Geico Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve geico.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Geico Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Geico Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Geico Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Geico Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	3	46.8%	151,068,698	6.5	27,379	32,654	14	32,700	7	2,274	32,700
California	870	609	3	52.2%	20,424,023	5.8	1,166	1,740	1	1,740	0	190	1,740
Texas	846	595	4	46.7%	13,033,397	6.4	1,360	1,917	2	1,923	0	127	1,923
New York	791	600	3	50.3%	9,874,567	6.2	1,491	1,756	1	1,756	0	153	1,756
Florida	768	578	3	47.5%	9,777,154	6.3	446	975	1	975	0	75	975
Illinois	670	490	3	48.3%	6,196,589	6.3	1,247	1,382	2	1,389	3	108	1,389
Pennsylvania	757	591	3	47.0%	6,006,980	6.5	1,604	1,781	1	1,781	0	140	1,781
Georgia	409	319	3	51.5%	5,306,752	5.8	574	726	2	727	0	71	727
Ohio	670	548	4	45.1%	5,253,752	6.6	976	1,188	2	1,195	0	59	1,195
New Jersey	436	328	3	51.4%	4,562,688	5.9	537	593	1	593	0	63	593
North Carolina	506	406	4	42.2%	4,285,446	6.8	683	802	2	804	0	42	804
Michigan	656	528	5	39.4%	3,918,655	6.9	833	976	1	977	0	40	977
Virginia	406	322	3	46.2%	3,890,507	6.4	723	891	1	891	0	58	891
Washington	337	274	3	46.4%	3,374,899	6.3	451	587	2	588	0	40	588
Arizona	269	218	3	48.4%	3,363,927	6.1	247	396	1	396	0	42	396
Maryland	338	254	3	48.9%	2,936,789	6.2	392	463	1	463	0	45	463
Tennessee	377	305	4	43.6%	2,898,587	6.6	514	622	1	622	0	40	622
Colorado	296	242	3	51.8%	2,863,134	5.9	381	514	2	521	2	57	521
Indiana	472	373	5	39.8%	2,639,196	7.1	659	770	1	770	0	22	770
Wisconsin	481	384	5	43.2%	2,494,927	6.6	694	769	2	770	0	42	770
Minnesota	530	418	5	44.2%	2,442,931	6.8	777	878	1	878	0	42	878
Massachusetts	517	422	5	35.6%	2,428,448	7.3	461	534	1	534	0	13	534
Missouri	427	337	5	37.9%	2,310,088	7.1	887	1,017	1	1,017	0	37	1,017
South Carolina	278	223	3	45.9%	2,273,998	6.3	347	422	2	423	0	37	423
Louisiana	306	237	4	46.4%	2,162,662	6.5	431	510	2	511	0	30	511
Alabama	320	261	5	43.3%	2,104,031	6.6	522	637	1	637	0	34	637
Oklahoma	322	248	4	49.3%	1,933,031	6.2	557	646	1	646	0	62	646
Kentucky	354	287	5	42.9%	1,907,821	6.9	698	758	1	758	0	24	758
Oregon	271	224	3	44.5%	1,817,065	6.4	355	414	1	414	0	32	414
Connecticut	284	228	3	48.1%	1,723,345	6.2	234	279	3	289	2	24	289
Nevada	176	146	3	50.6%	1,479,522	6.0	92	168	1	168	0	18	168
Iowa	486	357	3	45.2%	1,415,214	6.8	890	933	1	933	0	54	933
Utah	245	207	5	44.1%	1,343,282	6.5	246	284	1	284	0	15	284
Mississippi	250	193	3	44.8%	1,338,428	6.5	384	418	1	418	0	30	418
Arkansas	261	209	5	40.4%	1,209,049	6.9	553	587	1	587	0	26	587
Kansas	341	261	5	39.8%	1,156,570	7.0	616	692	2	693	0	19	693
New Mexico	204	159	3	50.5%	1,054,691	6.2	327	361	1	361	0	23	361
Nebraska	308	241	3	47.1%	898,155	6.6	524	581	1	581	0	41	581
West Virginia	277	224	4	42.7%	780,495	6.6	684	704	1	704	0	34	704
Hawaii	152	129	3	54.1%	768,860	5.6	82	93	1	93	0	14	93
Idaho	199	170	4	42.7%	719,607	6.5	251	273	1	273	0	20	273
New Hampshire	226	197	3	47.3%	635,590	6.5	238	248	1	248	0	17	248
Maine	240	198	4	41.3%	550,708	6.8	421	425	1	425	0	24	425
Montana	229	186	3	51.1%	532,386	6.4	348	361	1	361	0	23	361
Delaware	159	137	3	50.0%	474,296	6.0	52	66	1	66	0	6	66
Rhode Island	157	139	3	44.1%	465,914	6.6	64	77	1	77	0	3	77
Alaska	155	134	3	55.0%	405,850	4.8	218	235	1	235	0	87	235
South Dakota	217	174	4	43.6%	376,336	6.5	359	370	1	370	0	23	370
North Dakota	206	168	5	45.7%	343,483	6.6	367	381	1	381	0	22	381
Vermont	197	170	4	43.8%	273,664	6.5	250	254	1	254	0	17	254
Wyoming	152	130	4	44.4%	258,605	6.5	164	171	1	171	0	4	171

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	173	138	4	48.4%	1,543,058	6.1	96	1	96	0	8	96
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	3	53.8%	1,454,655	5.8	56	1	57	1	6	57
Los Angeles	California	147	126	3	57.0%	1,400,365	5.4	62	1	62	0	14	62
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	3	51.8%	1,346,965	5.8	37	1	37	0	5	37
Miami	Florida	160	123	3	49.4%	927,631	6.1	55	1	55	0	6	55
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	3	54.8%	864,041	5.7	47	1	47	0	6	47
Bronx	New York	118	103	3	59.2%	853,200	5.1	25	1	25	0	8	25
New York City	New York	128	111	3	51.9%	841,642	5.8	47	1	47	0	4	47
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	4	44.0%	782,481	6.3	59	1	59	0	4	59
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	3	49.5%	765,194	6.1	43	1	43	0	4	43
San Diego	California	134	116	3	54.0%	728,051	5.6	36	1	36	0	5	36
Dallas	Texas	149	126	3	47.9%	667,413	5.9	48	1	48	0	5	48
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	4	44.7%	648,497	6.4	42	1	42	0	2	42
Denver	Colorado	136	120	3	56.5%	614,595	5.3	38	1	38	0	9	38
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	3	52.1%	567,059	5.8	51	1	51	0	8	51
San Jose	California	129	116	3	51.6%	542,314	5.9	28	1	28	0	1	28
Austin	Texas	138	123	3	47.8%	519,572	6.1	44	1	45	0	3	45
Orlando	Florida	133	115	3	50.9%	506,745	5.9	32	1	32	0	4	32
Seattle	Washington	142	127	3	51.2%	489,498	5.9	35	1	35	0	4	35
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	4	48.9%	483,826	6.1	39	1	39	0	0	39
San Francisco	California	121	106	3	51.3%	446,088	6.0	28	1	28	0	2	28
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	3	50.0%	433,501	5.7	31	1	31	0	5	31
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	4	47.8%	433,157	6.2	24	1	24	0	3	24
El Paso	Texas	122	110	3	54.9%	433,052	5.7	24	1	24	0	5	24
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	5	47.2%	427,464	6.0	32	1	32	0	3	32
Sacramento	California	134	115	3	51.8%	416,957	6.0	28	1	28	0	4	28
Portland	Oregon	130	112	3	44.6%	410,508	6.4	33	1	33	0	0	33
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	3	48.5%	410,229	6.3	30	1	30	0	1	30
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	3	47.8%	397,202	6.0	27	1	27	0	3	27
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	4	40.6%	386,027	6.9	37	1	37	0	0	37
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	3	56.4%	385,310	5.7	43	1	43	0	6	43
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	3	55.9%	382,535	5.5	28	1	28	0	5	28
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	5	40.6%	370,039	6.9	32	1	32	0	1	32
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	3	55.4%	363,325	5.6	17	1	17	0	2	17
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	5	44.0%	356,789	6.7	29	2	30	0	1	30
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	3	47.1%	353,760	6.4	29	1	29	0	2	29
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	5	38.3%	350,945	6.9	45	1	45	0	1	45
Tampa	Florida	131	110	4	43.1%	342,005	6.7	27	1	27	0	2	27
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	4	42.2%	339,075	6.6	45	1	45	0	1	45
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	5	42.3%	338,297	6.6	30	1	30	0	2	30
Bakersfield	California	112	102	3	57.2%	320,001	5.2	11	1	11	0	3	11
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	4	46.0%	319,633	6.4	26	1	26	0	1	26
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	3	46.3%	315,913	6.5	39	1	39	0	3	39
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	3	53.8%	314,098	5.5	30	2	31	1	6	31
Fresno	California	120	105	3	50.9%	306,719	5.9	18	1	18	0	1	18
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	5	40.2%	306,281	6.9	32	1	32	0	3	32
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	4	44.1%	282,683	6.4	25	1	26	0	3	26
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	3	50.9%	272,295	5.9	13	1	13	0	2	13
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	3	48.1%	265,725	6.0	31	1	31	0	4	31
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	4	40.5%	255,794	6.9	22	1	22	0	1	22
Buffalo	New York	142	124	4	43.9%	247,201	6.6	28	1	28	0	3	28
Staten Island	New York	120	105	3	52.0%	246,396	5.9	12	1	12	0	1	12
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	4	43.6%	238,488	6.7	15	2	16	0	1	16
Long Beach	California	120	109	3	49.2%	235,550	6.1	12	1	12	0	0	12
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	3	54.4%	232,919	5.8	19	1	19	0	5	19
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	4	55.7%	231,769	5.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	4	48.3%	231,176	6.3	27	1	27	0	3	27
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	4	48.1%	225,576	6.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	3	48.5%	222,155	5.9	22	1	22	0	3	22
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	3	52.6%	222,025	6.1	28	1	28	0	2	28
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	3	49.2%	214,274	5.9	11	1	11	0	0	11
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	5	42.7%	213,474	6.7	30	1	30	0	0	30
Spring	Texas	114	103	3	56.0%	213,253	5.4	8	1	8	0	3	8
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	4	43.8%	213,035	6.6	19	1	19	0	1	19
Rochester	New York	125	108	4	45.1%	212,799	6.4	24	1	24	0	4	24
Oakland	California	115	102	3	50.9%	209,529	5.9	14	1	14	0	2	14
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	3	54.0%	208,644	6.0	17	1	17	0	3	17
Riverside	California	113	102	3	55.5%	205,189	5.3	7	1	7	0	2	7
Arlington	Texas	122	107	4	50.1%	199,013	6.0	12	1	12	0	3	12
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	3	52.3%	193,976	5.9	10	1	10	0	1	10
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	3	51.5%	190,901	6.0	12	1	12	0	1	12
Santa Ana	California	110	99	3	53.2%	189,962	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Reno	Nevada	112	100	3	63.4%	188,064	5.0	12	1	12	0	4	12
Katy	Texas	112	102	3	54.5%	187,501	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	6	32.5%	185,962	7.5	49	1	49	0	1	49
Anaheim	California	114	102	3	50.0%	184,313	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	4	50.0%	183,558	6.1	7	1	7	0	1	7
Stockton	California	122	108	3	49.0%	183,265	6.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	4	40.7%	183,211	6.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	3	51.3%	182,891	5.9	16	1	16	0	1	16
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	3	50.4%	178,683	5.9	14	1	14	0	2	14
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	4	54.6%	176,222	5.7	7	1	7	0	1	7
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	3	57.8%	175,229	5.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	5	44.8%	175,188	6.3	15	1	15	0	1	15
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	3	53.0%	172,398	5.8	10	1	10	0	2	10
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	4	45.1%	170,832	6.2	18	1	18	0	1	18
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	5	40.1%	167,531	7.0	26	2	27	0	1	27
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	3	51.9%	166,043	6.1	15	1	15	0	1	15
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	4	57.1%	165,743	5.9	8	1	8	0	1	8
Spokane	Washington	113	104	5	45.1%	162,022	6.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Naples	Florida	125	111	3	50.2%	157,192	6.2	14	1	14	0	1	14
Plano	Texas	112	103	3	51.2%	156,452	6.0	7	1	7	0	1	7
Irvine	California	112	101	3	58.3%	155,893	5.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	4	47.5%	154,895	6.1	18	1	18	0	1	18
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	3	59.0%	154,471	4.4	7	1	7	0	4	7
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	3	44.7%	153,360	6.2	14	1	14	0	1	14
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	4	40.9%	150,560	7.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	3	51.5%	148,877	6.2	22	1	22	0	3	22
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	3	55.2%	148,170	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	3	49.0%	146,023	6.1	11	1	11	0	1	11
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	3	47.4%	144,600	6.3	9	1	9	0	1	9
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	4	48.8%	143,940	6.2	14	1	14	0	2	14
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	4	50.6%	141,956	6.1	9	1	9	0	1	9
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	3	42.7%	139,301	6.8	11	1	11	0	0	11
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	3	58.1%	138,680	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	5	42.2%	138,364	6.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Garland	Texas	106	96	3	57.7%	137,397	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Akron	Ohio	122	112	3	50.8%	137,338	6.2	17	1	17	0	1	17
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	5	53.5%	137,124	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	3	51.0%	136,704	6.2	13	1	13	0	1	13
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	4	44.3%	136,345	6.5	15	1	15	0	1	15
Jamaica	New York	112	100	3	55.5%	135,332	4.7	6	1	6	0	2	6
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	4	46.1%	132,826	6.5	10	1	10	0	0	10
Chula Vista	California	109	100	3	50.0%	130,416	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Modesto	California	111	101	4	49.3%	130,315	5.7	7	1	7	0	1	7
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	4	53.2%	129,920	5.5	12	1	12	0	3	12
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	3	51.8%	129,722	6.0	13	1	13	0	2	13
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	6	42.8%	129,422	6.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	3	53.3%	128,504	5.6	10	1	10	0	2	10
Flushing	New York	107	96	3	58.7%	126,269	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	5	37.8%	126,104	6.9	20	1	20	0	1	20
Corona	California	111	98	3	48.7%	125,245	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	3	56.9%	124,774	5.5	10	1	10	0	2	10
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	3	42.6%	123,107	6.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	3	57.8%	122,341	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Bernardino	California	113	103	4	47.9%	119,576	6.1	7	1	7	0	1	7
Irving	Texas	111	102	3	49.6%	119,199	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	5	42.9%	118,633	6.4	14	1	14	0	2	14
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	3	52.6%	117,376	5.9	12	1	12	0	2	12
Fontana	California	109	98	3	50.0%	117,364	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	4	47.5%	116,674	6.4	14	1	14	0	1	14
Salem	Oregon	110	101	5	43.5%	115,832	6.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	4	55.6%	114,775	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	3	51.0%	113,354	5.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Ocala	Florida	118	107	3	49.5%	111,483	6.2	11	1	11	0	1	11
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	5	47.4%	110,722	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	4	42.8%	110,428	6.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	5	34.5%	109,666	7.3	16	1	16	0	0	16
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	4	52.3%	108,738	5.9	15	1	15	0	1	15
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	4	44.5%	108,498	6.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	5	42.9%	108,491	6.4	10	1	10	0	1	10
Laredo	Texas	126	110	4	40.0%	108,317	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	4	49.1%	107,773	6.0	9	1	9	0	1	9
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	3	56.6%	107,577	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	4	48.1%	107,474	6.1	11	1	11	0	1	11
Fremont	California	107	98	3	46.1%	107,459	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boise	Idaho	111	100	4	41.2%	105,590	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	3	48.3%	105,338	6.3	12	1	12	0	1	12
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	5	38.0%	103,234	6.8	18	1	18	0	1	18
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	4	50.0%	102,727	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	4	44.9%	102,705	6.2	14	1	14	0	2	14
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	4	50.0%	102,215	6.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Oxnard	California	107	98	4	46.2%	101,813	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Van Nuys	California	105	95	3	57.0%	101,330	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	3	50.0%	100,819	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	3	64.6%	100,456	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Oceanside	California	106	96	3	50.0%	100,130	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	3	50.0%	99,954	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Denton	Texas	110	101	3	62.4%	98,633	4.8	6	1	6	0	3	6
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	3	47.3%	98,364	6.3	11	1	11	0	0	11
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	5	41.3%	98,141	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Whittier	California	108	98	4	50.0%	98,081	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	3	55.3%	97,706	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	3	58.3%	97,571	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Pasadena	California	113	103	3	61.6%	97,098	5.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	5	45.0%	96,881	6.5	10	1	10	0	0	10
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	3	52.8%	96,753	5.9	9	1	9	0	1	9
Vallejo	California	107	98	3	77.3%	96,180	4.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
Hayward	California	108	98	3	50.0%	96,017	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	4	61.8%	95,981	4.8	4	2	5	0	2	5
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	3	44.3%	95,634	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	4	47.0%	95,442	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Olympia	Washington	110	98	4	51.9%	94,905	5.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	4	50.0%	94,596	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	3	46.9%	94,419	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	California	106	96	3	50.0%	94,164	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	4	44.8%	93,944	6.4	13	1	13	0	0	13
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	4	58.7%	92,429	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Lancaster	California	105	96	3	50.0%	92,210	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Visalia	California	108	99	4	60.5%	91,912	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Midland	Texas	113	102	3	57.3%	91,619	5.4	5	1	5	0	2	5
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	4	46.7%	91,595	6.3	11	1	11	0	1	11
Ogden	Utah	110	101	5	45.3%	91,276	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	3	54.7%	90,624	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	3	50.0%	90,413	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	3	44.4%	90,150	6.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	4	43.0%	90,106	6.6	10	1	10	0	0	10
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	3	49.0%	90,001	6.5	13	1	13	0	0	13
Escondido	California	104	94	4	50.0%	89,827	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elk Grove	California	109	96	4	50.0%	89,660	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	106	98	4	64.7%	88,849	5.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	3	45.2%	88,091	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Garden Grove	California	110	97	4	50.0%	87,881	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Yonkers	New York	109	99	4	48.5%	87,625	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Palmdale	California	106	97	4	50.0%	87,468	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Humble	Texas	108	98	3	52.5%	87,404	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Torrance	California	113	103	3	49.0%	86,578	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	3	53.9%	86,495	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Odessa	Texas	112	103	3	53.9%	86,310	5.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	3	59.6%	86,263	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
El Cajon	California	109	97	5	50.0%	86,232	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Frisco	Texas	105	95	5	50.0%	86,224	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orange	California	111	100	3	59.2%	85,884	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	5	34.0%	85,568	7.6	11	1	11	0	0	11
Murrieta	California	106	96	4	64.5%	85,357	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	4	46.6%	85,038	6.2	9	1	9	0	1	9
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	5	48.8%	84,904	6.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Norwalk	California	99	91	3	80.0%	84,709	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Santa Maria	California	106	97	3	59.2%	84,695	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
North Hollywood	California	108	98	3	55.3%	84,686	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	4	41.1%	84,253	6.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	3	56.9%	83,248	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Fullerton	California	106	97	3	59.7%	83,128	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	3	58.4%	83,047	5.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Astoria	New York	111	100	3	58.1%	82,851	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Ontario	California	109	98	4	46.9%	82,842	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	3	64.2%	82,607	5.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	4	45.0%	82,546	6.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	4	47.3%	82,336	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	6	44.3%	82,280	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
San Mateo	California	106	97	4	57.8%	82,263	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	5	47.8%	82,119	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	3	60.6%	82,117	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
La Puente	California	105	96	3	69.6%	82,075	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	3	80.0%	81,946	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	3	50.0%	81,821	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	6	43.2%	81,635	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	3	50.0%	81,010	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	4	59.1%	80,960	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	4	47.5%	80,949	6.5	11	1	11	0	1	11
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	5	51.1%	80,868	5.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	4	52.8%	80,720	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Syracuse	New York	119	107	4	35.5%	80,484	7.4	15	1	15	0	0	15
Bothell	Washington	110	98	3	62.7%	80,389	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	5	42.2%	80,366	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Macon	Georgia	118	108	3	49.1%	80,301	6.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	3	65.2%	80,155	5.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Homestead	Florida	111	99	4	42.7%	80,105	6.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	4	40.6%	80,038	7.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	4	41.2%	79,409	6.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Everett	Washington	112	100	5	47.6%	79,380	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pomona	California	107	97	3	50.0%	78,993	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Albany	New York	117	102	3	51.7%	78,262	6.2	11	1	11	0	1	11
Cypress	Texas	108	101	3	45.2%	77,075	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Schenectady	New York	113	101	3	47.4%	76,758	6.0	8	1	8	0	1	8
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	4	45.2%	76,540	6.2	9	1	9	0	2	9
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	8	28.9%	76,209	7.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Roseville	California	106	95	4	54.5%	76,162	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	California	99	90	3	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	2	68.4%	75,773	4.5	4	2	5	0	1	5
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	4	58.5%	75,356	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	5	50.4%	75,126	5.9	7	1	7	0	1	7
Pearland	Texas	104	96	4	54.4%	74,884	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	5	43.9%	74,667	6.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	3	54.8%	74,601	6.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	5	51.4%	74,382	5.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	3	60.7%	74,149	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Orem	Utah	104	96	4	73.8%	74,084	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	5	40.1%	73,914	7.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	3	50.0%	73,799	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Concord	California	107	98	3	56.5%	73,638	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	3	52.5%	73,220	5.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	5	40.2%	72,665	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	3	46.1%	72,490	6.5	12	1	12	0	0	12
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	4	46.5%	72,471	6.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	3	60.6%	72,234	4.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	4	41.9%	72,147	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Killeen	Texas	110	101	3	47.5%	71,332	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clovis	California	106	97	4	58.8%	71,328	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	3	57.6%	71,097	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	4	70.0%	70,534	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	4	53.6%	70,316	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Waco	Texas	112	100	6	44.1%	69,857	6.4	9	1	9	0	1	9
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	3	60.4%	69,843	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Compton	California	106	98	4	50.0%	69,438	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	5	52.5%	69,232	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	112	100	4	44.6%	69,015	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	9	29.8%	68,579	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Inglewood	California	124	112	3	51.2%	68,471	6.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Hemet	California	105	95	3	53.1%	68,414	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	4	47.8%	68,245	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Victorville	California	105	95	4	50.0%	68,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	7	38.8%	68,143	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	3	66.1%	67,924	5.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	3	46.4%	67,632	6.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	7	40.0%	67,571	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	110	99	3	53.0%	67,355	5.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Mission	Texas	105	95	7	36.9%	66,736	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tyler	Texas	115	104	6	42.7%	66,666	6.1	9	1	9	0	2	9
El Monte	California	103	94	3	70.4%	65,927	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	3	67.7%	65,839	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	4	54.6%	65,728	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	6	44.7%	65,476	6.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	7	36.0%	65,429	6.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	8	35.1%	65,395	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	3	51.9%	64,967	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	6	44.3%	64,770	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	6	38.8%	64,623	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	3	47.5%	64,610	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	3	55.6%	64,356	5.2	5	1	5	0	2	5
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	7	38.0%	64,313	7.3	10	1	10	0	0	10
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	6	50.0%	64,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	5	50.0%	64,043	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	4	47.8%	63,798	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	3	65.8%	63,684	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
San Leandro	California	108	97	3	57.1%	63,503	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	3	64.2%	63,432	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	5	35.7%	63,155	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	4	51.4%	62,976	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	5	34.3%	62,928	7.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Santa Clara	California	107	97	4	50.0%	62,759	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Napa	California	101	92	4	64.3%	62,161	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	4	55.8%	62,155	4.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	5	42.6%	62,040	6.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Panama City	Florida	107	99	4	48.9%	61,790	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	6	37.5%	61,534	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Kent	Washington	113	102	5	38.3%	61,517	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	7	34.2%	61,496	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	4	63.1%	61,485	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	3	62.5%	61,483	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	4	46.0%	61,382	5.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Deltona	Florida	102	93	3	65.3%	61,347	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	5	46.8%	61,187	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	7	49.3%	60,947	6.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	7	37.3%	60,941	7.3	18	1	18	0	0	18
Canton	Ohio	117	105	5	41.3%	60,654	7.3	12	1	12	0	1	12
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	4	62.1%	60,112	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	5	43.0%	60,071	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	6	51.6%	59,581	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Conroe	Texas	111	101	5	37.0%	59,300	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	4	38.9%	59,101	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	5	45.2%	59,006	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	3	54.2%	58,724	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Simi Valley	California	101	92	3	45.6%	58,691	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Abilene	Texas	111	102	5	45.1%	58,662	6.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	4	59.3%	58,374	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	4	53.6%	58,117	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	6	41.8%	58,071	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	5	46.6%	57,777	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Yakima	Washington	109	100	4	44.3%	57,557	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	5	43.4%	57,544	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	3	54.9%	57,527	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Redwood City	California	105	95	3	50.0%	57,232	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	3	43.9%	57,152	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fairfield	California	102	93	4	50.0%	57,040	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	4	50.0%	57,033	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	California	106	97	3	47.5%	56,993	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	5	50.0%	56,877	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	California	109	96	4	50.0%	56,835	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	4	60.8%	56,797	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	4	58.2%	56,767	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Temecula	California	109	99	7	43.5%	56,515	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	4	46.2%	56,513	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	California	100	91	3	50.0%	56,451	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	4	47.3%	56,156	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	6	36.9%	55,970	7.3	14	1	14	0	0	14
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	7	42.8%	55,894	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	6	41.4%	55,784	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Independence	Missouri	112	103	6	44.9%	55,697	6.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	6	41.9%	55,652	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	102	94	4	50.0%	55,636	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	4	49.6%	55,560	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
College Station	Texas	107	98	6	44.9%	55,217	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	6	44.9%	55,127	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	6	50.0%	55,124	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	5	53.0%	55,114	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	4	44.9%	54,970	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	6	47.6%	54,804	6.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Warren	Michigan	115	103	4	40.5%	54,695	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ventura	California	104	95	3	47.1%	54,661	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	4	50.0%	54,348	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	4	41.4%	54,209	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	7	37.9%	53,676	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Auburn	Washington	112	101	7	47.5%	53,625	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	5	50.0%	53,439	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Richardson	Texas	109	101	4	46.6%	53,368	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Palo Alto	California	107	96	3	54.9%	53,108	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Redding	California	110	99	4	46.9%	53,060	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	7	36.7%	53,021	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Longview	Texas	122	109	5	50.4%	53,019	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pacoima	California	100	90	4	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Largo	Florida	113	105	4	49.1%	52,884	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	3	46.9%	52,727	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	4	44.2%	52,617	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	7	35.8%	52,595	7.3	10	1	10	0	0	10
Athens	Georgia	115	106	4	42.1%	52,540	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	3	47.1%	52,506	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chico	California	105	96	3	46.6%	52,252	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Daly City	California	103	94	5	45.7%	52,250	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	6	41.3%	51,840	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	4	52.3%	51,712	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	4	53.4%	51,500	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Provo	Utah	108	99	4	44.1%	51,399	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	8	39.7%	51,270	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Covina	California	111	100	3	46.9%	51,268	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	4	48.5%	51,156	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Menifee	California	108	98	3	46.2%	51,089	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	3	50.0%	51,082	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Burbank	California	109	100	4	47.2%	50,940	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	5	50.0%	50,861	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tracy	California	106	96	4	43.3%	50,771	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	8	30.9%	50,768	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	5	50.0%	50,731	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Keller	Texas	108	99	6	43.4%	50,441	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	107	98	4	50.0%	50,241	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	105	94	4	48.8%	50,214	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	108	100	6	50.0%	50,141	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	3	50.0%	49,885	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	4	44.3%	49,734	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	5	37.6%	49,604	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	6	50.0%	49,565	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	5	50.6%	49,559	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	6	46.6%	49,392	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	7	42.2%	49,368	6.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	4	45.4%	49,275	6.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	4	48.1%	49,273	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	3	51.4%	48,979	6.0	7	1	7	0	1	7
Missoula	Montana	111	102	4	50.2%	48,843	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Flint	Michigan	117	105	7	31.4%	48,824	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	5	33.5%	48,735	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Antioch	California	107	99	5	44.0%	48,667	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	4	49.4%	48,640	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	5	40.2%	48,600	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hawthorne	California	101	90	5	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	6	50.0%	48,383	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Merced	California	108	100	6	46.9%	48,285	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sylmar	California	100	94	4	50.0%	48,244	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pittsburg	California	98	90	3	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	6	50.2%	47,695	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	4	42.3%	47,694	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	5	46.2%	47,596	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	6	50.0%	47,359	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	110	98	5	50.0%	47,284	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	105	96	4	50.0%	47,237	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	5	46.9%	47,089	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	6	50.0%	46,984	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	6	37.0%	46,829	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	5	50.0%	46,698	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	4	43.6%	46,639	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	5	49.0%	46,592	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	4	46.2%	46,534	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Perris	California	106	96	8	39.6%	46,506	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	California	105	96	4	49.2%	46,479	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	4	48.8%	46,345	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Covington	Georgia	107	98	5	50.0%	46,344	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	4	44.0%	46,182	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Baytown	Texas	108	98	8	38.8%	45,730	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	5	45.8%	45,677	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sandy	Utah	111	103	6	41.1%	45,366	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Riverview	Florida	104	96	5	40.6%	45,218	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	7	38.8%	44,992	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Indio	California	103	94	4	46.8%	44,971	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	7	34.4%	44,845	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	7	38.2%	44,707	6.6	11	1	11	0	1	11
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	4	46.7%	44,704	6.4	8	1	8	0	0	8
Rialto	California	106	97	6	41.8%	44,589	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	117	107	4	46.5%	44,566	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	6	43.1%	43,991	6.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Hesperia	California	105	94	6	42.2%	43,825	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	3	46.0%	43,763	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	6	44.9%	43,268	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	5	39.4%	42,944	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	109	99	7	34.9%	42,721	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bryan	Texas	114	105	5	44.4%	42,719	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	5	40.0%	42,687	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	6	36.5%	42,342	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	4	44.6%	42,286	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	6	42.7%	42,066	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Milton	Florida	108	99	6	43.5%	41,217	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	8	33.3%	40,497	7.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	4	40.9%	40,104	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	5	40.0%	40,100	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	9	34.4%	40,053	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	6	41.8%	39,928	6.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	5	42.2%	39,866	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Buford	Georgia	102	94	5	40.0%	39,641	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	6	37.2%	39,630	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	6	31.2%	39,394	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	9	38.9%	38,668	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livermore	California	105	95	6	39.5%	38,027	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	5	37.9%	37,714	7.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	6	38.8%	36,978	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	8	35.3%	36,271	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ballwin	Missouri	105	95	7	37.8%	35,804	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	7	35.3%	35,378	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vacaville	California	101	92	6	33.5%	35,312	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	7	36.5%	34,720	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	108	96	7	34.0%	34,046	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Apopka	Florida	105	95	7	34.8%	33,962	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	107	98	7	35.5%	33,290	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	6	34.2%	32,496	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	8	34.1%	32,110	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	107	97	7	32.9%	30,784	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	8	30.4%	30,701	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	8	27.3%	30,345	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	10	28.6%	29,850	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	7	31.6%	29,313	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Medford	Oregon	106	98	8	30.0%	27,976	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	6	28.9%	26,931	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	10	23.4%	22,335	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	3	57.0%	1,400,365	5.4	62	1	62	14	62
San Diego	134	116	3	54.0%	728,051	5.6	36	1	36	5	36
San Jose	129	116	3	51.6%	542,314	5.9	28	1	28	1	28
San Francisco	121	106	3	51.3%	446,088	6.0	28	1	28	2	28
Sacramento	134	115	3	51.8%	416,957	6.0	28	1	28	4	28
Bakersfield	112	102	3	57.2%	320,001	5.2	11	1	11	3	11
Fresno	120	105	3	50.9%	306,719	5.9	18	1	18	1	18
Long Beach	120	109	3	49.2%	235,550	6.1	12	1	12	0	12
Oakland	115	102	3	50.9%	209,529	5.9	14	1	14	2	14
Riverside	113	102	3	55.5%	205,189	5.3	7	1	7	2	7
Santa Ana	110	99	3	53.2%	189,962	5.7	6	1	6	1	6
Anaheim	114	102	3	50.0%	184,313	6.0	7	1	7	0	7
Stockton	122	108	3	49.0%	183,265	6.3	12	1	12	0	12
Irvine	112	101	3	58.3%	155,893	5.3	9	1	9	2	9
Chula Vista	109	100	3	50.0%	130,416	6.0	5	1	5	0	5
Modesto	111	101	4	49.3%	130,315	5.7	7	1	7	1	7
Corona	111	98	3	48.7%	125,245	6.2	5	1	5	0	5
San Bernardino	113	103	4	47.9%	119,576	6.1	7	1	7	1	7
Fontana	109	98	3	50.0%	117,364	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Fremont	107	98	3	46.1%	107,459	6.5	4	1	4	0	4
Moreno Valley	109	99	4	50.0%	102,727	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Oxnard	107	98	4	46.2%	101,813	6.3	4	1	4	0	4
Van Nuys	105	95	3	57.0%	101,330	5.3	4	1	4	1	4
Oceanside	106	96	3	50.0%	100,130	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Huntington Beach	111	99	3	50.0%	99,954	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Whittier	108	98	4	50.0%	98,081	6.0	6	1	6	0	6
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	3	55.3%	97,706	5.5	4	1	4	1	4
Pasadena	113	103	3	61.6%	97,098	5.0	6	1	6	2	6
Vallejo	107	98	3	77.3%	96,180	4.0	4	1	4	2	4
Hayward	108	98	3	50.0%	96,017	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Santa Rosa	112	100	3	44.3%	95,634	6.5	6	1	6	0	6
Salinas	106	96	3	50.0%	94,164	6.0	5	1	5	0	5
Lancaster	105	96	3	50.0%	92,210	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Visalia	108	99	4	60.5%	91,912	5.0	3	1	3	1	3
Escondido	104	94	4	50.0%	89,827	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Elk Grove	109	96	4	50.0%	89,660	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Garden Grove	110	97	4	50.0%	87,881	6.0	5	1	5	0	5
Palmdale	106	97	4	50.0%	87,468	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Torrance	113	103	3	49.0%	86,578	6.2	5	1	5	0	5
El Cajon	109	97	5	50.0%	86,232	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Orange	111	100	3	59.2%	85,884	5.4	5	1	5	1	5
Murrieta	106	96	4	64.5%	85,357	4.5	2	1	2	1	2
Norwalk	99	91	3	80.0%	84,709	3.0	1	1	1	1	1
Santa Maria	106	97	3	59.2%	84,695	5.3	3	1	3	1	3
North Hollywood	108	98	3	55.3%	84,686	5.5	4	1	4	1	4
Fullerton	106	97	3	59.7%	83,128	5.5	4	1	4	1	4
Ontario	109	98	4	46.9%	82,842	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
San Mateo	106	97	4	57.8%	82,263	5.3	4	1	4	1	4
La Puente	105	96	3	69.6%	82,075	5.0	2	1	2	1	2
Bell Gardens	99	90	3	80.0%	81,946	3.0	1	1	1	1	1
Sunnyvale	107	98	4	52.8%	80,720	5.5	4	1	4	1	4
Pomona	107	97	3	50.0%	78,993	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Roseville	106	95	4	54.5%	76,162	5.3	3	1	3	0	3
South Gate	99	90	3	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	1	1	1	1
Concord	107	98	3	56.5%	73,638	5.3	4	1	4	1	4
Clovis	106	97	4	58.8%	71,328	5.0	3	1	3	1	3
Compton	106	98	4	50.0%	69,438	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Inglewood	124	112	3	51.2%	68,471	6.0	5	1	5	1	5
Hemet	105	95	3	53.1%	68,414	5.7	3	1	3	1	3
Victorville	105	95	4	50.0%	68,155	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Berkeley	110	99	3	53.0%	67,355	5.8	9	1	9	1	9
El Monte	103	94	3	70.4%	65,927	4.5	2	1	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	111	99	3	47.5%	64,610	6.3	7	1	7	0	7
San Leandro	108	97	3	57.1%	63,503	5.7	3	1	3	1	3
Santa Clara	107	97	4	50.0%	62,759	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Napa	101	92	4	64.3%	62,161	5.0	2	1	2	0	2
Simi Valley	101	92	3	45.6%	58,691	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
Mission Viejo	105	95	4	59.3%	58,374	5.0	2	1	2	1	2
Redwood City	105	95	3	50.0%	57,232	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Fairfield	102	93	4	50.0%	57,040	6.0	2	1	2	0	2
Vista	106	97	3	47.5%	56,993	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Costa Mesa	104	95	5	50.0%	56,877	6.0	2	1	2	0	2
Carlsbad	109	96	4	50.0%	56,835	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
Temecula	109	99	7	43.5%	56,515	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Downey	100	91	3	50.0%	56,451	6.0	3	1	3	0	3
Santa Cruz	106	95	5	53.0%	55,114	5.3	4	1	4	1	4
Ventura	104	95	3	47.1%	54,661	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Palo Alto	107	96	3	54.9%	53,108	5.5	4	1	4	1	4
Redding	110	99	4	46.9%	53,060	6.3	4	1	4	0	4
Pacoima	100	90	4	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Chico	105	96	3	46.6%	52,252	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Daly City	103	94	5	45.7%	52,250	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
West Covina	111	100	3	46.9%	51,268	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Menifee	108	98	3	46.2%	51,089	6.5	4	1	4	0	4
Burbank	109	100	4	47.2%	50,940	6.2	5	1	5	0	5
Tracy	106	96	4	43.3%	50,771	6.0	4	1	4	0	4
San Marcos	107	98	4	50.0%	50,241	6.0	2	1	2	0	2
Madera	105	94	4	48.8%	50,214	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Antioch	107	99	5	44.0%	48,667	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
Hawthorne	101	90	5	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Merced	108	100	6	46.9%	48,285	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Sylmar	100	94	4	50.0%	48,244	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Pittsburg	98	90	3	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	1	1	0	1
Chino	105	96	4	50.0%	47,237	6.0	2	1	2	0	2
Perris	106	96	8	39.6%	46,506	7.0	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Monica	105	96	4	49.2%	46,479	6.2	5	1	5	0	5
Indio	103	94	4	46.8%	44,971	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
Rialto	106	97	6	41.8%	44,589	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
Hesperia	105	94	6	42.2%	43,825	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
Livermore	105	95	6	39.5%	38,027	7.0	2	1	2	0	2
Vacaville	101	92	6	33.5%	35,312	7.5	2	1	2	0	2

Houston

ZIP	geico.com	allstate.com	nationwide.com	farmers.com	esurance.com	libertymutual.com
77088	6	4	5	8	7	9
77047	6	4	5	8	7	9
77037	7	4	5	6	8	9
77098	6	4	5	7	8	9
77027	6	4	5	7	8	9
77068	6	1	5	7	8	9
77078	7	4	5	8	6	9
77086	6	4	5	7	8	9
77035	6	4	5	7	8	9
77008	6	4	5	7	8	9
77004	6	1	5	7	8	9
77028	6	4	5	7	8	9
77059	6	2	5	7	8	9
77039	6	4	5	7	8	9
77019	6	4	5	7	8	9
77075	3	1	2	4	5	6
77077	6	4	5	7	8	9
77079	6	4	5	7	8	9
77099	6	4	5	7	8	9
77024	6	4	5	7	8	9
77095	7	4	5	2	8	9
77048	6	4	5	7	8	9
77044	7	4	5	6	8	9
77015	8	4	5	6	7	9
77017	3	1	2	4	5	6
77057	6	4	5	7	8	9
77055	6	4	5	2	8	9
77006	6	4	5	7	8	9
77026	4	1	2	3	5	6
77046	6	4	5	7	8	9
77066	7	2	5	6	8	9
77023	8	4	5	6	7	9
77094	6	4	5	7	8	9
77084	6	4	5	7	8	9
77013	6	4	5	7	8	9
77063	3	1	2	4	5	6
77053	7	4	5	6	8	9
77022	6	4	5	8	7	9
77072	6	4	5	8	7	9
77049	7	4	5	6	8	9
77045	6	4	5	7	8	9
77010	8	1	5	6	7	9
77018	6	4	5	7	8	9
77041	7	3	5	6	8	9
77009	4	1	2	3	5	6
77089	6	2	5	1	8	9
77032	7	4	5	6	8	9
77036	8	4	5	6	7	9
77085	8	4	5	6	7	9
77054	6	4	5	7	8	9
77058	6	4	5	8	7	9
77014	6	4	5	7	8	9
77067	4	1	2	3	5	6
77005	6	4	5	7	8	9
77076	3	1	2	4	5	6
77070	6	4	5	7	8	9
77060	6	4	5	8	7	9
77080	8	4	5	3	6	9
77050	5	1	2	4	3	6
77091	6	4	5	8	7	9
77071	3	1	2	5	4	6
77061	6	4	5	7	8	9
77020	8	4	5	7	6	9
77081	7	4	5	6	8	9
77030	6	4	5	8	7	9
77040	7	4	5	6	8	9
77090	6	1	5	8	7	9
77031	5	1	2	3	4	6
77051	6	4	5	7	8	9
77011	6	4	5	7	8	9
77042	6	4	5	7	8	9
77062	8	4	5	3	6	9
77082	3	1	2	4	5	6
77093	6	4	5	7	8	9
77073	7	4	5	8	6	9
77033	7	4	5	8	6	9
77043	7	4	5	6	8	9
77074	7	4	5	8	6	9
77064	6	4	5	7	8	9
77012	6	4	5	8	7	9
77002	6	4	5	8	7	9
77092	8	4	5	7	6	9
77069	8	4	5	6	7	9
77021	3	1	2	5	4	6
77083	8	4	5	7	6	9
77029	8	4	5	7	6	9
77034	6	1	5	8	7	9
77087	4	1	2	5	3	6
77003	7	2	5	8	6	9
77038	8	4	5	7	6	9
77007	4	1	2	5	3	6
77016	8	4	5	7	6	9
77065	8	4	5	7	6	9
77096	8	4	5	6	7	9
77025	3	1	2	4	5	7
77056	8	4	5	6	7	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Geico

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Geico Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Geico Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Geico Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Geico Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly