Caring Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve caring.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 7,331 Retirement Homes In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Caring Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Caring Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Caring Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Caring Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	23,895	7,331	1	72.0%	232,516,659	3.8	27,379	32,654	4,814	55,425	4,241	8,057	55,421
California	3,595	1,223	1	70.4%	27,542,273	3.9	1,166	1,740	312	2,975	208	377	2,975
Texas	3,056	1,154	1	72.6%	20,247,162	3.7	1,360	1,917	312	3,014	265	459	3,014
Florida	2,414	824	1	73.1%	15,047,940	3.7	446	975	178	1,672	135	247	1,672
New York	2,805	836	1	72.7%	14,266,034	3.8	1,491	1,756	183	3,099	222	428	3,099
Pennsylvania	2,720	823	1	72.9%	9,326,855	3.6	1,604	1,781	236	3,288	259	512	3,288
Illinois	2,697	847	1	70.2%	9,004,730	3.9	1,247	1,382	258	2,431	142	279	2,431
Ohio	2,444	801	1	73.6%	8,572,688	3.7	976	1,188	262	2,107	152	269	2,105
North Carolina	1,949	613	1	73.0%	7,409,215	3.7	683	802	164	1,460	113	212	1,460
Michigan	2,226	735	1	72.3%	7,197,707	3.8	833	976	175	1,526	118	204	1,526
Georgia	2,062	656	1	69.5%	7,153,437	3.9	574	726	166	1,159	91	176	1,159
New Jersey	1,696	544	1	70.7%	6,275,547	3.9	537	593	126	1,082	67	148	1,082
Virginia	2,029	641	1	70.1%	5,900,114	3.8	723	891	126	1,571	118	225	1,571
Washington	1,817	591	1	72.5%	5,280,014	3.7	451	587	83	961	83	145	961
Arizona	1,478	533	1	73.1%	5,077,783	3.7	247	396	47	579	54	94	579
Tennessee	1,774	613	1	73.5%	4,882,201	3.7	514	622	122	1,060	89	159	1,060
Indiana	2,695	785	1	73.1%	4,855,105	3.6	659	770	135	1,348	104	197	1,348
Massachusetts	1,743	515	1	70.4%	4,806,591	4.0	461	534	123	893	71	127	893
Missouri	2,106	689	1	71.8%	4,371,223	3.9	887	1,017	155	1,729	120	229	1,729
Maryland	1,540	503	1	72.5%	4,352,273	3.8	392	463	84	833	54	116	832
Wisconsin	2,117	689	1	71.8%	4,148,212	3.9	694	769	157	1,330	86	170	1,330
Colorado	1,747	544	1	73.9%	4,087,644	3.7	381	514	66	877	80	150	877
Minnesota	2,166	698	1	71.7%	3,961,792	3.9	777	878	165	1,478	106	225	1,478
South Carolina	1,441	458	1	72.7%	3,604,643	3.8	347	422	83	746	54	114	746
Alabama	1,791	559	1	72.8%	3,542,421	3.7	522	637	92	1,000	94	167	1,000
Louisiana	1,532	543	1	72.7%	3,389,056	3.7	431	510	83	856	65	117	856
Kentucky	1,831	622	1	70.6%	3,137,634	3.9	698	758	87	1,229	85	192	1,228
Oregon	1,895	614	1	71.6%	2,924,141	3.8	355	414	62	726	62	114	726
Oklahoma	1,691	559	1	72.8%	2,854,247	3.7	557	646	93	1,087	98	174	1,087
Connecticut	1,300	434	1	72.7%	2,603,386	3.8	234	279	76	491	36	67	491
Iowa	1,960	661	1	72.3%	2,266,173	3.7	890	933	134	1,613	115	239	1,613
Arkansas	1,638	519	1	74.4%	2,224,214	3.8	553	587	82	1,025	76	153	1,025
Utah	1,248	452	1	71.5%	2,176,858	3.8	246	284	40	516	34	71	516
Kansas	1,728	545	1	73.8%	2,147,327	3.6	616	692	95	1,201	100	199	1,201
Nevada	948	312	1	73.2%	2,140,505	3.8	92	168	13	232	17	31	232
Mississippi	1,463	493	1	71.0%	2,123,459	3.9	384	418	76	703	51	99	703
New Mexico	1,251	410	1	72.8%	1,521,161	3.8	327	361	22	596	42	81	596
Nebraska	1,474	501	1	73.4%	1,398,064	3.7	524	581	50	859	82	138	859
West Virginia	1,524	477	1	72.8%	1,331,663	3.6	684	704	61	1,283	101	201	1,283
Idaho	1,251	427	1	72.1%	1,215,723	3.7	251	273	32	471	29	55	471
Hawaii	789	271	1	73.4%	1,043,142	3.7	82	93	9	164	11	22	164
New Hampshire	1,334	439	1	72.8%	978,830	3.9	238	248	36	401	26	52	401
Maine	1,714	549	1	70.0%	933,443	4.2	421	425	43	710	29	90	710
Montana	1,341	417	1	73.5%	766,208	3.7	348	361	24	527	47	82	527
Rhode Island	730	233	1	72.0%	761,222	3.9	64	77	24	137	6	14	137
Delaware	779	261	1	73.6%	698,781	3.5	52	66	14	128	12	25	128
South Dakota	1,240	402	1	69.5%	600,752	3.7	359	370	23	594	50	93	594
North Dakota	1,127	336	1	70.2%	527,087	4.0	367	381	17	633	33	95	633
Alaska	1,222	405	1	67.2%	496,185	2.8	218	235	8	251	102	111	251
Vermont	1,149	368	1	71.3%	445,726	3.9	250	254	22	486	33	88	486
Wyoming	1,097	367	1	68.7%	400,088	4.0	164	171	24	259	10	21	259

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	449	148	1	71.6%	2,283,291	3.8	96	5	135	9	13	135
Chicago	Illinois	383	108	1	72.4%	1,956,827	3.7	56	2	112	6	12	112
Brooklyn	New York	245	73	1	73.8%	1,918,671	3.7	37	2	38	4	4	38
Los Angeles	California	432	130	1	75.2%	1,847,483	3.4	62	3	124	12	24	124
Miami	Florida	545	172	1	71.9%	1,351,436	3.7	55	6	110	5	10	110
San Antonio	Texas	384	112	1	72.4%	1,286,477	3.6	59	1	59	7	7	59
New York City	New York	293	77	1	77.9%	1,263,428	3.4	47	1	47	10	10	47
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	342	96	1	74.8%	1,178,727	3.6	47	3	48	7	7	48
Las Vegas	Nevada	369	108	1	75.3%	1,164,733	3.5	43	1	43	7	7	43
Bronx	New York	238	64	1	71.9%	1,036,573	3.6	25	2	50	3	6	50
Phoenix	Arizona	363	127	1	70.7%	1,025,866	3.9	42	1	42	2	2	42
San Diego	California	374	130	1	73.3%	987,036	3.6	36	3	72	5	11	72
Dallas	Texas	359	120	2	67.4%	938,873	4.4	48	4	52	1	11	52
Denver	Colorado	449	142	1	75.6%	821,531	3.4	38	6	76	8	16	76
Austin	Texas	369	119	1	75.3%	819,305	3.4	44	2	47	9	10	47
Minneapolis	Minnesota	557	172	1	71.9%	782,984	3.9	51	10	97	7	14	97
San Jose	California	386	108	1	74.1%	778,666	3.7	28	2	47	3	4	47
Seattle	Washington	330	95	1	74.8%	714,280	3.4	35	3	70	7	14	70
Orlando	Florida	369	116	1	71.4%	710,900	3.9	32	4	35	2	2	35
Indianapolis	Indiana	392	113	1	73.9%	703,199	3.6	37	5	40	5	5	40
Tucson	Arizona	369	107	1	77.7%	702,606	3.4	32	3	35	7	7	35
Jacksonville	Florida	290	91	1	79.4%	688,389	3.4	31	2	62	7	14	62
Portland	Oregon	368	113	1	74.6%	686,951	3.4	33	2	37	7	8	37
Atlanta	Georgia	465	141	1	69.3%	684,827	3.9	39	6	50	6	8	50
Saint Louis	Missouri	516	158	1	74.5%	682,927	3.6	45	9	90	7	14	90
Fort Worth	Texas	321	109	1	74.6%	680,266	3.4	32	2	59	6	11	59
San Francisco	California	400	117	1	76.6%	666,569	3.5	28	1	28	5	5	28
Charlotte	North Carolina	294	84	1	71.8%	650,752	3.8	24	2	48	3	6	48
Columbus	Ohio	357	119	1	76.0%	643,155	3.6	30	2	31	4	4	31
Cincinnati	Ohio	350	115	1	76.8%	617,698	3.3	45	2	46	11	11	46
Tampa	Florida	354	111	1	75.8%	600,710	3.3	27	2	54	6	12	54
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	457	142	1	71.1%	590,946	3.9	27	9	52	3	9	52
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	378	101	1	72.3%	586,849	3.8	29	4	34	2	3	34
Sacramento	California	350	109	1	71.3%	574,013	3.8	28	2	56	2	4	56
Cleveland	Ohio	385	114	1	75.2%	564,395	3.3	29	7	47	7	12	47
Saint Paul	Minnesota	501	164	1	68.8%	550,406	4.1	30	11	57	4	8	57
El Paso	Texas	372	114	1	69.2%	546,059	3.8	24	2	26	1	2	26
Louisville	Kentucky	343	96	1	71.0%	540,682	3.9	32	1	32	1	1	32
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	364	100	1	74.8%	510,339	3.5	39	6	78	6	12	78
Baltimore	Maryland	327	101	1	79.9%	503,943	3.3	22	4	44	5	10	44
Albuquerque	New Mexico	298	85	1	76.5%	501,825	3.5	17	1	17	3	3	17
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	423	136	1	73.3%	500,580	3.4	43	6	55	8	11	55
Washington DC	District of Columbia	344	82	1	72.8%	497,883	3.6	28	1	28	4	4	28
Memphis	Tennessee	319	92	1	71.3%	495,989	3.7	26	3	52	3	6	52
Detroit	Michigan	329	103	1	73.5%	470,789	3.5	25	1	25	4	4	25
Colorado Springs	Colorado	362	121	1	75.6%	441,208	3.4	30	2	32	6	6	32
Buffalo	New York	328	88	1	77.0%	433,521	3.3	28	4	55	7	12	55
Fresno	California	307	100	1	71.3%	429,281	3.9	18	2	36	1	2	36
Omaha	Nebraska	299	94	1	75.4%	416,563	3.5	31	1	31	5	5	31
Kansas City	Missouri	367	110	1	72.2%	413,048	3.8	49	3	98	3	6	98
Bakersfield	California	253	72	1	71.9%	402,320	3.8	11	2	22	1	2	22
Mesa	Arizona	281	92	1	74.4%	397,681	3.5	13	2	20	2	3	20
Salt Lake City	Utah	344	109	1	80.2%	390,218	3.2	19	2	30	5	9	30
Raleigh	North Carolina	280	80	1	70.3%	384,317	3.8	15	3	28	1	2	28
Long Beach	California	251	71	1	78.7%	377,136	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
Hollywood	Florida	268	82	1	78.4%	367,699	3.3	9	2	10	2	2	10
Birmingham	Alabama	380	114	1	72.8%	364,051	3.5	30	2	31	5	5	31
Staten Island	New York	260	81	1	76.7%	363,669	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
Rochester	New York	350	101	1	77.0%	363,032	3.5	24	2	48	4	8	48
Dayton	Ohio	378	117	1	72.9%	348,534	3.7	27	7	53	3	6	53
Aurora	Colorado	321	103	1	78.0%	339,603	2.9	11	3	22	4	8	22
Nashville	Tennessee	302	85	1	72.8%	333,794	3.6	22	3	34	3	4	34
Virginia Beach	Virginia	238	79	1	71.1%	319,915	3.8	12	2	19	1	2	19
New Orleans	Louisiana	265	79	1	74.6%	319,418	3.5	19	2	38	3	6	38
Wichita	Kansas	298	82	1	76.2%	318,307	3.4	26	2	52	5	10	52
Tulsa	Oklahoma	303	88	1	71.2%	300,577	3.6	28	2	56	4	8	56
Oakland	California	259	81	1	72.8%	299,712	3.8	14	2	15	1	1	15
Arlington	Texas	266	89	1	75.5%	299,580	3.3	12	2	15	3	3	15
Honolulu	Hawaii	234	63	1	71.3%	296,794	3.7	11	2	22	1	2	22
Spring	Texas	228	93	1	77.8%	296,361	3.3	8	3	12	2	3	12
Richmond	Virginia	260	75	1	74.0%	289,293	3.4	15	2	23	3	4	23
Hialeah	Florida	235	76	1	78.2%	286,823	3.1	7	3	14	2	4	14
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	304	100	1	75.7%	286,756	3.5	18	3	20	3	3	20
Grand Rapids	Michigan	230	67	1	77.5%	285,146	3.3	12	1	12	3	3	12
Knoxville	Tennessee	271	83	1	73.0%	282,195	3.7	17	1	17	2	2	17
Anaheim	California	217	60	1	75.5%	278,154	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Stockton	California	260	77	1	74.0%	276,758	3.5	12	2	13	2	2	13
Riverside	California	204	65	1	74.7%	276,374	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Columbia	South Carolina	238	75	1	78.0%	267,582	3.4	14	2	28	3	6	28
West Palm Beach	Florida	291	92	1	71.5%	264,842	3.7	12	3	25	2	4	25
Santa Ana	California	236	74	1	72.9%	260,480	3.5	6	2	7	1	1	7
Littleton	Colorado	337	117	1	79.7%	259,501	3.1	10	6	20	3	6	20
Alexandria	Virginia	300	91	1	72.6%	257,632	3.6	14	5	24	2	4	24
Tacoma	Washington	356	112	1	76.6%	255,414	3.3	20	4	23	5	6	23
Corpus Christi	Texas	334	108	1	77.7%	253,108	3.2	18	1	18	5	5	18
Spokane	Washington	258	90	1	70.2%	252,576	3.9	14	1	14	1	1	14
Vancouver	Washington	258	81	1	76.9%	250,761	3.2	11	1	11	3	3	11
Saint Petersburg	Florida	370	123	1	70.0%	249,547	4.0	16	3	30	0	0	30
Glendale	Arizona	277	99	1	80.3%	244,736	3.0	9	2	17	3	5	17
Lexington	Kentucky	282	91	1	76.4%	244,477	3.2	15	1	15	4	4	15
Scottsdale	Arizona	278	106	1	81.5%	243,098	2.9	11	2	21	4	7	21
Greensboro	North Carolina	221	57	1	74.1%	242,582	3.8	9	2	18	1	2	18
Katy	Texas	183	73	1	70.0%	240,620	4.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
Pompano Beach	Florida	303	88	2	64.3%	238,113	5.0	10	6	19	1	2	19
Silver Spring	Maryland	281	86	1	76.9%	233,183	3.6	7	5	10	1	2	10
Naples	Florida	335	114	1	73.5%	230,108	3.8	14	1	14	1	1	14
Fort Wayne	Indiana	253	79	1	72.0%	229,169	3.8	16	1	16	1	1	16
Plano	Texas	193	67	1	74.2%	226,692	3.6	7	4	14	1	2	14
Toledo	Ohio	256	81	1	73.6%	226,257	3.6	15	2	30	2	4	30
Henderson	Nevada	191	68	1	74.7%	226,081	3.4	8	2	12	2	3	12
Marietta	Georgia	242	73	1	70.0%	225,840	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mobile	Alabama	334	110	1	80.6%	218,660	3.2	18	1	18	5	5	18
Fayetteville	North Carolina	232	76	1	87.6%	213,747	2.5	8	1	8	4	4	8
Lubbock	Texas	327	101	1	77.0%	212,932	3.4	14	1	14	3	3	14
Newark	New Jersey	243	74	1	75.6%	212,026	3.7	9	2	18	1	2	18
Lakeland	Florida	232	71	1	81.8%	211,052	3.0	9	2	18	3	6	18
Lincoln	Nebraska	302	91	1	72.8%	210,623	3.6	22	1	22	3	3	22
Madison	Wisconsin	269	87	1	71.3%	210,201	3.8	14	2	28	1	2	28
Laredo	Texas	212	72	1	77.4%	209,560	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Reno	Nevada	225	63	1	70.0%	207,757	4.0	12	2	23	0	0	23
Tallahassee	Florida	275	82	1	71.7%	206,412	3.7	10	1	10	1	1	10
Modesto	California	252	74	1	76.7%	202,828	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Corona	California	215	64	1	78.1%	201,018	3.4	5	3	7	1	2	7
Gilbert	Arizona	232	76	1	83.5%	199,318	2.5	6	2	11	3	5	11
Salem	Oregon	232	71	1	74.6%	198,768	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Akron	Ohio	274	82	1	73.4%	198,542	3.8	17	2	34	1	2	34
Kissimmee	Florida	290	91	1	68.6%	198,365	4.1	7	4	11	0	0	11
Bradenton	Florida	278	92	1	78.3%	198,230	3.4	10	1	10	2	2	10
Durham	North Carolina	201	55	1	67.9%	197,042	4.3	8	2	16	0	0	16
Oxnard	California	185	60	1	87.9%	193,635	2.5	4	3	8	2	4	8
Boise	Idaho	201	68	2	74.7%	191,364	3.7	9	2	11	1	1	11
Winston Salem	North Carolina	310	107	1	72.4%	191,336	3.8	9	2	18	1	2	18
Pensacola	Florida	304	93	1	70.4%	188,708	3.8	13	2	14	1	1	14
Fort Myers	Florida	256	72	1	74.8%	188,261	3.3	11	2	11	2	3	11
Chandler	Arizona	201	74	3	70.0%	188,031	4.0	6	3	12	0	0	12
Jersey City	New Jersey	201	56	3	70.0%	183,137	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Norfolk	Virginia	302	94	1	74.5%	182,997	3.6	14	2	28	2	4	28
Chula Vista	California	180	50	2	70.0%	182,582	4.0	5	2	6	0	0	6
Jamaica	New York	175	52	1	74.5%	181,680	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Sarasota	Florida	269	79	1	71.9%	179,845	3.8	13	2	26	1	2	26
Savannah	Georgia	261	68	1	74.4%	179,520	3.7	10	2	20	1	2	20
Lawrenceville	Georgia	197	56	2	70.0%	179,278	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Irving	Texas	193	69	1	73.8%	177,436	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Anchorage	Alaska	271	87	2	71.6%	174,852	3.8	12	1	12	1	1	12
San Bernardino	California	220	70	2	70.0%	174,661	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Frisco	Texas	128	51	1	100.0%	172,448	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Wilmington	Delaware	267	87	1	77.6%	170,397	2.8	10	3	20	4	8	20
Greenville	South Carolina	203	66	1	77.3%	169,767	3.4	9	2	18	2	4	18
Flushing	New York	137	43	1	77.7%	167,107	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Amarillo	Texas	292	93	2	72.8%	166,746	3.9	14	1	14	1	1	14
Garland	Texas	201	70	1	70.0%	166,550	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chesapeake	Virginia	225	61	2	70.0%	166,525	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Des Moines	Iowa	251	84	1	74.5%	166,443	3.5	11	2	22	2	4	22
Chattanooga	Tennessee	270	80	1	79.7%	165,670	3.0	15	2	30	5	10	30
Fontana	California	167	54	2	70.0%	164,309	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Las Vegas	Nevada	229	75	1	70.0%	163,662	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fremont	California	197	61	2	70.0%	163,209	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Syracuse	New York	310	87	1	71.9%	163,142	3.6	15	1	15	2	2	15
Boca Raton	Florida	217	64	2	73.3%	162,815	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Torrance	California	205	73	1	90.5%	160,044	2.2	5	3	6	3	3	6
Lake Worth	Florida	233	84	1	77.2%	159,392	3.6	5	6	12	1	2	12
Ocala	Florida	251	82	2	70.0%	157,547	4.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Shreveport	Louisiana	222	71	1	70.0%	156,218	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Providence	Rhode Island	223	68	1	76.1%	156,087	3.3	8	3	15	2	4	15
Huntsville	Alabama	263	78	1	79.5%	155,968	3.3	11	2	22	3	6	22
Springfield	Missouri	255	88	1	66.5%	153,158	4.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Little Rock	Arkansas	257	66	1	70.0%	152,646	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Tempe	Arizona	198	61	1	80.3%	152,582	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Green Bay	Wisconsin	241	68	1	83.2%	152,539	2.7	7	3	12	3	5	12
Santa Rosa	California	225	69	1	70.0%	151,241	4.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Charleston	South Carolina	252	73	1	76.8%	151,216	3.6	10	2	20	2	4	20
Augusta	Georgia	237	66	1	73.9%	151,112	3.4	8	2	11	2	2	11
Reading	Pennsylvania	303	97	2	70.0%	150,721	4.0	10	3	20	0	0	20
Edmond	Oklahoma	190	68	1	87.7%	150,566	2.6	5	3	12	2	4	12
Beaverton	Oregon	156	50	2	74.4%	150,078	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Whittier	California	217	73	1	76.3%	149,600	3.5	6	4	8	1	1	8
Montgomery	Alabama	280	73	1	71.2%	149,482	3.5	13	1	13	2	2	13
Overland Park	Kansas	240	84	1	81.2%	148,965	3.0	9	2	18	3	6	18
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	199	59	1	79.7%	148,576	2.8	5	2	10	2	4	10
Irvine	California	289	94	3	55.4%	148,340	5.3	9	2	15	0	2	15
Fort Collins	Colorado	186	64	2	75.5%	147,030	3.4	5	2	9	1	2	9
Yonkers	New York	187	54	1	81.2%	146,515	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Trenton	New Jersey	301	91	1	70.4%	146,434	3.8	11	3	22	1	4	22
Clearwater	Florida	276	86	1	79.8%	146,345	3.0	9	2	14	3	5	14
Clarksville	Tennessee	152	51	1	83.2%	146,138	3.0	3	2	4	1	2	4
Gainesville	Florida	252	78	1	69.4%	145,279	4.1	10	2	15	0	0	15
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	246	75	2	71.3%	144,786	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Garden Grove	California	202	69	1	82.3%	144,569	2.8	5	2	10	2	4	10
Salinas	California	209	63	1	75.6%	142,287	2.8	5	2	10	2	4	10
El Cajon	California	178	53	1	82.4%	142,120	3.0	3	3	5	1	2	5
Eugene	Oregon	208	66	2	70.0%	142,092	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Escondido	California	155	59	1	79.0%	141,889	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Brownsville	Texas	165	49	3	70.0%	140,925	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Huntington Beach	California	180	60	3	70.0%	139,935	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Worcester	Massachusetts	221	68	1	74.7%	138,574	3.7	9	2	18	1	2	18
Jackson	Mississippi	244	67	1	81.1%	138,067	3.2	11	2	17	3	5	17
Sunnyvale	California	195	57	1	90.3%	137,885	1.8	4	3	5	3	4	5
Cape Coral	Florida	223	75	1	76.2%	137,781	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Olympia	Washington	253	91	1	74.9%	136,898	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Evansville	Indiana	209	52	1	73.2%	135,159	3.8	9	2	18	1	2	18
Cumming	Georgia	172	65	2	83.1%	134,566	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Hayward	California	188	57	2	70.0%	134,423	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Grand Prairie	Texas	190	73	1	70.0%	133,382	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Oceanside	California	170	63	3	66.5%	133,152	4.3	4	2	8	0	3	8
Ogden	Utah	189	59	2	65.4%	131,732	4.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Homestead	Florida	242	71	2	70.0%	131,372	4.0	7	4	14	0	0	14
Henrico	Virginia	257	76	1	68.2%	131,346	4.1	7	3	11	0	0	11
Roanoke	Virginia	237	66	1	77.0%	130,428	3.4	10	2	20	2	4	20
Fredericksburg	Virginia	224	71	1	74.9%	130,340	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	214	59	1	76.3%	129,274	3.7	9	2	18	1	2	18
Lancaster	California	166	58	2	70.0%	129,093	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	239	61	3	70.3%	129,032	3.8	13	1	13	1	1	13
Cypress	Texas	121	54	2	75.5%	128,864	3.5	2	2	4	0	2	4
Lansing	Michigan	252	81	1	77.7%	127,646	3.3	7	2	14	2	4	14
Rockford	Illinois	274	85	1	70.0%	127,630	4.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Mckinney	Texas	138	46	1	67.2%	127,001	4.3	3	3	6	0	0	6
Mission	Texas	164	50	2	70.0%	126,764	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Decatur	Georgia	225	74	1	70.0%	126,578	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Beaumont	Texas	227	70	1	86.6%	125,997	2.6	8	2	10	4	4	10
York	Pennsylvania	232	62	2	70.0%	125,822	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Flint	Michigan	233	73	1	80.6%	125,369	3.1	7	2	14	2	4	14
Boynton Beach	Florida	203	69	2	71.9%	125,251	3.5	6	3	18	1	3	18
Van Nuys	California	158	46	1	70.0%	124,468	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Hyattsville	Maryland	190	45	1	78.7%	123,934	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	228	69	1	68.2%	123,852	3.6	9	1	9	2	2	9
Newport News	Virginia	254	85	1	70.0%	123,680	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Ontario	California	177	51	1	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	225	70	1	75.3%	123,615	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Waco	Texas	224	69	1	77.3%	122,424	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Conroe	Texas	248	82	1	76.3%	122,324	3.6	7	2	12	1	2	12
Woodbridge	Virginia	177	56	4	57.2%	121,148	5.3	3	3	6	0	0	6
Las Cruces	New Mexico	232	81	1	81.1%	120,809	2.7	7	2	8	3	4	8
Melbourne	Florida	169	50	1	77.6%	120,798	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
North Hollywood	California	140	44	1	78.7%	120,533	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Peoria	Arizona	177	67	1	70.0%	120,470	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Gaithersburg	Maryland	197	62	1	83.3%	120,452	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Tyler	Texas	245	87	2	77.0%	120,158	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Renton	Washington	235	79	1	77.4%	119,904	3.4	5	3	6	1	1	6
Midland	Texas	204	69	1	74.9%	119,768	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Macon	Georgia	261	73	2	73.2%	119,764	3.7	9	2	18	1	2	18
South Bend	Indiana	227	76	1	81.3%	119,294	3.1	10	2	20	3	6	20
Boston	Massachusetts	278	78	1	78.6%	119,290	2.9	14	1	14	5	5	14
Allentown	Pennsylvania	212	68	2	70.0%	118,963	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Visalia	California	170	48	1	78.1%	118,719	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Odessa	Texas	220	77	1	74.1%	118,560	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Sugar Land	Texas	171	57	1	70.0%	118,250	4.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Surprise	Arizona	182	59	1	87.1%	118,026	2.5	4	2	7	2	3	7
Topeka	Kansas	300	80	2	71.9%	117,546	3.7	18	1	18	2	2	18
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	179	55	1	95.8%	117,483	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Lafayette	Louisiana	190	67	1	73.1%	117,304	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Round Rock	Texas	171	65	2	70.0%	117,253	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Ann Arbor	Michigan	200	63	3	70.0%	116,705	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Everett	Washington	210	70	1	70.0%	116,670	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Humble	Texas	162	64	1	70.0%	116,570	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Naperville	Illinois	184	59	1	70.0%	116,065	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rockville	Maryland	206	63	1	79.7%	115,400	3.3	4	4	8	1	2	8
Pueblo	Colorado	256	80	2	72.8%	115,174	3.6	7	2	8	1	1	8
Cary	North Carolina	162	51	1	74.0%	114,995	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Hemet	California	152	42	1	88.6%	114,109	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Fullerton	California	180	60	1	81.4%	113,370	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Schenectady	New York	241	71	2	69.0%	111,903	4.1	8	2	16	0	0	16
Manassas	Virginia	195	58	1	73.5%	111,706	3.8	4	3	8	1	2	8
Bridgeport	Connecticut	233	72	1	75.8%	111,023	3.5	6	2	11	1	2	11
Saint Augustine	Florida	239	87	1	84.5%	110,787	2.4	5	3	7	2	3	7
Denton	Texas	225	72	1	70.0%	110,709	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Killeen	Texas	194	62	3	73.6%	110,599	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Pomona	California	165	55	3	70.0%	110,590	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pasadena	California	180	61	1	70.0%	110,406	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Clovis	California	155	46	1	90.7%	110,147	2.0	3	3	6	2	4	6
Youngstown	Ohio	259	82	1	70.0%	109,969	4.0	12	3	24	0	0	24
Inglewood	California	210	71	1	81.8%	109,466	2.8	5	3	6	2	2	6
Edinburg	Texas	172	54	3	70.0%	108,899	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Paterson	New Jersey	266	90	2	74.2%	108,255	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Kent	Washington	190	61	2	66.9%	107,326	4.3	4	3	8	0	2	8
Roseville	California	165	59	2	76.7%	107,254	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
San Mateo	California	193	54	1	75.2%	107,049	3.5	4	3	7	0	1	7
Ridgewood	New York	98	27	1	100.0%	106,717	1.0	1	2	2	1	2	2
Orange	California	179	59	1	73.1%	106,000	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Albany	New York	262	73	1	70.0%	105,866	4.0	11	2	12	0	0	12
Joliet	Illinois	204	57	1	81.6%	105,174	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Palmdale	California	190	62	2	60.0%	104,962	5.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Panama City	Florida	223	68	1	82.7%	104,529	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	213	63	1	74.8%	104,339	3.2	6	1	6	2	2	6
Alpharetta	Georgia	195	75	3	55.0%	104,008	6.3	4	4	7	0	1	7
Bloomington	Indiana	201	72	1	77.5%	103,512	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Bellingham	Washington	164	67	1	81.8%	103,509	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Yuma	Arizona	161	50	3	70.0%	103,319	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Canton	Ohio	273	91	1	70.0%	102,890	4.0	12	2	24	0	0	24
Fairfax	Virginia	209	63	3	62.6%	102,498	4.8	4	4	8	0	0	8
Mesquite	Texas	146	51	2	70.0%	102,419	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	201	74	2	78.3%	102,386	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Yakima	Washington	153	43	1	78.5%	101,952	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Muskegon	Michigan	202	65	1	78.3%	101,163	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Olathe	Kansas	134	49	4	70.0%	101,061	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Elgin	Illinois	166	47	1	82.5%	100,825	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	206	56	1	69.2%	100,708	3.6	5	1	5	1	1	5
Santa Maria	California	184	53	2	70.0%	100,162	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Spring Hill	Florida	178	63	1	79.8%	100,083	2.8	5	3	13	2	4	13
Abilene	Texas	209	71	1	76.8%	100,001	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Puyallup	Washington	217	73	3	70.0%	99,972	4.0	5	2	7	0	0	7
Charlottesville	Virginia	196	55	1	81.1%	99,767	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Metairie	Louisiana	198	67	1	70.0%	99,576	4.0	5	2	7	0	0	7
Mcallen	Texas	162	47	3	70.0%	99,112	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Bothell	Washington	186	61	1	77.2%	99,021	3.0	3	3	4	1	1	4
Costa Mesa	California	137	49	1	86.7%	98,591	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Saint Charles	Missouri	186	72	2	70.0%	97,901	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Cambridge	Massachusetts	186	62	1	84.4%	97,739	2.2	5	2	10	3	6	10
Frederick	Maryland	155	43	3	73.8%	97,353	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Summerville	South Carolina	139	46	1	70.0%	97,259	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Stamford	Connecticut	226	66	2	75.5%	97,204	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Concord	California	175	49	3	74.6%	97,190	3.3	4	2	8	1	1	8
New Haven	Connecticut	200	60	1	74.4%	96,907	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Astoria	New York	151	53	1	67.8%	96,800	4.3	4	4	8	0	0	8
Pearland	Texas	151	58	3	70.0%	96,319	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	179	59	1	70.0%	96,100	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hamilton	Ohio	179	64	1	70.0%	95,969	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Richardson	Texas	149	54	1	83.5%	95,732	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Vista	California	160	50	1	79.8%	95,620	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Victorville	California	164	50	2	70.0%	95,417	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hampton	Virginia	228	73	1	70.0%	95,362	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Missouri City	Texas	145	52	1	89.7%	95,130	2.5	2	2	3	1	2	3
Santa Barbara	California	206	54	3	70.0%	95,119	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Saginaw	Michigan	231	72	2	72.7%	94,789	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Warren	Michigan	205	67	1	70.0%	94,634	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Carrollton	Texas	169	64	2	70.0%	94,368	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Braunfels	Texas	137	47	1	91.6%	94,206	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Norman	Oklahoma	184	57	1	75.9%	94,184	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Stone Mountain	Georgia	180	60	2	72.9%	93,481	4.0	3	4	5	0	2	5
Arvada	Colorado	197	69	2	70.0%	93,394	4.0	5	2	8	0	0	8
Miami Beach	Florida	189	52	1	80.5%	93,122	2.8	5	4	10	2	4	10
West Valley City	Utah	156	45	2	70.0%	93,008	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
High Point	North Carolina	194	58	1	76.0%	92,929	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Falls Church	Virginia	255	70	1	77.1%	92,840	3.4	5	6	9	1	2	9
Sterling Heights	Michigan	201	57	1	70.0%	92,729	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Asheville	North Carolina	152	44	4	70.0%	92,467	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Boulder	Colorado	213	49	3	70.0%	91,883	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Downey	California	161	53	1	81.3%	91,797	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Lowell	Massachusetts	182	54	1	82.3%	91,687	2.5	4	2	8	2	4	8
Longmont	Colorado	169	58	3	70.0%	91,536	4.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
New Port Richey	Florida	197	66	1	75.7%	91,487	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	182	67	3	70.0%	91,349	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	193	56	1	78.4%	91,022	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Woodstock	Georgia	121	49	1	88.6%	90,156	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
San Leandro	California	164	52	1	81.1%	90,149	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Rialto	California	147	50	2	84.5%	90,058	3.5	2	3	4	0	2	4
Chico	California	172	53	1	80.1%	89,678	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Elk Grove	California	170	56	7	50.0%	89,660	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Edison	New Jersey	159	49	1	88.5%	89,188	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Berkeley	California	233	77	3	70.0%	88,989	4.0	9	2	9	0	0	9
Vero Beach	Florida	206	64	1	76.9%	88,590	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
West Jordan	Utah	186	64	2	71.6%	88,468	4.0	3	2	6	0	2	6
Racine	Wisconsin	226	78	2	70.0%	88,251	4.0	5	3	10	0	0	10
Hillsboro	Oregon	136	54	1	85.8%	88,240	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Santa Clara	California	174	51	3	70.0%	87,862	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	174	60	1	70.0%	87,656	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Lewisville	Texas	150	58	1	73.6%	87,308	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Vallejo	California	177	55	2	70.0%	87,126	4.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Santa Cruz	California	185	60	1	83.7%	87,044	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Athens	Georgia	213	60	2	69.8%	87,018	4.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Independence	Missouri	267	77	2	70.0%	86,829	4.0	8	2	16	0	0	16
Hartford	Connecticut	170	49	2	70.0%	86,365	4.0	6	2	12	0	0	12
Clermont	Florida	178	60	1	86.0%	86,173	3.3	3	2	4	1	1	4
College Station	Texas	139	48	3	70.0%	86,134	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Toms River	New Jersey	151	58	2	70.0%	86,002	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Fargo	North Dakota	165	47	2	70.0%	85,732	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	171	65	4	70.0%	85,580	4.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Duluth	Minnesota	255	71	1	73.0%	85,541	3.7	11	1	11	1	1	11
Appleton	Wisconsin	172	48	1	70.0%	85,191	4.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Federal Way	Washington	145	47	2	84.9%	85,058	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Winter Haven	Florida	153	50	1	79.4%	84,854	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Springdale	Arkansas	126	32	1	87.6%	84,417	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	265	87	1	87.7%	83,914	2.5	8	4	16	4	8	16
Madera	California	166	56	1	81.5%	83,890	3.0	3	4	6	1	2	6
Waterbury	Connecticut	204	65	1	77.1%	83,719	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Sparks	Nevada	182	54	1	70.0%	83,486	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Delray Beach	Florida	222	79	1	70.0%	83,345	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Idaho Falls	Idaho	194	67	2	76.4%	83,261	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Elizabeth	New Jersey	166	49	1	82.3%	82,697	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
La Puente	California	154	53	1	70.0%	82,564	4.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Baytown	Texas	170	65	3	70.0%	82,455	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
O Fallon	Missouri	146	50	1	85.4%	82,408	2.5	2	3	4	1	2	4
Apopka	Florida	144	53	1	84.3%	82,356	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Tracy	California	198	77	2	70.0%	82,001	4.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
Provo	Utah	177	65	3	70.0%	81,566	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Sandy	Utah	186	66	2	73.8%	81,520	3.5	4	3	8	1	2	8
Rock Hill	South Carolina	167	55	3	70.0%	81,452	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ventura	California	160	54	2	70.0%	81,171	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Florissant	Missouri	178	61	2	75.0%	81,166	3.0	3	4	6	1	2	6
Anderson	South Carolina	167	54	1	82.5%	81,165	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Nampa	Idaho	141	41	2	70.0%	81,134	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bowling Green	Kentucky	171	46	3	70.0%	80,861	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Franklin	Tennessee	146	49	2	75.7%	80,603	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Redwood City	California	168	57	2	70.0%	80,124	4.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Daly City	California	147	46	1	70.0%	80,081	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Fairfield	California	141	46	4	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Greeley	Colorado	121	38	2	70.0%	79,846	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Belleville	Illinois	191	72	1	85.5%	79,734	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Carlsbad	California	179	50	1	70.0%	79,569	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Scranton	Pennsylvania	249	71	1	79.8%	79,379	3.3	8	3	15	2	4	15
Lawrence	Kansas	208	57	2	78.5%	79,347	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Redding	California	195	61	2	70.0%	79,106	4.5	4	3	5	0	0	5
Kenosha	Wisconsin	186	62	2	70.0%	79,016	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Auburn	Washington	170	61	2	70.0%	79,010	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Daytona Beach	Florida	220	63	1	76.5%	78,886	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Grand Junction	Colorado	209	63	3	74.5%	78,554	3.5	6	2	8	1	1	8
Longview	Texas	219	68	1	74.6%	78,539	3.4	5	2	9	1	2	9
Gulfport	Mississippi	166	58	1	82.6%	78,220	2.0	3	2	6	2	4	6
Englewood	Colorado	191	73	1	70.0%	78,110	4.0	4	5	7	0	0	7
Davenport	Iowa	229	87	2	74.5%	78,096	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Palm Bay	Florida	188	59	2	70.0%	77,904	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Allen	Texas	129	51	2	70.0%	77,890	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Ballwin	Missouri	137	53	1	82.2%	77,799	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
San Angelo	Texas	190	71	3	70.0%	77,537	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Antioch	California	144	50	1	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	201	63	1	75.7%	77,500	3.3	4	4	6	1	2	6
Santa Fe	New Mexico	196	66	4	60.0%	76,852	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Orem	Utah	145	52	2	76.5%	76,725	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
West Covina	California	170	60	2	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Spartanburg	South Carolina	190	61	2	68.4%	76,558	4.2	5	2	9	0	0	9
Waukegan	Illinois	115	37	1	78.2%	76,273	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
West Chester	Pennsylvania	161	54	3	70.0%	76,087	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
South Gate	California	99	41	3	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
Lynnwood	Washington	175	56	1	70.0%	75,872	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Burbank	California	206	65	2	70.0%	75,611	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Milton	Florida	177	64	1	79.7%	75,549	3.0	3	2	6	1	1	6
Largo	Florida	187	57	1	70.0%	75,334	4.0	5	3	9	0	0	9
Dearborn	Michigan	196	70	1	79.1%	75,230	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Gastonia	North Carolina	147	44	1	70.0%	74,927	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Ypsilanti	Michigan	147	46	3	70.0%	74,829	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Norwalk	California	99	36	4	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pacoima	California	98	35	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
New Bedford	Massachusetts	195	56	1	77.8%	73,756	3.3	4	2	5	1	2	5
Vacaville	California	137	49	2	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Keller	Texas	144	56	4	63.2%	73,505	5.0	2	3	3	0	0	3
Missoula	Montana	188	54	2	75.5%	73,462	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Broomfield	Colorado	172	61	2	70.0%	73,325	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Wichita Falls	Texas	221	76	2	74.0%	73,114	3.6	7	3	14	1	2	14
Simi Valley	California	134	53	4	56.8%	73,103	5.5	2	3	4	0	0	4
Livonia	Michigan	152	53	1	77.2%	72,976	3.3	3	1	3	1	1	3
Meridian	Idaho	132	50	2	70.0%	72,955	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Hesperia	California	132	41	3	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Rapid City	South Dakota	152	48	2	75.1%	72,624	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Muncie	Indiana	178	62	1	78.3%	72,596	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Merced	California	175	62	2	70.0%	72,142	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Riverview	Florida	185	53	3	64.5%	71,763	4.7	3	3	6	0	0	6
Bell Gardens	California	98	31	3	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	230	77	2	70.0%	71,460	4.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Quincy	Massachusetts	145	47	2	75.8%	71,336	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Laurel	Maryland	184	58	3	63.2%	71,073	5.0	4	4	8	1	2	8
Lynn	Massachusetts	183	56	2	75.5%	70,619	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	38	4	70.0%	70,534	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Perris	California	146	40	2	60.0%	70,434	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	168	58	2	70.0%	70,207	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Parker	Colorado	147	52	3	70.0%	70,197	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lehigh Acres	Florida	212	61	2	60.0%	70,133	5.0	6	3	11	0	0	11
Rancho Cucamonga	California	210	72	7	39.7%	70,057	6.8	4	3	8	0	0	8
Roswell	Georgia	133	41	1	70.0%	69,839	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Elkhart	Indiana	167	52	2	70.0%	69,604	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Compton	California	170	53	5	50.0%	69,438	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bellevue	Washington	216	66	3	47.4%	69,296	6.4	5	2	6	0	0	6
Kennewick	Washington	162	45	2	70.0%	69,167	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jupiter	Florida	177	67	2	70.0%	68,993	4.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	170	49	4	70.0%	68,563	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Hagerstown	Maryland	169	55	4	70.0%	68,555	4.0	3	3	6	0	0	6
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	126	45	4	70.0%	68,179	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Hawthorne	California	100	27	4	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Midlothian	Virginia	160	46	2	70.0%	67,745	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Lithonia	Georgia	135	51	2	70.0%	67,733	4.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Palo Alto	California	213	69	3	70.0%	67,677	4.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Napa	California	138	48	3	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	California	97	36	4	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Ashburn	Virginia	129	38	3	60.0%	67,384	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Menifee	California	188	67	2	61.0%	67,382	4.8	4	2	6	0	1	6
Livermore	California	135	39	3	70.0%	67,377	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	California	134	45	3	70.0%	67,264	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Pittsburg	California	99	33	3	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	165	52	3	70.0%	67,057	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Johnson City	Tennessee	194	65	2	70.0%	66,805	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Brockton	Massachusetts	142	40	1	70.0%	66,798	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	258	78	2	70.0%	66,718	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Morgantown	West Virginia	153	47	3	70.0%	66,700	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Westerville	Ohio	134	38	2	70.0%	66,646	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Annapolis	Maryland	200	70	2	70.0%	66,534	4.0	5	3	10	0	0	10
Fort Mill	South Carolina	161	58	1	70.0%	66,510	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	185	65	2	70.0%	66,481	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Valdosta	Georgia	214	61	2	70.0%	66,466	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Champaign	Illinois	163	49	2	70.0%	66,197	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Monica	California	195	67	3	70.0%	66,087	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Coral Springs	Florida	135	49	3	67.7%	65,839	4.5	2	3	4	0	1	4
Elmhurst	New York	96	33	4	70.0%	65,777	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	131	49	3	70.0%	65,711	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
El Monte	California	138	46	3	70.0%	65,598	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	140	48	2	70.0%	65,377	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Medford	Oregon	133	47	3	70.0%	65,276	4.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Covington	Georgia	150	49	3	70.0%	64,881	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Bryan	Texas	197	68	2	67.3%	64,784	4.2	5	2	10	0	0	10
Moreno Valley	California	185	61	8	30.0%	61,636	8.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Mcdonough	Georgia	143	51	2	60.0%	60,877	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Temecula	California	170	53	6	46.5%	60,407	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	124	39	3	60.0%	59,478	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	150	54	3	60.0%	59,462	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Plainfield	Illinois	171	60	3	59.7%	58,817	5.3	3	3	5	0	0	5
Bowie	Maryland	200	57	4	55.8%	57,044	5.5	4	4	7	0	0	7
Deltona	Florida	145	48	3	60.0%	56,333	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
San Marcos	California	143	53	3	55.1%	55,385	5.5	2	4	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	California	142	47	7	40.0%	52,898	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Douglasville	Georgia	136	51	6	46.0%	50,713	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Acworth	Georgia	145	53	6	50.0%	49,842	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Herndon	Virginia	148	52	5	49.2%	46,006	6.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Mission Viejo	California	138	52	7	30.0%	29,507	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	432	130	1	75.2%	1,847,483	3.4	62	3	124	12	24	124
San Diego	374	130	1	73.3%	987,036	3.6	36	3	72	5	11	72
San Jose	386	108	1	74.1%	778,666	3.7	28	2	47	3	4	47
San Francisco	400	117	1	76.6%	666,569	3.5	28	1	28	5	5	28
Sacramento	350	109	1	71.3%	574,013	3.8	28	2	56	2	4	56
Fresno	307	100	1	71.3%	429,281	3.9	18	2	36	1	2	36
Bakersfield	253	72	1	71.9%	402,320	3.8	11	2	22	1	2	22
Long Beach	251	71	1	78.7%	377,136	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
Oakland	259	81	1	72.8%	299,712	3.8	14	2	15	1	1	15
Anaheim	217	60	1	75.5%	278,154	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Stockton	260	77	1	74.0%	276,758	3.5	12	2	13	2	2	13
Riverside	204	65	1	74.7%	276,374	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Santa Ana	236	74	1	72.9%	260,480	3.5	6	2	7	1	1	7
Modesto	252	74	1	76.7%	202,828	3.6	7	2	14	1	2	14
Corona	215	64	1	78.1%	201,018	3.4	5	3	7	1	2	7
Oxnard	185	60	1	87.9%	193,635	2.5	4	3	8	2	4	8
Chula Vista	180	50	2	70.0%	182,582	4.0	5	2	6	0	0	6
San Bernardino	220	70	2	70.0%	174,661	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Fontana	167	54	2	70.0%	164,309	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fremont	197	61	2	70.0%	163,209	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	205	73	1	90.5%	160,044	2.2	5	3	6	3	3	6
Santa Rosa	225	69	1	70.0%	151,241	4.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Whittier	217	73	1	76.3%	149,600	3.5	6	4	8	1	1	8
Irvine	289	94	3	55.4%	148,340	5.3	9	2	15	0	2	15
Garden Grove	202	69	1	82.3%	144,569	2.8	5	2	10	2	4	10
Salinas	209	63	1	75.6%	142,287	2.8	5	2	10	2	4	10
El Cajon	178	53	1	82.4%	142,120	3.0	3	3	5	1	2	5
Escondido	155	59	1	79.0%	141,889	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Huntington Beach	180	60	3	70.0%	139,935	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sunnyvale	195	57	1	90.3%	137,885	1.8	4	3	5	3	4	5
Hayward	188	57	2	70.0%	134,423	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Oceanside	170	63	3	66.5%	133,152	4.3	4	2	8	0	3	8
Lancaster	166	58	2	70.0%	129,093	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Van Nuys	158	46	1	70.0%	124,468	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Ontario	177	51	1	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Hollywood	140	44	1	78.7%	120,533	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Visalia	170	48	1	78.1%	118,719	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Hemet	152	42	1	88.6%	114,109	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Fullerton	180	60	1	81.4%	113,370	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Pomona	165	55	3	70.0%	110,590	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pasadena	180	61	1	70.0%	110,406	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Clovis	155	46	1	90.7%	110,147	2.0	3	3	6	2	4	6
Inglewood	210	71	1	81.8%	109,466	2.8	5	3	6	2	2	6
Roseville	165	59	2	76.7%	107,254	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
San Mateo	193	54	1	75.2%	107,049	3.5	4	3	7	0	1	7
Orange	179	59	1	73.1%	106,000	3.4	5	2	10	1	2	10
Palmdale	190	62	2	60.0%	104,962	5.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Maria	184	53	2	70.0%	100,162	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	137	49	1	86.7%	98,591	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Concord	175	49	3	74.6%	97,190	3.3	4	2	8	1	1	8
Vista	160	50	1	79.8%	95,620	3.0	3	3	6	1	2	6
Victorville	164	50	2	70.0%	95,417	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	206	54	3	70.0%	95,119	4.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Downey	161	53	1	81.3%	91,797	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
San Leandro	164	52	1	81.1%	90,149	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Rialto	147	50	2	84.5%	90,058	3.5	2	3	4	0	2	4
Chico	172	53	1	80.1%	89,678	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Elk Grove	170	56	7	50.0%	89,660	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Berkeley	233	77	3	70.0%	88,989	4.0	9	2	9	0	0	9
Santa Clara	174	51	3	70.0%	87,862	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Vallejo	177	55	2	70.0%	87,126	4.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Santa Cruz	185	60	1	83.7%	87,044	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Madera	166	56	1	81.5%	83,890	3.0	3	4	6	1	2	6
La Puente	154	53	1	70.0%	82,564	4.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Tracy	198	77	2	70.0%	82,001	4.0	4	4	8	0	0	8
Ventura	160	54	2	70.0%	81,171	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Redwood City	168	57	2	70.0%	80,124	4.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Daly City	147	46	1	70.0%	80,081	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Fairfield	141	46	4	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Carlsbad	179	50	1	70.0%	79,569	4.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Redding	195	61	2	70.0%	79,106	4.5	4	3	5	0	0	5
Antioch	144	50	1	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
West Covina	170	60	2	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
South Gate	99	41	3	80.0%	76,082	3.0	1	2	2	0	1	2
Burbank	206	65	2	70.0%	75,611	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Norwalk	99	36	4	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pacoima	98	35	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Vacaville	137	49	2	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Simi Valley	134	53	4	56.8%	73,103	5.5	2	3	4	0	0	4
Hesperia	132	41	3	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Merced	175	62	2	70.0%	72,142	4.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bell Gardens	98	31	3	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Perris	146	40	2	60.0%	70,434	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rancho Cucamonga	210	72	7	39.7%	70,057	6.8	4	3	8	0	0	8
Compton	170	53	5	50.0%	69,438	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Hawthorne	100	27	4	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	213	69	3	70.0%	67,677	4.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Napa	138	48	3	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Sylmar	97	36	4	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Menifee	188	67	2	61.0%	67,382	4.8	4	2	6	0	1	6
Livermore	135	39	3	70.0%	67,377	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	134	45	3	70.0%	67,264	4.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Pittsburg	99	33	3	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	195	67	3	70.0%	66,087	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
El Monte	138	46	3	70.0%	65,598	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Moreno Valley	185	61	8	30.0%	61,636	8.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Temecula	170	53	6	46.5%	60,407	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	143	53	3	55.1%	55,385	5.5	2	4	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	142	47	7	40.0%	52,898	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	138	52	7	30.0%	29,507	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Chino	133	47	7	30.4%	28,731	7.5	2	2	3	0	0	3

Houston

ZIP	caring.com	aplaceformom.com	usnews.com	dibbern.com	retirementliving.com	yelp.com
77088	4	6	7	8	10	12
77047	4	6	7	8	9	10
77037	4	6	7	8	10	11
77098	4	5	6	7	8	9
77027	4	5	6	7	8	9
77068	4	6	7	8	10	15
77078	4	5	6	7	8	13
77086	4	6	7	8	10	12
77035	5	6	7	8	9	10
77008	4	5	6	7	8	9
77004	4	5	6	7	8	9
77028	4	5	6	7	8	10
77059	4	5	6	7	8	9
77039	4	6	7	8	10
77019	4	5	6	7	8	9
77075	4	6	7	8	10	11
77077	5	6	7	8	9	10
77079	5	6	7	8	9	10
77099	4	5	6	7	8	9
77024	4	6	7	8	10	11
77095	4	5	6	7	8	9
77048	4	5	6	7	8	10
77044	4	6	7	8	10	15
77015	1	3	4	5	7	8
77017	4	5	6	7	8	9
77057	4	5	6	7	8	9
77055	4	5	6	7	8	9
77006	4	1	6	7	8	9
77026	1	2	3	4	5	6
77046	4	5	6	7	8	9
77066	4	6	7	8	10	16
77023	4	5	6	7	8	9
77094	4	5	6	7	8	9
77084	4	5	6	7	8	17
77013	4	6	7	8	10	11
77063	5	7	8	9	10	11
77053	4	6	7	8	10
77022	1	2	3	4	5	6
77072	4	5	6	7	8	9
77049	4	6	7	8	10	11
77045	4	5	6	7	8	9
77010	4	5	6	7	8	9
77018	4	5	6	7	8	9
77041	4	6	7	8	10	11
77009	4	5	6	7	8	14
77089	4	6	7	8	10	14
77032	4	6	7	8	10	11
77036	4	5	6	7	8	9
77085	4	5	6	7	8	9
77054	5	6	7	8	9	12
77058	4	6	7	8	10	15
77014	1	3	4	5	7	8
77067	4	6	7	8	10	47
77005	5	6	7	8	9	14
77076	4	6	7	8	10	11
77070	5	7	8	9	11	15
77060	4	6	7	8	10	18
77080	4	6	7	8	10	16
77050	4	6	7	8	10	14
77091	4	5	6	7	8	15
77071	4	5	6	7	8	15
77061	4	6	7	8	10	15
77020	4	5	6	7	8	13
77081	4	5	6	7	8	13
77030	5	6	7	8	9	14
77040	4	6	7	8	10	11
77090	4	6	7	8	10	11
77031	4	5	6	7	8	13
77051	4	5	6	7	8	9
77011	4	5	6	7	8	9
77042	4	5	6	7	8	13
77062	4	6	7	8	10	15
77082	5	6	7	8	9	10
77093	4	5	6	7	8	14
77073	1	3	4	5	7	13
77033	4	5	6	7	8	9
77043	1	2	3	4	5	6
77074	5	6	7	8	9	10
77064	4	5	6	7	8	19
77012	4	5	6	7	8	9
77002	4	5	6	7	8	9
77092	4	6	7	8	10	11
77069	4	6	7	8	10	33
77021	1	2	3	4	5	6
77083	4	6	7	8	10	35
77029	4	6	7	8	10	14
77034	4	5	6	7	8	9
77087	4	6	7	8	10	11
77003	4	5	6	7	8	14
77038	4	6	7	8	10	11
77007	4	5	6	7	8	16
77016	1	3	4	5	7	8
77065	4	6	7	8	10	11
77096	1	2	3	4	5	6
77025	4	5	6	7	8	9
77056	4	5	6	7	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Caring

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 7,331 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Caring Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (nursing home near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Caring Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Caring Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Caring Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly