Aetnadentaloffers Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve aetnadentaloffers.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 54,836 Dentists In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Aetnadentaloffers Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Aetnadentaloffers Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Aetnadentaloffers Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Bronx
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Aetnadentaloffers Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	66,540	54,836	47	0.6%	1,936,661	45.9	27,172	31,484	1	31,484	0	0	0
California	9,788	8,363	57	0.5%	214,702	55.5	1,141	1,611	1	1,611	0	0	0
Florida	4,577	3,926	88	0.6%	116,723	55.8	442	922	1	922	0	0	0
New York	4,865	4,028	104	0.6%	110,262	44.3	1,491	1,716	1	1,716	0	0	0
Texas	6,124	5,317	152	0.4%	108,603	58.0	1,300	1,561	1	1,561	0	0	0
Pennsylvania	4,343	3,629	88	0.7%	83,308	43.5	1,604	1,777	1	1,777	0	0	0
New Jersey	3,545	3,005	62	0.8%	73,525	35.4	537	593	1	593	0	0	0
Ohio	3,522	2,892	100	0.6%	72,855	45.1	956	1,125	1	1,125	0	0	0
Michigan	3,330	2,736	82	0.7%	72,680	40.8	832	975	1	975	0	0	0
Illinois	4,343	3,666	110	0.6%	72,103	43.6	1,220	1,300	1	1,300	0	0	0
Georgia	2,923	2,476	123	0.7%	71,086	44.6	572	719	1	719	0	0	0
North Carolina	2,979	2,481	162	0.6%	58,271	45.6	669	750	1	750	0	0	0
Virginia	3,113	2,572	147	0.6%	54,257	46.6	723	886	1	886	0	0	0
Massachusetts	2,984	2,507	68	0.8%	52,856	37.9	461	534	1	534	0	0	0
Missouri	2,484	2,056	121	0.7%	42,892	42.3	887	998	1	998	0	0	0
Indiana	4,303	3,689	137	0.6%	41,933	46.5	653	748	1	748	0	0	0
Minnesota	2,425	2,007	110	0.8%	41,524	39.9	777	878	1	878	0	0	0
Wisconsin	2,420	1,976	111	0.7%	41,275	40.8	694	769	1	769	0	0	0
Tennessee	2,276	1,896	177	0.6%	39,002	50.7	513	610	1	610	0	0	0
Washington	3,022	2,564	196	0.5%	38,855	53.5	445	542	1	542	0	0	0
Maryland	2,392	2,023	171	0.6%	37,868	46.7	392	463	1	463	0	0	0
Alabama	1,992	1,662	146	0.7%	33,529	45.1	520	635	1	635	0	0	0
South Carolina	1,958	1,649	183	0.6%	31,307	47.0	346	419	1	419	0	0	0
Louisiana	1,713	1,393	174	0.7%	31,257	47.2	431	510	1	510	0	0	0
Kentucky	2,019	1,646	150	0.7%	29,234	42.1	698	758	1	758	0	0	0
Connecticut	1,847	1,566	122	0.8%	29,041	37.2	234	279	1	279	0	0	0
Colorado	2,406	2,030	255	0.5%	25,688	55.2	376	472	1	472	0	0	0
Iowa	2,087	1,687	137	0.8%	24,426	39.8	890	933	1	933	0	0	0
Mississippi	1,657	1,389	149	0.8%	24,027	38.5	384	418	1	418	0	0	0
Arizona	2,122	1,822	347	0.3%	23,894	61.3	243	309	1	309	0	0	0
Arkansas	1,659	1,369	137	0.8%	22,686	40.3	553	587	1	587	0	0	0
Oregon	2,514	2,099	209	0.5%	21,382	49.5	349	378	1	378	0	0	0
Oklahoma	1,897	1,583	200	0.5%	21,151	50.6	549	610	1	610	0	0	0
Utah	1,562	1,331	188	0.7%	20,898	45.4	246	284	1	284	0	0	0
Kansas	1,914	1,596	180	0.6%	18,236	44.0	615	687	1	687	0	0	0
West Virginia	1,423	1,163	129	0.8%	14,898	36.0	684	704	1	704	0	0	0
New Mexico	1,254	1,042	163	0.5%	11,374	47.3	323	355	1	355	0	0	0
Idaho	1,423	1,227	161	0.6%	10,838	47.0	251	272	1	272	0	0	0
Maine	2,132	1,818	137	0.8%	10,706	38.2	421	425	1	425	0	0	0
New Hampshire	1,292	1,092	148	0.8%	10,701	37.1	238	248	1	248	0	0	0
Nebraska	1,554	1,290	194	0.5%	10,015	49.1	520	576	1	576	0	0	0
Hawaii	751	626	100	0.7%	9,453	45.3	82	93	1	93	0	0	0
Rhode Island	671	559	125	0.8%	8,784	35.2	64	77	1	77	0	0	0
Montana	1,247	1,031	121	0.8%	7,860	40.0	348	361	1	361	0	0	0
Delaware	681	575	114	0.8%	7,319	41.5	52	66	1	66	0	0	0
South Dakota	1,064	895	118	0.7%	6,078	42.1	359	370	1	370	0	0	0
North Dakota	917	763	95	0.8%	5,643	39.2	367	381	1	381	0	0	0
Nevada	1,017	876	225	0.2%	5,236	71.0	86	111	1	111	0	0	0
Vermont	1,055	870	118	0.8%	5,163	38.2	250	254	1	254	0	0	0
Wyoming	973	823	114	0.8%	4,888	34.8	164	171	1	171	0	0	0
Alaska	949	788	116	0.6%	4,401	47.2	218	235	1	235	0	0	0

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Bronx	New York	182	148	73	0.6%	8,405	60.5	25	1	25
Miami	Florida	493	424	132	0.4%	7,679	78.5	55	1	55
Saint Louis	Missouri	359	304	97	0.8%	7,061	41.1	45	1	45
Minneapolis	Minnesota	479	401	123	0.6%	6,697	58.2	51	1	51
Los Angeles	California	410	350	178	0.2%	5,194	95.0	54	1	54
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	407	341	99	0.6%	5,122	59.4	27	1	27
Saint Paul	Minnesota	447	381	111	0.6%	5,027	56.2	30	1	30
Detroit	Michigan	209	159	68	0.7%	4,321	51.3	25	1	25
Cleveland	Ohio	289	232	79	0.6%	4,290	61.4	29	1	29
Atlanta	Georgia	411	359	133	0.4%	3,800	80.2	34	1	34
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	269	222	99	0.5%	3,709	72.6	29	1	29
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	297	243	131	0.2%	3,686	94.7	45	1	45
Brooklyn	New York	281	234	159	0.1%	3,409	98.3	21	1	21
Dayton	Ohio	335	286	84	0.6%	3,108	55.7	27	1	27
Buffalo	New York	244	195	76	0.5%	2,987	68.1	28	1	28
Saint Petersburg	Florida	272	235	52	0.8%	2,901	38.1	16	1	16
Hialeah	Florida	186	152	42	0.8%	2,892	40.4	7	1	7
Hollywood	Florida	217	177	56	0.6%	2,688	60.3	9	1	9
Pompano Beach	Florida	281	235	64	0.7%	2,681	47.4	10	1	10
Memphis	Tennessee	228	167	92	0.4%	2,635	81.0	26	1	26
Bakersfield	California	174	145	73	0.4%	2,486	74.9	11	1	11
Baltimore	Maryland	225	182	86	0.4%	2,418	79.7	22	1	22
Denver	Colorado	410	357	173	0.2%	2,408	92.4	27	1	27
Newark	New Jersey	188	149	36	0.8%	2,348	35.2	9	1	9
Louisville	Kentucky	214	169	105	0.3%	2,324	88.6	32	1	32
Oakland	California	166	131	63	0.6%	2,287	63.6	14	1	14
Winston Salem	North Carolina	174	145	32	0.9%	2,248	33.4	9	1	9
Santa Ana	California	147	123	50	0.6%	2,222	56.7	6	1	6
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	304	244	130	0.3%	2,203	87.3	38	1	38
Laredo	Texas	168	141	35	0.8%	2,131	39.7	6	1	6
Salt Lake City	Utah	246	200	92	0.4%	2,073	78.0	19	1	19
West Palm Beach	Florida	226	190	67	0.5%	2,026	65.4	12	1	12
New Orleans	Louisiana	174	140	76	0.5%	2,022	71.6	19	1	19
Kissimmee	Florida	251	217	44	0.7%	2,011	51.6	6	1	6
Stockton	California	172	144	64	0.5%	1,997	65.7	12	1	12
Washington DC	District of Columbia	212	182	110	0.3%	1,965	90.0	28	1	28
Long Beach	California	160	132	77	0.4%	1,936	79.2	12	1	12
Jacksonville	Florida	249	216	112	0.2%	1,901	94.1	28	1	28
Sacramento	California	260	222	114	0.2%	1,893	93.5	26	1	26
Anaheim	California	154	125	67	0.5%	1,881	67.6	7	1	7
Silver Spring	Maryland	256	223	59	0.6%	1,812	64.1	7	1	7
Fontana	California	132	114	41	0.8%	1,786	43.3	3	1	3
Honolulu	Hawaii	156	136	72	0.4%	1,781	75.9	11	1	11
Trenton	New Jersey	221	187	41	0.8%	1,767	33.9	11	1	11
Tallahassee	Florida	175	134	52	0.6%	1,757	57.9	10	1	10
Fresno	California	164	133	89	0.3%	1,741	90.2	18	1	18
Alexandria	Virginia	240	204	82	0.5%	1,688	71.6	14	1	14
San Bernardino	California	162	129	46	0.7%	1,683	52.1	7	1	7
Houston	Texas	472	423	273	0.1%	1,658	99.6	16	1	16
Lawrenceville	Georgia	129	111	52	0.6%	1,658	53.8	4	1	4
Riverside	California	142	119	72	0.4%	1,658	74.6	7	1	7
Reading	Pennsylvania	161	134	43	0.8%	1,649	42.2	10	1	10
Birmingham	Alabama	221	176	103	0.3%	1,623	90.5	30	1	30
Akron	Ohio	169	131	59	0.6%	1,622	58.8	17	1	17
New York City	New York	280	238	177	0.1%	1,613	99.6	23	1	23
Homestead	Florida	187	161	33	0.9%	1,608	32.3	7	1	7
Corpus Christi	Texas	177	136	62	0.5%	1,606	70.7	18	1	18
Lake Worth	Florida	233	195	47	0.8%	1,604	45.0	5	1	5
Staten Island	New York	155	128	82	0.3%	1,597	85.0	12	1	12
Fort Wayne	Indiana	165	135	63	0.5%	1,594	68.8	16	1	16
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	159	136	47	0.8%	1,584	40.8	6	1	6
Corona	California	139	114	53	0.6%	1,577	57.8	5	1	5
Brownsville	Texas	133	110	35	0.8%	1,570	41.7	3	1	3
Tacoma	Washington	268	221	80	0.5%	1,517	69.9	20	1	20
Moreno Valley	California	135	111	35	0.7%	1,512	45.0	4	1	4
Lubbock	Texas	180	145	60	0.5%	1,510	64.1	14	1	14
Wichita	Kansas	179	143	88	0.4%	1,510	84.0	26	1	26
Norfolk	Virginia	166	137	51	0.6%	1,505	57.9	14	1	14
Jersey City	New Jersey	146	120	61	0.6%	1,502	62.0	7	1	7
Woodbridge	Virginia	157	133	42	0.7%	1,499	48.3	3	1	3
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	294	247	136	0.2%	1,494	95.0	19	1	19
Rochester	New York	216	177	97	0.3%	1,481	88.8	24	1	24
Toledo	Ohio	167	131	67	0.5%	1,472	71.3	15	1	15
Littleton	Colorado	337	296	82	0.4%	1,439	75.3	9	1	9
Garden Grove	California	149	120	36	0.8%	1,420	38.6	5	1	5
Lakeland	Florida	176	148	58	0.6%	1,420	63.3	9	1	9
Omaha	Nebraska	195	165	109	0.3%	1,413	92.7	30	1	30
Youngstown	Ohio	183	153	33	0.9%	1,407	30.3	12	1	12
Oxnard	California	130	107	49	0.6%	1,393	56.0	4	1	4
Providence	Rhode Island	178	139	48	0.7%	1,374	52.4	8	1	8
Mobile	Alabama	212	170	76	0.5%	1,372	69.2	18	1	18
Naples	Florida	217	186	77	0.4%	1,371	74.1	14	1	14
Hayward	California	128	100	45	0.7%	1,357	48.5	4	1	4
Salem	Oregon	137	106	62	0.5%	1,357	67.7	7	1	7
Pensacola	Florida	192	151	63	0.5%	1,351	66.5	13	1	13
Richmond	Virginia	180	141	97	0.3%	1,350	84.5	15	1	15
Albuquerque	New Mexico	186	155	108	0.2%	1,330	96.6	15	1	15
Ontario	California	124	101	41	0.7%	1,322	44.0	3	1	3
Amarillo	Texas	179	145	54	0.6%	1,320	60.7	14	1	14
Montgomery	Alabama	212	176	51	0.6%	1,310	56.8	13	1	13
Aurora	Colorado	141	120	85	0.3%	1,309	88.6	11	1	11
Tampa	Florida	238	208	114	0.2%	1,306	95.3	13	1	13
Lexington	Kentucky	151	122	77	0.4%	1,302	78.3	15	1	15
Knoxville	Tennessee	178	143	84	0.3%	1,297	85.5	17	1	17
Fayetteville	North Carolina	161	134	59	0.5%	1,292	66.3	8	1	8
Whittier	California	238	204	45	0.7%	1,286	54.3	6	1	6
Pomona	California	133	110	35	0.8%	1,280	37.7	3	1	3
Jamaica	New York	141	115	65	0.5%	1,274	67.7	6	1	6
Chesapeake	Virginia	136	116	63	0.5%	1,273	66.7	6	1	6
Oceanside	California	141	118	51	0.6%	1,269	55.5	4	1	4
Salinas	California	154	124	46	0.7%	1,267	50.8	5	1	5
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	225	188	87	0.3%	1,265	81.6	18	1	18
Madison	Wisconsin	156	131	72	0.4%	1,264	76.0	14	1	14
Compton	California	133	111	26	0.9%	1,254	28.7	3	1	3
Wilmington	Delaware	192	154	63	0.6%	1,251	65.9	10	1	10
Yonkers	New York	147	124	47	0.7%	1,240	51.2	5	1	5
Paterson	New Jersey	155	128	30	0.8%	1,238	34.3	9	1	9
Savannah	Georgia	149	120	64	0.5%	1,238	68.8	10	1	10
Lancaster	California	135	113	48	0.7%	1,234	52.7	3	1	3
Shreveport	Louisiana	155	124	61	0.6%	1,231	63.9	12	1	12
Indianapolis	Indiana	317	274	142	0.1%	1,226	96.4	22	1	22
Marietta	Georgia	176	153	85	0.4%	1,222	79.7	7	1	7
Yuma	Arizona	128	100	29	0.8%	1,211	35.7	3	1	3
Modesto	California	136	119	67	0.5%	1,208	73.4	7	1	7
Grand Prairie	Texas	136	117	53	0.6%	1,205	55.5	4	1	4
Palmdale	California	150	127	42	0.7%	1,202	50.8	4	1	4
Alpharetta	Georgia	183	159	50	0.6%	1,192	61.3	4	1	4
Arlington	Texas	144	120	92	0.3%	1,189	89.0	12	1	12
Erie	Pennsylvania	158	126	50	0.6%	1,183	54.7	13	1	13
Garland	Texas	125	110	68	0.5%	1,175	69.4	5	1	5
Edinburg	Texas	136	115	40	0.7%	1,165	44.7	3	1	3
Ocala	Florida	173	142	64	0.5%	1,165	67.2	11	1	11
Bradenton	Florida	190	162	78	0.5%	1,163	67.6	10	1	10
Greensboro	North Carolina	161	131	80	0.4%	1,161	83.6	9	1	9
Mission	Texas	128	106	52	0.6%	1,159	55.0	3	1	3
Odessa	Texas	159	136	41	0.7%	1,146	47.3	6	1	6
Cincinnati	Ohio	205	166	134	0.1%	1,144	100.0	31	1	31
Santa Maria	California	145	123	33	0.8%	1,141	39.0	3	1	3
Escondido	California	126	106	49	0.6%	1,136	55.8	4	1	4
Cape Coral	Florida	144	119	51	0.6%	1,123	56.7	6	1	6
Macon	Georgia	179	148	45	0.7%	1,123	50.7	9	1	9
Schenectady	New York	175	144	43	0.7%	1,114	50.3	8	1	8
Bridgeport	Connecticut	160	136	41	0.8%	1,110	42.3	6	1	6
Hamilton	Ohio	138	116	35	0.8%	1,109	37.0	3	1	3
Flushing	New York	129	106	61	0.5%	1,108	67.3	4	1	4
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	162	130	50	0.7%	1,105	53.8	9	1	9
Henrico	Virginia	222	182	60	0.6%	1,100	60.6	7	1	7
Manassas	Virginia	183	157	45	0.7%	1,096	45.5	4	1	4
York	Pennsylvania	145	119	49	0.6%	1,088	57.6	7	1	7
Reno	Nevada	165	135	78	0.4%	1,085	82.9	12	1	12
Topeka	Kansas	190	154	60	0.7%	1,081	53.4	18	1	18
Olympia	Washington	192	166	54	0.6%	1,071	60.0	6	1	6
Perris	California	125	103	22	0.9%	1,068	28.0	2	1	2
Sarasota	Florida	194	168	80	0.4%	1,068	74.4	13	1	13
Kent	Washington	148	127	51	0.7%	1,063	52.8	4	1	4
Flint	Michigan	169	140	48	0.7%	1,059	50.4	7	1	7
Syracuse	New York	156	121	71	0.5%	1,055	72.7	15	1	15
Stone Mountain	Georgia	171	145	29	0.8%	1,055	35.7	3	1	3
Clearwater	Florida	202	166	68	0.6%	1,054	60.6	9	1	9
Killeen	Texas	142	115	40	0.7%	1,052	50.0	4	1	4
Visalia	California	133	108	44	0.7%	1,052	49.7	3	1	3
Lincoln	Nebraska	161	138	77	0.4%	1,049	81.5	22	1	22
Evansville	Indiana	153	125	57	0.6%	1,048	62.2	9	1	9
Gainesville	Florida	150	125	59	0.5%	1,046	67.5	10	1	10
Augusta	Georgia	144	109	65	0.5%	1,045	71.3	8	1	8
Pueblo	Colorado	188	152	46	0.7%	1,042	55.1	7	1	7
Lehigh Acres	Florida	180	153	26	0.9%	1,039	30.2	6	1	6
Newport News	Virginia	147	92	62	0.6%	1,017	62.0	7	1	7
Ogden	Utah	136	111	60	0.5%	1,016	69.0	5	1	5
Tempe	Arizona	127	103	60	0.5%	1,016	66.0	4	1	4
Saint Charles	Missouri	141	120	44	0.7%	1,015	46.7	3	1	3
Roanoke	Virginia	174	140	54	0.6%	1,014	57.0	10	1	10
Eugene	Oregon	150	123	64	0.5%	1,009	69.8	6	1	6
Spokane	Washington	188	161	98	0.3%	1,002	92.6	13	1	13
Jackson	Mississippi	175	142	55	0.6%	1,002	59.9	11	1	11
San Mateo	California	173	141	41	0.7%	998	49.8	4	1	4
Kalamazoo	Michigan	150	124	54	0.6%	993	58.9	7	1	7
Las Cruces	New Mexico	188	155	46	0.7%	991	51.6	7	1	7
Puyallup	Washington	168	137	41	0.7%	991	52.2	5	1	5
Springfield	Missouri	147	119	77	0.4%	988	76.0	7	1	7
New Haven	Connecticut	139	113	35	0.8%	985	42.8	5	1	5
Norwalk	California	97	79	23	0.9%	985	26.0	1	1	1
Beaverton	Oregon	135	113	61	0.5%	982	68.5	4	1	4
Rockford	Illinois	144	119	58	0.5%	970	65.4	9	1	9
Chula Vista	California	127	106	78	0.4%	968	81.2	5	1	5
Irving	Texas	136	116	75	0.4%	968	79.2	6	1	6
Lake Charles	Louisiana	159	130	38	0.7%	968	44.8	5	1	5
Fairfax	Virginia	207	184	52	0.6%	957	58.3	4	1	4
Hemet	California	135	113	36	0.7%	956	44.7	3	1	3
Chattanooga	Tennessee	200	159	81	0.5%	954	75.1	15	1	15
West Valley City	Utah	122	100	41	0.7%	954	47.3	3	1	3
Rialto	California	135	110	27	0.9%	952	29.0	2	1	2
Racine	Wisconsin	156	132	37	0.8%	948	44.2	5	1	5
Clarksville	Tennessee	121	100	58	0.5%	946	65.0	3	1	3
Midland	Texas	138	119	56	0.6%	943	60.0	5	1	5
Inglewood	California	214	187	37	0.7%	940	50.2	5	1	5
South Bend	Indiana	157	125	47	0.6%	940	54.9	10	1	10
Fredericksburg	Virginia	143	121	62	0.5%	935	65.0	5	1	5
Lithonia	Georgia	128	108	23	1.0%	931	22.5	2	1	2
Victorville	California	109	91	44	0.7%	927	51.0	3	1	3
Fremont	California	126	111	76	0.4%	925	79.3	4	1	4
Glendale	Arizona	233	210	101	0.3%	923	88.4	7	1	7
Mcallen	Texas	125	105	50	0.6%	919	54.3	3	1	3
Vallejo	California	140	113	38	0.7%	917	45.8	4	1	4
Conroe	Texas	201	178	62	0.6%	913	61.9	7	1	7
Denton	Texas	147	119	58	0.6%	912	61.7	6	1	6
Beaumont	Texas	155	123	51	0.6%	909	57.8	8	1	8
Charleston	South Carolina	190	160	73	0.5%	908	71.9	10	1	10
Yakima	Washington	144	118	44	0.7%	908	47.8	4	1	4
Rockville	Maryland	201	175	46	0.6%	907	58.3	4	1	4
Cumming	Georgia	123	104	57	0.6%	902	62.7	3	1	3
Olathe	Kansas	112	98	55	0.6%	900	56.5	2	1	2
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	147	120	64	0.5%	900	69.7	9	1	9
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	80	25	0.9%	897	30.0	1	1	1
Des Moines	Iowa	159	135	73	0.4%	894	78.8	11	1	11
Warren	Michigan	142	123	53	0.7%	893	53.2	5	1	5
Columbia	South Carolina	148	122	97	0.3%	892	94.2	14	1	14
Durham	North Carolina	144	119	88	0.3%	886	89.3	8	1	8
Berkeley	California	208	164	52	0.7%	881	48.7	9	1	9
Hawthorne	California	100	84	25	0.9%	881	28.0	1	1	1
Arvada	Colorado	149	125	50	0.7%	880	52.6	5	1	5
Bloomington	Indiana	138	118	47	0.7%	880	53.2	6	1	6
Madera	California	184	159	34	0.9%	880	44.0	3	1	3
Downey	California	130	108	37	0.8%	879	41.0	3	1	3
Panama City	Florida	165	135	44	0.7%	877	48.5	6	1	6
Muskegon	Michigan	143	118	45	0.7%	876	50.8	5	1	5
Fort Myers	Florida	194	161	86	0.3%	873	80.8	11	1	11
Elizabeth	New Jersey	139	118	26	0.9%	873	32.0	3	1	3
Lafayette	Louisiana	141	117	55	0.5%	873	64.2	5	1	5
Billings	Montana	138	114	50	0.6%	872	55.3	4	1	4
Fort Collins	Colorado	130	112	66	0.4%	871	73.8	5	1	5
Huntington Beach	California	132	109	69	0.4%	871	75.3	4	1	4
Worcester	Massachusetts	147	123	69	0.5%	870	71.9	9	1	9
Boynton Beach	Florida	142	119	67	0.5%	866	70.5	6	1	6
South Gate	California	99	86	27	0.9%	865	28.0	1	1	1
Hesperia	California	112	96	30	0.8%	864	35.5	2	1	2
Green Bay	Wisconsin	164	136	68	0.5%	862	65.4	7	1	7
Saginaw	Michigan	155	123	50	0.7%	862	53.4	7	1	7
Menifee	California	154	132	40	0.8%	859	41.0	4	1	4
Summerville	South Carolina	114	102	49	0.6%	858	57.5	2	1	2
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	122	105	70	0.5%	857	73.4	5	1	5
Rancho Cucamonga	California	131	109	69	0.5%	857	69.5	4	1	4
Pittsburg	California	100	78	26	0.9%	855	30.0	1	1	1
Fullerton	California	131	109	55	0.6%	854	57.8	4	1	4
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	135	109	54	0.6%	851	61.0	5	1	5
Hampton	Virginia	149	108	54	0.6%	850	57.8	6	1	6
Canton	Ohio	145	113	60	0.6%	844	61.9	12	1	12
Duluth	Minnesota	192	159	41	0.7%	843	48.4	11	1	11
Tulsa	Oklahoma	188	161	106	0.2%	843	97.4	26	1	26
Athens	Georgia	146	121	48	0.7%	840	51.8	6	1	6
Indio	California	130	105	26	0.9%	839	32.0	2	1	2
Spring Hill	Florida	148	124	45	0.7%	839	51.2	5	1	5
Auburn	Washington	139	124	39	0.7%	838	45.0	3	1	3
Lansing	Michigan	134	111	66	0.5%	838	67.7	7	1	7
Mesquite	Texas	118	97	56	0.6%	837	62.3	3	1	3
Everett	Washington	130	109	63	0.5%	836	69.6	5	1	5
Murrieta	California	117	97	53	0.6%	834	56.0	2	1	2
Bowling Green	Kentucky	135	107	38	0.7%	830	47.0	4	1	4
Abilene	Texas	163	133	45	0.6%	829	56.5	6	1	6
Pasadena	California	148	128	60	0.5%	829	66.2	6	1	6
Milton	Florida	121	98	27	0.9%	824	32.0	3	1	3
Peoria	Arizona	130	106	61	0.5%	820	71.3	4	1	4
Fort Pierce	Florida	193	164	32	0.9%	816	33.6	8	1	8
El Monte	California	113	92	29	0.9%	813	33.5	2	1	2
Vancouver	Washington	152	125	91	0.2%	812	93.8	11	1	11
O Fallon	Missouri	118	103	29	0.8%	811	35.0	2	1	2
Ventura	California	131	108	44	0.7%	811	48.7	3	1	3
Falls Church	Virginia	279	249	53	0.7%	810	57.0	5	1	5
Joliet	Illinois	139	111	52	0.6%	810	55.6	5	1	5
Merced	California	134	111	36	0.8%	810	40.3	3	1	3
New Port Richey	Florida	151	122	41	0.7%	810	52.5	4	1	4
Deltona	Florida	120	100	28	0.9%	807	33.0	2	1	2
Antioch	California	117	97	43	0.7%	806	46.0	2	1	2
Greeley	Colorado	115	96	42	0.7%	804	48.5	2	1	2
Nampa	Idaho	135	116	43	0.7%	804	49.7	3	1	3
Cambridge	Massachusetts	157	127	48	0.7%	803	50.6	5	1	5
Apopka	Florida	116	92	29	0.8%	801	37.0	2	1	2
Florissant	Missouri	147	125	35	0.7%	801	44.0	3	1	3
Little Rock	Arkansas	147	120	76	0.4%	801	82.5	12	1	12
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	129	102	50	0.6%	799	57.7	3	1	3
Independence	Missouri	169	148	49	0.6%	799	53.8	8	1	8
Lowell	Massachusetts	146	114	43	0.7%	797	46.8	4	1	4
Palm Bay	Florida	141	116	39	0.7%	795	48.8	4	1	4
Santa Clara	California	126	102	47	0.6%	795	56.5	4	1	4
Tracy	California	171	148	47	0.7%	795	47.5	4	1	4
San Angelo	Texas	151	125	38	0.7%	793	47.3	4	1	4
Elk Grove	California	127	112	68	0.4%	792	75.0	3	1	3
Mckinney	Texas	113	99	71	0.4%	792	76.3	3	1	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	202	176	51	0.6%	792	61.4	5	1	5
Provo	Utah	135	111	44	0.7%	791	51.3	3	1	3
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	133	105	49	0.6%	790	54.5	4	1	4
Hartford	Connecticut	146	119	54	0.6%	789	54.7	6	1	6
San Leandro	California	128	108	43	0.7%	789	47.0	3	1	3
Longmont	Colorado	132	114	49	0.6%	788	59.0	3	1	3
Waterbury	Connecticut	172	146	39	0.7%	788	45.7	6	1	6
Grand Rapids	Michigan	159	125	97	0.2%	787	97.9	12	1	12
Tucson	Arizona	260	213	142	0.1%	787	93.2	9	1	9
Melbourne	Florida	131	110	65	0.5%	786	68.4	5	1	5
Gaithersburg	Maryland	132	109	57	0.5%	785	64.4	5	1	5
Valdosta	Georgia	151	116	34	0.8%	782	36.6	5	1	5
Santa Fe	New Mexico	150	124	49	0.6%	779	57.6	5	1	5
Lewisville	Texas	126	107	50	0.7%	778	52.3	3	1	3
Clovis	California	150	131	47	0.6%	778	55.3	3	1	3
Simi Valley	California	117	96	54	0.6%	778	59.0	2	1	2
Fairfield	California	110	91	48	0.7%	776	50.5	2	1	2
Allentown	Pennsylvania	135	113	68	0.5%	774	74.3	7	1	7
Huntsville	Alabama	151	127	76	0.4%	771	80.0	11	1	11
Kenosha	Wisconsin	149	127	49	0.7%	771	50.8	4	1	4
Sterling Heights	Michigan	122	100	52	0.6%	771	61.0	4	1	4
Ann Arbor	Michigan	140	117	65	0.5%	767	72.8	5	1	5
Surprise	Arizona	135	111	52	0.6%	767	61.5	4	1	4
Douglasville	Georgia	120	102	43	0.7%	765	50.5	2	1	2
Albany	New York	193	159	69	0.5%	764	67.3	11	1	11
Vacaville	California	119	99	43	0.7%	764	47.0	2	1	2
Chico	California	138	110	45	0.7%	760	51.0	3	1	3
Portsmouth	Virginia	145	118	36	0.8%	760	39.4	7	1	7
Scranton	Pennsylvania	181	150	41	0.8%	757	42.4	8	1	8
Costa Mesa	California	116	97	45	0.7%	756	52.5	2	1	2
Waukegan	Illinois	129	111	39	0.8%	755	40.5	2	1	2
New Bedford	Massachusetts	151	125	33	0.8%	754	39.0	4	1	4
Baytown	Texas	128	103	49	0.6%	753	55.0	3	1	3
Redding	California	165	134	49	0.7%	752	45.0	4	1	4
Irvine	California	142	126	90	0.3%	751	91.0	9	1	9
Waco	Texas	140	114	65	0.5%	750	72.8	9	1	9
Sandy	Utah	137	113	44	0.7%	749	51.0	4	1	4
Lynchburg	Virginia	184	149	47	0.7%	747	47.3	4	1	4
Lynn	Massachusetts	136	113	35	0.8%	745	39.3	4	1	4
Kansas City	Missouri	216	181	135	0.1%	741	99.6	30	1	30
Boston	Massachusetts	176	148	69	0.5%	734	71.1	14	1	14
Stamford	Connecticut	129	105	56	0.6%	734	61.8	6	1	6
Broomfield	Colorado	164	139	46	0.7%	732	49.7	3	1	3
Delray Beach	Florida	170	143	48	0.6%	731	58.2	5	1	5
Anchorage	Alaska	155	126	84	0.3%	731	87.0	12	1	12
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	144	117	61	0.5%	731	65.3	6	1	6
Mcdonough	Georgia	120	103	42	0.7%	731	46.5	2	1	2
West Jordan	Utah	125	105	54	0.6%	731	60.0	3	1	3
Redwood City	California	142	120	53	0.6%	730	55.0	4	1	4
Toms River	New Jersey	125	105	52	0.6%	729	59.3	3	1	3
Concord	California	127	106	54	0.6%	728	63.0	4	1	4
West Covina	California	119	102	49	0.7%	728	52.3	3	1	3
Rock Hill	South Carolina	131	113	48	0.6%	727	56.3	3	1	3
Gilbert	Arizona	134	116	82	0.3%	726	88.7	6	1	6
Torrance	California	209	178	79	0.4%	726	79.2	5	1	5
Ballwin	Missouri	119	104	39	0.8%	725	43.0	2	1	2
Norman	Oklahoma	132	107	54	0.6%	723	60.3	4	1	4
Miami Beach	Florida	179	158	51	0.6%	722	59.8	5	1	5
Largo	Florida	149	119	49	0.7%	721	52.0	5	1	5
Elgin	Illinois	126	103	56	0.6%	720	59.3	3	1	3
Terre Haute	Indiana	144	117	36	0.8%	719	42.5	6	1	6
Winter Haven	Florida	127	103	45	0.7%	718	52.0	3	1	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	159	129	43	0.7%	718	39.7	3	1	3
Midlothian	Virginia	137	116	37	0.7%	718	52.3	3	1	3
Orange	California	124	105	63	0.5%	718	70.0	5	1	5
Belleville	Illinois	130	109	39	0.8%	717	42.0	4	1	4
Chandler	Arizona	127	107	93	0.3%	716	91.8	6	1	6
Covington	Georgia	133	114	38	0.8%	714	41.5	2	1	2
Longview	Texas	161	137	43	0.7%	714	51.4	5	1	5
Clermont	Florida	169	142	38	0.7%	711	43.3	3	1	3
Appleton	Wisconsin	131	107	52	0.6%	708	61.0	4	1	4
Daytona Beach	Florida	155	128	42	0.7%	705	51.0	5	1	5
Springdale	Arkansas	112	95	42	0.7%	705	46.0	2	1	2
Lawrence	Kansas	140	113	41	0.7%	704	49.6	5	1	5
Brockton	Massachusetts	117	98	41	0.7%	703	45.0	2	1	2
Elkhart	Indiana	127	106	44	0.7%	703	48.3	3	1	3
Charlottesville	Virginia	144	118	55	0.6%	702	61.8	5	1	5
La Puente	California	175	153	55	0.6%	702	71.0	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	California	143	115	60	0.5%	700	67.0	7	1	7
Vero Beach	Florida	157	132	50	0.6%	698	57.7	6	1	6
High Point	North Carolina	133	108	55	0.6%	698	62.3	4	1	4
Gulfport	Mississippi	127	109	38	0.7%	697	46.3	3	1	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	132	108	45	0.7%	697	49.0	3	1	3
Santa Rosa	California	130	106	83	0.3%	697	87.0	6	1	6
College Station	Texas	117	97	56	0.6%	696	62.5	2	1	2
Davenport	Iowa	139	117	49	0.7%	696	52.5	6	1	6
Boulder	Colorado	143	115	66	0.5%	693	67.0	6	1	6
Franklin	Tennessee	123	103	50	0.6%	685	54.3	3	1	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	127	110	51	0.6%	684	56.7	3	1	3
Morgantown	West Virginia	124	97	45	0.7%	681	47.3	3	1	3
Champaign	Illinois	123	98	42	0.7%	680	47.3	3	1	3
Fargo	North Dakota	129	107	59	0.6%	680	64.0	4	1	4
Bend	Oregon	167	142	66	0.6%	678	56.7	3	1	3
Carrollton	Texas	116	98	62	0.5%	674	69.3	3	1	3
Laurel	Maryland	182	156	55	0.6%	674	58.5	4	1	4
Tyler	Texas	145	122	67	0.4%	674	74.3	9	1	9
Acworth	Georgia	111	97	42	0.7%	672	51.5	2	1	2
Newnan	Georgia	119	103	41	0.7%	671	47.5	2	1	2
Lees Summit	Missouri	171	150	47	0.7%	670	49.0	6	1	6
San Marcos	California	122	107	46	0.7%	669	52.5	2	1	2
Spartanburg	South Carolina	143	121	52	0.6%	669	58.4	5	1	5
Carlsbad	California	131	113	55	0.6%	667	60.0	4	1	4
Nashville	Tennessee	215	179	118	0.1%	667	95.8	11	1	11
Bellingham	Washington	132	109	60	0.5%	666	66.3	3	1	3
Kennesaw	Georgia	120	104	47	0.7%	666	51.5	2	1	2
Cypress	Texas	113	98	73	0.4%	665	80.0	2	1	2
Astoria	New York	181	153	66	0.5%	664	73.0	4	1	4
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	132	111	61	0.5%	664	66.3	4	1	4
Kennewick	Washington	133	110	48	0.7%	664	51.7	3	1	3
Anderson	South Carolina	143	120	43	0.7%	663	51.5	4	1	4
Plainfield	Illinois	163	137	40	0.7%	662	50.0	3	1	3
Temecula	California	129	111	61	0.5%	661	66.7	3	1	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	170	140	44	0.7%	659	52.0	7	1	7
Buford	Georgia	112	98	48	0.7%	657	52.5	2	1	2
Palo Alto	California	136	112	51	0.7%	655	54.0	4	1	4
Hillsboro	Oregon	112	96	50	0.6%	653	55.5	2	1	2
Manchester	New Hampshire	129	103	59	0.6%	653	63.0	5	1	5
Muncie	Indiana	148	126	41	0.7%	650	49.8	5	1	5
Orem	Utah	123	105	48	0.6%	650	54.3	3	1	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	131	108	48	0.7%	650	51.3	3	1	3
Bryan	Texas	150	132	45	0.7%	646	50.6	5	1	5
El Paso	Texas	245	197	125	0.1%	644	92.2	9	1	9
Cary	North Carolina	120	107	75	0.4%	639	78.3	4	1	4
Johnson City	Tennessee	127	104	46	0.7%	638	53.0	4	1	4
Metairie	Louisiana	124	96	67	0.4%	637	74.8	5	1	5
Missoula	Montana	153	126	49	0.7%	637	53.8	5	1	5
Overland Park	Kansas	145	126	85	0.3%	636	84.4	9	1	9
Annapolis	Maryland	168	140	40	0.7%	635	51.2	5	1	5
Napa	California	114	92	47	0.7%	635	55.0	2	1	2
Gastonia	North Carolina	120	100	53	0.6%	635	59.7	3	1	3
Grand Junction	Colorado	153	125	50	0.6%	630	59.5	6	1	6
Decatur	Georgia	205	179	93	0.3%	629	79.6	5	1	5
Livermore	California	115	97	44	0.7%	628	54.0	2	1	2
Edison	New Jersey	128	109	51	0.6%	627	57.3	3	1	3
Frederick	Maryland	121	100	64	0.5%	627	71.5	4	1	4
Vista	California	114	102	60	0.5%	626	67.0	3	1	3
Burbank	California	133	114	56	0.6%	619	61.2	5	1	5
Idaho Falls	Idaho	130	112	53	0.6%	609	63.0	4	1	4
Greenville	South Carolina	151	129	86	0.3%	607	91.2	9	1	9
Holland	Michigan	111	94	48	0.6%	607	54.5	2	1	2
Parker	Colorado	119	102	51	0.6%	605	58.5	2	1	2
Ashburn	Virginia	111	97	60	0.5%	602	65.0	2	1	2
Woodstock	Georgia	113	98	54	0.6%	600	60.0	2	1	2
New Braunfels	Texas	117	101	53	0.6%	599	60.5	2	1	2
Rapid City	South Dakota	122	101	49	0.6%	597	57.7	3	1	3
Renton	Washington	205	179	75	0.4%	597	72.8	4	1	4
Roswell	Georgia	117	97	51	0.6%	595	59.5	2	1	2
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	133	108	50	0.6%	591	59.3	3	1	3
Boca Raton	Florida	144	119	90	0.3%	590	93.0	9	1	9
Daly City	California	179	154	43	0.5%	587	71.5	2	1	2
Chino	California	112	97	53	0.6%	587	56.0	2	1	2
Sunnyvale	California	198	177	76	0.4%	584	80.0	3	1	3
Santa Cruz	California	121	96	60	0.6%	582	61.8	4	1	4
Jupiter	Florida	130	106	52	0.6%	570	61.3	4	1	4
Bowie	Maryland	206	178	53	0.6%	568	62.0	4	1	4
Orlando	Florida	296	249	159	0.1%	562	97.4	4	1	4
Hyattsville	Maryland	151	133	86	0.4%	560	84.0	5	1	5
Herndon	Virginia	142	120	49	0.6%	559	59.0	2	1	2
Boise	Idaho	155	137	98	0.2%	559	93.6	8	1	8
Naperville	Illinois	120	97	81	0.3%	559	85.3	4	1	4
Richardson	Texas	127	113	64	0.5%	559	69.7	3	1	3
Quincy	Massachusetts	130	105	55	0.6%	555	58.0	3	1	3
Asheville	North Carolina	127	110	73	0.4%	545	78.0	5	1	5
Allen	Texas	109	95	62	0.5%	543	71.0	2	1	2
Ridgewood	New York	100	83	67	0.5%	523	70.0	1	1	1
Livonia	Michigan	118	101	58	0.5%	520	64.0	3	1	3
Santa Monica	California	136	117	59	0.5%	518	64.0	5	1	5
Sparks	Nevada	159	133	69	0.4%	518	78.8	4	1	4
Virginia Beach	Virginia	156	132	112	0.1%	518	98.7	7	1	7
Mission Viejo	California	111	93	61	0.5%	516	66.5	2	1	2
Dearborn	Michigan	125	101	61	0.5%	515	65.8	4	1	4
Medford	Oregon	113	90	57	0.6%	513	64.0	2	1	2
Spring	Texas	254	230	158	0.1%	510	89.1	3	1	3
Round Rock	Texas	187	168	83	0.3%	502	82.7	2	1	2
Federal Way	Washington	115	96	66	0.5%	496	69.5	2	1	2
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	147	121	62	0.5%	485	71.0	2	1	2
Riverview	Florida	179	158	62	0.4%	479	71.7	3	1	3
Frisco	Texas	116	101	88	0.3%	473	91.0	2	1	2
Meridian	Idaho	117	99	67	0.4%	463	74.5	2	1	2
Coral Springs	Florida	114	94	65	0.5%	455	72.0	2	1	2
Ypsilanti	Michigan	109	91	73	0.4%	453	75.0	2	1	2
Bothell	Washington	199	170	87	0.3%	447	66.3	2	1	2
Roseville	California	121	111	86	0.3%	427	89.0	3	1	3
Elmhurst	New York	99	80	70	0.5%	423	74.0	1	1	1
Englewood	Colorado	246	216	78	0.4%	417	77.5	3	1	3
Bellevue	Washington	122	104	88	0.3%	404	91.8	5	1	5
San Diego	California	401	356	242	0.0%	402	95.8	4	1	4
Columbus	Ohio	241	204	157	0.0%	396	97.2	2	1	2
Pearland	Texas	170	154	101	0.3%	387	88.0	1	1	1
Mesa	Arizona	166	148	120	0.1%	387	98.5	4	1	4
El Cajon	California	189	166	126	0.2%	370	86.0	1	1	1
Edmond	Oklahoma	184	160	118	0.2%	369	88.0	3	1	3
Sugar Land	Texas	188	165	126	0.2%	361	92.7	2	1	2
Lynnwood	Washington	183	160	87	0.3%	340	80.3	2	1	2
Plano	Texas	137	118	113	0.1%	328	101.1	4	1	4
Colorado Springs	Colorado	254	221	139	0.1%	312	96.5	6	1	6
San Francisco	California	222	191	157	0.0%	301	100.7	9	1	9
North Las Vegas	Nevada	175	147	115	0.1%	293	93.3	4	1	4
Dallas	Texas	315	278	213	0.0%	277	99.7	1	1	1
North Hollywood	California	128	113	106	0.2%	258	96.3	3	1	3
Missouri City	Texas	169	146	115	0.2%	241	77.0	1	1	1
Seattle	Washington	295	254	200	0.0%	237	99.3	2	1	2
Sylmar	California	101	86	93	0.2%	232	95.0	1	1	1
Portland	Oregon	224	194	174	0.0%	228	100.3	3	1	3
Bell Gardens	California	102	88	97	0.2%	215	98.0	1	1	1
Keller	Texas	166	144	129	0.2%	213	83.0	1	1	1
Fort Worth	Texas	223	188	184	0.0%	196	100.4	3	1	3
Chicago	Illinois	313	270	282	0.0%	153	100.9	1	1	1
Austin	Texas	264	237	226	0.0%	130	100.6	2	1	2
Scottsdale	Arizona	228	204	198	0.0%	129	99.7	3	1	3
Van Nuys	California	141	125	134	0.1%	105	100.8	1	1	1
Las Vegas	Nevada	265	234	242	0.0%	103	101.0	2	1	2
San Antonio	Texas	288	251	255	0.0%	99	100.9	2	1	2
Phoenix	Arizona	231	197	223	0.0%	71	101.0	1	1	1
Raleigh	North Carolina	166	146	164	0.0%	21	101.1	1	1	1

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	410	350	178	0.2%	5,194	95.0	54	1	54
Bakersfield	174	145	73	0.4%	2,486	74.9	11	1	11
Oakland	166	131	63	0.6%	2,287	63.6	14	1	14
Santa Ana	147	123	50	0.6%	2,222	56.7	6	1	6
Stockton	172	144	64	0.5%	1,997	65.7	12	1	12
Long Beach	160	132	77	0.4%	1,936	79.2	12	1	12
Sacramento	260	222	114	0.2%	1,893	93.5	26	1	26
Anaheim	154	125	67	0.5%	1,881	67.6	7	1	7
Fontana	132	114	41	0.8%	1,786	43.3	3	1	3
Fresno	164	133	89	0.3%	1,741	90.2	18	1	18
San Bernardino	162	129	46	0.7%	1,683	52.1	7	1	7
Riverside	142	119	72	0.4%	1,658	74.6	7	1	7
Corona	139	114	53	0.6%	1,577	57.8	5	1	5
Moreno Valley	135	111	35	0.7%	1,512	45.0	4	1	4
Garden Grove	149	120	36	0.8%	1,420	38.6	5	1	5
Oxnard	130	107	49	0.6%	1,393	56.0	4	1	4
Hayward	128	100	45	0.7%	1,357	48.5	4	1	4
Ontario	124	101	41	0.7%	1,322	44.0	3	1	3
Whittier	238	204	45	0.7%	1,286	54.3	6	1	6
Pomona	133	110	35	0.8%	1,280	37.7	3	1	3
Oceanside	141	118	51	0.6%	1,269	55.5	4	1	4
Salinas	154	124	46	0.7%	1,267	50.8	5	1	5
Compton	133	111	26	0.9%	1,254	28.7	3	1	3
Lancaster	135	113	48	0.7%	1,234	52.7	3	1	3
Modesto	136	119	67	0.5%	1,208	73.4	7	1	7
Palmdale	150	127	42	0.7%	1,202	50.8	4	1	4
Santa Maria	145	123	33	0.8%	1,141	39.0	3	1	3
Escondido	126	106	49	0.6%	1,136	55.8	4	1	4
Perris	125	103	22	0.9%	1,068	28.0	2	1	2
Visalia	133	108	44	0.7%	1,052	49.7	3	1	3
San Mateo	173	141	41	0.7%	998	49.8	4	1	4
Norwalk	97	79	23	0.9%	985	26.0	1	1	1
Chula Vista	127	106	78	0.4%	968	81.2	5	1	5
Hemet	135	113	36	0.7%	956	44.7	3	1	3
Rialto	135	110	27	0.9%	952	29.0	2	1	2
Inglewood	214	187	37	0.7%	940	50.2	5	1	5
Victorville	109	91	44	0.7%	927	51.0	3	1	3
Fremont	126	111	76	0.4%	925	79.3	4	1	4
Vallejo	140	113	38	0.7%	917	45.8	4	1	4
Berkeley	208	164	52	0.7%	881	48.7	9	1	9
Hawthorne	100	84	25	0.9%	881	28.0	1	1	1
Madera	184	159	34	0.9%	880	44.0	3	1	3
Downey	130	108	37	0.8%	879	41.0	3	1	3
Huntington Beach	132	109	69	0.4%	871	75.3	4	1	4
South Gate	99	86	27	0.9%	865	28.0	1	1	1
Hesperia	112	96	30	0.8%	864	35.5	2	1	2
Menifee	154	132	40	0.8%	859	41.0	4	1	4
Rancho Cucamonga	131	109	69	0.5%	857	69.5	4	1	4
Pittsburg	100	78	26	0.9%	855	30.0	1	1	1
Fullerton	131	109	55	0.6%	854	57.8	4	1	4
Indio	130	105	26	0.9%	839	32.0	2	1	2
Murrieta	117	97	53	0.6%	834	56.0	2	1	2
Pasadena	148	128	60	0.5%	829	66.2	6	1	6
El Monte	113	92	29	0.9%	813	33.5	2	1	2
Ventura	131	108	44	0.7%	811	48.7	3	1	3
Merced	134	111	36	0.8%	810	40.3	3	1	3
Antioch	117	97	43	0.7%	806	46.0	2	1	2
Santa Clara	126	102	47	0.6%	795	56.5	4	1	4
Tracy	171	148	47	0.7%	795	47.5	4	1	4
Elk Grove	127	112	68	0.4%	792	75.0	3	1	3
San Leandro	128	108	43	0.7%	789	47.0	3	1	3
Clovis	150	131	47	0.6%	778	55.3	3	1	3
Simi Valley	117	96	54	0.6%	778	59.0	2	1	2
Fairfield	110	91	48	0.7%	776	50.5	2	1	2
Vacaville	119	99	43	0.7%	764	47.0	2	1	2
Chico	138	110	45	0.7%	760	51.0	3	1	3
Costa Mesa	116	97	45	0.7%	756	52.5	2	1	2
Redding	165	134	49	0.7%	752	45.0	4	1	4
Irvine	142	126	90	0.3%	751	91.0	9	1	9
Redwood City	142	120	53	0.6%	730	55.0	4	1	4
Concord	127	106	54	0.6%	728	63.0	4	1	4
West Covina	119	102	49	0.7%	728	52.3	3	1	3
Torrance	209	178	79	0.4%	726	79.2	5	1	5
Orange	124	105	63	0.5%	718	70.0	5	1	5
La Puente	175	153	55	0.6%	702	71.0	2	1	2
Santa Barbara	143	115	60	0.5%	700	67.0	7	1	7
Santa Rosa	130	106	83	0.3%	697	87.0	6	1	6
San Marcos	122	107	46	0.7%	669	52.5	2	1	2
Carlsbad	131	113	55	0.6%	667	60.0	4	1	4
Temecula	129	111	61	0.5%	661	66.7	3	1	3
Palo Alto	136	112	51	0.7%	655	54.0	4	1	4
Napa	114	92	47	0.7%	635	55.0	2	1	2
Livermore	115	97	44	0.7%	628	54.0	2	1	2
Vista	114	102	60	0.5%	626	67.0	3	1	3
Burbank	133	114	56	0.6%	619	61.2	5	1	5
Daly City	179	154	43	0.5%	587	71.5	2	1	2
Chino	112	97	53	0.6%	587	56.0	2	1	2
Sunnyvale	198	177	76	0.4%	584	80.0	3	1	3
Santa Cruz	121	96	60	0.6%	582	61.8	4	1	4
Santa Monica	136	117	59	0.5%	518	64.0	5	1	5
Mission Viejo	111	93	61	0.5%	516	66.5	2	1	2
Roseville	121	111	86	0.3%	427	89.0	3	1	3
San Diego	401	356	242	0.0%	402	95.8	4	1	4
El Cajon	189	166	126	0.2%	370	86.0	1	1	1
San Francisco	222	191	157	0.0%	301	100.7	9	1	9
North Hollywood	128	113	106	0.2%	258	96.3	3	1	3
Sylmar	101	86	93	0.2%	232	95.0	1	1	1
Bell Gardens	102	88	97	0.2%	215	98.0	1	1	1
Van Nuys	141	125	134	0.1%	105	100.8	1	1	1

Bronx

ZIP	aetnadentaloffers.com	zocdoc.com	concerneddentalcare.com	gladdentalpc.com	yelp.com	bronx-ny-dentist.com
10458	58	4	5	6	7	8
10468	59	1	2	3	4	5
10469	63	4	5	6	8	7
10459	57	1	3	2	4	5
10457	67	4	5	6	8	2
10466	61	4	5	6	8	7
10455	63	4	5	6	8	7
10467	56	5	4	6	7	8
10472	65	4	5	6	8	7
10454	61	5	4	6	7	8
10463	62	5	7	8	6	10
10471	58	4	5	6	7	9
10461	63	4	5	6	7	9
10473	60	4	5	6	8	7
10464	62	4	5	6	7	9
10460	60	1	2	3	5	4
10451	64	4	5	2	7	8
10453	65	5	4	6	7	8
10462	60	5	4	6	7	8
10475	57	4	5	6	8	7
10465	57	4	5	6	7	9
10456	59	4	6	5	7	8
10474	59	4	5	6	7	8
10470	55	5	4	6	7	8
10452	61	4	5	6	7	8

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Aetnadentaloffers

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 54,836 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Aetnadentaloffers Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (dentist near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Aetnadentaloffers Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Aetnadentaloffers Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Aetnadentaloffers Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly