Club24gyms Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve club24gyms.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,305 Gyms In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Club24gyms Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Club24gyms Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Club24gyms Report, June 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
Connecticut
Miami
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Club24gyms Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	34,882	13,305	82	0.4%	1,251,775	87.5	4,569	6,375	8	6,376	0	8	76
Connecticut	1,271	666	9	9.6%	343,693	20.1	212	256	6	257	0	8	76
California	4,415	2,035	87	0.4%	145,708	79.2	353	565	1	565	0	0	0
Florida	2,755	1,297	105	0.4%	80,408	74.4	164	385	1	385	0	0	0
Texas	3,524	1,604	124	0.3%	74,524	85.7	297	444	1	444	0	0	0
New York	2,962	1,383	119	0.3%	58,614	86.6	329	419	1	419	0	0	0
Illinois	2,798	1,312	138	0.3%	36,630	89.5	186	233	1	233	0	0	0
Georgia	2,016	985	167	0.3%	31,139	84.9	122	161	1	161	0	0	0
North Carolina	2,089	990	157	0.3%	29,689	86.6	133	170	1	170	0	0	0
Ohio	2,338	1,162	178	0.2%	28,543	90.5	94	192	1	192	0	0	0
Washington	1,750	891	138	0.4%	27,750	82.6	97	162	1	162	0	0	0
Michigan	2,051	980	165	0.2%	24,089	92.3	77	119	1	119	0	0	0
Virginia	1,936	921	142	0.3%	23,763	89.6	103	142	1	142	0	0	0
Pennsylvania	2,688	1,340	218	0.2%	23,135	94.3	125	180	1	180	0	0	0
Tennessee	1,632	818	150	0.3%	21,362	84.7	112	150	1	150	0	0	0
Massachusetts	1,836	950	172	0.3%	20,615	87.2	101	120	2	120	0	0	0
Maryland	1,303	702	140	0.3%	19,992	84.9	83	110	1	110	0	0	0
Arizona	1,335	675	126	0.3%	18,928	83.6	59	106	1	106	0	0	0
Indiana	2,878	1,368	159	0.3%	18,449	85.0	138	174	2	174	0	0	0
South Carolina	1,343	677	125	0.4%	17,798	80.8	92	120	1	120	0	0	0
New Jersey	1,775	883	214	0.2%	17,663	89.5	83	92	1	92	0	0	0
Colorado	1,660	805	159	0.3%	15,378	88.1	67	101	1	101	0	0	0
Missouri	2,086	1,040	179	0.2%	14,396	92.7	69	122	1	122	0	0	0
Minnesota	1,926	897	169	0.2%	12,922	91.7	67	110	1	110	0	0	0
Louisiana	1,308	661	147	0.3%	12,660	86.1	78	105	1	105	0	0	0
Kentucky	1,635	819	141	0.3%	12,580	92.8	63	93	1	93	0	0	0
Wisconsin	1,895	867	209	0.2%	11,929	92.4	74	95	1	95	0	0	0
Alabama	1,536	786	180	0.2%	11,141	88.1	82	116	1	116	0	0	0
Utah	1,087	585	123	0.3%	10,576	88.6	32	48	1	48	0	0	0
Mississippi	1,293	676	130	0.4%	10,550	89.9	46	60	1	60	0	0	0
Oregon	1,772	895	184	0.2%	9,949	85.4	80	97	1	97	0	0	0
Oklahoma	1,441	721	155	0.3%	9,819	86.5	98	136	1	136	0	0	0
Nevada	807	447	118	0.2%	6,043	83.5	28	47	1	47	0	0	0
Iowa	1,772	802	205	0.2%	5,898	93.0	93	100	1	100	0	0	0
New Mexico	1,079	594	123	0.3%	5,706	85.0	73	86	1	86	0	0	0
Kansas	1,515	733	179	0.2%	5,174	88.3	94	123	1	123	0	0	0
Arkansas	1,465	727	180	0.2%	4,723	92.6	61	66	1	66	0	0	0
Idaho	1,114	618	147	0.3%	4,385	87.8	45	52	1	52	0	0	0
Nebraska	1,396	751	132	0.2%	4,316	87.2	95	118	1	118	0	0	0
Rhode Island	513	314	123	0.3%	2,814	85.4	12	15	1	15	0	0	0
West Virginia	1,171	643	170	0.1%	2,413	93.5	65	69	1	69	0	0	0
Montana	1,115	594	157	0.2%	2,404	86.7	67	70	1	70	0	0	0
Hawaii	620	357	144	0.2%	2,233	95.7	7	7	1	7	0	0	0
South Dakota	970	532	129	0.2%	1,919	88.2	59	63	1	63	0	0	0
Alaska	942	535	128	0.3%	1,852	91.5	23	31	1	31	0	0	0
New Hampshire	1,030	586	235	0.1%	1,493	99.2	2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Delaware	606	376	148	0.2%	1,426	89.5	10	10	1	10	0	0	0
North Dakota	794	445	161	0.1%	1,106	84.6	81	82	1	82	0	0	0
Wyoming	826	452	164	0.1%	850	94.0	15	16	1	16	0	0	0
Maine	1,614	916	316	0.1%	690	97.8	19	19	2	19	0	0	0
Vermont	863	495	257	0.1%	320	99.8	3	4	1	4	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Miami	Florida	377	222	85	0.4%	8,266	69.6	33	1	33
Los Angeles	California	353	225	80	0.3%	8,135	77.5	28	1	28
Waterbury	Connecticut	154	111	13	7.0%	7,588	12.5	6	1	6
New Haven	Connecticut	141	100	11	5.6%	7,327	15.0	5	1	5
Hartford	Connecticut	148	107	12	5.7%	7,008	13.7	6	1	6
Bronx	New York	234	156	62	0.5%	6,746	70.2	11	1	11
San Francisco	California	253	153	51	0.7%	5,918	52.4	26	1	26
Bridgeport	Connecticut	174	130	13	4.0%	5,824	17.2	6	1	6
Chicago	Illinois	299	179	99	0.2%	5,692	85.6	25	1	25
Charlotte	North Carolina	236	153	51	0.6%	5,574	57.3	20	1	20
Cleveland	Ohio	264	169	51	0.7%	5,507	43.3	26	1	26
New York City	New York	323	196	82	0.3%	5,311	76.0	22	1	22
Brooklyn	New York	221	141	97	0.2%	5,139	85.9	14	1	14
Cincinnati	Ohio	263	174	64	0.6%	4,951	53.5	35	1	35
Orlando	Florida	310	194	55	0.5%	4,896	60.6	21	1	21
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	309	198	65	0.6%	4,591	63.3	15	1	15
San Diego	California	291	189	75	0.3%	4,585	80.8	15	1	15
Sacramento	California	254	168	52	0.6%	4,538	68.1	16	1	16
Tucson	Arizona	248	163	67	0.4%	4,066	68.8	19	1	19
Minneapolis	Minnesota	405	256	87	0.4%	3,983	72.4	22	1	22
Indianapolis	Indiana	316	188	77	0.4%	3,873	69.1	19	1	19
Saint Louis	Missouri	320	215	83	0.4%	3,768	63.3	23	1	23
Houston	Texas	324	199	115	0.1%	3,711	93.1	23	1	23
Saint Paul	Minnesota	367	247	69	0.5%	3,649	64.1	15	1	15
Seattle	Washington	270	173	82	0.4%	3,535	72.4	22	1	22
San Jose	California	240	157	80	0.3%	3,515	78.8	11	1	11
Tampa	Florida	289	194	66	0.4%	3,448	65.2	16	1	16
Jacksonville	Florida	282	191	73	0.4%	3,429	74.2	15	1	15
Phoenix	Arizona	304	194	88	0.2%	3,310	82.4	13	1	13
San Antonio	Texas	343	208	94	0.2%	3,153	89.3	14	1	14
Fresno	California	235	159	63	0.5%	2,945	63.3	10	1	10
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	260	163	105	0.2%	2,941	89.1	11	1	11
Las Vegas	Nevada	288	157	95	0.2%	2,907	83.3	13	1	13
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	313	205	72	0.4%	2,904	65.6	24	1	24
Albuquerque	New Mexico	189	133	62	0.4%	2,856	71.7	9	1	9
Oakland	California	191	124	48	0.7%	2,750	48.7	12	1	12
Denver	Colorado	335	212	103	0.3%	2,724	84.2	11	1	11
Baltimore	Maryland	225	146	71	0.4%	2,688	62.0	15	1	15
Detroit	Michigan	204	130	79	0.4%	2,616	69.4	13	1	13
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	129	55	0.6%	2,584	67.3	7	1	7
Atlanta	Georgia	379	246	103	0.3%	2,504	78.1	15	1	15
Louisville	Kentucky	239	158	79	0.3%	2,493	73.4	16	1	16
Salt Lake City	Utah	244	153	61	0.5%	2,406	66.3	10	1	10
Staten Island	New York	207	133	58	0.5%	2,338	68.3	6	1	6
Lexington	Kentucky	205	141	41	0.7%	2,331	50.2	12	1	12
Portland	Oregon	234	152	95	0.2%	2,158	84.0	12	1	12
Naples	Florida	205	143	43	0.6%	2,030	52.8	10	1	10
Vancouver	Washington	198	140	53	0.6%	2,027	55.0	7	1	7
Mobile	Alabama	242	169	43	0.7%	2,026	53.7	12	1	12
Dayton	Ohio	277	186	66	0.4%	2,022	73.3	11	1	11
Silver Spring	Maryland	208	147	49	0.7%	2,002	50.3	5	1	5
Kansas City	Missouri	240	160	78	0.3%	1,974	78.3	21	1	21
Fort Worth	Texas	234	139	94	0.2%	1,965	82.1	11	1	11
Woodbridge	Virginia	147	111	27	0.9%	1,932	27.7	3	1	3
Omaha	Nebraska	252	175	76	0.3%	1,906	76.9	13	1	13
Buffalo	New York	256	172	80	0.3%	1,880	75.8	11	1	11
Moreno Valley	California	149	118	27	0.9%	1,863	28.5	4	1	4
Columbus	Ohio	226	148	99	0.2%	1,832	88.9	9	1	9
Reading	Pennsylvania	204	141	28	0.8%	1,807	35.6	9	1	9
Dallas	Texas	274	162	119	0.1%	1,743	93.5	10	1	10
Austin	Texas	276	175	106	0.2%	1,727	91.3	12	1	12
Spokane	Washington	205	140	65	0.5%	1,699	63.4	8	1	8
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	278	186	95	0.2%	1,693	81.9	14	1	14
Saint Petersburg	Florida	226	170	66	0.5%	1,672	60.1	9	1	9
Washington DC	District of Columbia	240	156	89	0.2%	1,620	84.1	8	1	8
Corona	California	165	130	48	0.6%	1,619	46.0	4	1	4
Long Beach	California	193	131	74	0.3%	1,616	71.8	6	1	6
New Orleans	Louisiana	190	125	75	0.4%	1,583	72.2	9	1	9
Memphis	Tennessee	260	169	98	0.2%	1,568	82.3	9	1	9
Alpharetta	Georgia	178	128	37	0.8%	1,564	46.5	3	1	3
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	269	170	107	0.2%	1,540	84.5	8	1	8
Anchorage	Alaska	219	157	55	0.6%	1,532	54.3	8	1	8
Flushing	New York	142	96	46	0.7%	1,526	48.3	3	1	3
Modesto	California	178	129	51	0.6%	1,515	51.0	5	1	5
Garland	Texas	171	128	47	0.6%	1,498	57.8	3	1	3
Pomona	California	127	92	23	0.9%	1,495	24.3	3	1	3
Madison	Wisconsin	197	133	60	0.5%	1,486	70.0	7	1	7
Littleton	Colorado	254	169	61	0.5%	1,474	68.2	5	1	5
Birmingham	Alabama	246	168	87	0.3%	1,468	75.9	12	1	12
Kissimmee	Florida	225	143	59	0.5%	1,464	61.4	4	1	4
Fort Wayne	Indiana	202	125	60	0.5%	1,460	70.9	7	1	7
El Paso	Texas	263	166	93	0.2%	1,453	86.8	6	1	6
Schenectady	New York	182	134	28	0.9%	1,453	61.8	4	1	4
Lancaster	California	143	112	36	0.8%	1,448	73.3	1	1	1
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	160	58	0.5%	1,434	64.5	12	1	12
Raleigh	North Carolina	220	153	87	0.3%	1,411	81.3	5	1	5
Santa Ana	California	147	105	73	0.4%	1,408	66.2	3	1	3
Green Bay	Wisconsin	178	128	35	0.8%	1,406	51.3	5	1	5
Hayward	California	141	109	41	0.7%	1,405	48.3	3	1	3
Tacoma	Washington	245	175	74	0.4%	1,396	63.8	11	1	11
Mesquite	Texas	120	88	21	1.0%	1,390	23.7	3	1	3
Melbourne	Florida	142	100	27	0.9%	1,380	31.0	5	1	5
Jackson	Mississippi	187	120	34	0.8%	1,378	31.2	10	1	10
Nashville	Tennessee	264	176	82	0.3%	1,367	80.8	8	1	8
Frisco	Texas	123	94	36	0.8%	1,366	40.0	2	1	2
Reno	Nevada	175	123	73	0.5%	1,344	67.4	7	1	7
Aurora	Colorado	200	142	77	0.3%	1,337	71.3	5	1	5
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	243	156	71	0.4%	1,327	74.7	7	1	7
Hollywood	Florida	210	145	80	0.3%	1,304	70.2	4	1	4
Chattanooga	Tennessee	215	147	52	0.6%	1,286	58.1	10	1	10
Ogden	Utah	148	106	46	0.6%	1,280	54.0	3	1	3
Orange	California	160	118	31	0.9%	1,280	30.6	5	1	5
Flint	Michigan	177	124	32	0.8%	1,278	45.7	5	1	5
Yuma	Arizona	131	94	31	0.9%	1,264	32.3	3	1	3
Brockton	Massachusetts	121	88	18	1.3%	1,259	59.5	1	1	1
Tallahassee	Florida	184	127	63	0.4%	1,258	64.6	6	1	6
Knoxville	Tennessee	219	147	74	0.3%	1,252	78.7	6	1	6
Surprise	Arizona	166	121	26	0.9%	1,244	26.5	4	1	4
Bradenton	Florida	199	137	70	0.5%	1,216	58.0	6	1	6
Sugar Land	Texas	161	116	39	0.7%	1,188	49.3	3	1	3
Macon	Georgia	181	125	40	0.7%	1,186	52.4	6	1	6
Pensacola	Florida	202	141	60	0.4%	1,183	68.8	7	1	7
Elgin	Illinois	138	101	18	1.0%	1,180	22.3	3	1	3
Elk Grove	California	138	108	43	0.7%	1,173	52.7	2	1	2
Murrieta	California	124	94	28	0.9%	1,157	31.5	2	1	2
West Palm Beach	Florida	214	155	81	0.3%	1,156	73.4	5	1	5
Lithonia	Georgia	126	92	21	1.2%	1,153	59.5	1	1	1
Panama City	Florida	168	120	28	0.9%	1,138	28.2	6	1	6
Salem	Oregon	171	121	63	0.4%	1,136	71.4	3	1	3
Syracuse	New York	206	141	59	0.5%	1,131	66.1	9	1	9
Huntington Beach	California	141	107	60	0.6%	1,126	53.0	3	1	3
Tulsa	Oklahoma	261	158	87	0.3%	1,125	77.6	11	1	11
Fayetteville	North Carolina	193	134	61	0.5%	1,124	68.6	4	1	4
Chesapeake	Virginia	155	110	60	0.5%	1,122	56.7	4	1	4
Marietta	Georgia	179	127	81	0.3%	1,118	73.7	3	1	3
Mesa	Arizona	232	166	88	0.2%	1,118	80.3	4	1	4
Anaheim	California	183	125	77	0.3%	1,104	72.9	3	1	3
Rochester	New York	260	165	95	0.2%	1,102	85.1	6	1	6
Conroe	Texas	182	124	45	0.7%	1,100	50.3	5	1	5
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	113	44	0.7%	1,096	42.4	4	1	4
Santa Clara	California	140	104	29	0.9%	1,092	33.8	4	1	4
Grand Rapids	Michigan	196	131	85	0.3%	1,088	74.2	5	1	5
Fort Myers	Florida	199	133	70	0.4%	1,084	65.5	6	1	6
Fairfax	Virginia	179	130	41	0.7%	1,075	49.0	3	1	3
Edinburg	Texas	145	109	43	0.7%	1,073	49.3	2	1	2
Bowling Green	Kentucky	155	112	23	0.9%	1,062	46.0	3	1	3
Lansing	Michigan	162	105	46	0.6%	1,059	50.3	5	1	5
Auburn	Washington	138	106	24	0.9%	1,054	25.7	3	1	3
Metairie	Louisiana	149	111	40	0.7%	1,046	44.0	4	1	4
Olympia	Washington	184	139	49	0.6%	1,040	50.7	4	1	4
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	124	52	0.6%	1,038	59.2	3	1	3
Greenville	South Carolina	166	118	60	0.5%	1,032	75.8	4	1	4
Brownsville	Texas	145	108	57	0.5%	1,027	50.3	2	1	2
Lubbock	Texas	194	130	74	0.4%	1,024	72.9	6	1	6
Ocala	Florida	188	135	61	0.5%	1,017	65.5	6	1	6
Redding	California	161	114	26	0.9%	1,013	47.3	3	1	3
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	180	129	55	0.6%	1,012	53.6	6	1	6
Fullerton	California	152	108	41	0.7%	1,008	48.5	3	1	3
Lakeland	Florida	168	116	73	0.4%	1,007	70.3	4	1	4
Cape Coral	Florida	169	118	52	0.6%	1,005	55.3	4	1	4
Denton	Texas	161	117	50	0.6%	1,003	53.3	4	1	4
Chandler	Arizona	159	113	79	0.4%	1,000	76.2	2	1	2
Columbia	South Carolina	196	130	82	0.3%	994	78.3	5	1	5
Sterling Heights	Michigan	138	108	40	0.7%	989	48.0	3	1	3
Bellevue	Washington	156	118	50	0.7%	984	50.6	4	1	4
Hesperia	California	110	82	25	0.9%	984	24.5	2	1	2
San Mateo	California	173	123	43	0.7%	972	46.5	3	1	3
Lake Worth	Florida	195	140	64	0.5%	968	69.4	2	1	2
San Marcos	California	125	96	24	1.0%	965	23.0	2	1	2
Rialto	California	126	104	28	0.9%	964	29.5	2	1	2
Everett	Washington	159	119	58	0.6%	960	58.6	3	1	3
Augusta	Georgia	174	120	63	0.5%	958	74.8	3	1	3
Clearwater	Florida	207	149	59	0.5%	957	63.1	5	1	5
Ashburn	Virginia	109	80	33	0.9%	955	34.0	2	1	2
Fort Collins	Colorado	143	97	61	0.5%	955	66.6	3	1	3
Muskegon	Michigan	164	123	38	0.7%	951	53.6	3	1	3
Manchester	New Hampshire	144	108	32	0.8%	950	56.4	3	1	3
Renton	Washington	194	137	51	0.6%	946	62.6	3	1	3
Norwalk	California	99	76	28	0.9%	942	30.0	1	1	1
Gulfport	Mississippi	129	93	21	1.0%	940	19.7	3	1	3
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	132	85	0.3%	938	69.9	8	1	8
Round Rock	Texas	159	114	53	0.6%	933	56.7	2	1	2
Pittsburg	California	97	76	19	1.0%	932	22.0	1	1	1
Scottsdale	Arizona	221	144	82	0.3%	930	86.0	3	1	3
Bloomington	Indiana	155	107	47	0.7%	926	63.8	3	1	3
Savannah	Georgia	184	118	71	0.4%	926	64.1	5	1	5
Sunnyvale	California	166	124	54	0.6%	924	66.8	2	1	2
Evansville	Indiana	188	134	60	0.5%	921	61.9	5	1	5
York	Pennsylvania	164	109	61	0.5%	906	60.9	4	1	4
New Port Richey	Florida	159	120	44	0.7%	904	45.3	3	1	3
Fontana	California	140	103	64	0.4%	903	76.7	1	1	1
Boise	Idaho	181	132	79	0.4%	902	83.8	3	1	3
Springdale	Arkansas	108	76	23	0.9%	899	25.5	2	1	2
Toledo	Ohio	206	144	83	0.3%	898	78.4	5	1	5
Toms River	New Jersey	144	110	45	0.7%	896	51.7	2	1	2
Arvada	Colorado	169	121	44	0.7%	895	41.0	4	1	4
Daly City	California	137	99	32	0.8%	893	42.5	2	1	2
Astoria	New York	172	111	48	0.6%	892	52.0	3	1	3
Vacaville	California	124	92	30	0.8%	888	34.5	2	1	2
New Braunfels	Texas	119	92	31	0.9%	884	33.0	2	1	2
Edmond	Oklahoma	173	122	57	0.5%	869	62.6	3	1	3
Grand Prairie	Texas	144	112	64	0.5%	869	82.8	1	1	1
Jersey City	New Jersey	167	122	77	0.3%	868	66.3	4	1	4
Kennesaw	Georgia	116	83	30	0.9%	868	31.5	2	1	2
Beaverton	Oregon	152	108	70	0.4%	865	68.3	2	1	2
Akron	Ohio	176	133	79	0.3%	864	73.8	7	1	7
Laredo	Texas	157	110	77	0.3%	860	63.7	3	1	3
Overland Park	Kansas	179	133	64	0.5%	860	65.8	5	1	5
Livermore	California	118	87	21	0.9%	857	30.0	2	1	2
Champaign	Illinois	121	88	24	0.9%	851	29.0	3	1	3
Homestead	Florida	200	144	61	0.5%	850	80.4	2	1	2
Florissant	Missouri	140	104	37	0.8%	850	50.3	2	1	2
Canton	Ohio	171	124	53	0.6%	849	54.1	8	1	8
Burbank	California	156	117	36	0.8%	848	45.0	4	1	4
South Gate	California	97	77	26	0.9%	846	30.0	1	1	1
Las Cruces	New Mexico	190	137	52	0.6%	844	59.0	4	1	4
Huntsville	Alabama	176	125	72	0.4%	843	63.4	7	1	7
Independence	Missouri	181	135	44	0.7%	843	51.3	5	1	5
Spring	Texas	216	144	94	0.2%	842	79.1	3	1	3
Menifee	California	160	116	38	0.8%	832	44.8	3	1	3
Cambridge	Massachusetts	143	101	40	0.7%	830	58.2	3	1	3
Worcester	Massachusetts	188	129	68	0.4%	828	66.7	4	1	4
Chula Vista	California	141	98	76	0.3%	826	62.6	3	1	3
Roseville	California	126	89	51	0.6%	818	56.7	2	1	2
Vallejo	California	141	104	47	0.7%	817	43.8	3	1	3
Beaumont	Texas	185	133	54	0.6%	813	62.9	4	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	California	140	105	62	0.5%	808	68.0	2	1	2
Kent	Washington	145	108	65	0.5%	805	63.3	2	1	2
Glendale	Arizona	208	138	89	0.3%	796	79.1	3	1	3
Carrollton	Texas	144	105	53	0.6%	792	50.0	2	1	2
Nampa	Idaho	140	103	44	0.7%	786	49.0	2	1	2
Vista	California	132	102	50	0.7%	786	55.0	2	1	2
Odessa	Texas	177	132	61	0.5%	785	52.0	4	1	4
Richardson	Texas	145	105	43	0.7%	784	55.7	2	1	2
Pacoima	California	99	65	44	0.7%	783	45.0	1	1	1
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	139	93	60	0.5%	778	56.2	4	1	4
Anderson	South Carolina	143	101	37	0.8%	776	43.5	3	1	3
Hampton	Virginia	163	116	50	0.6%	776	51.7	4	1	4
Riverside	California	179	125	91	0.2%	773	83.4	2	1	2
Duluth	Minnesota	185	138	47	0.7%	772	58.7	6	1	6
Berkeley	California	206	146	57	0.6%	768	61.1	5	1	5
San Bernardino	California	163	119	83	0.3%	763	81.1	2	1	2
Midland	Texas	158	112	66	0.5%	759	70.4	2	1	2
Lewisville	Texas	150	111	47	0.6%	757	51.3	2	1	2
Eugene	Oregon	149	109	73	0.4%	754	69.7	3	1	3
Abilene	Texas	172	124	52	0.6%	751	62.8	3	1	3
Peoria	Arizona	145	110	65	0.4%	751	64.3	2	1	2
Colorado Springs	Colorado	244	160	107	0.1%	750	85.4	8	1	8
Puyallup	Washington	167	120	60	0.5%	748	57.0	3	1	3
Largo	Florida	147	115	47	0.7%	742	43.0	4	1	4
West Valley City	Utah	125	94	53	0.6%	737	50.7	2	1	2
Lawrenceville	Georgia	150	116	85	0.3%	731	84.8	1	1	1
Plano	Texas	174	116	82	0.2%	731	84.7	2	1	2
Dearborn	Michigan	139	103	39	0.8%	729	62.8	2	1	2
Carlsbad	California	144	105	52	0.6%	726	51.0	3	1	3
Riverview	Florida	163	115	47	0.6%	719	55.3	2	1	2
Lehigh Acres	Florida	170	122	45	0.6%	713	49.5	4	1	4
Winter Haven	Florida	123	88	48	0.7%	712	48.3	2	1	2
Fort Mill	South Carolina	135	97	40	0.7%	709	44.7	3	1	3
Spring Hill	Florida	177	136	50	0.6%	707	56.2	3	1	3
Sandy	Utah	133	94	48	0.6%	705	49.5	3	1	3
Chico	California	139	103	45	0.6%	704	51.7	2	1	2
Manassas	Virginia	175	123	55	0.5%	702	64.3	2	1	2
Whittier	California	178	130	73	0.4%	701	76.0	2	1	2
Hamilton	Ohio	143	112	50	0.5%	700	74.3	1	1	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	174	124	41	0.7%	700	43.6	4	1	4
Inglewood	California	193	129	55	0.5%	699	60.4	3	1	3
Cypress	Texas	115	87	66	0.4%	698	70.5	1	1	1
Fairfield	California	118	87	49	0.6%	696	64.0	1	1	1
Arlington	Texas	210	146	96	0.2%	687	83.9	3	1	3
Bell Gardens	California	97	65	48	0.7%	686	52.0	1	1	1
Hyattsville	Maryland	171	115	59	0.4%	685	75.2	2	1	2
Plainfield	Illinois	154	114	46	0.7%	685	51.3	2	1	2
Santa Rosa	California	148	101	80	0.3%	679	80.2	2	1	2
Stockton	California	214	153	99	0.2%	678	82.1	3	1	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	196	140	55	0.5%	677	59.2	3	1	3
Laurel	Maryland	160	119	51	0.6%	676	50.5	3	1	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	131	97	68	0.4%	671	78.0	1	1	1
Bellingham	Washington	137	102	57	0.5%	666	55.3	2	1	2
Bowie	Maryland	177	122	46	0.6%	664	48.3	3	1	3
Amarillo	Texas	198	142	85	0.3%	657	76.4	5	1	5
Irvine	California	194	134	85	0.2%	657	81.7	3	1	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	162	113	68	0.4%	654	71.6	3	1	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	145	103	55	0.5%	652	63.5	2	1	2
Norman	Oklahoma	139	101	61	0.5%	651	51.8	3	1	3
Spartanburg	South Carolina	154	106	48	0.6%	647	56.2	3	1	3
Norfolk	Virginia	203	135	90	0.3%	643	83.2	4	1	4
Wichita	Kansas	227	154	106	0.2%	641	80.8	8	1	8
Gaithersburg	Maryland	162	125	64	0.4%	640	75.6	2	1	2
Sparks	Nevada	159	114	54	0.5%	635	70.5	2	1	2
Downey	California	140	102	57	0.6%	632	51.3	2	1	2
Allen	Texas	116	84	58	0.6%	628	65.5	1	1	1
Lake Charles	Louisiana	155	114	60	0.5%	628	55.6	3	1	3
Providence	Rhode Island	185	127	84	0.3%	627	72.8	3	1	3
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	141	108	63	0.5%	621	52.3	2	1	2
Parker	Colorado	121	92	51	0.6%	620	63.5	1	1	1
Pasadena	California	173	120	67	0.4%	615	77.8	2	1	2
Palm Bay	Florida	156	117	54	0.6%	614	64.8	2	1	2
Cumming	Georgia	141	113	74	0.4%	612	76.3	1	1	1
Fremont	California	144	108	82	0.3%	606	85.0	1	1	1
Hagerstown	Maryland	159	117	47	0.6%	606	74.3	1	1	1
Scranton	Pennsylvania	192	139	51	0.6%	605	52.0	5	1	5
Garden Grove	California	168	123	72	0.3%	601	73.8	2	1	2
Bend	Oregon	150	104	65	0.5%	600	77.7	1	1	1
Falls Church	Virginia	198	135	52	0.5%	597	58.4	3	1	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	185	126	78	0.3%	597	71.6	5	1	5
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	179	121	76	0.3%	593	72.7	4	1	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	96	53	0.6%	590	53.3	2	1	2
Paterson	New Jersey	168	125	64	0.4%	589	68.4	4	1	4
El Monte	California	122	91	47	0.6%	585	64.0	1	1	1
Rapid City	South Dakota	136	98	49	0.6%	582	50.3	2	1	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	139	100	58	0.5%	579	48.8	3	1	3
Stamford	Connecticut	156	108	67	0.4%	574	36.7	5	1	5
Clermont	Florida	150	112	56	0.6%	569	75.7	1	1	1
Tempe	Arizona	152	108	78	0.3%	567	68.3	2	1	2
Decatur	Georgia	191	124	85	0.3%	553	74.6	2	1	2
Rock Hill	South Carolina	149	110	58	0.5%	550	51.7	2	1	2
Edison	New Jersey	131	100	50	0.5%	548	54.0	2	1	2
Bothell	Washington	158	114	65	0.4%	546	56.0	2	1	2
Newnan	Georgia	120	94	49	0.6%	546	63.5	1	1	1
Santa Fe	New Mexico	154	110	66	0.4%	541	60.2	3	1	3
College Station	Texas	120	92	68	0.4%	540	65.0	1	1	1
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	113	78	0.3%	538	67.8	3	1	3
Greeley	Colorado	117	84	67	0.5%	536	62.0	1	1	1
Charleston	South Carolina	200	138	85	0.3%	527	65.6	6	1	6
Yonkers	New York	145	109	84	0.3%	527	69.4	2	1	2
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	126	82	0.3%	526	87.2	1	1	1
Shreveport	Louisiana	197	134	92	0.2%	525	82.8	3	1	3
Warren	Michigan	160	120	65	0.4%	525	70.0	2	1	2
Sarasota	Florida	220	137	92	0.2%	524	82.4	4	1	4
El Cajon	California	162	110	80	0.3%	523	77.3	1	1	1
Little Rock	Arkansas	189	127	90	0.2%	523	85.3	3	1	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	87	66	0.5%	518	72.0	1	1	1
Perris	California	131	104	56	0.4%	514	64.5	1	1	1
Costa Mesa	California	119	83	66	0.5%	512	69.5	1	1	1
Alexandria	Virginia	256	180	109	0.1%	507	87.2	3	1	3
Saginaw	Michigan	172	127	66	0.4%	506	66.4	3	1	3
Victorville	California	125	89	70	0.4%	506	78.0	1	1	1
Charlottesville	Virginia	146	107	65	0.4%	505	73.6	2	1	2
Franklin	Tennessee	142	111	65	0.5%	504	77.3	1	1	1
Mcallen	Texas	146	109	72	0.4%	504	77.0	1	1	1
Bryan	Texas	160	116	61	0.5%	497	55.2	3	1	3
Oxnard	California	149	105	89	0.2%	496	84.8	1	1	1
Topeka	Kansas	225	156	84	0.3%	493	58.8	10	1	10
Lawrence	Kansas	165	121	61	0.5%	491	52.8	3	1	3
Tracy	California	151	116	70	0.4%	487	82.8	1	1	1
Apopka	Florida	119	89	58	0.5%	484	62.5	1	1	1
Mckinney	Texas	135	95	92	0.3%	482	76.7	1	1	1
West Jordan	Utah	143	105	68	0.4%	478	73.7	1	1	1
Greensboro	North Carolina	179	129	108	0.1%	476	79.4	3	1	3
O Fallon	Missouri	122	96	54	0.5%	476	62.0	1	1	1
Asheville	North Carolina	142	100	77	0.4%	472	74.8	2	1	2
Oceanside	California	143	104	87	0.2%	468	83.8	1	1	1
New Bedford	Massachusetts	151	108	61	0.5%	467	59.8	2	1	2
Clovis	California	140	103	77	0.4%	456	75.7	1	1	1
Fargo	North Dakota	146	103	72	0.4%	455	66.3	2	1	2
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	153	106	77	0.3%	453	65.5	3	1	3
Rockford	Illinois	173	125	89	0.2%	452	74.7	3	1	3
Englewood	Colorado	191	132	68	0.4%	448	71.0	2	1	2
Belleville	Illinois	144	107	58	0.5%	444	62.8	2	1	2
Federal Way	Washington	118	90	67	0.4%	444	65.5	1	1	1
Palmdale	California	157	119	88	0.3%	441	62.8	2	1	2
Hillsboro	Oregon	125	91	64	0.4%	439	65.0	1	1	1
Santa Barbara	California	140	100	76	0.3%	434	85.1	2	1	2
Rockville	Maryland	176	126	80	0.3%	433	84.5	1	1	1
Hemet	California	145	111	73	0.3%	431	77.7	1	1	1
Mcdonough	Georgia	122	94	64	0.4%	430	63.5	1	1	1
Deltona	Florida	115	82	66	0.5%	427	63.5	1	1	1
Miami Beach	Florida	162	87	77	0.4%	419	77.6	2	1	2
Athens	Georgia	158	111	77	0.3%	417	66.2	3	1	3
Buford	Georgia	120	94	72	0.4%	413	65.5	1	1	1
Elkhart	Indiana	143	105	64	0.4%	413	73.7	1	1	1
West Covina	California	136	102	72	0.4%	407	77.0	1	1	1
Valdosta	Georgia	155	110	66	0.4%	401	52.8	3	1	3
Pueblo	Colorado	182	129	89	0.3%	400	79.4	2	1	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	173	127	88	0.2%	398	91.3	1	1	1
Muncie	Indiana	152	108	62	0.4%	391	54.0	3	1	3
Meridian	Idaho	115	91	80	0.4%	387	67.0	1	1	1
Missoula	Montana	151	107	68	0.4%	386	60.6	3	1	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	120	91	0.2%	385	89.5	1	1	1
Portsmouth	Virginia	167	123	68	0.4%	385	60.1	4	1	4
Saint Charles	Missouri	147	107	85	0.3%	384	76.0	1	1	1
Honolulu	Hawaii	182	116	122	0.1%	382	95.2	1	1	1
Visalia	California	140	110	86	0.3%	382	76.0	1	1	1
Newport News	Virginia	172	124	94	0.2%	380	71.1	3	1	3
Albany	New York	201	138	90	0.2%	377	77.5	4	1	4
Torrance	California	185	125	93	0.2%	377	87.8	1	1	1
Acworth	Georgia	126	91	68	0.4%	375	65.0	1	1	1
Keller	Texas	145	101	82	0.3%	374	62.5	1	1	1
Billings	Montana	155	110	83	0.3%	373	83.0	1	1	1
Longmont	Colorado	144	104	84	0.3%	373	77.3	1	1	1
Wilmington	Delaware	186	138	106	0.2%	372	93.6	1	1	1
Davenport	Iowa	155	111	71	0.4%	369	62.2	3	1	3
Mission	Texas	142	109	96	0.2%	365	75.7	1	1	1
North Hollywood	California	145	96	86	0.2%	360	88.3	1	1	1
Roanoke	Virginia	197	139	96	0.2%	358	86.2	2	1	2
Naperville	Illinois	150	112	89	0.2%	357	84.5	1	1	1
Joliet	Illinois	141	104	79	0.3%	356	71.8	2	1	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	181	136	74	0.3%	348	76.8	2	1	2
Provo	Utah	143	97	81	0.3%	347	74.7	1	1	1
Delray Beach	Florida	171	122	83	0.3%	343	71.4	2	1	2
Des Moines	Iowa	196	127	102	0.2%	342	94.5	1	1	1
Concord	California	144	109	83	0.3%	339	83.5	1	1	1
North Las Vegas	Nevada	189	119	104	0.1%	335	92.7	1	1	1
Pompano Beach	Florida	243	170	153	0.1%	331	93.9	1	1	1
Gastonia	North Carolina	131	97	81	0.3%	327	75.3	1	1	1
Coral Springs	Florida	121	90	79	0.3%	323	69.5	1	1	1
Ventura	California	129	90	84	0.3%	322	74.7	1	1	1
Boca Raton	Florida	197	132	106	0.1%	317	87.8	2	1	2
Jamaica	New York	181	121	107	0.1%	317	89.5	1	1	1
Montgomery	Alabama	199	132	105	0.1%	312	84.8	3	1	3
Gainesville	Florida	178	127	103	0.1%	309	82.4	3	1	3
Henrico	Virginia	202	142	110	0.2%	308	89.4	1	1	1
Youngstown	Ohio	195	146	101	0.2%	308	73.9	4	1	4
Kennewick	Washington	140	107	85	0.3%	305	74.3	1	1	1
Van Nuys	California	149	98	100	0.2%	302	87.3	1	1	1
Waukesha	Wisconsin	131	99	80	0.3%	300	77.0	1	1	1
Hialeah	Florida	184	107	139	0.1%	294	90.9	1	1	1
Yakima	Washington	139	101	95	0.2%	293	82.8	1	1	1
Pearland	Texas	147	103	116	0.2%	278	82.0	1	1	1
Longview	Texas	171	129	87	0.3%	273	69.2	2	1	2
Irving	Texas	164	118	115	0.1%	268	89.2	1	1	1
Lynnwood	Washington	160	120	97	0.2%	267	84.3	1	1	1
Winston Salem	North Carolina	188	144	121	0.1%	265	92.4	1	1	1
Henderson	Nevada	197	121	127	0.1%	252	94.3	1	1	1
Lynn	Massachusetts	141	107	85	0.3%	252	80.8	1	1	1
Gilbert	Arizona	186	131	121	0.1%	251	91.3	1	1	1
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	107	92	0.2%	248	82.8	1	1	1
Boulder	Colorado	180	118	89	0.2%	247	89.8	1	1	1
Terre Haute	Indiana	164	119	88	0.3%	241	74.8	2	1	2
Waco	Texas	177	125	111	0.2%	238	77.8	3	1	3
Livonia	Michigan	128	98	84	0.3%	237	76.3	1	1	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	165	112	97	0.2%	237	84.0	1	1	1
Vero Beach	Florida	164	116	90	0.2%	236	89.2	1	1	1
Jupiter	Florida	139	98	90	0.2%	227	67.5	2	1	2
Humble	Texas	164	106	130	0.1%	227	89.3	1	1	1
Newark	New Jersey	167	121	127	0.1%	222	86.1	2	1	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	179	129	90	0.2%	216	81.1	2	1	2
La Puente	California	145	95	118	0.2%	212	75.5	1	1	1
Wichita Falls	Texas	174	123	90	0.2%	210	79.4	2	1	2
Broomfield	Colorado	148	104	100	0.2%	209	74.3	1	1	1
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	101	95	0.2%	208	75.0	1	1	1
Grand Junction	Colorado	162	113	100	0.2%	208	89.5	1	1	1
Richmond	Virginia	191	124	143	0.1%	204	96.9	1	1	1
Johnson City	Tennessee	143	104	94	0.2%	203	82.3	1	1	1
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	145	101	109	0.2%	203	83.3	1	1	1
Boston	Massachusetts	174	108	104	0.1%	193	90.9	3	1	3
Tyler	Texas	182	124	112	0.1%	190	79.0	3	1	3
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	104	102	0.1%	181	84.0	1	1	1
Midlothian	Virginia	138	104	108	0.2%	171	76.3	1	1	1
Killeen	Texas	162	110	124	0.1%	167	82.5	1	1	1
Racine	Wisconsin	164	121	107	0.1%	156	84.8	1	1	1
Durham	North Carolina	173	123	143	0.1%	154	94.1	1	1	1
Lowell	Massachusetts	147	109	116	0.1%	148	82.8	1	1	1
Frederick	Maryland	152	112	119	0.1%	137	84.8	1	1	1
Salinas	California	164	124	138	0.1%	110	86.4	1	1	1
Bakersfield	California	211	141	196	0.0%	102	94.9	1	1	1
South Bend	Indiana	190	131	152	0.0%	54	93.8	1	1	1
Annapolis	Maryland	169	121	140	0.1%	52	88.4	1	1	1
Chino	California	122	94	100	0.0%	35	65.5	1	1	1
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	162	113	152	0.0%	22	86.2	1	1	1
Trenton	New Jersey	210	152	207	0.0%	9	93.6	1	1	1

Connecticut

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Waterbury	154	111	13	7.0%	7,588	12.5	6	1	6
New Haven	141	100	11	5.6%	7,327	15.0	5	1	5
Hartford	148	107	12	5.7%	7,008	13.7	6	1	6
Bridgeport	174	130	13	4.0%	5,824	17.2	6	1	6
Stamford	156	108	67	0.4%	574	36.7	5	1	5

Miami

ZIP	club24gyms.com	yelp.com	planetfitness.com	24hourfitness.com	racked.com	expertise.com
33129		4	6	3	1	2
33157	60	1	5	12		4
33180	34	4	9	25
33126	48	3	5	2		4
33167	49	3	5	7		11
33136	44	2	7	6	4	5
33166	50	4	6	2	1	5
33189	25	1	4	9
33127	48	2	7	5	3	4
33179	47	2	1	19		9
33158	49	1	5	12	3	4
33135	63	1	8	13	4	5
33175	54	5	9	4	14	12
33144	58	4	7	2	3	5
33162		4	1	24
33193	54	1	4	3	9	7
33131	51	4	10	7	6	8
33194		4	1	44	10	9
33143		2	5	12	1	4
33122	53	3	7	1	2	5
33173	48	1	4	3	8	6
33174	54	6	3	4	5	8
33184		1	3	11
33133	50	3	8	12	1	2
33196	50	1	4	3	9	7
33176	32	1	3	11
33125		1	7	3	2
33145	58	3	9	13	1	2
33165		2	4	1	7
33185		1	4	3	7	6
33134		6	9	4	5
33150	50	3	5	13	1	2
33183		4	6	8	51
33132		1	3	4	6	5
33172		1	6	3
33170		1	4	3	5
33161		1	3	12
33130	48	2	7	1
33181		4	6	36
33190		4	2	12
33177	55	1	6	5	4	8
33156	33	1	3	9
33146		1	7	5
33187		1	5	3
33178		1	6	3
33147	54	1	4	9
33137	52	1	7	4	5
33168	46	1	3	5	2
33128		1	7	3	2
33138		2	7	13	5	6
33155	43	2	6	5	3	4
33169	46	1	3	2
33182	51	2	5	1	8
33186	50	1	4	3
33142		2	8	14	5	4

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Club24gyms

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,305 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Club24gyms Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (gym near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Club24gyms Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Club24gyms Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Club24gyms Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly