Cars Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve cars.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 26,648 Car Dealerships In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Cars Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Cars Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Cars Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Chicago
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Cars Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	42,840	26,648	1	50.3%	162,477,817	5.0	27,379	32,653	2,551	39,359	8,059	16,673	33,982
California	4,660	3,066	2	52.9%	20,720,606	5.0	1,166	1,740	221	2,194	408	958	1,904
New York	3,346	2,297	1	81.2%	15,929,595	2.4	1,491	1,756	142	2,108	945	1,424	2,097
Florida	3,099	2,008	1	47.2%	9,718,717	6.5	446	975	103	1,159	186	416	824
Illinois	3,413	2,317	1	73.6%	9,442,056	3.8	1,247	1,382	154	1,691	393	870	1,608
Texas	4,180	2,890	2	28.2%	7,855,386	7.7	1,360	1,917	137	2,170	362	615	1,558
New Jersey	2,169	1,521	1	85.2%	7,568,140	2.3	537	593	83	703	322	475	702
Michigan	2,872	1,948	1	62.5%	6,224,985	4.0	833	976	84	1,252	181	651	1,182
Pennsylvania	3,567	2,458	2	47.3%	6,052,616	4.5	1,604	1,781	117	2,035	529	907	1,767
Ohio	3,237	2,206	1	43.3%	5,035,548	5.7	976	1,188	95	1,570	73	570	1,341
Virginia	2,510	1,715	1	58.3%	4,901,271	3.8	723	891	57	989	341	514	919
Massachusetts	2,270	1,495	1	70.0%	4,783,701	3.5	461	534	128	706	132	419	660
Georgia	2,389	1,652	2	45.1%	4,642,273	6.2	574	726	86	901	23	281	696
North Carolina	2,897	1,937	1	43.3%	4,400,779	5.0	683	802	65	973	234	396	824
Minnesota	2,084	1,400	1	64.4%	3,559,121	4.3	777	878	89	1,048	206	439	975
Missouri	2,476	1,728	1	57.6%	3,507,342	4.4	887	1,017	54	1,255	298	539	1,128
Maryland	1,620	1,195	1	56.7%	3,406,115	4.5	392	463	49	581	78	271	514
Washington	1,951	1,362	2	38.7%	2,816,628	6.5	451	587	45	809	21	274	614
Indiana	3,450	2,422	3	41.7%	2,765,217	5.4	659	769	28	858	171	304	736
Wisconsin	2,310	1,605	2	44.4%	2,563,771	5.0	694	769	112	963	164	388	833
Connecticut	1,448	1,037	1	65.5%	2,346,666	3.5	234	279	43	333	83	181	315
South Carolina	1,775	1,236	1	46.7%	2,316,063	5.2	347	422	50	497	70	187	439
Arizona	1,483	1,098	2	32.9%	2,284,295	6.5	247	396	28	480	66	125	353
Tennessee	2,131	1,502	2	34.0%	2,259,828	6.7	514	622	60	752	101	263	554
Colorado	1,818	1,269	2	39.4%	2,179,877	5.4	381	514	32	625	126	234	520
Alabama	1,992	1,424	1	41.1%	2,000,999	6.1	522	637	33	712	163	253	543
Utah	1,352	959	1	64.2%	1,952,641	3.9	246	284	27	336	96	169	315
Kentucky	2,068	1,515	1	41.1%	1,826,278	4.6	698	758	46	893	238	404	778
Iowa	2,222	1,525	1	51.7%	1,620,811	4.3	890	933	71	1,125	233	468	1,080
Arkansas	1,802	1,312	1	54.1%	1,618,671	4.0	553	587	31	674	225	327	621
Oklahoma	1,808	1,281	1	37.6%	1,474,207	6.1	557	646	31	742	145	224	597
Louisiana	1,611	1,180	2	31.5%	1,467,573	7.1	431	510	31	602	93	181	431
Kansas	1,788	1,227	1	48.5%	1,409,690	5.1	616	692	41	828	135	308	734
Mississippi	1,571	1,156	1	45.3%	1,353,728	5.8	384	418	55	533	44	184	440
New Hampshire	1,301	943	1	73.3%	985,400	3.0	238	248	39	308	68	184	307
West Virginia	1,480	1,084	1	53.3%	975,178	4.1	684	704	17	782	166	351	749
Maine	1,734	1,296	1	70.8%	944,169	2.7	421	425	18	448	203	282	440
New Mexico	1,486	1,073	2	38.0%	793,678	4.4	327	361	12	420	126	186	389
Oregon	1,914	1,341	5	19.4%	790,239	7.9	355	414	17	587	4	100	411
Rhode Island	725	530	1	73.4%	775,074	3.8	64	77	17	94	9	50	88
Nebraska	1,702	1,171	1	35.4%	674,550	5.8	524	581	23	685	99	201	610
Idaho	1,284	911	2	35.8%	604,025	5.9	251	273	14	345	31	121	288
Hawaii	829	625	3	41.5%	590,042	5.8	82	93	6	131	5	69	108
Delaware	820	616	1	59.3%	562,806	4.3	52	66	12	80	14	34	70
Vermont	1,120	831	1	74.6%	466,499	2.6	250	254	14	293	125	187	288
Nevada	950	691	10	13.8%	404,690	9.5	92	168	10	199	5	41	111
South Dakota	1,167	830	2	36.2%	312,881	5.9	359	370	10	412	73	114	344
Montana	1,320	999	2	28.6%	297,829	6.3	348	361	15	489	12	159	412
Alaska	1,018	759	2	37.4%	276,326	3.7	218	235	8	262	128	155	237
Wyoming	1,070	796	1	44.0%	256,190	4.8	164	171	9	219	43	80	196
North Dakota	1,058	779	2	28.9%	216,810	7.2	367	381	11	477	57	117	301

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Chicago	Illinois	304	197	2	82.9%	2,239,247	2.7	56	2	58	1	46	58
Brooklyn	New York	273	178	3	68.4%	1,777,724	4.3	37	1	37	0	26	36
New York City	New York	324	240	1	92.7%	1,503,708	1.7	47	1	47	36	37	47
Bronx	New York	289	217	1	87.5%	1,260,599	2.1	25	1	25	17	18	25
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	361	254	5	47.8%	753,726	6.2	47	2	50	1	2	42
Saint Paul	Minnesota	451	315	1	87.1%	696,602	2.3	30	1	30	15	21	30
Minneapolis	Minnesota	491	333	1	61.8%	672,648	4.9	51	3	55	7	21	52
Saint Louis	Missouri	364	279	2	69.0%	632,733	3.8	45	2	46	5	28	44
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	423	294	1	72.5%	602,473	4.4	27	4	37	7	13	32
San Francisco	California	310	240	3	63.9%	555,782	4.8	28	2	34	1	8	34
Washington DC	District of Columbia	353	270	2	79.8%	546,110	2.9	28	2	30	6	22	30
Miami	Florida	436	290	7	27.8%	521,669	9.6	55	3	83	5	9	24
Cleveland	Ohio	351	242	2	62.9%	471,683	4.6	29	3	30	1	15	28
Fort Worth	Texas	239	168	5	43.9%	400,168	6.4	32	2	37	0	0	34
Detroit	Michigan	315	215	3	61.5%	393,946	5.4	25	2	26	0	3	24
Buffalo	New York	333	241	2	69.5%	391,337	3.9	28	2	44	3	13	44
Denver	Colorado	393	266	6	35.0%	380,698	7.8	38	4	57	1	2	46
Los Angeles	California	408	275	8	14.7%	361,962	9.9	62	2	63	0	1	43
San Diego	California	356	237	9	26.1%	351,232	8.8	36	2	39	2	2	31
Phoenix	Arizona	260	183	8	23.2%	337,263	9.7	42	2	53	0	0	27
Hialeah	Florida	215	151	1	87.3%	320,548	2.3	7	2	10	4	6	10
Oakland	California	280	215	3	76.4%	314,507	4.1	14	2	17	0	11	15
Atlanta	Georgia	429	309	6	31.0%	306,334	9.3	39	1	39	0	6	20
Saint Petersburg	Florida	244	181	2	84.4%	300,781	2.5	16	1	16	1	13	16
Staten Island	New York	259	189	4	61.8%	293,147	4.4	12	1	12	0	4	12
Pompano Beach	Florida	295	195	1	78.5%	290,988	3.7	10	2	11	2	4	10
Long Beach	California	205	156	5	60.5%	289,662	5.0	12	2	16	0	1	16
Hollywood	Florida	256	173	2	57.4%	268,975	5.3	9	1	9	0	1	9
Tucson	Arizona	330	238	7	28.2%	255,051	8.5	32	2	38	3	3	24
Santa Ana	California	179	127	4	70.0%	249,955	4.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Corona	California	179	132	1	95.9%	246,767	1.6	5	2	9	4	7	9
Jamaica	New York	172	128	1	97.5%	237,822	2.0	6	1	6	4	4	6
Newark	New Jersey	207	150	2	80.3%	225,434	3.0	9	2	18	0	12	18
Winston Salem	North Carolina	225	155	1	85.1%	224,715	2.3	9	1	9	5	5	9
Vancouver	Washington	217	170	3	67.1%	218,786	4.2	11	1	11	0	5	11
Scottsdale	Arizona	206	152	2	72.9%	217,467	3.5	11	3	12	1	8	10
Norfolk	Virginia	202	134	1	87.7%	215,263	2.6	14	2	14	6	9	14
Kissimmee	Florida	253	183	3	66.5%	192,319	5.0	7	2	7	2	2	6
Anaheim	California	191	137	4	51.9%	191,365	5.3	7	2	10	0	0	10
Flushing	New York	141	104	1	89.0%	191,363	2.5	4	2	5	2	2	5
Stockton	California	257	180	6	50.8%	189,766	5.8	12	2	14	0	0	14
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	178	135	1	92.1%	187,059	2.3	6	1	6	2	4	6
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	293	203	7	22.3%	181,176	9.2	29	2	34	0	0	20
Trenton	New Jersey	263	198	1	85.8%	178,359	2.4	11	1	11	6	6	11
Alexandria	Virginia	289	224	4	50.3%	178,310	5.6	14	1	14	1	2	13
Fontana	California	151	109	3	75.8%	177,853	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Wilmington	Delaware	245	182	1	77.5%	170,115	3.1	10	2	10	5	6	10
Lawrenceville	Georgia	149	101	4	65.4%	167,521	4.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Providence	Rhode Island	210	145	3	81.4%	166,878	3.6	8	3	8	1	5	8
Baltimore	Maryland	266	197	7	25.9%	163,086	8.3	22	3	22	0	1	18
Woodbridge	Virginia	174	131	1	76.6%	162,204	3.3	3	1	3	2	2	3
Lake Worth	Florida	188	129	2	78.4%	161,935	2.8	5	2	5	2	2	5
Homestead	Florida	233	168	1	86.3%	161,928	2.1	7	2	7	2	7	7
Silver Spring	Maryland	247	193	2	53.0%	160,569	8.3	7	3	10	0	2	6
Rochester	New York	250	171	7	33.8%	159,520	8.7	24	1	24	0	0	20
Whittier	California	225	153	1	77.3%	151,694	3.5	6	2	7	1	4	7
Lancaster	California	163	123	3	81.8%	150,865	3.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
San Bernardino	California	211	153	4	59.0%	147,143	4.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Salt Lake City	Utah	235	155	7	30.2%	147,112	9.6	19	1	19	1	3	9
Syracuse	New York	274	210	3	64.5%	146,365	4.6	15	2	26	0	6	25
Newport News	Virginia	202	132	3	82.3%	145,437	2.6	7	2	7	0	7	7
Schenectady	New York	198	147	2	89.0%	144,284	2.3	8	2	13	1	10	13
Alpharetta	Georgia	194	148	1	75.7%	143,208	3.0	4	2	4	0	3	4
Dayton	Ohio	375	262	7	29.5%	140,945	8.9	27	3	35	0	4	19
El Paso	Texas	343	243	9	17.8%	140,583	9.2	24	1	24	2	2	18
Fremont	California	159	115	5	60.0%	139,894	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Omaha	Nebraska	217	126	8	24.6%	135,962	9.5	31	3	38	0	0	24
Compton	California	150	106	1	97.6%	135,590	1.3	3	2	4	2	4	4
Sunnyvale	California	217	156	1	88.3%	134,924	3.0	4	2	4	3	3	4
Toledo	Ohio	223	159	6	43.5%	133,717	6.8	15	2	19	0	0	15
Rancho Cucamonga	California	153	110	2	75.6%	133,531	3.0	4	2	5	0	4	5
Astoria	New York	179	131	1	93.5%	133,445	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Hyattsville	Maryland	194	147	2	83.8%	132,005	2.6	5	2	8	0	6	8
Yonkers	New York	197	143	3	72.6%	131,016	4.8	5	2	8	0	6	7
Seattle	Washington	330	230	11	13.5%	128,928	11.3	35	3	36	0	0	12
Paterson	New Jersey	171	120	2	88.2%	128,582	2.6	9	1	9	1	7	9
Dallas	Texas	312	221	11	9.2%	127,985	13.1	48	1	48	1	1	3
Saint Charles	Missouri	158	115	1	90.7%	126,812	2.0	3	1	3	1	3	3
Charleston	South Carolina	226	156	3	64.1%	126,212	4.8	10	3	11	0	5	10
Orlando	Florida	306	206	11	12.6%	125,880	12.5	32	3	32	0	2	7
Orange	California	150	102	2	86.2%	124,954	2.4	5	2	5	0	4	5
Oxnard	California	157	114	3	56.5%	124,606	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Edinburg	Texas	140	100	3	80.0%	124,456	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Spring Hill	Florida	203	159	1	96.5%	121,037	1.6	5	2	9	4	7	9
Boynton Beach	Florida	177	125	4	68.1%	118,471	4.5	6	2	7	0	0	7
San Mateo	California	191	139	2	82.6%	117,597	2.8	4	2	4	0	4	4
Inglewood	California	239	175	1	86.8%	116,156	2.4	5	2	5	3	3	5
Independence	Missouri	214	162	1	93.6%	116,139	2.0	8	2	14	6	11	14
Kent	Washington	178	128	3	70.6%	113,383	4.0	4	2	6	0	2	6
Aurora	Colorado	229	176	8	25.8%	112,315	8.5	11	1	11	0	1	9
Boston	Massachusetts	223	161	3	73.1%	111,019	3.5	14	2	16	0	11	16
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	327	233	9	16.1%	110,094	10.9	39	3	45	0	0	14
Garden Grove	California	171	127	4	61.7%	108,476	5.0	5	2	5	0	1	5
High Point	North Carolina	173	134	1	88.3%	107,970	2.5	4	2	5	2	3	5
Overland Park	Kansas	183	129	4	58.4%	107,068	5.2	9	2	13	0	1	13
Ridgewood	New York	100	72	1	100.0%	106,717	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	286	184	9	15.6%	106,234	12.1	43	1	43	0	0	7
Sterling Heights	Michigan	169	128	3	80.0%	105,976	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Santa Rosa	California	176	127	6	49.0%	105,843	6.3	6	2	8	0	0	8
Columbus	Ohio	255	168	10	12.3%	104,410	11.8	30	1	30	1	1	3
San Leandro	California	158	122	2	93.7%	104,174	1.7	3	2	4	1	4	4
Menifee	California	191	147	1	94.1%	104,010	1.8	4	2	8	3	6	8
Littleton	Colorado	300	202	6	31.8%	103,380	8.2	10	2	12	0	1	8
Allen	Texas	134	96	1	92.7%	103,137	2.0	2	2	3	1	2	3
Cambridge	Massachusetts	159	111	1	88.1%	101,967	2.2	5	2	10	2	8	10
Edison	New Jersey	143	103	1	100.0%	100,827	1.0	3	2	4	3	4	4
San Marcos	California	121	76	1	100.0%	100,481	1.0	2	2	4	2	4	4
Chesapeake	Virginia	175	115	6	42.1%	100,175	6.8	6	2	6	0	0	6
Fullerton	California	155	108	1	71.6%	99,741	3.5	4	1	4	1	1	4
Rockford	Illinois	227	176	5	54.5%	99,369	5.9	9	2	12	0	0	12
Boca Raton	Florida	245	180	5	44.4%	98,764	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
West Valley City	Utah	149	101	3	74.0%	98,379	3.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	198	149	3	84.1%	98,269	2.7	6	2	7	1	6	7
Miami Beach	Florida	184	129	1	84.9%	98,224	3.2	5	2	6	3	4	4
Indianapolis	Indiana	322	220	11	10.2%	97,203	11.6	37	1	37	1	1	11
Provo	Utah	155	107	3	83.1%	96,793	2.7	3	1	3	0	3	3
Charlotte	North Carolina	225	143	10	10.6%	96,245	11.1	24	1	24	0	0	12
Naperville	Illinois	171	112	3	57.8%	95,917	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	California	138	91	3	84.6%	95,562	2.3	3	2	4	1	3	4
Albany	New York	213	157	4	63.1%	95,466	5.3	11	1	11	1	1	10
Norwalk	California	99	63	2	90.0%	95,297	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Antioch	California	144	100	2	86.0%	95,270	2.5	2	2	3	0	2	3
New Haven	Connecticut	174	128	3	72.8%	94,811	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Elizabeth	New Jersey	153	112	2	94.1%	94,544	1.7	3	1	3	1	3	3
Sugar Land	Texas	168	125	4	55.9%	94,453	8.3	3	2	3	0	2	2
Elmhurst	New York	100	72	1	100.0%	93,967	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Santa Clara	California	167	121	3	74.5%	93,502	3.5	4	2	6	0	3	6
Hesperia	California	111	78	2	90.0%	93,430	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Delray Beach	Florida	185	131	2	78.3%	93,184	3.0	5	2	6	1	4	6
Joliet	Illinois	164	114	3	71.7%	92,452	4.0	5	2	6	0	2	6
West Jordan	Utah	146	100	2	74.8%	92,401	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Largo	Florida	166	124	1	84.9%	91,409	2.4	5	2	7	3	4	7
Pasadena	California	171	118	4	58.0%	91,407	5.2	6	1	6	0	1	6
Vista	California	143	98	2	76.1%	91,250	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Sandy	Utah	143	91	2	82.3%	90,876	2.8	4	2	5	1	3	5
West Palm Beach	Florida	217	149	6	24.5%	90,772	10.3	12	1	12	1	1	4
Broomfield	Colorado	167	119	2	86.4%	90,545	2.3	3	3	5	1	3	5
Falls Church	Virginia	255	195	1	75.1%	90,349	3.8	5	3	7	1	2	7
Greensboro	North Carolina	197	137	8	27.4%	89,814	8.4	9	2	15	0	0	14
Jersey City	New Jersey	232	179	7	34.3%	89,712	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Palmdale	California	168	126	3	51.1%	89,442	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Keller	Texas	146	106	2	76.8%	89,256	3.0	2	3	3	0	2	3
Stamford	Connecticut	186	136	4	69.3%	89,174	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Mission Viejo	California	121	75	2	90.0%	88,522	2.0	2	2	4	0	4	4
Costa Mesa	California	127	80	2	77.8%	88,468	3.0	2	1	2	1	1	2
Tampa	Florida	271	192	11	11.2%	88,443	13.2	27	1	27	0	0	2
Herndon	Virginia	150	107	1	94.6%	88,424	1.5	2	2	3	1	3	3
Las Vegas	Nevada	232	144	15	5.7%	88,368	14.2	43	1	43	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	161	115	1	93.8%	88,311	2.0	3	2	4	2	3	4
Arvada	Colorado	215	164	4	66.2%	88,281	4.2	5	2	8	0	2	8
Douglasville	Georgia	139	97	3	80.0%	88,198	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Midlothian	Virginia	151	110	1	91.0%	88,055	2.3	3	2	4	1	3	4
Naples	Florida	265	205	7	28.0%	87,556	8.9	14	2	14	2	3	6
Rock Hill	South Carolina	154	109	3	75.0%	87,309	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
San Jose	California	312	209	11	8.3%	86,936	13.0	28	1	28	0	1	3
Indio	California	132	92	2	90.0%	86,482	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Racine	Wisconsin	201	148	2	68.5%	86,376	4.4	5	2	5	1	1	5
Olympia	Washington	233	171	4	46.8%	85,654	6.8	6	3	8	0	3	4
Fresno	California	225	157	9	14.1%	84,914	10.6	18	2	35	0	0	11
Clermont	Florida	171	127	1	84.3%	84,553	2.3	3	2	3	1	3	3
Cincinnati	Ohio	247	167	10	10.5%	84,137	11.2	45	1	45	0	0	14
Meridian	Idaho	126	77	4	80.0%	83,377	3.0	2	2	2	0	2	2
Elgin	Illinois	152	109	4	68.2%	83,315	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Salinas	California	182	130	5	44.0%	82,910	6.6	5	2	8	0	0	7
Milton	Florida	145	100	1	87.5%	82,870	2.3	3	2	3	1	3	3
Grand Prairie	Texas	159	113	6	43.4%	82,745	7.0	4	2	6	0	0	4
Macon	Georgia	214	151	6	50.4%	82,432	6.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
O Fallon	Missouri	129	91	1	85.4%	82,408	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Houston	Texas	419	273	18	2.6%	82,359	18.2	96	2	97	0	0	0
Palm Bay	Florida	173	135	3	73.6%	81,963	3.3	4	1	4	1	3	4
Daly City	California	143	103	2	71.6%	81,959	3.5	2	2	3	1	1	3
Santa Cruz	California	152	103	3	78.2%	81,374	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Orem	Utah	136	92	3	80.0%	80,254	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Ashburn	Virginia	121	76	3	71.4%	80,224	4.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Henrico	Virginia	249	186	5	41.4%	79,763	8.9	7	3	9	2	2	4
Murrieta	California	136	92	3	60.3%	79,748	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	California	139	99	2	69.9%	79,730	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Franklin	Tennessee	145	107	3	74.4%	79,260	3.7	3	1	3	0	2	3
Carlsbad	California	172	118	3	69.3%	78,782	4.5	4	2	8	0	2	8
Redwood City	California	175	126	3	67.8%	77,627	4.5	4	1	4	1	1	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	194	133	2	81.2%	77,422	2.6	7	2	12	1	9	12
Metairie	Louisiana	150	104	5	54.2%	77,052	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pittsburg	California	100	69	3	80.0%	76,865	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Youngstown	Ohio	241	182	2	48.9%	76,752	5.0	12	3	14	0	7	10
Waterbury	Connecticut	162	119	4	70.4%	76,481	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Melbourne	Florida	171	123	5	48.8%	75,964	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Clinton Township	Michigan	160	114	4	75.6%	75,823	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Palo Alto	California	162	109	1	78.4%	75,821	4.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Chino	California	137	100	3	80.0%	75,579	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Springdale	Arkansas	114	75	3	78.3%	75,476	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Glendale	Arizona	236	176	8	24.7%	75,241	9.8	9	2	11	0	0	4
Kansas City	Missouri	204	124	8	13.1%	75,099	10.7	49	3	80	0	0	24
El Monte	California	117	80	3	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Sacramento	California	336	219	11	9.3%	74,486	12.4	28	1	28	0	1	5
Florissant	Missouri	159	110	4	68.3%	74,014	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	164	114	1	78.8%	73,693	2.3	4	2	4	2	3	4
Albuquerque	New Mexico	209	139	11	11.2%	73,636	12.2	17	1	17	0	0	3
Colorado Springs	Colorado	343	242	10	12.6%	73,587	12.1	30	1	30	2	2	2
Toms River	New Jersey	138	96	4	59.6%	73,219	5.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
South Bend	Indiana	227	171	5	49.6%	72,818	5.7	10	2	11	0	0	10
Frisco	Texas	131	91	5	42.1%	72,675	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Rockville	Maryland	191	142	4	50.2%	72,641	7.0	4	1	4	0	2	2
Honolulu	Hawaii	211	151	8	17.4%	72,434	9.7	11	2	13	0	0	9
Torrance	California	239	167	6	40.8%	72,187	6.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Puyallup	Washington	189	140	4	50.3%	71,903	7.6	5	2	6	0	2	4
El Cajon	California	152	95	6	41.6%	71,757	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Lithonia	Georgia	123	83	2	73.8%	71,444	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Pearland	Texas	162	119	3	51.9%	71,381	10.5	2	2	2	0	1	1
Dearborn	Michigan	157	112	3	74.9%	71,261	3.3	4	2	6	0	3	6
Bowie	Maryland	202	158	1	69.3%	70,830	4.3	4	3	5	1	2	5
Lakewood	New Jersey	99	60	1	70.0%	70,534	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Jupiter	Florida	158	109	2	71.2%	70,194	3.0	4	2	6	0	4	6
Bothell	Washington	199	147	3	54.6%	69,999	5.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Acworth	Georgia	138	99	4	70.0%	69,778	4.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Edmond	Oklahoma	161	96	4	40.6%	69,669	8.6	5	2	6	1	1	3
New Port Richey	Florida	189	146	3	57.7%	69,661	5.8	4	1	4	1	1	4
Birmingham	Alabama	228	166	11	13.9%	69,513	13.0	30	1	30	0	0	4
Stone Mountain	Georgia	182	125	3	53.6%	68,821	4.7	3	2	4	0	2	3
Annapolis	Maryland	212	153	3	72.2%	68,664	5.0	5	2	7	1	2	6
Fort Wayne	Indiana	229	167	8	21.5%	68,529	9.3	16	2	17	0	0	13
Richardson	Texas	137	99	3	59.7%	68,426	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Warren	Michigan	188	130	5	50.6%	68,352	6.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Livermore	California	135	97	2	71.0%	68,327	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Coral Springs	Florida	133	96	4	70.0%	68,067	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Topeka	Kansas	268	193	5	41.6%	67,997	7.8	18	1	18	0	0	14
Cary	North Carolina	156	115	6	43.7%	67,951	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	162	112	2	69.2%	67,742	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	145	112	3	68.8%	65,896	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Fort Mill	South Carolina	144	95	3	69.2%	65,787	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Livonia	Michigan	132	89	2	69.2%	65,435	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Visalia	California	162	121	7	42.7%	64,909	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Manassas	Virginia	212	158	2	42.5%	64,607	8.3	4	1	4	1	1	2
Santa Maria	California	157	115	6	44.7%	64,003	6.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Perris	California	127	91	4	54.4%	63,890	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Apopka	Florida	138	99	3	65.2%	63,692	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Belleville	Illinois	172	122	3	67.7%	63,114	4.0	4	2	6	0	3	6
Huntington Beach	California	164	120	6	30.9%	61,812	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Louisville	Kentucky	248	177	9	8.0%	60,581	12.3	32	1	32	0	0	1
Van Nuys	California	140	89	7	34.0%	60,451	8.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Richmond	Virginia	219	151	9	15.5%	60,437	10.7	15	1	15	0	0	8
Fairfax	Virginia	211	158	5	36.7%	60,136	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	173	125	6	32.1%	59,743	7.8	5	2	6	0	0	6
Rialto	California	134	95	3	55.5%	59,158	4.5	2	2	4	0	1	4
Modesto	California	176	117	8	22.4%	59,120	9.4	7	2	8	0	0	4
Cape Coral	Florida	198	142	8	32.4%	58,599	7.7	6	3	9	0	0	6
Hawthorne	California	100	64	5	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	139	95	6	44.0%	57,422	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Monica	California	195	143	5	60.8%	57,372	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pomona	California	163	122	6	36.3%	57,293	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	California	100	59	2	60.0%	57,062	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Ann Arbor	Michigan	180	134	8	34.2%	57,055	7.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Irvine	California	200	143	9	21.2%	56,777	9.3	9	1	9	0	0	7
Plainfield	Illinois	163	108	1	57.4%	56,589	5.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Winter Haven	Florida	168	120	6	51.7%	55,267	8.3	3	2	3	0	1	2
Ballwin	Missouri	124	90	3	58.1%	55,022	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	California	151	110	4	47.4%	54,929	6.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hemet	California	177	124	4	42.4%	54,608	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Peoria	Arizona	174	135	7	31.3%	53,943	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Wichita Falls	Texas	197	145	4	54.4%	53,752	5.4	7	2	8	0	0	8
Tracy	California	174	123	4	45.6%	53,390	5.0	4	1	4	1	1	4
Gaithersburg	Maryland	180	138	5	36.6%	52,870	9.8	5	2	8	0	0	3
Summerville	South Carolina	126	84	6	37.7%	52,371	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Ontario	California	140	102	8	29.3%	51,711	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bell Gardens	California	100	58	6	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Grand Rapids	Michigan	195	133	8	13.9%	51,032	10.7	12	1	12	0	0	6
Santa Barbara	California	196	149	6	37.5%	50,988	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
La Puente	California	163	114	3	43.0%	50,738	5.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Abilene	Texas	201	156	6	38.8%	50,558	7.0	6	2	9	0	0	8
Vallejo	California	194	136	6	40.5%	50,420	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
San Angelo	Texas	165	122	5	45.5%	50,404	6.8	4	3	5	0	1	4
Bakersfield	California	225	172	10	8.9%	49,929	10.9	11	2	22	0	0	6
Riverside	California	199	152	11	13.5%	49,815	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	205	158	7	48.7%	49,675	5.2	6	2	7	1	3	6
Vero Beach	Florida	203	154	7	43.0%	49,582	6.8	6	2	8	0	0	8
Portland	Oregon	237	158	14	5.4%	49,534	14.6	33	1	33	0	0	0
Chula Vista	California	174	125	9	18.9%	49,247	8.8	5	2	9	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	207	150	7	31.8%	49,178	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Olathe	Kansas	119	82	6	33.3%	48,040	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Flint	Michigan	220	164	6	30.9%	47,984	7.4	7	1	7	1	1	7
Riverview	Florida	156	109	3	42.9%	47,730	7.3	3	2	5	0	2	4
Parker	Colorado	132	92	5	46.6%	46,728	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Springfield	Missouri	205	148	9	20.2%	46,637	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	6
Tacoma	Washington	292	219	10	13.9%	46,373	12.0	20	2	35	0	1	5
Austin	Texas	256	159	15	4.3%	46,365	15.7	44	1	44	0	0	0
Burbank	California	193	152	6	42.8%	46,205	7.8	5	2	7	0	0	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	158	107	5	39.7%	46,076	6.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Roseville	California	156	109	8	32.4%	45,329	9.7	3	2	5	0	0	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	212	153	7	35.4%	45,308	7.6	5	1	5	0	1	3
Mcdonough	Georgia	118	77	7	44.6%	45,213	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Chico	California	154	113	6	39.8%	44,529	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	4
Gulfport	Mississippi	143	96	6	46.6%	44,181	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Napa	California	145	102	7	45.7%	44,171	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bridgeport	Connecticut	181	131	6	29.8%	43,662	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Jacksonville	Florida	249	165	15	5.0%	43,421	15.0	31	2	32	0	0	1
Bryan	Texas	188	138	6	45.0%	43,315	6.4	5	2	6	0	0	5
Arlington	Texas	210	155	12	10.8%	43,031	10.7	12	2	12	0	0	4
Reading	Pennsylvania	272	201	10	19.9%	42,916	10.4	10	2	14	1	1	5
Fayetteville	North Carolina	189	141	9	17.6%	42,911	10.3	8	1	8	0	0	2
Vacaville	California	124	83	5	40.6%	42,757	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Marietta	Georgia	217	157	10	13.2%	42,438	11.0	7	1	7	0	0	3
Englewood	Colorado	216	143	5	37.9%	42,297	7.5	4	2	5	0	0	3
Oceanside	California	166	120	9	21.1%	42,246	10.0	4	2	6	0	0	2
Pueblo	Colorado	244	177	8	26.7%	42,169	9.4	7	1	7	0	1	2
Deltona	Florida	129	93	6	44.9%	42,144	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Columbia	South Carolina	200	140	10	12.2%	41,841	10.3	14	2	20	0	0	9
Holland	Michigan	122	87	6	44.5%	41,808	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Muskegon	Michigan	163	116	8	32.3%	41,733	7.8	5	2	9	0	0	5
Moreno Valley	California	182	138	9	19.9%	40,909	9.5	4	2	6	0	0	1
Berkeley	California	269	193	7	31.5%	40,009	8.1	9	3	14	1	2	7
New Bedford	Massachusetts	180	124	5	41.3%	39,173	7.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Nashville	Tennessee	246	169	10	8.5%	39,146	12.1	22	1	22	1	1	1
Lewisville	Texas	156	112	6	32.9%	39,093	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Waukegan	Illinois	124	84	6	40.0%	39,011	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Evansville	Indiana	223	170	9	21.1%	38,904	8.7	9	2	9	0	0	9
Kalamazoo	Michigan	183	139	8	23.5%	38,522	8.6	7	2	8	0	0	6
Ogden	Utah	186	139	8	19.0%	38,221	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Bradenton	Florida	226	167	10	15.1%	38,187	10.5	10	1	10	0	0	4
Clearwater	Florida	226	171	10	20.7%	37,889	9.8	9	2	10	2	3	3
Mckinney	Texas	130	87	9	20.0%	37,798	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	180	133	9	28.3%	37,033	8.4	5	2	8	0	0	5
Knoxville	Tennessee	192	134	10	9.6%	36,979	10.9	17	1	17	0	0	8
Covington	Georgia	145	99	4	39.0%	36,180	6.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Longmont	Colorado	152	110	7	27.3%	35,700	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	184	141	7	34.6%	35,641	7.8	5	1	5	1	1	4
Mesa	Arizona	199	139	13	6.6%	35,278	13.5	13	2	14	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	163	120	8	33.3%	35,108	8.0	5	3	6	0	0	5
Surprise	Arizona	165	123	8	25.9%	35,095	8.0	4	2	6	0	0	3
Ocala	Florida	226	174	9	15.5%	34,913	10.2	11	2	12	0	0	6
Spartanburg	South Carolina	180	124	8	31.1%	34,856	9.2	5	2	6	0	0	4
Decatur	Georgia	192	136	11	19.3%	34,826	9.2	5	1	5	0	1	2
Duluth	Minnesota	254	181	8	29.6%	34,663	9.3	11	2	12	0	0	7
North Hollywood	California	136	89	9	22.3%	34,182	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission	Texas	144	105	8	18.4%	33,278	9.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Sparks	Nevada	198	148	10	27.8%	33,130	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Akron	Ohio	219	157	10	12.2%	33,088	11.4	17	2	17	0	0	5
Wichita	Kansas	221	145	11	7.9%	33,088	12.2	26	1	26	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	130	92	7	30.0%	32,070	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Morgantown	West Virginia	140	98	6	32.9%	31,330	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	162	120	9	29.5%	31,325	10.0	2	1	2	0	1	1
Lakeland	Florida	216	159	10	12.1%	31,146	10.6	9	1	9	0	0	5
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	252	178	12	8.2%	30,982	14.9	18	1	18	0	2	2
Corpus Christi	Texas	276	199	10	9.5%	30,926	11.2	18	1	18	0	0	8
Laredo	Texas	189	132	10	11.4%	30,916	9.8	6	2	11	0	0	5
Lafayette	Louisiana	170	134	8	19.1%	30,597	9.6	5	2	5	0	0	4
Amarillo	Texas	225	164	10	13.3%	30,549	9.8	14	2	16	0	0	14
North Las Vegas	Nevada	165	112	10	13.0%	30,446	12.4	7	2	7	0	0	1
Gilbert	Arizona	171	139	10	12.7%	30,418	11.7	6	1	6	0	0	1
Federal Way	Washington	142	95	8	30.0%	30,001	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Memphis	Tennessee	248	178	22	4.3%	29,906	18.5	26	1	26	0	0	2
Odessa	Texas	189	136	8	18.4%	29,523	10.7	6	2	9	0	0	2
Brownsville	Texas	158	108	9	14.6%	29,492	9.3	3	2	4	0	0	3
Tallahassee	Florida	241	174	11	10.1%	28,964	11.1	10	1	10	0	0	1
Sylmar	California	100	68	5	30.0%	28,946	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Champaign	Illinois	164	117	8	30.0%	28,370	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Orleans	Louisiana	255	182	13	6.4%	27,510	13.7	19	1	19	0	0	1
Lexington	Kentucky	199	137	12	8.5%	27,138	12.1	15	1	15	0	0	0
Baytown	Texas	152	108	9	23.0%	27,100	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	221	171	7	26.9%	26,743	9.6	8	2	14	0	0	10
Mcallen	Texas	154	111	9	18.8%	26,564	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Laurel	Maryland	189	136	11	23.5%	26,461	9.3	4	2	5	0	0	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	199	141	9	15.4%	26,249	11.9	7	2	7	0	0	2
Hamilton	Ohio	158	103	9	19.1%	26,131	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	157	103	9	23.1%	26,064	8.8	4	2	6	0	0	5
Lynchburg	Virginia	184	139	8	25.3%	25,916	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	141	98	5	26.4%	25,748	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Spokane	Washington	246	176	10	7.1%	25,529	12.9	14	1	14	0	0	0
Savannah	Georgia	222	169	11	10.6%	25,479	11.0	10	2	18	0	0	4
Davenport	Iowa	176	122	8	24.2%	25,373	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	4
Panama City	Florida	211	143	9	20.0%	25,276	9.5	6	2	7	0	0	4
Durham	North Carolina	185	125	11	8.6%	24,988	11.4	8	2	16	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	177	130	9	15.6%	24,919	9.8	5	2	7	0	0	3
Tempe	Arizona	146	104	10	13.1%	24,867	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Raleigh	North Carolina	177	118	15	4.5%	24,742	15.5	15	1	15	0	0	0
Fort Myers	Florida	215	151	11	9.7%	24,397	10.8	11	1	11	1	1	2
Lincoln	Nebraska	263	187	11	8.3%	24,068	11.5	22	1	22	0	0	7
Boulder	Colorado	198	149	9	18.2%	23,873	10.7	6	1	6	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	110	68	6	24.1%	23,835	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saginaw	Michigan	204	154	10	18.2%	23,673	8.7	7	2	11	0	0	7
Chattanooga	Tennessee	225	166	13	11.1%	23,104	14.5	15	1	15	0	0	1
Johnson City	Tennessee	159	120	9	24.1%	23,030	10.0	4	2	4	0	0	1
Elkhart	Indiana	154	107	9	22.9%	22,799	9.3	3	2	4	0	0	2
Sarasota	Florida	215	157	12	9.1%	22,774	12.2	13	1	13	0	1	1
Rapid City	South Dakota	154	120	7	23.4%	22,655	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Beaverton	Oregon	149	102	10	11.1%	22,407	11.5	4	2	4	0	0	1
Charlottesville	Virginia	173	121	9	18.2%	22,406	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	4
Boise	Idaho	204	130	13	8.7%	22,183	12.4	9	2	11	0	0	3
Pensacola	Florida	265	188	11	8.3%	22,141	11.6	13	1	13	0	0	1
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	205	152	10	13.1%	22,116	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	6
Hagerstown	Maryland	174	126	10	22.6%	22,110	6.3	3	2	4	0	1	3
San Antonio	Texas	286	179	28	1.2%	22,024	23.2	59	1	59	0	0	0
West Covina	California	141	97	8	20.0%	21,882	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fredericksburg	Virginia	150	100	9	12.4%	21,571	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Simi Valley	California	127	88	6	16.6%	21,319	11.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	99	65	8	20.0%	21,160	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Mobile	Alabama	243	161	14	7.7%	20,875	12.8	18	2	19	1	1	2
Erie	Pennsylvania	245	181	10	11.2%	20,638	10.2	13	2	16	0	0	12
Reno	Nevada	256	189	13	6.9%	20,455	13.3	12	2	13	0	0	2
Fort Pierce	Florida	233	180	8	21.3%	20,400	8.8	8	1	8	1	1	6
Elk Grove	California	146	106	10	11.3%	20,344	11.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
Woodstock	Georgia	117	78	8	20.0%	20,344	9.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Appleton	Wisconsin	170	120	9	16.7%	20,307	10.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	191	147	9	14.6%	20,294	10.0	6	2	6	0	0	4
Tulsa	Oklahoma	241	155	14	4.8%	20,261	14.9	28	1	28	0	0	1
Madison	Wisconsin	188	141	11	6.8%	20,096	13.2	14	1	14	0	0	0
Bellevue	Washington	179	131	12	13.6%	19,832	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	149	108	9	18.1%	19,686	11.0	3	2	4	0	0	1
Irving	Texas	166	117	11	8.2%	19,618	11.8	6	2	7	0	0	0
Salem	Oregon	210	157	11	7.3%	19,514	12.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Hayward	California	153	114	11	10.1%	19,344	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Virginia Beach	Virginia	218	141	13	4.3%	19,314	15.1	12	1	12	0	0	0
Plano	Texas	186	142	13	6.3%	19,226	13.6	7	1	7	0	0	0
Chandler	Arizona	178	138	13	7.1%	19,183	12.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Shreveport	Louisiana	207	148	12	8.3%	18,506	11.8	12	1	12	0	0	1
York	Pennsylvania	202	149	9	10.2%	18,406	11.0	7	1	7	0	0	2
Lawrence	Kansas	175	123	9	18.1%	18,260	10.2	5	2	8	0	0	3
Las Cruces	New Mexico	207	150	10	12.2%	18,104	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Gastonia	North Carolina	153	103	9	16.8%	17,968	9.3	3	2	6	0	0	3
Fort Collins	Colorado	171	122	11	9.1%	17,724	10.8	5	2	6	0	0	3
New Braunfels	Texas	134	100	9	17.2%	17,696	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Little Rock	Arkansas	210	157	10	8.1%	17,690	11.4	12	1	12	0	0	4
Des Moines	Iowa	168	98	12	7.9%	17,650	12.5	11	1	11	0	0	1
Conroe	Texas	218	154	14	10.9%	17,494	11.3	7	1	7	0	0	3
Killeen	Texas	168	118	9	11.6%	17,421	11.8	4	2	6	0	0	1
Grand Junction	Colorado	189	132	9	16.5%	17,403	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	4
Cumming	Georgia	145	103	10	10.3%	16,704	10.7	3	2	5	0	0	2
Gainesville	Florida	231	165	10	7.9%	16,449	12.1	10	1	10	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	204	146	10	10.2%	16,187	10.3	9	2	11	0	0	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	211	149	11	8.5%	15,475	11.8	9	1	9	0	0	0
Garland	Texas	162	111	11	6.4%	15,297	13.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lansing	Michigan	164	122	10	9.3%	15,255	11.1	7	3	8	0	0	2
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	161	118	11	10.4%	15,192	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	1
Bloomington	Indiana	184	134	11	11.2%	14,997	11.3	6	2	10	0	0	3
Greenville	South Carolina	178	130	12	6.8%	14,841	13.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Escondido	California	146	91	11	8.2%	14,747	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Lubbock	Texas	241	170	14	5.2%	14,303	15.0	14	1	14	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	168	122	10	9.7%	14,253	10.3	3	2	5	0	0	2
Redding	California	204	143	9	12.5%	14,097	9.3	4	2	7	0	1	2
Roanoke	Virginia	228	169	10	8.3%	14,074	11.1	10	1	10	1	1	2
Spring	Texas	256	182	27	3.7%	14,038	15.9	8	1	8	0	0	3
Tyler	Texas	184	129	11	9.0%	14,013	11.4	9	2	11	0	0	2
Worcester	Massachusetts	207	144	12	7.5%	13,848	12.4	9	2	11	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	249	174	14	5.6%	13,597	13.5	12	1	12	0	0	1
Beaumont	Texas	201	142	10	9.3%	13,579	10.8	8	1	8	0	0	2
Clarksville	Tennessee	148	114	11	7.7%	13,512	12.3	3	2	4	0	0	0
Mesquite	Texas	152	109	10	9.2%	13,476	11.3	3	2	6	0	0	2
Jackson	Mississippi	195	139	13	7.7%	13,197	12.3	11	1	11	0	0	1
Bend	Oregon	174	120	12	10.8%	13,143	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Lynnwood	Washington	170	123	9	11.9%	12,876	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Denton	Texas	181	133	11	8.1%	12,732	12.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Montgomery	Alabama	235	174	13	5.9%	12,294	12.9	13	2	14	0	0	1
Fargo	North Dakota	165	120	10	9.9%	12,176	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Eugene	Oregon	218	148	13	6.0%	12,172	13.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Cypress	Texas	120	85	13	7.0%	11,942	13.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	174	138	11	9.0%	11,889	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Billings	Montana	153	108	10	8.5%	11,677	11.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	140	97	10	12.5%	11,634	10.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	153	113	11	9.2%	11,532	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Canton	Ohio	266	205	13	7.8%	11,515	12.8	12	1	12	0	0	2
Clovis	California	146	98	18	9.4%	11,389	10.7	3	3	6	0	0	2
Bellingham	Washington	148	105	11	9.0%	11,384	11.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Everett	Washington	167	126	14	6.8%	11,356	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Yakima	Washington	159	118	11	8.7%	11,258	11.8	4	2	7	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	140	103	11	8.5%	11,212	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Hartford	Connecticut	150	101	12	9.0%	11,104	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Merced	California	163	119	9	10.4%	10,726	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Athens	Georgia	191	126	11	8.5%	10,593	11.5	6	2	8	0	0	1
Carrollton	Texas	131	101	12	7.8%	10,563	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Round Rock	Texas	164	112	17	6.3%	10,500	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Temecula	California	152	102	11	8.1%	10,459	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	145	101	10	8.3%	10,351	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Victorville	California	154	111	9	7.6%	10,323	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	164	118	11	8.8%	10,137	11.3	4	2	6	0	0	2
Lowell	Massachusetts	159	116	10	9.0%	10,035	11.3	4	2	8	0	0	2
Concord	California	165	114	9	7.7%	10,032	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	124	90	10	10.0%	9,913	10.0	2	2	3	0	0	2
Huntsville	Alabama	230	171	14	5.0%	9,905	14.8	11	1	11	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	181	136	11	8.6%	9,349	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Nampa	Idaho	150	96	12	8.0%	9,268	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Auburn	Washington	141	95	11	8.1%	9,142	12.0	3	2	5	0	0	0
Saint Augustine	Florida	221	164	19	7.0%	9,110	13.0	5	2	8	0	0	0
Green Bay	Wisconsin	204	157	13	4.8%	8,821	13.7	7	1	7	0	1	1
Madera	California	182	124	14	8.3%	8,594	11.7	3	3	6	0	0	1
Katy	Texas	176	125	23	2.5%	8,579	17.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	173	127	12	8.9%	8,441	11.8	5	2	9	0	0	1
Hampton	Virginia	175	114	12	6.2%	8,405	13.5	6	2	11	0	0	0
Kennewick	Washington	154	106	8	8.4%	8,321	11.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	132	93	10	8.6%	8,243	12.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Henderson	Nevada	163	102	20	2.7%	8,170	17.5	8	1	8	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	123	83	11	6.5%	7,952	13.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	205	150	11	7.9%	7,714	12.0	5	2	9	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	127	86	12	7.6%	7,586	12.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Muncie	Indiana	186	137	10	8.1%	7,544	11.6	5	2	10	0	0	0
Augusta	Georgia	183	124	16	3.6%	7,434	16.9	8	1	8	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	152	110	10	7.5%	7,341	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hillsboro	Oregon	126	89	13	6.9%	7,148	13.0	2	2	3	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	117	84	10	7.5%	7,004	12.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	119	78	13	7.4%	7,001	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	153	109	12	5.6%	6,820	14.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	199	144	12	6.0%	5,719	15.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Greeley	Colorado	148	104	13	4.9%	5,592	16.5	2	2	3	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Francisco	310	240	3	63.9%	555,782	4.8	28	2	34	1	8	34
Los Angeles	408	275	8	14.7%	361,962	9.9	62	2	63	0	1	43
San Diego	356	237	9	26.1%	351,232	8.8	36	2	39	2	2	31
Oakland	280	215	3	76.4%	314,507	4.1	14	2	17	0	11	15
Long Beach	205	156	5	60.5%	289,662	5.0	12	2	16	0	1	16
Santa Ana	179	127	4	70.0%	249,955	4.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Corona	179	132	1	95.9%	246,767	1.6	5	2	9	4	7	9
Anaheim	191	137	4	51.9%	191,365	5.3	7	2	10	0	0	10
Stockton	257	180	6	50.8%	189,766	5.8	12	2	14	0	0	14
Fontana	151	109	3	75.8%	177,853	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Whittier	225	153	1	77.3%	151,694	3.5	6	2	7	1	4	7
Lancaster	163	123	3	81.8%	150,865	3.0	3	2	4	0	2	4
San Bernardino	211	153	4	59.0%	147,143	4.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fremont	159	115	5	60.0%	139,894	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	150	106	1	97.6%	135,590	1.3	3	2	4	2	4	4
Sunnyvale	217	156	1	88.3%	134,924	3.0	4	2	4	3	3	4
Rancho Cucamonga	153	110	2	75.6%	133,531	3.0	4	2	5	0	4	5
Orange	150	102	2	86.2%	124,954	2.4	5	2	5	0	4	5
Oxnard	157	114	3	56.5%	124,606	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
San Mateo	191	139	2	82.6%	117,597	2.8	4	2	4	0	4	4
Inglewood	239	175	1	86.8%	116,156	2.4	5	2	5	3	3	5
Garden Grove	171	127	4	61.7%	108,476	5.0	5	2	5	0	1	5
Santa Rosa	176	127	6	49.0%	105,843	6.3	6	2	8	0	0	8
San Leandro	158	122	2	93.7%	104,174	1.7	3	2	4	1	4	4
Menifee	191	147	1	94.1%	104,010	1.8	4	2	8	3	6	8
San Marcos	121	76	1	100.0%	100,481	1.0	2	2	4	2	4	4
Fullerton	155	108	1	71.6%	99,741	3.5	4	1	4	1	1	4
Downey	138	91	3	84.6%	95,562	2.3	3	2	4	1	3	4
Norwalk	99	63	2	90.0%	95,297	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Antioch	144	100	2	86.0%	95,270	2.5	2	2	3	0	2	3
Santa Clara	167	121	3	74.5%	93,502	3.5	4	2	6	0	3	6
Hesperia	111	78	2	90.0%	93,430	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Pasadena	171	118	4	58.0%	91,407	5.2	6	1	6	0	1	6
Vista	143	98	2	76.1%	91,250	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Palmdale	168	126	3	51.1%	89,442	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Mission Viejo	121	75	2	90.0%	88,522	2.0	2	2	4	0	4	4
Costa Mesa	127	80	2	77.8%	88,468	3.0	2	1	2	1	1	2
San Jose	312	209	11	8.3%	86,936	13.0	28	1	28	0	1	3
Indio	132	92	2	90.0%	86,482	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Fresno	225	157	9	14.1%	84,914	10.6	18	2	35	0	0	11
Salinas	182	130	5	44.0%	82,910	6.6	5	2	8	0	0	7
Daly City	143	103	2	71.6%	81,959	3.5	2	2	3	1	1	3
Santa Cruz	152	103	3	78.2%	81,374	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Murrieta	136	92	3	60.3%	79,748	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	139	99	2	69.9%	79,730	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Carlsbad	172	118	3	69.3%	78,782	4.5	4	2	8	0	2	8
Redwood City	175	126	3	67.8%	77,627	4.5	4	1	4	1	1	4
Pittsburg	100	69	3	80.0%	76,865	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Palo Alto	162	109	1	78.4%	75,821	4.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Chino	137	100	3	80.0%	75,579	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
El Monte	117	80	3	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Sacramento	336	219	11	9.3%	74,486	12.4	28	1	28	0	1	5
Torrance	239	167	6	40.8%	72,187	6.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
El Cajon	152	95	6	41.6%	71,757	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Livermore	135	97	2	71.0%	68,327	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Visalia	162	121	7	42.7%	64,909	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Maria	157	115	6	44.7%	64,003	6.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Perris	127	91	4	54.4%	63,890	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Huntington Beach	164	120	6	30.9%	61,812	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Van Nuys	140	89	7	34.0%	60,451	8.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Rialto	134	95	3	55.5%	59,158	4.5	2	2	4	0	1	4
Modesto	176	117	8	22.4%	59,120	9.4	7	2	8	0	0	4
Hawthorne	100	64	5	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Monica	195	143	5	60.8%	57,372	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pomona	163	122	6	36.3%	57,293	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	100	59	2	60.0%	57,062	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Irvine	200	143	9	21.2%	56,777	9.3	9	1	9	0	0	7
Ventura	151	110	4	47.4%	54,929	6.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Hemet	177	124	4	42.4%	54,608	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tracy	174	123	4	45.6%	53,390	5.0	4	1	4	1	1	4
Ontario	140	102	8	29.3%	51,711	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bell Gardens	100	58	6	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Barbara	196	149	6	37.5%	50,988	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
La Puente	163	114	3	43.0%	50,738	5.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Vallejo	194	136	6	40.5%	50,420	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Bakersfield	225	172	10	8.9%	49,929	10.9	11	2	22	0	0	6
Riverside	199	152	11	13.5%	49,815	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	2
Chula Vista	174	125	9	18.9%	49,247	8.8	5	2	9	0	0	4
Burbank	193	152	6	42.8%	46,205	7.8	5	2	7	0	0	4
Roseville	156	109	8	32.4%	45,329	9.7	3	2	5	0	0	4
Chico	154	113	6	39.8%	44,529	7.0	3	2	5	0	0	4
Napa	145	102	7	45.7%	44,171	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vacaville	124	83	5	40.6%	42,757	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Oceanside	166	120	9	21.1%	42,246	10.0	4	2	6	0	0	2
Moreno Valley	182	138	9	19.9%	40,909	9.5	4	2	6	0	0	1
Berkeley	269	193	7	31.5%	40,009	8.1	9	3	14	1	2	7
North Hollywood	136	89	9	22.3%	34,182	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	100	68	5	30.0%	28,946	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
West Covina	141	97	8	20.0%	21,882	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Simi Valley	127	88	6	16.6%	21,319	11.0	2	2	3	0	0	1
Pacoima	99	65	8	20.0%	21,160	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Elk Grove	146	106	10	11.3%	20,344	11.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
Hayward	153	114	11	10.1%	19,344	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Escondido	146	91	11	8.2%	14,747	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Redding	204	143	9	12.5%	14,097	9.3	4	2	7	0	1	2
Clovis	146	98	18	9.4%	11,389	10.7	3	3	6	0	0	2
Merced	163	119	9	10.4%	10,726	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Temecula	152	102	11	8.1%	10,459	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Victorville	154	111	9	7.6%	10,323	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Concord	165	114	9	7.7%	10,032	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Madera	182	124	14	8.3%	8,594	11.7	3	3	6	0	0	1

Chicago

ZIP	cars.com	drivechicago.com	kingdomchevy.com	mikeandersonchevychicago.com	autotrader.com	toyotaonwestern.com
60638	2	1	8	14	32
60628	3	1	7	13	6	2
60649	2	3	6	8	7	1
60619	3	1	4	6	36	2
60639	2	1	4	5	3
60629	2	1	3	4	36
60659	2	1	5	10	3	4
60657	2	1	6	7	3	4
60616	2	1	3	4	34
60606	2	1	5	6	3	4
60618	1	2	3	4	30
60608	2	1	4	5	3
60647	2	1	4	5	3
60617	3	1	4	5	12	2
60607	2	1	4	5	34	3
60637	5	4	7	8	6
60636	2	1	3	4	36
60605	2	1	4	5	3
60634	4	5	9	6	35
60624	2	1	5	6	3	4
60603	2	1	5	6	3	4
60655	2	1	3	11	13
60615	5	4	7	8	6
60625	2	1	5	4	3
60656	5	4	7	15	6
60646	5	4	7	13	6
60602	3	2	6	7	4	1
60642	2	1	4	5	36	3
60633	2	1	6	12	4	3
60660	2	1	5	6	3	4
60611	2	1	5	6	3	4
60620	3	1	5	6	36	2
60661	2	1	4	5	34	3
60610	2	1	4	5	35	3
60651	2	1	3	6	4	5
60632	2	1	3	4	12
60643	6	4	10	15	7	5
60612	2	1	3	4	35
60621	2	1	3	4	35	82
60652	6	4	11	17	7	5
60601	2	1	5	6	3	4
60641	5	4	8	7	6
60630	2	1	5	6	3
60604	2	1	5	6	3	4
60654	2	1	5	6	3	4
60644	5	4	7	8	6
60614	3	1	6	7	35	2
60623	2	1	3	6	4
60613	2	1	4	5	33	3
60645	2	1	6	10	38	3
60622	2	1	4	3	32
60626	4	2	5	10	35	3
60609	5	4	6	7	34
60653	2	1	4	5	3
60631	2	1	10	11	33
60640	3	1	7	6	37	2

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Cars

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 26,648 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Cars Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (car dealership near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Cars Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Cars Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Cars Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly