Adeccousa Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve adeccousa.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 3,999 Temp/Staffing Agencies In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

Adeccousa Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
Adeccousa Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World Adeccousa Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Houston
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	Adeccousa Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	7,540	3,999	1	65.1%	210,266,236	3.9	27,379	32,654	583	48,794	4,981	9,940	48,099
California	1,360	944	2	53.4%	20,893,051	4.9	1,166	1,740	54	2,150	196	355	1,988
Texas	1,240	931	1	64.1%	17,869,846	4.3	1,360	1,917	25	2,240	218	369	2,215
Florida	966	722	1	69.3%	14,277,889	4.0	446	975	33	1,337	149	269	1,329
New York	1,134	846	1	65.5%	12,843,397	3.3	1,491	1,756	61	3,419	421	931	3,368
Illinois	1,062	805	1	69.3%	8,883,356	3.7	1,247	1,382	27	1,830	213	400	1,830
Ohio	954	726	1	74.6%	8,686,785	3.4	976	1,188	54	2,134	230	519	2,134
Pennsylvania	1,029	812	1	64.4%	8,232,493	3.7	1,604	1,781	45	2,564	305	557	2,526
North Carolina	886	673	1	71.6%	7,273,405	3.6	683	802	30	1,300	147	288	1,300
Michigan	822	647	1	71.0%	7,064,908	3.7	833	976	34	1,545	142	323	1,519
New Jersey	755	605	1	71.8%	6,374,007	3.6	537	593	25	1,082	94	202	1,082
Georgia	875	662	1	59.0%	6,076,132	4.5	574	726	20	852	75	127	846
Virginia	851	651	1	67.9%	5,709,642	3.6	723	891	22	1,554	143	334	1,547
Indiana	1,061	837	1	74.0%	4,908,626	3.4	659	770	28	1,433	164	339	1,433
Arizona	651	501	1	69.9%	4,857,736	3.8	247	396	11	624	70	127	611
Massachusetts	727	584	1	67.6%	4,618,471	3.9	461	534	16	704	65	118	702
Tennessee	769	604	1	66.0%	4,386,693	4.0	514	622	13	779	64	139	778
Missouri	886	653	1	70.8%	4,309,563	3.8	887	1,017	12	1,430	135	235	1,429
Washington	732	581	2	55.9%	4,071,305	5.0	451	587	10	751	53	90	681
Maryland	666	536	1	66.4%	3,985,475	4.0	392	463	14	688	56	108	688
Wisconsin	762	586	1	63.2%	3,651,169	3.8	694	769	26	1,067	144	263	1,006
Colorado	794	603	1	60.2%	3,332,205	4.5	381	514	13	729	67	127	690
Minnesota	832	635	1	60.3%	3,330,707	4.2	777	878	7	1,165	98	201	1,114
Kentucky	744	581	1	73.1%	3,252,644	3.5	698	758	31	1,357	115	287	1,357
Alabama	717	569	1	62.3%	3,029,511	4.2	522	637	5	954	78	157	932
South Carolina	651	516	1	60.3%	2,990,016	4.4	347	422	9	530	53	85	524
Oklahoma	761	589	1	75.9%	2,972,709	3.5	557	646	9	1,004	125	237	1,004
Louisiana	708	573	1	61.3%	2,856,328	4.6	431	510	6	729	82	151	691
Connecticut	544	455	1	68.9%	2,468,412	3.9	234	279	13	408	44	80	408
Oregon	774	623	2	57.5%	2,345,911	4.6	355	414	6	455	34	54	453
Kansas	768	596	1	73.6%	2,141,253	3.4	616	692	14	1,154	113	260	1,154
Iowa	766	581	1	66.4%	2,078,941	3.9	890	933	6	1,096	115	210	1,085
Arkansas	689	555	1	65.7%	1,963,279	3.9	553	587	4	906	66	114	906
Mississippi	619	498	1	64.2%	1,918,171	4.2	384	418	6	437	51	62	430
Nevada	452	371	2	60.7%	1,774,768	4.4	92	168	5	199	17	37	198
Utah	556	454	1	58.2%	1,771,491	4.3	246	284	3	447	31	61	435
New Mexico	515	424	1	71.5%	1,493,049	3.7	327	361	7	513	49	78	513
West Virginia	574	470	1	79.1%	1,446,970	2.6	684	704	14	1,587	247	519	1,587
Nebraska	575	445	1	66.6%	1,269,434	4.2	524	581	7	809	78	125	809
Idaho	548	463	1	67.3%	1,135,525	4.1	251	273	5	390	29	54	389
Hawaii	336	289	2	78.2%	1,111,730	3.4	82	93	4	129	16	33	129
New Hampshire	487	418	1	75.8%	1,018,077	3.3	238	248	9	473	42	89	473
Maine	726	618	1	68.8%	917,039	3.9	421	425	6	657	46	86	655
Rhode Island	339	293	1	80.3%	848,491	2.9	64	77	4	160	23	45	160
Delaware	365	309	1	76.2%	723,906	3.6	52	66	4	108	11	20	108
Montana	528	435	1	65.9%	687,234	3.6	348	361	5	651	51	165	651
South Dakota	484	394	1	59.9%	517,280	4.1	359	370	4	698	41	143	691
Vermont	441	379	1	82.0%	512,462	2.9	250	254	9	525	65	158	525
Wyoming	459	371	1	80.8%	470,410	3.0	164	171	10	394	29	105	394
Alaska	529	386	1	58.6%	432,204	3.8	218	235	2	236	52	59	236
North Dakota	474	392	1	56.0%	420,900	4.4	367	381	1	381	29	45	381

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Houston	Texas	301	260	1	73.7%	2,348,601	3.6	96	1	96	13	13	96
Chicago	Illinois	235	205	2	66.2%	1,787,629	4.2	56	2	57	4	5	57
Miami	Florida	261	228	1	82.7%	1,553,499	2.8	55	4	83	21	30	83
San Antonio	Texas	240	205	2	76.9%	1,368,020	3.4	59	2	63	9	13	63
New York City	New York	202	179	2	74.4%	1,206,790	3.4	47	1	47	10	10	47
Phoenix	Arizona	217	197	1	75.4%	1,093,473	3.4	42	2	46	7	10	46
Bronx	New York	194	165	1	73.4%	1,058,552	3.6	25	1	25	3	3	25
Dallas	Texas	253	221	2	63.9%	889,854	4.5	48	2	48	0	12	48
San Diego	California	217	185	2	63.5%	855,155	4.7	36	3	39	0	6	39
Las Vegas	Nevada	229	196	3	54.6%	844,389	5.4	43	2	44	0	6	44
Tucson	Arizona	231	197	1	87.1%	788,072	2.2	32	3	51	13	24	51
Austin	Texas	230	205	1	71.5%	778,200	3.9	44	1	44	2	2	44
Denver	Colorado	233	200	1	68.5%	744,430	4.0	38	5	44	6	9	44
Indianapolis	Indiana	219	193	1	76.4%	727,000	3.3	37	3	44	7	11	44
Orlando	Florida	235	206	1	72.8%	724,748	3.6	32	3	35	3	5	35
Atlanta	Georgia	267	232	1	72.6%	718,059	3.8	39	3	42	6	6	42
Charlotte	North Carolina	208	177	1	77.7%	704,561	3.3	24	2	26	6	6	26
Saint Louis	Missouri	250	223	1	76.0%	697,550	3.4	45	4	52	7	11	52
El Paso	Texas	219	194	1	87.7%	692,189	2.8	24	3	29	10	11	29
Sacramento	California	204	178	1	81.1%	652,465	2.8	28	2	29	11	12	29
Jacksonville	Florida	199	172	1	74.2%	643,325	3.6	31	2	34	3	6	34
Cincinnati	Ohio	221	194	1	78.5%	631,124	3.3	45	3	56	7	14	56
Columbus	Ohio	202	178	1	74.5%	630,600	3.5	30	4	34	5	6	34
Fort Worth	Texas	216	193	2	68.8%	626,996	4.3	32	1	32	0	7	32
Tampa	Florida	208	189	1	75.7%	600,268	3.4	27	3	35	2	8	35
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	250	222	1	71.3%	592,655	4.0	27	4	41	1	3	41
Portland	Oregon	210	192	3	61.2%	563,172	4.8	33	3	36	2	9	36
Saint Paul	Minnesota	240	211	1	67.2%	537,671	4.4	30	3	43	4	6	40
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	240	208	1	78.7%	536,944	3.0	43	3	57	12	17	57
San Jose	California	196	177	3	50.9%	534,443	5.8	28	1	28	0	2	28
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	228	204	1	76.6%	522,447	3.5	39	2	41	7	7	41
Memphis	Tennessee	209	183	1	73.8%	513,445	3.7	26	2	27	3	3	27
Louisville	Kentucky	205	181	2	67.3%	512,334	4.2	32	3	36	1	9	36
Cleveland	Ohio	213	190	1	68.0%	509,949	4.1	29	2	32	2	3	32
Albuquerque	New Mexico	198	181	1	74.8%	490,646	3.5	17	1	17	3	3	17
Baltimore	Maryland	199	173	1	72.8%	459,472	3.8	22	1	22	2	2	22
Raleigh	North Carolina	184	168	1	83.0%	453,756	2.8	15	2	22	4	9	22
Seattle	Washington	225	198	4	47.2%	450,521	6.1	35	2	35	0	4	35
Fresno	California	183	166	2	71.7%	431,836	3.8	18	1	18	3	3	18
Kansas City	Missouri	220	191	1	75.0%	428,565	3.5	49	2	54	7	10	54
Omaha	Nebraska	189	164	1	76.8%	424,414	3.3	31	2	32	7	8	32
Buffalo	New York	213	184	1	75.0%	421,942	3.5	28	3	33	5	6	33
New Orleans	Louisiana	178	158	1	94.6%	404,887	1.5	19	2	37	12	18	37
Mesa	Arizona	181	168	2	72.8%	389,353	3.7	13	1	13	3	3	13
Honolulu	Hawaii	173	155	1	93.5%	388,797	1.5	11	2	20	6	11	20
Rochester	New York	197	174	1	81.6%	384,900	3.0	24	4	33	5	12	33
Birmingham	Alabama	206	185	1	70.4%	351,902	3.7	30	1	30	3	3	30
Tulsa	Oklahoma	191	163	1	81.7%	344,824	3.1	28	2	32	7	10	32
Brooklyn	New York	197	175	12	13.1%	339,972	10.2	37	2	72	0	0	22
Dayton	Ohio	225	201	1	71.0%	339,439	4.3	27	3	42	3	5	42
Grand Rapids	Michigan	159	143	1	87.4%	321,369	2.5	12	2	15	6	7	15
Minneapolis	Minnesota	266	232	6	29.4%	319,716	9.8	51	4	80	0	2	34
Aurora	Colorado	146	133	1	72.5%	315,832	3.5	11	3	14	1	2	14
Wichita	Kansas	187	168	1	75.0%	313,488	3.4	26	2	29	4	7	29
Nashville	Tennessee	200	178	3	66.6%	305,114	4.2	22	3	24	1	5	24
Los Angeles	California	240	207	10	12.4%	304,507	10.6	62	2	73	0	0	25
Hialeah	Florida	160	148	1	82.5%	302,739	2.7	7	4	16	3	6	16
Hollywood	Florida	173	163	2	63.5%	297,769	4.7	9	4	14	1	2	14
Toledo	Ohio	186	171	1	93.1%	286,208	1.7	15	3	29	9	15	29
Katy	Texas	142	128	1	80.7%	277,464	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
Riverside	California	147	126	1	74.9%	277,082	3.3	7	2	8	1	2	8
Saint Petersburg	Florida	181	165	1	77.4%	275,867	3.3	16	3	20	3	5	20
Richmond	Virginia	188	161	2	68.4%	267,552	3.8	15	2	17	3	3	17
Corpus Christi	Texas	183	162	2	81.5%	265,630	2.4	18	2	25	8	12	25
Knoxville	Tennessee	177	160	2	68.6%	265,236	4.3	17	1	17	0	4	17
Columbia	South Carolina	175	156	1	77.4%	265,219	3.3	14	2	15	3	4	15
Tallahassee	Florida	156	145	1	91.8%	264,448	1.8	10	2	20	5	10	20
Stockton	California	176	155	2	70.0%	261,664	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Vancouver	Washington	174	160	1	79.1%	257,784	3.0	11	2	15	2	5	15
Alexandria	Virginia	187	165	2	71.2%	252,650	3.8	14	2	18	1	1	18
Fort Wayne	Indiana	174	153	1	79.2%	252,172	3.3	16	2	22	4	7	22
Virginia Beach	Virginia	174	156	5	56.0%	251,870	4.8	12	1	12	0	3	12
West Palm Beach	Florida	176	161	1	67.6%	250,675	4.3	12	1	12	0	0	12
Lakeland	Florida	150	135	1	96.3%	248,200	1.3	9	2	18	7	9	18
Pompano Beach	Florida	180	170	2	65.5%	242,660	4.7	10	3	12	1	1	12
Greensboro	North Carolina	158	139	1	73.7%	241,517	3.4	9	2	10	1	2	10
Irvine	California	158	147	1	87.3%	233,649	2.4	9	2	13	3	6	13
Spring	Texas	173	156	3	60.1%	228,939	6.8	8	2	11	2	2	5
Lexington	Kentucky	186	167	1	71.0%	227,180	3.9	15	2	17	2	3	17
Newark	New Jersey	174	154	1	80.5%	225,838	2.8	9	3	13	3	5	13
Reno	Nevada	179	162	1	75.2%	223,304	3.5	12	2	14	1	3	14
Durham	North Carolina	155	138	1	75.3%	218,431	3.6	8	1	8	1	1	8
Boise	Idaho	151	136	1	84.2%	215,550	2.7	9	2	10	4	4	10
Sarasota	Florida	183	166	1	85.6%	214,209	2.6	13	3	18	6	6	18
Glendale	Arizona	163	148	2	70.2%	213,984	4.1	9	1	9	0	2	9
Winston Salem	North Carolina	168	155	1	80.9%	213,679	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Modesto	California	153	139	1	78.5%	207,718	3.3	7	1	7	1	2	7
Plano	Texas	143	134	2	67.5%	206,081	4.3	7	2	8	0	2	8
Madison	Wisconsin	161	147	2	67.7%	199,587	4.3	14	2	15	1	3	15
Providence	Rhode Island	151	138	1	95.6%	196,060	1.4	8	2	14	5	8	14
Littleton	Colorado	213	189	3	59.7%	194,249	5.0	10	2	10	0	0	10
Silver Spring	Maryland	168	152	4	63.8%	193,439	4.4	7	3	9	1	2	9
Shreveport	Louisiana	185	168	1	84.0%	187,440	2.6	12	2	16	4	7	16
Kissimmee	Florida	188	167	2	64.6%	186,766	4.4	7	2	10	0	1	10
Henderson	Nevada	159	140	2	61.7%	186,701	4.9	8	1	8	1	1	8
Staten Island	New York	156	137	6	39.1%	185,602	7.3	12	2	18	0	1	17
Henrico	Virginia	160	147	1	96.0%	184,965	1.7	7	3	13	4	8	13
Santa Ana	California	135	123	3	51.6%	184,417	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	203	177	13	11.7%	184,274	10.9	47	1	48	2	2	15
Fremont	California	126	115	2	76.8%	179,050	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
San Bernardino	California	148	131	2	71.7%	178,991	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Syracuse	New York	173	155	1	76.6%	173,685	3.6	15	1	15	2	2	15
Detroit	Michigan	180	160	6	26.7%	171,175	9.4	25	3	47	0	0	22
Fort Myers	Florida	180	159	2	66.7%	167,816	4.2	11	2	12	0	1	12
Des Moines	Iowa	159	143	1	74.8%	167,014	3.8	11	1	11	1	1	11
Chesapeake	Virginia	141	129	2	70.0%	166,525	4.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Greenville	South Carolina	164	149	1	75.4%	165,610	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
Marietta	Georgia	163	149	4	51.0%	164,662	5.9	7	2	9	0	2	8
Beaverton	Oregon	138	130	1	81.2%	163,645	2.8	4	2	5	1	2	5
Wilmington	Delaware	188	165	1	73.7%	161,845	3.4	10	2	11	2	2	11
Chattanooga	Tennessee	179	159	2	76.6%	159,173	4.0	15	2	20	1	5	20
Anaheim	California	139	127	6	43.1%	158,755	6.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Naples	Florida	203	182	5	50.3%	157,571	6.1	14	1	14	0	0	14
Little Rock	Arkansas	167	151	1	71.8%	156,476	3.8	12	1	12	1	1	12
Oxnard	California	137	122	4	70.0%	154,173	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Woodbridge	Virginia	140	128	1	71.7%	151,737	4.0	3	2	4	1	2	4
Melbourne	Florida	151	129	1	97.2%	151,332	1.4	5	2	9	3	5	9
Green Bay	Wisconsin	154	140	1	82.4%	151,145	3.0	7	3	9	2	3	9
Ann Arbor	Michigan	133	117	1	90.0%	150,100	1.6	5	3	13	4	5	13
Peoria	Arizona	142	128	2	85.7%	147,429	2.5	4	1	4	2	2	4
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	151	3	72.5%	147,174	3.8	6	1	6	1	1	6
Fort Collins	Colorado	145	133	2	75.2%	146,367	3.6	5	2	7	0	2	7
Jamaica	New York	144	130	2	60.0%	146,342	5.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Grand Prairie	Texas	137	125	1	76.8%	146,257	3.3	4	2	6	1	1	6
Cypress	Texas	118	111	1	85.5%	145,924	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Oceanside	California	125	116	1	72.5%	145,116	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Allentown	Pennsylvania	148	131	2	83.9%	142,582	2.3	7	2	8	4	4	8
Erie	Pennsylvania	161	147	1	77.4%	141,952	3.3	13	2	26	3	6	26
Garden Grove	California	131	118	1	80.7%	141,824	2.8	5	3	11	2	3	11
Overland Park	Kansas	161	144	2	76.8%	140,913	3.4	9	2	12	2	3	12
Naperville	Illinois	126	114	2	84.9%	140,800	2.5	4	2	5	1	4	5
Fayetteville	North Carolina	150	136	4	57.4%	139,982	5.5	8	1	8	0	2	8
York	Pennsylvania	161	144	2	77.9%	139,958	3.3	7	3	9	1	2	9
Decatur	Georgia	159	142	1	77.0%	139,145	3.6	5	2	5	1	1	5
Topeka	Kansas	174	159	2	85.1%	139,056	2.1	18	3	34	8	15	34
Edmond	Oklahoma	168	144	2	80.8%	138,730	2.8	5	1	5	2	2	5
Evansville	Indiana	168	149	1	75.0%	138,344	3.6	9	3	14	2	3	14
Kalamazoo	Michigan	150	134	1	84.0%	137,779	2.3	7	3	13	1	6	13
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	171	148	1	81.1%	137,294	3.1	9	2	12	1	4	12
Rancho Cucamonga	California	129	117	3	76.8%	135,560	3.3	4	2	5	1	1	5
Laredo	Texas	151	135	5	49.4%	133,703	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Fontana	California	118	106	3	56.9%	133,604	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
North Las Vegas	Nevada	150	132	4	57.0%	133,163	5.3	7	1	7	0	1	7
Trenton	New Jersey	179	162	2	64.0%	133,122	4.5	11	5	21	2	3	21
Tempe	Arizona	139	128	1	70.0%	132,997	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Amarillo	Texas	178	163	3	57.9%	132,525	5.4	14	1	14	0	3	14
Alpharetta	Georgia	152	141	2	70.0%	132,434	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	188	168	11	16.3%	132,074	11.8	29	4	57	1	2	10
Homestead	Florida	162	148	3	70.1%	131,479	3.6	7	2	10	1	2	10
Lake Worth	Florida	155	140	1	63.6%	131,282	4.8	5	2	7	0	0	7
Flushing	New York	133	119	4	60.0%	129,040	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Corona	California	150	135	6	50.0%	128,620	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Macon	Georgia	167	146	1	78.2%	128,054	3.0	9	2	10	3	3	10
Bradenton	Florida	180	158	3	50.0%	126,656	5.0	10	2	15	2	5	15
Ontario	California	127	114	1	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Schenectady	New York	161	140	2	76.2%	123,473	3.4	8	3	14	1	3	14
Torrance	California	145	131	1	69.5%	122,959	4.6	5	2	5	1	1	5
Palmdale	California	134	120	4	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Concord	California	140	130	1	93.4%	121,599	1.5	4	2	7	3	4	7
Roanoke	Virginia	172	156	3	71.7%	121,475	3.1	10	3	14	2	5	14
Salt Lake City	Utah	197	174	9	24.5%	119,356	9.2	19	2	33	0	0	22
Scottsdale	Arizona	173	160	6	39.6%	118,088	7.6	11	3	13	0	1	9
Saginaw	Michigan	147	127	2	90.4%	117,744	2.3	7	3	17	2	7	17
Panama City	Florida	148	127	2	93.2%	117,731	1.8	6	3	18	1	6	18
Humble	Texas	134	121	1	70.0%	116,570	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waco	Texas	151	137	2	73.2%	115,890	3.3	9	1	9	2	2	9
South Bend	Indiana	164	146	2	79.0%	115,877	2.9	10	3	13	3	4	13
Albany	New York	177	156	2	76.5%	115,756	3.2	11	2	12	3	3	12
Boulder	Colorado	158	145	2	88.0%	115,566	2.2	6	2	11	0	6	11
Muskegon	Michigan	135	123	1	89.2%	115,188	1.8	5	3	10	2	5	10
Lansing	Michigan	166	149	2	70.0%	115,044	4.0	7	1	7	0	0	7
Cary	North Carolina	133	124	1	74.0%	114,995	3.3	4	2	5	1	1	5
Manassas	Virginia	148	130	2	74.7%	113,507	3.5	4	2	6	0	1	6
Billings	Montana	152	131	3	82.0%	112,550	2.8	4	3	9	0	3	9
Saint Charles	Missouri	139	125	1	80.3%	112,272	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Hamilton	Ohio	138	125	2	81.8%	112,149	3.0	3	2	5	1	2	5
Salem	Oregon	156	144	5	42.0%	111,818	6.7	7	1	7	0	0	7
Norfolk	Virginia	174	158	5	45.4%	111,485	6.3	14	2	21	2	2	15
Canton	Ohio	175	163	2	75.6%	111,105	3.6	12	2	13	1	2	13
Pasadena	California	136	123	3	70.0%	110,406	4.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Daly City	California	128	117	1	95.7%	109,451	1.5	2	3	6	1	2	4
Edinburg	Texas	130	117	1	70.0%	108,899	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Duluth	Minnesota	178	156	1	92.9%	108,851	1.9	11	3	31	3	11	31
Yonkers	New York	139	126	3	60.0%	108,319	5.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Ypsilanti	Michigan	119	106	1	100.0%	106,899	1.0	2	3	6	2	2	6
Lancaster	California	131	114	5	57.9%	106,743	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Anchorage	Alaska	181	160	5	43.6%	106,510	6.6	12	1	12	0	1	12
Victorville	California	127	114	3	77.8%	106,027	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
College Station	Texas	123	112	1	85.4%	105,058	2.5	2	3	4	1	1	4
Chico	California	129	117	2	93.5%	104,715	1.7	3	3	6	1	3	6
Florissant	Missouri	135	122	1	95.0%	102,925	2.0	3	2	4	2	3	4
Youngstown	Ohio	164	144	1	65.4%	102,766	5.2	12	1	12	0	1	12
Lynchburg	Virginia	147	130	1	100.0%	102,365	1.0	4	4	11	4	5	11
Ocala	Florida	169	156	5	45.2%	101,767	6.6	11	1	11	0	0	11
Surprise	Arizona	141	127	1	74.7%	101,217	4.3	4	2	4	1	1	4
Ashburn	Virginia	114	102	1	90.0%	101,076	2.0	2	3	5	0	3	5
Sunnyvale	California	141	131	2	65.9%	100,636	4.5	4	2	7	0	2	7
San Marcos	California	108	103	1	100.0%	100,481	1.0	2	2	3	2	3	3
Saint Augustine	Florida	170	148	3	76.4%	100,116	3.0	5	2	5	2	3	5
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	134	118	1	81.6%	100,100	2.8	4	2	5	1	2	5
Augusta	Georgia	163	145	4	48.8%	99,845	6.3	8	1	8	0	0	8
Bakersfield	California	171	151	10	17.8%	99,294	10.2	11	1	11	0	0	6
Paterson	New Jersey	154	138	2	67.6%	98,493	4.6	9	1	9	0	2	9
Whittier	California	158	143	2	50.1%	98,182	5.8	6	2	7	0	1	7
Joliet	Illinois	138	125	1	75.7%	97,561	3.2	5	3	12	1	2	12
Compton	California	129	117	2	70.0%	97,213	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Mcdonough	Georgia	113	103	1	95.4%	96,833	1.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Akron	Ohio	163	148	6	35.7%	96,416	7.8	17	2	20	0	1	20
Mobile	Alabama	200	176	6	35.5%	96,404	7.2	18	1	18	0	0	18
Stamford	Connecticut	147	138	2	74.8%	96,271	3.5	6	1	6	1	1	6
Yuma	Arizona	124	109	4	65.0%	95,997	4.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redding	California	151	136	2	83.9%	94,799	3.0	4	3	6	0	2	6
Charlottesville	Virginia	151	137	1	76.0%	93,448	3.4	5	1	5	1	1	5
Fredericksburg	Virginia	142	129	5	53.6%	93,190	5.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Bridgeport	Connecticut	149	136	4	63.5%	93,031	4.8	6	1	6	0	1	6
Gastonia	North Carolina	114	103	2	86.9%	93,007	2.3	3	2	5	1	2	5
Lawrence	Kansas	137	120	1	91.9%	92,888	2.0	5	3	14	2	6	14
Santa Clara	California	129	119	1	73.9%	92,715	3.5	4	2	5	0	1	5
Spokane	Washington	179	160	7	25.8%	92,707	9.5	14	2	23	0	1	8
Carlsbad	California	129	120	2	81.2%	92,350	2.8	4	2	6	1	2	6
Elgin	Illinois	128	114	1	75.5%	92,250	3.0	3	3	7	1	1	7
El Cajon	California	134	120	3	53.2%	91,729	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
West Chester	Pennsylvania	114	99	2	84.1%	91,416	3.0	3	3	8	1	2	8
New Braunfels	Texas	120	111	2	88.9%	91,344	3.0	2	3	5	1	1	5
Sterling Heights	Michigan	136	123	2	68.4%	90,668	4.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Gainesville	Florida	158	146	5	43.0%	90,096	6.6	10	1	10	0	0	10
Santa Fe	New Mexico	145	130	3	70.3%	90,012	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Norman	Oklahoma	154	133	2	72.5%	89,961	3.3	4	3	8	1	2	8
Independence	Missouri	169	147	1	71.5%	88,725	3.6	8	2	12	1	3	12
Puyallup	Washington	148	133	3	62.1%	88,657	4.8	5	1	5	0	1	5
Boston	Massachusetts	171	154	3	58.3%	88,434	4.3	14	2	18	0	6	18
Palm Bay	Florida	137	119	1	79.1%	87,993	3.0	4	3	9	0	3	9
Olympia	Washington	171	154	4	48.1%	87,976	6.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Lincoln	Nebraska	192	172	9	30.4%	87,815	8.3	22	1	22	0	0	22
West Valley City	Utah	123	110	3	66.1%	87,797	4.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Rapid City	South Dakota	119	105	2	90.0%	87,089	2.0	3	3	9	0	3	9
Tracy	California	149	136	2	74.2%	86,969	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Downey	California	131	117	1	77.0%	86,892	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Fort Mill	South Carolina	130	115	1	90.9%	86,354	2.0	3	3	5	2	3	5
Bowling Green	Kentucky	129	113	3	74.7%	86,263	3.5	4	2	6	0	2	6
Auburn	Washington	127	118	1	76.0%	85,831	3.7	3	1	3	1	1	3
Laurel	Maryland	141	123	1	76.2%	85,749	3.5	4	4	8	0	1	8
Westerville	Ohio	111	99	1	89.4%	85,117	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Colorado Springs	Colorado	210	188	10	14.5%	84,740	11.5	30	4	35	1	1	8
Appleton	Wisconsin	131	124	4	69.6%	84,661	3.8	4	2	5	1	1	5
Jupiter	Florida	134	124	1	85.8%	84,615	3.5	4	2	6	1	1	6
Sparks	Nevada	140	126	2	70.9%	84,525	3.3	4	2	5	3	3	4
Rockville	Maryland	151	133	2	58.3%	84,348	5.0	4	2	6	0	0	6
Yakima	Washington	131	116	4	64.6%	83,851	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Santa Maria	California	132	121	6	58.5%	83,726	5.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Huntington Beach	California	129	117	6	41.7%	83,403	6.8	4	3	7	0	0	7
Bothell	Washington	142	129	3	65.0%	83,354	4.3	3	3	5	0	0	5
Ballwin	Missouri	111	103	1	87.8%	83,138	2.5	2	1	2	1	1	2
Lewisville	Texas	136	126	2	70.0%	83,075	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Sandy	Utah	135	121	2	75.2%	83,045	3.5	4	3	10	0	2	10
Arvada	Colorado	153	142	4	62.2%	82,964	4.8	5	2	9	0	0	9
Gaithersburg	Maryland	138	121	4	57.3%	82,867	5.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Astoria	New York	148	132	3	57.8%	82,531	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Kenosha	Wisconsin	131	123	1	72.4%	81,743	3.8	4	2	5	0	1	5
O Fallon	Missouri	129	115	1	84.6%	81,574	2.5	2	2	4	1	2	4
Manchester	New Hampshire	137	121	1	70.0%	81,241	4.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Reading	Pennsylvania	162	143	6	37.7%	81,101	7.1	10	1	10	0	1	10
Cumming	Georgia	135	121	4	50.0%	81,010	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Allen	Texas	114	107	3	72.7%	80,883	4.0	2	1	2	0	1	2
Boca Raton	Florida	159	151	6	36.2%	80,465	7.3	9	2	10	0	0	10
New Port Richey	Florida	146	128	1	66.3%	80,108	4.8	4	2	5	1	2	5
Delray Beach	Florida	153	143	3	67.2%	80,048	4.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Fullerton	California	138	126	3	57.3%	79,830	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Boynton Beach	Florida	146	135	5	45.8%	79,759	6.3	6	2	7	0	0	7
Abilene	Texas	162	148	3	61.3%	79,731	5.0	6	1	6	0	1	6
Asheville	North Carolina	129	113	4	60.2%	79,550	5.2	5	2	6	0	1	6
Vista	California	125	116	3	66.4%	79,537	4.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Lehigh Acres	Florida	174	155	3	67.9%	79,350	4.3	6	2	7	0	1	7
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	137	120	3	60.8%	79,319	5.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Pomona	California	127	113	4	50.0%	78,993	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Burbank	California	132	120	3	73.1%	78,959	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Salinas	California	144	131	7	41.6%	78,366	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Pueblo	Colorado	166	150	5	49.5%	78,264	6.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Lowell	Massachusetts	127	119	3	70.0%	77,939	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Fairfax	Virginia	142	130	6	47.6%	77,853	6.0	4	2	8	0	2	8
Hayward	California	135	122	7	40.3%	77,427	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hemet	California	135	121	3	60.0%	77,272	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	California	125	117	6	43.0%	77,238	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Simi Valley	California	116	104	4	60.0%	77,227	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	California	138	123	1	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Odessa	Texas	137	125	5	47.8%	76,505	6.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Falls Church	Virginia	165	148	2	63.3%	76,198	4.8	5	2	7	0	0	7
Lynnwood	Washington	135	120	2	70.1%	75,927	4.0	3	4	5	0	1	5
Clarksville	Tennessee	128	117	5	42.9%	75,374	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Champaign	Illinois	128	114	2	79.7%	75,372	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Warren	Michigan	134	119	4	55.6%	75,119	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Toms River	New Jersey	140	127	3	61.1%	75,030	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Milton	Florida	131	117	2	79.1%	74,894	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Renton	Washington	153	143	4	48.1%	74,481	6.4	5	2	5	0	0	5
Mission	Texas	129	118	6	41.0%	74,254	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Worcester	Massachusetts	155	140	5	40.0%	74,244	7.0	9	1	9	0	0	9
Everett	Washington	144	132	5	44.4%	73,984	6.8	5	2	7	0	0	7
Kent	Washington	134	126	5	46.0%	73,786	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Provo	Utah	131	118	3	63.2%	73,631	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Belleville	Illinois	139	122	2	79.0%	73,605	3.3	4	1	4	2	2	4
Quincy	Massachusetts	117	108	2	78.1%	73,480	3.3	3	1	4	0	2	4
Broomfield	Colorado	135	121	3	70.0%	73,325	4.0	3	2	3	0	0	3
Meridian	Idaho	119	104	3	70.0%	72,955	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Carrollton	Texas	130	115	3	54.1%	72,876	5.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Livermore	California	112	98	2	75.2%	72,427	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Stone Mountain	Georgia	146	133	3	56.4%	72,320	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Fairfield	California	119	106	4	63.3%	72,167	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Annapolis	Maryland	160	140	2	75.7%	71,952	3.4	5	2	6	0	2	6
Mckinney	Texas	133	120	6	38.0%	71,831	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Bowie	Maryland	158	144	1	70.0%	71,515	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Englewood	Colorado	161	144	1	64.1%	71,493	4.5	4	3	5	0	0	5
Miami Beach	Florida	141	131	4	61.3%	70,889	4.8	5	2	9	0	0	9
San Angelo	Texas	141	125	3	63.9%	70,779	4.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Baytown	Texas	127	118	4	60.0%	70,676	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Edison	New Jersey	125	114	1	70.0%	70,579	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lakewood	New Jersey	98	90	4	70.0%	70,534	4.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Perris	California	125	110	4	60.0%	70,434	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Jordan	Utah	127	116	5	57.0%	70,399	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clinton Township	Michigan	124	114	2	70.0%	70,207	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukegan	Illinois	116	102	3	71.8%	70,019	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Pearland	Texas	121	110	3	50.8%	69,923	5.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Brownsville	Texas	130	116	7	34.6%	69,607	7.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Elkhart	Indiana	126	116	1	70.0%	69,604	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Plainfield	Illinois	140	125	2	70.0%	68,991	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Las Cruces	New Mexico	159	141	4	46.3%	68,966	6.0	7	2	8	0	0	8
Apopka	Florida	119	109	3	70.0%	68,358	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Cape Coral	Florida	155	134	6	37.6%	68,051	7.3	6	2	10	0	0	10
Lees Summit	Missouri	164	149	3	66.7%	68,050	4.3	6	2	7	0	0	7
Bryan	Texas	149	135	3	70.5%	67,913	4.0	5	1	5	0	1	5
Midlothian	Virginia	121	113	2	70.0%	67,745	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lithonia	Georgia	121	107	2	70.0%	67,733	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Napa	California	113	94	3	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Olathe	Kansas	118	107	4	46.7%	67,459	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	California	128	112	3	70.0%	67,264	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	123	111	2	63.1%	66,956	5.0	2	2	2	0	0	2
Lubbock	Texas	166	148	7	24.1%	66,806	8.7	14	1	14	0	0	14
Elk Grove	California	137	122	6	37.2%	66,759	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Davenport	Iowa	147	130	4	63.6%	66,661	4.0	6	2	8	1	1	8
Hillsboro	Oregon	110	103	3	64.7%	66,600	4.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
South Gate	California	99	90	3	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sugar Land	Texas	133	120	6	39.1%	65,972	7.7	3	2	5	0	0	3
San Francisco	California	177	162	14	7.6%	65,873	12.1	28	3	56	1	1	7
Keller	Texas	130	116	2	56.6%	65,817	5.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Deltona	Florida	108	95	4	70.0%	65,722	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Murrieta	California	120	109	5	49.7%	65,721	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Jersey City	New Jersey	162	143	8	25.1%	65,635	8.4	7	2	14	0	0	14
El Monte	California	113	102	4	70.0%	65,598	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lynn	Massachusetts	127	116	2	70.0%	65,477	4.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
Nampa	Idaho	128	116	7	56.5%	65,456	5.7	3	2	4	0	1	4
Vallejo	California	136	123	4	52.5%	65,300	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Valdosta	Georgia	140	124	4	68.7%	65,263	5.6	5	1	5	0	2	5
La Puente	California	131	120	4	54.4%	64,139	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Ridgewood	New York	96	85	4	60.0%	64,030	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Idaho Falls	Idaho	142	129	4	58.6%	63,929	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
Parker	Colorado	124	111	4	63.4%	63,530	4.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ogden	Utah	149	133	8	31.2%	62,858	8.0	5	2	8	0	0	8
Redwood City	California	142	125	3	54.9%	62,783	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	121	108	3	64.4%	62,701	4.5	2	2	2	0	0	2
Elizabeth	New Jersey	128	115	3	62.3%	62,604	5.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Rialto	California	128	117	5	58.2%	61,994	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Garland	Texas	135	124	9	26.0%	61,838	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Frederick	Maryland	125	107	5	46.8%	61,795	6.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Portsmouth	Virginia	141	128	3	64.3%	61,306	4.7	7	2	12	0	0	12
Washington DC	District of Columbia	197	175	15	8.9%	61,222	11.6	28	2	29	0	0	5
Longmont	Colorado	130	120	4	46.8%	61,187	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Clovis	California	125	113	5	50.2%	60,894	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Holland	Michigan	100	87	3	64.8%	60,873	4.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Orange	California	125	115	4	41.6%	60,340	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Rockford	Illinois	163	144	5	32.9%	60,070	7.7	9	1	9	0	0	9
Round Rock	Texas	134	120	5	35.8%	59,976	7.7	3	2	3	0	0	2
Clermont	Florida	132	115	4	59.7%	59,861	4.3	3	2	4	0	1	4
Cambridge	Massachusetts	136	127	5	51.5%	59,630	5.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Denton	Texas	149	136	6	37.7%	59,555	7.3	6	1	6	0	0	6
Savannah	Georgia	154	135	8	24.6%	59,460	9.3	10	1	10	0	0	8
Fort Pierce	Florida	178	161	4	61.8%	59,185	4.6	8	1	8	0	0	8
Mesquite	Texas	125	115	6	40.0%	58,525	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Racine	Wisconsin	140	131	4	46.2%	58,236	6.6	5	2	7	0	0	7
Waterbury	Connecticut	141	127	5	53.6%	58,197	5.3	6	1	6	0	1	6
Hawthorne	California	99	88	5	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Chandler	Arizona	143	133	6	21.6%	57,948	9.2	6	3	12	0	0	8
Vero Beach	Florida	148	134	7	50.0%	57,607	6.0	6	1	6	0	0	6
Bellingham	Washington	136	123	4	45.5%	57,587	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Oakland	California	161	146	12	13.9%	57,392	11.3	14	3	22	0	0	2
Johnson City	Tennessee	134	121	5	60.0%	57,261	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Menifee	California	149	134	4	51.6%	57,012	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Herndon	Virginia	122	113	4	60.8%	56,797	5.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Eugene	Oregon	157	140	6	27.9%	56,667	8.3	6	1	6	0	0	4
Inglewood	California	146	128	4	42.3%	56,664	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	145	133	6	45.2%	56,638	6.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Mcallen	Texas	131	118	7	40.0%	56,635	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Largo	Florida	139	124	5	52.4%	56,446	5.6	5	2	6	0	1	6
Elmhurst	New York	100	86	5	60.0%	56,380	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Vacaville	California	109	98	6	53.5%	56,371	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	121	5	57.4%	56,201	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	200	180	10	14.7%	55,854	12.8	18	1	19	0	1	3
Hagerstown	Maryland	148	136	4	56.9%	55,739	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Antioch	California	115	106	4	50.0%	55,361	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Scranton	Pennsylvania	162	146	3	55.3%	54,964	5.0	8	2	13	0	2	13
Ventura	California	121	107	5	47.4%	54,929	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	149	140	7	29.2%	54,420	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Tyler	Texas	155	143	8	34.8%	54,393	7.8	9	1	10	0	1	10
New Bedford	Massachusetts	140	126	4	57.3%	54,318	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Morgantown	West Virginia	124	108	5	57.0%	54,291	5.0	3	1	3	0	1	3
Pensacola	Florida	184	163	8	20.2%	54,264	8.5	13	1	13	0	1	13
Kennewick	Washington	123	108	5	54.7%	54,086	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	California	131	114	4	52.5%	54,021	5.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Brockton	Massachusetts	118	106	4	56.6%	54,006	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Mission Viejo	California	113	107	3	54.5%	53,616	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Winter Haven	Florida	134	120	6	50.0%	53,439	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Monica	California	122	114	4	56.5%	53,325	5.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Riverview	Florida	128	118	3	47.8%	53,254	6.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Norwalk	California	97	87	5	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bloomington	Indiana	148	132	6	39.2%	52,365	6.5	6	2	12	0	0	12
Springdale	Arkansas	110	95	5	54.1%	52,199	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Athens	Georgia	153	137	6	41.8%	52,168	7.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Daytona Beach	Florida	146	129	4	50.3%	51,832	6.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Spring Hill	Florida	157	143	5	40.5%	50,799	5.8	5	1	5	1	1	5
Muncie	Indiana	150	137	4	54.5%	50,547	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hampton	Virginia	152	132	5	37.1%	50,538	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
San Mateo	California	131	118	7	35.2%	50,096	7.5	4	2	7	0	0	7
New Haven	Connecticut	145	130	6	38.3%	49,912	7.8	5	2	9	0	1	9
Clearwater	Florida	166	146	6	27.1%	49,763	8.4	9	2	18	0	1	11
Metairie	Louisiana	135	119	7	34.7%	49,304	7.6	5	2	9	0	0	9
Palo Alto	California	137	127	5	50.4%	48,694	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
San Leandro	California	127	114	6	43.7%	48,581	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pittsburg	California	95	88	4	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Lake Charles	Louisiana	148	135	6	36.7%	48,020	7.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Summerville	South Carolina	120	108	8	34.1%	47,383	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Livonia	Michigan	120	110	5	50.0%	47,284	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Santa Barbara	California	149	133	8	34.6%	46,980	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Tacoma	Washington	210	187	15	13.9%	46,347	10.7	20	1	20	1	1	6
Terre Haute	Indiana	148	131	5	48.6%	46,183	6.2	6	2	7	0	0	7
Hartford	Connecticut	140	125	6	37.4%	46,179	7.0	6	2	9	0	0	9
Hesperia	California	116	103	5	44.4%	46,125	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	162	149	6	36.2%	45,962	7.3	9	2	10	0	0	10
Moreno Valley	California	128	115	8	22.3%	45,853	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Acworth	Georgia	120	107	6	45.8%	45,677	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Greeley	Colorado	111	101	6	40.0%	45,626	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Long Beach	California	156	140	17	9.5%	45,375	10.5	12	1	12	0	0	6
Merced	California	123	112	6	43.5%	44,861	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Waukesha	Wisconsin	124	117	7	46.3%	44,318	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
High Point	North Carolina	133	120	7	36.2%	44,282	7.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Douglasville	Georgia	126	111	8	40.0%	44,099	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Grand Junction	Colorado	149	130	5	41.5%	43,762	6.8	6	1	6	0	0	6
Dearborn	Michigan	130	118	6	45.7%	43,410	5.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Charleston	South Carolina	164	145	9	22.0%	43,375	10.1	10	1	10	0	0	5
Coral Springs	Florida	114	108	4	44.1%	42,879	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Arlington	Texas	174	155	14	10.8%	42,848	10.6	12	1	12	0	0	4
Irving	Texas	143	131	14	17.8%	42,831	9.2	6	1	6	0	0	6
Kennesaw	Georgia	111	102	7	43.1%	42,732	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Hyattsville	Maryland	138	123	9	27.1%	42,653	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Covington	Georgia	130	117	5	45.9%	42,499	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Medford	Oregon	112	102	5	45.3%	42,269	6.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Anderson	South Carolina	132	122	6	42.9%	42,245	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	162	144	9	23.2%	42,091	9.4	9	1	9	0	0	6
Missoula	Montana	152	136	5	42.6%	41,401	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Franklin	Tennessee	124	115	6	38.3%	40,821	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Woodstock	Georgia	122	110	6	40.0%	40,688	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Lawrenceville	Georgia	136	121	11	15.8%	40,498	9.0	4	2	7	0	0	4
Orem	Utah	126	118	5	40.0%	40,127	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Lafayette	Louisiana	145	128	7	24.5%	39,262	8.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chino	California	112	102	6	40.0%	37,790	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Flint	Michigan	150	129	8	24.1%	37,529	8.4	7	1	7	0	0	6
Springfield	Missouri	167	146	11	16.1%	37,055	9.3	7	1	7	0	0	6
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	145	131	10	25.4%	36,933	8.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Midland	Texas	146	133	7	22.6%	36,122	8.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Gulfport	Mississippi	137	122	6	37.4%	35,379	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Wichita Falls	Texas	164	150	5	35.6%	35,141	7.4	7	1	7	0	0	7
Beaumont	Texas	149	134	8	23.9%	34,801	8.1	8	1	8	0	0	8
Roseville	California	128	114	8	24.7%	34,492	8.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Richardson	Texas	116	105	8	30.0%	34,379	8.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Santa Rosa	California	144	129	11	15.4%	33,194	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	5
Conroe	Texas	159	145	11	20.6%	32,981	9.4	7	2	9	0	0	5
Temecula	California	135	125	10	23.7%	30,780	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Bend	Oregon	137	124	9	24.8%	30,356	7.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Federal Way	Washington	119	106	6	30.0%	30,001	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roswell	Georgia	123	114	8	30.0%	29,931	8.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Van Nuys	California	133	118	11	16.5%	29,393	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	California	112	105	7	25.6%	29,072	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Longview	Texas	137	126	7	27.5%	28,950	8.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Chula Vista	California	149	137	9	10.7%	27,976	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Jackson	Mississippi	170	153	10	15.8%	26,978	10.2	11	1	11	0	0	5
Spartanburg	South Carolina	153	140	9	24.0%	26,925	9.0	5	1	5	0	0	5
Huntsville	Alabama	162	142	13	13.1%	25,625	10.4	11	1	11	0	0	5
Fargo	North Dakota	144	129	10	20.7%	25,346	9.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Gilbert	Arizona	148	137	10	10.6%	25,307	11.5	6	2	8	0	0	3
Buford	Georgia	109	99	8	25.3%	25,089	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Newport News	Virginia	154	136	13	14.0%	24,781	9.6	7	1	7	0	0	6
Rock Hill	South Carolina	133	121	9	20.0%	23,272	9.0	3	2	6	0	0	6
Bell Gardens	California	101	94	9	20.0%	20,487	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Cruz	California	124	112	9	19.0%	19,780	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Montgomery	Alabama	176	155	14	9.2%	19,302	11.1	13	2	14	0	0	2
Newnan	Georgia	124	114	9	20.0%	18,679	9.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
North Hollywood	California	127	117	12	10.0%	15,313	10.0	4	2	7	0	0	4
Bellevue	Washington	141	132	11	10.5%	15,288	10.6	5	1	5	0	0	2
Frisco	Texas	115	103	7	8.8%	15,192	11.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Killeen	Texas	132	120	7	9.9%	14,838	10.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Visalia	California	130	117	10	9.6%	14,622	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	159	144	11	8.6%	11,928	11.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Pacoima	California	100	93	9	10.0%	10,580	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
San Diego	217	185	2	63.5%	855,155	4.7	36	3	39	0	6	39
Sacramento	204	178	1	81.1%	652,465	2.8	28	2	29	11	12	29
San Jose	196	177	3	50.9%	534,443	5.8	28	1	28	0	2	28
Fresno	183	166	2	71.7%	431,836	3.8	18	1	18	3	3	18
Los Angeles	240	207	10	12.4%	304,507	10.6	62	2	73	0	0	25
Riverside	147	126	1	74.9%	277,082	3.3	7	2	8	1	2	8
Stockton	176	155	2	70.0%	261,664	4.0	12	1	12	0	0	12
Irvine	158	147	1	87.3%	233,649	2.4	9	2	13	3	6	13
Modesto	153	139	1	78.5%	207,718	3.3	7	1	7	1	2	7
Santa Ana	135	123	3	51.6%	184,417	5.7	6	1	6	0	1	6
Fremont	126	115	2	76.8%	179,050	3.3	4	1	4	1	1	4
San Bernardino	148	131	2	71.7%	178,991	3.6	7	1	7	1	1	7
Anaheim	139	127	6	43.1%	158,755	6.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Oxnard	137	122	4	70.0%	154,173	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Oceanside	125	116	1	72.5%	145,116	3.8	4	1	4	0	1	4
Garden Grove	131	118	1	80.7%	141,824	2.8	5	3	11	2	3	11
Rancho Cucamonga	129	117	3	76.8%	135,560	3.3	4	2	5	1	1	5
Fontana	118	106	3	56.9%	133,604	5.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Corona	150	135	6	50.0%	128,620	6.2	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ontario	127	114	1	70.0%	123,654	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Torrance	145	131	1	69.5%	122,959	4.6	5	2	5	1	1	5
Palmdale	134	120	4	70.0%	122,455	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Concord	140	130	1	93.4%	121,599	1.5	4	2	7	3	4	7
Pasadena	136	123	3	70.0%	110,406	4.0	6	2	7	0	0	7
Daly City	128	117	1	95.7%	109,451	1.5	2	3	6	1	2	4
Lancaster	131	114	5	57.9%	106,743	5.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Victorville	127	114	3	77.8%	106,027	3.0	3	2	4	1	1	4
Chico	129	117	2	93.5%	104,715	1.7	3	3	6	1	3	6
Sunnyvale	141	131	2	65.9%	100,636	4.5	4	2	7	0	2	7
San Marcos	108	103	1	100.0%	100,481	1.0	2	2	3	2	3	3
Bakersfield	171	151	10	17.8%	99,294	10.2	11	1	11	0	0	6
Whittier	158	143	2	50.1%	98,182	5.8	6	2	7	0	1	7
Compton	129	117	2	70.0%	97,213	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Redding	151	136	2	83.9%	94,799	3.0	4	3	6	0	2	6
Santa Clara	129	119	1	73.9%	92,715	3.5	4	2	5	0	1	5
Carlsbad	129	120	2	81.2%	92,350	2.8	4	2	6	1	2	6
El Cajon	134	120	3	53.2%	91,729	5.7	3	2	3	0	0	3
Tracy	149	136	2	74.2%	86,969	3.3	4	2	8	1	2	8
Downey	131	117	1	77.0%	86,892	3.0	3	1	3	1	1	3
Santa Maria	132	121	6	58.5%	83,726	5.0	3	2	6	0	1	6
Huntington Beach	129	117	6	41.7%	83,403	6.8	4	3	7	0	0	7
Fullerton	138	126	3	57.3%	79,830	5.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Vista	125	116	3	66.4%	79,537	4.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
Pomona	127	113	4	50.0%	78,993	6.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Burbank	132	120	3	73.1%	78,959	3.8	5	1	5	0	2	5
Salinas	144	131	7	41.6%	78,366	7.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hayward	135	122	7	40.3%	77,427	7.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hemet	135	121	3	60.0%	77,272	5.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Escondido	125	117	6	43.0%	77,238	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Simi Valley	116	104	4	60.0%	77,227	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
West Covina	138	123	1	70.0%	76,586	4.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Livermore	112	98	2	75.2%	72,427	3.5	2	2	3	0	1	3
Fairfield	119	106	4	63.3%	72,167	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Perris	125	110	4	60.0%	70,434	5.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Napa	113	94	3	70.0%	67,666	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Indio	128	112	3	70.0%	67,264	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Elk Grove	137	122	6	37.2%	66,759	7.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
South Gate	99	90	3	70.0%	66,572	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Francisco	177	162	14	7.6%	65,873	12.1	28	3	56	1	1	7
Murrieta	120	109	5	49.7%	65,721	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Monte	113	102	4	70.0%	65,598	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vallejo	136	123	4	52.5%	65,300	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
La Puente	131	120	4	54.4%	64,139	7.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Redwood City	142	125	3	54.9%	62,783	5.5	4	1	4	0	0	4
Rialto	128	117	5	58.2%	61,994	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Clovis	125	113	5	50.2%	60,894	6.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Orange	125	115	4	41.6%	60,340	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Hawthorne	99	88	5	60.0%	58,102	5.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Oakland	161	146	12	13.9%	57,392	11.3	14	3	22	0	0	2
Menifee	149	134	4	51.6%	57,012	5.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Inglewood	146	128	4	42.3%	56,664	6.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Vacaville	109	98	6	53.5%	56,371	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Antioch	115	106	4	50.0%	55,361	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Ventura	121	107	5	47.4%	54,929	6.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Madera	131	114	4	52.5%	54,021	5.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Mission Viejo	113	107	3	54.5%	53,616	5.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Monica	122	114	4	56.5%	53,325	5.6	5	1	5	0	1	5
Norwalk	97	87	5	50.0%	52,943	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
San Mateo	131	118	7	35.2%	50,096	7.5	4	2	7	0	0	7
Palo Alto	137	127	5	50.4%	48,694	5.5	4	1	4	0	1	4
San Leandro	127	114	6	43.7%	48,581	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Pittsburg	95	88	4	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Barbara	149	133	8	34.6%	46,980	7.9	7	1	7	0	0	7
Hesperia	116	103	5	44.4%	46,125	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Berkeley	162	149	6	36.2%	45,962	7.3	9	2	10	0	0	10
Moreno Valley	128	115	8	22.3%	45,853	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	3
Long Beach	156	140	17	9.5%	45,375	10.5	12	1	12	0	0	6
Merced	123	112	6	43.5%	44,861	6.7	3	1	3	0	0	3
Chino	112	102	6	40.0%	37,790	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Roseville	128	114	8	24.7%	34,492	8.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Santa Rosa	144	129	11	15.4%	33,194	9.7	6	1	6	0	0	5
Temecula	135	125	10	23.7%	30,780	8.7	3	1	3	0	0	2
Van Nuys	133	118	11	16.5%	29,393	9.8	4	2	5	0	0	3
Costa Mesa	112	105	7	25.6%	29,072	8.5	2	2	3	0	0	3
Chula Vista	149	137	9	10.7%	27,976	10.2	5	1	5	0	0	3
Bell Gardens	101	94	9	20.0%	20,487	9.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Santa Cruz	124	112	9	19.0%	19,780	9.3	4	1	4	0	0	4
North Hollywood	127	117	12	10.0%	15,313	10.0	4	2	7	0	0	4
Visalia	130	117	10	9.6%	14,622	10.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
Pacoima	100	93	9	10.0%	10,580	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Sylmar	101	94	10	10.0%	9,649	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1

Houston

ZIP	adeccousa.com	randstadusa.com	frontlinesourcegroup.com	murrayresources.com	burnettspecialists.com	claytonpersonnel.com
77088	4	5	7	6	2	1
77047	4	5	6	7	3	10
77037	4	5	6	7	9	2
77098	4	5	7	6	3	10
77027	1	2	3	4	5	7
77068	4	5	7	6	8	9
77078	4	5	7	6	9	8
77086	1	2	4	3	5	6
77035	4	5	6	7	8	10
77008	4	5	6	7	9	10
77004	4	5	2	6	9	10
77028	4	5	2	7	9	8
77059	4	5	7	6	3	10
77039	1	2	4	3	6	5
77019	4	5	3	7	2	9
77075	4	5	7	6	9	10
77077	1	2	3	4	6	7
77079	4	5	7	6	8	10
77099	4	5	6	7	8	10
77024	4	5	6	7	8	9
77095	4	5	7	6	8	9
77048	4	5	7	6	8	9
77044	4	5	7	6	9	8
77015	4	5	7	6	9	8
77017	4	5	7	6	8	10
77057	4	5	7	6	8	10
77055	4	5	7	6	8	9
77006	1	2	4	3	5	7
77026	4	5	1	7	10	8
77046	4	5	7	6	1	10
77066	4	5	7	6	8	9
77023	4	5	2	7	8	10
77094	4	5	7	6	8	10
77084	4	5	7	6	8	10
77013	1	2	4	3	5	6
77063	4	5	7	6	1	10
77053	4	5	6	7	8	9
77022	1	2	3	4	5	6
77072	4	5	7	6	3	10
77049	4	5	6	7	8	9
77045	4	5	7	6	1	10
77010	4	5	1	3	9	10
77018	1	2	4	3	5	7
77041	1	2	4	3	5	6
77009	4	5	2	6	8	9
77089	4	5	7	6	1	10
77032	4	5	6	7	8	9
77036	4	5	6	7	8	10
77085	4	5	7	6	10	9
77054	4	5	7	6	3	10
77058	4	5	7	6	8	11
77014	4	5	6	7	10	8
77067	4	5	7	6	8	9
77005	4	5	7	6	1	10
77076	4	5	7	6	8	9
77070	4	5	7	6	8	9
77060	4	5	6	7	9	3
77080	1	2	4	3	5	7
77050	4	5	7	6	8	3
77091	4	5	7	6	3	1
77071	4	5	6	7	8	10
77061	4	5	7	6	9	10
77020	4	5	1	7	9	10
77081	4	5	7	6	8	10
77030	4	5	7	6	8	10
77040	1	2	4	3	5	7
77090	4	5	7	6	9	8
77031	4	5	6	7	8	10
77051	1	2	3	4	5	7
77011	4	5	3	7	10	9
77042	4	5	7	6	1	10
77062	4	5	7	6	9	10
77082	4	5	7	6	9	10
77093	4	5	7	6	8	9
77073	4	5	6	7	11	8
77033	4	5	2	6	8	9
77043	1	2	3	4	7	6
77074	4	5	6	7	9	10
77064	4	5	7	6	9	10
77012	4	5	7	6	8	10
77002	4	5	2	3	8	10
77092	4	5	7	6	9	10
77069	4	6	5	7	8	10
77021	4	5	3	7	8	10
77083	4	5	1	6	8	12
77029	4	5	7	6	8	10
77034	4	6	5	7	1	11
77087	4	6	5	7	8	10
77003	4	6	1	7	8	10
77038	4	5	6	7	10	1
77007	5	6	2	8	9	11
77016	4	5	6	7	8	9
77065	4	2	7	6	9	8
77096	4	5	7	6	9	10
77025	4	6	5	7	9	10
77056	4	5	7	6	9	10

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for Adeccousa

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 3,999 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

Adeccousa Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (temp agency near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

Adeccousa Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

Adeccousa Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Adeccousa Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly