Autotagagency Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve autotagagency.net's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 513 Tag & Title Agencies (DMV Agents) In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Autotagagency Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Autotagagency Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Autotagagency Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
Florida
Miami
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Autotagagency Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	9,809	513	2	26.5%	85,680,956	17.3	27,150	32,388	50	34,568	520	6,118	19,757
Florida	1,013	157	1	69.9%	14,397,919	3.6	446	975	32	1,954	246	685	1,937
Michigan	1,099	156	2	59.6%	5,933,057	5.4	833	976	12	985	7	489	903
Illinois	1,127	158	3	33.3%	4,275,631	13.2	1,241	1,375	13	1,428	8	203	1,106
Massachusetts	1,065	141	2	60.4%	4,128,514	5.7	461	534	10	538	3	175	500
California	1,400	185	11	9.5%	3,726,845	26.9	1,162	1,733	16	1,755	0	48	330
Texas	1,288	154	6	12.9%	3,596,895	23.2	1,354	1,904	17	1,924	1	207	797
New York	1,239	159	10	18.0%	3,539,637	17.1	1,488	1,752	16	1,889	23	336	1,139
Georgia	888	130	4	31.6%	3,251,262	7.7	574	726	10	799	28	77	631
Pennsylvania	1,046	230	2	24.6%	3,142,835	15.8	1,596	1,768	20	1,936	44	169	1,147
Virginia	917	158	1	35.6%	2,996,137	14.4	722	890	13	892	4	120	519
Indiana	947	156	3	43.5%	2,885,195	10.6	658	769	14	792	1	198	653
South Carolina	711	137	2	51.5%	2,550,589	5.8	347	422	10	459	17	87	416
Wisconsin	999	148	4	42.9%	2,477,587	12.1	692	767	15	791	3	168	606
Minnesota	974	146	2	44.4%	2,454,702	9.3	777	878	14	901	7	343	723
Alabama	806	147	1	37.9%	1,842,134	9.8	522	637	12	712	27	162	521
Connecticut	742	129	2	50.8%	1,818,273	9.9	233	278	13	279	3	43	220
Kentucky	828	144	2	35.9%	1,597,213	10.5	698	758	15	765	3	225	587
Missouri	928	145	5	25.4%	1,546,518	16.7	884	1,014	16	1,024	3	254	570
New Jersey	706	160	10	16.7%	1,480,418	20.2	537	593	16	601	8	20	189
Washington	791	139	5	19.7%	1,436,285	21.5	450	586	18	612	0	49	336
Ohio	1,047	146	8	11.6%	1,344,865	25.7	971	1,182	16	1,194	0	43	234
North Carolina	918	144	10	11.6%	1,176,412	21.4	681	799	17	813	1	41	272
Utah	681	132	4	36.8%	1,121,315	13.7	245	283	14	284	6	93	172
Tennessee	865	146	7	15.8%	1,046,816	23.0	510	617	13	619	5	43	212
Oregon	733	136	4	25.1%	1,024,364	16.1	354	413	13	421	2	103	258
Iowa	948	146	5	30.0%	940,054	16.9	889	932	14	966	6	148	618
Arizona	677	130	16	13.5%	934,977	24.5	247	395	12	395	23	53	140
New Hampshire	659	127	3	53.6%	720,114	6.3	238	248	7	270	0	67	254
Idaho	628	121	3	41.6%	701,242	10.3	251	273	9	292	0	86	232
Louisiana	738	136	9	13.8%	644,440	16.4	428	506	17	602	7	37	158
Maine	778	136	3	43.8%	583,917	7.6	421	424	10	547	1	94	507
Rhode Island	486	96	2	49.6%	523,937	7.9	64	77	7	87	0	14	76
Hawaii	510	110	3	36.8%	522,831	10.1	82	93	10	94	0	44	68
New Mexico	686	127	7	24.7%	516,861	15.2	326	360	11	360	3	108	214
Maryland	716	159	19	8.2%	495,260	29.2	388	457	15	458	2	8	83
Mississippi	719	127	7	16.5%	492,475	23.9	380	414	14	440	0	30	111
Nebraska	730	138	7	25.8%	492,347	15.8	523	580	13	592	4	170	377
Delaware	458	116	1	47.4%	449,630	9.5	52	66	12	71	0	8	52
Nevada	587	119	13	14.4%	421,329	21.4	92	167	11	167	1	41	68
Colorado	838	136	22	6.3%	350,348	30.1	377	506	16	514	2	22	100
Montana	678	130	5	32.8%	341,547	11.9	346	359	11	364	10	170	266
South Dakota	630	127	4	38.6%	333,172	9.2	358	369	12	399	3	117	332
West Virginia	744	143	10	14.3%	260,900	21.7	681	701	14	705	0	48	218
North Dakota	628	125	5	33.5%	251,632	12.7	366	380	12	392	3	176	263
Alaska	562	123	5	30.0%	221,595	7.8	218	235	12	242	0	152	208
Wyoming	554	115	5	29.6%	172,537	12.1	163	170	9	175	2	79	127
Kansas	823	130	17	5.5%	160,917	29.4	611	687	13	692	0	9	113
Arkansas	736	131	14	5.3%	157,886	30.1	548	582	15	586	0	12	89
Vermont	691	128	7	23.2%	145,250	20.5	249	253	13	257	3	44	102
Oklahoma	771	134	47	0.9%	36,118	49.9	414	497	25	505	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Miami	Florida	356	91	3	49.4%	928,284	6.3	55	8	120	4	11	114
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	297	86	1	90.2%	750,138	2.0	27	8	69	13	29	69
Orlando	Florida	297	65	2	72.6%	722,775	3.5	32	4	63	5	20	63
Tampa	Florida	267	64	3	64.9%	514,641	4.9	27	2	44	0	6	44
Saint Paul	Minnesota	368	81	3	45.9%	367,197	10.3	30	5	31	0	5	25
West Palm Beach	Florida	267	61	1	94.0%	348,301	1.7	12	4	28	6	13	28
Jacksonville	Florida	309	78	6	32.7%	283,595	7.6	31	2	53	0	0	52
Saint Petersburg	Florida	276	62	2	76.5%	272,815	3.3	16	2	32	3	14	32
Minneapolis	Minnesota	443	88	3	24.1%	262,113	23.1	51	9	53	0	4	21
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	348	80	6	36.9%	251,913	11.7	39	7	44	1	1	35
Bradenton	Florida	247	58	1	96.3%	243,865	1.5	10	3	17	5	14	17
Sarasota	Florida	243	51	1	96.4%	241,349	1.3	13	4	24	9	14	24
Portland	Oregon	346	74	7	25.1%	230,562	30.0	33	8	33	0	4	9
Grand Rapids	Michigan	240	54	3	61.4%	225,768	4.8	12	1	12	0	1	12
Kissimmee	Florida	230	54	1	77.6%	224,204	3.4	7	2	10	1	5	10
Naples	Florida	258	65	2	69.2%	216,502	4.1	14	3	24	1	3	24
Hollywood	Florida	203	62	4	45.4%	212,938	6.0	9	3	16	1	2	15
Fort Wayne	Indiana	259	64	3	64.0%	203,708	4.6	16	2	17	0	2	17
Fort Myers	Florida	195	44	1	79.0%	198,643	2.9	11	3	17	2	9	17
Ocala	Florida	223	50	2	83.3%	187,585	2.7	11	2	18	0	15	18
Pompano Beach	Florida	238	70	4	50.3%	186,238	6.2	10	5	20	0	0	20
Buffalo	New York	349	77	5	33.1%	186,227	25.1	28	9	30	0	7	10
Savannah	Georgia	261	63	1	74.2%	179,077	4.2	10	1	10	2	2	9
Madison	Wisconsin	249	67	4	58.6%	172,796	5.1	14	2	18	0	0	18
Pensacola	Florida	236	57	3	63.3%	169,766	4.2	13	2	18	0	4	18
Lake Worth	Florida	213	51	2	80.1%	165,454	3.0	5	4	13	0	5	13
Atlanta	Georgia	387	86	9	16.3%	161,215	10.4	39	2	42	0	0	23
Columbia	South Carolina	284	64	4	47.0%	161,053	6.0	14	3	16	0	1	16
Tallahassee	Florida	226	53	4	53.7%	154,583	5.5	10	2	13	0	0	13
Gainesville	Florida	207	50	2	70.1%	146,788	4.3	10	2	12	1	1	12
Wilmington	Delaware	238	61	3	66.2%	145,356	4.3	10	2	12	0	0	12
Saint Louis	Missouri	425	91	11	15.7%	143,838	23.3	45	9	46	0	0	13
Clearwater	Florida	219	60	2	75.6%	138,517	3.3	9	2	18	2	4	18
Birmingham	Alabama	333	67	4	27.3%	136,754	11.3	30	3	32	0	0	17
Rochester	New York	327	73	6	28.5%	134,484	13.1	24	4	35	0	1	30
Lakeland	Florida	221	46	4	51.5%	132,839	5.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Evansville	Indiana	225	49	2	71.8%	132,502	3.7	9	1	9	0	4	9
Melbourne	Florida	170	41	1	84.4%	131,401	2.2	5	2	8	3	5	8
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	180	39	2	64.0%	130,072	4.2	6	2	12	0	2	12
Woodbridge	Virginia	157	33	4	60.0%	126,992	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Panama City	Florida	179	42	1	100.0%	126,365	1.0	6	4	13	6	11	13
Cape Coral	Florida	208	46	3	69.7%	125,978	4.0	6	2	8	0	1	8
Boca Raton	Florida	215	59	4	56.4%	125,392	5.8	9	2	10	0	1	10
Boynton Beach	Florida	191	54	2	69.6%	121,117	4.0	6	2	12	0	4	12
Worcester	Massachusetts	239	57	2	64.7%	120,013	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
New Port Richey	Florida	184	36	1	98.1%	118,528	1.3	4	3	8	3	8	8
Summerville	South Carolina	140	22	1	84.1%	116,854	2.5	2	2	3	0	3	3
Brooklyn	New York	323	75	20	4.4%	115,348	26.7	37	8	37	0	0	6
San Diego	California	336	71	14	8.2%	111,123	30.5	35	9	35	0	0	10
Brownsville	Texas	170	37	4	53.8%	108,310	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	189	41	1	82.2%	107,721	2.8	5	4	10	1	4	10
Manassas	Virginia	170	42	2	69.0%	104,866	6.8	4	2	4	0	3	3
Lincoln	Nebraska	321	76	4	36.1%	104,466	22.8	22	8	23	0	2	10
Daytona Beach	Florida	190	40	1	100.0%	103,095	1.0	5	6	17	5	11	17
Laredo	Texas	236	42	5	38.0%	102,915	22.5	6	5	6	0	2	2
San Antonio	Texas	396	83	14	5.8%	102,776	38.3	59	9	59	0	0	9
Virginia Beach	Virginia	239	48	8	22.7%	102,132	24.9	12	5	12	0	0	3
Charleston	South Carolina	243	49	3	51.8%	102,011	5.3	10	3	13	0	1	13
Ashburn	Virginia	131	42	2	90.0%	101,076	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Las Vegas	Nevada	427	82	15	6.5%	100,164	28.9	42	9	42	0	0	7
Vancouver	Washington	254	54	6	30.6%	99,683	23.4	11	7	11	0	1	4
Sunnyvale	California	188	39	2	63.4%	96,858	9.3	4	2	4	0	2	3
Deltona	Florida	103	23	1	100.0%	93,889	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Apopka	Florida	125	32	1	94.8%	92,555	1.5	2	3	5	1	3	5
Warren	Michigan	188	48	2	67.7%	91,584	4.2	5	2	6	0	1	6
Lehigh Acres	Florida	180	47	1	77.7%	90,875	3.0	6	2	12	2	4	12
Orem	Utah	152	34	2	90.0%	90,286	2.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Saint Charles	Missouri	175	33	2	63.6%	88,982	4.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Clermont	Florida	156	33	1	88.1%	88,348	3.0	3	2	5	1	1	5
Riverview	Florida	144	36	2	79.2%	88,214	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Spring Hill	Florida	151	32	3	70.0%	87,804	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
New York City	New York	398	81	17	5.4%	87,092	30.4	47	10	47	0	0	3
Vero Beach	Florida	197	49	2	75.5%	86,982	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Sparks	Nevada	168	27	2	72.9%	86,913	7.8	4	3	4	1	2	3
Pittsburg	California	97	21	2	90.0%	86,473	2.0	1	1	1	0	1	1
Winston Salem	North Carolina	248	54	4	32.7%	86,253	21.6	9	4	9	0	0	4
Hialeah	Florida	181	53	8	23.4%	85,940	8.7	7	3	12	0	0	9
Chicago	Illinois	358	78	17	3.1%	84,760	39.6	56	9	56	0	0	5
San Francisco	California	337	72	13	9.6%	83,407	28.5	28	8	28	0	0	8
Augusta	Georgia	214	41	5	40.5%	82,860	8.0	8	1	8	0	0	6
Homestead	Florida	169	46	5	44.2%	82,858	6.4	7	2	13	0	0	13
Houston	Texas	412	85	19	2.6%	82,156	41.4	95	12	96	0	0	9
Kalamazoo	Michigan	235	56	3	50.0%	82,055	13.1	7	1	7	1	2	5
Macon	Georgia	263	55	5	50.1%	82,043	5.9	9	1	9	0	0	9
Erie	Pennsylvania	249	62	3	44.6%	81,826	13.5	13	4	15	1	5	11
San Jose	California	333	74	15	7.7%	80,612	28.5	27	9	27	0	0	7
Syracuse	New York	274	66	6	35.2%	79,854	21.0	15	3	18	0	1	13
West Jordan	Utah	169	38	2	64.6%	79,768	6.0	3	2	3	0	2	2
Florissant	Missouri	169	38	1	73.1%	79,199	4.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Palm Bay	Florida	176	41	2	70.7%	78,724	3.5	4	2	7	1	2	7
Mobile	Alabama	290	67	4	29.0%	78,608	8.2	18	2	20	0	0	19
Saginaw	Michigan	225	55	3	60.0%	78,182	5.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
South Bend	Indiana	261	58	3	52.8%	77,529	5.8	10	2	10	0	1	9
Ann Arbor	Michigan	195	39	4	46.0%	76,761	10.2	5	2	5	0	2	4
Lansing	Michigan	229	50	3	45.9%	75,484	6.6	7	3	7	0	0	5
Largo	Florida	167	39	3	70.0%	75,334	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Los Angeles	California	404	92	25	3.1%	74,970	30.0	62	12	65	0	0	4
Delray Beach	Florida	169	39	4	62.3%	74,169	4.8	5	2	6	0	1	6
Memphis	Tennessee	312	67	11	10.7%	74,152	28.8	26	8	26	0	0	5
Bloomington	Indiana	213	45	3	54.5%	72,802	11.0	6	2	8	0	1	7
Chino	California	125	24	2	76.7%	72,499	17.5	2	2	2	0	1	1
Milton	Florida	152	34	2	76.3%	72,254	3.3	3	3	6	0	2	6
Santa Fe	New Mexico	172	42	5	56.0%	71,712	5.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Mesa	Arizona	251	44	13	13.3%	70,975	35.5	12	6	12	0	0	3
Lexington	Kentucky	323	65	7	21.9%	69,965	24.5	15	6	15	0	0	4
Valdosta	Georgia	191	38	3	73.5%	69,793	5.0	5	1	5	0	2	5
Colorado Springs	Colorado	334	71	8	11.9%	69,207	33.5	29	10	30	0	0	8
Herndon	Virginia	136	30	2	73.8%	69,010	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Columbus	Ohio	359	77	11	8.1%	68,341	31.5	30	8	30	0	0	5
Sacramento	California	348	73	12	8.5%	68,167	32.1	28	10	29	0	1	5
Louisville	Kentucky	345	72	11	8.9%	67,898	36.2	32	9	32	0	0	7
Yakima	Washington	168	39	5	52.1%	67,680	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	213	48	1	70.0%	66,998	4.0	8	2	16	0	0	16
Lowell	Massachusetts	184	38	4	60.0%	66,805	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Cincinnati	Ohio	385	86	10	8.3%	66,498	30.3	45	8	46	0	0	8
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	192	34	3	45.7%	66,480	6.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Hartford	Connecticut	208	52	2	53.9%	66,463	5.3	6	2	6	0	0	6
Naperville	Illinois	181	47	5	40.0%	66,323	7.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Grand Prairie	Texas	186	38	6	34.7%	66,112	15.8	4	2	4	0	0	2
Olympia	Washington	222	48	3	36.1%	65,941	12.7	6	4	6	0	2	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	203	45	3	60.0%	65,182	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Indianapolis	Indiana	370	81	13	6.8%	64,978	34.9	37	8	37	0	1	8
Hesperia	California	126	24	3	62.5%	64,856	15.5	2	2	2	0	1	1
Ypsilanti	Michigan	142	31	3	60.0%	64,139	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Winter Haven	Florida	156	33	5	60.0%	64,127	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Fairfax	Virginia	186	44	3	39.1%	63,910	12.3	4	2	4	0	0	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	185	38	3	52.4%	63,728	12.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Palmdale	California	134	28	6	36.3%	63,504	20.0	4	2	4	0	1	2
Provo	Utah	168	38	2	54.5%	63,478	10.3	3	2	3	0	2	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	209	54	3	64.9%	61,609	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
New Bedford	Massachusetts	179	42	3	64.9%	61,554	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	197	54	3	54.3%	61,338	5.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Lakewood	New Jersey	101	18	4	60.0%	60,458	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Clinton Township	Michigan	163	35	2	60.0%	60,178	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	137	48	3	55.3%	60,108	5.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Dayton	Ohio	340	76	13	12.5%	59,707	26.5	27	6	27	0	0	5
Plainfield	Illinois	159	36	4	59.9%	59,030	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Montgomery	Alabama	240	44	4	28.1%	58,936	8.6	13	1	13	0	0	11
Muskegon	Michigan	192	39	3	44.9%	57,962	14.4	5	2	5	0	1	2
Rock Hill	South Carolina	151	24	3	49.5%	57,624	7.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	California	142	25	2	50.4%	57,341	16.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	369	81	13	7.0%	56,885	31.1	29	8	30	0	0	5
Livonia	Michigan	158	32	3	60.0%	56,740	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Quincy	Massachusetts	154	41	5	60.0%	56,473	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Holland	Michigan	130	33	3	60.0%	56,324	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Riverside	California	244	47	10	15.2%	56,180	21.6	7	6	7	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	169	40	4	60.0%	56,123	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Jupiter	Florida	159	41	4	56.9%	56,076	4.8	4	2	7	0	1	7
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	263	61	7	30.6%	55,647	18.8	9	2	9	0	3	5
El Paso	Texas	314	63	14	7.0%	55,511	30.6	23	9	23	0	1	4
Cleveland	Ohio	349	76	15	7.3%	55,087	29.6	29	8	31	0	0	5
Alexandria	Virginia	276	65	11	15.3%	54,364	22.6	14	6	14	0	0	5
Sandy	Utah	176	27	2	49.0%	54,063	7.3	4	3	4	0	1	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	188	41	4	40.6%	53,782	12.0	4	1	4	0	0	3
Anderson	South Carolina	163	36	4	54.2%	53,342	5.5	4	2	5	0	0	5
Everett	Washington	199	43	6	31.2%	52,008	14.6	5	3	5	0	0	3
Gulfport	Mississippi	150	29	3	54.8%	51,912	6.7	3	2	4	0	0	3
Lynchburg	Virginia	205	44	2	50.6%	51,787	16.3	4	2	4	1	1	2
San Bernardino	California	241	43	8	20.7%	51,753	22.0	7	4	7	0	0	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	185	38	5	47.4%	51,708	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	3
Salem	Oregon	225	48	8	19.3%	51,481	25.3	7	5	8	0	0	2
Gilbert	Arizona	183	34	8	21.3%	50,832	21.3	6	4	6	0	0	3
Hampton	Virginia	223	44	6	37.3%	50,746	14.8	6	1	6	0	1	4
Elgin	Illinois	141	30	4	40.8%	49,921	16.7	3	3	3	0	0	2
Providence	Rhode Island	231	48	8	23.9%	49,088	20.5	8	4	8	0	0	3
Stamford	Connecticut	209	41	6	37.7%	48,557	28.2	6	3	6	0	0	1
Lees Summit	Missouri	220	49	5	47.5%	48,488	9.2	6	4	6	0	1	5
Lithonia	Georgia	123	25	4	50.0%	48,381	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Salt Lake City	Utah	315	72	14	9.8%	47,521	19.9	19	8	19	0	0	6
Alpharetta	Georgia	186	37	8	25.0%	47,334	9.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Decatur	Georgia	192	41	8	26.0%	47,024	9.6	5	1	5	0	0	4
Tucson	Arizona	309	68	15	5.2%	46,817	34.9	32	5	32	0	0	2
Duluth	Minnesota	264	58	3	39.9%	46,704	12.1	11	3	12	0	1	9
Simi Valley	California	127	29	5	35.7%	45,984	15.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Covington	Georgia	136	24	4	49.3%	45,658	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Champaign	Illinois	165	31	4	48.2%	45,576	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Johnson City	Tennessee	180	48	4	47.1%	44,993	5.8	4	2	4	0	2	3
Nampa	Idaho	164	36	4	38.2%	44,300	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Anaheim	California	192	30	13	11.9%	43,774	28.1	7	3	7	0	0	1
Honolulu	Hawaii	254	43	18	10.5%	43,503	22.7	11	6	11	0	1	2
Dearborn	Michigan	186	39	4	44.9%	42,676	11.3	4	1	4	0	3	3
Marietta	Georgia	206	38	6	13.0%	41,951	10.9	7	2	9	0	0	4
Napa	California	132	22	6	43.2%	41,758	12.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Norfolk	Virginia	297	62	11	16.9%	41,611	16.4	14	9	14	0	0	7
Meridian	Idaho	140	25	6	39.3%	40,995	21.0	2	2	2	0	1	1
Youngstown	Ohio	250	51	6	26.0%	40,871	24.6	11	5	11	0	1	4
Kennewick	Washington	151	27	5	41.3%	40,807	24.3	3	3	3	0	0	2
Joliet	Illinois	213	45	7	31.3%	40,381	7.2	5	3	7	0	0	7
Athens	Georgia	221	42	5	32.0%	39,922	7.8	6	2	7	0	0	7
Midlothian	Virginia	135	35	6	41.1%	39,733	11.0	3	3	4	0	3	3
Trenton	New Jersey	242	62	12	19.0%	39,545	21.6	11	4	11	0	0	4
Lynnwood	Washington	169	34	7	36.3%	39,379	7.3	3	3	4	0	0	4
Garland	Texas	188	37	11	16.5%	39,294	31.6	5	2	5	0	0	1
Hawthorne	California	99	21	7	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Angelo	Texas	181	43	7	34.7%	38,480	13.8	4	2	4	0	2	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	164	30	5	29.8%	38,239	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	153	32	4	39.9%	38,056	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Moreno Valley	California	166	37	11	18.4%	37,768	14.3	4	3	4	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	236	52	7	29.7%	37,745	21.6	9	6	9	0	1	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	160	32	5	38.4%	37,654	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Fresno	California	341	78	16	6.2%	37,084	28.2	18	8	18	0	0	4
Rockville	Maryland	178	40	7	25.6%	37,040	23.5	4	3	4	0	0	1
Clovis	California	155	21	7	30.4%	36,864	15.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Las Cruces	New Mexico	225	51	9	24.7%	36,762	16.1	7	5	7	0	1	4
Austin	Texas	322	73	16	3.4%	36,757	38.8	41	11	41	0	0	2
Carlsbad	California	189	41	4	32.2%	36,655	12.0	4	3	4	0	0	2
Waukegan	Illinois	127	17	5	37.4%	36,492	11.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Edinburg	Texas	162	27	8	23.4%	36,390	20.7	3	2	3	1	1	1
Boise	Idaho	224	44	12	14.2%	36,323	26.9	9	5	9	0	1	2
Fredericksburg	Virginia	224	49	7	20.8%	36,143	25.0	5	2	5	0	0	1
Springfield	Missouri	227	41	8	15.7%	36,122	21.4	7	3	7	0	1	4
San Marcos	California	143	23	5	35.1%	35,281	8.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Rockford	Illinois	255	49	11	19.3%	35,175	26.6	9	6	9	0	1	2
Dallas	Texas	382	88	18	2.5%	35,129	40.5	48	10	48	0	0	5
Chandler	Arizona	197	38	10	13.0%	34,920	24.5	6	4	6	0	0	2
Mesquite	Texas	151	27	9	23.1%	33,754	24.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Greenville	South Carolina	215	40	8	15.3%	33,478	12.3	9	2	9	0	0	5
Daly City	California	151	29	6	28.8%	32,929	13.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Bakersfield	California	246	47	15	5.9%	32,852	26.5	11	3	11	0	0	2
Albany	New York	249	50	5	21.6%	32,675	28.7	11	5	11	0	0	5
Jackson	Mississippi	217	42	7	19.1%	32,530	28.0	11	5	11	0	0	3
Silver Spring	Maryland	223	49	16	10.6%	32,081	30.7	7	4	7	0	0	1
Coral Springs	Florida	126	32	7	32.3%	31,399	7.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Carrollton	Texas	160	23	8	23.0%	31,066	12.3	3	2	3	0	0	1
Akron	Ohio	332	64	9	11.4%	30,943	22.2	17	7	17	0	1	5
New Orleans	Louisiana	288	67	9	7.2%	30,780	16.7	19	7	25	0	0	3
Vallejo	California	185	31	8	24.7%	30,706	23.0	4	3	4	0	1	1
Morgantown	West Virginia	154	32	8	32.1%	30,573	15.7	3	3	3	0	1	1
Woodstock	Georgia	106	24	7	30.0%	30,516	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Yuma	Arizona	156	27	6	20.6%	30,407	24.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
Racine	Wisconsin	232	50	6	23.8%	30,042	27.0	5	4	6	0	0	3
Glendale	Arizona	234	38	10	9.8%	29,820	30.7	9	5	9	0	0	1
Fargo	North Dakota	179	32	10	24.1%	29,530	19.0	4	3	4	0	0	2
Cumming	Georgia	161	34	6	18.1%	29,406	10.0	3	2	4	0	0	3
Round Rock	Texas	169	28	12	17.5%	29,349	28.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Fayetteville	North Carolina	248	52	10	12.0%	29,181	14.3	8	5	10	0	0	3
Muncie	Indiana	209	48	5	31.4%	29,147	13.2	5	2	6	0	0	5
O Fallon	Missouri	151	30	9	30.1%	29,026	8.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Arvada	Colorado	201	45	7	21.7%	28,889	17.4	5	3	5	0	1	2
Knoxville	Tennessee	297	63	16	7.5%	28,829	26.0	17	8	17	0	0	5
Garden Grove	California	194	36	7	16.3%	28,705	28.4	5	2	5	0	0	1
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	169	44	8	22.9%	28,618	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	2
Omaha	Nebraska	368	83	16	5.1%	28,309	37.3	31	9	31	0	0	6
Oceanside	California	171	34	9	14.1%	28,229	24.5	4	3	4	0	0	1
Tacoma	Washington	320	65	14	8.3%	27,796	24.9	20	8	20	0	2	4
Detroit	Michigan	354	73	27	4.2%	26,680	24.9	25	6	25	0	0	4
Acworth	Georgia	139	25	9	26.6%	26,548	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	1
Spartanburg	South Carolina	183	34	7	23.5%	26,289	11.0	5	3	6	0	0	3
Boston	Massachusetts	276	51	11	17.3%	26,235	29.7	14	3	14	0	0	2
Stockton	California	284	55	15	7.0%	26,231	35.6	12	5	12	0	1	1
Phoenix	Arizona	359	84	21	1.8%	26,195	40.8	42	8	42	0	0	1
Reno	Nevada	265	53	12	8.6%	25,514	42.1	12	5	12	0	1	1
Cypress	Texas	131	32	9	14.8%	25,286	9.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Portsmouth	Virginia	208	51	8	26.1%	24,829	17.9	7	1	7	0	1	4
Ogden	Utah	201	39	13	12.2%	24,612	26.4	5	3	5	0	0	1
Waukesha	Wisconsin	167	36	7	25.4%	24,292	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	2
Kennesaw	Georgia	121	24	4	24.4%	24,157	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Abilene	Texas	201	39	7	18.4%	23,906	17.7	6	5	6	0	0	2
Fort Worth	Texas	339	72	20	2.6%	23,834	31.2	32	10	32	0	0	7
Auburn	Washington	165	29	9	20.9%	23,579	18.7	3	3	3	0	0	1
Anchorage	Alaska	259	57	13	9.5%	23,298	22.9	12	5	12	0	1	3
Livermore	California	137	30	8	24.2%	23,281	22.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Midland	Texas	186	36	7	14.4%	23,086	20.6	5	4	5	0	0	2
Long Beach	California	281	65	17	4.8%	22,816	15.9	12	4	14	0	0	1
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	213	60	9	13.2%	22,387	14.1	9	3	10	0	0	4
Bronx	New York	303	63	25	1.5%	22,334	28.9	25	6	25	0	0	1
Victorville	California	150	30	9	16.3%	22,236	20.7	3	3	3	0	0	1
Billings	Montana	147	39	13	15.9%	21,783	26.8	4	2	4	0	0	1
Jersey City	New Jersey	217	46	13	8.3%	21,751	12.6	7	3	8	0	0	1
Lawrenceville	Georgia	163	28	10	8.5%	21,712	11.5	4	2	6	0	0	1
Oakland	California	240	54	22	5.2%	21,259	45.9	13	5	13	0	0	1
Santa Maria	California	161	25	11	14.8%	21,193	23.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Falls Church	Virginia	207	44	12	17.6%	21,173	20.6	5	4	5	0	0	2
Irvine	California	222	44	12	7.9%	21,125	20.9	9	5	9	0	0	1
North Las Vegas	Nevada	238	49	14	9.0%	21,102	27.1	7	4	7	0	0	1
Newnan	Georgia	138	21	6	22.6%	21,081	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	California	162	33	11	17.8%	20,644	21.3	3	3	3	0	0	1
Lake Charles	Louisiana	205	41	11	15.6%	20,411	20.8	5	4	5	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	139	24	8	18.8%	20,086	12.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	298	88	39	1.3%	19,955	55.5	42	13	42	0	0	1
Redwood City	California	183	38	11	17.2%	19,676	16.3	4	4	4	0	0	2
Spokane	Washington	262	51	16	5.5%	19,668	38.0	14	6	14	0	0	2
Denver	Colorado	387	86	27	1.8%	19,494	42.2	36	11	38	0	0	3
Beaverton	Oregon	184	28	12	9.6%	19,441	25.8	4	3	4	0	0	1
Raleigh	North Carolina	296	65	19	3.6%	19,422	35.7	15	6	15	0	0	3
Annapolis	Maryland	198	42	10	20.1%	19,059	27.6	5	4	5	0	0	1
Pueblo	Colorado	231	56	11	12.0%	18,897	28.6	7	4	7	0	0	1
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	277	62	16	5.0%	18,855	26.3	17	5	17	0	0	2
Bridgeport	Connecticut	211	45	13	12.8%	18,743	19.7	6	3	6	0	0	2
Washington DC	District of Columbia	320	71	23	2.7%	18,223	34.6	27	8	28	0	0	3
Newark	New Jersey	232	47	12	6.4%	18,043	25.6	9	4	9	0	0	1
Corpus Christi	Texas	271	56	14	5.5%	17,999	28.1	18	7	19	0	0	2
Chula Vista	California	194	39	14	6.9%	17,895	24.6	5	5	6	0	0	2
Durham	North Carolina	215	40	13	6.1%	17,673	34.6	8	6	8	0	0	3
Douglasville	Georgia	128	28	8	16.0%	17,638	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Downey	California	144	36	9	15.6%	17,599	26.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	221	39	14	12.5%	17,477	24.0	6	5	6	0	0	1
Yonkers	New York	213	42	13	9.7%	17,453	28.4	5	3	5	0	0	1
Charlotte	North Carolina	296	66	19	1.9%	17,441	25.8	24	6	24	0	0	0
Des Moines	Iowa	236	50	13	7.8%	17,423	28.8	11	4	11	0	0	1
Lubbock	Texas	280	57	13	6.3%	17,349	31.4	14	7	15	0	0	4
San Mateo	California	188	33	13	12.0%	17,098	17.5	4	4	4	0	0	1
Sugar Land	Texas	171	29	16	9.8%	16,503	22.7	3	2	3	0	0	1
Roanoke	Virginia	299	66	18	9.6%	16,249	15.8	10	7	10	0	0	4
Newport News	Virginia	219	43	16	9.1%	16,092	22.9	7	3	7	0	1	2
Indio	California	143	28	7	16.5%	15,901	22.0	2	2	2	0	0	1
Irving	Texas	222	44	15	6.5%	15,575	35.5	6	4	6	0	0	2
Spring	Texas	257	44	17	3.9%	14,722	26.4	8	5	9	0	0	1
Toledo	Ohio	276	54	14	4.7%	14,599	38.9	15	6	15	0	0	2
Miami Beach	Florida	172	53	8	12.3%	14,269	9.2	5	3	10	0	0	6
Peoria	Arizona	176	35	13	8.2%	14,094	20.0	4	3	4	0	0	1
Chesapeake	Virginia	204	43	19	5.9%	14,030	24.5	6	3	6	0	0	1
Merced	California	169	34	10	13.2%	13,599	23.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
Franklin	Tennessee	153	32	9	12.7%	13,554	17.0	3	3	3	0	0	2
Seattle	Washington	331	69	29	1.4%	13,532	47.1	35	9	37	0	0	1
Reading	Pennsylvania	228	58	11	6.2%	13,430	23.0	10	6	13	0	0	4
Flint	Michigan	242	43	21	8.5%	13,270	27.6	7	2	7	0	0	1
Burbank	California	203	40	9	11.8%	12,734	22.0	5	4	5	0	0	1
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	337	80	19	1.9%	12,732	19.8	43	3	43	0	0	0
Jamaica	New York	190	37	14	5.2%	12,722	29.5	6	2	6	0	0	1
Plano	Texas	220	40	18	4.2%	12,686	32.3	7	4	7	0	0	1
Littleton	Colorado	273	57	19	3.6%	11,714	39.6	10	5	10	0	0	1
Baltimore	Maryland	285	76	28	1.8%	11,573	41.3	21	9	21	0	0	1
Kansas City	Missouri	364	80	26	2.0%	11,566	33.8	49	9	50	0	0	3
Canton	Ohio	229	44	10	7.8%	11,441	29.4	12	5	12	0	0	1
Independence	Missouri	231	36	14	8.9%	11,012	30.8	8	4	8	0	0	1
Oxnard	California	193	33	16	5.0%	10,991	24.8	4	3	4	0	0	1
Asheville	North Carolina	176	39	8	8.3%	10,901	24.8	5	4	5	0	0	1
Chattanooga	Tennessee	274	60	17	5.1%	10,656	29.7	14	4	14	0	0	1
Westerville	Ohio	140	27	9	11.0%	10,485	31.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Arlington	Texas	286	58	22	2.5%	9,758	30.7	12	5	12	0	0	1
Palo Alto	California	172	40	12	9.9%	9,542	20.5	4	2	4	0	0	1
Allentown	Pennsylvania	187	51	18	5.6%	9,494	19.9	7	5	9	0	0	5
Scottsdale	Arizona	283	60	23	3.2%	9,408	34.0	11	5	11	0	0	2
Albuquerque	New Mexico	328	70	26	1.4%	9,377	30.4	17	6	17	0	0	0
Wichita	Kansas	297	66	17	2.2%	9,190	24.7	26	4	26	0	0	1
Ontario	California	164	26	13	5.2%	9,161	19.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	154	36	12	8.8%	8,524	11.0	3	2	4	0	0	1
Pearland	Texas	134	27	15	6.1%	8,360	20.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	162	26	14	7.0%	8,344	20.7	3	3	3	0	0	1
Mcdonough	Georgia	145	25	12	8.1%	8,206	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	112	16	12	8.0%	7,928	12.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Escondido	California	191	40	20	4.4%	7,907	25.5	4	3	4	0	0	1
Topeka	Kansas	298	54	16	4.8%	7,823	28.0	18	6	18	0	0	2
Clarksville	Tennessee	155	27	15	4.4%	7,703	31.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Henderson	Nevada	235	44	19	2.5%	7,645	26.1	8	6	8	0	0	0
Fremont	California	177	34	18	3.2%	7,473	18.5	4	4	4	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	187	32	13	6.1%	7,448	29.5	4	2	4	0	0	1
Manchester	New Hampshire	222	40	17	6.3%	7,329	32.6	5	3	5	0	0	2
Fullerton	California	199	35	17	5.1%	7,122	22.0	4	4	4	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	167	33	14	5.6%	7,076	16.0	3	3	3	0	0	1
Fontana	California	151	26	17	3.0%	7,039	21.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Aurora	Colorado	259	54	29	1.6%	6,831	41.7	11	5	11	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	99	21	11	7.0%	6,754	13.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Henrico	Virginia	213	44	25	3.5%	6,708	24.6	7	3	7	0	0	1
Bend	Oregon	161	34	16	5.5%	6,690	25.7	3	1	3	0	1	1
Salinas	California	216	39	21	3.5%	6,647	20.0	5	4	5	0	0	0
Rialto	California	143	21	12	6.2%	6,615	20.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
San Leandro	California	168	29	15	5.9%	6,590	16.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Corona	California	177	38	18	2.5%	6,511	28.0	5	3	5	0	0	1
Staten Island	New York	276	65	25	1.3%	6,392	27.4	12	7	12	0	0	0
Mission	Texas	167	26	17	3.3%	6,047	20.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	126	17	12	6.0%	5,986	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Modesto	California	241	51	27	2.2%	5,915	26.3	7	4	7	0	0	1
Hillsboro	Oregon	136	27	15	5.7%	5,888	15.5	2	3	3	0	0	1
Greensboro	North Carolina	225	47	21	1.7%	5,705	34.9	9	3	9	0	0	0
Boulder	Colorado	195	32	12	4.3%	5,665	41.8	6	4	6	0	0	1
Nashville	Tennessee	311	62	22	1.2%	5,415	32.5	22	7	22	0	0	1
Scranton	Pennsylvania	223	50	16	5.3%	5,289	23.9	8	4	11	0	0	3
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	181	39	17	2.8%	5,142	21.8	5	4	5	0	1	2
Englewood	Colorado	193	34	14	4.5%	5,004	47.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Edison	New Jersey	167	33	14	4.9%	4,931	28.3	3	2	3	0	0	1
Schenectady	New York	232	44	19	3.0%	4,852	29.9	8	5	8	0	0	1
Wichita Falls	Texas	230	45	12	4.7%	4,675	36.3	7	4	7	0	0	1
Renton	Washington	207	35	20	3.0%	4,633	34.0	5	4	5	0	0	0
North Hollywood	California	161	25	19	3.0%	4,550	38.8	4	2	4	0	0	1
Hamilton	Ohio	158	24	18	3.3%	4,534	26.0	3	3	3	0	0	0
Shreveport	Louisiana	247	54	23	2.0%	4,514	21.2	12	3	12	0	0	0
Lafayette	Louisiana	180	35	16	2.8%	4,498	18.4	5	2	5	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	187	31	18	3.1%	4,491	30.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Eugene	Oregon	214	40	25	2.1%	4,352	28.8	6	3	6	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	188	44	20	2.7%	4,311	29.0	5	3	5	0	0	1
El Cajon	California	171	35	19	2.4%	4,173	22.3	3	3	3	0	0	0
Overland Park	Kansas	259	50	17	2.3%	4,162	28.8	9	5	9	0	0	0
Richmond	Virginia	288	62	38	1.1%	4,150	28.3	15	5	15	0	0	1
Frederick	Maryland	150	39	18	3.1%	4,098	31.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Metairie	Louisiana	184	37	17	2.8%	4,034	17.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Huntsville	Alabama	252	54	19	2.0%	3,914	24.0	11	6	11	0	0	2
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	159	28	14	3.1%	3,778	22.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Tulsa	Oklahoma	298	81	24	0.9%	3,714	29.3	27	5	28	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	187	33	13	3.6%	3,667	28.6	5	4	5	0	0	1
West Covina	California	159	32	21	3.3%	3,630	28.3	3	2	3	0	0	1
Fort Mill	South Carolina	162	28	18	3.8%	3,610	17.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Tempe	Arizona	170	32	22	1.9%	3,604	34.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Little Rock	Arkansas	245	46	18	1.6%	3,580	31.7	12	6	12	0	0	0
Bowie	Maryland	196	44	20	3.5%	3,543	33.3	4	2	4	0	0	1
Baytown	Texas	175	35	20	3.0%	3,526	21.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	223	39	20	2.2%	3,507	27.3	9	4	9	0	0	0
Bellevue	Washington	196	35	23	2.3%	3,383	44.6	5	3	5	0	0	1
Killeen	Texas	187	32	20	2.2%	3,352	34.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Tyler	Texas	256	47	27	2.1%	3,335	27.1	9	4	9	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	209	43	15	3.1%	3,217	28.8	5	3	5	0	0	1
Santa Cruz	California	179	32	20	3.1%	3,216	36.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	205	34	23	2.6%	3,204	19.0	5	5	5	0	0	0
Surprise	Arizona	160	27	22	2.4%	3,201	32.5	4	2	4	0	0	0
Antioch	California	128	17	18	2.9%	3,176	25.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Santa Ana	California	197	38	34	0.9%	3,156	30.0	6	2	6	0	0	0
Conroe	Texas	226	48	27	2.0%	3,149	27.0	7	5	7	0	0	1
Cambridge	Massachusetts	220	39	26	2.6%	3,027	25.6	5	3	5	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	169	41	21	3.1%	2,904	39.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Paterson	New Jersey	233	52	25	2.0%	2,886	25.0	9	5	9	0	0	0
Puyallup	Washington	207	42	19	2.0%	2,814	34.4	5	3	5	0	0	0
Hayward	California	183	34	25	1.5%	2,800	34.8	4	3	4	0	0	0
Orange	California	151	31	17	1.9%	2,689	18.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
New Haven	Connecticut	178	35	22	2.0%	2,663	28.4	5	2	5	0	0	0
Vista	California	163	25	16	2.2%	2,649	26.0	3	3	3	0	0	0
York	Pennsylvania	211	56	19	1.5%	2,639	30.0	7	4	8	0	0	0
Redding	California	193	30	17	2.3%	2,607	32.3	4	3	4	0	0	0
Katy	Texas	177	29	37	0.7%	2,566	43.5	4	2	5	0	0	0
Elk Grove	California	182	29	27	1.4%	2,554	30.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Tracy	California	140	31	23	1.9%	2,215	22.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Pomona	California	154	28	28	1.3%	2,121	33.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Gaithersburg	Maryland	183	42	24	1.5%	2,119	33.0	5	3	5	0	0	0
Concord	California	172	30	25	1.6%	2,043	31.5	4	3	4	0	0	0
Edmond	Oklahoma	180	39	18	1.2%	2,036	22.0	5	2	5	0	0	0
Rancho Cucamonga	California	187	32	31	1.1%	1,996	28.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Amarillo	Texas	290	65	34	0.9%	1,960	35.9	14	3	14	0	0	0
Santa Rosa	California	201	39	37	0.9%	1,900	31.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Whittier	California	192	41	34	0.9%	1,789	27.5	6	3	6	0	0	0
Flushing	New York	178	36	33	0.8%	1,783	36.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Chico	California	148	33	26	1.6%	1,743	26.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Mckinney	Texas	147	25	28	0.9%	1,708	32.3	3	3	3	0	0	0
Lancaster	California	154	34	26	0.9%	1,694	26.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Huntington Beach	California	195	36	35	0.8%	1,693	34.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Santa Barbara	California	212	45	31	1.2%	1,659	25.0	7	3	7	0	0	0
Frisco	Texas	147	24	26	0.9%	1,623	26.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Compton	California	164	23	25	1.2%	1,617	25.0	3	3	3	0	0	0
Green Bay	Wisconsin	235	45	35	0.8%	1,557	36.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Fort Collins	Colorado	167	38	36	0.7%	1,454	41.4	4	3	4	0	0	0
Torrance	California	201	34	39	0.8%	1,433	39.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Van Nuys	California	168	30	37	0.8%	1,402	39.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Cary	North Carolina	152	26	27	0.9%	1,376	31.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Odessa	Texas	218	43	33	0.8%	1,329	44.5	5	2	5	0	0	0
Pasadena	California	193	35	31	0.8%	1,302	36.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Visalia	California	171	31	36	0.9%	1,293	34.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Beaumont	Texas	256	50	40	0.9%	1,288	29.8	8	4	8	0	0	0
Humble	Texas	161	25	38	0.7%	1,237	44.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Mcallen	Texas	168	30	35	0.9%	1,230	29.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Roseville	California	157	34	31	0.9%	1,224	34.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Denton	Texas	191	36	36	0.8%	1,205	41.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	145	22	32	0.9%	1,198	27.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
West Valley City	Utah	153	22	29	0.9%	1,184	30.0	3	3	3	0	0	0
Temecula	California	164	30	28	0.9%	1,168	32.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Inglewood	California	208	39	33	0.9%	1,143	32.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Olathe	Kansas	140	25	30	0.8%	1,136	40.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Hemet	California	162	28	35	0.9%	1,135	31.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	186	31	31	0.9%	1,125	33.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	154	30	31	0.9%	1,097	30.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Keller	Texas	130	27	27	0.9%	1,093	24.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	146	27	28	0.9%	1,070	32.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
La Puente	California	146	26	28	0.9%	1,033	35.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Richardson	Texas	162	31	30	0.9%	1,027	28.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	165	32	34	0.9%	1,025	32.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Grand Junction	Colorado	187	36	26	0.9%	973	27.5	6	3	6	0	0	0
Allen	Texas	127	31	31	0.9%	960	30.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	151	38	37	0.7%	943	51.7	2	2	2	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	129	29	36	0.8%	941	43.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Murrieta	California	134	26	42	0.7%	939	48.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	168	35	35	0.9%	925	26.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	130	29	26	1.0%	924	21.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Norwalk	California	98	19	28	0.9%	921	32.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	97	21	29	0.9%	910	33.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Greeley	Colorado	126	20	36	0.8%	906	39.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Mission Viejo	California	141	29	33	0.9%	887	28.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	100	17	33	0.8%	886	36.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Perris	California	145	24	41	0.7%	872	45.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Broomfield	Colorado	163	29	33	0.8%	870	34.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
El Monte	California	134	27	24	0.9%	864	25.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Menifee	California	192	33	46	0.8%	864	42.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	164	32	32	0.9%	855	31.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	147	26	34	0.8%	849	36.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	98	21	36	0.8%	840	37.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	146	27	38	0.8%	835	37.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
South Gate	California	98	17	28	0.9%	827	32.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	191	42	38	0.9%	825	31.2	5	2	5	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	188	36	38	0.8%	813	39.3	6	5	6	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	98	24	30	0.9%	808	33.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Missouri City	Texas	152	22	39	0.8%	801	41.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Santa Monica	California	196	38	35	0.8%	792	37.4	5	2	5	0	0	0
Kent	Washington	178	31	63	0.5%	791	70.0	4	2	4	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	180	42	43	0.7%	782	47.3	4	2	4	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	197	39	40	0.8%	781	39.4	5	2	5	0	0	0
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	112	21	37	0.8%	775	39.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	120	14	38	0.8%	746	39.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bothell	Washington	163	34	53	0.6%	744	56.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	157	30	45	0.7%	724	43.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Federal Way	Washington	142	33	43	0.7%	712	48.0	2	2	2	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	160	36	46	0.6%	701	47.8	3	2	3	0	0	0
Springdale	Arkansas	106	23	42	0.7%	680	48.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Parker	Colorado	127	26	48	0.6%	636	47.0	2	2	2	0	0	0

Florida

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Miami	356	91	3	49.4%	928,284	6.3	55	8	120	4	11	114
Fort Lauderdale	297	86	1	90.2%	750,138	2.0	27	8	69	13	29	69
Orlando	297	65	2	72.6%	722,775	3.5	32	4	63	5	20	63
Tampa	267	64	3	64.9%	514,641	4.9	27	2	44	0	6	44
West Palm Beach	267	61	1	94.0%	348,301	1.7	12	4	28	6	13	28
Jacksonville	309	78	6	32.7%	283,595	7.6	31	2	53	0	0	52
Saint Petersburg	276	62	2	76.5%	272,815	3.3	16	2	32	3	14	32
Bradenton	247	58	1	96.3%	243,865	1.5	10	3	17	5	14	17
Sarasota	243	51	1	96.4%	241,349	1.3	13	4	24	9	14	24
Kissimmee	230	54	1	77.6%	224,204	3.4	7	2	10	1	5	10
Naples	258	65	2	69.2%	216,502	4.1	14	3	24	1	3	24
Hollywood	203	62	4	45.4%	212,938	6.0	9	3	16	1	2	15
Fort Myers	195	44	1	79.0%	198,643	2.9	11	3	17	2	9	17
Ocala	223	50	2	83.3%	187,585	2.7	11	2	18	0	15	18
Pompano Beach	238	70	4	50.3%	186,238	6.2	10	5	20	0	0	20
Pensacola	236	57	3	63.3%	169,766	4.2	13	2	18	0	4	18
Lake Worth	213	51	2	80.1%	165,454	3.0	5	4	13	0	5	13
Tallahassee	226	53	4	53.7%	154,583	5.5	10	2	13	0	0	13
Gainesville	207	50	2	70.1%	146,788	4.3	10	2	12	1	1	12
Clearwater	219	60	2	75.6%	138,517	3.3	9	2	18	2	4	18
Lakeland	221	46	4	51.5%	132,839	5.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Melbourne	170	41	1	84.4%	131,401	2.2	5	2	8	3	5	8
Port Saint Lucie	180	39	2	64.0%	130,072	4.2	6	2	12	0	2	12
Panama City	179	42	1	100.0%	126,365	1.0	6	4	13	6	11	13
Cape Coral	208	46	3	69.7%	125,978	4.0	6	2	8	0	1	8
Boca Raton	215	59	4	56.4%	125,392	5.8	9	2	10	0	1	10
Boynton Beach	191	54	2	69.6%	121,117	4.0	6	2	12	0	4	12
New Port Richey	184	36	1	98.1%	118,528	1.3	4	3	8	3	8	8
Saint Augustine	189	41	1	82.2%	107,721	2.8	5	4	10	1	4	10
Daytona Beach	190	40	1	100.0%	103,095	1.0	5	6	17	5	11	17
Deltona	103	23	1	100.0%	93,889	1.0	2	1	2	2	2	2
Apopka	125	32	1	94.8%	92,555	1.5	2	3	5	1	3	5
Lehigh Acres	180	47	1	77.7%	90,875	3.0	6	2	12	2	4	12
Clermont	156	33	1	88.1%	88,348	3.0	3	2	5	1	1	5
Riverview	144	36	2	79.2%	88,214	3.0	3	2	6	1	2	6
Spring Hill	151	32	3	70.0%	87,804	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Vero Beach	197	49	2	75.5%	86,982	3.5	6	2	12	1	2	12
Hialeah	181	53	8	23.4%	85,940	8.7	7	3	12	0	0	9
Homestead	169	46	5	44.2%	82,858	6.4	7	2	13	0	0	13
Palm Bay	176	41	2	70.7%	78,724	3.5	4	2	7	1	2	7
Largo	167	39	3	70.0%	75,334	4.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Delray Beach	169	39	4	62.3%	74,169	4.8	5	2	6	0	1	6
Milton	152	34	2	76.3%	72,254	3.3	3	3	6	0	2	6
Fort Pierce	213	48	1	70.0%	66,998	4.0	8	2	16	0	0	16
Winter Haven	156	33	5	60.0%	64,127	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Jupiter	159	41	4	56.9%	56,076	4.8	4	2	7	0	1	7
Coral Springs	126	32	7	32.3%	31,399	7.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Miami Beach	172	53	8	12.3%	14,269	9.2	5	3	10	0	0	6

Miami

ZIP	autotagagency.net	miamidade.gov	floridatagandtitle.com	yelp.com	sweetwaterautotags.com	mapquest.com
33129	3	2	7	6	13	10
33157	8	1	3	7	15	12
33180	7	2	3	4	22	9
33126	2	4	6	7	12	10
33167	8	4	6	7	14	10
33136	8	1	7	6	12	10
33166	8	4	6	7	10	12
33189	6	1	2	3	13	5
33127	8	4	7	6	13	10
33179	8	1	6	7	14	10
33158	5	1	3	4	10	7
33135	2	4	7	6	13	10
33175	4	5	7	8	3	12
33144	1	4	6	7	10	11
33162	8	1	6	7	14	5
33193	5	1	3	4	7	8
33131	8	1	7	6	14	10
33194	8	4	1	7	10	11
33143	5	1	3	4	7	8
33122	8	4	6	7	2	12
33173	5	1	3	4	8	9
33174	8	4	6	7	1	11
33184	7	4	6	5	1	13
33133	1	4	7	6	13	10
33196	8	4	1	7	14	10
33176	4	1	2	3	16	6
33125	8	4	7	6	14	10
33145	2	3	7	6	14	10
33165	5	1	3	4	7	9
33185	8	4	2	7	10	12
33134	1	4	6	7	12	10
33150	5	1	3	4	11	7
33183	3	5	4	7	10	11
33132	8	1	7	6	13	10
33172	10	4	5	6	1	13
33170	8	3	1	7	15	11
33161	11	4	8	9	18	5
33130	8	1	7	6	14	10
33181	11	2	8	9	15	5
33190	7	1	2	3	15	5
33177	8	1	2	7	16	11
33156	7	3	6	11	16	10
33146	1	5	8	7	14	6
33187	8	3	1	7	14	10
33178	8	4	5	6	2	11
33147	8	4	6	7	13	10
33137	8	3	7	6	15	10
33168	8	2	6	7	14	10
33128	8	1	7	6	12	10
33138	8	4	6	7	14	10
33155	3	4	6	7	13	11
33169	8	2	6	7	16	11
33182	5	1	3	4	7	11
33186	3	4	1	7	10	11
33142	5	1	3	4	9	7

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Autotagagency

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 513 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Autotagagency Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (tag agency near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Autotagagency Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Autotagagency Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Autotagagency Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly