Hotels Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve hotels.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 36,593 Hotels In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Hotels Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Hotels Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Hotels Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Hotels Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	161,469	36,593	4	58.7%	189,411,392	9.0	26,596	31,870	20,742	36,722	1,439	8,587	31,699
California	21,430	6,910	4	62.2%	24,338,359	6.5	1,152	1,726	1,308	1,974	85	477	1,786
Texas	26,374	7,521	4	61.9%	17,259,246	8.6	1,317	1,874	1,491	2,122	92	435	1,888
Florida	9,923	3,390	5	57.5%	11,837,579	6.1	444	973	514	1,124	13	111	1,048
New York	24,363	7,105	4	59.8%	11,737,225	7.1	1,478	1,743	1,672	1,995	71	499	1,753
Illinois	23,837	6,815	3	63.7%	8,173,163	7.1	1,233	1,368	1,434	1,604	91	467	1,423
Pennsylvania	25,668	7,055	3	58.7%	7,507,327	12.2	1,520	1,697	1,713	1,946	75	497	1,613
Ohio	19,156	5,604	3	62.4%	7,266,320	6.3	967	1,179	1,113	1,376	73	387	1,260
Georgia	12,787	3,811	4	62.5%	6,432,558	6.8	566	718	666	852	28	180	769
Michigan	17,748	5,459	3	59.3%	5,902,844	7.8	821	964	957	1,118	39	288	974
New Jersey	10,692	3,253	3	64.6%	5,735,136	7.8	524	580	580	655	42	225	595
North Carolina	14,313	4,176	4	53.4%	5,422,935	7.5	674	793	785	912	31	245	782
Virginia	15,140	4,300	4	51.9%	4,363,246	9.0	705	873	799	1,023	42	250	868
Washington	10,424	2,989	5	58.1%	4,226,770	8.1	439	575	489	648	23	130	597
Indiana	15,213	4,611	3	62.4%	4,142,416	8.2	642	753	760	882	59	237	777
Massachusetts	9,971	2,909	3	59.0%	4,031,396	6.4	460	533	509	602	39	174	524
Arizona	6,279	1,997	5	57.7%	4,007,518	9.0	239	388	272	437	3	71	373
Maryland	9,069	2,583	3	64.7%	3,882,575	7.0	387	458	454	538	45	191	463
Tennessee	11,479	3,414	4	57.4%	3,814,791	7.2	506	614	584	705	23	195	642
Colorado	10,278	3,235	4	59.8%	3,308,555	7.6	374	507	427	569	11	104	480
Wisconsin	15,176	4,428	3	56.9%	3,289,126	7.1	691	766	790	872	30	203	756
Minnesota	17,191	5,094	4	55.0%	3,041,036	8.1	762	863	867	1,001	31	213	883
Missouri	19,408	5,661	4	48.8%	2,974,608	8.3	873	1,003	1,007	1,152	37	264	948
Alabama	11,863	3,240	4	57.4%	2,793,757	9.1	506	621	585	721	19	150	615
Louisiana	10,105	2,829	4	57.6%	2,684,648	9.2	418	497	478	569	29	147	496
South Carolina	8,796	2,690	4	50.9%	2,523,293	7.3	344	419	392	479	19	122	420
Oklahoma	13,574	3,812	4	61.2%	2,397,862	7.6	547	636	639	756	35	184	676
Oregon	9,396	2,994	5	54.5%	2,224,454	8.8	346	405	396	459	9	82	396
Kentucky	15,742	4,351	5	44.8%	1,990,352	15.9	637	697	734	801	27	172	626
Connecticut	5,803	1,730	4	54.5%	1,951,539	6.5	234	279	265	330	15	63	290
Nevada	3,115	900	3	66.3%	1,937,959	9.6	87	163	96	179	2	51	158
Utah	6,655	2,016	4	61.1%	1,859,760	7.4	242	280	288	334	5	69	296
Arkansas	13,900	4,128	3	61.3%	1,833,719	11.7	526	560	606	649	23	162	553
Iowa	19,509	5,472	3	54.8%	1,716,297	7.1	885	928	1,031	1,078	45	257	923
Mississippi	9,980	2,955	4	54.4%	1,625,887	14.4	356	390	410	456	17	84	366
Kansas	14,795	4,296	4	55.3%	1,607,275	9.1	602	678	700	779	27	164	661
Hawaii	1,735	571	3	72.9%	1,037,082	7.9	79	90	80	91	11	34	84
West Virginia	15,944	4,421	3	53.6%	979,469	18.0	620	640	711	740	23	159	553
Idaho	7,392	2,234	5	54.7%	923,676	9.0	245	267	282	308	18	74	263
New Mexico	8,532	2,384	5	43.8%	914,398	11.9	315	349	355	394	11	71	316
Nebraska	13,802	4,112	5	46.2%	880,536	9.8	512	569	600	657	24	118	527
Maine	10,369	3,369	3	54.2%	722,545	8.3	415	419	478	492	27	130	416
New Hampshire	6,738	2,142	4	52.0%	699,368	7.4	235	245	268	291	12	71	252
Rhode Island	2,224	724	3	56.9%	600,746	6.6	64	77	72	86	5	23	76
Montana	9,815	2,851	5	52.4%	546,004	15.6	323	336	368	381	8	57	303
Delaware	1,961	669	5	50.3%	477,696	6.0	52	66	63	86	0	14	79
South Dakota	10,350	2,998	4	49.6%	428,255	10.6	350	361	405	418	15	92	324
North Dakota	10,585	2,932	3	54.6%	410,069	15.1	343	356	391	405	16	79	310
Vermont	6,241	1,985	3	55.3%	345,512	7.2	247	251	287	297	10	68	253
Alaska	4,726	1,404	5	41.9%	308,965	44.0	134	151	148	165	0	19	116
Wyoming	5,292	1,538	5	48.6%	282,869	12.6	157	164	179	186	4	28	149

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	106	67	4	70.0%	2,231,146	4.0	96	1	96	0	0	96
Los Angeles	California	101	64	4	70.0%	1,719,866	4.0	62	1	62	0	0	62
Chicago	Illinois	103	84	5	60.2%	1,627,248	5.0	56	1	56	0	1	56
Miami	Florida	108	83	4	70.0%	1,315,411	4.0	55	1	55	0	0	55
Brooklyn	New York	111	58	6	50.0%	1,300,374	6.0	37	1	37	0	0	37
Las Vegas	Nevada	110	79	3	77.4%	1,196,739	3.3	43	1	43	0	31	43
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	105	61	4	70.0%	1,103,075	4.0	47	1	47	0	0	47
San Diego	California	102	79	3	80.0%	1,077,754	3.0	36	1	36	0	36	36
San Antonio	Texas	103	57	5	60.0%	1,067,363	5.0	59	1	59	0	0	59
New York City	New York	105	87	5	60.0%	973,088	5.0	47	1	47	0	0	47
Phoenix	Arizona	119	74	4	63.1%	915,863	4.7	42	1	42	0	0	42
Bronx	New York	96	34	5	60.0%	864,873	5.0	25	1	25	0	0	25
Dallas	Texas	104	67	5	60.0%	835,444	5.0	48	1	48	0	0	48
Orlando	Florida	103	74	4	70.0%	697,186	4.0	32	1	32	0	0	32
Atlanta	Georgia	109	58	4	70.0%	692,009	4.0	39	1	39	0	0	39
Indianapolis	Indiana	107	53	4	70.0%	666,356	4.0	37	1	37	0	0	37
Austin	Texas	114	71	5	60.4%	657,073	5.0	44	1	44	0	1	44
Denver	Colorado	108	66	5	60.0%	652,279	5.0	38	1	38	0	0	38
San Jose	California	103	53	5	60.0%	630,089	5.0	28	2	30	0	0	28
San Francisco	California	103	78	4	70.0%	609,139	4.0	28	1	28	0	1	28
Columbus	Ohio	107	56	4	70.0%	592,650	4.0	30	1	30	0	0	30
Seattle	Washington	103	70	5	60.0%	573,072	5.0	35	1	35	0	0	35
Portland	Oregon	105	69	5	60.0%	552,144	5.0	33	1	33	0	0	33
Minneapolis	Minnesota	113	71	6	50.0%	544,417	6.0	51	1	51	0	0	51
Jacksonville	Florida	111	51	5	60.0%	520,306	5.0	31	1	31	0	0	31
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	103	54	5	60.0%	487,073	5.0	29	1	29	0	0	29
Sacramento	California	107	58	5	60.5%	486,943	5.0	28	1	28	0	0	28
Cincinnati	Ohio	104	53	5	60.5%	486,210	5.0	45	1	45	0	0	45
Tampa	Florida	108	60	5	60.0%	475,634	5.0	27	1	27	0	0	27
El Paso	Texas	107	49	5	60.0%	473,453	5.0	24	1	24	0	0	24
Fort Worth	Texas	106	44	6	50.0%	455,976	6.0	32	1	32	0	0	32
Tucson	Arizona	100	59	6	50.0%	452,393	6.0	32	1	32	0	0	32
Cleveland	Ohio	109	51	5	60.0%	450,181	5.0	29	1	29	0	0	29
Baltimore	Maryland	122	57	4	69.5%	438,499	4.0	22	1	22	0	0	22
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	107	71	6	50.9%	423,001	6.0	27	1	27	0	0	27
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	109	48	5	60.0%	409,565	5.0	43	1	43	0	0	43
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	114	63	5	60.0%	409,557	5.0	39	1	39	0	0	39
Colorado Springs	Colorado	114	67	4	70.0%	408,452	4.0	30	1	30	0	0	30
Saint Paul	Minnesota	102	57	6	50.0%	399,852	6.0	30	2	60	0	0	60
Detroit	Michigan	106	57	5	60.0%	384,278	5.0	25	1	25	0	0	25
Nashville	Tennessee	103	65	3	80.0%	366,706	3.0	22	1	22	0	22	22
Fresno	California	100	44	5	60.0%	361,480	5.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Memphis	Tennessee	105	55	6	50.5%	350,921	5.9	26	1	26	0	0	26
Aurora	Colorado	104	45	2	79.3%	345,446	2.8	11	2	14	0	8	11
Buffalo	New York	107	52	5	60.0%	337,668	5.0	28	1	28	0	0	28
Bakersfield	California	94	38	5	60.0%	335,548	5.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Omaha	Nebraska	102	44	5	60.0%	331,441	5.0	31	1	31	0	0	31
Raleigh	North Carolina	123	58	5	60.0%	328,003	5.0	15	1	15	0	0	15
Mesa	Arizona	97	47	5	60.0%	320,731	5.0	13	1	13	0	0	13
Virginia Beach	Virginia	103	55	4	70.0%	315,043	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Birmingham	Alabama	104	47	5	60.0%	300,106	5.0	30	1	30	0	0	30
Salt Lake City	Utah	102	60	5	60.0%	292,052	5.0	19	1	19	0	0	19
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	80	4	70.0%	291,232	4.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Long Beach	California	100	58	5	60.0%	287,381	5.0	12	2	24	0	0	24
Dayton	Ohio	104	44	5	60.0%	286,904	5.0	27	1	27	0	0	27
Santa Ana	California	100	37	3	80.0%	285,663	3.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Staten Island	New York	111	42	5	60.0%	284,461	5.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Saint Louis	Missouri	109	55	7	30.0%	275,176	8.0	45	1	45	0	0	45
Spring	Texas	115	69	4	70.0%	266,675	4.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Riverside	California	149	74	4	70.0%	259,008	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tulsa	Oklahoma	130	49	5	60.1%	253,764	5.0	28	2	49	0	0	49
Saint Petersburg	Florida	99	62	3	70.0%	249,547	4.0	16	1	16	0	0	16
Rochester	New York	110	50	6	50.0%	235,730	6.0	24	1	24	0	0	24
Littleton	Colorado	100	40	4	70.0%	227,794	4.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	101	48	5	60.0%	227,383	5.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Marietta	Georgia	94	43	4	70.0%	225,840	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
West Palm Beach	Florida	107	53	5	60.0%	222,364	5.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Pompano Beach	Florida	100	48	5	60.0%	222,340	5.0	10	2	20	0	0	20
Anaheim	California	102	67	5	60.0%	221,176	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Grand Rapids	Michigan	100	48	5	60.0%	220,690	5.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Hialeah	Florida	107	40	5	60.0%	220,196	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Wichita	Kansas	105	47	5	52.4%	218,870	9.3	26	2	26	0	0	20
Spokane	Washington	101	49	5	60.0%	215,747	5.0	14	1	14	0	0	14
Scottsdale	Arizona	103	73	4	70.0%	208,734	4.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Katy	Texas	96	37	5	60.0%	206,246	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Tacoma	Washington	107	40	5	60.0%	200,020	5.0	20	1	20	0	0	20
Arlington	Texas	104	49	6	50.0%	198,483	6.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Greensboro	North Carolina	96	40	5	60.0%	196,547	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Corpus Christi	Texas	92	40	5	60.0%	195,455	5.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Plano	Texas	99	32	5	63.0%	192,311	4.7	7	2	12	0	0	12
New Orleans	Louisiana	101	79	7	44.9%	192,128	6.5	19	1	19	0	0	19
Fort Wayne	Indiana	98	44	5	60.0%	190,977	5.0	16	1	16	0	0	16
Winston Salem	North Carolina	99	38	4	70.0%	184,891	4.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Toledo	Ohio	96	46	5	60.0%	184,547	5.0	15	2	30	0	0	30
Silver Spring	Maryland	99	40	5	60.0%	181,826	5.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Henderson	Nevada	105	44	5	60.0%	181,613	5.0	8	2	16	0	0	16
Lawrenceville	Georgia	96	40	4	70.0%	179,278	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Naples	Florida	107	61	5	56.7%	177,534	5.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Whittier	California	114	48	2	90.0%	176,545	2.0	6	2	11	0	11	11
Oakland	California	102	46	7	42.7%	175,771	6.7	14	2	19	0	0	19
San Bernardino	California	97	41	4	70.0%	174,661	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Kissimmee	Florida	99	54	5	60.0%	173,443	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tallahassee	Florida	95	39	5	60.0%	172,846	5.0	10	2	20	0	0	20
Flushing	New York	113	48	3	80.0%	172,054	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Corona	California	104	42	4	66.0%	169,731	4.4	5	3	10	0	0	5
Irving	Texas	106	40	4	70.0%	168,390	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Newark	New Jersey	104	49	5	60.0%	168,356	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Garland	Texas	166	55	4	70.0%	166,550	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lubbock	Texas	99	46	5	60.0%	165,990	5.0	14	1	14	0	0	14
Mobile	Alabama	113	56	5	60.2%	163,350	4.9	18	1	18	0	0	18
Jamaica	New York	99	72	4	66.7%	162,796	4.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Akron	Ohio	101	37	5	60.0%	162,191	5.0	17	2	34	0	0	34
Pensacola	Florida	105	55	5	60.0%	160,931	5.0	13	2	26	0	0	26
Lexington	Kentucky	98	46	6	50.0%	159,911	6.0	15	1	15	0	0	15
Hyattsville	Maryland	93	41	1	100.0%	157,523	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Jersey City	New Jersey	99	41	5	60.0%	156,974	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Chula Vista	California	95	35	5	59.4%	154,863	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Boise	Idaho	103	49	5	60.0%	153,641	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Little Rock	Arkansas	106	52	4	70.0%	152,646	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Bradenton	Florida	97	45	5	60.0%	151,868	5.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Reno	Nevada	105	56	6	50.0%	148,398	6.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Norfolk	Virginia	106	41	5	60.0%	147,355	5.0	14	2	28	0	0	28
Fayetteville	North Carolina	94	42	5	60.0%	146,408	5.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Savannah	Georgia	122	70	5	60.0%	144,757	5.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Lake Worth	Florida	102	41	4	70.0%	144,551	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gilbert	Arizona	97	39	5	60.0%	143,160	5.0	6	2	12	0	0	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	100	45	5	60.0%	142,736	5.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	82	30	4	70.0%	142,188	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Brownsville	Texas	96	37	4	70.0%	140,925	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mission	Texas	130	67	3	76.6%	138,670	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Springfield	Missouri	170	68	5	60.0%	138,225	5.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Boca Raton	Florida	108	50	5	62.1%	138,003	4.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Lakeland	Florida	104	42	6	53.3%	137,565	5.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Amarillo	Texas	95	42	5	60.0%	137,384	5.0	14	1	14	0	0	14
Vancouver	Washington	106	67	8	41.9%	136,499	6.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Laredo	Texas	101	40	6	50.0%	135,449	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Warren	Michigan	118	45	1	100.0%	135,192	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Ocala	Florida	97	36	5	60.0%	135,040	5.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Des Moines	Iowa	95	44	5	60.0%	133,990	5.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Shreveport	Louisiana	101	46	5	60.0%	133,901	5.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Tempe	Arizona	99	45	4	70.0%	132,997	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	91	38	4	70.0%	132,434	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oxnard	California	105	41	5	60.0%	132,230	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Modesto	California	101	45	6	50.0%	132,229	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Albuquerque	New Mexico	105	55	7	20.0%	131,141	9.0	17	1	17	0	0	17
Santa Rosa	California	110	45	5	60.0%	129,635	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Trenton	New Jersey	107	34	5	61.9%	128,738	4.9	11	2	21	0	0	21
Kent	Washington	162	55	3	80.0%	128,401	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Charleston	South Carolina	100	59	4	65.1%	128,123	4.6	10	1	10	0	0	10
Woodbridge	Virginia	113	43	5	60.0%	126,992	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Decatur	Georgia	121	40	4	70.0%	126,578	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cape Coral	Florida	97	35	4	70.0%	126,568	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Montgomery	Alabama	123	53	5	60.0%	125,900	5.0	13	1	13	0	0	13
Gainesville	Florida	96	49	5	60.0%	125,653	5.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Compton	California	91	32	2	90.0%	124,988	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	107	55	5	60.0%	124,736	5.0	15	1	15	0	0	15
Ontario	California	117	63	4	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Moreno Valley	California	108	36	5	60.0%	123,272	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	California	96	41	4	70.0%	123,033	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Clarksville	Tennessee	87	34	4	70.0%	122,988	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Augusta	Georgia	108	44	5	60.0%	122,658	5.0	8	2	16	0	0	16
North Hollywood	California	92	45	3	80.0%	122,503	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Anchorage	Alaska	106	55	6	50.0%	122,062	6.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Glendale	Arizona	100	37	5	40.0%	121,898	7.0	9	3	18	0	0	18
Carrollton	Texas	85	39	2	90.0%	121,330	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Beaverton	Oregon	97	36	5	60.0%	120,982	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Ogden	Utah	94	39	5	60.0%	120,858	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Oceanside	California	109	50	5	60.0%	120,155	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cypress	Texas	129	77	4	70.0%	119,421	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Huntsville	Alabama	89	38	5	60.0%	117,735	5.0	11	2	22	0	0	22
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	90	34	5	63.1%	117,616	4.8	5	2	9	0	0	9
Fontana	California	104	46	6	50.0%	117,364	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	3
Richmond	Virginia	110	45	8	30.0%	117,316	8.0	15	1	15	0	0	15
Ann Arbor	Michigan	93	45	4	70.0%	116,705	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Durham	North Carolina	107	43	7	40.0%	116,046	7.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Orange	California	103	60	3	80.0%	115,994	3.0	5	2	8	0	5	8
Hayward	California	106	37	5	60.0%	115,220	5.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Grand Prairie	Texas	88	36	5	60.0%	114,328	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Mckinney	Texas	99	41	5	60.0%	113,395	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	California	92	34	5	60.0%	112,997	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Greenville	South Carolina	101	45	6	51.3%	112,682	5.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Stockton	California	99	43	7	30.0%	112,142	8.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Midland	Texas	93	32	4	70.0%	111,992	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Evansville	Indiana	93	44	5	60.0%	110,713	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Pomona	California	93	36	4	70.0%	110,590	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	100	39	5	60.0%	110,108	5.0	13	1	13	0	0	13
Overland Park	Kansas	92	38	5	60.0%	110,071	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Green Bay	Wisconsin	95	44	5	60.0%	109,999	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Olympia	Washington	101	39	5	60.0%	109,709	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	95	49	5	60.0%	109,001	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Melbourne	Florida	102	48	4	70.0%	108,980	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Florissant	Missouri	101	44	1	100.0%	108,289	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Elk Grove	California	90	27	5	60.0%	107,591	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Sunnyvale	California	103	57	4	70.0%	106,942	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Van Nuys	California	94	43	5	60.0%	106,687	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	California	92	38	5	60.0%	106,076	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Newport News	Virginia	92	28	5	60.0%	106,011	5.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Rancho Cucamonga	California	99	35	5	60.0%	105,959	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palmdale	California	82	37	5	60.0%	104,962	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boynton Beach	Florida	96	37	5	60.0%	104,452	5.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Reading	Pennsylvania	103	46	6	48.4%	104,312	6.2	10	2	20	0	0	20
El Cajon	California	101	31	5	60.0%	103,478	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
North Las Vegas	Nevada	106	43	7	44.1%	103,198	6.7	7	2	8	0	0	8
Edmond	Oklahoma	97	39	5	60.0%	103,024	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Paterson	New Jersey	109	35	4	70.0%	102,060	4.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Allentown	Pennsylvania	93	44	5	60.0%	101,961	5.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Fort Myers	Florida	111	62	6	40.4%	101,661	6.9	11	1	11	0	0	11
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	95	36	5	60.0%	101,627	5.0	9	2	18	0	0	18
Eugene	Oregon	105	49	6	50.0%	101,495	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Sugar Land	Texas	92	36	5	60.0%	101,357	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Gaithersburg	Maryland	90	40	4	70.0%	101,214	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Olathe	Kansas	85	38	4	70.0%	101,061	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Racine	Wisconsin	102	42	3	80.0%	100,858	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Round Rock	Texas	87	38	5	60.0%	100,502	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Clara	California	94	37	3	80.0%	100,414	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	4
Sarasota	Florida	105	54	6	40.0%	100,112	7.0	13	1	13	0	0	13
Everett	Washington	100	41	5	60.0%	100,003	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Humble	Texas	102	44	5	60.0%	99,917	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Metairie	Louisiana	90	37	4	70.0%	99,576	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Naperville	Illinois	92	36	5	60.0%	99,484	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Peoria	Arizona	106	48	5	57.7%	99,304	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Jordan	Utah	96	39	3	80.0%	98,856	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	93	38	5	60.0%	98,471	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Macon	Georgia	94	36	5	60.0%	98,220	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Fairfax	Virginia	99	36	5	60.0%	98,185	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Topeka	Kansas	102	42	5	60.0%	98,065	5.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Summerville	South Carolina	82	30	4	70.0%	97,259	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Schenectady	New York	104	36	5	60.0%	97,239	5.0	8	2	16	0	0	16
Pearland	Texas	81	37	4	70.0%	96,319	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lafayette	Louisiana	116	58	5	60.0%	96,308	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Conroe	Texas	88	37	5	60.0%	96,194	5.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Ridgewood	New York	92	31	2	90.0%	96,045	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Vista	California	98	65	3	80.0%	95,894	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Victorville	California	89	37	4	70.0%	95,417	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pacoima	California	95	27	2	90.0%	95,219	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
South Gate	California	93	37	1	100.0%	95,103	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Waco	Texas	103	36	5	60.0%	94,966	5.0	9	2	18	0	0	18
Denton	Texas	91	39	5	60.0%	94,894	5.0	6	2	11	0	0	11
La Puente	California	95	45	3	80.0%	94,358	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Youngstown	Ohio	101	34	5	60.0%	94,259	5.0	12	2	24	0	0	24
Perris	California	103	39	3	80.0%	93,912	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Tyler	Texas	107	38	5	60.0%	93,688	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Arvada	Colorado	108	46	4	70.0%	93,394	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Edinburg	Texas	92	40	5	60.0%	93,342	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Fremont	California	101	51	7	40.0%	93,262	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	103	39	5	60.0%	92,911	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Worcester	Massachusetts	103	31	6	50.0%	92,806	6.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Sterling Heights	Michigan	87	32	4	70.0%	92,729	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clearwater	Florida	102	61	6	50.4%	92,461	5.9	9	2	17	0	0	17
Saint Augustine	Florida	104	65	4	70.0%	91,736	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	95	38	4	70.0%	91,349	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fairfield	California	89	44	3	80.0%	91,263	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Visalia	California	92	33	5	60.0%	91,208	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	97	38	6	50.0%	91,165	6.0	9	2	18	0	0	18
Manassas	Virginia	97	40	5	60.0%	91,155	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Abilene	Texas	93	37	4	70.0%	91,109	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Albany	New York	110	50	5	60.0%	90,742	5.0	11	2	22	0	0	22
Yonkers	New York	88	38	6	50.0%	90,266	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Killeen	Texas	95	42	5	60.0%	90,120	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Simi Valley	California	94	36	4	70.0%	90,098	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bothell	Washington	88	37	4	70.0%	89,795	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Riverview	Florida	99	60	3	80.0%	89,066	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
San Leandro	California	107	41	3	80.0%	88,950	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Yuma	Arizona	93	42	5	60.0%	88,559	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	139	66	3	80.0%	88,351	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
South Bend	Indiana	98	38	5	60.0%	88,027	5.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Bridgeport	Connecticut	94	35	5	60.0%	87,850	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
West Chester	Pennsylvania	99	34	3	80.0%	86,957	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Sylmar	California	85	38	2	90.0%	86,838	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Puyallup	Washington	83	37	5	60.0%	85,690	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
San Mateo	California	93	38	5	60.0%	85,430	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Ballwin	Missouri	98	37	2	90.0%	85,202	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Mcallen	Texas	93	37	5	60.0%	84,953	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Lynn	Massachusetts	118	40	2	90.0%	84,184	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Roseville	California	92	34	5	60.0%	83,876	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Broomfield	Colorado	88	36	3	80.0%	83,800	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	90	37	5	60.0%	83,668	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Athens	Georgia	108	58	4	67.0%	83,614	3.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Parker	Colorado	100	45	3	83.4%	83,586	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Pasadena	California	105	47	6	53.0%	83,538	5.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lewisville	Texas	83	37	4	70.0%	83,075	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baytown	Texas	94	44	4	70.0%	82,455	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	100	53	5	60.0%	82,372	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bell Gardens	California	96	35	3	80.0%	81,946	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Keller	Texas	102	40	4	70.0%	81,381	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hamilton	Ohio	124	55	5	59.1%	81,087	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lakewood	New Jersey	99	44	3	80.0%	80,610	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Inglewood	California	93	37	5	60.0%	80,280	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Clinton Township	Michigan	95	41	3	80.0%	80,237	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Bloomington	Indiana	104	39	5	60.0%	80,144	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Daly City	California	101	43	4	70.0%	80,081	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	93	36	4	70.0%	79,846	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pueblo	Colorado	102	47	6	50.0%	79,066	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Laurel	Maryland	139	70	4	70.0%	78,730	4.0	4	5	8	0	0	5
Ashburn	Virginia	95	37	4	70.0%	78,615	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Longmont	Colorado	92	32	5	60.0%	78,459	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saginaw	Michigan	103	42	5	60.0%	78,182	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Apopka	Florida	95	44	3	80.0%	78,123	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Clermont	Florida	128	48	3	77.8%	78,030	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Temecula	California	102	44	5	60.0%	77,948	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	95	41	7	40.0%	77,888	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Flint	Michigan	91	33	6	50.0%	77,734	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Cary	North Carolina	93	41	6	50.0%	77,666	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Madison	Wisconsin	111	57	8	26.3%	77,524	10.3	14	1	14	0	0	11
Menifee	California	108	50	4	70.0%	77,371	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Joliet	Illinois	95	34	5	60.0%	77,327	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Knoxville	Tennessee	101	52	8	20.0%	77,306	9.0	17	1	17	0	0	17
Hemet	California	90	39	5	60.0%	77,272	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Stamford	Connecticut	96	39	5	60.0%	77,248	5.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Douglasville	Georgia	80	34	4	70.0%	77,174	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	91	37	5	60.0%	76,986	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
West Covina	California	89	35	4	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	103	46	5	60.0%	76,276	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Westerville	Ohio	98	42	3	80.0%	76,166	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Cumming	Georgia	92	29	6	46.9%	76,014	6.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Boston	Massachusetts	103	77	6	49.8%	75,582	6.1	14	1	14	0	0	14
Spring Hill	Florida	98	37	5	60.0%	75,260	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Canton	Ohio	102	41	6	51.2%	75,234	5.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Elmhurst	New York	89	38	3	80.0%	75,174	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Saint Charles	Missouri	101	48	5	53.6%	74,997	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
El Monte	California	110	52	3	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Ypsilanti	Michigan	90	36	4	70.0%	74,829	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Las Cruces	New Mexico	96	35	6	50.0%	74,497	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Norman	Oklahoma	101	43	5	60.0%	74,451	5.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Missouri City	Texas	105	47	4	70.0%	74,266	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
College Station	Texas	95	42	5	60.0%	73,829	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Toms River	New Jersey	90	31	5	60.0%	73,716	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	87	32	5	60.0%	73,584	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elgin	Illinois	91	31	5	60.0%	73,327	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	99	84	6	50.0%	72,798	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Beaumont	Texas	131	52	6	50.0%	72,750	6.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
New Port Richey	Florida	119	44	5	60.0%	72,498	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Englewood	Colorado	93	43	4	65.0%	72,490	4.5	4	2	7	0	0	7
Rockville	Maryland	107	42	6	50.0%	72,378	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Falls Church	Virginia	101	35	5	60.0%	72,220	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
New Braunfels	Texas	90	42	4	70.0%	71,954	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Valley City	Utah	95	36	5	54.1%	71,825	5.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Sparks	Nevada	103	38	5	60.0%	71,560	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bowie	Maryland	103	36	4	70.0%	71,515	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	91	28	4	70.0%	71,023	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orem	Utah	84	39	4	70.0%	70,223	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Provo	Utah	93	42	5	60.0%	69,914	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	86	38	5	60.0%	69,816	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salem	Oregon	104	48	7	26.2%	69,804	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	6
Acworth	Georgia	78	34	4	70.0%	69,778	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Nampa	Idaho	94	41	5	60.0%	69,543	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Cambridge	Massachusetts	98	49	5	60.0%	69,475	5.0	5	2	8	0	0	5
Bowling Green	Kentucky	89	46	5	60.0%	69,309	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hartford	Connecticut	107	39	5	56.0%	69,048	5.3	6	2	12	0	0	12
Mission Viejo	California	90	38	4	70.0%	68,851	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Richardson	Texas	99	34	5	60.0%	68,759	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Hampton	Virginia	132	52	6	50.5%	68,735	5.8	6	2	12	0	0	12
Redwood City	California	92	36	5	60.0%	68,678	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Costa Mesa	California	90	44	5	60.0%	68,252	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Carlsbad	California	101	51	5	60.0%	68,202	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redding	California	95	38	5	60.0%	67,820	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Surprise	Arizona	105	35	6	50.0%	67,780	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Midlothian	Virginia	104	35	4	70.0%	67,745	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Downey	California	90	36	5	60.0%	67,741	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Lithonia	Georgia	84	43	4	70.0%	67,733	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	93	41	5	60.0%	67,728	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Chico	California	98	45	5	60.0%	67,209	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lowell	Massachusetts	169	63	5	60.0%	66,805	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Angelo	Texas	95	37	5	60.0%	66,460	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Antioch	California	99	38	5	60.0%	66,433	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Fargo	North Dakota	100	43	6	54.2%	66,410	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	California	92	32	6	50.0%	66,122	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Asheville	North Carolina	98	48	6	50.0%	66,048	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Wilmington	Delaware	112	53	6	30.0%	65,841	8.0	10	2	20	0	0	20
Lansing	Michigan	108	41	7	40.0%	65,739	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Boulder	Colorado	106	46	6	50.0%	65,631	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Idaho Falls	Idaho	94	47	5	60.0%	65,413	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lake Charles	Louisiana	88	38	6	50.0%	65,353	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Haven	Connecticut	102	44	6	50.0%	65,109	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lynnwood	Washington	79	38	5	60.0%	65,033	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Muncie	Indiana	99	33	4	70.0%	64,932	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Yakima	Washington	92	42	6	50.0%	64,927	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Burbank	California	97	45	5	60.0%	64,810	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Muskegon	Michigan	92	37	6	50.0%	64,588	6.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Gastonia	North Carolina	90	37	5	60.0%	64,223	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Winter Haven	Florida	90	40	5	60.0%	64,127	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Franklin	Tennessee	96	51	5	60.0%	63,884	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	81	37	5	64.4%	63,809	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Bellingham	Washington	95	44	6	50.0%	63,247	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Panama City	Florida	99	61	5	50.0%	63,183	6.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Vacaville	California	92	34	5	60.0%	63,178	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Longview	Texas	88	38	5	60.0%	63,167	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Santa Cruz	California	96	61	5	60.0%	62,429	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hesperia	California	89	29	5	60.0%	62,287	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	California	94	31	5	60.0%	61,836	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Independence	Missouri	106	49	6	49.7%	61,674	6.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Lynchburg	Virginia	88	37	5	60.0%	61,419	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lees Summit	Missouri	99	35	5	60.0%	61,251	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Louisville	Kentucky	107	55	11	8.0%	61,221	12.0	32	1	32	0	0	1
High Point	North Carolina	96	46	6	50.0%	61,154	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Appleton	Wisconsin	98	42	5	50.0%	60,851	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Federal Way	Washington	92	31	5	60.0%	60,086	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	California	99	57	7	30.0%	59,972	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roswell	Georgia	93	28	3	60.0%	59,862	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	97	42	5	60.0%	59,654	5.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Buford	Georgia	93	43	5	60.0%	59,462	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Homestead	Florida	109	46	7	31.7%	59,434	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Wichita Falls	Texas	90	39	5	60.0%	59,305	5.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Kennewick	Washington	93	39	5	60.0%	59,286	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anderson	South Carolina	137	47	5	60.0%	59,045	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Hagerstown	Maryland	85	36	5	60.0%	58,762	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Duluth	Minnesota	116	61	6	50.0%	58,571	6.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Mesquite	Texas	93	37	5	40.0%	58,525	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	96	40	5	60.0%	58,439	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Coral Springs	Florida	90	41	5	60.0%	58,343	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	93	39	5	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	98	47	5	60.0%	58,009	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ventura	California	98	45	6	50.0%	57,980	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
O Fallon	Missouri	88	32	5	60.0%	57,876	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Miami Beach	Florida	98	84	6	50.0%	57,842	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Jackson	Mississippi	117	79	7	33.9%	57,813	7.8	11	2	11	0	0	11
Livermore	California	89	36	5	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Indio	California	140	64	5	60.0%	57,655	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	California	99	60	5	60.0%	57,649	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vero Beach	Florida	99	48	6	50.0%	57,607	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Waukesha	Wisconsin	91	38	5	60.0%	57,477	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Brockton	Massachusetts	89	35	5	60.0%	57,256	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Dearborn	Michigan	94	31	5	60.0%	57,053	5.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Fort Mill	South Carolina	92	37	5	60.0%	57,008	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Terre Haute	Indiana	97	36	5	60.0%	56,984	5.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Valdosta	Georgia	86	43	5	60.0%	56,971	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Daytona Beach	Florida	99	59	5	55.2%	56,937	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Milton	Florida	108	37	5	60.0%	56,845	5.0	3	3	6	0	0	5
Champaign	Illinois	87	36	5	60.0%	56,740	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livonia	Michigan	91	36	5	60.0%	56,740	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Chino	California	105	41	5	60.0%	56,684	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	California	100	69	5	60.0%	56,646	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Deltona	Florida	93	45	5	60.0%	56,333	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Herndon	Virginia	90	40	5	60.0%	56,075	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Newnan	Georgia	97	40	5	60.0%	56,037	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Medford	Oregon	93	47	5	60.0%	55,951	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fullerton	California	100	44	5	40.0%	55,710	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Allen	Texas	102	40	6	50.0%	55,636	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Frisco	Texas	93	35	7	31.9%	55,019	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	94	40	5	57.7%	54,955	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	106	35	6	50.0%	54,319	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Largo	Florida	114	52	6	50.0%	53,810	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Johnson City	Tennessee	91	34	5	56.2%	53,669	5.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	103	34	6	54.2%	53,129	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	California	95	35	5	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Meridian	Idaho	94	42	5	50.0%	52,111	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Kansas City	Missouri	111	54	11	9.0%	51,453	11.0	49	1	49	0	0	0
Manchester	New Hampshire	101	54	5	43.7%	50,739	6.6	5	2	10	0	0	10
Lawrence	Kansas	102	46	6	50.0%	50,527	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Vallejo	California	92	38	7	40.0%	49,786	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Santa Fe	New Mexico	99	63	6	38.7%	49,601	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Odessa	Texas	100	46	7	30.9%	49,502	7.8	6	2	9	0	0	9
Plainfield	Illinois	88	38	4	50.0%	49,279	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Charlottesville	Virginia	104	54	7	40.0%	49,192	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bend	Oregon	102	53	7	40.0%	48,903	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukegan	Illinois	95	37	6	50.0%	48,764	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Missoula	Montana	98	41	6	50.0%	48,642	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rapid City	South Dakota	95	43	6	50.0%	48,383	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Pierce	Florida	92	40	6	50.0%	47,856	6.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
New Bedford	Massachusetts	97	35	6	50.0%	47,407	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	101	33	6	50.0%	47,061	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	96	46	6	50.0%	46,937	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	2
Grand Junction	Colorado	98	43	6	44.5%	46,915	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Tracy	California	97	33	7	40.0%	46,858	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Santa Barbara	California	103	65	7	34.5%	46,830	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lehigh Acres	Florida	108	41	7	40.0%	46,756	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Providence	Rhode Island	105	55	7	22.0%	45,004	8.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Spartanburg	South Carolina	96	41	7	40.0%	44,783	7.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Palm Bay	Florida	101	48	6	40.0%	44,516	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bellevue	Washington	100	51	7	30.0%	43,884	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Madera	California	96	48	7	42.4%	43,606	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	82	37	6	40.0%	41,148	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	97	42	6	40.0%	40,192	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Springdale	Arkansas	91	39	5	40.0%	38,562	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roanoke	Virginia	110	38	7	22.6%	38,361	9.1	10	1	10	0	0	7
Annapolis	Maryland	100	42	7	40.0%	38,020	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gulfport	Mississippi	97	50	6	40.0%	37,887	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Woodstock	Georgia	99	46	8	33.8%	34,371	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Auburn	Washington	138	51	8	30.0%	33,862	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Belleville	Illinois	92	35	7	33.7%	31,429	7.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Covington	Georgia	99	40	6	32.6%	30,197	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Elkhart	Indiana	92	40	8	30.0%	29,830	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Napa	California	105	70	8	30.0%	29,000	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bryan	Texas	108	43	8	30.0%	28,884	8.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Delray Beach	Florida	98	52	7	22.7%	27,039	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lancaster	California	105	50	9	13.5%	24,955	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Charlotte	North Carolina	108	58	16	2.7%	24,872	17.3	24	1	24	0	0	0
Hollywood	Florida	101	72	12	5.2%	24,492	14.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	106	42	9	21.6%	22,647	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Alexandria	Virginia	105	52	14	5.7%	20,353	15.6	14	1	14	0	0	4
Elizabeth	New Jersey	96	41	9	20.0%	20,093	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	California	104	47	10	10.0%	17,965	10.0	4	3	8	0	0	4
Fredericksburg	Virginia	96	46	6	10.0%	17,400	10.0	5	2	10	0	0	5
Lincoln	Nebraska	106	63	13	5.5%	15,939	14.5	22	1	22	0	0	0
Portsmouth	Virginia	104	44	8	14.5%	13,790	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Chandler	Arizona	101	42	13	5.0%	13,431	15.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Washington DC	District of Columbia	105	80	19	1.9%	12,670	18.1	28	1	28	0	0	0
Santa Maria	California	107	49	11	8.6%	12,304	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clovis	California	99	35	9	10.0%	12,139	10.0	3	2	6	0	0	3
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	95	36	8	9.0%	11,212	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Concord	California	109	47	12	7.6%	9,950	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Jupiter	Florida	104	46	8	10.0%	9,856	10.0	4	2	8	0	0	4
Columbia	South Carolina	105	57	14	2.6%	9,044	18.4	14	2	14	0	0	0
Henrico	Virginia	101	37	14	4.5%	8,643	15.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Rialto	California	105	47	10	8.0%	8,527	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	95	42	11	8.0%	8,066	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Irvine	California	108	48	15	3.0%	8,028	17.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Syracuse	New York	103	39	14	2.8%	6,312	18.7	15	2	15	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	97	52	15	4.0%	5,707	16.0	4	2	5	0	0	0
York	Pennsylvania	101	66	15	2.6%	4,642	17.3	7	3	11	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	101	64	4	70.0%	1,719,866	4.0	62	1	62	0	0	62
San Diego	102	79	3	80.0%	1,077,754	3.0	36	1	36	0	36	36
San Jose	103	53	5	60.0%	630,089	5.0	28	2	30	0	0	28
San Francisco	103	78	4	70.0%	609,139	4.0	28	1	28	0	1	28
Sacramento	107	58	5	60.5%	486,943	5.0	28	1	28	0	0	28
Fresno	100	44	5	60.0%	361,480	5.0	18	1	18	0	0	18
Bakersfield	94	38	5	60.0%	335,548	5.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Long Beach	100	58	5	60.0%	287,381	5.0	12	2	24	0	0	24
Santa Ana	100	37	3	80.0%	285,663	3.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Riverside	149	74	4	70.0%	259,008	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Anaheim	102	67	5	60.0%	221,176	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Whittier	114	48	2	90.0%	176,545	2.0	6	2	11	0	11	11
Oakland	102	46	7	42.7%	175,771	6.7	14	2	19	0	0	19
San Bernardino	97	41	4	70.0%	174,661	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Corona	104	42	4	66.0%	169,731	4.4	5	3	10	0	0	5
Chula Vista	95	35	5	59.4%	154,863	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Oxnard	105	41	5	60.0%	132,230	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Modesto	101	45	6	50.0%	132,229	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Santa Rosa	110	45	5	60.0%	129,635	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Compton	91	32	2	90.0%	124,988	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Ontario	117	63	4	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Moreno Valley	108	36	5	60.0%	123,272	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	96	41	4	70.0%	123,033	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
North Hollywood	92	45	3	80.0%	122,503	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Oceanside	109	50	5	60.0%	120,155	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fontana	104	46	6	50.0%	117,364	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	3
Orange	103	60	3	80.0%	115,994	3.0	5	2	8	0	5	8
Hayward	106	37	5	60.0%	115,220	5.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Salinas	92	34	5	60.0%	112,997	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Stockton	99	43	7	30.0%	112,142	8.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Pomona	93	36	4	70.0%	110,590	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elk Grove	90	27	5	60.0%	107,591	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Sunnyvale	103	57	4	70.0%	106,942	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Van Nuys	94	43	5	60.0%	106,687	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	92	38	5	60.0%	106,076	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rancho Cucamonga	99	35	5	60.0%	105,959	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palmdale	82	37	5	60.0%	104,962	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Cajon	101	31	5	60.0%	103,478	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Clara	94	37	3	80.0%	100,414	3.0	4	2	8	0	4	4
Vista	98	65	3	80.0%	95,894	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Victorville	89	37	4	70.0%	95,417	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pacoima	95	27	2	90.0%	95,219	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
South Gate	93	37	1	100.0%	95,103	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
La Puente	95	45	3	80.0%	94,358	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Perris	103	39	3	80.0%	93,912	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Fremont	101	51	7	40.0%	93,262	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fairfield	89	44	3	80.0%	91,263	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Visalia	92	33	5	60.0%	91,208	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Simi Valley	94	36	4	70.0%	90,098	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Leandro	107	41	3	80.0%	88,950	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Sylmar	85	38	2	90.0%	86,838	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
San Mateo	93	38	5	60.0%	85,430	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Roseville	92	34	5	60.0%	83,876	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Pasadena	105	47	6	53.0%	83,538	5.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Bell Gardens	96	35	3	80.0%	81,946	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Inglewood	93	37	5	60.0%	80,280	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Daly City	101	43	4	70.0%	80,081	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Temecula	102	44	5	60.0%	77,948	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Menifee	108	50	4	70.0%	77,371	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hemet	90	39	5	60.0%	77,272	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
West Covina	89	35	4	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	103	46	5	60.0%	76,276	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
El Monte	110	52	3	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Mission Viejo	90	38	4	70.0%	68,851	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	92	36	5	60.0%	68,678	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Costa Mesa	90	44	5	60.0%	68,252	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Carlsbad	101	51	5	60.0%	68,202	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redding	95	38	5	60.0%	67,820	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	90	36	5	60.0%	67,741	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Chico	98	45	5	60.0%	67,209	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	99	38	5	60.0%	66,433	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	92	32	6	50.0%	66,122	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Burbank	97	45	5	60.0%	64,810	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Vacaville	92	34	5	60.0%	63,178	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	96	61	5	60.0%	62,429	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hesperia	89	29	5	60.0%	62,287	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	94	31	5	60.0%	61,836	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Huntington Beach	99	57	7	30.0%	59,972	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hawthorne	93	39	5	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	98	47	5	60.0%	58,009	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ventura	98	45	6	50.0%	57,980	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livermore	89	36	5	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Indio	140	64	5	60.0%	57,655	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	99	60	5	60.0%	57,649	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chino	105	41	5	60.0%	56,684	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	100	69	5	60.0%	56,646	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	100	44	5	40.0%	55,710	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Norwalk	95	35	5	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Vallejo	92	38	7	40.0%	49,786	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Tracy	97	33	7	40.0%	46,858	7.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Santa Barbara	103	65	7	34.5%	46,830	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Madera	96	48	7	42.4%	43,606	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	97	42	6	40.0%	40,192	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Napa	105	70	8	30.0%	29,000	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lancaster	105	50	9	13.5%	24,955	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Escondido	104	47	10	10.0%	17,965	10.0	4	3	8	0	0	4
Santa Maria	107	49	11	8.6%	12,304	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Clovis	99	35	9	10.0%	12,139	10.0	3	2	6	0	0	3
Concord	109	47	12	7.6%	9,950	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Rialto	105	47	10	8.0%	8,527	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Irvine	108	48	15	3.0%	8,028	17.0	9	1	9	0	0	0

Houston

ZIP	hotels.com	tripadvisor.com	expedia.com	booking.com	kayak.com	agoda.com
77088	4	1	2	3	5	6
77047	4	1	2	3	5	6
77037	4	1	2	3	5	6
77098	4	1	2	3	5	6
77027	4	1	2	3	5	6
77068	4	1	2	3	5	6
77078	4	1	2	3	5	6
77086	4	1	2	3	5	6
77035	4	1	2	3	5	6
77008	4	1	2	3	5	6
77004	4	1	2	3	5	6
77028	4	1	2	3	5	6
77059	4	1	2	3	5	6
77039	4	1	2	3	5	6
77019	4	1	2	3	5	6
77075	4	1	2	3	5	6
77077	4	1	2	3	5	6
77079	4	1	2	3	5	6
77099	4	1	2	3	5	6
77024	4	1	2	3	5	6
77095	4	1	2	3	5	6
77048	4	1	2	3	5	6
77044	4	1	2	3	5	6
77015	4	1	2	3	5	6
77017	4	1	2	3	5	6
77057	4	1	2	3	5	6
77055	4	1	2	3	5	6
77006	4	1	2	3	5	6
77026	4	1	2	3	5	6
77046	4	1	2	3	5	6
77066	4	1	2	3	5	6
77023	4	1	2	3	5	6
77094	4	1	2	3	5	6
77084	4	1	2	3	5	6
77013	4	1	2	3	5	6
77063	4	1	2	3	5	6
77053	4	1	2	3	5	6
77022	4	1	2	3	5	6
77072	4	1	2	3	5	6
77049	4	1	2	3	5	6
77045	4	1	2	3	5	6
77010	4	1	2	3	5	6
77018	4	1	2	3	5	6
77041	4	1	2	3	5	6
77009	4	1	2	3	5	6
77089	4	1	2	3	5	6
77032	4	1	2	3	5	6
77036	4	1	2	3	5	6
77085	4	1	2	3	5	6
77054	4	1	2	3	5	6
77058	4	1	2	3	5	6
77014	4	1	2	3	5	6
77067	4	1	2	3	5	6
77005	4	1	2	3	5	6
77076	4	1	2	3	5	6
77070	4	1	2	3	5	6
77060	4	1	2	3	5	6
77080	4	1	2	3	5	6
77050	4	1	2	3	5	6
77091	4	1	2	3	5	6
77071	4	1	2	3	5	6
77061	4	1	2	3	5	6
77020	4	1	2	3	5	6
77081	4	1	2	3	5	6
77030	4	1	2	3	5	6
77040	4	1	2	3	5	6
77090	4	1	2	3	5	6
77031	4	1	2	3	5	6
77051	4	1	2	3	5	6
77011	4	1	2	3	5	6
77042	4	1	2	3	5	6
77062	4	1	2	3	5	6
77082	4	1	2	3	5	6
77093	4	1	2	3	5	6
77073	4	1	2	3	5	6
77033	4	1	2	3	5	6
77043	4	1	2	3	5	6
77074	4	1	2	3	5	6
77064	4	1	2	3	5	6
77012	4	1	2	3	5	6
77002	4	1	2	3	5	6
77092	4	1	2	3	5	6
77069	4	1	2	3	5	6
77021	4	1	2	3	5	6
77083	4	1	2	3	5	6
77029	4	1	2	3	5	6
77034	4	1	2	3	5	6
77087	4	1	2	3	5	6
77003	4	1	2	3	5	6
77038	4	1	2	3	5	6
77007	4	1	2	3	5	6
77016	4	1	2	3	5	6
77065	4	1	2	3	5	6
77096	4	1	2	3	5	6
77025	4	1	2	3	5	6
77056	4	1	2	3	5	6

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Hotels

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 36,593 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Hotels Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (hotel)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Hotels Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Hotels Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Hotels Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly