Ezcater Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve ezcater.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 10,355 Caterers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Ezcater Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Ezcater Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Ezcater Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Ezcater Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	38,085	10,355	2	64.3%	207,527,367	7.2	27,360	32,631	2,843	41,716	5,519	11,343	26,160
California	5,122	1,957	2	63.9%	25,007,683	5.8	1,166	1,739	245	2,195	145	835	1,799
Texas	3,561	1,471	2	72.1%	20,091,778	5.7	1,358	1,914	174	2,481	373	900	1,902
Florida	3,107	1,237	2	80.9%	16,665,692	3.7	446	974	151	1,108	387	659	984
New York	4,683	1,783	2	69.3%	13,594,861	7.5	1,491	1,756	166	2,452	357	573	1,198
Georgia	2,429	1,074	2	72.3%	7,440,006	5.2	574	726	130	891	188	349	706
Illinois	3,154	1,315	2	57.2%	7,338,498	10.0	1,247	1,382	196	1,817	135	227	698
Pennsylvania	3,458	1,459	2	54.9%	7,025,371	8.2	1,603	1,780	163	2,517	169	416	1,295
North Carolina	2,462	1,078	2	67.1%	6,813,866	6.3	683	802	108	976	136	336	678
Ohio	2,691	1,194	2	53.2%	6,191,329	7.6	975	1,187	115	1,509	172	351	834
Arizona	1,608	794	1	84.7%	5,887,516	4.3	247	396	50	480	162	209	433
Michigan	2,499	1,084	2	54.5%	5,427,611	8.1	833	976	91	1,316	101	283	675
Virginia	2,333	1,057	2	61.9%	5,208,228	7.7	721	889	105	1,173	75	263	696
New Jersey	3,041	1,262	3	57.2%	5,077,758	6.7	537	593	207	849	77	197	580
Washington	2,182	1,051	2	65.7%	4,786,190	6.4	451	587	73	744	82	228	536
Tennessee	1,923	939	2	69.3%	4,606,469	6.3	514	622	81	770	93	255	530
Colorado	2,079	982	1	82.5%	4,564,892	4.7	381	514	49	604	179	274	482
Indiana	3,446	1,502	2	67.7%	4,496,221	5.5	658	769	62	979	161	405	719
Maryland	1,866	900	2	68.2%	4,092,354	7.0	392	463	64	549	76	181	322
South Carolina	1,756	854	1	82.5%	4,089,831	3.4	347	422	52	466	172	279	416
Massachusetts	2,646	1,098	2	58.4%	3,988,437	8.4	461	534	142	670	107	160	305
Louisiana	1,711	848	2	73.6%	3,431,077	4.8	431	510	40	621	176	253	494
Alabama	1,849	924	2	65.5%	3,186,440	6.0	522	637	67	777	151	258	555
Wisconsin	2,253	973	2	49.9%	2,880,783	9.2	694	769	72	1,029	104	153	487
Minnesota	2,233	1,012	3	48.5%	2,678,949	9.4	774	875	71	1,043	53	143	583
Nevada	1,099	613	1	90.7%	2,652,160	3.5	92	168	13	199	88	108	182
Oklahoma	1,568	814	2	63.7%	2,494,979	6.5	557	646	83	842	93	177	613
Missouri	2,055	988	4	40.9%	2,489,360	10.6	886	1,016	94	1,384	94	166	698
Oregon	2,256	1,066	2	59.3%	2,420,615	6.9	355	414	30	478	23	118	341
Kentucky	1,739	894	2	52.3%	2,323,429	9.4	697	756	84	1,025	90	159	457
Connecticut	1,897	826	2	57.4%	2,055,746	8.6	234	279	75	324	49	86	163
Mississippi	1,638	860	2	60.3%	1,800,998	6.4	383	417	55	522	84	137	378
Kansas	1,726	902	2	60.6%	1,763,067	6.7	616	692	35	1,019	93	212	759
Utah	1,329	721	2	50.6%	1,539,130	9.4	246	284	47	367	38	65	153
Iowa	1,870	903	4	46.3%	1,449,774	9.9	890	933	43	1,170	89	221	412
West Virginia	1,593	867	1	78.4%	1,434,162	3.1	683	703	20	726	369	484	673
Arkansas	1,569	807	3	46.8%	1,399,099	8.7	553	587	81	812	88	136	435
New Mexico	1,361	713	2	64.9%	1,356,427	4.9	327	361	14	465	43	145	396
Nebraska	1,544	837	2	60.6%	1,154,039	7.3	524	581	54	662	50	207	451
Idaho	1,395	768	2	59.9%	1,011,197	7.1	250	272	25	312	21	84	237
Rhode Island	855	463	2	71.3%	753,746	5.4	64	77	17	93	16	44	72
Delaware	897	503	2	73.5%	698,089	4.8	52	66	23	84	21	34	65
Hawaii	929	544	2	41.6%	591,881	10.6	82	93	16	108	2	3	41
South Dakota	1,245	682	1	67.8%	585,806	6.2	357	368	39	470	109	130	387
New Hampshire	1,416	749	4	42.7%	574,060	9.6	238	248	26	304	25	50	128
North Dakota	1,130	648	1	75.4%	566,778	4.2	367	381	23	405	149	214	355
Montana	1,377	764	3	44.3%	461,583	7.5	347	360	32	442	35	83	321
Alaska	1,094	618	2	41.6%	306,759	8.9	218	235	32	358	3	16	222
Wyoming	1,133	665	4	40.5%	235,483	8.8	164	171	37	254	9	32	155
Maine	2,057	1,126	10	16.6%	221,669	12.9	421	425	37	524	2	14	108
Vermont	1,231	689	11	12.0%	75,112	15.3	249	253	26	322	5	5	22

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	390	192	1	91.0%	2,900,208	1.8	96	1	96	57	78	96
Chicago	Illinois	259	112	1	92.5%	2,500,148	1.7	56	1	56	43	43	56
Los Angeles	California	345	194	2	79.7%	1,957,420	3.0	62	3	104	1	60	104
Brooklyn	New York	232	104	2	74.0%	1,924,907	4.6	37	2	37	21	21	29
Miami	Florida	562	305	2	87.4%	1,643,057	2.3	55	7	78	9	67	78
New York City	New York	252	129	1	96.7%	1,568,507	1.4	47	1	47	40	40	47
Las Vegas	Nevada	335	161	1	97.3%	1,504,165	1.3	43	1	43	39	39	43
San Antonio	Texas	300	147	2	82.8%	1,472,493	2.7	59	2	114	0	90	114
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	306	174	2	90.6%	1,427,590	1.9	47	1	47	18	43	47
Bronx	New York	238	138	1	99.0%	1,426,950	1.1	25	1	25	24	24	25
Phoenix	Arizona	297	162	1	94.2%	1,366,848	1.5	42	1	42	34	35	42
San Diego	California	341	178	2	82.7%	1,113,834	2.6	36	3	72	0	56	72
Denver	Colorado	441	233	1	97.8%	1,062,896	1.2	38	4	38	35	35	38
Atlanta	Georgia	480	259	1	94.0%	929,178	1.6	39	7	42	31	33	42
Austin	Texas	271	125	3	82.0%	892,073	2.8	44	1	44	1	42	44
Seattle	Washington	346	194	1	91.0%	868,913	1.8	35	2	35	20	29	35
Tucson	Arizona	400	210	1	94.9%	858,211	1.4	32	2	32	28	28	32
Jacksonville	Florida	315	166	1	98.0%	849,558	1.4	31	1	31	27	27	31
Dallas	Texas	305	163	4	60.4%	840,340	5.2	48	4	49	0	2	48
Fort Worth	Texas	305	152	2	89.0%	811,977	2.2	32	1	32	10	27	32
San Jose	California	367	213	2	77.2%	810,699	3.4	28	2	33	0	24	33
Saint Louis	Missouri	544	341	1	86.9%	797,337	2.7	45	6	47	32	33	44
Indianapolis	Indiana	405	223	2	83.2%	792,103	2.7	37	2	37	0	28	37
Orlando	Florida	324	166	3	77.3%	769,453	3.3	32	2	32	2	26	32
Charlotte	North Carolina	234	119	2	84.2%	763,322	2.4	24	1	24	0	21	24
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	349	173	1	93.2%	756,832	1.6	29	1	29	22	24	29
Portland	Oregon	278	149	2	81.7%	752,000	2.8	33	1	33	0	25	33
San Francisco	California	235	126	2	85.7%	745,823	2.5	28	3	41	0	35	41
Minneapolis	Minnesota	620	360	2	68.2%	742,560	4.1	51	9	54	8	34	49
Columbus	Ohio	316	154	2	83.8%	709,065	2.6	30	1	30	5	25	30
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	510	281	2	79.9%	663,955	3.1	27	8	30	12	16	30
Tampa	Florida	341	169	2	83.7%	663,524	2.5	27	2	27	1	22	27
Saint Paul	Minnesota	516	288	1	80.0%	640,125	3.3	30	10	31	15	17	29
Memphis	Tennessee	330	172	1	90.7%	630,568	2.1	26	2	28	6	25	28
Sacramento	California	335	190	2	76.5%	615,240	3.4	28	1	28	1	23	28
Cincinnati	Ohio	307	159	3	72.9%	585,921	3.8	45	1	45	0	24	45
Cleveland	Ohio	336	182	2	77.4%	580,501	3.2	29	2	30	1	25	30
Detroit	Michigan	223	115	2	89.1%	570,929	2.2	25	1	25	4	22	25
Colorado Springs	Colorado	402	238	1	96.6%	563,781	1.3	30	2	30	27	27	30
Bakersfield	California	255	144	1	100.0%	559,247	1.0	11	1	11	11	11	11
Fresno	California	300	175	1	92.8%	558,985	1.6	18	1	18	13	17	18
Albuquerque	New Mexico	248	125	2	82.4%	540,489	2.7	17	1	17	0	13	17
Washington DC	District of Columbia	210	115	3	79.0%	540,261	3.3	28	1	28	0	25	28
Louisville	Kentucky	273	137	2	69.3%	527,640	10.2	31	7	32	17	19	23
Baltimore	Maryland	260	135	2	82.5%	520,663	2.6	22	1	22	1	17	22
Mesa	Arizona	274	154	1	95.8%	512,092	1.5	13	1	13	11	11	13
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	323	165	3	74.8%	510,600	3.4	39	1	39	1	28	39
Staten Island	New York	160	75	1	100.0%	474,101	1.0	12	1	12	12	12	12
Birmingham	Alabama	348	184	1	94.5%	472,489	1.3	30	2	30	27	27	30
Dayton	Ohio	432	230	1	92.8%	443,731	1.7	27	4	27	20	22	27
Raleigh	North Carolina	219	100	2	81.1%	443,289	3.0	15	1	15	3	11	15
Aurora	Colorado	297	174	1	99.8%	434,549	1.3	11	2	12	10	10	12
Virginia Beach	Virginia	247	137	1	96.2%	432,952	1.3	12	1	12	11	11	12
Omaha	Nebraska	281	138	3	76.3%	421,432	3.3	31	1	31	0	28	31
Rochester	New York	260	128	2	88.9%	419,210	2.1	24	1	24	1	23	24
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	474	278	4	60.8%	414,738	4.6	43	3	44	3	3	42
Salt Lake City	Utah	318	180	1	84.5%	411,447	2.1	19	2	19	15	15	18
New Orleans	Louisiana	190	79	1	95.3%	407,910	1.6	19	1	19	15	15	19
Hollywood	Florida	283	150	1	86.6%	405,763	2.3	9	2	9	5	5	9
El Paso	Texas	416	233	4	51.4%	405,642	6.5	24	7	41	0	2	37
Arlington	Texas	266	153	1	100.0%	396,966	1.0	12	1	12	12	12	12
Long Beach	California	236	127	2	80.0%	383,175	3.0	12	1	12	0	12	12
Knoxville	Tennessee	254	133	1	97.7%	377,453	1.2	17	1	17	16	16	17
Wichita	Kansas	304	164	1	89.7%	374,790	1.8	26	1	26	14	22	26
West Palm Beach	Florida	288	158	1	100.0%	370,607	1.0	12	1	12	12	12	12
Tulsa	Oklahoma	345	188	1	86.9%	366,985	4.9	28	3	28	14	16	24
Nashville	Tennessee	242	110	2	79.4%	363,938	3.0	22	1	22	0	17	22
Hialeah	Florida	258	139	1	98.2%	360,367	1.1	7	3	14	6	14	14
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	317	154	1	94.8%	359,375	1.8	18	1	18	13	13	18
Santa Ana	California	209	125	1	97.4%	347,785	1.3	6	1	6	5	6	6
Oakland	California	217	114	2	83.4%	343,479	2.8	14	1	14	1	11	14
Saint Petersburg	Florida	375	229	1	94.0%	335,230	1.9	16	2	16	14	14	15
Columbia	South Carolina	238	119	1	95.5%	327,426	1.3	14	1	14	10	14	14
Littleton	Colorado	311	162	1	98.0%	319,054	1.2	10	4	10	9	10	10
Grand Rapids	Michigan	197	104	2	86.4%	317,973	2.5	12	1	12	0	10	12
Greensboro	North Carolina	216	118	1	96.0%	314,450	1.3	9	1	9	6	9	9
Pompano Beach	Florida	344	186	1	84.4%	312,719	2.7	10	3	10	5	6	10
Katy	Texas	145	77	2	90.0%	309,369	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Naples	Florida	323	170	1	98.5%	308,239	1.1	14	1	14	12	14	14
Buffalo	New York	314	161	4	54.1%	304,327	5.6	28	2	28	2	3	27
Spring	Texas	243	132	2	79.7%	303,517	3.1	8	2	8	0	5	8
Toledo	Ohio	257	133	1	96.7%	297,570	1.4	15	1	15	13	13	15
Anaheim	California	206	114	2	80.0%	294,901	3.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Scottsdale	Arizona	250	126	1	98.2%	292,871	1.3	11	2	11	10	10	11
Fort Wayne	Indiana	269	156	1	91.6%	291,567	1.8	16	2	18	12	14	18
Stockton	California	284	160	2	77.9%	291,244	3.5	12	1	12	0	10	12
Silver Spring	Maryland	263	144	1	95.0%	288,012	1.6	7	2	7	5	7	7
Richmond	Virginia	260	133	3	73.0%	285,434	3.6	15	1	15	0	12	15
Corpus Christi	Texas	267	152	1	87.5%	284,954	1.7	18	1	18	14	14	18
Marietta	Georgia	232	125	1	88.2%	284,515	2.6	7	2	7	4	4	7
Glendale	Arizona	275	156	1	92.8%	282,789	1.9	9	2	11	7	9	11
Lincoln	Nebraska	328	199	1	96.6%	279,496	2.2	22	1	22	9	19	22
Riverside	California	232	131	2	75.2%	278,142	3.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Henderson	Nevada	189	88	2	91.8%	277,855	1.8	8	2	11	5	8	11
Madison	Wisconsin	222	100	1	93.5%	275,751	1.4	14	1	14	10	13	14
Durham	North Carolina	165	77	1	94.9%	275,409	1.4	8	1	8	7	7	8
Kissimmee	Florida	276	150	1	94.2%	272,214	1.7	7	3	7	5	6	7
Alexandria	Virginia	310	183	2	75.8%	268,762	3.6	14	2	14	8	8	13
Pensacola	Florida	341	186	1	100.0%	268,218	1.0	13	1	13	13	13	13
Akron	Ohio	296	176	1	99.2%	268,157	1.2	17	1	17	15	16	17
Irvine	California	236	132	1	100.0%	267,599	1.0	9	1	9	9	9	9
Plano	Texas	206	102	1	87.5%	267,334	2.3	7	1	7	4	4	7
Reno	Nevada	269	152	2	89.7%	266,144	2.3	12	1	12	6	11	12
Lexington	Kentucky	267	146	2	83.1%	265,882	2.5	15	1	15	0	13	15
Lubbock	Texas	267	136	1	95.7%	264,823	1.4	14	1	14	12	12	14
Tallahassee	Florida	283	148	1	91.5%	263,462	1.6	10	1	10	8	8	10
Vancouver	Washington	241	140	3	80.3%	261,826	3.1	11	1	11	0	9	11
Jersey City	New Jersey	199	100	1	100.0%	261,624	1.0	7	1	7	7	7	7
Spokane	Washington	293	159	2	71.7%	257,836	3.6	14	2	14	2	7	14
Chandler	Arizona	209	104	1	95.9%	257,492	1.5	6	1	6	3	6	6
Lawrenceville	Georgia	188	107	1	100.0%	256,112	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Tacoma	Washington	384	232	2	74.7%	249,175	3.2	20	2	20	2	17	20
Jamaica	New York	162	89	1	100.0%	243,904	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Newark	New Jersey	234	132	2	86.5%	242,793	2.3	9	1	9	0	8	9
Irving	Texas	204	120	1	100.0%	240,557	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Gilbert	Arizona	193	111	1	100.0%	238,600	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	201	108	1	100.0%	237,893	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
North Las Vegas	Nevada	215	101	1	100.0%	233,803	1.0	7	2	7	7	7	7
Fort Myers	Florida	271	148	1	92.7%	233,358	1.6	11	1	11	8	9	11
Boise	Idaho	188	100	2	90.8%	232,449	2.3	9	1	9	3	7	9
Syracuse	New York	246	133	1	98.3%	222,931	1.2	15	1	15	14	14	15
Bradenton	Florida	282	155	1	88.0%	222,632	2.6	10	2	10	4	6	10
Honolulu	Hawaii	237	130	3	52.8%	219,509	5.8	11	1	11	0	0	11
Lakeland	Florida	238	132	2	85.0%	219,269	2.6	9	1	9	1	7	9
Savannah	Georgia	190	90	2	90.0%	217,135	2.0	10	1	10	0	10	10
Norfolk	Virginia	302	169	2	86.7%	212,943	2.8	14	1	14	0	10	14
Modesto	California	237	135	2	80.0%	211,566	3.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Ocala	Florida	287	163	1	93.6%	210,580	1.5	11	1	11	9	9	11
Garland	Texas	185	96	1	88.2%	209,820	2.2	5	1	5	3	3	5
Winston Salem	North Carolina	300	186	3	79.4%	209,629	3.1	9	1	9	1	6	9
Sarasota	Florida	273	144	1	83.7%	209,405	2.2	13	1	13	7	8	13
Amarillo	Texas	265	134	1	89.6%	205,121	2.3	14	1	14	7	9	14
Augusta	Georgia	225	116	1	100.0%	204,430	1.0	8	1	8	8	8	8
Boca Raton	Florida	223	117	1	91.2%	202,645	1.7	9	1	9	7	7	9
Greenville	South Carolina	243	117	1	90.9%	199,629	1.7	9	1	9	7	7	9
Lake Worth	Florida	244	113	1	96.2%	198,706	1.6	5	2	6	3	6	6
Flushing	New York	139	68	1	92.3%	198,507	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Gainesville	Florida	264	148	1	93.0%	194,751	1.3	10	1	10	9	9	10
Des Moines	Iowa	225	106	2	87.1%	194,448	2.4	11	1	11	0	10	11
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	243	135	1	94.1%	191,106	1.5	6	1	6	5	5	6
Wilmington	Delaware	265	154	2	85.6%	187,922	2.4	10	1	10	2	8	10
Fayetteville	North Carolina	247	142	3	77.0%	187,885	3.1	8	1	8	0	5	8
Fremont	California	164	87	2	80.0%	186,525	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Shreveport	Louisiana	247	134	2	82.9%	185,006	2.4	12	1	12	3	9	12
Brownsville	Texas	165	85	1	90.7%	182,597	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	237	125	1	100.0%	181,668	1.0	9	1	9	9	9	9
Overland Park	Kansas	226	125	1	97.6%	179,110	1.3	9	1	9	8	8	9
Montgomery	Alabama	301	170	2	84.8%	177,922	3.2	13	1	13	0	11	13
Grand Prairie	Texas	178	94	1	93.2%	177,671	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Oxnard	California	174	101	2	80.0%	176,306	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Huntsville	Alabama	247	138	1	89.5%	175,562	2.0	11	1	11	7	8	11
Charleston	South Carolina	223	109	1	89.0%	175,191	1.9	10	2	10	5	9	10
Tempe	Arizona	167	87	1	91.9%	174,660	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Yonkers	New York	188	84	1	96.4%	173,976	1.6	5	2	10	4	8	10
Homestead	Florida	231	140	2	92.4%	173,471	2.4	7	4	12	1	10	12
Cape Coral	Florida	206	107	1	95.9%	173,355	1.5	6	1	6	5	5	6
Frisco	Texas	128	53	1	100.0%	172,448	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Peoria	Arizona	178	98	1	100.0%	172,100	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Clearwater	Florida	266	148	1	93.5%	171,437	2.0	9	3	11	7	7	11
Cypress	Texas	121	49	1	100.0%	170,601	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Mckinney	Texas	149	70	2	90.0%	170,093	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Henrico	Virginia	247	134	2	87.9%	169,355	2.1	7	1	7	3	7	7
Allentown	Pennsylvania	175	98	1	99.2%	168,601	1.4	7	1	7	6	6	7
Trenton	New Jersey	313	182	2	80.6%	167,694	2.9	11	4	12	0	9	12
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	170	95	1	89.7%	167,211	2.0	5	1	5	2	4	5
Evansville	Indiana	275	153	1	90.6%	167,165	1.7	9	1	9	5	8	9
Decatur	Georgia	203	100	1	92.3%	166,961	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
Salem	Oregon	213	109	4	62.4%	166,289	5.4	7	2	7	0	0	6
Mobile	Alabama	402	244	5	60.7%	164,862	5.1	18	1	18	0	0	18
Reading	Pennsylvania	282	162	2	76.5%	164,645	3.1	10	2	10	3	6	10
Providence	Rhode Island	229	112	2	80.1%	164,202	3.0	8	1	8	1	7	8
Kalamazoo	Michigan	203	107	1	100.0%	164,118	1.0	7	1	7	7	7	7
Sugar Land	Texas	174	84	1	97.0%	163,778	1.3	3	2	3	2	3	3
Macon	Georgia	264	151	1	100.0%	163,700	1.0	9	1	9	9	9	9
Eugene	Oregon	189	99	3	80.0%	162,391	3.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Worcester	Massachusetts	226	122	1	87.0%	161,414	2.0	9	1	9	6	6	9
Kent	Washington	183	105	1	100.0%	160,501	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Huntington Beach	California	165	79	2	80.0%	159,926	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Everett	Washington	199	109	1	95.4%	159,016	2.0	5	1	5	2	4	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	185	104	2	90.0%	158,938	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Beaverton	Oregon	169	93	1	78.4%	158,010	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Palmdale	California	183	96	2	90.0%	157,442	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Youngstown	Ohio	294	163	1	100.0%	157,098	1.0	12	1	12	12	12	12
Fredericksburg	Virginia	199	112	2	90.0%	156,599	2.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Corona	California	195	108	3	60.4%	155,480	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cary	North Carolina	169	84	1	100.0%	155,332	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Santa Rosa	California	178	98	2	71.6%	154,716	4.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Denton	Texas	211	116	1	97.3%	153,853	1.5	6	1	6	5	5	6
Naperville	Illinois	162	82	1	92.6%	153,575	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Jackson	Mississippi	246	133	1	89.4%	152,317	1.8	11	1	11	8	8	11
Mission	Texas	161	79	1	83.3%	150,824	2.3	3	1	3	1	2	3
Ann Arbor	Michigan	153	71	2	90.3%	150,602	1.8	5	1	5	1	5	5
Renton	Washington	237	140	1	97.2%	150,499	1.2	5	2	5	4	5	5
Melbourne	Florida	195	112	1	96.4%	150,057	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
Lansing	Michigan	204	115	2	90.0%	147,913	2.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Bridgeport	Connecticut	191	103	1	100.0%	146,417	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Mesquite	Texas	161	83	1	100.0%	146,313	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	161	82	1	83.2%	146,138	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Olathe	Kansas	139	72	1	100.0%	144,373	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Topeka	Kansas	357	224	2	88.3%	144,293	2.3	18	1	18	1	16	18
Chattanooga	Tennessee	294	160	3	69.2%	143,799	6.2	15	5	16	0	11	12
Hayward	California	170	91	2	74.5%	143,067	3.3	4	1	4	1	3	4
Astoria	New York	161	77	1	100.0%	142,685	1.0	4	2	6	4	6	6
Boston	Massachusetts	236	117	1	93.8%	142,336	1.4	14	1	14	12	12	14
Conroe	Texas	234	120	2	88.7%	142,279	2.3	7	2	7	1	6	7
Metairie	Louisiana	188	88	1	100.0%	142,252	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Mcallen	Texas	154	77	1	100.0%	141,588	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	187	94	1	97.2%	141,568	1.2	5	1	5	4	5	5
Waco	Texas	226	118	2	89.4%	141,565	1.6	9	1	9	6	9	9
Schenectady	New York	222	114	2	86.6%	140,376	2.5	8	1	8	0	8	8
Paterson	New Jersey	242	139	1	96.2%	140,332	1.3	9	1	9	8	8	9
Anchorage	Alaska	232	132	4	57.4%	140,033	5.9	12	1	12	0	0	11
Beaumont	Texas	259	144	1	96.2%	139,916	1.4	8	1	8	7	7	8
Flint	Michigan	236	131	2	89.4%	139,043	1.9	7	3	7	5	6	7
Moreno Valley	California	182	91	3	67.7%	139,027	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Round Rock	Texas	183	78	2	83.0%	139,025	2.7	3	2	3	2	2	3
Summerville	South Carolina	135	69	1	100.0%	138,942	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Roanoke	Virginia	286	161	2	81.7%	138,437	2.8	10	1	10	1	8	10
Torrance	California	225	123	2	77.9%	137,689	3.0	5	3	6	0	5	6
Sunnyvale	California	197	104	2	90.1%	137,627	2.0	4	3	5	1	4	5
Albany	New York	230	116	2	90.5%	136,876	1.9	11	1	11	1	11	11
Visalia	California	171	98	2	90.0%	136,813	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Van Nuys	California	130	72	2	76.9%	136,711	3.3	4	2	7	0	3	7
Olympia	Washington	241	136	2	74.7%	136,548	3.7	6	3	7	1	5	5
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	223	118	2	80.5%	136,426	2.8	9	1	9	1	6	9
Lafayette	Louisiana	187	95	2	84.3%	135,359	4.6	5	2	5	3	3	4
Warren	Michigan	186	110	1	100.0%	135,192	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Bellevue	Washington	191	109	1	92.3%	134,950	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
South Bend	Indiana	241	146	2	91.2%	133,868	1.9	10	1	10	4	9	10
Arvada	Colorado	207	115	1	100.0%	133,420	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Rockford	Illinois	234	136	3	73.2%	133,404	4.0	9	2	11	0	4	11
Pearland	Texas	159	76	1	96.4%	132,637	1.5	2	2	2	1	2	2
Humble	Texas	142	68	2	79.6%	132,544	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Yuma	Arizona	150	82	1	89.7%	132,391	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Pueblo	Colorado	248	129	2	83.1%	131,463	2.7	7	2	7	0	5	7
Alpharetta	Georgia	200	97	2	69.0%	130,468	3.3	4	2	4	2	3	4
Fairfax	Virginia	204	107	2	79.3%	129,753	3.8	4	4	5	2	3	3
Springfield	Missouri	216	113	6	56.3%	129,695	5.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Cumming	Georgia	144	67	3	80.0%	129,615	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Elk Grove	California	149	75	2	71.7%	128,550	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Longmont	Colorado	157	77	1	97.3%	127,286	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Hyattsville	Maryland	132	66	3	80.7%	127,181	2.8	5	1	5	0	5	5
Edmond	Oklahoma	197	95	2	73.8%	126,636	4.0	5	2	5	2	2	5
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	155	75	1	96.9%	126,488	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Pomona	California	145	71	2	80.0%	126,388	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Killeen	Texas	187	99	1	84.0%	126,130	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	161	90	1	100.0%	125,223	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Newport News	Virginia	237	130	3	70.7%	124,932	5.3	7	2	7	0	5	6
North Hollywood	California	124	67	2	81.3%	124,439	2.8	4	2	7	0	4	7
Stamford	Connecticut	183	86	1	96.6%	124,405	1.5	6	1	6	5	5	6
Las Cruces	New Mexico	250	124	1	83.3%	124,176	2.1	7	1	7	3	5	7
Norman	Oklahoma	200	114	1	100.0%	124,085	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Rockville	Maryland	208	109	1	85.7%	124,017	2.3	4	2	4	1	3	4
Ontario	California	153	82	3	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Jordan	Utah	160	87	1	100.0%	123,570	1.0	3	2	4	3	4	4
Billings	Montana	140	63	2	89.6%	123,052	2.5	4	1	4	1	3	4
Puyallup	Washington	226	136	2	86.0%	122,825	2.0	5	2	5	4	4	5
Joliet	Illinois	186	99	1	95.3%	122,811	1.6	5	1	5	4	4	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	160	76	1	100.0%	122,640	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Tyler	Texas	241	140	3	78.5%	122,515	3.6	9	1	9	0	7	9
High Point	North Carolina	171	93	1	100.0%	122,307	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Appleton	Wisconsin	169	86	1	100.0%	121,702	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Surprise	Arizona	191	98	1	89.4%	121,246	1.8	4	2	5	3	4	5
Frederick	Maryland	177	98	1	91.5%	120,841	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
New Port Richey	Florida	189	100	1	100.0%	120,830	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Inglewood	California	232	131	2	90.0%	120,420	2.0	5	3	8	0	8	8
Elgin	Illinois	147	73	1	98.2%	119,978	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Hampton	Virginia	221	124	1	87.8%	119,563	1.7	6	1	6	5	5	6
Sterling Heights	Michigan	158	85	1	90.2%	119,433	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Saginaw	Michigan	239	134	2	90.9%	118,499	1.9	7	1	7	1	7	7
Carrollton	Texas	148	75	1	87.8%	118,401	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	226	129	1	100.0%	116,889	1.0	6	2	6	6	6	6
College Station	Texas	126	52	2	94.9%	116,741	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Roseville	California	150	77	2	83.3%	116,417	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	156	85	1	100.0%	116,360	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Spring Hill	Florida	204	115	1	92.5%	116,060	2.6	5	1	5	3	3	5
Cambridge	Massachusetts	164	72	1	100.0%	115,791	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
New Haven	Connecticut	169	74	1	88.4%	115,110	3.4	5	1	5	2	2	5
Richardson	Texas	162	81	1	100.0%	114,598	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Miami Beach	Florida	205	109	1	98.7%	114,204	1.2	5	2	9	4	9	9
El Cajon	California	174	87	2	66.2%	114,097	4.3	3	2	5	0	4	5
Greeley	Colorado	129	63	1	100.0%	114,065	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	170	85	2	81.7%	113,871	3.2	6	1	6	0	4	6
Panama City	Florida	190	92	2	90.0%	113,729	2.0	6	2	6	0	6	6
Saint Augustine	Florida	218	121	1	86.5%	113,313	2.2	5	2	5	2	4	5
Athens	Georgia	191	88	2	90.0%	112,244	2.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Spartanburg	South Carolina	187	99	1	100.0%	111,957	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Gaithersburg	Maryland	196	109	2	77.2%	111,639	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Fullerton	California	168	90	2	80.0%	111,421	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Lowell	Massachusetts	154	83	1	100.0%	111,341	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Allen	Texas	121	55	1	100.0%	111,272	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Boynton Beach	Florida	198	113	4	63.9%	111,228	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Baytown	Texas	154	76	1	94.4%	111,163	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Compton	California	157	88	2	80.0%	111,100	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Charlottesville	Virginia	171	88	2	90.0%	110,683	2.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Hartford	Connecticut	175	79	1	89.5%	110,411	2.0	6	1	6	4	4	6
Victorville	California	154	84	2	80.6%	109,857	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
West Valley City	Utah	158	92	1	82.3%	109,341	2.7	3	2	4	1	3	4
Bowling Green	Kentucky	173	95	1	94.6%	109,332	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Burbank	California	180	95	1	100.0%	108,016	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Escondido	California	164	89	3	59.5%	106,870	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Fargo	North Dakota	161	76	1	86.9%	106,426	2.3	4	1	4	2	3	4
Riverview	Florida	182	85	1	95.5%	106,370	1.3	3	2	3	2	3	3
Provo	Utah	151	82	1	91.2%	106,229	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Bothell	Washington	185	105	2	82.8%	106,225	3.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
La Puente	California	164	82	2	90.0%	106,153	2.0	2	3	3	0	3	3
Murrieta	California	133	67	2	80.0%	105,795	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hemet	California	173	92	2	81.2%	104,623	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Nampa	Idaho	153	76	2	90.0%	104,315	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Florissant	Missouri	166	85	1	95.6%	103,547	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Lewisville	Texas	156	85	1	87.1%	103,321	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Simi Valley	California	130	69	2	80.0%	102,970	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Englewood	Colorado	213	107	1	92.0%	102,657	1.8	4	2	4	2	4	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	184	91	3	80.0%	102,469	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
Palm Bay	Florida	196	113	1	91.7%	102,052	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Delray Beach	Florida	217	111	1	85.6%	101,891	2.2	5	1	5	3	3	5
Laurel	Maryland	192	100	1	90.4%	101,636	2.0	4	2	4	3	3	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	179	92	2	90.0%	101,592	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Auburn	Washington	164	92	2	90.0%	101,585	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Mcdonough	Georgia	136	58	1	100.0%	101,462	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Broomfield	Colorado	165	83	1	96.8%	101,378	1.3	3	2	3	2	3	3
Ashburn	Virginia	124	62	2	90.0%	101,076	2.0	2	2	3	0	3	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	208	106	1	92.9%	100,964	1.5	6	1	6	5	5	6
Berkeley	California	254	136	2	79.2%	100,673	3.3	9	2	9	1	5	9
Sparks	Nevada	190	93	2	84.3%	100,556	2.5	4	1	4	0	4	4
Elizabeth	New Jersey	157	87	1	100.0%	100,467	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Santa Clara	California	168	87	2	80.0%	100,414	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Orem	Utah	149	83	1	100.0%	100,318	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Santa Barbara	California	173	87	2	73.4%	99,785	3.7	7	1	7	0	4	7
Roswell	Georgia	126	51	1	100.0%	99,770	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
San Angelo	Texas	187	100	2	90.0%	99,690	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Kennesaw	Georgia	125	54	1	100.0%	99,130	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
West Covina	California	149	76	2	90.0%	98,467	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Mission Viejo	California	125	60	1	100.0%	98,358	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Rialto	California	135	66	2	91.8%	97,880	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Apopka	Florida	129	54	1	100.0%	97,654	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Coral Springs	Florida	124	59	1	100.0%	97,238	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Abilene	Texas	212	124	2	74.6%	97,141	3.3	6	1	6	0	4	6
Rapid City	South Dakota	133	61	1	100.0%	96,765	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Keller	Texas	154	61	2	83.1%	96,570	3.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Elkhart	Indiana	160	77	1	96.8%	96,238	1.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	50	2	90.0%	96,209	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Bowie	Maryland	219	122	1	94.2%	96,202	1.5	4	2	4	3	4	4
Boulder	Colorado	190	99	3	73.0%	95,798	3.2	6	1	6	3	3	6
Waukesha	Wisconsin	150	77	1	100.0%	95,795	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	177	92	1	100.0%	95,435	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Fairfield	California	123	66	2	83.4%	95,108	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Dearborn	Michigan	157	84	1	100.0%	95,089	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Terre Haute	Indiana	204	105	1	100.0%	94,973	1.0	6	1	6	6	6	6
Ballwin	Missouri	120	69	1	100.0%	94,669	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Pasadena	California	175	86	3	60.0%	94,617	5.3	6	3	7	0	4	5
Champaign	Illinois	157	78	1	100.0%	94,567	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	226	114	5	51.4%	94,212	6.3	7	2	7	0	0	7
Jupiter	Florida	160	79	1	95.4%	94,004	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Elmhurst	New York	99	45	1	100.0%	93,967	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Perris	California	143	67	2	80.0%	93,912	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Clermont	Florida	167	85	1	93.5%	93,732	2.0	3	2	3	2	2	3
Canton	Ohio	252	144	4	63.7%	93,623	5.5	12	4	13	0	8	9
Lynn	Massachusetts	193	103	1	100.0%	93,538	1.0	4	1	4	4	4	4
Hesperia	California	133	71	2	90.0%	93,430	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Vero Beach	Florida	216	112	3	80.8%	93,095	3.0	6	1	6	0	5	6
Daly City	California	159	80	2	81.3%	93,059	3.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Woodbridge	Virginia	178	89	5	43.9%	93,000	6.7	3	4	4	1	1	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	126	65	2	90.0%	92,584	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Bell Gardens	California	100	58	2	90.0%	92,190	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Racine	Wisconsin	213	114	2	73.1%	92,115	4.0	5	3	6	0	4	4
Redwood City	California	165	98	2	80.0%	91,570	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Madera	California	167	80	2	88.8%	91,400	2.3	3	2	3	0	3	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	175	92	2	83.6%	91,175	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Downey	California	164	88	2	80.0%	90,321	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Parker	Colorado	131	65	2	90.0%	90,254	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	160	83	2	83.6%	89,477	2.7	3	1	3	1	2	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	171	74	6	45.8%	89,150	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Herndon	Virginia	135	71	1	95.4%	89,146	1.5	2	2	2	1	2	2
Fort Mill	South Carolina	133	57	1	93.4%	88,719	1.7	3	1	3	1	3	3
Springdale	Arkansas	125	57	1	91.7%	88,413	2.0	2	1	2	1	2	2
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	139	56	2	90.0%	87,659	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Longview	Texas	192	109	3	83.2%	87,558	2.8	5	1	5	0	3	5
Palo Alto	California	163	87	1	90.2%	87,246	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Franklin	Tennessee	153	76	2	81.7%	86,948	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Vallejo	California	168	90	2	69.8%	86,819	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Edinburg	Texas	182	99	5	55.7%	86,672	4.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Carlsbad	California	168	84	2	75.7%	86,097	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Clovis	California	155	77	3	70.7%	85,870	4.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Tracy	California	201	110	2	73.2%	85,742	4.3	4	2	4	0	2	4
Acworth	Georgia	130	63	2	85.8%	85,551	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Livonia	Michigan	142	73	1	90.1%	85,209	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Lithonia	Georgia	135	78	2	87.9%	85,031	2.5	2	2	2	1	1	2
Covington	Georgia	152	70	1	91.7%	84,998	2.0	2	2	2	1	2	2
Erie	Pennsylvania	251	133	6	45.8%	84,123	9.1	13	5	14	0	1	7
Medford	Oregon	130	50	2	90.0%	83,927	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Lawrence	Kansas	198	112	3	82.8%	83,713	2.8	5	1	5	0	5	5
Grand Junction	Colorado	204	117	1	78.7%	83,049	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Asheville	North Carolina	161	71	3	62.8%	82,948	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
New Braunfels	Texas	130	64	3	80.0%	82,234	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
San Leandro	California	137	66	2	73.7%	81,937	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Kennewick	Washington	160	84	1	82.6%	81,638	2.3	3	1	3	1	2	3
Toms River	New Jersey	140	66	2	66.3%	81,467	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Midlothian	Virginia	156	77	1	83.5%	80,829	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	145	72	3	82.5%	80,767	2.7	3	1	3	0	3	3
Anderson	South Carolina	154	84	2	82.0%	80,703	3.0	4	1	4	0	3	4
Redding	California	191	111	4	71.0%	80,240	4.3	4	2	4	0	2	4
Woodstock	Georgia	126	63	2	78.6%	79,984	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Falls Church	Virginia	253	134	3	66.1%	79,598	3.8	5	4	6	1	3	5
Hagerstown	Maryland	171	95	3	80.6%	78,939	2.3	3	1	3	1	3	3
Oceanside	California	166	85	6	39.1%	78,268	8.5	4	4	5	0	1	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	255	142	2	78.1%	77,613	2.8	8	2	9	1	7	9
Temecula	California	160	84	4	59.3%	77,070	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livermore	California	123	66	2	80.0%	77,002	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	170	72	1	80.6%	76,756	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Concord	California	174	96	2	58.6%	76,364	5.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
South Gate	California	100	48	3	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Santa Monica	California	153	71	2	80.0%	75,528	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
El Monte	California	136	67	2	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Douglasville	Georgia	132	71	3	68.0%	74,964	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Newnan	Georgia	134	68	3	80.0%	74,716	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Ridgewood	New York	100	43	3	70.0%	74,702	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Indio	California	138	70	2	76.8%	73,798	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Buford	Georgia	126	56	2	74.1%	73,386	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Meridian	Idaho	130	49	2	70.0%	72,955	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	California	163	85	3	70.0%	72,834	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Menifee	California	186	91	2	65.8%	72,777	5.3	4	2	4	0	3	3
Merced	California	157	79	4	70.6%	72,714	4.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Muncie	Indiana	204	117	3	78.4%	72,713	3.6	5	1	5	0	4	5
Costa Mesa	California	129	57	2	63.3%	72,039	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Plainfield	Illinois	176	78	2	72.9%	71,853	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Whittier	California	267	166	6	35.8%	70,228	7.7	6	4	8	0	2	7
Federal Way	Washington	139	77	1	70.0%	70,100	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bryan	Texas	184	90	3	72.4%	69,678	4.6	5	3	6	2	2	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	157	78	3	73.9%	69,551	2.7	3	1	3	1	2	3
Edison	New Jersey	144	76	2	68.5%	69,023	4.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
Lynnwood	Washington	191	96	3	62.8%	68,083	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Manassas	Virginia	192	101	5	44.8%	68,034	7.3	4	4	5	0	1	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	199	117	4	64.8%	66,842	4.6	5	2	6	0	1	6
Annapolis	Maryland	204	118	2	70.2%	66,704	5.6	5	3	5	0	3	4
Gulfport	Mississippi	161	78	3	70.1%	66,427	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
San Marcos	California	132	65	4	65.4%	65,675	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Westerville	Ohio	116	42	2	67.7%	64,422	3.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Valdosta	Georgia	193	106	4	67.4%	63,956	4.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Bellingham	Washington	148	77	6	50.0%	63,247	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Deltona	Florida	134	73	4	65.1%	61,134	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Largo	Florida	203	116	5	56.2%	60,532	5.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
Hawthorne	California	99	46	4	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	California	101	56	4	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Kansas City	Missouri	279	139	12	9.9%	56,674	16.7	49	6	51	0	0	13
Holland	Michigan	125	65	5	60.0%	56,324	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Milton	Florida	161	89	5	59.4%	56,271	5.3	3	1	3	1	1	3
Waukegan	Illinois	122	59	5	57.3%	55,849	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	California	97	52	2	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	235	131	4	50.5%	49,942	6.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Vacaville	California	127	65	5	46.5%	48,925	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chula Vista	California	197	110	8	18.5%	48,357	9.6	5	3	10	0	0	8
Lake Charles	Louisiana	203	103	7	36.9%	48,293	6.8	5	2	9	0	0	7
Missoula	Montana	189	102	7	47.8%	46,475	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Maria	California	178	90	9	32.3%	46,287	9.0	3	3	3	0	0	2
Orange	California	162	81	7	31.9%	46,264	9.0	5	3	5	0	0	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	171	93	8	34.9%	44,819	6.7	3	3	4	0	1	3
Missouri City	Texas	162	79	4	42.1%	44,651	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Davenport	Iowa	211	112	7	41.8%	43,881	6.7	6	2	10	0	0	10
Lees Summit	Missouri	209	119	6	42.9%	43,799	7.8	6	3	11	0	0	10
Independence	Missouri	232	140	7	34.5%	42,817	7.6	8	4	16	0	0	15
Winter Haven	Florida	142	72	7	40.0%	42,751	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Mateo	California	176	92	7	25.2%	35,845	11.3	4	4	6	0	1	1
Bend	Oregon	167	80	8	29.0%	35,401	8.7	3	3	4	0	0	3
Little Rock	Arkansas	241	131	9	15.8%	34,551	10.5	12	3	16	0	0	8
Sandy	Utah	166	92	8	30.9%	34,073	10.5	4	4	5	0	0	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	194	102	8	28.3%	32,865	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Belleville	Illinois	176	101	7	34.1%	31,800	7.8	4	2	8	0	0	7
Laredo	Texas	218	120	10	10.1%	27,257	13.3	6	5	11	0	0	2
Hamilton	Ohio	156	79	8	19.9%	27,226	10.3	3	3	4	0	0	1
Chico	California	152	77	11	23.9%	26,806	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Pierce	Florida	240	138	8	27.2%	26,075	7.5	8	3	9	1	1	6
Portsmouth	Virginia	218	116	8	26.8%	25,531	9.1	7	4	10	0	0	5
Ogden	Utah	163	83	12	11.9%	24,030	14.0	5	6	6	0	0	1
Duluth	Minnesota	234	126	10	19.4%	22,726	10.6	11	5	12	0	0	7
Fontana	California	158	81	10	9.6%	22,480	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
West Chester	Pennsylvania	158	89	11	20.6%	22,389	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lancaster	California	164	88	10	12.1%	22,351	9.7	3	3	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	California	99	48	8	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Bernardino	California	222	126	12	8.4%	20,886	11.3	7	3	9	0	0	1
York	Pennsylvania	213	119	13	11.4%	20,478	14.3	7	6	9	0	0	2
Lynchburg	Virginia	207	109	10	19.3%	19,764	13.0	4	3	4	0	1	1
Antioch	California	131	68	8	17.3%	19,160	9.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Vista	California	164	90	9	15.7%	18,832	9.3	3	3	3	0	0	3
Salinas	California	196	108	11	9.2%	17,349	11.0	5	3	6	0	0	1
Garden Grove	California	194	109	11	9.5%	16,619	10.6	5	4	5	0	0	2
Bloomington	Indiana	205	109	10	11.8%	15,728	15.5	6	4	7	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	187	100	14	6.3%	10,015	14.0	5	7	8	0	0	0
Pittsburg	California	99	45	9	10.0%	9,608	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	48	10	9.0%	9,069	11.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Odessa	Texas	222	129	16	5.4%	8,603	14.5	6	7	9	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	128	63	13	8.0%	7,613	12.5	2	3	4	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	176	84	14	6.4%	6,076	13.0	4	4	5	0	0	0
Saint Charles	Missouri	171	88	17	4.2%	5,819	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Chino	California	124	61	14	6.1%	5,746	13.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Ventura	California	140	74	13	4.8%	5,570	15.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	198	108	16	4.3%	5,545	16.0	5	3	10	0	0	0
Napa	California	125	53	13	5.4%	5,249	15.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	148	75	17	5.1%	5,135	14.7	3	4	5	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	139	69	17	3.0%	2,894	17.0	2	2	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	345	194	2	79.7%	1,957,420	3.0	62	3	104	1	60	104
San Diego	341	178	2	82.7%	1,113,834	2.6	36	3	72	0	56	72
San Jose	367	213	2	77.2%	810,699	3.4	28	2	33	0	24	33
San Francisco	235	126	2	85.7%	745,823	2.5	28	3	41	0	35	41
Sacramento	335	190	2	76.5%	615,240	3.4	28	1	28	1	23	28
Bakersfield	255	144	1	100.0%	559,247	1.0	11	1	11	11	11	11
Fresno	300	175	1	92.8%	558,985	1.6	18	1	18	13	17	18
Long Beach	236	127	2	80.0%	383,175	3.0	12	1	12	0	12	12
Santa Ana	209	125	1	97.4%	347,785	1.3	6	1	6	5	6	6
Oakland	217	114	2	83.4%	343,479	2.8	14	1	14	1	11	14
Anaheim	206	114	2	80.0%	294,901	3.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Stockton	284	160	2	77.9%	291,244	3.5	12	1	12	0	10	12
Riverside	232	131	2	75.2%	278,142	3.4	7	1	7	0	6	7
Irvine	236	132	1	100.0%	267,599	1.0	9	1	9	9	9	9
Modesto	237	135	2	80.0%	211,566	3.0	7	1	7	0	7	7
Fremont	164	87	2	80.0%	186,525	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Oxnard	174	101	2	80.0%	176,306	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Huntington Beach	165	79	2	80.0%	159,926	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Rancho Cucamonga	185	104	2	90.0%	158,938	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Palmdale	183	96	2	90.0%	157,442	2.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Corona	195	108	3	60.4%	155,480	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Rosa	178	98	2	71.6%	154,716	4.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Hayward	170	91	2	74.5%	143,067	3.3	4	1	4	1	3	4
Moreno Valley	182	91	3	67.7%	139,027	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Torrance	225	123	2	77.9%	137,689	3.0	5	3	6	0	5	6
Sunnyvale	197	104	2	90.1%	137,627	2.0	4	3	5	1	4	5
Visalia	171	98	2	90.0%	136,813	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Van Nuys	130	72	2	76.9%	136,711	3.3	4	2	7	0	3	7
Elk Grove	149	75	2	71.7%	128,550	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Pomona	145	71	2	80.0%	126,388	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
North Hollywood	124	67	2	81.3%	124,439	2.8	4	2	7	0	4	7
Ontario	153	82	3	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Inglewood	232	131	2	90.0%	120,420	2.0	5	3	8	0	8	8
Roseville	150	77	2	83.3%	116,417	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
El Cajon	174	87	2	66.2%	114,097	4.3	3	2	5	0	4	5
Fullerton	168	90	2	80.0%	111,421	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Compton	157	88	2	80.0%	111,100	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Victorville	154	84	2	80.6%	109,857	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Burbank	180	95	1	100.0%	108,016	1.0	5	1	5	5	5	5
Escondido	164	89	3	59.5%	106,870	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
La Puente	164	82	2	90.0%	106,153	2.0	2	3	3	0	3	3
Murrieta	133	67	2	80.0%	105,795	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hemet	173	92	2	81.2%	104,623	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Simi Valley	130	69	2	80.0%	102,970	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Berkeley	254	136	2	79.2%	100,673	3.3	9	2	9	1	5	9
Santa Clara	168	87	2	80.0%	100,414	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Santa Barbara	173	87	2	73.4%	99,785	3.7	7	1	7	0	4	7
West Covina	149	76	2	90.0%	98,467	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Mission Viejo	125	60	1	100.0%	98,358	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Rialto	135	66	2	91.8%	97,880	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Fairfield	123	66	2	83.4%	95,108	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Pasadena	175	86	3	60.0%	94,617	5.3	6	3	7	0	4	5
Perris	143	67	2	80.0%	93,912	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hesperia	133	71	2	90.0%	93,430	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Daly City	159	80	2	81.3%	93,059	3.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Bell Gardens	100	58	2	90.0%	92,190	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Redwood City	165	98	2	80.0%	91,570	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Madera	167	80	2	88.8%	91,400	2.3	3	2	3	0	3	3
Downey	164	88	2	80.0%	90,321	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Palo Alto	163	87	1	90.2%	87,246	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Vallejo	168	90	2	69.8%	86,819	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Carlsbad	168	84	2	75.7%	86,097	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Clovis	155	77	3	70.7%	85,870	4.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Tracy	201	110	2	73.2%	85,742	4.3	4	2	4	0	2	4
San Leandro	137	66	2	73.7%	81,937	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Redding	191	111	4	71.0%	80,240	4.3	4	2	4	0	2	4
Oceanside	166	85	6	39.1%	78,268	8.5	4	4	5	0	1	2
Temecula	160	84	4	59.3%	77,070	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livermore	123	66	2	80.0%	77,002	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Concord	174	96	2	58.6%	76,364	5.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
South Gate	100	48	3	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Santa Monica	153	71	2	80.0%	75,528	3.0	5	1	5	0	5	5
El Monte	136	67	2	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Indio	138	70	2	76.8%	73,798	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Santa Cruz	163	85	3	70.0%	72,834	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Menifee	186	91	2	65.8%	72,777	5.3	4	2	4	0	3	3
Merced	157	79	4	70.6%	72,714	4.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Costa Mesa	129	57	2	63.3%	72,039	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Whittier	267	166	6	35.8%	70,228	7.7	6	4	8	0	2	7
San Marcos	132	65	4	65.4%	65,675	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Hawthorne	99	46	4	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	101	56	4	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	97	52	2	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Vacaville	127	65	5	46.5%	48,925	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chula Vista	197	110	8	18.5%	48,357	9.6	5	3	10	0	0	8
Santa Maria	178	90	9	32.3%	46,287	9.0	3	3	3	0	0	2
Orange	162	81	7	31.9%	46,264	9.0	5	3	5	0	0	3
San Mateo	176	92	7	25.2%	35,845	11.3	4	4	6	0	1	1
Chico	152	77	11	23.9%	26,806	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fontana	158	81	10	9.6%	22,480	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Lancaster	164	88	10	12.1%	22,351	9.7	3	3	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	99	48	8	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Bernardino	222	126	12	8.4%	20,886	11.3	7	3	9	0	0	1
Antioch	131	68	8	17.3%	19,160	9.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Vista	164	90	9	15.7%	18,832	9.3	3	3	3	0	0	3
Salinas	196	108	11	9.2%	17,349	11.0	5	3	6	0	0	1
Garden Grove	194	109	11	9.5%	16,619	10.6	5	4	5	0	0	2
Pittsburg	99	45	9	10.0%	9,608	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chino	124	61	14	6.1%	5,746	13.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Ventura	140	74	13	4.8%	5,570	15.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Napa	125	53	13	5.4%	5,249	15.0	2	2	2	0	0	0

Houston

ZIP	ezcater.com	yelp.com	houstoncatering.com	pappascatering.com	expertise.com	tjscatering.net
77088	1	2	3	4	5	6
77047	1	2	3	4	5	6
77037	2	1	3	5	4	6
77098	1	2	4	5	3	6
77027	1	2	4	5	3	6
77068	2	1	4	3	5	6
77078	4	5	6	7	8	9
77086	5	4	6	7	8	9
77035	1	2	3	4	5	8
77008	1	2	3	4	5	6
77004	4	5	8	7	6	9
77028	1	2	3	4	5	6
77059	1	2	4	3	5	6
77039	2	1	3	4	5	6
77019	1	2	4	5	3	6
77075	1	2	3	4	5	6
77077	1	2	3	5	4	7
77079	1	2	4	5	3	6
77099	1	2	3	4	5	6
77024	2	1	4	5	3	6
77095	2	1	3	5	4	6
77048	1	2	3	4	5	6
77044	2	1	4	5	3	6
77015	2	1	3	5	4	6
77017	1	2	3	4	5	6
77057	1	2	4	5	3	7
77055	4	5	6	7	8	9
77006	1	2	4	3	5	6
77026	1	2	4	3	5	7
77046	1	2	3	5	4	7
77066	2	1	3	4	5	6
77023	1	2	3	4	5	7
77094	1	2	3	4	5	6
77084	1	2	3	4	5	6
77013	1	2	3	4	5	7
77063	4	5	6	1	7	10
77053	1	2	3	5	4	6
77022	1	2	3	4	5	7
77072	1	2	3	4	5	6
77049	2	1	5	4	3	6
77045	1	2	3	4	5	6
77010	1	2	5	4	3	7
77018	4	5	7	6	8	9
77041	5	4	7	8	6	9
77009	4	5	6	7	8	10
77089	2	1	3	5	4	6
77032	1	2	3	4	5	6
77036	4	5	6	7	8	9
77085	1	2	3	4	5	9
77054	1	2	5	3	4	6
77058	2	1	4	5	3	6
77014	2	1	3	4	5	6
77067	2	1	3	4	5	6
77005	5	4	7	8	6	9
77076	1	2	3	4	5	6
77070	2	1	3	4	5	6
77060	2	1	3	4	5	6
77080	1	2	3	4	5	6
77050	2	1	3	4	5	6
77091	4	5	6	7	8	9
77071	1	2	3	4	5	6
77061	1	2	3	4	5	6
77020	4	5	6	7	8	10
77081	1	2	3	4	5	6
77030	1	2	5	4	3	6
77040	5	4	6	8	7	9
77090	2	1	5	4	3	6
77031	1	2	3	4	5	6
77051	1	2	3	4	5	6
77011	1	2	4	3	5	6
77042	1	2	3	4	5	6
77062	1	2	4	3	5	10
77082	1	2	3	4	5	6
77093	1	2	3	4	5	6
77073	5	4	7	6	8	9
77033	4	5	6	7	8	9
77043	1	2	3	4	5	6
77074	1	2	3	4	5	6
77064	2	1	3	5	4	6
77012	1	2	3	4	5	6
77002	1	2	3	5	4	6
77092	1	2	3	4	5	6
77069	2	1	3	4	5	6
77021	1	2	4	3	5	6
77083	2	1	3	4	5	6
77029	1	2	4	3	5	6
77034	1	2	4	3	5	6
77087	1	2	3	4	5	6
77003	4	5	6	7	8	9
77038	5	4	6	7	8	9
77007	1	2	4	5	3	6
77016	4	5	6	7	8	9
77065	2	1	3	4	5	6
77096	1	2	3	5	4	7
77025	1	2	3	4	5	6
77056	1	2	3	5	4	6

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Ezcater

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 10,355 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Ezcater Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (catering near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Ezcater Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Ezcater Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Ezcater Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly