Aplaceformom Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve aplaceformom.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 7,331 Retirement Homes In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Aplaceformom Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Aplaceformom Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Aplaceformom Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Aplaceformom Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	23,895	7,331	2	52.1%	168,095,878	7.1	27,379	32,654	4,099	42,851	253	2,912	33,755
California	3,595	1,223	2	56.9%	22,282,491	5.7	1,166	1,740	403	2,191	32	216	2,105
Texas	3,056	1,154	2	55.8%	15,556,703	6.2	1,360	1,917	234	2,358	18	219	1,992
Florida	2,414	824	2	57.2%	11,781,919	5.6	446	975	212	1,172	13	126	1,107
New York	2,805	836	2	50.2%	9,841,677	6.5	1,491	1,756	174	2,301	21	168	2,042
Illinois	2,697	847	2	52.6%	6,744,708	7.5	1,247	1,382	216	1,862	12	100	1,350
Pennsylvania	2,720	823	2	50.6%	6,473,045	7.1	1,604	1,781	203	2,384	13	142	1,955
Georgia	2,062	656	2	57.9%	5,962,298	6.4	574	726	153	986	13	81	784
Ohio	2,444	801	2	49.1%	5,714,402	7.8	976	1,188	147	1,476	1	88	987
Michigan	2,226	735	2	51.4%	5,118,575	6.3	833	976	155	1,209	12	110	1,098
North Carolina	1,949	613	2	49.0%	4,979,604	7.3	683	802	140	1,012	3	73	778
New Jersey	1,696	544	2	53.0%	4,703,398	6.3	537	593	195	767	17	60	662
Virginia	2,029	641	2	54.0%	4,544,628	7.0	723	891	106	1,228	5	75	992
Washington	1,817	591	2	58.8%	4,277,294	5.6	451	587	107	877	6	100	831
Arizona	1,478	533	2	59.3%	4,122,101	5.6	247	396	57	510	3	49	479
Massachusetts	1,743	515	2	53.1%	3,628,808	6.6	461	534	175	659	8	43	545
Maryland	1,540	503	2	55.5%	3,330,642	6.4	392	463	97	674	9	53	589
Tennessee	1,774	613	2	48.9%	3,251,140	7.3	514	622	69	808	1	52	585
Indiana	2,695	785	3	45.6%	3,024,212	7.9	659	770	83	933	2	44	666
Colorado	1,747	544	2	54.1%	2,992,004	6.7	381	514	63	664	4	63	547
Minnesota	2,166	698	2	51.7%	2,857,679	7.5	777	878	97	1,307	11	78	934
Wisconsin	2,117	689	2	46.1%	2,664,229	7.9	694	769	98	1,061	2	49	742
Missouri	2,106	689	2	42.5%	2,587,825	8.6	887	1,017	81	1,482	0	65	848
South Carolina	1,441	458	2	51.0%	2,527,483	7.0	347	422	66	577	1	44	443
Alabama	1,791	559	3	49.1%	2,388,162	6.9	522	637	60	833	3	66	652
Oregon	1,895	614	2	54.0%	2,202,740	6.1	355	414	71	493	1	43	454
Louisiana	1,532	543	3	46.9%	2,185,248	7.3	431	510	34	664	0	44	495
Oklahoma	1,691	559	2	48.3%	1,893,151	7.5	557	646	43	839	1	61	585
Kentucky	1,831	622	3	39.0%	1,733,760	8.7	698	758	56	1,021	0	23	662
Nevada	948	312	2	59.3%	1,733,633	5.5	92	168	13	196	4	16	185
Connecticut	1,300	434	2	48.1%	1,722,698	7.5	234	279	91	345	4	20	257
Utah	1,248	452	2	53.8%	1,637,146	7.0	246	284	38	404	5	19	347
Iowa	1,960	661	2	42.3%	1,324,921	7.9	890	933	62	1,316	4	60	897
Kansas	1,728	545	2	44.9%	1,306,481	7.9	616	692	53	985	1	44	677
New Mexico	1,251	410	3	55.9%	1,167,537	6.3	327	361	27	426	4	34	383
Mississippi	1,463	493	3	38.9%	1,163,627	8.1	384	418	47	591	2	24	382
Arkansas	1,638	519	3	34.1%	1,018,996	8.9	553	587	44	900	1	28	550
Nebraska	1,474	501	2	48.7%	926,811	7.9	524	581	28	676	5	39	440
Idaho	1,251	427	2	48.3%	814,659	6.8	251	273	30	352	0	15	307
West Virginia	1,524	477	4	39.9%	729,102	8.6	684	704	30	892	0	36	597
New Hampshire	1,334	439	2	54.2%	728,621	6.7	238	248	54	380	4	18	332
Hawaii	789	271	3	38.4%	546,317	7.5	82	93	16	138	0	3	122
Maine	1,714	549	2	40.2%	535,787	7.3	421	425	39	656	1	13	571
Delaware	779	261	2	55.1%	522,733	5.5	52	66	27	83	1	12	83
Montana	1,341	417	3	49.1%	512,003	6.4	348	361	30	416	0	40	386
Rhode Island	730	233	2	46.1%	487,289	6.6	64	77	25	95	1	4	87
South Dakota	1,240	402	3	40.6%	351,027	7.9	359	370	14	421	0	19	321
Alaska	1,222	405	3	46.5%	343,152	4.9	218	235	8	248	0	99	219
North Dakota	1,127	336	3	43.8%	329,183	10.2	367	381	9	389	1	16	227
Vermont	1,149	368	3	31.9%	199,063	8.3	250	254	23	381	1	6	313
Wyoming	1,097	367	4	33.6%	195,621	7.9	164	171	10	184	2	8	134

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	449	148	2	57.6%	1,836,501	5.2	96	2	97	1	10	97
Brooklyn	New York	245	73	3	56.2%	1,461,291	5.4	37	1	37	0	4	37
Chicago	Illinois	383	108	2	52.4%	1,416,383	5.7	56	1	56	0	6	56
Los Angeles	California	432	130	2	55.1%	1,353,564	5.5	62	3	63	0	12	63
San Antonio	Texas	384	112	2	61.1%	1,087,235	4.8	59	1	59	0	6	59
Dallas	Texas	359	120	1	76.2%	1,060,914	3.4	48	3	49	9	12	49
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	342	96	2	64.8%	1,021,135	4.6	47	1	47	0	7	47
Las Vegas	Nevada	369	108	2	64.5%	997,666	4.6	43	2	44	0	6	44
Miami	Florida	545	172	2	52.1%	978,370	5.8	55	7	58	0	4	58
New York City	New York	293	77	3	54.4%	882,471	5.7	47	2	66	0	7	66
Phoenix	Arizona	363	127	2	60.7%	880,757	4.9	42	1	42	0	2	42
Bronx	New York	238	64	2	51.9%	748,282	5.6	25	2	36	0	3	36
San Diego	California	374	130	2	53.3%	717,938	5.5	36	1	36	0	6	36
Austin	Texas	369	119	2	65.1%	708,403	4.4	44	2	45	0	10	45
Minneapolis	Minnesota	557	172	2	60.7%	660,868	5.0	51	12	80	3	10	78
Atlanta	Georgia	465	141	2	64.8%	640,580	4.4	39	8	44	1	7	44
Orlando	Florida	369	116	2	62.2%	619,897	4.8	32	2	32	0	2	32
Tucson	Arizona	369	107	2	67.7%	612,389	4.4	32	2	33	0	7	33
Indianapolis	Indiana	392	113	2	63.6%	605,849	4.6	37	3	38	0	5	38
Denver	Colorado	449	142	2	55.6%	604,105	5.4	38	4	38	0	8	38
San Jose	California	386	108	2	57.2%	600,465	5.4	28	1	28	0	3	28
San Francisco	California	400	117	2	66.6%	579,551	4.5	28	2	29	0	5	29
Portland	Oregon	368	113	2	62.7%	577,167	4.5	33	1	33	0	7	33
Columbus	Ohio	357	119	2	65.7%	555,869	4.6	30	3	31	0	4	31
Seattle	Washington	330	95	2	56.6%	540,199	5.2	35	4	37	0	8	37
Cincinnati	Ohio	350	115	2	66.5%	534,847	4.3	45	1	45	0	11	45
Fort Worth	Texas	321	109	2	56.8%	517,738	5.3	32	1	32	0	6	32
Jacksonville	Florida	290	91	2	59.4%	514,953	5.4	31	1	31	0	7	31
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	457	142	2	60.8%	505,655	4.6	27	11	31	2	6	31
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	378	101	2	60.9%	494,546	5.0	29	3	33	0	2	33
Saint Louis	Missouri	516	158	2	52.8%	484,754	5.7	45	10	53	0	7	53
Charlotte	North Carolina	294	84	2	51.8%	469,468	5.8	24	1	24	0	3	24
Saint Paul	Minnesota	501	164	2	58.7%	469,174	5.2	30	13	48	0	5	48
El Paso	Texas	372	114	2	59.1%	466,037	5.1	24	2	24	0	1	24
Cleveland	Ohio	385	114	2	59.8%	448,809	4.9	29	4	31	0	7	31
Tampa	Florida	354	111	2	55.8%	442,165	5.3	27	2	28	0	6	28
Albuquerque	New Mexico	298	85	3	66.5%	436,255	4.5	17	1	17	0	3	17
Washington DC	District of Columbia	344	82	2	62.8%	429,459	4.6	28	1	28	0	4	28
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	423	136	2	62.7%	427,654	4.7	43	3	44	0	8	44
Sacramento	California	350	109	2	51.3%	413,073	5.8	28	1	28	0	2	28
Detroit	Michigan	329	103	2	63.3%	405,147	4.6	25	1	25	0	4	25
Colorado Springs	Colorado	362	121	2	65.1%	379,756	4.5	30	2	31	0	6	31
Baltimore	Maryland	327	101	2	59.9%	377,768	5.3	22	2	22	0	5	22
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	364	100	2	54.8%	373,855	5.5	39	4	42	0	6	42
Omaha	Nebraska	299	94	2	65.4%	361,323	4.5	31	1	31	0	5	31
Louisville	Kentucky	343	96	3	46.6%	354,605	6.4	32	2	33	0	2	33
Long Beach	California	251	71	2	68.7%	329,239	4.5	12	1	12	0	2	12
Mesa	Arizona	281	92	2	59.6%	318,461	5.1	13	1	13	0	2	13
Hollywood	Florida	268	82	2	66.9%	313,458	4.4	9	2	9	0	2	9
Fresno	California	307	100	2	51.3%	308,787	5.9	18	1	18	0	1	18
Birmingham	Alabama	380	114	2	60.8%	304,093	4.6	30	2	31	0	5	31
Kansas City	Missouri	367	110	2	52.2%	298,707	5.8	49	1	49	0	3	49
Memphis	Tennessee	319	92	3	42.1%	292,568	6.6	26	2	26	0	0	26
Bakersfield	California	253	72	2	51.9%	290,470	5.8	11	1	11	0	1	11
Salt Lake City	Utah	344	109	2	59.4%	289,021	5.2	19	4	21	0	5	19
Raleigh	North Carolina	280	80	2	52.8%	288,409	5.3	15	2	16	1	2	16
Buffalo	New York	328	88	3	49.9%	280,757	6.1	28	3	28	0	2	28
Aurora	Colorado	321	103	2	62.2%	270,822	4.5	11	4	16	1	5	16
Dayton	Ohio	378	117	2	56.4%	269,825	5.6	27	6	32	0	3	32
Rochester	New York	350	101	2	57.0%	268,740	5.5	24	1	24	0	4	24
Nashville	Tennessee	302	85	2	57.2%	262,360	5.2	22	2	23	0	3	23
Pompano Beach	Florida	303	88	1	68.9%	255,231	4.2	10	6	11	0	1	11
Oakland	California	259	81	2	61.8%	254,599	4.9	14	2	20	0	1	20
Virginia Beach	Virginia	238	79	2	56.0%	251,930	5.4	12	1	12	0	1	12
Arlington	Texas	266	89	2	62.6%	248,359	4.5	12	1	12	0	3	12
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	304	100	2	65.1%	246,762	4.6	18	1	18	0	3	18
Knoxville	Tennessee	271	83	2	63.0%	243,542	4.7	17	1	17	0	2	17
Spring	Texas	228	93	2	62.6%	238,392	4.8	8	4	11	0	2	11
Wichita	Kansas	298	82	2	56.2%	234,749	5.4	26	1	26	0	5	26
New Orleans	Louisiana	265	79	2	54.6%	233,830	5.5	19	1	19	0	3	19
Richmond	Virginia	260	75	2	58.0%	226,617	4.9	15	1	15	0	3	15
Stockton	California	260	77	2	59.5%	222,328	4.9	12	1	12	0	2	12
Corpus Christi	Texas	334	108	2	67.7%	220,532	4.2	18	1	18	0	5	18
Santa Ana	California	236	74	2	61.6%	220,125	4.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Tacoma	Washington	356	112	2	65.9%	219,547	4.4	20	2	23	0	5	23
Vancouver	Washington	258	81	2	66.9%	218,159	4.2	11	1	11	0	3	11
Spokane	Washington	258	90	2	60.2%	216,618	4.9	14	2	28	0	2	28
Tulsa	Oklahoma	303	88	2	51.2%	216,155	5.6	28	1	28	0	4	28
Hialeah	Florida	235	76	3	58.2%	213,424	5.1	7	3	8	0	2	8
Anaheim	California	217	60	3	57.9%	213,304	5.4	7	2	13	0	1	13
Lexington	Kentucky	282	91	2	66.4%	212,495	4.2	15	1	15	0	4	15
Grand Rapids	Michigan	230	67	3	57.5%	211,582	5.3	12	1	12	0	3	12
West Palm Beach	Florida	291	92	2	56.9%	210,941	5.5	12	3	16	0	2	16
Columbia	South Carolina	238	75	2	60.6%	207,886	5.1	14	2	15	0	4	15
Irvine	California	289	94	1	77.4%	207,184	3.3	9	1	9	2	3	9
Riverside	California	204	65	2	54.7%	202,371	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Fort Wayne	Indiana	253	79	2	62.0%	197,339	4.8	16	1	16	0	1	16
Alexandria	Virginia	300	91	2	55.2%	195,655	5.3	14	2	16	0	2	16
Littleton	Colorado	337	117	2	59.7%	194,417	5.1	10	4	10	0	3	10
Marietta	Georgia	242	73	2	60.0%	193,577	5.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Mobile	Alabama	334	110	2	70.6%	191,517	4.2	18	1	18	0	5	18
Scottsdale	Arizona	278	106	2	63.1%	188,093	4.8	11	2	14	0	4	14
Silver Spring	Maryland	281	86	2	62.0%	187,992	5.0	7	5	11	0	1	11
Naples	Florida	335	114	2	59.8%	187,258	5.1	14	1	14	0	1	14
Lubbock	Texas	327	101	2	67.0%	185,267	4.4	14	1	14	0	3	14
Saint Petersburg	Florida	370	123	2	51.3%	183,004	5.9	16	3	21	0	0	21
Lincoln	Nebraska	302	91	2	62.8%	181,701	4.6	22	2	23	0	3	23
Henderson	Nevada	191	68	2	58.8%	177,936	4.9	8	2	11	0	2	11
Tallahassee	Florida	275	82	3	61.7%	177,605	4.7	10	1	10	0	1	10
Greensboro	North Carolina	221	57	2	54.1%	177,066	5.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Fayetteville	North Carolina	232	76	3	72.0%	175,760	4.0	8	1	8	0	4	8
Bradenton	Florida	278	92	2	68.9%	174,495	4.2	10	3	14	0	3	14
Katy	Texas	183	73	3	50.0%	171,872	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Glendale	Arizona	277	99	2	56.2%	171,249	5.1	9	3	10	0	2	10
Oceanside	California	170	63	1	84.4%	168,987	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Corona	California	215	64	2	65.4%	168,174	4.4	5	2	6	0	2	6
Plano	Texas	193	67	2	54.2%	165,598	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Toledo	Ohio	256	81	2	53.6%	164,741	5.6	15	1	15	0	2	15
Fort Myers	Florida	256	72	2	65.0%	163,432	4.1	11	2	11	1	3	11
Pensacola	Florida	304	93	2	60.3%	161,783	4.8	13	1	13	0	1	13
Lakeland	Florida	232	71	3	61.8%	159,480	5.0	9	1	9	0	3	9
Boise	Idaho	201	68	3	62.1%	158,951	4.9	9	1	9	0	1	9
Kissimmee	Florida	290	91	3	54.9%	158,556	5.4	7	3	8	0	0	8
Gilbert	Arizona	232	76	2	65.4%	155,962	4.3	6	1	6	0	3	6
Newark	New Jersey	243	74	2	55.6%	155,907	5.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Frisco	Texas	128	51	2	90.0%	155,203	2.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Chula Vista	California	180	50	3	59.4%	154,863	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Madison	Wisconsin	269	87	3	52.0%	153,364	5.5	14	2	15	0	2	15
Alpharetta	Georgia	195	75	1	80.9%	153,077	3.3	4	3	7	1	2	7
Anchorage	Alaska	271	87	3	61.6%	150,440	4.8	12	1	12	0	1	12
Modesto	California	252	74	2	56.7%	149,937	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Oxnard	California	185	60	2	67.9%	149,559	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Syracuse	New York	310	87	3	65.7%	148,995	4.3	15	2	16	1	3	16
Reno	Nevada	225	63	5	50.1%	148,803	5.9	12	1	12	0	0	12
Woodbridge	Virginia	177	56	2	70.0%	148,157	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Cypress	Texas	121	54	1	85.5%	145,924	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Salem	Oregon	232	71	2	54.6%	145,460	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Akron	Ohio	274	82	3	53.4%	144,478	5.8	17	1	17	0	1	17
Amarillo	Texas	292	93	4	62.8%	143,849	4.9	14	1	14	0	1	14
Moreno Valley	California	185	61	2	70.0%	143,818	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garland	Texas	201	70	2	60.0%	142,757	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ocala	Florida	251	82	3	63.0%	141,840	4.7	11	2	12	0	1	12
Fontana	California	167	54	3	60.0%	140,836	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Boca Raton	Florida	217	64	3	63.3%	140,591	4.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Torrance	California	205	73	2	79.5%	140,546	3.4	5	2	5	0	3	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	229	75	3	60.0%	140,282	5.0	7	2	14	0	0	14
Winston Salem	North Carolina	310	107	2	52.4%	138,510	5.8	9	1	9	0	1	9
Sarasota	Florida	269	79	2	55.1%	137,969	5.2	13	4	16	0	3	16
Rancho Cucamonga	California	210	72	1	76.8%	135,629	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Chandler	Arizona	201	74	4	50.0%	134,308	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Norfolk	Virginia	302	94	3	54.5%	133,878	5.6	14	1	14	0	2	14
Savannah	Georgia	261	68	3	54.4%	131,268	5.7	10	1	10	0	1	10
Jersey City	New Jersey	201	56	4	50.0%	130,812	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Honolulu	Hawaii	234	63	7	31.3%	130,376	7.7	11	2	22	0	0	22
Springfield	Missouri	255	88	3	56.5%	130,120	5.3	7	1	7	0	0	7
Trenton	New Jersey	301	91	2	62.3%	129,516	4.7	11	3	11	1	2	11
Irving	Texas	193	69	3	53.8%	129,324	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Lawrenceville	Georgia	197	56	3	50.0%	128,056	6.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Wilmington	Delaware	267	87	2	57.6%	126,503	4.8	10	3	12	0	4	12
Greenville	South Carolina	203	66	2	57.3%	125,862	5.4	9	1	9	0	2	9
Santa Rosa	California	225	69	3	58.1%	125,587	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Elk Grove	California	170	56	2	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Montgomery	Alabama	280	73	3	59.5%	124,886	4.8	13	1	13	0	2	13
San Bernardino	California	220	70	3	50.0%	124,758	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Augusta	Georgia	237	66	2	61.0%	124,659	4.8	8	1	8	0	2	8
Huntsville	Alabama	263	78	2	63.4%	124,436	5.0	11	2	12	0	4	12
Chattanooga	Tennessee	270	80	2	59.7%	124,091	5.0	15	1	15	0	5	15
Escondido	California	155	59	2	69.0%	123,923	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Kent	Washington	190	61	1	76.9%	123,376	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Green Bay	Wisconsin	241	68	2	67.0%	122,798	4.4	7	1	7	0	3	7
Whittier	California	217	73	2	62.4%	122,497	4.8	6	3	7	0	1	7
Palmdale	California	190	62	1	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Des Moines	Iowa	251	84	2	54.5%	121,780	5.5	11	1	11	0	2	11
Clarksville	Tennessee	152	51	2	68.8%	120,852	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Sunnyvale	California	195	57	2	78.8%	120,376	3.0	4	2	4	0	3	4
Shreveport	Louisiana	222	71	3	53.7%	119,851	5.6	12	1	12	0	0	12
Cape Coral	Florida	223	75	2	66.2%	119,700	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	225	61	3	50.0%	118,947	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Cumming	Georgia	172	65	3	73.1%	118,364	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Providence	Rhode Island	223	68	2	57.6%	118,137	5.1	8	3	9	0	2	9
Clearwater	Florida	276	86	2	64.1%	117,467	4.6	9	2	9	0	3	9
Gainesville	Florida	252	78	3	56.0%	117,213	5.6	10	1	10	0	0	10
Fremont	California	197	61	4	50.0%	116,578	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	California	180	60	4	58.3%	116,504	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Brownsville	Texas	165	49	4	57.7%	116,113	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Worth	Florida	233	84	2	55.7%	114,938	5.4	5	5	8	0	1	8
Tempe	Arizona	198	61	3	60.3%	114,583	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	186	64	4	58.3%	113,515	5.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
El Cajon	California	178	53	2	65.8%	113,502	4.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Fredericksburg	Virginia	224	71	3	64.9%	112,940	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Overland Park	Kansas	240	84	2	61.2%	112,274	5.0	9	1	9	0	3	9
Charleston	South Carolina	252	73	3	56.8%	111,836	5.6	10	2	12	0	2	12
Ogden	Utah	189	59	3	55.4%	111,589	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Jackson	Mississippi	244	67	2	65.5%	111,543	4.7	11	1	11	0	3	11
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	199	59	3	59.7%	111,305	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Erie	Pennsylvania	239	61	4	60.3%	110,681	4.8	13	1	13	0	1	13
Lancaster	California	166	58	3	60.0%	110,651	5.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Yonkers	New York	187	54	4	61.2%	110,409	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Beaverton	Oregon	156	50	3	54.4%	109,750	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Rockford	Illinois	274	85	2	60.0%	109,397	5.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Durham	North Carolina	201	55	5	37.6%	109,073	7.3	8	5	12	0	0	12
Little Rock	Arkansas	257	66	3	50.0%	109,033	6.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Jamaica	New York	175	52	5	44.5%	108,508	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Hyattsville	Maryland	190	45	2	68.7%	108,182	4.4	5	2	10	0	2	10
Naperville	Illinois	184	59	2	65.1%	107,987	4.5	4	2	5	0	1	5
Reading	Pennsylvania	303	97	3	50.0%	107,658	6.0	10	5	14	0	0	14
Waco	Texas	224	69	2	67.3%	106,597	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Ontario	California	177	51	3	60.0%	105,989	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Las Cruces	New Mexico	232	81	2	71.1%	105,860	3.9	7	2	8	0	3	8
Salinas	California	209	63	2	55.6%	104,622	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Tyler	Texas	245	87	3	67.0%	104,543	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Simi Valley	California	134	53	1	81.2%	104,511	3.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	246	75	3	51.3%	104,161	5.5	6	2	8	0	1	8
Boston	Massachusetts	278	78	2	67.6%	102,654	4.4	14	1	14	0	3	14
Flushing	New York	137	43	6	47.7%	102,587	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mission	Texas	164	50	3	56.6%	102,451	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bellevue	Washington	216	66	1	70.0%	102,397	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Beaumont	Texas	227	70	2	70.1%	101,966	4.3	8	1	8	0	4	8
Eugene	Oregon	208	66	3	50.0%	101,495	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Stone Mountain	Georgia	180	60	1	79.0%	101,317	3.7	3	3	5	1	1	5
Hemet	California	152	42	2	78.6%	101,231	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
West Jordan	Utah	186	64	1	81.6%	100,825	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Rialto	California	147	50	1	94.5%	100,716	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Olympia	Washington	253	91	2	54.9%	100,328	5.5	6	2	10	0	1	10
Renton	Washington	235	79	2	64.6%	100,067	4.6	5	2	5	0	1	5
Everett	Washington	210	70	3	60.0%	100,003	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	California	180	60	2	71.4%	99,442	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	228	69	3	54.7%	99,383	4.9	9	1	9	0	2	9
Edmond	Oklahoma	190	68	2	57.8%	99,247	5.4	5	2	5	0	1	5
Henrico	Virginia	257	76	2	50.9%	98,035	6.4	7	3	8	0	0	7
Roanoke	Virginia	237	66	3	57.0%	96,535	5.4	10	1	10	0	2	10
Hayward	California	188	57	4	50.0%	96,017	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Surprise	Arizona	182	59	2	70.6%	95,686	4.3	4	1	4	0	2	4
Killeen	Texas	194	62	5	63.6%	95,579	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Lafayette	Louisiana	190	67	3	59.5%	95,555	4.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	214	59	3	56.3%	95,398	5.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Grand Prairie	Texas	190	73	3	50.0%	95,273	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pomona	California	165	55	4	60.0%	94,791	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lansing	Michigan	252	81	2	57.7%	94,776	5.3	7	1	7	0	2	7
Pasadena	California	180	61	2	60.0%	94,634	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Conroe	Texas	248	82	2	59.0%	94,609	5.3	7	2	9	0	1	9
Flint	Michigan	233	73	2	60.6%	94,276	5.1	7	1	7	0	2	7
Homestead	Florida	242	71	4	50.0%	93,837	6.0	7	3	9	0	0	9
Sugar Land	Texas	171	57	3	55.5%	93,679	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Paterson	New Jersey	266	90	3	64.2%	93,675	4.3	9	1	9	0	2	9
Inglewood	California	210	71	2	69.9%	93,527	4.0	5	2	5	0	2	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	179	55	3	75.8%	92,955	3.8	4	1	4	0	3	4
Murrieta	California	142	47	2	70.0%	92,571	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manassas	Virginia	195	58	2	60.6%	92,082	4.8	4	3	6	0	1	6
Panama City	Florida	223	68	2	72.7%	91,893	3.5	6	1	6	0	3	6
Garden Grove	California	202	69	4	52.3%	91,840	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gaithersburg	Maryland	197	62	2	63.3%	91,534	5.4	5	2	8	0	1	8
Laredo	Texas	212	72	7	33.8%	91,531	7.8	6	3	7	0	0	5
Temecula	California	170	53	2	70.0%	90,939	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bellingham	Washington	164	67	2	71.8%	90,860	4.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Kalamazoo	Michigan	225	70	3	55.3%	90,792	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Decatur	Georgia	225	74	2	50.0%	90,413	6.0	5	3	7	0	0	7
Albany	New York	262	73	2	59.5%	89,979	5.1	11	1	11	0	0	11
South Bend	Indiana	227	76	3	61.3%	89,952	5.1	10	2	11	0	3	11
North Hollywood	California	140	44	2	58.7%	89,907	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
York	Pennsylvania	232	62	4	50.0%	89,873	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Fairfax	Virginia	209	63	4	54.9%	89,855	5.5	4	4	5	0	0	5
Melbourne	Florida	169	50	2	57.6%	89,661	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Santa Fe	New Mexico	196	66	3	70.0%	89,660	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mckinney	Texas	138	46	5	47.2%	89,202	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	239	87	2	68.0%	89,098	4.4	5	2	5	0	1	5
Yakima	Washington	153	43	3	68.5%	88,967	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Van Nuys	California	158	46	5	50.0%	88,906	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Yuma	Arizona	161	50	4	60.0%	88,559	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Newport News	Virginia	254	85	4	50.0%	88,343	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Mesquite	Texas	146	51	3	60.0%	87,788	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Midland	Texas	204	69	4	54.9%	87,770	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Costa Mesa	California	137	49	2	76.7%	87,215	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	213	63	2	62.4%	87,032	4.5	6	1	6	0	2	6
Macon	Georgia	261	73	3	53.2%	87,024	5.7	9	1	9	0	1	9
Abilene	Texas	209	71	2	66.8%	86,985	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Odessa	Texas	220	77	3	54.1%	86,545	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	206	56	3	59.2%	86,148	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Peoria	Arizona	177	67	2	50.0%	86,050	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Clovis	California	155	46	2	70.7%	85,870	4.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Santa Maria	California	184	53	3	60.0%	85,853	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Coral Springs	Florida	135	49	1	87.7%	85,286	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	212	68	5	50.0%	84,976	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Topeka	Kansas	300	80	5	51.9%	84,857	5.7	18	1	18	0	2	18
Stamford	Connecticut	226	66	3	65.5%	84,329	4.0	6	1	6	0	2	6
Cary	North Carolina	162	51	5	54.0%	83,929	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
New Braunfels	Texas	137	47	2	81.6%	83,927	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Roseville	California	165	59	3	60.0%	83,876	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Round Rock	Texas	171	65	4	50.0%	83,752	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Ann Arbor	Michigan	200	63	4	50.0%	83,361	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Humble	Texas	162	64	2	50.0%	83,265	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bridgeport	Connecticut	233	72	3	56.8%	83,125	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Worcester	Massachusetts	221	68	3	44.7%	82,890	6.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Menifee	California	188	67	1	74.7%	82,611	3.3	4	2	5	1	1	5
San Mateo	California	193	54	2	57.8%	82,263	5.3	4	2	5	0	1	5
Laurel	Maryland	184	58	1	73.1%	82,240	3.8	4	3	5	0	1	5
Perris	California	146	40	1	70.0%	82,173	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Richardson	Texas	149	54	2	71.5%	81,914	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	212	61	1	70.0%	81,822	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Victorville	California	164	50	4	60.0%	81,786	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Norman	Oklahoma	184	57	3	65.9%	81,776	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Carrollton	Texas	169	64	3	60.0%	80,887	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
High Point	North Carolina	194	58	3	66.0%	80,698	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Clermont	Florida	178	60	2	80.3%	80,497	3.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Evansville	Indiana	209	52	5	43.2%	79,802	6.8	9	1	9	0	0	9
Rockville	Maryland	206	63	3	55.1%	79,782	5.8	4	4	6	0	1	6
Bothell	Washington	186	61	2	62.2%	79,752	4.3	3	3	4	0	1	4
Schenectady	New York	241	71	4	49.0%	79,490	6.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Sterling Heights	Michigan	201	57	2	60.0%	79,482	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	193	56	2	68.4%	79,416	4.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Joliet	Illinois	204	57	2	61.6%	79,398	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Mcallen	Texas	162	47	5	56.0%	79,353	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edison	New Jersey	159	49	2	78.5%	79,106	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Denton	Texas	225	72	4	50.0%	79,078	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Ashburn	Virginia	129	38	2	70.0%	78,615	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Puyallup	Washington	217	73	4	55.0%	78,595	5.4	5	2	7	0	0	7
Pueblo	Colorado	256	80	6	49.4%	78,191	6.0	7	2	8	0	1	8
Pearland	Texas	151	58	5	56.4%	77,598	5.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	145	52	2	73.1%	77,566	4.0	2	3	3	0	1	3
Orange	California	179	59	2	53.1%	77,001	5.4	5	2	10	0	1	10
Elgin	Illinois	166	47	2	62.5%	76,383	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Berkeley	California	233	77	4	60.0%	76,276	5.0	9	2	9	0	0	9
Lake Charles	Louisiana	201	74	4	58.3%	76,245	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Youngstown	Ohio	259	82	2	48.3%	75,883	6.1	12	2	12	0	0	12
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	182	67	4	57.9%	75,502	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Muskegon	Michigan	202	65	5	58.3%	75,328	5.4	5	2	10	0	1	10
Charlottesville	Virginia	196	55	3	61.1%	75,171	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Federal Way	Washington	145	47	4	74.9%	75,044	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
San Leandro	California	164	52	2	67.4%	74,924	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Riverview	Florida	185	53	1	67.2%	74,861	4.0	3	3	4	0	1	4
Ridgewood	New York	98	27	3	70.0%	74,702	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Cambridge	Massachusetts	186	62	3	64.4%	74,581	4.2	5	2	9	0	3	9
Vallejo	California	177	55	3	59.9%	74,571	5.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
Athens	Georgia	213	60	3	59.8%	74,547	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Keller	Texas	144	56	3	63.4%	73,692	4.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Fargo	North Dakota	165	47	5	60.0%	73,484	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bend	Oregon	171	65	5	60.0%	73,354	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Visalia	California	170	48	5	48.1%	73,115	6.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Boynton Beach	Florida	203	69	3	41.9%	73,025	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Waterbury	Connecticut	204	65	2	67.1%	72,855	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Apopka	Florida	144	53	2	74.3%	72,591	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Olathe	Kansas	134	49	5	50.0%	72,187	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	California	160	50	3	59.8%	71,646	5.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Mcdonough	Georgia	143	51	1	70.0%	71,023	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Frederick	Maryland	155	43	5	53.8%	70,953	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
New Haven	Connecticut	200	60	5	54.4%	70,864	5.4	5	1	5	0	1	5
Arvada	Colorado	197	69	4	53.1%	70,824	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Longmont	Colorado	169	58	5	54.1%	70,785	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Falls Church	Virginia	255	70	3	58.7%	70,607	5.2	5	6	9	0	1	9
Belleville	Illinois	191	72	2	75.5%	70,411	3.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
San Marcos	California	143	53	2	70.0%	70,337	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Miami Beach	Florida	189	52	2	60.5%	69,986	4.8	5	3	9	0	2	9
Franklin	Tennessee	146	49	3	65.7%	69,956	4.0	3	2	6	0	2	6
Saint Charles	Missouri	186	72	4	50.0%	69,929	6.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	172	48	2	57.5%	69,918	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rock Hill	South Carolina	167	55	4	60.0%	69,816	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Woodstock	Georgia	121	49	2	68.6%	69,812	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Acworth	Georgia	145	53	2	70.0%	69,778	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Canton	Ohio	273	91	3	47.3%	69,475	6.4	12	2	17	0	0	17
Summerville	South Carolina	139	46	4	50.0%	69,471	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lowell	Massachusetts	182	54	2	62.3%	69,419	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Kennesaw	Georgia	124	39	2	70.0%	69,391	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	150	54	2	70.0%	69,372	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Downey	California	161	53	4	61.3%	69,216	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Metairie	Louisiana	198	67	5	48.5%	69,051	6.2	5	3	7	0	0	7
Mission Viejo	California	138	52	4	70.0%	68,851	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Saginaw	Michigan	231	72	4	52.7%	68,728	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Billings	Montana	179	59	4	50.0%	68,643	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hamilton	Ohio	179	64	3	50.0%	68,549	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bowie	Maryland	200	57	2	67.1%	68,534	4.3	4	3	5	0	0	5
Hampton	Virginia	228	73	4	50.0%	68,116	6.0	6	2	10	0	0	10
Redding	California	195	61	3	60.0%	67,820	5.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Hillsboro	Oregon	136	54	2	65.8%	67,666	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Davenport	Iowa	229	87	3	64.5%	67,609	4.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Warren	Michigan	205	67	3	50.0%	67,596	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
New Port Richey	Florida	197	66	2	55.7%	67,321	5.3	4	2	7	0	1	7
Chico	California	172	53	2	60.1%	67,275	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Ventura	California	160	54	3	57.9%	67,130	5.0	3	3	7	0	1	7
West Valley City	Utah	156	45	4	50.0%	66,434	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Astoria	New York	151	53	3	46.5%	66,314	6.3	4	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Cruz	California	185	60	2	63.7%	66,235	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Chino	California	133	47	4	70.0%	66,132	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Asheville	North Carolina	152	44	5	50.0%	66,048	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Deltona	Florida	145	48	2	70.0%	65,722	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Boulder	Colorado	213	49	5	50.0%	65,631	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Vero Beach	Florida	206	64	4	56.9%	65,547	5.5	6	1	6	0	1	6
Herndon	Virginia	148	52	2	70.0%	65,421	4.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Springdale	Arkansas	126	32	2	67.6%	65,136	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Concord	California	175	49	4	50.0%	65,110	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Staten Island	New York	260	81	13	13.7%	64,928	10.5	12	1	12	0	0	2
Baytown	Texas	170	65	4	55.1%	64,869	5.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Burbank	California	206	65	4	60.0%	64,810	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fort Pierce	Florida	265	87	2	67.7%	64,772	4.5	8	2	10	0	4	10
Missoula	Montana	188	54	3	65.5%	63,734	4.4	5	2	9	0	2	9
Lewisville	Texas	150	58	3	53.6%	63,572	5.0	3	2	5	0	1	5
Norwalk	California	99	36	5	60.0%	63,532	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bloomington	Indiana	201	72	4	47.5%	63,440	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Madera	California	166	56	3	61.5%	63,297	5.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
O Fallon	Missouri	146	50	2	65.4%	63,116	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Racine	Wisconsin	226	78	4	50.0%	63,037	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Clara	California	174	51	4	50.0%	62,759	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	174	60	2	50.0%	62,612	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elizabeth	New Jersey	166	49	2	62.3%	62,604	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Duluth	Minnesota	255	71	4	53.0%	62,113	5.7	11	1	11	0	1	11
Douglasville	Georgia	136	51	4	56.0%	61,737	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hartford	Connecticut	170	49	5	50.0%	61,689	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Scranton	Pennsylvania	249	71	2	61.9%	61,548	5.1	8	1	8	0	2	8
College Station	Texas	139	48	4	50.0%	61,525	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Idaho Falls	Idaho	194	67	5	56.4%	61,456	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Toms River	New Jersey	151	58	4	50.0%	61,430	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lynn	Massachusetts	183	56	4	65.5%	61,265	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Lees Summit	Missouri	230	77	3	60.0%	61,247	5.2	6	2	7	0	0	7
Parker	Colorado	147	52	4	60.0%	60,169	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sparks	Nevada	182	54	2	50.0%	59,633	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Delray Beach	Florida	222	79	4	50.0%	59,532	6.0	5	3	8	0	0	8
Florissant	Missouri	178	61	3	55.0%	59,508	5.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Plainfield	Illinois	171	60	2	60.3%	59,452	4.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	209	63	5	56.3%	59,387	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Lawrence	Kansas	208	57	5	58.7%	59,353	5.2	5	2	6	0	1	6
Kennewick	Washington	162	45	3	60.0%	59,286	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
La Puente	California	154	53	3	50.0%	58,974	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Ballwin	Missouri	137	53	2	62.2%	58,865	4.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Palm Bay	Florida	188	59	5	52.8%	58,725	5.8	4	3	8	0	0	8
Tracy	California	198	77	3	50.0%	58,572	6.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Provo	Utah	177	65	4	50.0%	58,262	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jupiter	Florida	177	67	3	58.6%	57,766	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Livermore	California	135	39	4	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	194	65	3	60.0%	57,261	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redwood City	California	168	57	3	50.0%	57,232	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Daly City	California	147	46	3	50.0%	57,201	6.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Independence	Missouri	267	77	5	46.1%	57,171	6.4	8	1	8	0	0	8
Morgantown	West Virginia	153	47	5	60.0%	57,171	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	186	66	3	51.7%	57,082	5.8	4	3	6	0	0	6
Fairfield	California	141	46	5	50.0%	57,040	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	121	38	5	50.0%	57,033	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fort Mill	South Carolina	161	58	2	60.0%	57,008	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Valdosta	Georgia	214	61	3	60.0%	56,971	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Largo	Florida	187	57	3	52.8%	56,845	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Carlsbad	California	179	50	4	50.0%	56,835	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Orem	Utah	145	52	3	56.5%	56,661	5.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Santa Monica	California	195	67	4	60.0%	56,646	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Auburn	Washington	170	61	3	50.0%	56,436	6.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Spring Hill	Florida	178	63	4	44.9%	56,346	6.0	5	3	8	0	1	8
El Monte	California	138	46	4	60.0%	56,227	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Dearborn	Michigan	196	70	3	59.1%	56,212	5.3	4	2	8	0	1	8
Newnan	Georgia	140	48	4	60.0%	56,037	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daytona Beach	Florida	220	63	3	54.3%	56,027	5.6	5	2	6	0	0	6
Spartanburg	South Carolina	190	61	5	50.0%	55,979	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Englewood	Colorado	191	73	3	50.0%	55,793	6.0	4	3	4	0	0	4
San Angelo	Texas	190	71	5	50.0%	55,384	6.0	4	3	7	0	0	7
Antioch	California	144	50	4	50.0%	55,361	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	California	170	60	4	50.0%	54,704	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Barbara	California	206	54	6	40.0%	54,354	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
West Chester	Pennsylvania	161	54	4	50.0%	54,348	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Lynnwood	Washington	175	56	5	50.0%	54,195	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	126	45	5	55.6%	54,178	5.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Livonia	Michigan	152	53	3	57.2%	54,063	5.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Westerville	Ohio	134	38	4	56.5%	53,761	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	147	44	3	50.0%	53,519	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	147	46	5	50.0%	53,450	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rapid City	South Dakota	152	48	4	55.1%	53,271	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Palo Alto	California	213	69	4	55.0%	53,205	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pacoima	California	98	35	5	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vacaville	California	137	49	4	50.0%	52,648	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynchburg	Virginia	201	63	5	51.3%	52,486	5.5	4	2	4	0	1	4
Broomfield	Colorado	172	61	3	50.0%	52,375	6.0	3	3	4	0	0	4
New Bedford	Massachusetts	195	56	4	55.2%	52,331	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Meridian	Idaho	132	50	4	50.0%	52,111	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Hesperia	California	132	41	4	50.0%	51,906	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Anderson	South Carolina	167	54	4	52.5%	51,643	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Merced	California	175	62	4	50.0%	51,530	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Bell Gardens	California	98	31	4	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	38	5	50.0%	50,382	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Wichita Falls	Texas	221	76	4	50.9%	50,296	6.3	7	3	13	0	0	12
Clinton Township	Michigan	168	58	4	50.0%	50,148	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roswell	Georgia	133	41	2	50.0%	49,885	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Longview	Texas	219	68	4	47.2%	49,666	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	170	49	5	50.0%	48,974	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	169	55	5	50.0%	48,968	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	129	51	4	43.7%	48,576	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Hawthorne	California	100	27	5	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Midlothian	Virginia	160	46	4	50.0%	48,389	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Lithonia	Georgia	135	51	4	50.0%	48,381	6.0	2	3	4	0	0	4
Napa	California	138	48	5	50.0%	48,333	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sylmar	California	97	36	5	50.0%	48,244	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Indio	California	134	45	5	50.0%	48,046	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Brockton	Massachusetts	142	40	5	50.0%	47,713	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Portsmouth	Virginia	258	78	4	50.0%	47,656	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Annapolis	Maryland	200	70	5	50.0%	47,525	6.0	5	2	7	0	0	7
Terre Haute	Indiana	185	65	5	50.0%	47,487	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Milton	Florida	177	64	4	50.0%	47,371	6.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Champaign	Illinois	163	49	3	50.0%	47,284	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edinburg	Texas	172	54	6	30.0%	46,671	8.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Medford	Oregon	133	47	4	50.0%	46,626	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Nampa	Idaho	141	41	7	40.0%	46,362	7.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Covington	Georgia	150	49	4	50.0%	46,344	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Kenosha	Wisconsin	186	62	5	40.0%	45,152	7.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Winter Haven	Florida	153	50	5	39.4%	42,102	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Compton	California	170	53	8	30.0%	41,663	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Quincy	Massachusetts	145	47	6	43.9%	41,282	6.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Elmhurst	New York	96	33	6	40.0%	37,587	7.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Holland	Michigan	131	49	6	40.0%	37,549	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bowling Green	Kentucky	171	46	7	31.8%	36,725	7.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Bryan	Texas	197	68	4	37.3%	35,900	7.2	5	2	10	0	0	10
Gulfport	Mississippi	166	58	6	36.8%	34,834	6.3	3	2	6	0	0	6
Elkhart	Indiana	167	52	8	30.0%	29,830	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	165	52	7	30.0%	28,739	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Muncie	Indiana	178	62	8	25.5%	23,697	10.0	5	3	6	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	99	33	7	10.0%	9,608	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
South Gate	California	99	41	10	9.0%	8,559	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	432	130	2	55.1%	1,353,564	5.5	62	3	63	0	12	63
San Diego	374	130	2	53.3%	717,938	5.5	36	1	36	0	6	36
San Jose	386	108	2	57.2%	600,465	5.4	28	1	28	0	3	28
San Francisco	400	117	2	66.6%	579,551	4.5	28	2	29	0	5	29
Sacramento	350	109	2	51.3%	413,073	5.8	28	1	28	0	2	28
Long Beach	251	71	2	68.7%	329,239	4.5	12	1	12	0	2	12
Fresno	307	100	2	51.3%	308,787	5.9	18	1	18	0	1	18
Bakersfield	253	72	2	51.9%	290,470	5.8	11	1	11	0	1	11
Oakland	259	81	2	61.8%	254,599	4.9	14	2	20	0	1	20
Stockton	260	77	2	59.5%	222,328	4.9	12	1	12	0	2	12
Santa Ana	236	74	2	61.6%	220,125	4.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Anaheim	217	60	3	57.9%	213,304	5.4	7	2	13	0	1	13
Irvine	289	94	1	77.4%	207,184	3.3	9	1	9	2	3	9
Riverside	204	65	2	54.7%	202,371	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Oceanside	170	63	1	84.4%	168,987	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Corona	215	64	2	65.4%	168,174	4.4	5	2	6	0	2	6
Chula Vista	180	50	3	59.4%	154,863	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Modesto	252	74	2	56.7%	149,937	5.6	7	1	7	0	1	7
Oxnard	185	60	2	67.9%	149,559	4.5	4	1	4	0	2	4
Moreno Valley	185	61	2	70.0%	143,818	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fontana	167	54	3	60.0%	140,836	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Torrance	205	73	2	79.5%	140,546	3.4	5	2	5	0	3	5
Rancho Cucamonga	210	72	1	76.8%	135,629	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Santa Rosa	225	69	3	58.1%	125,587	5.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Elk Grove	170	56	2	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Bernardino	220	70	3	50.0%	124,758	6.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Escondido	155	59	2	69.0%	123,923	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Whittier	217	73	2	62.4%	122,497	4.8	6	3	7	0	1	7
Palmdale	190	62	1	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sunnyvale	195	57	2	78.8%	120,376	3.0	4	2	4	0	3	4
Fremont	197	61	4	50.0%	116,578	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Huntington Beach	180	60	4	58.3%	116,504	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
El Cajon	178	53	2	65.8%	113,502	4.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Lancaster	166	58	3	60.0%	110,651	5.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Ontario	177	51	3	60.0%	105,989	5.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Salinas	209	63	2	55.6%	104,622	4.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Simi Valley	134	53	1	81.2%	104,511	3.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Hemet	152	42	2	78.6%	101,231	3.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Rialto	147	50	1	94.5%	100,716	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Fullerton	180	60	2	71.4%	99,442	4.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Hayward	188	57	4	50.0%	96,017	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Pomona	165	55	4	60.0%	94,791	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pasadena	180	61	2	60.0%	94,634	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Inglewood	210	71	2	69.9%	93,527	4.0	5	2	5	0	2	5
Murrieta	142	47	2	70.0%	92,571	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Garden Grove	202	69	4	52.3%	91,840	5.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Temecula	170	53	2	70.0%	90,939	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Hollywood	140	44	2	58.7%	89,907	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Van Nuys	158	46	5	50.0%	88,906	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Costa Mesa	137	49	2	76.7%	87,215	3.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Clovis	155	46	2	70.7%	85,870	4.0	3	2	3	0	2	3
Santa Maria	184	53	3	60.0%	85,853	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Roseville	165	59	3	60.0%	83,876	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Menifee	188	67	1	74.7%	82,611	3.3	4	2	5	1	1	5
San Mateo	193	54	2	57.8%	82,263	5.3	4	2	5	0	1	5
Perris	146	40	1	70.0%	82,173	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Victorville	164	50	4	60.0%	81,786	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Orange	179	59	2	53.1%	77,001	5.4	5	2	10	0	1	10
Berkeley	233	77	4	60.0%	76,276	5.0	9	2	9	0	0	9
San Leandro	164	52	2	67.4%	74,924	4.3	3	1	3	0	1	3
Vallejo	177	55	3	59.9%	74,571	5.3	4	2	7	0	0	7
Visalia	170	48	5	48.1%	73,115	6.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Vista	160	50	3	59.8%	71,646	5.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
San Marcos	143	53	2	70.0%	70,337	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Downey	161	53	4	61.3%	69,216	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Mission Viejo	138	52	4	70.0%	68,851	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redding	195	61	3	60.0%	67,820	5.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Chico	172	53	2	60.1%	67,275	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Ventura	160	54	3	57.9%	67,130	5.0	3	3	7	0	1	7
Santa Cruz	185	60	2	63.7%	66,235	5.3	4	1	4	0	1	4
Chino	133	47	4	70.0%	66,132	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Concord	175	49	4	50.0%	65,110	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Burbank	206	65	4	60.0%	64,810	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Norwalk	99	36	5	60.0%	63,532	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Madera	166	56	3	61.5%	63,297	5.0	3	2	3	0	1	3
Santa Clara	174	51	4	50.0%	62,759	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
La Puente	154	53	3	50.0%	58,974	6.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Tracy	198	77	3	50.0%	58,572	6.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Livermore	135	39	4	60.0%	57,752	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	168	57	3	50.0%	57,232	6.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Daly City	147	46	3	50.0%	57,201	6.0	2	4	4	0	0	4
Fairfield	141	46	5	50.0%	57,040	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	179	50	4	50.0%	56,835	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Monica	195	67	4	60.0%	56,646	5.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
El Monte	138	46	4	60.0%	56,227	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Antioch	144	50	4	50.0%	55,361	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	170	60	4	50.0%	54,704	6.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Barbara	206	54	6	40.0%	54,354	7.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Palo Alto	213	69	4	55.0%	53,205	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pacoima	98	35	5	50.0%	52,900	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vacaville	137	49	4	50.0%	52,648	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hesperia	132	41	4	50.0%	51,906	6.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Merced	175	62	4	50.0%	51,530	6.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Bell Gardens	98	31	4	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hawthorne	100	27	5	50.0%	48,418	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Napa	138	48	5	50.0%	48,333	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Sylmar	97	36	5	50.0%	48,244	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Indio	134	45	5	50.0%	48,046	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Compton	170	53	8	30.0%	41,663	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Pittsburg	99	33	7	10.0%	9,608	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
South Gate	99	41	10	9.0%	8,559	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0

Houston

ZIP	aplaceformom.com	caring.com	usnews.com	dibbern.com	retirementliving.com	yelp.com
77088	6	4	7	8	10	12
77047	6	4	7	8	9	10
77037	6	4	7	8	10	11
77098	5	4	6	7	8	9
77027	5	4	6	7	8	9
77068	6	4	7	8	10	15
77078	5	4	6	7	8	13
77086	6	4	7	8	10	12
77035	6	5	7	8	9	10
77008	5	4	6	7	8	9
77004	5	4	6	7	8	9
77028	5	4	6	7	8	10
77059	5	4	6	7	8	9
77039	6	4	7	8	10
77019	5	4	6	7	8	9
77075	6	4	7	8	10	11
77077	6	5	7	8	9	10
77079	6	5	7	8	9	10
77099	5	4	6	7	8	9
77024	6	4	7	8	10	11
77095	5	4	6	7	8	9
77048	5	4	6	7	8	10
77044	6	4	7	8	10	15
77015	3	1	4	5	7	8
77017	5	4	6	7	8	9
77057	5	4	6	7	8	9
77055	5	4	6	7	8	9
77006	1	4	6	7	8	9
77026	2	1	3	4	5	6
77046	5	4	6	7	8	9
77066	6	4	7	8	10	16
77023	5	4	6	7	8	9
77094	5	4	6	7	8	9
77084	5	4	6	7	8	17
77013	6	4	7	8	10	11
77063	7	5	8	9	10	11
77053	6	4	7	8	10
77022	2	1	3	4	5	6
77072	5	4	6	7	8	9
77049	6	4	7	8	10	11
77045	5	4	6	7	8	9
77010	5	4	6	7	8	9
77018	5	4	6	7	8	9
77041	6	4	7	8	10	11
77009	5	4	6	7	8	14
77089	6	4	7	8	10	14
77032	6	4	7	8	10	11
77036	5	4	6	7	8	9
77085	5	4	6	7	8	9
77054	6	5	7	8	9	12
77058	6	4	7	8	10	15
77014	3	1	4	5	7	8
77067	6	4	7	8	10	47
77005	6	5	7	8	9	14
77076	6	4	7	8	10	11
77070	7	5	8	9	11	15
77060	6	4	7	8	10	18
77080	6	4	7	8	10	16
77050	6	4	7	8	10	14
77091	5	4	6	7	8	15
77071	5	4	6	7	8	15
77061	6	4	7	8	10	15
77020	5	4	6	7	8	13
77081	5	4	6	7	8	13
77030	6	5	7	8	9	14
77040	6	4	7	8	10	11
77090	6	4	7	8	10	11
77031	5	4	6	7	8	13
77051	5	4	6	7	8	9
77011	5	4	6	7	8	9
77042	5	4	6	7	8	13
77062	6	4	7	8	10	15
77082	6	5	7	8	9	10
77093	5	4	6	7	8	14
77073	3	1	4	5	7	13
77033	5	4	6	7	8	9
77043	2	1	3	4	5	6
77074	6	5	7	8	9	10
77064	5	4	6	7	8	19
77012	5	4	6	7	8	9
77002	5	4	6	7	8	9
77092	6	4	7	8	10	11
77069	6	4	7	8	10	33
77021	2	1	3	4	5	6
77083	6	4	7	8	10	35
77029	6	4	7	8	10	14
77034	5	4	6	7	8	9
77087	6	4	7	8	10	11
77003	5	4	6	7	8	14
77038	6	4	7	8	10	11
77007	5	4	6	7	8	16
77016	3	1	4	5	7	8
77065	6	4	7	8	10	11
77096	2	1	3	4	5	6
77025	5	4	6	7	8	9
77056	5	4	6	7	8	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Aplaceformom

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 7,331 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Aplaceformom Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (nursing home near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Aplaceformom Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Aplaceformom Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Aplaceformom Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly