Budget Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve budget.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 967 Car Rental Providers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Budget Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Budget Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Budget Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Budget Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	5,266	967	2	76.8%	247,820,017	3.4	27,379	32,653	1,275	40,051	5,767	12,260	40,022
California	913	287	2	76.5%	29,939,622	3.3	1,166	1,740	166	2,302	344	809	2,302
Texas	733	214	2	78.4%	21,868,559	3.3	1,360	1,917	108	2,442	336	797	2,442
Florida	723	244	2	79.9%	16,457,894	3.2	446	974	123	1,342	208	505	1,342
New York	721	214	2	72.7%	14,263,386	3.5	1,491	1,756	57	2,154	279	651	2,153
Illinois	612	182	2	80.3%	10,295,175	3.2	1,247	1,382	59	1,716	274	555	1,716
Pennsylvania	700	211	2	73.9%	9,446,231	3.5	1,604	1,781	56	2,033	273	516	2,032
Ohio	549	166	2	78.6%	9,154,592	3.3	976	1,188	42	1,489	228	464	1,489
North Carolina	553	177	2	77.8%	7,898,064	3.5	683	802	36	971	125	283	971
Michigan	551	170	2	79.1%	7,873,617	3.1	833	976	38	1,284	211	459	1,284
Georgia	548	170	2	72.6%	7,475,806	3.7	574	726	30	846	102	224	844
New Jersey	518	181	2	77.9%	6,919,818	3.2	537	593	60	793	126	292	790
Virginia	569	175	2	78.1%	6,573,020	3.4	723	891	41	1,094	151	332	1,094
Arizona	497	169	2	80.5%	5,591,994	2.9	247	396	39	584	124	255	581
Washington	541	179	2	76.1%	5,539,504	3.3	451	587	28	733	84	219	733
Indiana	755	215	2	77.5%	5,144,163	3.3	659	770	27	949	129	289	945
Tennessee	475	168	2	77.0%	5,113,999	3.5	514	622	24	745	92	206	745
Massachusetts	519	164	2	72.5%	4,948,780	3.5	461	534	36	695	97	219	695
Missouri	597	177	2	78.9%	4,807,760	3.4	887	1,017	26	1,199	177	343	1,199
Maryland	505	166	2	79.4%	4,764,169	3.1	392	463	31	621	99	229	621
Colorado	569	180	2	82.1%	4,543,800	3.0	381	514	33	692	119	258	692
Wisconsin	511	159	2	78.2%	4,519,456	3.3	694	769	25	916	141	263	916
Minnesota	543	174	2	79.7%	4,403,418	3.2	777	878	28	1,135	168	386	1,135
Alabama	484	162	2	76.4%	3,718,248	3.4	522	637	22	797	125	255	797
South Carolina	457	148	2	74.1%	3,669,996	3.8	347	422	23	465	45	103	465
Louisiana	490	173	2	77.1%	3,593,981	3.3	431	510	22	648	95	202	648
Kentucky	455	152	2	73.1%	3,249,818	4.0	698	758	15	825	60	175	825
Oklahoma	465	157	2	78.7%	3,085,320	3.5	557	646	18	734	103	199	734
Oregon	546	178	2	75.2%	3,068,087	3.4	355	414	21	513	54	147	513
Connecticut	402	134	2	72.9%	2,612,493	3.7	234	279	20	317	41	85	317
Iowa	546	175	2	74.9%	2,345,139	3.5	890	933	19	1,171	159	365	1,168
Nevada	376	142	2	79.0%	2,309,924	3.3	92	168	14	205	37	68	205
Utah	433	160	2	73.2%	2,229,215	3.6	246	284	18	320	38	70	320
Mississippi	445	152	2	72.9%	2,178,633	3.8	384	418	14	498	43	123	487
Kansas	506	168	2	74.2%	2,159,197	3.8	616	692	13	736	98	151	736
Arkansas	481	169	2	72.0%	2,152,634	3.9	553	587	13	624	59	138	624
New Mexico	424	146	2	86.8%	1,814,132	2.8	327	361	14	498	90	215	497
Nebraska	467	160	2	74.8%	1,425,548	3.5	524	581	11	627	93	141	627
Idaho	451	149	2	76.8%	1,296,518	3.0	251	273	16	367	67	134	367
West Virginia	447	158	2	69.5%	1,271,471	3.8	684	704	3	795	83	184	795
Maine	503	197	2	75.3%	1,003,065	3.4	421	425	6	509	72	139	509
New Hampshire	389	146	2	71.7%	964,000	3.9	238	248	4	262	24	44	262
Hawaii	381	159	2	64.0%	909,666	4.1	82	93	5	96	11	15	96
Rhode Island	308	115	2	73.8%	779,561	3.5	64	77	7	93	13	28	93
Delaware	324	133	2	80.9%	767,798	2.8	52	66	7	92	17	41	92
Montana	462	158	2	72.5%	755,926	3.5	348	361	15	429	66	123	429
South Dakota	421	147	2	77.8%	672,344	2.6	359	370	10	519	167	213	519
Alaska	436	147	2	79.6%	587,415	2.4	218	235	8	260	123	145	260
North Dakota	386	148	2	68.6%	515,175	4.1	367	381	4	400	36	85	400
Wyoming	392	145	3	71.0%	413,019	3.3	164	171	8	218	53	71	218
Vermont	351	127	2	66.0%	412,395	4.4	250	254	3	257	4	35	257

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	303	122	2	83.1%	2,649,998	2.6	96	16	140	28	60	140
Chicago	Illinois	245	99	2	83.2%	2,247,758	2.6	56	11	79	17	34	79
Los Angeles	California	288	130	2	79.0%	1,942,066	2.9	62	13	89	15	35	89
Brooklyn	New York	226	91	2	61.6%	1,602,332	4.7	37	2	39	2	6	39
Miami	Florida	270	129	2	75.6%	1,420,758	5.2	54	8	71	9	26	71
Las Vegas	Nevada	251	100	2	82.1%	1,269,323	3.0	43	4	50	13	17	50
San Antonio	Texas	255	99	3	70.2%	1,247,338	3.9	59	1	59	2	2	59
Phoenix	Arizona	229	92	2	79.9%	1,159,244	3.1	42	7	57	7	19	57
Dallas	Texas	276	112	2	82.3%	1,145,904	2.6	48	9	71	14	31	71
San Diego	California	272	116	2	74.7%	1,006,069	3.7	36	8	47	6	13	47
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	262	102	3	63.5%	1,000,122	4.4	47	8	60	3	22	60
New York City	New York	226	96	2	61.0%	989,111	5.1	47	5	57	3	14	57
Bronx	New York	201	86	2	65.9%	949,658	4.3	25	1	25	0	6	25
Austin	Texas	244	97	2	86.7%	943,252	2.0	44	11	77	21	41	77
Minneapolis	Minnesota	294	111	2	83.3%	907,124	2.6	51	7	74	14	34	74
Denver	Colorado	266	105	2	78.4%	852,306	3.2	38	10	57	7	24	57
Orlando	Florida	256	105	2	81.4%	811,056	2.6	32	8	47	11	20	47
San Jose	California	223	95	2	73.9%	775,652	3.6	28	2	30	4	6	30
Indianapolis	Indiana	267	104	2	80.7%	768,311	2.8	37	5	45	13	17	45
Fort Worth	Texas	237	96	2	83.7%	762,907	2.6	32	6	54	7	24	54
Saint Louis	Missouri	269	102	2	82.5%	756,701	2.6	45	7	65	17	27	65
Charlotte	North Carolina	240	97	2	82.4%	746,577	2.4	24	7	37	9	16	37
Jacksonville	Florida	236	98	2	84.3%	731,152	2.6	31	7	48	10	21	48
Tucson	Arizona	259	104	2	80.0%	724,101	3.0	32	3	39	9	13	39
Seattle	Washington	258	98	2	74.3%	709,937	3.3	35	6	51	5	19	51
Portland	Oregon	252	96	2	74.9%	689,111	3.5	33	7	45	6	14	45
Columbus	Ohio	244	97	2	81.4%	688,935	2.8	30	8	51	9	22	51
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	252	111	2	82.8%	688,416	2.7	27	7	43	3	20	43
Saint Paul	Minnesota	286	109	2	85.1%	680,826	2.6	30	7	49	6	24	49
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	252	91	2	83.4%	677,102	2.6	29	3	45	7	20	45
El Paso	Texas	243	87	2	80.8%	637,494	2.9	24	4	33	6	12	33
Sacramento	California	242	98	2	78.8%	634,162	3.0	28	8	44	4	18	44
Cincinnati	Ohio	252	97	2	78.5%	631,324	3.0	45	5	60	10	21	60
Atlanta	Georgia	247	97	3	62.9%	621,723	4.6	39	4	45	2	11	45
Tampa	Florida	236	96	2	77.8%	616,932	3.1	27	4	32	7	10	32
Cleveland	Ohio	238	92	2	80.6%	604,409	2.8	29	6	46	6	22	46
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	255	104	2	86.8%	592,728	2.3	43	6	73	16	35	73
Albuquerque	New Mexico	222	85	2	89.0%	583,507	2.3	17	6	31	4	15	31
Louisville	Kentucky	243	97	2	74.2%	564,369	3.4	32	5	38	3	9	38
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	257	103	2	80.7%	550,778	2.8	39	7	54	11	21	54
Baltimore	Maryland	238	97	2	85.6%	539,874	2.4	22	4	29	9	13	29
Memphis	Tennessee	220	87	2	74.2%	516,042	3.6	26	4	29	2	5	29
Fresno	California	238	97	2	82.5%	496,776	2.6	18	2	28	7	12	28
Colorado Springs	Colorado	264	114	2	84.9%	495,375	2.3	30	5	47	14	20	47
Kansas City	Missouri	262	103	2	83.8%	478,828	3.2	49	4	57	9	15	57
Raleigh	North Carolina	207	78	2	81.4%	444,908	3.0	15	4	21	4	7	21
San Francisco	California	204	77	4	49.5%	431,055	5.1	28	7	41	6	13	41
Dayton	Ohio	247	99	1	89.6%	428,496	1.9	27	7	65	15	40	65
Mesa	Arizona	207	82	2	79.0%	422,171	3.1	13	3	19	3	9	19
Buffalo	New York	243	98	2	74.6%	419,943	3.6	28	4	33	3	9	33
Omaha	Nebraska	228	90	3	75.4%	416,296	3.5	31	2	34	3	6	34
Bakersfield	California	193	86	2	72.4%	405,072	3.7	11	1	13	0	2	13
Hollywood	Florida	200	93	1	84.3%	394,960	2.6	9	5	16	3	7	16
Staten Island	New York	177	78	2	82.8%	392,403	3.0	12	2	19	2	7	19
Birmingham	Alabama	241	100	2	78.1%	390,518	2.9	30	4	45	5	18	45
Nashville	Tennessee	222	91	2	84.0%	384,833	2.5	22	4	36	5	17	36
Detroit	Michigan	227	89	3	59.6%	381,578	5.2	25	2	30	0	6	30
Rochester	New York	227	88	2	80.4%	378,904	2.9	24	4	39	4	18	39
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	76	2	83.8%	377,106	2.7	12	5	24	1	12	24
Aurora	Colorado	193	80	2	86.5%	376,608	2.5	11	1	15	5	6	15
Long Beach	California	197	89	2	78.1%	374,177	3.3	12	3	15	2	5	15
Salt Lake City	Utah	231	97	2	75.8%	369,160	3.5	19	5	22	3	4	22
Pompano Beach	Florida	201	90	1	95.4%	353,473	1.4	10	4	16	6	10	16
New Orleans	Louisiana	203	80	2	80.3%	343,749	2.9	19	2	22	5	8	22
Oakland	California	196	77	2	81.0%	333,345	2.9	14	1	16	4	6	16
Wichita	Kansas	236	101	2	78.9%	329,465	3.3	26	3	30	5	9	30
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	209	79	2	86.7%	328,640	2.4	18	4	24	7	11	24
Hialeah	Florida	163	82	1	88.5%	324,707	2.3	7	3	13	2	7	13
Knoxville	Tennessee	208	81	2	83.2%	321,683	2.5	17	2	23	8	9	23
Grand Rapids	Michigan	193	74	2	86.4%	317,742	2.3	12	2	19	4	10	19
Tulsa	Oklahoma	264	113	3	75.2%	317,295	3.5	28	2	33	2	7	33
Washington DC	District of Columbia	200	82	5	46.2%	316,447	5.4	28	7	40	4	12	40
Arlington	Texas	167	70	2	79.1%	313,834	2.9	12	1	13	4	5	13
West Palm Beach	Florida	186	87	2	83.7%	310,098	2.8	12	5	18	3	8	18
Spring	Texas	180	80	2	79.7%	303,618	3.0	8	3	12	2	4	12
Riverside	California	167	73	2	81.6%	301,919	2.6	7	2	11	2	5	11
Littleton	Colorado	209	89	2	91.3%	297,176	2.2	10	4	17	5	8	17
Richmond	Virginia	233	95	2	75.6%	295,747	3.2	15	2	19	3	5	19
Saint Petersburg	Florida	211	84	2	80.9%	288,293	2.8	16	2	20	6	7	20
Spokane	Washington	212	85	2	78.9%	283,625	3.4	14	1	16	2	4	16
Stockton	California	199	85	3	74.3%	277,875	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
Katy	Texas	153	69	2	80.7%	277,315	2.5	4	2	6	1	3	6
Greensboro	North Carolina	180	74	2	83.6%	273,894	2.8	9	2	13	2	5	13
Tacoma	Washington	240	96	2	81.6%	272,082	2.9	20	3	29	4	11	29
Henderson	Nevada	169	71	1	89.8%	271,947	2.0	8	2	15	4	8	15
Plano	Texas	170	68	2	87.9%	268,590	2.3	7	3	11	3	5	11
Toledo	Ohio	228	91	2	86.7%	266,580	2.5	15	1	25	4	12	25
Fort Wayne	Indiana	184	75	2	83.0%	264,045	2.8	16	2	28	1	13	28
Akron	Ohio	213	79	1	97.0%	262,330	1.2	17	2	32	13	18	32
Vancouver	Washington	207	83	2	79.9%	260,492	3.2	11	1	12	3	3	12
Santa Ana	California	159	71	2	72.9%	260,277	4.0	6	3	9	1	3	9
Lexington	Kentucky	197	76	2	80.8%	258,467	2.9	15	1	20	4	7	20
Durham	North Carolina	186	71	2	87.6%	254,109	2.3	8	2	14	3	6	14
Alexandria	Virginia	208	86	2	71.1%	252,328	3.8	14	4	17	2	4	17
Chandler	Arizona	163	69	1	93.7%	251,817	1.7	6	3	12	4	7	12
Glendale	Arizona	170	72	2	82.3%	250,768	2.7	9	4	15	3	6	15
Anaheim	California	143	65	2	67.9%	250,227	3.7	7	3	10	0	5	10
Naples	Florida	191	74	2	79.2%	247,967	3.0	14	2	20	3	7	20
Kissimmee	Florida	173	78	2	84.3%	243,576	2.4	7	4	12	2	5	12
Madison	Wisconsin	192	74	2	81.3%	239,848	2.6	14	2	21	5	9	21
Columbia	South Carolina	205	83	2	69.6%	238,666	4.0	14	2	14	1	1	14
Scottsdale	Arizona	183	76	2	79.4%	236,692	2.9	11	5	19	4	10	19
Silver Spring	Maryland	180	79	2	77.6%	235,126	3.0	7	3	11	2	4	11
Chula Vista	California	176	72	2	90.0%	234,706	2.4	5	2	8	1	4	8
Honolulu	Hawaii	185	82	3	55.3%	230,137	5.6	11	1	11	0	1	11
Marietta	Georgia	175	76	3	70.0%	225,840	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mobile	Alabama	220	88	2	83.0%	225,315	3.2	18	2	22	4	6	22
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	95	3	77.5%	224,262	3.2	22	1	29	4	8	29
Laredo	Texas	161	69	2	81.9%	221,812	2.8	6	1	10	1	4	10
Chesapeake	Virginia	164	60	2	91.5%	217,648	2.2	6	2	10	2	5	10
Lubbock	Texas	209	87	2	77.7%	214,889	3.2	14	1	15	3	4	15
Tallahassee	Florida	179	76	2	74.2%	213,767	3.3	10	3	15	2	6	15
Sarasota	Florida	194	81	2	85.1%	212,910	2.7	13	2	18	4	7	18
Lawrenceville	Georgia	146	65	2	83.1%	212,893	2.5	4	1	7	0	3	7
Fort Myers	Florida	186	74	2	83.7%	210,555	2.5	11	6	18	4	9	18
Pensacola	Florida	196	80	2	78.2%	209,853	3.7	13	3	16	2	5	16
Boise	Idaho	188	78	2	81.5%	208,712	2.7	9	2	18	0	9	18
Irving	Texas	163	68	1	86.1%	207,192	2.5	6	2	9	2	4	9
Anchorage	Alaska	174	76	2	84.5%	206,354	2.8	12	3	13	4	5	13
Amarillo	Texas	172	69	1	89.7%	205,424	2.4	14	3	21	5	10	21
Winston Salem	North Carolina	185	73	2	76.7%	202,659	3.4	9	1	12	0	3	12
Modesto	California	169	70	2	76.6%	202,446	3.1	7	1	9	1	3	9
Fayetteville	North Carolina	176	70	2	82.9%	202,390	3.0	8	1	9	2	3	9
Santa Rosa	California	159	69	2	92.0%	198,840	1.7	6	2	11	3	6	11
North Las Vegas	Nevada	150	58	2	84.6%	197,802	2.9	7	2	8	2	3	8
Wilmington	Delaware	185	81	2	89.9%	197,286	1.9	10	3	16	3	11	16
Bradenton	Florida	169	70	2	77.8%	197,039	3.5	10	2	14	0	5	14
Corpus Christi	Texas	198	77	3	59.6%	194,113	4.9	18	2	18	0	6	18
Ocala	Florida	184	86	2	85.6%	192,752	2.5	11	1	18	3	9	18
Lakeland	Florida	165	76	3	74.5%	191,995	3.4	9	1	14	0	5	14
Des Moines	Iowa	191	77	2	84.6%	188,919	2.5	11	3	19	3	9	19
Gainesville	Florida	184	79	2	90.2%	188,805	2.0	10	2	15	5	8	15
Hayward	California	154	61	1	98.3%	188,781	1.3	4	1	6	3	4	6
Augusta	Georgia	178	78	2	92.3%	188,599	2.1	8	1	10	5	5	10
Oxnard	California	150	71	2	85.4%	188,163	2.3	4	2	9	1	5	9
Norfolk	Virginia	189	72	2	76.2%	187,145	3.6	14	2	17	1	3	17
Salem	Oregon	174	79	2	70.0%	186,578	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Eugene	Oregon	177	75	1	91.2%	185,202	2.0	6	1	9	4	4	9
Newark	New Jersey	177	83	2	65.3%	183,197	4.2	9	2	10	1	2	10
Fremont	California	152	58	3	78.1%	182,111	3.0	4	1	5	1	2	5
Shreveport	Louisiana	213	86	2	81.1%	180,988	2.8	12	2	20	4	9	20
Reno	Nevada	195	78	2	60.9%	180,772	4.3	12	2	12	1	2	12
Syracuse	New York	208	83	2	79.2%	179,683	3.2	15	2	20	2	6	20
Springfield	Missouri	165	66	3	77.9%	179,431	3.4	7	1	9	1	2	9
Elk Grove	California	131	59	1	100.0%	179,319	1.0	3	1	6	3	3	6
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	153	64	1	95.9%	178,625	1.6	5	1	9	2	5	9
Garland	Texas	154	69	2	74.5%	177,192	3.4	5	2	7	0	2	7
Montgomery	Alabama	210	90	2	84.4%	177,102	2.9	13	1	18	3	6	18
Fort Collins	Colorado	147	62	1	91.0%	177,101	2.0	5	2	9	1	5	9
Charleston	South Carolina	216	82	2	89.9%	176,954	1.8	10	4	16	6	8	16
Oceanside	California	132	62	2	88.1%	176,439	2.3	4	2	6	1	3	6
Henrico	Virginia	182	74	2	90.7%	174,739	2.1	7	4	13	2	7	13
Grand Prairie	Texas	119	54	1	91.2%	173,811	2.0	4	3	9	2	5	9
Homestead	Florida	173	82	2	92.1%	172,801	1.7	7	2	13	2	7	13
Jamaica	New York	157	69	2	70.6%	172,103	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Savannah	Georgia	195	78	2	71.2%	171,756	3.4	10	1	10	2	2	10
Cape Coral	Florida	159	71	1	94.5%	170,942	1.5	6	1	9	5	5	9
Corona	California	162	72	2	66.3%	170,597	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Boca Raton	Florida	177	82	2	76.6%	170,267	3.1	9	1	11	2	4	11
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	136	59	2	83.7%	169,977	3.0	6	1	10	0	4	10
San Bernardino	California	147	69	3	68.1%	169,974	4.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Boynton Beach	Florida	153	66	1	97.6%	169,823	1.5	6	1	10	4	6	10
Huntington Beach	California	134	62	2	84.8%	169,521	2.5	4	2	7	1	3	7
Providence	Rhode Island	180	74	2	82.6%	169,435	2.6	8	3	12	3	7	12
Little Rock	Arkansas	183	77	2	77.5%	169,032	3.1	12	2	14	3	4	14
Reading	Pennsylvania	186	74	3	77.2%	166,167	3.3	10	2	10	3	3	10
Greenville	South Carolina	186	78	2	74.5%	163,456	3.6	9	3	12	1	4	12
Fredericksburg	Virginia	159	68	1	93.6%	162,788	1.8	5	2	8	3	5	8
Green Bay	Wisconsin	182	74	2	88.2%	161,672	2.3	7	4	13	2	6	13
Trenton	New Jersey	196	79	2	77.5%	161,118	3.5	11	2	12	0	5	12
Moreno Valley	California	144	60	2	77.9%	159,968	3.3	4	1	7	0	3	7
Huntsville	Alabama	202	81	2	81.4%	159,768	2.8	11	3	18	3	8	18
Odessa	Texas	152	59	1	99.6%	159,397	1.2	6	2	15	5	10	15
Rockford	Illinois	185	73	1	87.3%	159,196	2.0	9	2	15	5	8	15
Lancaster	California	135	65	2	86.0%	158,682	2.3	3	2	7	0	4	7
Frisco	Texas	123	54	2	91.9%	158,488	2.0	2	2	4	1	2	4
Chattanooga	Tennessee	214	89	2	75.9%	157,745	3.7	15	3	19	1	5	19
Palmdale	California	141	69	2	89.6%	156,785	2.3	4	1	8	0	4	8
Rancho Cucamonga	California	143	70	2	87.8%	154,981	2.3	4	2	7	1	3	7
Edmond	Oklahoma	142	52	2	89.6%	153,934	2.2	5	2	9	1	5	9
Humble	Texas	146	63	2	92.3%	153,693	2.0	3	2	4	2	2	4
Clearwater	Florida	182	71	2	83.8%	153,584	2.9	9	5	13	3	5	13
Mission	Texas	143	63	2	84.7%	153,398	2.7	3	1	4	1	2	4
Round Rock	Texas	134	55	1	91.3%	152,995	2.0	3	2	4	2	2	4
Fontana	California	131	59	3	65.0%	152,497	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Worcester	Massachusetts	155	65	2	82.0%	152,224	3.1	9	1	12	1	4	12
Van Nuys	California	137	66	2	85.5%	151,946	2.5	4	2	6	1	3	6
Peoria	Arizona	152	66	2	88.1%	151,697	2.3	4	3	9	1	5	9
Overland Park	Kansas	187	74	3	82.7%	151,666	2.8	9	1	10	3	4	10
Ogden	Utah	158	65	3	74.8%	150,682	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
El Cajon	California	136	64	1	86.0%	148,371	2.7	3	2	3	1	2	3
Fairfax	Virginia	165	66	1	90.6%	148,341	2.0	4	2	6	2	3	6
Cumming	Georgia	136	61	2	91.5%	148,315	1.7	3	1	5	1	3	5
Mckinney	Texas	112	49	2	78.4%	148,176	3.0	3	1	4	1	1	4
North Hollywood	California	131	60	1	96.2%	147,322	1.8	4	2	5	3	3	5
Escondido	California	136	61	2	81.6%	146,630	2.8	4	1	5	1	2	5
Beaverton	Oregon	146	61	2	72.6%	146,434	3.5	4	1	5	0	1	5
York	Pennsylvania	182	81	2	81.4%	146,355	2.7	7	1	10	2	4	10
Clarksville	Tennessee	130	60	2	83.2%	146,138	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Jersey City	New Jersey	164	73	4	55.7%	145,762	5.7	7	2	8	0	1	8
Flushing	New York	136	64	2	67.7%	145,600	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Erie	Pennsylvania	206	79	2	79.3%	145,471	2.8	13	2	14	5	5	14
Denton	Texas	166	74	2	91.5%	144,727	2.0	6	3	12	3	6	12
Olathe	Kansas	122	56	1	100.0%	144,373	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Torrance	California	157	78	2	81.5%	144,029	3.0	5	2	6	1	2	6
Lansing	Michigan	148	63	1	86.8%	142,684	2.0	7	2	15	2	8	15
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	195	79	2	84.2%	142,544	3.1	9	1	12	2	3	12
Olympia	Washington	158	63	2	77.1%	141,054	3.2	6	2	10	0	4	10
Brownsville	Texas	132	59	3	70.0%	140,925	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Yuma	Arizona	125	58	1	95.0%	140,160	1.3	3	2	8	2	5	8
Allentown	Pennsylvania	176	78	2	82.1%	139,577	3.4	7	2	7	2	2	7
Whittier	California	140	67	3	69.9%	137,149	4.2	6	3	6	0	1	6
Ontario	California	130	59	3	77.6%	137,053	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Naperville	Illinois	150	59	2	82.2%	136,310	2.8	4	2	7	1	3	7
Surprise	Arizona	153	68	1	100.0%	135,559	1.0	4	2	10	4	7	10
Albany	New York	210	86	2	89.5%	135,409	2.5	11	3	14	6	6	14
Saint Charles	Missouri	136	61	1	96.4%	134,791	1.3	3	3	6	2	4	6
Cary	North Carolina	142	59	2	86.6%	134,565	2.8	4	2	6	1	3	6
Ann Arbor	Michigan	159	68	2	80.1%	133,598	2.6	5	1	8	2	3	8
Las Cruces	New Mexico	163	62	2	89.6%	133,545	2.0	7	2	12	3	6	12
Evansville	Indiana	182	80	2	71.9%	132,698	3.6	9	1	9	2	2	9
Lake Worth	Florida	149	69	3	63.9%	131,852	4.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Kalamazoo	Michigan	169	72	2	80.1%	131,423	2.9	7	1	11	2	4	11
Canton	Ohio	187	71	2	89.3%	131,216	2.1	12	1	21	4	10	21
Longmont	Colorado	130	56	1	100.0%	130,765	1.0	3	1	5	3	3	5
Roanoke	Virginia	183	77	2	77.0%	130,518	3.4	10	3	12	1	4	12
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	191	77	2	71.7%	130,198	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Newport News	Virginia	153	63	2	73.7%	130,169	3.9	7	2	8	0	1	8
Roseville	California	134	56	1	93.1%	130,128	1.7	3	1	6	1	3	6
Everett	Washington	155	60	2	77.7%	129,535	3.4	5	2	6	1	1	6
Lafayette	Louisiana	150	72	2	80.2%	128,805	3.0	5	3	6	1	3	6
Mcallen	Texas	141	61	2	90.5%	128,185	2.0	3	1	6	1	3	6
Conroe	Texas	166	72	2	79.5%	127,511	3.1	7	2	9	2	2	9
Sugar Land	Texas	144	65	2	75.5%	127,464	3.7	3	3	4	0	1	4
Concord	California	144	58	1	97.8%	127,377	1.3	4	1	7	3	4	7
South Bend	Indiana	170	69	2	86.7%	127,262	2.2	10	3	18	3	9	18
Woodbridge	Virginia	139	61	2	60.0%	126,992	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hamilton	Ohio	136	54	1	92.1%	126,311	1.7	3	1	4	2	3	4
Murrieta	California	121	57	2	94.8%	125,431	1.5	2	2	4	1	3	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	164	69	2	85.4%	124,332	2.6	5	3	8	2	3	8
Yakima	Washington	146	66	1	95.3%	123,774	1.5	4	1	7	2	4	7
Puyallup	Washington	161	69	2	86.0%	122,889	2.4	5	1	8	0	5	8
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	63	4	64.9%	122,814	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pueblo	Colorado	170	71	2	76.9%	121,641	3.1	7	1	11	0	4	11
Gilbert	Arizona	149	66	4	50.8%	121,226	6.0	6	3	8	1	2	8
Killeen	Texas	158	72	2	80.5%	120,953	2.8	4	1	5	1	2	5
Fullerton	California	147	69	2	86.8%	120,886	2.0	4	3	9	2	5	9
Bloomington	Indiana	157	61	2	90.0%	120,216	2.0	6	1	12	0	6	12
Macon	Georgia	177	79	2	73.2%	119,764	3.7	9	1	10	1	1	10
Pasadena	California	163	74	2	75.8%	119,531	3.0	6	3	9	1	5	9
Cypress	Texas	122	55	3	70.0%	119,421	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Jackson	Mississippi	203	79	2	70.0%	119,223	4.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Boston	Massachusetts	197	79	2	78.5%	119,126	3.4	14	6	25	3	10	25
Midland	Texas	168	75	2	74.3%	118,926	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Flint	Michigan	180	79	3	75.3%	117,035	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Bellevue	Washington	152	70	2	80.0%	116,957	3.2	5	2	7	0	2	7
Irvine	California	161	71	6	43.7%	116,851	6.7	9	3	11	0	2	11
Youngstown	Ohio	189	70	2	74.1%	116,368	3.2	12	2	12	4	4	12
Toms River	New Jersey	133	54	1	94.5%	116,060	1.7	3	1	5	2	3	5
Mesquite	Texas	143	59	2	78.5%	114,910	3.3	3	1	4	0	1	4
Yonkers	New York	145	64	2	63.6%	114,875	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	181	74	2	82.2%	114,630	2.7	6	2	10	1	4	10
Vallejo	California	163	67	2	91.9%	114,377	2.3	4	1	8	1	4	8
Beaumont	Texas	184	72	2	78.3%	113,925	3.6	8	1	9	1	1	9
Pearland	Texas	128	57	2	82.8%	113,916	3.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	147	64	1	86.9%	113,556	2.4	5	2	7	3	4	7
Muskegon	Michigan	151	61	2	87.8%	113,448	2.4	5	1	10	1	5	10
Stamford	Connecticut	133	65	1	88.1%	113,404	3.0	6	1	7	2	2	7
Norman	Oklahoma	147	60	1	90.6%	112,467	2.3	4	1	7	1	4	7
Gaithersburg	Maryland	163	61	2	77.8%	112,432	4.0	5	2	6	1	1	6
Appleton	Wisconsin	140	58	1	92.4%	112,393	1.8	4	1	6	3	3	6
Kent	Washington	137	59	3	70.0%	112,351	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chico	California	140	57	1	100.0%	112,015	1.0	3	1	4	3	3	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	139	62	2	84.4%	111,860	2.8	4	1	6	1	2	6
Athens	Georgia	141	58	2	89.6%	111,771	1.7	6	1	11	3	6	11
Lewisville	Texas	137	57	1	93.8%	111,262	1.7	3	2	7	2	4	7
New Haven	Connecticut	140	62	2	85.1%	110,863	2.8	5	3	8	1	4	8
Simi Valley	California	115	52	2	85.6%	110,176	2.5	2	1	4	0	2	4
Hyattsville	Maryland	174	72	2	69.8%	110,029	4.0	5	2	6	0	1	6
Boulder	Colorado	170	67	2	83.6%	109,721	2.8	6	2	10	1	4	10
San Mateo	California	144	61	2	76.6%	109,052	3.5	4	3	7	1	3	7
Melbourne	Florida	147	68	3	70.0%	108,980	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Temecula	California	144	69	2	83.8%	108,919	2.0	3	1	6	1	3	6
La Puente	California	126	61	2	92.2%	108,736	2.5	2	3	3	1	1	3
Asheville	North Carolina	149	60	2	82.2%	108,539	2.8	5	1	7	2	2	7
Saint Augustine	Florida	152	70	2	82.8%	108,529	2.4	5	3	9	1	4	9
Decatur	Georgia	167	70	2	59.4%	107,492	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Schenectady	New York	173	72	3	66.0%	106,972	4.4	8	2	8	0	1	8
Visalia	California	134	63	3	70.0%	106,410	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Charlottesville	Virginia	160	63	2	86.2%	105,989	2.6	5	2	8	2	4	8
Panama City	Florida	158	68	2	83.8%	105,907	3.0	6	1	7	2	2	7
Bellingham	Washington	139	62	2	83.5%	105,636	2.7	3	1	6	0	3	6
Miami Beach	Florida	142	77	1	91.1%	105,434	2.2	5	4	7	2	4	7
Pomona	California	135	59	2	66.7%	105,408	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	169	74	2	82.2%	105,293	2.6	5	1	9	1	4	9
Bend	Oregon	120	51	3	86.1%	105,264	2.3	3	2	6	0	3	6
College Station	Texas	123	48	1	85.4%	105,058	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
New Port Richey	Florida	140	58	2	86.2%	104,143	2.5	4	1	7	0	3	7
Fargo	North Dakota	156	70	1	84.9%	104,006	2.8	4	2	7	0	3	7
Independence	Missouri	175	79	2	83.6%	103,713	2.8	8	2	10	3	4	10
Frederick	Maryland	158	68	2	78.5%	103,553	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Merced	California	141	65	1	100.0%	103,060	1.0	3	1	6	3	3	6
Metairie	Louisiana	159	60	3	72.3%	102,845	3.6	5	1	6	0	1	6
Hemet	California	136	61	3	79.8%	102,825	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Abilene	Texas	172	73	2	78.1%	101,615	2.8	6	1	9	1	4	9
Duluth	Minnesota	209	81	2	86.7%	101,584	2.6	11	3	22	1	11	22
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	137	57	2	82.8%	101,554	3.0	4	1	6	1	2	6
Waterbury	Connecticut	157	69	1	93.4%	101,520	1.8	6	2	10	3	5	10
Vista	California	127	56	2	84.7%	101,501	2.3	3	1	4	1	2	4
Billings	Montana	150	62	2	73.8%	101,300	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Lawrence	Kansas	167	73	1	100.0%	101,053	1.0	5	2	9	5	5	9
Santa Maria	California	143	64	3	70.0%	100,162	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockville	Maryland	144	63	3	69.0%	99,819	4.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	122	56	2	76.4%	99,739	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	161	68	2	82.3%	99,101	2.6	5	4	7	1	3	7
Compton	California	131	59	2	71.3%	99,022	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	142	64	2	77.1%	98,984	3.0	3	3	4	1	2	4
Manassas	Virginia	154	62	2	65.0%	98,806	4.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Franklin	Tennessee	128	58	2	92.8%	98,786	1.7	3	1	5	1	3	5
Rialto	California	121	59	1	92.7%	98,761	3.0	2	1	2	1	1	2
Rock Hill	South Carolina	138	61	2	84.6%	98,418	2.7	3	1	4	1	2	4
Carlsbad	California	144	66	2	86.4%	98,156	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
West Chester	Pennsylvania	141	61	2	90.3%	98,140	1.7	3	1	6	1	3	6
Costa Mesa	California	120	56	2	85.6%	97,324	2.5	2	2	4	0	2	4
Coral Springs	Florida	124	61	1	100.0%	97,238	1.0	2	1	4	2	2	4
Hampton	Virginia	165	65	2	71.4%	97,220	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Keller	Texas	130	53	2	83.4%	96,944	2.5	2	3	4	0	2	4
Berkeley	California	187	82	2	76.2%	96,867	3.7	9	4	13	0	5	13
Bowie	Maryland	155	65	1	94.8%	96,810	1.5	4	2	6	3	4	6
Lithonia	Georgia	120	59	1	100.0%	96,762	1.0	2	2	4	2	2	4
Santa Barbara	California	157	68	3	71.0%	96,521	4.3	7	2	9	0	2	9
O Fallon	Missouri	118	50	1	100.0%	96,460	1.0	2	2	3	2	2	3
Richardson	Texas	141	59	2	84.1%	96,394	2.3	3	2	6	1	3	6
Bridgeport	Connecticut	142	64	4	65.7%	96,177	4.3	6	1	7	0	1	7
Pittsburg	California	99	42	1	100.0%	96,081	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Ridgewood	New York	100	51	2	90.0%	96,045	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
West Covina	California	118	59	2	87.6%	95,846	2.0	3	2	4	2	2	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	133	55	1	97.5%	95,538	1.3	3	1	5	2	3	5
Missouri City	Texas	127	56	2	90.0%	95,485	2.0	2	3	4	0	2	4
Victorville	California	124	56	3	70.0%	95,417	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	California	98	46	2	90.0%	95,297	2.0	1	1	2	0	1	2
Garden Grove	California	158	70	3	54.1%	95,044	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Warren	Michigan	154	62	2	70.0%	94,634	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Broomfield	Colorado	138	62	1	90.3%	94,633	2.0	3	2	5	2	2	5
Spartanburg	South Carolina	148	59	2	84.4%	94,517	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Provo	Utah	142	64	2	81.0%	94,434	3.0	3	2	5	0	2	5
West Jordan	Utah	129	63	2	76.2%	94,176	3.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Inglewood	California	166	71	3	69.8%	93,330	4.0	5	2	5	0	1	5
Lees Summit	Missouri	159	67	2	90.8%	92,711	1.8	6	2	10	3	5	10
Renton	Washington	160	63	3	59.8%	92,661	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Braunfels	Texas	127	58	2	90.0%	92,513	2.0	2	1	4	0	2	4
Redding	California	148	68	2	81.8%	92,466	3.3	4	2	4	1	1	4
Astoria	New York	148	69	3	64.3%	91,771	4.5	4	3	5	0	1	5
Englewood	Colorado	163	72	2	82.1%	91,564	2.8	4	2	6	1	3	6
Jupiter	Florida	132	62	2	92.9%	91,527	1.5	4	1	7	2	4	7
Laurel	Maryland	148	59	3	81.1%	91,166	3.0	4	3	4	0	2	4
Waco	Texas	174	69	4	57.6%	91,149	6.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Palo Alto	California	137	59	1	94.2%	91,097	1.8	4	3	7	2	4	7
Joliet	Illinois	150	60	2	70.5%	90,912	3.6	5	1	5	1	1	5
Lynchburg	Virginia	148	62	2	86.2%	88,232	2.5	4	2	7	0	3	7
Santa Clara	California	134	59	2	70.0%	87,862	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
West Valley City	Utah	138	67	2	66.1%	87,797	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	109	52	2	90.0%	87,659	2.0	2	3	4	0	2	4
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	147	62	3	70.0%	87,656	4.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Vero Beach	Florida	159	63	3	75.9%	87,422	3.5	6	2	8	0	2	8
Orange	California	135	60	2	60.0%	86,995	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Livermore	California	124	54	2	89.5%	86,153	2.0	2	2	4	1	2	4
Midlothian	Virginia	138	55	2	89.0%	86,146	1.7	3	2	6	2	3	6
Manchester	New Hampshire	139	57	3	74.2%	86,060	3.6	5	1	7	0	2	7
San Angelo	Texas	131	54	2	77.6%	85,953	3.3	4	1	6	0	2	6
Roswell	Georgia	126	52	1	86.0%	85,837	2.5	2	1	3	1	1	3
Livonia	Michigan	102	42	2	90.7%	85,749	2.0	3	1	5	1	3	5
Belleville	Illinois	146	61	2	92.0%	85,734	1.8	4	1	7	1	4	7
Racine	Wisconsin	148	68	4	67.9%	85,647	4.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Menifee	California	143	63	2	77.5%	85,627	3.8	4	2	5	0	1	5
Spring Hill	Florida	157	68	2	68.2%	85,603	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Dearborn	Michigan	140	57	2	90.0%	85,580	2.0	4	2	8	0	4	8
Annapolis	Maryland	160	70	2	90.0%	85,544	2.0	5	2	9	0	5	9
Grand Junction	Colorado	171	72	2	80.9%	85,363	2.7	6	2	10	1	5	10
Chino	California	110	51	2	90.0%	85,027	2.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Clovis	California	113	53	3	70.0%	84,970	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anderson	South Carolina	144	62	2	86.2%	84,796	2.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	143	68	2	82.2%	84,781	3.0	5	3	9	1	4	9
Deltona	Florida	121	57	2	90.0%	84,500	2.0	2	1	4	0	2	4
Antioch	California	114	46	3	76.0%	84,198	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Medford	Oregon	112	51	2	90.0%	83,927	2.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Hartford	Connecticut	158	70	2	68.0%	83,924	3.7	6	3	7	0	2	7
Vacaville	California	104	45	3	79.4%	83,598	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Tempe	Arizona	140	60	5	44.0%	83,576	6.0	4	2	5	0	1	5
Ashburn	Virginia	122	54	2	74.3%	83,426	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Summerville	South Carolina	124	52	3	60.0%	83,365	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Baytown	Texas	141	63	2	70.0%	82,455	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edison	New Jersey	131	60	2	81.5%	82,218	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	166	74	2	85.9%	82,197	2.3	8	3	14	2	7	14
Perris	California	123	58	2	70.0%	82,173	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Orem	Utah	117	54	2	81.7%	81,948	3.0	3	1	5	0	2	5
Cambridge	Massachusetts	141	64	2	70.8%	81,944	3.8	5	1	7	0	2	7
Palm Bay	Florida	152	66	3	73.5%	81,804	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	161	71	2	69.8%	81,564	3.8	6	1	6	0	2	6
Ventura	California	126	54	3	70.0%	81,171	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	California	123	54	2	73.0%	81,139	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	164	63	2	82.0%	81,098	2.7	7	2	10	2	4	10
Elizabeth	New Jersey	139	68	2	80.6%	80,988	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	148	58	3	70.0%	80,861	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Riverview	Florida	136	58	2	72.5%	80,676	3.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Arvada	Colorado	158	65	4	60.3%	80,418	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Bothell	Washington	139	57	2	62.6%	80,278	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Largo	Florida	157	67	3	74.4%	80,032	3.4	5	2	8	1	3	8
Madera	California	138	61	2	77.6%	79,952	3.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	158	72	3	73.3%	79,936	3.5	4	1	5	0	1	5
Saginaw	Michigan	161	72	3	61.3%	79,924	4.7	7	2	7	0	0	7
Elkhart	Indiana	136	56	2	80.4%	79,903	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Fairfield	California	123	54	4	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	California	115	50	2	76.6%	79,569	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
New Bedford	Massachusetts	142	55	1	83.8%	79,451	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Holland	Michigan	117	51	2	84.5%	79,357	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Fort Mill	South Carolina	140	63	2	83.2%	79,016	2.7	3	2	4	1	2	4
Winter Haven	Florida	129	59	2	73.9%	78,949	3.7	3	1	4	0	1	4
Hillsboro	Oregon	113	46	2	76.3%	78,486	3.5	2	2	3	1	1	3
Herndon	Virginia	129	55	2	83.8%	78,355	2.5	2	2	3	1	1	3
Allen	Texas	110	49	2	70.0%	77,890	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	60	2	77.5%	77,747	3.3	3	2	4	0	2	4
Longview	Texas	150	60	2	73.8%	77,697	3.2	5	1	7	1	2	7
Burbank	California	159	71	2	71.9%	77,632	3.6	5	3	6	0	2	6
Auburn	Washington	122	54	2	68.7%	77,511	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Kennewick	Washington	134	63	2	78.4%	77,476	3.3	3	1	5	0	2	5
Indio	California	114	59	2	80.4%	77,259	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Carrollton	Texas	122	56	3	56.4%	76,098	5.0	3	3	4	0	1	4
Santa Cruz	California	126	54	3	72.6%	75,583	5.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
Missoula	Montana	148	62	2	77.6%	75,462	3.0	5	1	6	1	2	6
Sparks	Nevada	146	64	3	63.2%	75,420	4.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Hagerstown	Maryland	145	56	2	76.8%	75,191	3.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	56	3	70.0%	74,829	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Springdale	Arkansas	122	54	3	77.6%	74,777	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Mission Viejo	California	103	51	3	75.5%	74,249	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Pacoima	California	99	53	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Gastonia	North Carolina	137	57	3	69.1%	73,933	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Redwood City	California	149	61	2	64.4%	73,709	4.0	4	2	5	1	1	5
Daly City	California	129	54	3	64.3%	73,593	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Milton	Florida	116	49	2	77.0%	72,934	3.3	3	2	5	0	2	5
Lynnwood	Washington	141	65	2	67.2%	72,878	4.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Westerville	Ohio	121	56	3	76.5%	72,803	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	124	57	3	75.1%	72,624	3.0	3	1	4	1	1	4
Salinas	California	144	63	5	38.5%	72,518	6.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Kennesaw	Georgia	117	54	3	73.1%	72,471	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Muncie	Indiana	159	69	2	77.9%	72,214	3.4	5	1	5	0	2	5
Bell Gardens	California	96	51	4	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Terre Haute	Indiana	148	66	2	74.7%	70,992	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Bryan	Texas	176	71	2	73.5%	70,732	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Clermont	Florida	134	67	4	70.0%	70,179	4.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	172	73	2	73.6%	70,167	3.9	7	1	8	1	2	8
Federal Way	Washington	121	52	4	70.0%	70,100	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	143	65	3	74.9%	70,092	4.0	4	3	5	1	2	5
Nampa	Idaho	121	57	2	60.0%	69,543	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Tyler	Texas	170	73	5	44.5%	69,467	6.4	9	1	9	0	0	9
Plainfield	Illinois	144	66	2	70.0%	68,991	4.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Greeley	Colorado	110	52	3	60.0%	68,439	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Apopka	Florida	121	59	3	69.6%	67,925	4.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Hawthorne	California	101	52	4	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Scranton	Pennsylvania	186	79	3	68.2%	67,767	3.9	8	1	8	0	1	8
Downey	California	127	64	3	60.0%	67,741	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Napa	California	121	56	3	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sylmar	California	98	51	4	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Edinburg	Texas	137	57	3	43.2%	67,189	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	118	49	3	66.6%	66,837	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Florissant	Missouri	141	54	3	61.7%	66,761	4.7	3	3	3	0	0	3
South Gate	California	96	51	4	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Delray Beach	Florida	148	71	2	55.9%	66,536	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gulfport	Mississippi	135	60	2	70.0%	66,303	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ballwin	Missouri	116	52	3	70.0%	66,268	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Champaign	Illinois	140	63	2	70.0%	66,197	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Buford	Georgia	117	51	3	65.9%	65,358	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Topeka	Kansas	200	86	4	39.6%	64,667	7.4	18	1	18	0	0	18
Newnan	Georgia	116	54	3	68.9%	64,309	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	137	61	3	66.3%	63,477	4.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	142	59	3	66.2%	63,213	4.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
High Point	North Carolina	151	67	5	51.6%	63,121	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	133	58	4	55.8%	63,035	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Meridian	Idaho	121	54	2	60.0%	62,533	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	46	3	60.0%	60,458	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Marcos	California	115	59	3	60.0%	60,289	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sandy	Utah	139	57	3	54.3%	59,919	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Davenport	Iowa	144	61	4	57.1%	59,861	5.2	6	1	6	0	1	6
Sunnyvale	California	135	60	5	39.1%	59,720	6.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Morgantown	West Virginia	133	61	3	62.5%	59,523	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Waukegan	Illinois	115	51	4	60.9%	59,435	4.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Acworth	Georgia	122	57	3	58.4%	58,170	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	120	50	3	60.0%	57,256	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Paterson	New Jersey	133	61	5	38.8%	56,641	7.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Elmhurst	New York	97	50	2	60.0%	56,380	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
El Monte	California	107	56	3	60.0%	56,227	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Quincy	Massachusetts	124	55	3	59.7%	56,146	4.3	3	1	3	1	1	3
Santa Monica	California	154	72	5	59.3%	55,963	5.0	5	2	5	0	1	5
Lowell	Massachusetts	126	59	6	50.0%	55,671	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elgin	Illinois	140	55	3	45.5%	55,586	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Douglasville	Georgia	118	54	3	50.0%	55,124	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Woodstock	Georgia	116	53	3	50.0%	50,861	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	116	52	3	50.0%	50,731	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Covington	Georgia	125	53	4	54.1%	50,188	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Valdosta	Georgia	139	55	3	52.6%	49,986	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	288	130	2	79.0%	1,942,066	2.9	62	13	89	15	35	89
San Diego	272	116	2	74.7%	1,006,069	3.7	36	8	47	6	13	47
San Jose	223	95	2	73.9%	775,652	3.6	28	2	30	4	6	30
Sacramento	242	98	2	78.8%	634,162	3.0	28	8	44	4	18	44
Fresno	238	97	2	82.5%	496,776	2.6	18	2	28	7	12	28
San Francisco	204	77	4	49.5%	431,055	5.1	28	7	41	6	13	41
Bakersfield	193	86	2	72.4%	405,072	3.7	11	1	13	0	2	13
Long Beach	197	89	2	78.1%	374,177	3.3	12	3	15	2	5	15
Oakland	196	77	2	81.0%	333,345	2.9	14	1	16	4	6	16
Riverside	167	73	2	81.6%	301,919	2.6	7	2	11	2	5	11
Stockton	199	85	3	74.3%	277,875	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
Santa Ana	159	71	2	72.9%	260,277	4.0	6	3	9	1	3	9
Anaheim	143	65	2	67.9%	250,227	3.7	7	3	10	0	5	10
Chula Vista	176	72	2	90.0%	234,706	2.4	5	2	8	1	4	8
Modesto	169	70	2	76.6%	202,446	3.1	7	1	9	1	3	9
Santa Rosa	159	69	2	92.0%	198,840	1.7	6	2	11	3	6	11
Hayward	154	61	1	98.3%	188,781	1.3	4	1	6	3	4	6
Oxnard	150	71	2	85.4%	188,163	2.3	4	2	9	1	5	9
Fremont	152	58	3	78.1%	182,111	3.0	4	1	5	1	2	5
Elk Grove	131	59	1	100.0%	179,319	1.0	3	1	6	3	3	6
Oceanside	132	62	2	88.1%	176,439	2.3	4	2	6	1	3	6
Corona	162	72	2	66.3%	170,597	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
San Bernardino	147	69	3	68.1%	169,974	4.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Huntington Beach	134	62	2	84.8%	169,521	2.5	4	2	7	1	3	7
Moreno Valley	144	60	2	77.9%	159,968	3.3	4	1	7	0	3	7
Lancaster	135	65	2	86.0%	158,682	2.3	3	2	7	0	4	7
Palmdale	141	69	2	89.6%	156,785	2.3	4	1	8	0	4	8
Rancho Cucamonga	143	70	2	87.8%	154,981	2.3	4	2	7	1	3	7
Fontana	131	59	3	65.0%	152,497	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Van Nuys	137	66	2	85.5%	151,946	2.5	4	2	6	1	3	6
El Cajon	136	64	1	86.0%	148,371	2.7	3	2	3	1	2	3
North Hollywood	131	60	1	96.2%	147,322	1.8	4	2	5	3	3	5
Escondido	136	61	2	81.6%	146,630	2.8	4	1	5	1	2	5
Torrance	157	78	2	81.5%	144,029	3.0	5	2	6	1	2	6
Whittier	140	67	3	69.9%	137,149	4.2	6	3	6	0	1	6
Ontario	130	59	3	77.6%	137,053	3.3	3	1	3	0	2	3
Roseville	134	56	1	93.1%	130,128	1.7	3	1	6	1	3	6
Concord	144	58	1	97.8%	127,377	1.3	4	1	7	3	4	7
Murrieta	121	57	2	94.8%	125,431	1.5	2	2	4	1	3	4
Fullerton	147	69	2	86.8%	120,886	2.0	4	3	9	2	5	9
Pasadena	163	74	2	75.8%	119,531	3.0	6	3	9	1	5	9
Irvine	161	71	6	43.7%	116,851	6.7	9	3	11	0	2	11
Vallejo	163	67	2	91.9%	114,377	2.3	4	1	8	1	4	8
Chico	140	57	1	100.0%	112,015	1.0	3	1	4	3	3	4
Simi Valley	115	52	2	85.6%	110,176	2.5	2	1	4	0	2	4
San Mateo	144	61	2	76.6%	109,052	3.5	4	3	7	1	3	7
Temecula	144	69	2	83.8%	108,919	2.0	3	1	6	1	3	6
La Puente	126	61	2	92.2%	108,736	2.5	2	3	3	1	1	3
Visalia	134	63	3	70.0%	106,410	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pomona	135	59	2	66.7%	105,408	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Merced	141	65	1	100.0%	103,060	1.0	3	1	6	3	3	6
Hemet	136	61	3	79.8%	102,825	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Vista	127	56	2	84.7%	101,501	2.3	3	1	4	1	2	4
Santa Maria	143	64	3	70.0%	100,162	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Compton	131	59	2	71.3%	99,022	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Rialto	121	59	1	92.7%	98,761	3.0	2	1	2	1	1	2
Carlsbad	144	66	2	86.4%	98,156	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Costa Mesa	120	56	2	85.6%	97,324	2.5	2	2	4	0	2	4
Berkeley	187	82	2	76.2%	96,867	3.7	9	4	13	0	5	13
Santa Barbara	157	68	3	71.0%	96,521	4.3	7	2	9	0	2	9
Pittsburg	99	42	1	100.0%	96,081	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
West Covina	118	59	2	87.6%	95,846	2.0	3	2	4	2	2	4
Victorville	124	56	3	70.0%	95,417	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	98	46	2	90.0%	95,297	2.0	1	1	2	0	1	2
Garden Grove	158	70	3	54.1%	95,044	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Inglewood	166	71	3	69.8%	93,330	4.0	5	2	5	0	1	5
Redding	148	68	2	81.8%	92,466	3.3	4	2	4	1	1	4
Palo Alto	137	59	1	94.2%	91,097	1.8	4	3	7	2	4	7
Santa Clara	134	59	2	70.0%	87,862	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Orange	135	60	2	60.0%	86,995	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Livermore	124	54	2	89.5%	86,153	2.0	2	2	4	1	2	4
Menifee	143	63	2	77.5%	85,627	3.8	4	2	5	0	1	5
Chino	110	51	2	90.0%	85,027	2.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Clovis	113	53	3	70.0%	84,970	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	114	46	3	76.0%	84,198	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Vacaville	104	45	3	79.4%	83,598	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Perris	123	58	2	70.0%	82,173	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	126	54	3	70.0%	81,171	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	123	54	2	73.0%	81,139	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Madera	138	61	2	77.6%	79,952	3.3	3	2	3	0	1	3
Fairfield	123	54	4	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	115	50	2	76.6%	79,569	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Burbank	159	71	2	71.9%	77,632	3.6	5	3	6	0	2	6
Indio	114	59	2	80.4%	77,259	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Santa Cruz	126	54	3	72.6%	75,583	5.0	4	1	4	0	2	4
Mission Viejo	103	51	3	75.5%	74,249	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Pacoima	99	53	4	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Redwood City	149	61	2	64.4%	73,709	4.0	4	2	5	1	1	5
Daly City	129	54	3	64.3%	73,593	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Salinas	144	63	5	38.5%	72,518	6.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Bell Gardens	96	51	4	70.0%	71,703	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hawthorne	101	52	4	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Downey	127	64	3	60.0%	67,741	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Napa	121	56	3	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sylmar	98	51	4	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
South Gate	96	51	4	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Marcos	115	59	3	60.0%	60,289	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sunnyvale	135	60	5	39.1%	59,720	6.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
El Monte	107	56	3	60.0%	56,227	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	154	72	5	59.3%	55,963	5.0	5	2	5	0	1	5
Tracy	153	66	4	38.6%	45,172	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4

Houston

ZIP	budget.com	enterprise.com	avis.com	expedia.com	carrentals.com	kayak.com
77088	1	3	2	4	5	6
77047	3	1	6	7	8	9
77037	4	1	3	7	8	9
77098	4	1	5	7	8	9
77027	1	3	2	4	5	6
77068	1	2	3	4	6	5
77078	1	3	2	4	5	6
77086	1	2	6	7	9	8
77035	2	1	5	7	9	8
77008	1	3	2	4	6	5
77004	2	1	5	7	9	8
77028	4	5	6	7	9	10
77059	2	1	5	7	9	8
77039	4	3	2	7	10	8
77019	2	3	5	7	9	8
77075	3	1	5	7	9	8
77077	4	1	2	7	9	8
77079	4	1	5	7	9	8
77099	1	3	2	4	6	5
77024	3	2	5	7	10	9
77095	4	1	3	7	10	9
77048	1	3	2	4	6	5
77044	4	2	1	7	9	10
77015	4	1	2	7	10	8
77017	2	1	5	7	9	8
77057	4	1	5	7	9	8
77055	2	1	5	7	9	10
77006	2	3	5	7	10	9
77026	3	1	5	7	9	10
77046	4	1	5	7	9	8
77066	2	1	5	7	9	8
77023	4	1	5	7	9	10
77094	1	6	3	7	9	8
77084	4	1	5	7	9	8
77013	1	3	2	4	6	5
77063	4	2	3	7	9	8
77053	3	1	6	7	11	8
77022	4	1	2	7	9	8
77072	2	1	6	7	9	8
77049	4	2	1	7	10	8
77045	4	1	2	7	9	8
77010	2	1	5	7	8	9
77018	3	2	1	7	9	8
77041	4	3	2	7	9	8
77009	4	2	1	7	8	9
77089	4	1	6	7	9	8
77032	1	2	5	7	8	9
77036	1	2	6	7	8	9
77085	1	2	5	7	9	8
77054	4	2	1	7	9	11
77058	1	2	5	7	9	8
77014	2	1	3	7	8	9
77067	4	2	1	7	9	10
77005	4	1	2	7	9	10
77076	1	3	2	4	5	6
77070	1	2	3	4	6	5
77060	4	2	1	11	8	10
77080	4	2	5	7	8	9
77050	3	1	6	7	9	8
77091	3	1	5	7	8	9
77071	1	3	6	7	8	9
77061	1	3	2	4	5	6
77020	3	1	5	7	8	9
77081	4	1	6	7	8	9
77030	4	1	2	7	9	11
77040	3	1	6	7	9	10
77090	3	1	6	7	9	8
77031	3	1	5	7	8	9
77051	1	2	6	7	8	9
77011	3	1	5	7	8	9
77042	4	5	1	7	8	10
77062	4	2	1	7	8	9
77082	1	2	3	4	5	6
77093	4	2	6	7	8	9
77073	2	3	1	7	9	12
77033	2	5	6	7	8	9
77043	2	1	5	7	8	9
77074	1	2	5	7	8	9
77064	4	3	5	7	8	9
77012	3	1	6	7	8	9
77002	2	1	5	7	8	9
77092	1	3	6	7	8	9
77069	2	1	6	7	9	8
77021	1	2	6	7	8	9
77083	1	2	3	4	8	5
77029	4	2	6	7	8	9
77034	2	1	6	7	8	9
77087	1	2	3	4	5	6
77003	1	2	3	4	5	6
77038	4	2	1	7	9	8
77007	4	2	5	7	8	9
77016	4	6	5	7	8	9
77065	1	2	6	7	8	9
77096	3	1	5	7	8	9
77025	1	3	2	4	5	6
77056	4	6	5	7	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Budget

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 967 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Budget Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (car rental near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Budget Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Budget Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Budget Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly