Carrentals Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve carrentals.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 967 Car Rental Providers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Carrentals Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Carrentals Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Carrentals Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Chicago
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Carrentals Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	5,266	967	8	18.8%	60,760,007	11.4	27,379	32,654	3,638	38,477	9	46	14,264
California	913	287	8	20.2%	7,893,447	10.7	1,166	1,740	323	2,092	2	6	987
Texas	733	214	7	21.3%	5,948,100	10.6	1,360	1,917	197	2,076	0	3	1,152
Florida	723	244	8	17.9%	3,678,270	10.9	446	975	179	1,167	1	4	519
New York	721	214	8	15.4%	3,022,182	11.6	1,491	1,756	191	2,119	0	1	651
Illinois	612	182	7	22.0%	2,825,739	11.4	1,247	1,382	172	1,598	0	0	589
Pennsylvania	700	211	9	17.7%	2,265,935	12.0	1,604	1,781	146	2,070	0	0	597
Georgia	548	170	8	19.9%	2,054,012	11.2	574	726	113	813	0	0	366
Michigan	551	170	8	19.5%	1,939,315	11.7	833	976	141	1,126	0	0	400
North Carolina	553	177	8	18.8%	1,914,210	11.5	683	802	106	960	0	0	379
Massachusetts	519	164	7	26.5%	1,811,979	10.7	461	534	153	622	3	6	296
New Jersey	518	181	8	20.1%	1,787,696	10.9	537	593	152	715	0	0	279
Ohio	549	166	8	14.7%	1,713,503	11.6	976	1,188	109	1,343	0	0	440
Arizona	497	169	6	22.9%	1,593,972	9.8	247	396	67	520	3	11	271
Virginia	569	175	8	18.4%	1,551,553	11.7	723	891	82	1,047	0	1	345
Washington	541	179	7	18.7%	1,364,104	10.9	451	587	84	669	0	1	311
Colorado	569	180	7	23.0%	1,270,120	10.6	381	514	88	644	0	0	275
Wisconsin	511	159	7	20.5%	1,182,095	11.1	694	769	92	894	0	0	360
Indiana	755	215	8	17.7%	1,173,586	11.2	659	770	71	867	0	1	345
Maryland	505	166	8	19.3%	1,160,554	11.4	392	463	67	527	0	0	229
Tennessee	475	168	8	16.3%	1,081,195	11.5	514	622	68	693	0	0	273
South Carolina	457	148	8	20.3%	1,007,070	11.4	347	422	64	518	0	0	198
Missouri	597	177	9	14.2%	866,668	12.3	887	1,017	69	1,183	0	0	310
Oregon	546	178	7	20.9%	852,628	10.8	355	414	55	467	0	2	249
Minnesota	543	174	8	15.2%	838,774	11.4	777	878	81	1,044	0	0	367
Kentucky	455	152	8	18.3%	813,944	12.7	698	758	58	863	0	1	218
Oklahoma	465	157	8	20.1%	789,340	10.9	557	646	50	708	0	0	329
Connecticut	402	134	7	21.9%	783,306	11.0	234	279	64	351	0	1	155
Louisiana	490	173	8	16.4%	766,820	11.4	431	510	49	590	0	0	232
Alabama	484	162	9	15.5%	754,888	11.5	522	637	60	714	0	0	288
Kansas	506	168	8	19.0%	551,434	11.2	616	692	46	779	0	0	308
Arkansas	481	169	9	18.2%	545,745	11.6	553	587	50	790	0	0	226
Iowa	546	175	8	14.6%	456,277	12.0	890	933	60	1,142	0	0	312
Utah	433	160	8	14.8%	449,080	12.2	246	284	44	350	0	0	84
Mississippi	445	152	8	13.8%	411,382	12.1	384	418	56	459	0	0	165
Nevada	376	142	9	13.8%	404,713	11.7	92	168	23	216	0	0	42
New Mexico	424	146	7	18.8%	393,796	11.2	327	361	27	414	0	0	172
West Virginia	447	158	9	16.7%	306,267	13.0	684	704	36	911	0	2	191
Idaho	451	149	8	14.9%	251,953	11.1	251	273	37	321	0	0	131
Nebraska	467	160	9	13.1%	250,185	11.6	524	581	30	657	0	0	240
Hawaii	381	159	8	15.6%	222,275	11.4	82	93	27	119	0	0	40
Rhode Island	308	115	8	19.3%	203,444	11.1	64	77	21	112	0	0	38
Maine	503	197	8	14.9%	199,167	12.0	421	425	48	559	0	0	160
Delaware	324	133	8	19.9%	189,149	10.6	52	66	15	76	0	0	38
South Dakota	421	147	7	21.0%	181,644	11.6	359	370	23	482	0	6	120
Montana	462	158	9	16.7%	173,893	11.3	348	361	36	432	0	0	168
New Hampshire	389	146	9	12.1%	162,044	12.9	238	248	27	340	0	0	54
Alaska	436	147	7	20.6%	151,826	11.8	218	235	24	270	0	0	81
North Dakota	386	148	7	19.5%	146,157	11.6	367	381	17	504	0	0	153
Wyoming	392	145	9	19.7%	114,568	11.3	164	171	27	209	0	0	84
Vermont	351	127	14	6.8%	42,348	14.1	250	254	18	306	0	0	18

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Chicago	Illinois	245	99	6	35.0%	945,942	7.4	56	1	56	0	0	56
Houston	Texas	303	122	5	28.1%	894,925	8.1	96	1	96	0	0	95
Dallas	Texas	276	112	5	36.5%	508,887	7.6	48	2	48	0	0	48
Miami	Florida	270	129	6	26.0%	488,770	8.9	55	5	59	0	0	46
San Antonio	Texas	255	99	6	26.5%	470,659	8.3	59	1	59	0	0	59
San Francisco	California	204	77	3	51.7%	449,475	5.8	28	1	28	0	2	28
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	262	102	7	24.1%	380,378	8.6	47	2	47	0	0	46
Tucson	Arizona	259	104	4	40.9%	370,340	7.2	32	3	36	0	0	32
Indianapolis	Indiana	267	104	5	36.3%	345,127	7.5	37	3	38	0	0	37
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	252	91	5	36.9%	299,268	7.5	29	3	30	0	0	27
New York City	New York	226	96	9	16.5%	267,899	9.3	47	1	47	0	0	46
Bronx	New York	201	86	9	18.2%	262,155	9.3	25	1	25	0	0	19
San Jose	California	223	95	7	24.3%	255,639	8.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Washington DC	District of Columbia	200	82	6	36.2%	247,611	7.1	28	1	28	0	0	28
Brooklyn	New York	226	91	14	9.3%	242,726	11.5	37	3	40	0	0	6
Denver	Colorado	266	105	7	22.3%	242,440	9.3	38	5	42	0	0	30
Orlando	Florida	256	105	7	22.9%	227,585	8.8	32	3	33	0	0	30
Austin	Texas	244	97	7	20.3%	221,041	8.9	44	2	45	0	0	44
Las Vegas	Nevada	251	100	9	14.2%	219,218	11.2	43	2	50	0	0	11
Memphis	Tennessee	220	87	5	31.0%	215,409	8.3	26	2	27	0	0	24
Fort Worth	Texas	237	96	6	22.4%	203,936	8.9	32	2	35	0	0	35
Minneapolis	Minnesota	294	111	8	17.9%	195,265	11.2	51	4	57	0	0	23
Sacramento	California	242	98	7	24.2%	194,605	8.5	28	1	28	0	0	28
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	255	104	5	26.3%	179,730	8.2	43	2	44	0	0	39
Portland	Oregon	252	96	8	19.3%	177,602	9.2	33	2	37	0	0	34
Columbus	Ohio	244	97	6	20.7%	175,186	9.2	30	1	30	0	0	28
Jacksonville	Florida	236	98	9	19.9%	172,237	9.6	31	4	41	1	4	15
Atlanta	Georgia	247	97	9	17.1%	168,867	10.3	39	8	42	0	0	24
Bakersfield	California	193	86	7	30.0%	167,774	8.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Detroit	Michigan	227	89	6	23.9%	152,832	8.6	25	2	27	0	0	23
Lexington	Kentucky	197	76	3	46.9%	150,138	6.2	15	1	15	0	1	15
Aurora	Colorado	193	80	5	34.4%	149,748	7.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Riverside	California	167	73	4	40.3%	148,973	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Louisville	Kentucky	243	97	7	19.5%	148,401	9.1	32	1	32	0	0	28
San Diego	California	272	116	9	10.9%	146,563	10.8	36	5	42	0	0	19
Baltimore	Maryland	238	97	6	23.1%	145,755	9.5	22	2	23	0	0	15
Raleigh	North Carolina	207	78	7	26.6%	145,219	8.3	15	2	16	0	0	16
Hollywood	Florida	200	93	6	30.0%	140,620	8.0	9	2	9	0	0	9
Irvine	California	161	71	4	52.1%	139,320	5.9	9	1	9	0	1	9
Charlotte	North Carolina	240	97	9	15.2%	137,943	9.5	24	1	24	0	0	23
Los Angeles	California	288	130	15	5.6%	136,961	14.3	62	6	110	0	0	3
Arlington	Texas	167	70	6	34.2%	135,869	7.5	12	1	12	0	0	12
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	209	79	6	34.2%	129,603	8.0	18	2	19	0	0	17
Hayward	California	154	61	4	66.9%	128,428	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Grand Rapids	Michigan	193	74	6	33.9%	124,593	7.6	12	1	12	0	0	12
Anaheim	California	143	65	5	32.4%	119,254	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Wichita	Kansas	236	101	7	26.8%	112,172	8.4	26	1	26	0	0	26
El Paso	Texas	243	87	10	14.1%	111,150	10.3	24	3	27	0	0	21
Hialeah	Florida	163	82	6	30.1%	110,515	8.6	7	2	7	0	0	6
Kansas City	Missouri	262	103	7	19.2%	109,692	10.0	49	2	71	0	0	37
Alexandria	Virginia	208	86	5	30.6%	108,383	7.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Tacoma	Washington	240	96	5	31.9%	106,275	8.0	20	3	21	0	0	20
Fresno	California	238	97	6	17.6%	106,052	9.1	18	1	18	0	0	16
Phoenix	Arizona	229	92	13	7.3%	106,021	13.0	42	5	76	0	0	3
Seattle	Washington	258	98	10	10.9%	103,918	10.5	35	3	38	0	0	24
Spokane	Washington	212	85	6	28.6%	103,004	8.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Birmingham	Alabama	241	100	8	20.1%	100,701	8.9	30	2	31	0	0	29
Lubbock	Texas	209	87	6	36.4%	100,599	7.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Gilbert	Arizona	149	66	5	41.9%	100,016	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Albuquerque	New Mexico	222	85	8	15.0%	98,400	9.6	17	1	17	0	0	16
Jersey City	New Jersey	164	73	5	37.5%	98,072	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Modesto	California	169	70	6	37.0%	97,973	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mesa	Arizona	207	82	7	18.1%	96,514	9.2	13	1	13	0	0	13
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	252	111	10	11.3%	94,328	12.6	27	4	30	0	0	12
Madison	Wisconsin	192	74	7	31.9%	94,100	7.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
Fremont	California	152	58	5	39.8%	92,688	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chesapeake	Virginia	164	60	5	37.5%	89,176	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Newark	New Jersey	177	83	5	31.6%	88,795	7.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Silver Spring	Maryland	180	79	5	28.9%	87,598	8.6	7	2	7	0	0	6
West Palm Beach	Florida	186	87	7	23.0%	85,187	8.7	12	3	14	0	0	13
Tallahassee	Florida	179	76	6	29.6%	85,150	8.2	10	1	10	0	0	9
Cincinnati	Ohio	252	97	10	10.6%	85,054	11.0	45	2	46	0	0	11
Reading	Pennsylvania	186	74	5	38.6%	83,129	7.1	10	1	10	0	0	10
Amarillo	Texas	172	69	5	36.3%	83,117	7.4	14	1	14	0	0	14
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	191	77	5	45.5%	82,701	6.1	9	1	9	0	1	9
Marietta	Georgia	175	76	5	25.3%	81,661	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Wilmington	Delaware	185	81	6	37.0%	81,257	7.3	10	2	11	0	0	11
New Orleans	Louisiana	203	80	9	18.8%	80,243	9.4	19	2	21	0	0	16
Mobile	Alabama	220	88	8	29.2%	79,239	8.3	18	2	19	0	0	17
Winston Salem	North Carolina	185	73	7	30.0%	79,239	8.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Cleveland	Ohio	238	92	13	10.6%	79,180	12.0	29	6	41	0	0	8
York	Pennsylvania	182	81	4	44.0%	79,011	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Saint Petersburg	Florida	211	84	7	22.0%	78,393	8.9	16	2	20	0	0	14
Toledo	Ohio	228	91	6	25.3%	77,911	8.1	15	1	15	0	0	15
Irving	Texas	163	68	7	32.3%	77,732	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Woodbridge	Virginia	139	61	5	36.7%	77,597	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Colorado Springs	Colorado	264	114	9	13.1%	76,491	10.6	30	3	42	0	0	13
Chula Vista	California	176	72	6	29.1%	75,976	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Salem	Oregon	174	79	7	28.3%	75,303	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Augusta	Georgia	178	78	6	36.8%	75,286	7.8	8	1	8	0	0	7
Eugene	Oregon	177	75	5	36.6%	74,322	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Santa Rosa	California	159	69	6	34.3%	74,183	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Buffalo	New York	243	98	10	13.1%	73,854	10.6	28	3	29	0	0	9
Pompano Beach	Florida	201	90	8	19.8%	73,234	9.9	10	5	10	0	0	8
Bellevue	Washington	152	70	3	50.0%	73,141	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lawrenceville	Georgia	146	65	6	28.5%	73,112	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Paterson	New Jersey	133	61	3	50.0%	72,900	6.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Stockton	California	199	85	7	19.5%	72,799	9.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Anchorage	Alaska	174	76	5	29.6%	72,224	8.6	12	1	12	0	0	11
Olathe	Kansas	122	56	6	50.0%	72,187	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Katy	Texas	153	69	7	20.7%	71,069	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Escondido	California	136	61	5	39.5%	70,939	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tulsa	Oklahoma	264	113	8	16.7%	70,568	9.3	28	1	28	0	0	28
Saint Louis	Missouri	269	102	10	7.7%	70,532	12.5	45	3	58	0	0	6
Akron	Ohio	213	79	6	25.9%	69,894	8.5	17	1	17	0	0	17
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	257	103	11	10.2%	69,535	11.5	39	3	49	0	0	7
Springfield	Missouri	165	66	5	30.0%	69,113	8.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Rialto	California	121	59	4	64.5%	68,741	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Erie	Pennsylvania	206	79	5	36.6%	67,102	7.1	13	1	13	0	0	13
Trenton	New Jersey	196	79	6	31.6%	65,712	8.7	11	2	12	0	0	7
Tampa	Florida	236	96	12	8.2%	64,759	12.4	27	4	45	0	0	5
Scottsdale	Arizona	183	76	6	21.7%	64,739	9.1	11	2	12	0	0	10
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	95	8	22.2%	64,336	8.8	22	1	22	0	0	22
Little Rock	Arkansas	183	77	6	29.4%	64,137	7.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Albany	New York	210	86	4	42.2%	63,758	7.4	11	2	12	0	0	10
Santa Clara	California	134	59	4	50.0%	62,759	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Long Beach	California	197	89	11	13.1%	62,723	10.7	12	1	12	0	0	5
Norman	Oklahoma	147	60	5	50.3%	62,431	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Spring	Texas	180	80	7	16.2%	61,834	10.1	8	2	8	0	0	5
San Bernardino	California	147	69	7	24.8%	61,811	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Kissimmee	Florida	173	78	7	21.4%	61,738	10.4	7	3	8	0	0	5
Elizabeth	New Jersey	139	68	4	60.6%	60,894	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Charleston	South Carolina	216	82	7	30.9%	60,823	7.9	10	2	12	0	0	12
Fayetteville	North Carolina	176	70	7	24.9%	60,648	8.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Kent	Washington	137	59	5	37.7%	60,525	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Beaverton	Oregon	146	61	6	30.0%	60,491	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Frederick	Maryland	158	68	5	45.6%	60,235	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Haven	Connecticut	140	62	5	46.1%	60,043	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lansing	Michigan	148	63	6	36.4%	59,904	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Vista	California	127	56	5	49.8%	59,660	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Nashville	Tennessee	222	91	9	13.0%	59,610	10.9	22	1	22	0	0	8
Greensboro	North Carolina	180	74	7	18.1%	59,450	9.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Littleton	Colorado	209	89	8	18.1%	58,848	10.0	10	4	11	0	0	5
Hampton	Virginia	165	65	4	43.1%	58,725	6.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	63	5	30.7%	58,023	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Oakland	California	196	77	10	14.1%	58,017	10.6	14	1	14	0	0	6
Boca Raton	Florida	177	82	7	26.0%	57,842	8.3	9	1	9	0	0	9
Oceanside	California	132	62	7	28.7%	57,556	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tempe	Arizona	140	60	8	30.0%	56,999	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Toms River	New Jersey	133	54	4	46.3%	56,895	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ocala	Florida	184	86	6	25.2%	56,808	8.6	11	1	11	0	0	11
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	136	59	5	27.9%	56,574	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Honolulu	Hawaii	185	82	12	13.5%	56,261	10.1	11	1	11	0	0	7
Boston	Massachusetts	197	79	5	36.7%	55,735	6.6	14	2	15	1	1	15
Bellingham	Washington	139	62	4	43.9%	55,585	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anderson	South Carolina	144	62	5	56.2%	55,274	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	147	62	6	28.4%	55,230	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Indio	California	114	59	4	57.2%	54,966	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Overland Park	Kansas	187	74	7	29.8%	54,583	8.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Elgin	Illinois	140	55	4	44.5%	54,405	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Plano	Texas	170	68	8	17.8%	54,274	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	4
Laredo	Texas	161	69	8	20.0%	54,180	9.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Gainesville	Florida	184	79	6	25.8%	54,088	8.1	10	1	10	0	0	10
Carrollton	Texas	122	56	4	40.0%	53,924	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Wayne	Indiana	184	75	6	16.9%	53,835	9.9	16	1	16	0	0	11
Gastonia	North Carolina	137	57	6	49.8%	53,316	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Durham	North Carolina	186	71	7	18.3%	53,121	9.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Waco	Texas	174	69	7	33.6%	53,108	7.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Sterling Heights	Michigan	139	62	5	40.0%	52,988	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chandler	Arizona	163	69	10	19.3%	51,770	9.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Corpus Christi	Texas	198	77	9	15.9%	51,640	10.5	18	1	18	0	0	7
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	195	79	6	30.4%	51,563	7.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Franklin	Tennessee	128	58	4	48.3%	51,468	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	117	51	4	54.5%	51,195	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Round Rock	Texas	134	55	7	30.4%	51,003	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Charlottesville	Virginia	160	63	4	41.5%	51,001	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Knoxville	Tennessee	208	81	8	13.2%	50,882	9.5	17	1	17	0	0	15
Youngstown	Ohio	189	70	7	32.3%	50,730	7.3	12	1	12	0	0	10
Humble	Texas	146	63	6	30.4%	50,638	8.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Bradenton	Florida	169	70	7	19.8%	50,085	9.7	10	3	12	0	0	8
Naperville	Illinois	150	59	5	30.0%	49,742	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Renton	Washington	160	63	7	32.0%	49,517	7.2	5	2	5	0	1	5
Warren	Michigan	154	62	5	36.5%	49,404	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Saint Paul	Minnesota	286	109	13	6.2%	49,356	13.5	30	3	33	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	143	65	4	52.5%	49,093	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Richmond	Virginia	233	95	11	12.5%	49,035	10.1	15	2	16	0	0	10
Concord	California	144	58	5	37.6%	48,959	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Las Cruces	New Mexico	163	62	5	32.5%	48,378	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Grand Junction	Colorado	171	72	4	45.6%	48,120	6.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Puyallup	Washington	161	69	7	33.7%	48,079	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mckinney	Texas	112	49	6	25.2%	47,620	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Burbank	California	159	71	5	44.0%	47,521	7.2	5	3	7	1	1	7
Denton	Texas	166	74	5	30.0%	47,447	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Redding	California	148	68	7	41.8%	47,234	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Duluth	Minnesota	209	81	4	40.0%	46,856	7.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Fredericksburg	Virginia	159	68	6	26.9%	46,766	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lehigh Acres	Florida	161	71	5	39.8%	46,498	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Hemet	California	136	61	5	36.0%	46,418	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Syracuse	New York	208	83	8	20.5%	46,410	9.0	15	1	15	0	0	15
Vancouver	Washington	207	83	11	14.2%	46,399	9.8	11	1	11	0	0	7
Naples	Florida	191	74	8	14.6%	45,622	9.8	14	1	14	0	0	11
Ashburn	Virginia	122	54	4	40.0%	44,923	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	California	103	51	5	45.5%	44,742	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Schenectady	New York	173	72	7	27.5%	44,642	7.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Lowell	Massachusetts	126	59	7	40.0%	44,536	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Athens	Georgia	141	58	6	35.7%	44,520	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Yakima	Washington	146	66	7	34.2%	44,463	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	California	157	78	8	25.0%	44,286	9.2	5	3	6	0	0	4
Norfolk	Virginia	189	72	7	17.9%	44,018	9.5	14	1	14	0	0	13
Bridgeport	Connecticut	142	64	6	30.0%	43,925	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Beaumont	Texas	184	72	7	30.0%	43,650	8.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Gaithersburg	Maryland	163	61	6	30.0%	43,352	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Palmdale	California	141	69	6	24.8%	43,346	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Shreveport	Louisiana	213	86	8	19.3%	43,028	9.2	12	2	13	0	0	11
Staten Island	New York	177	78	10	9.1%	42,971	10.9	12	1	12	0	0	1
Cypress	Texas	122	55	5	25.2%	42,955	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	117	54	6	43.1%	42,732	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ridgewood	New York	100	51	7	40.0%	42,687	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Terre Haute	Indiana	148	66	5	44.7%	42,500	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Cumming	Georgia	136	61	5	26.2%	42,395	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Garden Grove	California	158	70	7	24.1%	42,316	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elk Grove	California	131	59	7	23.6%	42,253	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Joliet	Illinois	150	60	6	32.6%	42,025	7.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	California	147	69	5	30.0%	41,783	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fargo	North Dakota	156	70	6	34.0%	41,677	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fairfax	Virginia	165	66	7	25.4%	41,543	9.3	4	3	4	0	0	3
Carlsbad	California	144	66	6	36.4%	41,321	7.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Salinas	California	144	63	7	21.9%	41,294	8.4	5	2	7	0	0	7
Moreno Valley	California	144	60	7	20.0%	41,091	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Jordan	Utah	129	63	6	33.0%	40,815	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
El Cajon	California	136	64	8	23.6%	40,729	9.7	3	3	5	0	0	3
Sugar Land	Texas	144	65	7	23.9%	40,377	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Brownsville	Texas	132	59	8	20.0%	40,264	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	130	60	7	22.9%	40,235	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	214	89	8	19.3%	40,209	9.1	15	2	16	0	0	14
Rockford	Illinois	185	73	7	22.0%	40,106	8.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Laurel	Maryland	148	59	6	35.6%	40,095	7.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Jamaica	New York	157	69	9	16.4%	39,984	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	2
Green Bay	Wisconsin	182	74	7	21.6%	39,636	9.4	7	2	8	0	0	6
Longmont	Colorado	130	56	7	30.2%	39,454	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Henderson	Nevada	169	71	8	13.0%	39,352	10.9	8	3	11	0	0	4
Macon	Georgia	177	79	7	24.0%	39,282	8.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Murrieta	California	121	57	6	29.7%	39,272	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	115	51	5	40.0%	39,011	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Temecula	California	144	69	6	29.5%	38,315	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Las Vegas	Nevada	150	58	10	16.3%	38,092	12.0	7	2	11	0	0	2
Providence	Rhode Island	180	74	8	18.4%	37,776	10.6	8	3	16	0	0	6
Sunnyvale	California	135	60	7	24.7%	37,749	8.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Victorville	California	124	56	6	27.4%	37,357	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	California	163	67	6	30.0%	37,340	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	120	51	6	30.5%	37,315	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	147	64	7	28.5%	37,311	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Waterbury	Connecticut	157	69	6	34.1%	37,079	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Spartanburg	South Carolina	148	59	6	33.0%	36,930	8.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mission	Texas	143	63	7	20.3%	36,721	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	California	123	54	7	33.0%	36,664	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Angelo	Texas	131	54	5	32.9%	36,405	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pueblo	Colorado	170	71	7	23.0%	36,306	8.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Newnan	Georgia	116	54	6	38.9%	36,291	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manassas	Virginia	154	62	6	23.8%	36,137	8.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Killeen	Texas	158	72	7	24.0%	36,101	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Arvada	Colorado	158	65	8	27.0%	36,043	9.4	5	2	7	0	0	3
Miami Beach	Florida	142	77	7	31.0%	35,870	7.0	5	2	5	0	0	4
Santa Ana	California	159	71	10	10.0%	35,708	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Independence	Missouri	175	79	6	28.8%	35,701	7.8	8	1	8	0	0	8
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	76	10	7.9%	35,697	12.4	12	2	21	0	0	1
Edmond	Oklahoma	142	52	7	20.8%	35,653	10.2	5	2	7	0	0	3
Ontario	California	130	59	10	20.0%	35,411	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Roseville	California	134	56	6	25.3%	35,405	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Whittier	California	140	67	9	18.0%	35,352	11.0	6	4	7	0	0	4
Rockville	Maryland	144	63	7	24.4%	35,321	10.0	4	3	5	0	0	4
Omaha	Nebraska	228	90	12	6.3%	34,898	14.2	31	3	38	0	0	6
Hyattsville	Maryland	174	72	7	22.1%	34,873	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Midland	Texas	168	75	8	21.8%	34,807	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Edinburg	Texas	137	57	6	22.3%	34,646	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Frisco	Texas	123	54	6	20.0%	34,490	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Peoria	Arizona	152	66	8	20.0%	34,420	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Topeka	Kansas	200	86	6	21.0%	34,391	8.4	18	1	18	0	0	18
Richardson	Texas	141	59	5	30.0%	34,379	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fairfield	California	123	54	7	30.0%	34,224	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Boulder	Colorado	170	67	6	26.0%	34,122	8.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Jackson	Mississippi	203	79	8	20.0%	34,064	9.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Quincy	Massachusetts	124	55	5	35.8%	33,687	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Asheville	North Carolina	149	60	6	25.3%	33,382	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	60	6	33.2%	33,301	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Douglasville	Georgia	118	54	5	30.0%	33,074	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Herndon	Virginia	129	55	4	35.4%	33,072	7.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Kalamazoo	Michigan	169	72	8	20.0%	32,824	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tyler	Texas	170	73	8	20.7%	32,296	8.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
West Covina	California	118	59	6	29.4%	32,191	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tracy	California	153	66	7	27.4%	32,150	9.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Fort Pierce	Florida	166	74	6	33.6%	32,143	7.6	8	2	8	0	0	8
Norwalk	California	98	46	6	30.0%	31,766	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
College Station	Texas	123	48	8	25.4%	31,228	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fort Myers	Florida	186	74	10	12.3%	30,968	10.9	11	5	14	0	0	4
Flushing	New York	136	64	9	14.4%	30,948	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	1
Olympia	Washington	158	63	8	16.9%	30,903	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	5
Huntsville	Alabama	202	81	8	15.6%	30,539	10.7	11	2	11	0	0	7
Woodstock	Georgia	116	53	5	30.0%	30,516	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rochester	New York	227	88	13	6.5%	30,509	13.5	24	3	47	0	0	1
Conroe	Texas	166	72	7	18.9%	30,358	9.4	7	2	7	0	0	5
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	46	6	30.0%	30,229	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livonia	Michigan	102	42	6	31.9%	30,188	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	187	82	7	23.7%	30,108	9.3	9	3	10	0	0	8
Ogden	Utah	158	65	8	14.9%	30,083	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Pensacola	Florida	196	80	11	11.2%	30,063	10.7	13	1	13	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	121	52	7	30.0%	30,043	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Yonkers	New York	145	64	8	16.6%	30,017	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	133	55	6	30.3%	29,646	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	133	58	8	26.2%	29,616	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	California	131	59	9	21.3%	29,584	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Plainfield	Illinois	144	66	5	30.0%	29,567	8.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Worcester	Massachusetts	155	65	8	15.9%	29,563	9.8	9	1	9	0	0	8
Ventura	California	126	54	6	25.5%	29,561	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Glendale	Arizona	170	72	9	9.7%	29,411	10.7	9	3	10	0	0	6
O Fallon	Missouri	118	50	7	30.3%	29,216	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lake Worth	Florida	149	69	10	14.1%	29,122	11.4	5	4	7	0	0	2
Auburn	Washington	122	54	7	25.8%	29,099	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Falls Church	Virginia	161	68	8	24.2%	29,072	8.4	5	3	5	0	0	4
Hawthorne	California	101	52	8	30.0%	29,051	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pittsburg	California	99	42	7	30.0%	28,824	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Greeley	Colorado	110	52	8	25.1%	28,634	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	142	59	6	30.0%	28,631	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rock Hill	South Carolina	138	61	8	24.6%	28,602	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Metairie	Louisiana	159	60	7	20.0%	28,450	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Stamford	Connecticut	133	65	7	22.1%	28,436	8.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Billings	Montana	150	62	7	20.6%	28,319	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	181	74	7	20.3%	28,318	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Dayton	Ohio	247	99	12	5.9%	28,178	13.9	27	3	40	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	121	57	5	30.0%	28,167	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Appleton	Wisconsin	140	58	6	23.1%	28,114	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Monte	California	107	56	5	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daly City	California	129	54	8	24.3%	27,832	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Clovis	California	113	53	7	22.9%	27,822	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Summerville	South Carolina	124	52	7	20.0%	27,788	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	153	64	8	14.7%	27,486	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Dearborn	Michigan	140	57	6	28.9%	27,452	8.3	4	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Cruz	California	126	54	8	26.2%	27,297	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Reno	Nevada	195	78	11	9.2%	27,181	10.8	12	3	14	0	0	2
Menifee	California	143	63	6	24.5%	27,066	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
High Point	North Carolina	151	67	8	22.1%	27,038	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Fe	New Mexico	169	74	8	21.0%	26,938	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Palo Alto	California	137	59	7	27.9%	26,933	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	California	127	64	9	23.8%	26,836	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	137	57	8	21.9%	26,806	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	142	55	8	28.0%	26,580	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Edison	New Jersey	131	60	7	26.2%	26,369	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salt Lake City	Utah	231	97	15	5.4%	26,267	14.8	19	5	35	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	117	54	7	26.2%	26,234	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	158	72	6	23.9%	26,106	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Saginaw	Michigan	161	72	7	20.0%	26,061	9.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hillsboro	Oregon	113	46	7	25.3%	25,984	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Evansville	Indiana	182	80	8	14.0%	25,919	9.6	9	1	9	0	0	7
Lancaster	California	135	65	7	14.0%	25,737	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Buford	Georgia	117	51	7	25.9%	25,717	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Missoula	Montana	148	62	8	25.9%	25,162	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sandy	Utah	139	57	6	22.6%	24,979	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lees Summit	Missouri	159	67	8	24.4%	24,895	8.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Ann Arbor	Michigan	159	68	8	14.9%	24,831	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	143	70	8	14.0%	24,802	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	California	143	64	7	17.2%	24,557	9.3	3	2	6	0	0	5
Vero Beach	Florida	159	63	7	21.3%	24,522	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Yuma	Arizona	125	58	6	16.6%	24,451	9.3	3	2	5	0	0	5
Santa Monica	California	154	72	7	25.4%	24,018	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Everett	Washington	155	60	8	14.3%	23,904	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Baytown	Texas	141	63	7	20.0%	23,559	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Provo	Utah	142	64	7	20.0%	23,305	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Manchester	New Hampshire	139	57	6	20.0%	23,212	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pasadena	California	163	74	8	14.6%	23,075	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	4
Scranton	Pennsylvania	186	79	8	23.1%	22,951	8.4	8	1	8	0	0	8
Saint Charles	Missouri	136	61	8	16.4%	22,904	9.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Longview	Texas	150	60	9	21.5%	22,670	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Sparks	Nevada	146	64	7	18.9%	22,572	10.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Boise	Idaho	188	78	9	8.8%	22,549	11.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Flint	Michigan	180	79	10	14.4%	22,463	9.9	7	1	7	0	0	5
Brockton	Massachusetts	120	50	7	23.4%	22,335	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Antioch	California	114	46	7	20.0%	22,144	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	138	61	7	21.5%	22,111	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	141	61	7	20.0%	21,739	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Astoria	New York	148	69	11	15.1%	21,535	9.8	4	2	4	0	0	3
Henrico	Virginia	182	74	9	11.1%	21,410	10.3	7	3	9	0	0	5
Morgantown	West Virginia	133	61	7	22.5%	21,409	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	California	150	71	6	9.7%	21,270	10.5	4	2	5	0	0	2
Columbia	South Carolina	205	83	13	6.2%	21,232	13.7	14	4	18	0	0	1
Saint Augustine	Florida	152	70	7	16.1%	21,099	10.2	5	3	6	0	0	3
Annapolis	Maryland	160	70	8	22.1%	21,000	10.4	5	2	5	0	0	4
Meridian	Idaho	121	54	6	20.0%	20,844	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	141	64	7	17.9%	20,680	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Merced	California	141	65	7	20.0%	20,612	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	172	73	8	21.4%	20,375	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Cary	North Carolina	142	59	9	13.0%	20,262	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Inglewood	California	166	71	11	14.8%	19,764	10.2	5	3	6	0	0	4
Simi Valley	California	115	52	7	15.2%	19,511	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Savannah	Georgia	195	78	12	8.1%	19,452	11.4	10	4	13	0	0	3
Coral Springs	Florida	124	61	7	20.0%	19,448	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Huntington Beach	California	134	62	8	9.7%	19,364	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Napa	California	121	56	8	20.0%	19,333	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chino	California	110	51	6	20.4%	19,284	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	145	56	7	19.7%	19,262	9.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Panama City	Florida	158	68	10	15.1%	19,116	11.3	6	2	11	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	California	157	68	9	14.0%	19,047	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	3
Valdosta	Georgia	139	55	7	20.0%	18,990	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Largo	Florida	157	67	9	17.6%	18,955	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Champaign	Illinois	140	63	8	20.0%	18,913	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fort Mill	South Carolina	140	63	7	19.8%	18,833	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Elmhurst	New York	97	50	6	20.0%	18,793	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Medford	Oregon	112	51	7	20.0%	18,650	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverview	Florida	136	58	8	16.7%	18,557	10.0	3	2	4	0	0	2
Sarasota	Florida	194	81	14	7.2%	18,142	13.1	13	6	25	0	0	1
Racine	Wisconsin	148	68	8	14.1%	17,815	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lynchburg	Virginia	148	62	7	17.3%	17,746	10.3	4	3	5	0	0	3
Keller	Texas	130	53	6	15.3%	17,739	11.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Broomfield	Colorado	138	62	7	16.8%	17,578	9.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	148	58	7	15.0%	17,366	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	56	7	16.0%	17,112	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Delray Beach	Florida	148	71	8	13.9%	16,520	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	California	120	56	7	14.4%	16,429	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lakeland	Florida	165	76	10	6.3%	16,303	13.6	9	2	12	0	0	0
Missouri City	Texas	127	56	8	15.2%	16,102	11.5	2	2	3	0	0	1
New Braunfels	Texas	127	58	6	15.6%	16,003	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Westerville	Ohio	121	56	7	16.5%	15,678	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	164	63	8	15.8%	15,612	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lawrence	Kansas	167	73	7	15.4%	15,602	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	3
South Bend	Indiana	170	69	11	10.5%	15,442	10.4	10	1	10	0	0	4
Newport News	Virginia	153	63	12	8.7%	15,441	11.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Montgomery	Alabama	210	90	10	7.3%	15,410	12.8	13	1	13	0	0	2
Visalia	California	134	63	8	10.0%	15,201	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Decatur	Georgia	167	70	13	8.4%	15,121	11.6	5	2	6	0	0	2
Canton	Ohio	187	71	10	10.2%	14,987	10.9	12	1	12	0	0	5
Allentown	Pennsylvania	176	78	11	8.8%	14,942	11.0	7	2	9	0	0	2
Redwood City	California	149	61	8	13.0%	14,897	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clearwater	Florida	182	71	15	7.8%	14,264	12.8	9	4	17	0	0	2
Mcallen	Texas	141	61	8	10.0%	14,159	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Muncie	Indiana	159	69	9	14.9%	13,789	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	2
Parker	Colorado	118	49	8	13.4%	13,389	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynnwood	Washington	141	65	9	12.4%	13,387	10.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Lafayette	Louisiana	150	72	12	8.2%	13,208	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Pearland	Texas	128	57	9	9.4%	12,880	10.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
New Port Richey	Florida	140	58	7	10.6%	12,823	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	1
Midlothian	Virginia	138	55	8	12.9%	12,445	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Orange	California	135	60	9	8.6%	12,415	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Mesquite	Texas	143	59	10	8.4%	12,330	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	164	69	10	8.2%	11,966	11.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Roanoke	Virginia	183	77	12	7.0%	11,872	12.8	10	2	14	0	0	1
Lewisville	Texas	137	57	7	10.0%	11,868	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Englewood	Colorado	163	72	10	10.6%	11,844	12.5	4	5	7	0	0	1
Odessa	Texas	152	59	12	7.0%	11,163	13.3	6	1	6	0	0	1
Des Moines	Iowa	191	77	14	5.0%	11,158	14.5	11	2	17	0	0	0
Daytona Beach	Florida	143	68	11	10.8%	11,116	11.6	5	2	8	0	0	2
Hamilton	Ohio	136	54	10	8.0%	11,013	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Homestead	Florida	173	82	12	5.8%	10,939	14.3	7	3	8	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	104	45	7	10.0%	10,530	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Florissant	Missouri	141	54	9	9.3%	10,041	11.0	3	3	5	0	0	1
La Puente	California	126	61	9	8.5%	10,001	12.0	2	3	3	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	126	52	6	10.0%	9,977	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palm Bay	Florida	152	66	11	8.9%	9,948	11.5	4	2	6	0	0	1
Melbourne	Florida	147	68	12	6.2%	9,716	13.6	5	3	7	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	131	60	11	6.3%	9,639	14.0	4	3	7	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	157	61	10	7.1%	9,426	12.7	6	2	8	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	134	67	9	9.3%	9,373	11.0	3	3	4	0	0	2
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	109	52	6	9.3%	9,066	14.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Winter Haven	Florida	129	59	10	8.3%	8,885	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Apopka	Florida	121	59	8	9.0%	8,789	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Covington	Georgia	125	53	8	9.4%	8,726	10.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Chico	California	140	57	10	7.8%	8,699	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Bowie	Maryland	155	65	10	8.5%	8,640	14.5	4	2	4	0	0	1
Greenville	South Carolina	186	78	13	3.8%	8,428	16.0	9	2	10	0	0	0
Boynton Beach	Florida	153	66	15	4.7%	8,251	16.0	6	3	9	0	0	0
Cape Coral	Florida	159	71	14	4.5%	8,186	15.3	6	2	6	0	0	0
Van Nuys	California	137	66	13	4.5%	8,084	15.8	4	3	8	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	176	71	12	8.2%	7,862	12.4	5	2	5	0	0	0
Livermore	California	124	54	9	8.0%	7,700	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bothell	Washington	139	57	11	5.8%	7,411	15.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Ballwin	Missouri	116	52	9	7.6%	7,189	12.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	146	61	9	7.6%	7,075	12.3	4	2	7	0	0	1
Hartford	Connecticut	158	70	11	5.6%	6,955	14.2	6	3	12	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	135	60	11	7.0%	6,630	13.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	122	56	13	5.0%	6,460	14.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	99	53	12	6.0%	6,348	14.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Abilene	Texas	172	73	13	4.4%	5,744	15.0	6	2	6	0	0	0
Garland	Texas	154	69	14	2.4%	5,699	17.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Springdale	Arkansas	122	54	12	5.8%	5,550	14.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	151	61	12	4.3%	5,545	15.4	5	2	9	0	0	0
Stone Mountain	Georgia	142	64	13	4.2%	5,371	16.0	3	2	4	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	124	57	13	5.5%	5,349	14.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
West Valley City	Utah	138	67	13	4.0%	5,315	16.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	147	62	15	3.9%	4,900	16.0	4	3	7	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	136	56	14	4.9%	4,839	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lithonia	Georgia	120	59	11	4.8%	4,633	15.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	157	68	15	3.6%	4,482	16.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Kennewick	Washington	134	63	12	4.2%	4,110	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	115	59	14	4.0%	4,043	16.0	2	3	4	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	98	51	14	4.0%	3,859	16.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
San Mateo	California	144	61	19	2.7%	3,828	17.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
South Gate	California	96	51	12	4.0%	3,804	16.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Surprise	Arizona	153	68	14	2.8%	3,803	16.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Pomona	California	135	59	16	2.2%	3,498	17.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	144	61	14	3.2%	3,338	16.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Grand Prairie	Texas	119	54	15	1.7%	3,271	18.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Fontana	California	131	59	17	1.3%	3,115	18.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	96	51	12	3.0%	3,073	17.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	116	49	14	2.7%	2,603	17.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Corona	California	162	72	16	1.0%	2,547	20.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Jupiter	Florida	132	62	16	2.5%	2,489	16.3	4	3	5	0	0	0
Hesperia	California	115	50	14	2.2%	2,306	17.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Waukesha	Wisconsin	137	61	16	1.9%	1,850	18.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Perris	California	123	58	14	1.5%	1,783	18.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	110	49	14	1.4%	1,519	18.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Acworth	Georgia	122	57	15	1.4%	1,413	18.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Nampa	Idaho	121	57	16	1.0%	1,156	19.3	3	1	3	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Francisco	204	77	3	51.7%	449,475	5.8	28	1	28	0	2	28
San Jose	223	95	7	24.3%	255,639	8.6	28	1	28	0	0	28
Sacramento	242	98	7	24.2%	194,605	8.5	28	1	28	0	0	28
Bakersfield	193	86	7	30.0%	167,774	8.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Riverside	167	73	4	40.3%	148,973	6.6	7	1	7	0	0	7
San Diego	272	116	9	10.9%	146,563	10.8	36	5	42	0	0	19
Irvine	161	71	4	52.1%	139,320	5.9	9	1	9	0	1	9
Los Angeles	288	130	15	5.6%	136,961	14.3	62	6	110	0	0	3
Hayward	154	61	4	66.9%	128,428	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Anaheim	143	65	5	32.4%	119,254	7.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fresno	238	97	6	17.6%	106,052	9.1	18	1	18	0	0	16
Modesto	169	70	6	37.0%	97,973	7.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fremont	152	58	5	39.8%	92,688	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chula Vista	176	72	6	29.1%	75,976	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Santa Rosa	159	69	6	34.3%	74,183	7.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Stockton	199	85	7	19.5%	72,799	9.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Escondido	136	61	5	39.5%	70,939	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rialto	121	59	4	64.5%	68,741	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	134	59	4	50.0%	62,759	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Long Beach	197	89	11	13.1%	62,723	10.7	12	1	12	0	0	5
San Bernardino	147	69	7	24.8%	61,811	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Vista	127	56	5	49.8%	59,660	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oakland	196	77	10	14.1%	58,017	10.6	14	1	14	0	0	6
Oceanside	132	62	7	28.7%	57,556	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Indio	114	59	4	57.2%	54,966	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Concord	144	58	5	37.6%	48,959	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Burbank	159	71	5	44.0%	47,521	7.2	5	3	7	1	1	7
Redding	148	68	7	41.8%	47,234	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Hemet	136	61	5	36.0%	46,418	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mission Viejo	103	51	5	45.5%	44,742	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Torrance	157	78	8	25.0%	44,286	9.2	5	3	6	0	0	4
Palmdale	141	69	6	24.8%	43,346	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	158	70	7	24.1%	42,316	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elk Grove	131	59	7	23.6%	42,253	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fullerton	147	69	5	30.0%	41,783	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Carlsbad	144	66	6	36.4%	41,321	7.5	4	2	8	0	0	8
Salinas	144	63	7	21.9%	41,294	8.4	5	2	7	0	0	7
Moreno Valley	144	60	7	20.0%	41,091	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Cajon	136	64	8	23.6%	40,729	9.7	3	3	5	0	0	3
Murrieta	121	57	6	29.7%	39,272	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Temecula	144	69	6	29.5%	38,315	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sunnyvale	135	60	7	24.7%	37,749	8.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Victorville	124	56	6	27.4%	37,357	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	163	67	6	30.0%	37,340	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	123	54	7	33.0%	36,664	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Ana	159	71	10	10.0%	35,708	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Ontario	130	59	10	20.0%	35,411	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Roseville	134	56	6	25.3%	35,405	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Whittier	140	67	9	18.0%	35,352	11.0	6	4	7	0	0	4
Fairfield	123	54	7	30.0%	34,224	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	118	59	6	29.4%	32,191	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tracy	153	66	7	27.4%	32,150	9.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Norwalk	98	46	6	30.0%	31,766	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Berkeley	187	82	7	23.7%	30,108	9.3	9	3	10	0	0	8
Compton	131	59	9	21.3%	29,584	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ventura	126	54	6	25.5%	29,561	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hawthorne	101	52	8	30.0%	29,051	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pittsburg	99	42	7	30.0%	28,824	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
El Monte	107	56	5	30.0%	28,113	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daly City	129	54	8	24.3%	27,832	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Clovis	113	53	7	22.9%	27,822	8.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	126	54	8	26.2%	27,297	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Menifee	143	63	6	24.5%	27,066	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Palo Alto	137	59	7	27.9%	26,933	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Downey	127	64	9	23.8%	26,836	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lancaster	135	65	7	14.0%	25,737	9.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rancho Cucamonga	143	70	8	14.0%	24,802	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	143	64	7	17.2%	24,557	9.3	3	2	6	0	0	5
Santa Monica	154	72	7	25.4%	24,018	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pasadena	163	74	8	14.6%	23,075	9.5	6	1	6	0	0	4
Antioch	114	46	7	20.0%	22,144	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	138	61	7	21.5%	22,111	9.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	150	71	6	9.7%	21,270	10.5	4	2	5	0	0	2
Merced	141	65	7	20.0%	20,612	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Inglewood	166	71	11	14.8%	19,764	10.2	5	3	6	0	0	4
Simi Valley	115	52	7	15.2%	19,511	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Huntington Beach	134	62	8	9.7%	19,364	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Napa	121	56	8	20.0%	19,333	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chino	110	51	6	20.4%	19,284	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Barbara	157	68	9	14.0%	19,047	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	120	56	7	14.4%	16,429	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Visalia	134	63	8	10.0%	15,201	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redwood City	149	61	8	13.0%	14,897	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Orange	135	60	9	8.6%	12,415	11.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Vacaville	104	45	7	10.0%	10,530	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
La Puente	126	61	9	8.5%	10,001	12.0	2	3	3	0	0	0
North Hollywood	131	60	11	6.3%	9,639	14.0	4	3	7	0	0	0
Chico	140	57	10	7.8%	8,699	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Van Nuys	137	66	13	4.5%	8,084	15.8	4	3	8	0	0	0
Livermore	124	54	9	8.0%	7,700	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Pacoima	99	53	12	6.0%	6,348	14.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
San Marcos	115	59	14	4.0%	4,043	16.0	2	3	4	0	0	0
Sylmar	98	51	14	4.0%	3,859	16.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
San Mateo	144	61	19	2.7%	3,828	17.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
South Gate	96	51	12	4.0%	3,804	16.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Pomona	135	59	16	2.2%	3,498	17.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fontana	131	59	17	1.3%	3,115	18.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	96	51	12	3.0%	3,073	17.0	1	2	2	0	0	0
Corona	162	72	16	1.0%	2,547	20.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Hesperia	115	50	14	2.2%	2,306	17.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Perris	123	58	14	1.5%	1,783	18.5	2	1	2	0	0	0

Chicago

ZIP	carrentals.com	enterprise.com	budget.com	avis.com	kayak.com	hertz.com
60638	9	2	1	6	8	3
60628	8	1	4	5	7	2
60649	8	1	4	6	7	11
60619	8	1	4	6	7	2
60639	8	1	4	6	7	3
60629	8	3	2	5	7	12
60659	8	3	1	5	7	2
60657	5	2	1	3	4	8
60616	5	2	1	3	4	9
60606	5	2	1	3	4	9
60618	8	1	4	3	7	12
60608	8	1	3	6	7	11
60647	8	2	4	1	7	11
60617	5	2	1	3	4	8
60607	8	1	2	3	6	11
60637	8	1	2	3	7	11
60636	8	1	3	5	6	12
60605	5	3	1	2	4	8
60634	8	1	4	5	7	12
60624	5	3	1	2	4	8
60603	8	1	4	6	7	3
60655	8	1	3	6	7	11
60615	5	3	1	2	4	9
60625	8	2	4	6	7	1
60656	8	1	4	5	7	12
60646	8	1	2	5	7	12
60602	8	1	3	6	7	2
60642	5	2	1	3	4	9
60633	8	1	4	6	7	3
60660	8	1	4	6	7	2
60611	8	3	4	6	7	1
60620	8	1	4	6	7	12
60661	8	1	2	6	7	12
60610	8	1	4	6	7	2
60651	8	1	2	3	7	11
60632	8	1	4	6	7	3
60643	8	1	4	5	7	2
60612	8	1	4	6	7	12
60621	8	1	4	6	7	12
60652	5	3	1	2	4	9
60601	8	2	3	6	7	1
60641	8	1	4	5	7	3
60630	8	1	3	6	7	11
60604	8	2	4	1	7	12
60654	8	2	1	6	7	11
60644	8	1	2	5	7	3
60614	8	2	1	6	7	3
60623	8	1	2	5	7	11
60613	8	2	1	6	7	3
60645	8	1	3	6	7	11
60622	8	1	4	3	7	11
60626	8	5	1	6	7	11
60609	5	3	1	2	4	8
60653	8	1	3	6	7	11
60631	5	2	1	3	4	8
60640	8	1	2	6	7	3

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Carrentals

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 967 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Carrentals Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (car rental near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Carrentals Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Carrentals Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Carrentals Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly