Healthgrades Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve healthgrades.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 2,825 ENT Doctors/Medical Centers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Healthgrades Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Healthgrades Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Healthgrades Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Las Vegas
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Healthgrades Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	5,848	2,825	1	40.5%	130,615,635	12.4	27,210	32,413	3,498	38,225	991	4,212	23,397
California	1,368	810	2	44.7%	17,482,530	9.6	1,165	1,737	282	1,923	63	233	1,532
Florida	1,096	695	1	53.5%	11,020,334	7.1	445	973	180	1,267	89	279	1,110
Texas	1,293	774	1	33.0%	9,211,490	19.7	1,330	1,872	244	2,115	41	177	1,026
New York	1,184	691	4	28.5%	5,600,422	16.4	1,474	1,699	200	1,928	74	195	956
Ohio	1,046	614	1	44.9%	5,221,506	12.8	975	1,187	162	1,373	51	201	721
Pennsylvania	1,180	691	2	37.3%	4,769,004	15.1	1,598	1,774	173	2,010	84	248	924
Michigan	921	558	2	45.0%	4,482,520	11.7	832	975	147	1,138	36	137	611
Illinois	1,113	666	3	33.1%	4,243,114	13.1	1,246	1,381	156	1,588	47	152	700
New Jersey	917	554	2	45.5%	4,042,509	10.8	535	591	187	687	42	112	398
North Carolina	905	544	1	35.7%	3,624,068	12.2	672	790	131	924	16	83	631
Virginia	952	575	1	42.6%	3,584,422	10.8	721	889	114	1,076	17	107	689
Arizona	776	499	3	47.4%	3,291,916	12.9	246	394	52	472	0	56	338
Indiana	1,254	709	1	44.2%	2,936,548	11.8	659	770	97	972	19	132	599
Tennessee	868	515	1	42.4%	2,819,980	11.3	510	618	80	730	14	92	487
Maryland	944	585	2	46.4%	2,785,499	9.6	391	461	79	568	18	69	417
Massachusetts	824	482	2	40.3%	2,753,747	12.1	459	529	114	586	32	91	329
Missouri	1,019	607	1	42.9%	2,610,307	10.9	887	1,017	71	1,234	7	125	787
Wisconsin	924	549	2	44.6%	2,579,186	10.5	688	763	79	872	20	88	686
Georgia	933	578	5	24.7%	2,539,621	17.6	557	708	121	823	14	47	384
Oklahoma	817	511	1	61.9%	2,425,520	6.4	557	646	47	837	58	235	698
Washington	876	529	4	32.6%	2,370,825	11.3	451	586	68	779	2	46	510
Colorado	909	552	1	42.5%	2,349,004	14.6	372	505	69	585	9	54	298
Louisiana	839	518	1	40.6%	1,892,670	13.0	428	505	59	561	7	52	326
Connecticut	735	455	1	52.6%	1,884,496	7.2	234	279	82	326	9	49	281
Nevada	641	415	2	63.2%	1,848,169	7.1	92	168	18	203	2	33	174
South Carolina	825	505	1	36.1%	1,789,054	11.5	347	422	70	531	8	54	325
Kentucky	911	552	2	38.6%	1,718,252	11.0	698	758	78	912	16	83	574
Minnesota	898	547	4	31.0%	1,711,661	14.9	777	878	61	1,075	17	59	309
Alabama	890	549	3	31.1%	1,514,488	15.9	505	619	79	741	7	37	372
Oregon	971	590	3	36.1%	1,474,822	12.2	352	410	54	492	5	50	348
Kansas	946	574	2	45.3%	1,318,130	10.8	616	692	43	762	17	87	587
New Mexico	744	471	1	62.8%	1,311,298	7.9	327	361	26	456	31	93	370
Arkansas	853	527	1	41.6%	1,243,229	10.7	553	587	43	666	18	58	459
Mississippi	895	549	3	41.0%	1,224,358	11.1	383	416	48	514	9	73	374
West Virginia	875	534	2	51.8%	947,541	7.4	684	704	43	882	23	130	654
Idaho	734	468	1	52.3%	882,014	10.1	250	272	30	314	11	58	245
Iowa	933	553	5	25.2%	788,180	14.5	883	926	41	1,074	8	48	406
Rhode Island	549	359	1	74.1%	782,581	3.5	64	77	24	100	16	43	99
Hawaii	595	377	3	52.7%	749,545	7.6	82	93	14	134	2	15	110
Utah	740	474	6	23.9%	728,789	17.0	242	280	43	299	0	14	106
Maine	891	534	2	47.2%	628,963	9.2	421	425	28	563	23	60	386
Nebraska	833	514	4	30.8%	586,286	13.0	513	570	34	686	0	22	458
Delaware	563	359	1	57.0%	540,964	8.1	52	66	15	75	6	17	59
New Hampshire	729	443	3	39.1%	524,956	10.0	238	248	33	318	2	21	239
Montana	770	484	1	42.6%	444,177	10.6	348	361	21	435	0	35	324
South Dakota	722	462	5	34.2%	295,433	13.3	354	365	19	379	1	2	224
Vermont	686	420	3	44.7%	279,237	10.0	248	252	21	309	0	19	234
Wyoming	711	444	1	42.8%	249,342	10.9	164	171	21	195	0	24	125
North Dakota	685	438	3	32.1%	241,267	11.7	366	380	18	444	0	13	272
Alaska	631	405	8	23.7%	175,200	12.8	217	234	9	263	0	4	113

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Las Vegas	Nevada	322	216	2	73.6%	1,137,029	3.7	43	1	43	1	19	43
Phoenix	Arizona	296	204	2	71.6%	1,038,628	3.9	42	1	42	0	17	42
San Antonio	Texas	250	175	5	55.1%	980,604	7.4	59	4	59	0	0	56
Miami	Florida	436	297	4	45.6%	857,597	6.8	55	8	75	2	3	70
Los Angeles	California	343	227	6	32.3%	794,369	17.8	60	6	60	0	0	50
El Paso	Texas	326	212	2	82.1%	647,796	3.3	24	3	47	9	20	46
Cincinnati	Ohio	321	211	4	67.7%	544,290	4.2	45	1	45	0	25	45
Albuquerque	New Mexico	281	185	1	82.6%	541,797	2.9	17	2	34	6	12	34
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	367	245	2	63.1%	524,434	4.8	27	8	43	2	8	43
Denver	Colorado	387	258	4	48.2%	524,163	10.5	38	7	41	1	11	33
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	341	231	2	72.4%	494,379	3.7	43	5	76	2	34	76
Saint Paul	Minnesota	398	256	3	61.0%	487,533	5.8	30	9	34	8	10	25
Bakersfield	California	249	167	1	83.7%	467,900	2.5	11	1	11	6	6	11
Charlotte	North Carolina	314	205	5	47.1%	426,930	6.3	24	2	35	0	0	35
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	332	222	3	51.6%	418,767	5.8	29	3	31	0	1	31
Fort Worth	Texas	265	184	5	44.8%	408,709	7.3	32	4	51	0	0	49
San Jose	California	296	197	6	36.9%	387,994	7.5	28	2	42	0	0	38
Sacramento	California	351	230	4	48.2%	387,790	7.9	28	2	28	0	0	27
Kansas City	Missouri	344	231	2	67.5%	386,097	4.4	49	2	98	0	26	98
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	343	228	2	55.2%	376,560	5.6	39	5	53	0	5	53
Minneapolis	Minnesota	431	287	4	34.5%	375,549	10.0	51	8	55	0	4	39
Orlando	Florida	336	231	8	37.1%	369,816	7.5	32	3	59	1	3	56
Indianapolis	Indiana	342	214	7	38.0%	362,016	7.4	37	5	72	0	0	69
Brooklyn	New York	270	172	10	13.9%	361,389	21.3	35	4	35	0	0	13
Fresno	California	292	194	3	59.4%	357,704	5.3	18	1	18	0	0	18
Buffalo	New York	314	212	4	61.4%	345,457	5.0	28	3	32	3	3	32
Baltimore	Maryland	250	162	3	54.4%	343,269	5.5	22	3	24	0	2	24
Long Beach	California	228	157	3	69.6%	333,382	3.8	12	1	12	0	5	12
Tulsa	Oklahoma	288	194	2	78.8%	332,728	3.1	28	1	28	0	18	28
Chicago	Illinois	334	223	12	11.7%	316,390	11.3	56	2	86	0	0	21
Mesa	Arizona	244	165	4	59.1%	315,713	5.0	13	2	26	0	0	26
Saint Louis	Missouri	397	256	7	33.8%	310,141	8.4	45	8	49	0	1	43
West Palm Beach	Florida	258	175	1	82.1%	304,364	2.8	12	3	21	3	10	21
Virginia Beach	Virginia	252	172	4	67.4%	303,412	4.7	12	2	16	0	3	16
Dayton	Ohio	342	221	3	61.5%	294,099	5.4	27	7	30	0	8	29
Tampa	Florida	282	195	6	36.9%	292,327	7.0	27	1	27	0	0	27
Nashville	Tennessee	283	181	3	63.1%	289,404	4.8	22	2	26	2	8	25
Cleveland	Ohio	321	213	4	37.9%	284,643	7.1	29	4	51	1	1	48
Staten Island	New York	245	167	2	60.0%	284,458	5.1	12	1	12	0	4	12
Columbus	Ohio	328	209	5	33.4%	282,479	8.2	30	3	32	0	1	25
San Diego	California	360	241	8	20.7%	278,331	9.3	36	2	36	0	1	21
Colorado Springs	Colorado	328	213	5	47.6%	277,894	6.6	30	4	46	0	0	45
Wichita	Kansas	282	186	2	65.4%	273,348	4.6	26	1	26	0	12	26
Naples	Florida	269	185	1	86.7%	271,494	2.5	14	2	28	7	14	28
Tucson	Arizona	325	218	6	29.9%	270,313	9.3	32	4	60	0	1	57
Jacksonville	Florida	290	194	6	31.0%	268,796	9.5	31	3	59	0	0	54
Riverside	California	191	134	2	72.4%	267,726	4.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Houston	Texas	419	284	12	8.3%	265,354	34.4	93	22	94	0	0	20
Memphis	Tennessee	300	188	5	37.4%	260,355	7.2	26	3	28	1	1	28
New Orleans	Louisiana	236	164	4	58.8%	251,783	5.2	19	1	19	0	0	19
Hollywood	Florida	236	159	5	52.2%	244,623	5.1	9	2	9	1	3	9
Detroit	Michigan	285	188	6	37.6%	240,648	7.2	25	2	47	0	1	45
Anaheim	California	187	128	2	65.3%	240,545	4.3	7	1	7	0	4	7
Aurora	Colorado	220	150	4	54.8%	238,758	5.4	11	3	16	0	4	14
Saint Petersburg	Florida	288	201	3	65.0%	231,900	4.6	16	4	23	1	8	22
Pompano Beach	Florida	249	173	1	62.3%	230,754	5.0	10	5	10	1	2	10
Stockton	California	261	164	3	61.7%	230,474	4.5	12	1	12	0	5	12
Portland	Oregon	311	203	7	24.3%	223,827	14.4	33	6	56	0	0	50
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	296	196	10	14.1%	222,217	10.6	47	3	48	0	0	25
Louisville	Kentucky	289	189	8	28.3%	215,312	9.1	32	3	63	0	0	52
Grand Rapids	Michigan	201	131	4	57.6%	211,973	5.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Fort Wayne	Indiana	220	138	2	66.2%	210,862	4.1	16	2	30	0	10	30
Boca Raton	Florida	227	153	1	93.0%	206,713	1.8	9	2	10	7	8	10
Corona	California	209	142	1	80.0%	205,710	3.2	5	1	5	1	2	5
Kissimmee	Florida	217	151	1	70.0%	202,375	5.6	7	3	11	2	6	10
Sarasota	Florida	251	175	1	79.9%	199,852	2.8	13	2	13	4	6	13
Marietta	Georgia	200	141	4	61.7%	199,093	5.6	7	3	8	0	1	7
Knoxville	Tennessee	241	161	4	51.0%	197,236	6.1	17	2	25	0	0	25
Henderson	Nevada	198	135	2	65.1%	196,904	4.4	8	2	8	0	3	8
Honolulu	Hawaii	241	163	5	47.2%	196,526	6.1	11	2	22	0	0	22
Madison	Wisconsin	251	166	2	66.5%	196,002	4.4	14	2	23	0	3	23
Newark	New Jersey	220	144	2	69.5%	194,924	3.8	9	1	9	0	4	9
Greensboro	North Carolina	206	138	5	58.8%	192,757	5.4	9	2	14	0	2	14
Pensacola	Florida	268	178	2	71.1%	190,592	4.1	13	2	26	0	8	26
Rochester	New York	302	200	4	39.1%	184,529	7.3	24	2	47	0	0	47
Akron	Ohio	265	175	3	67.4%	182,126	4.2	17	1	17	0	6	17
San Francisco	California	283	181	8	20.8%	181,422	9.4	28	1	28	0	0	15
Santa Ana	California	217	146	3	50.5%	180,455	6.3	6	2	6	0	0	5
Syracuse	New York	226	146	2	78.5%	178,111	3.0	15	2	16	5	5	16
Lakeland	Florida	228	155	3	68.1%	175,662	4.3	9	1	9	0	5	9
Tallahassee	Florida	216	152	2	60.3%	173,675	4.8	10	1	10	0	2	10
North Las Vegas	Nevada	193	132	2	73.0%	170,728	4.0	7	1	7	0	2	7
Laredo	Texas	209	140	3	63.0%	170,723	5.0	6	2	12	0	2	12
Fort Myers	Florida	226	150	3	67.8%	170,659	4.5	11	3	21	0	6	21
Lexington	Kentucky	255	170	4	53.3%	170,616	5.6	15	1	15	0	0	15
Fort Collins	Colorado	192	128	1	86.9%	169,296	2.4	5	1	5	3	3	5
Tacoma	Washington	320	215	5	50.5%	168,455	6.4	20	5	31	0	4	30
Fontana	California	131	91	3	70.0%	164,309	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Amarillo	Texas	246	165	3	71.1%	162,845	3.9	14	1	14	0	5	14
Plano	Texas	185	133	5	53.3%	162,666	9.7	7	3	12	0	0	11
Reading	Pennsylvania	225	148	3	73.7%	158,622	4.0	10	3	19	0	8	19
Lincoln	Nebraska	272	174	5	54.8%	158,602	6.2	22	2	44	0	0	44
Glendale	Arizona	244	162	5	52.0%	158,511	7.2	9	3	9	0	1	8
Irvine	California	228	154	4	59.1%	158,203	5.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Norfolk	Virginia	255	180	3	63.8%	156,761	4.9	14	2	26	0	5	26
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	223	159	1	91.8%	155,415	2.0	9	1	9	6	6	9
Salem	Oregon	195	126	3	57.5%	153,193	5.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	300	198	6	40.1%	152,126	7.8	18	2	18	0	1	14
Providence	Rhode Island	219	148	1	73.2%	150,013	4.0	8	2	15	0	4	15
Cape Coral	Florida	178	115	3	82.8%	149,642	2.8	6	1	6	0	5	6
Boise	Idaho	222	155	4	58.3%	149,356	5.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
San Bernardino	California	219	146	3	59.7%	148,986	5.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Chattanooga	Tennessee	277	187	3	70.8%	147,275	4.0	15	2	15	0	10	15
Ocala	Florida	224	153	2	65.4%	147,138	4.6	11	3	19	0	5	19
Lake Worth	Florida	194	134	2	70.7%	146,055	4.2	5	6	7	1	3	7
Edmond	Oklahoma	188	124	2	84.6%	145,245	2.6	5	2	5	1	3	5
Mobile	Alabama	292	200	5	52.9%	143,665	5.4	18	2	21	0	0	21
Dallas	Texas	335	231	13	10.3%	143,103	12.1	48	3	48	0	0	20
Arlington	Texas	250	174	5	36.0%	142,810	7.5	12	1	12	0	0	12
Reno	Nevada	251	164	5	47.5%	140,890	6.5	12	2	23	0	0	23
Pomona	California	165	109	1	88.8%	140,291	2.7	3	1	3	2	2	3
Ontario	California	147	96	1	79.3%	140,101	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Salt Lake City	Utah	289	199	6	28.6%	139,251	9.5	19	3	19	0	0	16
Springfield	Missouri	215	142	5	60.1%	138,562	5.3	7	2	8	0	1	8
Hialeah	Florida	210	137	5	37.8%	138,561	8.0	7	6	12	0	1	10
Rockford	Illinois	207	137	2	75.9%	138,447	3.3	9	2	18	0	10	18
Overland Park	Kansas	208	137	2	74.5%	136,615	3.3	9	1	9	2	4	9
Mission	Texas	167	110	2	74.7%	135,289	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Winston Salem	North Carolina	240	162	3	50.8%	134,207	13.6	9	3	10	0	4	9
Moreno Valley	California	206	130	4	65.3%	134,116	4.8	4	2	4	0	2	4
Mckinney	Texas	155	109	4	70.4%	133,060	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Homestead	Florida	238	149	2	70.8%	132,847	4.7	7	2	7	1	2	7
Edinburg	Texas	151	100	3	84.6%	131,570	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Wilmington	Delaware	231	164	3	59.8%	131,283	4.6	10	2	11	0	3	11
Worcester	Massachusetts	211	140	3	70.6%	131,104	4.1	9	1	9	1	5	9
Eugene	Oregon	178	124	5	63.5%	128,801	5.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Compton	California	136	93	1	92.3%	128,134	1.7	3	1	3	2	3	3
Yuma	Arizona	160	104	2	86.6%	127,769	2.3	3	2	6	0	5	6
Schenectady	New York	257	169	2	78.6%	127,321	3.1	8	2	11	1	8	11
Evansville	Indiana	197	132	2	68.7%	126,757	4.4	9	2	18	0	4	18
Corpus Christi	Texas	296	201	4	38.8%	126,335	6.5	18	2	24	0	0	24
Lancaster	California	175	116	5	68.5%	126,287	3.7	3	1	3	1	1	3
Garden Grove	California	176	114	2	71.4%	125,411	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Garland	Texas	169	118	4	52.7%	125,357	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Alexandria	Virginia	277	187	5	35.3%	125,232	7.7	14	5	26	0	0	23
Trenton	New Jersey	249	171	5	59.3%	123,317	5.3	11	4	14	1	3	14
Gilbert	Arizona	172	119	5	51.7%	123,283	5.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Brownsville	Texas	154	100	5	60.9%	122,652	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Chula Vista	California	187	124	4	46.6%	121,559	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Montgomery	Alabama	250	168	4	57.9%	121,533	4.9	13	2	26	0	0	26
Toledo	Ohio	261	178	5	39.5%	121,525	6.9	15	3	30	0	0	30
Fredericksburg	Virginia	180	127	2	69.8%	121,374	4.2	5	2	9	0	3	9
Modesto	California	202	134	4	45.7%	120,807	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bradenton	Florida	251	164	5	47.0%	118,943	6.7	10	3	12	0	0	12
Chandler	Arizona	207	143	5	43.9%	117,902	6.5	6	2	9	0	0	9
Oakland	California	266	172	6	28.1%	115,853	8.5	14	3	15	0	0	13
Huntsville	Alabama	229	158	4	59.0%	115,734	5.1	11	1	11	0	0	11
Melbourne	Florida	140	96	3	73.6%	114,608	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Flint	Michigan	183	122	2	73.6%	114,471	3.4	7	1	7	1	4	7
Erie	Pennsylvania	239	160	2	62.3%	114,403	4.6	13	2	20	0	6	20
Greenville	South Carolina	190	125	4	51.9%	113,958	5.3	9	2	11	0	0	11
Omaha	Nebraska	296	197	7	20.0%	110,399	10.9	31	2	31	0	0	15
Littleton	Colorado	264	177	3	33.8%	110,014	15.4	10	9	15	0	1	10
York	Pennsylvania	181	120	3	60.9%	109,415	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Huntington Beach	California	175	110	5	54.7%	109,318	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oxnard	California	174	123	2	49.5%	109,141	6.3	4	2	4	0	1	4
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	167	118	2	83.6%	109,058	3.0	3	2	6	0	4	6
Visalia	California	154	96	2	70.5%	107,113	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Spokane	Washington	272	174	5	29.7%	106,776	7.7	14	3	19	0	0	17
Seattle	Washington	322	210	11	11.1%	106,090	11.5	35	4	61	0	0	27
Green Bay	Wisconsin	240	163	4	57.8%	105,996	6.1	7	1	7	0	0	6
Conroe	Texas	208	147	2	65.8%	105,565	4.4	7	2	7	0	2	7
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	191	124	4	51.7%	105,060	5.7	6	2	12	0	0	12
Mcallen	Texas	156	98	4	74.1%	104,966	3.0	3	1	3	1	2	3
Birmingham	Alabama	260	168	10	20.9%	104,429	10.3	30	5	52	0	0	23
Tempe	Arizona	133	96	3	54.9%	104,386	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	California	173	113	4	58.9%	104,007	5.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Yakima	Washington	184	115	2	80.0%	103,883	3.0	4	2	7	0	4	7
Paterson	New Jersey	225	145	3	70.4%	102,682	3.9	9	1	9	0	6	9
Canton	Ohio	207	130	2	69.6%	102,359	3.8	12	2	21	0	7	21
Clarksville	Tennessee	161	109	5	58.0%	101,821	5.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Clearwater	Florida	214	142	4	55.5%	101,687	5.2	9	3	16	0	1	16
Newport News	Virginia	181	120	4	57.3%	101,322	5.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Ashburn	Virginia	130	83	2	90.0%	101,076	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Woodbridge	Virginia	157	105	5	47.7%	101,000	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bloomington	Indiana	182	122	2	75.0%	100,206	4.0	6	2	12	0	4	12
Beaverton	Oregon	206	130	4	49.5%	99,792	7.0	4	2	4	0	1	3
Murrieta	California	144	91	3	75.5%	99,785	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
West Jordan	Utah	144	101	3	80.7%	99,698	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Buford	Georgia	115	73	1	100.0%	99,103	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	236	162	5	54.5%	99,048	5.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	169	120	2	68.0%	98,975	3.6	5	2	10	0	4	10
Delray Beach	Florida	195	135	1	82.3%	98,020	3.0	5	2	9	1	3	9
Lubbock	Texas	247	164	5	35.1%	97,077	8.4	14	3	27	0	0	26
Savannah	Georgia	218	147	4	40.1%	96,778	6.8	10	2	20	0	0	20
Washington DC	District of Columbia	267	174	10	14.1%	96,449	13.5	28	3	28	0	0	13
Daytona Beach	Florida	223	157	1	93.3%	96,143	2.2	5	1	5	3	3	5
Hamilton	Ohio	153	101	4	70.0%	95,969	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Beaumont	Texas	211	135	2	65.5%	95,319	4.9	8	2	9	0	2	9
Las Cruces	New Mexico	198	130	3	63.8%	94,989	4.7	7	2	13	0	2	13
Cypress	Texas	110	71	4	55.5%	94,744	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saint Augustine	Florida	189	124	1	72.1%	94,504	4.0	5	4	10	0	4	10
Ann Arbor	Michigan	159	107	3	56.5%	94,270	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Roanoke	Virginia	258	173	4	55.3%	93,714	5.1	10	2	18	0	1	18
Independence	Missouri	233	152	2	75.4%	93,477	3.9	8	1	8	0	3	8
Saginaw	Michigan	206	144	2	71.7%	93,452	3.7	7	2	13	0	6	13
Allentown	Pennsylvania	172	118	5	54.8%	93,155	5.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Racine	Wisconsin	181	124	2	73.7%	92,967	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Peoria	Arizona	171	120	4	54.0%	92,886	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Vero Beach	Florida	183	122	3	80.4%	92,648	3.2	6	1	6	0	4	6
Bellingham	Washington	159	104	2	73.0%	92,314	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
O Fallon	Missouri	146	97	1	95.1%	91,776	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Hayward	California	174	119	4	47.7%	91,638	6.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Youngstown	Ohio	225	153	3	58.3%	91,529	5.3	12	3	12	0	3	11
Franklin	Tennessee	149	93	2	85.3%	90,843	2.7	3	2	6	0	4	6
Lakewood	New Jersey	99	62	2	90.0%	90,687	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
San Angelo	Texas	179	125	2	81.7%	90,525	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Rockville	Maryland	170	111	3	62.3%	90,130	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Rosa	California	169	109	5	41.7%	90,120	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Killeen	Texas	179	129	4	60.0%	90,057	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Saint Charles	Missouri	158	104	3	64.4%	90,031	4.7	3	3	4	0	1	4
Elk Grove	California	135	89	6	50.0%	89,660	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	203	135	3	69.8%	89,456	3.4	5	2	9	0	5	9
San Mateo	California	172	104	4	62.6%	89,120	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Macon	Georgia	227	152	2	54.4%	89,109	6.0	9	2	17	0	1	15
Longmont	Colorado	162	108	3	68.0%	88,896	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Odessa	Texas	203	141	4	55.5%	88,858	7.5	6	3	6	0	1	5
Elgin	Illinois	144	105	2	72.5%	88,604	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Torrance	California	195	132	5	49.9%	88,301	17.8	5	2	5	0	0	4
Clovis	California	142	98	3	72.7%	88,273	4.0	3	2	3	1	1	3
Spring	Texas	220	151	7	23.1%	88,018	18.1	8	4	8	0	3	3
Vallejo	California	194	130	3	70.3%	87,452	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Napa	California	140	86	2	90.0%	86,999	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hemet	California	178	119	3	67.4%	86,852	4.3	3	3	5	0	1	5
Cumming	Georgia	149	105	3	53.6%	86,801	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jackson	Mississippi	233	154	4	50.9%	86,746	5.5	11	2	22	0	2	22
Rock Hill	South Carolina	144	96	3	74.4%	86,597	4.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Menifee	California	203	136	1	77.8%	85,980	3.0	4	1	4	1	2	4
Panama City	Florida	198	140	2	68.0%	85,942	3.7	6	2	12	1	5	12
Atlanta	Georgia	349	237	14	8.7%	85,606	19.2	39	12	42	0	0	11
Lake Charles	Louisiana	159	109	4	65.4%	85,492	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Laurel	Maryland	176	116	2	75.9%	85,360	3.5	4	2	4	0	3	4
Sunnyvale	California	191	124	3	55.8%	85,211	6.0	4	3	5	0	0	5
Palm Bay	Florida	160	108	2	76.3%	84,922	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Winter Haven	Florida	158	105	1	79.4%	84,854	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	202	138	3	51.7%	84,784	5.7	7	2	14	0	0	14
Belleville	Illinois	180	115	1	90.8%	84,626	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Van Nuys	California	137	89	6	47.6%	84,584	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
South Bend	Indiana	217	136	5	57.2%	83,884	5.5	10	1	10	0	0	10
Roseville	California	163	106	5	60.0%	83,876	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edison	New Jersey	165	115	2	82.9%	83,588	2.7	3	1	3	1	2	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	149	98	3	83.2%	83,449	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Summerville	South Carolina	144	89	4	60.0%	83,365	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Little Rock	Arkansas	238	162	5	38.0%	82,892	7.4	12	1	12	0	0	12
Jersey City	New Jersey	201	128	8	31.4%	82,177	7.7	7	2	14	0	0	14
Irving	Texas	189	129	7	34.1%	82,045	7.5	6	2	12	0	0	12
Victorville	California	151	91	4	60.0%	81,786	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Florissant	Missouri	153	98	1	75.3%	81,548	4.3	3	2	4	1	1	4
Scottsdale	Arizona	218	144	7	27.1%	80,752	21.3	10	3	10	0	1	5
Federal Way	Washington	143	88	2	80.0%	80,157	3.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Ventura	California	164	104	4	68.8%	79,762	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Gainesville	Florida	213	146	5	38.0%	79,627	7.2	10	1	10	0	0	10
New Bedford	Massachusetts	154	105	2	83.7%	79,363	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	127	76	2	81.2%	79,135	3.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
Downey	California	151	94	2	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chesapeake	Virginia	184	127	7	33.1%	78,784	8.2	6	1	6	0	0	5
Metairie	Louisiana	164	110	4	55.3%	78,719	5.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
La Puente	California	163	99	3	66.7%	78,700	30.5	2	2	2	0	1	1
Warren	Michigan	174	111	4	58.2%	78,620	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chico	California	160	101	2	69.9%	78,345	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Spring Hill	Florida	178	114	2	62.1%	77,894	4.4	5	2	6	0	1	6
Missoula	Montana	203	139	2	80.0%	77,826	3.0	5	2	10	0	5	10
Fayetteville	North Carolina	210	136	6	31.8%	77,541	7.0	8	2	11	0	0	11
West Covina	California	152	98	2	70.6%	77,218	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	144	99	2	57.9%	76,674	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	152	100	3	61.2%	76,662	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Shreveport	Louisiana	216	143	6	34.3%	76,562	31.6	10	3	10	0	0	7
Asheville	North Carolina	181	123	3	57.8%	76,395	5.2	5	2	7	0	0	7
Waco	Texas	210	140	4	48.1%	76,176	7.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	184	122	5	40.7%	75,765	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Olympia	Washington	221	140	4	41.4%	75,733	7.0	6	2	9	0	0	9
Bowling Green	Kentucky	161	103	5	65.4%	75,520	3.5	4	2	8	0	4	8
Anderson	South Carolina	169	108	3	76.2%	74,955	3.8	4	3	8	0	3	8
Bridgeport	Connecticut	198	131	5	50.9%	74,544	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Augusta	Georgia	193	120	6	36.5%	74,517	7.4	8	3	15	0	0	14
Abilene	Texas	190	130	3	56.8%	73,873	5.7	6	4	11	0	2	11
Vacaville	California	126	82	3	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	73	3	68.1%	72,848	3.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Yonkers	New York	182	119	5	40.3%	72,676	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rialto	California	135	84	3	68.2%	72,653	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Richmond	Virginia	234	152	7	18.5%	72,180	10.4	15	4	18	0	0	14
Davenport	Iowa	195	125	2	68.7%	72,087	4.5	6	1	6	0	3	6
Sparks	Nevada	173	109	4	60.0%	71,560	5.0	4	3	7	0	0	7
Lansing	Michigan	187	126	4	43.3%	71,125	6.1	7	2	7	0	2	6
Spartanburg	South Carolina	155	102	2	63.2%	70,716	4.8	5	2	6	0	1	6
New Haven	Connecticut	183	122	3	53.4%	69,596	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Port Richey	Florida	174	118	3	56.9%	68,729	5.5	4	2	4	0	1	4
Auburn	Washington	158	107	3	60.8%	68,658	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Surprise	Arizona	177	117	5	50.6%	68,536	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lowell	Massachusetts	165	109	5	61.5%	68,431	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boynton Beach	Florida	170	117	4	39.2%	68,263	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Orange	California	168	115	5	47.0%	68,218	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Albany	New York	231	157	4	45.0%	68,036	6.4	11	2	22	0	0	22
Muncie	Indiana	192	124	2	73.1%	67,776	3.2	5	2	10	0	6	10
Lees Summit	Missouri	206	133	3	66.1%	67,466	4.2	6	1	6	0	2	6
Brockton	Massachusetts	125	76	4	70.2%	67,005	3.5	2	2	4	0	2	4
Parker	Colorado	125	79	3	66.6%	66,784	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Duluth	Minnesota	241	153	3	56.9%	66,652	5.6	11	2	22	0	0	22
Frederick	Maryland	144	91	5	50.4%	66,589	5.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Gaithersburg	Maryland	173	124	6	45.9%	66,328	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Wichita Falls	Texas	216	153	3	67.1%	66,279	4.4	7	1	7	0	3	7
Livonia	Michigan	123	86	2	70.0%	66,197	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Keller	Texas	133	92	3	56.8%	66,004	5.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Vancouver	Washington	227	146	9	20.2%	65,853	9.3	11	2	22	0	0	10
Muskegon	Michigan	175	118	4	51.0%	65,828	6.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Deltona	Florida	108	66	3	70.0%	65,722	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Oceanside	California	176	114	5	32.8%	65,676	8.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	123	86	3	63.0%	65,620	4.5	2	2	4	0	1	4
Largo	Florida	161	112	3	60.2%	64,758	5.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Appleton	Wisconsin	179	111	3	52.8%	64,200	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Indio	California	132	88	3	66.8%	64,189	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hartford	Connecticut	185	118	5	51.8%	63,855	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Gastonia	North Carolina	140	95	2	59.6%	63,839	5.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Concord	California	188	127	5	48.9%	63,735	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Lewisville	Texas	137	89	5	53.6%	63,572	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Toms River	New Jersey	132	88	6	51.7%	63,560	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Tyler	Texas	201	128	5	40.5%	63,188	6.9	9	2	18	0	0	18
Santa Maria	California	165	105	3	44.1%	63,115	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Sugar Land	Texas	166	113	6	37.3%	63,072	31.0	3	3	5	0	0	4
Idaho Falls	Idaho	183	126	5	57.4%	62,624	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Temecula	California	154	108	4	48.2%	62,601	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Puyallup	Washington	215	142	3	43.7%	62,372	9.2	5	4	8	0	1	5
Champaign	Illinois	168	112	3	65.8%	62,264	4.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
High Point	North Carolina	173	109	4	50.5%	61,762	6.3	4	2	6	0	0	6
Fairfax	Virginia	207	136	5	37.5%	61,292	7.0	4	3	4	0	0	3
Redwood City	California	172	115	5	53.5%	61,194	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	187	120	4	49.7%	61,122	8.4	5	3	6	0	0	4
Des Moines	Iowa	233	153	9	27.2%	60,689	8.3	11	1	11	0	0	11
Portsmouth	Virginia	200	132	2	63.7%	60,669	4.3	7	2	7	0	3	7
Elizabeth	New Jersey	163	99	5	60.0%	60,280	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Milton	Florida	148	96	2	63.5%	60,165	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	176	113	3	63.3%	60,136	4.5	6	2	12	0	2	12
San Marcos	California	119	79	5	59.8%	60,047	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Longview	Texas	183	121	5	57.0%	59,977	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Allen	Texas	116	74	6	53.7%	59,704	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pasadena	California	190	134	6	37.4%	58,980	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Johnson City	Tennessee	141	99	2	61.6%	58,832	4.8	4	2	7	0	1	7
Lynchburg	Virginia	169	111	3	57.2%	58,530	5.0	4	3	7	0	2	7
Whittier	California	234	149	7	29.8%	58,463	16.3	6	3	6	0	0	4
Berkeley	California	261	169	6	45.7%	58,125	7.9	9	3	9	0	0	7
Santa Clara	California	175	113	4	46.1%	57,873	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Morgantown	West Virginia	141	93	4	60.0%	57,171	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	183	121	6	50.6%	57,061	5.8	4	2	7	0	1	7
Norman	Oklahoma	178	125	4	45.9%	56,959	6.3	4	2	8	0	0	8
Carrollton	Texas	136	95	5	42.2%	56,854	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cambridge	Massachusetts	173	109	4	49.1%	56,836	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Midland	Texas	171	105	5	35.5%	56,738	8.0	5	3	9	0	0	8
Bryan	Texas	197	132	4	58.8%	56,657	5.2	5	3	8	0	0	8
Hagerstown	Maryland	155	102	3	57.5%	56,355	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Elkhart	Indiana	154	97	2	56.4%	56,109	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hampton	Virginia	185	117	4	40.5%	55,132	8.7	6	2	7	0	0	6
Greeley	Colorado	132	86	5	48.2%	54,928	7.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Acworth	Georgia	130	90	5	54.2%	54,006	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	180	124	4	41.7%	53,769	6.8	5	2	9	0	0	9
Fremont	California	191	125	6	22.9%	53,442	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Dearborn	Michigan	160	106	3	55.9%	53,156	5.3	4	3	5	0	2	5
Grand Prairie	Texas	162	111	6	27.8%	53,016	8.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
Pacoima	California	99	68	6	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	166	103	5	54.0%	52,867	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	197	130	4	50.0%	52,732	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Bowie	Maryland	173	110	3	51.3%	52,422	6.0	4	2	4	0	1	3
Holland	Michigan	132	86	4	55.5%	52,065	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Fullerton	California	157	102	5	37.3%	51,975	7.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Kent	Washington	198	130	5	32.3%	51,789	8.8	4	3	6	0	0	2
El Cajon	California	169	118	6	29.6%	51,065	8.7	3	3	4	0	0	2
Coral Springs	Florida	129	87	6	52.3%	50,847	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fargo	North Dakota	170	113	5	41.5%	50,798	6.3	4	2	6	0	0	6
Costa Mesa	California	135	89	5	44.4%	50,555	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Everett	Washington	145	92	7	30.2%	50,270	7.8	5	3	9	0	0	9
Billings	Montana	173	123	4	36.6%	50,219	7.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Bend	Oregon	161	103	4	40.5%	49,541	6.7	3	2	6	0	0	6
Woodstock	Georgia	129	87	4	48.6%	49,468	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Henrico	Virginia	241	159	5	25.6%	49,350	8.6	7	3	9	0	0	7
Jupiter	Florida	153	107	6	50.0%	49,259	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission Viejo	California	131	86	4	50.0%	49,179	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverview	Florida	159	106	3	44.0%	49,005	6.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Santa Barbara	California	222	148	6	35.6%	48,319	7.4	7	2	14	0	0	14
Merced	California	172	111	5	46.6%	48,064	7.3	3	3	4	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	California	162	108	4	46.1%	47,931	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Plainfield	Illinois	180	118	4	48.6%	47,906	13.3	3	4	4	0	1	3
San Leandro	California	158	104	5	43.0%	47,783	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Round Rock	Texas	162	112	7	28.5%	47,672	38.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	205	141	3	50.1%	47,575	6.0	5	3	8	0	2	8
Redding	California	181	120	4	42.0%	47,479	6.8	4	3	6	0	0	6
Scranton	Pennsylvania	213	137	3	47.7%	47,450	5.8	8	3	14	0	1	14
Fort Pierce	Florida	233	157	4	49.2%	47,067	6.0	8	3	9	0	0	9
Denton	Texas	175	120	5	29.7%	47,004	11.5	6	2	6	0	0	4
Medford	Oregon	112	78	2	50.0%	46,626	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Perris	California	150	99	5	39.6%	46,506	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	180	127	5	39.1%	45,397	6.8	5	2	10	0	0	10
Simi Valley	California	127	84	6	34.4%	44,279	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Athens	Georgia	173	111	6	35.4%	44,089	8.2	6	2	11	0	0	11
Santa Monica	California	176	120	4	46.7%	44,064	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Raleigh	North Carolina	233	149	11	8.0%	43,965	14.4	15	3	16	0	0	3
Daly City	California	146	96	5	38.4%	43,884	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	189	116	5	40.3%	43,730	15.0	3	3	3	0	1	2
Rapid City	South Dakota	151	98	4	45.1%	43,594	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lawrenceville	Georgia	142	92	6	16.7%	42,729	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Silver Spring	Maryland	226	144	10	14.0%	42,527	28.6	7	5	8	0	0	4
Sandy	Utah	167	107	5	38.2%	42,210	24.3	4	3	4	0	1	3
Manassas	Virginia	194	128	5	27.4%	41,680	8.8	4	3	4	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	170	113	3	43.5%	41,649	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Midlothian	Virginia	144	96	4	42.2%	40,866	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mcdonough	Georgia	123	79	5	40.0%	40,585	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Falls Church	Virginia	206	134	7	32.4%	38,989	12.4	5	5	6	0	1	5
Kennewick	Washington	167	120	4	39.4%	38,969	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Chino	California	144	93	5	41.2%	38,957	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
South Gate	California	98	70	4	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Englewood	Colorado	201	132	4	33.9%	37,802	7.8	4	4	7	0	0	7
Herndon	Virginia	139	84	5	39.2%	36,661	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	156	108	6	33.3%	36,236	46.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Roswell	Georgia	127	93	7	36.3%	36,177	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Waterbury	Connecticut	171	109	5	33.2%	36,107	14.2	6	2	6	0	0	5
Ballwin	Missouri	138	83	7	38.1%	36,088	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Charleston	South Carolina	250	165	6	18.2%	35,842	10.3	10	3	11	0	0	6
Jamaica	New York	185	119	9	14.7%	35,767	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	1
Lawrence	Kansas	181	120	5	35.2%	35,563	7.2	5	2	8	0	0	8
Renton	Washington	183	116	7	22.7%	35,218	9.0	5	2	5	0	0	4
Boulder	Colorado	193	126	9	26.4%	34,685	8.7	6	3	6	0	0	4
Frisco	Texas	133	89	8	20.0%	34,490	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	California	138	94	8	28.6%	34,236	9.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Quincy	Massachusetts	152	95	4	36.2%	34,046	7.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Salinas	California	175	113	7	17.6%	33,096	10.0	5	3	6	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	146	97	8	35.2%	32,934	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	2
Miami Beach	Florida	191	134	8	27.9%	32,250	8.6	5	2	7	0	0	5
Springdale	Arkansas	120	79	6	32.4%	31,269	7.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Carlsbad	California	173	114	6	27.4%	31,097	10.3	4	3	5	0	0	2
College Station	Texas	123	77	6	25.1%	30,918	8.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Stone Mountain	Georgia	168	113	9	23.7%	30,457	14.3	3	2	3	0	0	1
Missouri City	Texas	145	100	10	28.2%	29,927	11.5	2	2	2	0	1	1
West Valley City	Utah	170	113	6	22.0%	29,191	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Anchorage	Alaska	249	173	10	11.9%	29,149	11.2	12	2	17	0	0	5
Douglasville	Georgia	139	90	7	26.4%	29,114	10.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Topeka	Kansas	292	195	7	17.6%	28,765	9.5	18	2	18	0	0	11
Columbia	South Carolina	142	86	13	8.3%	28,490	14.7	14	2	14	0	0	4
Clermont	Florida	152	107	7	26.4%	26,455	11.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Olathe	Kansas	122	78	7	18.3%	26,409	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Valdosta	Georgia	178	113	5	27.7%	26,266	7.6	5	3	6	0	0	5
North Hollywood	California	124	75	9	17.1%	26,129	21.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Durham	North Carolina	204	138	10	8.9%	25,757	13.5	8	3	9	0	0	2
Bellevue	Washington	159	104	7	17.1%	25,033	10.8	5	2	5	0	0	4
Pueblo	Colorado	218	146	6	15.7%	24,872	11.0	7	4	11	0	0	5
Lehigh Acres	Florida	235	160	6	21.3%	24,865	8.8	6	2	10	0	0	10
Lafayette	Louisiana	162	111	10	15.3%	24,629	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Burbank	California	200	135	7	22.8%	24,576	8.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Apopka	Florida	110	72	10	24.8%	24,197	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Nampa	Idaho	140	93	7	20.0%	23,181	9.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Palo Alto	California	167	109	8	23.2%	22,445	12.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Tracy	California	183	123	8	18.7%	21,892	10.5	4	3	6	0	0	3
Alpharetta	Georgia	174	120	10	11.5%	21,691	13.5	4	3	4	0	0	1
Norwalk	California	98	57	7	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Ogden	Utah	186	121	7	10.4%	20,867	17.8	5	4	5	0	0	2
Naperville	Illinois	120	71	11	12.6%	20,832	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Flushing	New York	153	98	7	9.0%	19,356	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	140	89	6	16.7%	19,097	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elmhurst	New York	99	66	8	20.0%	18,793	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Gulfport	Mississippi	161	112	7	19.7%	18,640	9.7	3	3	4	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	132	88	8	17.4%	16,278	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	160	110	6	13.0%	15,944	21.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Covington	Georgia	128	82	5	17.2%	15,915	13.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Baytown	Texas	146	100	7	12.4%	14,558	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Madera	California	159	106	8	13.8%	14,184	10.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
El Monte	California	138	87	10	15.1%	14,127	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Richardson	Texas	144	101	10	12.1%	13,818	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livermore	California	136	84	10	14.3%	13,760	10.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Astoria	New York	156	100	10	9.4%	13,459	33.5	3	1	3	0	0	1
Broomfield	Colorado	166	99	11	12.7%	13,347	13.0	3	3	4	0	0	2
Palmdale	California	170	102	14	7.4%	13,027	13.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Bronx	New York	290	186	33	0.9%	12,937	34.7	25	3	25	0	0	0
Stamford	Connecticut	185	124	8	9.6%	12,334	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	4
Bothell	Washington	174	116	16	9.6%	12,253	38.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Hesperia	California	128	83	8	10.0%	10,381	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	102	63	9	10.0%	9,684	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Boston	Massachusetts	214	129	12	6.3%	9,516	12.9	14	1	14	0	0	0
Pearland	Texas	144	96	10	6.7%	9,225	21.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Westerville	Ohio	122	71	5	9.6%	9,184	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Fort Mill	South Carolina	170	111	11	9.6%	9,161	31.7	3	4	4	0	0	2
Ridgewood	New York	99	61	8	8.0%	8,537	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	123	80	10	8.1%	8,336	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Inglewood	California	226	155	15	6.2%	8,330	23.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Decatur	Georgia	182	125	15	4.6%	8,265	18.6	5	2	5	0	0	0
Pittsburg	California	99	61	11	7.0%	6,726	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Antioch	California	124	76	12	5.0%	5,536	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	216	137	15	3.7%	5,168	16.3	6	2	9	0	0	0
Cary	North Carolina	114	70	15	3.2%	5,040	23.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	146	98	10	5.0%	4,983	15.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	161	105	12	4.1%	4,780	26.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Lithonia	Georgia	128	89	15	4.4%	4,262	15.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Waukegan	Illinois	127	84	13	4.1%	3,993	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Austin	Texas	293	197	69	0.4%	3,911	77.7	33	13	33	0	0	0
Escondido	California	146	97	19	1.8%	3,159	27.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Arvada	Colorado	185	126	14	2.4%	3,157	20.8	5	2	5	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	140	100	19	3.1%	3,047	37.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Katy	Texas	163	105	27	0.9%	2,966	35.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
New York City	New York	328	215	103	0.1%	2,188	94.0	11	5	11	0	0	0
Mesquite	Texas	143	100	20	1.2%	1,722	20.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	145	95	26	0.9%	1,456	30.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	166	106	48	0.7%	1,087	46.2	5	6	6	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	152	98	26	0.9%	930	26.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	98	61	54	0.6%	645	56.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	343	227	6	32.3%	794,369	17.8	60	6	60	0	0	50
Bakersfield	249	167	1	83.7%	467,900	2.5	11	1	11	6	6	11
San Jose	296	197	6	36.9%	387,994	7.5	28	2	42	0	0	38
Sacramento	351	230	4	48.2%	387,790	7.9	28	2	28	0	0	27
Fresno	292	194	3	59.4%	357,704	5.3	18	1	18	0	0	18
Long Beach	228	157	3	69.6%	333,382	3.8	12	1	12	0	5	12
San Diego	360	241	8	20.7%	278,331	9.3	36	2	36	0	1	21
Riverside	191	134	2	72.4%	267,726	4.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Anaheim	187	128	2	65.3%	240,545	4.3	7	1	7	0	4	7
Stockton	261	164	3	61.7%	230,474	4.5	12	1	12	0	5	12
Corona	209	142	1	80.0%	205,710	3.2	5	1	5	1	2	5
San Francisco	283	181	8	20.8%	181,422	9.4	28	1	28	0	0	15
Santa Ana	217	146	3	50.5%	180,455	6.3	6	2	6	0	0	5
Fontana	131	91	3	70.0%	164,309	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Irvine	228	154	4	59.1%	158,203	5.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
San Bernardino	219	146	3	59.7%	148,986	5.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pomona	165	109	1	88.8%	140,291	2.7	3	1	3	2	2	3
Ontario	147	96	1	79.3%	140,101	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Moreno Valley	206	130	4	65.3%	134,116	4.8	4	2	4	0	2	4
Compton	136	93	1	92.3%	128,134	1.7	3	1	3	2	3	3
Lancaster	175	116	5	68.5%	126,287	3.7	3	1	3	1	1	3
Garden Grove	176	114	2	71.4%	125,411	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Chula Vista	187	124	4	46.6%	121,559	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Modesto	202	134	4	45.7%	120,807	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Oakland	266	172	6	28.1%	115,853	8.5	14	3	15	0	0	13
Huntington Beach	175	110	5	54.7%	109,318	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Oxnard	174	123	2	49.5%	109,141	6.3	4	2	4	0	1	4
Visalia	154	96	2	70.5%	107,113	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Rancho Cucamonga	173	113	4	58.9%	104,007	5.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Murrieta	144	91	3	75.5%	99,785	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Hayward	174	119	4	47.7%	91,638	6.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Rosa	169	109	5	41.7%	90,120	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Elk Grove	135	89	6	50.0%	89,660	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Mateo	172	104	4	62.6%	89,120	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	195	132	5	49.9%	88,301	17.8	5	2	5	0	0	4
Clovis	142	98	3	72.7%	88,273	4.0	3	2	3	1	1	3
Vallejo	194	130	3	70.3%	87,452	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Napa	140	86	2	90.0%	86,999	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hemet	178	119	3	67.4%	86,852	4.3	3	3	5	0	1	5
Menifee	203	136	1	77.8%	85,980	3.0	4	1	4	1	2	4
Sunnyvale	191	124	3	55.8%	85,211	6.0	4	3	5	0	0	5
Van Nuys	137	89	6	47.6%	84,584	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roseville	163	106	5	60.0%	83,876	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Victorville	151	91	4	60.0%	81,786	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ventura	164	104	4	68.8%	79,762	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Downey	151	94	2	70.0%	79,031	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
La Puente	163	99	3	66.7%	78,700	30.5	2	2	2	0	1	1
Chico	160	101	2	69.9%	78,345	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
West Covina	152	98	2	70.6%	77,218	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Vacaville	126	82	3	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rialto	135	84	3	68.2%	72,653	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orange	168	115	5	47.0%	68,218	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Oceanside	176	114	5	32.8%	65,676	8.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Indio	132	88	3	66.8%	64,189	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Concord	188	127	5	48.9%	63,735	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Santa Maria	165	105	3	44.1%	63,115	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Temecula	154	108	4	48.2%	62,601	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Redwood City	172	115	5	53.5%	61,194	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Marcos	119	79	5	59.8%	60,047	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pasadena	190	134	6	37.4%	58,980	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Whittier	234	149	7	29.8%	58,463	16.3	6	3	6	0	0	4
Berkeley	261	169	6	45.7%	58,125	7.9	9	3	9	0	0	7
Santa Clara	175	113	4	46.1%	57,873	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fremont	191	125	6	22.9%	53,442	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pacoima	99	68	6	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fullerton	157	102	5	37.3%	51,975	7.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
El Cajon	169	118	6	29.6%	51,065	8.7	3	3	4	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	135	89	5	44.4%	50,555	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	131	86	4	50.0%	49,179	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Barbara	222	148	6	35.6%	48,319	7.4	7	2	14	0	0	14
Merced	172	111	5	46.6%	48,064	7.3	3	3	4	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	162	108	4	46.1%	47,931	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	158	104	5	43.0%	47,783	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Redding	181	120	4	42.0%	47,479	6.8	4	3	6	0	0	6
Perris	150	99	5	39.6%	46,506	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	127	84	6	34.4%	44,279	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	176	120	4	46.7%	44,064	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Daly City	146	96	5	38.4%	43,884	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Chino	144	93	5	41.2%	38,957	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
South Gate	98	70	4	40.0%	38,041	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vista	138	94	8	28.6%	34,236	9.3	3	3	4	0	0	2
Salinas	175	113	7	17.6%	33,096	10.0	5	3	6	0	0	3
Carlsbad	173	114	6	27.4%	31,097	10.3	4	3	5	0	0	2
North Hollywood	124	75	9	17.1%	26,129	21.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Burbank	200	135	7	22.8%	24,576	8.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Palo Alto	167	109	8	23.2%	22,445	12.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Tracy	183	123	8	18.7%	21,892	10.5	4	3	6	0	0	3
Norwalk	98	57	7	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fairfield	140	89	6	16.7%	19,097	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	159	106	8	13.8%	14,184	10.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
El Monte	138	87	10	15.1%	14,127	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Livermore	136	84	10	14.3%	13,760	10.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Palmdale	170	102	14	7.4%	13,027	13.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Hesperia	128	83	8	10.0%	10,381	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	102	63	9	10.0%	9,684	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Inglewood	226	155	15	6.2%	8,330	23.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Pittsburg	99	61	11	7.0%	6,726	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Antioch	124	76	12	5.0%	5,536	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Escondido	146	97	19	1.8%	3,159	27.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	98	61	54	0.6%	645	56.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sylmar	98	61	62	0.6%	531	64.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

Las Vegas

ZIP	healthgrades.com	yelp.com	unlvmedicine.org	lubritzandnasri.com	lomaxentlv.com	entlasvegas.com
89121	5	4	6	1	7	8
89131	5	4	7	9	1	8
89141	5	4	6	10	7	1
89122	5	4	6	3	7	8
89161	5	4	6	9	1	3
89120	5	4	6	3		7
89110	5	4	6	2	7	8
89101	5	4	7	3	8	11
89102	5	4	7	2	8	11
89183	5	4	6	9	7	8
89142	5	4	6	3	7	8
89143	5	4	6	3	1	11
89123	5	4	6	9	7	8
89166	2	1	3	7	4	5
89135	2	1	3	6	5	4
89156	2	1	3	6	4	5
89134	2	1	4	7	6	8
89103	2	1	3	6	5	4
89104	2	1	3	6	5	4
89144	2	1	4	8	6	7
89113	2	1	3	10	5	4
89148	2	1	3	12		5
89130	2	1	4	8	5	7
89117	2	1	4	8	6	7
89179	2	1	3	9	4	5
89139	2	1	3	5		4
89149	1	2	3	6	4	5
89129	2	1	4	7	5	8
89108	2	1	3	6	5	8
89178	5	4	6	9	7	1
89107	5	4	7	9	8	11
89147	5	4	6	8	7	3
89138	2	1	4	7	5	8
89169	5	4	6	1	8	7
89118	5	4	6	9	7	1
89109	5	4	6	1	9	7
89115	2	1	3	6	4	5
89145	5	4	7	2	8	11
89146	5	4	6	8	7	9
89124	2	1	3	6	4	5
89106	5	4	6	3	9	11
89128	5	4	7	2	9	11
89119	5	4	6	2		7

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Healthgrades

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 2,825 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Healthgrades Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (ent near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Healthgrades Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Healthgrades Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Healthgrades Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly