501	7.9	9	2	9	0	0	9
Syracuse	New York	173	155	9	26.6%	60,249	8.6	15	1	15	0	0	15
Killeen	Texas	132	120	5	40.0%	60,080	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	California	120	109	6	45.2%	59,710	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Barbara	California	149	133	6	43.8%	59,566	6.9	7	2	11	0	0	11
Vacaville	California	109	98	5	56.5%	59,455	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vero Beach	Florida	148	134	6	51.4%	59,175	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lake Charles	Louisiana	148	135	5	45.2%	59,133	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Virginia Beach	Virginia	174	156	10	13.1%	58,847	9.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Apopka	Florida	119	109	4	60.0%	58,592	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Concord	California	140	130	6	44.6%	58,124	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Moreno Valley	California	128	115	7	28.3%	58,042	9.0	4	2	7	0	0	5
Arlington	Texas	174	155	11	14.6%	57,804	10.1	12	1	12	0	0	9
Clarksville	Tennessee	128	117	8	32.9%	57,804	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kent	Washington	134	126	7	36.0%	57,736	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Indio	California	128	112	4	60.0%	57,655	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Dayton	Ohio	225	201	12	12.0%	57,606	15.0	26	9	31	0	0	8
O Fallon	Missouri	129	115	2	59.7%	57,598	5.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Cincinnati	Ohio	221	194	19	7.1%	57,201	13.0	45	4	69	0	0	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	150	134	7	34.8%	57,164	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Alexandria	Virginia	187	165	13	16.1%	57,051	16.2	13	3	13	0	0	8
Costa Mesa	California	112	105	6	50.0%	56,877	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Fe	New Mexico	145	130	5	44.2%	56,635	24.6	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	146	129	3	54.9%	56,552	5.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
Muskegon	Michigan	135	123	5	43.7%	56,463	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lawrence	Kansas	137	120	4	55.8%	56,363	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Deltona	Florida	108	95	5	60.0%	56,333	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	127	116	4	60.0%	56,123	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Anchorage	Alaska	181	160	9	22.9%	56,009	8.8	12	2	13	0	0	13
Lowell	Massachusetts	127	119	6	50.0%	55,671	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	145	131	5	38.1%	55,533	7.0	5	2	6	0	0	5
Plainfield	Illinois	140	125	3	55.2%	54,366	5.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Boulder	Colorado	158	145	4	41.3%	54,210	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Eugene	Oregon	157	140	8	26.5%	53,720	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Clermont	Florida	132	115	5	53.2%	53,361	7.7	3	2	3	0	1	2
Livermore	California	112	98	3	55.2%	53,177	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Macon	Georgia	167	146	8	32.4%	52,995	7.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Quincy	Massachusetts	117	108	4	56.1%	52,807	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lansing	Michigan	166	149	6	32.0%	52,531	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Charleston	South Carolina	164	145	7	26.5%	52,188	9.8	10	1	10	0	0	8
Meridian	Idaho	119	104	5	50.0%	52,111	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orlando	Florida	235	206	23	5.2%	52,022	29.5	30	10	37	0	0	5
Puyallup	Washington	148	133	5	36.3%	51,803	8.6	5	2	5	0	1	3
San Leandro	California	127	114	5	46.3%	51,488	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fresno	California	183	166	16	8.5%	51,350	18.4	17	2	17	0	0	2
Lawrenceville	Georgia	136	121	10	20.0%	51,222	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Missoula	Montana	152	136	4	52.6%	51,130	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Laurel	Maryland	141	123	3	45.3%	50,953	6.5	4	3	7	0	0	7
Conroe	Texas	159	145	7	31.6%	50,724	8.4	7	2	8	0	1	5
Panama City	Florida	148	127	3	40.0%	50,546	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Billings	Montana	152	131	4	36.4%	50,025	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fredericksburg	Virginia	142	129	8	28.6%	49,780	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Buford	Georgia	109	99	3	50.0%	49,552	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clovis	California	125	113	6	40.4%	49,057	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Muncie	Indiana	150	137	5	52.8%	48,935	5.8	5	2	10	0	0	10
College Station	Texas	123	112	6	39.7%	48,909	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	124	117	6	50.7%	48,560	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Warren	Michigan	134	119	6	35.8%	48,434	7.4	5	2	7	0	0	7
Hawthorne	California	99	88	6	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fremont	California	126	115	10	20.7%	48,275	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Racine	Wisconsin	140	131	5	37.7%	47,511	19.0	5	2	6	0	0	5
Grand Rapids	Michigan	159	143	12	12.9%	47,497	10.8	12	1	12	0	0	3
Littleton	Colorado	213	189	12	14.6%	47,490	43.4	7	5	10	0	0	8
Memphis	Tennessee	209	183	15	6.8%	47,324	13.1	26	4	45	0	0	1
Astoria	New York	148	132	7	33.1%	47,218	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Duluth	Minnesota	178	156	4	40.2%	47,095	6.9	11	1	11	0	0	11
York	Pennsylvania	161	144	9	26.1%	46,950	8.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Sarasota	Florida	183	166	9	18.7%	46,760	9.2	13	1	13	0	0	13
Birmingham	Alabama	206	185	17	9.3%	46,638	10.7	30	2	30	0	0	10
Lynchburg	Virginia	147	130	3	45.4%	46,480	6.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Richmond	Virginia	188	161	13	11.9%	46,440	9.9	15	1	15	0	0	13
Tracy	California	149	136	4	39.6%	46,415	8.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	121	6	47.4%	46,406	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Menifee	California	149	134	7	41.6%	45,959	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	137	121	8	39.1%	45,373	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Valley City	Utah	123	110	7	34.1%	45,251	7.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Antioch	California	115	106	5	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Evansville	Indiana	168	149	11	23.8%	43,964	8.7	9	1	9	0	0	7
Sacramento	California	204	178	19	5.5%	43,914	17.9	27	1	27	0	0	0
Chattanooga	Tennessee	179	159	7	21.0%	43,732	14.7	14	2	15	0	0	14
Jacksonville	Florida	199	172	22	5.0%	43,622	15.0	31	3	60	0	0	1
Homestead	Florida	162	148	8	22.9%	43,017	22.1	7	3	7	0	0	5
Ridgewood	New York	96	85	5	40.0%	42,687	7.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Douglasville	Georgia	126	111	9	38.0%	41,897	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Newport News	Virginia	154	136	10	23.7%	41,853	8.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	121	108	7	42.9%	41,756	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Santa Cruz	California	124	112	6	40.0%	41,620	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	133	117	6	24.7%	41,200	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Baytown	Texas	127	118	6	34.7%	40,912	37.7	2	1	2	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	124	108	6	42.8%	40,803	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	145	133	7	32.5%	40,760	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rialto	California	128	117	7	38.2%	40,678	7.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	135	121	5	38.8%	40,664	7.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Coral Springs	Florida	114	108	5	41.8%	40,651	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Spartanburg	South Carolina	153	140	8	36.3%	40,629	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hillsboro	Oregon	110	103	6	39.5%	40,615	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Honolulu	Hawaii	173	155	11	9.8%	40,581	11.6	11	2	12	0	0	2
Kansas City	Missouri	220	191	18	7.1%	40,312	37.3	44	10	46	0	0	2
Charlottesville	Virginia	151	137	7	32.7%	40,205	7.6	5	3	10	0	0	10
Sugar Land	Texas	133	120	9	23.6%	39,870	14.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	148	131	8	23.4%	39,809	8.7	7	2	12	0	0	8
Frederick	Maryland	125	107	7	30.0%	39,599	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chula Vista	California	149	137	8	15.1%	39,510	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Norman	Oklahoma	154	133	6	31.7%	39,293	7.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	171	148	9	23.0%	38,939	8.9	9	1	9	0	0	6
High Point	North Carolina	133	120	8	31.7%	38,757	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	137	124	8	31.7%	38,753	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	119	105	5	40.0%	38,706	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Abilene	Texas	162	148	7	29.6%	38,564	23.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Springdale	Arkansas	110	95	7	40.0%	38,562	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Round Rock	Texas	134	120	7	23.0%	38,558	12.0	3	3	4	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	162	149	7	30.3%	38,548	8.1	9	2	9	0	0	8
Pittsburg	California	95	88	5	40.0%	38,432	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Shreveport	Louisiana	185	168	10	17.2%	38,428	9.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
South Gate	California	99	90	6	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Peoria	Arizona	142	128	8	22.1%	38,003	9.3	4	2	7	0	0	5
Madison	Wisconsin	161	147	10	12.8%	37,605	10.5	14	1	14	0	0	6
Chico	California	129	117	5	33.5%	37,510	8.3	3	2	5	0	0	4
El Monte	California	113	102	6	40.0%	37,484	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Plano	Texas	143	134	10	12.2%	37,145	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	162	146	7	37.1%	36,907	7.6	8	3	9	0	0	7
Santa Clara	California	129	119	8	29.4%	36,846	9.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	163	144	9	20.2%	36,810	9.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Charlotte	North Carolina	208	177	25	4.0%	36,689	53.2	19	7	19	0	0	1
Akron	Ohio	163	148	13	13.4%	36,209	24.2	17	3	17	0	0	3
El Cajon	California	134	120	7	21.0%	36,201	23.3	3	3	3	0	0	1
Amarillo	Texas	178	163	9	15.8%	36,166	32.1	12	2	12	0	0	6
Yonkers	New York	139	126	7	20.0%	36,106	9.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Renton	Washington	153	143	10	23.3%	36,010	9.2	5	2	5	0	0	4
Yuma	Arizona	124	109	6	24.4%	35,981	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Henrico	Virginia	160	147	10	18.6%	35,803	11.0	7	3	8	0	0	6
Bellingham	Washington	136	123	8	28.1%	35,500	9.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	114	103	6	33.0%	35,348	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Athens	Georgia	153	137	7	28.3%	35,290	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Saint Augustine	Florida	170	148	8	26.8%	35,183	9.8	5	3	7	0	0	3
Colorado Springs	Colorado	210	188	16	5.9%	34,574	24.5	27	5	27	0	0	1
Bryan	Texas	149	135	7	35.7%	34,335	7.8	5	2	9	0	0	9
Lafayette	Louisiana	145	128	8	21.2%	34,062	9.4	5	2	7	0	0	4
Stockton	California	176	155	13	9.1%	34,054	10.9	12	2	14	0	0	1
Mission Viejo	California	113	107	6	34.5%	33,944	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Longmont	Colorado	130	120	8	25.9%	33,827	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Rosa	California	144	129	10	15.6%	33,720	10.2	6	1	6	0	0	2
Stamford	Connecticut	147	138	8	26.1%	33,659	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	5
Las Cruces	New Mexico	159	141	7	22.6%	33,634	22.6	7	2	7	0	0	5
Bowie	Maryland	158	144	5	32.8%	33,500	30.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	149	130	6	31.5%	33,216	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Greensboro	North Carolina	158	139	15	10.0%	32,674	10.8	9	1	9	0	0	1
Medford	Oregon	112	102	7	34.9%	32,536	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
South Bend	Indiana	164	146	8	22.2%	32,500	8.3	10	1	10	0	0	10
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	200	180	14	8.5%	32,389	12.5	18	2	18	0	0	3
Saint Charles	Missouri	139	125	8	23.1%	32,323	9.3	3	3	4	0	0	3
Decatur	Georgia	159	142	10	17.8%	32,142	20.6	5	3	7	0	0	3
Columbus	Ohio	202	178	26	3.8%	32,102	17.7	30	7	41	0	0	0
Fort Worth	Texas	216	193	23	3.5%	31,783	30.9	30	5	31	0	0	2
Delray Beach	Florida	153	143	6	26.6%	31,721	26.6	4	2	8	0	0	8
Fort Myers	Florida	180	159	13	12.6%	31,597	9.7	11	3	15	0	0	12
Hesperia	California	116	103	6	30.0%	31,143	8.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Albany	New York	177	156	9	20.6%	31,093	9.4	11	1	11	0	0	8
Riverview	Florida	128	118	7	27.7%	30,850	37.7	2	1	2	0	0	2
Naples	Florida	203	182	12	9.8%	30,825	19.4	14	3	14	0	0	3
Burbank	California	132	120	7	28.4%	30,705	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Orleans	Louisiana	178	158	11	7.2%	30,699	15.5	19	2	19	0	0	0
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	188	168	30	3.8%	30,633	17.2	29	4	29	0	0	2
Miami Beach	Florida	141	131	8	26.4%	30,564	10.0	5	2	5	0	0	4
Auburn	Washington	127	118	10	27.1%	30,556	9.3	3	3	4	0	0	1
Woodstock	Georgia	122	110	8	30.0%	30,516	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Lake Worth	Florida	155	140	11	14.7%	30,369	27.0	5	4	5	0	0	2
Saginaw	Michigan	147	127	6	23.2%	30,294	18.3	7	2	7	0	0	3
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	90	7	30.0%	30,229	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Covington	Georgia	130	117	8	32.4%	30,071	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Valdosta	Georgia	140	124	7	31.6%	30,012	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Acworth	Georgia	120	107	8	30.0%	29,905	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Houston	Texas	301	260	56	0.9%	29,754	25.4	96	2	96	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	132	122	8	30.0%	29,522	8.0	4	3	7	0	0	7
Fort Wayne	Indiana	174	153	12	9.3%	29,443	14.7	16	2	16	0	0	1
Dallas	Texas	253	221	33	2.1%	29,399	18.8	48	3	48	0	0	1
Stone Mountain	Georgia	146	133	8	22.9%	29,396	58.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
Orange	California	125	115	10	20.2%	29,268	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fort Pierce	Florida	178	161	7	30.5%	29,203	7.9	8	2	9	0	0	9
Perris	California	125	110	9	24.8%	29,123	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Henderson	Nevada	159	140	14	9.6%	29,084	12.6	8	3	13	0	0	3
Salinas	California	144	131	8	15.4%	29,009	11.0	5	2	6	0	0	1
Cambridge	Massachusetts	136	127	8	25.0%	29,004	8.4	5	3	7	0	0	5
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	149	140	11	15.5%	28,936	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	1
Roseville	California	128	114	9	20.7%	28,871	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	134	118	8	23.5%	28,857	8.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Provo	Utah	131	118	10	24.7%	28,808	8.3	3	3	4	0	0	3
Elmhurst	New York	100	86	7	30.0%	28,190	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Scottsdale	Arizona	173	160	15	9.4%	28,143	11.7	11	2	11	0	0	2
Denton	Texas	149	136	8	17.7%	28,058	39.7	4	2	4	0	0	2
Tulsa	Oklahoma	191	163	16	6.6%	27,908	13.9	28	2	28	0	0	0
Holland	Michigan	100	87	7	29.7%	27,872	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roanoke	Virginia	172	156	11	16.4%	27,784	18.2	9	2	13	0	0	13
Mobile	Alabama	200	176	12	10.2%	27,692	10.9	18	3	21	0	0	3
Washington DC	District of Columbia	197	175	21	4.0%	27,688	18.9	27	2	44	0	0	0
Lubbock	Texas	166	148	11	9.9%	27,503	12.9	14	3	19	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	111	102	8	27.5%	27,237	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	131	114	6	26.4%	27,209	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	137	120	9	20.7%	27,002	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	1
Pensacola	Florida	184	163	11	10.0%	26,819	9.8	13	2	15	0	0	12
Ventura	California	121	107	9	22.9%	26,557	14.0	3	2	3	0	1	1
Santa Maria	California	132	121	8	18.5%	26,490	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Spring Hill	Florida	157	143	8	21.0%	26,315	18.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Midlothian	Virginia	121	113	9	27.1%	26,225	8.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Mesa	Arizona	181	168	18	4.9%	26,161	15.1	13	1	13	0	0	0
Lynnwood	Washington	135	120	8	24.0%	26,044	9.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Saint Petersburg	Florida	181	165	13	7.2%	25,733	17.8	16	3	17	0	0	1
Santa Monica	California	122	114	6	27.3%	25,728	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ashburn	Virginia	114	102	5	22.9%	25,664	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Little Rock	Arkansas	167	151	15	11.8%	25,636	9.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Manassas	Virginia	148	130	10	16.8%	25,579	15.0	4	4	4	0	0	1
Bothell	Washington	142	129	8	19.8%	25,455	10.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Columbia	South Carolina	175	156	16	7.3%	25,134	12.6	14	1	14	0	0	2
Odessa	Texas	137	125	8	15.6%	24,915	10.5	6	2	11	0	0	7
Fairfax	Virginia	142	130	11	14.7%	24,116	10.5	4	3	5	0	0	3
Orem	Utah	126	118	9	23.8%	23,925	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hamilton	Ohio	138	125	10	17.4%	23,891	38.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Tacoma	Washington	210	187	16	7.1%	23,824	20.8	19	4	21	0	0	3
Knoxville	Tennessee	177	160	16	6.2%	23,789	13.9	17	1	17	0	0	0
San Francisco	California	177	162	20	2.7%	23,739	20.3	27	1	27	0	0	0
Jackson	Mississippi	170	153	11	13.9%	23,651	9.6	11	1	11	0	0	9
Cleveland	Ohio	213	190	29	3.2%	23,639	54.9	26	15	27	0	0	3
Keller	Texas	130	116	11	20.3%	23,626	53.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Montgomery	Alabama	176	155	11	11.1%	23,346	10.2	13	1	13	0	0	8
Chandler	Arizona	143	133	9	8.3%	22,267	11.7	6	2	8	0	0	1
West Covina	California	138	123	10	20.0%	21,882	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Laredo	Texas	151	135	11	8.0%	21,562	35.2	6	3	6	0	0	1
Ypsilanti	Michigan	119	106	7	20.0%	21,380	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norwalk	California	97	87	7	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Wichita Falls	Texas	164	150	7	21.3%	21,077	8.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Herndon	Virginia	122	113	8	21.9%	20,477	23.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Lees Summit	Missouri	164	149	7	19.9%	20,318	20.8	6	4	10	0	0	8
Appleton	Wisconsin	131	124	11	16.6%	20,249	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oxnard	California	137	122	10	9.1%	20,087	11.8	4	2	4	0	0	1
Lithonia	Georgia	121	107	7	20.6%	19,909	31.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Reno	Nevada	179	162	17	6.6%	19,663	13.5	12	1	12	0	0	0
Beaverton	Oregon	138	130	11	9.6%	19,435	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	141	127	9	17.7%	19,217	9.2	6	4	10	0	0	9
Wilmington	Delaware	188	165	15	8.6%	18,885	12.2	10	3	14	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	137	127	8	19.5%	18,819	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Boston	Massachusetts	171	154	10	12.4%	18,807	9.5	14	1	14	0	0	14
Gulfport	Mississippi	137	122	8	19.8%	18,756	8.7	3	2	6	0	0	4
Irvine	California	158	147	13	7.0%	18,686	12.9	9	2	10	0	0	1
Santa Ana	California	135	123	20	5.2%	18,599	16.7	6	2	6	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	142	125	9	16.1%	18,482	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Lakeland	Florida	150	135	15	7.0%	18,088	17.0	9	2	9	0	0	0
Pearland	Texas	121	110	12	13.1%	18,064	17.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Raleigh	North Carolina	184	168	27	3.2%	17,365	17.2	15	2	15	0	0	0
Fort Collins	Colorado	145	133	11	8.9%	17,312	11.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Brownsville	Texas	130	116	10	8.5%	17,183	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Boca Raton	Florida	159	151	11	7.7%	17,168	22.3	8	1	8	0	0	1
Des Moines	Iowa	159	143	18	7.7%	17,143	11.9	11	2	11	0	0	4
Indianapolis	Indiana	219	193	42	1.7%	16,148	20.4	37	5	45	0	0	1
Hialeah	Florida	160	148	12	4.3%	15,891	33.0	6	1	6	0	0	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	113	103	8	15.4%	15,664	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Inglewood	California	146	128	10	11.6%	15,570	37.6	4	2	4	0	0	1
Sparks	Nevada	140	126	12	12.9%	15,366	10.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	123	111	9	14.4%	15,273	16.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Spokane	Washington	179	160	15	4.2%	15,259	15.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Greenville	South Carolina	164	149	21	6.9%	15,113	13.1	9	1	9	0	0	1
Temecula	California	135	125	11	11.2%	14,569	10.7	3	3	5	0	0	3
Winston Salem	North Carolina	168	155	16	5.5%	14,501	42.3	6	2	6	0	0	0
Gainesville	Florida	158	146	15	6.9%	14,356	57.7	9	4	9	0	0	2
Mcallen	Texas	131	118	10	10.0%	14,159	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	148	131	8	14.7%	13,986	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Overland Park	Kansas	161	144	17	7.5%	13,830	12.7	9	2	10	0	0	1
Olathe	Kansas	118	107	8	9.6%	13,798	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Edison	New Jersey	125	114	13	13.4%	13,514	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Englewood	Colorado	161	144	13	12.0%	13,395	64.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Corpus Christi	Texas	183	162	18	4.1%	13,331	26.3	18	3	18	0	0	0
Mission	Texas	129	118	11	7.3%	13,221	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Waco	Texas	151	137	11	8.3%	13,215	41.1	6	1	6	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	146	133	10	8.0%	12,799	12.0	5	2	6	0	0	0
Naperville	Illinois	126	114	13	7.6%	12,655	66.0	4	3	4	0	0	1
Franklin	Tennessee	124	115	10	11.9%	12,636	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Providence	Rhode Island	151	138	13	6.1%	12,512	23.9	7	2	10	0	0	0
Napa	California	113	94	8	12.8%	12,419	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Arvada	Colorado	153	142	13	9.2%	12,214	12.0	5	2	5	0	0	1
Fort Mill	South Carolina	130	115	12	12.6%	12,012	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	159	144	12	8.4%	11,778	11.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Lehigh Acres	Florida	174	155	13	9.7%	11,342	17.5	6	1	6	0	0	2
Redding	California	151	136	8	10.0%	11,295	24.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Saint Louis	Missouri	250	223	40	1.2%	11,260	76.9	24	18	27	0	0	0
San Diego	California	217	185	40	0.8%	10,966	67.6	26	9	27	0	0	0
Flint	Michigan	150	129	13	7.0%	10,866	24.9	7	2	7	0	0	0
Reading	Pennsylvania	162	143	15	5.0%	10,838	29.2	10	5	11	0	0	0
Alpharetta	Georgia	152	141	14	5.7%	10,835	33.5	3	2	3	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	129	113	12	8.2%	10,766	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Elgin	Illinois	128	114	15	8.8%	10,733	11.0	3	2	6	0	0	1
Dearborn	Michigan	130	118	12	11.1%	10,584	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rock Hill	South Carolina	133	121	10	9.0%	10,472	11.0	3	2	5	0	0	0
North Las Vegas	Nevada	150	132	18	4.4%	10,305	15.9	7	2	8	0	0	0
Nashville	Tennessee	200	178	24	2.2%	10,242	29.4	22	9	24	0	0	0
Richardson	Texas	116	105	9	8.8%	10,078	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	123	114	9	10.0%	9,977	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kennewick	Washington	123	108	9	10.0%	9,881	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Longview	Texas	137	126	12	9.4%	9,845	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
San Mateo	California	131	118	10	6.8%	9,707	23.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Torrance	California	145	131	17	5.4%	9,488	14.8	5	2	5	0	0	0
Beaumont	Texas	149	134	13	6.5%	9,449	33.9	6	1	6	0	0	1
Newnan	Georgia	124	114	10	10.0%	9,340	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Spring	Texas	173	156	22	2.4%	9,090	21.4	8	4	11	0	0	0
Chesapeake	Virginia	141	129	16	3.8%	9,086	19.0	6	2	7	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	134	121	8	9.4%	8,948	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Bowling Green	Kentucky	129	113	10	7.7%	8,890	11.3	4	2	5	0	0	2
Florissant	Missouri	135	122	11	8.1%	8,733	24.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Tampa	Florida	208	189	37	1.0%	8,148	28.3	27	5	27	0	0	0
Escondido	California	125	117	14	4.5%	8,082	16.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Vancouver	Washington	174	160	18	2.3%	7,564	58.5	6	4	6	0	0	1
Visalia	California	130	117	13	5.0%	7,530	29.0	3	4	5	0	0	0
Chino	California	112	102	9	8.0%	7,519	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Rockville	Maryland	151	133	16	5.0%	7,175	35.5	3	3	3	0	0	1
Kenosha	Wisconsin	131	123	17	6.3%	7,070	46.5	4	4	5	0	0	1
Lexington	Kentucky	186	167	22	2.1%	6,822	70.0	8	5	8	0	0	0
La Puente	California	131	120	16	4.7%	5,541	16.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Falls Church	Virginia	165	148	16	4.6%	5,520	82.4	1	1	1	0	0	1
Austin	Texas	230	205	68	0.5%	5,443	65.0	27	12	27	0	0	0
Vista	California	125	116	17	4.3%	5,158	15.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Hayward	California	135	122	13	2.6%	5,017	23.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	147	130	12	4.6%	4,798	15.0	6	3	9	0	0	1
Huntington Beach	California	129	117	17	2.4%	4,798	40.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	127	117	18	2.9%	4,469	17.0	4	2	5	0	0	0
Sandy	Utah	135	121	13	4.0%	4,423	30.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Erie	Pennsylvania	161	147	18	2.4%	4,369	37.2	13	3	13	0	0	1
Van Nuys	California	133	118	21	2.0%	3,574	18.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ontario	California	127	114	19	2.0%	3,506	59.0	3	3	3	0	0	0
West Palm Beach	Florida	176	161	28	0.9%	3,494	52.8	10	6	10	0	0	1
Portland	Oregon	210	192	80	0.4%	3,470	76.6	19	7	19	0	0	0
Sterling Heights	Michigan	136	123	17	2.5%	3,336	71.3	2	2	2	0	0	0
Katy	Texas	142	128	22	1.0%	3,329	22.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	100	93	16	2.0%	2,116	18.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	101	94	17	2.0%	1,930	18.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	134	121	27	0.9%	1,534	27.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pasadena	California	136	123	27	0.9%	1,360	33.2	6	3	6	0	0	0
Irving	Texas	143	131	58	0.6%	1,352	61.0	5	3	5	0	0	0
Compton	California	129	117	26	0.9%	1,284	45.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Topeka	Kansas	174	159	41	0.7%	1,148	51.7	18	4	18	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	108	103	26	0.9%	929	26.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	111	99	24	0.9%	898	25.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Oceanside	California	125	116	77	0.3%	675	82.8	3	1	3	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	114	99	53	0.6%	607	61.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Everett	Washington	144	132	72	0.4%	599	74.2	2	2	2	0	0	0
Tempe	Arizona	139	128	86	0.3%	568	75.8	2	2	2	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	120	110	53	0.6%	554	60.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Daly City	California	128	117	74	0.4%	441	76.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	126	116	82	0.3%	302	88.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bellevue	Washington	141	132	95	0.2%	281	89.4	3	3	3	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	124	114	86	0.3%	280	90.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	140	125	99	0.2%	211	87.8	3	2	3	0	0	0
Champaign	Illinois	128	114	113	0.1%	122	98.7	2	2	2	0	0	0
Downey	California	131	117	118	0.1%	94	95.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Gaithersburg	Maryland	138	121	130	0.0%	56	99.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	136	126	125	0.0%	42	97.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	148	132	145	0.0%	10	99.5	1	1	1	0	0	0
Annapolis	Maryland	160	140	158	0.0%	1	101.4	1	1	1	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Anaheim	139	127	5	56.1%	206,637	5.6	7	1	7	1	7
Oakland	161	146	5	32.7%	134,731	7.8	14	2	15	0	13
Los Angeles	240	207	20	5.4%	131,658	21.0	59	4	62	0	2
Fontana	118	106	5	54.2%	127,292	5.7	3	2	4	0	4
Bakersfield	171	151	9	22.2%	124,432	8.8	11	1	11	0	11
San Bernardino	148	131	6	40.4%	100,893	6.9	7	1	7	0	7
Rancho Cucamonga	129	117	6	55.3%	97,706	5.5	4	1	4	1	4
Whittier	158	143	4	47.3%	92,821	6.8	6	3	10	0	9
San Jose	196	177	17	8.3%	86,689	12.1	28	3	30	0	2
Garden Grove	131	118	4	47.9%	84,115	6.4	5	1	5	0	5
Modesto	153	139	7	30.7%	81,299	8.0	7	2	8	0	8
Palmdale	134	120	5	44.8%	78,333	6.5	4	1	4	0	4
Elk Grove	137	122	5	42.9%	76,881	6.7	3	1	3	0	3
Fairfield	119	106	3	66.5%	75,886	5.0	2	1	2	1	2
Long Beach	156	140	14	15.5%	74,431	9.4	12	1	12	0	12
Lancaster	131	114	6	40.0%	73,768	7.0	3	1	3	0	3
Merced	123	112	4	70.0%	72,142	4.0	3	1	3	0	3
Vallejo	136	123	3	57.5%	71,613	5.3	4	1	4	0	4
Victorville	127	114	5	50.0%	68,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Corona	150	135	8	26.3%	67,542	8.6	5	2	6	0	5
Fullerton	138	126	4	47.3%	65,903	6.3	4	1	4	0	4
Sunnyvale	141	131	3	42.5%	64,950	7.8	4	2	4	0	3
Hemet	135	121	5	50.0%	64,393	6.0	3	2	6	0	6
Simi Valley	116	104	7	50.0%	64,356	6.0	2	1	2	0	2
Riverside	147	126	11	17.4%	64,203	16.7	7	3	8	0	6
Pomona	127	113	5	40.0%	63,194	7.0	3	1	3	0	3
Murrieta	120	109	6	45.2%	59,710	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Barbara	149	133	6	43.8%	59,566	6.9	7	2	11	0	11
Vacaville	109	98	5	56.5%	59,455	5.5	2	1	2	0	2
Concord	140	130	6	44.6%	58,124	6.3	4	1	4	0	4
Moreno Valley	128	115	7	28.3%	58,042	9.0	4	2	7	0	5
Indio	128	112	4	60.0%	57,655	5.0	2	1	2	0	2
Costa Mesa	112	105	6	50.0%	56,877	6.0	2	1	2	0	2
Livermore	112	98	3	55.2%	53,177	5.5	2	1	2	0	2
San Leandro	127	114	5	46.3%	51,488	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Fresno	183	166	16	8.5%	51,350	18.4	17	2	17	0	2
Clovis	125	113	6	40.4%	49,057	8.3	3	2	3	0	2
Hawthorne	99	88	6	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Fremont	126	115	10	20.7%	48,275	8.8	4	1	4	0	4
Tracy	149	136	4	39.6%	46,415	8.8	4	2	4	0	3
Menifee	149	134	7	41.6%	45,959	6.8	4	1	4	0	4
Antioch	115	106	5	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	2
Sacramento	204	178	19	5.5%	43,914	17.9	27	1	27	0	0
Santa Cruz	124	112	6	40.0%	41,620	7.0	4	1	4	0	4
Rialto	128	117	7	38.2%	40,678	7.5	2	2	4	0	4
Chula Vista	149	137	8	15.1%	39,510	9.2	5	1	5	0	3
Berkeley	162	149	7	30.3%	38,548	8.1	9	2	9	0	8
Pittsburg	95	88	5	40.0%	38,432	7.0	1	1	1	0	1
South Gate	99	90	6	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	1
Chico	129	117	5	33.5%	37,510	8.3	3	2	5	0	4
El Monte	113	102	6	40.0%	37,484	7.0	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Clara	129	119	8	29.4%	36,846	9.0	4	2	4	0	3
El Cajon	134	120	7	21.0%	36,201	23.3	3	3	3	0	1
Stockton	176	155	13	9.1%	34,054	10.9	12	2	14	0	1
Mission Viejo	113	107	6	34.5%	33,944	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Rosa	144	129	10	15.6%	33,720	10.2	6	1	6	0	2
Hesperia	116	103	6	30.0%	31,143	8.0	2	2	3	0	3
Burbank	132	120	7	28.4%	30,705	8.4	5	1	5	0	5
Orange	125	115	10	20.2%	29,268	9.0	5	1	5	0	5
Perris	125	110	9	24.8%	29,123	8.5	2	1	2	0	2
Salinas	144	131	8	15.4%	29,009	11.0	5	2	6	0	1
Roseville	128	114	9	20.7%	28,871	8.7	3	1	3	0	3
Madera	131	114	6	26.4%	27,209	11.7	3	1	3	0	2
Ventura	121	107	9	22.9%	26,557	14.0	3	2	3	1	1
Santa Maria	132	121	8	18.5%	26,490	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Santa Monica	122	114	6	27.3%	25,728	8.4	5	1	5	0	5
San Francisco	177	162	20	2.7%	23,739	20.3	27	1	27	0	0
West Covina	138	123	10	20.0%	21,882	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Norwalk	97	87	7	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	1
Oxnard	137	122	10	9.1%	20,087	11.8	4	2	4	0	1
Palo Alto	137	127	8	19.5%	18,819	9.0	4	1	4	0	3
Irvine	158	147	13	7.0%	18,686	12.9	9	2	10	0	1
Santa Ana	135	123	20	5.2%	18,599	16.7	6	2	6	0	0
Redwood City	142	125	9	16.1%	18,482	10.3	4	1	4	0	3
Inglewood	146	128	10	11.6%	15,570	37.6	4	2	4	0	1
Temecula	135	125	11	11.2%	14,569	10.7	3	3	5	0	3
Napa	113	94	8	12.8%	12,419	9.5	2	1	2	0	2
Redding	151	136	8	10.0%	11,295	24.5	4	2	4	0	3
San Diego	217	185	40	0.8%	10,966	67.6	26	9	27	0	0
San Mateo	131	118	10	6.8%	9,707	23.5	4	2	4	0	0
Torrance	145	131	17	5.4%	9,488	14.8	5	2	5	0	0
Escondido	125	117	14	4.5%	8,082	16.0	4	1	4	0	0
Visalia	130	117	13	5.0%	7,530	29.0	3	4	5	0	0
Chino	112	102	9	8.0%	7,519	12.5	2	1	2	0	0
La Puente	131	120	16	4.7%	5,541	16.5	2	2	2	0	0
Vista	125	116	17	4.3%	5,158	15.7	3	2	4	0	0
Hayward	135	122	13	2.6%	5,017	23.0	4	1	4	0	0
Huntington Beach	129	117	17	2.4%	4,798	40.3	4	3	4	0	0
North Hollywood	127	117	18	2.9%	4,469	17.0	4	2	5	0	0
Van Nuys	133	118	21	2.0%	3,574	18.0	4	1	4	0	0
Ontario	127	114	19	2.0%	3,506	59.0	3	3	3	0	0
Pacoima	100	93	16	2.0%	2,116	18.0	1	1	1	0	0
Sylmar	101	94	17	2.0%	1,930	18.0	1	1	1	0	0
Pasadena	136	123	27	0.9%	1,360	33.2	6	3	6	0	0
Compton	129	117	26	0.9%	1,284	45.7	3	3	3	0	0
San Marcos	108	103	26	0.9%	929	26.5	2	1	2	0	0
Oceanside	125	116	77	0.3%	675	82.8	3	1	3	0	0
Daly City	128	117	74	0.4%	441	76.0	1	1	1	0	0
Downey	131	117	118	0.1%	94	95.0	1	1	1	0	0

Brooklyn

ZIP	indeed.com	roberthalf.com	randstadusa.com	simplyhired.com	yelp.com	reliablestaffing.com
11208	13	6	4	5	9	8
11206	10	4	5	7	6	8
11239	9	4	7	5	6	8
11229	13	6	4	5	8	7
11226	9	4	6	5	7	8
11218	9	4	5	6	7	8
11216	10	6	4	5	8	7
11228	9	4	5	6	7	8
11238	9	4	5	7	6	8
11237	13	5	4	6	8	3
11217	9	3	5	7	6	8
11207	6	1	3	2	4	5
11236	9	5	4	6	7	8
11205	10	3	5	7	6	8
11219	11	5	4	7	8	10
11234	13	6	4	5	9	8
11203	14	6	5	9	7	8
11224	18	5	4	7	8	10
11225	6	2	1	3	4	5
11215	9	4	5	7	6	8
11233	9	5	4	6	7	8
11211	14	5	4	6	7	8
11220	13	2	1	4	5	7
11230	9	4	5	7	6	8
11232	16	5	4	7	8	10
11201	17	2	6	14	8	7
11212	9	6	4	5	7	8
11221	9	4	6	7	5	3
11210	9	4	6	7	5	8
11214	8	4	6	7	5	9
11213	17	4	7	6	5	8
11223	8	4	6	7	5	9
11235	9	4	7	6	5	8
11204	9	5	6	7	4	8
11222	15	5	4	10	7	2
11209	8	4	6	7	5	24
11231	14	3	6		7	8

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Indeed

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 3,999 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Indeed Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (temp agency near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Indeed Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Indeed Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Indeed Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly