Allstate Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve allstate.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 8,137 Insurance Companies Or Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Allstate Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Allstate Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Allstate Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Allstate Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	10,953	8,137	1	76.6%	247,320,212	3.3	27,379	32,654	442	35,050	7,396	9,043	35,049
California	870	609	1	76.3%	29,881,527	3.3	1,166	1,740	29	1,883	391	478	1,883
Texas	846	595	1	77.1%	21,490,215	3.2	1,360	1,917	25	2,056	455	541	2,056
Florida	768	578	1	75.8%	15,615,641	3.4	446	975	26	1,044	195	241	1,044
New York	791	600	1	78.3%	15,359,415	3.2	1,491	1,756	52	2,044	396	582	2,044
Pennsylvania	757	591	1	76.8%	9,821,025	3.4	1,604	1,781	34	1,941	326	460	1,941
Illinois	670	490	1	75.9%	9,728,909	3.4	1,247	1,382	17	1,472	248	303	1,472
Ohio	670	548	1	76.3%	8,879,147	3.5	976	1,188	28	1,266	213	289	1,266
Georgia	409	319	1	74.7%	7,691,387	3.4	574	726	12	772	124	157	772
North Carolina	506	406	1	75.4%	7,653,674	3.5	683	802	24	858	132	173	858
Michigan	656	528	1	75.1%	7,477,525	3.5	833	976	19	1,016	164	196	1,016
New Jersey	436	328	1	77.5%	6,880,054	3.3	537	593	18	641	121	149	641
Virginia	406	322	1	76.8%	6,465,707	3.4	723	891	23	960	177	228	960
Washington	337	274	1	77.3%	5,628,602	3.1	451	587	24	660	160	210	660
Arizona	269	218	1	78.0%	5,421,018	3.0	247	396	19	436	116	146	436
Massachusetts	517	422	1	76.9%	5,251,842	3.3	461	534	8	549	123	131	549
Indiana	472	373	1	76.3%	5,065,662	3.4	659	770	18	820	149	188	820
Tennessee	377	305	1	75.6%	5,020,703	3.3	514	622	12	663	126	154	663
Maryland	338	254	1	77.0%	4,623,736	3.3	392	463	21	527	90	130	527
Colorado	296	242	1	81.2%	4,492,321	2.7	381	514	13	565	215	247	565
Missouri	427	337	1	73.8%	4,492,314	3.5	887	1,017	11	1,053	175	202	1,053
Wisconsin	481	384	1	76.3%	4,408,200	3.3	694	769	9	796	180	196	796
Minnesota	530	418	1	76.7%	4,241,332	3.3	777	878	8	927	198	228	927
South Carolina	278	223	1	78.4%	3,886,387	3.2	347	422	11	484	98	141	484
Alabama	320	261	1	76.2%	3,705,796	3.2	522	637	12	699	153	198	699
Louisiana	306	237	1	78.2%	3,647,176	3.2	431	510	13	553	117	144	553
Kentucky	354	287	1	75.7%	3,366,937	3.5	698	758	7	774	127	138	774
Oregon	271	224	1	75.0%	3,059,468	3.1	355	414	12	437	117	132	437
Oklahoma	322	248	1	78.0%	3,054,938	3.2	557	646	7	682	167	191	682
Connecticut	284	228	1	74.9%	2,681,662	3.5	234	279	3	289	45	50	289
Iowa	486	357	1	76.5%	2,396,159	3.4	890	933	5	961	194	211	961
Utah	245	207	1	75.4%	2,296,018	3.2	246	284	5	302	74	85	302
Mississippi	250	193	1	76.2%	2,277,517	3.3	384	418	4	437	96	108	437
Arkansas	261	209	1	75.8%	2,266,748	3.2	553	587	4	640	149	177	640
Nevada	176	146	1	77.3%	2,259,334	2.9	92	168	5	178	61	68	178
Kansas	341	261	1	74.8%	2,176,521	3.4	616	692	5	721	133	152	721
New Mexico	204	159	1	75.2%	1,570,466	2.9	327	361	2	410	120	153	410
Nebraska	308	241	1	77.1%	1,467,930	3.4	524	581	3	588	120	127	588
West Virginia	277	224	1	76.9%	1,406,673	3.3	684	704	10	749	159	195	749
Idaho	199	170	1	76.4%	1,289,306	3.0	251	273	6	286	86	96	286
Hawaii	152	129	1	77.1%	1,096,282	3.1	82	93	2	97	28	31	97
New Hampshire	226	197	1	78.6%	1,055,739	3.2	238	248	9	271	57	79	271
Maine	240	198	1	78.8%	1,049,980	3.2	421	425	4	470	105	136	470
Montana	229	186	1	81.9%	853,702	2.8	348	361	5	398	138	164	398
Rhode Island	157	139	1	74.5%	786,699	3.5	64	77	4	91	9	18	91
Delaware	159	137	1	81.3%	771,814	3.2	52	66	4	77	17	24	77
South Dakota	217	174	1	75.4%	651,704	3.1	359	370	2	374	115	117	374
North Dakota	206	168	1	80.9%	607,477	2.9	367	381	1	406	140	153	406
Alaska	155	134	1	82.1%	606,007	1.7	218	235	5	244	180	190	243
Vermont	197	170	1	76.4%	477,429	3.2	250	254	3	276	58	72	276
Wyoming	152	130	1	74.6%	434,478	3.0	164	171	3	176	55	57	176

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	173	138	1	76.6%	2,440,852	3.3	96	3	105	20	25	105
Brooklyn	New York	137	115	1	79.6%	2,070,429	3.1	37	4	46	9	14	46
Chicago	Illinois	152	133	1	75.1%	2,028,200	3.6	56	1	56	8	8	56
Los Angeles	California	147	126	1	78.5%	1,928,058	3.2	62	1	62	17	17	62
Miami	Florida	160	123	1	75.4%	1,416,816	3.5	55	2	57	8	10	57
San Antonio	Texas	150	126	1	76.0%	1,350,743	3.2	59	1	59	16	16	59
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	138	117	1	77.5%	1,221,289	3.4	47	3	50	7	10	50
New York City	New York	128	111	1	74.3%	1,205,579	3.5	47	3	49	7	9	49
Bronx	New York	118	103	1	82.2%	1,184,289	2.8	25	4	29	9	12	29
Las Vegas	Nevada	132	111	1	75.1%	1,161,617	3.5	43	2	45	7	7	45
Phoenix	Arizona	146	126	1	74.1%	1,075,097	3.6	42	1	42	6	6	42
San Diego	California	134	116	1	78.7%	1,059,771	2.9	36	2	45	11	15	45
Dallas	Texas	149	126	1	75.7%	1,054,611	3.1	48	4	54	13	17	54
Denver	Colorado	136	120	1	83.2%	904,324	2.6	38	3	42	17	18	42
Minneapolis	Minnesota	134	119	1	79.8%	868,943	2.9	51	3	53	17	20	53
Austin	Texas	138	123	1	73.0%	794,283	3.6	44	2	45	6	7	45
San Jose	California	129	116	1	74.9%	786,576	3.5	28	2	29	4	5	29
Orlando	Florida	133	115	1	76.1%	758,239	3.4	32	2	33	6	7	33
Seattle	Washington	142	127	1	77.3%	738,585	3.2	35	3	38	8	11	38
Tucson	Arizona	126	106	1	78.7%	712,266	3.1	32	4	37	8	12	37
Indianapolis	Indiana	142	120	1	73.6%	700,315	3.7	37	4	41	3	6	41
Atlanta	Georgia	141	121	1	70.8%	699,954	3.9	39	2	40	1	2	40
Jacksonville	Florida	141	122	1	80.4%	697,441	2.8	31	2	36	12	15	36
Charlotte	North Carolina	125	111	1	76.9%	696,923	3.2	24	3	26	5	7	26
San Francisco	California	121	106	1	79.4%	690,617	3.1	28	2	30	7	9	30
Fort Worth	Texas	136	119	1	73.1%	666,677	3.6	32	2	33	4	4	33
Saint Louis	Missouri	139	119	1	72.2%	662,156	3.6	45	2	47	6	8	47
Portland	Oregon	130	112	1	71.0%	653,159	3.8	33	2	34	2	3	34
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	133	115	1	75.4%	626,798	3.3	27	1	27	7	7	27
Columbus	Ohio	133	119	1	73.3%	620,270	3.7	30	1	30	4	5	30
El Paso	Texas	122	110	1	78.3%	617,824	3.3	24	1	24	6	6	24
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	129	116	1	75.8%	615,319	3.4	29	1	29	6	6	29
Sacramento	California	134	115	1	75.7%	608,827	3.4	28	1	28	6	6	28
Louisville	Kentucky	134	121	1	79.2%	602,428	3.0	32	3	34	10	11	34
Cincinnati	Ohio	137	123	1	73.5%	590,801	3.5	45	3	47	7	9	47
Saint Paul	Minnesota	138	121	1	73.8%	590,175	3.5	30	1	30	5	5	30
Tampa	Florida	131	110	1	74.3%	588,728	3.6	27	1	28	3	4	28
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	142	127	1	84.1%	573,908	3.0	43	2	44	14	15	44
Cleveland	Ohio	127	112	1	72.6%	544,888	3.7	29	2	30	3	4	30
Washington DC	District of Columbia	121	104	1	77.4%	529,813	3.4	28	2	30	4	7	30
Memphis	Tennessee	124	110	1	75.2%	523,156	3.4	26	1	28	5	6	28
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	135	123	1	74.4%	507,884	3.5	39	2	40	7	7	40
Colorado Springs	Colorado	120	108	1	85.7%	500,349	2.3	30	2	34	15	19	34
Albuquerque	New Mexico	126	112	1	74.4%	487,598	3.7	17	1	17	2	2	17
Fresno	California	120	105	1	79.4%	478,312	3.1	18	1	21	4	6	21
Detroit	Michigan	142	120	1	74.0%	473,781	3.4	25	2	26	4	5	26
Baltimore	Maryland	121	109	1	72.9%	459,752	3.6	22	1	24	2	3	24
Bakersfield	California	112	102	1	81.8%	457,479	2.6	11	1	11	5	5	11
Kansas City	Missouri	139	128	1	75.0%	428,828	3.3	49	4	56	8	15	56
Buffalo	New York	142	124	1	74.9%	421,690	3.4	28	2	29	5	6	29
Mesa	Arizona	118	107	1	77.0%	411,867	3.2	13	2	15	3	5	15
Omaha	Nebraska	132	118	1	73.8%	407,507	3.5	31	2	33	4	6	33
Staten Island	New York	120	105	1	84.7%	401,432	2.8	12	3	19	1	8	19
Dayton	Ohio	125	115	1	82.9%	396,431	2.9	27	4	30	9	13	30
Raleigh	North Carolina	122	110	1	71.0%	388,327	3.8	15	2	16	1	1	16
Aurora	Colorado	120	110	1	85.3%	371,256	2.5	11	2	13	5	6	13
Rochester	New York	125	108	1	78.2%	368,758	3.2	24	2	27	5	8	27
Birmingham	Alabama	124	111	1	73.5%	367,459	3.5	30	1	30	5	5	30
New Orleans	Louisiana	126	113	1	85.8%	366,963	2.6	19	3	22	8	9	22
Salt Lake City	Utah	127	112	1	74.9%	364,776	3.5	19	1	19	3	3	19
Hollywood	Florida	114	103	1	77.7%	364,078	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Virginia Beach	Virginia	117	102	1	80.8%	363,498	3.4	12	1	14	3	3	14
Nashville	Tennessee	122	110	1	77.7%	356,299	3.1	22	3	24	6	8	24
Long Beach	California	120	109	1	70.0%	335,278	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Tulsa	Oklahoma	133	122	1	78.9%	332,973	3.3	28	1	28	7	7	28
Honolulu	Hawaii	115	102	1	79.3%	329,878	3.2	11	1	12	3	3	12
Oakland	California	115	102	1	78.5%	323,109	3.1	14	1	14	4	4	14
Wichita	Kansas	134	117	1	76.2%	318,184	3.3	26	1	31	5	8	31
Spring	Texas	114	103	1	83.1%	316,565	2.8	8	2	9	3	4	9
Arlington	Texas	122	107	1	79.4%	315,085	3.0	12	1	12	4	4	12
Knoxville	Tennessee	117	107	1	79.3%	306,478	3.3	17	1	17	4	4	17
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	125	109	1	80.7%	305,659	3.1	18	3	20	5	6	20
Columbia	South Carolina	119	110	1	87.7%	300,719	1.9	14	1	24	8	12	24
Richmond	Virginia	117	104	1	74.3%	290,452	3.3	15	1	16	3	4	16
Riverside	California	113	102	1	78.0%	288,642	3.1	7	1	7	2	2	7
Alexandria	Virginia	115	103	1	80.8%	286,676	2.9	14	4	18	5	7	18
Pompano Beach	Florida	122	109	1	76.1%	281,992	3.2	10	1	10	3	3	10
Santa Ana	California	110	99	1	78.5%	280,144	3.2	6	2	7	1	2	7
Saint Petersburg	Florida	127	111	1	78.5%	279,949	3.1	16	3	18	4	6	18
Hialeah	Florida	120	106	1	76.2%	279,596	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Grand Rapids	Michigan	121	109	1	75.7%	278,259	3.6	12	1	12	2	2	12
Katy	Texas	112	102	1	80.0%	275,117	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
West Palm Beach	Florida	116	104	1	74.1%	274,746	3.7	12	2	13	1	2	13
Spokane	Washington	113	104	1	76.4%	274,723	3.4	14	1	14	3	3	14
Stockton	California	122	108	1	70.0%	261,664	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Littleton	Colorado	115	107	1	80.0%	260,380	3.1	10	2	11	3	3	11
Anaheim	California	114	102	1	70.0%	258,038	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Reno	Nevada	112	100	1	85.2%	253,008	2.8	12	1	12	5	5	12
Lexington	Kentucky	123	114	1	78.5%	251,202	3.4	15	1	15	3	3	15
Corpus Christi	Texas	122	111	1	76.9%	250,407	3.3	18	2	19	4	5	19
Naples	Florida	125	111	1	78.7%	246,342	3.1	14	2	16	4	5	16
Tacoma	Washington	119	107	1	73.8%	246,097	3.4	20	4	24	3	5	24
Greensboro	North Carolina	116	103	1	75.1%	245,994	3.4	9	2	10	1	2	10
Marietta	Georgia	116	106	1	76.1%	245,656	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Durham	North Carolina	114	101	1	84.4%	244,921	2.9	8	1	8	3	3	8
Madison	Wisconsin	115	106	1	82.5%	243,216	2.7	14	1	14	6	6	14
Plano	Texas	112	103	1	78.9%	241,011	3.1	7	1	7	2	2	7
Vancouver	Washington	116	107	1	73.0%	237,939	3.7	11	2	12	1	1	12
Jersey City	New Jersey	109	101	1	90.6%	236,969	1.6	7	2	9	5	6	9
Fort Wayne	Indiana	120	107	1	74.4%	236,819	3.3	16	1	16	4	4	16
Silver Spring	Maryland	113	102	1	77.8%	235,837	3.1	7	1	7	2	2	7
Glendale	Arizona	116	106	1	77.3%	235,465	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Scottsdale	Arizona	121	108	1	78.0%	232,692	3.0	11	2	12	3	4	12
Lincoln	Nebraska	121	109	1	79.6%	230,156	3.4	22	1	23	4	5	23
Toledo	Ohio	120	111	1	74.1%	228,028	3.3	15	2	21	2	7	21
Laredo	Texas	126	110	1	82.3%	222,875	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Lawrenceville	Georgia	121	109	1	87.0%	222,729	2.5	4	2	6	1	3	6
Akron	Ohio	122	112	1	81.0%	219,056	3.2	17	1	18	4	5	18
Irvine	California	112	101	1	81.2%	217,416	3.0	9	1	9	3	3	9
Henderson	Nevada	111	100	1	71.3%	215,964	3.8	8	2	9	0	1	9
Newark	New Jersey	112	101	1	76.8%	215,616	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Lubbock	Texas	131	117	1	77.9%	215,544	3.1	14	1	14	4	4	14
Chandler	Arizona	114	103	1	78.1%	209,687	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Pensacola	Florida	123	113	1	78.1%	209,531	3.1	13	2	14	4	4	14
Gilbert	Arizona	109	99	1	85.7%	204,427	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Garland	Texas	106	96	1	85.7%	203,928	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Kissimmee	Florida	116	103	1	70.0%	202,350	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Anchorage	Alaska	118	108	1	82.9%	202,308	2.4	12	4	16	5	8	16
Boise	Idaho	111	100	1	79.0%	202,228	3.1	9	2	11	2	3	11
Tallahassee	Florida	116	107	1	70.0%	201,653	4.0	10	1	10	0	0	10
Sarasota	Florida	118	106	1	80.0%	200,131	3.1	13	1	13	4	4	13
Mobile	Alabama	119	109	1	73.7%	200,005	3.5	18	1	18	3	3	18
Bradenton	Florida	120	105	1	78.9%	199,707	2.8	10	2	12	4	4	12
Irving	Texas	111	102	1	82.9%	199,437	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Lakeland	Florida	115	105	1	77.0%	198,443	3.3	9	2	10	2	2	10
Salem	Oregon	110	101	1	74.3%	198,097	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
San Bernardino	California	113	103	1	78.7%	196,444	3.0	7	2	9	1	3	9
Savannah	Georgia	114	104	1	81.1%	195,568	3.1	10	2	12	2	4	12
Amarillo	Texas	117	105	1	84.2%	192,821	2.8	14	4	19	4	8	19
Corona	California	111	98	1	74.0%	190,301	3.4	5	2	6	1	1	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	113	101	1	79.8%	189,858	2.8	6	2	7	2	3	7
Modesto	California	111	101	2	71.3%	188,517	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Jamaica	New York	112	100	1	77.0%	187,762	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Flushing	New York	107	96	1	87.1%	187,350	2.5	4	2	5	2	2	5
Shreveport	Louisiana	118	105	1	83.6%	186,484	3.0	12	1	12	4	4	12
Winston Salem	North Carolina	118	106	1	70.3%	185,671	3.7	9	1	10	1	1	10
Norfolk	Virginia	122	110	2	75.3%	184,917	3.4	14	2	16	2	4	16
North Las Vegas	Nevada	110	99	1	79.1%	184,904	3.1	7	2	9	1	3	9
Fayetteville	North Carolina	121	107	1	75.2%	183,393	3.6	8	1	8	1	1	8
Chula Vista	California	109	100	1	70.0%	182,582	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Woodbridge	Virginia	106	96	1	84.5%	178,773	2.7	3	2	4	1	2	4
Wilmington	Delaware	114	105	1	81.4%	178,691	3.0	10	2	11	3	4	11
Fort Myers	Florida	121	112	1	70.7%	177,964	3.9	11	1	12	0	1	12
Greenville	South Carolina	109	101	1	79.3%	174,119	3.0	9	1	9	3	3	9
Syracuse	New York	119	107	1	76.0%	172,450	3.4	15	2	18	2	5	18
Des Moines	Iowa	117	107	1	76.6%	171,049	2.9	11	1	11	4	4	11
Reading	Pennsylvania	113	104	1	79.0%	170,206	3.1	10	1	10	3	3	10
Springfield	Missouri	113	102	1	73.0%	168,086	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Huntsville	Alabama	118	108	1	85.4%	167,654	2.5	11	2	13	4	6	13
Boca Raton	Florida	119	106	1	74.5%	165,668	3.4	9	1	9	2	2	9
Ocala	Florida	118	107	1	73.3%	165,016	3.7	11	1	11	1	1	11
Fontana	California	109	98	1	70.0%	164,309	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	California	107	98	1	74.3%	163,757	3.5	4	1	5	0	1	5
Fremont	California	107	98	1	70.0%	163,209	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ogden	Utah	110	101	1	80.2%	161,519	2.8	5	1	6	2	2	6
Chattanooga	Tennessee	120	107	1	77.3%	160,684	3.2	15	1	15	4	4	15
Little Rock	Arkansas	117	106	1	73.3%	159,885	3.5	12	1	12	2	2	12
Worcester	Massachusetts	117	103	1	85.1%	157,873	2.7	9	1	9	4	4	9
Trenton	New Jersey	116	104	1	75.3%	156,480	3.5	11	1	11	2	2	11
Lake Worth	Florida	109	99	1	74.7%	154,348	3.6	5	1	5	1	1	5
Van Nuys	California	105	95	1	86.3%	153,457	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Gainesville	Florida	119	107	1	72.9%	152,720	3.8	10	1	11	0	1	11
Tempe	Arizona	112	103	1	80.3%	152,582	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Erie	Pennsylvania	116	105	1	82.7%	151,712	2.8	13	2	17	4	6	17
Santa Rosa	California	112	100	1	70.0%	151,241	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Huntington Beach	California	111	99	1	75.6%	151,114	3.5	4	1	5	0	1	5
Montgomery	Alabama	115	105	1	71.8%	150,690	3.5	13	1	13	2	2	13
Beaverton	Oregon	112	102	1	73.9%	149,079	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Humble	Texas	108	98	1	88.3%	147,096	2.3	3	1	4	1	2	4
Providence	Rhode Island	109	98	2	71.5%	146,670	3.6	8	1	8	1	1	8
Eugene	Oregon	113	103	2	71.7%	145,531	3.8	6	2	7	0	1	7
Charleston	South Carolina	121	110	1	73.7%	145,198	3.4	10	2	12	2	2	12
Peoria	Arizona	110	99	1	84.4%	145,197	2.8	4	3	6	1	3	6
Whittier	California	108	98	2	73.4%	143,924	3.7	6	2	7	0	1	7
Moreno Valley	California	109	99	1	70.0%	143,818	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Augusta	Georgia	117	107	2	70.0%	143,101	4.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Santa Maria	California	106	97	1	100.0%	143,089	1.0	3	1	5	3	4	5
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	116	104	1	70.0%	142,188	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Clearwater	Florida	123	109	1	77.3%	141,707	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Frisco	Texas	105	95	2	82.1%	141,654	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Brownsville	Texas	109	100	1	70.0%	140,925	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Olympia	Washington	110	98	1	77.1%	140,888	3.3	6	2	7	1	2	7
Henrico	Virginia	120	109	1	72.8%	140,345	3.6	7	1	8	1	1	8
Oceanside	California	106	96	1	70.0%	140,181	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fredericksburg	Virginia	115	103	1	80.5%	140,122	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Midland	Texas	113	102	1	86.9%	139,074	2.2	5	1	5	3	3	5
York	Pennsylvania	115	104	1	76.6%	137,714	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Edmond	Oklahoma	109	100	1	80.1%	137,494	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Alpharetta	Georgia	109	98	2	72.6%	137,264	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Garden Grove	California	110	97	1	77.9%	136,844	3.4	5	2	6	1	1	6
Lancaster	California	105	96	1	74.0%	136,388	3.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	110	101	1	70.0%	136,304	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Round Rock	Texas	107	99	1	81.1%	135,908	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Boynton Beach	Florida	114	101	1	78.0%	135,853	3.3	6	1	7	1	2	7
Rancho Cucamonga	California	109	98	1	76.8%	135,560	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Visalia	California	108	99	1	88.6%	134,624	2.0	3	2	4	2	2	4
Hayward	California	108	98	1	70.0%	134,423	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kent	Washington	113	102	1	83.5%	134,079	2.8	4	2	6	1	2	6
Tyler	Texas	115	104	1	85.9%	134,067	1.9	9	1	14	5	7	14
Overland Park	Kansas	116	104	1	72.9%	133,653	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Grand Prairie	Texas	106	96	2	70.0%	133,382	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Denton	Texas	110	101	1	84.2%	133,133	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	115	106	1	78.6%	133,051	3.0	9	1	9	3	3	9
Rockford	Illinois	114	104	1	72.6%	132,308	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Mckinney	Texas	106	98	1	70.0%	132,294	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Salinas	California	106	96	1	70.0%	131,830	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Edinburg	Texas	112	102	1	84.6%	131,570	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Homestead	Florida	111	99	1	70.0%	131,372	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Kalamazoo	Michigan	115	103	1	80.0%	131,243	2.9	7	2	8	2	3	8
Odessa	Texas	112	103	1	81.4%	130,247	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Lafayette	Louisiana	109	100	1	80.8%	129,748	2.8	5	2	6	2	2	6
Killeen	Texas	110	101	1	86.0%	129,211	2.5	4	1	5	2	2	5
Pasadena	California	113	103	1	81.6%	128,643	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Green Bay	Wisconsin	112	103	2	70.0%	128,332	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Naperville	Illinois	107	97	1	77.4%	128,297	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Cary	North Carolina	123	108	1	82.5%	128,076	2.8	4	1	4	2	2	4
Albany	New York	117	102	1	84.3%	127,537	2.9	11	3	13	4	4	13
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	115	106	1	70.2%	127,459	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Everett	Washington	112	100	1	76.4%	127,351	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Mission	Texas	105	95	2	70.0%	126,764	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Jackson	Mississippi	113	99	1	74.3%	126,619	3.7	11	1	11	1	1	11
Decatur	Georgia	109	99	1	70.0%	126,578	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Cape Coral	Florida	115	104	2	70.0%	126,568	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Yonkers	New York	109	99	1	70.0%	126,372	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Escondido	California	104	94	1	70.0%	125,757	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Evansville	Indiana	134	120	1	68.1%	125,740	4.1	9	1	9	0	0	9
Elk Grove	California	109	96	1	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roanoke	Virginia	112	100	1	73.6%	124,719	3.4	10	2	12	1	3	12
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	114	105	2	66.9%	124,644	4.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gaithersburg	Maryland	121	106	2	86.1%	124,487	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Vallejo	California	107	98	1	99.7%	124,140	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Hyattsville	Maryland	113	97	1	78.7%	123,934	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Torrance	California	113	103	1	70.0%	123,755	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ontario	California	109	98	1	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Schenectady	New York	113	101	1	76.1%	123,260	3.3	8	1	8	2	2	8
Clarksville	Tennessee	105	96	1	70.0%	122,988	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Billings	Montana	106	98	1	89.3%	122,618	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Newport News	Virginia	112	99	1	69.4%	122,566	3.7	7	1	7	1	1	7
Palmdale	California	106	97	1	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pueblo	Colorado	111	98	1	77.1%	121,915	2.7	7	1	7	3	3	7
Youngstown	Ohio	116	105	1	77.5%	121,718	3.8	12	3	14	2	2	14
Metairie	Louisiana	111	102	1	85.3%	121,395	2.4	5	1	6	2	3	6
Orange	California	111	100	1	83.5%	121,105	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Topeka	Kansas	117	105	2	74.0%	120,998	3.5	18	1	18	3	3	18
Hamilton	Ohio	110	102	1	88.2%	120,918	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
El Cajon	California	109	97	1	70.0%	120,724	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Hollywood	California	108	98	1	78.7%	120,533	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Las Cruces	New Mexico	120	107	1	80.2%	119,485	3.1	7	1	7	2	2	7
Cypress	Texas	108	101	1	70.0%	119,421	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hampton	Virginia	114	100	1	87.4%	119,105	2.3	6	2	8	3	4	8
Waco	Texas	112	100	2	75.2%	119,034	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Allentown	Pennsylvania	111	101	1	70.0%	118,955	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Bellevue	Washington	112	101	1	81.2%	118,811	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Fairfax	Virginia	106	96	1	72.5%	118,566	3.8	4	2	5	0	1	5
Yuma	Arizona	107	99	1	80.3%	118,526	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Bothell	Washington	110	98	1	92.3%	118,346	2.0	3	2	4	2	2	4
Lansing	Michigan	118	107	1	72.0%	118,270	3.9	7	1	8	0	1	8
Sugar Land	Texas	105	97	2	70.0%	118,250	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Mateo	California	106	97	1	82.8%	117,822	2.8	4	2	5	1	2	5
Conroe	Texas	111	101	1	73.4%	117,604	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Ann Arbor	Michigan	114	103	1	70.0%	116,705	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rockville	Maryland	109	101	2	79.6%	115,214	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Surprise	Arizona	106	98	1	84.9%	115,110	2.8	4	2	5	1	2	5
Macon	Georgia	118	108	1	70.2%	114,922	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Sunnyvale	California	107	98	2	74.4%	113,636	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Cumming	Georgia	106	97	1	70.0%	113,413	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fullerton	California	106	97	1	81.4%	113,370	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Canton	Ohio	117	105	1	76.9%	112,990	3.7	12	2	13	1	2	13
Bridgeport	Connecticut	112	102	1	76.9%	112,579	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Puyallup	Washington	112	101	1	78.3%	111,812	3.2	5	2	6	1	2	6
Murrieta	California	106	96	1	84.5%	111,806	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Astoria	New York	111	100	1	78.1%	111,388	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Pearland	Texas	104	96	1	80.8%	111,202	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Stamford	Connecticut	112	102	1	86.0%	110,717	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Pomona	California	107	97	1	70.0%	110,590	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Melbourne	Florida	117	107	1	70.9%	110,453	3.6	5	1	5	1	1	5
Joliet	Illinois	108	97	1	85.5%	110,162	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Carrollton	Texas	109	98	1	81.4%	109,709	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Flint	Michigan	117	105	2	70.0%	108,827	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Charlottesville	Virginia	113	100	1	88.4%	108,771	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
La Puente	California	105	96	1	92.2%	108,736	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Santa Barbara	California	111	99	1	79.9%	108,552	3.1	7	2	8	2	2	8
Boston	Massachusetts	115	105	2	71.5%	108,521	3.8	14	1	14	1	1	14
Frederick	Maryland	106	96	1	82.2%	108,508	2.5	4	1	5	2	2	5
Renton	Washington	112	100	1	70.0%	108,396	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Florissant	Missouri	108	99	1	100.0%	108,289	1.0	3	2	6	3	4	6
Ventura	California	104	95	1	92.9%	107,682	1.7	3	1	6	1	3	6
Paterson	New Jersey	112	99	1	73.8%	107,528	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Roseville	California	106	95	2	76.7%	107,254	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Abilene	Texas	111	102	1	82.1%	106,920	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Panama City	Florida	107	99	1	84.6%	106,919	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
Norwalk	California	99	91	1	100.0%	105,886	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Bloomington	Indiana	107	97	2	79.2%	105,794	2.5	6	1	6	3	3	6
South Bend	Indiana	130	116	1	71.6%	105,096	3.8	10	1	10	1	1	10
Boulder	Colorado	112	102	1	79.6%	104,523	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	114	101	1	74.9%	104,440	3.7	6	1	6	1	1	6
Manassas	Virginia	110	101	1	68.2%	103,657	4.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Allen	Texas	102	94	1	92.7%	103,137	2.0	2	3	4	1	2	4
Saint Charles	Missouri	104	95	1	73.6%	102,968	3.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Inglewood	California	124	112	1	76.9%	102,908	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Hemet	California	105	95	1	79.8%	102,825	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Arvada	Colorado	110	101	1	76.8%	102,482	2.8	5	2	6	2	2	6
Bell Gardens	California	99	90	1	100.0%	102,433	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Mesquite	Texas	106	98	1	70.0%	102,419	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lake Charles	Louisiana	112	102	1	78.2%	102,203	3.0	5	2	6	1	2	6
Warren	Michigan	115	103	1	75.5%	102,100	3.4	5	1	6	1	1	6
Longmont	Colorado	108	98	1	78.0%	101,973	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Yakima	Washington	109	100	1	78.5%	101,952	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	108	99	1	70.0%	101,917	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Beaumont	Texas	114	103	1	70.0%	101,849	4.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Olathe	Kansas	107	98	1	70.0%	101,061	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elgin	Illinois	107	97	1	82.5%	100,825	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
West Jordan	Utah	112	103	1	81.6%	100,825	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	91	1	100.0%	100,763	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Falls Church	Virginia	107	96	1	83.5%	100,489	2.6	5	2	6	2	3	6
Orem	Utah	104	96	1	100.0%	100,318	1.0	3	1	3	3	3	3
Sparks	Nevada	108	98	1	83.8%	99,947	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Concord	California	107	98	1	76.5%	99,682	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	111	102	1	81.1%	99,490	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Mcallen	Texas	109	100	2	70.0%	99,112	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hartford	Connecticut	105	97	1	79.2%	97,710	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Summerville	South Carolina	104	96	3	70.0%	97,259	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	109	99	1	77.7%	97,236	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Compton	California	106	98	1	70.0%	97,213	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Asheville	North Carolina	112	100	1	73.1%	96,572	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Livermore	California	105	95	1	100.0%	96,253	1.0	2	3	5	2	3	5
Clovis	California	106	97	1	78.8%	95,605	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Muskegon	Michigan	111	100	3	73.9%	95,514	3.6	5	2	7	0	2	7
Victorville	California	105	95	1	70.0%	95,417	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bend	Oregon	109	99	1	77.8%	95,114	3.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
South Gate	California	99	90	1	100.0%	95,103	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Fargo	North Dakota	108	100	1	77.3%	94,705	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
New Braunfels	Texas	104	96	1	91.6%	94,206	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Berkeley	California	110	99	1	74.0%	94,117	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Lewisville	Texas	109	100	1	79.3%	94,057	2.7	3	2	4	1	2	4
Appleton	Wisconsin	107	99	1	76.6%	93,270	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Miami Beach	Florida	113	99	1	80.4%	93,027	3.2	5	2	6	1	2	6
West Valley City	Utah	106	96	2	70.0%	93,008	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sterling Heights	Michigan	112	104	1	70.0%	92,729	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vista	California	106	97	1	77.4%	92,728	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Cambridge	Massachusetts	109	100	1	80.0%	92,659	2.2	5	1	5	3	3	5
High Point	North Carolina	110	99	2	75.4%	92,223	3.3	4	1	5	1	1	5
Longview	Texas	122	109	1	87.4%	92,002	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
New Haven	Connecticut	106	98	1	70.6%	91,928	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Saint Augustine	Florida	112	104	1	70.0%	91,736	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	106	97	3	70.0%	91,349	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Saginaw	Michigan	118	107	2	70.0%	91,212	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Napa	California	101	92	1	94.3%	91,160	2.0	2	1	3	1	2	3
Spartanburg	South Carolina	114	105	1	81.3%	90,984	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Temecula	California	109	99	2	70.0%	90,939	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bowling Green	Kentucky	108	97	1	78.7%	90,885	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
San Angelo	Texas	108	99	1	81.7%	90,533	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
San Leandro	California	108	97	1	81.1%	90,149	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Simi Valley	California	101	92	1	70.0%	90,098	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Stone Mountain	Georgia	108	98	2	70.0%	89,817	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Fe	New Mexico	109	99	2	70.0%	89,660	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Midlothian	Virginia	103	94	1	92.2%	89,255	2.0	3	1	3	2	2	3
Kenosha	Wisconsin	112	104	1	78.8%	88,895	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Palm Bay	Florida	107	100	1	79.8%	88,823	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Auburn	Washington	112	101	1	78.7%	88,798	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Bellingham	Washington	106	96	2	70.0%	88,546	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	109	100	1	90.3%	88,438	1.7	3	1	5	1	3	5
Broomfield	Colorado	105	96	1	84.4%	88,408	2.7	3	2	4	1	2	4
Racine	Wisconsin	111	103	1	70.0%	88,251	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Santa Clara	California	107	97	1	70.0%	87,862	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Spring Hill	Florida	110	99	1	70.0%	87,804	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lynnwood	Washington	104	95	1	80.9%	87,639	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Athens	Georgia	115	106	2	70.0%	87,301	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Norman	Oklahoma	111	100	1	70.0%	86,860	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lowell	Massachusetts	108	100	1	78.0%	86,807	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Lehigh Acres	Florida	110	101	1	73.9%	86,412	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Tracy	California	106	96	1	73.7%	86,363	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
College Station	Texas	107	98	1	70.0%	86,134	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Toms River	New Jersey	109	99	2	70.0%	86,002	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Brockton	Massachusetts	103	95	1	89.8%	85,677	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Independence	Missouri	112	103	2	68.8%	85,385	4.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Coral Springs	Florida	104	96	1	87.7%	85,286	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Federal Way	Washington	105	95	1	85.1%	85,185	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Englewood	Colorado	109	100	1	76.2%	85,045	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Kennewick	Washington	106	96	1	85.8%	84,766	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
New Bedford	Massachusetts	114	104	1	89.3%	84,681	2.3	4	2	7	1	3	7
El Monte	California	103	94	1	90.4%	84,669	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
New Port Richey	Florida	111	101	1	70.0%	84,581	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Springdale	Arkansas	104	96	1	87.6%	84,417	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Sandy	Utah	111	103	1	76.4%	84,356	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Downey	California	100	91	1	74.6%	84,272	3.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Delray Beach	Florida	109	100	1	70.0%	83,345	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Mission Viejo	California	105	95	1	84.5%	83,123	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	110	98	1	81.3%	83,001	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Duluth	Minnesota	115	106	1	70.6%	82,714	3.7	11	1	11	1	1	11
Elizabeth	New Jersey	106	97	1	82.3%	82,697	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Baytown	Texas	108	98	2	70.0%	82,455	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Daytona Beach	Florida	108	98	1	79.9%	82,356	3.0	5	1	6	1	2	6
Perris	California	106	96	3	70.0%	82,173	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vero Beach	Florida	114	101	1	71.2%	82,051	3.8	6	2	7	0	1	7
Gastonia	North Carolina	107	97	2	76.4%	81,807	3.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Provo	Utah	108	99	1	70.0%	81,566	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	108	99	3	70.0%	81,452	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Keller	Texas	108	99	1	70.0%	81,381	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	113	101	1	70.0%	81,241	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
West Chester	Pennsylvania	103	94	2	74.7%	81,197	3.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Anderson	South Carolina	107	99	1	82.5%	81,165	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Nampa	Idaho	109	99	3	70.0%	81,134	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	102	93	1	83.1%	80,965	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Largo	Florida	113	105	1	75.0%	80,664	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Herndon	Virginia	104	94	1	86.2%	80,523	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Richardson	Texas	109	101	1	70.0%	80,219	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Deltona	Florida	102	93	1	85.3%	80,125	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Redwood City	California	105	95	1	70.0%	80,124	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	California	103	94	3	70.0%	80,081	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	California	102	93	3	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	104	95	2	70.0%	79,846	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	California	104	95	1	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	California	109	96	1	70.0%	79,569	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lithonia	Georgia	103	95	1	82.1%	79,465	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Davenport	Iowa	109	100	1	75.6%	79,270	3.3	6	1	8	1	2	8
Wichita Falls	Texas	115	105	1	80.2%	79,258	3.1	7	1	7	2	2	7
Redding	California	110	99	1	70.0%	79,124	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Plainfield	Illinois	106	98	1	80.1%	78,951	2.7	3	2	4	1	2	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	112	102	1	82.7%	78,836	2.3	7	2	8	4	4	8
Elkhart	Indiana	109	101	1	79.2%	78,797	3.3	3	1	3	1	1	3
Laurel	Maryland	109	99	1	70.0%	78,730	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Ashburn	Virginia	104	95	1	70.0%	78,615	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chico	California	105	96	1	70.0%	78,411	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Riverview	Florida	104	96	2	70.0%	77,933	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	California	107	99	1	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Menifee	California	108	98	2	70.0%	77,371	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Douglasville	Georgia	109	99	4	70.0%	77,174	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Jupiter	Florida	107	97	1	78.1%	77,011	2.5	4	2	5	2	2	5
Santa Monica	California	105	96	1	81.5%	76,953	2.8	5	2	7	2	2	7
Waterbury	Connecticut	109	101	2	70.8%	76,953	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Belleville	Illinois	106	97	1	82.2%	76,678	2.5	4	1	7	1	3	7
West Covina	California	111	100	1	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Idaho Falls	Idaho	107	97	3	70.0%	76,315	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Waukegan	Illinois	104	96	1	78.2%	76,273	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Santa Cruz	California	106	95	2	73.0%	75,924	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Burbank	California	109	100	2	70.0%	75,611	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Lawrence	Kansas	111	102	2	74.5%	75,276	3.0	5	2	7	1	3	7
Dearborn	Michigan	110	99	1	79.1%	75,230	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Fort Mill	South Carolina	106	98	1	79.1%	75,170	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	117	107	1	78.4%	75,062	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	108	2	70.0%	74,829	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Winter Haven	Florida	107	97	2	70.0%	74,815	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Ridgewood	New York	99	91	2	70.0%	74,702	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lynchburg	Virginia	107	97	1	72.9%	74,636	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Morgantown	West Virginia	105	96	1	78.3%	74,620	3.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Rialto	California	106	97	2	70.0%	74,608	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Franklin	Tennessee	105	96	3	70.0%	74,532	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Missouri City	Texas	109	99	1	70.0%	74,266	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	California	100	90	2	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Livonia	Michigan	109	98	1	78.2%	73,935	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	108	97	1	70.0%	73,825	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Missoula	Montana	111	102	2	75.9%	73,804	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Vacaville	California	101	92	2	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	108	99	1	76.9%	73,350	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Meridian	Idaho	107	99	2	70.0%	72,955	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	California	107	96	1	75.3%	72,834	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Hesperia	California	105	94	2	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Covington	Georgia	107	98	3	78.3%	72,570	3.0	2	1	3	0	1	3
Merced	California	108	100	4	70.0%	72,142	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	California	105	94	2	70.0%	72,076	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	106	95	1	70.0%	72,010	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Bryan	Texas	114	105	1	74.7%	71,931	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Bowie	Maryland	111	100	1	70.0%	71,515	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Gulfport	Mississippi	111	99	1	75.2%	71,257	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Woodstock	Georgia	104	96	3	70.0%	71,205	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mcdonough	Georgia	107	98	3	70.0%	71,023	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Edison	New Jersey	107	97	1	70.0%	70,579	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	California	107	98	2	70.0%	70,337	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Terre Haute	Indiana	112	103	2	74.0%	70,290	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Clinton Township	Michigan	111	102	1	70.0%	70,207	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Parker	Colorado	108	100	2	70.0%	70,197	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	108	96	2	70.0%	70,179	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Roswell	Georgia	108	97	1	70.0%	69,839	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	117	104	1	70.0%	69,596	4.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Kennesaw	Georgia	108	97	3	70.0%	69,391	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Buford	Georgia	102	94	1	70.0%	69,372	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	110	99	2	70.0%	68,563	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Apopka	Florida	105	95	2	70.0%	68,358	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	California	101	90	3	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Rapid City	South Dakota	104	96	3	70.0%	67,736	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Sylmar	California	100	94	2	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
O Fallon	Missouri	105	95	2	70.0%	67,522	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	California	103	94	3	70.0%	67,264	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	California	98	90	1	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fort Pierce	Florida	119	105	1	70.0%	66,998	4.0	8	1	8	0	0	8
Valdosta	Georgia	112	103	2	70.2%	66,685	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Westerville	Ohio	107	98	1	70.0%	66,646	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	110	101	2	70.0%	66,534	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Milton	Florida	108	99	1	70.0%	66,319	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	110	98	2	70.0%	66,197	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	California	105	96	2	70.0%	66,132	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	107	97	2	70.6%	66,004	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	107	96	2	70.0%	65,885	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elmhurst	New York	100	91	4	70.0%	65,777	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Holland	Michigan	107	98	3	70.0%	65,711	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	105	96	2	70.0%	65,377	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Medford	Oregon	106	98	3	70.0%	65,276	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Muncie	Indiana	110	100	1	70.0%	64,932	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Acworth	Georgia	109	99	2	64.2%	63,974	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	147	126	1	78.5%	1,928,058	3.2	62	1	62	17	17	62
San Diego	134	116	1	78.7%	1,059,771	2.9	36	2	45	11	15	45
San Jose	129	116	1	74.9%	786,576	3.5	28	2	29	4	5	29
San Francisco	121	106	1	79.4%	690,617	3.1	28	2	30	7	9	30
Sacramento	134	115	1	75.7%	608,827	3.4	28	1	28	6	6	28
Fresno	120	105	1	79.4%	478,312	3.1	18	1	21	4	6	21
Bakersfield	112	102	1	81.8%	457,479	2.6	11	1	11	5	5	11
Long Beach	120	109	1	70.0%	335,278	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Oakland	115	102	1	78.5%	323,109	3.1	14	1	14	4	4	14
Riverside	113	102	1	78.0%	288,642	3.1	7	1	7	2	2	7
Santa Ana	110	99	1	78.5%	280,144	3.2	6	2	7	1	2	7
Stockton	122	108	1	70.0%	261,664	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Anaheim	114	102	1	70.0%	258,038	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Irvine	112	101	1	81.2%	217,416	3.0	9	1	9	3	3	9
San Bernardino	113	103	1	78.7%	196,444	3.0	7	2	9	1	3	9
Corona	111	98	1	74.0%	190,301	3.4	5	2	6	1	1	6
Modesto	111	101	2	71.3%	188,517	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Chula Vista	109	100	1	70.0%	182,582	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Fontana	109	98	1	70.0%	164,309	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oxnard	107	98	1	74.3%	163,757	3.5	4	1	5	0	1	5
Fremont	107	98	1	70.0%	163,209	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Van Nuys	105	95	1	86.3%	153,457	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Santa Rosa	112	100	1	70.0%	151,241	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Huntington Beach	111	99	1	75.6%	151,114	3.5	4	1	5	0	1	5
Whittier	108	98	2	73.4%	143,924	3.7	6	2	7	0	1	7
Moreno Valley	109	99	1	70.0%	143,818	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Maria	106	97	1	100.0%	143,089	1.0	3	1	5	3	4	5
Oceanside	106	96	1	70.0%	140,181	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Garden Grove	110	97	1	77.9%	136,844	3.4	5	2	6	1	1	6
Lancaster	105	96	1	74.0%	136,388	3.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	109	98	1	76.8%	135,560	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Visalia	108	99	1	88.6%	134,624	2.0	3	2	4	2	2	4
Hayward	108	98	1	70.0%	134,423	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Salinas	106	96	1	70.0%	131,830	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pasadena	113	103	1	81.6%	128,643	3.0	6	1	6	2	2	6
Escondido	104	94	1	70.0%	125,757	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Elk Grove	109	96	1	70.0%	125,523	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	107	98	1	99.7%	124,140	1.8	4	1	4	3	3	4
Torrance	113	103	1	70.0%	123,755	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ontario	109	98	1	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Palmdale	106	97	1	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Orange	111	100	1	83.5%	121,105	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
El Cajon	109	97	1	70.0%	120,724	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
North Hollywood	108	98	1	78.7%	120,533	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
San Mateo	106	97	1	82.8%	117,822	2.8	4	2	5	1	2	5
Sunnyvale	107	98	2	74.4%	113,636	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Fullerton	106	97	1	81.4%	113,370	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Murrieta	106	96	1	84.5%	111,806	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Pomona	107	97	1	70.0%	110,590	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
La Puente	105	96	1	92.2%	108,736	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Santa Barbara	111	99	1	79.9%	108,552	3.1	7	2	8	2	2	8
Ventura	104	95	1	92.9%	107,682	1.7	3	1	6	1	3	6
Roseville	106	95	2	76.7%	107,254	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Norwalk	99	91	1	100.0%	105,886	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Inglewood	124	112	1	76.9%	102,908	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Hemet	105	95	1	79.8%	102,825	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Bell Gardens	99	90	1	100.0%	102,433	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Concord	107	98	1	76.5%	99,682	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Compton	106	98	1	70.0%	97,213	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livermore	105	95	1	100.0%	96,253	1.0	2	3	5	2	3	5
Clovis	106	97	1	78.8%	95,605	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Victorville	105	95	1	70.0%	95,417	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
South Gate	99	90	1	100.0%	95,103	1.0	1	1	1	1	1	1
Berkeley	110	99	1	74.0%	94,117	3.7	9	1	9	1	1	9
Vista	106	97	1	77.4%	92,728	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Napa	101	92	1	94.3%	91,160	2.0	2	1	3	1	2	3
Temecula	109	99	2	70.0%	90,939	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Leandro	108	97	1	81.1%	90,149	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Simi Valley	101	92	1	70.0%	90,098	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Clara	107	97	1	70.0%	87,862	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Tracy	106	96	1	73.7%	86,363	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
El Monte	103	94	1	90.4%	84,669	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Downey	100	91	1	74.6%	84,272	3.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Mission Viejo	105	95	1	84.5%	83,123	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Perris	106	96	3	70.0%	82,173	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Redwood City	105	95	1	70.0%	80,124	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Daly City	103	94	3	70.0%	80,081	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Fairfield	102	93	3	70.0%	79,855	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Costa Mesa	104	95	1	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Carlsbad	109	96	1	70.0%	79,569	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Redding	110	99	1	70.0%	79,124	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Chico	105	96	1	70.0%	78,411	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Antioch	107	99	1	70.0%	77,505	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Menifee	108	98	2	70.0%	77,371	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Santa Monica	105	96	1	81.5%	76,953	2.8	5	2	7	2	2	7
West Covina	111	100	1	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Cruz	106	95	2	73.0%	75,924	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Burbank	109	100	2	70.0%	75,611	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rialto	106	97	2	70.0%	74,608	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pacoima	100	90	2	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vacaville	101	92	2	70.0%	73,707	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Palo Alto	107	96	1	75.3%	72,834	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Hesperia	105	94	2	70.0%	72,668	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Merced	108	100	4	70.0%	72,142	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	105	94	2	70.0%	72,076	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
San Marcos	107	98	2	70.0%	70,337	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hawthorne	101	90	3	70.0%	67,785	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	100	94	2	70.0%	67,541	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Indio	103	94	3	70.0%	67,264	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Pittsburg	98	90	1	70.0%	67,257	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chino	105	96	2	70.0%	66,132	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2

Houston

ZIP	allstate.com	nationwide.com	farmers.com	geico.com	esurance.com	libertymutual.com
77088	4	5	8	6	7	9
77047	4	5	8	6	7	9
77037	4	5	6	7	8	9
77098	4	5	7	6	8	9
77027	4	5	7	6	8	9
77068	1	5	7	6	8	9
77078	4	5	8	7	6	9
77086	4	5	7	6	8	9
77035	4	5	7	6	8	9
77008	4	5	7	6	8	9
77004	1	5	7	6	8	9
77028	4	5	7	6	8	9
77059	2	5	7	6	8	9
77039	4	5	7	6	8	9
77019	4	5	7	6	8	9
77075	1	2	4	3	5	6
77077	4	5	7	6	8	9
77079	4	5	7	6	8	9
77099	4	5	7	6	8	9
77024	4	5	7	6	8	9
77095	4	5	2	7	8	9
77048	4	5	7	6	8	9
77044	4	5	6	7	8	9
77015	4	5	6	8	7	9
77017	1	2	4	3	5	6
77057	4	5	7	6	8	9
77055	4	5	2	6	8	9
77006	4	5	7	6	8	9
77026	1	2	3	4	5	6
77046	4	5	7	6	8	9
77066	2	5	6	7	8	9
77023	4	5	6	8	7	9
77094	4	5	7	6	8	9
77084	4	5	7	6	8	9
77013	4	5	7	6	8	9
77063	1	2	4	3	5	6
77053	4	5	6	7	8	9
77022	4	5	8	6	7	9
77072	4	5	8	6	7	9
77049	4	5	6	7	8	9
77045	4	5	7	6	8	9
77010	1	5	6	8	7	9
77018	4	5	7	6	8	9
77041	3	5	6	7	8	9
77009	1	2	3	4	5	6
77089	2	5	1	6	8	9
77032	4	5	6	7	8	9
77036	4	5	6	8	7	9
77085	4	5	6	8	7	9
77054	4	5	7	6	8	9
77058	4	5	8	6	7	9
77014	4	5	7	6	8	9
77067	1	2	3	4	5	6
77005	4	5	7	6	8	9
77076	1	2	4	3	5	6
77070	4	5	7	6	8	9
77060	4	5	8	6	7	9
77080	4	5	3	8	6	9
77050	1	2	4	5	3	6
77091	4	5	8	6	7	9
77071	1	2	5	3	4	6
77061	4	5	7	6	8	9
77020	4	5	7	8	6	9
77081	4	5	6	7	8	9
77030	4	5	8	6	7	9
77040	4	5	6	7	8	9
77090	1	5	8	6	7	9
77031	1	2	3	5	4	6
77051	4	5	7	6	8	9
77011	4	5	7	6	8	9
77042	4	5	7	6	8	9
77062	4	5	3	8	6	9
77082	1	2	4	3	5	6
77093	4	5	7	6	8	9
77073	4	5	8	7	6	9
77033	4	5	8	7	6	9
77043	4	5	6	7	8	9
77074	4	5	8	7	6	9
77064	4	5	7	6	8	9
77012	4	5	8	6	7	9
77002	4	5	8	6	7	9
77092	4	5	7	8	6	9
77069	4	5	6	8	7	9
77021	1	2	5	3	4	6
77083	4	5	7	8	6	9
77029	4	5	7	8	6	9
77034	1	5	8	6	7	9
77087	1	2	5	4	3	6
77003	2	5	8	7	6	9
77038	4	5	7	8	6	9
77007	1	2	5	4	3	6
77016	4	5	7	8	6	9
77065	4	5	7	8	6	9
77096	4	5	6	8	7	9
77025	1	2	4	3	5	7
77056	4	5	6	8	7	9

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Allstate

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 8,137 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Allstate Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (insurance company near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Allstate Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Allstate Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Allstate Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly