24hourfitness Market Research
15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly

Explain & Improve 24hourfitness.com's Search Traffic By Comparing To All 13,305 Gyms In USA

Who Is This For
Just a Few Benefits

24hourfitness Managers
Founders, Partners, Business Development & Marketing Directors
24hourfitness Personnel
Business Analysts, Digital Marketing Experts, SEO Experts, etc.
Other Parties
Journalists, Salesmen, Investors, Service Providers, etc.

Get a snapshot of your online presence
Compare with competitors & track month-to-month movements
Get a full picture of your competition
National or regional (state/county) & local (city/neighborhood)
Enter new markets
Or merge with/acquire another business

Real-World 24hourfitness Report, December 2025 (1% Sample of All Data)

Google search results collected from every zip-code in America. Reported at neighborhood, city, county, state, and national levels.

National Overview
City Overview
California
Los Angeles
National
Competitors
Local
Competitors
RAW Rankings

National Overview

State	Competition			Business Intelligence Metrics			RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
State	Websites	Competitors	24hourfitness Rank	Visibility	Reach	Average Position	Cities	ZIPs	Pages	Rankings	Top 1	Top 3	Top 10
USA	34,882	13,305	7	14.7%	47,588,513	13.2	27,361	32,635	500	33,707	70	544	11,966
California	4,415	2,035	4	42.4%	16,596,998	8.5	1,164	1,738	249	2,164	12	283	1,535
Texas	3,524	1,604	5	20.8%	5,796,803	13.1	1,360	1,917	80	2,077	3	20	819
Florida	2,755	1,297	8	15.9%	3,274,288	16.6	446	975	26	1,013	10	43	250
Washington	1,750	891	4	29.9%	2,177,170	11.7	451	587	29	639	0	46	330
New York	2,962	1,383	11	10.9%	2,145,298	12.9	1,489	1,754	22	1,797	5	12	616
Colorado	1,660	805	4	35.4%	1,959,108	10.3	381	514	33	580	3	15	317
Oregon	1,772	895	4	36.8%	1,500,106	11.4	353	412	22	484	14	65	244
Nevada	807	447	5	38.5%	1,126,799	8.7	92	168	11	213	0	4	149
New Jersey	1,775	883	8	11.2%	998,558	13.2	536	592	21	605	5	16	135
Michigan	2,051	980	12	8.1%	810,287	12.5	833	976	2	977	0	0	413
Hawaii	620	357	4	53.0%	753,081	8.3	82	93	11	102	11	19	65
Pennsylvania	2,688	1,340	13	5.8%	741,634	12.8	1,603	1,780	1	1,780	0	0	631
Illinois	2,798	1,312	14	5.3%	682,144	13.6	1,245	1,380	2	1,380	0	0	307
Ohio	2,338	1,162	14	5.6%	648,979	13.9	975	1,187	2	1,188	1	1	345
Virginia	1,936	921	11	6.9%	577,307	13.8	723	891	7	894	0	2	270
Georgia	2,016	985	13	4.8%	494,850	15.5	574	726	2	730	1	4	110
North Carolina	2,089	990	18	4.3%	433,086	16.0	683	802	1	802	0	0	132
Wisconsin	1,895	867	13	7.2%	417,428	12.3	694	769	1	769	0	0	324
Maryland	1,303	702	15	6.9%	415,378	14.5	392	463	3	474	3	11	150
Indiana	2,878	1,368	10	6.3%	415,195	13.4	658	769	1	769	0	0	174
Utah	1,087	585	9	12.4%	378,762	12.0	246	284	8	311	0	1	98
Minnesota	1,926	897	10	6.6%	362,912	12.7	777	878	4	882	0	0	261
Massachusetts	1,836	950	15	5.3%	359,974	14.5	461	534	2	534	0	0	117
Missouri	2,086	1,040	12	5.7%	344,967	13.7	887	1,017	2	1,017	0	0	311
Alabama	1,536	786	10	6.7%	323,676	15.3	522	637	2	639	0	0	209
Kentucky	1,635	819	12	6.5%	287,746	12.5	697	757	1	757	0	0	299
Louisiana	1,308	661	13	6.1%	283,657	14.3	429	508	2	508	0	0	176
Tennessee	1,632	818	18	4.2%	281,453	17.4	514	622	1	622	0	0	137
Mississippi	1,293	676	10	9.3%	276,843	11.4	384	418	1	418	0	0	151
Arizona	1,335	675	19	3.9%	270,284	16.2	247	396	2	419	0	0	56
Arkansas	1,465	727	9	8.3%	247,722	11.9	553	587	5	594	2	2	247
Iowa	1,772	802	8	7.7%	241,396	12.8	890	933	3	934	0	0	384
Connecticut	1,271	666	12	6.1%	218,847	14.5	234	279	2	279	0	0	50
South Carolina	1,343	677	17	3.9%	191,511	17.8	347	422	1	422	0	0	72
Oklahoma	1,441	721	14	4.9%	190,239	15.5	557	645	3	652	0	0	170
West Virginia	1,171	643	10	9.0%	165,010	11.1	684	704	2	709	0	0	324
Kansas	1,515	733	15	5.5%	160,526	14.0	615	691	4	707	0	0	178
Nebraska	1,396	751	13	6.9%	131,931	13.1	523	580	3	585	0	0	195
New Mexico	1,079	594	12	6.2%	129,902	12.8	327	361	3	363	0	0	137
Maine	1,614	916	8	9.3%	123,680	11.1	421	425	2	426	0	0	235
New Hampshire	1,030	586	10	8.8%	118,900	11.3	238	248	1	248	0	0	118
Idaho	1,114	618	13	5.2%	87,914	13.7	251	273	2	277	0	0	78
Delaware	606	376	14	6.8%	64,880	15.2	52	66	1	66	0	0	9
South Dakota	970	532	15	7.1%	61,190	12.4	359	370	2	374	0	0	121
Montana	1,115	594	20	5.8%	60,712	13.0	348	361	3	363	0	0	117
Vermont	863	495	10	8.5%	53,396	11.6	250	254	1	254	0	0	92
North Dakota	794	445	14	6.6%	49,698	13.8	367	381	4	387	0	0	116
Rhode Island	513	314	16	4.5%	47,285	17.7	64	77	1	77	0	0	9
Alaska	942	535	14	5.9%	43,782	12.3	217	234	3	243	0	0	123
Wyoming	826	452	14	6.9%	40,187	12.6	164	171	3	174	0	0	60

City Overview

City	State	Competition	Business Intelligence Metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	California	353	225	2	61.7%	1,517,141	5.1	62	5	67	1	20	62
Houston	Texas	324	199	5	43.5%	1,387,505	6.7	96	7	167	0	0	153
San Diego	California	291	189	3	72.9%	982,327	4.2	36	6	41	0	21	38
Miami	Florida	377	222	3	48.7%	914,674	8.3	55	4	59	4	21	39
Las Vegas	Nevada	288	157	4	49.3%	761,415	6.0	43	3	62	0	0	60
Portland	Oregon	234	152	2	82.6%	760,468	2.7	33	7	56	6	42	56
Seattle	Washington	270	173	3	67.1%	641,248	4.2	35	4	59	0	25	57
San Jose	California	240	157	5	58.7%	616,453	5.1	28	3	48	0	2	48
Sacramento	California	254	168	3	75.4%	606,949	3.3	28	5	37	0	25	37
Denver	Colorado	335	212	3	54.9%	596,903	6.0	38	6	49	1	5	48
Brooklyn	New York	221	141	10	19.2%	498,629	10.5	37	2	37	0	0	15
San Francisco	California	253	153	4	56.3%	489,723	4.8	28	5	31	0	10	28
Austin	Texas	276	175	7	36.6%	398,244	7.6	44	2	46	0	0	40
Fort Worth	Texas	234	139	6	41.3%	377,088	6.9	32	6	40	0	0	38
Orlando	Florida	310	194	4	36.9%	367,873	7.8	32	4	43	0	4	36
Honolulu	Hawaii	182	116	2	78.6%	326,848	2.9	11	1	11	4	8	11
Dallas	Texas	274	162	8	22.4%	311,228	11.0	48	4	48	0	0	22
Anaheim	California	183	125	2	83.7%	308,412	2.7	7	2	8	0	6	8
Oakland	California	191	124	3	68.4%	281,655	4.2	14	2	17	0	0	17
Santa Ana	California	147	105	4	65.2%	232,971	4.3	6	3	12	0	1	12
Tacoma	Washington	245	175	3	69.1%	230,199	4.5	20	3	22	0	14	20
Fort Lauderdale	Florida	309	198	4	27.0%	224,583	16.6	27	6	31	3	4	10
Fontana	California	140	103	1	91.5%	214,870	1.7	3	1	3	2	3	3
Bronx	New York	234	156	8	14.0%	202,301	9.8	25	2	25	0	0	19
Riverside	California	179	125	4	54.2%	200,413	5.4	7	1	7	1	1	7
Irvine	California	194	134	3	73.6%	197,027	3.3	9	2	15	0	8	15
Spring	Texas	216	144	5	48.3%	184,086	5.5	8	5	10	0	3	10
Littleton	Colorado	254	169	5	52.5%	170,872	6.1	10	7	14	0	3	12
Jersey City	New Jersey	167	122	4	65.1%	170,333	4.0	7	2	8	0	4	8
San Bernardino	California	163	119	4	67.6%	168,550	4.1	7	2	9	0	3	9
Colorado Springs	Colorado	244	160	8	27.6%	161,105	8.5	30	3	30	0	0	25
Salt Lake City	Utah	244	153	5	32.9%	160,071	7.3	19	6	20	0	0	19
Salem	Oregon	171	121	4	57.5%	153,279	5.3	7	2	13	0	0	13
Chula Vista	California	141	98	5	55.3%	144,249	5.6	5	3	10	0	0	10
Whittier	California	178	130	2	73.2%	143,543	3.5	6	1	6	0	4	6
Oceanside	California	143	104	4	70.0%	140,181	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lancaster	California	143	112	4	75.7%	139,661	3.7	3	2	6	0	2	6
New York City	New York	323	196	12	8.4%	136,676	13.4	47	2	47	0	0	12
Mckinney	Texas	135	95	3	70.0%	132,294	4.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Kissimmee	Florida	225	143	5	45.4%	131,095	7.1	7	5	13	0	0	10
Lake Worth	Florida	195	140	3	61.4%	126,884	7.2	5	3	5	2	2	3
Moreno Valley	California	149	118	4	61.4%	126,235	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Fremont	California	144	108	3	53.4%	124,538	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	California	130	101	2	87.5%	121,564	2.3	3	2	6	1	4	6
Aurora	Colorado	200	142	7	27.8%	121,179	8.7	11	2	20	0	0	14
Vancouver	Washington	198	140	6	37.1%	120,908	7.5	11	1	11	0	0	11
Irving	Texas	164	118	6	50.0%	120,279	6.0	6	2	11	0	0	11
Huntington Beach	California	141	107	5	60.0%	119,944	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hayward	California	141	109	2	62.1%	119,281	4.3	4	2	5	0	2	5
Fort Collins	Colorado	143	97	4	61.0%	118,825	4.8	5	1	5	0	0	5
Ontario	California	140	100	3	66.9%	118,171	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Homestead	Florida	200	144	4	61.4%	115,145	5.0	7	3	14	0	0	14
Torrance	California	185	125	3	64.4%	113,808	4.8	5	4	9	0	0	9
Roseville	California	126	89	2	80.0%	111,835	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Hollywood	Florida	210	145	8	23.6%	110,537	10.9	9	3	9	0	0	5
Escondido	California	153	110	4	60.5%	108,714	4.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Arlington	Texas	210	146	7	27.0%	107,265	8.3	12	1	12	0	0	11
Rancho Cucamonga	California	140	105	5	60.0%	105,959	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sunnyvale	California	166	124	3	68.0%	103,868	4.8	4	3	5	0	2	4
Grand Prairie	Texas	144	112	4	54.4%	103,580	5.3	4	3	7	0	1	7
Boynton Beach	Florida	160	120	4	59.5%	103,575	5.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Mesquite	Texas	120	88	4	70.5%	103,166	4.0	3	2	4	0	1	4
Carrollton	Texas	144	105	3	76.2%	102,735	3.3	3	2	6	0	2	6
Santa Rosa	California	148	101	4	47.1%	101,796	6.5	6	2	8	0	0	8
Kent	Washington	145	108	4	63.1%	101,326	4.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pasadena	California	173	120	4	63.9%	100,835	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
Beaverton	Oregon	152	108	5	49.7%	100,169	6.5	4	3	8	0	0	8
El Cajon	California	162	110	3	57.5%	99,238	5.3	3	4	5	0	0	5
Indio	California	118	87	1	96.8%	93,017	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Santa Cruz	California	139	103	2	84.6%	88,072	2.5	4	2	5	0	5	5
Garden Grove	California	168	123	5	50.0%	87,967	6.2	5	3	9	0	0	9
Bakersfield	California	211	141	9	15.7%	87,665	11.3	11	3	11	0	0	5
North Las Vegas	Nevada	189	119	5	37.3%	87,202	7.9	7	3	9	0	0	8
Boulder	Colorado	180	118	4	66.2%	86,851	4.3	6	2	12	0	0	12
Redwood City	California	156	125	3	75.1%	85,928	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
Bellevue	Washington	156	118	4	58.7%	85,916	5.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Reno	Nevada	175	123	7	28.9%	85,741	10.2	12	3	12	0	2	7
Sugar Land	Texas	161	116	3	50.2%	84,771	7.7	3	3	4	0	0	2
Arvada	Colorado	169	121	3	63.0%	84,101	4.4	5	2	10	0	2	10
Annapolis	Maryland	169	121	2	87.9%	83,526	2.2	5	1	5	2	5	5
Auburn	Washington	138	106	4	72.9%	82,273	3.7	3	2	3	0	1	3
La Puente	California	145	95	2	69.6%	82,075	5.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Palmdale	California	157	119	5	46.6%	81,468	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	California	127	94	3	72.0%	80,035	3.7	3	2	5	0	1	5
Costa Mesa	California	119	83	3	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Baytown	Texas	145	106	3	66.9%	78,858	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Apopka	Florida	119	89	3	80.0%	78,123	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Coral Springs	Florida	121	90	3	80.0%	77,790	3.0	2	1	2	0	2	2
Van Nuys	California	149	98	5	43.7%	77,649	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
West Covina	California	136	102	3	70.6%	77,218	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Pompano Beach	Florida	243	170	8	20.5%	75,865	13.9	10	3	10	0	1	4
Olympia	Washington	184	139	5	41.4%	75,700	7.0	6	2	8	0	0	7
Long Beach	California	193	131	8	15.8%	75,466	9.9	12	1	12	0	0	9
Pacoima	California	99	65	3	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Bothell	Washington	158	114	3	57.3%	73,490	4.3	3	3	5	0	3	5
Elk Grove	California	138	108	6	40.8%	73,149	7.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Ventura	California	129	90	4	62.9%	72,894	4.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Lynnwood	Washington	160	120	3	66.4%	72,005	4.3	3	3	4	0	1	4
Parker	Colorado	121	92	4	70.0%	70,197	4.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Downey	California	140	102	3	62.0%	70,043	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Richardson	Texas	145	105	4	60.0%	68,759	5.0	3	2	4	0	0	4
Orange	California	160	118	6	47.3%	68,647	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Carlsbad	California	144	105	5	60.0%	68,202	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Pearland	Texas	147	103	5	49.2%	67,675	6.5	2	3	3	0	0	3
Sandy	Utah	133	94	4	60.7%	67,056	5.0	4	1	4	0	1	4
Fairfax	Virginia	179	130	6	40.6%	66,484	10.0	4	2	4	0	1	2
Concord	California	144	109	4	50.0%	65,110	6.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Inglewood	California	193	129	5	47.5%	63,541	6.0	5	2	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	California	152	108	5	44.6%	62,167	6.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Livermore	California	118	87	3	64.3%	61,852	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Oxnard	California	149	105	8	27.7%	61,155	7.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
Puyallup	Washington	167	120	5	42.2%	60,289	7.2	5	1	5	0	1	5
Katy	Texas	157	106	9	17.5%	60,088	10.8	4	3	6	0	0	2
Falls Church	Virginia	198	135	4	49.5%	59,535	5.8	5	2	7	0	0	7
Englewood	Colorado	191	132	4	53.3%	59,525	6.3	4	3	4	0	1	3
San Mateo	California	173	123	5	41.6%	59,248	7.0	4	3	5	0	0	5
Mission Viejo	California	116	92	4	60.0%	59,015	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Monica	California	131	85	4	62.3%	58,781	4.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Stockton	California	214	153	8	15.5%	58,091	9.8	12	2	12	0	0	8
Indianapolis	Indiana	316	188	13	6.0%	57,278	14.3	37	1	37	0	0	1
Greeley	Colorado	117	84	6	50.0%	57,033	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Renton	Washington	194	137	6	36.7%	56,773	7.2	5	2	5	0	0	5
Corona	California	165	130	9	21.8%	55,988	8.6	5	2	8	0	0	7
Allen	Texas	116	84	6	50.0%	55,636	6.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Rialto	California	126	104	5	51.8%	55,247	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Broomfield	Colorado	148	104	3	52.6%	55,055	5.3	3	2	3	0	0	3
Henderson	Nevada	197	121	8	18.2%	54,943	10.5	8	4	9	0	0	3
Humble	Texas	164	106	7	33.0%	54,937	8.0	3	3	3	0	0	2
Burbank	California	156	117	4	49.7%	53,733	6.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Plano	Texas	174	116	8	17.5%	53,363	9.9	7	2	11	0	0	5
Hialeah	Florida	184	107	10	14.1%	51,605	17.0	7	3	7	0	0	2
Phoenix	Arizona	304	194	14	3.5%	51,430	16.6	42	1	42	0	0	0
Bell Gardens	California	97	65	4	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Santa Barbara	California	140	100	3	37.7%	51,173	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pomona	California	127	92	5	32.3%	51,090	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Cypress	Texas	115	87	6	29.3%	49,963	8.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vallejo	California	141	104	6	38.6%	48,099	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	California	97	76	5	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
North Hollywood	California	145	96	6	31.1%	47,559	7.5	4	3	7	0	0	7
Chino	California	122	94	5	50.0%	47,237	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Hillsboro	Oregon	125	91	5	45.8%	47,092	6.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Antioch	California	126	96	8	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	California	112	82	6	34.4%	44,279	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Missouri City	Texas	147	101	5	40.7%	43,148	6.0	2	2	3	0	1	3
Daly City	California	137	99	5	35.8%	40,913	10.5	2	4	4	0	0	2
Sparks	Nevada	159	114	6	33.3%	39,709	9.0	4	2	4	0	0	3
Berkeley	California	206	146	6	31.2%	39,705	8.3	9	5	16	0	0	8
Saint Paul	Minnesota	367	247	14	4.9%	38,829	16.0	30	1	30	0	0	3
Hawthorne	California	96	77	5	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Staten Island	New York	207	133	11	8.1%	38,282	12.1	12	1	12	0	0	2
Minneapolis	Minnesota	405	256	18	3.5%	37,892	21.7	51	1	51	0	0	0
Lewisville	Texas	150	111	7	30.6%	36,347	8.0	3	2	5	0	0	5
Saint Louis	Missouri	320	215	16	4.0%	36,240	16.3	45	1	45	0	0	1
El Monte	California	122	91	5	36.8%	34,471	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Conroe	Texas	182	124	6	20.3%	32,593	15.0	7	3	8	0	0	3
Victorville	California	125	89	7	23.4%	31,917	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	4
Madera	California	147	104	6	30.2%	31,145	12.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Chicago	Illinois	299	179	31	1.1%	29,646	21.0	56	1	56	0	0	0
Sylmar	California	98	64	7	30.0%	28,946	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hesperia	California	110	82	6	27.8%	28,843	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Omaha	Nebraska	252	175	13	5.1%	28,044	14.8	31	1	31	0	0	0
West Palm Beach	Florida	214	155	11	7.4%	27,402	15.5	12	3	12	0	0	3
Albuquerque	New Mexico	189	133	13	4.0%	26,023	16.1	17	1	17	0	0	0
Jamaica	New York	181	121	11	10.5%	25,670	16.0	6	2	7	0	0	2
Yonkers	New York	145	109	8	13.9%	25,085	9.8	5	1	5	0	0	4
Washington DC	District of Columbia	240	156	18	3.7%	25,027	16.6	28	2	28	0	0	0
Deltona	Florida	115	82	7	25.1%	23,579	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
El Paso	Texas	263	166	16	2.9%	23,155	17.5	24	1	24	0	0	0
Cincinnati	Ohio	263	174	18	2.8%	22,458	22.1	45	1	45	0	0	0
Port Saint Lucie	Florida	166	126	7	11.1%	22,457	10.2	6	1	6	0	0	4
Pittsburgh	Pennsylvania	278	186	18	3.3%	22,323	18.2	39	1	39	0	0	1
Louisville	Kentucky	239	158	18	2.9%	22,291	17.2	32	1	32	0	0	0
Everett	Washington	159	119	9	13.3%	22,228	12.0	5	2	5	0	0	3
Vista	California	132	102	8	18.5%	22,222	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
San Antonio	Texas	343	208	30	1.2%	21,714	22.7	59	2	59	0	0	0
Mesa	Arizona	232	166	13	4.0%	21,543	17.5	13	1	13	0	0	0
Atlanta	Georgia	379	246	24	2.1%	20,370	28.0	39	1	39	0	0	1
Winston Salem	North Carolina	188	144	13	7.7%	20,285	12.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Flushing	New York	142	96	11	9.0%	19,356	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Baltimore	Maryland	225	146	18	3.0%	18,879	24.1	22	1	22	0	0	0
San Marcos	California	125	96	9	18.7%	18,826	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Dayton	Ohio	277	186	19	3.8%	18,229	18.5	27	1	27	0	0	1
Round Rock	Texas	159	114	13	10.7%	17,976	28.3	3	2	3	0	0	1
Cleveland	Ohio	264	169	24	2.4%	17,728	19.1	29	1	29	0	0	0
Philadelphia	Pennsylvania	260	163	36	1.1%	17,378	20.4	47	1	47	0	0	0
Glendale	Arizona	208	138	14	5.6%	16,958	16.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Chandler	Arizona	159	113	12	6.2%	16,573	13.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Keller	Texas	145	101	11	14.2%	16,558	13.0	2	3	3	0	0	1
Detroit	Michigan	204	130	20	2.6%	16,485	19.1	25	1	25	0	0	0
Saint Petersburg	Florida	226	170	15	4.5%	15,869	18.3	16	1	16	0	0	0
Madison	Wisconsin	197	133	13	5.3%	15,752	14.6	14	1	14	0	0	0
Clinton Township	Michigan	134	101	9	15.6%	15,645	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	3
Raleigh	North Carolina	220	153	15	2.8%	15,460	18.3	15	1	15	0	0	0
Astoria	New York	172	111	9	10.7%	15,252	14.8	4	2	4	0	0	1
Trenton	New Jersey	210	152	15	7.2%	14,892	12.8	11	1	11	0	0	1
Erie	Pennsylvania	185	126	10	7.7%	14,084	12.5	13	1	13	0	0	0
Kansas City	Missouri	240	160	21	2.4%	13,780	23.3	49	2	49	0	0	1
Frisco	Texas	123	94	10	8.0%	13,755	12.5	2	2	2	0	0	1
Delray Beach	Florida	171	122	12	11.4%	13,520	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	1
Hemet	California	145	111	11	10.4%	13,416	12.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Modesto	California	178	129	12	5.1%	13,393	14.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Des Moines	Iowa	196	127	14	5.9%	13,256	15.9	11	1	11	0	0	0
Salinas	California	164	124	11	7.0%	13,193	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Tampa	Florida	289	194	25	1.7%	13,154	20.7	27	1	27	0	0	0
Alexandria	Virginia	256	180	18	3.7%	13,135	16.9	14	1	14	0	0	0
Oklahoma City	Oklahoma	313	205	21	1.9%	12,867	23.9	42	1	42	0	0	0
Montgomery	Alabama	199	132	12	6.0%	12,676	14.1	13	1	13	0	0	0
Rochester	New York	260	165	26	2.7%	12,570	19.1	24	1	24	0	0	0
Rockford	Illinois	173	125	12	6.9%	12,516	12.8	9	1	9	0	0	1
Waukegan	Illinois	124	90	9	12.7%	12,421	9.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Warren	Michigan	160	120	10	9.2%	12,386	10.8	5	1	5	0	0	1
Wichita	Kansas	227	154	17	2.9%	12,246	22.6	26	1	26	0	0	0
Santa Clara	California	140	104	11	9.5%	11,970	10.3	4	3	7	0	0	3
Buffalo	New York	256	172	19	2.1%	11,755	28.6	28	1	28	0	0	0
Hamilton	Ohio	143	112	9	8.5%	11,624	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fairfield	California	118	87	7	10.0%	11,408	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Milwaukee	Wisconsin	269	170	38	1.4%	11,198	27.7	29	1	29	0	0	0
Edinburg	Texas	145	109	12	7.2%	11,165	14.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Silver Spring	Maryland	208	147	19	3.7%	11,146	23.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Bloomington	Indiana	155	107	10	8.2%	10,943	11.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
West Valley City	Utah	125	94	9	8.2%	10,918	12.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Wilmington	Delaware	186	138	19	5.0%	10,902	23.2	10	1	10	0	0	1
Ogden	Utah	148	106	12	5.4%	10,861	14.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Albany	New York	201	138	12	7.1%	10,712	22.3	11	1	11	0	0	1
Spokane	Washington	205	140	19	2.9%	10,477	19.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Bridgeport	Connecticut	174	130	10	7.1%	10,447	12.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Livonia	Michigan	128	98	10	11.0%	10,366	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	1
Elgin	Illinois	138	101	9	8.4%	10,266	11.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Santa Maria	California	155	113	11	7.1%	10,229	13.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Beaumont	Texas	185	133	14	6.9%	10,070	13.3	8	1	8	0	0	0
Columbus	Ohio	226	148	31	1.2%	10,061	23.6	30	1	30	0	0	0
Perris	California	131	104	9	8.5%	10,001	11.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Charlotte	North Carolina	236	153	24	1.1%	9,995	21.8	24	1	24	0	0	0
Tucson	Arizona	248	163	22	1.1%	9,982	21.7	32	1	32	0	0	0
Menifee	California	160	116	9	9.0%	9,948	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Stone Mountain	Georgia	155	114	13	7.6%	9,765	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Baton Rouge	Louisiana	243	156	18	2.6%	9,730	17.1	18	1	18	0	0	0
Norwalk	California	99	76	9	9.0%	9,530	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
South Gate	California	97	77	7	10.0%	9,510	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Akron	Ohio	176	133	15	3.5%	9,465	16.9	17	1	17	0	0	0
Flint	Michigan	177	124	13	6.1%	9,418	13.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Fresno	California	235	159	18	1.6%	9,407	25.8	18	2	18	0	0	2
Youngstown	Ohio	195	146	15	6.0%	9,389	13.6	12	1	12	0	0	1
Newport News	Virginia	172	124	13	5.3%	9,316	15.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Independence	Missouri	181	135	9	7.3%	9,083	12.6	8	1	8	0	0	0
Jacksonville	Florida	282	191	24	1.0%	9,035	21.8	31	1	31	0	0	0
Fort Pierce	Florida	179	129	9	9.4%	9,021	10.5	8	1	8	0	0	5
Palo Alto	California	145	101	9	9.2%	8,912	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Lansing	Michigan	162	105	11	5.4%	8,898	15.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Memphis	Tennessee	260	169	34	1.3%	8,882	37.8	26	1	26	0	0	1
Hagerstown	Maryland	159	117	10	9.0%	8,844	10.7	3	1	3	0	0	1
Hampton	Virginia	163	116	13	6.4%	8,676	13.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Lincoln	Nebraska	223	160	16	3.0%	8,673	17.0	22	1	22	0	0	0
Las Cruces	New Mexico	190	137	13	5.8%	8,668	13.9	7	1	7	0	0	1
Murrieta	California	124	94	12	6.5%	8,656	13.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Abilene	Texas	172	124	11	6.6%	8,584	14.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
New Haven	Connecticut	141	100	10	6.6%	8,537	13.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lake Charles	Louisiana	155	114	12	6.4%	8,424	13.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Gulfport	Mississippi	129	93	10	8.8%	8,359	11.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Longview	Texas	171	129	11	7.9%	8,304	12.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Racine	Wisconsin	164	121	11	6.6%	8,302	13.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Sterling Heights	Michigan	138	108	12	6.2%	8,274	13.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Muskegon	Michigan	164	123	12	6.4%	8,262	13.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Evansville	Indiana	188	134	13	4.4%	8,186	15.3	9	1	9	0	0	0
Overland Park	Kansas	179	133	16	4.4%	8,155	18.8	9	1	9	0	0	0
Winter Haven	Florida	123	88	10	7.6%	8,137	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Jackson	Mississippi	187	120	15	4.8%	8,124	15.4	11	1	11	0	0	0
Lynn	Massachusetts	141	107	9	8.4%	7,856	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Henrico	Virginia	202	142	17	4.1%	7,839	17.9	7	2	7	0	0	0
Alpharetta	Georgia	178	128	14	4.1%	7,826	24.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Elkhart	Indiana	143	105	12	7.8%	7,751	12.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Saginaw	Michigan	172	127	11	5.9%	7,717	14.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Naples	Florida	205	143	20	2.4%	7,637	20.8	14	1	14	0	0	0
Elmhurst	New York	98	66	10	8.0%	7,517	12.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Killeen	Texas	162	110	12	5.0%	7,502	15.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Schenectady	New York	182	134	15	4.6%	7,498	17.0	8	1	8	0	0	0
Tracy	California	151	116	14	6.3%	7,380	13.5	4	2	6	0	0	0
Vacaville	California	124	92	11	6.9%	7,307	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Belleville	Illinois	144	107	10	7.8%	7,295	12.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lawrence	Kansas	165	121	13	7.2%	7,295	12.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Laredo	Texas	157	110	17	2.7%	7,206	21.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Valdosta	Georgia	155	110	13	7.5%	7,115	12.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Tempe	Arizona	152	108	14	3.6%	6,914	18.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Gastonia	North Carolina	131	97	12	6.3%	6,787	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Waukesha	Wisconsin	131	99	10	6.8%	6,548	13.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
High Point	North Carolina	148	110	12	5.4%	6,546	14.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Richmond	Virginia	191	124	15	1.7%	6,517	22.2	15	2	15	0	0	0
Garland	Texas	171	128	16	2.7%	6,483	22.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Napa	California	113	78	11	6.6%	6,350	13.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Allentown	Pennsylvania	173	127	14	3.7%	6,319	28.3	7	1	7	0	0	0
Portsmouth	Virginia	167	123	10	6.5%	6,222	14.0	7	1	7	0	0	1
Muncie	Indiana	152	108	9	6.7%	6,212	12.2	5	1	5	0	0	2
Lithonia	Georgia	126	92	14	6.4%	6,177	14.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lakewood	New Jersey	97	83	12	6.0%	6,046	14.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Waterbury	Connecticut	154	111	15	5.5%	6,021	14.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Bradenton	Florida	199	137	20	2.4%	6,001	20.6	10	1	10	0	0	0
Topeka	Kansas	225	156	16	3.7%	5,990	16.4	18	1	18	0	0	0
Woodbridge	Virginia	147	111	16	2.8%	5,931	19.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Lehigh Acres	Florida	170	122	12	5.0%	5,879	16.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Milton	Florida	144	110	14	6.1%	5,788	13.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Scranton	Pennsylvania	192	139	10	5.8%	5,782	14.5	8	1	8	0	0	0
Duluth	Minnesota	185	138	12	4.8%	5,676	16.3	11	1	11	0	0	0
Peoria	Arizona	145	110	17	3.3%	5,630	22.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Sarasota	Florida	220	137	22	2.2%	5,612	19.7	13	1	13	0	0	0
San Angelo	Texas	150	105	14	5.1%	5,603	14.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Provo	Utah	143	97	10	4.8%	5,576	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Nashville	Tennessee	264	176	23	1.2%	5,553	31.4	22	1	22	0	0	0
Tulsa	Oklahoma	261	158	25	1.3%	5,547	25.2	28	1	28	0	0	0
Gilbert	Arizona	186	131	17	2.3%	5,488	18.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Newark	New Jersey	167	121	17	2.0%	5,488	20.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Johnson City	Tennessee	143	104	13	5.6%	5,390	14.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Birmingham	Alabama	246	168	37	1.1%	5,355	39.8	30	1	30	0	0	0
Ridgewood	New York	98	73	11	5.0%	5,336	15.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
Cape Coral	Florida	169	118	14	2.9%	5,228	20.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Fort Wayne	Indiana	202	125	19	1.6%	5,226	19.8	16	1	16	0	0	0
Spring Hill	Florida	177	136	14	4.1%	5,188	15.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Idaho Falls	Idaho	139	100	15	4.7%	5,088	15.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Scottsdale	Arizona	221	144	23	1.7%	5,062	19.9	11	1	11	0	0	0
West Jordan	Utah	143	105	14	4.1%	5,013	20.7	3	3	3	0	0	0
Chico	California	139	103	13	4.4%	4,906	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Merced	California	145	104	13	4.7%	4,814	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Green Bay	Wisconsin	178	128	16	2.6%	4,804	16.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Boise	Idaho	181	132	20	1.9%	4,800	19.8	9	1	9	0	0	0
Tyler	Texas	182	124	16	3.1%	4,794	21.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Covington	Georgia	144	102	16	5.2%	4,792	15.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Rockville	Maryland	176	126	18	3.3%	4,780	21.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Appleton	Wisconsin	145	103	18	3.9%	4,779	16.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Midlothian	Virginia	138	104	12	4.8%	4,679	18.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Pueblo	Colorado	182	129	16	2.9%	4,648	17.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Rock Hill	South Carolina	149	110	15	4.0%	4,639	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Longmont	Colorado	144	104	16	3.5%	4,613	20.7	3	2	4	0	0	0
Canton	Ohio	171	124	15	3.1%	4,582	17.0	12	1	12	0	0	0
Marietta	Georgia	179	127	23	1.4%	4,563	22.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Temecula	California	136	103	12	3.5%	4,511	14.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Plainfield	Illinois	154	114	17	4.6%	4,501	16.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Roanoke	Virginia	197	139	17	2.6%	4,434	18.7	10	1	10	0	0	0
Virginia Beach	Virginia	187	129	22	1.0%	4,428	20.6	12	1	12	0	0	0
Decatur	Georgia	191	124	16	2.4%	4,300	21.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Terre Haute	Indiana	164	119	15	4.5%	4,276	17.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Lees Summit	Missouri	181	136	16	4.2%	4,269	16.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Holland	Michigan	113	83	12	4.5%	4,181	15.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Corpus Christi	Texas	208	132	23	1.3%	4,155	29.6	18	1	18	0	0	0
Rapid City	South Dakota	136	98	13	4.3%	4,149	18.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Knoxville	Tennessee	219	147	24	1.1%	4,132	24.9	17	1	17	0	0	0
Broken Arrow	Oklahoma	141	108	15	3.2%	4,124	17.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Brockton	Massachusetts	121	88	14	4.3%	4,121	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Manassas	Virginia	175	123	20	2.7%	4,113	23.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Rio Rancho	New Mexico	132	91	17	4.1%	4,018	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
South Bend	Indiana	190	131	19	2.7%	4,013	18.1	10	1	10	0	0	0
Riverview	Florida	163	115	20	3.6%	3,973	20.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
New Orleans	Louisiana	190	125	29	0.9%	3,966	25.6	19	1	19	0	0	0
Clermont	Florida	150	112	14	3.9%	3,905	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
O Fallon	Missouri	122	96	13	4.0%	3,886	16.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Florissant	Missouri	140	104	15	3.6%	3,852	17.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bowie	Maryland	177	122	15	3.7%	3,799	22.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Clearwater	Florida	207	149	18	2.1%	3,776	20.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
Elizabeth	New Jersey	133	105	13	3.7%	3,692	17.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Providence	Rhode Island	185	127	24	1.8%	3,684	42.6	8	1	8	0	0	0
Laurel	Maryland	160	119	18	3.2%	3,655	17.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Paterson	New Jersey	168	125	15	2.5%	3,627	18.1	9	1	9	0	0	0
Greensboro	North Carolina	179	129	24	1.1%	3,549	28.2	9	1	9	0	0	0
Norfolk	Virginia	203	135	25	1.4%	3,518	30.3	14	1	14	0	0	0
Brownsville	Texas	145	108	19	1.7%	3,516	21.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Harrisburg	Pennsylvania	180	129	18	2.1%	3,480	20.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Vero Beach	Florida	164	116	16	3.0%	3,400	19.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Saint Augustine	Florida	196	140	18	2.6%	3,400	20.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Miami Beach	Florida	162	87	20	2.9%	3,354	27.8	5	4	5	0	0	0
Summerville	South Carolina	123	90	17	2.4%	3,349	17.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
York	Pennsylvania	164	109	18	1.8%	3,312	20.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Palm Bay	Florida	156	117	16	2.9%	3,205	22.8	4	1	4	0	0	0
Nampa	Idaho	140	103	19	2.8%	3,188	19.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Spartanburg	South Carolina	154	106	15	2.8%	3,110	18.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Roswell	Georgia	118	89	15	3.1%	3,062	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Grand Rapids	Michigan	196	131	36	0.8%	3,035	36.8	12	1	12	0	0	0
Durham	North Carolina	173	123	22	1.0%	3,024	29.9	8	1	8	0	0	0
Chattanooga	Tennessee	215	147	20	1.4%	2,933	36.6	15	1	15	0	0	0
Fort Myers	Florida	199	133	25	1.1%	2,891	28.9	11	1	11	0	0	0
Medford	Oregon	123	88	15	3.0%	2,838	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Yakima	Washington	139	101	16	2.2%	2,837	22.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Shreveport	Louisiana	197	134	21	1.3%	2,834	26.3	12	2	12	0	0	0
Mobile	Alabama	242	169	24	1.0%	2,795	28.1	18	1	18	0	0	0
Naperville	Illinois	150	112	17	1.7%	2,781	24.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Toledo	Ohio	206	144	27	0.9%	2,772	28.0	15	1	15	0	0	0
Lexington	Kentucky	205	141	31	0.9%	2,720	34.0	15	1	15	0	0	0
Anderson	South Carolina	143	101	16	2.7%	2,676	17.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Columbia	South Carolina	196	130	36	0.8%	2,668	42.8	14	1	14	0	0	0
Hyattsville	Maryland	171	115	17	1.7%	2,648	22.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Macon	Georgia	181	125	19	1.6%	2,619	23.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Fredericksburg	Virginia	170	124	21	1.5%	2,591	21.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Anchorage	Alaska	219	157	22	1.0%	2,530	26.1	12	1	12	0	0	0
Billings	Montana	155	110	18	1.8%	2,504	19.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Lafayette	Louisiana	160	113	17	1.6%	2,502	18.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Grand Junction	Colorado	162	113	16	2.4%	2,498	19.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Wichita Falls	Texas	174	123	15	2.5%	2,466	18.4	7	1	7	0	0	1
Daytona Beach	Florida	174	124	15	2.4%	2,463	29.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Pensacola	Florida	202	141	29	0.9%	2,442	30.2	13	1	13	0	0	0
Sioux Falls	South Dakota	179	121	18	1.3%	2,400	23.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
Lakeland	Florida	168	116	28	0.9%	2,376	26.9	9	1	9	0	0	0
New Port Richey	Florida	159	120	21	1.9%	2,336	23.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Amarillo	Texas	198	142	25	1.0%	2,327	28.7	14	1	14	0	0	0
Newnan	Georgia	120	94	14	2.5%	2,322	17.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lawrenceville	Georgia	150	116	25	0.9%	2,315	28.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Reading	Pennsylvania	204	141	20	1.1%	2,284	22.4	10	1	10	0	0	0
Lubbock	Texas	194	130	33	0.8%	2,277	37.5	14	1	14	0	0	0
Athens	Georgia	158	111	18	1.8%	2,248	19.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Dearborn	Michigan	139	103	17	2.4%	2,243	20.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Tallahassee	Florida	184	127	37	0.8%	2,181	44.3	10	1	10	0	0	0
Fayetteville	North Carolina	193	134	31	0.9%	2,155	30.6	8	1	8	0	0	0
Greenville	South Carolina	166	118	18	1.0%	2,152	21.7	9	1	9	0	0	0
Waco	Texas	177	125	21	1.3%	2,129	23.6	9	1	9	0	0	0
Visalia	California	140	110	19	1.4%	2,095	19.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Savannah	Georgia	184	118	31	0.9%	2,084	33.6	10	1	10	0	0	0
Springfield	Missouri	168	123	23	0.9%	2,048	28.9	7	1	7	0	0	0
Little Rock	Arkansas	189	127	23	0.9%	2,030	25.9	12	1	12	0	0	0
Boca Raton	Florida	197	132	25	0.9%	2,024	28.0	9	1	9	0	0	0
New Bedford	Massachusetts	151	108	17	2.1%	1,995	19.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ocala	Florida	188	135	30	0.9%	1,995	30.5	11	1	11	0	0	0
Syracuse	New York	206	141	29	0.9%	1,970	30.9	15	1	15	0	0	0
Gainesville	Florida	178	127	23	0.9%	1,947	25.8	10	1	10	0	0	0
Herndon	Virginia	121	88	20	2.1%	1,941	18.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chesapeake	Virginia	155	110	31	0.8%	1,938	37.7	6	1	6	0	0	0
Joliet	Illinois	141	104	18	1.5%	1,912	23.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Eugene	Oregon	149	109	21	0.9%	1,900	26.3	6	1	6	0	0	0
Huntsville	Alabama	176	125	26	0.9%	1,849	24.6	11	1	11	0	0	0
Morgantown	West Virginia	126	94	15	1.9%	1,833	18.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Woodstock	Georgia	120	90	17	1.8%	1,788	18.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Murfreesboro	Tennessee	162	113	23	0.9%	1,753	23.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Augusta	Georgia	174	120	32	0.8%	1,733	36.5	8	1	8	0	0	0
Mission	Texas	142	109	24	0.9%	1,673	25.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Worcester	Massachusetts	188	129	26	0.9%	1,658	30.4	9	1	9	0	0	0
Charleston	South Carolina	200	138	29	0.8%	1,657	34.2	10	1	10	0	0	0
Odessa	Texas	177	132	24	1.0%	1,620	25.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Yuma	Arizona	131	94	20	1.1%	1,619	22.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Bend	Oregon	150	104	20	1.3%	1,580	21.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Quincy	Massachusetts	136	100	20	1.7%	1,573	25.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Fort Mill	South Carolina	135	97	20	1.6%	1,563	21.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Redding	California	161	114	18	1.4%	1,555	18.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Edmond	Oklahoma	173	122	27	0.9%	1,554	33.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Clarksville	Tennessee	131	97	29	0.9%	1,550	29.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Douglasville	Georgia	132	98	20	1.4%	1,537	19.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bowling Green	Kentucky	155	112	19	1.3%	1,536	21.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Cumming	Georgia	141	113	23	0.9%	1,535	24.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Boston	Massachusetts	174	108	19	1.0%	1,520	20.4	14	1	14	0	0	0
Denton	Texas	161	117	25	0.9%	1,489	26.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Davenport	Iowa	155	111	18	1.4%	1,471	23.5	6	1	6	0	0	0
Kalamazoo	Michigan	162	113	27	0.9%	1,465	30.0	7	1	7	0	0	0
Bryan	Texas	160	116	19	1.5%	1,463	22.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Midland	Texas	158	112	24	0.9%	1,432	30.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Melbourne	Florida	142	100	25	0.9%	1,425	27.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Lynchburg	Virginia	165	112	24	1.4%	1,398	19.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Saint Charles	Missouri	147	107	26	1.0%	1,370	21.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Olathe	Kansas	117	89	23	0.9%	1,357	25.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Ann Arbor	Michigan	151	113	34	0.8%	1,325	40.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Mcallen	Texas	146	109	28	0.9%	1,260	29.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Gaithersburg	Maryland	162	125	28	0.9%	1,251	29.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Frederick	Maryland	152	112	21	0.9%	1,248	26.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Cary	North Carolina	158	113	34	0.8%	1,242	38.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Metairie	Louisiana	149	111	27	0.9%	1,223	32.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Surprise	Arizona	166	121	28	0.9%	1,185	30.8	4	2	4	0	0	0
Santa Fe	New Mexico	154	110	24	0.9%	1,179	28.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Stamford	Connecticut	156	108	25	0.9%	1,179	30.7	6	2	6	0	0	0
Clovis	California	140	103	26	0.9%	1,153	24.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
West Chester	Pennsylvania	124	94	17	1.1%	1,145	18.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Panama City	Florida	168	120	27	0.9%	1,143	27.2	6	1	6	0	0	0
Tuscaloosa	Alabama	145	101	25	0.9%	1,133	26.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Missoula	Montana	151	107	20	1.2%	1,119	20.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Manchester	New Hampshire	144	108	20	1.0%	1,111	22.2	5	1	5	0	0	0
Norman	Oklahoma	139	101	30	0.9%	1,094	32.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Cambridge	Massachusetts	143	101	23	0.9%	1,088	26.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Cedar Rapids	Iowa	153	106	35	0.8%	1,088	41.0	6	1	6	0	0	0
Hartford	Connecticut	148	107	28	0.9%	1,081	30.8	6	1	6	0	0	0
Toms River	New Jersey	144	110	30	0.9%	1,078	31.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
College Station	Texas	120	92	27	0.9%	1,077	31.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Bethlehem	Pennsylvania	139	104	27	0.9%	1,070	33.5	4	1	4	0	0	0
Bellingham	Washington	137	102	29	0.8%	1,065	34.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Ashburn	Virginia	109	80	26	0.9%	1,024	28.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Asheville	North Carolina	142	100	35	0.8%	1,024	42.4	5	1	5	0	0	0
Fargo	North Dakota	146	103	33	0.8%	1,016	39.8	4	2	5	0	0	0
Charlottesville	Virginia	146	107	34	0.8%	986	37.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Meridian	Idaho	115	91	24	0.9%	975	25.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Franklin	Tennessee	142	111	25	0.9%	970	27.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Mcdonough	Georgia	122	94	24	1.0%	970	23.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Lowell	Massachusetts	147	109	30	0.9%	967	32.3	4	1	4	0	0	0
Kenosha	Wisconsin	144	107	28	0.9%	966	34.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Ypsilanti	Michigan	118	87	27	0.9%	966	27.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Myrtle Beach	South Carolina	139	93	48	0.7%	961	53.8	5	1	5	0	0	0
Edison	New Jersey	131	100	21	0.9%	953	25.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Acworth	Georgia	126	91	21	1.0%	951	23.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Kennesaw	Georgia	116	83	23	1.0%	942	24.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Ballwin	Missouri	119	93	18	1.0%	941	19.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Largo	Florida	147	115	32	0.9%	936	32.6	5	1	5	0	0	0
Orem	Utah	140	105	22	0.9%	934	25.3	3	2	3	0	0	0
Springdale	Arkansas	108	76	20	1.0%	932	22.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
New Braunfels	Texas	119	92	29	0.9%	917	30.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Westerville	Ohio	113	81	24	1.0%	907	24.0	2	1	2	0	0	0
Buford	Georgia	120	94	29	0.9%	889	29.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Federal Way	Washington	118	90	28	0.9%	886	30.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Chapel Hill	North Carolina	132	96	24	0.9%	865	30.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Champaign	Illinois	121	88	27	0.9%	818	32.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Jupiter	Florida	139	98	31	0.8%	809	37.8	4	2	4	0	0	0

California

City	Competition	Business intelligence metrics	RAW Data (Google Search Results across all ZIPs)
Los Angeles	353	225	2	61.7%	1,517,141	5.1	62	5	67	1	20	62
San Diego	291	189	3	72.9%	982,327	4.2	36	6	41	0	21	38
San Jose	240	157	5	58.7%	616,453	5.1	28	3	48	0	2	48
Sacramento	254	168	3	75.4%	606,949	3.3	28	5	37	0	25	37
San Francisco	253	153	4	56.3%	489,723	4.8	28	5	31	0	10	28
Anaheim	183	125	2	83.7%	308,412	2.7	7	2	8	0	6	8
Oakland	191	124	3	68.4%	281,655	4.2	14	2	17	0	0	17
Santa Ana	147	105	4	65.2%	232,971	4.3	6	3	12	0	1	12
Fontana	140	103	1	91.5%	214,870	1.7	3	1	3	2	3	3
Riverside	179	125	4	54.2%	200,413	5.4	7	1	7	1	1	7
Irvine	194	134	3	73.6%	197,027	3.3	9	2	15	0	8	15
San Bernardino	163	119	4	67.6%	168,550	4.1	7	2	9	0	3	9
Chula Vista	141	98	5	55.3%	144,249	5.6	5	3	10	0	0	10
Whittier	178	130	2	73.2%	143,543	3.5	6	1	6	0	4	6
Oceanside	143	104	4	70.0%	140,181	4.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Lancaster	143	112	4	75.7%	139,661	3.7	3	2	6	0	2	6
Moreno Valley	149	118	4	61.4%	126,235	5.0	4	2	5	0	0	5
Fremont	144	108	3	53.4%	124,538	6.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Compton	130	101	2	87.5%	121,564	2.3	3	2	6	1	4	6
Huntington Beach	141	107	5	60.0%	119,944	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Hayward	141	109	2	62.1%	119,281	4.3	4	2	5	0	2	5
Ontario	140	100	3	66.9%	118,171	4.3	3	2	4	0	0	4
Torrance	185	125	3	64.4%	113,808	4.8	5	4	9	0	0	9
Roseville	126	89	2	80.0%	111,835	3.0	3	1	3	0	3	3
Escondido	153	110	4	60.5%	108,714	4.8	4	2	8	0	0	8
Rancho Cucamonga	140	105	5	60.0%	105,959	5.0	4	1	4	0	0	4
Sunnyvale	166	124	3	68.0%	103,868	4.8	4	3	5	0	2	4
Santa Rosa	148	101	4	47.1%	101,796	6.5	6	2	8	0	0	8
Pasadena	173	120	4	63.9%	100,835	4.5	6	1	6	0	0	6
El Cajon	162	110	3	57.5%	99,238	5.3	3	4	5	0	0	5
Indio	118	87	1	96.8%	93,017	1.5	2	1	2	1	2	2
Santa Cruz	139	103	2	84.6%	88,072	2.5	4	2	5	0	5	5
Garden Grove	168	123	5	50.0%	87,967	6.2	5	3	9	0	0	9
Bakersfield	211	141	9	15.7%	87,665	11.3	11	3	11	0	0	5
Redwood City	156	125	3	75.1%	85,928	3.3	4	1	4	0	3	4
La Puente	145	95	2	69.6%	82,075	5.0	2	2	2	0	1	2
Palmdale	157	119	5	46.6%	81,468	7.0	4	2	4	0	0	4
San Leandro	127	94	3	72.0%	80,035	3.7	3	2	5	0	1	5
Costa Mesa	119	83	3	70.0%	79,627	4.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Van Nuys	149	98	5	43.7%	77,649	6.3	4	2	5	0	0	5
West Covina	136	102	3	70.6%	77,218	4.0	3	1	3	0	2	3
Long Beach	193	131	8	15.8%	75,466	9.9	12	1	12	0	0	9
Pacoima	99	65	3	70.0%	74,059	4.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Elk Grove	138	108	6	40.8%	73,149	7.0	3	3	5	0	0	5
Ventura	129	90	4	62.9%	72,894	4.7	3	2	5	0	0	5
Downey	140	102	3	62.0%	70,043	4.7	3	1	3	0	1	3
Orange	160	118	6	47.3%	68,647	6.4	5	1	5	0	0	5
Carlsbad	144	105	5	60.0%	68,202	5.0	4	2	8	0	0	8
Concord	144	109	4	50.0%	65,110	6.0	4	2	7	0	0	7
Inglewood	193	129	5	47.5%	63,541	6.0	5	2	5	0	0	5
Fullerton	152	108	5	44.6%	62,167	6.5	4	2	6	0	0	6
Livermore	118	87	3	64.3%	61,852	4.5	2	1	2	0	1	2
Oxnard	149	105	8	27.7%	61,155	7.8	4	2	5	0	0	5
San Mateo	173	123	5	41.6%	59,248	7.0	4	3	5	0	0	5
Mission Viejo	116	92	4	60.0%	59,015	5.0	2	2	4	0	0	4
Santa Monica	131	85	4	62.3%	58,781	4.6	5	1	5	0	0	5
Stockton	214	153	8	15.5%	58,091	9.8	12	2	12	0	0	8
Corona	165	130	9	21.8%	55,988	8.6	5	2	8	0	0	7
Rialto	126	104	5	51.8%	55,247	5.5	2	2	4	0	0	4
Burbank	156	117	4	49.7%	53,733	6.0	5	2	10	0	0	10
Bell Gardens	97	65	4	50.0%	51,217	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
Santa Barbara	140	100	3	37.7%	51,173	7.1	7	1	7	0	0	7
Pomona	127	92	5	32.3%	51,090	8.0	3	1	3	0	0	3
Vallejo	141	104	6	38.6%	48,099	6.8	4	1	4	0	0	4
Pittsburg	97	76	5	50.0%	48,041	6.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
North Hollywood	145	96	6	31.1%	47,559	7.5	4	3	7	0	0	7
Chino	122	94	5	50.0%	47,237	6.0	2	2	3	0	0	3
Antioch	126	96	8	40.0%	44,288	7.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Simi Valley	112	82	6	34.4%	44,279	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Daly City	137	99	5	35.8%	40,913	10.5	2	4	4	0	0	2
Berkeley	206	146	6	31.2%	39,705	8.3	9	5	16	0	0	8
Hawthorne	96	77	5	40.0%	38,734	7.0	1	2	2	0	0	2
El Monte	122	91	5	36.8%	34,471	7.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Victorville	125	89	7	23.4%	31,917	9.0	3	2	5	0	0	4
Madera	147	104	6	30.2%	31,145	12.0	3	2	3	0	0	2
Sylmar	98	64	7	30.0%	28,946	8.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Hesperia	110	82	6	27.8%	28,843	8.5	2	1	2	0	0	2
Vista	132	102	8	18.5%	22,222	9.3	3	1	3	0	0	2
San Marcos	125	96	9	18.7%	18,826	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	1
Hemet	145	111	11	10.4%	13,416	12.0	3	2	3	0	0	1
Modesto	178	129	12	5.1%	13,393	14.7	7	1	7	0	0	0
Salinas	164	124	11	7.0%	13,193	13.0	5	1	5	0	0	0
Santa Clara	140	104	11	9.5%	11,970	10.3	4	3	7	0	0	3
Fairfield	118	87	7	10.0%	11,408	10.0	2	1	2	0	0	2
Santa Maria	155	113	11	7.1%	10,229	13.0	3	2	3	0	0	0
Perris	131	104	9	8.5%	10,001	11.5	2	2	2	0	0	0
Menifee	160	116	9	9.0%	9,948	11.0	4	1	4	0	0	0
Norwalk	99	76	9	9.0%	9,530	11.0	1	1	1	0	0	0
South Gate	97	77	7	10.0%	9,510	10.0	1	1	1	0	0	1
Fresno	235	159	18	1.6%	9,407	25.8	18	2	18	0	0	2
Palo Alto	145	101	9	9.2%	8,912	10.5	4	1	4	0	0	2
Murrieta	124	94	12	6.5%	8,656	13.5	2	2	3	0	0	0
Tracy	151	116	14	6.3%	7,380	13.5	4	2	6	0	0	0
Vacaville	124	92	11	6.9%	7,307	13.5	2	1	2	0	0	0
Napa	113	78	11	6.6%	6,350	13.0	2	2	4	0	0	0
Chico	139	103	13	4.4%	4,906	15.7	3	1	3	0	0	0
Merced	145	104	13	4.7%	4,814	15.3	3	1	3	0	0	0
Temecula	136	103	12	3.5%	4,511	14.7	3	2	3	0	0	0
Visalia	140	110	19	1.4%	2,095	19.0	3	1	3	0	0	0
Redding	161	114	18	1.4%	1,555	18.5	4	1	4	0	0	1
Clovis	140	103	26	0.9%	1,153	24.0	3	1	3	0	0	0

Los Angeles

ZIP	24hourfitness.com	yelp.com	goldsgym.com	planetfitness.com	crunch.com	timeout.com
90011	7	4	6	1	10	11
90003	3	1	4	7	9	6
90023	4	1	2	5	6	8
90014	5	1	3	7	9	6
90012	3	1	4	7	9	6
90010	3	1	5	7	9	4
90063	6	1	3	9	8	5
90061	7	1	3	5	6	9
90065	3	1	5	7	9	4
90034	8	1	10	5	3	6
90032	6	4	7	8	11	10
90043	7	4	6	9	11	8
90041	3	1	4	7	9	6
90001	5	1	3	7	9	6
90021	5	1	3	7	11	6
90035	4	2	5	8	1	10
90045	3	1	4	6	7	9
90036	4	1	5	9	3	7
90005	3	1	5	7	9	4
90066	8	2	10	5	1	6
90026	5	1	3	7	9	6
90067	12	2	10	5	1	9
90057	6	4	7	9	12	8
90013	7	4	6	9	11	8
90044	3	1	5	7	9	4
90017	6	4	1	8	11	10
90040	7	1	14	3	9
90004	2	1	4	5	3	7
90031	3	1	4	7	9	6
90022	4	1	5	7	9	3
90062	3	1	4	8	6	7
90029	5	1	3	7	4	6
90028	4	1	3	6	15
90018	3	1	4	7	9	6
90038	5	1	3	7	17	9
90049	11	5	13	8	4	9
90048	4	2	10	6	1	7
90008	2	1	3	7	5	9
90089	2	1	3	5	8	7
90059	6	4	5	1	7	10
90019	2	1	4	6	3	10
90039	2	1	3	6	5	8
90027	4	1	5	7	3	6
90058	1	2	12	4	8
90007	7	5	4	8	11	10
90047	4	2	1	5	9	7
90077	14	5	13	9	4	11
90025	7	1	8	4	3	5
90015	5	1	3	7	6	9
90046	7	1	9	5	3	6
90056	5	1	4	7	3	6
90016	6	1	3	8	5	7
90037	3	1	4	6	8	10
90064	8	1	9	4	3	6
90068	6	1	3	7	5	10
90006	5	1	3	6	8	10
90020	3	1	4	7	6	9
90024	8	1	9	4	3	6
90033	5	1	3	7	9	6
90073	9	1	6	3	2	8
90002	5	1	3	8	7	6
90042	3	1	4	6	8	10

Local Competitors

RAW Rankings

Turn This Data Into an Unfair Advantage for 24hourfitness

Business Intelligence Powered by Local Data

With 100% coverage in the US (32,654 zip-codes) and reporting at the city, state, and national level, you are now equipped to act on relevant business insights instead of average, interpolated, extrapolated, sampled, estimated, and other forms of unreliable data.

Market size
Revenue forecasts
Better business goals

Local, Regional, and National Competitive Landscape

Sales happen locally. In real zip-codes and neighborhoods, not in "states" or in "regions". To help you win local markets and discover opportunities that others miss, we monitor ALL your 13,305 competitors, from EVERY zip-code in USA, no matter how big or small they are.

Benchmark against ANY competitor
Discover trends & emerging players
Identify threats & opportunities

Custom Marketing Plans & Smarter Budgeting

Proprietary population-based metrics such as Visibility or Reach will help you spot business opportunities instantly. Maximize ROI by tailoring your strategy to local target markets, prioritizing and mobilizing resources where they are going to make the most impact.

A/B testing for success strategies
PPC intelligence & lower Google Ads spend
Track progress & organic intelligence

Market Segmentation & Demographic Data-Enrichment

A complete demographic profile of your market, with different levels of granularity (zip-code, city, region, etc.), allows for hyper-personalized communication and marketing campaigns. Monitor competitors, listen to communities and make your business stand out and be a part of the future.

Blend into local communities
Stimulate "in-house" competition
Improve company morale

Our Customers Love This Data, as Will You

Having a tool like this has been a gamechanger!

Knowing exactly where we rank and where the opportunities lie has helped inform action and growth.

Highly recommend SEOlium!

Alex P.

PM, WriteMaps, NZ

As a serious, enterprise-level ecom SEO, I have used EVERY rank tracking tool there is. Sadly, they are mostly all the same, and very unreliable. SEOlium is unique and powerful, and provides truly actionable intelligence, not the same old features you find everywhere. SEOlium is a must-have tool if you’re a serious SEO. Period.

Marty Marion

CEO, Master Positioning, LLC

SEOlium is more than just your average rank tracking tool. The owner goes out of his way to bring features not easily found in the market.
In addition to your standard rank tracking function, you can enjoy its market share and Bulk Import From Google Search Console feature.

Steven Kang

SEO Signals Lab

SEOlium opened my eyes to what is possible.

I now have a clearer picture and they guided me through what I needed to do.

The results have been amazing. Thank you guys.

Adrian Teasdale

CEO, Competitor Monitor, UK

Purchase Options, 30 Days Money Back Guarantee

One-Time Payment

$1,000

24hourfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

1 keyword (gym near me)

National/State Overview

City Overview (50 cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Rising Star

$5,000/mo

24hourfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

10 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State Overview

City Overview (1,500 Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

5 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

Market Dominator

$10,000/mo

24hourfitness Data (32,654 zip-codes)

25 Keywords (to be agreed)

National/State/County Overview

City Overview (25,000+ Cities)

National/Regional Competitors

Local Competitors

Track Progress (Monthly Reports)

Organic Intelligence

Google Ads Intelligence

10 Brand Mention Alerts

SERP Domain Emails

Custom Data Filtering & Processing

RAW SQL Database Export

Custom Dashboards

Account Manager

24hourfitness Market Research15 KPIs for Every City & State Delivered Monthly