Focusfitness Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve focusfitness.club's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,305 Gyms In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Focusfitness Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Focusfitness Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Focusfitness Report, March 2026 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Saint Louis
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Focusfitness Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	34,882	13,305	81	0.4%	1,257,810	68.0	25,747	29,616	1	29,616	0	0	17
California	4,415	2,035	95	0.3%	130,992	75.5	1,077	1,474	1	1,474	0	0	0
Texas	3,524	1,604	117	0.3%	79,783	74.4	1,194	1,494	1	1,494	0	0	0
Florida	2,755	1,297	116	0.4%	75,009	77.2	430	873	1	873	0	0	0
Arkansas	1,465	727	26	2.1%	62,437	56.1	529	561	1	561	0	0	17
New York	2,962	1,383	137	0.3%	51,968	71.4	1,368	1,493	1	1,493	0	0	0
Michigan	2,051	980	86	0.5%	47,567	62.4	807	941	1	941	0	0	0
Illinois	2,798	1,312	113	0.4%	44,901	66.7	1,171	1,248	1	1,248	0	0	0
Pennsylvania	2,688	1,340	123	0.3%	43,553	69.1	1,449	1,542	1	1,542	0	0	0
Ohio	2,338	1,162	119	0.4%	43,020	69.7	893	1,038	1	1,038	0	0	0
Georgia	2,016	985	128	0.4%	43,015	69.7	547	675	1	675	0	0	0
North Carolina	2,089	990	118	0.4%	39,858	69.9	654	756	1	756	0	0	0
New Jersey	1,775	883	103	0.4%	37,663	73.7	512	566	1	566	0	0	0
Virginia	1,936	921	95	0.4%	36,229	66.1	704	856	1	856	0	0	0
Indiana	2,878	1,368	107	0.4%	28,299	69.9	632	731	1	731	0	0	0
Missouri	2,086	1,040	115	0.4%	26,650	64.8	843	939	1	939	0	0	0
Tennessee	1,632	818	130	0.4%	26,569	67.9	483	567	1	567	0	0	0
Washington	1,750	891	144	0.4%	26,280	71.1	434	525	1	525	0	0	0
Minnesota	1,926	897	85	0.5%	26,125	61.6	751	839	1	839	0	0	0
Massachusetts	1,836	950	134	0.4%	25,880	72.8	421	476	1	476	0	0	0
Wisconsin	1,895	867	121	0.4%	24,775	63.4	654	705	1	705	0	0	0
Arizona	1,335	675	105	0.3%	23,238	75.1	227	345	1	345	0	0	0
Alabama	1,536	786	107	0.4%	21,684	66.6	482	575	1	575	0	0	0
Maryland	1,303	702	136	0.3%	20,659	71.5	368	418	1	418	0	0	0
Kentucky	1,635	819	97	0.5%	20,367	60.7	669	722	1	722	0	0	0
Louisiana	1,308	661	107	0.4%	19,991	67.3	414	477	1	477	0	0	0
South Carolina	1,343	677	117	0.4%	19,661	71.6	328	392	1	392	0	0	0
Oklahoma	1,441	721	106	0.5%	17,811	65.9	536	620	1	620	0	0	0
Colorado	1,660	805	154	0.3%	16,777	74.7	335	420	1	420	0	0	0
Iowa	1,772	802	91	0.5%	16,109	61.1	856	896	1	896	0	0	0
Connecticut	1,271	666	142	0.4%	15,458	70.3	224	267	1	267	0	0	0
Mississippi	1,293	676	91	0.5%	15,061	63.2	351	380	1	380	0	0	0
Oregon	1,772	895	139	0.3%	14,164	71.4	326	357	1	357	0	0	0
Utah	1,087	585	106	0.4%	13,555	65.9	229	261	1	261	0	0	0
Kansas	1,515	733	100	0.5%	13,174	64.5	594	659	1	659	0	0	0
West Virginia	1,171	643	78	0.5%	9,546	62.7	655	675	1	675	0	0	0
Nebraska	1,396	751	92	0.4%	7,928	64.8	500	552	1	552	0	0	0
New Mexico	1,079	594	103	0.4%	7,910	67.0	309	339	1	339	0	0	0
Idaho	1,114	618	108	0.4%	7,273	65.1	244	260	1	260	0	0	0
Maine	1,614	916	112	0.5%	6,493	63.4	410	411	1	411	0	0	0
New Hampshire	1,030	586	114	0.5%	6,384	62.0	229	238	1	238	0	0	0
Hawaii	620	357	92	0.4%	6,229	64.7	81	92	1	92	0	0	0
Montana	1,115	594	108	0.5%	5,062	62.2	335	346	1	346	0	0	0
Nevada	807	447	133	0.2%	4,929	81.7	87	123	1	123	0	0	0
Rhode Island	513	314	101	0.4%	4,565	72.2	63	76	1	76	0	0	0
South Dakota	970	532	80	0.5%	4,254	62.9	337	348	1	348	0	0	0
Delaware	606	376	95	0.4%	4,119	72.3	50	64	1	64	0	0	0
North Dakota	794	445	77	0.5%	3,696	62.8	354	367	1	367	0	0	0
Alaska	942	535	85	0.5%	3,510	58.4	208	220	1	220	0	0	0
Vermont	863	495	95	0.5%	3,435	60.2	239	243	1	243	0	0	0
Wyoming	826	452	87	0.6%	3,227	61.8	152	159	1	159	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Saint Louis	Missouri	320	215	91	0.4%	3,293	82.8	43	1	43
San Antonio	Texas	343	208	93	0.2%	3,222	93.2	35	1	35
Minneapolis	Minnesota	405	256	96	0.3%	3,209	86.6	40	1	40
Saint Paul	Minnesota	367	247	80	0.4%	3,133	79.9	28	1	28
Phoenix	Arizona	304	194	97	0.2%	2,792	94.2	28	1	28
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	309	198	91	0.3%	2,640	87.3	25	1	25
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	313	205	74	0.4%	2,554	84.6	41	1	41
Tampa	Florida	289	194	83	0.3%	2,337	87.2	24	1	24
Mesa	Arizona	232	166	60	0.4%	2,317	75.2	13	1	13
Miami	Florida	377	222	139	0.1%	2,168	94.3	14	1	14
Fresno	California	235	159	74	0.3%	2,085	84.1	17	1	17
Indianapolis	Indiana	316	188	96	0.2%	2,076	91.6	29	1	29
Bronx	New York	234	156	99	0.1%	2,035	93.4	12	1	12
Atlanta	Georgia	379	246	112	0.2%	2,018	91.6	26	1	26
Jacksonville	Florida	282	191	89	0.2%	1,977	92.7	27	1	27
Bakersfield	California	211	141	73	0.4%	1,965	83.9	10	1	10
Tucson	Arizona	248	163	95	0.2%	1,914	93.3	27	1	27
Sacramento	California	254	168	83	0.2%	1,890	92.3	25	1	25
Hollywood	Florida	210	145	65	0.4%	1,824	79.4	8	1	8
Dayton	Ohio	277	186	75	0.4%	1,815	82.2	26	1	26
Orlando	Florida	310	194	99	0.2%	1,810	94.5	16	1	16
New York City	New York	323	196	118	0.1%	1,769	98.3	19	1	19
Stockton	California	214	153	65	0.5%	1,684	73.8	12	1	12
Louisville	Kentucky	239	158	89	0.2%	1,665	94.8	28	1	28
Hialeah	Florida	184	107	64	0.4%	1,647	74.9	7	1	7
Cleveland	Ohio	264	169	94	0.2%	1,634	92.9	20	1	20
Anaheim	California	183	125	63	0.4%	1,602	75.6	7	1	7
Pompano Beach	Florida	243	170	66	0.4%	1,564	76.9	10	1	10
Saint Petersburg	Florida	226	170	70	0.4%	1,532	76.7	16	1	16
Raleigh	North Carolina	220	153	84	0.3%	1,494	91.9	15	1	15
Las Vegas	Nevada	288	157	128	0.1%	1,459	99.1	17	1	17
Wichita	Kansas	227	154	76	0.3%	1,420	85.8	25	1	25
Salt Lake City	Utah	244	153	86	0.3%	1,411	93.1	14	1	14
San Jose	California	240	157	110	0.1%	1,381	96.3	17	1	17
Birmingham	Alabama	246	168	89	0.3%	1,368	91.1	28	1	28
Knoxville	Tennessee	219	147	72	0.3%	1,344	84.1	17	1	17
Aurora	Colorado	200	142	76	0.3%	1,337	84.7	10	1	10
Winston Salem	North Carolina	188	144	58	0.5%	1,333	69.2	9	1	9
Alexandria	Virginia	256	180	71	0.4%	1,326	79.4	13	1	13
Vancouver	Washington	198	140	75	0.4%	1,323	78.9	11	1	11
Fort Worth	Texas	234	139	111	0.1%	1,302	97.4	20	1	20
West Palm Beach	Florida	214	155	77	0.4%	1,301	84.7	12	1	12
Honolulu	Hawaii	182	116	85	0.3%	1,286	87.6	11	1	11
Long Beach	California	193	131	82	0.3%	1,285	93.3	12	1	12
Kissimmee	Florida	225	143	63	0.4%	1,279	75.6	6	1	6
Omaha	Nebraska	252	175	87	0.2%	1,274	93.5	27	1	27
Laredo	Texas	157	110	66	0.5%	1,232	73.7	6	1	6
Detroit	Michigan	204	130	98	0.2%	1,227	95.2	20	1	20
Santa Ana	California	147	105	77	0.3%	1,197	86.2	6	1	6
Riverside	California	179	125	78	0.3%	1,193	84.6	6	1	6
Albuquerque	New Mexico	189	133	92	0.2%	1,192	94.1	13	1	13
Corona	California	165	130	59	0.5%	1,188	73.2	5	1	5
Silver Spring	Maryland	208	147	68	0.4%	1,181	81.0	6	1	6
Fontana	California	140	103	55	0.5%	1,178	68.0	3	1	3
Lexington	Kentucky	205	141	73	0.4%	1,149	83.1	14	1	14
Garland	Texas	171	128	58	0.5%	1,140	71.0	5	1	5
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	129	89	0.2%	1,113	93.0	12	1	12
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	132	79	0.3%	1,105	84.9	18	1	18
Fort Wayne	Indiana	202	125	75	0.3%	1,104	82.3	15	1	15
Tulsa	Oklahoma	261	158	89	0.3%	1,103	91.3	25	1	25
Arlington	Texas	210	146	78	0.3%	1,096	88.0	8	1	8
Cincinnati	Ohio	263	174	110	0.1%	1,094	97.2	24	1	24
Spokane	Washington	205	140	82	0.3%	1,092	89.7	14	1	14
Naples	Florida	205	143	76	0.3%	1,092	83.6	14	1	14
Memphis	Tennessee	260	169	103	0.2%	1,082	97.2	16	1	16
Greensboro	North Carolina	179	129	74	0.3%	1,080	85.8	9	1	9
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	243	156	79	0.3%	1,067	89.4	17	1	17
Glendale	Arizona	208	138	74	0.4%	1,067	85.0	8	1	8
Modesto	California	178	129	68	0.4%	1,061	78.9	7	1	7
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	269	170	118	0.1%	1,058	95.7	13	1	13
Colorado Springs	Colorado	244	160	97	0.2%	1,055	94.7	22	1	22
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	160	75	0.4%	1,052	82.0	21	1	21
Lake Worth	Florida	195	140	59	0.5%	1,049	70.6	5	1	5
Charlotte	North Carolina	236	153	117	0.1%	1,047	97.8	13	1	13
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	126	57	0.5%	1,036	67.8	6	1	6
Grand Rapids	Michigan	196	131	86	0.3%	1,034	91.2	12	1	12
Oxnard	California	149	105	61	0.5%	1,022	71.8	4	1	4
Woodbridge	Virginia	147	111	57	0.5%	998	71.3	3	1	3
El Paso	Texas	263	166	105	0.1%	985	92.5	12	1	12
Moreno Valley	California	149	118	57	0.5%	984	72.3	4	1	4
Buffalo	New York	256	172	103	0.2%	977	95.5	14	1	14
San Bernardino	California	163	119	69	0.4%	968	80.1	7	1	7
Washington DC	District of Columbia	240	156	103	0.1%	967	96.5	14	1	14
Homestead	Florida	200	144	51	0.5%	966	67.0	7	1	7
Mission	Texas	142	109	59	0.5%	960	65.7	3	1	3
Amarillo	Texas	198	142	68	0.4%	952	78.1	14	1	14
Tacoma	Washington	245	175	88	0.3%	951	88.4	18	1	18
Bradenton	Florida	199	137	78	0.4%	947	80.1	10	1	10
Chula Vista	California	141	98	70	0.4%	942	83.8	5	1	5
Palmdale	California	157	119	56	0.5%	924	66.5	4	1	4
Marietta	Georgia	179	127	86	0.3%	923	87.4	6	1	6
Durham	North Carolina	173	123	81	0.3%	918	87.5	8	1	8
Toledo	Ohio	206	144	81	0.3%	914	87.7	13	1	13
Salem	Oregon	171	121	72	0.3%	913	84.1	7	1	7
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	162	113	59	0.5%	912	70.6	5	1	5
Richmond	Virginia	191	124	91	0.2%	896	94.9	11	1	11
Olympia	Washington	184	139	58	0.5%	886	70.3	6	1	6
Ontario	California	140	100	56	0.5%	883	69.0	3	1	3
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	124	56	0.5%	878	68.0	5	1	5
Chandler	Arizona	159	113	81	0.3%	877	86.3	6	1	6
Ocala	Florida	188	135	67	0.4%	875	76.8	10	1	10
Edinburg	Texas	145	109	52	0.6%	864	65.3	3	1	3
Tallahassee	Florida	184	127	80	0.3%	860	88.9	10	1	10
Columbia	South Carolina	196	130	85	0.2%	851	94.4	12	1	12
Grand Prairie	Texas	144	112	66	0.4%	849	74.5	4	1	4
Salinas	California	164	124	64	0.4%	845	73.6	4	1	4
Lubbock	Texas	194	130	80	0.3%	842	88.9	13	1	13
Rochester	New York	260	165	104	0.2%	834	96.5	16	1	16
Whittier	California	178	130	69	0.4%	831	76.8	6	1	6
Brownsville	Texas	145	108	67	0.4%	823	76.7	2	1	2
Chesapeake	Virginia	155	110	72	0.3%	822	85.3	6	1	6
Irvine	California	194	134	71	0.3%	819	86.4	8	1	8
Hayward	California	141	109	66	0.4%	813	76.5	4	1	4
Lakeland	Florida	168	116	85	0.3%	811	88.1	9	1	9
Elk Grove	California	138	108	62	0.5%	810	74.0	3	1	3
Newport News	Virginia	172	124	58	0.5%	806	74.4	7	1	7
Escondido	California	153	110	60	0.4%	804	73.0	4	1	4
Denver	Colorado	335	212	160	0.1%	802	98.5	7	1	7
Lawrenceville	Georgia	150	116	80	0.3%	802	77.5	3	1	3
Newark	New Jersey	167	121	80	0.3%	801	89.9	9	1	9
Baltimore	Maryland	225	146	109	0.1%	800	97.6	10	1	10
Rancho Cucamonga	California	140	105	63	0.5%	799	73.8	4	1	4
Fayetteville	North Carolina	193	134	75	0.3%	798	86.8	8	1	8
Trenton	New Jersey	210	152	68	0.4%	795	78.8	11	1	11
Evansville	Indiana	188	134	67	0.4%	793	76.8	9	1	9
Topeka	Kansas	225	156	61	0.5%	792	71.1	18	1	18
Des Moines	Iowa	196	127	73	0.4%	784	83.7	11	1	11
Rockford	Illinois	173	125	66	0.4%	783	76.4	9	1	9
Garden Grove	California	168	123	60	0.4%	781	74.2	5	1	5
Fremont	California	144	108	74	0.3%	781	86.0	4	1	4
Pensacola	Florida	202	141	78	0.3%	779	85.9	12	1	12
Lancaster	California	143	112	69	0.4%	777	77.3	2	1	2
Montgomery	Alabama	199	132	77	0.4%	775	81.9	13	1	13
Sarasota	Florida	220	137	75	0.3%	773	87.2	12	1	12
Norfolk	Virginia	203	135	84	0.3%	769	86.7	14	1	14
Santa Maria	California	155	113	50	0.5%	766	65.3	3	1	3
Youngstown	Ohio	195	146	52	0.5%	766	71.9	12	1	12
Cape Coral	Florida	169	118	65	0.4%	764	77.0	6	1	6
Clarksville	Tennessee	131	97	65	0.4%	763	74.0	3	1	3
Jersey City	New Jersey	167	122	81	0.3%	760	90.4	7	1	7
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	113	63	0.5%	759	72.0	5	1	5
Pueblo	Colorado	182	129	59	0.5%	758	72.1	7	1	7
Ogden	Utah	148	106	73	0.4%	757	79.6	4	1	4
Plano	Texas	174	116	81	0.2%	756	91.9	6	1	6
Gilbert	Arizona	186	131	71	0.3%	755	83.5	5	1	5
Anchorage	Alaska	219	157	82	0.3%	753	84.3	9	1	9
Cumming	Georgia	141	113	62	0.5%	751	73.3	3	1	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	120	63	0.4%	748	77.3	6	1	6
Compton	California	130	101	56	0.5%	744	65.7	3	1	3
Syracuse	New York	206	141	73	0.3%	741	86.9	14	1	14
Schenectady	New York	182	134	61	0.5%	738	72.8	8	1	8
Huntington Beach	California	141	107	75	0.4%	737	81.8	4	1	4
Mcallen	Texas	146	109	58	0.5%	736	66.3	3	1	3
Flint	Michigan	177	124	63	0.5%	734	71.7	7	1	7
Beaverton	Oregon	152	108	74	0.4%	723	82.5	4	1	4
Shreveport	Louisiana	197	134	79	0.3%	718	83.0	11	1	11
Visalia	California	140	110	60	0.5%	716	71.7	3	1	3
Fort Myers	Florida	199	133	86	0.3%	709	89.4	11	1	11
Simi Valley	California	112	82	58	0.6%	709	63.5	2	1	2
Pomona	California	127	92	63	0.4%	707	72.7	3	1	3
Clearwater	Florida	207	149	71	0.4%	704	79.2	9	1	9
Kent	Washington	145	108	73	0.4%	700	75.5	4	1	4
Beaumont	Texas	185	133	60	0.5%	699	74.9	7	1	7
Savannah	Georgia	184	118	85	0.3%	697	89.9	10	1	10
Torrance	California	185	125	70	0.4%	695	81.0	5	1	5
Augusta	Georgia	174	120	76	0.3%	694	84.3	8	1	8
Mesquite	Texas	120	88	66	0.5%	694	71.3	3	1	3
Irving	Texas	164	118	81	0.3%	689	84.5	5	1	5
Wilmington	Delaware	186	138	81	0.3%	687	88.7	10	1	10
Everett	Washington	159	119	71	0.4%	684	81.0	5	1	5
Las Cruces	New Mexico	190	137	60	0.5%	682	71.6	7	1	7
Henrico	Virginia	202	142	77	0.4%	681	82.6	7	1	7
Oceanside	California	143	104	76	0.3%	679	85.0	4	1	4
Spring Hill	Florida	177	136	52	0.5%	676	65.8	5	1	5
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	141	108	60	0.5%	675	67.0	3	1	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	155	114	55	0.5%	673	65.3	3	1	3
Worcester	Massachusetts	188	129	78	0.4%	672	82.4	9	1	9
Austin	Texas	276	175	136	0.1%	669	100.2	13	1	13
Midland	Texas	158	112	71	0.4%	669	77.8	5	1	5
Naperville	Illinois	150	112	65	0.4%	669	78.8	4	1	4
Carrollton	Texas	144	105	59	0.5%	668	69.3	3	1	3
Yonkers	New York	145	109	70	0.4%	668	82.4	5	1	5
Killeen	Texas	162	110	67	0.4%	665	75.3	4	1	4
Tempe	Arizona	152	108	71	0.3%	664	84.0	4	1	4
Fairfax	Virginia	179	130	65	0.4%	661	78.5	4	1	4
Hemet	California	145	111	55	0.5%	660	67.3	3	1	3
Waco	Texas	177	125	68	0.4%	660	77.6	9	1	9
Allentown	Pennsylvania	173	127	71	0.4%	656	82.6	7	1	7
Littleton	Colorado	254	169	102	0.2%	656	90.3	5	1	5
Fullerton	California	152	108	59	0.5%	654	72.0	4	1	4
Los Angeles	California	353	225	196	0.0%	652	99.7	10	1	10
Saint Charles	Missouri	147	107	62	0.5%	651	72.7	3	1	3
Odessa	Texas	177	132	68	0.4%	641	78.8	6	1	6
Kalamazoo	Michigan	162	113	71	0.4%	638	80.4	7	1	7
Denton	Texas	161	117	68	0.4%	635	78.8	6	1	6
Reno	Nevada	175	123	95	0.2%	635	96.9	10	1	10
Olathe	Kansas	117	89	62	0.4%	634	75.0	2	1	2
Springfield	Missouri	168	123	83	0.3%	632	90.3	6	1	6
Conroe	Texas	182	124	76	0.4%	632	79.4	7	1	7
Nampa	Idaho	140	103	57	0.5%	625	65.3	3	1	3
Macon	Georgia	181	125	73	0.4%	623	79.9	9	1	9
Sunnyvale	California	166	124	72	0.4%	623	79.3	4	1	4
Billings	Montana	155	110	64	0.5%	621	74.5	4	1	4
Lewisville	Texas	150	111	60	0.5%	620	67.7	3	1	3
Abilene	Texas	172	124	62	0.5%	619	70.5	6	1	6
Arvada	Colorado	169	121	60	0.5%	619	72.8	5	1	5
Eugene	Oregon	149	109	79	0.3%	619	89.8	6	1	6
Perris	California	131	104	48	0.5%	617	66.5	2	1	2
Roanoke	Virginia	197	139	74	0.4%	616	80.2	10	1	10
New Port Richey	Florida	159	120	61	0.5%	614	68.3	4	1	4
Chattanooga	Tennessee	215	147	84	0.3%	613	89.0	14	1	14
Frisco	Texas	123	94	74	0.4%	613	84.5	2	1	2
Puyallup	Washington	167	120	71	0.4%	612	77.2	5	1	5
Racine	Wisconsin	164	121	57	0.5%	611	71.2	5	1	5
Cary	North Carolina	158	113	71	0.4%	609	78.8	4	1	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	179	121	74	0.3%	608	85.6	9	1	9
Muskegon	Michigan	164	123	62	0.5%	604	71.2	5	1	5
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	260	163	157	0.0%	603	100.0	10	1	10
Tyler	Texas	182	124	67	0.4%	603	82.3	9	1	9
Hampton	Virginia	163	116	66	0.4%	598	76.0	6	1	6
Warren	Michigan	160	120	62	0.4%	597	74.8	5	1	5
Appleton	Wisconsin	145	103	59	0.5%	593	70.3	4	1	4
Providence	Rhode Island	185	127	87	0.3%	593	90.0	8	1	8
Manassas	Virginia	175	123	67	0.4%	588	79.5	4	1	4
Lansing	Michigan	162	105	73	0.4%	586	83.3	7	1	7
Erie	Pennsylvania	185	126	79	0.3%	584	88.1	12	1	12
Lake Charles	Louisiana	155	114	65	0.4%	584	74.2	5	1	5
Gaithersburg	Maryland	162	125	67	0.4%	583	79.8	5	1	5
Longmont	Colorado	144	104	66	0.4%	583	74.3	3	1	3
Yakima	Washington	139	101	61	0.4%	583	73.5	4	1	4
Lithonia	Georgia	126	92	51	0.6%	581	59.0	2	1	2
Oakland	California	191	124	104	0.1%	581	97.1	7	1	7
Sterling Heights	Michigan	138	108	65	0.4%	580	75.0	4	1	4
Summerville	South Carolina	123	90	69	0.4%	573	77.5	2	1	2
West Valley City	Utah	125	94	67	0.4%	572	75.7	3	1	3
Nashville	Tennessee	264	176	112	0.1%	567	96.5	12	1	12
Edmond	Oklahoma	173	122	74	0.3%	564	85.6	5	1	5
Hagerstown	Maryland	159	117	51	0.6%	563	63.3	3	1	3
Douglasville	Georgia	132	98	59	0.5%	560	68.5	2	1	2
Paterson	New Jersey	168	125	69	0.4%	559	80.9	9	1	9
Joliet	Illinois	141	104	64	0.4%	556	76.4	5	1	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	145	101	67	0.5%	556	73.3	4	1	4
West Covina	California	136	102	57	0.5%	556	68.3	3	1	3
Independence	Missouri	181	135	65	0.4%	554	76.5	7	1	7
Akron	Ohio	176	133	91	0.2%	553	93.9	15	1	15
Lehigh Acres	Florida	170	122	60	0.5%	551	72.7	6	1	6
Clermont	Florida	150	112	58	0.5%	550	62.7	3	1	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	196	140	65	0.4%	549	78.2	5	1	5
Tracy	California	151	116	64	0.5%	549	71.8	4	1	4
Pittsburg	California	97	76	59	0.6%	548	62.0	1	1	1
Bridgeport	Connecticut	174	130	71	0.4%	547	81.0	5	1	5
Bend	Oregon	150	104	72	0.4%	546	67.3	3	1	3
West Jordan	Utah	143	105	63	0.4%	546	74.7	3	1	3
Elkhart	Indiana	143	105	53	0.5%	545	64.0	3	1	3
Overland Park	Kansas	179	133	83	0.3%	545	89.0	9	1	9
Rockville	Maryland	176	126	69	0.4%	543	80.3	4	1	4
Greeley	Colorado	117	84	66	0.5%	542	71.5	2	1	2
Orem	Utah	140	105	49	0.5%	541	64.7	3	1	3
Melbourne	Florida	142	100	75	0.3%	537	84.6	5	1	5
Lawrence	Kansas	165	121	58	0.5%	536	72.4	4	1	4
Little Rock	Arkansas	189	127	87	0.2%	536	92.4	11	1	11
Murrieta	California	124	94	69	0.4%	535	78.5	2	1	2
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	278	186	131	0.1%	534	97.4	8	1	8
Duluth	Minnesota	185	138	60	0.5%	532	75.5	11	1	11
Menifee	California	160	116	59	0.5%	532	70.3	4	1	4
San Angelo	Texas	150	105	59	0.5%	532	70.8	4	1	4
Vista	California	132	102	66	0.4%	531	75.0	3	1	3
Kansas City	Missouri	240	160	120	0.1%	530	99.2	20	1	20
Rock Hill	South Carolina	149	110	61	0.5%	530	73.7	3	1	3
Waukegan	Illinois	124	90	60	0.5%	528	63.0	2	1	2
Antioch	California	126	96	60	0.5%	527	72.0	2	1	2
Provo	Utah	143	97	58	0.5%	526	74.3	3	1	3
Toms River	New Jersey	144	110	70	0.4%	525	76.7	3	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	198	135	57	0.4%	524	75.6	5	1	5
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	153	106	70	0.4%	523	81.2	6	1	6
Longview	Texas	171	129	56	0.5%	521	69.2	5	1	5
Panama City	Florida	168	120	64	0.4%	521	78.2	6	1	6
South Bend	Indiana	190	131	69	0.4%	520	81.9	9	1	9
Covington	Georgia	144	102	49	0.6%	518	63.5	2	1	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	122	94	60	0.5%	514	68.5	2	1	2
Canton	Ohio	171	124	72	0.3%	513	84.9	12	1	12
Temecula	California	136	103	67	0.4%	511	86.7	2	1	2
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	180	129	79	0.3%	510	89.0	8	1	8
Downey	California	140	102	64	0.5%	510	73.0	3	1	3
Yuma	Arizona	131	94	77	0.3%	510	81.7	3	1	3
Cypress	Texas	115	87	78	0.3%	509	89.0	2	1	2
Flushing	New York	142	96	88	0.2%	509	91.5	2	1	2
Roseville	California	126	89	74	0.4%	509	81.7	3	1	3
Round Rock	Texas	159	114	87	0.3%	509	88.7	3	1	3
Parker	Colorado	121	92	63	0.5%	508	68.0	2	1	2
High Point	North Carolina	148	110	66	0.4%	507	78.8	4	1	4
La Puente	California	145	95	70	0.4%	504	82.0	2	1	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	83	66	0.5%	504	69.0	1	1	1
Gastonia	North Carolina	131	97	61	0.5%	503	72.0	3	1	3
Redwood City	California	156	125	66	0.4%	503	75.8	4	1	4
Green Bay	Wisconsin	178	128	82	0.3%	500	84.9	5	1	5
Fairfield	California	118	87	67	0.4%	498	74.0	2	1	2
Clovis	California	140	103	72	0.4%	495	78.3	3	1	3
New Haven	Connecticut	141	100	72	0.4%	495	81.4	5	1	5
Rialto	California	126	104	66	0.5%	495	73.5	2	1	2
San Marcos	California	125	96	60	0.5%	493	70.0	2	1	2
Gainesville	Florida	178	127	90	0.2%	492	93.4	10	1	10
Milton	Florida	144	110	53	0.5%	491	67.7	3	1	3
Elgin	Illinois	138	101	65	0.4%	490	78.7	3	1	3
Madera	California	147	104	62	0.5%	490	75.3	3	1	3
Concord	California	144	109	69	0.4%	489	81.8	4	1	4
San Leandro	California	127	94	68	0.4%	489	75.3	3	1	3
Victorville	California	125	89	71	0.4%	487	83.7	3	1	3
Winter Haven	Florida	123	88	69	0.5%	483	74.0	3	1	3
Ventura	California	129	90	69	0.4%	483	77.7	3	1	3
Peoria	Arizona	145	110	79	0.3%	481	85.0	3	1	3
Redding	California	161	114	69	0.4%	481	70.8	4	1	4
Delray Beach	Florida	171	122	67	0.4%	480	78.6	5	1	5
Frederick	Maryland	152	112	71	0.4%	479	82.8	4	1	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	113	80	0.3%	475	92.0	5	1	5
Hesperia	California	110	82	71	0.5%	472	73.0	2	1	2
Riverview	Florida	163	115	66	0.4%	471	75.3	3	1	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	155	112	65	0.4%	470	75.5	4	1	4
Midlothian	Virginia	138	104	60	0.5%	469	73.0	3	1	3
Allen	Texas	116	84	70	0.4%	467	77.0	2	1	2
Chico	California	139	103	67	0.4%	466	77.3	3	1	3
Merced	California	145	104	62	0.5%	464	73.7	3	1	3
Vacaville	California	124	92	64	0.4%	463	75.5	2	1	2
El Monte	California	122	91	58	0.5%	462	69.0	2	1	2
New Braunfels	Texas	119	92	69	0.4%	462	72.5	2	1	2
Deltona	Florida	115	82	63	0.5%	460	70.0	2	1	2
Bryan	Texas	160	116	64	0.5%	459	70.6	5	1	5
Davenport	Iowa	155	111	64	0.4%	459	76.0	6	1	6
San Mateo	California	173	123	81	0.3%	459	85.0	3	1	3
Spartanburg	South Carolina	154	106	68	0.4%	459	78.2	5	1	5
Apopka	Florida	119	89	63	0.5%	458	72.0	2	1	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	143	104	61	0.5%	458	73.3	4	1	4
Valdosta	Georgia	155	110	63	0.5%	458	71.2	5	1	5
Metairie	Louisiana	149	111	74	0.3%	457	87.0	5	1	5
Vero Beach	Florida	164	116	68	0.4%	456	78.3	6	1	6
South Gate	California	97	77	67	0.5%	456	71.0	1	1	1
Woodstock	Georgia	120	90	66	0.4%	456	74.5	2	1	2
Athens	Georgia	158	111	75	0.4%	455	81.8	6	1	6
Inglewood	California	193	129	66	0.3%	455	81.6	4	1	4
Broomfield	Colorado	148	104	68	0.4%	454	75.3	3	1	3
Jackson	Mississippi	187	120	86	0.3%	454	86.5	6	1	6
O Fallon	Missouri	122	96	56	0.5%	453	72.0	2	1	2
Saginaw	Michigan	172	127	74	0.3%	452	75.3	6	1	6
Acworth	Georgia	126	91	60	0.5%	450	74.0	2	1	2
Buford	Georgia	120	94	70	0.5%	447	74.0	2	1	2
Charleston	South Carolina	200	138	91	0.2%	445	93.6	8	1	8
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	104	74	0.4%	443	83.8	4	1	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	143	97	91	0.2%	443	93.0	4	1	4
Madison	Wisconsin	197	133	102	0.1%	442	98.4	9	1	9
Waterbury	Connecticut	154	111	71	0.4%	442	78.2	6	1	6
Daytona Beach	Florida	174	124	64	0.4%	439	77.4	5	1	5
Orange	California	160	118	79	0.3%	439	87.6	3	1	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	101	71	0.4%	438	75.7	3	1	3
Norman	Oklahoma	139	101	75	0.4%	438	85.5	4	1	4
Belleville	Illinois	144	107	59	0.5%	437	73.0	4	1	4
Dearborn	Michigan	139	103	65	0.5%	437	75.8	4	1	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	178	128	94	0.2%	436	90.3	3	1	3
Mission Viejo	California	116	92	65	0.4%	436	74.5	2	1	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	179	129	65	0.5%	435	73.0	8	1	8
Livonia	Michigan	128	98	65	0.5%	435	73.3	3	1	3
Palm Bay	Florida	156	117	67	0.4%	432	81.3	3	1	3
Lees Summit	Missouri	181	136	68	0.4%	431	73.5	6	1	6
Terre Haute	Indiana	164	119	64	0.5%	431	74.0	6	1	6
Hillsboro	Oregon	125	91	65	0.4%	430	77.5	2	1	2
Renton	Washington	194	137	87	0.3%	430	83.8	4	1	4
Plainfield	Illinois	154	114	65	0.4%	429	75.3	3	1	3
Jamaica	New York	181	121	93	0.2%	428	91.8	3	1	3
Berkeley	California	206	146	80	0.3%	427	84.9	9	1	9
Richardson	Texas	145	105	64	0.4%	427	81.7	3	1	3
Muncie	Indiana	152	108	57	0.5%	426	73.6	5	1	5
Auburn	Washington	138	106	70	0.4%	425	81.3	3	1	3
Boulder	Colorado	180	118	77	0.3%	423	86.3	6	1	6
Indio	California	118	87	71	0.4%	422	74.5	2	1	2
Portsmouth	Virginia	167	123	63	0.4%	422	75.9	7	1	7
College Station	Texas	120	92	82	0.3%	421	85.0	2	1	2
Sandy	Utah	133	94	75	0.4%	416	81.3	4	1	4
Grand Junction	Colorado	162	113	71	0.4%	416	78.7	6	1	6
Hawthorne	California	96	77	69	0.4%	416	76.0	1	1	1
Chino	California	122	94	72	0.4%	415	76.5	2	1	2
Burbank	California	156	117	70	0.4%	414	80.8	5	1	5
Stamford	Connecticut	156	108	79	0.3%	413	84.7	6	1	6
Hamilton	Ohio	143	112	87	0.3%	412	71.3	2	1	2
Laurel	Maryland	160	119	72	0.4%	410	81.8	4	1	4
Bloomington	Indiana	155	107	81	0.3%	409	88.0	6	1	6
Reading	Pennsylvania	204	141	97	0.2%	409	88.4	5	1	5
Scottsdale	Arizona	221	144	116	0.1%	409	98.1	7	1	7
Lowell	Massachusetts	147	109	71	0.4%	407	83.3	4	1	4
Federal Way	Washington	118	90	70	0.4%	406	78.5	2	1	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	192	139	76	0.4%	402	78.8	8	1	8
Lynn	Massachusetts	141	107	67	0.4%	401	78.3	4	1	4
Pearland	Texas	147	103	91	0.3%	396	87.5	1	1	1
Brockton	Massachusetts	121	88	71	0.4%	392	76.0	2	1	2
Pasadena	California	173	120	83	0.2%	391	84.7	4	1	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	154	110	76	0.3%	391	89.4	5	1	5
Springdale	Arkansas	108	76	71	0.4%	391	78.5	2	1	2
Palo Alto	California	145	101	74	0.4%	389	81.0	4	1	4
Anderson	South Carolina	143	101	72	0.4%	387	79.0	4	1	4
Roswell	Georgia	118	89	76	0.4%	387	80.0	2	1	2
Costa Mesa	California	119	83	79	0.3%	383	85.0	2	1	2
Carlsbad	California	144	105	77	0.3%	378	86.0	4	1	4
Mobile	Alabama	242	169	100	0.1%	377	93.8	4	1	4
Vallejo	California	141	104	79	0.3%	376	81.3	3	1	3
Kennewick	Washington	140	107	72	0.4%	374	80.7	3	1	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	165	112	75	0.4%	373	81.8	4	1	4
Charlottesville	Virginia	146	107	76	0.3%	372	85.4	4	1	4
Ballwin	Missouri	119	93	67	0.4%	371	80.0	2	1	2
Florissant	Missouri	140	104	79	0.3%	371	82.7	3	1	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	151	108	74	0.4%	371	79.3	4	1	4
Gulfport	Mississippi	129	93	74	0.4%	367	81.0	3	1	3
Hartford	Connecticut	148	107	81	0.3%	366	89.8	5	1	5
Newnan	Georgia	120	94	73	0.4%	364	79.0	2	1	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	116	83	76	0.4%	361	82.5	2	1	2
Largo	Florida	147	115	78	0.3%	361	78.4	4	1	4
Coral Springs	Florida	121	90	75	0.4%	360	81.5	2	1	2
Annapolis	Maryland	169	121	72	0.4%	358	81.4	5	1	5
Sugar Land	Texas	161	116	106	0.2%	358	91.3	2	1	2
Huntsville	Alabama	176	125	97	0.2%	357	95.2	9	1	9
Santa Rosa	California	148	101	95	0.2%	357	93.7	3	1	3
Edison	New Jersey	131	100	73	0.4%	356	83.3	3	1	3
Daly City	California	137	99	85	0.3%	354	91.0	2	1	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	133	105	70	0.4%	354	83.7	3	1	3
Fargo	North Dakota	146	103	83	0.3%	354	90.0	4	1	4
Medford	Oregon	123	88	73	0.4%	354	81.0	2	1	2
Ashburn	Virginia	109	80	83	0.3%	353	88.0	2	1	2
Herndon	Virginia	121	88	76	0.4%	352	81.5	2	1	2
Champaign	Illinois	121	88	74	0.4%	352	81.0	3	1	3
Ridgewood	New York	98	73	81	0.3%	352	86.0	1	1	1
Holland	Michigan	113	83	75	0.4%	351	81.5	2	1	2
Rapid City	South Dakota	136	98	72	0.4%	344	82.0	3	1	3
Santa Cruz	California	139	103	84	0.3%	344	88.0	4	1	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	96	77	0.4%	343	84.7	3	1	3
Staten Island	New York	207	133	130	0.1%	343	96.8	4	1	4
Meridian	Idaho	115	91	86	0.3%	342	86.5	2	1	2
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	139	93	92	0.2%	342	95.6	4	1	4
Boca Raton	Florida	197	132	103	0.2%	335	96.1	5	1	5
Wichita Falls	Texas	174	123	75	0.3%	335	81.9	6	1	6
Livermore	California	118	87	72	0.3%	332	84.5	2	1	2
Napa	California	113	78	79	0.3%	331	84.5	2	1	2
Missoula	Montana	151	107	74	0.3%	327	81.6	4	1	4
Waukesha	Wisconsin	131	99	77	0.3%	322	85.7	3	1	3
Morgantown	West Virginia	126	94	75	0.3%	321	84.3	3	1	3
Franklin	Tennessee	142	111	77	0.3%	314	87.7	2	1	2
Asheville	North Carolina	142	100	88	0.2%	313	95.0	5	1	5
Jupiter	Florida	139	98	80	0.3%	311	88.0	4	1	4
San Francisco	California	253	153	179	0.0%	310	100.2	6	1	6
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	107	80	0.3%	310	85.5	3	1	3
Portland	Oregon	234	152	162	0.0%	309	100.4	6	1	6
Englewood	Colorado	191	132	89	0.3%	307	87.3	3	1	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	132	91	96	0.3%	301	89.0	2	1	2
Baytown	Texas	145	106	93	0.3%	300	79.0	2	1	2
West Chester	Pennsylvania	124	94	89	0.3%	300	91.7	3	1	3
New Orleans	Louisiana	190	125	124	0.1%	296	99.8	6	1	6
Bellingham	Washington	137	102	90	0.2%	289	88.7	2	1	2
Bowie	Maryland	177	122	82	0.3%	287	84.5	3	1	3
Spring	Texas	216	144	168	0.1%	266	95.0	2	1	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	143	101	88	0.2%	259	94.6	4	1	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	136	100	86	0.3%	257	91.7	3	1	3
Sparks	Nevada	159	114	101	0.2%	257	92.5	3	1	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	139	100	99	0.2%	245	86.5	3	1	3
Humble	Texas	164	106	124	0.1%	243	93.0	1	1	1
Bellevue	Washington	156	118	104	0.2%	232	96.0	3	1	3
Bothell	Washington	158	114	115	0.2%	232	88.7	2	1	2
Chicago	Illinois	299	179	246	0.0%	228	100.9	2	1	2
Fort Mill	South Carolina	135	97	90	0.2%	227	95.7	3	1	3
Greenville	South Carolina	166	118	117	0.1%	223	98.8	4	1	4
Dallas	Texas	274	162	200	0.0%	211	100.3	3	1	3
Santa Clara	California	140	104	100	0.2%	211	92.5	2	1	2
El Cajon	California	162	110	129	0.1%	206	95.3	1	1	1
Manchester	New Hampshire	144	108	95	0.2%	203	95.0	4	1	4
Decatur	Georgia	191	124	121	0.1%	194	93.0	2	1	2
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	87	99	0.2%	191	96.0	1	1	1
North Hollywood	California	145	96	105	0.1%	184	98.8	2	1	2
Sylmar	California	98	64	98	0.2%	183	100.0	1	1	1
Santa Barbara	California	140	100	102	0.1%	181	99.0	5	1	5
Albany	New York	201	138	124	0.1%	175	95.7	4	1	4
Boise	Idaho	181	132	124	0.1%	169	97.8	4	1	4
York	Pennsylvania	164	109	114	0.1%	168	94.4	2	1	2
Columbus	Ohio	226	148	176	0.0%	166	100.1	2	1	2
Miami Beach	Florida	162	87	105	0.1%	162	99.0	3	1	3
North Las Vegas	Nevada	189	119	134	0.1%	155	95.1	2	1	2
Brooklyn	New York	221	141	202	0.0%	153	100.9	1	1	1
Lynnwood	Washington	160	120	128	0.1%	151	94.3	1	1	1
Keller	Texas	145	101	128	0.1%	146	91.5	1	1	1
Hyattsville	Maryland	171	115	131	0.1%	138	96.4	2	1	2
Surprise	Arizona	166	121	124	0.1%	138	93.8	1	1	1
Henderson	Nevada	197	121	166	0.0%	133	100.6	2	1	2
Astoria	New York	172	111	139	0.1%	123	97.0	1	1	1
San Diego	California	291	189	226	0.0%	110	99.9	3	1	3
Houston	Texas	324	199	296	0.0%	106	101.0	1	1	1
Seattle	Washington	270	173	229	0.0%	102	100.1	1	1	1
Mckinney	Texas	135	95	133	0.1%	95	98.7	1	1	1
Santa Monica	California	131	85	125	0.0%	43	99.0	2	1	2

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Fresno	235	159	74	0.3%	2,085	84.1	17	1	17
Bakersfield	211	141	73	0.4%	1,965	83.9	10	1	10
Sacramento	254	168	83	0.2%	1,890	92.3	25	1	25
Stockton	214	153	65	0.5%	1,684	73.8	12	1	12
Anaheim	183	125	63	0.4%	1,602	75.6	7	1	7
San Jose	240	157	110	0.1%	1,381	96.3	17	1	17
Long Beach	193	131	82	0.3%	1,285	93.3	12	1	12
Santa Ana	147	105	77	0.3%	1,197	86.2	6	1	6
Riverside	179	125	78	0.3%	1,193	84.6	6	1	6
Corona	165	130	59	0.5%	1,188	73.2	5	1	5
Fontana	140	103	55	0.5%	1,178	68.0	3	1	3
Modesto	178	129	68	0.4%	1,061	78.9	7	1	7
Oxnard	149	105	61	0.5%	1,022	71.8	4	1	4
Moreno Valley	149	118	57	0.5%	984	72.3	4	1	4
San Bernardino	163	119	69	0.4%	968	80.1	7	1	7
Chula Vista	141	98	70	0.4%	942	83.8	5	1	5
Palmdale	157	119	56	0.5%	924	66.5	4	1	4
Ontario	140	100	56	0.5%	883	69.0	3	1	3
Salinas	164	124	64	0.4%	845	73.6	4	1	4
Whittier	178	130	69	0.4%	831	76.8	6	1	6
Irvine	194	134	71	0.3%	819	86.4	8	1	8
Hayward	141	109	66	0.4%	813	76.5	4	1	4
Elk Grove	138	108	62	0.5%	810	74.0	3	1	3
Escondido	153	110	60	0.4%	804	73.0	4	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	140	105	63	0.5%	799	73.8	4	1	4
Garden Grove	168	123	60	0.4%	781	74.2	5	1	5
Fremont	144	108	74	0.3%	781	86.0	4	1	4
Lancaster	143	112	69	0.4%	777	77.3	2	1	2
Santa Maria	155	113	50	0.5%	766	65.3	3	1	3
Compton	130	101	56	0.5%	744	65.7	3	1	3
Huntington Beach	141	107	75	0.4%	737	81.8	4	1	4
Visalia	140	110	60	0.5%	716	71.7	3	1	3
Simi Valley	112	82	58	0.6%	709	63.5	2	1	2
Pomona	127	92	63	0.4%	707	72.7	3	1	3
Torrance	185	125	70	0.4%	695	81.0	5	1	5
Oceanside	143	104	76	0.3%	679	85.0	4	1	4
Hemet	145	111	55	0.5%	660	67.3	3	1	3
Fullerton	152	108	59	0.5%	654	72.0	4	1	4
Los Angeles	353	225	196	0.0%	652	99.7	10	1	10
Sunnyvale	166	124	72	0.4%	623	79.3	4	1	4
Perris	131	104	48	0.5%	617	66.5	2	1	2
Oakland	191	124	104	0.1%	581	97.1	7	1	7
West Covina	136	102	57	0.5%	556	68.3	3	1	3
Tracy	151	116	64	0.5%	549	71.8	4	1	4
Pittsburg	97	76	59	0.6%	548	62.0	1	1	1
Murrieta	124	94	69	0.4%	535	78.5	2	1	2
Menifee	160	116	59	0.5%	532	70.3	4	1	4
Vista	132	102	66	0.4%	531	75.0	3	1	3
Antioch	126	96	60	0.5%	527	72.0	2	1	2
Temecula	136	103	67	0.4%	511	86.7	2	1	2
Downey	140	102	64	0.5%	510	73.0	3	1	3
Roseville	126	89	74	0.4%	509	81.7	3	1	3
La Puente	145	95	70	0.4%	504	82.0	2	1	2
Redwood City	156	125	66	0.4%	503	75.8	4	1	4
Fairfield	118	87	67	0.4%	498	74.0	2	1	2
Clovis	140	103	72	0.4%	495	78.3	3	1	3
Rialto	126	104	66	0.5%	495	73.5	2	1	2
San Marcos	125	96	60	0.5%	493	70.0	2	1	2
Madera	147	104	62	0.5%	490	75.3	3	1	3
Concord	144	109	69	0.4%	489	81.8	4	1	4
San Leandro	127	94	68	0.4%	489	75.3	3	1	3
Victorville	125	89	71	0.4%	487	83.7	3	1	3
Ventura	129	90	69	0.4%	483	77.7	3	1	3
Redding	161	114	69	0.4%	481	70.8	4	1	4
Hesperia	110	82	71	0.5%	472	73.0	2	1	2
Chico	139	103	67	0.4%	466	77.3	3	1	3
Merced	145	104	62	0.5%	464	73.7	3	1	3
Vacaville	124	92	64	0.4%	463	75.5	2	1	2
El Monte	122	91	58	0.5%	462	69.0	2	1	2
San Mateo	173	123	81	0.3%	459	85.0	3	1	3
South Gate	97	77	67	0.5%	456	71.0	1	1	1
Inglewood	193	129	66	0.3%	455	81.6	4	1	4
Orange	160	118	79	0.3%	439	87.6	3	1	3
Mission Viejo	116	92	65	0.4%	436	74.5	2	1	2
Berkeley	206	146	80	0.3%	427	84.9	9	1	9
Indio	118	87	71	0.4%	422	74.5	2	1	2
Hawthorne	96	77	69	0.4%	416	76.0	1	1	1
Chino	122	94	72	0.4%	415	76.5	2	1	2
Burbank	156	117	70	0.4%	414	80.8	5	1	5
Pasadena	173	120	83	0.2%	391	84.7	4	1	4
Palo Alto	145	101	74	0.4%	389	81.0	4	1	4
Costa Mesa	119	83	79	0.3%	383	85.0	2	1	2
Carlsbad	144	105	77	0.3%	378	86.0	4	1	4
Vallejo	141	104	79	0.3%	376	81.3	3	1	3
Santa Rosa	148	101	95	0.2%	357	93.7	3	1	3
Daly City	137	99	85	0.3%	354	91.0	2	1	2
Santa Cruz	139	103	84	0.3%	344	88.0	4	1	4
Livermore	118	87	72	0.3%	332	84.5	2	1	2
Napa	113	78	79	0.3%	331	84.5	2	1	2
San Francisco	253	153	179	0.0%	310	100.2	6	1	6
Santa Clara	140	104	100	0.2%	211	92.5	2	1	2
El Cajon	162	110	129	0.1%	206	95.3	1	1	1
North Hollywood	145	96	105	0.1%	184	98.8	2	1	2
Sylmar	98	64	98	0.2%	183	100.0	1	1	1
Santa Barbara	140	100	102	0.1%	181	99.0	5	1	5
San Diego	291	189	226	0.0%	110	99.9	3	1	3
Santa Monica	131	85	125	0.0%	43	99.0	2	1	2

Saint Louis

ZIP	focusfitness.club	yelp.com	clubfitness.us	planetfitness.com	anytimefitness.com	fitcitystl.com
63110	83	2	4	7	1	6
63121		2	4	5	1	7
63141	78	1	2	4	6	14
63130	79	1	4	3	5	9
63143	78	2	1	4	8	6
63133		1	4	3	8	7
63112	85	2	4	6	1	7
63102	84	2	3	6	1	5
63103	87	2	3	5	1	7
63124	100	1	9	3	4	16
63134	79	4	2	3	1	10
63111	93	1	3	7	9	6
63129	84	2	4	5	3	13
63138	84	1	4	2	6	11
63120	84	1	3	7	10	4
63147	91	4	6	9	13	7
63116	94	2	4	6	1	8
63137	82	6	2	1	4	3
63106	86	1	2	5	10	4
63127	80	4	8	3	5	19
63107	82	2	3	5	1	7
63146	77	1	5	4	10
63105	83	1	9	6	10	13
63117	72	3	6	4	8	12
63136	82	2	4	5	1	7
63126	85	2	5	4	1	14
63125	83	1	3	5	8	7
63135	75	7	3	1	5	18
63115	86	2	4	5	1	8
63128	72	1	4	3	8	12
63139	83	5	7	9	4	15
63108	84	2	4	7	1	6
63119	74	1	9	4	6	19
63122	70	1	4	3	6	12
63144	75	1	4	3	7	14
63101	81	1	3	5	2	7
63132	77	1	5	4	3	11
63123	82	4	3	8	10	17
63113	88	1	3	6	2	5
63114	82	1	4	3	7	11
63104	85	5	7	9	6	1
63118	77	1	3	6	2	4
63131	79	2	4	1	7	11
63140	71	1	5	4	3	25
63109	86	2	1	6	4	11

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Focusfitness

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,305 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Focusfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (gym near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Focusfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Focusfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Focusfitness Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly