Avasflowers Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve avasflowers.net's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 14,661 Flower Shops In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Avasflowers Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Avasflowers Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Avasflowers Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Birmingham
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Avasflowers Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	20,279	14,661	2	42.1%	136,043,996	19.3	23,817	28,926	9,946	29,843	3,737	9,811	23,155
California	3,522	2,984	2	35.3%	13,807,943	21.4	992	1,549	548	1,591	115	316	1,047
Texas	2,901	2,392	2	32.6%	9,102,087	22.7	1,187	1,706	474	1,714	161	472	1,124
Florida	2,228	1,890	2	32.9%	6,784,899	12.3	432	954	294	1,005	64	198	608
Illinois	2,370	1,953	2	46.1%	5,913,477	18.0	1,098	1,232	490	1,257	220	545	1,073
New York	2,738	2,293	2	28.2%	5,535,400	25.2	1,209	1,465	683	1,499	225	521	1,101
Pennsylvania	2,533	2,119	2	42.2%	5,398,833	25.9	1,314	1,489	553	1,514	169	459	1,149
New Jersey	1,828	1,573	2	56.9%	5,054,873	14.7	493	548	345	565	54	216	507
Georgia	2,002	1,642	2	47.7%	4,914,557	12.2	534	685	251	689	72	204	577
Michigan	1,924	1,623	2	47.8%	4,758,583	20.5	691	831	426	860	126	321	729
Ohio	2,222	1,866	2	39.4%	4,590,759	23.3	804	1,010	392	1,038	125	333	746
North Carolina	1,924	1,584	2	41.5%	4,215,613	13.9	635	754	296	765	97	229	620
Massachusetts	1,695	1,447	2	53.9%	3,678,505	14.0	428	486	313	511	63	201	489
Virginia	1,870	1,578	2	42.6%	3,588,303	21.3	593	753	288	777	108	245	650
Washington	1,752	1,521	2	45.1%	3,282,763	23.6	395	490	188	566	80	165	395
Minnesota	1,784	1,519	2	57.0%	3,150,646	13.2	712	810	309	842	169	384	747
Indiana	2,903	2,457	2	45.7%	3,036,093	17.1	583	694	257	699	69	220	526
Wisconsin	1,890	1,589	2	51.5%	2,973,864	16.5	606	681	339	696	138	328	593
Alabama	1,610	1,354	1	60.6%	2,946,279	11.0	492	607	209	639	98	234	546
Missouri	1,852	1,561	2	45.1%	2,746,240	21.7	781	908	254	935	112	343	683
South Carolina	1,567	1,331	2	51.8%	2,568,745	7.6	345	420	165	452	53	140	352
Maryland	1,499	1,315	2	42.0%	2,520,693	14.7	365	433	190	445	72	152	335
Arizona	1,329	1,181	2	34.9%	2,427,260	13.7	233	382	88	397	47	105	248
Colorado	1,691	1,454	2	41.4%	2,289,540	21.2	314	445	125	450	59	159	298
Tennessee	1,668	1,397	2	34.2%	2,269,876	19.2	447	555	198	560	56	133	382
Connecticut	1,360	1,193	2	60.7%	2,174,839	4.9	232	277	165	288	49	120	281
Louisiana	1,558	1,328	2	44.4%	2,068,990	18.8	372	451	136	498	44	110	374
Kentucky	1,681	1,410	2	46.3%	2,059,202	27.0	550	610	181	614	56	205	470
Mississippi	1,429	1,229	1	62.7%	1,872,890	16.5	336	370	140	372	46	140	343
Arkansas	1,489	1,288	1	61.1%	1,826,968	24.9	437	471	138	482	52	181	438
Iowa	1,732	1,455	1	58.2%	1,822,354	21.4	744	786	243	829	116	350	715
Oregon	2,003	1,755	2	43.6%	1,778,399	20.2	304	363	123	366	40	115	277
Utah	1,319	1,187	2	56.0%	1,703,231	25.7	194	232	84	233	36	83	179
Kansas	1,545	1,335	2	53.9%	1,568,233	14.6	554	630	150	631	96	284	576
Oklahoma	1,758	1,522	2	38.8%	1,521,739	16.8	503	592	148	594	54	179	385
West Virginia	1,444	1,243	1	60.9%	1,114,428	9.4	670	690	135	751	94	265	608
New Hampshire	1,132	1,003	2	72.9%	979,298	13.2	216	226	138	235	73	132	218
Maine	2,190	1,930	1	65.9%	878,449	11.4	404	408	184	435	96	169	330
New Mexico	1,240	1,088	3	40.4%	843,626	21.0	276	310	61	313	34	79	214
Idaho	1,184	1,049	2	48.2%	812,576	24.9	200	222	63	230	25	58	201
Rhode Island	756	684	2	60.8%	642,808	5.2	64	77	36	81	9	28	71
Nebraska	1,531	1,333	4	33.7%	642,083	18.8	459	516	102	518	77	178	402
Montana	1,362	1,192	2	59.2%	616,646	31.3	255	268	50	268	14	106	245
Hawaii	935	835	4	40.0%	568,264	18.6	72	82	33	91	10	18	73
Delaware	805	732	2	57.5%	545,600	10.8	49	62	33	74	6	27	58
South Dakota	1,223	1,078	1	59.9%	517,890	19.7	308	319	58	323	32	104	304
North Dakota	1,110	959	1	58.4%	439,017	11.7	347	361	46	401	42	88	381
Nevada	989	884	8	14.5%	423,958	23.1	80	156	30	167	13	21	75
Wyoming	1,116	983	1	63.7%	371,026	18.7	143	150	43	150	20	55	139
Vermont	1,042	926	2	58.8%	367,573	29.7	190	194	94	210	40	75	166
Alaska	1,099	991	2	43.7%	322,316	34.3	173	190	38	197	11	18	107

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Birmingham	Alabama	375	333	2	77.5%	387,478	3.7	30	2	30	0	13	30
Minneapolis	Minnesota	521	478	5	30.1%	327,356	20.2	49	10	49	1	5	24
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	392	352	2	38.9%	323,203	11.7	27	7	27	0	3	16
Miami	Florida	448	397	10	16.4%	308,055	17.5	55	10	76	1	5	15
Saint Paul	Minnesota	457	417	6	29.0%	231,957	12.8	30	12	45	1	2	12
Pompano Beach	Florida	279	252	2	59.5%	220,467	5.1	10	5	10	3	4	9
Newark	New Jersey	195	177	3	70.8%	198,661	4.0	9	1	9	0	6	9
Mesa	Arizona	238	216	6	36.3%	194,233	7.5	13	1	13	0	0	13
Laredo	Texas	215	192	4	69.9%	189,492	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Garland	Texas	173	158	3	78.6%	187,118	3.2	5	1	5	0	4	5
Atlanta	Georgia	391	345	8	18.8%	185,812	14.4	39	9	39	0	3	9
Irving	Texas	178	161	3	70.2%	168,811	4.0	6	1	6	0	4	6
Denver	Colorado	405	347	9	15.2%	164,879	17.4	37	4	37	0	3	7
Aurora	Colorado	222	202	7	37.8%	164,797	7.4	11	1	11	0	0	11
Brownsville	Texas	172	157	2	80.7%	162,465	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Fontana	California	147	137	4	65.0%	152,649	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Everett	Washington	197	184	1	91.4%	152,291	2.0	5	1	5	3	4	5
Anaheim	California	197	179	7	40.0%	147,450	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Toledo	Ohio	279	253	6	47.1%	144,862	6.3	15	1	15	0	0	15
Kissimmee	Florida	270	245	4	49.9%	144,373	9.7	7	3	7	0	1	6
Hollywood	Florida	226	207	8	30.2%	141,636	7.9	9	2	9	0	0	9
Grand Prairie	Texas	165	148	3	73.2%	139,562	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	195	178	2	73.0%	138,169	4.8	4	3	4	0	2	4
Dayton	Ohio	423	372	7	28.7%	137,003	10.2	27	6	27	2	4	16
Santa Ana	California	179	166	6	38.3%	136,797	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
West Valley City	Utah	137	124	1	100.0%	132,868	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Amarillo	Texas	326	296	4	57.4%	131,348	5.6	14	1	14	0	1	14
Kent	Washington	182	165	3	80.0%	128,401	3.0	4	1	4	0	4	4
Gilbert	Arizona	199	180	5	52.9%	126,162	5.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Palmdale	California	194	180	3	72.0%	125,895	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Santa Rosa	California	195	170	4	57.8%	124,889	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Pueblo	Colorado	256	230	2	78.3%	123,822	3.0	7	2	8	0	6	8
Little Rock	Arkansas	278	251	5	54.3%	118,351	5.7	12	1	12	0	0	12
Mesquite	Texas	150	140	3	80.0%	117,050	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Durham	North Carolina	205	182	7	40.0%	115,977	7.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
York	Pennsylvania	199	179	3	64.2%	115,331	4.3	7	1	7	0	4	7
Olathe	Kansas	137	126	1	78.8%	113,838	3.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Beaverton	Oregon	160	145	4	56.4%	113,675	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Carrollton	Texas	154	140	2	83.6%	112,638	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Roseville	California	146	138	3	80.0%	111,835	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Olympia	Washington	226	205	4	61.1%	111,734	4.7	6	3	6	0	3	6
West Palm Beach	Florida	270	238	7	30.1%	111,515	8.8	12	4	12	0	1	10
San Bernardino	California	219	195	6	44.6%	111,176	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Summerville	South Carolina	147	127	3	80.0%	111,154	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Concord	California	172	162	2	85.1%	110,876	2.5	4	1	4	0	4	4
Paterson	New Jersey	176	164	2	75.6%	110,290	3.4	9	1	9	0	6	9
Edinburg	Texas	157	143	2	70.9%	110,278	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Tacoma	Washington	354	321	7	33.1%	110,230	13.7	19	2	19	0	0	17
Salinas	California	224	205	5	58.5%	110,216	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Killeen	Texas	198	178	4	73.3%	110,126	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Longmont	Colorado	175	160	3	83.2%	108,807	2.7	3	1	3	0	3	3
Saint Louis	Missouri	421	380	11	11.9%	108,744	51.9	42	11	43	0	1	7
Elk Grove	California	154	140	5	60.0%	107,591	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chandler	Arizona	194	178	7	39.8%	106,905	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Garden Grove	California	196	181	4	60.7%	106,630	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Hialeah	Florida	241	218	6	28.9%	106,005	20.6	6	1	6	0	0	6
Santa Maria	California	178	167	4	74.0%	105,899	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	237	213	4	62.2%	105,395	5.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Wichita	Kansas	403	362	8	25.0%	104,424	8.6	26	1	26	0	0	21
Fort Collins	Colorado	179	157	5	52.9%	102,928	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ogden	Utah	190	179	5	51.0%	102,664	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Reading	Pennsylvania	284	252	6	47.3%	101,839	6.2	10	2	10	0	0	10
Columbia	South Carolina	287	263	6	29.7%	101,794	7.6	14	1	14	0	0	14
Surprise	Arizona	169	159	3	74.9%	101,501	3.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Corona	California	200	184	6	38.2%	98,237	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lubbock	Texas	291	262	6	35.2%	97,314	7.3	14	1	14	0	0	14
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	374	336	10	11.9%	96,960	15.4	29	4	29	0	3	6
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	394	353	9	14.1%	96,333	13.6	43	3	43	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	180	163	4	70.1%	96,294	3.8	4	1	4	0	2	4
Buffalo	New York	360	320	10	17.1%	96,155	12.9	28	4	28	0	1	5
Oxnard	California	180	161	6	43.3%	95,395	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Littleton	Colorado	290	252	6	29.2%	95,040	12.0	10	4	10	0	0	5
Lewisville	Texas	152	139	3	80.0%	94,942	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Waco	Texas	211	185	4	59.3%	93,856	5.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Spring Hill	Florida	202	184	3	74.4%	93,317	4.2	5	1	5	0	3	5
Tempe	Arizona	156	142	5	48.9%	92,978	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mckinney	Texas	138	124	6	48.8%	92,223	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Worth	Florida	205	181	4	44.3%	91,380	7.6	5	4	5	0	0	4
Vallejo	California	176	166	3	72.6%	90,372	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Apopka	Florida	130	116	2	90.0%	87,889	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Macon	Georgia	282	257	4	53.7%	87,867	5.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Perris	California	151	141	2	74.4%	87,368	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Compton	California	147	136	4	62.9%	87,358	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	320	277	8	22.9%	86,851	9.1	18	1	18	0	0	11
West Jordan	Utah	152	141	4	70.0%	86,499	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	156	144	3	77.9%	86,002	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
South Gate	California	100	87	2	90.0%	85,593	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Grand Junction	Colorado	184	163	3	80.0%	84,371	3.0	6	1	6	0	6	6
Huntsville	Alabama	249	223	6	42.7%	83,830	6.8	11	1	11	0	0	11
Lehigh Acres	Florida	205	189	3	71.6%	83,641	3.8	6	1	6	0	4	6
Oceanside	California	173	154	6	41.3%	82,625	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kalamazoo	Michigan	234	211	6	50.0%	82,059	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hampton	Virginia	209	185	5	60.0%	81,739	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Rock Hill	South Carolina	159	139	4	70.0%	81,452	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Laurel	Maryland	184	171	2	72.4%	81,401	4.0	4	2	4	0	2	4
Evansville	Indiana	251	224	6	44.1%	81,356	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Ashburn	Virginia	121	110	3	71.4%	80,224	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Glendale	Arizona	238	215	8	26.2%	79,780	11.7	9	2	9	0	0	6
Lexington	Kentucky	315	289	7	24.8%	79,322	8.3	15	1	15	0	0	13
Detroit	Michigan	253	225	9	12.4%	79,181	10.5	25	1	25	0	0	16
Topeka	Kansas	314	285	6	48.3%	78,997	6.5	18	1	18	0	0	18
Racine	Wisconsin	204	182	5	62.5%	78,739	5.0	5	2	5	0	1	5
Peoria	Arizona	178	162	5	45.7%	78,589	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fremont	California	165	157	5	33.6%	78,402	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Victorville	California	146	137	4	57.2%	77,956	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jackson	Mississippi	244	214	6	45.7%	77,791	6.7	11	1	11	0	0	11
Eugene	Oregon	219	197	6	38.3%	77,753	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Nampa	Idaho	154	137	4	67.1%	77,741	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	California	133	121	4	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Honolulu	Hawaii	229	203	8	18.6%	77,373	9.3	11	1	11	0	0	7
Douglasville	Georgia	148	129	4	70.0%	77,174	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	100	90	3	80.0%	76,865	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Milton	Florida	151	137	1	80.9%	76,691	3.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Shreveport	Louisiana	285	255	7	34.3%	76,586	7.9	12	1	12	0	0	11
Rialto	California	151	139	4	71.8%	76,564	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Norfolk	Virginia	264	232	7	31.1%	76,385	8.1	14	1	14	0	0	14
Baytown	Texas	165	154	3	64.8%	76,318	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Denton	Texas	230	208	6	48.2%	76,282	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
El Monte	California	115	105	3	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Athens	Georgia	227	206	5	60.0%	74,829	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Springdale	Arkansas	135	123	2	77.6%	74,777	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Temecula	California	160	148	4	57.3%	74,496	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norman	Oklahoma	177	157	5	60.0%	74,451	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Frederick	Maryland	165	149	5	56.2%	74,242	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Homestead	Florida	277	257	4	39.5%	74,159	14.7	7	2	7	0	0	6
Norwalk	California	100	93	4	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Richardson	Texas	149	136	5	64.5%	73,930	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pomona	California	160	146	4	46.7%	73,811	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Broomfield	Colorado	161	144	2	70.3%	73,683	4.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
South Bend	Indiana	241	214	6	50.0%	73,356	6.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Chesapeake	Virginia	203	186	7	30.8%	73,225	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Raleigh	North Carolina	229	198	10	13.4%	73,094	10.4	15	1	15	0	0	11
Boynton Beach	Florida	173	154	6	41.9%	72,966	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Frisco	Texas	127	115	5	42.1%	72,675	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Murrieta	California	145	133	6	54.8%	72,534	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tucson	Arizona	391	354	12	8.0%	72,445	14.1	32	2	32	0	0	2
Mission	Texas	164	150	7	40.0%	72,437	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Providence	Rhode Island	209	191	6	35.3%	72,323	7.8	8	2	8	0	1	7
Hayward	California	175	164	6	37.6%	72,246	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hillsboro	Oregon	125	112	4	70.0%	72,010	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hartford	Connecticut	167	155	4	58.1%	71,731	5.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Boulder	Colorado	227	203	5	54.1%	71,050	5.5	6	2	8	0	0	8
Ann Arbor	Michigan	177	155	5	42.5%	70,842	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pearland	Texas	162	145	5	51.5%	70,806	19.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	282	254	6	39.0%	70,799	7.4	9	1	9	0	0	8
Herndon	Virginia	126	118	4	75.4%	70,455	3.5	2	2	2	0	1	2
Federal Way	Washington	136	129	4	70.0%	70,100	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Tracy	California	169	151	4	59.8%	70,022	5.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Stockton	California	272	250	9	18.7%	69,827	9.3	12	1	12	0	0	11
Bend	Oregon	168	146	5	56.9%	69,586	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Ontario	California	150	141	5	39.3%	69,442	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Montgomery	Alabama	276	248	7	33.1%	69,423	7.2	13	1	13	0	0	13
Roanoke	Virginia	295	266	6	40.9%	69,368	7.1	10	2	10	0	0	9
Lancaster	California	166	153	5	37.6%	69,280	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Auburn	Washington	165	156	4	61.3%	69,223	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Las Cruces	New Mexico	243	216	5	46.5%	69,220	6.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Escondido	California	174	159	6	38.5%	69,106	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Gainesville	Florida	240	217	7	33.0%	69,097	7.3	10	1	10	0	0	10
Vista	California	144	137	3	57.2%	68,514	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Panama City	Florida	186	162	5	54.1%	68,394	5.8	6	2	6	0	0	6
Waukegan	Illinois	124	110	4	70.0%	68,270	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saint Augustine	Florida	240	214	5	52.0%	68,175	7.8	5	2	5	0	2	3
Duluth	Minnesota	273	257	4	58.1%	68,058	5.1	11	1	11	0	0	11
Vancouver	Washington	259	231	8	20.8%	67,937	9.4	11	1	11	0	0	6
O Fallon	Missouri	148	135	3	70.3%	67,800	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Newnan	Georgia	149	132	3	72.6%	67,778	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Rapid City	South Dakota	155	140	4	70.0%	67,736	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bryan	Texas	180	161	2	70.3%	67,710	3.4	5	1	5	0	3	5
Santa Fe	New Mexico	195	179	5	52.8%	67,654	5.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Orange	California	151	137	5	46.5%	67,385	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fargo	North Dakota	193	171	5	54.7%	66,932	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Midland	Texas	220	197	6	41.8%	66,922	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Renton	Washington	226	207	4	43.2%	66,901	24.4	4	1	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	California	151	143	5	60.0%	66,712	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	164	147	5	50.2%	66,445	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Menifee	California	179	162	3	59.8%	66,072	4.3	4	2	5	0	2	5
Manchester	New Hampshire	198	181	4	56.4%	65,400	4.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Simi Valley	California	131	120	6	50.0%	64,356	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Plainfield	Illinois	170	151	3	65.2%	64,221	4.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	139	121	5	60.0%	64,139	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mobile	Alabama	318	286	9	23.6%	64,101	9.1	18	2	18	1	1	13
Orem	Utah	142	131	5	63.8%	64,052	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Odessa	Texas	204	185	7	40.0%	64,031	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Terre Haute	Indiana	204	182	4	67.4%	63,996	5.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Moreno Valley	California	169	156	6	31.1%	63,840	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tyler	Texas	251	231	7	40.8%	63,734	7.2	9	1	9	0	0	9
Indianapolis	Indiana	390	349	12	6.7%	63,674	13.1	37	3	37	1	1	2
Santa Clara	California	141	128	4	50.6%	63,475	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elgin	Illinois	161	151	6	51.8%	63,340	5.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Vacaville	California	135	122	5	60.0%	63,178	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Arvada	Colorado	197	181	5	47.0%	62,742	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Independence	Missouri	239	216	5	50.5%	62,647	5.5	8	1	8	0	0	8
Meridian	Idaho	130	118	5	60.0%	62,533	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Inglewood	California	232	212	4	46.6%	62,415	8.6	5	2	5	0	1	4
Joliet	Illinois	183	162	5	48.4%	62,368	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Clermont	Florida	171	153	4	62.2%	62,327	4.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Lawrence	Kansas	206	185	4	61.5%	62,127	4.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
La Puente	California	179	161	4	52.0%	61,357	14.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Woodbridge	Virginia	168	156	8	28.9%	61,110	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	192	174	4	55.9%	60,721	5.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Cypress	Texas	123	104	6	35.5%	60,623	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Marcos	California	126	113	5	60.2%	60,530	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lakewood	New Jersey	100	86	2	60.0%	60,458	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Anchorage	Alaska	309	279	7	24.8%	60,437	8.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	160	145	5	48.2%	60,334	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lawrenceville	Georgia	181	163	7	23.5%	60,178	9.8	4	1	4	0	0	2
Parker	Colorado	137	121	5	60.0%	60,169	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
San Angelo	Texas	188	169	5	54.3%	60,110	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elkhart	Indiana	155	140	5	60.0%	59,660	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Provo	Utah	166	151	5	51.2%	59,620	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fullerton	California	161	142	6	42.4%	59,054	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	California	162	147	3	51.4%	58,819	18.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Hesperia	California	133	117	3	56.6%	58,806	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
High Point	North Carolina	181	166	4	47.6%	58,246	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Livermore	California	141	134	5	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bowling Green	Kentucky	181	162	6	50.0%	57,748	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fairfield	California	132	116	4	50.1%	57,165	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	138	127	4	59.8%	57,049	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Salt Lake City	Utah	330	296	10	11.7%	57,013	14.7	19	3	19	0	1	1
Tallahassee	Florida	266	234	8	19.7%	56,728	9.3	10	1	10	0	0	6
Reno	Nevada	249	225	8	19.1%	56,715	9.7	12	1	12	0	0	8
Mcallen	Texas	161	148	7	40.0%	56,635	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Downey	California	156	145	6	50.0%	56,451	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Corpus Christi	Texas	333	303	9	17.3%	56,430	9.7	18	1	18	0	0	12
Rockville	Maryland	188	171	4	38.9%	56,360	8.0	4	3	4	0	1	3
Schenectady	New York	231	211	7	34.8%	56,356	7.4	8	1	8	0	0	8
Burbank	California	178	161	5	52.1%	56,226	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cape Coral	Florida	207	183	9	31.1%	56,206	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Jersey City	New Jersey	192	172	7	21.5%	56,136	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Palm Bay	Florida	180	166	5	50.4%	56,066	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Deltona	Florida	138	123	4	59.5%	55,908	5.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	162	148	3	43.3%	55,580	15.3	3	2	3	0	1	2
Lynnwood	Washington	192	175	3	51.1%	55,334	35.7	2	1	2	0	2	2
Cambridge	Massachusetts	168	155	6	47.6%	55,144	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Madera	California	175	153	5	53.5%	55,053	7.7	3	3	5	0	0	4
Austin	Texas	349	312	13	5.0%	54,654	14.8	44	1	44	0	0	0
Chattanooga	Tennessee	286	257	8	26.3%	54,637	8.5	15	2	15	0	1	15
Lake Charles	Louisiana	194	177	6	41.7%	54,455	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Spokane	Washington	271	234	9	15.0%	54,053	11.6	14	2	26	0	0	2
Stamford	Connecticut	182	169	5	41.9%	53,968	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Salem	Oregon	247	217	9	20.1%	53,592	9.3	7	1	7	0	0	6
Trenton	New Jersey	291	265	8	25.5%	52,971	25.2	11	1	11	0	0	5
Portsmouth	Virginia	214	190	4	55.5%	52,929	5.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Boise	Idaho	236	208	9	20.6%	52,806	9.4	9	1	9	0	0	7
Fredericksburg	Virginia	193	176	7	30.3%	52,783	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	180	168	6	36.1%	52,568	7.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Covina	California	155	145	5	47.4%	51,900	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Alexandria	Virginia	271	244	9	14.6%	51,763	14.0	14	3	14	0	0	9
Acworth	Georgia	144	133	6	51.6%	51,481	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cleveland	Ohio	342	303	14	6.8%	51,210	18.0	29	4	32	0	0	3
Bronx	New York	221	199	16	3.6%	51,194	16.7	25	2	31	0	0	0
Indio	California	138	129	6	53.2%	51,120	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	132	117	6	50.0%	50,731	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	161	143	6	38.7%	50,530	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	119	110	5	45.4%	50,493	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Winter Haven	Florida	145	135	7	46.9%	50,093	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Memphis	Tennessee	314	279	13	7.2%	49,945	15.4	26	2	26	0	0	2
Marietta	Georgia	222	198	9	15.4%	49,620	9.9	7	1	7	0	0	4
College Station	Texas	136	121	7	40.0%	49,220	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Belleville	Illinois	174	158	5	52.8%	49,213	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Newport News	Virginia	212	180	8	27.7%	49,023	8.3	7	1	7	0	0	6
Chico	California	169	153	5	43.6%	48,853	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rochester	New York	325	290	11	10.4%	48,833	12.4	24	2	24	0	0	1
Edison	New Jersey	141	133	6	48.3%	48,693	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Coral Springs	Florida	128	108	6	50.0%	48,619	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Visalia	California	173	161	7	31.9%	48,496	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hawthorne	California	99	91	2	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Overland Park	Kansas	212	195	8	26.4%	48,353	8.7	9	1	9	0	0	7
Hagerstown	Maryland	180	161	5	49.2%	48,217	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	181	164	6	50.0%	47,407	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bellevue	Washington	175	163	8	32.4%	47,388	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chino	California	126	113	5	50.0%	47,237	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	134	121	5	48.5%	47,234	7.5	2	2	2	0	1	1
Albuquerque	New Mexico	317	286	12	7.1%	46,451	12.7	17	1	17	0	0	0
Bowie	Maryland	223	203	5	45.4%	46,363	10.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Missoula	Montana	209	189	6	47.4%	46,153	6.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Irvine	California	182	161	9	17.1%	45,653	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	6
Gastonia	North Carolina	165	146	5	42.6%	45,555	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clarksville	Tennessee	153	134	8	25.6%	44,992	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ventura	California	151	130	6	38.8%	44,974	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bloomington	Indiana	196	173	6	33.6%	44,828	7.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fayetteville	North Carolina	216	194	9	18.2%	44,434	9.4	8	1	8	0	0	7
Puyallup	Washington	205	186	5	31.0%	44,329	43.4	3	1	3	0	1	3
Bakersfield	California	255	227	12	7.9%	44,146	12.1	11	1	11	0	0	0
Worcester	Massachusetts	192	169	8	23.7%	44,029	9.0	9	1	9	0	0	6
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	225	201	5	31.0%	43,289	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Mateo	California	185	169	8	30.4%	43,239	8.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Woodstock	Georgia	107	98	6	42.4%	43,151	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	334	298	19	2.7%	42,815	27.4	46	1	46	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	120	109	5	43.1%	42,732	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	185	166	6	37.7%	42,612	7.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
Falls Church	Virginia	225	204	4	35.3%	42,517	11.6	5	3	5	0	0	4
Gaithersburg	Maryland	185	173	8	29.0%	41,970	9.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Holland	Michigan	128	115	5	44.5%	41,808	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Metairie	Louisiana	176	164	7	29.2%	41,482	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rockford	Illinois	248	220	8	22.7%	41,478	9.0	9	1	9	0	0	6
Florissant	Missouri	157	142	5	37.8%	40,914	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bridgeport	Connecticut	190	171	7	27.9%	40,850	8.8	6	1	6	0	0	4
Redding	California	199	187	7	36.1%	40,818	5.8	4	2	4	1	1	4
Anderson	South Carolina	185	163	6	41.2%	40,560	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Greeley	Colorado	129	118	6	35.3%	40,275	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gulfport	Mississippi	159	144	6	42.5%	40,208	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
New Orleans	Louisiana	256	226	10	9.3%	39,796	10.7	19	2	28	0	0	13
Beaumont	Texas	236	215	8	27.3%	39,742	8.4	8	1	8	0	0	7
Daytona Beach	Florida	207	188	6	38.5%	39,681	7.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Wilmington	Delaware	263	237	11	18.0%	39,482	19.0	9	3	17	1	1	4
Warren	Michigan	187	164	7	29.2%	39,456	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Covington	Georgia	154	144	4	42.4%	39,340	6.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Sunnyvale	California	191	173	8	25.7%	39,337	13.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Fort Pierce	Florida	240	216	6	40.7%	38,955	7.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
New Port Richey	Florida	168	154	9	32.1%	38,838	9.0	4	2	4	0	1	1
Bothell	Washington	206	186	7	30.2%	38,788	37.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	174	154	7	20.8%	38,688	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Albany	New York	246	222	7	25.4%	38,392	9.6	11	1	11	0	0	10
West Chester	Pennsylvania	142	133	8	35.0%	38,032	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	154	133	7	37.8%	37,955	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Springfield	Missouri	224	198	9	16.4%	37,719	9.9	7	1	7	0	0	5
Vero Beach	Florida	208	187	7	32.5%	37,444	8.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Yuma	Arizona	164	148	7	25.1%	37,074	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hamilton	Ohio	156	143	7	26.9%	36,918	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hemet	California	166	156	7	28.6%	36,838	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lincoln	Nebraska	312	277	9	12.7%	36,771	10.4	22	1	22	0	0	12
Idaho Falls	Idaho	188	169	7	33.6%	36,664	7.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Los Angeles	California	369	326	28	1.5%	36,402	31.7	61	3	61	0	0	1
Jacksonville	Florida	298	267	15	4.2%	36,295	15.6	31	1	31	0	0	0
Winston Salem	North Carolina	263	237	10	13.7%	36,203	9.7	9	1	9	0	0	7
Cumming	Georgia	152	134	7	22.3%	36,161	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Scranton	Pennsylvania	249	214	9	36.3%	36,133	7.0	8	2	8	0	1	8
Roswell	Georgia	131	121	6	36.0%	35,952	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lithonia	Georgia	130	118	3	36.8%	35,597	25.5	2	2	2	0	1	1
Long Beach	California	232	210	12	7.4%	35,456	12.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Omaha	Nebraska	375	342	11	6.4%	35,223	15.6	31	2	31	0	0	2
Arlington	Texas	278	248	10	8.9%	35,206	11.3	12	1	12	0	0	7
Clovis	California	145	127	5	28.9%	35,068	10.0	3	3	4	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	California	115	104	6	35.5%	34,906	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Davenport	Iowa	204	186	7	33.3%	34,888	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Muskegon	Michigan	224	201	7	26.8%	34,596	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Spartanburg	South Carolina	202	178	7	30.7%	34,338	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Tampa	Florida	290	258	18	4.3%	34,058	17.4	27	2	27	0	0	1
Lees Summit	Missouri	236	216	5	33.2%	33,877	7.7	6	1	6	0	0	6
Kennewick	Washington	175	163	6	34.2%	33,806	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Buford	Georgia	115	101	6	34.1%	33,745	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	144	132	5	33.6%	33,740	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Riverview	Florida	181	166	8	30.3%	33,707	9.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Lowell	Massachusetts	149	131	8	30.0%	33,402	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	175	162	5	34.1%	33,381	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Las Vegas	Nevada	189	169	10	14.0%	32,844	10.1	7	1	7	0	0	5
Santa Cruz	California	153	133	7	31.1%	32,343	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	California	163	146	7	18.2%	32,204	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	328	293	15	4.7%	32,184	33.7	39	3	39	0	0	2
Virginia Beach	Virginia	227	193	12	7.1%	32,179	12.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Lafayette	Louisiana	172	153	9	20.0%	32,103	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fort Wayne	Indiana	297	260	10	10.1%	32,028	10.9	16	1	16	0	0	10
Torrance	California	226	211	9	18.0%	31,854	16.4	5	2	5	0	0	4
Dallas	Texas	301	266	18	2.3%	31,686	69.0	23	6	26	0	1	1
Charlottesville	Virginia	212	195	9	25.7%	31,610	8.4	5	2	7	0	0	5
New Haven	Connecticut	171	149	8	24.2%	31,537	7.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Allentown	Pennsylvania	193	180	9	18.5%	31,428	10.3	7	1	7	0	0	3
Sparks	Nevada	184	167	9	26.2%	31,252	9.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Fairfax	Virginia	175	166	8	19.1%	31,245	11.0	4	4	5	0	0	2
Flint	Michigan	230	210	9	20.0%	31,092	9.9	7	1	7	0	0	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	193	168	6	30.4%	31,072	7.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Merced	California	164	147	8	30.0%	30,918	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Erie	Pennsylvania	239	206	9	16.6%	30,507	9.9	13	1	13	0	0	9
Louisville	Kentucky	317	282	15	4.0%	30,174	15.8	32	1	32	0	0	0
Franklin	Tennessee	153	136	6	28.3%	30,173	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Largo	Florida	186	172	8	27.8%	29,926	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	4
Toms River	New Jersey	148	137	8	24.2%	29,718	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Charleston	South Carolina	220	193	11	15.0%	29,609	14.2	10	2	15	0	0	2
Lansing	Michigan	222	195	9	17.9%	29,462	9.9	7	2	12	0	0	5
Jupiter	Florida	157	145	8	29.8%	29,373	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	149	134	6	31.3%	29,248	8.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
New Braunfels	Texas	144	127	6	28.4%	29,144	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greensboro	North Carolina	215	190	11	8.4%	27,447	11.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Edmond	Oklahoma	183	164	14	15.9%	27,217	11.6	5	2	5	0	0	2
Plano	Texas	191	178	10	8.9%	27,137	11.3	7	1	7	0	0	4
Jamaica	New York	163	145	11	11.0%	26,810	11.3	6	1	6	0	0	2
Livonia	Michigan	144	124	7	28.1%	26,553	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pensacola	Florida	274	246	10	9.9%	26,498	10.2	13	1	13	0	0	10
Modesto	California	242	223	10	10.0%	26,446	10.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Muncie	Indiana	203	184	8	28.1%	26,043	9.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	California	209	181	9	18.7%	25,473	9.6	7	2	8	0	0	6
Asheville	North Carolina	168	144	9	18.8%	24,777	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Colorado Springs	Colorado	358	320	15	4.2%	24,757	17.7	30	3	30	0	1	2
Waukesha	Wisconsin	153	140	7	25.8%	24,745	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madison	Wisconsin	238	211	11	8.4%	24,718	11.8	14	1	14	0	0	1
Sugar Land	Texas	178	161	15	14.2%	23,948	15.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Chula Vista	California	178	164	10	9.0%	23,527	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Round Rock	Texas	189	169	11	14.0%	23,523	11.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Augusta	Georgia	212	184	10	11.5%	23,483	10.5	8	1	8	0	0	5
Silver Spring	Maryland	273	251	13	7.7%	23,376	18.1	7	2	7	0	0	2
Appleton	Wisconsin	162	143	8	19.0%	23,124	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Medford	Oregon	139	124	7	24.7%	23,007	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Richmond	Virginia	271	244	13	5.9%	22,988	14.3	15	1	15	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	186	170	10	15.1%	22,983	54.8	2	1	2	0	0	2
Wichita Falls	Texas	219	199	8	23.2%	22,920	8.9	7	1	7	0	0	5
Fresno	California	306	268	15	3.8%	22,792	15.9	18	2	20	0	0	0
Midlothian	Virginia	162	144	8	23.5%	22,763	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Naperville	Illinois	147	131	8	13.7%	22,686	10.8	4	1	4	0	0	1
Chicago	Illinois	235	200	36	0.8%	22,486	35.6	55	1	55	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	149	138	9	23.9%	22,458	8.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Staten Island	New York	231	204	15	4.7%	22,102	15.5	12	1	12	0	0	0
Houston	Texas	340	297	46	0.7%	21,806	47.8	84	1	84	0	0	0
Riverside	California	191	171	12	5.9%	21,742	14.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Cary	North Carolina	152	138	8	13.9%	21,545	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Charlotte	North Carolina	297	264	16	2.3%	21,257	23.6	24	2	24	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	162	142	8	22.1%	21,122	8.8	4	1	4	0	0	3
Henderson	Nevada	177	157	14	6.8%	20,432	25.0	8	2	8	0	0	2
Ocala	Florida	264	237	10	9.0%	20,268	11.6	11	1	11	0	0	4
Savannah	Georgia	272	240	10	8.4%	20,158	12.0	10	1	10	0	0	2
Brooklyn	New York	212	188	40	0.8%	19,792	42.1	37	1	37	0	0	0
Des Moines	Iowa	241	218	10	8.7%	19,523	11.1	11	2	22	0	0	7
Clearwater	Florida	239	213	13	10.6%	19,443	11.1	9	2	9	0	0	2
Napa	California	136	119	6	20.0%	19,333	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Youngstown	Ohio	287	256	11	12.2%	19,244	11.1	12	2	12	0	0	8
Flushing	New York	140	122	11	8.9%	19,146	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Champaign	Illinois	176	161	6	20.0%	18,913	9.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orlando	Florida	328	299	22	1.9%	18,656	37.9	31	2	31	0	0	1
Grand Rapids	Michigan	237	215	13	5.1%	18,630	14.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
El Cajon	California	182	161	10	10.8%	18,592	24.7	3	3	3	0	0	1
Syracuse	New York	274	251	11	8.2%	18,564	12.0	15	1	15	0	0	0
Saint Charles	Missouri	167	152	9	12.9%	18,095	10.3	3	2	3	0	0	2
Yonkers	New York	184	167	10	10.0%	18,053	10.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fort Myers	Florida	254	233	11	7.0%	17,565	12.7	11	3	21	0	1	1
Conroe	Texas	268	241	14	10.9%	17,402	12.3	7	2	7	0	0	2
Yakima	Washington	197	181	7	13.3%	17,279	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bellingham	Washington	154	136	9	13.6%	17,193	10.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Boca Raton	Florida	202	176	12	7.7%	17,192	12.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	150	126	8	17.8%	16,917	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Akron	Ohio	266	238	13	6.2%	16,857	13.5	17	1	17	0	0	0
Lakeland	Florida	238	214	12	6.5%	16,812	13.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	212	188	8	17.4%	16,544	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	4
Green Bay	Wisconsin	251	222	10	9.0%	16,529	12.7	7	1	7	0	0	4
Saint Petersburg	Florida	333	298	15	4.6%	16,413	16.4	16	1	16	0	0	2
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	221	200	11	8.1%	16,373	12.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	223	206	9	15.5%	16,298	10.4	5	1	5	0	0	3
Dearborn	Michigan	142	130	8	17.0%	16,169	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Knoxville	Tennessee	239	214	15	4.2%	16,079	15.7	17	1	17	0	0	0
Portland	Oregon	245	218	19	1.7%	15,668	19.0	33	1	33	0	0	0
Whittier	California	252	229	15	7.8%	15,337	17.0	6	2	6	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	California	127	112	9	13.3%	15,165	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Saginaw	Michigan	226	206	9	11.6%	15,142	10.3	7	2	11	0	0	3
San Antonio	Texas	328	294	32	0.8%	14,724	35.8	59	1	59	0	0	0
Greenville	South Carolina	193	173	12	6.7%	14,637	13.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Carlsbad	California	158	144	9	12.6%	14,309	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Henrico	Virginia	244	220	10	7.4%	14,251	37.1	5	3	6	0	0	1
Phoenix	Arizona	295	271	22	1.0%	13,952	23.1	42	1	42	0	0	0
Englewood	Colorado	220	193	14	12.4%	13,783	36.8	3	2	3	0	0	1
Las Vegas	Nevada	300	262	30	0.9%	13,565	31.2	43	2	48	0	0	0
Tulsa	Oklahoma	349	315	16	3.2%	13,537	16.7	28	1	28	0	0	0
El Paso	Texas	362	327	19	1.6%	12,771	19.4	24	2	24	1	1	1
Keller	Texas	145	133	13	10.8%	12,566	14.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Scottsdale	Arizona	250	228	20	4.2%	12,429	16.3	11	2	11	0	0	0
Pasadena	California	171	152	11	7.8%	12,300	12.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	182	165	10	10.0%	12,264	10.0	4	2	8	0	0	4
San Diego	California	372	334	28	0.9%	12,154	33.2	35	3	35	0	1	2
Berkeley	California	242	222	10	9.2%	11,648	12.3	9	2	9	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	166	148	14	10.9%	11,583	19.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Sarasota	Florida	246	222	16	4.6%	11,526	15.5	13	2	13	0	0	1
Abilene	Texas	203	178	10	8.8%	11,454	11.0	6	1	6	0	0	4
Annapolis	Maryland	195	175	10	11.7%	11,114	45.6	3	1	3	0	0	3
Seattle	Washington	326	301	26	1.2%	11,047	94.3	3	2	3	0	0	1
Sacramento	California	298	268	21	1.4%	10,988	20.1	28	1	28	0	0	0
Nashville	Tennessee	266	236	18	2.3%	10,725	17.8	22	1	22	0	0	0
New York City	New York	236	202	52	0.7%	10,705	59.9	47	4	47	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	California	155	132	14	5.2%	10,457	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Columbus	Ohio	317	278	24	1.2%	10,305	32.6	26	3	26	0	0	1
Canton	Ohio	227	204	12	7.0%	10,297	12.8	12	2	24	0	0	0
San Jose	California	285	258	22	1.0%	10,143	22.5	28	1	28	0	0	0
Bradenton	Florida	279	255	19	3.7%	9,320	40.5	8	3	12	0	0	0
Fort Worth	Texas	302	266	27	1.0%	8,726	23.5	32	1	32	0	0	0
Redwood City	California	172	157	11	7.6%	8,717	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Delray Beach	Florida	195	170	11	7.1%	8,505	29.0	4	1	4	0	0	2
Baltimore	Maryland	276	248	21	1.2%	7,568	24.4	22	3	24	0	0	1
Ridgewood	New York	98	87	8	7.0%	7,470	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	175	158	19	5.2%	7,426	35.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Naples	Florida	293	264	18	2.3%	7,287	18.9	14	1	14	0	0	0
Palo Alto	California	180	169	11	7.5%	7,209	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Melbourne	Florida	168	152	15	4.4%	6,848	15.6	5	2	8	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	174	161	13	7.0%	6,609	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	98	88	11	7.0%	6,578	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Cincinnati	Ohio	275	253	36	0.8%	6,557	36.7	44	1	44	0	0	0
Spring	Texas	243	216	30	1.7%	6,362	30.6	8	2	8	0	0	0
Miami Beach	Florida	160	144	15	5.2%	6,002	15.4	5	2	5	0	0	0
Washington DC	District of Columbia	240	216	30	0.8%	5,765	37.0	25	1	25	0	0	0
Kansas City	Missouri	284	255	20	1.0%	5,573	21.9	49	2	60	0	0	0
Decatur	Georgia	200	178	19	3.1%	5,553	18.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Oakland	California	201	181	19	1.2%	4,969	21.7	14	3	14	0	0	0
San Francisco	California	249	216	71	0.4%	3,539	68.3	14	3	14	0	0	0
Katy	Texas	144	122	30	0.9%	3,042	30.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Van Nuys	California	143	122	21	1.2%	2,182	19.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	125	106	24	1.0%	1,510	20.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	152	133	25	0.9%	1,420	28.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	132	116	41	0.8%	1,269	42.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	100	85	22	1.0%	994	22.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	140	126	22	1.0%	915	51.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	100	87	47	0.7%	762	47.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	100	87	44	0.8%	724	44.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	119	108	59	0.5%	491	68.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Boston	Massachusetts	184	168	94	0.2%	231	95.1	1	1	1	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Fontana	147	137	4	65.0%	152,649	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anaheim	197	179	7	40.0%	147,450	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Santa Ana	179	166	6	38.3%	136,797	7.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Palmdale	194	180	3	72.0%	125,895	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Santa Rosa	195	170	4	57.8%	124,889	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Roseville	146	138	3	80.0%	111,835	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
San Bernardino	219	195	6	44.6%	111,176	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Concord	172	162	2	85.1%	110,876	2.5	4	1	4	0	4	4
Salinas	224	205	5	58.5%	110,216	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Elk Grove	154	140	5	60.0%	107,591	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Garden Grove	196	181	4	60.7%	106,630	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Santa Maria	178	167	4	74.0%	105,899	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Corona	200	184	6	38.2%	98,237	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Oxnard	180	161	6	43.3%	95,395	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vallejo	176	166	3	72.6%	90,372	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Perris	151	141	2	74.4%	87,368	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Compton	147	136	4	62.9%	87,358	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	100	87	2	90.0%	85,593	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Oceanside	173	154	6	41.3%	82,625	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fremont	165	157	5	33.6%	78,402	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Victorville	146	137	4	57.2%	77,956	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	133	121	4	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	100	90	3	80.0%	76,865	3.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Rialto	151	139	4	71.8%	76,564	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
El Monte	115	105	3	80.0%	74,969	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Temecula	160	148	4	57.3%	74,496	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norwalk	100	93	4	70.0%	74,120	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Pomona	160	146	4	46.7%	73,811	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Murrieta	145	133	6	54.8%	72,534	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hayward	175	164	6	37.6%	72,246	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tracy	169	151	4	59.8%	70,022	5.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Stockton	272	250	9	18.7%	69,827	9.3	12	1	12	0	0	11
Ontario	150	141	5	39.3%	69,442	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lancaster	166	153	5	37.6%	69,280	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	174	159	6	38.5%	69,106	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vista	144	137	3	57.2%	68,514	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Orange	151	137	5	46.5%	67,385	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
San Leandro	151	143	5	60.0%	66,712	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Menifee	179	162	3	59.8%	66,072	4.3	4	2	5	0	2	5
Simi Valley	131	120	6	50.0%	64,356	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Moreno Valley	169	156	6	31.1%	63,840	8.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Clara	141	128	4	50.6%	63,475	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vacaville	135	122	5	60.0%	63,178	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Inglewood	232	212	4	46.6%	62,415	8.6	5	2	5	0	1	4
La Puente	179	161	4	52.0%	61,357	14.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
San Marcos	126	113	5	60.2%	60,530	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fullerton	161	142	6	42.4%	59,054	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	162	147	3	51.4%	58,819	18.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Hesperia	133	117	3	56.6%	58,806	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Livermore	141	134	5	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	132	116	4	50.1%	57,165	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Downey	156	145	6	50.0%	56,451	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Burbank	178	161	5	52.1%	56,226	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Madera	175	153	5	53.5%	55,053	7.7	3	3	5	0	0	4
West Covina	155	145	5	47.4%	51,900	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Indio	138	129	6	53.2%	51,120	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chico	169	153	5	43.6%	48,853	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Visalia	173	161	7	31.9%	48,496	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hawthorne	99	91	2	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chino	126	113	5	50.0%	47,237	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Irvine	182	161	9	17.1%	45,653	10.0	9	1	9	0	0	6
Ventura	151	130	6	38.8%	44,974	7.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bakersfield	255	227	12	7.9%	44,146	12.1	11	1	11	0	0	0
San Mateo	185	169	8	30.4%	43,239	8.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Redding	199	187	7	36.1%	40,818	5.8	4	2	4	1	1	4
Sunnyvale	191	173	8	25.7%	39,337	13.5	4	2	4	0	0	3
Hemet	166	156	7	28.6%	36,838	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Los Angeles	369	326	28	1.5%	36,402	31.7	61	3	61	0	0	1
Long Beach	232	210	12	7.4%	35,456	12.3	12	1	12	0	0	0
Clovis	145	127	5	28.9%	35,068	10.0	3	3	4	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	115	104	6	35.5%	34,906	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Cruz	153	133	7	31.1%	32,343	8.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rancho Cucamonga	163	146	7	18.2%	32,204	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Torrance	226	211	9	18.0%	31,854	16.4	5	2	5	0	0	4
Merced	164	147	8	30.0%	30,918	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Modesto	242	223	10	10.0%	26,446	10.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Santa Barbara	209	181	9	18.7%	25,473	9.6	7	2	8	0	0	6
Chula Vista	178	164	10	9.0%	23,527	11.0	5	1	5	0	0	3
Fresno	306	268	15	3.8%	22,792	15.9	18	2	20	0	0	0
Riverside	191	171	12	5.9%	21,742	14.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Napa	136	119	6	20.0%	19,333	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Cajon	182	161	10	10.8%	18,592	24.7	3	3	3	0	0	1
Whittier	252	229	15	7.8%	15,337	17.0	6	2	6	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	127	112	9	13.3%	15,165	10.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Carlsbad	158	144	9	12.6%	14,309	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Pasadena	171	152	11	7.8%	12,300	12.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
San Diego	372	334	28	0.9%	12,154	33.2	35	3	35	0	1	2
Berkeley	242	222	10	9.2%	11,648	12.3	9	2	9	0	0	3
Sacramento	298	268	21	1.4%	10,988	20.1	28	1	28	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	155	132	14	5.2%	10,457	14.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
San Jose	285	258	22	1.0%	10,143	22.5	28	1	28	0	0	0
Redwood City	172	157	11	7.6%	8,717	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Palo Alto	180	169	11	7.5%	7,209	11.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Santa Monica	174	161	13	7.0%	6,609	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Oakland	201	181	19	1.2%	4,969	21.7	14	3	14	0	0	0
San Francisco	249	216	71	0.4%	3,539	68.3	14	3	14	0	0	0
Van Nuys	143	122	21	1.2%	2,182	19.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
North Hollywood	125	106	24	1.0%	1,510	20.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	100	85	22	1.0%	994	22.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Pacoima	100	87	47	0.7%	762	47.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Sylmar	100	87	44	0.8%	724	44.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

Birmingham

ZIP	avasflowers.net	nortonsflorist.com	yelp.com	sandysflowersbirmingham.com	flowers280.com	bolinreevesflorist.com
35210	5	4	6	7	8	9
35221	7	4	6	5	8	9
35228	2	1	3	4	5	6
35229	3	1	2	4	5	6
35224	4	1	3	2	5	6
35233	4	1	2	3	5	6
35242	2	1	3	4	5	6
35211	3	1	2	4	6	5
35226	4	2	1	10	13	14
35216	2	1	3	4	5	6
35215	2	1	3	4	5	6
35205	4	1	3	2	5	6
35206	3	1	2	4	5	6
35217	2	1	3	4	5	6
35234	4	1	3	2	5	6
35207	4	1	3	2	6	5
35203	7	4	6	5	8	9
35254	3	1	2	4	5	6
35214	5	4	6	7	8	9
35243	5	4	6	7	8	9
35223	2	1	3	4	5	6
35212	4	1	3	2	5	6
35222	3	1	2	4	5	6
35218	7	4	6	5	9	8
35209	2	1	3	4	5	6
35208	4	1	3	2	6	5
35244	4	1	3	10	17
35204	4	1	3	2	6	5
35235	5	4	6	7	8	9
35213	2	1	3	4	5	6

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Avasflowers

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 14,661 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Avasflowers Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (florist near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Avasflowers Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Avasflowers Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Avasflowers Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly