Avis Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve avis.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 967 Car Rental Providers In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Avis Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Avis Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Avis Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Avis Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	5,266	967	3	54.2%	174,870,487	9.0	26,596	31,344	1,038	34,957	1,203	7,888	34,745
California	913	287	3	48.8%	19,097,546	12.6	1,114	1,610	117	1,775	35	361	1,737
Texas	733	214	3	59.3%	16,543,463	8.5	1,324	1,844	106	2,123	103	530	2,121
Florida	723	244	3	52.4%	10,784,237	13.9	428	886	67	996	43	225	994
New York	721	214	3	52.2%	10,246,719	7.4	1,468	1,722	47	1,821	17	289	1,790
Pennsylvania	700	211	3	57.5%	7,359,312	7.7	1,570	1,734	34	1,828	33	337	1,826
Illinois	612	182	3	56.5%	7,237,814	8.5	1,215	1,334	40	1,412	29	285	1,408
Georgia	548	170	3	62.9%	6,472,862	8.8	557	696	45	800	38	206	798
Ohio	549	166	3	54.7%	6,367,667	9.8	954	1,131	31	1,255	50	269	1,242
Michigan	551	170	3	54.8%	5,460,302	7.8	820	946	35	1,087	66	283	1,087
North Carolina	553	177	3	51.3%	5,209,161	8.6	661	777	27	813	11	117	811
New Jersey	518	181	3	55.7%	4,946,268	8.2	522	574	48	621	24	141	609
Virginia	569	175	3	51.4%	4,327,459	11.5	696	834	23	863	3	142	862
Tennessee	475	168	3	58.8%	3,908,550	5.7	513	619	27	684	18	140	684
Missouri	597	177	3	62.2%	3,788,142	6.9	868	997	24	1,133	27	282	1,133
Indiana	755	215	3	55.6%	3,692,465	11.7	624	717	17	803	35	183	799
Maryland	505	166	3	59.1%	3,547,253	8.2	380	448	22	473	9	93	473
Arizona	497	169	3	49.8%	3,462,183	12.4	231	366	23	394	13	78	388
Washington	541	179	3	47.0%	3,421,981	14.1	412	533	22	588	28	116	587
Massachusetts	519	164	3	47.9%	3,269,381	9.3	449	514	21	529	2	67	520
Minnesota	543	174	3	58.0%	3,207,379	7.0	765	859	26	957	59	238	951
Wisconsin	511	159	3	53.8%	3,106,590	7.6	686	743	27	1,003	102	381	1,002
Alabama	484	162	3	55.3%	2,690,032	6.2	517	631	21	680	12	142	671
South Carolina	457	148	3	51.4%	2,548,913	9.5	333	405	11	411	2	55	410
Louisiana	490	173	3	54.2%	2,525,959	12.3	405	473	20	505	2	86	505
Colorado	569	180	4	44.4%	2,456,132	17.9	347	446	28	497	15	112	493
Oklahoma	465	157	3	57.7%	2,261,804	8.5	539	620	16	775	44	259	772
Oregon	546	178	3	52.6%	2,147,257	8.3	344	401	14	453	21	81	452
Kentucky	455	152	3	47.1%	2,094,722	9.2	684	730	9	739	1	99	738
Kansas	506	168	3	68.9%	2,005,166	4.7	616	692	18	850	55	255	848
Iowa	546	175	3	56.9%	1,781,976	5.1	890	933	14	1,030	32	221	1,027
Connecticut	402	134	3	48.6%	1,739,050	8.6	230	270	17	288	6	62	287
Nevada	376	142	3	57.4%	1,678,790	5.7	92	167	14	184	2	37	184
Utah	433	160	3	52.1%	1,587,072	5.4	246	284	12	321	6	64	318
Arkansas	481	169	3	51.9%	1,550,851	10.2	528	556	13	620	21	164	607
Mississippi	445	152	3	51.9%	1,550,586	5.8	384	418	12	436	1	57	419
Nebraska	467	160	3	74.4%	1,417,413	4.2	524	581	15	782	62	263	781
New Mexico	424	146	3	57.8%	1,206,751	6.4	324	356	11	373	7	87	373
Hawaii	381	159	3	61.5%	873,938	4.9	82	93	8	103	0	19	103
West Virginia	447	158	3	46.4%	849,062	13.5	637	646	7	647	2	82	636
New Hampshire	389	146	3	61.7%	828,903	5.0	238	248	15	283	7	64	283
Idaho	451	149	3	47.2%	796,606	14.4	227	247	7	281	2	62	280
Maine	503	197	3	49.0%	652,542	8.1	410	414	4	414	0	49	411
Montana	462	158	3	59.4%	619,545	12.7	319	329	20	426	32	166	425
Rhode Island	308	115	4	51.7%	546,563	11.5	61	72	4	73	2	13	73
Delaware	324	133	3	53.8%	511,280	18.1	44	57	8	62	1	14	62
North Dakota	386	148	3	66.6%	500,140	9.5	346	358	15	550	48	246	550
Alaska	436	147	3	64.2%	473,921	5.5	214	231	14	258	14	114	258
Wyoming	392	145	2	73.3%	426,779	5.4	161	168	15	240	14	100	239
South Dakota	421	147	3	47.2%	408,057	9.7	345	351	10	425	45	110	425
Vermont	351	127	3	51.3%	320,798	5.5	250	254	3	260	1	38	260

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	303	122	3	70.7%	2,252,655	4.0	96	13	120	11	40	120
Chicago	Illinois	245	99	3	63.2%	1,707,509	4.7	56	4	63	2	18	63
Brooklyn	New York	226	91	3	57.2%	1,488,521	5.2	37	1	39	0	6	39
Los Angeles	California	288	130	3	58.5%	1,437,723	5.0	62	8	69	3	15	69
San Antonio	Texas	255	99	2	80.3%	1,428,181	2.9	59	9	99	17	42	99
Miami	Florida	270	129	3	63.0%	1,183,123	4.6	55	8	68	6	20	68
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	262	102	2	66.1%	1,041,911	4.3	47	2	47	1	9	47
Las Vegas	Nevada	251	100	3	57.7%	891,936	5.3	43	3	44	0	9	44
Dallas	Texas	276	112	3	61.9%	861,789	5.1	48	4	51	1	11	51
Phoenix	Arizona	229	92	3	54.0%	783,887	5.6	42	3	43	0	5	43
New York City	New York	226	96	4	45.9%	744,730	7.2	47	9	60	3	13	40
Atlanta	Georgia	247	97	2	73.5%	726,793	3.8	39	9	53	8	19	53
Bronx	New York	201	86	4	46.3%	667,566	6.2	25	1	25	0	2	25
San Diego	California	272	116	4	49.5%	666,560	5.9	36	6	42	2	6	42
Minneapolis	Minnesota	294	111	3	60.5%	658,958	5.0	51	7	55	3	15	55
Indianapolis	Indiana	267	104	3	67.0%	637,749	4.5	37	6	45	2	16	45
Austin	Texas	244	97	3	55.8%	606,659	5.4	44	5	49	2	9	49
Columbus	Ohio	244	97	3	70.7%	598,825	4.0	30	8	45	7	16	45
Saint Louis	Missouri	269	102	3	64.2%	588,589	4.7	45	7	55	2	17	55
Orlando	Florida	256	105	3	57.0%	567,258	5.2	32	4	35	0	8	35
Cincinnati	Ohio	252	97	3	70.4%	565,923	4.2	45	4	59	4	20	59
Tucson	Arizona	259	104	3	60.0%	542,505	4.8	32	4	37	2	11	37
El Paso	Texas	243	87	3	66.8%	527,459	4.9	24	4	29	1	6	29
San Jose	California	223	95	5	50.1%	525,889	5.9	28	2	31	1	3	31
Denver	Colorado	266	105	4	47.2%	512,784	6.4	38	5	43	0	8	43
Fort Worth	Texas	237	96	3	56.1%	511,638	5.6	32	3	34	0	4	34
Charlotte	North Carolina	240	97	3	53.7%	487,174	5.9	24	4	28	1	4	28
Memphis	Tennessee	220	87	3	68.9%	479,142	3.8	26	6	41	7	17	41
Tampa	Florida	236	96	3	59.0%	467,843	5.0	27	3	30	0	8	30
Omaha	Nebraska	228	90	2	84.1%	464,782	2.7	31	5	54	12	26	54
Saint Paul	Minnesota	286	109	3	57.0%	455,928	8.1	29	6	32	1	7	32
Seattle	Washington	258	98	3	47.4%	453,203	6.1	35	2	36	0	3	36
Jacksonville	Florida	236	98	3	51.6%	447,199	5.8	31	1	31	0	3	31
Sacramento	California	242	98	3	54.1%	435,560	5.3	28	4	33	1	6	33
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	252	111	3	52.2%	434,271	19.4	23	1	23	0	4	23
Portland	Oregon	252	96	3	46.7%	429,796	6.4	33	3	34	0	1	34
Louisville	Kentucky	243	97	3	56.1%	427,162	5.7	32	4	35	1	5	35
Kansas City	Missouri	262	103	3	70.2%	401,365	4.2	49	3	66	3	24	66
Cleveland	Ohio	238	92	3	53.1%	398,531	5.5	29	1	29	0	5	29
Detroit	Michigan	227	89	2	61.3%	392,394	4.9	25	1	25	0	1	25
Baltimore	Maryland	238	97	3	60.1%	379,220	5.0	22	1	22	0	6	22
Washington DC	District of Columbia	200	82	3	53.1%	363,034	5.9	28	3	31	1	3	31
Bakersfield	California	193	86	3	64.3%	359,769	4.5	11	1	14	1	3	14
Albuquerque	New Mexico	222	85	3	53.6%	351,376	5.8	17	1	17	0	1	17
Raleigh	North Carolina	207	78	3	63.1%	345,183	4.9	15	3	18	2	4	18
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	257	103	3	50.1%	342,057	6.0	39	2	40	1	3	40
Buffalo	New York	243	98	3	59.2%	333,392	5.2	28	4	36	1	8	36
Stockton	California	199	85	2	87.7%	327,659	2.3	12	2	22	2	12	22
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	255	104	3	47.7%	325,642	7.9	42	1	42	0	5	42
Tulsa	Oklahoma	264	113	2	75.9%	320,432	2.9	28	4	48	9	22	48
Long Beach	California	197	89	3	64.8%	310,311	4.7	12	3	15	0	5	15
Corpus Christi	Texas	198	77	2	89.2%	290,437	1.8	18	3	32	9	20	32
Wichita	Kansas	236	101	3	69.4%	290,007	3.7	26	3	37	4	16	37
Birmingham	Alabama	241	100	3	56.1%	280,474	5.4	30	3	32	1	5	32
New Orleans	Louisiana	203	80	3	65.3%	279,295	4.3	19	2	22	1	8	22
Marietta	Georgia	175	76	2	86.1%	277,737	2.3	7	4	13	2	6	13
Knoxville	Tennessee	208	81	3	71.2%	275,164	3.8	17	2	24	3	10	24
Nashville	Tennessee	222	91	3	58.5%	268,220	4.5	22	2	27	2	8	27
Honolulu	Hawaii	185	82	2	64.2%	267,032	4.6	11	1	11	0	1	11
Spring	Texas	180	80	3	69.8%	265,775	4.0	8	5	11	2	3	11
Salt Lake City	Utah	231	97	3	53.8%	261,710	5.1	19	4	26	0	8	26
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	209	79	3	67.4%	255,360	4.0	18	4	24	0	11	24
Rochester	New York	227	88	3	53.6%	252,788	5.5	24	2	25	1	4	25
Katy	Texas	153	69	3	72.9%	250,420	3.5	4	2	5	0	2	5
Mesa	Arizona	207	82	4	46.7%	249,583	6.3	13	1	13	0	0	13
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	95	2	84.4%	244,167	2.9	22	2	38	1	17	38
Aurora	Colorado	193	80	3	55.6%	242,301	5.4	11	1	11	0	2	11
Dayton	Ohio	247	99	3	49.8%	238,047	12.6	25	5	27	1	3	27
Pompano Beach	Florida	201	90	3	63.5%	235,411	4.8	10	1	10	0	1	10
Lakeland	Florida	165	76	2	89.0%	229,421	2.0	9	2	18	2	9	18
Richmond	Virginia	233	95	3	57.9%	226,302	5.1	15	2	16	0	2	16
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	76	3	50.2%	226,060	13.7	11	1	12	0	1	12
Oakland	California	196	77	4	54.4%	223,903	5.7	14	3	15	0	2	15
Silver Spring	Maryland	180	79	3	72.6%	220,133	3.9	7	5	11	0	4	11
Fresno	California	238	97	4	36.4%	219,023	7.1	18	1	18	0	0	18
Fort Wayne	Indiana	184	75	3	67.9%	216,126	3.9	16	2	23	2	8	23
Staten Island	New York	177	78	4	44.8%	212,537	14.1	11	1	11	0	0	11
Alexandria	Virginia	208	86	3	59.3%	210,247	5.2	14	3	16	0	2	16
Santa Ana	California	159	71	3	56.4%	201,276	5.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Hialeah	Florida	163	82	3	53.8%	197,419	5.6	7	2	7	0	1	7
Lawrenceville	Georgia	146	65	3	77.1%	197,381	3.5	4	1	6	1	2	6
San Francisco	California	204	77	7	22.2%	192,849	8.4	28	2	29	0	1	29
Springfield	Missouri	165	66	2	83.6%	192,699	3.0	7	1	11	2	4	11
West Palm Beach	Florida	186	87	4	50.9%	188,525	5.8	12	2	13	1	2	13
Grand Rapids	Michigan	193	74	3	50.6%	186,075	5.6	12	3	15	1	6	15
Lubbock	Texas	209	87	3	66.8%	184,698	37.4	9	3	10	3	10	10
Reading	Pennsylvania	186	74	2	85.6%	184,379	2.8	10	1	15	1	8	15
Naples	Florida	191	74	3	58.8%	184,034	5.1	14	3	17	1	4	17
Scottsdale	Arizona	183	76	3	61.7%	183,846	5.4	11	4	13	1	2	13
Winston Salem	North Carolina	185	73	3	69.1%	182,539	4.0	9	2	13	2	4	13
Spokane	Washington	212	85	3	49.8%	179,230	18.2	12	4	17	4	8	16
Durham	North Carolina	186	71	3	61.5%	178,350	4.5	8	2	11	0	3	11
Tacoma	Washington	240	96	3	53.1%	177,105	5.9	20	2	21	0	1	21
Vancouver	Washington	207	83	3	53.6%	174,892	5.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Riverside	California	167	73	3	47.1%	174,206	6.0	7	1	7	0	1	7
Amarillo	Texas	172	69	3	75.9%	173,837	3.2	14	1	18	3	7	18
Columbia	South Carolina	205	83	3	50.2%	172,102	5.9	14	1	14	0	1	14
Ogden	Utah	158	65	2	84.7%	170,576	2.6	5	2	8	1	4	8
Anchorage	Alaska	174	76	3	69.2%	168,934	4.3	12	3	13	0	5	13
Jersey City	New Jersey	164	73	3	64.4%	168,380	3.9	7	2	9	1	3	9
Alpharetta	Georgia	161	63	2	88.7%	167,877	2.0	4	2	8	1	4	8
Henderson	Nevada	169	71	4	55.1%	166,770	5.5	8	2	8	0	1	8
Pensacola	Florida	196	80	3	60.6%	162,627	5.3	13	3	14	0	2	14
Savannah	Georgia	195	78	3	67.0%	161,693	4.0	10	2	13	2	5	13
Fayetteville	North Carolina	176	70	3	66.1%	161,195	4.6	8	1	8	0	2	8
Laredo	Texas	161	69	4	59.5%	161,080	5.5	6	2	9	0	3	9
Hollywood	Florida	200	93	4	33.8%	158,623	47.7	5	2	6	1	1	6
Providence	Rhode Island	180	74	3	76.7%	157,231	3.5	8	2	9	2	4	9
Overland Park	Kansas	187	74	1	85.7%	157,204	2.4	9	3	16	1	10	16
Reno	Nevada	195	78	3	52.5%	155,716	13.2	11	3	12	0	2	12
Cypress	Texas	122	55	2	90.0%	153,541	2.0	2	3	4	0	2	4
Salem	Oregon	174	79	3	57.3%	152,627	4.7	7	2	10	3	3	10
Madison	Wisconsin	192	74	3	51.7%	152,506	6.0	14	2	16	0	2	16
Glendale	Arizona	170	72	3	50.0%	152,372	6.0	9	3	9	0	0	9
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	252	91	8	18.8%	152,326	61.9	12	2	13	0	2	13
Saint Petersburg	Florida	211	84	5	42.5%	151,666	17.9	14	1	14	0	0	14
Newark	New Jersey	177	83	3	53.5%	150,038	5.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Ontario	California	130	59	2	83.1%	146,801	2.7	3	2	4	0	3	4
Mission	Texas	143	63	3	78.0%	141,243	3.7	3	2	4	0	2	4
Plano	Texas	170	68	4	46.2%	141,009	6.3	7	2	7	0	1	7
Round Rock	Texas	134	55	3	83.7%	140,222	2.7	3	3	4	0	3	4
Fort Myers	Florida	186	74	3	55.6%	139,816	5.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Greensboro	North Carolina	180	74	4	42.5%	139,360	6.6	9	1	9	0	0	9
Trenton	New Jersey	196	79	3	66.0%	137,172	5.1	11	2	11	0	4	11
Arlington	Texas	167	70	5	34.5%	137,039	7.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Allentown	Pennsylvania	176	78	3	80.0%	136,028	3.9	7	2	7	0	2	7
Corona	California	162	72	4	52.7%	135,485	6.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	150	58	3	57.9%	135,414	5.3	7	2	8	0	2	8
Sarasota	Florida	194	81	3	53.9%	134,974	5.8	13	1	13	0	2	13
Topeka	Kansas	200	86	2	82.5%	134,823	2.8	18	1	28	4	11	28
Kissimmee	Florida	173	78	3	46.1%	133,185	6.3	7	3	8	0	1	8
Fort Collins	Colorado	147	62	3	68.4%	133,118	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Bradenton	Florida	169	70	3	51.5%	130,425	5.8	10	2	10	0	1	10
Des Moines	Iowa	191	77	3	58.3%	130,131	5.4	11	2	12	0	2	12
Olathe	Kansas	122	56	2	90.0%	129,936	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Boynton Beach	Florida	153	66	2	74.3%	129,403	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Chandler	Arizona	163	69	3	47.7%	128,074	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fredericksburg	Virginia	159	68	3	73.6%	127,988	3.8	5	2	6	0	3	6
Ocala	Florida	184	86	3	56.9%	127,980	5.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Evansville	Indiana	182	80	3	69.3%	127,904	3.9	9	1	13	1	5	13
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	153	64	3	68.1%	126,880	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Victorville	California	124	56	1	92.6%	126,216	1.7	3	1	3	1	3	3
El Cajon	California	136	64	3	72.5%	124,964	3.7	3	3	4	0	1	4
Rockford	Illinois	185	73	3	68.3%	124,491	3.9	9	2	11	1	4	11
Chattanooga	Tennessee	214	89	3	59.5%	123,703	5.1	15	3	16	1	2	16
Lancaster	California	135	65	3	67.0%	123,560	35.3	2	2	4	0	2	4
Norfolk	Virginia	189	72	3	50.0%	122,796	6.0	14	2	14	0	0	14
Roanoke	Virginia	183	77	3	71.7%	121,558	13.0	9	2	14	1	6	14
Mobile	Alabama	220	88	4	44.5%	120,900	6.4	18	2	18	0	1	18
Jamaica	New York	157	69	5	49.0%	119,397	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Garland	Texas	154	69	3	50.0%	118,965	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Wilmington	Delaware	185	81	4	54.2%	118,890	5.5	10	2	10	0	1	10
York	Pennsylvania	182	81	3	65.7%	118,075	4.7	7	2	8	1	2	8
Huntsville	Alabama	202	81	3	60.2%	118,057	4.7	11	3	14	1	4	14
Gainesville	Florida	184	79	3	55.8%	116,915	5.1	10	1	10	0	3	10
Henrico	Virginia	182	74	3	60.2%	116,049	5.1	7	2	7	0	1	7
Lafayette	Louisiana	150	72	3	71.7%	115,085	4.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Eugene	Oregon	177	75	3	56.6%	114,920	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Little Rock	Arkansas	183	77	3	52.3%	114,102	5.6	12	1	12	0	2	12
Kent	Washington	137	59	2	70.5%	113,108	26.5	3	1	3	2	3	3
Melbourne	Florida	147	68	2	72.4%	112,771	3.6	5	2	8	2	3	8
Garden Grove	California	158	70	2	64.1%	112,620	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Torrance	California	157	78	3	63.6%	112,389	4.8	5	3	6	0	2	6
Hemet	California	136	61	2	86.7%	111,683	2.3	3	2	5	0	3	5
Las Cruces	New Mexico	163	62	3	73.8%	110,019	3.6	7	3	11	0	5	11
Flushing	New York	136	64	4	50.3%	108,107	6.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Lake Worth	Florida	149	69	4	51.6%	106,568	5.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Greenville	South Carolina	186	78	4	48.3%	106,094	5.9	9	2	9	0	0	9
Fontana	California	131	59	4	45.1%	105,822	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Grand Prairie	Texas	119	54	3	55.4%	105,541	5.3	4	2	5	0	1	5
Van Nuys	California	137	66	3	59.3%	105,521	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Santa Barbara	California	157	68	2	77.2%	104,923	3.0	7	1	12	2	5	12
Humble	Texas	146	63	3	63.0%	104,876	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Newport News	Virginia	153	63	3	59.0%	104,225	5.3	7	2	7	0	0	7
Visalia	California	134	63	4	68.6%	104,221	4.0	3	2	5	0	2	5
Whittier	California	140	67	4	53.1%	104,142	5.8	6	2	6	0	0	6
Hamilton	Ohio	136	54	3	75.6%	103,694	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Modesto	California	169	70	5	39.2%	103,616	58.6	3	1	3	1	3	3
Charleston	South Carolina	216	82	3	52.3%	102,976	5.7	10	2	10	0	1	10
Boise	Idaho	188	78	4	40.0%	102,428	7.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Astoria	New York	148	69	2	71.3%	101,695	3.8	4	4	7	1	2	7
Fairfax	Virginia	165	66	3	62.1%	101,632	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Flint	Michigan	180	79	4	65.3%	101,489	4.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Douglasville	Georgia	118	54	2	92.0%	101,425	2.0	2	1	4	1	2	4
North Hollywood	California	131	60	3	66.0%	101,033	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Racine	Wisconsin	148	68	3	80.0%	100,858	3.0	5	3	10	0	5	10
Beaverton	Oregon	146	61	4	50.0%	100,819	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	California	126	54	1	96.6%	100,513	2.0	4	1	5	2	3	5
Clermont	Florida	134	67	1	100.0%	100,255	1.0	3	2	6	3	3	6
Buford	Georgia	117	51	1	100.0%	99,103	1.0	2	1	3	2	2	3
Woodbridge	Virginia	139	61	3	46.7%	98,762	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	122	56	3	75.5%	98,519	34.7	2	1	2	1	2	2
Decatur	Georgia	167	70	3	54.4%	98,307	5.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Littleton	Colorado	209	89	6	30.2%	98,201	34.9	7	3	7	0	0	7
Pasadena	California	163	74	3	62.2%	98,093	4.8	6	2	7	1	1	7
Waco	Texas	174	69	2	61.6%	97,572	5.6	9	1	10	0	1	10
Saint Augustine	Florida	152	70	3	74.3%	97,424	4.0	5	4	8	1	3	8
Inglewood	California	166	71	2	72.7%	97,303	4.0	5	2	7	0	3	7
Oxnard	California	150	71	3	44.0%	97,069	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hawthorne	California	101	52	1	100.0%	96,836	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Sandy	Utah	139	57	2	87.3%	96,373	2.3	4	1	8	1	4	8
Montgomery	Alabama	210	90	4	45.9%	96,322	6.4	13	2	13	0	0	13
Brownsville	Texas	132	59	5	47.7%	95,981	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rockville	Maryland	144	63	4	66.2%	95,830	4.8	4	3	5	1	1	5
Bowling Green	Kentucky	148	58	2	82.9%	95,754	2.8	4	2	7	0	4	7
Boca Raton	Florida	177	82	4	42.9%	95,367	36.1	6	2	7	1	4	7
Laurel	Maryland	148	59	2	84.4%	94,931	3.0	4	3	5	1	3	5
Tyler	Texas	170	73	2	60.7%	94,755	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Albany	New York	210	86	3	62.6%	94,742	5.0	11	2	11	0	3	11
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	164	69	3	64.9%	94,524	4.6	5	2	7	0	2	7
Independence	Missouri	175	79	3	76.0%	94,286	3.5	8	1	11	0	5	11
Manchester	New Hampshire	139	57	2	80.7%	93,716	3.2	5	1	9	0	4	9
Edinburg	Texas	137	57	2	60.0%	93,342	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	181	74	4	65.6%	91,524	4.7	6	1	7	0	1	7
Pueblo	Colorado	170	71	3	57.5%	90,941	4.9	7	4	11	0	4	11
Yonkers	New York	145	64	3	50.2%	90,564	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Berkeley	California	187	82	3	71.1%	90,347	4.1	9	3	12	0	4	12
Hyattsville	Maryland	174	72	3	57.2%	90,096	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pomona	California	135	59	3	56.7%	89,609	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Chico	California	140	57	3	79.9%	89,467	3.0	3	1	4	0	2	4
Clarksville	Tennessee	130	60	3	50.0%	87,849	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Newnan	Georgia	116	54	2	93.7%	87,525	1.5	2	1	3	1	2	3
Palm Bay	Florida	152	66	2	78.4%	87,283	3.3	4	2	6	0	3	6
Vero Beach	Florida	159	63	4	75.6%	87,098	3.3	6	3	11	1	5	11
Napa	California	121	56	2	90.0%	86,999	2.0	2	1	4	0	2	4
Midland	Texas	168	75	3	54.3%	86,928	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Mcdonough	Georgia	116	52	2	85.4%	86,687	2.5	2	2	4	0	2	4
Frisco	Texas	123	54	3	50.0%	86,224	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	California	126	54	2	74.0%	85,794	4.0	3	2	5	0	2	5
Acworth	Georgia	122	57	2	85.8%	85,551	2.5	2	1	4	0	2	4
Sparks	Nevada	146	64	2	71.6%	85,391	4.0	4	2	6	0	2	6
Ridgewood	New York	100	51	3	80.0%	85,374	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Jackson	Mississippi	203	79	4	50.0%	85,159	6.0	11	1	11	0	0	11
Roswell	Georgia	126	52	2	85.3%	85,149	2.5	2	1	4	0	2	4
Federal Way	Washington	121	52	2	85.0%	85,143	2.5	2	2	4	0	2	4
Macon	Georgia	177	79	4	51.9%	84,980	6.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Kennesaw	Georgia	117	54	2	85.6%	84,886	2.5	2	1	3	0	2	3
Clearwater	Florida	182	71	3	45.9%	84,095	16.6	8	4	8	0	1	8
Syracuse	New York	208	83	5	37.0%	83,988	7.5	15	2	20	2	5	13
Saint Charles	Missouri	136	61	3	59.8%	83,638	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lewisville	Texas	137	57	3	70.2%	83,293	4.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Yuma	Arizona	125	58	3	56.1%	82,809	4.7	3	1	4	0	1	4
Idaho Falls	Idaho	158	72	2	75.6%	82,452	3.8	4	1	7	0	3	7
Lawrence	Kansas	167	73	2	81.5%	82,403	3.2	5	1	8	0	4	8
Green Bay	Wisconsin	182	74	4	44.9%	82,325	6.4	7	2	7	0	0	7
New Braunfels	Texas	127	58	3	80.0%	82,234	3.0	2	2	4	0	2	4
Mcallen	Texas	141	61	3	57.8%	81,811	4.3	3	2	4	1	1	4
Oceanside	California	132	62	6	40.8%	81,799	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Coral Springs	Florida	124	61	3	84.1%	81,774	2.5	2	1	2	0	2	2
Sunnyvale	California	135	60	4	53.3%	81,480	5.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Canton	Ohio	187	71	3	55.4%	81,411	5.4	12	2	13	0	2	13
Woodstock	Georgia	116	53	2	80.0%	81,377	3.0	2	1	4	0	2	4
Springdale	Arkansas	122	54	2	84.1%	81,120	2.5	2	1	3	0	2	3
Killeen	Texas	158	72	3	53.6%	80,559	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Huntington Beach	California	134	62	4	40.0%	79,963	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Rialto	California	121	59	3	74.5%	79,400	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Orange	California	135	60	4	54.6%	79,110	5.4	5	2	6	0	1	6
Falls Church	Virginia	161	68	3	65.5%	78,800	4.4	5	3	6	0	2	6
Mission Viejo	California	103	51	2	80.0%	78,686	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Boston	Massachusetts	197	79	4	51.8%	78,621	5.4	14	3	16	1	4	16
Morgantown	West Virginia	133	61	2	82.5%	78,580	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Burbank	California	159	71	3	71.8%	77,529	4.2	5	3	7	0	2	7
Muskegon	Michigan	151	61	3	59.9%	77,407	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Monica	California	154	72	2	82.0%	77,398	2.8	5	2	8	0	4	7
Kalamazoo	Michigan	169	72	5	47.1%	77,234	6.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pittsburg	California	99	42	3	80.0%	76,865	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Puyallup	Washington	161	69	4	53.7%	76,643	5.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Stone Mountain	Georgia	142	64	3	59.4%	76,156	5.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Santa Maria	California	143	64	4	52.8%	75,605	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	142	55	3	79.6%	75,508	2.8	4	2	7	0	3	7
Appleton	Wisconsin	140	58	3	61.4%	74,758	4.5	4	2	6	0	2	6
Peoria	Arizona	152	66	4	43.3%	74,519	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
College Station	Texas	123	48	3	60.5%	74,451	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Joliet	Illinois	150	60	4	57.7%	74,424	4.8	5	2	6	0	2	6
San Leandro	California	123	54	3	66.6%	74,027	4.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Spartanburg	South Carolina	148	59	3	65.9%	73,735	4.6	5	1	5	0	2	5
Boulder	Colorado	170	67	3	55.8%	73,185	20.8	5	3	7	0	3	7
Rancho Cucamonga	California	143	70	5	41.4%	73,173	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	161	71	3	62.2%	72,744	4.7	6	2	8	0	2	8
Stamford	Connecticut	133	65	4	56.4%	72,672	4.7	6	2	7	0	2	7
Gaithersburg	Maryland	163	61	4	50.0%	72,322	5.8	5	2	5	0	0	5
Santa Fe	New Mexico	169	74	3	56.4%	72,212	43.0	3	2	3	1	1	3
West Valley City	Utah	138	67	3	54.1%	71,825	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Murrieta	California	121	57	4	54.2%	71,731	5.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Compton	California	131	59	4	51.3%	71,247	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Manassas	Virginia	154	62	3	46.8%	71,112	6.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Elizabeth	New Jersey	139	68	3	70.6%	70,941	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Missoula	Montana	148	62	3	72.6%	70,674	3.8	5	3	8	0	4	8
Westerville	Ohio	121	56	4	74.1%	70,579	3.0	2	2	3	1	1	3
Spring Hill	Florida	157	68	3	56.2%	70,432	5.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Winter Haven	Florida	129	59	3	65.7%	70,208	34.7	2	1	2	1	2	2
Conroe	Texas	166	72	3	43.8%	70,147	19.1	6	2	7	0	1	7
Waterbury	Connecticut	157	69	3	64.5%	70,083	4.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Elkhart	Indiana	136	56	3	70.4%	69,959	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Fullerton	California	147	69	3	50.0%	69,638	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Anderson	South Carolina	144	62	4	70.7%	69,605	4.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Metairie	Louisiana	159	60	4	48.9%	69,492	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Athens	Georgia	141	58	4	55.3%	68,952	5.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Bowie	Maryland	155	65	3	67.0%	68,414	4.3	4	2	4	0	2	4
Colorado Springs	Colorado	264	114	10	11.6%	67,832	78.3	7	4	7	0	5	7
Riverview	Florida	136	58	3	60.9%	67,814	5.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Livermore	California	124	54	4	70.0%	67,377	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	195	79	4	39.6%	67,002	7.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Valdosta	Georgia	139	55	2	70.1%	66,606	4.0	5	1	7	0	2	7
Lake Charles	Louisiana	147	64	5	50.9%	66,544	5.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Surprise	Arizona	153	68	4	48.8%	66,196	5.5	4	2	4	0	1	4
Broomfield	Colorado	138	62	3	62.9%	65,865	4.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Lansing	Michigan	148	63	5	40.0%	65,785	58.3	3	1	3	2	3	3
Englewood	Colorado	163	72	3	58.9%	65,717	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Tempe	Arizona	140	60	7	34.4%	65,283	76.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	137	57	4	53.0%	65,039	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pearland	Texas	128	57	3	47.2%	64,962	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Saginaw	Michigan	161	72	4	49.6%	64,653	6.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Simi Valley	California	115	52	3	50.0%	64,356	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	California	144	66	4	56.4%	64,055	5.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Tracy	California	153	66	3	54.6%	63,926	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Wichita Falls	Texas	164	63	3	64.6%	63,890	4.7	7	2	8	1	2	8
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	60	4	63.2%	63,390	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Covington	Georgia	125	53	3	68.3%	63,301	4.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	138	61	4	54.0%	62,877	6.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Allen	Texas	110	49	3	56.3%	62,696	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Franklin	Tennessee	128	58	3	58.3%	62,116	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Muncie	Indiana	159	69	3	66.9%	62,088	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Schenectady	New York	173	72	5	38.2%	61,968	8.0	8	1	8	0	0	6
Belleville	Illinois	146	61	3	66.3%	61,821	4.0	4	2	5	0	2	5
Redding	California	148	68	4	54.5%	61,601	27.8	3	3	4	1	3	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	133	55	3	62.7%	61,439	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Renton	Washington	160	63	6	39.5%	61,197	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hartford	Connecticut	158	70	4	49.3%	60,794	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Youngstown	Ohio	189	70	5	38.3%	60,168	7.8	12	2	12	0	0	12
Missouri City	Texas	127	56	3	56.6%	60,002	5.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Vista	California	127	56	4	49.8%	59,693	6.7	3	3	4	0	1	4
Cary	North Carolina	142	59	5	38.0%	59,045	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	147	62	4	47.1%	59,005	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	159	68	5	35.3%	58,890	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hesperia	California	115	50	4	56.6%	58,806	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Perris	California	123	58	3	50.0%	58,695	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
O Fallon	Missouri	118	50	4	60.3%	58,154	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Keller	Texas	130	53	3	50.0%	58,129	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	California	134	59	5	46.3%	58,123	76.0	1	2	2	1	2	2
Sylmar	California	98	51	5	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Richardson	Texas	141	59	3	50.0%	57,299	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	140	63	3	60.0%	56,740	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baytown	Texas	141	63	3	48.1%	56,686	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cambridge	Massachusetts	141	64	4	48.9%	56,633	7.0	5	3	6	0	1	6
Longmont	Colorado	130	56	5	43.2%	56,501	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Downey	California	127	64	4	50.0%	56,451	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	110	51	3	59.6%	56,295	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ashburn	Virginia	122	54	3	50.0%	56,154	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Yakima	Washington	146	66	5	43.2%	56,129	6.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Herndon	Virginia	129	55	3	60.0%	56,075	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Longview	Texas	150	60	4	52.9%	55,641	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Summerville	South Carolina	124	52	5	40.0%	55,577	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hagerstown	Maryland	145	56	3	56.3%	55,148	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Auburn	Washington	122	54	5	48.7%	54,936	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	141	61	3	50.0%	54,348	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Irvine	California	161	71	9	20.3%	54,333	9.2	9	2	10	0	1	5
Fort Mill	South Carolina	140	63	3	57.1%	54,240	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Lynnwood	Washington	141	65	4	50.0%	54,195	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redwood City	California	149	61	4	47.3%	54,105	5.8	4	2	5	0	1	5
Pacoima	California	99	53	5	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Annapolis	Maryland	160	70	4	55.6%	52,887	6.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Meridian	Idaho	121	54	3	50.0%	52,111	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Madera	California	138	61	5	50.4%	51,849	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bryan	Texas	176	71	4	53.5%	51,476	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Edmond	Oklahoma	142	52	5	30.0%	51,456	44.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	135	60	4	54.2%	51,332	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bothell	Washington	139	57	5	40.0%	51,312	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Provo	Utah	142	64	4	44.0%	51,256	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bell Gardens	California	96	51	5	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	148	62	3	50.0%	51,183	6.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Antioch	California	114	46	4	46.0%	50,982	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	131	60	4	50.0%	50,414	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	California	115	59	4	50.0%	50,241	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ypsilanti	Michigan	121	56	5	46.4%	49,570	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	California	123	54	6	43.4%	49,476	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Olympia	Washington	158	63	7	27.0%	49,408	38.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Kennewick	Washington	134	63	3	50.0%	49,405	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Plainfield	Illinois	144	66	3	50.0%	49,279	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
San Bernardino	California	147	69	8	19.7%	49,107	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	191	77	7	26.8%	48,715	59.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Dearborn	Michigan	140	57	3	51.1%	48,619	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Midlothian	Virginia	138	55	3	50.0%	48,389	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Lithonia	Georgia	120	59	4	50.0%	48,381	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
South Gate	California	96	51	5	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Arvada	Colorado	158	65	5	35.5%	47,418	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Milton	Florida	116	49	3	50.0%	47,371	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ballwin	Missouri	116	52	4	50.0%	47,335	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Deltona	Florida	121	57	3	50.0%	46,945	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Monte	California	107	56	4	50.0%	46,856	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Abilene	Texas	172	73	6	35.6%	46,383	7.0	6	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Rosa	California	159	69	7	21.3%	45,986	69.2	2	1	2	0	1	2
Vacaville	California	104	45	5	43.5%	45,841	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	120	56	5	40.0%	45,501	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bloomington	Indiana	157	61	6	34.0%	45,468	38.7	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mckinney	Texas	112	49	7	24.0%	45,387	37.7	2	1	2	0	0	2
Miami Beach	Florida	142	77	5	38.5%	44,558	43.4	3	2	3	0	1	3
Brockton	Massachusetts	120	50	4	46.6%	44,463	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	109	52	3	45.6%	44,438	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Daly City	California	129	54	6	38.7%	44,224	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Apopka	Florida	121	59	4	45.2%	44,161	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Holland	Michigan	117	51	6	46.4%	43,547	51.5	1	1	1	0	1	1
Scranton	Pennsylvania	186	79	5	43.4%	43,167	6.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
Bellevue	Washington	152	70	6	29.4%	43,039	61.8	2	1	2	0	2	2
Hampton	Virginia	165	65	5	31.5%	42,927	69.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Salinas	California	144	63	6	22.7%	42,811	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	137	61	5	43.7%	41,898	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Medford	Oregon	112	51	5	44.9%	41,862	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	137	57	8	38.9%	41,652	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Irving	Texas	163	68	8	17.1%	41,239	69.3	2	2	2	0	0	2
Sugar Land	Texas	144	65	6	24.4%	41,204	68.3	1	2	2	0	1	2
High Point	North Carolina	151	67	7	33.4%	40,840	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Palo Alto	California	137	59	5	41.9%	40,549	53.3	2	2	2	0	0	2
Parker	Colorado	118	49	6	40.0%	40,113	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Florissant	Missouri	141	54	5	36.9%	39,919	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	172	73	5	41.8%	39,856	6.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Greeley	Colorado	110	52	7	34.7%	39,570	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Mateo	California	144	61	7	27.8%	39,548	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Largo	Florida	157	67	5	35.3%	37,941	43.8	3	1	3	0	0	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	133	58	6	33.3%	37,643	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Fargo	North Dakota	156	70	8	30.7%	37,600	53.8	2	2	2	0	1	2
Elmhurst	New York	97	50	4	40.0%	37,587	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Duluth	Minnesota	209	81	5	31.1%	36,448	55.7	5	1	5	3	5	5
Temecula	California	144	69	7	27.5%	35,741	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Carrollton	Texas	122	56	5	25.9%	34,973	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Delray Beach	Florida	148	71	6	29.3%	34,930	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Nampa	Idaho	121	57	5	30.0%	34,772	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Angelo	Texas	131	54	6	31.3%	34,662	30.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Davenport	Iowa	144	61	6	32.3%	33,917	7.8	6	2	6	0	0	6
Rapid City	South Dakota	124	57	7	34.7%	33,597	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Daytona Beach	Florida	143	68	3	31.8%	32,769	25.4	4	1	4	0	0	4
Roseville	California	134	56	7	23.4%	32,668	69.3	1	1	1	0	0	1
Asheville	North Carolina	149	60	7	23.7%	31,272	8.6	5	2	5	0	0	5
Lynn	Massachusetts	143	65	7	33.0%	30,913	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Frederick	Maryland	158	68	8	22.5%	29,748	76.5	1	1	1	0	1	1
Quincy	Massachusetts	124	55	6	31.6%	29,726	7.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	113	46	6	28.4%	29,262	53.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Menifee	California	143	63	5	26.0%	28,736	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lees Summit	Missouri	159	67	7	27.9%	28,485	7.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Billings	Montana	150	62	6	20.7%	28,404	76.3	1	1	1	0	1	1
Panama City	Florida	158	68	8	22.1%	27,910	52.7	3	2	3	1	1	3
New Haven	Connecticut	140	62	7	21.4%	27,847	81.6	1	1	1	0	0	1
Orem	Utah	117	54	6	27.7%	27,786	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Warren	Michigan	154	62	9	20.0%	27,038	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Augusta	Georgia	178	78	10	12.7%	25,992	89.1	1	1	1	0	0	1
Elgin	Illinois	140	55	8	21.1%	25,841	9.0	3	2	4	0	1	2
Waukegan	Illinois	115	51	7	26.4%	25,760	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bend	Oregon	120	51	7	19.5%	23,813	9.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Homestead	Florida	173	82	7	12.6%	23,712	73.9	2	1	2	0	0	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	142	59	7	24.2%	23,062	31.5	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cape Coral	Florida	159	71	10	12.2%	22,027	84.8	1	1	1	0	0	1
Clovis	California	113	53	8	18.0%	21,829	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Gilbert	Arizona	149	66	10	9.0%	21,474	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Norwalk	California	98	46	7	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Akron	Ohio	213	79	11	6.7%	18,118	95.2	1	2	2	0	1	2
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	136	59	10	8.2%	16,623	69.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
La Puente	California	126	61	7	13.0%	15,354	53.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bridgeport	Connecticut	142	64	8	10.0%	14,642	10.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Odessa	Texas	152	59	10	8.5%	13,584	85.3	1	1	1	0	0	1
Paterson	New Jersey	133	61	8	9.2%	13,467	10.8	9	1	9	0	0	2
Indio	California	114	59	11	12.8%	12,298	54.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Anaheim	California	143	65	18	2.8%	10,334	87.4	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lowell	Massachusetts	126	59	10	9.0%	10,021	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
West Jordan	Utah	129	63	9	8.0%	9,886	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Tallahassee	Florida	179	76	17	2.0%	5,866	91.6	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fort Pierce	Florida	166	74	16	2.6%	2,510	89.1	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lexington	Kentucky	197	76	59	0.5%	1,618	94.5	1	1	1	0	1	1

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	288	130	3	58.5%	1,437,723	5.0	62	8	69	3	15	69
San Diego	272	116	4	49.5%	666,560	5.9	36	6	42	2	6	42
San Jose	223	95	5	50.1%	525,889	5.9	28	2	31	1	3	31
Sacramento	242	98	3	54.1%	435,560	5.3	28	4	33	1	6	33
Bakersfield	193	86	3	64.3%	359,769	4.5	11	1	14	1	3	14
Stockton	199	85	2	87.7%	327,659	2.3	12	2	22	2	12	22
Long Beach	197	89	3	64.8%	310,311	4.7	12	3	15	0	5	15
Oakland	196	77	4	54.4%	223,903	5.7	14	3	15	0	2	15
Fresno	238	97	4	36.4%	219,023	7.1	18	1	18	0	0	18
Santa Ana	159	71	3	56.4%	201,276	5.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Francisco	204	77	7	22.2%	192,849	8.4	28	2	29	0	1	29
Riverside	167	73	3	47.1%	174,206	6.0	7	1	7	0	1	7
Ontario	130	59	2	83.1%	146,801	2.7	3	2	4	0	3	4
Corona	162	72	4	52.7%	135,485	6.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Victorville	124	56	1	92.6%	126,216	1.7	3	1	3	1	3	3
El Cajon	136	64	3	72.5%	124,964	3.7	3	3	4	0	1	4
Lancaster	135	65	3	67.0%	123,560	35.3	2	2	4	0	2	4
Garden Grove	158	70	2	64.1%	112,620	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Torrance	157	78	3	63.6%	112,389	4.8	5	3	6	0	2	6
Hemet	136	61	2	86.7%	111,683	2.3	3	2	5	0	3	5
Fontana	131	59	4	45.1%	105,822	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Van Nuys	137	66	3	59.3%	105,521	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Santa Barbara	157	68	2	77.2%	104,923	3.0	7	1	12	2	5	12
Visalia	134	63	4	68.6%	104,221	4.0	3	2	5	0	2	5
Whittier	140	67	4	53.1%	104,142	5.8	6	2	6	0	0	6
Modesto	169	70	5	39.2%	103,616	58.6	3	1	3	1	3	3
North Hollywood	131	60	3	66.0%	101,033	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Santa Cruz	126	54	1	96.6%	100,513	2.0	4	1	5	2	3	5
Pasadena	163	74	3	62.2%	98,093	4.8	6	2	7	1	1	7
Inglewood	166	71	2	72.7%	97,303	4.0	5	2	7	0	3	7
Oxnard	150	71	3	44.0%	97,069	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hawthorne	101	52	1	100.0%	96,836	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Berkeley	187	82	3	71.1%	90,347	4.1	9	3	12	0	4	12
Pomona	135	59	3	56.7%	89,609	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Chico	140	57	3	79.9%	89,467	3.0	3	1	4	0	2	4
Napa	121	56	2	90.0%	86,999	2.0	2	1	4	0	2	4
Ventura	126	54	2	74.0%	85,794	4.0	3	2	5	0	2	5
Oceanside	132	62	6	40.8%	81,799	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Sunnyvale	135	60	4	53.3%	81,480	5.8	4	2	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	134	62	4	40.0%	79,963	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Rialto	121	59	3	74.5%	79,400	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Orange	135	60	4	54.6%	79,110	5.4	5	2	6	0	1	6
Mission Viejo	103	51	2	80.0%	78,686	3.0	2	2	3	0	2	3
Burbank	159	71	3	71.8%	77,529	4.2	5	3	7	0	2	7
Santa Monica	154	72	2	82.0%	77,398	2.8	5	2	8	0	4	7
Pittsburg	99	42	3	80.0%	76,865	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Santa Maria	143	64	4	52.8%	75,605	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	123	54	3	66.6%	74,027	4.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	143	70	5	41.4%	73,173	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Murrieta	121	57	4	54.2%	71,731	5.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Compton	131	59	4	51.3%	71,247	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fullerton	147	69	3	50.0%	69,638	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Livermore	124	54	4	70.0%	67,377	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	115	52	3	50.0%	64,356	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	144	66	4	56.4%	64,055	5.5	4	2	4	0	0	4
Tracy	153	66	3	54.6%	63,926	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redding	148	68	4	54.5%	61,601	27.8	3	3	4	1	3	4
Vista	127	56	4	49.8%	59,693	6.7	3	3	4	0	1	4
Hesperia	115	50	4	56.6%	58,806	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Perris	123	58	3	50.0%	58,695	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	134	59	5	46.3%	58,123	76.0	1	2	2	1	2	2
Sylmar	98	51	5	60.0%	57,892	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Downey	127	64	4	50.0%	56,451	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	110	51	3	59.6%	56,295	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Irvine	161	71	9	20.3%	54,333	9.2	9	2	10	0	1	5
Redwood City	149	61	4	47.3%	54,105	5.8	4	2	5	0	1	5
Pacoima	99	53	5	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Madera	138	61	5	50.4%	51,849	6.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bell Gardens	96	51	5	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Antioch	114	46	4	46.0%	50,982	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Marcos	115	59	4	50.0%	50,241	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	123	54	6	43.4%	49,476	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Bernardino	147	69	8	19.7%	49,107	10.6	7	1	7	0	0	2
South Gate	96	51	5	50.0%	47,552	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
El Monte	107	56	4	50.0%	46,856	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Rosa	159	69	7	21.3%	45,986	69.2	2	1	2	0	1	2
Vacaville	104	45	5	43.5%	45,841	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	120	56	5	40.0%	45,501	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daly City	129	54	6	38.7%	44,224	7.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Salinas	144	63	6	22.7%	42,811	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Palo Alto	137	59	5	41.9%	40,549	53.3	2	2	2	0	0	2
San Mateo	144	61	7	27.8%	39,548	8.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Temecula	144	69	7	27.5%	35,741	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roseville	134	56	7	23.4%	32,668	69.3	1	1	1	0	0	1
Menifee	143	63	5	26.0%	28,736	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clovis	113	53	8	18.0%	21,829	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	1
Norwalk	98	46	7	20.0%	21,177	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
La Puente	126	61	7	13.0%	15,354	53.5	1	1	1	0	0	1
Indio	114	59	11	12.8%	12,298	54.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Anaheim	143	65	18	2.8%	10,334	87.4	1	1	1	0	0	1

Houston

ZIP	avis.com	enterprise.com	budget.com	expedia.com	carrentals.com	kayak.com
77088	2	3	1	4	5	6
77047	6	1	3	7	8	9
77037	3	1	4	7	8	9
77098	5	1	4	7	8	9
77027	2	3	1	4	5	6
77068	3	2	1	4	6	5
77078	2	3	1	4	5	6
77086	6	2	1	7	9	8
77035	5	1	2	7	9	8
77008	2	3	1	4	6	5
77004	5	1	2	7	9	8
77028	6	5	4	7	9	10
77059	5	1	2	7	9	8
77039	2	3	4	7	10	8
77019	5	3	2	7	9	8
77075	5	1	3	7	9	8
77077	2	1	4	7	9	8
77079	5	1	4	7	9	8
77099	2	3	1	4	6	5
77024	5	2	3	7	10	9
77095	3	1	4	7	10	9
77048	2	3	1	4	6	5
77044	1	2	4	7	9	10
77015	2	1	4	7	10	8
77017	5	1	2	7	9	8
77057	5	1	4	7	9	8
77055	5	1	2	7	9	10
77006	5	3	2	7	10	9
77026	5	1	3	7	9	10
77046	5	1	4	7	9	8
77066	5	1	2	7	9	8
77023	5	1	4	7	9	10
77094	3	6	1	7	9	8
77084	5	1	4	7	9	8
77013	2	3	1	4	6	5
77063	3	2	4	7	9	8
77053	6	1	3	7	11	8
77022	2	1	4	7	9	8
77072	6	1	2	7	9	8
77049	1	2	4	7	10	8
77045	2	1	4	7	9	8
77010	5	1	2	7	8	9
77018	1	2	3	7	9	8
77041	2	3	4	7	9	8
77009	1	2	4	7	8	9
77089	6	1	4	7	9	8
77032	5	2	1	7	8	9
77036	6	2	1	7	8	9
77085	5	2	1	7	9	8
77054	1	2	4	7	9	11
77058	5	2	1	7	9	8
77014	3	1	2	7	8	9
77067	1	2	4	7	9	10
77005	2	1	4	7	9	10
77076	2	3	1	4	5	6
77070	3	2	1	4	6	5
77060	1	2	4	11	8	10
77080	5	2	4	7	8	9
77050	6	1	3	7	9	8
77091	5	1	3	7	8	9
77071	6	3	1	7	8	9
77061	2	3	1	4	5	6
77020	5	1	3	7	8	9
77081	6	1	4	7	8	9
77030	2	1	4	7	9	11
77040	6	1	3	7	9	10
77090	6	1	3	7	9	8
77031	5	1	3	7	8	9
77051	6	2	1	7	8	9
77011	5	1	3	7	8	9
77042	1	5	4	7	8	10
77062	1	2	4	7	8	9
77082	3	2	1	4	5	6
77093	6	2	4	7	8	9
77073	1	3	2	7	9	12
77033	6	5	2	7	8	9
77043	5	1	2	7	8	9
77074	5	2	1	7	8	9
77064	5	3	4	7	8	9
77012	6	1	3	7	8	9
77002	5	1	2	7	8	9
77092	6	3	1	7	8	9
77069	6	1	2	7	9	8
77021	6	2	1	7	8	9
77083	3	2	1	4	8	5
77029	6	2	4	7	8	9
77034	6	1	2	7	8	9
77087	3	2	1	4	5	6
77003	3	2	1	4	5	6
77038	1	2	4	7	9	8
77007	5	2	4	7	8	9
77016	5	6	4	7	8	9
77065	6	2	1	7	8	9
77096	5	1	3	7	8	9
77025	2	3	1	4	5	6
77056	5	6	4	7	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Avis

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 967 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Avis Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (car rental near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Avis Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Avis Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Avis Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly