Dominos Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve dominos.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,352 Pizzerias In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Dominos Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Dominos Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Dominos Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Brooklyn
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Dominos Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	23,795	13,352	3	26.4%	85,284,462	8.2	27,379	32,654	9,361	52,403	171	941	40,205
California	2,747	1,730	3	26.5%	10,360,193	8.9	1,166	1,740	619	2,664	2	12	1,785
Texas	1,647	1,034	4	26.1%	7,275,499	8.3	1,360	1,917	558	2,968	17	72	2,225
Florida	1,965	1,238	3	23.4%	4,824,162	9.1	446	975	430	1,426	3	4	984
New York	2,976	1,957	4	19.0%	3,731,440	9.2	1,491	1,756	417	2,918	0	12	1,967
Georgia	1,098	742	4	33.8%	3,476,705	7.4	574	726	296	1,149	5	32	996
North Carolina	1,373	898	4	30.4%	3,089,506	7.8	683	802	344	1,274	7	29	1,061
Ohio	1,567	1,033	4	24.9%	2,902,295	8.1	976	1,188	478	1,846	5	35	1,501
Michigan	1,430	927	3	28.4%	2,829,153	8.5	833	976	300	1,648	2	16	1,232
Pennsylvania	2,381	1,598	4	22.0%	2,813,774	8.6	1,604	1,781	497	2,874	7	33	2,065
Illinois	1,656	1,094	4	21.8%	2,796,682	8.5	1,247	1,382	440	2,147	5	41	1,563
New Jersey	2,040	1,436	3	25.8%	2,287,608	8.7	537	593	369	951	3	10	682
Virginia	1,356	892	4	26.7%	2,246,658	7.8	723	891	294	1,407	16	44	1,161
Washington	1,182	787	3	28.4%	2,064,494	8.1	451	587	191	901	1	14	720
Missouri	999	680	3	30.9%	1,879,116	7.5	887	1,017	265	1,688	8	55	1,443
Indiana	1,494	971	4	27.7%	1,835,406	8.1	659	770	184	1,221	5	27	955
Minnesota	1,137	757	3	32.7%	1,808,793	7.5	777	878	245	1,390	14	40	1,138
Tennessee	980	669	4	26.7%	1,773,264	8.2	514	622	222	980	7	29	695
Massachusetts	1,965	1,375	3	25.6%	1,749,100	8.6	461	534	337	801	0	7	593
Louisiana	795	575	4	36.5%	1,702,849	7.0	431	510	132	771	8	32	695
Alabama	906	655	4	34.8%	1,690,879	7.2	522	637	194	994	6	32	897
South Carolina	904	618	4	32.1%	1,592,979	7.7	347	422	163	683	2	13	585
Arizona	870	612	4	22.1%	1,537,156	9.0	247	396	97	600	0	1	432
Maryland	1,054	739	4	24.5%	1,472,229	8.3	392	463	226	749	2	15	600
Wisconsin	1,325	845	4	23.4%	1,350,322	8.3	694	769	238	1,263	2	16	935
Mississippi	771	586	4	42.9%	1,282,077	6.6	384	418	150	761	3	30	688
Oklahoma	826	617	4	32.3%	1,266,084	7.4	557	646	104	1,051	5	31	886
Oregon	1,060	738	3	28.5%	1,163,622	8.0	355	414	104	614	1	14	497
Kentucky	921	682	4	25.9%	1,150,007	8.2	698	758	150	1,311	2	19	973
Colorado	1,068	696	4	20.3%	1,124,854	9.0	381	514	131	780	0	17	524
Utah	719	531	4	32.8%	997,613	8.0	246	284	103	470	3	13	373
Arkansas	825	622	4	32.3%	965,578	7.5	553	587	129	981	3	18	809
New Mexico	708	540	3	39.2%	819,995	7.2	327	361	78	603	4	17	554
Kansas	832	604	4	28.0%	814,585	8.1	616	692	84	1,132	9	26	844
Connecticut	1,310	894	4	22.1%	792,946	9.3	234	279	165	416	0	3	284
Iowa	920	643	4	24.9%	781,487	8.6	890	933	81	1,549	3	13	1,036
Idaho	741	564	3	36.1%	608,387	7.7	251	273	68	458	0	8	398
Nevada	623	450	6	18.6%	542,550	9.0	92	168	39	259	0	1	173
West Virginia	786	606	4	28.0%	511,196	8.2	684	704	111	1,253	5	19	937
Nebraska	780	580	5	22.8%	434,148	8.2	524	581	38	944	0	16	723
Maine	1,077	778	3	30.2%	402,679	8.6	421	425	127	765	2	12	575
New Hampshire	809	598	3	29.7%	398,491	7.7	238	248	121	411	0	6	349
Montana	716	552	4	27.6%	287,638	7.7	348	361	34	603	2	11	536
Delaware	499	373	3	28.9%	274,574	8.6	52	66	46	109	1	1	87
Hawaii	531	414	4	19.1%	271,144	9.0	82	93	39	155	0	2	100
Rhode Island	502	379	3	22.3%	235,272	9.3	64	77	51	124	0	0	85
South Dakota	643	496	3	26.2%	226,387	7.9	359	370	28	552	1	19	416
Wyoming	610	480	4	35.8%	208,483	7.4	164	171	36	273	0	7	237
Alaska	606	470	4	26.0%	192,102	7.7	218	235	12	412	0	6	361
Vermont	673	509	3	28.1%	175,659	8.2	250	254	77	462	0	7	355
North Dakota	614	482	4	23.1%	173,169	8.6	367	381	28	609	0	4	485

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Brooklyn	New York	205	140	5	22.6%	587,236	9.2	37	7	70	0	0	52
Houston	Texas	273	196	6	15.3%	487,159	9.8	96	20	133	0	0	69
San Jose	California	221	183	4	37.2%	390,935	7.3	28	5	34	0	0	34
Chicago	Illinois	233	156	6	13.8%	373,280	12.3	56	5	64	0	0	20
Phoenix	Arizona	250	191	5	22.9%	332,501	9.0	42	4	56	0	0	49
Indianapolis	Indiana	268	198	4	33.1%	315,091	7.6	37	9	52	0	0	52
San Antonio	Texas	217	163	7	17.5%	311,930	9.3	59	3	61	0	0	52
Minneapolis	Minnesota	340	256	4	27.4%	298,343	8.4	51	19	68	0	0	64
Albuquerque	New Mexico	227	181	3	45.0%	295,120	6.7	17	4	20	0	1	20
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	301	237	3	34.0%	283,044	7.6	27	16	39	0	0	38
El Paso	Texas	254	203	4	35.7%	281,431	7.4	24	4	25	0	0	25
Tampa	Florida	252	193	3	35.4%	280,661	7.4	27	10	37	0	0	35
Miami	Florida	360	265	7	14.2%	266,877	11.1	55	18	99	0	0	24
Fort Worth	Texas	221	170	5	27.2%	248,389	8.4	32	5	42	0	0	34
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	240	190	5	35.1%	239,299	7.8	43	6	46	0	0	46
Dallas	Texas	295	217	6	16.8%	234,597	9.5	48	9	58	0	0	43
Bakersfield	California	189	157	3	41.5%	232,180	6.9	11	1	11	0	0	11
Saint Paul	Minnesota	304	239	3	28.8%	230,594	8.2	30	18	43	0	0	42
Las Vegas	Nevada	249	171	7	14.6%	225,865	10.0	43	7	65	0	0	27
Orlando	Florida	263	191	4	21.8%	217,050	9.2	32	6	36	0	0	29
Los Angeles	California	324	250	9	8.6%	211,530	11.9	62	10	118	0	0	16
San Diego	California	252	172	6	15.7%	211,483	9.6	36	10	45	0	0	31
Atlanta	Georgia	303	222	6	21.4%	211,170	9.5	39	14	44	0	0	24
Saint Louis	Missouri	311	243	4	22.4%	205,155	9.1	45	35	71	0	0	56
Bronx	New York	207	160	6	14.0%	201,731	10.2	25	7	34	0	0	17
Sacramento	California	218	159	5	23.1%	186,052	8.7	28	5	36	0	0	34
Jacksonville	Florida	239	187	7	20.2%	175,497	8.9	31	1	31	0	0	30
Portland	Oregon	213	148	7	19.0%	175,184	9.3	33	1	33	0	0	31
Virginia Beach	Virginia	185	141	4	37.6%	169,417	7.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Riverside	California	173	131	3	44.9%	166,287	6.7	7	3	9	0	0	9
Tucson	Arizona	250	190	6	17.3%	156,851	9.8	32	5	35	0	0	22
Stockton	California	195	152	3	41.3%	154,255	6.8	12	1	12	0	0	12
Detroit	Michigan	165	102	5	24.0%	153,407	8.5	25	4	50	0	0	46
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	242	178	8	9.7%	153,115	11.8	47	8	72	0	0	8
Columbia	South Carolina	179	135	3	43.0%	147,571	6.9	14	4	17	0	0	17
Denver	Colorado	281	201	7	12.8%	139,286	10.5	38	7	41	0	0	13
Santa Ana	California	149	119	4	39.0%	139,094	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Seattle	Washington	234	164	7	14.3%	137,048	10.4	35	3	36	0	0	18
Fresno	California	198	148	6	22.7%	136,628	9.1	18	3	20	0	0	16
Spokane	Washington	209	158	4	37.7%	135,722	7.4	14	2	16	0	0	16
Baltimore	Maryland	245	185	5	21.5%	135,521	8.8	22	7	37	0	0	37
Anaheim	California	168	134	4	36.1%	132,912	7.6	7	2	8	0	0	8
Greensboro	North Carolina	172	133	4	40.0%	130,922	7.2	9	2	10	0	0	10
West Palm Beach	Florida	203	151	4	35.3%	130,896	7.8	12	7	16	0	0	14
Dayton	Ohio	263	214	4	26.5%	126,695	8.6	27	11	35	0	0	30
San Bernardino	California	172	145	3	50.2%	125,337	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Savannah	Georgia	182	137	3	51.2%	123,424	6.4	10	1	10	0	0	10
Buffalo	New York	215	157	4	21.3%	119,633	9.0	28	4	28	0	0	24
Tacoma	Washington	251	206	3	35.3%	117,844	7.2	20	4	21	1	1	21
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	211	168	5	30.4%	115,322	7.8	18	1	18	0	0	18
Boise	Idaho	169	129	3	44.3%	113,316	6.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Charlotte	North Carolina	199	142	9	12.3%	111,712	11.3	24	3	27	0	0	7
Lakeland	Florida	175	144	3	43.0%	110,981	6.9	9	3	11	0	0	11
New York City	New York	260	170	9	6.8%	109,923	13.6	47	8	57	0	0	8
Long Beach	California	184	141	5	22.8%	109,086	8.6	12	1	12	0	0	12
Wichita	Kansas	236	181	5	25.5%	106,715	8.8	26	1	26	0	0	25
Salem	Oregon	168	132	3	40.0%	106,616	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lawrenceville	Georgia	148	120	3	40.0%	102,445	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clarksville	Tennessee	137	113	3	58.1%	102,121	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Irving	Texas	154	122	3	42.4%	102,060	6.8	6	2	7	0	0	7
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	269	192	7	14.9%	101,844	10.1	39	4	41	0	0	21
Columbus	Ohio	242	175	7	11.9%	100,865	11.2	30	5	32	0	0	5
Colorado Springs	Colorado	234	183	6	17.2%	100,342	9.7	30	6	34	0	0	22
Norfolk	Virginia	203	160	6	40.8%	100,187	7.5	14	1	14	0	0	14
Cincinnati	Ohio	238	184	7	12.3%	99,091	10.0	45	2	46	0	0	30
Hollywood	Florida	177	137	5	21.1%	98,793	9.0	9	5	15	0	0	5
Hialeah	Florida	176	145	4	26.3%	96,338	8.6	7	4	11	0	0	9
Pompano Beach	Florida	214	167	3	25.5%	94,447	9.5	10	8	12	0	0	11
Pensacola	Florida	184	145	3	35.1%	94,203	7.5	13	1	13	0	0	13
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	222	149	8	11.6%	94,026	10.8	29	6	36	0	0	9
Odessa	Texas	174	140	4	58.5%	93,630	5.3	6	3	8	0	1	8
Washington DC	District of Columbia	199	144	7	13.7%	93,464	11.1	28	5	32	0	0	10
Saint Petersburg	Florida	209	175	5	26.2%	93,326	8.6	16	4	27	0	0	25
Louisville	Kentucky	223	172	9	12.1%	91,712	11.2	32	6	44	0	0	8
Plano	Texas	145	109	4	30.0%	91,641	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Kissimmee	Florida	192	147	4	31.0%	89,655	8.3	7	5	9	0	0	8
Reading	Pennsylvania	175	130	3	41.4%	89,224	7.2	10	3	11	0	0	9
Arlington	Texas	185	138	5	22.5%	89,133	8.8	12	2	13	0	0	11
Winston Salem	North Carolina	191	163	4	33.6%	88,873	7.6	9	5	16	0	0	16
Garland	Texas	152	117	4	36.7%	87,371	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Shreveport	Louisiana	206	165	4	39.0%	86,968	7.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Raleigh	North Carolina	187	139	5	15.9%	86,946	9.3	15	2	20	0	0	16
Omaha	Nebraska	201	145	7	15.7%	86,761	9.5	31	2	32	0	0	23
Corona	California	152	124	4	33.7%	86,642	8.0	5	3	9	0	0	7
Birmingham	Alabama	231	177	5	17.2%	86,058	9.6	30	3	31	0	0	27
Lubbock	Texas	199	158	4	30.7%	84,895	8.0	14	1	14	0	0	12
Springfield	Missouri	152	112	4	36.8%	84,864	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Jackson	Mississippi	202	165	3	49.5%	84,236	5.8	11	2	12	0	1	12
Augusta	Georgia	194	158	3	40.1%	81,969	6.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
Cleveland	Ohio	256	187	8	10.9%	81,736	12.4	29	10	36	0	0	14
Glendale	Arizona	191	149	5	26.6%	81,030	8.4	9	3	10	0	0	10
Chandler	Arizona	151	115	4	30.0%	80,618	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Peoria	Arizona	142	112	4	46.8%	80,534	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Warren	Michigan	144	109	3	58.5%	79,072	5.2	5	2	7	0	0	7
Tyler	Texas	168	133	4	50.0%	78,117	6.3	9	2	13	0	0	13
Marietta	Georgia	177	134	5	23.7%	76,522	8.6	7	4	9	0	0	9
Grand Prairie	Texas	137	107	3	40.0%	76,218	7.0	4	3	6	0	0	6
Baytown	Texas	138	111	4	64.4%	75,825	5.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Killeen	Texas	134	109	4	50.3%	75,610	6.3	4	3	6	0	0	6
Kent	Washington	146	121	4	46.9%	75,225	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salt Lake City	Utah	235	189	7	15.4%	75,124	9.9	19	6	23	0	0	15
Norwalk	California	99	81	3	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	160	128	4	45.7%	73,036	6.6	5	2	9	0	0	9
Tracy	California	158	131	4	62.0%	72,671	5.5	4	4	8	0	0	8
Kansas City	Missouri	217	160	6	12.4%	70,949	10.2	49	2	52	0	0	30
Nashville	Tennessee	214	160	8	15.4%	70,707	11.2	22	5	26	0	0	6
Ontario	California	132	106	3	40.0%	70,659	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fontana	California	127	101	4	30.0%	70,418	8.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Memphis	Tennessee	245	187	9	10.1%	70,242	12.2	26	6	36	0	0	4
Lexington	Kentucky	190	137	6	21.9%	70,181	9.0	15	1	15	0	0	14
Fremont	California	139	116	4	30.0%	69,947	8.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Beaverton	Oregon	135	108	4	34.4%	69,423	7.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Huntsville	Alabama	192	148	4	35.3%	69,347	7.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Amarillo	Texas	213	169	5	30.2%	69,237	7.9	14	3	16	0	0	16
Lafayette	Louisiana	150	123	3	43.1%	69,150	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pomona	California	139	116	4	43.7%	69,095	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	California	136	107	4	38.3%	68,872	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hayward	California	135	115	3	35.7%	68,481	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salinas	California	154	128	4	36.3%	68,354	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Anchorage	Alaska	184	141	5	27.8%	67,765	8.0	12	3	14	0	0	13
Laredo	Texas	175	147	6	25.0%	67,594	8.5	6	2	7	0	0	7
Lithonia	Georgia	116	99	2	69.8%	67,534	4.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Cypress	Texas	113	89	4	39.3%	67,023	7.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Reno	Nevada	169	125	5	22.5%	66,658	9.2	12	1	12	0	0	11
Pueblo	Colorado	181	145	3	41.5%	65,629	6.7	7	2	8	0	0	8
Independence	Missouri	166	137	4	52.7%	65,425	5.9	8	1	8	0	0	8
Tulsa	Oklahoma	237	178	7	15.3%	64,496	9.7	28	3	31	0	0	20
Tallahassee	Florida	191	145	5	22.4%	64,424	8.8	10	1	10	0	0	9
San Francisco	California	184	137	10	7.3%	63,452	12.8	28	6	44	0	0	2
Greenville	South Carolina	174	128	5	28.9%	63,335	8.3	9	2	10	0	0	10
Lake Charles	Louisiana	161	131	4	48.3%	63,174	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	California	129	107	3	45.1%	62,871	6.3	4	2	6	0	0	6
Ogden	Utah	148	120	6	31.2%	62,779	8.2	5	3	10	0	0	9
Longview	Texas	160	130	4	59.4%	62,534	5.6	5	2	8	0	1	8
Chula Vista	California	147	114	6	23.7%	61,852	8.4	5	2	6	0	0	5
West Jordan	Utah	128	109	4	49.9%	61,690	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Topeka	Kansas	219	175	4	37.2%	60,765	7.1	18	1	18	0	0	18
Hemet	California	135	118	3	47.1%	60,632	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Richmond	Virginia	200	152	7	15.3%	59,937	10.1	15	1	15	0	0	7
Edison	New Jersey	124	96	4	59.3%	59,816	5.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Bridgeport	Connecticut	148	109	4	40.7%	59,609	6.7	6	2	8	0	0	8
Torrance	California	157	124	4	33.5%	59,153	8.2	5	3	6	0	0	4
Mission Viejo	California	114	89	4	60.0%	59,015	5.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
El Cajon	California	145	105	3	34.2%	58,961	7.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Paterson	New Jersey	176	143	4	40.3%	58,816	7.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Syracuse	New York	195	153	5	25.8%	58,430	8.5	15	4	18	0	0	15
Bellevue	Washington	148	120	4	39.8%	58,171	7.2	5	2	6	0	0	6
Fayetteville	North Carolina	161	124	5	23.7%	57,851	8.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
New Orleans	Louisiana	199	141	7	13.3%	56,776	10.6	19	1	19	0	0	3
Wilmington	Delaware	183	142	4	25.7%	56,454	8.7	10	6	18	0	0	16
Flint	Michigan	164	127	5	36.3%	56,424	7.4	7	2	13	0	0	13
High Point	North Carolina	144	116	4	46.1%	56,374	7.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Montgomery	Alabama	212	172	4	26.8%	56,215	8.1	13	1	13	0	0	13
Pasadena	California	165	133	3	35.4%	55,807	7.7	6	2	8	0	0	8
York	Pennsylvania	145	108	5	31.0%	55,680	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Moreno Valley	California	134	108	5	27.0%	55,560	8.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Green Bay	Wisconsin	160	127	4	30.2%	55,331	7.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Henderson	Nevada	173	127	5	18.3%	55,286	10.1	8	4	10	0	0	2
Roseville	California	133	105	4	39.3%	54,878	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bradenton	Florida	176	136	6	21.7%	54,859	8.3	10	2	13	0	0	13
Jersey City	New Jersey	153	104	7	20.8%	54,432	9.7	7	1	7	0	0	5
Alpharetta	Georgia	152	120	3	28.8%	54,429	9.8	4	3	5	0	0	4
Olympia	Washington	171	142	4	29.3%	53,494	8.2	6	5	8	0	0	8
Akron	Ohio	206	160	5	19.7%	53,193	8.9	17	2	30	0	0	28
Saginaw	Michigan	168	139	5	40.3%	52,463	6.7	7	2	11	0	0	11
Mesquite	Texas	131	109	4	35.7%	52,280	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lansing	Michigan	155	113	4	31.7%	52,154	8.3	7	2	13	0	0	9
Compton	California	131	111	4	37.5%	52,127	7.3	3	2	5	0	0	5
Rialto	California	122	101	3	48.2%	51,336	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Silver Spring	Maryland	197	166	5	16.9%	51,331	10.3	7	7	10	0	0	5
Mobile	Alabama	248	206	5	18.9%	51,236	8.8	18	4	20	0	0	18
Edmond	Oklahoma	153	112	5	29.8%	51,147	8.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Oakland	California	170	125	6	12.4%	51,028	10.0	14	4	19	0	0	12
Bloomington	Indiana	155	119	5	38.1%	50,844	7.2	6	3	8	0	0	8
Appleton	Wisconsin	140	111	4	41.7%	50,799	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Jamaica	New York	151	114	4	20.8%	50,789	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Rancho Cucamonga	California	141	112	4	28.6%	50,446	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roanoke	Virginia	203	168	5	29.6%	50,230	8.3	10	4	13	0	0	13
Santa Clara	California	126	101	3	40.0%	50,207	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Abilene	Texas	178	142	4	38.0%	49,457	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Elgin	Illinois	124	100	3	40.0%	48,885	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Spring	Texas	184	140	7	12.8%	48,773	10.1	8	7	12	0	0	6
Toledo	Ohio	198	146	6	15.9%	48,773	9.3	15	3	17	0	0	16
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	160	137	5	23.9%	48,557	9.0	6	6	10	0	0	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	157	124	6	20.3%	48,295	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Evansville	Indiana	171	126	5	26.1%	48,108	8.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Portsmouth	Virginia	170	142	3	50.1%	47,798	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Palmdale	California	151	126	5	27.1%	47,372	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Everett	Washington	143	116	5	28.3%	47,219	8.0	5	3	9	0	0	9
Aurora	Colorado	191	142	7	10.8%	47,057	10.7	11	2	12	0	0	2
Austin	Texas	202	125	11	4.3%	47,051	16.2	44	7	76	0	0	0
Perris	California	124	106	3	40.0%	46,956	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Homestead	Florida	179	151	4	25.0%	46,948	8.7	7	6	13	0	0	13
Muncie	Indiana	164	134	3	50.0%	46,380	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fort Wayne	Indiana	198	152	7	14.5%	46,167	9.6	16	1	16	0	0	14
Belleville	Illinois	145	121	4	49.2%	45,890	6.3	4	3	8	0	0	8
Rochester	New York	202	147	8	9.7%	45,880	12.1	24	4	29	0	0	4
Sunnyvale	California	158	133	4	30.0%	45,832	8.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	California	148	115	4	26.0%	45,737	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Visalia	California	143	112	5	30.0%	45,604	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Yakima	Washington	145	124	3	35.0%	45,397	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	132	103	3	47.8%	45,312	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hampton	Virginia	140	107	4	33.0%	45,019	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Chico	California	130	100	3	40.0%	44,806	7.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Roswell	Georgia	116	93	3	44.7%	44,552	6.5	2	3	4	0	0	4
Meridian	Idaho	114	88	4	42.7%	44,521	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Worcester	Massachusetts	162	116	4	23.8%	44,240	8.9	9	1	9	0	0	8
Sandy	Utah	134	111	3	40.0%	44,176	7.0	4	3	6	0	0	6
Longmont	Colorado	133	109	5	33.8%	44,141	7.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	123	101	4	40.0%	44,099	7.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Winter Haven	Florida	130	110	5	41.0%	43,818	7.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Mcallen	Texas	130	104	5	30.7%	43,487	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Olathe	Kansas	112	91	4	30.0%	43,312	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
San Mateo	California	148	121	4	30.4%	43,239	8.0	4	3	5	0	0	5
Trenton	New Jersey	206	168	4	20.7%	43,145	9.5	11	5	16	0	0	7
Round Rock	Texas	147	99	5	25.7%	43,042	10.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Flushing	New York	146	112	4	20.0%	43,013	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	California	139	112	4	30.0%	42,927	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Saint Charles	Missouri	134	114	4	30.7%	42,897	8.0	3	5	6	0	0	6
New Braunfels	Texas	119	96	6	41.6%	42,810	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
New Haven	Connecticut	143	91	5	32.8%	42,732	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Deltona	Florida	117	94	3	45.3%	42,569	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Mission	Texas	142	109	6	23.4%	42,422	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Eugene	Oregon	161	124	6	20.8%	42,246	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Antioch	California	120	102	4	38.1%	42,224	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	California	126	103	4	36.4%	42,192	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allentown	Pennsylvania	163	130	5	24.8%	42,185	8.7	7	1	7	0	0	5
Riverview	Florida	147	121	5	37.8%	42,120	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Woodstock	Georgia	117	94	4	41.4%	42,081	6.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Dearborn	Michigan	120	98	3	44.0%	41,882	7.5	4	3	8	0	0	8
Acworth	Georgia	127	107	6	41.6%	41,513	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Henrico	Virginia	188	148	4	21.5%	41,430	9.0	7	4	8	0	0	6
Mesa	Arizona	183	139	8	7.7%	41,300	12.8	13	5	17	0	0	2
Albany	New York	180	131	4	27.3%	41,271	8.0	11	2	12	0	0	12
Madison	Wisconsin	183	133	6	13.9%	41,131	10.6	14	2	21	0	0	5
Macon	Georgia	188	150	5	24.9%	40,831	8.4	9	2	10	0	0	10
Katy	Texas	135	103	7	11.8%	40,661	11.5	4	3	8	0	0	2
Littleton	Colorado	223	169	5	12.5%	40,518	11.0	10	5	12	0	0	4
Gilbert	Arizona	152	109	7	17.0%	40,500	9.8	6	3	8	0	0	4
Newport News	Virginia	159	118	5	22.9%	40,461	8.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Alexandria	Virginia	215	163	5	11.3%	40,220	11.6	14	7	19	0	0	7
Yonkers	New York	154	130	4	22.3%	40,180	8.8	5	2	10	0	0	10
Pearland	Texas	137	105	4	29.2%	40,156	8.5	2	3	3	0	0	2
Ann Arbor	Michigan	146	110	7	24.0%	40,023	9.6	5	2	6	0	0	3
Vancouver	Washington	173	134	7	12.2%	39,799	11.9	11	4	21	0	0	2
Sterling Heights	Michigan	132	112	4	30.0%	39,741	8.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Lowell	Massachusetts	124	93	4	35.6%	39,612	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Concord	California	135	111	3	30.4%	39,611	7.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Lincoln	Nebraska	189	149	7	13.7%	39,606	9.4	22	2	23	0	0	22
Gaithersburg	Maryland	148	126	5	27.3%	39,463	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	143	112	4	31.9%	39,070	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	129	108	4	40.0%	38,960	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Elk Grove	California	138	109	5	21.6%	38,772	9.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
Hawthorne	California	97	84	3	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Covington	Georgia	122	101	4	41.7%	38,655	7.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Bothell	Washington	158	122	7	30.0%	38,539	8.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Oceanside	California	137	100	7	19.2%	38,435	9.5	4	3	6	0	0	4
Orem	Utah	132	112	4	38.1%	38,245	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Vista	California	128	92	3	31.8%	38,162	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Woodbridge	Virginia	137	110	5	17.9%	37,991	9.3	3	3	5	0	0	3
Valdosta	Georgia	157	128	4	40.0%	37,980	7.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Spartanburg	South Carolina	157	126	6	33.9%	37,928	7.8	5	2	9	0	0	9
Mckinney	Texas	126	104	5	20.0%	37,798	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vacaville	California	117	96	5	35.9%	37,757	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	176	141	4	38.2%	37,749	7.1	7	2	8	0	0	8
Edinburg	Texas	144	118	6	24.3%	37,735	8.7	3	2	4	0	0	4
Orange	California	131	108	4	26.0%	37,732	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Oxnard	California	149	116	7	17.1%	37,602	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	110	4	30.0%	37,567	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Scottsdale	Arizona	195	146	5	12.6%	37,557	11.8	11	5	17	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	142	114	4	34.2%	37,337	7.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Rockville	Maryland	159	127	4	25.7%	37,164	8.3	4	4	7	0	0	6
West Valley City	Utah	121	100	4	27.9%	37,135	7.7	3	3	6	0	0	5
San Angelo	Texas	143	114	4	32.8%	36,285	7.8	4	3	8	0	0	8
Englewood	Colorado	172	132	4	32.4%	36,157	8.5	4	3	4	0	1	2
Manassas	Virginia	150	125	7	23.8%	36,137	8.8	4	5	8	0	0	5
Gastonia	North Carolina	141	114	5	33.3%	35,642	7.7	3	3	6	0	0	6
Simi Valley	California	110	89	6	27.6%	35,532	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Staten Island	New York	161	124	8	7.5%	35,528	12.4	12	3	17	0	0	0
Las Cruces	New Mexico	173	139	5	23.8%	35,496	8.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Burbank	California	134	104	3	32.8%	35,473	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Carrollton	Texas	126	101	4	26.2%	35,330	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Largo	Florida	145	117	4	32.8%	35,321	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Providence	Rhode Island	176	133	5	17.2%	35,302	9.5	8	2	8	0	0	7
Ocala	Florida	182	140	7	15.6%	35,168	10.2	11	1	11	0	0	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	145	121	4	30.0%	35,067	8.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Charleston	South Carolina	173	130	5	17.8%	35,063	9.0	10	2	14	0	0	13
Beaumont	Texas	173	136	5	24.1%	35,058	8.8	8	5	14	0	0	14
Fredericksburg	Virginia	155	121	5	20.1%	35,054	9.0	5	4	10	0	0	9
Apopka	Florida	121	104	5	35.7%	34,828	7.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	151	113	4	30.0%	34,818	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Nampa	Idaho	140	119	5	30.0%	34,772	8.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Grand Junction	Colorado	157	128	5	32.9%	34,729	7.5	6	3	12	0	0	12
Lake Worth	Florida	171	134	6	16.8%	34,708	10.4	5	8	9	0	0	5
Bowie	Maryland	168	139	4	33.9%	34,678	8.3	4	4	6	0	0	4
Merced	California	128	109	4	33.5%	34,555	7.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Anderson	South Carolina	135	106	4	35.1%	34,550	7.0	4	3	8	0	0	8
Inglewood	California	168	130	4	25.8%	34,510	8.8	5	4	9	0	0	7
Modesto	California	170	131	6	13.0%	34,318	10.6	7	4	14	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	113	87	4	30.0%	34,126	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Delray Beach	Florida	168	135	4	28.6%	34,039	8.4	5	3	7	0	0	6
Auburn	Washington	123	105	4	30.0%	33,862	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Honolulu	Hawaii	179	135	7	8.1%	33,823	11.9	11	4	17	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	152	123	4	30.0%	33,742	8.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Stone Mountain	Georgia	147	129	5	26.2%	33,663	8.3	3	3	6	0	0	6
Boulder	Colorado	152	120	6	25.6%	33,635	8.7	6	2	12	0	0	11
Little Rock	Arkansas	184	147	5	15.4%	33,586	10.0	12	2	13	0	0	6
Youngstown	Ohio	195	148	3	21.4%	33,549	9.3	12	5	17	0	0	14
Fairfax	Virginia	156	132	4	20.5%	33,512	8.8	4	4	7	0	0	5
San Leandro	California	129	108	4	30.0%	33,356	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Newark	New Jersey	180	140	6	11.8%	33,184	9.9	9	2	18	0	0	10
Naples	Florida	202	145	6	10.6%	33,074	10.3	14	1	14	0	0	11
O Fallon	Missouri	121	104	4	34.3%	33,066	7.5	2	3	4	0	0	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	155	124	5	34.7%	33,003	7.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Saint Augustine	Florida	168	129	4	24.7%	32,387	8.4	5	5	8	0	0	8
Athens	Georgia	158	120	4	25.9%	32,249	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Denton	Texas	155	121	7	20.2%	31,881	9.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Puyallup	Washington	166	139	5	22.1%	31,570	9.0	5	3	8	0	0	6
Hesperia	California	106	85	4	30.0%	31,143	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hartford	Connecticut	135	105	4	25.1%	31,006	8.5	6	2	10	0	0	10
Asheville	North Carolina	140	103	6	23.5%	30,984	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Santa Rosa	California	141	105	6	14.3%	30,867	10.5	6	1	6	0	0	2
Midlothian	Virginia	138	108	6	31.6%	30,572	9.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Metairie	Louisiana	148	116	5	21.5%	30,525	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fairfield	California	125	103	5	26.7%	30,505	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vallejo	California	136	111	5	24.3%	30,247	8.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Clinton Township	Michigan	132	112	4	30.0%	30,089	8.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Buford	Georgia	117	99	4	30.0%	29,731	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chattanooga	Tennessee	213	161	7	14.3%	29,660	10.0	15	4	19	0	0	12
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	151	119	8	21.2%	29,579	9.2	6	2	8	0	0	4
Yuma	Arizona	134	113	4	20.0%	29,520	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cary	North Carolina	144	108	8	19.0%	29,455	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Lancaster	California	133	113	6	16.0%	29,439	9.3	3	2	6	0	0	3
Rockford	Illinois	158	117	6	16.1%	29,432	10.0	9	2	10	0	0	4
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	162	9	9.0%	29,209	11.3	18	10	33	0	0	6
Richardson	Texas	135	107	4	25.5%	29,208	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livermore	California	123	103	5	30.0%	28,876	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	California	98	79	4	30.0%	28,824	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Herndon	Virginia	120	99	6	30.8%	28,760	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	115	87	4	30.0%	28,628	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Clearwater	Florida	181	139	6	15.6%	28,618	9.8	9	2	9	0	0	2
South Gate	California	96	80	4	30.0%	28,531	8.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	151	121	4	27.4%	28,225	9.0	3	4	6	0	0	4
El Monte	California	115	95	4	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Newnan	Georgia	121	97	5	30.0%	28,019	8.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Grand Rapids	Michigan	170	128	9	7.6%	28,007	12.3	12	4	20	0	0	0
Decatur	Georgia	163	121	7	15.4%	27,836	10.0	5	3	6	0	0	4
Springdale	Arkansas	115	95	5	28.3%	27,273	8.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Victorville	California	117	92	5	20.0%	27,262	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Des Moines	Iowa	177	131	5	12.2%	27,194	10.5	11	1	11	0	0	4
Sugar Land	Texas	137	100	5	16.0%	27,090	10.3	3	4	5	0	0	3
Frisco	Texas	116	89	5	15.5%	26,811	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Missoula	Montana	154	121	6	27.4%	26,687	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Overland Park	Kansas	167	131	6	14.5%	26,532	10.1	9	3	14	0	0	7
Murrieta	California	124	101	5	20.0%	26,449	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	171	135	7	14.5%	26,428	10.4	9	1	9	0	0	3
Falls Church	Virginia	187	149	4	21.9%	26,319	10.0	5	6	8	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	142	118	5	24.7%	25,916	8.7	3	5	6	0	0	6
Lynn	Massachusetts	137	113	4	27.3%	25,515	8.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Brownsville	Texas	129	103	6	12.6%	25,452	10.0	3	2	6	0	0	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	112	88	4	25.6%	25,408	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Boca Raton	Florida	170	132	7	11.4%	25,288	10.9	9	2	10	0	0	2
Lewisville	Texas	132	103	6	21.3%	25,224	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Jupiter	Florida	139	108	6	25.6%	25,196	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bowling Green	Kentucky	138	112	5	21.8%	25,164	8.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Sparks	Nevada	145	112	5	21.1%	25,134	9.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Federal Way	Washington	117	91	5	25.0%	25,015	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hillsboro	Oregon	118	95	4	24.2%	24,918	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	2
Milton	Florida	138	113	4	26.3%	24,884	8.3	3	5	6	0	0	6
Florissant	Missouri	148	117	4	22.6%	24,433	9.3	3	2	4	0	0	3
Palo Alto	California	137	112	4	25.0%	24,200	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Johnson City	Tennessee	132	98	6	25.2%	24,073	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fort Myers	Florida	181	138	7	9.3%	23,388	11.5	11	6	16	0	0	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	169	127	5	10.0%	23,342	10.1	7	2	13	0	0	6
Provo	Utah	132	106	5	20.0%	23,305	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Clovis	California	134	102	5	18.9%	22,975	9.0	3	4	5	0	0	4
Greeley	Colorado	119	95	6	20.0%	22,813	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Billings	Montana	155	128	6	16.6%	22,762	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Whittier	California	195	155	8	11.5%	22,544	10.5	6	3	7	0	0	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	142	109	5	11.6%	22,504	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Ashburn	Virginia	122	96	5	20.0%	22,461	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Humble	Texas	128	97	7	13.4%	22,244	10.3	3	2	4	0	0	1
Conroe	Texas	191	147	6	13.8%	22,175	9.6	7	3	8	0	0	7
Berkeley	California	188	145	6	17.4%	22,107	9.1	9	3	10	0	0	9
Summerville	South Carolina	120	96	6	15.9%	22,088	9.5	2	3	4	0	0	3
Medford	Oregon	118	98	6	23.6%	22,054	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Hamilton	Ohio	146	118	6	16.1%	22,026	9.3	3	2	5	0	0	4
West Covina	California	123	102	4	20.0%	21,882	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Pierce	Florida	188	157	5	22.4%	21,422	8.6	8	3	12	0	0	12
Kalamazoo	Michigan	157	120	6	13.0%	21,410	10.3	7	2	8	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	127	94	5	19.7%	21,403	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Ridgewood	New York	97	78	4	20.0%	21,343	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Tempe	Arizona	131	93	7	11.1%	21,184	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Panama City	Florida	165	125	5	16.6%	20,933	9.3	6	3	7	0	0	6
Quincy	Massachusetts	133	103	4	22.1%	20,761	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Knoxville	Tennessee	202	149	11	5.3%	20,663	13.9	17	4	25	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	135	105	5	21.5%	20,408	8.3	3	2	4	0	0	3
Durham	North Carolina	170	127	9	7.0%	20,258	12.9	8	6	14	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	150	123	6	20.0%	20,211	9.0	5	2	7	0	0	7
Bryan	Texas	162	139	5	20.8%	19,984	8.8	5	3	10	0	0	8
Norman	Oklahoma	145	116	7	15.9%	19,778	10.8	4	2	6	0	0	1
Gainesville	Florida	187	132	8	9.3%	19,504	11.3	10	6	19	0	0	2
Coral Springs	Florida	117	93	5	20.0%	19,448	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	California	123	98	5	20.0%	19,218	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Duluth	Minnesota	177	135	7	16.4%	19,209	10.3	11	2	12	0	0	3
Carlsbad	California	132	98	6	16.8%	19,108	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Keller	Texas	126	98	5	16.1%	18,732	9.5	2	4	4	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	141	108	6	14.5%	18,690	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Chino	California	108	84	4	19.6%	18,506	9.5	2	2	4	0	0	3
Schenectady	New York	177	136	9	11.4%	18,474	11.1	8	2	9	0	0	4
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	88	7	17.3%	18,449	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynchburg	Virginia	154	122	6	18.0%	18,400	9.5	4	3	5	0	0	3
Kennewick	Washington	132	111	5	18.4%	18,190	9.3	3	2	6	0	0	5
Downey	California	141	111	6	16.1%	18,166	9.3	3	2	5	0	0	4
Canton	Ohio	167	128	6	12.3%	18,042	11.1	12	1	12	0	0	1
Fort Mill	South Carolina	124	86	7	18.8%	17,898	11.0	3	2	4	0	0	1
Clermont	Florida	141	119	5	17.6%	17,659	9.7	3	3	4	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	154	119	7	16.0%	17,363	9.7	3	3	5	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	185	141	9	11.2%	17,319	10.2	5	3	6	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	129	103	6	16.2%	17,224	9.5	2	3	3	0	0	2
New Port Richey	Florida	136	105	5	14.2%	17,099	10.0	4	5	8	0	0	5
Huntington Beach	California	128	102	8	8.5%	16,964	11.5	4	2	5	0	0	0
Daly City	California	140	104	6	14.8%	16,939	10.5	2	3	3	0	0	2
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	168	127	6	10.0%	16,938	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Annapolis	Maryland	174	143	5	17.8%	16,894	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Scranton	Pennsylvania	169	127	7	17.0%	16,865	9.8	8	2	8	0	0	4
Waukegan	Illinois	118	90	6	17.3%	16,838	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
College Station	Texas	115	96	7	13.3%	16,410	11.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Cumming	Georgia	140	114	6	10.0%	16,202	10.0	3	3	5	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	153	121	8	14.5%	15,760	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	3
Muskegon	Michigan	153	124	8	12.2%	15,720	11.4	5	2	8	0	0	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	123	100	5	15.4%	15,664	9.5	2	2	4	0	0	3
Sarasota	Florida	189	142	10	6.2%	15,451	14.2	13	4	14	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	115	92	6	13.7%	15,195	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	121	88	6	14.9%	14,952	9.5	2	2	4	0	0	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	157	127	5	8.5%	14,847	11.5	6	3	8	0	0	0
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	156	117	9	7.9%	14,781	12.2	5	3	9	0	0	1
Erie	Pennsylvania	179	140	9	7.9%	14,468	11.6	13	2	23	0	0	4
Palm Bay	Florida	138	115	7	12.9%	14,310	10.5	4	2	5	0	0	2
Cape Coral	Florida	149	112	8	7.8%	14,156	12.3	6	1	6	0	0	1
Menifee	California	148	125	5	12.6%	13,947	10.0	4	2	5	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	111	92	5	14.8%	13,936	9.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Boston	Massachusetts	178	120	9	9.1%	13,882	11.2	14	2	16	0	0	3
Van Nuys	California	148	117	9	7.7%	13,689	12.3	4	4	8	0	0	1
Surprise	Arizona	144	114	6	10.0%	13,556	10.0	4	2	7	0	0	4
Melbourne	Florida	138	105	7	8.6%	13,388	11.4	5	2	9	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	131	101	7	10.9%	13,387	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Miami Beach	Florida	147	112	5	11.5%	13,305	10.4	5	3	7	0	0	4
Naperville	Illinois	139	105	8	8.0%	13,265	12.0	4	2	6	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	150	114	5	9.7%	13,204	10.3	7	2	11	0	0	5
Astoria	New York	164	121	7	9.1%	12,983	11.0	4	3	5	0	0	2
Waco	Texas	179	138	8	8.2%	12,945	11.7	9	2	13	0	0	0
Racine	Wisconsin	152	119	9	10.1%	12,773	11.6	5	2	8	0	0	1
Irvine	California	181	140	11	4.8%	12,724	15.1	9	2	15	0	0	0
South Bend	Indiana	161	126	9	8.6%	12,570	11.3	10	3	12	0	0	2
Arvada	Colorado	143	112	7	9.4%	12,561	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Temecula	California	134	108	7	9.3%	12,103	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	156	117	7	8.1%	11,830	11.8	5	2	7	0	0	1
Stamford	Connecticut	138	105	7	9.0%	11,587	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	144	121	5	10.0%	11,446	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	148	114	8	8.9%	11,411	11.4	5	2	6	0	0	1
Bellingham	Washington	133	106	7	9.0%	11,384	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	146	116	9	7.4%	11,357	12.5	4	5	8	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	142	108	7	9.1%	11,246	10.8	5	2	6	0	0	1
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	131	105	5	8.6%	11,242	11.3	3	2	5	0	0	1
La Puente	California	138	113	9	9.5%	11,181	11.0	2	3	3	0	0	1
Cambridge	Massachusetts	140	112	7	9.0%	10,421	11.0	5	2	10	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	145	116	8	8.2%	10,334	11.4	5	2	6	0	0	1
Vero Beach	Florida	151	114	7	8.9%	10,300	11.0	6	2	7	0	0	1
Kenosha	Wisconsin	140	108	9	9.1%	10,235	11.0	4	2	7	0	0	2
Rock Hill	South Carolina	125	99	9	8.5%	9,876	12.0	3	2	5	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	122	89	8	7.9%	9,715	11.7	3	3	6	0	0	1
Parker	Colorado	126	105	7	9.7%	9,692	10.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Hyattsville	Maryland	148	118	10	6.2%	9,689	13.6	5	4	9	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	127	98	6	10.0%	9,457	10.0	3	3	5	0	0	3
Davenport	Iowa	162	129	7	9.0%	9,438	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	98	72	6	10.0%	9,397	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Redding	California	146	117	8	8.3%	9,381	12.0	4	3	5	0	0	0
Santa Cruz	California	136	106	7	9.0%	9,364	11.0	4	2	6	0	0	0
Hagerstown	Maryland	144	115	8	9.6%	9,361	10.0	3	3	5	0	0	1
Plainfield	Illinois	131	103	7	9.5%	9,347	10.7	3	3	5	0	0	1
Elkhart	Indiana	135	109	7	9.3%	9,211	10.7	3	3	5	0	0	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	160	128	6	8.9%	9,210	11.2	5	4	8	0	0	1
Bend	Oregon	138	112	8	7.4%	9,035	12.7	3	3	4	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	132	100	6	9.4%	8,972	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Santa Monica	California	147	114	6	9.4%	8,879	10.4	5	2	6	0	0	4
Franklin	Tennessee	129	103	8	8.3%	8,814	11.7	3	2	5	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	129	100	7	8.8%	8,810	11.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
Champaign	Illinois	131	101	6	9.3%	8,769	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Lees Summit	Missouri	169	145	7	8.6%	8,749	10.8	6	5	9	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	127	103	8	9.0%	8,622	11.0	3	4	6	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	145	122	8	8.8%	8,546	11.3	3	2	5	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	117	85	8	8.6%	8,232	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	97	75	9	8.0%	8,195	12.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	130	98	7	8.2%	8,077	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	136	108	11	6.0%	7,920	14.0	4	3	8	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	98	75	9	8.0%	7,719	12.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	97	72	9	7.0%	7,406	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	95	81	8	7.0%	7,053	13.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Napa	California	116	87	8	7.0%	6,767	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Jose	221	183	4	37.2%	390,935	7.3	28	5	34	0	34
Bakersfield	189	157	3	41.5%	232,180	6.9	11	1	11	0	11
Los Angeles	324	250	9	8.6%	211,530	11.9	62	10	118	0	16
San Diego	252	172	6	15.7%	211,483	9.6	36	10	45	0	31
Sacramento	218	159	5	23.1%	186,052	8.7	28	5	36	0	34
Riverside	173	131	3	44.9%	166,287	6.7	7	3	9	0	9
Stockton	195	152	3	41.3%	154,255	6.8	12	1	12	0	12
Santa Ana	149	119	4	39.0%	139,094	7.7	6	1	6	0	6
Fresno	198	148	6	22.7%	136,628	9.1	18	3	20	0	16
Anaheim	168	134	4	36.1%	132,912	7.6	7	2	8	0	8
San Bernardino	172	145	3	50.2%	125,337	5.6	7	1	7	1	7
Long Beach	184	141	5	22.8%	109,086	8.6	12	1	12	0	12
Corona	152	124	4	33.7%	86,642	8.0	5	3	9	0	7
Norwalk	99	81	3	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	1
Tracy	158	131	4	62.0%	72,671	5.5	4	4	8	0	8
Ontario	132	106	3	40.0%	70,659	7.0	3	1	3	0	3
Fontana	127	101	4	30.0%	70,418	8.0	3	3	5	0	5
Fremont	139	116	4	30.0%	69,947	8.0	4	2	8	0	8
Pomona	139	116	4	43.7%	69,095	7.0	3	1	3	0	3
Escondido	136	107	4	38.3%	68,872	7.3	4	1	4	0	4
Hayward	135	115	3	35.7%	68,481	7.0	4	1	4	0	4
Salinas	154	128	4	36.3%	68,354	8.0	5	1	5	0	5
San Francisco	184	137	10	7.3%	63,452	12.8	28	6	44	0	2
Fullerton	129	107	3	45.1%	62,871	6.3	4	2	6	0	6
Chula Vista	147	114	6	23.7%	61,852	8.4	5	2	6	0	5
Hemet	135	118	3	47.1%	60,632	6.3	3	1	3	0	3
Torrance	157	124	4	33.5%	59,153	8.2	5	3	6	0	4
Mission Viejo	114	89	4	60.0%	59,015	5.0	2	3	4	0	4
El Cajon	145	105	3	34.2%	58,961	7.3	3	2	3	0	3
Pasadena	165	133	3	35.4%	55,807	7.7	6	2	8	0	8
Moreno Valley	134	108	5	27.0%	55,560	8.0	4	2	5	0	5
Roseville	133	105	4	39.3%	54,878	7.0	3	1	3	0	3
Compton	131	111	4	37.5%	52,127	7.3	3	2	5	0	5
Rialto	122	101	3	48.2%	51,336	6.5	2	1	2	0	2
Oakland	170	125	6	12.4%	51,028	10.0	14	4	19	0	12
Rancho Cucamonga	141	112	4	28.6%	50,446	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Santa Clara	126	101	3	40.0%	50,207	7.0	4	1	4	0	4
Palmdale	151	126	5	27.1%	47,372	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Perris	124	106	3	40.0%	46,956	7.0	2	1	2	0	2
Sunnyvale	158	133	4	30.0%	45,832	8.0	4	2	4	0	4
Garden Grove	148	115	4	26.0%	45,737	8.4	5	1	5	0	5
Visalia	143	112	5	30.0%	45,604	8.0	3	2	6	0	6
Chico	130	100	3	40.0%	44,806	7.0	3	2	4	0	4
San Mateo	148	121	4	30.4%	43,239	8.0	4	3	5	0	5
Santa Maria	139	112	4	30.0%	42,927	8.0	3	2	6	0	6
Antioch	120	102	4	38.1%	42,224	7.5	2	1	2	0	2
Ventura	126	103	4	36.4%	42,192	7.7	3	1	3	0	3
Concord	135	111	3	30.4%	39,611	7.8	4	2	5	0	5
Elk Grove	138	109	5	21.6%	38,772	9.0	3	2	4	0	3
Hawthorne	97	84	3	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	2	2	0	2
Oceanside	137	100	7	19.2%	38,435	9.5	4	3	6	0	4
Vista	128	92	3	31.8%	38,162	8.0	3	1	3	0	3
Vacaville	117	96	5	35.9%	37,757	8.0	2	2	4	0	3
Orange	131	108	4	26.0%	37,732	8.4	5	1	5	0	5
Oxnard	149	116	7	17.1%	37,602	9.8	4	1	4	0	2
Simi Valley	110	89	6	27.6%	35,532	8.0	2	1	2	0	2
Burbank	134	104	3	32.8%	35,473	7.8	5	1	5	0	5
Merced	128	109	4	33.5%	34,555	7.7	3	2	5	0	5
Inglewood	168	130	4	25.8%	34,510	8.8	5	4	9	0	7
Modesto	170	131	6	13.0%	34,318	10.6	7	4	14	0	2
Costa Mesa	113	87	4	30.0%	34,126	8.0	2	1	2	0	2
San Leandro	129	108	4	30.0%	33,356	8.0	3	2	4	0	4
Hesperia	106	85	4	30.0%	31,143	8.0	2	1	2	0	2
Santa Rosa	141	105	6	14.3%	30,867	10.5	6	1	6	0	2
Fairfield	125	103	5	26.7%	30,505	8.0	2	1	2	0	2
Vallejo	136	111	5	24.3%	30,247	8.8	4	2	5	0	5
Lancaster	133	113	6	16.0%	29,439	9.3	3	2	6	0	3
Livermore	123	103	5	30.0%	28,876	8.0	2	2	4	0	4
Pittsburg	98	79	4	30.0%	28,824	8.0	1	2	2	0	2
South Gate	96	80	4	30.0%	28,531	8.0	1	2	2	0	2
Madera	151	121	4	27.4%	28,225	9.0	3	4	6	0	4
El Monte	115	95	4	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	2	4	0	4
Victorville	117	92	5	20.0%	27,262	9.0	3	2	5	0	5
Murrieta	124	101	5	20.0%	26,449	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Palo Alto	137	112	4	25.0%	24,200	8.3	4	1	4	0	4
Clovis	134	102	5	18.9%	22,975	9.0	3	4	5	0	4
Whittier	195	155	8	11.5%	22,544	10.5	6	3	7	0	3
Berkeley	188	145	6	17.4%	22,107	9.1	9	3	10	0	9
West Covina	123	102	4	20.0%	21,882	9.0	3	1	3	0	3
Indio	123	98	5	20.0%	19,218	9.0	2	1	2	0	2
Carlsbad	132	98	6	16.8%	19,108	9.5	4	1	4	0	3
Chino	108	84	4	19.6%	18,506	9.5	2	2	4	0	3
Downey	141	111	6	16.1%	18,166	9.3	3	2	5	0	4
Huntington Beach	128	102	8	8.5%	16,964	11.5	4	2	5	0	0
Daly City	140	104	6	14.8%	16,939	10.5	2	3	3	0	2
San Marcos	121	88	6	14.9%	14,952	9.5	2	2	4	0	3
Menifee	148	125	5	12.6%	13,947	10.0	4	2	5	0	3
Van Nuys	148	117	9	7.7%	13,689	12.3	4	4	8	0	1
Santa Barbara	150	114	5	9.7%	13,204	10.3	7	2	11	0	5
Irvine	181	140	11	4.8%	12,724	15.1	9	2	15	0	0
Temecula	134	108	7	9.3%	12,103	10.7	3	1	3	0	1
Redwood City	144	121	5	10.0%	11,446	10.0	4	1	4	0	4
North Hollywood	146	116	9	7.4%	11,357	12.5	4	5	8	0	0
La Puente	138	113	9	9.5%	11,181	11.0	2	3	3	0	1
Redding	146	117	8	8.3%	9,381	12.0	4	3	5	0	0
Santa Cruz	136	106	7	9.0%	9,364	11.0	4	2	6	0	0
Santa Monica	147	114	6	9.4%	8,879	10.4	5	2	6	0	4
Bell Gardens	97	75	9	8.0%	8,195	12.0	1	2	2	0	0
Sylmar	98	75	9	8.0%	7,719	12.0	1	2	2	0	0
Pacoima	97	72	9	7.0%	7,406	13.0	1	1	1	0	0
Napa	116	87	8	7.0%	6,767	13.0	2	1	2	0	0

Brooklyn

ZIP	dominos.com	yelp.com	tripadvisor.com	thrillist.com	grubhub.com	bkpizza.nyc
11208	10	4	6	7	8	12
11206	9	4	6	7	8	11
11239	9	4	6	7	8	15
11229	8	4	6	7	11	15
11226	10	4	6	7	8	13
11218	6	1	3	4	5	8
11216	10	4	6	7	8	14
11228	8	4	6	7	20	9
11238	7	1	3	4	5	10
11237	10	4	6	7	8	14
11217	6	1	3	5	4	8
11207	9	4	6	7	8	12
11236	9	4	7	6	8	13
11205	9	4	6	7	8	11
11219	6	1	3	4	5	9
11234	9	4	6	7	8	12
11203	10	4	6	7	8	12
11224	8	4	6	7	22	10
11225	10	4	6	7	8	13
11215	9	4	6	7	8	12
11233	7	1	4	3	5	12
11211	8	4	6	7	20	10
11220	9	4	6	7	8
11230	10	4	6	7	8	13
11232	8	4	6	7	18	10
11201	13	4	6	8	10	15
11212	10	4	6	7	8	14
11221	11	4	6	7	8	15
11210	11	4	6	8	7	15
11214	9	4	6	7	8	11
11213	10	4	6	7	8	14
11223	7	1	3	4	5	10
11235	8	4	6	7	13	15
11204	8	4	6	7	18	10
11222	16	4	6	8	7	10
11209	6	1	3	5	4	9
11231	16	4	6	8	19

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Dominos

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,352 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Dominos Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (pizza near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Dominos Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Dominos Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Dominos Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly